Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Open Access

Peer-reviewed

Research Article

Quantitative Assessment of 2q35-rs13387042 Polymorphism and Hormone Receptor Status with Breast Cancer Risk

  • Chao Gu ,

    Contributed equally to this work with: Chao Gu, Liang Zhou

    Affiliation Department of General Surgery, Jinshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China

    ⨯
  • Liang Zhou ,

    Contributed equally to this work with: Chao Gu, Liang Zhou

    Affiliation Department of General Surgery, Jinshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China

    ⨯
  • Jianping Yu

    jianping_yu001@126.com

    Affiliation Department of General Surgery, Jinshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China

    ⨯

Abstract

Background

The association between rs13387042 polymorphism on 2q35 and breast cancer (BC) has been widely evaluated since it was first identified through genome-wide association approach. However, the results have been inconclusive. To investigate this inconsistency, we performed a meta-analysis of all available studies dealing with the relationship between the 2q35-rs13387042 polymorphism and BC.

Methods

Databases including MEDLINE, PubMed, EMBASE, ISI web of science and CNKI (China National Knowledge Infrastructure) were searched to find relevant studies. Odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used to assess the strength of association. The random-effects model was applied, addressing heterogeneity and publication bias.

Results

A total of 24 articles involving 99,772 cases and 164,985 controls were included. In a combined analysis, the summary per-allele odds ratio (OR) for BC of 2q35-rs13387042 polymorphism was 1.13 (95% CI: 1.11–1.16; P<10−5). Significant associations were also detected under co-dominant, dominant and recessive genetic models. In the subgroup analysis by ethnicity, significantly increased risks were found in Asians, Caucasians and Hispanic whites for the polymorphism in all comparisons; whereas no significant associations were found among Africans. In addition, we find 2q35-rs13387042 polymorphism conferred significantly risks for both ER-positive and ER-negative tumors. Furthermore, significant associations were also detected both in PR–positive and PR–negative cancer.

Conclusions

Our findings demonstrated that rs13387042-A allele is a risk-conferring factors for the development of BC, especially in Asians, Caucasians and Hispanic whites.

Citation: Gu C, Zhou L, Yu J (2013) Quantitative Assessment of 2q35-rs13387042 Polymorphism and Hormone Receptor Status with Breast Cancer Risk. PLoS ONE 8(7): e66979. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0066979

Editor: Xiao-Ping Miao, MOE Key Laboratory of Environment and Health, School of Public Health, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, China

Received: March 19, 2013; Accepted: May 15, 2013; Published: July 22, 2013

Copyright: © 2013 Gu et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Funding: The authors have no support or funding to report.

Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Introduction

Breast cancer (BC), as a substantial global public health concern, is one of the most common cancers diagnosed in women and is the primary cause of death among women in both the developing and developed world [1]. It is estimated that over one million women are diagnosed with BC every year, and more than 410,000 will die from the disease [2]. During the past two decades, there are well-documented reductions in mortality from BC in many counties. However, incidence rates continue to increase and do so more rapidly in countries that historically had low rates [3]. The etiology of BC is extremely complex and, while not yet elucidated, appears to involve numerous genetic, endocrine, and external environmental factors [4].

Family history is an important risk factor for BC. The risk of developing BC for a woman with a first-degree affected relative is increased 2-fold [5]. The risk is even greater for women with multiple cases in family members. BC may be attributable to mutations in high-penetrance genes such as BRCA1, BRCA2, p53 and PTEN, as well as moderate or low penetrance genes (e.g., CHEK2, ATM, HRAS1, BRIP1, and PALB2), but these mutations account for a relatively small proportion of the heritable risk in these BC families [6], [7]. Since 2007, several genome-wide association studies of BC [5], [8]–[10], have identified a number of genetic susceptibility loci that are associated with the risk of BC. Recently, a genome-wide association (GWA) study conducted in European ancestry population by Stacey et al. identified a new genetic susceptibility locus, rs13387042, at chromosome 2q35 was associated with BC risk [11]. After that, a number of studies have investigated the association between 2q35 rs13387042 polymorphism and BC risk. However, these studies have yielded conflicting or inconclusive result. These disparate findings may be due partly to insufficient power, phenotypic heterogeneity, population stratification, small effect of the polymorphism on BC risk, and even publication biases. Therefore, we carried out a comprehensive meta-analysis on all eligible studies to estimate the overall BC risk of 2q35-rs13387042 polymorphism as well as to quantify the between-study heterogeneity and potential bias.

Materials and Methods

We performed this analysis in accordance with the guidelines of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) statement [12] (Checklist S1).

Literature search strategy and inclusion criteria

Epidemiological genetic association studies published before the end of December 2012 on breast cancer and polymorphism in the chromosome 2q35 were sought by computer-based searches from databases including MEDLINE, PubMed, EMBASE, ISI web of science and CNKI (China National Knowledge Infrastructure) without language restriction. Search term combinations were keywords relating to the chromosome 2q35 (e.g., “2q35”, “rs13387042”) in combination with words related to breast cancer (e.g., breast cancer' or ‘malignant breast neoplasm’). All searched studies were retrieved, and their bibliographies were checked for other relevant publications. Review articles and bibliographies of other relevant studies identified were hand-searched to find additional eligible studies.

Articles were included in this meta-analysis if they (a) examined the hypothesis that 2q35-rs13387042 polymorphism was associated with BC risk, (b) followed a case-control or cohort study design, (c) identify BC cases histologically or pathologically, and (d) provided sufficient information on genotype/allele counts between cases and controls to estimate the odds ratio (OR) and the corresponding 95% confidence interval (95% CI). The major reasons for exclusion of studies were (a) overlapping data, (b) case-only studies, (c) familiar based studies and review articles.

Data extraction

Information was carefully extracted from all eligible publications independently by two of the authors according to the inclusion criteria listed above. The following variables were extracted from each study if available: the first author, published year, study design, geographic area, ethnicity, mean age of cases and controls, case-control match status, definition and numbers of cases and controls, source of controls, genotyping method, frequency of genotypes, and Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium (HWE) in controls. Relevant clinical characteristics included estrogen receptor (ER) status, progesterone receptor (PR) status, ERBB2 status, and tumor grade. Review reports from the two were than compared to identify any inconsistency, and differences were resolved by further discussion among all authors. Studies with different ethnic groups were considered as individual studies for our analyses.

Quality assessment: extended-quality score

For association studies with inconsistent results on the same polymorphisms, the methodological quality should be assessed by appropriate criteria to limit the risk of introducing bias into meta-analyses or systematic reviews. A procedure known as ‘extended-quality score’, has been developed to assess the quality of association studies. The procedure scores each paper categorizing it as having ‘high’, ‘median’ or ‘poor’ quality. Detailed procedure of the quality assessment was previously described [13].

Statistical methods

Deviation from Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium for controls was examined by χ2 tests with 1 degree of freedom. OR with 95% CIs was used to assess the strength of association between the 2q35-rs13387042 polymorphism and BC risk. The meta-analysis examined the association between the polymorphism and the risk of BC for the: (1) allele contrast, (2) heterozygous, (3) homozygote, (5) dominant, and (6) recessive model. Heterogeneity across individual studies was calculated using the Cochran's Q-statistic test followed by subsidiary analysis or by random-effects regression models with restricted maximum likelihood estimation [14]–[16]. The Q test was also performed to detect heterogeneity between subgroups. Random-effects and fixed-effect summary measures were calculated as inverse-variance–weighted average of the log odds ratio. The results of random-effects summary were reported in the text because it takes into account the variation between studies. Sources of heterogeneity were investigated by stratified meta-analyses based on ethnicity, sample size (No. cases ≥1000 or, <1000), ER and PR status. In addition, ethnicity, sample size, genotyping method and quality score were analyzed as covariates in meta-regression. The significance of the overall OR was determined by the Z-test. Publication bias was assessed with the Begg test [17] and Egger test [18]. Sensitivity analysis was performed by removing each individual study in turn from the total and re-analyzing the remainder. This procedure was used to ensure that no individual study was entirely responsible for the combined results. Statistical power (nominal α = 0.05) of this meta-analysis based on overall sample size was calculated with the pooled OR estimate from different ethnicity and minor allele frequency in controls [19]. The analyses were carried out by using the STATA software version 10.0 (Stata Corporation, College Station, TX). The type I error rate was set at 0.05. All P-values were two-tailed.

Results

Characteristics of included studies

Study selection process was shown in Figure S1. A total of 24 studies with 99,772 cancer cases and 164,985 controls were retrieved based on the search criteria for BC susceptibility related to the 2q35-rs13387042 polymorphism [11], [20]–[42]. In addition, all studies indicated that the frequency distributions of genotypes in the controls were consistent with Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium. The extended-quality scores ranged from 5 to 8, and 4 studies were given median quality, whereas 20 were given high quality. No ‘poor quality’ study was found. The statistical power of this meta-analysis based on overall sample size was 93%. The main study characteristics were summarized in Table 1.

thumbnail
Download:
Table 1. Characteristics of studies included in a meta-analysis of the association between 2q35-rs13387042 and BC.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0066979.t001

Quantitative synthesis

Table 2 listed the main results of this meta-analysis. Using random effect model, the per-allele overall OR of the A variant for BC was 1.13 (95% CI: 1.11–1.16, P<10−5; Figure 1], with corresponding results for heterozygous and homozygote of 1.13 (95% CI: 1.10–1.15, P<10−5) and 1.20 (95% CI: 1.16–1.25, P<10−5), respectively. Significant associations were also found under dominant [OR = 1.12, 95% CI: 1.10–1.15, P<10−5] and recessive [OR = 1.19, 95% CI: 1.14–1.26, P<10−5] genetic models (Table S1).

thumbnail
Download:
Figure 1. Forest plot for association of 2q35-rs13387042 polymorphism and BC risk.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0066979.g001

thumbnail
Download:
Table 2. Results of meta-analysis for 2q35-rs13387042 polymorphism and BC risk.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0066979.t002

Significant heterogeneity was present among the included studies of the rs13387042 polymorphism (P<0.05). Ethnicity (P = 0.002) and sample size (P = 0.03) explained a large part of the heterogeneity, whereas genotyping method (P = 0.47), genotyping method (P = 0.23), and quality score (P = 0.55) explained little heterogeneity. In view of significant heterogeneity and to seek for its potential sources, we performed a panel of subgroup analyses on ethnicity and sample size. When stratifying for ethnicity, an OR of 1.12 (95% CI: 1.03–1.21, P<10−5) and 1.14 (95% CI: 1.11–1.17, P<10−5) resulted for rs13387042-A variant, among Asians and Caucasians, respectively. Significant associations were also found among Hispanic white with a per-allele OR of 1.24 (95% CI: 1.11–1.37, P<10−4), while no significant associations were detected in African populations for the polymorphism. Since, between-study heterogeneity decrease significantly, ethnicity was identified as a main source of heterogeneity. By considering sample size subgroups, the OR was 1.18 (95% CI: 1.13–1.23, P<10−5) in small studies compared to 1.12 (95% CI: 1.09–1.15, P<10−5) in larger studies. Similar results were also detected under co-dominant, dominant and recessive genetic models.

Interactions between rs13387042 and hormone receptor status with BC risk

Because ER and PR status is one of the major markers of BC subtypes, we further performed analyses to test for differences in the associations of the polymorphism with BC risk with respect to different ER and PR status (Table 3). Stratification of tumors by ER status indicated that rs13387042 polymorphism increased risk of both ER-positive and ER-negative tumors. However, stronger association was observed with ER-positive tumors 1.17 (95% CI: 1.15–1.19, P<10−5) compared to ER-negative tumors 1.08 (95% CI: 1.04–1.13, P<10−4). In addition, 2q35-rs13387042 was associated with greater risk of PR-positive BC (OR = 1.18, 95% CI: 1.15–1.21, P<10−5) than PR-negative BC (OR = 1.10, 95% CI: 1.05–1.15, P<10−4).

thumbnail
Download:
Table 3. Per-allele OR for rs13387042-A variant and BC risk stratified by hormone receptor status.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0066979.t003

Sensitivity analyses and publication bias

Sensitivity analysis was performed by excluding one study at a time. The results confirmed the significant association between the rs13387042 polymorphism and the risk of BC, with ORs and 95% CIs ranging from 1.13 (95% CI: 1.11–1.15) to 1.14 (95% CI: 1.11–1.16). Begg's funnel plot and Egger's test were performed to evaluate the publication bias of literatures. As shown in Figures S2, the shape of the funnel plots seemed symmetrical, suggesting no publication bias among the studies included. The statistical results still did not show publication bias (Begg test, P = 0.24; Egger test, P = 0.77; Figure S3)

Discussion

The pathogenesis of the development and progression of BC is far from being clear at present. Accumulated evidence suggests that it is a complex polygenic disorder for which genetic factors play an important role in disease etiology [4]. Common variation rs13387042 at 2q35 was originally identified in large GWA study in European population [11]. Since then, extensive case-control studies in different populations reported that the rs13387042 polymorphism in 2q35 has been implicated in BC risk. However, results of genetic association studies were confusing because of the difficulty in replicating significant associations. Different characteristics among studies such as ethnicities, BC subtype, definition of case and control, introduced heterogeneity and made the results of association studies hard to be interpreted. A meta-analysis aiming at finding out the origin of heterogeneity and assessing overall effects of these variants on BC was performed. This is the first comprehensive meta-analysis that examined the rs13387042 polymorphisms in 2q35 and the relationship with susceptibility for BC. Its strength was based on the accumulation of published data giving greater information to detect significant differences. In total, the meta-analysis involved 24 studies for BC that provided 99,772 cases and 164,985 controls. Overall, a significant association existed between the 2q35 rs13387042 variant and BC risk.

In the subgroup analysis, study conducted in Caucasian populations was responsible for heterogeneity, and the ORs between different genetic models and sample size were consistent. The rs13387042 showed positive association with BC in Asian, Caucasian and Hispanic white populations. However, no associations were found in African descent population. In fact, the distribution of the less common G allele varies extensively between different races, with a prevalence of ∼88% among Asians, ∼49% among Caucasians and ∼28% among African population [34]–[36]. Thus, failing to identify any significant association in Caucasians and other populations could be due to substantially lower statistical power caused by the relatively lower prevalence of G allele of rs13387042. Such result could also be due to the limited number of studies among African populations, which had insufficient statistical power to detect a slight effect or different linkage disequilibrium (LD) pattern of the polymorphism among African populations. Therefore, additional studies are warranted to further validate ethnic difference in the effect of this polymorphism on BC risk. It is possible that variation at this locus has modest effects on BC, but environmental factors may predominate in the progress of BC, and mask the effects of this variation. Specific life style environmental factors, such as estrogen exposure status and smoking habit have been already well studied in recent decades [4]. The unconsidered factors mixed together may cover the role of 2q35-rs13387042 polymorphism.

Findings from previous studies suggested that several SNPs are predominantly associated with ER+ breast cancer: TNRC9-rs3803662 [11], [37], [41], 5p12-rs4415084 [9], 5p12-rs10941679 [9], FGFR2-rs2981582 [9], [43] 8q24-rs13281615 [44]. In our results, 2q35-rs13387042 was associated with both ER+ and ER− BC. Similar risks were also observed when stratified by PR status. SNP 2q35-rs13387042 showed a strongly statistically significant association with risk in ER+ and PR+ cases compared to ER− and PR− cases. Because ER and PR status are the major markers of BC subtypes, these observations suggest that inherited risk variants of these subtypes may vary. The magnitude of the observed differences is small, and by themselves these findings are unlikely to have any immediate clinical implications. However, the observed differences provide clues to the biologic mechanisms that underpin tumor heterogeneity, which may ultimately lead to improved treatment and prevention. Since rs13387042 is located in a 90-kb region of high LD without any known genes or human RNAs, indicating that further study of the biological function of this SNP is necessary.

The strengths of this study include the very large sample size, no deviation from Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium, and the high quality of the qualified studies. However, our current study should be interpreted with several technical limitations in mind. Firstly, the vast majority of white subjects in the study are of European descent, and statistical power for analyses in other ethnicities is limited. Because the sample size was considerably smaller for African studies, the main conclusions from this manuscript are based on analyses among white European and Asian women. Future studies including larger numbers of Africans are necessary to clarify the consistency of findings across ethnic groups. Secondly, our results were based on unadjusted estimates, while a more precise analysis should be conducted if individual data were available, which would allow for the adjustment by other covariates including age, menopausal status, family history, environmental factors and lifestyle [4]. Third, only published studies were included in this meta-analysis. Therefore, publication bias may have occurred, even though the use of a statistical test did not show it. Recently, two meta-analyses found that SLC4A7 and XRCC1 were associated with increased BC susceptibility [45], [46]. BC is an extremely complex disease and the same polymorphism may have different roles in different ethnicity. Using meta-analysis to combine all available evidence may help to identify new loci for BC susceptibility and thus provide insight into the in vivo relationship between candidate genes and BC. An improved understanding of the pathogenesis of BC will be beneficial in the diagnosis of prodromal symptoms and in establishing appropriate therapeutic intervention to prevent the onset and the progression of BC.

In summary, findings from this meta-analysis indicate that 2q35 rs13387042 polymorphism is significantly associated with an increased risk of BC. Further studies should investigate the markers on and adjacent to 2q35 to clarify whether the present association is causal or due to linkage disequilibrium.

Supporting Information

Figure S1.

Flow chart of literature search for studies examining 2q35-rs13387042 polymorphism and risk of BC.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0066979.s001

(TIF)

Figure S2.

Begg's funnel plot of 2q35-rs13387042 polymorphism and BC risk.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0066979.s002

(TIF)

Figure S3.

Test publication bias of studies of the 2q35-rs13387042 polymorphism of and BC using Egger test.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0066979.s003

(TIF)

Table S1.

Results of meta-analysis for 2q35-rs13387042 polymorphism and BC risk under dominant and recessive genetic model.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0066979.s004

(DOCX)

Checklist S1.

PRISMA 2009 Checklist

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0066979.s005

(DOC)

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: CG LZ JPY. Performed the experiments: CG LZ. Analyzed the data: CG LZ JPY. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: CG LZ. Wrote the paper: CG LZ JPY.

References

  1. 1. Shulman LN, Willett W, Sievers A, Knaul FM (2010) Breast cancer in developing countries: opportunities for improved survival. J Oncol 2010: 595167.
  2. 2. Coughlin SS, Ekwueme DU (2009) Breast cancer as a global health concern. Cancer Epidemiol 33: 315–318.
  3. 3. Benson JR, Jatoi I (2012) The global breast cancer burden. Future Oncol 8: 697–702.
  4. 4. Lichtenstein P, Holm NV, Verkasalo PK, Iliadou A, Kaprio J, et al. (2000) Environmental and heritable factors in the causation of cancer: analyses of cohorts of twins from Sweden, Denmark, and Finland. N Engl J Med 343: 78–85.
  5. 5. Easton DF, Pooley KA, Dunning AM, Pharoah PD, Thompson D, et al. (2007) Genome-wide association study identifies novel breast cancer susceptibility loci. Nature 447: 1087–1093.
  6. 6. Walsh T, Casadei S, Coats KH, Swisher E, Stray SM, et al. (2006) Spectrum of mutations in BRCA1, BRCA2, CHEK2, and TP53 in families at high risk of breast cancer. JAMA 295: 1379–1388.
  7. 7. Walsh T, Lee MK, Casadei S, Thornton AM, Stray SM, et al. (2010) Detection of inherited mutations for breast and ovarian cancer using genomic capture and massively parallel sequencing. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107: 12629–12633.
  8. 8. Hunter DJ, Kraft P, Jacobs KB, Cox DG, Yeager M, et al. (2007) A genome-wide association study identifies alleles in FGFR2 associated with risk of sporadic postmeno-pausal breast cancer. Nat Genet 39: 870–874.
  9. 9. Stacey SN, Manolescu A, Sulem P, Thorlacius S, Gudjonsson SA, et al. (2008) Common variants on chromosome 5p12 confer susceptibility to estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer. Nat Genet 40: 703–706.
  10. 10. Zheng W, Long J, Gao YT, Li C, Zheng Y, et al. (2009) Genome-wide association study identifies a new breast cancer susceptibility locus at 6q25.1. Nat Genet 41: 324–328.
  11. 11. Stacey SN, Manolescu A, Sulem P, Rafnar T, Gudmundsson J, et al. (2007) Common variants on chromosomes 2q35 and 16q12 confer susceptibility to estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer. Nat Genet 39: 865–869.
  12. 12. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG (2009) Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Ann Intern Med 151: 264–269, W264.
  13. 13. Li DW, Collier DA, He L (2006) Meta-analysis shows strong positive association of the neuregulin 1 (NRG1) gene with schizophrenia. Hum Mol Genet 15: 1995–2002.
  14. 14. Cochran WG (1954) The combination of estimates from different experiments. Biometrics 10: 101–129.
  15. 15. DerSimonian R, Laird N (1986) Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials 7: 177–188.
  16. 16. Thompson SG, Sharp SJ (1999) Explaining heterogeneity in meta-analysis: a comparison of methods. Stat Med 18: 2693–2708.
  17. 17. Begg CB, Mazumdar M (1994) Operating characteristics of a rank correlation test for publication bias. Biometrics 50: 1088–1101.
  18. 18. Egger M, Davey Smith G, Schneider M, Minder C (1997) Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ 315: 629–634.
  19. 19. Cai Y, Yi J, Ma Y, Fu D (2011) Meta-analysis of the effect of HHEX gene polymorphism on the risk of type 2 diabetes. Mutagenesis 26: 309–14.
  20. 20. Dai J, Hu Z, Jiang Y, Shen H, Dong J, et al. (2012) Breast cancer risk assessment with five independent genetic variants and two risk factors in Chinese women. Breast Cancer Res 14: R17.
  21. 21. Lin CY, Ho CM, Bau DT, Yang SF, Liu SH, et al. (2012) Evaluation of breast cancer susceptibility loci on 2q35, 3p24, 17q23 and FGFR2 genes in Taiwanese women with breast cancer. Anticancer Res 32: 475–482.
  22. 22. Sueta A, Ito H, Kawase T, Hirose K, Hosono S, et al. (2012) A genetic risk predictor for breast cancer using a combination of low-penetrance polymorphisms in a Japanese population. Breast Cancer Res Treat 132: 711–721.
  23. 23. Kim HC, Lee JY, Sung H, Choi JY, Park SK, et al. (2012) A genome-wide association study identifies a breast cancer risk variant in ERBB4 at 2q34: results from the Seoul Breast Cancer Study. Breast Cancer Res 14: R56.
  24. 24. He C, Chasman DI, Dreyfus J, Hwang SJ, Ruiter R, et al. (2012) Reproductive aging-associated common genetic variants and the risk of breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res 14: R54.
  25. 25. Harlid S, Ivarsson MI, Butt S, Grzybowska E, Eyfjörd JE, et al. (2012) Combined effect of low-penetrant SNPs on breast cancer risk. Br J Cancer 106: 389–396.
  26. 26. Huo D, Zheng Y, Ogundiran TO, Adebamowo C, Nathanson KL, et al. (2012) Evaluation of 19 susceptibility loci of breast cancer in women of African ancestry. Carcinogenesis 33: 835–840.
  27. 27. Shan J, Mahfoudh W, Dsouza SP, Hassen E, Bouaouina N, et al. (2012) Genome-Wide Association Studies (GWAS) breast cancer susceptibility loci in Arabs: susceptibility and prognostic implications in Tunisians. Breast Cancer Res Treat 135: 715–724.
  28. 28. Fletcher O, Johnson N, Orr N, Hosking FJ, Gibson LJ, et al. (2011) Novel breast cancer susceptibility locus at 9q31.2: results of a genome-wide association study. J Natl Cancer Inst 103: 425–435.
  29. 29. Stevens KN, Vachon CM, Lee AM, Slager S, Lesnick T, et al. (2011) Common breast cancer susceptibility loci are associated with triple-negative breast cancer. Cancer Res 71: 6240–6429.
  30. 30. Teraoka SN, Bernstein JL, Reiner AS, Haile RW, Bernstein L, et al. (2011) Single nucleotide polymorphisms associated with risk for contralateral breast cancer in the Women's Environment, Cancer, and Radiation Epidemiology (WECARE) Study. Breast Cancer Res 13: R114.
  31. 31. Li J, Humphreys K, Heikkinen T, Aittomäki K, Blomqvist C, et al. (2011) A combined analysis of genome-wide association studies in breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 126: 717–727.
  32. 32. Jiang Y, Han J, Liu J, Zhang G, Wang L, et al. (2011) Risk of genome-wide association study newly identified genetic variants for breast cancer in Chinese women of Heilongjiang Province. Breast Cancer Res Treat 128: 251–257.
  33. 33. Chen F, Chen GK, Millikan RC, John EM, Ambrosone CB, et al. (2011) Fine-mapping of breast cancer susceptibility loci characterizes genetic risk in African Americans. Hum Mol Genet 20: 4491–4503.
  34. 34. Hutter CM, Young AM, Ochs-Balcom HM, Carty CL, Wang T, et al. (2011) Replication of breast cancer GWAS susceptibility loci in the Women's Health Initiative African American SHARe Study. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 20: 1950–1959.
  35. 35. Slattery ML, Baumgartner KB, Giuliano AR, Byers T, Herrick JS, et al. (2011) Replication of five GWAS-identified loci and breast cancer risk among Hispanic and non-Hispanic white women living in the Southwestern United States. Breast Cancer Res Treat 129: 531–539.
  36. 36. Campa D, Kaaks R, Le Marchand L, Haiman CA, Travis RC, et al. (2011) Interactions between genetic variants and breast cancer risk factors in the breast and prostate cancer cohort consortium. J Natl Cancer Inst 103: 1252–1263.
  37. 37. Reeves GK, Travis RC, Green J, Bull D, Tipper S, et al. (2010) Incidence of breast cancer and its subtypes in relation to individual and multiple low-penetrance genetic susceptibility loci. JAMA 304: 426–434.
  38. 38. Zheng W, Wen W, Gao YT, Shyr Y, Zheng Y, et al. (2010) Genetic and clinical predictors for breast cancer risk assessment and stratification among Chinese women. J Natl Cancer Inst 102: 972–981.
  39. 39. Barnholtz-Sloan JS, Shetty PB, Guan X, Nyante SJ, Luo J, et al. (2010) FGFR2 and other loci identified in genome-wide association studies are associated with breast cancer in African-American and younger women. Carcinogenesis 31: 1417–1423.
  40. 40. Antoniou AC, Sinilnikova OM, McGuffog L, Healey S, Nevanlinna H, et al. (2009) Common variants in LSP1, 2q35 and 8q24 and breast cancer risk for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers. Hum Mol Genet 18: 4442–4456.
  41. 41. Milne RL, Benítez J, Nevanlinna H, Heikkinen T, Aittomäki K, et al. (2009) Risk of estrogen receptor-positive and -negative breast cancer and single-nucleotide polymorphism 2q35-rs13387042. J Natl Cancer Inst 101: 1012–1018.
  42. 42. Zheng W, Cai Q, Signorello LB, Long J, Hargreaves MK, et al. (2009) Evaluation of 11 breast cancer susceptibility loci in African-American women. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 18: 2761–2764.
  43. 43. Wang H, Yang Z, Zhang H (2013) Assessing interactions between the associations of fibroblast growth factor receptor 2 common genetic variants and hormone receptor status with breast cancer risk. Breast Cancer Res Treat 137: 511–522.
  44. 44. Garcia-Closas M, Hall P, Nevanlinna H, Pooley K, Morrison J, et al. (2008) Heterogeneity of breast cancer associations with five susceptibility loci by clinical and pathological characteristics. PLoS Genet 4: e1000054.
  45. 45. Chen W, Zhong R, Ming J, Zou L, Zhu B, et al. (2012) The SLC4A7 variant rs4973768 is associated with breast cancer risk: evidence from a case-control study and a meta-analysis. Breast Cancer Res Treat 136: 847–57.
  46. 46. Liu L, Yuan P, Liu L, Wu C, Zhang X, et al. (2011) A functional -77T>C polymorphism in XRCC1 is associated with risk of breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 125: 479–87.