Gemini Alkyldeoxy-D-Glucitolammonium Salts as Modern Surfactants and Microbiocides: Synthesis, Antimicrobial and Surface Activity, Biodegradation

Bogumił Brycki; Adrianna Szulc

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0084936

Abstract

Dimeric quaternary alkylammonium salts possess a favourable surface and antimicrobial activity. In this paper we describe synthesis, spectroscopic analysis, surface and antimicrobial activity as well as biodegradability of polymethylene-α,ω-bis(N,N-dialkyl-N-deoxy-D-glucitolammonium iodides), a new group of dimeric quaternary ammonium salts. This new group of gemini surfactants can be produced from chemicals which come from renewable sources. The structure of products has been determined by the FTIR and ¹H and ¹³C NMR spectroscopy. The biodegradability, surface activity and antimicrobial efficacy against Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus, Candida albicans, Aspergillus niger and Penicillium chrysogenum were determined. The influence of the number of alkyl chains and their lengths on surface and antimicrobial properties has been shown. In general, dimeric quaternary alkyldeoxy-D-glucitolammonium salts with long alkyl substituents show favourable surface properties and an excellent antimicrobial activity.

Citation: Brycki B, Szulc A (2014) Gemini Alkyldeoxy-D-Glucitolammonium Salts as Modern Surfactants and Microbiocides: Synthesis, Antimicrobial and Surface Activity, Biodegradation. PLoS ONE 9(1): e84936. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0084936

Editor: Stephen J. Johnson, University of Kansas, United States of America

Received: April 23, 2013; Accepted: November 15, 2013; Published: January 8, 2014

Copyright: © 2014 Brycki, Szulc. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Funding: This work was supported by the funds International Project DPN/N 172/CHINA/2009. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Introduction

Surfactants have many different applications; not only as household chemicals, but they are also used in the petrochemical, mining, cosmetics and pharmaceutical industry. Some surfactants are also applied in the “hi-tech” fields, especially in nanotechnology, molecular biology and nanomedicine [1]–[3]. Due to the huge consumption of surfactants, over 10 millions tonnes per annum and the risk of pollution of environment, there is a strong demand to obtain new, more effective and environment friendly surfactants. Among the others, more effective surfactant means a surfactant which can be used in smaller amounts to give the same or better surface effect in comparison to a classical surfactant. Double quaternary alkylammonium salts -gemini surfactants- belong to this new class of more effective surfactants. Gemini surfactants possess at least two hydrophobic hydrocarbon chains and two hydrophilic quaternary ammonium groups, which are connected by a spacer. The spacer can be either hydrophobic (polymethylene chain), or hydrophilic (polymethylene chain with ether or hydroxyl groups). From a structural point of view a spacer can be rigid (aromatic or unsaturated linear hydrocarbons) or flexible (polymethylene chain). The neutral charge of the molecule is retained by the presence of counterions, which usually are halide anions [4]–[8]. The gemini alkylammonium salts show unique surface and interfacial properties in aqueous solution. Critical micelle concentrations (CMC) of gemini surfactants are usually much lower than CMC's of corresponding monomeric surfactants [3], [4], [8]–[13]. The gemini alkylammonium compounds show also a very good antimicrobial activity against bacteria, viruses, molds and yeasts [14], [15]. The minimal inhibitory concentrations (MIC) of these compounds in some cases are even three orders of magnitude lower in comparison to their monomeric analogs [9], [16], [17]. The mechanism of biocidal activity of quaternary alkylammonium salts is based on adsorption of the alkylammonium cation on the bacterial cell surface, diffusion through the cell wall and then binding and disruption of cytoplasmatic membrane. Damage of the membrane results in a release of potassium ions and other cytoplasmatic constituents, finally leading to the death of the cell [9], [18], [19]. A frequently used microbiocides, especially in sublethal concentrations, can imply an increasing resistance of microorganisms. One of the way to overcome this serious negative side effect is a periodically application of new microbiocides with modified structures. One of a new type of gemini surfactants with advantageous surface and antimicrobial activity are sugar based gemini surfactants [20]–[22]. Sugar based gemini surfactants have been also tested as vectors for gene transfer, which has a great importance in gene therapy [23]–[26]. Synthesis of some nonionic types of those compounds was previously described [27]–[30].

In this paper we report synthesis, spectroscopic analysis, surface and antimicrobial activity, as well as biodegradability of new cationic gemini alkylammonium surfactants with deoxy-D-glucitol substituents (Figure 1) and their precursors. The synthesis, crystal structure, FTIR, NMR and B3LYP results of a bolaform molecule has been previously reported [31].

Download:

Figure 1. Structure of synthesized alkyldeoxy-D-glucitolammonium salts.

Spacer (s) may have 4 or 6 methylene groups; hydrocarbon substituents (R, R′) can be ethyl, propyl, octyl, decyl or dodecyl group.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0084936.g001

Materials and Methods

Materials

D-glucose, tetramethylenediamine, hexamethylenediamine, iodoethane, 1-iodopropane, 1-iodododecane were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. Hexanal was obtained from Fluka. Octanal, decanal, dodecanal, sodium borohydride and sodium cyanoborohydride were purchased from Merck. Sodium hydroxide, potassium hydroxide, hydrochloric acid, acetic acid, methanol, 2-propanol, N,N-dimethylformamide and diethyl ether were obtained from Chempur. Nitromethane was purchased from POCH. All reagents and solvents were used as obtained without further purification.

Measurements

Melting points were determined using Electrothermal Met-Temp apparatus. Elemental analysis were performed on Elemental Analyser Vario EL II. NMR spectra were recorded on a Varian VNMR-S spectrometer operating at 402.644 MHz and 101.244 MHz for ¹H and ¹³C respectively. The spectra were measured in D₂O solutions relative to internal standard 3-(trimethylsilyl)propionic-2,2,3,3-d₄ acid sodium salt, or in TFA-d solutions relative to internal standard tetramethylsilane. The 2D ¹H-¹H (COSY), ¹H-¹³C (HETCOR) spectra were performed on Bruker Avance 600 MHz. The FTIR spectra were recorded in KBr pellets on a Bruker IFS 66 v/S spectrometer, evacuated to avoid water and CO₂ absorptions, at 2 cm⁻¹ resolution. The electron spray ionization mass spectra (ESI-MS) were recorded on ZQ Waters mass spectrometer. The sample solutions were prepared in methanol or water. The ESI-MS spectra were recorded at a 30 V cone voltage.

Antimicrobial activity of the synthesized compounds was evaluated against two species of bacteria: Escherichia coli ATCC 10536 and Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 6538, yeast: Candida albicans ATCC 10231, and two species of mold: Aspergillus niger ATCC 16401 and Penicillium chrysogenum ATCC 60739. Minimal inhibitory concentrations (MIC) were measured by a tube standard 2-fold dilution method, i.e. the volume of the original solution is always doubled, as in going from 1 to 2. Bacteria were preincubated on Tripticase Soy Broth (TSB) slant for 1 day at 37°C and fungi were preincubated on Malt Extract Broth (MEB); mold for 5 days at 28°C, yeast – for 1 day at 37°C. Conidia suspensions were prepared by adding sterile water containing 0.1% (w/w) Tween 80 to the slant. The bacteria and yeasts cell suspension were prepared by similar procedure but without Tween 80. One mL of inoculum (density 10⁶ cells mL⁻¹) was mixed with 1 mL of media containing the tested compounds and incubated for 24 h at 30°C for fungi, and 37°C for bacteria. The MIC's were defined as the lowest concentrations of the compounds at which there was no visible growth.

Surface tension measurements were performed on Krüss 100 KC tensiometer with Dosimat control. Critical micelle concentrations (CMC) were determinated by the cross-point of the lines before and after CMC on the surface tension vs. log[concentration of surfactants] curve.

Biodegradability of the synthesized surfactants was examined using a dissolved organic carbon (DOC) die-away test according to OECD guideline 301A [32]. The inoculum was obtained from activated sludge from wastewater treatment plant. To the flask was added 250 mL of medium and adequate amount of test compound (to obtain concentration DOC in a range 10–40 mg L⁻¹). Sequentially inoculated with activated sludge, to the concentration of dry weight was lower than 30 mg L⁻¹ and supplemented by a medium to volume 500 mL. Blank sample was prepared in the same way, but without tested compound. Incubation was carried out in the indirect light at temperature 20–25°C. Test was conducted in the incubator. Aerating the solutions were obtained by the shaker. Biodegradation of the test substance was monitored by determination of DOC dye-away and was calculated using the following formula: where:

B is percentage of biodegradation of the test compound, %

C_t is average value of DOC after time t, mg L⁻¹

C_B is average value of DOC in blank sample after time t, mg L⁻¹

C_A is average value of DOC after time 3 h±30 min, mg L⁻¹

C_BA is average value of DOC in blank sample after time 3 h±30 min, mg L⁻¹.

Synthesis

Polymethylene-α,ω-bis(N,N-dialkyl-N-deoxy-D-glucitolammonium iodides) (1–12) were obtained in four-step synthesis (Figure 2). The first step, a condensation of D-glucose and diamine, gave products with glycosidic bonds. Step two, reduction of D-glucopyranosyle ring with sodium borohydride to deoxy-D-glucitol form, was followed by step 3, i.e. a reductive alkylation with aliphatic aldehydes, containing from 6 to 12 carbon atoms, in the presence of sodium cyanoborohydride as a selective reducing agent [33]. Quaternisation of nitrogen atoms by aliphatic n-iodides was the last, step 4 of the reaction procedure. Nonionic tetramethylene-1,4-bis(N-dodecyl-N-deoxy-D-glucitolamine) (I-13) (Figure S5) was also obtained for comparative study. The details of the syntheses are given in Materials and Methods S1.

Download:

Figure 2. Four-steps synthesis of polymethylene-α,ω-bis(N,N-dialkyl-N-deoxy-D-glucitolammonium iodides).

Condensation of D-glucose and diamine (Step 1, reduction of D-glucopyranosyl rings to deoxy-D-glucitol substituents (Step 2), reductive alkylation with aldehydes (Step 3) and quaternization of nitrogen atoms by aliphatic iodides (Step 4).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0084936.g002

Results and Discussion

Antimicrobial properties

Selected compounds were tested for antimicrobial activity against Escherichia coli ATCC 10536, Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 6538, Candida albicans ATCC 10231, Aspergillus niger ATCC 16401 and Penicillium chrysogenum ATCC 60739. The microorganisms used in our experiment are considered to be ubiquitous and commonly existing in hospitals and food industry plants. Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) values were determined and are given in Table 1.

Download:

Table 1. Antibacterial and antifungal activities of gemini alkyldeoxy-D-glucitolammonium salts as MIC's [µmol L⁻¹].

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0084936.t001

The MIC data presented in Table 1 show a distinct relationship between structure and antimicrobial activity of dimeric alkylammonium surfactants. Compounds with no hydrocarbon substituents at nitrogen atom, tetramethylene-1,4-bis(N-deoxy-D-glucitolammonium chloride) (I-3) (Figure S2) and hexamethylene-1,6-bis(N-deoxy-D-glucitolammonium chloride) (I-4) (Figure S2), show a very weak antimicrobial activity, with MIC over 240 µmol L⁻¹. Similarly, MIC value for nonionic tetramethylene-1,4-bis(N-dodecyl-N-deoxy-D-glucitolamine) (I-13) (Figure S5), where nitrogen atoms are not charged, is over 240 µmol L⁻¹. All synthesized gemini surfactants with long alkyl and deoxy-D-glucitol substituents (compounds 1–12) show a very good antimicrobial activity against Gram positive bacteria, Gram negative bacteria, and fungi. Dimeric quaternary alkyldeoxy-D-glucitolammonium salts with tetramethylene spacer show a better biocidal efficacy against microorganisms in comparison to compounds with the longer, hexamethylene spacer. Moreover, the highest antifungal activity was observed for quaternary ammonium derivatives, which contain one long and one short hydrocarbon chain (compounds 7 and 8). In both these cases, the ionic radius is smaller, in comparison to deoxy-D-glucitolammonium salts with hexamethylene spacer or deoxy-D-glucitolamonium salts with two long alkyl chains. The smaller ionic radius of cation causes stronger Coulombic interactions with the negatively charged cell surface of microorganisms and as a consequence the higher biocidal activity. MIC values of polymethylene-α,ω-bis(N,N-dialkyl-N-deoxy-D-glucitolammonium iodides) are lower than minimal inhibitory concentrations of conventional gemini alkylammonium surfactants with [n-s-n] structure, where “n” is a number of carbon atoms in the hydrocarbon chain and “s” is a number of methylene groups in the spacer [14], [16]. This phenomenon is a result of the presence of deoxy-D-glucitol substituents in the molecule, which allow more efficient adsorption of the ammonium cation on the microorganism cell surface. The very high antimicrobial activity of dimeric quaternary alkyldeoxy-D-glucitolammonium salts has a fundamental meaning from ecological point of view. These compounds show the same biocidal effectiveness like conventional quaternary ammonium salts or other biocides but in hundred times smaller amounts. Therefore their environmental fate is much smaller [34].

Surface properties

Most gemini alkylammonium salts are typical surfactants. The surface activity of these compounds is much higher than for corresponding monomeric surfactants. This efficiency is often characterized either by the concentration C₂₀, i.e. the surfactant concentration required to lower the surface tension of water by 0.02 N/m, or critical micelization concentration, CMC. For typical gemini surfactant, ethylene-1,2-bis(N-dodecyl-N,N-dimethylammonium bromide) [12-2-12], CMC value is 0.82 mmol L⁻¹ and surface tension at the critical micelle concentration is 30.6 mN m⁻¹ [11] while for dodecyltrimethylammonium bromide (DTAB) these values are 15.1 mmol L⁻¹ and 36.4 mN m⁻¹, respectively [11]. Similarly, the values of C₂₀ for 12-2-12 and DTAB are 0.0083 and 0.21 wt%, respectively [4]. The reason for this greater surface activity of gemini surfactants in the comparison to analogues monomeric surfactants, is the larger total number of carbon atoms in the hydrophobic chains of the geminis. The larger the total number of carbon atoms in the surfactant molecule, the greater the distortion of the water structure of the aqueous phase and the greater the tendency to adsorb at the interfaces surrounding the aqueous phase or to form micelles in the aqueous phase, that is, greater surface activity [3]. Surface tension at CMC (γ_CMC) and critical micelle concentrations (CMC) of dimeric quaternary alkyldeoxy-D-glucitolammonium salts are given in Table 2. Dimeric alkyldeoxy-D-glucitolammonium iodides show an excellent surface activity because of their amphiphilic structure. The CMC values of investigated iodides are much lower than CMC's of gemini alkylammonium salts with analogous lengths of hydrocarbon chain, where instead of deoxy-D-glucitol substituent is methyl group. Dimeric alkyldeoxy-D-glucitolammonium salts 1–12 containing two hydrocarbon chains show lower CMC values than those with a single hydrocarbon chain. For example CMC values for tetramethylene-1,4-bis(N-dodecyl-N-deoxy-D-glucitolammonium acetate) (I-8) (Figure S3) and hexamethylene-1,6-bis(N-dodecyl-N-deoxy-D-glucitolammonium acetate) (I-12) (Figure S4) are 0.17 and 0.12 mmol L⁻¹, respectively. It is important to note that one hydrocarbon chain must be long, at least 8 carbon atoms, however the second one can be shorter. Moreover, dimeric alkyldeoxy-D-glucitolammonium salts containing six methylene groups in the spacer show lower CMC values, than compounds with tetramethylene spacer. This is due to the morphology of micelles in the solution [35]. To form micelles, fewer of bigger cationic molecules are needed, i.e. critical micelle concentration is lower.

Download:

Table 2. Surface tension at CMC (γ_CMC) and critical micelle concentrations (CMC) values of gemini alkyldeoxy-D-glucitolammonium surfactants.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0084936.t002

Biodegradability

Alkylammonium gemini surfactants are poorly biodegradable because of their biocidal properties as well as strong adhesive properties. Banno et al. have studied biodegradation of conventional gemini cationic surfactants [36], [37]. They have proved that the homologous C10, C12 and C14 of pentamethylene-1,5-bis-(N-n-alkyl-N,N-dimethylammonium iodide) and trimethylene-1,3-bis-(N-dodecyl-N,N-dimethylammonium iodide) showed practically no biodegradation by activated sludge. The biochemical oxygen demand (BOD) biodegradability for homologue C10 was only about 10%.

However modification of the structure or addition of natural origin substituent, can significantly affect biodegrability. Compounds containing easily hydrolyzed groups in the structure showed a good biodegradability [36]. Generally readily biodegradable compounds achieve 70% removal of dissolved organic carbon (DOC) and 60% of theoretical oxygen demand (ThOD) or CO₂ production within 28 days [32].

Introduction of the carbonate linkage into the hydrophobic moiety of gemini surfactants enhanced its biodegradability. However, biodegradation of this surfactant was still low, only about 25% after 28 days of incubation for (C₁₂H₂₅-O-CO-O-(CH₂)₃-N⁺(CH₃)₂-(CH₂)₃-N⁺(CH₃)₂-(CH₂)₃-O-CO-O-C₁₂H₂₅ 2I⁻). The biodegradability of the primary biodegradation intermediates: 1-dodecanol and trimethylene-1,3-bis(N-3-hydroxypropyl-N,N-dimethylammonium iodide) were about 70% and 10% respectively. Based on these results, one can state that the low biodegradability of studied gemini surfactant are due to the low biodegradability of the intermediate having two ammonium groups [36], [37]. Introduction of the carbonate linkage into the linker moiety between the two single-type cationics, or in both the hydrophobic and linker moieties, significantly improved the biodegrability of those surfactants. The maximum BOD-biodegradability of homologous C12 exceeded 70% after a 28-day incubation [36], [37]. A comparison of the biodegradability of surfactants with two and three methylene groups in the linker containing carbonate group showed much higher degree of biodegradation for the former compounds. It is due to electron density of the carbonyl carbon. For compound with two methylene groups the carbonyl carbon atom is more influenced by charged nitrogen atom in comparison to compound with three methylene groups in the linker [36], [37].

In our study, we performed biodegradability measurements for different compounds: neutral dimeric surfactant tetramethylene-1,4-bis(N-dodecyl-N-deoxy-D-glucitolamine) (I-13) (Figure S5), the complex of dimeric surfactant with the weak hydrogen bond, hexamethylene-1,6-bis(N-dodecyl-N-deoxy-D-glucitolammonium acetate) (I-12) (Figure S4), protonated dimeric surfactants tetramethylene-1,4-bis(N-deoxy-D-glucitolammonium chloride) (I-3) (Figure S2) and hexamethylene-1,6-bis(N-deoxy-D-glucitolammonium chloride) (I-4) (Figure S2), as well as quaternized dimeric surfactants 1–12. The nonionic compound, tetramethylene-1,4-bis(N-dodecyl-N-deoxy-D-glucitolamine) (I-13) (Figure S5), undergoes the biodegradation up to 89.6±1.6%. The above compound is not charged, and no charged intermediates are formed during degradation process. Thus according to OECD is readily biodegradable [32]. In the case of the complex of dimeric surfactant with acetic acid, i.e. hexamethylene-1,6-bis(N-dodecyl-N-deoxy-D-glucitolammonium acetate) (I-12) (Figure S4), a weak hydrogen bond N…H-O exists between nitrogen atoms of surfactant and acetic acid, and nitrogen atoms are protonated to some extension. As a result of this partially protonated nitrogen atoms, the biodegradation is significantly lowered in comparison to biodegradation of neutral compound and equals 62.1±1.4%. In complexes of dimeric alkyldeoxy-D-glucitolamine with hydrochloric acid, i.e. tetramethylene-1,4-bis(N-deoxy-D-glucitolammonium chloride) (I-3) (Figure S2) and hexamethylene-1,6-bis(N-deoxy-D-glucitolammonium chloride) (I-4) (Figure S2), where nitrogen atoms are completely protonated, the biodegradation is very low and amounts 14.4±1.7% and 26.5±1.2%, respectively. The biodegradation data for dimeric quaternary alkyldeoxy-D-glucitolammonium iodides 1–12 are given in Table 3. These compounds are not easily degradated; the biodegradation degree does not exceed 34%.

Download:

Table 3. Biodegradation of gemini alkyldeoxy-D-glucitolammonium salts determined by DOC die-away test.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0084936.t003

These results demonstrate that dimeric quaternary alkyldeoxy-D-glucitolammonium iodides 1–12 and completely protonated compounds, tetramethylene-1,4-bis(N-deoxy-D-glucitolammonium chloride) (I-3) (Figure S2) and hexamethylene-1,6-bis(N-deoxy-D-glucitolammonium chloride) (I-4) (Figure S2), are relatively resistant to the biodegradation. This is due to positively charged nitrogen atoms and no sensitive groups in the structure of these compound to be easily hydrolized. In the case of neutral tetramethylene-1,4-bis(N-dodecyl-N-deoxy-D-glucitolamine) (I-13) (Figure S5) and compound with weak hydrogen bonds, hexamethylene-1,6-bis(N-dodecyl-N-deoxy-D-glucitolammonium acetate) (I-12) (Figure S4) the degree of biodegradation is much higher. It clearly indicates that the charge on nitrogen atom play a crucial role in the biodegradation process of studied alkylammonium salts. These results are in good accordance with work of Banno and proposed mechanism of biodegradation of gemini surfactants [36], [37]. It is important to note that there is no simple correlation between antimicrobial activity and biodegradation. The high antimicrobial activity of the biocide against specific strains do not always correspond to its low biodegradability. The biodegradation of cationic surfactants requires the concerted action of at least two microorganisms because a single organism usually lacks the full complement of enzymatic capabilities. The mechanisms for the enhanced biodegradation of mixed cultures are the provision of specific nutrients, removal of growth-inhibiting products, and the combined metabolic attack on the substrate. Consortia are required for the degradation of not only cationic surfactants [38].

Conclusions

A series of new gemini alkyldeoxy-D-glucitolammonium salts with tetramethylene and hexamethylene spacers and different hydrocarbon substituents have been synthesized and characterized by ¹H NMR, ¹³C NMR, FTIR, ESIMS and elemental analysis. Tetramethylene-1,4-bis(N-alkyl-N-deoxy-D-glucitolammonium acetates) and hexamethylene-1,6-bis(N-alkyl-N-deoxy-D-glucitolammonium acetates) as intermediates have also been described. The obtained cationic sugar based gemini surfactants exhibit a high antimicrobial activity against bacteria and fungi. The biocidal efficacy depends on structure of gemini surfactant. The most active are compounds with two hydrocarbon substituents; one of them should possess at least eight methylene groups while the second one can be shorter. Compounds without hydrocarbon substituents show no biocidal activity. Minimal inhibitory concentrations of sugar based gemini surfactants are much lower in comparison both to gemini surfactants with no deoxy-D-glucitol substituents as well as monomeric alkylammonium salts.

Investigated dimeric alkyldeoxy-D-glucitolammonium salts show an excellent surface activity. CMC values are much lower then corresponding gemini surfactants with no sugar substituent. This is due to the morphology of micelles in the solution. In order to form micelle, fewer of bigger cationic molecules are needed and critical micelle concentration is lower.

The biodegradability of gemini alkyldeoxy-D-glucitolammonium salts is poor in comparison to neutral substrates. This is caused by positively charged nitrogen atoms and lack of sensitive groups in the structure of these compound to be easily hydrolized.

Supporting Information

Figure S1.

Structure of polymethylene-1,n-bis(N-D-glucopyranosylamines). I-1 s = 4; I-2 s = 6.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0084936.s001

(TIF)

Figure S2.

Structure of polymethylene-1,n-bis(N-deoxy-D-glucitolammonium chlorides). I-3 s = 4; I-4 s = 6.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0084936.s002

(TIF)

Figure S3.

Structure of tetramethylene-1,4-bis(N-alkyl-N-deoxy-D-glucitolammonium acetates). I-5 R = C₆H₁₃; I-6 R = C₈H₁₇; I-7 R = C₁₀H₂₁; I-8 R = C₁₂H₂₅.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0084936.s003

(TIF)

Figure S4.

Structure of hexamethylene-1,6-bis(N-alkyl-N-deoxy-D-glucitolammonium acetates). I-9 R = C₆H₁₃; I-10 R = C₈H₁₇; I-11 R = C₁₀H₂₁; I-12 R = C₁₂H₂₅.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0084936.s004

(TIF)

Figure S5.

Structure of tetramethylene-1,4-bis(N-dodecyl-N-deoxy-D-glucitolamine) I-13.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0084936.s005

(TIF)

Figure S6.

Structure of tetramethylene-1,4-bis(N-alkyl-N-octyl-N-deoxy-D-glucitolammonium iodides). 1 R′ = C₂H₅; 2 R′ = C₃H₇; 3 R′ = C₁₂H₂₅.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0084936.s006

(TIF)

Figure S7.

Structure of tetramethylene-1,4-bis(N-alkyl-N-decyl-N-deoxy-D-glucitolammonium iodides). 4 R′ = C₂H₅; 5 R′ = C₃H₇; 6 R′ = C₁₂H₂₅.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0084936.s007

(TIF)

Figure S8.

Structure of tetramethylene-1,4-bis(N-alkyl-N-dodecyl-N-deoxy-D-glucitolammonium iodides). 7 R′ = C₂H₅; 8 R′ = C₃H₇; 9 R′ = C₁₂H₂₅.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0084936.s008

(TIF)

Figure S9.

Structure of hexamethylene-1,6-bis(N-dodecyl-N-alkyl-N-deoxy-D-glucitolammonium iodides). 10 R = C₈H₁₇; 11 R = C₁₀H₂₁; 12 R = C₁₂H₂₅.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0084936.s009

(TIF)

Materials and Methods S1.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0084936.s010

(DOC)

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: BB. Performed the experiments: AS. Analyzed the data: BB AS. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: BB AS. Wrote the paper: BB AS.

References

1. Mayers D (2006) An Overview of Surfactant Science and Technology. In: Surfactant Science and Technology 3^rd ed. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons. 1 p.
2. Schramm LL, Stasiuk EN, Marangoni DG (2003) Surfactants and their applications. Annu Rep Prog Chem Sect C 99: 3–48.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
3. Rosen MJ, Kunjappu JT (2012) Surfactants and Interfacial Phenomena 4^th ed., Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons. 459 p, 502p.
4. Zana R, Xia J (2004) Introduction. In: Gemini Surfactants Synthesis, Interfacial and Solution-Phase Behavior, and Applications. New York: Marcel Dekker. 1p.
5. Menger FM, Keiper JS (2000) Gemini Surfactants. Angew Chem Int Ed 39: 1906–1920.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
6. Menger FM, Littau CA (1991) Gemini Surfactants: Synthesis and Properties. J Am Chem Soc 113: 1451–1452.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
7. Hait SK, Moulik SP (2002) Gemini surfactants: A distinct class of self-assembling molecules. Curr Sci 82: 1101–1111.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
8. Holmberg K, Jönsson B, Kronberg B, Lindman B (2003) Novel Surfactants. In: Surfactants and Polymers in Aqueous Solution 2^nd ed., Chichester: John Wiley & Sons. 227 p.
9. Brycki B (2010) Gemini Alkylammonium Salts as Biodeterioration Inhibitors. Pol J Microbiol 59: 227–231.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
10. Pisárčik M, Devínsky F, Lacko I (2003) Critical micelle concentration, ionization degree and micellisation energy of cationic dimeric (gemini) surfactants in aqueous solution and in mixed micelles with anionic surfactant. Acta Facult Pharm Univ Comenianae 50: 119–131.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
11. Kuperkar K, Modi J, Patel K (2012) Surface-Active Properties and Antimicrobial Study of Conventional Cationic and Synthesized Symmetrical Gemini Surfactants. J Surfact Deterg 15: 107–115.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
12. Shukla D, Tyagi VK (2006) Cationic Gemini Surfactants: A Review. J Oleo Sci 55: 381–390.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
13. Para G, Hamerska-Dudra A, Wilk KA, Warszyński P (2010) Surface activity of cationic surfactants, influence of molecular structure. Colloid Surface A 365: 215–221.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
14. Brycki B, Kowalczyk I, Koziróg A (2011) Synthesis, Molecular Structure, Spectral Properties and Antifungal Activity of Polymethylene-α,ω-bis(N,N-dimethyl-N-dodecyloammonium bromides). Molecules 16: 319–335.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
15. Ng CKL, Obando D, Widmer F, Wright LC, Sorrell TC, et al. (2006) Correlation of Antifungal Activity with Fungal Phospholipase Inhibition Using a Series of Bisquaternary Ammonium Salts. J Med Chem 49: 811–816.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
16. Laatiris A, El Achouri M, Infante MR, Bensouda Y (2008) Antibacterial activity, structure and CMC relationships of alkanediyl α,ω -bis(dimethylammonium bromide) surfactants. Microbiol Res 163: 645–650.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
17. Diz M, Manresa A, Pinazo A, Erra P, Infante MR (1994) Synthesis, Surface Active Properties and Antimicrobial Activity of New Bis Quaternary Ammonium Compounds. J Chem Soc Perkin Trans 2: 1871–1876.
18. Lambert PA (2013) Mechanisms of Action of Microbicides. In: Fraise AP, Maillard J-Y, Sattar SA, editors. Russell, Hugo & Ayliffe's Principles and Practice of Disinfection, Preservation & Sterilization 5^th ed. Wiley-Blackwell. Chichester, UK, 139 p.
19. Walker EB (2003) Quaternary Ammonium Compounds. In: Paulson DS editor. Handbook of Topical Antimicrobials Industrial Applications in Consumer Products and Pharmaceuticals. New York: Marcel Dekker. 104 p.
20. Warwel S, Brüse F, Schier H (2004) Glucamine-Based Gemini Surfactants I: Gemini Surfactants from Long-Chain N-Alkyl Glucamines and α,ω-Diepoxides. J Surfact Deterg 7: 181–186.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
21. Warwel S, Brüse F (2004) Glucamine-Based Gemini Surfactants II: Gemini Surfactants from Long-Chain N-Alkyl Glucamines and Epoxy Resins. J Surfact Deterg 7: 187–193.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
22. Laska U, Wilk KA, Maliszewska I, Syper L (2006) Novel Glucose-Derived Gemini Surfactants with a 1,1′-Ethylenebisurea Spacer: Preparation, Thermotropic Behavior, and Biological Properties. J Surfact Deterg 9: 115–124.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
23. Bell PC, Bergsma M, Dolbnya IP, Bras W, Stuart MCA, et al. (2003) Transfection Mediated by Gemini Surfactants: Engineeres Escape from the Endosomal Compartment. J Am Chem Soc 125: 1551–1558.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
24. Wasungu L, Stuart MCA, Scarzello M, Engberts JBFN, Hoekstra D (2006) Lipoplexes formed from sugar-based gemini surfactants undergo a lamellar-to-micellar phase transition at acidic pH. Evidence for a non-inverted membrane-destabilizing hexagonal phase of lipoplexes. Biochim Biophys Acta 1758: 1677–1684.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
25. Wasungu L, Scarzello M, van Dam G, Molema G, Wagenaar A, et al. (2006) Transfection mediated by pH-sensitive sugar-based gemini surfactants; potential for in vivo gene therapy applications. J Mol Med 84: 774–784.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
26. Kirby AJ, Camilleri P, Engberts JBFN, Feiters MC, Nolte RJM, et al. (2003) Gemini Surfactants: New Synthetic Vectors for Gene Transfection. Angew Chem Int Ed 42: 1448–1457.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
27. Wagenaar A, Engberts JBFN (2007) Synthesis of nonionic reduded-sugar based bola amphiphiles and gemini surfactants with an α,ω-diamino-(oxa)alkyl spacer. Tetrahedron 63: 10622–10629.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
28. Fielden ML, Perrin C, Kremer A, Bergsma M, Stuart MC, et al. (2001) Sugar-based tertiary amino gemini surfactants with a vesicle-to-micelle transition in the endosomal pH range mediate efficient transfection in vitro. Eur J Biochem 268: 1269–1279.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
29. Pestman JM, Terpstra KR, Stuart MCA, van Doren HA, Brisson A, et al. (1997) Nonionic Bolaamphiphiles and Gemini Surfactants on Carbohydrates. Langmuir 13: 6857–6860.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
30. Johnsson M, Wagenaar A, Stuart MCA, Engberts JBFN (2003) Sugar-Based Gemini Surfactants with pH-Dependent Aggregation Behavior: Vesicle-to-Micelle Transition, Critical Micelle Concentration, and Vesicle Surface Charge Revesal. Langmuir 19: 4609–4618.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
31. Brycki B, Szulc A, Kowalczyk I, Borowiak T, Dutkiewicz G (2012) Polyamines –V: The structure of tetramethylene-1,4-bis(N-deoxyglucitolammonium chloride) studied by X-ray diffraction, DFT calculations, NMR and FTIR spectroscopy. J Mol Struct 1020: 41–47.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
32. Ready Biodegradability (1992) OECD Guideline for testing of chemicals.
33. Borch RF, Bernstein MD, Durst HD (1971) The Cyanohydridoborate Anion as a Selective Reducing Agent. J Am Chem Soc 93: 2897–2904.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
34. Takagi Y, Ebata S, Takei T (2004) Toxicology and Ecotoxicology of Detergent Chemicals. In: Zoller U editor. Handbook of Detergents, Part B: Environmental Impact. New York: Marcel Dekker. 129 p.
35. In M (2001) Gemini Surfactants and Surfactant Oligomers. In: Texter J editor. Reactions and Synthesis in Surfactant Systems. New York: Marcel Dekker. 59 p.
36. Banno T, Toshima K, Kawada K, Matsumura S (2009) Synthesis and Properties of Gemini-type Cationic Surfactants Containing Carbonate Linkages In the Linker Moiety Directed Toward Green and Sustainable Chemistry. J Surfact Deterg 12: 249–259.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
37. Banno T, Kawada K, Matsumura S (2010) Creation of Novel Green and Sustainable Gemini-Type Cationics Containing Carbonate Linkages. J Surfact Deterg 13: 387–398.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
38. Van Ginkel CG (2004) Biodegradation of cationic surfactants. An environmental perspective. In: Zoller U editor. Handbook of detergents. Part B: Environmental Impact. New York: Marcel Dekker, 533p.

[ref1] 1. Mayers D (2006) An Overview of Surfactant Science and Technology. In: Surfactant Science and Technology 3^rd ed. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons. 1 p.

[ref2] 2. Schramm LL, Stasiuk EN, Marangoni DG (2003) Surfactants and their applications. Annu Rep Prog Chem Sect C 99: 3–48.
View Article
Google Scholar

[3] View Article

[4] Google Scholar

[ref3] 3. Rosen MJ, Kunjappu JT (2012) Surfactants and Interfacial Phenomena 4^th ed., Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons. 459 p, 502p.

[ref4] 4. Zana R, Xia J (2004) Introduction. In: Gemini Surfactants Synthesis, Interfacial and Solution-Phase Behavior, and Applications. New York: Marcel Dekker. 1p.

[ref5] 5. Menger FM, Keiper JS (2000) Gemini Surfactants. Angew Chem Int Ed 39: 1906–1920.
View Article
Google Scholar

[8] View Article

[9] Google Scholar

[ref6] 6. Menger FM, Littau CA (1991) Gemini Surfactants: Synthesis and Properties. J Am Chem Soc 113: 1451–1452.
View Article
Google Scholar

[11] View Article

[12] Google Scholar

[ref7] 7. Hait SK, Moulik SP (2002) Gemini surfactants: A distinct class of self-assembling molecules. Curr Sci 82: 1101–1111.
View Article
Google Scholar

[14] View Article

[15] Google Scholar

[ref8] 8. Holmberg K, Jönsson B, Kronberg B, Lindman B (2003) Novel Surfactants. In: Surfactants and Polymers in Aqueous Solution 2^nd ed., Chichester: John Wiley & Sons. 227 p.

[ref9] 9. Brycki B (2010) Gemini Alkylammonium Salts as Biodeterioration Inhibitors. Pol J Microbiol 59: 227–231.
View Article
Google Scholar

[18] View Article

[19] Google Scholar

[ref10] 10. Pisárčik M, Devínsky F, Lacko I (2003) Critical micelle concentration, ionization degree and micellisation energy of cationic dimeric (gemini) surfactants in aqueous solution and in mixed micelles with anionic surfactant. Acta Facult Pharm Univ Comenianae 50: 119–131.
View Article
Google Scholar

[21] View Article

[22] Google Scholar

[ref11] 11. Kuperkar K, Modi J, Patel K (2012) Surface-Active Properties and Antimicrobial Study of Conventional Cationic and Synthesized Symmetrical Gemini Surfactants. J Surfact Deterg 15: 107–115.
View Article
Google Scholar

[24] View Article

[25] Google Scholar

[ref12] 12. Shukla D, Tyagi VK (2006) Cationic Gemini Surfactants: A Review. J Oleo Sci 55: 381–390.
View Article
Google Scholar

[27] View Article

[28] Google Scholar

[ref13] 13. Para G, Hamerska-Dudra A, Wilk KA, Warszyński P (2010) Surface activity of cationic surfactants, influence of molecular structure. Colloid Surface A 365: 215–221.
View Article
Google Scholar

[30] View Article

[31] Google Scholar

[ref14] 14. Brycki B, Kowalczyk I, Koziróg A (2011) Synthesis, Molecular Structure, Spectral Properties and Antifungal Activity of Polymethylene-α,ω-bis(N,N-dimethyl-N-dodecyloammonium bromides). Molecules 16: 319–335.
View Article
Google Scholar

[33] View Article

[34] Google Scholar

[ref15] 15. Ng CKL, Obando D, Widmer F, Wright LC, Sorrell TC, et al. (2006) Correlation of Antifungal Activity with Fungal Phospholipase Inhibition Using a Series of Bisquaternary Ammonium Salts. J Med Chem 49: 811–816.
View Article
Google Scholar

[36] View Article

[37] Google Scholar

[ref16] 16. Laatiris A, El Achouri M, Infante MR, Bensouda Y (2008) Antibacterial activity, structure and CMC relationships of alkanediyl α,ω -bis(dimethylammonium bromide) surfactants. Microbiol Res 163: 645–650.
View Article
Google Scholar

[39] View Article

[40] Google Scholar

[ref17] 17. Diz M, Manresa A, Pinazo A, Erra P, Infante MR (1994) Synthesis, Surface Active Properties and Antimicrobial Activity of New Bis Quaternary Ammonium Compounds. J Chem Soc Perkin Trans 2: 1871–1876.

[ref18] 18. Lambert PA (2013) Mechanisms of Action of Microbicides. In: Fraise AP, Maillard J-Y, Sattar SA, editors. Russell, Hugo & Ayliffe's Principles and Practice of Disinfection, Preservation & Sterilization 5^th ed. Wiley-Blackwell. Chichester, UK, 139 p.

[ref19] 19. Walker EB (2003) Quaternary Ammonium Compounds. In: Paulson DS editor. Handbook of Topical Antimicrobials Industrial Applications in Consumer Products and Pharmaceuticals. New York: Marcel Dekker. 104 p.

[ref20] 20. Warwel S, Brüse F, Schier H (2004) Glucamine-Based Gemini Surfactants I: Gemini Surfactants from Long-Chain N-Alkyl Glucamines and α,ω-Diepoxides. J Surfact Deterg 7: 181–186.
View Article
Google Scholar

[45] View Article

[46] Google Scholar

[ref21] 21. Warwel S, Brüse F (2004) Glucamine-Based Gemini Surfactants II: Gemini Surfactants from Long-Chain N-Alkyl Glucamines and Epoxy Resins. J Surfact Deterg 7: 187–193.
View Article
Google Scholar

[48] View Article

[49] Google Scholar

[ref22] 22. Laska U, Wilk KA, Maliszewska I, Syper L (2006) Novel Glucose-Derived Gemini Surfactants with a 1,1′-Ethylenebisurea Spacer: Preparation, Thermotropic Behavior, and Biological Properties. J Surfact Deterg 9: 115–124.
View Article
Google Scholar

[51] View Article

[52] Google Scholar

[ref23] 23. Bell PC, Bergsma M, Dolbnya IP, Bras W, Stuart MCA, et al. (2003) Transfection Mediated by Gemini Surfactants: Engineeres Escape from the Endosomal Compartment. J Am Chem Soc 125: 1551–1558.
View Article
Google Scholar

[54] View Article

[55] Google Scholar

[ref24] 24. Wasungu L, Stuart MCA, Scarzello M, Engberts JBFN, Hoekstra D (2006) Lipoplexes formed from sugar-based gemini surfactants undergo a lamellar-to-micellar phase transition at acidic pH. Evidence for a non-inverted membrane-destabilizing hexagonal phase of lipoplexes. Biochim Biophys Acta 1758: 1677–1684.
View Article
Google Scholar

[57] View Article

[58] Google Scholar

[ref25] 25. Wasungu L, Scarzello M, van Dam G, Molema G, Wagenaar A, et al. (2006) Transfection mediated by pH-sensitive sugar-based gemini surfactants; potential for in vivo gene therapy applications. J Mol Med 84: 774–784.
View Article
Google Scholar

[60] View Article

[61] Google Scholar

[ref26] 26. Kirby AJ, Camilleri P, Engberts JBFN, Feiters MC, Nolte RJM, et al. (2003) Gemini Surfactants: New Synthetic Vectors for Gene Transfection. Angew Chem Int Ed 42: 1448–1457.
View Article
Google Scholar

[63] View Article

[64] Google Scholar

[ref27] 27. Wagenaar A, Engberts JBFN (2007) Synthesis of nonionic reduded-sugar based bola amphiphiles and gemini surfactants with an α,ω-diamino-(oxa)alkyl spacer. Tetrahedron 63: 10622–10629.
View Article
Google Scholar

[66] View Article

[67] Google Scholar

[ref28] 28. Fielden ML, Perrin C, Kremer A, Bergsma M, Stuart MC, et al. (2001) Sugar-based tertiary amino gemini surfactants with a vesicle-to-micelle transition in the endosomal pH range mediate efficient transfection in vitro. Eur J Biochem 268: 1269–1279.
View Article
Google Scholar

[69] View Article

[70] Google Scholar

[ref29] 29. Pestman JM, Terpstra KR, Stuart MCA, van Doren HA, Brisson A, et al. (1997) Nonionic Bolaamphiphiles and Gemini Surfactants on Carbohydrates. Langmuir 13: 6857–6860.
View Article
Google Scholar

[72] View Article

[73] Google Scholar

[ref30] 30. Johnsson M, Wagenaar A, Stuart MCA, Engberts JBFN (2003) Sugar-Based Gemini Surfactants with pH-Dependent Aggregation Behavior: Vesicle-to-Micelle Transition, Critical Micelle Concentration, and Vesicle Surface Charge Revesal. Langmuir 19: 4609–4618.
View Article
Google Scholar

[75] View Article

[76] Google Scholar

[ref31] 31. Brycki B, Szulc A, Kowalczyk I, Borowiak T, Dutkiewicz G (2012) Polyamines –V: The structure of tetramethylene-1,4-bis(N-deoxyglucitolammonium chloride) studied by X-ray diffraction, DFT calculations, NMR and FTIR spectroscopy. J Mol Struct 1020: 41–47.
View Article
Google Scholar

[78] View Article

[79] Google Scholar

[ref32] 32. Ready Biodegradability (1992) OECD Guideline for testing of chemicals.

[ref33] 33. Borch RF, Bernstein MD, Durst HD (1971) The Cyanohydridoborate Anion as a Selective Reducing Agent. J Am Chem Soc 93: 2897–2904.
View Article
Google Scholar

[82] View Article

[83] Google Scholar

[ref34] 34. Takagi Y, Ebata S, Takei T (2004) Toxicology and Ecotoxicology of Detergent Chemicals. In: Zoller U editor. Handbook of Detergents, Part B: Environmental Impact. New York: Marcel Dekker. 129 p.

[ref35] 35. In M (2001) Gemini Surfactants and Surfactant Oligomers. In: Texter J editor. Reactions and Synthesis in Surfactant Systems. New York: Marcel Dekker. 59 p.

[ref36] 36. Banno T, Toshima K, Kawada K, Matsumura S (2009) Synthesis and Properties of Gemini-type Cationic Surfactants Containing Carbonate Linkages In the Linker Moiety Directed Toward Green and Sustainable Chemistry. J Surfact Deterg 12: 249–259.
View Article
Google Scholar

[87] View Article

[88] Google Scholar

[ref37] 37. Banno T, Kawada K, Matsumura S (2010) Creation of Novel Green and Sustainable Gemini-Type Cationics Containing Carbonate Linkages. J Surfact Deterg 13: 387–398.
View Article
Google Scholar

[90] View Article

[91] Google Scholar

[ref38] 38. Van Ginkel CG (2004) Biodegradation of cationic surfactants. An environmental perspective. In: Zoller U editor. Handbook of detergents. Part B: Environmental Impact. New York: Marcel Dekker, 533p.

Figures

Abstract

Introduction

Materials and Methods

Materials

Measurements

Synthesis

Results and Discussion

Antimicrobial properties

Surface properties

Biodegradability

Conclusions

Supporting Information

Author Contributions

References