Advertisement
Research Article

Analysis of the Airway Microbiota of Healthy Individuals and Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease by T-RFLP and Clone Sequencing

  • Tetyana Zakharkina,

    Affiliation: Department of Internal Medicine V – Pulmonology, Allergology, Respiratory Intensive Care Medicine, Saarland University Hospital, Homburg, Germany

    X
  • Elke Heinzel,

    Affiliation: Institute of Medical Microbiology and Hygiene of the University of Saarland, Homburg/Saar, Germany

    X
  • Rembert A. Koczulla,

    Affiliation: Clinic of Pneumology, University Hospital Giessen and Marburg, Philipps-University Marburg, Marburg, Germany

    X
  • Timm Greulich,

    Affiliation: Clinic of Pneumology, University Hospital Giessen and Marburg, Philipps-University Marburg, Marburg, Germany

    X
  • Katharina Rentz,

    Affiliation: Department of Internal Medicine V – Pulmonology, Allergology, Respiratory Intensive Care Medicine, Saarland University Hospital, Homburg, Germany

    X
  • Josch K. Pauling,

    Affiliation: Department of Computational Systems Biology, Max-Plank Institute for Informatics, Saarbruecken, Germany

    X
  • Jan Baumbach,

    Affiliation: Department of Computational Systems Biology, Max-Plank Institute for Informatics, Saarbruecken, Germany

    Current address: Computational Biology group, University of Southern Denmark, Campusvej, Odense M, Denmark

    X
  • Mathias Herrmann,

    Affiliation: Institute of Medical Microbiology and Hygiene of the University of Saarland, Homburg/Saar, Germany

    X
  • Christiane Grünewald,

    Affiliation: Department of Thoracic Surgery, Thoraxklinik at the University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany

    X
  • Hendrik Dienemann,

    Affiliation: Department of Thoracic Surgery, Thoraxklinik at the University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany

    X
  • Lutz von Müller,

    Affiliation: Institute of Medical Microbiology and Hygiene of the University of Saarland, Homburg/Saar, Germany

    X
  • Robert Bals mail

    robert.bals@uks.eu

    Affiliation: Department of Internal Medicine V – Pulmonology, Allergology, Respiratory Intensive Care Medicine, Saarland University Hospital, Homburg, Germany

    X
  • Published: July 09, 2013
  • DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0068302

Abstract

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a progressive, inflammatory lung disease that affects a large number of patients and has significant impact. One hallmark of the disease is the presence of bacteria in the lower airways. Objective: The aim of this study was to analyze the detailed structure of microbial communities found in the lungs of healthy individuals and patients with COPD. Nine COPD patients as compared and 9 healthy individuals underwent flexible bronchoscopy and BAL was performed. Bacterial nucleic acids were subjected to terminal restriction fragment (TRF) length polymorphism and clone library analysis. Overall, we identified 326 T-RFLP band, 159 in patients and 167 in healthy controls. The results of the TRF analysis correlated partly with the data obtained from clone sequencing. Although the results of the sequencing showed high diversity, the genera Prevotella, Sphingomonas, Pseudomonas, Acinetobacter, Fusobacterium, Megasphaera, Veillonella, Staphylococcus, and Streptococcus constituted the major part of the core microbiome found in both groups. A TRF band possibly representing Pseudomonas sp. monoinfection was associated with a reduction of the microbial diversity. Non-cultural methods reveal the complexity of the pulmonary microbiome in healthy individuals and in patients with COPD. Alterations of the microbiome in pulmonary diseases are correlated with disease.

Introduction

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a respiratory disease associated with chronic inflammation of the lung leading to tissue destruction and emphysema. Bacterial colonization is one critical factor contributing to COPD progression and the occurrence of acute exacerbations (AECOPD) [1], [2]. The “microbial hypothesis” highlights a vicious cycle, in which smoking results in impaired innate lung defense with subsequent changes in the pulmonary microbiome. This chronic colonization and infection results in further impairment of the mucociliary clearance and host defense apparatus due to aberrant mucus secretion, disrupted ciliary activity, and airway epithelial injury. Multiple pathways have been described how smoke exposure destroys lung host defense mechanisms, including the suppression of antimicrobial peptides [3], the destruction of the epithelial barrier [4], and the colonization of lower airways with tobacco-associated microbes [5].

Microbiological studies in COPD have been limited to the detection of specific respiratory pathogens such as P. aeruginosa, M. catarrhalis, and H. influenza [6], [7] by means of cultural methods or pathogen-specific PCR. The application of culture independent methods to detect the presence of microorganisms has been introduced to characterize the microbiome of various organs [8]. These methods include real time PCR, sequencing, and restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis [9]. The microbiome of the lungs in patients with cystic fibrosis were characterized by culture independent methods and revealed a complex structure of the microbial community in this disease [10][12]. Bacteria found in respiratory tract may represent about 6% of total human microbiome, which is comparable to the skin [13]. Several studies in this field highlight that pulmonary microbial communities are complex and diverse [14][18]. These studies focused on different patients groups and used different methodology. Huang et al. in their culture-independent survey focused on the microbiota during COPD exacerbations [16], Hilty et al. studied bacteria presenting in bronchoalveolar lavages of asthmatic children [15]. Differences between these studies indicate a wide interindividual variation and the need of standardization of sampling and analysis procedures. Many recent studies that characterize microbial communities use approaches, which are based on the sequence analysis of the 16S rRNA gene [19][22].

The aim of the current study was to examine the pulmonary microbial communities in COPD patients as compared to healthy individuals. Terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism (T-RFLP) analysis and molecular cloning with sequencing were used to characterize the pulmonary microbiome in health and disease.

Materials and Methods

Participant Selection

The study was approved by the ethic committees of the University of Marburg and the Landesärztekammer of the Saarland; all participants gave written informed consent. Healthy individuals were defined as never smokers, without chronic disorders and without any respiratory illnesses over one year prior the study. COPD patients had clinically diagnosed COPD as described in the GOLD guidelines (http://www.goldcopd.org/). The diagnosis of COPD was based on patient history, pulmonary function tests, and a post bronchodilator ratio of forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1)/vital capacity (VC) or forced vital capacity (FVC) below 0.7. The patient was defined as stable if there was no exacerbation for the previous 4 wks and the patient was not currently having an exacerbation. Table 1 summarizes the characteristics of the study populations.

thumbnail

Table 1. Patient and control individuals characteristics; all individuals were caucasian; FEV1 = forced expiratory volume in 1 s, VC = vital capacity, FEV1% = FEV1 predicted, PY = pack years, ICS = inhaled corticosteroid, LABA = long acting beta agonist, LAMA = long acting muscarinic agonist, BAL cells = bronchoalveolar lavage cell number×10 5/ml.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0068302.t001

Bronchoscopy was performed using a flexible video-bronchoscope following mild sedation and local anesthesia with xylocaine 2%. BAL of a segment of the middle lobe or the lingula was done by instillation of 5 times 20 mL of sterile saline and recovered fluid was immediately sent to the research laboratory.

DNA Purification

BAL samples were stored on ice prior to the DNA extraction. After centrifugation at 2500 rpm at 4°C for 10 min, the supernatant was discarded and the pellet was used as a starting material for the DNA isolation. Total DNA was purified by using a combination of a bead-beating method with the standard phenol:chloroform extraction. Each cell pellet was resuspended in 750 µl of sodium phosphate buffer (112.87 mM Na2HPO4, 7.12 mM NaH2PO4) and 250 µl of TNS solution (500 mM Tris-HCl, 100 mM NaCl, 10% SDS (w/v). Tubes were filled with 0.7 g of 0.5 mm sterile zirconia beads (Carl Roth GmbH, Karlsruhe, Germany) and vortexed for 45 sec at 6.5 m/s using the homogenizer Precellys® 24 (PEQLAB Biotechnologie GmbH, Erlangen, Germany). Following chilling on ice and pelleting of remaining cell fragments, lysates were denaturated with one volume of phenol:chloroform:isoamylalcohol (25:24:1). After short spinning, 800 µl of supernatant were mixed with an equal volume of chloroform:isoamylalcohol (24:1). Then 650 µl of the DNA containing supernatant were mixed thoroughly. The extracted DNA was precipitated by spinning for 80 min at 4°C with two volumes of PEG 6000 and washed in ice-cold 70% ethanol. Finally it was eluted in 50 µl of EB buffer (QIAGEN GmbH, Hilden, Germany) and additionally incubated at 37°C for 2 h to enhance the DNA recovery yield.

PCR Amplification of 16S rRNA Genes

Total DNA (100 ng) was used as a starting material for the PCR-based amplification of 16S rRNA gene. The used primer set was: (Ba27f, 5′ - aga gtt tga tcc tgg ctc ag - 3′ and Ba907r, 5′ - ccg tca att cct ttr agt tt - 3′ [23] (Metabion GmbH, Martinsried, Germany) generated a 900 bp long PCR product from E. coli DH5α 16S rRNA gene. After initial denaturation at 94°C for 3 min, PCR was performed using 40 cycles of denaturation at 94°C for 30 s, annealing at 50°C for 45 s, and extension at 72°C for 1 min and 30 s, followed by a final extension step at 72°C for 7 min (MyCycler Thermal Cycler, Bio-Rad, Munich, Germany). Total E. coli DH5α DNA (100 ng) was used as a positive control and 5 µl of destilled water as a negative control. PCR was run in duplicate and amplified products were pooled, purified using with NucleoSpin Extract II kit (MACHEREY-NAGEL GmbH & Co. KG, Dueren, Germany), and analyzed by electrophoresis using a 1.5% agarose gel.

T-RFLP Analysis

PCR was performed using a FAM (6-carboxyfluorescein)-Ba27 forward primer (Metabion GmbH, Martinsried, Germany). PCR products were cut out from the agarose gel, purified, and subjected to MspI (Promega GmbH, Mannheim, Germany) digestion for 3 h at 37°C in the dark. Then samples were subjected to capillary electrophoresis on ABI 310 Genetic Analyzer (Applied Biosystems Deutschland GmbH, Darmstadt, Germany) using the GeneScan™ 500 ROX™ XL size standard (Applied Biosystems Deutschland GmbH, Darmstadt, Germany). Data were analyzed with GeneMapper® Software (Applied Biosystems Deutschland GmbH, Darmstadt, Germany). For each sample analysis was done in duplicate.

Terminal restriction fragments (T-RFs) between 50 and 700 bp were included in the analysis and differences in TRF length of ±1 bp in different profiles were considered as identical in order to compare T-RFLP profiles between different samples. The relative abundance of each TRF within a given T-RFLP pattern was calculated as the peak height of the respective TRF divided by the total peak height of all TRFs detected. We compared TRFs with the good quality reference sequences from the RDP database. As additional control we compared the obtained data with those from species from the oral cavity. This comparison resulted in phylogenetic assignment on the genus level of fragments and was performed using a web - based tool Microbial Community analysis III (MiCA 3MiCA 3) with the following parameters: T-RFLP analysis (PAT+), digest sensitivity – 2 mismatches within 2 bases from 5′ of forward primer, window size – forward match ±1 bp. Some fragments could not be matched and assigned because of gaps in the database. Some fragments were identified as “uncultured bacteria” and could not be phylogenetically assigned. The copy number of 16S rRNA genes vary between different species (1 to 15 copies) and thus do not correspond necessarily to number of bacterial cells [24]. All terminal fragments were classified as “of the most frequent occurrence fragment” if the relative fluorescence of peaks was >3%. Microbial diversity was estimated with the Shannon-Wiener diversity index (H’) and species richness value using the Excel software (Microsoft, USA). The Shannon index enables to translate the T-RFLP data (the number and intensity of bands on a gel) into numerical data points that can be analyzed, modeled, and evaluated using various statistical parameters. The species richness value ignores the relative abundance of each phylotype and instead focuses only on the total number of unique phylotypes (bands on the gel) for a particular population [25].

Cloning and Sequence Analysis

To construct the clone libraries from BAL samples from 18 studied participants, amplicon pools were ligated and cloned using the standard protocol from the pGEM®-T Easy Vector System (Promega GmbH, Mannheim, Germany). 50±10 clones per clinical sampled were subjected to sequencing. Individual cloned 16S rRNA gene sequences were first amplified using the M13F and M13R primers and then sequenced with the 27F primer using an ABI3700 (Applied Biosystems, Inc.). Approximately 900 bp of the sequence (5′–3′, with primer ends) were compared with those available in the GenBank of the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) by BLAST search. Identification of the species level was defined as ≥98% similarity of the 16S rRNA gene sequence to the sequence of its closest bacterial relative in the GenBank database using online software BlastN (NCBI, USA). After primer, vector fragments, and chimeric sequences were removed (using RunVecScreen and Black Box Chimera Check (B2C2) software respectively), the operational taxonomic units (OTUs) were defined. OTU cutoff was less than 0.03, which corresponded to the strain level [26]. To determine the distances between aligned sequences the distance matrix view was generated in Ugene (Unipro Ugene, Novosibirsk, Russia). 16S rRNA gene sequences were aligned using distance neighbor-joining method (Phylip package) of phylogenetic analysis on Ugene software (Unipro Novosibirsk, Russia) and uploaded to the Interactive Tree of Life project for annotation [27]. Bootstrapping was carried out 1000 times to evaluate trees statistically. A web run version of Sequin program (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/projects/Seq​uin/) was used to submit the sequences to the GenBank database. A total of 128 clones were submitted to the GenBank under the accession numbers “JN382472” to JN382540” and “JN378754” to “JN378814”.

Statistical Analysis

We used the T-RFLP-analyzed data from BAL samples taken from all study participants. A total of 326 distinct peaks were detected. In order to find distinct COPD and healthy microbiome indicators, we applied supervised learning and cross validation using both, R [28] and WEKA [29]. R is a computational environment that provides a broad spectrum of statistical analysis methods while WEKA is a prominent software tool for machine learning consisting various classifiers as well as clustering techniques. Prior to classification, we first removed bands that are were regularly present from samples from the oral cavity (possibly correlating with Prevotella, Veillonella, Porphyromonas, and Fusobacterium). Secondly, bands that were evenly detected in healthy and COPD samples were also removed. Afterwards, we used a taxonomic mapping from species to their corresponding genera. This was done to reduce the feature space. Subsequently, a principal component analysis (PCA) was applied using a restrictive variance cutoff of 95%. PCA is generally used for pattern recognition in a data set and can be applied as a filter prior to machine learning, also allowing easier visualization of patterns within high-dimensional data [30]. Finally, significant genera were extracted for classifier training. We used a Naïve Bayes classifier model for classification. Classifier training, testing and validation were done within a cross validation scheme. Two classification techniques were applied. On the one hand we consistently optimized classification results based on the entire data set by iteratively eliminating low significant variables thus creating a robust classification model. Then we applied a simple K-Means clustering, which is a clustering technique to separate a set of observations into clusters based on their means in order to deduce a core set of distinctive genera [31]. On the other hand we selected genera beforehand using a PCA. The retained genera were then used for classifier training.

Furthermore, we specifically analyzed how restriction fragments corresponding to Pseudomonas and Lactobacillus interact using a PCA but retaining only these fragments. We visualized the PCA results with an R-biplot [32]. Covariance matrices illustrate dependencies which can additionally be used to analyze species interaction. A negative covariance indicates an inverse proportional relationship between two representatives within a microbial community.

Results

Restriction Profiles Reveal High Interindividual Variation of the Pulmonary Microbiome

A total number of 18 BALs (nine of healthy volunteers and nine of stable COPD patients) served as starting material for PCR amplification of 16S rRNA gene followed by MspI digestion. T-RFLP revealed a total of 326 bands. The mean number of T-RF per individual was 17.7 (±2.32 SEM) in the COPD group and 18.56 (±2.32) in the control group (P = 0.811, two-tailed t test). The range was 12 to 31 (SD 6.95) bands for the healthy individuals and 9 to 27 (SD 6.67) for the COPD patients. Several bacterial species were found consistent with these findings by database searches. However, as T-RFLP results based on PCR with one labeled primer cannot exactly determine the species, such correlations should be viewed with the appropriate caution. All samples showed highly heterogeneous terminal restriction fragment (TRF) patterns (Figure 1).

thumbnail

Figure 1. T-RFLP profiles revealed highly interindividual variation of detected bands.

Band sizes were correlated with bacterial general, keeping in mind that T-FRLP only allows a prediction but not a determination of the microbial taxa.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0068302.g001

Matrix tables of the obtained results (data not shown) indicated that some restriction fragments (possibly representing Bacteroides, Lactobacillus, Megasphaera, Prevotella, and Streptomyces) were most common and appeared in two thirds of healthy individual group samples. In contrast, a different set of restriction bands (possibly representing Actinomyces, Bacillus, Corynebacterium, Lactococcus, Micrococcus, and Peptostreptoocccus) could be found only in certain individuals.

In COPD patients, 4 restriction fragments were present almost in all studied samples, while 9 were distributed irregularly between patients. No COPD-specific pattern could be identified based on restriction fragment analysis. COPD patients with ID numbers 4 and 9 showed very low microbial diversity.

Statistical Learning Analysis Shows Distinctive Distribution of Restriction Fragments

We detected multiple T-RFPs in each sample group. To determine if any of them are correlated with disease status, a principal component analysis was performed. Classification optimization yielded the results as shown in Table 2. Several specific fragments were used to build a classifier model based on a data set consisting of 9 T-RFLP analyzed BAL samples taken from healthy individuals and COPD patients respectively, correlated with Neisseria, Corynebacterium, Staphylococcus, Bacillus, Mesorhizobium, Flavobacterium, Lysinibacillus, Lachnospiraceae, Streptomyces, Acinetobacter, Megasphaera, Pseudomonas, Clostridium, Sphingomonadales and Clostridiaceae. 16 patients (88.9%) out of 18 were correctly classified into the healthy or COPD group without any false negatives (COPD classified as healthy).

thumbnail

Table 2. Confusion matrix of the classification results using a NaiveBayes classifier and cross validation.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0068302.t002

With the application of simple K-Means clustering, we could further reduce the selected fragments (retaining bands correlated with Bacillus, Mesorhizobium, Flavobacterium, Streptomyces, Megasphaera, and Clostridiaceae). Given the TN (true negative) and FN (false negative) rates of 0.222 and zero respectively, this set of bands is reliably distinguishing between COPD patients and healthy individuals. One fragment (possibly representing Mesorhizobium) was only detected in samples of healthy individuals. Classifier training solely based on a prior feature selection via PCA (including retransformation) did not yield a good learning model and classification performance was non-distinctive. Different variance proportion cutoffs did not significantly change the results.

Two bands consistent with the presence of Pseudomonas and Lactobacillus were used in the PCA analysis to create a biplot using the R library (Figure 2) that revealed the presence of clusters representing data sets from healthy individuals and COPD patients.

thumbnail

Figure 2. Biplot of the principal component analysis of the bacterial communities from bronchoalveolar lavages samples of the chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients and healthy individuals.

The terminal restriction fragment lengths (in base pairs) corresponding to the correlated bacterial genera are specified in the brackets.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0068302.g002

In order to quantify the differences in community structures of the two studied groups, the fragment richness and Shannon diversity index were calculated. No difference between COPD patients and healthy individuals could be seen (Figure 3).

thumbnail

Figure 3. Sample richness (a) and Shannon diversity index (b) based on fragment lengths.

Terminal restriction fragments shorter than 50 bp were excluded from the analysis. Empty squares correspond to healthy individuals, filled squares to COPD patients.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0068302.g003

Sequencing Data Revealed the Presence of Distinct Core Genera in Health and Disease

A total of 806 clones from all individuals were sequenced and the obtained results were used for database searches. Most of the sequences matched with the phyla Firmicutes and Proteobacteria (Figures 4, 5) that represented 40 and 35% of the sequences in healthy individuals and COPD patients, respectively. Other sequences matched to the phyla Fusobacteria, Bacteroidetes, and Actinobacteria. The phylum Cyanobacteria was characteristic for the COPD patient group. Interestingly, anaerobic representatives of the standard microbiota made up 40% of total community in healthy individuals, and about 34% in COPD patients. Almost 20% of identified bacteria can tolerate oxygen in both sample types. One third of bacterial representatives have a Gram-negative type of cell wall.

thumbnail

Figure 4. A phylogenetic tree obtained from sequencing analysis illustrates the standard microbiota present in healthy lungs containing 75 leafs.

Different genera are denoted with different colors with one exception: the family Sphingomonadaceae represents the taxon of higher rank. Bacteria marked with green circles were detected only in healthy individuals, but not in COPD patients.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0068302.g004
thumbnail

Figure 5. A phylogenetic tree obtained from sequencing analysis illustrates the microbial community of lungs of patients with stable COPD and contains 76 leafs.

Different genera are denoted with different colors with two exceptions: the families Rhodocyclaceae and Lachnospiraceae represent the taxa of higher rank. Bacteria marked with red circles were detected only in COPD patients, whereas other microbes are the part of a core lung microbiome.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0068302.g005

Phylogenetic trees were constructed using the clustering neighbor-joining method. After construction, the reliability of trees was estimated by nonparametric bootstrapping. The genera Prevotella, Streptococcus, and Acinetobacter were more diverse, representing multiple species and strains. Three representatives of this genus were detected only in healthy individuals. Haemophilus parainfluenzae, Propionibacterium acnes, Micrococcus luteus, Terrahaemophilus sp., Eubacterium saburreum, Selenomonas sp., Centipeda periodontii, and Lactobacillus sakei made up 24% of total microbial community and were characteristic for healthy individuals (Figure 4).

A second distance-based neighbor-joining tree was constructed with 76 phylotypes detected in COPD patient group (Figure 5). Twenty nine distinct phylotypes were detected in the COPD patients. The genera Streptococcus, Veillonella, and Prevotella were most common and had the highest diversity. The diagram depicts that there were more than 20 unique species (composing 36.8% of total community) characteristic for COPD state. Unique genera included Afipia, Brevundimonas, Curvibacter, Moraxella, Neisseria, Undibacterium, Corynebacterium, Capnocytophaga, and Leptolyngbia.

A common core microbial community of 9 bacterial genera was identified in all samples analyzed. It included members of Acinetobacter, Fusobacterium, Megasphaera, Prevotella, Pseudomonas, Sphingomonas, Staphylococcus, Streptococcus, and Veillonella. We also examined sequencing data for the presence of atypical bacteria (Mycoplasma pneumoniae, Legionella pneumophila, and Chlamydophila pneumoniae), which are associated with COPD exacerbations [33]. Neither was detected by this method, although Mycoplasma and Legionella related species were identified in several samples using T-RFLP approach. The results from the RFLP analysis were correlated with the data from sequencing and showed that the results from both methods correlate partly (Table 3).

thumbnail

Table 3. An overview of the bacterial genera detected by sequencing and terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis in COPD patients and healthy individuals.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0068302.t003

Discussion

The results of the present study reveal the presence of highly diverse bacterial communities in the lungs of healthy individuals and COPD patients. The microbiome present in the lungs of COPD patients differs from healthy individuals in the prevalence of genera Afipia, Brevundimonas, Curvibacter, Moraxella, Neisseria, Undibacterium, Corynebacterium, Capnocytophaga, and Leptolyngbia. In two COPD patients, we observed a decrease of the bacterial diversity associated with a band possibly correlated with P. aeruginosa.

The core microbiome reported here compares well with those reported by other investigators [14][18]. The core microbiome in the lower respiratory tract in the present study comprises Prevotella, Sphingomonas, Pseudomonas, Acinetobacter, Fusobacterium, Megasphaera, Veillonella, Staphylococcus, and Streptococcus comparable to the study of Erb-Downward et al. that included the genera Pseudomonas, Streptococcus, Prevotella, Fusobacterium, Haemophilus, Veillonella, and Porphyromonas [14]. In the study of Hilty et al., Bacteroidetes (particularly Prevotella spp.) was more common in control subjects [15]. Huang et al. emphasized the pathogenic potential of newly identified B. diminuta, A. cryaerophilus, and L. interrogans in exacerbated COPD patients [16]. Moreover, they identified two gastrointestinal-associated species namely H. cetorum and C. mucosalis in respiratory samples. Anaerobes such as Prevotella and Veillonella are a component of commensal microbiota of the lung [15]. The core genera pool reported by Huang et al. by application of a high-density microarray [16] was much more diverse (27 classified bacterial families) as compared to the results of the present study. Disease status appears to be associated with reduction of the microbial diversity together with the overrepresentation of specific species. In the present study, two patients with low diversity revealed a restriction fragment correlated with Pseudomonas sp. A limited bacterial diversity was generally found for COPD patients [14]. Abundance of Proteobacteria was found in asthmatics [15], and members of the Pseudomonadaceae, Enterobacteriaceae, and Helicobacteraceae seemed to play the crucial role in severe exacerbations of COPD [16]. Members of the Comamonadaceae, Sphingomonadaceae, Oxalobacteraceae and other bacterial families were correlated with bronchial hypersensitivity [34]. The differences of age between the two groups studies in the present study might have be a factor that contributed to differences between the microbiomes. Taken together, several studies show that the microbiome of the lung can be analyzed by novel methodologies and is altered in patients with obstructive and inflammatory lung disease, such as asthma, COPD, and CF.

Despite the progress in the field of culture independent analysis of the microbiome, data on the respiratory tract are still limited and the published studies comprise a relatively low number of studied individuals. Different methods are currently being used developed to study the microbiome of the human body. The PhyloChip microarray contains more than 1 million oligoprobes and can differentiate about 60 000 bacterial taxa [6]. Studies using microarray technologies could demonstrate a significant complexity of the pulmonary microbiome (1200 bacterial taxa representing 140 distinct families) [16]. Hilty et al. used 454-pyrosequencing, a method of high-throughput DNA sequencing that allows the analysis of statistically reliable number of reads simultaneously [15]. Analysis of T-RFLPs is commonly used in soil and marine microbiology to evaluate changes in bacterial composition in particular ecological niches. The resolution power of T-RFLP is dependent in the labeling of the primers and the analysis process. As the respiratory microbiome is much more restricted in species diversity as compared to soil or intestinal microbiomes, we used one labeled primer, one restriction nuclease, and the length standard ROX1000 for analysis. Similar approaches were used in related studies using material from patients with cystic fibrosis [35], [36]. The resolution of T-RFLP chromatograms is around 2–5 bp, causing that sometimes separate organisms have similar fragment sizes. Sequencing data showed the prevalence of Lactobacillus sp. only in healthy individuals. In the present study, T-FRLP based analysis allowed the identification of bacteria in BAL samples and core community data and the results correlated well with those obtained by Sanger sequencing and database analysis. Based on the multiple methods that are presently used, it is not easy to compare the data from different studies.

The lung microbiome contains a large number of oral microorganisms. Representatives of the common oral microbiome were found in COPD patients and less in healthy individuals [14], [15]. Different reasons might account for this observation: 1) Contamination during the sampling procedure might contribute to the results as the bronchoscope is passed through the oro/nasopharynx. 2) The microbiome of the lung might be related to the microbiome of the upper airways and the oropharynx as small volumes of secretions are continuously microaspirated. This later concept is supported by data that indicate an association of lung disease with oral hygiene [37]. A number of factors could have impacted on the results and limited some aspects of the study. The number of patients in this and other studies on microbiome analysis is still small. Also the age difference between the study and control groups could have caused different results on the pulmonary microbiome. While it is currently not clear how age impacts in the composition of the pulmonary microbiome, the gut microbiome is dependent on age [38], [39].

In conclusion, the microbiome of the healthy lung is complex and differs from the microbiome of the respiratory tracts of COPD patients. Two different methods revealed partly diverse microbial spectra. Increasing knowledge about the pulmonary microbiome will provide the opportunity to understand the role of microorganisms in lung diseases.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Dr. Lawrence Chlumsky for database support; Dr. Ivica Letunić for his assistance in working with sequence alignments; Nicole Reuter, Annette Püchner, Lena Arnold, and Thomas Damm for excellent support.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: TZ EH ARK TG KR JKP JB MH CG HD LvM RB. Performed the experiments: TZ EH ARK TG KR JKP JB MH CG LvM RB. Analyzed the data: TZ EH JKP JB LvM RB. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: ARK TG CG HD RB. Wrote the paper: TZ JKP JB RB.

References

  1. 1. Veeramachaneni SB, Sethi S (2006) Pathogenesis of bacterial exacerbations of COPD. COPD 3: 109–115. doi: 10.1080/15412550600651347
  2. 2. Sethi S (2010) Infection as a comorbidity of COPD. Eur Respir J 35: 1209–1215. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00081409
  3. 3. Herr C, Beisswenger C, Hess C, Kandler K, Suttorp N, et al. (2009) Suppression of pulmonary innate host defence in smokers. Thorax 64: 144–149. doi: 10.1136/thx.2008.102681
  4. 4. Heijink IH, Brandenburg SM, Postma DS, van Oosterhout AJ (2012) Cigarette smoke impairs airway epithelial barrier function and cell-cell contact recovery. Eur Respir J 39: 419–428. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00193810
  5. 5. Pauly JL, Paszkiewicz G (2011) Cigarette smoke, bacteria, mold, microbial toxins, and chronic lung inflammation. J Oncol 2011: 819129. doi: 10.1155/2011/819129
  6. 6. Han MK, Huang YJ, Lipuma JJ, Boushey HA, Boucher RC, et al. (2012) Significance of the microbiome in obstructive lung disease. Thorax 67: 456–463. doi: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2011-201183
  7. 7. Zakharkina T, Koczulla AR, Mardanova O, Hattesohl A, Bals R (2011) Detection of microorganisms in exhaled breath condensate during acute exacerbations of COPD. Respirology 16: 932–938. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1843.2011.01977.x
  8. 8. Proctor LM (2011) The Human Microbiome Project in 2011 and beyond. Cell Host Microbe 10: 287–291. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2011.10.001
  9. 9. Rogers GB, Skelton S, Serisier DJ, van der Gast CJ, Bruce KD (2010) Determining cystic fibrosis-affected lung microbiology: comparison of spontaneous and serially induced sputum samples by use of terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism profiling. J ClinMicrobiol 48: 78–86. doi: 10.1128/jcm.01324-09
  10. 10. Sibley CD, Parkins MD, Rabin HR, Surette MG (2009) The relevance of the polymicrobial nature of airway infection in the acute and chronic management of patients with cystic fibrosis. CurrOpinInvestigDrugs 10: 787–794.
  11. 11. Sibley CD, Parkins MD, Rabin HR, Surette MG (2009) The relevance of the polymicrobial nature of airway infection in the acute and chronic management of patients with cystic fibrosis. Curr Opin Investig Drugs 10: 787–794.
  12. 12. Sibley CD, Surette MG (2011) The polymicrobial nature of airway infections in cystic fibrosis: Cangene Gold Medal Lecture. Can J Microbiol 57: 69–77. doi: 10.1139/w10-105
  13. 13. Markowitz VM, Chen IM, Chu K, Szeto E, Palaniappan K, et al. (2012) IMG/M: the integrated metagenome data management and comparative analysis system. Nucleic Acids Res 40: D123–129. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkr975
  14. 14. Erb-Downward JR, Thompson DL, Han MK, Freeman CM, McCloskey L, et al. (2011) Analysis of the lung microbiome in the “healthy” smoker and in COPD. PLoSONE 6: e16384. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0016384
  15. 15. Hilty M, Burke C, Pedro H, Cardenas P, Bush A, et al. (2010) Disordered microbial communities in asthmatic airways. PLoSONE 5: e8578. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0008578
  16. 16. Huang YJ, Kim E, Cox MJ, Brodie EL, Brown R, et al. (2010) A persistent and diverse airway microbiota present during chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbations. OMICS 14: 9–59. doi: 10.1089/omi.2009.0100
  17. 17. Charlson ES, Bittinger K, Haas AR, Fitzgerald AS, Frank I, et al. (2011) Topographical continuity of bacterial populations in the healthy human respiratory tract. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 184: 957–963. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201104-0655oc
  18. 18. Sze MA, Dimitriu PA, Hayashi S, Elliott WM, McDonough JE, et al. (2012) The lung tissue microbiome in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 185: 1073–1080. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201111-2075oc
  19. 19. Arumugam M, Raes J, Pelletier E, Le PD, Yamada T, et al. (2011) Enterotypes of the human gut microbiome. Nature 473: 174–180. doi: 10.1038/nature10187
  20. 20. Bahrani-Mougeot FK, Paster BJ, Coleman S, Barbuto S, Brennan MT, et al. (2007) Molecular analysis of oral and respiratory bacterial species associated with ventilator-associated pneumonia. J Clin Microbiol 45: 1588–1593. doi: 10.1128/jcm.01963-06
  21. 21. Brown CJ, Wong M, Davis CC, Kanti A, Zhou X, et al. (2007) Preliminary characterization of the normal microbiota of the human vulva using cultivation-independent methods. J MedMicrobiol 56: 271–276. doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.46607-0
  22. 22. Lemon KP, Klepac-Ceraj V, Schiffer HK, Brodie EL, Lynch SV, et al. (2010) Comparative analyses of the bacterial microbiota of the human nostril and oropharynx. MBio 1: 00129–00110. doi: 10.1128/mbio.00129-10
  23. 23. Collins MD (1991) Phylogenetic analysis of the genus Listeria based on reverse transcriptase sequencing of 16S rRNA.
  24. 24. Lee ZM, Bussema C, 3rd, Schmidt TM (2009) rrnDB: documenting the number of rRNA and tRNA genes in bacteria and archaea. Nucleic Acids Res 37: D489–493. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkn689
  25. 25. Allen B, Kon M, Bar-Yam Y (2009) A new phylogenetic diversity measure generalizing the shannon index and its application to phyllostomid bats. Am Nat 174: 236–243. doi: 10.1086/600101
  26. 26. Schloss PD, Handelsman J (2005) Introducing DOTUR, a computer program for defining operational taxonomic units and estimating species richness. ApplEnvironMicrobiol 71: 1501–1506. doi: 10.1128/aem.71.3.1501-1506.2005
  27. 27. Letunic I, Bork P (2011) Interactive tree of life v2: online annotation and display of phylogenetic trees made easy. Nucleic Acids Res 39: 475–478. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkr201
  28. 28. Team RDC (2011) R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing.
  29. 29. Hall M, Frank E, Holmes G, Pfahringer B, Reutemann P, et al. (2009) The WEKA Data Mining Software: An Update. ACM SIGKDD Explorations Newsletter 11: 10–18. doi: 10.1145/1656274.1656278
  30. 30. Joliffe IT, Morgan BJ (1992) Principal component analysis and exploratory factor analysis. Stat Methods Med Res 1: 69–95. doi: 10.1177/096228029200100105
  31. 31. MacQueen JB (1967) Some methods for classification and analysis of multivariate observations. Proceedings of 5th berkeley symposium on mathematical statistics and probability: University of California Press. pp. 281–297.
  32. 32. Gabriel KR, Odoroff CL (1990) Biplots in biomedical research. Stat Med 9: 469–485. doi: 10.1002/sim.4780090502
  33. 33. Diederen BM, van der Valk PD, Kluytmans JA, Peeters MF, Hendrix R (2007) The role of atypical respiratory pathogens in exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. EurRespirJ 30: 240–244. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00012707
  34. 34. Huang YJ, Nelson CE, Brodie EL, Desantis TZ, Baek MS, et al.. (2011) Airway microbiota and bronchial hyperresponsiveness in patients with suboptimally controlled asthma. J Allergy Clin Immunol 127: 372–381 e371–373.
  35. 35. Stressmann FA, Rogers GB, Klem ER, Lilley AK, Donaldson SH, et al. (2011) Analysis of the bacterial communities present in lungs of patients with cystic fibrosis from American and British centers. J Clin Microbiol 49: 281–291. doi: 10.1128/jcm.01650-10
  36. 36. Rogers GB, Skelton S, Serisier DJ, van der Gast CJ, Bruce KD (2010) Determining cystic fibrosis-affected lung microbiology: comparison of spontaneous and serially induced sputum samples by use of terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism profiling. J Clin Microbiol 48: 78–86. doi: 10.1128/jcm.01324-09
  37. 37. Liu Z, Zhang W, Zhang J, Zhou X, Zhang L, et al. (2012) Oral hygiene, periodontal health and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbations. J Clin Periodontol 39: 45–52. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051x.2011.01808.x
  38. 38. Yatsunenko T, Rey FE, Manary MJ, Trehan I, Dominguez-Bello MG, et al. (2012) Human gut microbiome viewed across age and geography. Nature 486: 222–227. doi: 10.1038/nature11053
  39. 39. O’Toole PW (2012) Changes in the intestinal microbiota from adulthood through to old age. Clin Microbiol Infect 18 Suppl 444–46. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2012.03867.x