Advertisement
Research Article

LdFlabarin, a New BAR Domain Membrane Protein of Leishmania Flagellum

  • Michèle Lefebvre equal contributor,

    equal contributor Contributed equally to this work with: Michèle Lefebvre, Emmanuel Tetaud

    Affiliations: CNRS UMR 5290, Montpellier, France, Université Montpellier 1, Montpellier, France, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire La Colombière, Montpellier, France, IRD 224, Montpellier, France

    X
  • Emmanuel Tetaud equal contributor,

    equal contributor Contributed equally to this work with: Michèle Lefebvre, Emmanuel Tetaud

    Affiliations: CNRS UMR 5095, Institut de Biochimie Génétique et Cellulaire, Bordeaux, France, Université Bordeaux Segalen, Bordeaux, France

    X
  • Magali Thonnus,

    Affiliations: CNRS UMR 5234, Bordeaux, France, Université Bordeaux Segalen, Bordeaux, France

    X
  • Bénédicte Salin,

    Affiliations: CNRS UMR 5095, Institut de Biochimie Génétique et Cellulaire, Bordeaux, France, Université Bordeaux Segalen, Bordeaux, France

    X
  • Fanny Boissier,

    Affiliations: CNRS UMR 5095, Institut de Biochimie Génétique et Cellulaire, Bordeaux, France, Université Bordeaux Segalen, Bordeaux, France

    X
  • Corinne Blancard,

    Affiliations: CNRS UMR 5095, Institut de Biochimie Génétique et Cellulaire, Bordeaux, France, Université Bordeaux Segalen, Bordeaux, France

    X
  • Cécile Sauvanet,

    Affiliations: CNRS UMR 5095, Institut de Biochimie Génétique et Cellulaire, Bordeaux, France, Université Bordeaux Segalen, Bordeaux, France

    X
  • Christelle Metzler,

    Affiliation: Université Bordeaux Segalen, Bordeaux, France

    X
  • Benoît Espiau,

    Affiliation: CNRS-EPHE USR 3278, Papetoai, Moorea, Polynésie Française

    X
  • Annelise Sahin,

    Affiliations: CNRS UMR 5234, Bordeaux, France, Université Bordeaux Segalen, Bordeaux, France

    X
  • Gilles Merlin mail

    gmerlin@univ-montp1.fr

    Affiliations: CNRS UMR 5290, Montpellier, France, Université Montpellier 1, Montpellier, France, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire La Colombière, Montpellier, France, IRD 224, Montpellier, France

    X
  • Published: September 27, 2013
  • DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0076380

Abstract

During the Leishmania life cycle, the flagellum undergoes successive assembly and disassembly of hundreds of proteins. Understanding these processes necessitates the study of individual components. Here, we investigated LdFlabarin, an uncharacterized L. donovani flagellar protein. The gene is conserved within the Leishmania genus and orthologous genes only exist in the Trypanosoma genus. LdFlabarin associates with the flagellar plasma membrane, extending from the base to the tip of the flagellum as a helicoidal structure. Site-directed mutagenesis, deletions and chimera constructs showed that LdFlabarin flagellar addressing necessitates three determinants: an N-terminal potential acylation site and a central BAR domain for membrane targeting and the C-terminal domain for flagellar specificity. In vitro, the protein spontaneously associates with liposomes, triggering tubule formation, which suggests a structural/morphogenetic function. LdFlabarin is the first characterized Leishmania BAR domain protein, and the first flagellum-specific BAR domain protein.

Introduction

Eukaryotic flagella present a remarkable evolutionary conservation of their structure and constituents [1]. They have been mostly studied in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii [2], [3] and Trypanosoma brucei [4], [5], two flagellated organisms. Thus, intraflagellar transport was first described in C. reinhardtii before being generalized to all eukaryotic flagella and cilia [6], [7]. Stressing their practical importance, protozoan studies allowed the identification of human orthologue genes whose mutations are responsible for pleiotropic, severe genetic diseases, such as polycystic kidney disease or Bardet-Biedl syndrome [8].

Leishmania are flagellated protozoan kinetoplastid parasites [9]. They exist alternatively as amastigotes (intracellular mammalian forms) and promastigotes (extracellular insect forms) [10]. While the amastigote flagellum barely sticks out of the cell body, its promastigote counterpart may be twice as long as the cell body. The flagellum is essential for promastigote motility within the insect digestive tract, allowing the migration of the parasites to the mouth parts and hence their transmission to a mammalian host through biting [11]. Recent elegant experiments have also shown that the flagellum is indispensable for infectious promastigotes to infect mammalian host macrophages where they transform into amastigotes [12]. Moreover, the flagellum is also suspected to bear other essential functions like cellular organization and sensory perception [13]. The differentiation from amastigotes to promastigotes and reciprocally requires the successive assembly and disassembly of hundreds of proteins. The dynamics of these processes is tightly regulated and their understanding necessitates the characterization of individual elements.

Bin/Amphiphysin/Rvs (BAR) domains are 200-amino-acid modular elements found in many eukaryotic multi-domain proteins [14]. Although their amino acid sequence may be poorly conserved and therefore difficult to identify, their structure is well conserved throughout evolution [15]. The archetype BAR domain consists of a monomer of three α-helices folded onto each other. Dimers form banana-shaped molecules with a positively charged concave face that interacts with the negatively charged lipid membranes [16]. BAR domains recognize or generate membrane curvature by inserting into the lipid bilayer. The specific membrane to which they bind to depends on adjacent domains, e.g., PH domains [17]. Since their discovery [18], BAR domains revealed diverse and have been categorized into several families and sub-families; some associate with concave, others with convex membranes [19]. BAR domain proteins are involved in membrane shaping, in the formation of endocytosis vesicles, tubules, endosomes, T-tubules, podosomes, filopodia, mitochondria and autophagosomes [20].

Here we report the characterization of LdFlabarin (L. donovani FLAgellar BAR domain proteIN). To our knowledge, it is the first BAR domain protein associated with a eukaryotic flagellum and the first BAR domain protein found in Leishmania. We show that its flagellar addressing depends on several determinants and presents some originality within the genus Leishmania and the BAR domain superfamily. It arranges into a helicoidal structure around the flagellum and provokes the tubulation of artificial membranes in vitro. This suggests a -role in flagellar morphogenesis or structural stability.

Results

Identification of the Leishmania Flabarin

We previously discovered the involvement of small G proteins in the biogenesis of the Leishmania flagellum [21][23], which led us to try and identify effectors. One of the approaches used was bioinformatics: the L. major genome [24], the only available Leishmania genome sequence at the time of the experiments, was searched for homologues of known partners of the human ARF/ARL small G proteins [25][27].

We found LmjF.27.1730, an unannotated 340-aa protein, as potential homologue of human HsArfaptin-1 (Genbank U52521), a partner of several ARF/ARL family members [25], [28]. The N-terminal region of LmjF.27.1730 (amino acids 10–231) showed some identity (Fig. S1A) with the C-terminal region of HsArfaptin-1 (amino acids 61–339 for a total length of 341). The presence of a polypyrimidine tract 59−12 nt upstream of the start codon, followed by an AG dinucleotide (7−6 nt upstream of the start codon), a potential spliced leader attachment site [29], validated the predicted functionality of the LmjF.27.1730 ORF.

For consistency with our previous work, we chose to focus on L. donovani. The orthologue was PCR amplified from L. donovani LV9 genomic DNA, using oligonucleotides designed from the LmjF.27.1730 sequence. The L. donovani protein comprised 339 amino acids, with a predicted molecular mass of 37 827 Da and a pI of 5.17. Its amino acid sequence was 90% identical to LmjF.27.1730 and differed by one amino acid with the now available L. infantum orthologue sequence (LinJ.27.1630) (Fig. S1B). For reasons becoming obvious below, these new proteins were named Flabarins for FLAgellar BAR domain proteINs.

Phylogenetic analysis of Flabarins

Blast searches and available data [24] revealed the existence of LdFlabarin orthologues in trypanosomatids (Fig. S1B). Flabarins amino acid sequences and lengths were well conserved within the genus Leishmania (L. infantum, L. major, L. mexicana, and L. braziliensis): 339–340 amino acids, 99.7−73.5% identity with LdFlabarin. By contrast, Trypanosoma (T. cruzi, T. vivax, T. congolense, and T. brucei) Flabarins were shorter (222–269 amino acids) and more divergent (18–20% identity). Synteny was observed within these species [24] except for T. vivax (though TvFlabarin sequence did not differ much from the other Trypanosoma Flabarin sequences). The T. brucei and T. gambiense Flabarin sequences were identical and the most divergent (18% identity). To our knowledge, the only previous report of trypanosomatid Flabarin is that of T. brucei, identified as a flagellar protein (Tb927.11.2410, formerly Tb11.22.0001) in the flagellome [4], [5] and not further studied. There is no apparent homologue in any other sequenced genome (Group OG5_148786 [30]), which makes the study of Flabarins particularly interesting.

LdFlabarin is a flagellar protein

LdFlabarin intracellular localization was investigated in L. amazonensis BA125 cells co-expressing mRed-LdFlabarin (with a free LdFlabarin C-terminus) and LdFlabarin-GFP (with a free LdFlabarin N-terminus). Fluorescence microscopy showed that mRed-LdFlabarin was diffusely distributed throughout the cell (Fig. 1A,C,D), while LdFlabarin-GFP localized exclusively to the flagellum (Fig. 1B,C,D). About 2% of LdFlabarin-GFP-expressing cells displayed a stronger fluorescence signal at the base of the flagellum (Fig. 1B), an area different from the basal body, as revealed by the marker LdCentrin-GFP [31] (Fig. 1E) and much larger.

thumbnail

Figure 1. Intracellular localization of LdFlabarin.

L. amazonensis BA125 cells were co-transfected with pNUS mRednD-LdFlabarin and pNUS LdFlabarin-GFPcH. (A–B) Fluorescence images from a cell expressing both mRed-LdFlabarin (red)(A) and LdFlabarin-GFP (green) (B). (C) Overlay of A and B. (D) Overlay of DAPI staining (blue) and phase contrast. (E) A cell expressing LdCentrin-GFP (green) and LdFlabarin-mRed.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0076380.g001

Since the LdFlabarins tagged at the N- or C-terminus did not co-localize, the localization of native LdFlabarin was unclear. To elucidate this point, we produced a specific anti-LdFlabarin rabbit antiserum. First, C-terminus His6-tagged recombinant LdFlabarin (LdFlabarin-His6) was synthesized in E. coli using the pET29b expression vector. After IPTG induction, a 55 kDa band (for a predicted 41.3 kDa, including the His6-tag) was visible in extracts submitted to SDS-PAGE (Fig. 2A, SI) while no band was visible without induction (Fig 2A, SNI). The difference between the predicted and the observed molecular masses may be due to intrinsic migration properties. Surprisingly, under non-denaturing conditions, partially purified LdFlabarin-His6 (Fig 2A, F16) presented several high molecular mass bands (~240, ~360, and ~570 kDa, Fig. 2B). When submitted to a denaturing second dimension electrophoresis, these high molecular mass bands all dissociated to 55 kDa spots (Fig 2C1), all of them being reactive to anti-His6 antiserum (Fig 2C2); thus, the complexes comprised mostly LdFlabarin-His6 proteins devoid of major E. coli contaminants, since no other spot was visible by Coomassie staining, although the presence of minor components, eventually responsible for the molecules aggregation, cannot be excluded.

thumbnail

Figure 2. Production of recombinant LdFlabarin-His6 and localization of LaFlabarin in Leishmania.

(A) 5 µg supernatant of non-induced (SNI), IPTG-induced (SI) and purified LdFlabarin-His6 (F16) were separated by SDS-PAGE (denaturating polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis). (B) The purified fraction (F16) was submitted to a blue-native gel (BN-PAGE) allowing separation of complex. (C) The complex were separated by electrophoresis in first non-denaturing conditions (BN-PAGE), and then the track was subjected to a second electrophoresis under denaturing conditions (SDS-PAGE) to separate the components of the differents complex. The gel was stained with Coomassie (C1) or transferred to membranes and revealed with 1:10000 anti-His (C2). (D) 3.106 L. amazonensis BA125 untransfected control cells (lanes 1) and LdFlabarin-mRed-expressing cells (lanes 2) were submitted to SDS-PAGE, transferred to membranes and revealed with 1:2000 anti-LdFlabarin (left panel) or 1:10000 anti-mRed (right panel) and 1:2500 anti-rabbit IgG conjugate as in [59]. (E) Localization of native LaFlabarin in L. amazonensis BA125 by indirect immunofluorescence. Cells were fixed and incubated with anti-LdFlabarin (1:1000) and Alexa-labelled anti-rabbit IgG (8 µg/ml). Panel 1, LaFlabarin green fluorescence image of two cells in the same field; panel 2, overlay of panel 1 with DAPI staining (blue) and phase contrast.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0076380.g002

For the rabbit immunization, the recombinant LdFlabarin-His6 was partially purified (Fig 2A, F16). The obtained anti-LdFlabarin antiserum was used to probe western-blots of L. amazonensis cell extracts. Native LaFlabarin was detected as a 50 kDa band (for a predicted 37.8 kDa; Fig. 2D, left panel, lane 1); no band was seen with the preimmune serum (not shown) or an anti-mRed antiserum (Fig 2D, right panel, lane 1). Using LdFlabarin-mRed-expressing cell extracts, the anti-LdFlabarin recognized a main additional band of 90 kDa (Fig. 2D, left panel, lane 2) (for a predicted 63.3 KDa), also detected by the anti-mRed antiserum (Fig 2D, right panel, lane 2). The difference between the predicted and the observed molecular masses is not clear at the moment, and may be due to post-translational modifications or intrinsic migration properties. An additional 75 kDa band was also detected by the anti-LdFlabarin (Fig 2D, left panel, lane 2); however, the intensity of this extra-band, feebly detected by the anti-mRed antiserum (Fig 2D, right panel, lane 2), was variable from an experiment to another, suggesting the existence of a preferential cleavage site within the LdFlabarin-mRed sequence; the protease(s) involved could be partially active in spite of the presence of an anti-protease cocktail during the cell lysis, although it remains possible that this partial proteolysis occurred before lysis.

Probing untransformed L. amazonensis cells by indirect immunofluorescence, the anti-LdFlabarin revealed a punctuated labelling along the flagellum (Fig. 2E1 and E2). As with the GFP/mRed fusion proteins, a spot was sometimes observed at the flagellum base (Fig. 2E, lower cell). The flagellum most distal part remained unlabelled (Fig. 2E, both cells); whether the endogenous LaFlabarin was absent or in too low amount to be detected by the antiserum remains unknown; conversely, the more abundant tagged LdFlabarin-GFP was visible from bottom to tip of the flagellum (Fig. 1B). In conclusion, our data confirmed the flagellar localization of native LaFlabarin and validated the observations made with the C-terminally tagged LdFlabarin-GFP (Fig. 1B): a free N-terminus is indispensable for LdFlabarin flagellar addressing.

Ultrastructural localization of LdFlabarin

When observed by indirect immunofluorescence (anti-LdFlabarin plus Alexa-labelled anti-rabbit IgG), the green fluorescence signal of LdFlabarin-mRed (Fig. 3A1) was usually confined to the periphery of the flagellum, while the inside region remained darker (Fig. 3A1 and A5), as expected for a plasma membrane labelling; this pattern was less obvious with LdFlabarin-GFP (Fig. 1B) or the direct visualization of LdFlabarin-mRed fluorescence (Fig. 3A2), which could be attributed to different diffusion characteristics of the fluorophores. For comparison, we used a paraflagellar rod (PFR) marker. PFR is a cytoskeletal structure of trypanosomatid, euglenoid and dinoflagellate flagella [32] that extends inside the flagellum, along the axoneme, from the exit of the flagellar pocket to the tip of the flagellum [33]. Its main constituents are two structurally related proteins, PFR1 and PFR2 [33], [34], which, as other cytoskeleton-associated proteins, remain insoluble after treatment with non-ionic detergents [35], [36]. When expressed as fusion proteins with GFP at their N-terminus, PFR proteins are addressed to the flagellum [37]. Here the L. amazonensis PFR2C (one of the tandemly repeated isoforms fused to GFP) was co-expressed with LdFlabarin-mRed in L. amazonensis. GFP-LaPFR2C was visible as a thin flagellar filament (Fig. 3B2), whereas LdFlabarin-mRed extended further inside the flagellar pocket and, in that particular case, was visible as two external red filaments on each side of the green GFP-LaPFR2C signal (Fig. 3B1, B3 and B4); clearly, LdFlabarin-mRed did not co-localize with GFP-LaPFR2C.

thumbnail

Figure 3. LdFlabarin is not associated with the flagellar cytoskeleton.

(A) Comparison of LaFlabarin/LdFlabarin-mRed localization by immunodetection with rabbit anti-LdFlabarin and mRed fluorescence. L. amazonensis BA125 cells expressing LdFlabarin-mRed were treated with anti-LdFlabarin plus Alexa-labelled anti-rabbit IgG. A1, native LaFlabarin and LdFlabarin-mRed revealed by anti-LdFlabarin plus Alexa-labelled anti-rabbit IgG (green); A2, same cell, LdFlabarin-mRed revealed by mRed fluorescence (red); A3, overlay of A1 and A2; A4, overlay of A1, A2, DAPI staining (blue) and phase contrast images; A5, magnification of the framed area of A1. (B) Co-expression of LdFlabarin-mRed and GFP-LaPFR2C in L. amazonensis BA125. Cells were co-transfected with pNUS LdFlabarin-mRedcD (red, B1) and pNUS GFPnH-LaPFR2C (green, B2; B3 is an overlay of B1 and B2), stained with DAPI (blue, B4). B5–12, NP-40 treatment. Prior to PFA fixation, cells co-expressing LdFlabarin-mRed and GFP-LaPFR2C were treated for 5 min at room temperature with 0.0005% (B5–8) and 0.001% (B9–12) NP-40. B1/B5/B9, LdFlabarin-mRed (red); B2/B6/B10, GFP-LaPRF2C (green); B3/B7/B11, overlay image of B1–2/B5–6/B9–10; and B4/B8/B12, overlay image of B1–2/B5–6/B9–10 plus DAPI staining (blue) and phase contrast.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0076380.g003

To investigate the possible association of LdFlabarin with the flagellar cytoskeleton, cells co-expressing GFP-LaPFR2C and LdFlabarin-mRed were treated with increasing concentrations (0.0005 to 1%) of the non-ionic detergent NP-40 before paraformaldehyde (PFA) fixation (Fig. 3B). From 0.0005% (Fig. 3B5–8) to 0.001% (Fig. 3B9–12) up to 1% NP-40 (not shown), GFP-LaPFR2C remained associated to the cell ghosts (Fig. 3B6 and B10), while LdFlabarin-mRed was destabilized with as little as 0.0005% NP-40 (Fig. 3B5) and completely solubilized with 0.001% NP-40 (Fig. 3B9), indicating that LdFlabarin is not associated with the flagellar cytoskeleton.

Then we performed immuno-electron microscopy on non-transfected and LdFlabarin-mRed-expressing L. amazonensis cells using anti-LdFlabarin or a rabbit anti-mRed antibody plus an anti-rabbit IgG-gold particles conjugate. The gold particles (black dots) localized to the flagellar plasma membrane (Fig. 4A and B upper panel) in longitudinal cross-sections of L. amazonensis cells. The specificity of the labelling was ascertained by the absence of any black dot when the anti-LdFlabarin primary antiserum was omitted (Fig 4D). A cumulative transverse cross-sectional image was generated (Fig. 4B, lower panel; artificial color: white dots), and LdFlabarin-mRed appeared both randomly distributed on the surface of the flagellum and randomly oriented with respect to the axoneme or the PFR. Conversely, in longitudinal sections, the black dots appeared clustered in small bundles, obliquely aligned and separated by a mean distance of 178±31 nm (Fig. 4C and F), compatible with a helicoidal arrangement around the flagellum (Fig. 4G). At the base of the flagellum, where LdFlabarin-mRed/GFP occasionnally accumulated (Fig. 1B and 2E1), dots exclusively localized to the flagellum, but not to the flagellar pocket membrane or lumen (Fig. 4E).

thumbnail

Figure 4. Ultrastructural localization of LdFlabarin.

(A) Longitudinal section of a flagellum of LdFlabarin-mRed-expressing L. amazonensis using anti-LdFlabarin and an anti-rabbit IgG-gold particle conjugate; black dots represent gold particles; f, flagellum. (B) Upper panel: transverse section of a flagellum of LdFlabarin-mRed-expressing L. amazonensis using the anti-Red antiserum. PFR, paraflagellar rod; Ax, axoneme; black dots, gold particles. Lower panel: localization of 383 gold particles (white dots) cumulated from 16 transverse cross-section images. (C) Longitudinal section of a flagellum of LdFlabarin-mRed-expressing L. amazonensis (anti-Red antiserum as in B); black dots, gold particles. (D) Same as A and B, except no anti-LdFlabarin antiserum. (E) Vicinity of the flagellar pocket of a LdFlabarin-mRed-expressing L. amazonensis cell (anti-Red antiserum as in B); black dots, gold particles; f, flagellum; fp, flagellar pocket; k, kinetoplast. (F) Gold particle frequency along the flagellum as a function of distance from the reference point (first gold particle counted); distance measurements (4546 gold particles from 50 different flagella) were performed using ImageJ software. (G) Schematic representation of LdFlabarin organization in the flagellum: black circles indicate LdFlabarin; Ax and PFR are also represented.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0076380.g004

Consistently, after cell fractionation, the 90 kDa band of LdFlabarin-mRed was mainly associated with the membrane fraction (100 000 g pellet) (Fig 5A lane P) compared to the soluble fraction (Fig 5A lane S) while it translocated to the soluble fraction in the presence of detergent (Fig 5A lane SN versus PN). The additional 75 kDa band, which behaved like the 90 kDa band in fractionation experiments, was present in variable amounts, depending of the lysate (Fig 5A) which confirmed it may be the result of a limited proteolysis. The presence of a small amount of LdFlabarin-mRed in the 100 000 g supernatants maybe reflected the occasional protein accumulation observed at the base of the flagellum, which did not seem to be associated to membranes according to the electron microscopy images (Fig. 4E).

thumbnail

Figure 5. Localization of LdFlabarin-mRed deletion mutants and chimeras.

(A). L. amazonensis cells expressing LdFlabarin-mRed, LdFlabarin/C4S-mRed, F(1–255)-mRed and F(1–12)-mRed-F(256–339) were fractionated into soluble and membrane fractions by 100 000 g centrifugation in presence and absence of 0.5% NP-40; equivalent of 7.5 106 cells supernatants (S and SN, N for NP-40) and pellets (P and PN) were submitted to SDS-PAGE and western blotting with anti-LdFlabarin as in Fig 2D. (B–E) L. amazonensis expressing red fluorescent proteins were fixed, DAPI stained for nuclear (not always visible) and kinetoplast DNAs coloration (blue), and observed under a fluorescence microscope. Constructs are schematically represented by a multicolored bar with the same color codes as in Figure S2; the BAR domain is schematized by a black bar under the constructs. (B) LdFlabarin/N267Q-mRed. (C) LdFlabarin-mRed (1–339). (D) LdFlabarin/C4S-mRed. (E) F(1–12)-Red-F(256–339). (F) F(1–255)-mRed. Bars correspond to 5 µm.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0076380.g005

Taken together, these data demonstrate a plasma membrane localization and point to a structural function for LdFlabarin.

Predicted consensus motifs of LdFlabarin

Trypanosomatid Flabarin sequences were analyzed for the presence of consensus motifs and potential post-translational modification sites, and their conservation among orthologues (Table S1).

Many Leishmania membrane proteins are heavily and variably glycosylated [38], [39]. LdFlabarin has a potential N-glycosylation site at asparagine 267 (N267), conserved in all Leishmania Flabarins but absent in Trypanosoma Flabarins (their sequence being shorter; Fig. S1B). Inactivation of this site by replacement of the asparagine 267 by a glutamine (LdFlabarin/N267Q-mRed) did not affect flagellar localization (Fig. 5B) (nor cell viability).

Some membrane proteins require acylation (palmitoylation) of N- or C- terminal cysteine residues for membrane anchoring [40]. Using the CSS-Palm software [41], we found a potential palmitoylation site in the LdFlabarin N-terminus (amino acids 1–7, MPLCASI) with a palmitoylable cysteine at position 4. This site is conserved in Leishmania and Trypanosoma Flabarins, with the exception of T. vivax (Table S1). The cysteine 4 was replaced by a serine (LdFlabarin/C4S-mRed); as a consequence, the potential palmitoylation site was destroyed. Compared to the flagellar wild-type LdFlabarin-mRed (Fig 5C), the fluorescence was diffuse throughout the cell body (Fig. 5D). Cell fractionation showed that the mutant protein LdFlabatin/C4S-mRed was not associated with the membrane fraction (Fig 5A, lane P) but remained soluble in the 100 000 g supernatant (Fig 5A, lane S). Thus, the cysteine 4 was indispensable for the membrane localization as for the flagellar addressing of LdFlabarin.

Structural domains of LdFlabarin

The amino acid sequence of LdFlabarin was analyzed by several online programs for structure predictions. As summarized in Fig. S2, LdFlabarin comprise (i) a short N-terminal β-strand (S1, aa 1–15), (ii) a putative BAR domain (aa 16/22 to 199/218, limits depending on the prediction program) with 6 α-helices (H1–6), a β-strand (S2) and 5 loops (L1–5), (iii) a “linker” consisting of one loop (L6) and one α-helix (H7), and (iv) a C-terminal disordered domain (D, aa 256–339). The D domain may overlap with loop L6/helix H7 and may comprise an additional α-helix (H8) (not shown). Three amphiphilic helix-rich regions (AHR) were detected within the BAR domain (AHR-1, aa 19–123; AHR-2, aa 202–221) and the C-terminus with a lower probability (AHR-3, aa 291–335). Three potential dimerization regions were predicted on each side of the BAR domain. Although this model will require validation by the 3D-structure determination of LdFlabarin, it provides useful insights on the properties of the protein.

The BAR domain.

Proteins of the BAR domain superfamily bind and tubulate liposomes in vitro [42], [43] and anchor proteins to membranes in vivo. To test the prediction of the presence of a functional BAR domain within LdFlabarin, we produced liposomes and examined their morphology by electron microscopy in the presence and absence of LdFlabarin. Incubation with purified LdFlabarin-His6 resulted in deformations of the liposomes that exhibited tubules of similar diameter (15.9±1.7 nm, mean of 92 measurements) but various length (Fig. 6A–C and F). Tubule length varied with protein concentration and incubation time but diameter was constant and there was no branching. By contrast, incubation without LdFlabarin-His6 showed no liposome deformation/tubulation (Fig. 6D). To rule out the possibility that the His6-tag was responsible for the tubulation, it was removed by thrombin digestion, the protein was further purified and similar tubulation occurred (Fig 6E). Thus, like other BAR domain–containing proteins, LdFlabarin was able to bind lipids and induce membrane curvature in vitro.

thumbnail

Figure 6. LdFlabarin binds and tubulates liposomes in vitro.

Electron micrographs of liposomes incubated with purified recombinant LdFlabarin-His6 (A–C, F) with LdFlabarin without His-tag (E) or with BSA (D).

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0076380.g006

Concerned with its role in vivo, we replaced LdFlabarin BAR domain by the mRed protein and expressed the chimera F(1–12)-mRed-F(256–339) in L. amazonensis. The protein localized diffusely to the entire cell body (Fig. 5E); cell fractionation revealed that it was soluble, absent from the 100 000 g pellet (Fig 5A, lane P) but present in the supernatant (Fig 5A, lane S) (same with detergent, Fig 5A, lanes SN and PN). Thus the putative BAR domain was necessary for LdFlabarin flagellar addressing.

However, the domain was not sufficient for LdFlabarin flagellar addressing, as the protein F(1–255)-mRed, obtained after deletion the tail (aa 256–339), localized mainly to membranes (Fig 5F) and could be found in the 100 000 g pellet (Fig 5A, lane P) but not in the supernatant (Fig 5A, lane S) except in the presence of detergent (Fig 5A lane SN).

In conclusion, LdFlabarin is a flagellar protein; its flagellar addressing depends on three determinants: an N-Terminal potential acylation (palmitoylation) site and a BAR domain, which direct the protein to plasma membranes, and a C-terminal domain which directs the membrane protein to the flagellum.

Discussion

Flabarins are not Arfaptin homologues and are unique to eukaryotes

We report the characterization of Flabarin, a novel Leishmania flagellar protein. It was identified based on its sequence homology to HsArfaptin-1. HsArfaptin-1/-2 localize to the trans-Golgi network (TGN) [25]; they interact with the small G proteins HsRac-1 [28], HsARF-1, -3, -6 [25], [44] and participate in the assembly of trafficking vesicles together with HsARF-1 [45] or HsARL-1 [46], [47]. On the other hand, Leishmania Flabarins are flagellar proteins; their ultrastructural localization and arrangement make it unlikely that they participate in intracellular trafficking. Besides, a close look at the sequence alignments (Fig. S1A) reveals that Flabarins and Arfaptins share identity only in the BAR domains which are located in the C-terminus of HsArfaptin-1 and in the N-terminus of LmFlabarin. Flabarins belong to only one orthologous group, the Group OG5_148786 [30], which exists only in trypanosomatids. Thus, these proteins are certainly not functional homologues.

Flabarins are flagellar proteins

The flagellum is a complex structure, comprising notably a lumen, a plasma membrane, an axoneme, and in the case of trypanosomatids, an additional structure called the PFR (paraflagellar rod). Flagellar targeting consists probably in several different mechanisms, for every protein must be targeted to its specific location and there are several hundreds of them. These mechanisms are being progressively deciphered [48] and reveal complex. Sequence motifs have been found to be involved in a specific flagellar targeting; for example, a simple HLA C-terminal motif is necessary, but not sufficient, for the proteins PFRA and ARP to reach their location in the T. brucei PFR structure [37], [49], while another N-Terminal motif is necessary and sufficient to address the protein ADK-A to the same structure [50]. Concerning flagellar membrane proteins, two main mechanisms have been documented. The first one concerns the Leishmania glucose transporter, where particular internal epitopes and amino-acids are essential [51], [52]. The second category of proteins must be myristoylated and palmitoylated at their N-termini for reaching the flagellar membrane; it is the case of the T. cruzi FCaBP [53], [54], of the T. brucei Calflagins [55] and of the Leishmania HASPB [56] and SMP-1 [57], [58].

For LdFlabarin, flagellar membrane targeting should involve another mechanism: there is no myristoylation site, only a potentially palmitoylable site at the N-terminus, there is a BAR domain, which does not exist in the other cases, and the C-terminus provides the flagellar specificity. In preliminary experiments, we expressed the dominant-negative mutant LdARL-1/T34N, which blocks TGN vesicular trafficking [59]: we observed that the flagellar localization of LdFlabarin-mRed was not modified (not shown), which raises questions about the trafficking pathway used by the protein for reaching its destination. It is being recognized that proteins do not diffuse freely from the membrane of the cell body to the flagellar membrane, and a diffusion barrier has been repeatedly invoked recently for controlling access to the flagellum (or cilium) [60][63]. More work is needed to address these problems.

Flabarins are original BAR domain proteins

First found in amphiphysin, a synaptic vesicle protein [64], later in the yeast Rvs161 protein [18], BAR domains represent an expanding family [14] belonging to a variety of multi-domain proteins from eukaryotes, including the protozoans T. brucei [65] and Leishmania (this work). Several sub-families have been defined, including the archetype Arfaptin BAR domain, the N-, F-, I- and SNX-BAR domains [17], [19], [66]. The basic BAR domain consists of three α-helices folded onto each other which dimerize to form a banana-shaped structure that binds to lipid membrane, recognizes and induces curvature [67]. Additional structures help the BAR domains in membrane anchoring, e.g. the N-terminal amphipathic α-helix of the N-BAR domain of endophilin-1 [68], while neighbouring domains (e.g., PH domains) provide the organelle membrane specificity [17].

The LdFlabarin BAR domain and structure have been predicted by online programs: several α-helices are recognizable between amino acids 16/22 and 218, but the real structure remains to be determined; crystallization attempts are actively pursued. LdFlabarin binds to, deforms and induces the tubulation of lipid membranes in vitro (Fig. 6) like other BAR domains proteins do. Moreover, our deletion studies uncovered two distinctive features of the LdFlabarin BAR domain. First, the BAR domain is necessary, but not sufficient, for membrane binding in vivo, which requires the presence of cysteine 4, a potentially palmitoylated amino acid, and suggests that palmitate could play the same membrane-anchoring role as the N-terminal amphipathic α-helix of N-BAR domains; to our knowledge, it is the first BAR domain of the sort. Second, the flagellar addressing, which depends on the C-terminal region, makes LdFlabarin the first BAR domain protein localized to a flagellum.

BAR domains are dimerization domains. Dimerization regions have been predicted for LdFlabarin (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Structure/cd​d/cdd.shtml [69]). Although our data need confirmation, they suggest that native LdFlabarin auto-associates to form oligomers of discrete sizes (Fig. 2B–C); the ultrastructural helicoidal arrangement around the flagellum would be consistent with such a controlled oligomerization (Fig. 4). In this perspective, we are planning to perform in vitro and in vivo interaction studies with recombinant truncated proteins.

Potential role of Flabarins

Many BAR domain proteins are involved in the biogenesis of membrane vesicles, by protrusion (intracellular traffic) and invagination (endocytosis), depending on the concave or convex curvature they induce or recognize. It is difficult to envision such processes at the flagellum surface because in Leishmania, vesicular endocytosis/exocytosis occur exclusively inside the flagellar pocket [70]. Given its helicoidal arrangement along the flagellum, LdFlabarin could have a morphogenetic function. The nature of the BAR domain (i.e., the banana-shaped dimer) is known to determine the curvature of the membrane to which it binds. Thus, “F-BAR domains typically induce wider membrane tubules compared with the ones induced by BAR/N-BAR domains” [71]; however, there is a large difference in diameter between the LdFlabarin-induced tubules in vitro (15.9±1.7 nm) and the flagellum (308±38 nm). LdFlabarin alone could not generate the flagellum as a large tubule but may help stabilizing its structural complex.

Gene disruption/replacement experiments are in progress, which will hopefully provide some understanding of LdFlabarin role and its involvement in Leishmania flagellar assembly, structure or functioning.

Materials and Methods

Cell culture and transfection

Leishmania amazonensis (MHOM/BR/1987/BA125; MHOM/BR/1987/BA276) and L. donovani (MHOM/ET/1967/Hu3:LV9) promastigotes were cultured at 24°C in AM medium with 7.5% FCS [21], [72]. Electroporations were done in duplicate with 50 µg plasmid, and stable transfectants selected by addition of 50 µg/ml hygromycin (Euromedex) or 10 µg/ml blasticidin (InvivoGen) 24 h later [21].

DNA technology

Conventional methods were used for DNA extractions [73]. Restriction and modification enzymes were from New England Biolabs, oligonucleotides from Eurofins MWG Operon. DNA fragments were amplified with Phusion DNA polymerase (Finnzymes) and cloned into the pUC-18 or pMOS vectors (SureClone Ligation Kit or Blunt Ended PCR Cloning Kit, GE Healthcare) using the E. coli strain XL1-Blue (Stratagene). Inserts were sequenced, analyzed with DNA Strider 1.4f14 [74], and recloned between Nde I and Kpn I sites (unless otherwise mentioned) into pNUS-GFPnH/cH (conferring hygromycin resistance) or pNUS-mRednD/cD (conferring blasticidin resistance) vectors [75], [76], allowing expression in Leishmania of proteins fused at their N/C-terminus either to the Green Fluorescent Protein (GFP) or the monomeric Red Fluorescent Protein (mRFP [77], named here mRed). All constructs were sequenced prior to transfection.

Plasmid constructions

The ORF was PCR amplified from L. donovani LV9 genomic DNA with oligonucleotides (designed from the L. major Friedlin genome [78]) G165(gatcagatctcatATGCCGCTCTGCGCCAGCATC)/G166(gatcggtaccTCACTCATCGTTGTTTGCGTC) or G165/G167(gatcggtaccCTCATCGTTGTTTGCGTCAAC) and cloned into pNUS-mRedcD (generating pNUS-LdFlabarin-mRedcD) or pNUS-mRednD (generating pNUS-mRednD-LdFlabarin), respectively.

For the LdFlabarin/N267Q mutant, the codon AAC (799–801) was mutated to cAg to replace N267 with Q. First, two overlapping fragments were amplified from the LdFlabarin ORF with oligonucleotides G390(gatcaagcttcatATGCCGCTCTGCGCCAGCATC)/G419(GCGGTGGCTGTTcTgCGATGTGACATC) and G418(GATGTCACATCGcAgAACAGCCACCGC)/G391(gatcggatccggtaccCTCATCGTTGTTTGCGTCAAC). Then, the fragments were annealed, LdFlabarin/N267Q amplified with the oligonucleotides G390/G391 and cloned into pNUS-mRedcD (generating pNUS-LdFlabarin/N267Q-mRedcD).

The LdFlabarin/C4S mutant was obtained by amplification from the LdFlabarin ORF with oligonucleotides G436(gatcaagcttcatATGCCGCTCTcCGCCAGCATC (with a c mutation at position 11 to replace C4 with S)/G391 and cloned into pNUS-mRedcD (generating pNUS-LdFlabarin/C4S-mRedcD).

The F(1–255)-mRed mutant was amplified from the LdFlabarin ORF with the oligonucleotides G165/G380(ctcggtaccCGACGCCTCGTTCTTGCGCTG) and cloned into the pNUS-mRedcD vector between Nde I and Kpn I.

The chimera F(1–12)-mRed-F(256–339) was constructed in three steps as follows. First, the C-terminal fragment F(256–339) was amplified from the LdFlabarin ORF with the oligonucleotides G381/G441(gatcggatccggtaccTCACTCATCGTTGTTTGCGTCAAC) and cloned between Nde I and Kpn I sites of pNUS-mRednD (thus replacing the mRed ORF), to generate the vector pNUS-F(255–339). Second, for the N-terminal fragment F1–12 (nt 1–36), 5 µg complementary oligonucleotides G344B(tatgCCGCTCTGCGCCAGCATCCCCGCGACGGTCGACggt​ac) and G345B(cGTCGACCGTCGCGGGGATGCTGGCGCAGAGCGGca) were boiled together in 40 mM Tris/HCl pH 7.5, 20 mM MgCl2, 50 mM NaCl, 5 mM DTT for 1 min and cooled slowly to room temperature for about 2 h; the annealed fragment was then cloned into pNUS-mRedcD to generate the vector pNUS-F(1–12)-mRedcD. Third, the F(1–12)-mRed fragment was amplified from the pNUS-F(1–12)-mRedcD with the oligonucleotides G390/G440(gatccatatgGGCGCCGGTGGAGTGGCGGCC), cloned (and oriented) into the Nde I site of pNUS-F(255–339), to generate the vector pNUS-F(1–12)-mRed-F(255–339).

LaPFR2C (Paraflagellar Rod protein 2C) was amplified from L. amazonensis BA276 genomic DNA with the oligonucleotides G308B(ctcggtaccagatctcatATGAGCATCGCTGCGGACATGG​CGTACCC)/G309(ctcggtaccagatctCTACTCGGTGATCTGTTGCA), as designed from the L. mexicana sequence (GenBank U45884) [34]. The LaPFR-2C ORF (submitted to GenBank, accession number JN874564) comprised 1797 bp/591 amino acids (98%/98.7% identity to LmxPFR2C, respectively [34]) with 36 nucleotides/8 amino acids differences. The ORF was cloned into the Acc65 I site of the pNUS-GFPnH vector (pNUS-GFPnH-LaPFR2C).

LdCentrin [31] (GenBank AF406767) was amplified from L. donovani LV9 genomic DNA with oligonucleotides G446(gatccatATGGCTGCGCTGACGGATGAACA)/G447(gatcggtaccCTTTCCACGCATGTGCAGCA) and cloned into pNUS-GFPcH (pNUS-LdCentrin-GFPcH); its sequence was 100% identical to the GenBank sequence.

Recombinant LdFlabarin-His6, anti-LdFlabarin rabbit antiserum

The LdFlabarin ORF was excised from the pNUS-LdFlabarin-mRedcD and transferred to the bacterial expression vector pET-29b (Novagen) (pET29b-LdFlabarin-His6) for expression in the E. coli strain BL21(DE3). The transformed bacteria were grown at 36°C in LB broth containing 100 µg/ml kanamycin. When cultures reached an OD at 600 nm of 0.6, isopropyl-β-D-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG) was added to a concentration of 0.4 mM to induce expression of LdFlabarin-His6. Bacteria were harvested 3–4 h later.

Recombinant LdFlabarin-His6 was purified by fast protein liquid chromatography (ÄKTA Purifier system) at 4°C. After IPTG induction, bacteria were resuspended in 10 ml binding buffer (5 mM imidazole in 10 mM Tris pH 8, 300 mM NaCl) and sonicated (3×90 s pulses interrupted with cooling on ice). After elimination of cell debris by centrifugation at 25000 g, the supernatant was applied to a nickel-chelated agarose affinity column (Qiagen). After extensive washes with binding buffer, the protein was eluted with an imidazole gradient (5–1000 mM) and 2 ml fractions were collected. The protein was eluted with about 150 mM imidazole (Fraction 16: F16). Fractions were analyzed by SDS-PAGE. The recombinant protein was concentrated to 1 mg/ml in Hepes 50 mM pH 7.5, 150 mM KCl, glycerol 10% using Vivaspin ultrafiltration device (Vivascience Sartorius, cutoff 10000 Da) and stored at 4°C. Protein concentration was determined by UV spectra and by the Bradford method [79].

Four 5-µg aliquots of LdFlabarin-His6 were injected every other week to a female NZW rabbit (Charles River Laboratories) at the IRD animal facility. The first injection was done with 50% complete Freund adjuvant, the last 3 with incomplete Freund adjuvant). Each time, ten (0.1 ml) aliquots of the homogenate were injected into the right side of the rabbit. The reactivity of the antiserum was tested 10 days after the third injection by Western blot. The final anti-LdFlabarin antiserum was collected 10 days after the fourth injection.

Cell lysis, cell fractionation and Western blotting

Leishmania total protein extraction was done as described [21]. For cell fractionation, 100 ml log phase cells (1.5 107 cells/ml) were washed twice with PBS, resuspended in 1 ml hypotonic Buffer I (10 mM Hepes pH 7.4, 1 mM DTT, 2 mM EDTA, 1/100 dilution of Sigma P8215 protease inhibitors cocktail) and incubated for 10 min in ice. Cells were mechanically broken by 20 passages through a 26GX1/2″ gauge. After addition of cold 3.5 ml Buffer II (same as Buffer I except 50 mM Hepes pH 7.4 instead of 10 mM)±0.5% NP-40, the lysates were cleared by 1500 g 15 min centrifugation and the supernatants further centrifuged at 100 000 g for 1 h at 4°C (SW55Ti rotor, Beckman Coulter Optima LE-80K centrifuge). The last supernatants represented the soluble fractions and the pellets, resuspended in 4.5 ml Buffer II±0.5% NP-40, the membrane fractions.

Western blotting was done as described [21] and revelation as in [59]; anti-LdFlabarin (1:2000 dilution) was additioned with BL-21 E. coli homogenate for eliminating an eventual reactivity of the rabbit serum with bacterial contaminants of the purified recombinant LdFlabarin.

Fluorescence microscopy

Fluorescence microscopy was done as described [21]. Cells were spread onto poly-L-lysine-treated coverslips and fixed with 4% PFA for 20 min at room temperature. Coverslips were washed 3×5 min with PBS and DNA was stained with DAPI (10 µg/ml) during the last 5-min wash before mounting on microscope slides with Mowiol. For indirect immunofluorescence, coverslips were incubated for 2 h with anti-LdFlabarin (1:1000 dilution), and for 2 h with 8 µg/ml goat anti-rabbit IgG conjugated to Alexa Fluor 488 (Molecular Probes). Observations were done with an Axioplan 2 Zeiss fluorescence microscope and a 100X oil lens. Images were acquired with a Princeton Instruments or Photometrics CoolSnap HQ camera and analyzed with Metaview (Universal Imaging) and Adobe Photoshop. Acquisition times: phase contrast, 100 ms; DAPI, 50 ms; red and green channels, 50–500 ms, depending on the fluorescence level to avoid saturation.

Freezing and freeze substitution for ultrastructural studies

Leishmania pellets (0.5–1 109 cells) were washed three times in PBS buffer, incubated with 2% dextran in PBS buffer for 1 h and placed on the surface of a Formvar-coated copper electron microscopy grid (400 mesh). Each loop was quickly submersed in precooled liquid propane and kept at −180°C in liquid nitrogen. The loops were incubated in 4% osmium tetroxide in dry acetone at −82°C for 48 h (substitution fixation), gradually warmed to room temperature, and washed three times in dry acetone. Specimens were stained for 1 h with 1% uranyl acetate in acetone at 4°C in the dark. After another rinse in dry acetone, the loops were infiltrated progressively with araldite (epoxy resin; Fluka). Ultrathin sections were contrasted with lead citrate.

Immunogold electron microscopy

Leishmania cells were cryofixed in 2% dextran as above and freeze substituted with acetone plus 0.1% glutaraldehyde for 3 days at −82°C. Samples were rinsed with acetone at −20°C and embedded progressively at −20°C in LR Gold resin (EMS). Resin polymerization was carried out at −20°C for 3 days under UV illumination, after which ultrathin LR Gold sections were collected on Formvar-coated nickel grids. Sections were incubated at room temperature with 1 mg/ml glycine for 5 min, with FCS (1:20) for 5 min, with anti-Red antiserum (1:250) (MOLBIO ML75489) or anti-LdFlabarin (1:2000) for 45 min and with an anti-rabbit/10 nm gold particles conjugate (1:500) (BioCell) for 45 min. The sections were rinsed with distilled water and contrasted for 5 min with 2% uranyl acetate in water followed by 1% lead citrate for 1 min. Specimens were observed with a HITACHI 7650 electron microscope (Electronic Imaging Pole of Bordeaux Imaging Center).

Liposome preparation and in vitro tubulation assays

Phosphatidylcholine (DOPC) and phosphatidylethanolamine (DOPE) (ratio: 70/30; 10 mg/ml in chloroform; Avanti Polar Lipids) were dried under a stream of argon and kept under vacuum for at least 2 h. The lipids were then redissolved in Hepes 50 mM pH 7.5, KCl 150 mM, glycerol 10% to a final concentration of 1 mg/ml, gently vortexed, subjected to seven freeze–thaw cycles, and immediately extruded 21 times through a 50- or 100-nm polycarbonate membrane (Avanti Polar Lipids). The homogeneity of the liposome preparations was tested using dynamic light scattering (DLS). For tubulation assays, 10 µl of liposomes were incubated with 10 µl of recombinant LdFlabarin-His6 (1 mg/ml = 24 µM) or LdFlabarin without Histidine-Tag (repurified after thrombin digestion) for 2 h at room temperature. Samples were applied for 15 min to Formvar/carbon-coated copper grids, washed with distilled water and stained with 2% uranyl acetate in water for 1 min. Specimens were examined on a HITACHI 7650 electron microscope as above.

Supporting Information

Figure S1.

A: Sequence alignment between H. sapiens Arfaptin-1 and L. major Flabarin. Alignment of HsArfaptin-1 (Genbank U52521) and LmFlabarin (LmjF.27.1730) obtained from GeneDB [GeneDB-Blast-Lmajor, 2013 #13595]. Score = 84 (34.6 bits), Expect = 0.033, P = 0.032. Identities = 54/213 (25%), Positives = 88/213 (41%). Identical amino acids are highlighted in black, similar amino acids (apolar, polar) in grey. B: Sequence alignment of LdFlabarin and its orthologues. Clustal W (1.83) (http://www.ch.embnet.org/software/Clusta​lW.html) alignment of LdFlabarin and its orthologues (Group OG5_148786, http://orthomcl.org): L. infantum (LinJ.27.1630), 99,7% id.; L. major (LmjF.27.1730), 90,3% id.; L. mexicana (LmxM.27.1730), 88,2% id.; L. braziliensis (LbrM.27.1860), 73,5% id.; Trypanosoma cruzi (TcCLB.506125.20 indicated by ♯, and TcCLB.504153.30), 20,3 and 19,8% id., respectively; T. vivax (TvY486_0013090), 19,2% id.; T. congolense (TcIL3000.11.2210.1), 18,3% id.; T. brucei (Tb927.11.2410, formerly Tb11.22.0001), 18% id. Two other orthologues, Tb427tmp.22.0001 (from another T. brucei strain) and Tbg972.11.2660 (T. gambiense), were not included because their amino acid sequences are identical to Tb927.11.2410. Identical amino acids are highlighted in black; *, and: correspond to “identity”, “semi-conservative substitution” and “conservative substitution”, respectively.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0076380.s001

(TIF)

Figure S2.

Analysis of structural domains and motifs of LdFlabarin. Schematic representation of LdFlabarin structural domain predictions by NCBI-Blast (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/blast/Blast.​cgi), secondary structure predictions by PredictProtein (http://www.predictprotein.org/) and Disopred (http://bioinf.cs.ucl.ac.uk/disopred/), and potential amphiphilic helices by Heliquest (http://heliquest.ipmc.cnrs.fr). Amino acids are numbered starting with the first methionine. NB: (i) the α-helix H7 (227–256; PredictProtein) is considered as belonging to the disordered region (D) by Disopred and (ii) there may be a α-helix in the middle of the disordered region (PredictProtein). PredictProtein/Disopred: red is for α-helix (H), blue for β-strand (S), green for loop (L), and yellow for disordered (D); solid lines limited by solid triangles correspond to potential dimerization domains. Heliquest: AHR, amphiphilic α-helix region. The four selected 18-aa windows show α-helices as viewed from above: for a comparison, the first on the left (M1-R18) is not amphiphilic, the other three are; non-polar amino acids are yellow, grey, and green; polar amino acids are blue for cationic, red for anionic, and pink and purple for neutral.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0076380.s002

(TIF)

Table S1.

Potential modification sites of Flabarins and conservation between species.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0076380.s003

(DOC)

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Pr. P. Bastien for his support and encouragements; Dr. A. Barral for the L. amazonensis strains BA125 and BA276; Y. Balard, N. Biteau, L. Crobu, C. Giroud, L. Talignani and Drs. S. Besteiro, C. Blaineau, M. Pagès, D. Robinson, Y. Sterkers and D. Tareste for their help; C. Hubert (Sequencing Facility of Bordeaux, France) for some DNA sequencing; P. Boutinaud and N. Barougier (Animal Facility, IRD, Montpellier, France) for the rabbit immunization and the anti-LdFlabarin antiserum collection; the Electronic Imaging Pole of Bordeaux Imaging Center. This work was initiated at the UMR CNRS 5234 (Bordeaux) and continued at both the UMR CNRS 5290 (formerly 2724, Montpellier) and the UMR CNRS 5095 (Bordeaux).

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: ET GM. Performed the experiments: ML ET MT BS FB CB CS CM BE AS GM. Analyzed the data: ML ET MT BS FB CB CM BE AS GM. Wrote the paper: ET GM.

References

  1. 1. Vincensini L, Blisnick T, Bastin P (2011) 1001 model organisms to study cilia and flagella. Biol Cell 103: 109–130. doi: 10.1042/bc20100104
  2. 2. Dutcher SK (1995) Flagellar assembly in two hundred and fifty easy-to-follow steps. Trends Genet 11: 398–404. doi: 10.1016/s0168-9525(00)89123-4
  3. 3. Silflow CD, Lefebvre PA (2001) Assembly and motility of eukaryotic cilia and llagella. Lessons from Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Plant Physiol 127: 1500–1507. doi: 10.1104/pp.010807
  4. 4. Broadhead R, Dawe HR, Farr H, Griffiths S, Hart SR, et al. (2006) Flagellar motility is required for the viability of the bloodstream trypanosome. Nature 440: 224–227. doi: 10.1038/nature04541
  5. 5. Ralston KS, Kabututu ZP, Melehani JH, Oberholzer M, Hill KL (2009) The Trypanosoma brucei flagellum: moving parasites in new directions. Annu Rev Microbiol 63: 335–362. doi: 10.1146/annurev.micro.091208.073353
  6. 6. Rosenbaum JL, Witman GB (2002) Intraflagellar transport. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 3: 813–825. doi: 10.1038/nrm952
  7. 7. Taschner M, Bhogaraju S, Lorentzen E (2012) Architecture and function of IFT complex proteins in ciliogenesis. Differentiation 83: S12–22. doi: 10.1016/j.diff.2011.11.001
  8. 8. Lee L (2011) Mechanisms of mammalian ciliary motility: Insights from primary ciliary dyskinesia genetics. Gene 473: 57–66. doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2010.11.006
  9. 9. Simpson AGB, Stevens JR, Lukes J (2006) The evolution and diversity of kinetoplastid flagellates. Trends Parasitol 22: 168–174. doi: 10.1016/j.pt.2006.02.006
  10. 10. Antoine J-C, Lang T, Prina E (1999) Biologie cellulaire de Leishmania. In: Dedet J-P, Les Leishmanioses. Paris: Ellipses. pp. 41–58.
  11. 11. Cuvillier A, Miranda JC, Ambit A, Barral A, Merlin G (2003) Abortive infection of Lutzomyia longipalpis insect vectors by aflagellated LdARL-3A-Q70L overexpressing Leishmania amazonensis parasites. Cell Microbiol 5: 717–728. doi: 10.1046/j.1462-5822.2003.00316.x
  12. 12. Forestier CL, Machu C, Loussert C, Pescher P, Spath GF (2011) Imaging host cell-Leishmania interaction dynamics implicates parasite motility, lysosome recruitment, and host cell wounding in the infection process. Cell Host Microbe 9: 319–330. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2011.03.011
  13. 13. Gluenz E, Ginger ML, McKean PG (2010) Flagellum assembly and function during the Leishmania life cycle. Curr Opin Microbiol 13: 473–479. doi: 10.1016/j.mib.2010.05.008
  14. 14. BAR-Superfamily (2013) Feb 21, last date accessed. http://wwwbar-superfamilyorg/website.
  15. 15. Masuda M, Mochizuki N (2010) Structural characteristics of BAR domain superfamily to sculpt the membrane. Semin Cell Dev Biol 21: 391–398. doi: 10.1016/j.semcdb.2010.01.010
  16. 16. Tarricone C, Xiao B, Justin N, Walker PA, Rittinger K, et al. (2001) The structural basis of Arfaptin-mediated cross-talk between Rac and Arf signalling pathways. Nature 411: 215–219. doi: 10.1038/35075620
  17. 17. Qualmann B, Koch D, Kessels MM (2011) Let's go bananas: revisiting the endocytic BAR code. EMBO J 30: 3501–3515. doi: 10.1038/emboj.2011.266
  18. 18. Sivadon P, Bauer F, Aigle M, Crouzet M (1995) Actin cytoskeleton and budding pattern are altered in the yeast rvs161 mutant: the Rvs161 protein shares common domains with the brain protein amphiphysin. Mol Gen Genet 246: 485–495. doi: 10.1007/bf00290452
  19. 19. Suetsugu S, Toyooka K, Senju Y (2010) Subcellular membrane curvature mediated by the BAR domain superfamily proteins. Semin Cell Dev Biol 21: 340–349. doi: 10.1016/j.semcdb.2009.12.002
  20. 20. Frost A, Unger VM, De Camilli P (2009) The BAR domain superfamily: membrane-molding macromolecules. Cell 137: 191–196. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2009.04.010
  21. 21. Cuvillier A, Redon F, Antoine J-C, Chardin P, DeVos T, et al. (2000) LdARL-3A, a Leishmania promastigote-specific ADP-ribosylation factor-like protein, is essential for flagellum integrity. J Cell Sci 113: 2065–2074.
  22. 22. Sahin A, Lemercier G, Tetaud E, Espiau B, Myler P, et al. (2004) Trypanosomatid flagellum biogenesis: ARL-3A is involved in several species. Exp Parasitol 108: 126–133. doi: 10.1016/j.exppara.2004.07.010
  23. 23. Sahin A, Espiau B, Marchand C, Merlin G (2008) Flagellar length depends on LdARL-3A GTP/GDP Unaltered Cycling in Leishmania amazonensis. Mol Biochem Parasitol 157: 83–87. doi: 10.1016/j.molbiopara.2007.08.003
  24. 24. TriTrypDB (2013) Available: http://tritrypdborg/tritrypdb/. 2013 Feb 21.
  25. 25. Kanoh H, Williger BT, Exton JH (1997) Arfaptin 1, a putative cytosolic target protein of ADP-ribosylation factor, is recruited to Golgi membranes. J Biol Chem 272: 5421–5429. doi: 10.1074/jbc.272.9.5421
  26. 26. Boman AL, Kuai J, Zhu XJ, Chen J, Kuriyama R, et al. (1999) Arf proteins bind to mitotic kinesin-like protein 1 (MKLP1) in a GTP-dependent fashion. Cell Motil Cytoskeleton 44: 119–132. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0169(199910)44:2<119::aid-cm4>3.0.co;2-c
  27. 27. Van Valkenburgh H, Shern JF, Sharer JD, Zhu X, Kahn RA (2001) ADP-ribosylation factors (ARFs) and ARF-like 1 (ARL1) have both specific and shared effectors: characterizing ARL1-binding proteins. J Biol Chem 276: 22826–22837. doi: 10.1074/jbc.m102359200
  28. 28. Van Aelst L, Joneson T, Bar-Sagi D (1996) Identification of a novel Rac1-interacting protein involved in membrane ruffling. EMBO J 15: 3778–3786.
  29. 29. Curotto de Lafaille MA, Laban A, Wirth DF (1992) Gene expression in Leishmania: analysis of essential 5′ DNA sequences. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 89: 2703–2707. doi: 10.1073/pnas.89.7.2703
  30. 30. OrthoMCLDB (2012) Available: http://orthomclorg/cgi-bin/OrthoMclWebcg​i?rm=indx. 2012 Sep 20.
  31. 31. Selvapandiyan A, Duncan R, Debrabant A, Bertholet S, Sreenivas G, et al. (2001) Expression of a mutant form of Leishmania donovani centrin reduces the growth of the parasite. J Biol Chem 276: 43253–43261. doi: 10.1074/jbc.m106806200
  32. 32. Cachon J, Cachon M, Cosson M-P, Cosson J (1988) The Paraflagellar Rod: a structure in search of a function. Biol Cell 63: 169–181. doi: 10.1016/0248-4900(88)90056-1
  33. 33. Maga JA, LeBowitz JH (1999) Unravelling the kinetoplastid paraflagellar rod. Trends Cell Biol 9: 409–413. doi: 10.1016/s0962-8924(99)01635-9
  34. 34. Moore LL, Santrich C, Lebowitz JH (1996) Stage-specific expression of the Leishmania mexicana paraflagellar rod protein PFR-2. Mol Biochem Parasitol 80: 125–135. doi: 10.1016/0166-6851(96)02688-6
  35. 35. Schlaeppi K, Deflorin J, Seebeck T (1989) The major component of the paraflagellar rod of Trypanosoma brucei is a helical protein that is encoded by two identical, tandemly linked genes. J Cell Biol 109: 1695–1709. doi: 10.1083/jcb.109.4.1695
  36. 36. Kunz S, Luginbuehl E, Seebeck T (2009) Gene Conversion Transfers the GAF-A Domain of Phosphodiesterase TbrPDEB1 to One Allele of TbrPDEB2 of Trypanosoma brucei. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 3: e455. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0000455
  37. 37. Bastin P, MacRae TH, Francis SB, Matthews KR, Gull K (1999) Flagellar morphogenesis: protein targeting and assembly in the paraflagellar rod of trypanosomes. Mol Cell Biol 19: 8191–8200.
  38. 38. Ilg T (2000) Proteophosphoglycans of Leishmania. Parasitol Today 16: 489–497. doi: 10.1016/s0169-4758(00)01791-9
  39. 39. Ilgoutz SC, McConville MJ (2001) Function and assembly of the Leishmania surface coat. Int J Parasitol 31: 899–908. doi: 10.1016/s0020-7519(01)00197-7
  40. 40. Linder ME, Deschenes RJ (2007) Palmitoylation: policing protein stability and traffic. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 8: 74–84. doi: 10.1038/nrm2084
  41. 41. Ren J, Wen L, Gao X, Jin C, Xue Y, et al. (2008) CSS-Palm 2.0: an updated software for palmitoylation sites prediction. Protein Eng Des Sel 21: 639–644. doi: 10.1093/protein/gzn039
  42. 42. Takei K, Slepnev VI, Haucke V, De Camilli P (1999) Functional partnership between amphiphysin and dynamin in clathrin-mediated endocytosis. Nat Cell Biol 1: 33–39. doi: 10.1038/9004
  43. 43. Peter BJ, Kent HM, Mills IG, Vallis Y, Butler PJ, et al. (2004) BAR domains as sensors of membrane curvature: the amphiphysin BAR structure. Science 303: 495–499. doi: 10.1126/science.1092586
  44. 44. D'Souza-Schorey C, Boshans RL, McDonough M, Stahl PD, Van Aelst L (1997) A role for POR1, a Rac1-interacting protein, in ARF6-mediated cytoskeletal rearrangements. EMBO J 16: 5445–5454. doi: 10.1093/emboj/16.17.5445
  45. 45. Gehart H, Goginashvili A, Beck R, Morvan J, Erbs E, et al. (2012) The BAR Domain Protein Arfaptin-1 Controls Secretory Granule Biogenesis at the trans-Golgi Network. Dev Cell 23: 756–768. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2012.07.019
  46. 46. Man Z, Kondo Y, Koga H, Umino H, Nakayama K, et al. (2011) Arfaptins are localized to the trans-Golgi by interaction with Arl1, but not Arfs. J Biol Chem 286: 11569–11578. doi: 10.1074/jbc.m110.201442
  47. 47. Nakamura K, Man Z, Xie Y, Hanai A, Makyio H, et al. (2012) Structural basis for membrane binding specificity of the Bin/Amphiphysin/Rvs (BAR) domain of Arfaptin-2 determined by Arl1 GTPase. J Biol Chem 287: 25478–25489. doi: 10.1074/jbc.m112.365783
  48. 48. Fridberg A, Buchanan KT, Engman DM (2007) Flagellar membrane trafficking in kinetoplastids. Parasitol Res 100: 205–212. doi: 10.1007/s00436-006-0329-2
  49. 49. Ersfeld K, Gull K (2001) Targeting of cytoskeletal proteins to the flagellum of Trypanosoma brucei. J Cell Sci 114: 141–148.
  50. 50. Pullen TJ, Ginger ML, Gaskell SJ, Gull K (2004) Protein targeting of an unusual, evolutionarily conserved adenylate kinase to a eukaryotic flagellum. Mol Biol Cell 15: 3257–3265. doi: 10.1091/mbc.e04-03-0217
  51. 51. Ignatushchenko M, Nasser MI, Landfear SM (2004) Sequences required for the flagellar targeting of an integral membrane protein. Mol Biochem Parasitol 135: 89–100. doi: 10.1016/j.molbiopara.2004.01.009
  52. 52. Tran KD, Rodriguez-Contreras D, Shinde U, Landfear SM (2012) Both sequence and context are important for flagellar targeting of a glucose transporter. J Cell Sci 125: 3293–3298. doi: 10.1242/jcs.103028
  53. 53. Godsel LM, Engman DM (1999) Flagellar protein localization mediated by a calcium-myristoyl/palmitoyl switch mechanism. EMBO J 18: 2057–2065. doi: 10.1093/emboj/18.8.2057
  54. 54. Buchanan KT, Ames JB, Asfaw SH, Wingard JN, Olson CL, et al. (2005) A flagellum-specific calcium sensor. J Biol Chem 280: 40104–40111. doi: 10.1074/jbc.m505777200
  55. 55. Emmer BT, Souther C, Toriello KM, Olson CL, Epting CL, et al. (2009) Identification of a palmitoyl acyltransferase required for protein sorting to the flagellar membrane. J Cell Sci 122: 867–874. doi: 10.1242/jcs.041764
  56. 56. Denny PW, Gokool S, Russell DG, Field MC, Smith DF (2000) Acylation-dependent protein export in Leishmania. J Biol Chem 275: 11017–11025. doi: 10.1074/jbc.275.15.11017
  57. 57. Tull D, Vince JE, Callaghan JM, Naderer T, Spurck T, et al. (2004) SMP-1, a Member of a New Family of Small Myristoylated Proteins in Kinetoplastid Parasites, Is Targeted to the Flagellum Membrane in Leishmania. Mol Biol Cell 15: 4775–4786. doi: 10.1091/mbc.e04-06-0457
  58. 58. Tull D, Naderer T, Spurck T, Mertens HDT, Heng J, et al. (2010) Membrane protein SMP-1 is required for normal flagellum function in Leishmania. J Cell Sci 123: 544–554. doi: 10.1242/jcs.059097
  59. 59. Sahin A, Espiau B, Tetaud E, Cuvillier A, Lartigue L, et al. (2008) The Leishmania ARL-1 and Golgi traffic. PLOs One 3: e1620. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0001620
  60. 60. Pazour GJ, Bloodgood RA (2008) Targeting Proteins to the Ciliary Membrane. In: Bradley KY, Current Topics in Developmental Biology: Academic Press. 115–149.
  61. 61. Milenkovic L, Scott MP, Rohatgi R (2009) Lateral transport of Smoothened from the plasma membrane to the membrane of the cilium. J Cell Biol 187: 365–374. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200907126
  62. 62. Chih B, Liu P, Chinn Y, Chalouni C, Komuves LG, et al. (2012) A ciliopathy complex at the transition zone protects the cilia as a privileged membrane domain. Nat Cell Biol 14: 61–72. doi: 10.1038/ncb2410
  63. 63. MacLean LM, O'Toole PJ, Stark M, Marrison J, Seelenmeyer C, et al. (2012) Trafficking and release of Leishmania metacyclic HASPB on macrophage invasion. Cell Microbiol 14: 740–761. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-5822.2012.01756.x
  64. 64. Lichte B, Veh RW, Meyer HE, Kilimann MW (1992) Amphiphysin, a novel protein associated with synaptic vesicles. EMBO J 11: 2521–2530.
  65. 65. Koumandou VL, Klute MJ, Herman EK, Nunez-Miguel R, Dacks JB, et al. (2011) Evolutionary reconstruction of the retromer complex and its function in Trypanosoma brucei. J Cell Sci 124: 1496–1509. doi: 10.1242/jcs.081596
  66. 66. van Weering JR, Verkade P, Cullen PJ (2010) SNX-BAR proteins in phosphoinositide-mediated, tubular-based endosomal sorting. Semin Cell Dev Biol 21: 371–380. doi: 10.1016/j.semcdb.2009.11.009
  67. 67. Lee E, Marcucci M, Daniell L, Pypaert M, Weisz OA, et al. (2002) Amphiphysin 2 (Bin1) and T-tubule biogenesis in muscle. Science 297: 1193–1196. doi: 10.1126/science.1071362
  68. 68. Kjaerulff O, Brodin L, Jung A (2011) The structure and function of endophilin proteins. Cell Biochem Biophys 60: 137–154. doi: 10.1007/s12013-010-9137-5
  69. 69. Marchler-Bauer A, Lu S, Anderson JB, Chitsaz F, Derbyshire MK, et al. (2011) CDD: a Conserved Domain Database for the functional annotation of proteins. Nucleic Acids Res 39: D225–229. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkq1189
  70. 70. Overath P, Stierhof Y-D, Wiese M (1997) Endocytosis and secretion in trypanosomatid parasites: tumultuous traffic in a pocket. Trends Cell Biol 7: 27–33. doi: 10.1016/s0962-8924(97)10046-0
  71. 71. Saarikangas J, Zhao H, Lappalainen P (2010) Regulation of the actin cytoskeleton-plasma membrane interplay by phosphoinositides. Physiol Rev 90: 259–289. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00036.2009
  72. 72. Lodes MJ, Merlin G, DeVos T, Gosh A, Madhubala R, et al. (1995) Increased expression of LD1 genes transcribed by RNA polymerase I in Leishmania donovani as a result of duplication into the rRNA gene locus. Mol Cell Biol 15: 6845–6853.
  73. 73. Sambrook J, Fritsch EF, Maniatis T (1989) Molecular Cloning, a Laboratory Manual (Second Edition); Ford N, Nolan C, Ferguson M, Cold Spring Harbor, New York: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press.
  74. 74. Marck C (1988) DNA Strider, a C program for the fast analysis of DNA and protein sequences on the Apple MacIntosh family of computers. Nucleic Acids Res 16: 1829–1836. doi: 10.1093/nar/16.5.1829
  75. 75. Tetaud E, Lecuix I, Sheldrake T, Baltz T, Fairlamb AH (2002) A new expression vector for Crithidia fasciculata and Leishmania. Mol Biochem Parasitol 120: 195–204. doi: 10.1016/s0166-6851(02)00002-6
  76. 76. Tetaud E, Lemercier G (2011) The pNUS site. Available: http://wwwibgcu-bordeaux2fr/pNUS/. 2011 Nov 5.
  77. 77. Campbell RE, Tour O, Palmer AE, Steinbach PA, Baird GS, et al. (2002) A monomeric red fluorescent protein. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99: 7877–7882. doi: 10.1073/pnas.082243699
  78. 78. GeneDB-L.major (2013) Available: http://wwwgenedborg/genedb/leish/indexjs​p.2013 Feb 21.
  79. 79. Bradford MM (1976) A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem 72: 248–254. doi: 10.1006/abio.1976.9999