Advertisement
Research Article

Surveillance for Hospitalized Acute Respiratory Infection in Guatemala

  • Jennifer R. Verani mail,

    qzr7@cdc.gov

    Affiliation: Respiratory Diseases Branch, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America

    X
  • John McCracken,

    Affiliation: Centro de Estudios en Salud, Universidad del Valle, Guatemala City, Guatemala

    X
  • Wences Arvelo,

    Affiliations: International Emerging Infections Program, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Regional Office for Central America and Panama, Guatemala City, Guatemala, Division of Global Disease Detection and Emergency Response, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America

    X
  • Alejandra Estevez,

    Affiliation: Centro de Estudios en Salud, Universidad del Valle, Guatemala City, Guatemala

    X
  • Maria Renee Lopez,

    Affiliation: Centro de Estudios en Salud, Universidad del Valle, Guatemala City, Guatemala

    X
  • Lissette Reyes,

    Affiliations: Field Epidemiology Training Program, Ministerio de Salud Pública y Asistencia Social, Guatemala City, Guatemala, Área de Salud de Santa Rosa, Ministerio de Salud Pública y Asistencia Social, Cuilapa, Guatemala

    X
  • Juan Carlos Moir,

    Affiliation: Área de Salud de Quetzaltenango, Ministerio de Salud Pública y Asistencia Social, Quetzaltenango, Guatemala

    X
  • Chris Bernart,

    Affiliation: Centro de Estudios en Salud, Universidad del Valle, Guatemala City, Guatemala

    X
  • Fabiola Moscoso,

    Affiliation: Centro de Estudios en Salud, Universidad del Valle, Guatemala City, Guatemala

    X
  • Jennifer Gray,

    Affiliation: Centro de Estudios en Salud, Universidad del Valle, Guatemala City, Guatemala

    X
  • Sonja J. Olsen,

    Affiliation: Influenza Division, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America

    X
  • Kim A. Lindblade

    Affiliations: International Emerging Infections Program, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Regional Office for Central America and Panama, Guatemala City, Guatemala, Division of Global Disease Detection and Emergency Response, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America

    X
  • Published: December 31, 2013
  • DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0083600

Abstract

Acute respiratory infections (ARI) are an important cause of illness and death worldwide, yet data on the etiology of ARI and the population-level burden in developing countries are limited. Surveillance for ARI was conducted at two hospitals in Guatemala. Patients admitted with at least one sign of acute infection and one sign or symptom of respiratory illness met the criteria for a case of hospitalized ARI. Nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swabs were collected and tested by polymerase chain reaction for adenovirus, parainfluenza virus types 1,2 and 3, respiratory syncytial virus, influenza A and B viruses, human metapneumovirus, Chlamydia pneumioniae, and Mycoplasma pneumoniae. Urine specimens were tested for Streptococcus pneumoniae antigen. Blood culture and chest radiograph were done at the discretion of the treating physician. Between November 2007 and December 2011, 3,964 case-patients were enrolled. While cases occurred among all age groups, 2,396 (60.4%) cases occurred in children <5 years old and 463 (11.7%) among adults ≥65 years old. Viruses were found in 52.6% of all case-patients and 71.8% of those aged <1 year old; the most frequently detected was respiratory syncytial virus, affecting 26.4% of case-patients. Urine antigen testing for Streptococcus pneumoniae performed for case-patients ≥15 years old was positive in 15.1% of those tested. Among 2,364 (59.6%) of case-patients with a radiograph, 907 (40.0%) had findings suggestive of bacterial pneumonia. Overall, 230 (5.9%) case-patients died during the hospitalization. Using population denominators, the observed hospitalized ARI incidence was 128 cases per 100,000, with the highest rates seen among children <1 year old (1,703 per 100,000), followed by adults ≥65 years old (292 per 100,000). These data, which demonstrate a substantial burden of hospitalized ARI in Guatemala due to a variety of pathogens, can help guide public health policies aimed at reducing the burden of illness and death due to respiratory infections.

Introduction

Acute respiratory infections (ARI) are a leading killer of children worldwide and also cause substantial morbidity and mortality among adults [1], [2]. ARI disproportionately affects the world's poorest populations [1], [3]. However, ascertaining the true burden of ARI in developing countries is challenging. Clinical case definitions are variable and non-specific, and laboratory and radiology diagnostics that can improve the accuracy of ARI surveillance are not always available. Active, population-based surveillance for ARI cases in the community is extremely resource-intensive and difficult to carry out for large populations. On the other hand, health facility-based surveillance is affected by healthcare seeking patterns for ARI, which may vary by population group and over time [4].

The etiology of ARI in developing countries is also not well characterized. Diagnostic testing for the broad range of pathogens that can cause ARI is costly and not widely available in resource-poor settings. Even with optimal diagnostic testing, the etiology of ARI can be difficult to determine due to limitations in available diagnostic methods. Furthermore, the causes of ARI are dynamic, with some pathogens emerging or newly recognized (such as influenza A (H1N1)pmd09 virus or human metapneumovirus), and others potentially declining. Vaccines against respiratory pathogens, such as Haemophilus influenzae type B or influenza viruses, may impact the incidence of hospitalized ARI as well as the relative contributions of other pathogens to the burden of ARI. Changes in the prevalence of risk factors for ARI, such as crowded living conditions or malnutrition, may also alter the burden of hospitalized ARI over time.

The International Emerging Infections Program of the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), in collaboration with the Guatemala Ministry of Public Health and Welfare and the Universidad del Valle de Guatemala (UVG) conducts surveillance for hospitalized ARI in two sites in Guatemala. The surveillance is aimed at measuring the burden of hospitalized ARI in the catchment area and characterizing ARI etiology. We present the findings of surveillance for hospitalized ARI from November 2007 through December 2011.

Methods

Ethics Statement

The surveillance protocol received approval from the institutional review boards of UVG (Guatemala City, Guatemala) and CDC (Atlanta, GA, USA), and approval from the Guatemala Ministry of Public Health and Welfare. Verbal consent was requested of patients in order to screen them for eligibility. Written, informed consent was obtained from eligible patients willing to participate. For patients <18 years of age, parents or guardians were asked to provide written, informed consent for the participation of the patient, and children aged seven through 17 years were asked for written, informed assent.

Setting

The surveillance system for hospitalized ARI is part of an on-going, integrated, health facility-based surveillance for respiratory, diarrheal, neurologic and febrile illness carried out in two departments – Santa Rosa (total population 319, 963), located 50 km south-east of the capital, Guatemala City, and Quetzaltenango (total population 705, 301), located 120 km north-west of the capital. Surveillance is conducted at the primary public hospital in each of the departments and both facilities serve as the regional reference hospitals. In Santa Rosa, surveillance of hospitalized ARI began in November 2007, and is conducted at the National Hospital of Cuilapa, which is the only public hospital in the department; it is a government hospital with 176-bed capacity, including four pediatric intensive care unit (ICU) beds and eight adult ICU beds. In Quetzaltenango, surveillance began in February 2009, and is conducted at the Western Regional Hospital, one of two general hospitals in the department; it is a large government hospital with 425 beds, including 22 pediatric and six adult ICU beds.

Within each department, a surveillance catchment area was defined based on the municipalities of residence of people visiting the emergency department. Healthcare utilization surveys were carried out at each site to characterize patterns of accessing healthcare for the illnesses under surveillance. In Santa Rosa, the survey was carried out in 2006 and found that among people who were hospitalized for severe respiratory illness (defined as cough and difficulty breathing for ≥2 days and/or report of a diagnosis of pneumonia by a healthcare provider during the last 12 months), 33% of those aged <5 years and 75% of those aged ≥5 years were admitted to the National Hospital of Cuilapa. In Quetzaltenango, the survey was carried out in 2009 and found that 75% of those aged <5 years and 50% of those aged ≥5 years hospitalized with severe respiratory illness were admitted to the Western Regional Hospital [5], [6].

The Haemophilus influenzae type B vaccine was introduced into the Guatemalan routine infant immunization program in 2005 [7]. The pneumococcal conjugate vaccine is available on the private market but was not introduced into the routine infant immunization program during the study period. Since 2007, seasonal influenza virus vaccine has been recommended for persons aged 60 and older and health care workers [8], although coverage is low [9].

Case definition and identification

A case of ARI was defined as a person admitted to one of the surveillance hospitals with at least one sign of acute infection and one sign or symptom of respiratory illness (Table 1). In the hospitals at each site, study nurses reviewed ward registers for patients admitted for respiratory-related diagnoses as well as emergency department logs for patients presenting with respiratory complaints. After obtaining verbal consent, patients admitted with a respiratory-related admission diagnosis or chief complaint were screened for eligibility as ARI cases (Table 1). In addition, patients that were consented and enrolled in the surveillance for acute diarrheal, neurological illness, or fever of unknown etiology were also screened for eligibility as ARI cases.

thumbnail

Table 1. Case definition for hospitalized acute respiratory infection*.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0083600.t001

Data and sample collection

Surveys were administered to participants and/or parents/guardians to gather demographic and epidemiologic data and information related to their illness. Additional clinical data, including presenting signs and symptoms, history of chronic illness, vital signs, hematology testing results, clinical course and admission/discharge diagnoses were gathered through medical record abstraction. A study physician performed a respiratory physical examination on all patients who met the case definition. When feasible, study nurses measured peripheral oxygen saturation using a pulse oximeter with the patient off oxygen. Study nurses also took nasopharyngeal (NP) and oropharyngeal (OP) swabs. Urine samples were gathered for enrolled patients ≥15 years of age. Blood cultures were performed per routine clinical care using automated blood culture systems (generally one blood culture bottle for children and two aerobic +/− two anaerobic bottles for adults); results of growth from any bottle were followed and recorded by study nurses. Follow-up contact of enrolled patients was attempted within three to six weeks after discharge to assess post-discharge sequelae or death.

Standardized interpretation of radiographs

Chest radiographs (CXRs) were performed when indicated as part of routine clinical care; surveillance staff obtained a digital image of CXRs done on enrolled patients using a digital camera [10][12]. The digital images were reviewed by a panel of radiologists who had undergone training on the World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines for standardized interpretation of CXRs for the diagnosis of pneumonia in children [12]. A modified version of the guidelines was used to interpret adult CXRs, which included recording the same radiologic endpoints as are used for pediatric CXRs. All digital images were reviewed independently by two radiologists and were classified as having end-point consolidation, other consolidation/infiltrate, no consolidation/infiltrate/effusion or uninterpretable. In cases of discordant interpretations between the first two readers, a third trained radiologist served as arbiter. End-point consolidation was considered suggestive of a bacterial etiology [12].

Laboratory testing of NP/OP swabs and urine

NP and OP swabs from each patient were placed in one tube in viral transport media that was stored at 4°C and sent to the International Emerging Infections Program laboratory at UVG where they were tested using real-time reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction per standard CDC protocols for adenovirus, parainfluenza virus types 1,2 and 3, respiratory syncytial virus (RSV), influenza A and B viruses, human metapneumovirus, Chlamydia pneumioniae, and Mycoplasma pneumoniae [9], [13], [14]. Samples were processed within 72 hours of being collected. Urine specimens were tested for Streptococcus pneumoniae and Legionella pneumophila (serogroup 1) antigen using Binax NOW (Binax Inc., Scarborough, ME, USA) tests.

Data management and analysis

Data collected through questionnaires and medical chart reviews were entered into hand-held personal digital devices with pre-programmed range and logic checks and skip patterns. Unique identifiers were assigned and used to link laboratory, clinical, and epidemiologic data. Data were managed and stored using Microsoft SQL Server 2008 (Redmond, VA, USA) and were imported into SAS Enterprise Guide (Cary, NC, USA) for analysis. OpenEpi version 3.01 [15] was used to calculate 95% confidence intervals (CI) for observed incidence rates.

Incidence calculations

Cases in patients from the defined catchment areas within each of the departments were used to calculate the incidence of hospitalized ARI. Denominators were the age-specific total populations of the municipalities in the surveillance catchment area obtained from the 2002 national census adjusted for population growth [16]. In addition, we calculated an adjusted incidence of hospitalized ARI, taking into account the findings of the healthcare utilization surveys in each catchment area described above [5], [6]. Observed incidence rates were divided by the following proportions to account for hospitalized ARI cases estimated to have been missed by the surveillance system: Santa Rosa <5 years of age: 0.33; Santa Rosa ≥5 years of age: 0.75; Quetzaltenango <5 years of age: 0.75; Quetzaltenango ≥5 years of age: 0.50. CIs were not calculated for adjusted rates because multiple levels of uncertainty around the estimates limited our ability to precisely quantify the interval. The adjustments were used to estimate hospitalized ARI only, and did not take into account the proportions of people with severe respiratory illness that were not hospitalized or that did not seek care. Data from 2007 were not included in incidence calculations since limited data were available for that year, and the calculations for Quetzaltenango were adjusted for an 11-month period of surveillance in 2009. Case-patients residing outside the catchment area were enrolled but not included in incidence calculations.

Results

Hospitalized ARI case-patient characteristics

From November 1, 2007, through December 31, 2011, a total of 8,914 hospitalized patients were screened for possible inclusion at the two hospitals. Among all screened patients, 4,837 (54.3%) presented with a chief complaint of some type of respiratory illness; of those 3,947 (81.6%) met the case definition for hospitalized ARI. An additional 329 hospitalized ARI cases were identified among patients presenting with a non-respiratory complaint, yielding a total of 4,276 patients who met the case definition, of which 3,964 (92.7%) were enrolled. Of those, 2,711 (68.4%) resided in the defined catchment areas in which healthcare utilization surveys had been conducted.

The median age among all enrolled patients was 1.7 years, while the mean age was 18.6 years; the range was 1 day to 100 years. Additional demographic and clinical data are presented in Table 2. There was a slight predominance of males (54.1%) and a majority of patients (63.2%) resided in households where the average monthly income was less than 1,000 Quetzals, (USD ~$130). Cough, reported in 92.8% of cases, was the most common symptom, followed by difficulty breathing (84.4%). Reported fever (72.4%) was more common than measured fever (43.4%). Of note, antipyretic use was common –61.5% of patients reported taking some medication within the 72 hours preceding admission, and 69.5% of those reported using antipyretics. Antimicrobial use was reported among or 37.4% of all case-patients. The most common physical finding was an abnormal lung exam, including rales, rhonchi or crackles on auscultation (90.3%); wheezing was less common (56.5%).

thumbnail

Table 2. Characteristics of patients hospitalized with acute respiratory infection, N = 3,964.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0083600.t002

Most patients (57.4%) had sought some care prior to hospitalization; the most common sites reported for initially seeking care were health centers (n = 553, 33.2%) and private clinics (n = 541, 32.5%). The duration of hospitalization ranged from 1 to 295 days, with a median of 5.5 days, and interquartile range of 3.3 to 8.8 days. Illness was severe enough to warrant an admission to the ICU for 21.6% of patients and 9.3% required mechanical ventilation. By age group, the proportion admitted to the ICU were: <1 year: 28.0%; 1–4 years: 24.6%; 5–14 years: 20.1%; 15–49 years: 13.4%; 50–64 years: 10.4%; ≥65 years: 11.1%. The overall in-hospital case fatality proportion was 5.9%; among 2,136 (58.6%) patients with post-discharge follow up information, an additional 58 (2.7%) of patients died within seven days of discharge. By age group, the in-hospital case fatality proportions were: <1 year: 4.8%; 1–4 years: 2.8%; 5–14 years: 2.7%; 15–49 years: 10.4%; 50–64 years: 8.7%; ≥65 years 10.4%.

Diagnostic testing: viruses

Just over half (50.4%) of case-patients had at least one virus detected, and 365 (9.4%) tested positive for two or more viruses (Table 3). The most commonly detected virus was RSV, affecting 26.4% of all case-patients. The relative frequency of viral pathogens detected in different age groups is presented in Figure 1. Viral infection was more common among case-patients <5 years old compared with those ≥5 years old (69.0% versus 30.3%, p<0.005), yet viruses were detected in all age groups. Infections with RSV and parainfluenza virus type 2 were also most common among children <5 years old, while influenza A virus was slightly more prevalent among older age groups. Multiviral infections were most commonly found among younger age groups. Among 365 case-patients with more than one virus, the most common combination was RSV and adenovirus (n = 84, 23.0%), followed by RSV and parainfluenza virus type 3 (n = 37, 10.1%). RSV was detected in 221 (60.6%) case-patients with more than one virus.

thumbnail

Figure 1. Viral pathogens by age group.

Proportion of case-patients with viruses detected on nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab, by age group.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0083600.g001
thumbnail

Table 3. Diagnostic tests performed, results, and probable etiologies among hospitalized patients with acute respiratory infections, N = 3,964.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0083600.t003

Diagnostic testing: bacteria

Results of bacterial testing of NP/OP swabs, urine and blood culture are presented in Table 3. C. pneumoniae and M. pneumoniae were rarely detected. Urine antigen testing among those ≥15 years old was positive for S. pneumoniae in 15.1% of cases and positive for L. pneumophila in only one case. The proportion of adult case-patients with S. pneumoniae detected by urine antigen was similar across age groups (Figure 2). Blood cultures were performed for 36.4% of patients and were frequently contaminated, with 24.9% of blood cultures with available results growing only coagulase-negative staphylococci. The most common pathogens isolated among the patients with blood cultures results were Staphylococcus aureus (n = 32, 2.4%) and S. pneumoniae (n = 12, 0.9%). Among the 12 with S. pneumoniae isolated from blood, four were also positive by urine antigen testing, one had a negative urine antigen result, and seven did not have urine antigen testing performed (including two case-patients aged <15 years and five case-patients who were ≥15 years but not tested).

thumbnail

Figure 2. Streptococcus pneumoniae and endpoint consolidation by age group.

Percent of case-patients with endpoint consolidation on chest radiograph and Streptococcus pneumoniae detected by urine antigen, by age group.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0083600.g002

Digital images of CXRs were available for interpretation for 2,364 (59.6%) patients, and 2,265 (95.8%) of those images were considered to be of adequate quality for standardized interpretation. Among interpretable images, 907 (40.0%) were found to show end-point consolidation suggestive of bacterial etiology. As shown in Figure 2, end-point consolidation on CXR was more common among adult age groups. End-point consolidation was found in 32.5% of case-patients <5 years old versus 50.9% of those ≥5 years old (p<0.005).

Mixed bacterial and viral infections

Among 168 case-patients with S. pneumoniae infection (detected by either blood culture or urine antigen testing) and viral testing performed, 48 (28.6%) also had at least one virus detected on NP/OP swab; the most frequently detected virus in this group was influenza A virus (n = 15). Viruses were detected in 22 (68.8%) of the 32 case-patients with S. aureus isolated by blood culture; RSV (n = 12) was the virus most commonly found. Among 893 case-patients with end-point pneumonia on CXR and viral testing performed on NP/OP swabs, 437 (48.9%) tested positive for at least one virus, with RSV detected in 176 (19.7%).

Seasonality and burden of hospitalized ARI

The seasonality of hospitalized ARI, viral pathogens, end-point consolidation and S. pneumoniae detected by urine antigen (in adult case-patients) is presented in Figure 3, which has varying axes (and therefore does not reflect relative burden of the pathogens). Peaks in the overall number of hospitalized ARI cases were generally observed in the second and third quarters. RSV cases demonstrated a consistent seasonality (peaks in July-November) that closely mirrored the peaks in overall hospitalized ARI cases. Increases in adenovirus cases were also noted during the annual peaks in overall cases, although the pattern was not as clearly defined as that of RSV. Monthly cases of human metapneumovirus were highest in mid-2010, and cases of influenza A virus peaked in mid-2009. Parainfluenza virus type 3, while affecting a relatively small number of cases, had a clear seasonal pattern with peaks in March to July. No seasonality was noted in the monthly cases of pneumococcal infections detected by urine antigen. The number of cases with end-point consolidation on CXR generally increased as the number of overall hospitalized ARI cases increased, however the monthly patterns varied from year to year.

thumbnail

Figure 3. Seasonality of respiratory pathogens and chest radiograph findings.

Cases of hospitalized acute respiratory infection (left axis) and number of case-patients with positive results for viral pathogens, Streptococcus pneumoniae urine antigen or with endpoint consolidation on chest radiograph (right axis, with varied scales), by month.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0083600.g003

Between 2008 and 2011 the overall incidence of hospitalized ARI in the defined catchment area ranged from 106 to 156 cases per 100,000 people (Table 4). The year with the highest observed incidence (156) was 2009, and there were no clear trends over time. The incidence rate among children <1 year old was 1,703 cases per 100,000– more than five times greater than that of any other age group. Among adults ≥65 years old the incidence was 292 per 100,000. The lowest incidence rate was observed among people between the ages of 5 and 49 years old (34 to 35 cases per 100,000). Although the observed incidence in Santa Rosa was notably higher than that of Quetzaltenango in 2009 (193 [95% CI 177, 211] versus 128 [95% CI 116, 141] per 100,000), the rates across the sites were more similar in 2010 and 2011. Adjusting for reported healthcare-seeking behaviors in the catchment area, the overall estimated rate for hospitalized acute respiratory infection was 263 cases per 100,000 during the study period.

thumbnail

Table 4. Observed incidence of hospitalized acute respiratory infections (ARI) in catchment areas by age group, site and incidence adjusted for healthcare utilization patterns, 2008–2011.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0083600.t004

Discussion

These surveillance data demonstrate the importance of hospitalized ARI as a public health problem in Guatemala, and also highlight the dynamic and complex nature of ARI. We found that, at a minimum, 128 of every 100,000 persons and nearly 2 of every 100 children <1 year old are hospitalized for acute respiratory infection each year in the surveillance catchment areas. Nearly 6% of patients hospitalized with ARI died during that admission; and while post-discharge follow-up was limited, an additional 2.7% of those case-patients with available follow-up data had died within 7 days of discharge. The case-fatality proportion was higher among adults than among children; however, given the high incidence of hospitalized ARI among young children, a proportion of 3-5% of cases dying represents a large burden of death due to ARI. Taking into account the reported healthcare utilization patterns, the true burden of hospitalized ARI may be more than twice the incidence observed in this study, as suggested by the estimated adjusted incidence. While all age groups were affected, the greatest burden of hospitalized ARI was observed among young children – a pattern consistent with other published literature [17]. The relatively high burden among older adults (>65 years) is also similar to previously described age patterns of ARI and pneumonia [18][20].

The relative contribution of the respiratory pathogens that were studied varied by age group, season and study year. Among viral pathogens, RSV was the most commonly detected, affecting more than a quarter of all case-patients and more than a third of those <1 year old. The predominance of RSV among children with severe respiratory infections and the clear seasonal pattern observed are consistent with studies from a wide variety of settings [21], [22], including data reported from this same surveillance system in Guatemala that focused on RSV in young children and infants [23]. The burden of RSV among adults is less understood, particularly in developing countries. In high-income settings RSV has been recognized as a cause of respiratory disease among certain high risk adult groups [24], and a recent study in Kenya reported a significant association between RSV and hospitalized ARI among older children and adults [25]. We detected RSV among case-patients of all ages, although the relative proportion affected was much higher among young children. Adenovirus, human metapneumovirus, influenza A virus, and parainfluenza virus type 3 were found in 7–11% of case-patients. Other studies in low and middle income countries have also reported these viruses to be relatively common among persons hospitalized with ARI [25][32]. The results of virologic testing on NP/OP swabs must be interpreted with caution, however, since some viruses may be present in the nasopharynges of healthy people [25], [26], [33][36]. While all of the viruses tested for in the surveillance system are known to cause respiratory disease and pneumonia, the strength of association between detection on NP/OP swabs and illness may vary considerably. Detection of adenovirus, in particular, has not been found to be reliably associated with respiratory illness [37], [38]. Further exploration of viruses present in healthy people from the study area is needed to fully understand the role of viral respiratory pathogens in this context.

The frequency of detection of certain viruses such as human metapneumovirus and influenza A virus in this study varied substantially from year to year. In 2009, the study year with the largest number of hospitalized ARI cases, Guatemala was affected by the emergence of influenza A virus strain (H1N1)pdm09 [39]. Yet even at the peak of the outbreak, the monthly number of RSV infections among case-patients was higher than that of influenza A virus, highlighting the importance of diagnostic testing in the context of outbreaks in order to guide prevention efforts.

Among the bacterial pathogens measured, S. pneumoniae was the most frequently detected –15% of adults were found to have evidence of pneumococcal infection by urine antigen assay. This important diagnostic tool for S. pneumoniae, however, cannot be used in young children (who suffer the greatest burden of pneumococcal disease) because nasopharyngeal colonization is very common and may lead to false positive urine antigen results [40]. In adults, urine antigen assays for S. pneumoniae are considered highly specific, yet the sensitivity has been estimated to be only 50–75% [41]. Therefore the true burden of S. pneumoniae is likely much higher than what was observed in this study. NP/OP swabs can be used to aid in the diagnosis of certain bacterial respiratory pathogens that do not tend to colonize the nasopharynx such as M. pneumoniae and C. pneumoniae; however, the contribution of those bacteria to the hospitalized ARI cases in Guatemala was minimal. Blood culture is highly specific for bacterial etiologies, yet the sensitivity is poor even in optimal conditions [12], [42]; high rates of contamination and frequent prior antibiotic use in this context likely further reduced the utility of blood culture to determine the etiology of hospitalized ARI. S. aureus was the most common bacterial pathogen detected by blood culture; however, given the rates of contamination observed it is possible that some of those cases may represent contamination rather than infection. Standardized CXR interpretation according to WHO guidelines is an important epidemiologic tool for estimating the burden of probable bacterial respiratory infections among children [10], [12], although experience with expanding these techniques to adult radiographs is limited [18]. End-point consolidation, which was found in 40% of case-patients, is suggestive of a bacterial etiology but cannot distinguish between bacterial pathogens. However, other studies in Guatemala and other Latin American countries have found S. pneumoniae to be the leading bacterial cause of pneumonia in children [43], [44] and adults [2], [45].

Evidence of infection with more than one pathogen was common, with nearly one in ten case-patients testing positive for multiple viruses and 29% or more of those with a bacterial infection also testing positive for at least one virus. Viral-bacterial co-infections have been described in up to 45% of cases of pediatric community-acquired pneumonia, with S. pneumoniae and a respiratory virus being the most typical combination [46]. Although data are limited on the clinical significance of multiple concurrent viruses and bacterial-viral co-infections, there is some evidence that such infections may be more severe and associated with poorer outcomes compared with single pathogen infections [46][48].

The findings of this study are subject to several limitations. First, the case definition for hospitalized ARI is based on signs/symptoms of respiratory disease and signs of acute infection; this differs from other case definitions in the field of respiratory infections (such as severe acute respiratory illness or pneumonia as defined in the Integrated Management of Childhood Illness guidelines [49]) and therefore the results are not directly comparable to studies using those definitions. The surveillance is hospital-based, so the findings cannot be extrapolated to persons with ARI that seek care elsewhere or do not seek medical care. Adjusted estimates of incidence were based on baseline healthcare utilization surveys conducted in the catchment area of each site and attempted to account for patients that may have been admitted with ARI to hospitals other than the surveillance sites; however, they do not account for people who were not hospitalized or did not seek care for their respiratory illness. It is also possible that healthcare utilization may have changed over time, which would affect the observed and adjusted incidences. As noted above, the determination of the etiology of ARI is limited by available diagnostic tools, including potentially poor positive predictive value of viral testing of NP/OP swabts and the relative insensitivity of blood culture and urine antigen testing for bacterial pathogens.

Acknowledgments

Despite the limitations, our findings provide insight into the burden and etiology of hospitalized ARI in Guatemala, including differences across age groups and over time. The ability to calculate the incidence of hospitalized ARI for all age groups is a particular strength of this surveillance system, since many studies of ARI burden focus on either children or adults, and thus cannot produce directly comparable data for all ages. Testing for both viral and bacterial pathogens provided a more thorough picture than studies that focus on one type of pathogen. The pathogens detected have served to highlight the important burden of certain infections (such as RSV and S. pneumoniae) and relatively limited contribution of others (such as atypical bacteria, influenza B virus, and parainfluenza virus types 1 and 2). Information on burden and etiology of pneumonia are essential for shaping public health policy and can guide decisions about the use of pneumonia prevention interventions such as vaccines, promotion of breastfeeding, zinc supplementation, or improved cookstoves [50]. One of the most powerful prevention tools against pneumonia – the pneumococcal conjugate vaccine – was recently introduced into the routine infant immunization program in Guatemala, and these data provide a valuable baseline against which the impact of the vaccine can be measured. Vaccines against RSV are under development, and our findings highlight the urgent need for effective RSV prevention interventions [22]. Continued surveillance for hospitalized ARI that incorporates clinical, epidemiologic and laboratory data across all age groups will help to measure the impact of such prevention interventions and guide future efforts to reduce the global burden of respiratory infections.

We would like to thank the Guatemala National Epidemiology Center, the Health Areas of Santa Rosa and Quetzaltenango, and the two surveillance hospitals for their cooperation. We are grateful to Gerard Lopez, Fredy Muñoz and their team of programmers for the development of the Questionnaire Mobile program for data entry. The authors would like to thank the following individuals for administrative and scientific support: Alicia Fry, Chris Van Beneden, Barry Fields, Jonas Winchell, Dean Erdman, Aleida Roldan, Laura Grajeda, Eduviges Molina, Lucrecia Piloña, Cesar Racancoj, Stacy Kopka, and our surveillance nurses and field staff. We are very thankful for the active participation of the residents of Santa Rosa and Quetzaltenango.

Disclaimer: The findings and conclusions in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: JRV JM WA LR JCM CB JG SJO KAL. Performed the experiments: AE MRL CB FM JG. Analyzed the data: JRV JM KAL. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: JRV JM WA AE MRL LR JCM CB FM JG SJO KAL. Wrote the paper: JRV. JM WA AE MRL LR JCM CB FM JG SJO KAL.

References

  1. 1. Rudan I, Tomaskovic L, Boschi Pinto C, Campbell H (2004) Global estimate of the incidence of clinical pneumonia among children under five years of age. Bulletin of the World Health Organization 82: 895–903.
  2. 2. Isturiz R, Luna C, Ramirez J (2010) Clinical and economic burden of pneumonia among adults in Latin America. International Journal of Infectious Diseases; IJID 14: e852–e856. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2010.02.2262
  3. 3. Andrade AL, Oliveira R, Vieira MA, Minamisava R, Pessoa V Jr, et al.. (2011) Population-based surveillance for invasive pneumococcal disease and pneumonia in infants and young children in Goiania, Brazil. Vaccine.
  4. 4. Deutscher M, Beneden CV, Burton D, Shultz A, Morgan OW, et al. (2012) Putting surveillance data into context: The role of health care utilization surveys in understanding population burden of pneumonia in developing countries. Journal of Epidemiology and Global Health 2: 73–81. doi: 10.1016/j.jegh.2012.03.001
  5. 5. Lindblade K, Johnson A, Arvelo W, Zhang X, Jordan H, et al. (2011) Low usage of government healthcare facilities for acute respiratory infections in guatemala: implications for influenza surveillance. BMC public health 11: 885–885. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-11-885
  6. 6. Morgan OW, Frenkel G, Zhang X, Taylor T, Verani J, et al.. (2010) Healthcare-Seeking Patterns for Pneumonia and Influenza-Like Illness, in Quetzaltenango, Guatemala, 2009. International Conference on Emerging Infectious Diseases. Atlanta, GA.
  7. 7. Danovaro-Holliday MC, Garcia S, de Quadros C, Tambini G, Andrus JK (2008) Progress in vaccination against Haemophilus influenzae type b in the Americas. PLoS Med 5: e87. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0050087
  8. 8. Ropero-Alvarez AM, Kurtis HJ, Danovaro-Holliday MC, Ruiz-Matus C, Andrus JK (2009) Expansion of seasonal influenza vaccination in the Americas. BMC Public Health 9: 361. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-9-361
  9. 9. Lindblade KA, Arvelo W, Gray J, Estevez A, Frenkel G, et al. (2010) A comparison of the epidemiology and clinical presentation of seasonal influenza A and 2009 pandemic influenza A (H1N1) in Guatemala. PLoS One 5: e15826. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0015826
  10. 10. Cherian T, Mulholland EK, Carlin JB, Ostensen H, Amin R, et al. (2005) Standardized interpretation of paediatric chest radiographs for the diagnosis of pneumonia in epidemiological studies. Bull World Health Organ 83: 353–359.
  11. 11. Whitehouse RW (1999) Use of digital cameras for radiographs: how to get the best pictures. J R Soc Med 92: 178–182.
  12. 12. WHO (2001) Standardization of interpretationof chest radiographs for the diagnosis of pneumonia in children. Geneva.
  13. 13. Tondella ML, Talkington DF, Holloway BP, Dowell SF, Cowley K, et al. (2002) Development and evaluation of real-time PCR-based fluorescence assays for detection of Chlamydia pneumoniae. J Clin Microbiol 40: 575–583. doi: 10.1128/jcm.40.2.575-583.2002
  14. 14. Zhang M, Holloway BP, Thacker WL, Schwartz SB, Talkington DF (1999) Development of TaqMan probe-based PCR with customized internal controls for detecting Mycoplasma pneumoniae and Mycoplasma fermentans. 99th General Meeting of the American Society for Microbiology. Chicago, IL.
  15. 15. Dean A, Sullivan K, Soe M OpenEpi: Open Source Epidemiologic Statistics for Public Health, Version 3.01 www.OpenEpi.com, updated 2013/04/06, accessed 2013/09/06.
  16. 16. Instituto Nacional de Estadística (2004) Estimaciones y proyecciones de población para el período 1950–2050. Guatemala City, Guatemala.
  17. 17. Rudan I, Boschi-Pinto C, Biloglav Z, Mulholland K, Campbell H (2008) Epidemiology and etiology of childhood pneumonia. Bull World Health Organ 86: 408–416. doi: 10.2471/blt.07.048769
  18. 18. Watt JP, Moisi JC, Donaldson RL, Reid R, Ferro S, et al. (2010) Measuring the incidence of adult community-acquired pneumonia in a Native American community. Epidemiol Infect 138: 1146–1154. doi: 10.1017/s0950268809991464
  19. 19. Olsen SJ, Laosiritaworn Y, Siasiriwattana S, Chunsuttiwat S, Dowell SF (2006) The incidence of pneumonia in rural Thailand. Int J Infect Dis 10: 439–445. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2006.06.004
  20. 20. Jokinen C, Heiskanen L, Juvonen H, Kallinen S, Karkola K, et al. (1993) Incidence of community-acquired pneumonia in the population of four municipalities in eastern Finland. Am J Epidemiol 137: 977–988.
  21. 21. Nair H, Nokes DJ, Gessner BD, Dherani M, Madhi SA, et al. (2010) Global burden of acute lower respiratory infections due to respiratory syncytial virus in young children: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet 375: 1545–1555. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(10)60206-1
  22. 22. Langley GF, Anderson LJ (2011) Epidemiology and prevention of respiratory syncytial virus infections among infants and young children. Pediatr Infect Dis J 30: 510–517. doi: 10.1097/inf.0b013e3182184ae7
  23. 23. Fischer Langley G, McCracken J, Arvelo W, Estevez A, Villarruel G, et al. (2013) The epidemiology and clinical characteristics of young children hospitalized with respiratory syncytial virus infections in Guatemala (2007–2010). Pediatr Infect Dis J 32: 629–635. doi: 10.1097/inf.0b013e318289e3bc
  24. 24. Falsey AR, Walsh EE (2000) Respiratory syncytial virus infection in adults. Clin Microbiol Rev 13: 371–384. doi: 10.1128/cmr.13.3.371-384.2000
  25. 25. Feikin DR, Njenga MK, Bigogo G, Aura B, Aol G, et al. (2012) Etiology and Incidence of viral and bacterial acute respiratory illness among older children and adults in rural western Kenya, 2007–2010. PLoS One 7: e43656. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0043656
  26. 26. Feikin DR, Njenga MK, Bigogo G, Aura B, Aol G, et al. (2013) Viral and bacterial causes of severe acute respiratory illness among children aged less than 5 years in a high malaria prevalence area of Western kenya, 2007–2010. Pediatr Infect Dis J 32: e14–19. doi: 10.1097/inf.0b013e31826fd39b
  27. 27. Kwofie TB, Anane YA, Nkrumah B, Annan A, Nguah SB, et al. (2012) Respiratory viruses in children hospitalized for acute lower respiratory tract infection in Ghana. Virol J 9: 78. doi: 10.1186/1743-422x-9-78
  28. 28. Mathisen M, Basnet S, Sharma A, Shrestha PS, Sharma BN, et al. (2011) RNA viruses in young Nepalese children hospitalized with severe pneumonia. Pediatr Infect Dis J 30: 1032–1036. doi: 10.1097/inf.0b013e31822f845f
  29. 29. Shafik CF, Mohareb EW, Yassin AS, Amin MA, El Kholy A, et al. (2012) Viral etiologies of lower respiratory tract infections among Egyptian children under five years of age. BMC Infect Dis 12: 350. doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-12-350
  30. 30. Suzuki A, Lupisan S, Furuse Y, Fuji N, Saito M, et al. (2012) Respiratory viruses from hospitalized children with severe pneumonia in the Philippines. BMC Infect Dis 12: 267. doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-12-267
  31. 31. Noyola DE, Alpuche-Solis AG, Herrera-Diaz A, Soria-Guerra RE, Sanchez-Alvarado J, et al. (2005) Human metapneumovirus infections in Mexico: epidemiological and clinical characteristics. J Med Microbiol 54: 969–974. doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.46052-0
  32. 32. Carneiro BM, Yokosawa J, Arbiza J, Costa LF, Mirazo S, et al. (2009) Detection of all four human metapneumovirus subtypes in nasopharyngeal specimens from children with respiratory disease in Uberlandia, Brazil. J Med Virol 81: 1814–1818. doi: 10.1002/jmv.21555
  33. 33. Mathisen M, Strand TA, Sharma BN, Chandyo RK, Valentiner-Branth P, et al. (2010) Clinical presentation and severity of viral community-acquired pneumonia in young Nepalese children. Pediatr Infect Dis J 29: e1–6. doi: 10.1097/inf.0b013e3181c2a1b9
  34. 34. Berkley JA, Munywoki P, Ngama M, Kazungu S, Abwao J, et al. (2010) Viral etiology of severe pneumonia among Kenyan infants and children. JAMA 303: 2051–2057. doi: 10.1001/jama.2010.675
  35. 35. Bruno R, Marsico S, Minini C, Apostoli P, Fiorentini S, et al. (2009) Human metapneumovirus infection in a cohort of young asymptomatic subjects. New Microbiol 32: 297–301.
  36. 36. Jansen RR, Wieringa J, Koekkoek SM, Visser CE, Pajkrt D, et al. (2011) Frequent detection of respiratory viruses without symptoms: toward defining clinically relevant cutoff values. J Clin Microbiol 49: 2631–2636. doi: 10.1128/jcm.02094-10
  37. 37. Singleton R, Bulkow L, Miernyk K, DeByle C, Pruitt L, et al. (2010) Viral respiratory infections in hospitalized and community control children in Alaska. J Med Virol 82: 1282–1290. doi: 10.1002/jmv.21790
  38. 38. Thavagnanam S, Christie SN, Doherty GM, Coyle PV, Shields MD, et al. (2010) Respiratory viral infection in lower airways of asymptomatic children. Acta Paediatrica 99: 394–398. doi: 10.1111/j.1651-2227.2009.01627.x
  39. 39. Reyes L, Arvelo W, Estevez A, Gray J, Moir JC, et al. (2010) Population-based surveillance for 2009 pandemic influenza A (H1N1) virus in Guatemala, 2009. Influenza Other Respi Viruses 4: 129–140. doi: 10.1111/j.1750-2659.2010.00138.x
  40. 40. Vernet G, Saha S, Satzke C, Burgess DH, Alderson M, et al. (2011) Laboratory-based diagnosis of pneumococcal pneumonia: state of the art and unmet needs. Clin Microbiol Infect 17 Suppl 31–13. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2011.03496.x
  41. 41. Klugman KP, Madhi SA, Albrich WC (2008) Novel approaches to the identification of Streptococcus pneumoniae as the cause of community-acquired pneumonia. Clin Infect Dis 47 Suppl 3S202–206. doi: 10.1086/591405
  42. 42. Werno AM, Murdoch DR (2008) Medical microbiology: laboratory diagnosis of invasive pneumococcal disease. Clin Infect Dis 46: 926–932. doi: 10.1086/528798
  43. 43. Asturias EJ, Soto M, Menendez R, Ramirez PL, Recinos F, et al. (2003) Meningitis and pneumonia in Guatemalan children: the importance of Haemophilus influenzae type b and Streptococcus pneumoniae. Rev Panam Salud Publica 14: 377–384. doi: 10.1590/s1020-49892003001100002
  44. 44. Gentile A, Bardach A, Ciapponi A, Garcia-Marti S, Aruj P, et al. Epidemiology of community-acquired pneumonia in children of Latin America and the Caribbean: a systematic review and meta-analysis. International Journal of Infectious Diseases.
  45. 45. Matute AJ, Brouwer WP, Hak E, Delgado E, Alonso E, et al. (2006) Aetiology and resistance patterns of community-acquired pneumonia in Leon, Nicaragua. Int J Antimicrob Agents 28: 423–427. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2006.07.016
  46. 46. Ruuskanen O, Lahti E, Jennings LC, Murdoch DR (2011) Viral pneumonia. Lancet 377: 1264–1275. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(10)61459-6
  47. 47. Juven T, Mertsola J, Waris M, Leinonen M, Ruuskanen O (2004) Clinical response to antibiotic therapy for community-acquired pneumonia. Eur J Pediatr 163: 140–144. doi: 10.1007/s00431-003-1397-2
  48. 48. Debiaggi M, Canducci F, Ceresola ER, Clementi M (2012) The role of infections and coinfections with newly identified and emerging respiratory viruses in children. Virol J 9: 247. doi: 10.1186/1743-422x-9-247
  49. 49. Organization WH (2005) Technical updates of the guidelines on the Integrated Management of Childhood Illness. Geneva: World Health Organization.
  50. 50. World Health Organization/The United Nations Children's Fund (2013) End preventable deaths: Global Action Plan for Prevention and Control of Pneumonia and Diarrhoea. Geneva.