Research Article

Species-Specificity of the BamA Component of the Bacterial Outer Membrane Protein-Assembly Machinery

  • Elena B. Volokhina,

    Affiliation: Department of Molecular Microbiology and Institute of Biomembranes, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands

    Current address: Department of Pediatric Nephrology, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands

  • Jan Grijpstra,

    Affiliation: Department of Molecular Microbiology and Institute of Biomembranes, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands

  • Frank Beckers,

    Affiliation: Department of Molecular Microbiology and Institute of Biomembranes, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands

  • Erika Lindh,

    Affiliation: Department of Molecular Microbiology and Institute of Biomembranes, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands

    Current address: Department of Virology, Haartman Institute, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland

  • Viviane Robert,

    Affiliation: Department of Molecular Microbiology and Institute of Biomembranes, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands

    Current address: Aix-Marseille Université, CNRS, Marseille, France

  • Jan Tommassen,

    Affiliation: Department of Molecular Microbiology and Institute of Biomembranes, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands

  • Martine P. Bos mail

    Affiliation: Department of Molecular Microbiology and Institute of Biomembranes, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands

  • Published: December 20, 2013
  • DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0085799


The BamA protein is the key component of the Bam complex, the assembly machinery for outer membrane proteins (OMP) in gram-negative bacteria. We previously demonstrated that BamA recognizes its OMP substrates in a species-specific manner in vitro. In this work, we further studied species specificity in vivo by testing the functioning of BamA homologs of the proteobacteria Neisseria meningitidis, Neisseria gonorrhoeae, Bordetella pertussis, Burkholderia mallei, and Escherichia coli in E. coli and in N. meningitidis. We found that no BamA functioned in another species than the authentic one, except for N. gonorrhoeae BamA, which fully complemented a N. meningitidis bamA mutant. E. coli BamA was not assembled into the N. meningitidis outer membrane. In contrast, the N. meningitidis BamA protein was assembled into the outer membrane of E. coli to a significant extent and also associated with BamD, an essential accessory lipoprotein of the Bam complex.Various chimeras comprising swapped N-terminal periplasmic and C-terminal membrane-embedded domains of N. meningitidis and E. coli BamA proteins were also not functional in either host, although some of them were inserted in the OM suggesting that the two domains of BamA need to be compatible in order to function. Furthermore, conformational analysis of chimeric proteins provided evidence for a 16-stranded β-barrel conformation of the membrane-embedded domain of BamA.


Gram-negative bacteria are characterized by a cell envelope consisting of an inner and an outer membrane (OM), which are separated by the peptidoglycan-containing periplasm. While integral inner membrane proteins are α-helical, all but two known integral OM proteins (OMPs) are β-barrels [13]. Only recently, the mechanisms of the assembly of OMPs into the OM have started to come to light. Previously, we showed that the Omp85 protein is an essential part of the OMP assembly machinery in Neisseria meningitidis; depletion of this essential protein in a conditional mutant strain resulted in the accumulation of unassembled forms of all OMPs analyzed [4]. Later, a similar function was shown for the Omp85 homologs in Escherichia coli [5-7], Pseudomonas aeruginosa [8] and Borrelia burgdorferi [9]. Omp85 homologs have been renamed BamA, for β-barrel assembly machine component A. Interestingly, a BamA homolog is also present and required for the assembly of β-barrel OMPs in mitochondria [10-12]. In E. coli, four lipoproteins associated with BamA (EcBamA) have been identified: BamB, BamC, BamD, and BamE [6,13]. We established that N. meningitidis BamA (NmBamA) is also associated with BamC, BamD (ComL) and BamE, and, additionally, with the RmpM protein [14]. BamB is not present in neisserial strains.

BamA was predicted to consist of an N-terminal part localized in the periplasm and a membrane-embedded β-barrel in its C-terminal part [4]. In the predicted periplasmic part, five polypeptide-transport-associated (POTRA) domains are located [15]. Crystallographic and NMR structural studies have shown a similar fold for all POTRA domains: a β-sheet of three β-strands overlaid with a pair of antiparallel α-helices [16-19]. For the β-barrel domain, originally a 12-stranded β-barrel topology was predicted [4], which leaves a 61-amino-acid region between the POTRA and β-barrel domains, which we designated the hinge region [20]. However, the crystal structure of the two-partner secretion-system component FhaC of Bordetella pertussis, which shares limited sequence similarity with BamA, showed that this protein consists of two POTRA domains and a 16-stranded β-barrel, suggesting that the BamA β-barrel might also contain 16 β-strands, with four additional β-strands located in the postulated hinge region [21,22].

We have shown that EcBamA interacts with OMPs via the so-called signature sequence present at the C terminus of the substrates [23]. This sequence is characterized by a phenylalanine or a tryptophan at the C-terminal position and hydrophobic amino-acid residues at positions -3, -5, -7, and -9 from the C terminus [24]. EcBamA interacted in vitro with E. coli-derived C-terminal signature sequences, but not with those found in neisserial OMPs, the defining difference being the nature of the penultimate C-terminal amino acid [23]. These results are consistent with the observation that neisserial OMPs are not efficiently assembled in E. coli. This apparently high species-specificity of the Bam machinery seems to be at odds with the observation that the Bam machinery of E. coli can properly assemble a mitochondrial β-barrel OMP [25] and with the finding that bacterial OMPs were properly assembled into the mitochondrial OM of Saccharomyces cerevisiae [26]. To gain further insight into the species-specificity of the functioning of the Bam machinery, we investigated here whether BamA homologs from various Gram-negative bacteria are able to substitute each other in vivo.

Materials and Methods

Bacterial Strains and Growth Conditions

E. coli strains TOP10F' (Invitrogen), DH5α (laboratory collection), and the EcBamA-depletion strain UTPBAD::bamA [27] were grown either on Luria-Bertani (LB) agar plates or in liquid LB medium on a shaker at the indicated temperatures. When necessary, the media were supplemented with an appropriate antibiotic (25 μg/ml chloramphenicol or 50 μg/ml kanamycin), 0.4% glucose, 0.02% L-arabinose or 0.5 mM isopropyl-β-D-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG). N. meningitidis strain HB-1[28], an unencapsulated derivative of the serogroup B strain H44/76, and Neisseria gonorrhoeae strain FA1090 from our laboratory collection were grown at 37°C in candle jars on GC agar plates (Oxoid), supplemented with Vitox (Oxoid), and, when necessary, with an antibiotic (10 μg/ml chloramphenicol or 80 μg/ml kanamycin). Liquid cultures were obtained by growing N. meningitidis for 6 h in tryptic soy broth (Becton Dickinson) in the absence or presence of 1 mM IPTG.

Plasmid Constructions

The plasmids and primers used are listed in Tables S1 and S2, respectively. DNA fragments containing bamA genes were obtained by PCR using genomic DNA from N. meningitidis HB-1 plus primer pair NmF/NmR, N. gonorrhoeae FA1090 DNA plus primer pair NmF/NmR , Burkholderia mallei Bogor DNA (provided by the Central Veterinary Institute, Lelystad, The Netherlands) plus primer pair BmF/BmR, Bordetella pertussis Tohama I DNA (provided by the Netherlands Vaccine Institute, Bilthoven, The Netherlands) plus primer pair BpF/BpR and E. coli DH5α DNA plus primer pair EcF/EcR, and cloned into pCRII-TOPO. We used the sequences of the locus tags NMB0182, NGO1801, BMA1547, BP1427 and b0177, respectively (, to design primers. The primers carried restriction sites allowing for subcloning of the genes behind the IPTG-inducible promoter on plasmid pFP10-c-lbpA, which is able to replicate in N. meningitidis as well as in E. coli. As a result of the cloning strategy, the original signal sequences were substituted by that of the lactoferrin-binding protein A (LbpA) of N. meningitidis (MNKKHSFPLTLTALAIATAFPSYA). The NdeI-AatII fragments, carrying N. meningitidis, N. gonorrhoeae, and E. coli bamA genes were ligated into NdeI-AatII-digested pFP10-c-lbpA, yielding pFP10-NmbamA, pFP10-NgbamA, and pFP10-EcbamA, respectively. The fragments containing B. pertussis and B. mallei bamA were excised using the NdeI site introduced by the forward primers and the KpnI site of pCRII-TOPO and introduced into NdeI-KpnI-digested pFP10-EcbamA, yielding pFP10-BpbamA and pFP10-BmbamA, respectively.

A construct encoding the C-terminal 317 amino acids of NmBamA fused to the signal sequence of LbpA was created by PCR using primer pair Omp85-F481-NmR and pFP10-NmbamA as template. The resulting PCR product was cloned into pCRII-TOPO and ligated into NdeI-AatII-digested pFP10-c-lbpA, yielding pFP10-481NmbamA.

The N- and C-terminal domains of NmBamA and EcBamA were swapped resulting in chimeras. Two chimeric bamA genes were designed encoding proteins in which the N-terminal and C-terminal domains of NmBamAand EcBamA were exchanged within a small region of high homology around the start of the predicted 12-stranded β-barrel [4]. The construct designated Ec479Nm encodes a protein carrying the N-terminal part of EcBamA and the C-terminal part of NmBamA, while construct Nm480Ec encodes the reverse chimera. The numbers indicate the most C-terminal amino acid of the BamA domain present in the N-terminal part of the chimera (counting the N-terminal signal sequence). For the Ec479Nm construct, two overlapping PCR products were made: one using the EcF and HingeR primers and pFP10-EcbamA as template and the other using the HingeF and NmR primers and pFP10-NmbamA as template. The purified PCR products were mixed, melted and annealed and combined with EcF and NmR as external primers in a second PCR to obtain the complete chimeric genes. For the Nm480Ec chimera, also two PCR products were generated: one using NmF and HingeR as primers and pFP10-NmbamA as template, and the other with HingeF and EcR as primers and pFP10-EcbamA as template. The second PCR was performed using purified PCR products and NmF and EcR as external primers. The obtained chimeras were introduced into pCRII-TOPO. The NdeI-AatII fragments were subsequently ligated into pFP10-c-lbpA digested with NdeI and AatII, yielding constructs pFP10-Ec479Nm and pFP10-Nm480Ec.

Another set of chimeras, designated Ec423Nm and Nm423Ec, was constructed to produce hybrid proteins where domain exchange occurred at the C terminus of the predicted POTRA5 domain [18] with the N-terminal domain of the chimeras comprising 423 amino-acid residues. To make the Ec423Nm construct, a megaprimer was created using primers EcNmF and Omp85R2, and pFP10-NmbamA as the template. The purified megaprimer was combined with the EcF primer and pFP10-EcbamA as the template for a second PCR and the product was cloned into pCRII-TOPO. The chimeric fragment was then introduced into pFP10-NmbamA, using the NdeI site and the KpnI site present in the N. meningitidis bamA gene, yielding pFP10-Ec423Nm. For the Nm423Ec chimera, megaprimer1 was generated using primer pair NmEcR-Omp85F3 and pFP10-NmbamA as the template. For the second PCR, megaprimer1 was combined with the EcR primer and pFP10-EcbamA as the template. The chimeric fragment obtained was cloned into pCRII-TOPO, yielding pCRII-Nm423Ec-a. Megaprimer2 was produced using primers Omp85F4 and Omp85R7 and pFP10-NmbamA as template. Megaprimer2 was then combined with EcR and pCRII-Nm423Ec-a as template in a PCR. The resulting PCR product was cloned into pCRII-TOPO, yielding pCRII-Nm423Ec-b. The missing 5' part of NmbamAwas added through insertion of a SalI-NotI fragment of pCRII-NmbamA, a precursor of pFP10-NmbamA, into SalI-NotI-restricted pCRII-Nm423Ec-b, yielding pCRII-Nm423Ec-c. Finally, an NdeI-KpnI fragment of pCRII-Nm423Ec-c was ligated into NdeI-KpnI-digested pFP10-EcbamA, yielding pFP10-Nm423Ec. Plasmid pRV-His-NmBamA was created by insertion of a NotI-AatII fragment, encoding NmBamA with an additional HHHHHHQDF amino-acid sequence between the signal sequence and the N terminus of the mature BamA protein, from pEN11-His-Omp85 into NotI-AatII restricted pRV2000. All constructs were verified by sequencing.


Reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) was performed as described [29] except that conventional PCR instead of real-time PCR was performed for amplification of cDNA. Primer couples Q-for-1/Q-rev-Ngo, Q-for-2/Q-rev-Eco, Q-for-3/Q-rev-Bper and Q-for-1/Q-rev-Bmal were used to amplify the bamA cDNAs of N. gonorrhoeae, E. coli, B. pertussis and B. mallei, respectively.

Complementation Assays

To test whether various BamA variants could complement BamA deficiency in E. coli, pFP10-based plasmids containing bamA variants under the control of an IPTG-inducible promoter were introduced into EcBamA-depletion strain UTPBAD::bamA, which produces EcBamA from an arabinose-inducible promoter. Growth of the resultant strains in LB with indicated supplements was assessed at 37°C or on LB plates at 22°C. To evaluate BamA complementation in N. meningitidis, it was tested whether the chromosomal copy of bamA could be disrupted, when bamA variants were expressed from the pFP10-derived plasmids. To this end, pRV1300 was used as the template to generate a PCR product containing a fragment upstream of N. meningitidis bamA, a kanamycin-resistance cassette and a 3' fragment of bamA, as described [4]. The PCR fragment was used to transform HB-1 cells carrying bamA variants on plasmid. Transformations were done in the presence of IPTG and transformants were selected on GC agar plates supplemented with 1 mM IPTG and kanamycin and analyzed by PCR using primer pair G and Omp85R2 that hybridize upstream and in the 3' part of NmbamA.

Isolation of Cell Envelopes

To isolate cell envelopes, bacteria from liquid cultures were collected by centrifugation, resuspended in 50 mM Tris-HCl, 5 mM EDTA (pH 8.0) containing protease inhibitor cocktail “Complete” (Roche) and stored overnight at -80°C. After ultrasonic disintegration (3 x 45 s at level 8, output 40%, Branson sonifier 450; Branson Ultrasonics Corporation), unbroken cells were removed by centrifugation (12,000 g, 15 min, 4°C). Cell envelopes were collected by ultracentrifugation (170,000 x g, 5 min, 4°C), dissolved in 2 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.6) and stored at –20°C.

Urea Extraction

Thirty-μl samples of cell envelope preparations were incubated in 1 ml of 20 mM Tris-HCl, 100 mM glycine (pH 7.6), 6 M urea for 1 h at room temperature while rotating. The insoluble material was separated from the soluble fraction by ultracentrifugation (200,000 x g, 1 h, 4°C). The pellet was dissolved in 30 μl of 2 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.6), while the solubilized proteins were precipitated from the supernatant with 10% trichloroacetic acid (TCA) and dissolved in 30 μl H2O.

Trypsin Treatment

Exponentially growing cells were pelleted and resuspended in phosphate-buffered saline plus 1 mM MgCl2 and 0.5 mM CaCl2 to an optical density at 550 nm (OD550) of 2. Trypsin was added to 200-µl portions of this suspension. After incubation for 15 min at room temperature, 1 mM phenylmethanesulfonyl fluoride (PMSF) was added, and the bacteria were collected by centrifugation and boiled in sample buffer for sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE). Cell envelopes were treated with 50 μg/ml trypsin at room temperature for the indicated time periods and subsequently boiled in SDS-PAGE sample buffer.

SDS-PAGE and Immunoblotting

Proteins were analyzed by standard denaturing SDS-PAGE as described [14], followed by staining with Coomassie Brilliant Blue or silver [30], or immunoblotting as described [14]. EcBamA was detected with a rabbit antiserum raised against the denatured full-length protein [23]. Rabbit antisera against the N-terminal (residues 22-464) and C-terminal (residues 455-797) regions of N. meningitidis BamA (α-N-NmBAmA and α-C-NmBamA, respectively) were generously provided by Ralph Judd (University of Montana, USA). The antisera against E. coli BamD and BamB were generous gifts of Naoko Yokota and Hajime Tokuda (University of Tokyo, Japan). A monoclonal antibody (Mab) directed against the POTRA1 domain of NmBamA (α-POTRA1Nm) came from GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals (Rixensart, Belgium).

Affinity Purification

Extraction and purification of His-tagged BamA from cell envelopes using Ni2+-nitrilotriacetic acid (Ni2+-NTA)-agarose beads (Qiagen) was performed as described [14].


E. coli BamA does not function in N. meningitidis

To determine whether E. coli BamA could substitute for N. meningitidis BamA in vivo, a plasmid containing the EcbamA gene under control of a lac promoter was introduced into N. meningitidis strain HB-1. This resulted in IPTG-dependent expression of EcbamA in HB-1 (Figure 1A). As a control, HB-1 was also transformed with a similar plasmid containing N. meningitidis bamA. Next, we attempted to disrupt the chromosomal NmbamA copy in the transformants. Correct mutants were easily obtained when N. meningitidis bamA was expressed from plasmid. In contrast, PCR analysis showed that the few kanamycin-resistant transformants that were obtained from the cells expressing EcbamA still contained the wild-type copy of NmbamA on the chromosome. Apparently, EcBamA cannot replace N. meningitidis BamA.


Figure 1. Expression and assembly of E. coli BamA in N. meningitidis.

Cell envelopes were analyzed by SDS-PAGE followed by immunoblotting using anti-EcBamA antiserum or by staining with Coomassie Brilliant Blue. BamA is indicated with arrowheads. A: Immunoblots of cell envelopes of uninduced (-) or induced (+) HB-1 cells containing pFP10-EcbamA carrying bamA under an IPTG-inducible promoter. B: Cell envelopes of HB-1 (Nm) expressing EcBamA or of E. coli strain DH5α (Ec) were extracted with urea and the input (i), urea-insoluble (p) and -soluble (s) fractions were analyzed by SDS-PAGE followed by staining with Coomassie Brilliant Blue (lower panels) or immunoblotting with anti-EcBamA antiserum (upper panels). Neisserial porins are indicated with asterisks. C: Cell envelopes of E. coli strain DH5α (Ec) or HB-1 (Nm) expressing EcBamA were treated (+) or not (-) with trypsin for 1 h and analyzed by SDS-PAGE followed by immunoblotting with anti-EcBamA antiserum. Trypsin-protected EcBamA fragments in E. coli are indicated with an asterisk.


The inability of EcBamA to substitute for NmBamA could be due to its failure to become correctly assembled in the meningococcal OM. To test this hypothesis, we analyzed the extractability of EcBamA with urea from these membranes. Correctly inserted OMPs are not usually extracted with urea, as demonstrated for the neisserial porins in Figure 1B (left panel). However, most of EcBamA present in neisserial cell envelopes was extractable with urea (Figure 1B, left panel), whereas, as expected, this was not the case for EcBamA in E. coli cell envelopes (Figure 1B, right panel). Correctly assembled β-barrel domains of OMPs are also usually resistant to proteases. Accordingly, the intact C-terminal β-barrel domain of EcBamA can be obtained by treating E. coli cell envelopes with trypsin [23] (Figure 1C). However, when neisserial cell envelopes containing EcBamA were treated with trypsin, no protected fragment was found (Figure 1C), indicating that no part of EcBamA is properly assembled into the OM. Together, these data demonstrate that EcBamA, for the most part, was not inserted in the neisserial OM and, therefore, cannot be expected to functionally replace NmBamA.

N. meningitidis BamA does not function in E.coli

To assess whether N. meningitidis BamA can substitute for E. coli BamA, we made use of the EcBamA-depletion strain UTPBAD::bamA in which chromosomal EcbamA expression is under control of an arabinose-inducible promoter resulting in a growth-arrest after prolonged growth in the absence of arabinose (Figure 2A). Introduction of pFP10-NmbamA into this strain did not rescue growth in the absence of arabinose even when NmBamA synthesis was induced with IPTG (Figure 2B), while a control strain containing EcbamA under IPTG control on pFP10-EcbamA continued to grow under these conditions (Figure 2C). The expression of N. meningitidis bamA in response to IPTG induction was confirmed on immunoblots (Figure 3A). Even under conditions of slow growth, i.e. on LB plates at 22°C, NmBamA did not support growth of E. coli (Figure S1). Thus, BamA of N. meningitidis does not function in E. coli. Interestingly, N. meningitidis BamA appeared to be inserted into the E. coli OM since it was not extracted from the membrane fraction with urea just as in neisserial cell envelopes (Figure 3B).


Figure 2. Functionality of BamA variants in E. coli.

Growth of E. coli strain UTPBAD::bamA carrying no plasmid (panel A) or plasmids encoding the proteins indicated in the upper right hand side of the graphs was assessed by measuring the OD600. Strains were grown in the presence of glucose (open circles), arabinose (closed diamonds) or IPTG (closed triangles) in LB at 37°C. Cultures were diluted into fresh medium at the time points indicated by arrows.


Figure 3. Expression and assembly of N. meningitidis BamA in E. coli.

A: Expression of NmbamA in E. coli. E. coli strain UTPBAD::bamA containing pFP10-NmbamA was grown in LB containing 0.02% arabinose in the absence or presence of IPTG. Cell envelopes were isolated and analyzed by immunoblotting with Mab α-POTRA1Nm. B: Assembly of NmBamA in the E. coli OM. Cell envelopes from E. coli strain UTPBAD::bamA containing pFP10-NmbamAgrown in LB containing 0.02% arabinose and IPTG were extracted with urea (Ec). As a control, cell envelopes of strain HB-1 were extracted with urea (Nm). Input (i), urea-insoluble (p) and -soluble (s) fractions were analyzed by SDS-PAGE and immunoblot analysis with Mab α-POTRA1Nm. C: Co-purification of Bam-complex components with His-tagged NmBamA in E. coli. Cell envelopes of E. coli DH5α cells containing pRV-His-NmbamA either induced (lanes 2) or not (lanes 1) with IPTG were extracted with Elugent and subjected to Ni2+-NTA purification. Shown are elution fractions analyzed by denaturing SDS-PAGE and silver staining (left panel) or immunoblotting (right panels) using antisera against the indicated proteins. As a positive control for BamB detection, cell envelopes derived from strain DH5α were also analyzed on blot (lane c). The arrow indicates the position of BamB.


EcBamA is associated with several lipoproteins, i.e., BamB, BamC, BamD and BamE [6,13]. A failure to associate with these lipoproteins might explain the lack of function of neisserial BamA in E. coli. To test this possibility, pRV-His-NmBamA encoding NmBamA with a His-tag at the N terminus of the mature protein was introduced into E. coli DH5α and expression of the recombinant protein was induced with IPTG. Cell envelopes were extracted with Elugent and the His-tagged NmBamAwas affinity purified with Ni2+-NTA beads under native conditions (Figure 3C). A control purification was done on cells not producing the His-tagged NmBamA. Remarkably, substantial amounts of E. coli BamD co-purified with the neisserial BamA (Figure 3C, lane 2), while no BamD was detected in the eluate of the control experiment with cells not expressing the His-tagged NmBamA (Figure 3C, lane 1). In contrast to this essential lipoprotein, the non-essential lipoprotein BamB did not specifically co-purify with NmBamA (Figure 3C). These results enforce the notion that at least a portion of NmBamA produced in E. coli is correctly assembled.

Complementation by Other BamA Homologs

The observation that EcBamA and NmBamA could not functionally replace each other in vivo could be related to the evolutionary distance between E. coli, belonging to the class of γ-proteobacteria, and N. meningitidis, a β-proteobacterium. Therefore, we next investigated whether BamA from other β-proteobacteria, i.e. those of B. pertussis, B. mallei and N. gonorrhoeae, could functionally substitute BamA in N. meningitidis. Strain HB-1 was transformed with plasmids containing these bamA genes under lac promoter control. N. gonorrhoeae and B. pertussis BamA protein production could be verified by immunoblotting utilizing the apparent cross-reactivity of the α-N-NmBamA and α-EcBamA antisera, respectively (Figure 4A). Expression of the B. mallei bamA gene was demonstrated by RT-PCR (Figure 4B). Next, we tested whether the chromosomal bamA gene could be inactivated while the cells were kept in the presence of IPTG. We only succeeded to obtain correct mutants when the gonococcal bamA was expressed from plasmid. Thus, apparently, the meningococcal BamA protein can be functionally replaced by BamA of the closely related species N. gonorrhoeae, which shows 95% amino-acid sequence identity with the meningococcal one (Figure S2A), but not by those of B. pertussis or B. mallei, which are less similar (Figure S2B). We evaluated also whether the B. pertussis and B. mallei BamA proteins could substitute for E. coli BamA. Neither one allowed for growth of the E.coli BamA-depletion strain in the absence of arabinose and the presence of IPTG at 37°C (Figure 2D,E) or at 22°C (Figure S1) although they were expressed (Figure 4C), demonstrating that they cannot functionally substitute EcBamA.


Figure 4. Expression of heterologous bamA variants in N. meningitidis and E. coli.

A, B: N. meningitidis strain HB-1 and its derivatives were grown with IPTG to induce expression of B. pertussis (Bper), B. mallei (Bmal), N. gonorrhoeae (Ngo) and as control, E. coli (Eco) bamA genes from plasmids. A: Cell lysates were analyzed by SDS-PAGE and immunoblotting with the antisera indicated on the right. Note that also chromosome-encoded NmBamA is detected with the α-N-NmBamA antiserum in the upper panel. B: RNA was isolated and treated or not with reverse transcriptase (RT). Specific cDNA was detected by conventional PCR followed by agarose gel electrophoresis. The -RT samples serve as controls for the absence of plasmid DNA in the RNA preparations. C: RNA was isolated from UTPBAD::bamA containing pFP10-BmbamA (Bmal) or pFP10-BpbamA (Bper) grown in the presence of arabinose and IPTG and processed as explained for panel B.


Functionality of Chimeras of N. meningitidis and E. coli BamA

To determine which part of the BamA protein could be dictating the species specificity of functionality, two sets of chimeras were constructed in which the N- and C-terminal domains of NmBamA and EcBamA are swapped. For the first couple of constructs, designated Ec479Nm and Nm480Ec, the site of the domain exchange was chosen based on a model predicting a 12-stranded β-barrel in the C-terminal part of BamA [4] (Figure 5A,B). The second set of chimeras, designated Ec423Nm and Nm423Ec, was designed based on a FhaC-like 16-stranded β-barrel [21]; in this case the domains were swapped directly after the C terminus of POTRA5 (Figure 5A,B). The chimeric genes were cloned behind an IPTG-inducible promoter and introduced into N. meningitidis. Synthesis of all hybrid proteins was detected when immunoblots with cell envelopes were probed with appropriate antisera (Figure 6A). However, the chromosomal copy of NmbamA could not be inactivated during expression of any of the chimeras indicating that all four chimeras are non-functional in N. meningitidis.


Figure 5. Schematic representation of the BamA chimeras used in this study.

A: Two sets of chimeras were constructed based on two different topology models for BamA. In one model, the POTRA domains (P1-P5) are connected via a hinge region (H) to a 12-stranded β-barrel (left). In the other model, the POTRA domains are directly connected to a larger, 16-stranded β-barrel (right). E. coli-derived polypeptides are indicated in grey and N. meningitidis derived polypeptides in white. B: ClustalW alignment of partial sequences (residues 417-485, counting the signal sequence) of N. meningitidis and E. coli BamA. The C terminus of POTRA5 (T423) [18] and the N terminus of the predicted 12-stranded β-barrel (V483) [4] are indicated by arrows. The β-strands 1 through 4 plus the start of the fifth, forming the BamA β-barrel as determined in the recently published crystal structure of NgBamA [37], are indicated with grey arrows.


Figure 6. Expression and assembly of BamA chimeras in N. meningitidis.

A: Derivatives of strain HB-1 containing plasmids encoding the chimeric proteins indicated above the panels were grown with or without IPTG. Cell envelopes were isolated and analyzed by SDS-PAGE and immunoblotting with the antisera shown below the blots. The chimeric proteins are indicated with asterisks. Note that also chromosome-encoded NmBamA is detected with the α-N-NmBamA antiserum (indicated with the arrowhead). B: Trypsin sensitivity of BamA variants in N. meningitidis cell envelopes. Cell envelopes of strain HB-1 expressing the indicated BamA variant were treated overnight with or without trypsin and analyzed on immunoblots. Chromosomally encoded NmBamA in the parent strain HB-1 (wt) yielded three tryptic fragments indicated as I, II and III. Additional digestion products of Ec479Nm and Ec423Nm are indicated with asterisks. Arrowheads indicate the positions of undigested NmBamA and the Ec423Nm and Ec479Nm chimeras, which all have indistinguishable electrophoretic mobilities. In the righ-hand panel, asterisks indicate the positions of undigested Nm423Ec and Nm480Ec. The blot required a long exposure time to visualize Nm480Ec which additionaly revealed a cross-reactive band just below the signal of the chimeras. C: Extractability of BamA variants from cell envelopes with urea. Cell envelopes of N. meningitidis strain HB-1 producing the chimeras indicated at the right were extracted with urea and the input (i), urea-insoluble (p) and -soluble (s) fractions were analyzed by SDS-PAGE and immunoblotting with the antibodies indicated on the left. Arrowheads indicate chromosomally encoded endogenous NmBamA. In the lower two panels, the positions of endogenous BamA and the chimeric proteins are indistinguishable.


To test whether the chimeric proteins were assembled in the OM, cell envelopes were treated overnight with trypsin. Such treatment of wild-type membranes yields three bands reactive with an antiserum directed against the C-terminal domain of NmBamA indicated with I, II and III in Figure 6B [14]. Treatment of the membranes containing the Ec423Nm or Ec479Nm chimeras with trypsin also yielded bands I, II and III; this was expected since these membranes also contain native NmBamA encoded by the chromosome. Remarkably, additional distinct fragments of 37 and 30 kDa were detected with the antiserum (indicated with asterisks in Figure 6B) indicating that the C-terminal β-barrel domain of these chimeras was assembled into the OM. In contrast, no trypsin-resistant fragments reactive with the α-EcBamA antiserum were obtained from cell envelopes containing the Nm423Ec or the Nm480Ec chimera (Figure 6B, right panel) suggesting that these proteins are not assembled in the OM. These observations were confirmed in urea extraction experiments: both Nm480Ec and Nm423Ec were fully extractable from the N. meningitidis cell envelopes, whereas Ec423Nm and Ec479Nm did not solubilize in urea (Figure 6C). Thus, only the chimeras containing the C-terminal part of NmBamA appeared to be assembled into the OM of N. meningitidis.

Next, we assessed functionality of the chimeric BamA proteins in E. coli by introducing the plasmids containing the chimeric constructs into the EcBamA-depletion strain. All chimeric proteins were produced after growth of the cells in the presence of arabinose plus IPTG (Figure 7). Extraction of the membrane fraction with urea indicated that the chimeric proteins Ec423Nm and Ec479Nm were fully inserted into the E. coli OM, whereas the Nm480Ec and Nm423Ec proteins were each for ~50% extractable and, therefore, only partially inserted (Figure 7). The plasmid-encoded full-length EcBamA was also partially extracted (Figure 7 bottom panel), in contrast to endogenously expressed chromosomal EcBamA (Figure 1B). Apparently, the cells cannot assemble overexpression levels of EcBamA. Despite significant insertion, none of the chimeras appeared to complement the absence of endogenous EcBamA, since the strains stopped growing in the absence of arabinose and presence of IPTG at 37°C (Figure 2F-I) or at 22°C (Figure S1).


Figure 7. Assembly of BamA chimeras in E. coli.

Derivatives of E. coli strain UTPBAD::bamA containing plasmids encoding BamA variants were grown in LB containing arabinose and IPTG. Cell envelopes were isolated and extracted with urea. Input (i), urea-insoluble (p) and -soluble (s) fractions were analyzed by SDS-PAGE and immunoblotting with the antibodies indicated on the left. The BamA variants encoded by the plasmids are indicated at the right.


Analysis of the NmBamA β-barrel Domain

The simplest model explaining the correct assembly of the C-terminal parts of both the Ec423Nm and the Ec479Nm chimera into the neisserial OM would be that their membrane-embedded domains are fully comprised within the NmBamA-derived part. These should then have identical conformations. To test this notion, we treated intact cells with limited amounts of trypsin in order to target only the surface-exposed part of the BamA variants. Trypsin treatment of cells of the parent strain HB-1 or HB-1 cells expressing the Ec423Nm or Ec479Nm chimera did not affect chromosomally encoded wild-type NmBamA as deduced from similar reactivity with Mab α-POTRA1Nm, which specifically recognizes POTRA1 of N. meningitidis BamA and, therefore, only reacts with endogenous NmBamA (Figure 8A, left panels). Apparently, no readily accessible trypsin-cleavage sites are exposed at the cell surface in native NmBamA. Next, we probed the samples with an antiserum directed against EcBamA to detect specifically the chimeric proteins. Remarkably, an approximately 7-kDa fragment was cleaved off from the majority of the Ec479Nm protein whereas little or no cleavage was observed for the Ec423Nm chimera (Figure 8A, right panels). Thus, the conformation of the membrane domain of the Ec479Nm chimera appears affected in such a way that one of its surface-exposed loops has become accessible to externally added protease. This result indicates that the exchanged fragment between residues 423 and 479 affects the barrel structure and probably belongs to the β-barrel domain, implying that this domain contains 16 β-strands.


Figure 8. Analysis of the β-barrel domain of NmBamA.

A: Intact HB-1 cells and HB-1 cells producing Ec423Nm or Ec479Nm were treated with the indicated concentrations of trypsin for 15 min and processed for immunoblotting with α-POTRA1Nm (left panels) or α-EcBamA (right panels) antibodies. B. Cell envelopes of HB-1 producing the proteins indicated at the right were treated with urea and processed for immunoblotting with α-C-NmBamA antiserum. C: Cell envelopes of HB-1 producing the proteins indicated on top were treated overnight with or without trypsin and analyzed on immunoblots with α-C-NmBamA antiserum. The # signs indicate the positions of the truncated 420Nm BamA and 481NmBamA variants, wheras the * signs indicate tryptic fragments derived from the chimeric Ec423Nm or Ec479Nm proteins (similar to those shown in Fig. 6B).


To test whether individual 16- or 12-stranded NmBamA β-barrels could be stably inserted in the OM, we produced such proteins, designated 420NmBamA (mature protein starting with amino acid 420 of NmBamA) and 481NmBamA (mature protein starting with amino acid 481 of NmBamA), in HB-1. Urea extraction experiments indicated that 420NmBamA was completely and 481NmBamA was only partially inserted in the OM (Figure 8B). Trypsin treatment of cell envelopes showed that 420NmBamA was completely protected from the protease, whereas 481NmBamA was for the most part degraded (Figure 8C). The 420NmBamA protein migrated at exactly the same position as the trypsin-protected fragment of Ec423Nm, suggesting that they possess a similar membrane domain, i.e. a stably integrated 16-stranded β-barrel.


In this work we studied the species-specific functioning of BamA, the central component of the OMP insertion machinery, which is essential and conserved in Gram-negative bacteria. Previously, it was reported that the BamA protein of the cyanobacterium Anabaena sp. PCC 7120 did not function in E. coli, despite its insertion in the E. coli OM [31]. This lack of function may be due to the large phylogenetic distance between these bacterial species which is reflected in the distinct pore diameters, differing number of POTRA domains (3 versus 5) and differences in associated complex components for BamA proteins from cyanobacterial and proteobacterial origin [32-35]. We now show that the BamA species specificity extends to much more closely related species, since even BamA homologs of proteobacteria or even within one class of proteobacteria were generally not exchangeable.

Several factors might potentially contribute to this lack of cross-complementation: insufficient assembly of the heterologous BamA into the OM of the host, an inability to associate with the accessory lipoproteins into a fully functional OMP-insertion machinery, or failure of the heterologous BamA to efficiently recognize various OMP substrates. E. coli BamA was not assembled into the OM of N. meningitidis and therefore could obviously not compensate for the absence of neisserial BamA. In contrast, N. meningitidis BamA appeared to be inserted into the E. coli OM, at least to a substantial extent. Previously, we showed that neisserial OMPs are only poorly inserted into the E. coli OM. This defect was related to the nature of the penultimate amino acid of the OMP: in Neisseria this residue is almost invariably a positively charged one, whereas in E. coli this is only very rarely the case [23]. Replacing the lysine present in this position in the neisserial porin PorA by glutamine greatly enhanced PorA assembly in E. coli [23]. NmBamA is one of the few neisserial OMPs possessing a threonine instead of a positively charged residue at the penultimate position; therefore, it might be sufficiently recognized by the Bam complex to be inserted into the E. coli OM. Neisserial BamA was even able to associate in the E. coli OM with the essential Bam-complex component BamD but not with BamB. The latter is consistent with the absence of a BamB homolog in N. meningitidis[14]. We did not test association of BamC and BamE, but, since these proteins have been shown to interact indirectly with BamA via BamD [13,36], they are likely to form part of the hybrid complex. Thus, despite its proper assembly into the OM and its association with at least the other essential Bam complex component, NmBamA could not functionally replace EcBamA. Therefore, the most likely explanation for its lack of function in E. coli is poor recognition of the host’s OMP substrates.

Paradoxically, whereas the lack of substrate recognition is apparently an issue when BamA proteins are exchanged between different proteobacteria, we recently showed that E. coli OMPs could be assembled into the OM of yeast mitochondria [25], and vice versa, that a mitochondrial OMP could be inserted into the E. coli OM [26]. However, these assemblies were efficient only when the OMPs were expressed at a low level with extensive amounts of unassembled OMPs accumulating at higher expression levels. It seems likely that also NmBamA can handle E. coli OMP substrates to some extent. However, due to the fact that for cellular survival it needs to deal with all OMPs under conditions of suboptimal recognition, it is not unexpected that NmBamA fails to sufficiently handle this load of substrates. Cells then likely die from lethal accumulation of periplasmic OMP aggregates.

Chimeric proteins comprising BamA domains derived from N. meningitidis and E. coli were not functional in either host. All evidence indicated that the two chimeras containing the C-terminal part of N. meningitidis BamA were inserted into the neisserial OM. However, the conformation of the β-barrel domain of the Ec479Nm protein was different as indicated by its accessibility to trypsin in intact cells. The apparent cleavage in one of its extracellular loops also explains the considerably smaller trypsin-resistant fragment detected after trypsinization of the Ec479Nm protein in cell envelopes (Figure 6B). In contrast, similar to wild-type NmBamA, the Ec423Nm chimera was resistant to trypsin digestion in intact cells. The most straightforward explanation for these results is that the protein segment between residues 423 and 479 does not constitute a hinge region between the POTRA domains and the β-barrel according to the original 12-stranded β-barrel model, but is actually part of the β-barrel. Consequently, in the Ec479Nm protein, four β-strands of the NmBamA β-barrel are substituted by the corresponding ones of EcBamA and this substitution results in a conformational change rendering a surface-exposed loop near the C-terminal end sensitive to trypsin. Overall, these data support a 16-stranded rather than the originally proposed 12-stranded membrane β-barrel. Interestingly, during submission of this manuscript the structure of N. gonorrhoeae BamA, refolded from solubilized inclusion bodies, was elucidated [37] and found to consist of a large periplasmic domain attached to a 16-stranded β-barrel domain. Thus, our observations from in vivo assembled proteins are consistent with the reported BamA structure.

Despite apparently correct membrane insertion of the Ec423Nm and Ec479Nm chimeras, the proteins could not functionally replace NmBamA. Trypsin digestion of the chimeras in cell envelopes did not yield the intermediate fragments seen for native BamA. These fragments are indicative for association with other Bam complex members [14]. Therefore, the EcBamA-derived POTRA domains in both chimeras apparently fail to associate with the accessory Bam complex components in N. meningitidis, which would explain the lack of function of both chimeras in N. meningitidis. In addition, it is entirely possible that the EcBamA-moiety of the chimeras does not efficiently recognize the neisserial OMP substrates. In E. coli, we expected at least the Ec423Nm chimera to function. This hybrid consists of the periplasmic POTRA domains from EcBamA and the entire β-barrel from NmBamA. Like the wild-type EcBamA, it was inserted into the OM of E. coli as shown in urea-extraction experiments. With its periplasmic domain derived from EcBamA, this chimeric protein should have no problem recognizing E. coli OMP substrates or recruiting accessory Bam components. However, these features were apparently not sufficient to allow for complete functioning. The lack of function of this hybrid suggests that appropriate interactions between the POTRA domains and the β-barrel are essential for function. Indeed, the POTRA5 domain was found to interact with several periplasmic loops in the crystal structure of NgBamA [37]. Such interaction may be essential and not be possible in the case of the Ec423Nm hybrid, which could also explain its lack of function.

In conclusion, our results demonstrate high species specificity in the functioning of the BamA component of the OMP assembly machinery. This specificity is most likely related to the requirement for an efficient recognition of the substrate OMPs and subtle species-specific differences in the recognition signals in these substrates. Furthermore, our results obtained with in vivo assembled BamA are consistent with the recently reported crystal structure of BamA [37]. Finally, our results indicate that specific interactions between the β-barrel and the POTRA domains might be essential for appropriate functioning.

Supporting Information

Figure S1.

BamA complementation assays in E. coli under slow growth conditions.



Figure S2.

Multiple sequence alignments of BamA variants.



Table S1.

Plasmids used in this study.



Table S2.

Primers used in this study.




We offer our special thanks to Luis Fernandez for providing the E. coli BamA-depletion strain and to Vincent Weynants (GlaxoSmithKline), Naoko Yokota, Hajime Tokuda and Ralph Judd for the generous gifts of antisera.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: EBV JT MPB. Performed the experiments: EVB JG FB EL VR MPB. Analyzed the data: EBV JT MPB. Wrote the manuscript: EBV JT MPB.


  1. 1. Koebnik R, Locher KP, Van Gelder P (2000) Structure and function of bacterial outer membrane proteins: barrels in a nutshell. Mol Microbiol 37: 239-253. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2958.2000.01983.x. PubMed: 10931321.
  2. 2. Chandran V, Fronzes R, Duquerroy S, Cronin N, Navaza J et al. (2009) Structure of the outer membrane complex of a type IV secretion system. Nature 462: 1011-1015. doi:10.1038/nature08588. PubMed: 19946264.
  3. 3. Dong C, Beis K, Nesper J, Brunkan-Lamontagne L, Clarke BR et al. (2006) Wza the translocon for E. coli capsular polysaccharides defines a new class of membrane protein. Nature 444: 226-229. doi:10.1038/nature05267. PubMed: 17086202.
  4. 4. Voulhoux R, Bos MP, Geurtsen J, Mols M, Tommassen J (2003) Role of a highly conserved bacterial protein in outer membrane protein assembly. Science 299: 262-265. doi:10.1126/science.1078973. PubMed: 12522254.
  5. 5. Doerrler WT, Raetz CRH (2005) Loss of outer membrane proteins without inhibition of lipid export in an Escherichia coli YaeT mutant. J Biol Chem 280: 27679-27687. doi:10.1074/jbc.M504796200. PubMed: 15951436.
  6. 6. Wu T, Malinverni J, Ruiz N, Kim S, Silhavy TJ et al. (2005) Identification of a multicomponent complex required for outer membrane biogenesis in Escherichia coli. Cell 121: 235-245. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2005.02.015. PubMed: 15851030.
  7. 7. Werner J, Misra R (2005) YaeT (Omp85) affects the assembly of lipid-dependent and lipid-independent outer membrane proteins of Escherichia coli. Mol Microbiol 57: 1450-1459. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2958.2005.04775.x. PubMed: 16102012.
  8. 8. Tashiro Y, Nomura N, Nakao R, Senpuku H, Kariyama R et al. (2008) Opr86 is essential for viability and is a potential candidate for a protective antigen against biofilm formation by Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J Bacteriol 190: 3969-3978. doi:10.1128/JB.02004-07. PubMed: 18390657.
  9. 9. Lenhart TR, Akins DR (2010) Borrelia burgdorferi locus BB0795 encodes a BamA orthologue required for growth and efficient localization of outer membrane proteins. Mol Microbiol 75: 692-709. PubMed: 20025662.
  10. 10. Gentle I, Gabriel K, Beech P, Waller R, Lithgow T (2004) The Omp85 family of proteins is essential for outer membrane biogenesis in mitochondria and bacteria. J Cell Biol 164: 19-24. doi:10.1083/jcb.200310092. PubMed: 14699090.
  11. 11. Kozjak V, Wiedemann N, Milenkovic D, Lohaus C, Meyer HE et al. (2003) An essential role of Sam50 in the protein sorting and assembly machinery of the mitochondrial outer membrane. J Biol Chem 278: 48520-48523. doi:10.1074/jbc.C300442200. PubMed: 14570913.
  12. 12. Paschen SA, Waizenegger T, Stan T, Preuss M, Cyrklaff M et al. (2003) Evolutionary conservation of biogenesis of β-barrel membrane proteins. Nature 426: 862-866. doi:10.1038/nature02208. PubMed: 14685243.
  13. 13. Sklar JG, Wu T, Gronenberg LS, Malinverni JC, Kahne D et al. (2007) Lipoprotein SmpA is a component of the YaeT complex that assembles outer membrane proteins in Escherichia coli. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 104: 6400-6405. doi:10.1073/pnas.0701579104. PubMed: 17404237.
  14. 14. Volokhina EB, Beckers F, Tommassen J, Bos MP (2009) The β-barrel assembly complex of Neisseria meningitidis. J Bacteriol 191: 7074-7085. doi:10.1128/JB.00737-09. PubMed: 19767435.
  15. 15. Sánchez-Pulido L, Devos D, Genevrois S, Vicente M, Valencia A (2003) POTRA: a conserved domain in the FtsQ family and a class of â-barrel outer membrane proteins. Trends Biochem Sci 28: 523-526. doi:10.1016/j.tibs.2003.08.003. PubMed: 14559180.
  16. 16. Gatzeva-Topalova PZ, Walton TA, Sousa MC (2008) Crystal structure of YaeT: conformational flexibility and substrate recognition. Structure 16: 1873–1881. doi:10.1016/j.str.2008.09.014. PubMed: 19081063.
  17. 17. Gatzeva-Topalova PZ, Warner LR, Pardi A, Sousa MC (2010) Structure and flexibility of the complete periplasmic domain of BamA: the protein insertion machine of the outer membrane. Structure 18: 1492-1501. doi:10.1016/j.str.2010.08.012. PubMed: 21070948.
  18. 18. Kim S, Malinverni JC, Sliz P, Silhavy TJ, Harrison SC et al. (2007) Structure and function of an essential component of the outer membrane protein assembly machine. Science 317: 961-964. doi:10.1126/science.1143993. PubMed: 17702946.
  19. 19. Knowles TJ, Jeeves M, Bobat S, Dancea F, McClelland D et al. (2008) Fold and function of polypeptide transport-associated domains responsible for delivering unfolded proteins to membranes. Mol Microbiol 68: 1216-1227. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2958.2008.06225.x. PubMed: 18430136.
  20. 20. Bos MP, Robert V, Tommassen J (2007) Functioning of outer membrane protein assembly factor Omp85 requires a single POTRA domain. EMBO Rep 8: 1149-1154. doi:10.1038/sj.embor.7401092. PubMed: 18007659.
  21. 21. Clantin B, Delattre AS, Rucktooa P, Saint N, Méli AC et al. (2007) Structure of the membrane protein FhaC: a member of the Omp85-TpsB transporter superfamily. Science 317: 957-961. doi:10.1126/science.1143860. PubMed: 17702945.
  22. 22. Jacob-Dubuisson F, Villeret V, Clantin B, Delattre AS, Saint N (2009) First structural insights into theTpsB/Omp85 superfamily. Biol Chem 390: 675–684. PubMed: 19558323.
  23. 23. Robert V, Volokhina EB, Senf F, Bos MP, Van Gelder P et al. (2006) Assembly factor Omp85 recognizes its outer membrane protein substrates by a species-specific C-terminal motif. PLoS Biol 4: e377. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0040377. PubMed: 17090219.
  24. 24. Struyvé M, Moons M, Tommassen J (1991) Carboxy-terminal phenylalanine is essential for the correct assembly of a bacterial outer membrane protein. J Mol Biol 218: 141-148. doi:10.1016/0022-2836(91)90880-F. PubMed: 1848301.
  25. 25. Walther DM, Bos MP, Rapaport D, Tommassen J (2010) The mitochondrial porin, VDAC, has retained the ability to be assembled in the bacterial outer membrane. Mol Biol Evol 27: 887-895. doi:10.1093/molbev/msp294. PubMed: 19959601.
  26. 26. Walther DM, Papic D, Bos MP, Tommassen J, Rapaport D (2009) Signals in bacterial β-barrel proteins are functional in eukaryotic cells for targeting to and assembly in mitochondria. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106: 2531-2536. doi:10.1073/pnas.0807830106. PubMed: 19181862.
  27. 27. Bodelón G, Marín E, Fernández LA (2009) Role of periplasmic chaperones and BamA (YaeT/Omp85) in folding and secretion of intimin from enteropathogenic Escherichia coli strains. J Bacteriol 191: 5169-5179. doi:10.1128/JB.00458-09. PubMed: 19525348.
  28. 28. Bos MP, Tommassen J (2005) Viability of a capsule- and lipopolysaccharide-deficient mutant of Neisseria meningitidis. Infect Immun 73: 6194-6197. doi:10.1128/IAI.73.9.6194-6197.2005. PubMed: 16113348.
  29. 29. Stork M, Bos MP, Jongerius I, de Kok N, Schilders I et al. (2010) An outer membrane receptor of Neisseria meningitidis involved in zinc acquisition with vaccine potential. PLoS Pathog 6: e1000969. PubMed: 20617164.
  30. 30. Blum H, Beier H, Gross HJ (1987) Improved silver staining of plant proteins, RNA and DNA in polyacrylamide gels. Electrophoresis 8: 93-99. doi:10.1002/elps.1150080203.
  31. 31. Wunder T, Bredemeier R, Ruprecht M, Schleiff E (2009) The Omp85 proteins of Anabaena sp. PCC 7120 and E. coli are functionally distinct. Endocytobiosis. Cell Res 19: 20-30.
  32. 32. Arnold T, Zeth K, Linke D (2010) Omp85 from the thermophilic cyanobacterium Thermosynechococcus elongatus differs from proteobacterial Omp85 in structure and domain composition. J Biol Chem 285: 18003-18015. doi:10.1074/jbc.M110.112516. PubMed: 20351097.
  33. 33. Bredemeier R, Schlegel T, Ertel F, Vojta A, Borissenko L et al. (2007) Functional and phylogenetic properties of the pore-forming beta-barrel transporters of the Omp85 family. J Biol Chem 282: 1882-18890. PubMed: 17088246.
  34. 34. Koenig P, Mirus O, Haarmann R, Sommer MS, Sinning I et al. (2010) Conserved properties of polypeptide transport-associated (POTRA) domains derived from cyanobacterial Omp85. J Biol Chem 285: 18016-18024. doi:10.1074/jbc.M110.112649. PubMed: 20348103.
  35. 35. Webb CT, Heinz E, Lithgow T (2012) Evolution of the β-barrel assembly machinery. Trends Microbiol 20: 612-620. doi:10.1016/j.tim.2012.08.006. PubMed: 22959613.
  36. 36. Malinverni JC, Werner J, Kim S, Sklar JG, Kahne D et al. (2006) YfiO stabilizes the YaeT complex and is essential for outer membrane protein assembly in Escherichia coli. Mol Microbiol 61: 151-164. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2958.2006.05211.x. PubMed: 16824102.
  37. 37. Noinaj N, Kuszak AJ, Gumbart JC, Lukacik P, Chang H et al. (2013) Structural insight into the biogenesis of β-barrel membrane proteins. Nature 501: 385-390. doi:10.1038/nature12521. PubMed: 23995689.