Advertisement
Research Article

Comparative Molecular Docking Analysis of Cytoplasmic Dynein Light Chain DYNLL1 with Pilin to Explore the Molecular Mechanism of Pathogenesis Caused by Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO

  • Samina Kausar,

    Affiliation: National Center for Bioinformatics, Quaid-i-Azam University, Islamabad, Pakistan

    X
  • Muhammad Asif,

    Affiliation: National Center for Bioinformatics, Quaid-i-Azam University, Islamabad, Pakistan

    X
  • Nousheen Bibi,

    Affiliation: National Center for Bioinformatics, Quaid-i-Azam University, Islamabad, Pakistan

    X
  • Sajid Rashid mail

    sajidrwp@yahoo.co.uk

    Affiliation: National Center for Bioinformatics, Quaid-i-Azam University, Islamabad, Pakistan

    X
  • Published: October 03, 2013
  • DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0076730
Corrections

15 Nov 2013: Kausar S, Asif M, Bibi N, Rashid S (2013) Correction: Comparative Molecular Docking Analysis of Cytoplasmic Dynein Light Chain DYNLL1 with Pilin to Explore the Molecular Mechanism of Pathogenesis Caused by Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO. PLoS ONE 8(11): 10.1371/annotation/2ee0288f-bbc7-4fb8-950b-4c504174f843. doi: 10.1371/annotation/2ee0288f-bbc7-4fb8-950b-4c504174f843 | View correction

Abstract

Cytoplasmic dynein light chain 1 (DYNLL1) is a component of large protein complex, which is implicated in cargo transport processes, and is known to interact with many cellular and viral proteins through its short consensus motif (K/R)XTQT. Still, it remains to be explored that bacterial proteins also exhibit similar recognition sequences to make them vulnerable to host defense mechanism. We employed multiple docking protocols including AUTODOCK, PatchDock, ZDOCK, DOCK/PIERR and CLUSPRO to explore the DYNLL1 and Pilin interaction followed by molecular dynamics simulation assays. Subsequent structural comparison of the predicted binding site for DYNLL1-Pilin complex against the experimentally verified DYNLL1 binding partners was performed to cross check the residual contributions and to determine the binding mode. On the basis of in silico analysis, here we describe a novel interaction of DYNLL1 and receptor binding domain of Pilin (the main protein constituent of bacterial type IV Pili) of gram negative bacteria Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PAO), which is the third most common nosocomial pathogen associated with the life-threatening infections. Evidently, our results underscore that Pilin specific motif (KSTQD) exhibits a close structural similarity to that of Vaccinia virus polymerase, P protein Rabies and P protein Mokola viruses. We speculate that binding of DYNLL1 to Pilin may trigger an uncontrolled inflammatory response of the host immune system during P. aeruginosa chronic infections thereby opening a new pioneering area to investigate the role of DYNLL1 in gram negative bacterial infections other than viral infections. Moreover, by manifesting a strict correspondence between sequence and function, our study anticipates a novel drug target site to control the complications caused by P. aeruginosa infections.

Introduction

Cytoplasmic dynein is a part of large protein complex which functions as a minus-end directed microtubule based motor with the intermediate and light chains, doubtlessly entangled in the dynein binding to the appropriate cargo transport processes [1][2]. Among dynein light chains, human 8 kDa dynein light chain type 1 (DYNLL1) which was initially elucidated as a subunit of Chlamydomonas axonemal dynein [3], prevails in multiple functions. This light chain is found to be highly similar to a subset of mammal, nematode, insect, metazoan, plant, bacteria and yeast [4].

In recent years, DYNLL1 has been reported to bind multiple target proteins including GRINL1A, p54, postsynaptic protein (gephyrin), neuronal nitric oxide synthase (nNOS), DIC, Bim, EML3, p21-activated kinase and Swallow [5][7]. Frequently, the short linear DYNLL1 interacting motifs are positioned in natively disordered protein segments [8] and exist near to the coiled-coil or other dimerization domains of the binding partners. DYNLL1 binding motifs are originally divided into two classes: K/R-XTQT or (K)3 X)2 T)1 Q0 T1 X2) and G-I/V-QVD or [X)3 G)2 (I/V))1 Q0 V1 D2] [7][9]. The central Gln (at position 0) in both classes caps the N-terminal end of the second alpha-helix, while residues at positions +1, 1 and 3 bind with the endogenous region of the binding groove. Some DYNLL1 interacting partners consist of unorthodox binding motifs, which lack the highly conserved Gln residue e.g. Pak1 [10] GRINL1A [5] and MYO5A [11], [12]. However, the general interacting topology of these peptides is similar to that of the recognized ones. Accordingly, a specific H-bond network balances the lack of conserved Gln [10] in the DYNLL1/Pak1 complex, and in the docking model of DYNLL1/GRINL1A [5].

DYNLL1 contains an exclusive fold with two five-stranded antiparallel beta-sheets, which are accountable for dimerization, while every beta-sheet consists of four strands originated from one monomer and a fifth strand comes from the other monomer. These beta-sheets are enclosed by two pairs of alpha-helices [13], [14]. The attached ligands of DYNLL1 lie in the two parallel grooves formed at the two brinks of the dimerization interface and form an additional antiparallel beta-strand thereby enlarging the central beta-sheets. Almost all dissimilar residues of DYNLL1 paralogs and orthologs in metazoans lie at the outer surface of the homodimer protein which lack binding contribution [7].

In human, since DYNLL1 homodimer has been reported to bind with KETQTP motif located in the intermediate chain, where it adopts an extended conformation, it is generally considered that most of the interacting cellular and viral peptides exhibit similar recognition sequences and interact in a similar fashion [15]. For intracellular transport, viruses use two approaches; either hijack the cytoplasmic membrane traffic or interact directly with the cytoskeletal transport machinery [9]. Upon infection, several viruses exploit the cellular cytoplasmic transport machinery to allow virions or subviral nucleoprotein complexes to travel long distances through the cytoplasm from the cell surface to the site of viral transcription and replication. Because free diffusion of molecules (larger than 50 nm in diameter) is restricted by the structural organization of cytoplasm, viruses as well as cellular organelles require active transport mechanism along microtubules [9], [15]. This is specifically obvious in case of neurotropic viruses which move long distances during retrograde or anterograde transport in the axon [9].

Moreover, integrity of the microtubules is interconnected and essential for viral infection, as demonstrated by experiments in which microtubule-depolymerizing agents such as colchicine,vinblastine or nocodazole were used. Such pathogens causing widespread illness include adenovirus [16], [17], parvovirus [18], herpes simplex virus (HSV) [16], [19], human cytomegalovirus [20], hepatitis B virus [21], african swine fever virus (ASFV) [22], rabies virus (RV) [23], influenza virus [24], human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) [25] and papillomavirus (PV) [26]. These viruses depend on the host microtubules for persuasive nuclear targeting and efficacious infection, a common mechanism for their delivery alongside the cell nucleus replication site [15].

In this study, we reported a novel infection model for gram negative bacteria PAO (a strain of Pseudomonas aeruginosa) based on a direct interaction of Fimbrial protein Pilin and DYNLL1. P. aeruginosa is a successful opportunistic bacteria being the third most common nosocomial pathogen in the world associated with life-threatening infections in the setting of epithelial injury, in part due to its ability to colonize a wide spectrum of living and nonliving surfaces using its type IV Pili, which are the polar flexible filaments of about 5.4 nm in diameter and 2.5 µm average length [27], [28]. PAO is a leading cause of serious congenital anomalies like urinary tract infections, bloodstream infections, surgical site infections, hospital-acquired pneumonia, respiratory morbidity and mortality in patients with cystic fibrosis (CF) [29], [30]. It is a frequent cause of exacerbations in the individuals with advanced chronic obstructive pulmonary disease [31]. Additionally, due to its frequent occurrence, nosocomial P. aeruginosa infections are often uncompromising with an enough mortality rate of approximately 50% for P. aeruginosa pneumonia patients [32]. As suggested above, P. aeruginosa infections are becoming more severe and a serious threat due to their continued emergence and spread of multi-drug resistant P. aeruginosa strains. Based on these factors, the therapeutic options are becoming increasingly limited. Thus, for the development of new drugs to target this highly infectious and medically important pathogen, our understanding of the pathogenesis of P. aeruginosa infections is critical.

Due to the recent recognition that proteins equate normal and aberrant cellular behavior by reinforcing defense against external pathogens, this study provides a basic insight into understanding the molecular mechanism of such control. It also signifies a novel drug target site to control the complications caused by P. aeruginosa during various infections. Thus, our study opens a revolutionary area of research by addressing the role of DYNLL1 in bacterial infections other than viral infections.

Methods

Data set

X-ray diffraction structure of human DYNLL1 (PDB code: 1CMI) was retreived through Protein Data Bank [33]. Experimentally verified binding motifs of DYNLL1 interaction partners (Table 1) were isolated through extensive litrature survey [1], [2], [7], [9], [15]. For Pilin, NMR-derived structure of Pseudomonas aeruginosa strain PAO (PDB ID: 1PAO) was used for docking simulations.

thumbnail

Table 1. Experimentally verified binding motifs (indicated by underline) of DYNLL1 interacting partners.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0076730.t001

Identification of putative DYNLL1 binding motif containing proteins

On the basis of specified consensus motif (K/R)XTQT for DYNLL1 binding partners, a homology search was performed against PDBsum database [34]. Linear motif search was accomplished by using the query sequences, particularly viral DYNLL1 binding motifs like KSTQT, RSTQT, KSIQI, KQTQT, SQTQT and TSTQT. The resulting hits with more than 75% sequence identity to the query sequence were collected. Later on, previously reported DYNLL1 interacting proteins (Table 2, unbold hits) were eliminated and the remaining hits (Table 2, bold hits) were selected for further analysis (Figure 1).

thumbnail

Figure 1. Schematic illustration of strategy.

(1) Collected DYNLL1 binding motif sequences and PDBSum database was screened for these motifs. (2) Candidate proteins containing the DYNLL1 interaction motifs were picked (Table 2, bold hits). The selected proteins were tested by molecular docking against DYNLL1 to verify the hits which bind to DYNLL1 specific binding pocket. (3) Selected DYNLL1-interacting proteins on the basis of binding score values and common docking poses. (4) 3D structure comparison of DYNLL1 binding partners was carried out to examine the motif similarity pattern. (5) 3D structure comparison among known and novel DYNLL1 interacting proteins was conducted to inspect the structural conservation of putative DYNLL1 binding motifs and to evaluate the similarity of interacting mode. (6) Candidate proteins exhibiting highly conserved and identical binding pattern to the known one were selected. (7) Finally, annotated the possible pathways for the functional basis of novel interactions.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0076730.g001
thumbnail

Table 2. DYNLL1 binding motif containing viral proteins.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0076730.t002

To screen the candidate proteins which bind to DYNLL1 specific binding pocket, initial molecular docking analysis was performed using the short-listed data set (Table 2). Subsequently, on the basis of functional relevance to pathogenesis, Pilin was selected (1PAO) for detailed analysis.

Molecular docking analysis of DYNLL1 and Pilin

Molecular docking analysis of DYNLL1 against Pilin was accomplished using five well known docking tools to obtain the best native conformation. These included AUTODOCK [35], PatchDock with refinement and re-scoring tool FireDock [36], [37], ZDOCK [38] and DOCK/PIERR [39] with refinement and re-scoring algorithm FiberDock [40] and CLUSPRO [41].

DYNLL1-Pilin semi flexible docking was carried out by a high performance OpenSuse linux system using AutoDock 4.0 [35]. Polar hydrogen atoms and KOLLMAN charges were assigned for DYNLL1 and number of active torsions in Pilin was set to 30 in order to perform docking simulation with rigid receptor (DYNLL1) and semi-flexible ligand (Pilin). The grid dimensions of 50×50×50 Å3 with a spacing 0.602 Å were set to generate the grid map. LGA was applied with the following parameters: docking consisted of 50 runs, initial population of 150 randomly placed individuals, 2.5×106 energy evaluations, a maximum number of 27,000 generations, a mutation rate of 0.02 and a crossover rate of 0.80.

In case of PatchDock tool, the input parameters were the PDB coordinate files for DYNLL1 (1CMI) and Pilin (1PAO) with default parameters. Scoring function that considers both geometric fit and atomic desolvation energy [42] was used to evaluate each candidate transformation. Finally, Root Mean Square Deviation (RMSD) clustering was applied to the candidate solutions to discard the redundant solutions.

ZDOCK uses a grid-based representation and 3D Fast Fourier Transform (FFT) to effectively explore the rigid body search space of docking positions [43]. ZDOCK version 3.0.2 was used to study DYNLL1 and Pilin binding and FiberDock (Flexible Induced-fit Backbone Refinement in Molecular Docking) algorithm was used for the refinement and scoring of the ZDOCK results of DYNLL1-Pilin interaction. The model file (models_example.ent) was prepared and uploaded on FiberDock to improve the accuracy of the candidate solutions and to identify the near native solutions among the 10 best solutions of ZDOCK.

DOCK/PIERR docking algorithm is based on residue contact potential learnt using an SVM-based scoring function to minimize false positive rates and FFT based approximations of OPLS (Optimized Potentials for Liquid Simulations) vdw energy and electrostatic interactions. Side chain remodeling and energy minimization were used to perform refinement. Refined models were re-ranked using residue and atomic potentials for protein docking [44]. The top 10 refined models of DYNLL1-Pilin were retrieved from DOCK/PIERR server.

Another docking algorithm used in this study was CLUSPRO which works in three main steps. First, it runs PIPER, a rigid body docking program, based on a novel Fast Fourier Transform (FFT) docking method with pair wise potentials. Second, by using a clustering technique for the detection of near native conformations [45] and by eliminating some of the non-native clusters, the 1000 best energy conformations are clustered, and the 30 largest clusters are retained for refinement. Third, by short Monte Carlo simulations, stability of these clusters is analyzed, and by the medium-range optimization method SDU (Semi-Definite programming based Underestimation), the structures are refined. Input of both proteins in CLUSPRO server resulted in a file containing 4 categories of predicted models: (1) Balanced, (2) Electrostatic-favored, (3) Hydrophobic-favored and (4) VdW+Elec. Models in all the categories were ranked by cluster size. We focused on saturated clusters of best models in all categories.

Comparative structural analysis of putative DYNLL1 binding motif

3D structures of DYNLL1 known interaction partners (BimEL (BCL2L11), DNMT3A, EML3, nNOS (NOS1), PAK1, RACK1 (GNB2L1) and Vaccinia polymerase) (Table 1) were obtained through PDB database [33] for performing structural comparisons among known and putative novel DYNLL1 binding motifs of candidate proteins. 3D structures of known interacting partners (Table 1) of DYNLL1 lacking experimentally determined structures were predicted by ab initio based method through I-TASSER server [46]. Subsequent visualization and superimposition of 3D structures were done using UCSF Chimera ver. 1.7.0 [47]. MolProbity [48], Verify 3D [49] and Errat [50] tools were used for model validation and WinCoot [51] was used for model refinement. The functionally important residues lying at the DYNLL1 binding site were screened through PDB database.

Analysis of interaction dynamics

Molecular dynamic (MD) simulation of best docked Pilin-DYNLL1 complex was performed to evaluate the stability, folding, conformational changes and dynamic behavior of interacting proteins. All MD simulations were performed using Amber03 force field using GROMACS 4.5 package [52], running on high performance OpenSuse linux system. During MD simulations, all the systems were solvated using TIP4P [53] water model in a periodic box, followed by addition of Na+ and Cl counter ions to neutralize the systems. Before MD simulations, energy minimization (steepest descent algorithm for 500 steps) was performed by tolerance of 1000 kJ/mol Å2 to remove initial steric clashes. The energy minimized systems were treated for 1000 ps equilibration run under pressure and temperature conditions to relax the systems. Finally, MD simulations were run for 15 ns time scale under constant temperature (300 K) and pressure (1 atm). PME (Particle Mesh Ewald) algorithm was used in all calculations to dissect electrostatic interactions. Snapshots were collected throughout the MD simulations of each system and PDBs were generated for 1, 5, 10, 12 and 15 ns intervals to investigate the time-dependent behavior and stability of each system. UCSF Chimera ver. 1.7.0 [47], PyMol (http://www.pymol.org) and GROMACS tools were used to analyze the stability and behavior of each system.

Results

Analysis of Pilin specific motif

Pilin (PDB ID: 1PAO) was found by screening the consensus DYNLL1 binding motif KSTQT against PDB database. It is a fimbrial protein of gram negative bacteria PAO, a strain of P. aeruginosa and encoded by the pilA gene. We identified that Pilin contains a homologous sequence (KSTQD) to DYNLL1 binding motif in its receptor binding domain (Figure 2). This motif is present in several DYNLL1-interacting proteins such as human adenovirus protease, BimEL, MAP4, P protein Rabies virus, P protein Mokola Virus, replication origin-binding protein (UL9) of human herpes virus 1 (HHV-1), human herpes simplex helicase and Amsacta moorei entomopox virus AMV179 ORF [2], [7].

thumbnail

Figure 2. Conservation pattern of Pilin receptor binding domain.

Pilin receptor binding domains (128-144 AA) of different strains of P. aeruginosa [60] are indicated and aligned. The Pilin protein of PAO strain contains a putative DYNLL1 binding motif which is highlighted by red rectangle. The black and dark gray colors show motif conservation pattern among four strains of P. aeruginosa, respectively.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0076730.g002

Next, the conservation pattern of this putative DYNLL1 interaction motif was studied in Pilin receptor binding domain across different strains of P. aeruginosa (PAO, KB7, PAK, CD4 and K122-4). This analysis demonstrated that Ser131 and Asp134 residues are quite conserved, while Thr130 and Gln133 are less conserved among P. aeruginosa strains [54]. Interestingly, Thr at 130 position is replaced by Lys residue which is uniquely present in PAO strain (Figure 2).

Comparative analysis of DYNLL1 and Pilin interaction by multiple docking protocols

To analyze the reliability of interaction mode of Pilin and DYNLL1, five most modern docking tools including AUTODOCK, PatchDock, ZDOCK, DOCK/PIERR and CLUSPRO were used to accomplish the molecular dockings and to find the near native conformation of DYNLL1-Pilin complex. Out of the conformations generated by semi-flexible docking simulations of DYNLL1 and Pilin by AUTODOCK, potential DYNLL1-Pilin clusters were ranked on the basis of lowest energy representation and RMSD values, using the default threshold (2.0 Å). DYNLL1-Pilin complex having the minimal energy of 0.9 kcal/mol clearly depicted the Pilin binding to the reported binding pocket of the DYNLL1 (Figure 3). Through PatchDock analysis, the ten best solutions were selected for further refinement and rescoring analysis by FireDock (Fast Interaction REfinement in molecular DOCKing) algorithm. The desolvation energy value for the best docking model was −8.43 kcal/mol (Figure 3), which revealed a high feasibility of this binding [55]. ZDOCK generated 2000 conformations of DYNLL1-Pilin complex and the top 500 models of complex were visualized in JMOL [56]. Interestingly, almost all models exhibited a similar pattern of Pilin interaction with the reported DYNLL1 binding pocket [7], [57], [58]. Desolvation energy (−9.40 kcal/mol) and a global free energy (−20.76 kcal/mol) (Figure 3) profile indicated a high interaction probability of DYNLL1 and Pilin. DOCK/PIERR output of DYNLL1-Pilin interactions were refined and re-scored using FiberDock. The best output model with a high desolvation (−11.03 kcal/mol) and global energy (−37.08 kcal/mol) was studied (Figure 3), which further support validated the Pilin binding with at the same DYNLL1 binding pocket. Altogether, out of the top 10 models, 7 conformations supported Pilin complementary with DYNLL1 binding pocket. To reliably generate high-quality structures of DYNLL1-Pilin complexes, another highly effective multistage docking approach CLUSPRO was used by employing a simplified energy function and limited flexibility to discover regions of interest. The sizes and lowest energy values for largest clusters of balanced were 272 and −647.5, electrostatic-favored were 287 and −691.1, hydrophobic-favored were, 303 and −750.1 and VdW+Elec were 310 and −146.4, respectively. The interacting residues of the representative models out of the largest clusters were analyzed by LIGPLOT [59].

thumbnail

Figure 3. Residual contributions of DYNLL1 and Pilin explored through multiple docking protocols.

The interacting residues of (A) DYNLL1 binding groove and (B) Pilin receptor binding domain are indicated. The residues marked in blue color are common among all the best docking poses, yellow and green colors indicate the residues which are common in 3 and 4 poses, respectively out of the 5 docking results. Pilin specific motif (KSTQD) is shown by black rectangle. Red rectangle highlights Lys130 residue which is only present in PAO strain. The docking/binding energy values for DYNLL1-Pilin obtained through individual docking procedures are: AUTODOCK, 0.9 kcal/mol; PatchDock, −28.31 kcal/mol; ZDOCK, −20.76 kcal/mol; DOCK/PIERR, −37.08 kcal/mol; CLUSPRO, −647.5 kcal/mol, respectively.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0076730.g003

The best DYNLL1-Pilin complexes predicted by the mentioned algorithms presented Pilin binding in the similar binding pocket of DYNLL1 (Figure 4), which substantiated sufficient evidence of their interaction (Figure S12).

thumbnail

Figure 4. Visualization of the best docked DYNLL1-Pilin complex in dimer form.

Blue and orange ribbons indicate individual DYNLL1 monomers connected by H-bonds as indicated. Pilin is shown in ribbon form in pink and yellow colors. Interacting residues are shown in atomic representations and H-bonds are shown by dotted black lines. Pilin specific residues (Lys130, Thr132 and Asp134) are involved in hydrogen bonding.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0076730.g004

Comparative binding analysis of Pilin to other DYNLL1 known targets

Binding pocket details for DYNLL1 were gathered through PDB database by studying PDB entries including 1F95 (bim peptide and dynein light chain 8 (dlc8) complex), 2XQQ (peptide (AC-SRGTQTE) in complex with human dynein light chain), 1CMI (dimer of the human DYNLL1 with a bound peptide) and 1F96 (nNos peptide and dynein light chain 8 (dlc8)) complex. In these complexes, we observed Thr70, Gly79, Glu69, Tyr77, Tyr75, Gln80, Gly63, Ala82, Phe62, Asn61, Thr67, Arg60, Tyr65, Val66, Ser64, His68, Phe73, Leu84, Lys36, Lys43, Glu35, Ile34, Gln19, Lys9, Asn10 and Val81 residues of DYNLL1 involved in binding with mentioned ligands [7], [57], [58].

Next, to validate the biological significance of putative Pilin-DYNLL1 binding motif, 3D structural comparisons of previously reported DYNLL1 binding motifs for BimEL, Adenain, DNMT3A, EML3, nNOS, PAK1, Rack1, Vaccinia polymerase P protein of Mokola and P protein Rabies viruses [2], [6], [7] were performed. These structures were superimposed for comparing the binding motif conservation structurally to further narrow down the interaction crosstalk. As indicated in Figure 5, Pilin peptide exhibited close structural similarity with Vaccinia polymerase and P protein Rabies by sharing an RMSD (Root mean square deviation) value of 0.2 Å. Similarly, superimposition of Pilin and P protein Mokola resulted in RMSD value of 0.3 Å (Figure 5). These data indicated that Pilin peptide (KSTQD) attains a similar binding pattern to that of Vaccinia polymerase (KQTQT), P protein Rabies (KSTQT) and P protein Mokola (KSTQT) viruses by sharing a common 3D architecture (Figure S3).

thumbnail

Figure 5. Structural comparisons of all possible combinations of binding motifs.

Individual RMSD values are plotted against the corresponding superposed motifs to all the indicated proteins including Pilin (KSTQD), Adenain (KSTQT), BimEL (KSTQT), DNMT3A (LGIQV), EML3 (RGTQT), nNOS (TGIQV), PAK1 (DVATS), Rack1 (YTVQD), P protein Mokola virus (KSTQT), P protein Rabies virus (KSTQT) and Vaccinia polymerase (KQTQT). The RMSD analysis shows that Pilin specific motif contains a close structural similarity to the validated DYNLL1 binding motifs.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0076730.g005

MD simulation analysis

The stability of secondary structure elements and conformational changes of simulated complexes were assessed by plotting root mean square deviation (RMSD), root mean square fluctuation (RMSF) and radius of gyration (Rg) values, obtained throughout the trajectory. Backbone RMSD scores observed over a period of 15 ns for DYNLL1 remained stable until 8 ns (1–1.5 Å), however RMSD behavior showed a marked increase during 9–13.5 ns time period, indicating more structural rearragements (Figure 6A). Subsequent analysis of root mean square fluctuation (RMSF) by residue indicated fluctuations between Arg60 (up to 5Å) and Gln80 (up to 4.5Å) (Figure 6B). To our surprise, DYNLL1-loop region amino acids involved in Pilin binding (Ser64, Tyr65, Tyr67, His68, Thr70, Phe73, Tyr75, Tyr77) exhibited more fluctuations (2–4 Å) (Figure 6C). Radius of gyration (Rg) is a simple measure of stability and firmness of the system and tends to change over time due to protein folded-unfolded states [60]. The calculated 2D plot for mean Rg for the system was consistent with RMSD profile (Figure 6D). In agreement to RMSD data, Rg profile for Pilin-DYNLL1 was elevated during 9–13.5 ns, indicating conformational changes due to structural flexibilty upon binding. An overall trend of RMSD (below 2.5Å) for bound and unbound systems indicated that systems were well equlibrated and validated the stability of complex during simulations. Next, individual simulated complexes were monitored by generating trajectories for 1 ns, 5 ns, 10 ns, 12 ns and 15 ns time intervals to investigate the time-dependent dynamics of individual amino acids for Pilin-DYNLL1. It was observed that Pilin exhibited a quite stable binding pattern with DYNLL1 by sharing residues located at the DYNLL1 binding motif (KSTQD) with varying binding affinities (Figure 7). As DYNLL1-loop attained more conformational changes upon Pilin binding, its orientations were deeply analysed by measuring its length at mentioned time scales. In analysed trajectories, the observed sizes of loops were 24.62 Å, 24.49 Å, 27.83 Å, 25.07 Å and 23.36 Å, respectively (Figure 7). The binding energy values at these time scales were −5384.58 kcal/mol, −5100.22 kcal/mol, −4848.70 kcal/mol, −5017.51 kcal/mol and −5003.91 kcal/mol, respectively. Moreover, MD simulations substantiated that DYNLL1 specific Lys9, Asn10, Ala11, Ser64, Tyr75 and Tyr77 residues were involved in hydrogen bonding with Ala128, Lys130, Thr132, Gln133, Asp134, Met136 and Thr138 residues of Pilin (Figure 7).

thumbnail

Figure 6. Stability and residue fluctuations of 15(DYNLL1-Pilin).

(A) RMSD plot of Cα atoms computed through bound DYNLL1-Pilin complex (blue) and unbound structure (red). (B) Comparison of the bound (blue) and unbound (red) structures quantified by their backbone root-mean-square-fluctuations (RMSF). The pilin binding site is indicated. (C) Comparative RMSF plot for DYNLL1-loop region between Arg60 and Gln80. (D) Radius of gyration (Rg) plot for DYNLL1-Pilin complex.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0076730.g006
thumbnail

Figure 7. Structural and conformational adjustments of DYNLL1-Pilin system at different time scales.

Snapshots were collected throughout the MD simulations of each system and PDBs were generated for 1, 5, 10, 12 and 15-dependent behavior and stability of each system. PDB structures were visualized in UCSF Chimera 1.7.0. 2D plots were generated through DIMPLOT and residues involved hydrogen bonding (indicated by black dotted lines) were monitored. The Pilin specific residues involved in hydrogen bonding are indicated by joining pink dotted circles. The observed DYNLL1-loop measurements were 24.62 Å, 24.49 Å, 27.83 Å, 25.07 Å and 23.36 Å, respectively. The binding energy values at indicated time scales were −5384.58 kJ/mol, −5100.22 kJ/mol, −4848.70 kJ/mol, −5017.51 kJ/mol and 5003.91 kJ/mol, respectively. Superimposed structures at the indicated time intervals for DYNLL1 are indicated by pink (1 ns), cyan (5 ns), blue (10 ns), pink (12 ns) and yellow (15 ns) colors, respectively.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0076730.g007

Discussion

Here, we employed a homology search using DYNLL1 specific consensus binding motif (K/R)XTQT and elucidated Pilin-DYNLL1 interaction through comparative docking simulations. Interestingly, MD simulation data and docking clusters revealed the involvement of Pilin specific Lys130 residue in DYNLL1 binding. This residue is uniquely present only in PAO strain of Pseudomonas aeruginosa thus raising the possibility that KSTQD binding motif of Pilin might be evolved due to substitution of Thr into Lys. Through MD studies, Rg and RMSD plots of the protein backbone showed convergence of simulated complex below 2.5 Å, indicating that all the systems were well equilibrated and stable throughout simulations. An increasing RMSD trend at 9 ns time scale is the indicative of mobility with in the binding pocket and depicted the structural flexibilty induced due to binding of Pilin. A more detailed analysis of trajectories at different time intervals explained a a positive role of DYNLL1-loop flexibilty in the stablized binding as shown by RMSF measurements (Figure 6). Particularly, the amino acids, namely, Ser64, Tyr65, Thr67, His68, Thr70, Phe73, Tyr75 and Tyr77 of the DYNLL1-loop region have shown more fluctuations upon Pilin binding, compared to the unbound form. This differential affinity of Pilin peptide towards DYNLL1-loop seems to be correlated with the subtle changes in the loop conformation, as widening of loop (27.83 Å) at 10 ns time interval resulted in a more stronger binding (−4848.70 kcal/mol). It is possible that this narrowing and widening of loop might adjust the KSTQD motif to establish interactions with the Lys9, Asn10 and Ala11 residues of DYNLL1-β1, closely located to the loop region. Interestingly, Pilin association to DYNLL1 resulted in conformational rearrangements of β1 by extending it slightly (Figure 7). These time-dependent binding characteristics can also be observed in focused Rg plot, where an increase of gyration rate was observed during 9–10 ns time interval (Figure 6). Overall, these results confirmed that intermolecular crosstalk of Pilin and DYNLL1 is stablized due to structural rearrangements, consequently leading to a more pronounced binding.

To authenticate the DYNLL1-Pilin interaction, we characterized the known binding partners of DYNLL1 having similar binding pattern, where structural overlay of Pilin peptide showed a striking similarity to that of Vaccinia polymerase and P protein Rabies. Given the association of only 12% DYNLL1 in dynein complex [61], we hypothesized implication of the free form of DYNLL1 in transportation independent processes by inducing an uncontrolled inflammatory response during lung chronic infection of P. aeruginosa, which causes most of the morbidity and mortality in CF patients [62], [63]. This process of increased rate of inflammation in response to Pilin stimulus [64] draw our attention to the preferable involvement of NF-κβ pathway in P. aeruginosa infection process. In mammalian cells, most common subunits of NF-κβ are RelA (p65) and p50, which lie in heterodimer form. Under basal conditions, cytosolic NF-κβ remains inactive due to the inhibitor protein Iκβα [65]. However, in response to a variety of stimuli including TNFα, interleukin (IL)-1β, lipopolysaccharide (LPS), pili [64] and flagellin [66], Iκβα gets phosphorylated by IKK (cytokine-activated IkappaB kinase) thereby resulting in its ubiquitination and degradation. Due to these events, nuclear localization signal (NLS) of NF-κβ is exposed which results in its translocation to the nucleus, where it regulates the transcription of multiple target genes [65].

NF-κβ activation triggers inflammatory responses by releasing interleukins IL-1β and IL-8 cytokines [63], [65]. Reasonably, there have been reported several different but interconnected concepts involving the stimuli like TNFα, pili, IL-1β and lipopolysaccharide for the generation of reactive oxygen species to oxidize DYNLL1 [65]. The oxidized form of DYNLL1 homodimer is stabilized by the formation of reversible disulfide bond and attains a conformational change that causes its dissociation from the Iκβα, allowing Iκβα phosphorylation and NF-κβ activation (Figure 8). Possibly, Pilin interaction with DYNLL1 may lead to self-aggregation and hijacking of DYNLL1 to transport Pilin into the specific cellular compartments for inflammasome activation, causing DYNLL1 deficient environment. This may interrupt a 14-kDa human thioredoxin (Trx)-related protein TRP14 (disulfide reductase) to carry out the reduction process of DYNLL1. This unique role of TRP14 protein is not unprecedented as it has been reported to inhibit tumor necrosis factor α (TNFα) induced NF-κβ activation by maintaining DYNLL1 in a reduced state, where DYNLL1 depletion causes an increased activation of NF-κβ and overproduction of p65 [65] (Figure 9). As oxidized DYNLL1 is unable to bind with Iκβα, subsequent unchecked and prolonged phosphorylation of Iκβα by Iκβ kinase and NF-κβ activation may provide a possible clue of excess inflammatory response caused by P. aeruginosa infection in the CF cells. Thus as a fair assessment, major alterations in DYNLL1 cellular distribution and binding perturbations might be coupled dynamically to the subtle regulatory mechanisms during infections.

thumbnail

Figure 8. Roles of DYNLL1 and Pilin in host defense mechanism.

Model of normal cell host defense mechanism. Pilin and flagellin trigger inflammasome activity in NLRC4 inflammasome activation pathway. DYNLL1/LC8 regulates NF-κβ activation by inhibiting the phosphorylation of Iκβα by Iκβ kinase.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0076730.g008
thumbnail

Figure 9. Role of DYNLL1-Pilin interaction during chronic inflammation.

Model of P. aeruginosa infected cell pathway. (1) DYNLL1/LC8-Pilin interaction interrupts the reduction mechanism of TRP14 by maintaining DYNLL1 in oxidized homodimeric form which is unable to bind with Iκβα. Iκβα is instantly degraded due to continuous phosphorylation by Iκβ kinase, resulting in up regulation of NF-κβ pathway. (2) Pilin hijacks DYNLL1 to obtain compartmental specificity and inflammasome activation.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0076730.g009

Initially, it has been observed that exaggerated cytokine responses of CF airway epithelial cells are due to the increased adherence of PAO to the CF cells. However, later on, no connection was observed between the high inflammatory response and P. aeruginosa adherence [63], which suggested the presence of an alternative mechanism for P. aeruginosa infection. Our proposed model serves as an alternative hypothesis, where type IV pili are delivered in a dependable process based on the bacterial TTSS (type III secretion system) [67]. TTSS is a mechanism whereby virulence factors including Pilin are introduced into the host cell by gram negative bacteria [68], which may contribute in host defense response through the activation of inflammasome. Pilin plays a crucial role in the host defense mechanism by inflammasome activation and production of IL-1β, which is a pivotal inflammatory cytokine and mediates the phagocyte activation, T-cell polarization and antibody production [69], [70]. Although, activation of inflammasome via Pilin (when injected by TTSS mechanism) is dependent on the NLRC4 (NOD-like receptor family, CARD domain-containing protein 4) and ASC (Apoptosis-associated speck-like protein containing a C-terminal caspase recruitment domain) components; however, upon introduction into cells by liposomal delivery, activation of caspase-1 (CASP-1) did not require NLRC4 and ASC proteins [67]. These data indicated that the sensors implicated in the identification of cytoplasmic danger signals like Pilin or viral DNA are compartmentalized, and that the diverse inflammasome components may be utilized in various compartments within cell.

Overall, our model provided the basis for understanding the mechanism of PAO infection through the possible involvement of Pilin by mediating an excess inflammatory response either by forcing DYNLL1 in oxidized state due to the interruption of TRP14 reduction mechanism or restricting DYNLL1 compartmentalization during inflammasome activation. Nevertheless, several biological and molecular mechanisms are possibly involved in mediating the complicated relationship between P. aeruginosa infections and exaggerated inflammation responses. Our model devised an excellent “infection hypothesis” by assessing a novel role of DYNLL1 in P. aeruginosa pathogenesis, and emphasized the need to further investigate the role of DYNLL1 during bacterial virulence.

Supporting Information

Figure S1.

Surface view of common binding groove. DYNLL1 (yellow) identified through comparative docking strategy. Pilin specific residues are indicated in the form of purple wires. Binding pocket residues of DYNLL1 are labeled in black color and distances are shown by solid lines (black).

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0076730.s001

(TIF)

Figure S2.

Interaction residue analysis for all complexes. (A) AUTODOCK, (B) CLUSPRO, (C) DOCK/PIERR, (D) PatchDock and (E) ZDOCK.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0076730.s002

(TIF)

Figure S3.

Superimposition of DYNLL1 binding motifs. (A) Vaccinia virus polymerase (KQTQT) and Pilin (KSTQD), (B) P protein of Mokola virus (KSTQT) and Pilin (KSTQD), (C) P protein Rabies virus (KSTQT) and Pilin (KSTQD). Pink, blue, green and black colors represent the binding motifs of Pilin, Vaccinia virus polymerase, P protein of Mokola virus and P protein of Rabies virus, respectively.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0076730.s003

(TIF)

Acknowledgments

We thank Miss Madia Wali and Miss Zahida Parveen for critical reading of the manuscript.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: SR. Performed the experiments: SK. Analyzed the data: SK. Wrote the paper: SR SK MA NB.

References

  1. 1. Alonso C, Miskin J, Hernaez B, Fernandez-Zapatero P, Soto L, et al. (2001) African swine fever virus protein p54 interacts with the microtubular motor complex through direct binding to light-chain dynein. J Virol 75: 9819–9827. doi: 10.1128/jvi.75.20.9819-9827.2001
  2. 2. Martinez-Moreno M, Navarro-Lerida I, Roncal F, Albar JP, Alonso C, et al. (2003) Recognition of novel viral sequences that associate with the dynein light chain LC8 identified through a pepscan technique. FEBS Lett 544: 262–267. doi: 10.1016/s0014-5793(03)00516-7
  3. 3. Pfister KK, Fay RB, Witman GB (1982) Purification and polypeptide composition of dynein ATPases from Chlamydomonas flagella. Cell Motil 2: 525–547. doi: 10.1002/cm.970020604
  4. 4. Jacob Y, Badrane H, Ceccaldi PE, Tordo N (2000) Cytoplasmic dynein LC8 interacts with lyssavirus phosphoprotein. J Virol. 74: 10217–10222. doi: 10.1128/jvi.74.21.10217-10222.2000
  5. 5. Garcia-Mayoral MF, Martinez-Moreno M, Albar JP, Rodriguez-Crespo I, Bruix M (2010) Structural basis for the interaction between dynein light chain 1 and the glutamate channel homolog GRINL1A. Febs J. 277: 2340–2350. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-4658.2010.07649.x
  6. 6. Garcia-Mayoral MF, Rodriguez-Crespo I, Bruix M (2011) Structural models of DYNLL1 with interacting partners: African swine fever virus protein p54 and postsynaptic scaffolding protein gephyrin. FEBS Lett 585: 53–57. doi: 10.1016/j.febslet.2010.11.027
  7. 7. Rapali P, Szenes A, Radnai L, Bakos A, Pal G, et al. (2011) DYNLL/LC8: a light chain subunit of the dynein motor complex and beyond. Febs J. 278: 2980–2996. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-4658.2011.08254.x
  8. 8. Barbar E (2008) Dynein light chain LC8 is a dimerization hub essential in diverse protein networks. Biochemistry 47: 503–508. doi: 10.1021/bi701995m
  9. 9. Dohner K, Sodeik B (2005) The role of the cytoskeleton during viral infection. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol 285: 67–108. doi: 10.1007/3-540-26764-6_3
  10. 10. Lightcap CM, Sun S, Lear JD, Rodeck U, Polenova T, et al. (2008) Biochemical and structural characterization of the Pak1-LC8 interaction. J Biol Chem 283: 27314–27324. doi: 10.1074/jbc.m800758200
  11. 11. Hodi Z, Nemeth AL, Radnai L, Hetenyi C, Schlett K, et al. (2006) Alternatively spliced exon B of myosin Va is essential for binding the tail-associated light chain shared by dynein. Biochemistry 45: 12582–12595. doi: 10.1021/bi060991e
  12. 12. Wagner W, Fodor E, Ginsburg A, Hammer JA (2006) The binding of DYNLL2 to myosin Va requires alternatively spliced exon B and stabilizes a portion of the myosin's coiled-coil domain. Biochemistry 45: 11564–11577. doi: 10.1021/bi061142u
  13. 13. Williams JC, Xie H, Hendrickson WA (2005) Crystal structure of dynein light chain TcTex-1. J Biol Chem 280: 21981–21986. doi: 10.1074/jbc.m414643200
  14. 14. Hall J, Karplus PA, Barbar E (2009) Multivalency in the assembly of intrinsically disordered Dynein intermediate chain. J Biol Chem 284: 33115–33121. doi: 10.1074/jbc.m109.048587
  15. 15. Merino-Gracia J, Garcia-Mayoral MF, Rodriguez-Crespo I (2011) The association of viral proteins with host cell dynein components during virus infection. Febs J. 278: 2997–3011. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-4658.2011.08252.x
  16. 16. Mabit H, Nakano MY, Prank U, Saam B, Dohner K, et al. (2002) Intact microtubules support adenovirus and herpes simplex virus infections. J Virol 76: 9962–9971. doi: 10.1128/jvi.76.19.9962-9971.2002
  17. 17. Suomalainen M, Nakano MY, Keller S, Boucke K, Stidwill RP, et al. (1999) Microtubule-dependent plus- and minus end-directed motilities are competing processes for nuclear targeting of adenovirus. J Cell Biol 144: 657–672. doi: 10.1083/jcb.144.4.657
  18. 18. Suikkanen S, Aaltonen T, Nevalainen M, Valilehto O, Lindholm L, et al. (2003) Exploitation of microtubule cytoskeleton and dynein during parvoviral traffic toward the nucleus. J Virol 77: 10270–10279. doi: 10.1128/jvi.77.19.10270-10279.2003
  19. 19. Sodeik B, Ebersold MW, Helenius A (1997) Microtubule-mediated transport of incoming herpes simplex virus 1 capsids to the nucleus. J Cell Biol 136: 1007–1021. doi: 10.1083/jcb.136.5.1007
  20. 20. Ogawa-Goto K, Tanaka K, Gibson W, Moriishi E, Miura Y, et al. (2003) Microtubule network facilitates nuclear targeting of human cytomegalovirus capsid. J Virol 77: 8541–8547. doi: 10.1128/jvi.77.15.8541-8547.2003
  21. 21. Funk A, Mhamdi M, Lin L, Will H, Sirma H (2004) Itinerary of hepatitis B viruses: delineation of restriction points critical for infectious entry. J Virol 78: 8289–8300. doi: 10.1128/jvi.78.15.8289-8300.2004
  22. 22. Jouvenet N, Monaghan P, Way M, Wileman T (2004) Transport of African swine fever virus from assembly sites to the plasma membrane is dependent on microtubules and conventional kinesin. J Virol 78: 7990–8001. doi: 10.1128/jvi.78.15.7990-8001.2004
  23. 23. Ceccaldi PE, Gillet JP, Tsiang H (1989) Inhibition of the transport of rabies virus in the central nervous system. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 48: 620–630. doi: 10.1097/00005072-198911000-00004
  24. 24. Lakadamyali M, Rust MJ, Babcock HP, Zhuang X (2003) Visualizing infection of individual influenza viruses. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 100: 9280–9285. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0832269100
  25. 25. McDonald D, Vodicka MA, Lucero G, Svitkina TM, Borisy GG, et al. (2002) Visualization of the intracellular behavior of HIV in living cells. J Cell Biol 159: 441–452. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200203150
  26. 26. Schneider MA, Spoden GA, Florin L, Lambert C (2011) Identification of the dynein light chains required for human papillomavirus infection. Cell Microbiol 13: 32–46. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-5822.2010.01515.x
  27. 27. Asikyan ML, Kus JV, Burrows LL (2008) Novel proteins that modulate type IV pilus retraction dynamics in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J Bacteriol 190: 7022–7034. doi: 10.1128/jb.00938-08
  28. 28. Bucior I, Pielage JF, Engel JN (2012) Pseudomonas aeruginosa pili and flagella mediate distinct binding and signaling events at the apical and basolateral surface of airway epithelium. PLoS Pathog 8: e1002616. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1002616
  29. 29. Smith EE, Buckley DG, Wu Z, Saenphimmachak C, Hoffman LR, et al. (2006) Genetic adaptation by Pseudomonas aeruginosa to the airways of cystic fibrosis patients. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103: 8487–8492. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0602138103
  30. 30. Tramper-Stranders GA, van der Ent CK, Molin S, Yang L, Hansen SK, et al. (2012) Initial Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection in patients with cystic fibrosis: characteristics of eradicated and persistent isolates. Clin Microbiol Infect 18: 567–574. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2011.03627.x
  31. 31. Almagro P, Salvado M, Garcia-Vidal C, Rodriguez-Carballeira M, Cuchi E, et al. (2012) Pseudomonas aeruginosa and mortality after hospital admission for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Respiration 84: 36–43. doi: 10.1159/000331224
  32. 32. Giantsou E, Manolas K (2011) Superinfections in Pseudomonas aeruginosa ventilator-associated pneumonia. Minerva Anestesiol 77: 964–970.
  33. 33. Berman HM, Westbrook J, Feng Z, Gilliland G, Bhat TN, et al. (2000) The Protein Data Bank. Nucleic Acids Res 28: 235–242. doi: 10.1093/nar/28.1.235
  34. 34. Laskowski RA, Hutchinson EG, Michie AD, Wallace AC, Jones ML, et al. (1997) PDBsum (1997) a Web-based database of summaries and analyses of all PDB structures. Trends Biochem Sci 22: 488–490. doi: 10.1016/s0968-0004(97)01140-7
  35. 35. Morris GM, Goodsell DS, Huey R, Olson AJ (1996) Distributed automated docking of flexible ligands to proteins: parallel applications of AutoDock 2.4. J Comput Aided Mol Des 10: 293–304. doi: 10.1007/bf00124499
  36. 36. Schneidman-Duhovny D, Inbar Y, Nussinov R, Wolfson HJ (2005) PatchDock and SymmDock: servers for rigid and symmetric docking. Nucleic Acids Res 33: W363–367. doi: 10.1093/nar/gki481
  37. 37. Andrusier N, Nussinov R, Wolfson HJ (2007) FireDock: fast interaction refinement in molecular docking. Proteins 69: 139–159. doi: 10.1002/prot.21495
  38. 38. Chen R, Li L, Weng Z (2003) ZDOCK: an initial-stage protein-docking algorithm. Proteins 52: 80–87. doi: 10.1002/prot.10389
  39. 39. Ravikant DV, Elber R (2010) PIE-efficient filters and coarse grained potentials for unbound protein-protein docking. Proteins 78: 400–419. doi: 10.1002/prot.22550
  40. 40. Mashiach E, Nussinov R, Wolfson HJ (2010) FiberDock: Flexible induced-fit backbone refinement in molecular docking. Proteins 78: 1503–1519. doi: 10.1002/prot.22668
  41. 41. Comeau SR, Gatchell DW, Vajda S, Camacho CJ (2004) ClusPro: a fully automated algorithm for protein-protein docking. Nucleic Acids Res 32: 96–99. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkh354
  42. 42. Zhang C, Vasmatzis G, Cornette JL, DeLisi C (1997) Determination of atomic desolvation energies from the structures of crystallized proteins. J Mol Biol 267: 707–726. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1996.0859
  43. 43. Chen R, Weng Z (2002) Docking unbound proteins using shape complementarity, desolvation, and electrostatics. Proteins 47: 281–294. doi: 10.1002/prot.10092
  44. 44. Viswanath S, Ravikant DV, Elber R (2013) Improving ranking of models for protein complexes with side chain modeling and atomic potentials. Proteins 81: 592–606. doi: 10.1002/prot.24214
  45. 45. Kozakov D, Clodfelter KH, Vajda S, Camacho CJ (2005) Optimal clustering for detecting near-native conformations in protein docking. Biophys J 89: 867–875. doi: 10.1529/biophysj.104.058768
  46. 46. Zhang Y (2008) I-TASSER server for protein 3D structure prediction. BMC Bioinformatics 9: 40. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-9-40
  47. 47. Pettersen EF, Goddard TD, Huang CC, Couch GS, Greenblatt DM, et al. (2004) UCSF Chimera–a visualization system for exploratory research and analysis. J Comput Chem 25: 1605–1612. doi: 10.1002/jcc.20084
  48. 48. Davis IW, Leaver-Fay A, Chen VB, Block JN, Kapral GJ, et al. (2007) MolProbity: all-atom contacts and structure validation for proteins and nucleic acids. Nucleic Acids Res 35: W375–383. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkm216
  49. 49. Luthy R, Bowie JU, Eisenberg D (1992) Assessment of protein models with three-dimensional profiles. Nature 356: 83–85. doi: 10.1038/356083a0
  50. 50. Colovos C, Yeates TO (1993) Verification of protein structures: patterns of nonbonded atomic interactions. Protein Sci 2: 1511–1519. doi: 10.1002/pro.5560020916
  51. 51. Emsley P, Lohkamp B, Scott WG, Cowtan K (2010) Features and development of Coot. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr 66: 486–501. doi: 10.1107/s0907444910007493
  52. 52. Duan Y, Wu C, Chowdhury S, Lee MC, Xiong G, et al. (2003) A point-charge force field for molecular mechanics simulations of proteins based on condensed-phase quantum mechanical calculations. J Comput Chem 24: 1999–2012. doi: 10.1002/jcc.10349
  53. 53. Zlenko DV (2012) [Diffusion factor calculation for TIP4P model of water]. Biofizika 57: 197–204.
  54. 54. Campbell AP, McInnes C, Hodges RS, Sykes BD (1995) Comparison of NMR solution structures of the receptor binding domains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa pili strains PAO, KB7, and PAK: implications for receptor binding and synthetic vaccine design. Biochemistry 34: 16255–16268. doi: 10.1021/bi00050a005
  55. 55. Ramanathan K, Shanthi V, Sethumadhavan R (2009) In silico identification of catalytic residues in azobenzene reductase from Bacillus subtilis and its docking studies with azo dyes. Interdiscip Sci 1: 290–297. doi: 10.1007/s12539-009-0035-8
  56. 56. Hanson RM (2010) Jmol – a paradigm shift in crystallographic visualization. Journal of Applied Crystallography 43: 1250–1260. doi: 10.1107/s0021889810030256
  57. 57. Liang J, Jaffrey SR, Guo W, Snyder SH, Clardy J (1999) Structure of the PIN/LC8 dimer with a bound peptide. Nat Struct Biol 6: 735–740. doi: 10.1038/11501
  58. 58. Fan J, Zhang Q, Tochio H, Li M, Zhang M (2001) Structural basis of diverse sequence-dependent target recognition by the 8 kDa dynein light chain. J Mol Biol 306: 97–108. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.2000.4374
  59. 59. Wallace AC, Laskowski RA (1995) Thornton JM: LIGPLOT (1995) a program to generate schematic diagrams of protein-ligand interactions. Protein Eng 8: 127–134. doi: 10.1093/protein/8.2.127
  60. 60. Ivankov DN, Bogatyreva NS, Lobanov MY, Galzitskaya OV (2009) Coupling between properties of the protein shape and the rate of protein folding. PLoS One 4: e6476. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0006476
  61. 61. Bergen JM, Pun SH (2007) Evaluation of an LC8-binding peptide for the attachment of artificial cargo to dynein. Mol Pharm 4: 119–128. doi: 10.1021/mp060086o
  62. 62. DiMango E, Ratner AJ, Bryan R, Tabibi S, Prince A (1998) Activation of NF-kappaB by adherent Pseudomonas aeruginosa in normal and cystic fibrosis respiratory epithelial cells. J Clin Invest 101: 2598–2605. doi: 10.1172/jci2865
  63. 63. Kube DM, Fletcher D, Davis PB (2005) Relation of exaggerated cytokine responses of CF airway epithelial cells to PAO1 adherence. Respir Res 6: 69.
  64. 64. Soong G, Reddy B, Sokol S, Adamo R, Prince A (2004) TLR2 is mobilized into an apical lipid raft receptor complex to signal infection in airway epithelial cells. J Clin Invest 113: 1482–1489. doi: 10.1172/jci20773
  65. 65. Jung Y, Kim H, Min SH, Rhee SG, Jeong W (2008) Dynein light chain LC8 negatively regulates NF-kappaB through the redox-dependent interaction with IkappaBalpha. J Biol Chem 283: 23863–23871. doi: 10.1074/jbc.m803072200
  66. 66. Smith KD, Ozinsky A (2002) Toll-like receptor-5 and the innate immune response to bacterial flagellin. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol 270: 93–108. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-59430-4_6
  67. 67. Arlehamn CS, Evans TJ (2011) Pseudomonas aeruginosa pilin activates the inflammasome. Cell Microbiol 13: 388–401. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-5822.2010.01541.x
  68. 68. Cornelis GR, Van Gijsegem F (2000) Assembly and function of type III secretory systems. Annu Rev Microbiol 54: 735–774. doi: 10.1146/annurev.micro.54.1.735
  69. 69. O'Neill LA (2008) The interleukin-1 receptor/Toll-like receptor superfamily: 10 years of progress. Immunol Rev 226: 10–18. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-065x.2008.00701.x
  70. 70. Dinarello CA (2009) Immunological and inflammatory functions of the interleukin-1 family. Annu Rev Immunol 27: 519–550. doi: 10.1146/annurev.immunol.021908.132612