To compare the safety and efficacy of adjunctive aripiprazole versus placebo for antipsychotic-induced hyperprolactinemia.
Population: adult patients presenting with antipsychotic-induced hyperprolactinemia diagnosed by prolactin level with or without prolactin-related symptoms. Interventions: adjunctive aripiprazole vs. adjunctive placebo. Outcome measures: adverse events and efficacy of treatment. Studies: randomized controlled trials.
Five randomized controlled trials with a total of 639 patients (326 adjunctive aripiprazole, 313 adjunctive placebo) met the inclusion criteria. Adjunctive aripiprazole was associated with a 79.11% (125/158) prolactin level normalization rate. Meta-analysis of insomnia, headache, sedation, psychiatric disorder, extrapyramidal symptom, dry mouth, and fatigue showed no significant differences in the adjunctive aripiprazole treatment group compared with the placebo group (risk difference (Mantel-Haenszel, random or fixed) −0.05 to 0.04 (95% confidence interval −0.13 to 0.16); I2 = 0% to 68%, P = 0.20 to 0.70). However, sedation, insomnia, and headache were more frequent when the adjunctive aripiprazole dose was higher than 15 mg/day. Meta-analysis of the prolactin level normalization indicated adjunctive aripiprazole was superior to placebo (risk difference (Mantel-Haenszel, random) 0.76 (95% confidence interval 0.67 to 0.85); I2 = 43%, P<0.00001). The subgroup analysis confirmed that the subjects who received adjunctive aripiprazole 5 mg/day showed a degree of prolactin normalization similar to that of all participants. No significant differences between groups in discontinuation and improvements of psychiatric symptoms.
Adjunctive aripiprazole is both safe and effective as a reasonable choice treatment for patients with antipsychotic-induced hyperprolactinemia. The appropriate dose of adjunctive aripiprazole may be 5 mg/day.
Citation: Li X, Tang Y, Wang C (2013) Adjunctive Aripiprazole Versus Placebo for Antipsychotic-Induced Hyperprolactinemia: Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. PLoS ONE 8(8): e70179. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0070179
Editor: Xiang Yang Zhang, Baylor College of Medicine, United States of America
Received: March 26, 2013; Accepted: June 16, 2013; Published: August 1, 2013
Copyright: © 2013 Li et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Funding: The study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81071083). This study was also funded by the Beijing Science and Technology Commission (D101107047810001 ). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Hyperprolactinemia is a common and serious side effect of antipsychotic treatment . Hyperprolactinemia is an apparent challenge in the treatment of antipsychotic-induced adverse effects, particularly in female patients, with a prevalence between 42%–66% . Hyperprolactinemia has both short and long-term consequences including menstrual irregularities, amenorrhea, galactorrhea, gynecomastia, sexual dysfunction, infertility, osteoporosis, and even breast cancer –.
Four strategies have been recommended for the treatment of this side effect. (1) Reduction of antipsychotic dose, but maintenance treatments with a reduction to a lower dose have a higher relapse rate than the no-dose-reduction treatment . (2) Switching to a different antipsychotic agent, however this is not always possible if the patient has responded well to the current antipsychotic. Furthermore, the alternative antipsychotics may be associated with other adverse effects, such as sedation, weight gain, and diabetes –. (3) Adjunctive dopamine agonists, such as bromocriptine. Evidence suggests the addition of dopamine agonists often aggravates psychosis and abnormal involuntary movements –. (4) Adjunctive herbal medicine, although psychiatrists in China and Japan always add herbal medicine to manage antipsychotic-induced hyperprolactinemia in clinical practice , , only a few, small sample studies have been conducted to test the efficacy , . While it is an interesting and potentially important adjunctive treatment, the findings so far are inconclusive and further studies are clearly needed in this field.
On the other hand, the role of aripiprazole in antipsychotic-induced hyperprolactinemia has recently gained some attention. Several case reports and a small open label trial showed the addition of aripiprazole reversed antipsychotic-induced hyperprolactinemia to risperidone ,  as well as to paliperidone, sulpiride, amisulpride, and ziprasidone –. Randomized controlled trials indicated normalization in prolactin levels by adjunctive aripiprazole in patients maintained with risperidone, haloperidol and sulpiride treatment –. Although adjunctive aripiprazole is effective for hyperprolactinemia, combination therapy is not a standard practice  and it is not recommended by the practice guidelines for the treatment of schizophrenics . Also, studies involving combination therapy have so far yielded conflicting findings regarding efficacy – and the majority of studies have shown that polypharmacy increased the incidence of adverse events –.
As a newer pharmacologic atypical antipsychotic, adjunctive aripiprazole may optimize D2 receptor activity, and thus reduce risk for extrapyramidal symptoms associated with haloperidol or risperidone  and decrease prolactin elevation resulting from full antagonists . Thus, adjunctive aripiprazole may have additional benefits in both efficacy and side effects . Though there have been quite a few randomized controlled trials of adjunctive aripiprazole for hyperprolactinemia, the findings are inconsistent and sometimes conflicting. Some studies indicated that the addition of aripiprazole was generally safe and well tolerated , , , while others found that adjunctive aripiprazole was associated with increased adverse events, including sedation, insomnia, headache, etc. , . So far, there has been no exhaustive system reviews on this topic.
The aim of this meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials was to compare adjunctive aripiprazole treatment with placebo for the treatment of antipsychotic-induced hyperprolactinemia, with particular focus on safety and tolerability.
Types of Studies
Randomized controlled trials comparing adjunctive aripiprazole with placebo for antipsychotic-induced hyperprolactinemia in adult patients were eligible for inclusion. We included studies which reported at least one of the outcome measures mentioned below and with well defined treatment programs. We excluded case series, retrospective studies, non-randomized studies and system reviews.
Types of Outcome Measures
We recorded clinical outcomes based on intent to treat (ITT) analysis if available. The primary outcome measures of this system review were adverse events and efficacy of treatment, as reported in the studies (Table 1). The secondary outcome measures were discontinuation and improvement in psychiatric symptoms (Table 1). The results of statistical heterogeneity were presented in the forest plots.
Table 1. Definition of outcome measures.doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0070179.t001
Selection of Studies
Two authors independently searched the Pubmed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases for randomized controlled trials comparing adjunctive aripiprazole with placebo for antipsychotic-induced hyperprolactinemia. We also searched the Chinese databases (CBM and CNKI databases) using the same key words. The search included all studies published between January 2001 and December 2012, regardless of language. Keywords used included: aripiprazole, hyperprolactinemia, prolactin abnormal, randomized controlled trial, controlled clinical trial, randomized, placebo, drug therapy, randomly, and trial. The keywords were used in combination with the Boolean operators AND, OR, and NOT. We used the “related article” function to supplement the search. We manually searched bibliographies of randomized controlled trials for studies that were missed in the electronic search. Two authors assessed studies that met the inclusion criteria for the meta-analysis independently; the third author would be involved in discussion if any disagreements existed.
Assessment of Risk of Bias in Included Studies
We used the method of random sequence generation (selection bias), allocation concealment (selection bias), blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias), blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias), incomplete outcome data (attrition bias), selective reporting (reporting bias), and other bias to assess the methodological quality of included individual randomized controlled trials. Furthermore, we used the grading of recommendations assessment, development, and evaluation (GRADE) system to rate the quality of evidence and strength of recommendations of this meta-analysis. This was recommended by the Cochrane Collaboration. GRADE included systematic assessments of all included trials across six main domains for each outcome: limitations of the study design and execution, inconsistency, indirectness, and imprecision of results, publication bias, and large treatment effect. Accordingly, we graded the recommendation for outcome measure of either adjunctive aripiprazole or placebo as very low, low, moderate, or high.
We performed the meta-analysis according to the recommendations of the Cochrane Collaboration, using the Review Manager Version 220.127.116.11 software. Two authors independently extracted data for analysis. We presented the summary statistic of dichotomous outcomes as risk difference for adverse events, discontinuation, and treatment efficacy. The Mantel-Haenszel and Inverse-Variance methods were used to combine the summary statistic. We used I2 method to assess the statistical heterogeneity. When combining studies for meta-analysis, we assumed that variation existed between trials, so we used a random effect model to provide a conservative estimate of the results if I2>25% . We used a fixed effect model if no heterogeneity existed. All statistical differences were considered significant when the p<0.05.
We conducted separate subgroup analysis for adverse events, discontinuation and prolactin level normalization of Chinese studies in this meta-analysis. The dose of aripiprazole was all 5 mg/day in Chinese studies, and the definition of hyperprolactinemia was prolactin level >60 µg/L in all of these studies. We did this subgroup analysis to examine if variations in populations, antipsychotics dosage and definition of hyperprolactinemia across studies may have been responsible for the heterogeneity of the primary outcome. We assessed whether these differences influenced the outcome.
We initially considered seven trials and included five in our analysis (Figure 1). Table 2 summarized the characteristics of the five included studies. Of the two excluded, one study was not blind, and the other one did not report method of randomization. Four studies included patients treated in one center; another one was a multi-center study. The diagnosis of hyperprolactinemia was made from the laboratory tests for serum prolactin level (Table 1), in addition there were two studies reported the prolactin-related adverse events.
Figure 1. PRISMA flow diagram.doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0070179.g001
Table 2. Individual study.doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0070179.t002
Randomization methods were reported as computer generated in one study, and random number table generated in another studies. The randomization method was high risk in another study because baseline adaptive random grouping was reported, which was partial randomization. Concealment of allocation was all unclear risk in five studies because it was not reported. Blinding methods were unclear in two studies, the rest of the studies were low risk in blinding. All studies described dropouts and withdrawals (Figure 2).
Figure 2. Risk of bias summary: review authors' judgments about each risk of bias item for each included study.doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0070179.g002
Analysis of Outcomes
Table 3 and Table 4 summarized outcomes for individual randomized controlled trials. A large number of patients were on adjunctive aripiprazole 5 mg/day. Therefore, we did a secondary analysis excluding data from the study with aripiprazole dose >5 mg/day to avoid the risk of any selection bias and over-estimation of treatment effects. Quality assessment of the included studies according to the GRADE approach showed some limitations of the study design and inconsistency, and some strengths of large treatment effect, no obvious indirectness or imprecision of reporting of results. Based on the above assessments, the quality of evidence presented for each outcome ranged from “low” to “high” (Table 5). We did not conduct a funnel plot analysis to show the presence of risk of publication bias, because only five studies included, asymmetry could not be reliably judged. Nonetheless, we did not identify any unpublished negative studies related to the papers.
Table 3. Summary of studies.doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0070179.t003
Table 4. Summary of adverse events and discontinuation.doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0070179.t004
Table 5. GRADE Analysis: quality assessment of adjunctive aripiprazole versus placebo for antipsychotic-induced hyperprolactinemia.doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0070179.t005
Meta-analysis of insomnia, headache, sedation, and psychiatric disorder (Figure 3) showed no significant differences in the adjunctive aripiprazole treatment group compared with the placebo group (risk difference (Mantel-Haenszel, random) −0.02 to 0.03 (95% confidence interval −0.13 to 0.10); I2 = 30% to 68%, P = 0.20 to 0.70).
Figure 3. Adjunctive aripiprazole vs. placebo for antipsychotic-induced hyperprolactinemia: forest plot for insomnia, headache, sedation, and psychiatric disorder.doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0070179.g003
A secondary analysis of insomnia, headache, and sedation including the data from the studies with adjunctive aripiprazole dose 5 mg/day (Figure 4) also showed no significant differences in the adjunctive aripiprazole treatment group compared with the placebo group (risk difference (Mantel-Haenszel, fixed) −0.05 to 0.05 (95% confidence interval −0.12 to 0.11); I2 = 0% to 36%, P = 0.07 to 1.00).
Figure 4. Adjunctive aripiprazole vs. placebo for antipsychotic-induced hyperprolactinemia: forest plot for a secondary analysis of insomnia, headache, sedation and forest plot for extrapyramidal symptoms, dry mouth, and fatigue.doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0070179.g004
Meta-analysis of extrapyramidal symptoms, dry mouth, and fatigue (Figure 4) showed no significant differences between the two groups (risk difference (Mantel-Haenszel, fixed) −0.05 to 0.04 (95% confidence interval −0.12 to 0.16); I2 = 0%, P = 0.22 to 0.55).
Meta-analysis of the prolactin level normalization (Figure 5) showed adjunctive aripiprazole was superior to placebo (risk difference (Mantel-Haenszel, random) 0.76 (95% confidence interval 0.67 to 0.85); I2 = 43%, P<0.00001).
Figure 5. Adjunctive aripiprazole vs. placebo for antipsychotic-induced hyperprolactinemia: forest plot for prolactin level normalization.doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0070179.g005
A secondary analysis of the prolactin level normalization including the data from the studies with adjunctive aripiprazole dose 5 mg/day (Figure 5) also indicated that adjunctive aripiprazole was superior to placebo(risk difference (Mantel-Haenszel, random) 0.74 (95% confidence interval 0.62 to 0.87); I2 = 59%, P<0.00001).
Two studies reported the change of prolactin-related symptoms (Table 2). In one study, 7 of 11 (63.60%) female patients having menstrual disturbances regained menstruation, and 1 of 2 patients (50%) no longer complained symptoms of galactorrhea in adjunctive aripiprazole group (Table S2). In another study, 27 of 28 (96.43%) patients regained menstruation, and 16 of 16 (100%) patients no longer complained symptom of galactorrhea in aripiprazole group. No patients in the placebo group showed fully recovery in prolactin-related symptoms in the two studies.
Meta-analysis of discontinuation (Figure 6) showed no significant differences in the adjunctive aripiprazole treatment group compared with the placebo group (risk difference (Mantel-Haenszel, fixed) −0.00 (95% confidence interval −0.06 to 0.06); I2 = 0%, P = 0.99).
Figure 6. Adjunctive aripiprazole vs. placebo for antipsychotic-induced hyperprolactinemia: forest plot for discontinuation.doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0070179.g006
A secondary analysis of discontinuation including the data from the studies with adjunctive aripiprazole dose 5 mg/day (Figure 6) also showed no significant differences in the adjunctive aripiprazole treatment group compared with the placebo group(risk difference (Mantel-Haenszel, fixed) −0.02 (95% confidence interval −0.09 to 0.04); I2 = 0%, P = 0.46).
Improvement in Psychiatric Symptoms
In all of the five studies, there were differences in the mean change from baseline to endpoint in either PANSS or BPRS total score in the adjunctive aripiprazole treatment group compared with the placebo group. (Table 1, Figure S1). Meta-analysis of improvement in psychiatric symptoms (Figure S1) showed no significant differences in three studies (mean difference (Inverse-Variance, fixed) −0.46 (95% confidence interval −1.13 to 0.20); I2 = 0%, P = 0.17) between the two groups.
This first meta-analysis of five randomized controlled trials including 639 patients compared the safety and efficacy of adjunctive aripiprazole treatment with that of adjunctive placebo in antipsychotic-induced hyperprolactinemia. It showed that adjunctive aripiprazole is generally safe and well tolerated, with no significant increase in the risk of adverse events and discontinuation compared with placebo. No significant differences in insomnia, headache, sedation, psychiatric disorder, extrapyramidal symptoms, dry mouth, and fatigue were found. Furthermore, adjunctive aripiprazole was superior to placebo in prolactin level normalization. However, augmentation with aripiprazole failed to demonstrate significant improvement in psychiatric symptoms compared with placebo.
Strengths of the Study
To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to review the safety of adjunctive aripiprazole treatment. Adverse events occurred at similar incidence rates among patients receiving adjunctive aripiprazole and placebo, except for sedation, insomnia, and headache, which were more frequent in the adjunctive aripiprazole (dose >15 mg/day)group than in the placebo groups. These side effects are known to occur in a small proportion of patients given aripiprazole . Thus we recommend that when one considers adjunctive aripiprazole treatment, attention should be paid to monitoring for symptoms of sedation, insomnia, and headache. Furthermore, the incidence of discontinuation was comparable between adjunctive aripiprazole groups and placebo groups. The results of these analysis showed that adjunctive aripiprazole 5–10 mg/day is safe and well tolerated for the treatment of antipsychotic-induced hyperprolactinemia. Adjunctive aripiprazole’s favorable safety and tolerability profile may lead to improved compliance in the management of hyperprolactinemia. The low rates of adverse events in adjunctive aripiprazole may attribute the pharmacodynamic profile of aripiprazole: potent partial agonist activity at dopamine D2 receptors stabilizes the dopamine system while avoiding the hypodopaminergia that may limit the tolerability of currently available antipsychotics . Although aripiprazole is a partial agonist at D2, clinical deterioration or worsening of symptoms generally did not occur with adjunctive aripiprazole treatment for hyperprolactinemia in this meta-analysis.
Although most case reports, open label studies, and placebo-controlled trials in adult patients have shown that adjunctive aripiprazole is associated with lower prolactin levels, unchanged or even elevated prolactin levels have also been reported by some studies . Our meta-analysis indicated that adjunctive aripiprazole significantly lowered prolactin level in patients with antipsychotic-induced hyperprolactinemia. Consistent with the improvements in prolactin levels, after adjunctive aripiprazole treatment, 37 participants with menstrual disturbances regained menstruation, 17 patients no longer complained of signs or symptoms of galactorrhea in two studies, whereas no patients did so in the placebo group. The prolactin-lowering effect of aripiprazole is likely due to its unique pharmacology as a D2 receptor partial agonist. With haloperidol or risperidone treatment, antagonist activity at D2 receptors in the tuberoinfundibular system region reduces dopamine activity, increasing the risk of hyperprolactinemia. In contrast, aripiprazole may act as a dopamine agonist in conditions of low endogenous dopamine activity , , which prevents the development of hypodopaminergia in the tuberoinfundibular system region, thereby decreasing the serum prolactin level.
We also searched Chinese database in this meta-analysis, which included randomized controlled trials comparing adjunctive aripiprazole with placebo for antipsychotic-induced hyperprolactinemia in China. Thus, it is the first study to include all trials available without applying any language restrictions. Moreover, we conducted subgroup analysis of Chinese studies in this meta-analysis. This subgroup analysis confirmed the significant superiority for adjunctive aripiprazole 5 mg/day versus placebo regarding the prolactin level normalization; furthermore we also confirmed that there was no significantly difference in insomnia, headache, sedation, and discontinuation between adjunctive aripiprazole 5 mg/day and placebo. Thus, the finding suggest that 5 mg/day dose of adjunctive aripiprazole may be appropriate, in fact adverse events were more frequent when adjunctive aripiprazole dose >15 mg/day in previous discussion.
Limitations of the Study
There was significant heterogeneity of the results in adverse events and prolactin level normalization in this meta-analysis, suggesting the effect of relevant moderator and mediator variables. This may be because meta- analyses combine results from trials that differ in their methodology, study size and year, patient and treatment selection, outcome variables, and study conduct. However, when combining studies of this nature for meta-analysis, we used a random effect model to provide a conservative estimate of prolactin level normalization and adverse events. We used a fixed effect model to analyze discontinuation because no heterogeneity existed. On the other hand, we conducted subgroup analysis of Chinese studies in this meta-analysis that sought to disentangle relevant moderator variables, strengthening the primary finding. In addition, in the meta-analysis of the prolactin level normalization, the study by Kane et al. (2009) was excluded because the presence of hyperprolactinemia was not an eligibility criterion.
This meta-analysis only included 639 patients in five randomized controlled trials. The sample size was relatively small for meta-analysis, which prevented further data exploration. However, we included studies with well defined randomized controlled trials comparing adjunctive aripiprazole with placebo. Although there were about 10 randomized controlled trials published in Chinese language, only 3 trials were included in this meta-analysis after a more strict quality assessment. In addition, random sequence generation was high risk in one study, potentially contributing to selection bias; however, this study was low risk in other bias. Although the GRADE approach showed the quality of evidence were “low” in insomnia and headaches, other outcomes were from “moderate” to “high”, especially the quality of evidence in prolactin level normalization were all “high”. This high quality of evidence will increase our confidence to use adjunctive aripiprazole to manage antipsychotic-induced hyperprlactinemia.
The correlation between aripiprazole dose and the change in prolactin levels may not have been fully analyzed because the aripiprazole doses were all higher than 5 mg/day in this meta-analysis. In contrast, in a previous study, 2 mg/day of aripiprazole acted as a partial dopamine agonist producing a clinical effect , , . It suggests the possibility that doses lower than 5 mg/day of aripiprazole can significantly decrease prolactin levels. The association between aripiprazole dose and prolactin level when used as adjunctive treatment needs to be more fully evaluated.
Comparison with other Studies
A review by Hoffer et al. (2009) included case studies, reports, and placebo-controlled trials studies to study the effectiveness of aripiprazole in lower prolactin level . Across all studies, aripiprazole reduced prolactin levels on an average of 74.30%, which is comparable to our meta-analysis. However, on the basis of this analysis, the adverse events were not reported in the adjunctive aripiprazole treatment. Secondly, this review just reviewed each study on a case-by-case basis and reported mean prolactin levels, although they computed mean percent-reductions in prolactin level in 16 studies, they did not conduct any quality assessment. Furthermore, this review failed to include Chinese studies, as well as the study by Shim et al (2009).
Marder et al. (2003) conducted a pooled analysis of safety and tolerability data from five 4- to 6-week double-blind multi-center studies of patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective randomized to aripiprazole (n = 932) or placebo (n = 416) . This analysis indicated that aripiprazole was well tolerated, with similar AE incidence rates to placebo. The median percentage changes from baseline at endpoint in serum prolactin levels were significantly lower for the aripiprazole group compared with the placebo group (56.5% vs. 0.0%), which is consistent with our meta-analysis. Unfortunately, all adjunctive aripiprazole studies were not included in this analysis.
Similarly, Deleon and Citrome had reviewed the efficacy and tolerability of aripiprazole in schizophrenia and bipolar disorder respectively , . Aripiprazole exhibited a favorable safety and tolerability profile, with a low propensity to cause extrapyramidal side effects, weight gain and hyperprolactinemia. Aripiprazole and other antipsychotics are commonly used for the initial treatment of acute mania, both as monotherapy and as adjuncts to mood stabilizers , . Aripiprazole may be the appropriate adjunctive antipsychotic for the patients with bipolar who have high risk for hyperprolactinemia.
Implications for Practice
Antipsychotic-induced hyperprolactinemia has both short and long-term consequences including menstrual irregularities, amenorrhea, galactorrhea, gynecomastia, sexual dysfunction, infertility, osteoporosis, and even breast cancer , . Adjunctive aripiprazole treatment as the management of antipsychotic-induced hyperprolactinemia is safe and effective. Rapid adjunctive therapy will increase the compliance of patients with antipsychotic-induced hyperprolactinemia, which may offer benefits in schizophrenia treatment, and thus is a reasonable choice for antipsychotic-induced hyperprolactinemia.
This meta-analysis of five randomized controlled trials comparing adjunctive aripiprazole and placebo have shown that adjunctive aripiprazole can be used safely and effectively for antipsychotic-induced hyperprolactinemia. Adjunctive aripiprazole is not associated with increased adverse events and discontinuations compared with placebo. Adjunctive aripiprazole is superior to placebo in prolactin level normalization. The recommended dose of adjunctive aripiprazole may be 5 mg/day. An early adjunctive aripiprazole to manage hyperprolactinemia may increase treatment compliance, which may offer benefits in schizophrenia treatment. The efficacy of adjunctive dose <5 mg/day needs further evaluation.
Adjunctive aripiprazole vs. placebo for antipsychotic-induced hyperprolactinemia: forest plot for improvement in psychiatry symptom.
We wish to thank Prof. Phil Wiffen (Training Director of UK Cochrane Center) and Dr. Jun Xia (Cochrane Schizophrenia Group) for their system review courses. We wish to thank Dr. Zhirui Zhou (Radiotherapy Department, The Tumor Hospital of Jilin Province) for his comments on the manuscript.
Conceived and designed the experiments: CW XL. Performed the experiments: XL CW. Analyzed the data: XL CW. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: XL CW. Wrote the paper: XL YT.
- 1. Haddad PM, Wieck A (2004) Antipsychotic-induced hyperprolactinaemia: mechanisms, clinical features and management. Drugs 64: 2291–2314. doi: 10.2165/00003495-200464200-00003
- 2. Halbreich U, Kahn LS (2003) Hyperprolactinemia and schizophrenia: mechanisms and clinical aspects. Journal of Psychiatric Practice® 9: 344–353. doi: 10.1097/00131746-200309000-00003
- 3. Byerly M, Suppes T, Tran Q-V, Baker RA (2007) Clinical implications of antipsychotic-induced hyperprolactinemia in patients with schizophrenia spectrum or bipolar spectrum disorders: recent developments and current perspectives. Journal of clinical psychopharmacology 27: 639–661. doi: 10.1097/jcp.0b013e31815ac4e5
- 4. Halbreich U, Rojansky N, Palter S, Hreshchyshyn M, Kreeger J, et al. (1995) Decreased bone mineral density in medicated psychiatric patients. Psychosomatic medicine 57: 485–491.
- 5. Wang C-Y, Xiang Y-T, Cai Z-J, Weng Y-Z, Bo Q-J, et al. (2010) Risperidone maintenance treatment in schizophrenia: a randomized, controlled trial. American Journal of Psychiatry 167: 676–685. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2009.09030358
- 6. McQuade RD, Stock E, Marcus R, Jody D, Gharbia NA, et al. (2004) A comparison of weight change during treatment with olanzapine or aripiprazole: results from a randomized, double-blind study. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry 65: 47–56. doi: 10.1016/s0924-977x(04)80281-5
- 7. Gianfrancesco FD, Grogg AL, Mahmoud RA, Wang R-h, Nasrallah HA (2002) Differential effects of risperidone, olanzapine, clozapine, and conventional antipsychotics on type 2 diabetes: findings from a large health plan database. The Journal of clinical psychiatry 63: 920. doi: 10.4088/jcp.v63n1010
- 8. Bonanno DG, Davydov L, Botts SR (2001) Olanzapine-induced diabetes mellitus. The Annals of pharmacotherapy 35: 563–565. doi: 10.1345/aph.10280
- 9. Yuan H-N, Wang C-Y, Sze CW, Tong Y, Tan Q-R, et al. (2008) A randomized, crossover comparison of herbal medicine and bromocriptine against risperidone-induced hyperprolactinemia in patients with schizophrenia. Journal of clinical psychopharmacology 28: 264–370. doi: 10.1097/jcp.0b013e318172473c
- 10. Biller B, Luciano A, Crosignani P, Molitch M, Olive D, et al. (1999) Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of hyperprolactinemia. The Journal of reproductive medicine 44: 1075.
- 11. Marken P, Haykal R, Fisher J (1992) Management of psychotropic-induced hyperprolactinemia. Clinical pharmacy 11: 851.
- 12. Yamada K, Kanba S, Yagi G, Asai M (1999) Herbal medicine (Shakuyaku-kanzo-to) in the treatment of risperidone-induced amenorrhea. Journal of clinical psychopharmacology 19: 380–381. doi: 10.1097/00004714-199908000-00018
- 13. Yamada K, Kanba S, Yagi G, Asai M (1997) Effectiveness of herbal medicine (shakuyaku-kanzo-to) for neuroleptic-induced hyperprolactinemia. Journal of clinical psychopharmacology 17: 234–235. doi: 10.1097/00004714-199706000-00025
- 14. Chen JX, Su YA, Wang SL, Bian QT, Liu YH, et al. (2009) Aripiprazole treatment of risperidone-induced hyperprolactinemia. The Journal of clinical psychiatry 70: 1058. doi: 10.4088/jcp.08l04671
- 15. Rainka M, Capote H, Ross C, Gengo F (2009) Attenuation of risperidone-induced hyperprolactinemia with the addition of aripiprazole. Journal of clinical pharmacy and therapeutics 34: 595–598. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2710.2008.01009.x
- 16. Rocha FL, Hara C, Ramos MG (2010) Using aripiprazole to attenuate paliperidone-induced hyperprolactinemia. Progress in neuro-psychopharmacology & biological psychiatry 34: 1153. doi: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2010.06.003
- 17. Chen LJ, Zhuo ZH, Zhuang H (2010) A study of aripiprazole in sulpiride induced male hyperprolactinemia. J Clin Psychiatry 20: 304–305.
- 18. Saitis M, Papazisis G, Katsigiannopoulos K, Kouvelas D (2008) Aripiprazole resolves amisulpride and ziprasidone-induced hyperprolactinemia. Psychiatry and clinical neurosciences 62: 624–624. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1819.2008.01859.x
- 19. Kane JM, Correll CU, Goff DC, Kirkpatrick B, Marder SR, et al. (2009) A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 16-week study of adjunctive aripiprazole for schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder inadequately treated with quetiapine or risperidone monotherapy. J Clin Psychiatry 70: 1348–1357. doi: 10.4088/jcp.09m05154yel
- 20. Shim JC, Shin JG, Kelly DL, Jung DU, Seo YS, et al. (2007) Adjunctive treatment with a dopamine partial agonist, aripiprazole, for antipsychotic-induced hyperprolactinemia: a placebo-controlled trial. Am J Psychiatry 164: 1404–1410. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2007.06071075
- 21. Xu LP, Ji JY, Shi H, Zhai FL, Zhang B, et al.. (2006) A control study of aripiprazole in the treatment of hyperprolactinemia by antipsychotics Chin J of Behavioral Med SCi: 718–720.
- 22. Lehman AF, Lieberman J, Dixon L, McGlashan T, Miller A, et al. (2004) Practice guideline for the treatment of patients with schizophrenia. The American Journal of Psychiatry 161: 1.
- 23. Correll CU, Rummel-Kluge C, Corves C, Kane JM, Leucht S (2009) Antipsychotic combinations vs monotherapy in schizophrenia: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Schizophrenia Bulletin 35: 443–457. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbn018
- 24. Raskin S, Katz G, Zislin Z, Knobler H, Durst R (2000) Clozapine and risperidone: combination/augmentation treatment of refractory schizophrenia: a preliminary observation. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica 101: 334–336. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0447.2000.101004334.x
- 25. Josiassen RC, Joseph A, Kohegyi E, Stokes S, Dadvand M, et al. (2005) Clozapine augmented with risperidone in the treatment of schizophrenia: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. American Journal of Psychiatry 162: 130–136. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.162.1.130
- 26. Honer WG, Thornton AE, Chen EY, Chan RC, Wong JO, et al. (2006) Clozapine alone versus clozapine and risperidone with refractory schizophrenia. New England Journal of Medicine 354: 472–482. doi: 10.1056/nejmoa053222
- 27. Anil YAE, Kivircik ABB, Turgut TI, Tümüklü M, Yazici MK, et al. (2005) A double-blind controlled study of adjunctive treatment with risperidone in schizophrenic patients partially responsive to clozapine: efficacy and safety. The Journal of clinical psychiatry 66: 63. doi: 10.4088/jcp.v66n0109
- 28. Bhattacharjee J, El-Sayeh HG (2008) Aripiprazole versus typicals for schizophrenia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev: CD006617.
- 29. Assion H, Reinbold H, Lemanski S, Basilowski M, Juckel G (2008) Amisulpride augmentation in patients with schizophrenia partially responsive or unresponsive to clozapine. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Pharmacopsychiatry 41: 24–28. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-993209
- 30. Marder SR, Meibach RC (1994) Risperidone in the treatment of schizophrenia. The American Journal of Psychiatry 151: 825–835.
- 31. Chen HZ, Niu MR, Qian MC, Yu BY, Shen XH, et al. (2009) Effect of aripiprazole on the hyperprolactinmia induced by risperidone in male schizophrenia patients. Chin J Psychiatry 42: 4.
- 32. Ji JY, Song ZX, Xu LP, Sun J, Shi JA, et al. (2008) Aripiprazole in treatment of female schizophrenics with risperldone induced hyperprolacflnemla. Chin J Psychiatry 41: 169–171.
- 33. Ried K (2006) Interpreting and understanding meta-analysis graphs: a practical guide. Australian family physician 35: 635–638.
- 34. Marder SR, McQuade RD, Stock E, Kaplita S, Marcus R, et al. (2003) Aripiprazole in the treatment of schizophrenia: safety and tolerability in short-term, placebo-controlled trials. Schizophrenia research 61: 123–136. doi: 10.1016/s0920-9964(03)00050-1
- 35. Burris KD, Molski TF, Xu C, Ryan E, Tottori K, et al. (2002) Aripiprazole, a novel antipsychotic, is a high-affinity partial agonist at human dopamine D2 receptors. Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics 302: 381–389. doi: 10.1124/jpet.102.033175
- 36. Shapiro DA, Renock S, Arrington E, Chiodo LA, Liu L-X, et al. (2003) Aripiprazole, a novel atypical antipsychotic drug with a unique and robust pharmacology. Neuropsychopharmacology 28: 1400–1411. doi: 10.1038/sj.npp.1300203
- 37. Yokoi F, Ph D M, Gründer G, Biziere K, Stephane M, et al. (2002) Dopamine D2 and D3 Receptor Occupancy in Normal Humans Treated with the Antipsychotic Drug Aripiprazole (OPC 14597): A Study Using Positron Emission Tomography and [11C] Raclopride. Neuropsychopharmacology 27: 248–259. doi: 10.1016/s0893-133x(02)00304-4
- 38. Grunder G, Carlsson A, Wong DF (2003) Mechanism of new antipsychotic medications: occupancy is not just antagonism. Archives of general psychiatry 60: 974. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.60.10.974
- 39. Hoffer ZS, Roth RL, Mathews M (2009) Evidence for the partial dopamine-receptor agonist aripiprazole as a first-line treatment of psychosis in patients with iatrogenic or tumorogenic hyperprolactinemia. Psychosomatics 50: 317–324. doi: 10.1176/appi.psy.50.4.317
- 40. DeLeon A, Patel NC, Crismon ML (2004) Aripiprazole: a comprehensive review of its pharmacology, clinical efficacy, and tolerability. Clin Ther 26: 649–666. doi: 10.1016/s0149-2918(04)90066-5
- 41. Citrome L (2006) A review of aripiprazole in the treatment of patients with schizophrenia or bipolar I disorder. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat 2: 427–443. doi: 10.2147/nedt.2006.2.4.427
- 42. Keck Jr PE, Mendlwicz J, Calabrese JR, Fawcett J, Suppes T, et al. (2000) A review of randomized, controlled clinical trials in acute mania. Journal of affective disorders 59: S31–S37. doi: 10.1016/s0165-0327(00)00177-4
- 43. Keck PE, Marcus R, Tourkodimitris S, Ali M, Liebeskind A, et al. (2003) A placebo-controlled, double-blind study of the efficacy and safety of aripiprazole in patients with acute bipolar mania. American Journal of Psychiatry 160: 1651–1658. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.160.9.1651
- 44. Szarfman A, Tonning JM, Levine JG, Doraiswamy PM (2006) Atypical antipsychotics and pituitary tumors: a pharmacovigilance study. Pharmacotherapy: The Journal of Human Pharmacology and Drug Therapy 26: 748–758. doi: 10.1592/phco.26.6.748
- 45. Wang PS, Walker AM, Tsuang MT, Orav EJ, Glynn RJ, et al. (2002) Dopamine antagonists and the development of breast cancer. Archives of general psychiatry 59: 1147. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.59.12.1147