Advertisement
Research Article

Gender Disparity between Cutaneous and Non-Cutaneous Manifestations of Lyme Borreliosis

  • Franc Strle,

    Affiliation: Department of Infectious Diseases, University Medical Center Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia

    X
  • Gary P. Wormser mail,

    gary_wormser@nymc.edu

    Affiliation: Division of Infectious Diseases, New York Medical College, Valhalla, New York, United States of America

    X
  • Paul Mead,

    Affiliation: National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Fort Collins, Colorado, United States of America

    X
  • Kanthi Dhaduvai,

    Affiliation: Division of Infectious Diseases, New York Medical College, Valhalla, New York, United States of America

    X
  • Michael V. Longo,

    Affiliation: Division of Infectious Diseases, New York Medical College, Valhalla, New York, United States of America

    X
  • Omosalewa Adenikinju,

    Affiliation: Division of Infectious Diseases, New York Medical College, Valhalla, New York, United States of America

    X
  • Sandeep Soman,

    Affiliation: Division of Infectious Diseases, New York Medical College, Valhalla, New York, United States of America

    X
  • Yodit Tefera,

    Affiliation: Division of Infectious Diseases, New York Medical College, Valhalla, New York, United States of America

    X
  • Vera Maraspin,

    Affiliation: Department of Infectious Diseases, University Medical Center Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia

    X
  • Stanka Lotrič-Furlan,

    Affiliation: Department of Infectious Diseases, University Medical Center Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia

    X
  • Katarina Ogrinc,

    Affiliation: Department of Infectious Diseases, University Medical Center Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia

    X
  • Jože Cimperman,

    Affiliation: Department of Infectious Diseases, University Medical Center Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia

    X
  • Eva Ružić-Sabljić,

    Affiliation: Institute for Microbiology and Immunology, Medical Faculty Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia

    X
  • Daša Stupica

    Affiliation: Department of Infectious Diseases, University Medical Center Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia

    X
  • Published: May 30, 2013
  • DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0064110

Abstract

Cutaneous manifestations of Lyme borreliosis in Europe include erythema migrans (EM) and acrodermatitis chronica atrophicans (ACA); the most common non-cutaneous manifestations are Lyme neuroborreliosis (LNB) and Lyme arthritis. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the gender distribution of patients with these clinical manifestations of Lyme borreliosis. Data on gender were obtained from the clinical records of patients with Lyme borreliosis aged ≥15 years who had been evaluated at the University Medical Center Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.

Among 10,539 patients diagnosed with EM, 6,245 (59.3%) were female and among 506 ACA patients 347 (68.6%) were female. In contrast, among the 60 patients with Lyme arthritis only 15 (25%) were female (p<0.0001 for the comparison of gender with EM or ACA) and among the 130 patients with LNB only 51 (39.2%) were females (p<0.0001for the comparison of gender with EM or ACA). Although the proportion that was female in the LNB group was greater than that of patients with Lyme arthritis, this difference did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.10). Although older individuals are more likely to be female in the general Slovenian population, the age of patients with cutaneous versus non-cutaneous manifestations was not the explanation for the observed differences in gender.

In conclusion, patients with cutaneous manifestations of Lyme borreliosis were predominantly female, whereas those with non-cutaneous manifestations were predominantly male. This provocative finding is unexplained but may have direct relevance to the pathogenesis of Lyme borreliosis.

Introduction

Lyme borreliosis is transmitted by the bite of Ixodes ticks infected with Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato (the term “sensu lato” refers to all of the species of Lyme borrelia) [1]. In the United States there is a male predominance of cases [2], [3]. This is not necessarily true in Europe where in some countries such as Germany there is a female predominance [4], [5]. It has been presumed that the explanation for the unequal gender distribution is that the likelihood of tick exposure is greater for males in the United States and greater for females in certain European countries.

In the United States, only B. burgdorferi sensu stricto (the term “sensu stricto” specifically refers to one particular species of Lyme borrelia) causes Lyme borreliosis whereas in Europe the majority of cases of Lyme borreliosis are caused by B. afzelii and B. garinii, rather than B. burgdorferi sensu stricto [1]. Consequently, there are a greater variety of clinical manifestations of Lyme borreliosis in Europe compared with the United States.

In this study we have evaluated the gender distribution according to clinical manifestation among patients with Lyme borreliosis evaluated at the University Medical Center Ljubljana in Ljubljana, Slovenia. Slovenia is a small central European country with 2 million inhabitants. From 2008 to 2011, the annual incidence of Lyme borreliosis was ≥250 cases/100,000 inhabitants [6].

Methods

Patient Population and Serologic Testing Methods

Clinical records were reviewed of patients with Lyme borreliosis aged ≥15 years who were evaluated at the University Medical Center Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia during 1990–2012. To account for changes in clinic procedures over time, data extraction was limited to periods when information on a specific manifestation was systematically collected, resulting in somewhat different time frames for the different manifestations. Erythema migrans (EM) was defined according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention criteria as an erythematous skin lesion of ≥5 cm in diameter [7]. EM patients diagnosed during the period 1990 to 2009 were included in the analysis.

Patients with acrodermatitis chronica atrophicans (ACA) were required to have a characteristic clinical picture, supportive histologic findings, and serum IgG antibody to borrelial antigens. ACA patients diagnosed from 1990 to July 2012 were included in the analysis. For patients with ACA, different serological methods were used over the 23 year time frame. Initially, IgG seropositivity in serum to B. burgdorferi sensu lato required either a positive immunofluorescence assay [8] or a positive enzyme linked immunosorbent assay with a positive supplemental IgG immunoblot [9]. In the past few years testing has been based on an indirect chemiluminescence immunoassay (LIAISON®, Diasorin, Italy) using the VlsE (variable major protein-like sequence expressed)recombinant antigen [10], following the manufacturer's recommendations.

Patients with Lyme arthritis had objective joint swelling in one or a few large joints, serum IgG antibody to borrelial antigens and no alternative explanation for the arthritis. The analysis included Lyme arthritis patients diagnosed between 2001 and July 2012. For patients with Lyme arthritis, IgG antibodies to B. burgdorferi sensu lato in serum were determined byan indirect chemiluminescence immunoassay (LIAISON®, Diasorin, Italy) using recombinant VlsE, following the manufacturer's recommendations.

Patients diagnosed with Lyme neuroborreliosis (LNB) were required to have cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) pleocytosis and at least one of the following: a) concomitant EM, b) isolation of B. burgdorferi sensu lato from CSF, or c) evidence of intrathecal synthesis of antibody to borrelial antigens. Patients diagnosed between October 2005 and July 2012 were included in the analysis. For patients with LNB, antibodies to B. burgdorferi sensu lato in serum and CSF were detected byan indirect chemiluminescence immunoassay (LIAISON®, Diasorin, Italy) using recombinant outer surface protein C (OspC) and recombinant VlsE as antigens for IgM antibody, and recombinant VlsE as the antigen for IgG antibody. Intrathecal synthesis of borrelial antibodies was determined using the approach described by Reiber and Peter: antibody index values >1.4 were interpreted as indicating production of intrathecal borrelial antibody [11]. In some patients intrathecal antibody synthesis to B. burgdorferi sensu lato was also determined using the IDEA™ Lyme Neuroborreliosis kit (DakoCytomation, Cambridgeshire, UK) that uses the flagellin antigen from B. afzelii; an index of ≥0.3 indicates intrathecal synthesis of specific borrelial antibodies with this assay.

Analysis

As in many countries, the overall sex ratio in Slovenia varies from male biased among younger age groups to female biased among older age groups [12]. Some differences in the sex ratio are therefore inherent when comparing groups of patients with different average ages. To correct for this, sex ratios for each clinical group were normalized using the direct standardization method, 5-year age groupings, and data for the Slovenian population for the year 2000 [12]. Statistical comparisons between groups were made after applying the age-adjusted sex ratio to the number of patients in each group and comparing the distributions by the chi-square test [13], [14].

Ethics Statement

The investigation was conducted according to the principles expressed in the Declaration of Helsinki. The study was approved by the National Medical Ethics Committee of the Republic of Slovenia (No 117/11/12). The Ethics Committee waived the need for written informed consent.

Results

Among the 10,539 Slovenian patients ≥15 years old diagnosed with EM from 1990 to 2009, 6,245 (59.3%) were female (Table 1). A similar female predominance of 57.7% was found among the subgroup of 580 patients with multiple EM skin lesions. Among the 506 ACA patients ≥15 years old diagnosed from 1990 to July 2012, 347 (68.6%) were female. Although the proportion of females was greater among patients with ACA than EM, this difference did not reach statistical significance after correcting for differences in age (X2 = 1.2, p = 0.27).

thumbnail

Table 1. Gender and Age of Slovenian Patients with Lyme Borreliosis According to Clinical Manifestation.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0064110.t001

In contrast, there was a striking male predominance among patients with Lyme arthritis. Among the 60 patients with Lyme arthritis ≥15 years old diagnosed between 2001 and July 2012 only 15 (25%) were female. There was a highly statistically significant difference between the proportion who were female in the arthritis group versus the EM group (X2 = 19.5, p<0.0001) and similarly versus the ACA group (X2 = 22.1, p<0.0001).

As the case definition for Lyme arthritis used in the present study conceivably could have included seropositive patients with arthritis caused by a condition other than Lyme borreliosis, we also evaluated the gender distribution in the subgroup of these patients who had either a concomitant EM skin lesion or evidence of Lyme arthritis based on detection of B. burgdorferi sensu lato in joint fluid by culture or by polymerase chain reaction. In this subgroup of 22 patients (whose median age of 47 years was similar to the median age of 48.5 years for the entire group of Lyme arthritis cases), 5 (22.7%) were female, suggesting that misdiagnosis did not contribute to the male predominance among Lyme arthritis cases.

Among the 130 patients ≥15 years old with LNB diagnosed from October 2005 to July 2012, there was also a male predominance. In this group only 51 (39.2%) were females, which was significantly different compared with the EM group (X2 = 19.1, p<0.0001) or the ACA group (X2 = 17.6, p<0.0001). Although the proportion of females in the LNB group was greater than in the Lyme arthritis group, this difference did not reach statistical significance (X2 = 2.7, p = 0.10). All of these comparisons were performed after correcting for differences in age.

Discussion

The results of this study conducted at a medical center in Slovenia show that the number of females diagnosed with EM or ACA exceeded the number of males with these cutaneous manifestations of Lyme borreliosis. The opposite was found for non-cutaneous manifestations, where the number of males diagnosed with LNB or Lyme arthritis exceeded the number of females. A female predominance among patients with ACA is quite consistent among case series of ACA reported from other European countries [15][17]. There has also been a female predominance among EM cases in many case series of adult patients from other European countries [17][21], with an especially high proportion of females in patients with recurrent EM in Sweden [22], [23]. Similarly, a male predominance for LNB or Lyme arthritis in Europe is by no means unique to Slovenia [4], [24][30]. A particular strength of our study is that we had data on a large number of patients with different clinical manifestations of Lyme borreliosis who were diagnosed at a single medical center, thus avoiding confounding variables that may be present when comparisons are made between medical centers.

To our knowledge, this is the first report to document at the same medical center that the proportion of ACA patients who are female is substantially greater than those diagnosed with EM. The difference in the proportion who were females between patients with ACA and EM, however, can be explained almost entirely by differences in the ages of these patients. ACA is a late manifestation of Lyme borreliosis, and patients with ACA were about 15 years older than those with EM. The sex ratio in Slovenia is increasingly biased toward females in older age groups [12], and the difference between ACA and EM patients becomes marginal after controlling for this trend. The observed differences in the proportions of females with EM or ACA, compared with those with either LNB or Lyme arthritis, however, cannot be accounted for by the ages of the patient groups.

Although the patient groups in this study were not from identical time periods, this could only substantively influence the results if there were marked time-related shifts in the sex ratio of the general Slovenian population between 1990 and 2012. Census data, however, indicate that females accounted for 51.5%, 51.1% and 50.5% of the Slovenian population in 1990, 2000, and 2010 respectively, underscoring that there have been no major shifts in the sex ratio [12]. In addition, if we had limited our analysis of EM cases to the 5,049 cases (48%) occurring during the overlapping years of 2000–2009, the female preponderance was essentially unchanged at 58%. Thus, time-related changes in the sex ratio cannot account for the observed gender differences between cutaneous and non-cutaneous clinical manifestations of Lyme borreliosis.

What might account for the male predominance among patients with LNB and Lyme arthritis? One possibility is that strains of B. garinii and B. burgdorferi sensu stricto, the Lyme borrelial species thought to be most closely associated with LNB and Lyme arthritis respectively [1], are less likely to infect women than men. This would be plausible if the ticks infected with these species of Lyme borrelia were preferentially found in geographic areas frequented more by men than women, or alternatively, if men were more susceptible to developing infection with these species after being bitten by an infected tick. With either of these scenarios, one might expect, relative to B. afzelii infection, that there would be a lower proportion of women with EM who had a positive skin culture for B. garinii or for B. burgdorferi sensu stricto. Table 2 shows the available Slovenian data on gender for the patients with a positive culture of a skin biopsy sample of an EM skin lesion [31][35]. In support of these hypotheses, a higher percentage of patients with B. afzelii infection were female compared with those infected with B. garinii (62.2% vs. 53.3%, p = 0.06), and this difference was statistically significant when the rates were adjusted for the age of the patients (59.1% vs. 44.1%, p = 0.003). Indeed, after the age correction there was a male predominance for B. garinii infections. However, this pattern was not found for B. burgdorferi sensu stricto.

thumbnail

Table 2. Correlation between the Species of Lyme Borrelia Isolated from the Skin of Patients with Erythema Migrans and the Gender of Infected Slovenian Patients.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0064110.t002

Since LNB and Lyme arthritis presumably arise in most cases through hematogenous dissemination [36], it may be that the likelihood of spirochetemia with highly neurotropic strains of B. garinii [37][39], or with strains of B. burgdorferi sensu stricto with the strongest propensity to infect joints [37], is greater in males than females. Possible differences between females and males in the immunologic response to borrelia has been discussed by others in trying to explain the much greater likelihood of recurrent episodes of EM in females from Sweden compared with men [21], [23]. In the experience at the University Medical Center Ljubljana with patients found to have a positive blood culture for B. garinii, there were 12 females compared with 10 males; among patients with a positive blood culture for B. burgdorferi sensu stricto, there were 3 females and no males to date. Clearly the available data are too limited to exclude the possibility that gender might influence the risk of hematogenous dissemination with certain strains of B. garinii or B. burgdorferi sensu stricto.

Perhaps the explanation is purely behavioral. It could be argued that Slovenian men are simply less likely than Slovenian women to seek health care for EM skin lesions, and thus they become at higher risk for dissemination of Lyme borrelia to extracutaneous sites. Available data in Slovenia on utilization of health care indicate among individuals aged ≥20 years that women had more outpatient primary care visits in 2010 than men with a ratio of 1.3 visits for women to 1 for men [40]. A counter-argument against this hypothesis, however, is the clear female predominance among patients with ACA, which is also a late manifestation of Lyme borreliosis [1]. However, it may be that men are simply less likely than women in Slovenia to seek medical care for any kind of skin lesion including both EM and ACA.

The potential for biologic significance of gender in infectious diseases is not unique to Lyme borreliosis. For example, it has been previously demonstrated in a murine model of Borrelia hermsii infection that males have a significantly higher initial peak level of spirochetemia than females [41]. In another example, it has been observed in patients with Coxiella burnetii infection (Q fever) that men are 2.5 times more likely to be symptomatic than women [42], and experimental studies in mice have confirmed that sex hormones play a role in the pathophysiology of this infection [43].

In conclusion, in this study performed at a single medical center in Slovenia, patients with the cutaneous manifestations of Lyme borreliosis, EM and ACA, were predominantly female, while those with LNB or Lyme arthritis were predominantly men. This pattern of gender distribution has been noted in other [4], [15][30], but not all [21], [44][47], case series from Europe of these particular clinical manifestations of Lyme borreliosis. Elucidation of the mechanism(s) involved may provide useful insights into the pathogenesis of Lyme borreliosis in Europe.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Lisa Giarratano and Shantale Williams for assistance, Stan Weiss and Joop Schellekens for helpful suggestions, Metka Zaletel from the Institute of Public Health of the Republic of Slovenia for providing information on outpatient visits according to gender, and Brad Biggerstaff, CDC, for statistical assistance.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: GPW FS PM KD MVL OA SS YT. Performed the experiments: FS VM SLF KO JC ERS DS. Analyzed the data: GPW PM FS KD MVL OA SS YT SLF KO DS. Wrote the paper: GPW PM KD MVL OA SS YT VM SLF KO JC ERS DS FS. Final approval of the version to be published: FS GPW PM KD MVL OA SS YT VM SLF KO JC ERS DS.

References

  1. 1. Stanek G, Wormser GP, Gray J, Strle F (2012) Lyme borreliosis. Lancet 379: 461–473. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(11)60103-7
  2. 2. Bacon RM, Kugeler KJ, Mead PS (2008) Surveillance for Lyme disease – United States, 1992–2006. Morbidity Mortality Weekly Report (MMWR) 57 (SS10) 1–9.
  3. 3. Wormser GP, Shapiro ED (2009) Implications of gender in chronic Lyme disease. J Womens Health 18: 831–834. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2008.1193
  4. 4. Fulop B, Poggensee G (2008) Epidemiological situation of Lyme borreliosis in Germany: surveillance data from six eastern German states, 2002 to 2006. Parasitol Res 103: S117–S120. doi: 10.1007/s00436-008-1060-y
  5. 5. Mehnert WH, Krause G (2005) Surveillance of Lyme borreliosis in Germany, 2002 and 2003. Eurosurveillance 10: 83–85.
  6. 6. Institute of Public Health of the Republic of Slovenia. Epidemiologic surveillance of communicable diseases in Slovenia in 2010. Ljubljana, 2011. Available: http://www.ivz.si. Accessed 2013 Mar 12.
  7. 7. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) website. Available: http://wwwn.cdc.gov/nndss/document/2012_​Case%20Definitions.pdf. Accessed 2013 Mar 12.
  8. 8. Wilske B, Schierz G, Preac-Mursic V, Weber K, Pfister HW, et al. (1984) Serological diagnosis of erythema migrans disease and related disorders. Infection 5: 331–337. doi: 10.1007/bf01651147
  9. 9. Strle F, Stanek G (2009) Clinical manifestations and diagnosis of Lyme borreliosis. Curr Probl Dermatol 37: 51–110. doi: 10.1159/000213070
  10. 10. Marangoni A, Moroni A, Accardo S, Cevenini R (2008) Borrelia burgdorferi VlsE antigen for the serological diagnosis of Lyme borreliosis. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 27: 349–354. doi: 10.1007/s10096-007-0445-7
  11. 11. Reiber H, Peter JB (2001) Cerebrospinal fluid analysis: disease-related data patterns and evaluation programs. J Neurol Sci 184: 101–122. doi: 10.1016/s0022-510x(00)00501-3
  12. 12. Statistical Office of the Republic of Slovenia website. Available: http://www.stat.si/eng/index.asp. Accessed 2013 Feb 28.
  13. 13. Selvin S (1991) Statistical Analysis of Epidemiological Data. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 375.
  14. 14. Woolson RF, Bean JA (1982) Mantel-Haenszel statistics and direct standardization. Statistics in Medicine 1: 37–39. doi: 10.1002/sim.4780010106
  15. 15. Asbrink E (1993) Acrodermatitis chronica atrophicans. Clin Dermatol 11: 369–375. doi: 10.1016/0738-081x(93)90092-q
  16. 16. Brehmer-Andersson E, Hovmark A, Asbrink E (1998) Acrodermatitis chronica atrophicans: histopathologic findings and clinical correlations in 111 cases. Acta DermVenereol 78: 207–213. doi: 10.1080/000155598441558
  17. 17. Hulshof MM, Vandenbroucke JP, Nohlmans LMKE, Spanjaard L, Bavinck JNB, et al. (1997) Long-term prognosis in patients treated for erythema chronicum migrans and acrodermatitis chronica atrophicans. Arch Dermatol 133: 33–37. doi: 10.1001/archderm.1997.03890370039007
  18. 18. Tibbles CD, Edlow JA (2007) Does this patient have erythema migrans? JAMA 297: 2617–2627. doi: 10.1001/jama.297.23.2617
  19. 19. Bennet L, Halling A, Berglund J (2006) Increased incidence of Lyme borreliosis in Southern Sweden following mild winters and during warm, humid summers. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 25: 426–432. doi: 10.1007/s10096-006-0167-2
  20. 20. Marangoni A, Sambri V, Accardo S, Carvini F, Mondardini V, et al. (2006) A decrease in the immunoglobulin G antibody response against VlsE protein of Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato correlates with the resolution of clinical signs in antibiotic-treated patients with early Lyme disease. Clin Vaccine Immunol 13: 525–529. doi: 10.1128/cvi.13.4.525-529.2006
  21. 21. Bennet L, Stjernberg L, Berglund J (2007) Effect of gender on clinical and epidemiologic features of Lyme borreliosis. Vector-Borne Zoonotic Dis 7: 34–41. doi: 10.1089/vbz.2006.0533
  22. 22. Bennet L, Berglund J (2002) Re-infection with Lyme borreliosis: A retrospective follow-up study in Southern Sweden. Scand J Infect Dis 34: 183–186. doi: 10.1080/00365540110080070
  23. 23. Jarefors S, Bennet L, You E, Forsberg P, Ekerfelt C, et al. (2006) Lyme borreliosis reinfection: might it be explained by a gender difference in immune response. Immunology 118: 224–232. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2567.2006.02360.x
  24. 24. Renaud I, Cachin C, Gerster JC (2004) Good outcomes of Lyme arthritis in 24 patients in an endemic area of Switzerland. Joint Bone Spine 71: 39–43. doi: 10.1016/s1297-319x(03)00160-x
  25. 25. Berglund J, Hansen BU, Eitrem R (1995) Lyme arthritis – a common manifestation in a highly endemic area in Sweden. J Rheumatol 22: 695–701.
  26. 26. Pancewicz S, Popku J, Rutkowski R, Knaś M, Grygorczuk S, et al. (2009) Activity of liposomal exoglycosidoses in serum and synovial fluid in patients with chronic Lyme and rheumatoid arthritis. Scand J Infect Dis 41: 584–589. doi: 10.1080/00365540903036220
  27. 27. Luczaj W, Moniuszko A, Rusak M, Pancewicz S, Zajkowska J, et al. (2011) Lipid peroxidation products as potential bio-indicators of Lyme arthritis. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 30: 415–422. doi: 10.1007/s10096-010-1102-0
  28. 28. Kirchner A, Koedel W, Fingerle V, Paul R, Wilske B, et al. (2000) Up-regulation of matrix metalloproteinase-9 in the cerebrospinal fluid of patients with acute Lyme neuroborreliosis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psych 68: 368–371. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.68.3.368
  29. 29. Van Burgel ND, Brandenburg A, Gerritsen HJ, Kroes ACM, Van Dam AP (2011) High sensitivity and specificity of the C6-peptide ELISA on cerebrospinal fluid in Lyme neuroborreliosis patients. Clin Microbiol Infect 17: 1495–1500. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2011.03459.x
  30. 30. Ljostad U, Skogvall E, Eikeland R, Midgard R, Skarpaas T, et al. (2008) Oral doxycycline versus intravenous ceftriaxone for European Lyme neuroborreliosis: a multicentre, non-inferiority, double-blind, randomized trial. Lancet Neurol 7: 690–695. doi: 10.1016/s1474-4422(08)70119-4
  31. 31. Strle F, Nadelman RB, Cimperman J, Nowakowski J, Picken RN, et al. (1999) Comparison of culture-confirmed erythema mirgans caused by Borrelia burgdorferi sensu stricto in New York state and by Borrelia afzelii in Slovenia. Ann Intern Med 130: 32–36. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-130-1-199901050-00006
  32. 32. Logar M, Ružić-Sabljić E, Lotrič-Furlan S, Cimperman J, Jurca T, et al. (2004) Comparison of erythema migrans caused by Borrelia afzelii and Borrelia garinii. Infection 32: 15–19. doi: 10.1007/s15010-004-3042-z
  33. 33. Cerar D, Cerar T, Ružić-Sabljić E, Wormser GP, Strle F (2010) Subjective symptoms after treatment of early Lyme disease. Am J Med 123: 79–86. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2009.05.011
  34. 34. Stupica D, Lusa L, Ružić-Sabljić E, Cerar T, Strle F (2012) Treatment of erythema migrans with doxycycline for 10 days versus 15 days. Clin Infect Dis 55: 343–350. doi: 10.1093/cid/cis402
  35. 35. Strle F, Ružić-Sabljić E, Logar M, Maraspin V, Lotrič-Furlan S, et al. (2011) Comparison of erythema migrans caused by Borrelia burgdorferi and Borrelia garinii. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis 11: 1253–1258. doi: 10.1089/vbz.2010.0230
  36. 36. Wormser GP, Brisson D, Liveris D, Hanincová K, Sandigursky S, et al. (2008) Borrelia burgdorferi genotype predicts the capacity for hematogenous dissemination during early Lyme disease. J Infect Dis 198: 1358–1364. doi: 10.1086/592279
  37. 37. Brisson D, Baxamusa N, Schwartz I, Wormser GP (2011) Biodiversity of Borrelia burgdorferi strains in tissues of Lyme disease patients. PLoS One 6 (8) e22926. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0022926
  38. 38. Panelius J, Rank A, Meri T, Seppala I, Meri S (2010) Expression and sequence diversity of the complement regulating outer surface protein E in Borrelia afzelii vs. Borrelia garinii in patients with erythema migrans or neuroborreliosis. Microbiol Pathogenesis 49: 363–368. doi: 10.1016/j.micpath.2010.06.006
  39. 39. Alitalo A, Meri T, Comstedt P, Jeffery L, Tornberg J, et al. (2005) Expression of complement factor H binding immunoevasion proteins in Borrelia garinii isolated from patients with neuroborreliosis. Eur J Immunol 35: 3043–3053. doi: 10.1002/eji.200526354
  40. 40. Institute of Public Health of the Republic of Slovenia website. Available: ZUBSTAT http://www.ivz.si/. Accessed 2012 Nov 10.
  41. 41. Benoit VM, Petrich A, Alugupalli KR, Marty-Roix R, Moter A, et al. (2010) Genetic control of the innate immune response to Borrelia hermsii influences the course of relapsing fever in inbred strains of mice. Infect Immun 78: 586–594. doi: 10.1128/iai.01216-09
  42. 42. Raoult D, Tissot-Dupont H, Foucault C, Gouvernet J, Fournier PE, et al. (2000) Q fever 1985–1998. Clinical and epidemiologic features of 1,383 infections. Medicine 79: 109–123. doi: 10.1097/00005792-200003000-00005
  43. 43. Leone M, Honstettre A, Lepidi H, Capo C, Bayard F, et al. (2004) Effect of sex on Coxiella burnetii infection: protective role of 17 beta-estradiol. J Infect Dis 189: 339–345. doi: 10.1086/380798
  44. 44. Huaux JP, Bigaignon G, Stadtsbaeder S, Zangerle PF, De Deuxchaisnes CN (1988) Pattern of Lyme arthritis in Europe: report of 14 cases. Ann Rheum Dis 47: 164–165. doi: 10.1136/ard.47.2.164
  45. 45. Pietruczuk A, Swierzbinska R, Pancewicz S, Pietruczuk M, Hermanowska-Szpakowicz T (2006) Serum levels of interleukin-18 (IL-18), interleukin 1-beta (IL-1beta), its soluble receptor sIL-1RII and C-reactive protein (CRP) in patients with Lyme arthritis. Infection 34: 158–162. doi: 10.1007/s15010-006-5013-z
  46. 46. Karkkonen K, Stiernstedt SH, Karlsson M (2001) Follow-up of patients treated with oral doxycycline for Lyme neuroborreliosis. Scand J Infect Dis 33: 259–262. doi: 10.1080/003655401300077225
  47. 47. Ciceroni L, Ciarrochi S, Ciervo A, Mondarini V, Guzzo F, et al. (2001) Isolation and characterization of Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato strains in an area of Italy where Lyme borreliosis is endemic. J Clin Microbiol 39: 2254–2260. doi: 10.1128/jcm.39.6.2254-2260.2001