Research Article

Saccade Adaptation Abnormalities Implicate Dysfunction of Cerebellar-Dependent Learning Mechanisms in Autism Spectrum Disorders (ASD)

  • Matthew W. Mosconi mail,

    Affiliation: Departments of Psychiatry and Pediatrics, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, Texas, United States of America

  • Beatriz Luna,

    Affiliation: Departments of Psychiatry and Psychology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States of America

  • Margaret Kay-Stacey,

    Affiliation: Department of Neurology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, United States of America

  • Caralynn V. Nowinski,

    Affiliation: Office of the Vice President for Research, University of Illinois, Urbana, Illinois, United States of America

  • Leah H. Rubin,

    Affiliation: Department of Psychiatry, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, United States of America

  • Charles Scudder,

    Affiliation: Departments of Otolaryngology and Neurobiology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States of America

  • Nancy Minshew,

    Affiliation: Departments of Psychiatry and Neurology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States of America

  • John A. Sweeney

    Affiliation: Departments of Psychiatry and Pediatrics, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, Texas, United States of America

  • Published: May 21, 2013
  • DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0063709


The cerebellar vermis (lobules VI-VII) has been implicated in both postmortem and neuroimaging studies of autism spectrum disorders (ASD). This region maintains the consistent accuracy of saccadic eye movements and plays an especially important role in correcting systematic errors in saccade amplitudes such as those induced by adaptation paradigms. Saccade adaptation paradigms have not yet been used to study ASD. Fifty-six individuals with ASD and 53 age-matched healthy controls performed an intrasaccadic target displacement task known to elicit saccadic adaptation reflected in an amplitude reduction. The rate of amplitude reduction and the variability of saccade amplitude across 180 adaptation trials were examined. Individuals with ASD adapted slower than healthy controls, and demonstrated more variability of their saccade amplitudes across trials prior to, during and after adaptation. Thirty percent of individuals with ASD did not significantly adapt, whereas only 6% of healthy controls failed to adapt. Adaptation rate and amplitude variability impairments were related to performance on a traditional neuropsychological test of manual motor control. The profile of impaired adaptation and reduced consistency of saccade accuracy indicates reduced neural plasticity within learning circuits of the oculomotor vermis that impedes the fine-tuning of motor behavior in ASD. These data provide functional evidence of abnormality in the cerebellar vermis that converges with previous reports of cellular and gross anatomic dysmorphology of this brain region in ASD.


Autism spectrum disorders (ASD) are lifelong neurodevelopmental syndromes that affect social, cognitive, and sensorimotor development [1]. While once considered rare, ASD now are known to affect ~1 in 88 children, and 1 in 54 males [2]. The etiology(ies) of ASD remains poorly understood. Studies of their neural bases indicate diverse and variably affected brain systems. The cerebellum is one of few brain structures consistently implicated in ASD and in known single-gene disorders associated with ASD [e.g., Fragile X syndrome, Joubert syndrome; [3], [4]]. Reduced Purkinje cell density has been repeatedly documented [5][9], and cells in the deep nuclei to which Purkinje cells project are abnormal in size and number [10]. Several studies have indicated that the volume of the cerebellar vermis is smaller in ASD [11][16], while cerebellar hemisphere volumes appear to be enlarged [13], [15], [17][20] (although see [21], [22] for negative findings).

The cerebellum plays a fundamental role in controlling the precision of movements [23]. Motor abnormalities have been noted in ASD since these disorders were originally described [24], [25]. More recent quantitative studies have documented impaired control of limb movements, including gait alterations, dysmetric manual movements and dyspraxia [26][28]. The severity of these abnormalities are predictive of functional outcomes [29] and may be the earliest identifiable features of the disorder [30][33]. There is some evidence that the profile of motor control and praxis deficits associated with ASD may be unique to the disorder, but more detailed characterization of motor impairments in ASD is needed [34], [35].

Eye movement studies have shown atypical gaze fixation, increased trial-to-trial amplitude variability of saccadic eye movements, and reduced accuracy of smooth pursuit eye movements in individuals with ASD and their unaffected first-degree relatives [36][40]. While initial reports suggested that saccade accuracy is intact in ASD [41], several studies using higher-resolution eye movement monitors have found modest hypometria (i.e., undershooting of targets) [39], [42] that may recover at least partially over the course of development [36]. Functional MRI studies have identified atypical activation in cerebellum, motor cortex, and basal ganglia during tasks of eye and hand movements [43][46].

The cerebellum’s role in controlling movement accuracy may be more directly assessed by systematically inducing movement error so that the motor system is forced to adapt [47][49]. Adaptation of arm movements involves cerebellum, primary motor cortex and parietal area 5 [50]. Despite the cerebellum’s known role in adapting limb movements, adaptation of limb movements has been shown to be intact in patients with cerebellar ataxia [51]. This suggests that neocortical reorganization may compensate for altered cerebellar adaptation mechanisms. Adaptation of limb movements appears to be unaffected in ASD [52], [53].

Adaptation of saccadic eye movements appears to be primarily dependent on the posterior cerebellum, including lobules VI and VII of the vermis [54]. Selective lesions of the cerebellar vermis lead to long-term disruptions in saccadic eye movement adaptation and the inability to consistently regulate eye movement amplitudes [55], [56]. In non-human primates, hypometria of visually guided saccades also is seen immediately after ablation of the vermis, but appears largely to resolve after only a few weeks [57][59]. Saccade adaptation is also altered in patients with cerebellar infarcts, but only if the vermis is affected [56]. It remains to be determined whether saccade adaptation is impaired in ASD.

Saccade adaptation has been well studied using laboratory paradigms in which intrasaccadic shifts in target location are generated immediately after saccade initiation, inducing a relatively constant error in the landing position [60]. Subjects gradually adjust their saccade amplitudes to reduce movement error with practice, although detection of the target displacement is often not consciously recognized because of the visual blanking during saccades.

In the present study, we utilized a conventional intrasaccadic target step paradigm to study saccade adaptation and the integrity of the cerebellar vermis in individuals with ASD (Figure 1). We reasoned that if individuals with ASD have a deficit involving the cerebellar vermis, then they will adapt at a slower rate than healthy controls, and they will show greater trial-to-trial variability in the amplitude of their saccades. We also predicted that cerebellar-dependent motor deficits evident in the oculomotor system would be associated with motor control impairments in the manual system. Therefore, we examined saccade adaptation rates and amplitude variability in relation to performance on a traditional neuropsychological test of manual motor control.


Figure 1. Schematic representations of the saccade adaptation test.

A.) Participants were instructed to shift their gaze to peripheral targets when they appeared. After subjects initiated their saccade, the target stepped inward from the ±12 deg location to ±9 deg in the same visual hemifield. B) Schematic representations of double-step target displacement and traces of non-adapted and adapted saccades.


Materials and Methods


Fifty-six individuals with ASD (50 M, 6 F) and 53 healthy control individuals (46 M, 7 F) participated in this study (Table 1). Due to the large number of trials required for subjects to adapt and then recover, subjects were randomly assigned to have either leftward or rightward adaptation tested (346 total trials, including 50 baseline trials of visually guided saccades, 200 trials during adaptation testing, and 96 trials of post-adaptation recovery). Thus four groups were examined (ASD leftward: n = 29; ASD rightward: n = 27; control leftward: n = 23; control rightward: n = 30). No demographic or performance differences between leftward and rightward adapting groups were identified, so they were combined for analyses. The ASD and control groups were matched on age (range 8–54 years) and handedness. Subjects completed the Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence to assess current intellectual abilities [61]. The subject groups had similar Performance IQs, but the ASD group had significantly lower Verbal and Full-Scale IQs than the control group. All IQ scores were in the average range for both groups.


Table 1. Demographic characteristics of individuals with autism spectrum disorders (ASD) and healthy control subjects.


Individuals with ASD, including Autistic Disorder and Asperger Disorder, were recruited through community advertisement at the University of Pittsburgh. Diagnoses of ASD were established with the Autism Diagnostic Inventory-Revised (ADI-R; [62]) and the Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule (ADOS; [63]) and confirmed by expert clinical opinion. Participants with ASD were excluded if they had a known genetic or metabolic disorder associated with ASD (e.g., Fragile X syndrome, tuberous sclerosis).

Control participants were recruited from the community through newspaper advertisements. Potential control participants completed a screening questionnaire that included prenatal, birth and developmental history, general medical history, treatment/medication history, and personal and family history of psychiatric and neurological disorders. Parents of controls less than 18 years old completed these questionnaires for their children. Control subjects were excluded for current or past psychiatric or neurological disorders, family history of ASD in first-, second- or third-degree relatives, or a history in first-degree relatives of a developmental or learning disorder, psychosis, or obsessive compulsive disorder.

No subjects were taking medications known to affect eye movements at the time of testing, including antipsychotics, stimulants or anticonvulsants [64]. Subjects had corrected or uncorrected far visual acuity of at least 20/40. No participant had a history of head injury, birth injury or seizure disorder. After a complete description of the study, written informed consent was obtained for each adult participant and informed parental consent was obtained for individuals less than 18 years of age. Minors provided written assent. Study procedures were approved by the Institutional Review Board of the University of Pittsburgh.

Eye Movement Tasks and Procedures

Saccade adaptation was elicited using an intrasaccadic target displacement paradigm with a centripetal step. Circular targets subtending 0.5 degrees (deg) of visual angle were presented in the horizontal plane at eye level on a computer monitor with a 57 cm wide screen display (Sony PREMIERPRO Series 24 FD Trinitron® CRT, Model GDM-FW900). Spatial resolution was set at 2304×1440 pixels. Subjects were seated 69 cm from the monitor and tested alone in an unlit room with flat black walls. The horizontal display subtended 23 deg of visual angle (29 cm) to each side of center. A chin rest with forehead and occipital restraints was used to minimize head movement.

Eye movements were monitored using infrared reflection sensors mounted on spectacle frames (Applied Science Laboratories, Inc., Model 210). Blinks were identified using electrodes placed above and below the left eye linked to an AC-coupled bioamplifier. Prior to performing tasks, subjects fixated a central target and peripheral targets at +/−12 deg of visual angle to calibrate eye movement recordings. An examiner in an adjacent room monitored eye movement activity during testing to ensure that subjects were alert and performing tasks according to instructions. Subjects performed the following three tasks:

Baseline saccade task.

To measure saccade amplitudes prior to adaptation, subjects first performed 50 trials of visually guided saccades. Trials began with central fixation for 1000–1500 ms, after which the target stepped to +/−6, 12 or 16 deg in the horizontal plane. Fifty percent of the trials were presented at the location from which saccades were to be adapted during the adaptation task (i.e., +12 deg for rightward adapting subjects, or −12 deg for leftward adapting subjects). Target presentation in the remaining trials was equally distributed across the other five locations.

Saccade Adaptation Task (Figure 1).

Trials began with central target fixation for 1000–1500 ms. Subjects were required to maintain fixation within +/−3 deg of center for at least 500 ms immediately before peripheral targets appeared. Adaptation trials constituted 90% (180/200) of trials during this phase of testing. During adaptation trials, the target stepped 12 deg from central fixation. When saccade velocity exceeded 30 deg/s, close to saccade initiation, targets were centripetally displaced from 12 to 9 deg from central fixation. The target remained at 9 deg for 1000 ms in 90% of adaptation trials. It remained at that location for 2000 ms in the remaining 10% of adaptation trials to encourage sustained fixation of the 9 deg target rather than an immediate return to central fixation. In 20 randomly interspersed trials (10% of adaptation trials), targets were presented at 6 deg from center in the hemifield opposite that in which adaptation was tested. These “catch trials” were presented without an intrasaccadic displacement, and were intended to reduce rates of anticipatory saccades to the +/−12 deg location. In this type of saccade adaptation paradigm, subjects gradually learn to make saccades closer to the 9 deg location, rather than to the 12 deg location. Typically, because the 3 degree centripetal step occurs during a saccade, the displacement is not perceived by subjects. Two hundred trials were presented in four 50-trial blocks, with 15 s of darkness between blocks to allow subjects to rest.

Recovery task.

To evaluate recovery from adaptation, subjects completed 80 trials (83% of recovery trials) in which they made saccades to stimuli presented 12 deg from fixation in the same hemifield in which adaptation had been tested. These trials did not include any intrasaccadic target displacement, so that recovery from adaptation effects could be examined. This task also included 16 “catch trials” (17% of post-adaptation trials) in which targets were presented at 6 deg in the opposite hemifield.

Eye Movement Measurements

Eye movement signals were sampled at 500 Hz with a 14-bit A/D converter (Dataq Instruments, DI-210). Recordings were smoothed off-line with a finite impulse response filter. The filter had a gradual transition band (from pass to no pass) between 20 Hz and 65 Hz for velocity and position data, and 30 Hz and 65 Hz for acceleration data. Saccades were identified for scoring when eye acceleration exceeded 1000 deg/s2, and were measured until 25% of peak deceleration, permitting resolution of saccade detection on the order of 0.25 deg. Recordings from the right eye were scored, unless there were problems with this recording (i.e., signal clipping or high noise artifact). Data were scored without knowledge of subjects’ diagnosis or demographic characteristics.

Manual Motor Testing

Participants completed a manual motor test in which they were presented with a pegboard of keyholes arranged in a 5×5 grid and with various orientations (Lafayette Instruments, Lafayette, IN). Subjects were instructed to insert a grooved peg into each slot with the proper orientation as fast as possible. Their dominant and non-dominant hands were tested separately. Time to completion and the number of times a peg was dropped were examined.

Statistical Analyses

Because amplitudes did not change over time during baseline testing, each subject’s amplitude values were averaged over all 12 deg trials in the direction to which adaptation was tested. To examine the rate of adaptation, we used general linear mixed models because this type of analysis is robust to missing data and it increases the precision of slope estimates by providing estimates for each individual [65]. In the present study, the logarithmic transformation of trial number was entered as a repeated measurement (to accommodate nonlinear learning functions), diagnostic group (ASD, controls) and the group X trial number interaction terms were entered as independent variables, and saccade amplitude was the dependent variable. These models yielded separate estimates of learning rate for each group as well as estimates of group differences. The same approach was used to evaluate amplitude change during the recovery phase, but a linear model is presented as it provided a good fit to the data. To examine the trial-wise variability of saccade amplitude, trials with target locations to which subjects adapted were divided into blocks of 10 sequential trials for baseline, adaptation and recovery phases. Then, the standard deviation of saccade amplitude was computed to assess amplitude variability for each block for each individual. This yielded 3 blocks for baseline data (the third block consisted of only 5 trials), 18 blocks of adaptation trials and 8 blocks of recovery trials. Linear (for baseline testing) and logarithmic models (for adaptation and recovery testing) were used to examine changes in amplitude variability during baseline, adaptation and recovery separately, but subjects did not show changes in amplitude variability within any phase (baseline: β = –.01; SE1,319 = .03×10−1; Z = −2.01; p = .05; adaptation: β = .24×10−3; SE1,1954 = .34×10−3; Z = .71; p = .48; recovery: β = .42×10−2; SE1,1082 = .31×10−2; Z = 1.36; p = .18). Therefore, blocks were averaged within each phase for analyses.

For all tasks, trials were considered invalid and excluded from analyses if primary saccades occurred simultaneously with a blink, were made in the wrong direction, or were anticipatory (latency <70 ms). Saccades more than 3 SD outside of the mean amplitude for all subjects were excluded from analyses to reduce outlier effects. For these reasons, the number of trials analyzed per individual with ASD on the adaptation task was less than that for controls (ASD: 142 (20); controls: 154 (16); t107 = 3.24, p = .001), but the number of trials for each group was sufficient to analyze learning rates. Further, the number of trials analyzed per subject was not related to adaptation rate (r108 = –.13, p = .18). Analyses of adaptation rate and amplitude variability each were performed with and without age entered as a covariate. Including age as a covariate did not substantively impact the results, so it was not included in the final models.


Saccade Amplitude

During the baseline condition, subjects with ASD and healthy controls did not differ in mean saccade amplitude (t107 = 1.23, p = .22; Table 2). During adaptation, healthy subjects (β = –.41; SE1,15902 = .02; Z = −17.51; p<.01) and subjects with ASD significantly reduced their saccade amplitudes over trials (β = –.31; SE1,15902 = .03; Z = 10.61; p<.01). Subjects with ASD adapted at a slower rate than controls (Figure 2; β = .11; SE1,15902 = .04; Z = 2.83; p<.01).


Figure 2. Saccade amplitudes for subjects with autism spectrum disorders (ASD) and healthy controls during adaptation and recovery.

The natural logarithmic model fit is presented for adaptation, and each data point represents the group mean for an individual trial. Subjects with ASD showed reduced rates of learning (p<.01). The linear fit is presented for recovery data. There was no difference in the rate at which subjects with ASD and healthy controls increased their amplitudes during the recovery phase (p = .66).


Table 2. Saccade amplitude and amplitude variability on 12 deg trials for individuals with autism spectrum disorders (ASD) and healthy controls during baseline testing, adaptation, and post-adaptation recovery.


The rate at which subjects adapted was greatest during initial trials of adaptation; specifically, subjects achieved 66% of their total amplitude reduction by trial 30. Therefore, we tested whether subjects with ASD also showed adaptation deficits during this initial phase of rapid amplitude reduction. ASD subjects adapted slower during the first 30 trials than healthy controls (β = .13; SE1,2743 = .06; Z = 2.01; p = .04).

We compared the proportion of individuals with ASD and healthy controls who did not adapt by classifying subjects whose rate of change over adaptation trials was not significant (p>.05) as “non-adapters”. A higher proportion of ASD subjects were non-adapters compared to healthy controls (Figure 3; ASD: 30% (17/56); controls: 6% (3/53); Χ2 = 11.09, p<.01). There were no differences between subjects with ASD that adapted versus those that did not adapt in terms of age (t53 = .10, p = .93), IQ (t53 = 1.12, p = .24), ADI-R social scores (t53 = .29, p = .77), ADI-R communication scores (t53 = 1.06, p = .29), ADOS social-communication scores (t53 = .24, p = .81), or baseline saccade amplitudes (t53 = .91, p = .37).


Figure 3. Cumulative frequency of adaptation rates (i.e., rate of amplitude reduction) for subjects with autism spectrum disorders (ASD) and healthy controls.

Positive values represent faster learning rates. Triangles are used to represent non-adapters for both diagnostic groups. Asterisks (*) are used to identify two control subjects whose rates of adaptation were statistically significant (p<.05) but also less than those of two non-adapting subjects with ASD. These two controls made more saccades that could be scored during adaptation (151 and 170 out of 180 respectively) than the two non-adapting subjects with ASD whose learning rate was faster but non-significant (133 and 135 out of 180 respectively). If these two subjects with ASD are re-classified as adapters, there is still a higher proportion of non-adapting ASD subjects compared to healthy controls (ASD: 27% (15/56); controls: 6% (3/53); X21 = 8.81, p<.01).


A comparison of mean saccade amplitudes during recovery indicated that they remained decreased relative to baseline saccade amplitudes in both groups (Figure 2; F1,104 = 248.42, p<.01), which is typical for this type of paradigm and number of recovery trials [66], [67]. Overall, subjects showed a linear increase in their saccade amplitudes during recovery trials (β = .03×10−1; SE1,7357 = .01×10−1; Z = 2.18; p = .03). The rate of recovery did not differ between subject groups (β = .03×10−3; SE1,7357 = .07×10−2; Z = .04; p = .97).

Amplitude Variability across Trials

Subjects with ASD showed more trial-wise variability in saccade amplitudes relative to controls across conditions (baseline, adaptation, and recovery; F1,106 = 11.32, p<.01). We analyzed each condition separately and found that subjects with ASD showed increased trial-wise amplitude variability prior to adaptation (Table 2; t107 = 2.13, p = .03), although this difference was no longer significant when a Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons was applied (p<.017). Across groups, amplitude variability was greater during adaptation trials compared to baseline trials (F1,105 = 141.27, p<.01). During adaptation, subjects with ASD continued to show greater mean amplitude variability than controls (Figure 4; t107 = 3.37, p<.01), but the degree to which amplitude variability increased during adaptation relative to baseline did not differ between subjects with ASD and controls (mean (sd) % increase: ASD = 82% (81); controls = 89% (96); t107 = .43, p = .67). During the recovery phase, individuals with ASD continued to show more amplitude variability than controls (t107 = 2.74; p<.01). Non-adapting subjects with ASD showed greater amplitude variability than adapters with ASD during adaptation (t54 = 3.68, p<.01) and during recovery (t54 = 2.93, p<.01), but not at baseline (t54 = 1.17, p = .25).


Figure 4. Standard deviation of the amplitude of primary saccades, a measure of trial-wise variability in saccade accuracy, during baseline testing, adaptation and recovery.

Data are presented in blocks of 10 trials. Subjects with autism spectrum disorders (ASD) showed greater trial-wise variability in saccade accuracy during each phase of testing (p<.01), but the rates at which variability changed during each of the phases were not different between subjects with ASD and healthy controls (p>.10).


Correlational Analyses

Neither the rate of adaptation nor amplitude variability was associated with age or IQ (for either group), or social-communication impairments on the ADOS or ADI-R for ASD participants (see Tables S1 and S2). Subjects with ASD were slower to complete the manual motor test (F1,86 = 21.65, p<.01), but there was no difference between groups in the number of dropped pegs (F1,86 = 2.96, p = .09). The group x hand (dominant vs. non-dominant) interactions were not significant (time to completion: F1,75 = .11, p = .74; dropped pegs: F1,75 = .08, p = .78), so performance was averaged across hands for correlational analyses. We used a Bonferroni corrected alpha level <.013 for these analyses. For subjects with ASD, adaptation rate was not associated with manual motor time to completion (r56 = .11, p = .43), but slower learning rates were associated with more dropped pegs during manual testing (Figure 5A; r56 = .39, p<.01). Neither of these relationships were significant for healthy controls (time to completion: r37 = .22, p = .19; dropped pegs: r37 = .18, p = .30). Increased amplitude variability in subjects with ASD showed a modest non-significant relationship with the number of dropped pegs, (Figure 5B; r40 = .30, p = .03). Amplitude variability was not related to manual motor completion time in subjects with ASD (r56 = -.04, p = .79). The relationships between saccade amplitude variability and manual motor indices were not significant for healthy controls (time to completion: r37 = .21, p = .22; dropped pegs: r37 = .17, p = .31). Increased amplitude variability during adaptation was related to reduced rates of adaptation for both healthy controls (r53 = .50, p<.01) and subjects with ASD (r54 = .58, p<.01). For both groups, less amplitude variability predicted faster adaptation.


Figure 5. Relationships between saccade adaptation and manual motor performance.

The number of errors during the manual motor test were averaged across hands and are presented for subjects with ASD in relation to A) the rate at which they adapted and B) their trial-to-trial amplitude variability across baseline testing and the adaptation and recovery phases.


Performance On 6 Degree “Catch Trials” During Adaptation And Recovery

Subjects showed a reduction in saccade amplitudes on the catch trials during adaptation relative to baseline saccade performance (F1,107 = 24.36, p<.01). However, the level to which amplitudes were reduced (4%) was less than that seen for adaptation trials with an intrasaccadic displacement (19%; F1,107 = 233.56, p<.01) and is less than the range of amplitude reduction for adapted saccades (10–40%) reported in previous studies [67][69]. The degree to which amplitudes were reduced on adaptation catch trials relative to saccades to the same location during baseline testing did not differ between individuals with ASD and healthy controls (F1,107 = .29, p = .59). Saccade amplitudes during recovery catch trials were greater than adaptation catch trials (F1,106 = 4.19, p = .04) but did not differ between subject groups (F1,106 = .02, p = .88). Variability in saccade amplitude for 6 deg trials also increased during adaptation compared to baseline trials (F1,105 = 46.21, p<.01), but the degree to which it changed did not differ between groups (F1,107 = .31, p = .58). No changes in amplitude variability occurred from adaptation to recovery for catch trials (F1,106 = .65, p = .42).


We used a saccadic adaptation test to examine how individuals with ASD adjusted their eye movements to systematically induced retinal image position errors [60]. This test requires that individuals refine their movement trajectories over trials to minimize error in the focus of gaze at the completion of saccades. Saccade adaptations are thought to be organized within the oculomotor vermis [54],[70], a region implicated in post-mortem and MRI studies of ASD [6],[10],[71]. In the present study, individuals with ASD adapted at a slower rate than healthy controls, suggesting that learning mechanisms within the oculomotor vermis are compromised. Our finding that saccade adaptation was altered despite no impairment being observed in the average accuracy of visually guided saccades during baseline testing indicates that cerebellar circuitry supporting on-line refinements of eye movements may be selectively disrupted in ASD. Alternatively, compensatory processes in other brain regions may be sufficient to minimize errors in gaze shifts over a longer period of time (days or weeks), so that the accuracy of visually guided saccades in individuals with ASD is less affected [36],[39].

The amplitude variability reducing function of the cerebellum also was abnormal in individuals with ASD. Increased trial-to-trial variability of saccade amplitudes was associated with reduced rates of adaptation, consistent with the hypothesis that vermal dysfunction contributes to both impaired adaptation and a failure to compensate for within-trial variability within the saccadic system, such as in the cumulative neuronal activity in the superior colliculus before and during the saccade. It also is possible that the increased variability of saccade landing positions, and thus the reduced consistency of the error signal relayed to the cerebellum reduces the rate at which adaptive mechanisms within the vermis can make systematic adjustments to saccade trajectories [72]. Studies in which the degree of error is systematically controlled for each individual subject are needed to address the relative contribution of increased amplitude variability to adaptation impairments in ASD.

Our results confirm and extend previous reports describing saccadic eye movement deficits in ASD. Prior studies documenting modest hypometria and greater variability in amplitude gain provide indirect evidence that cerebellar control of saccade accuracy may be compromised [36],[39]. Functional MRI findings of reduced vermal activation during saccades in ASD provides additional support for cerebellar alterations during eye movements, but the extent to which these alterations are a consequence of or causes to dysfunction within frontal and parietal cortical eye fields and basal ganglia nuclei remains unclear [46]. The present findings show that brain circuitry supporting the rapid adjustment of saccadic amplitudes to reduce retinal error is abnormal in ASD. There is considerable evidence from non-human primate work and studies of human cerebellar patients (described below) that modifications of Purkinje cell output within the vermis are primarily responsible for the short-term adaptation of saccades. Therefore, this study provides evidence, perhaps as strong as any available neurobehavioral paradigm can provide, that the function of the cerebellar vermis is disrupted in ASD and its dysfunction may underpin the motor coordination and learning impairments characteristic of this disorder.

The pattern of increased trial-to-trial variation in saccade accuracy together with a lack of alteration in average saccade accuracy during baseline testing is similar to that seen after monkeys have recovered from lesions in the oculomotor vermis [73]. Acute effects include dysmetria, more variable amplitudes, and reduced or abolished short-term adaptation. The ability to make accurate saccades is recovered over time, whereas amplitude variability and adaptation deficits persist. Thus, while brain regions outside of the vermis may be able to compensate for smaller amplitude errors over extended periods of time during saccades to static targets, they cannot sufficiently support rapid, larger scale corrections such as those elicited by adaptation paradigms. Instead, these larger scale corrections are uniquely dependent on the vermis [74].

A pattern similar to that seen in chronic lesions may occur in a neurodevelopmental disorder such as ASD, with putative alterations of the cerebellar vermis occurring within the first years of life [7]. It is possible that brain systems controlling the accuracy of saccades may be rescued at least partially during development, a hypothesis consistent with findings from a study of ASD documenting saccadic hypometria in children, but not adolescents or adults with ASD [36]. Adaptation mechanisms do not appear to recover, as we did not observe age-related differences in adaptation rate across the relatively wide age range of our study sample. Still, some caution should be exercised in interpreting the absence of developmental group differences as longitudinal studies would be necessary to characterize the maturation of adaptive mechanisms in ASD. Notably, baseline testing in the present study was designed specifically to assess saccade amplitudes to a particular location from which adaptation would be measured. The increased predictability of target locations (50% of trials were to the to-be-adapted location) may have limited our ability to identify the modest differences in saccade amplitude gain that have been reported in some prior studies [36],[39]. Similarly, no amplitude differences were seen between groups during “catch trials”, suggesting that there may have been too few trials to detect deficits, or that the accuracy of smaller saccades is relatively preserved in ASD as we have reported previously [37],[41].

The Neural Circuitry Of Adaptation Deficits In Asd

The cerebellum supports motor adaptation by monitoring the difference between expected and observed movement outcomes, adjusting movements on-line and refining future motor commands [75],[76]. The oculomotor vermis receives retinal error signals via olivary climbing fibers (Figure 6) [77][79]. Olivary inputs create complex spike discharges which, when co-occurring with more frequent simple spike discharges at parallel fiber-Purkinje cell synapses, can lead to a long lasting depression (LTD) and selective pruning of the parallel fiber input [80]. These processes modulate the amplitude and timing of Purkinje cell population bursts converging on fastigial neurons, and are the plastic mechanisms thought to support saccade adaptation [81]. Inactivation of vermal Purkinje cells eliminates short-term saccade adaptation and produces more variable saccades across trials in monkeys [59],[82]. Patients with cerebellar disease show saccade adaptation deficits and an impaired ability to modulate saccade accuracy across trials only if the vermis is affected [56]. The similarity between the pattern of deficit seen in patients with vermal lesions and individuals with ASD suggests that alterations in the oculomotor vermis are the primary factor responsible for saccade abnormalities observed in the present study.


Figure 6. Figure 6. Schematic representation of a sagittal view of the cerebellar “oculomotor” vermis - brainstem circuitry involved in the adaptation of saccadic eye movements.

Retinal error information reaches the inferior olive (IO), which in turn projects ascending climbing fibers that create complex spike action potentials at synapses on the Purkinje cell (PC) body and proximal dendrites. PCs also receive input via mossy fibers projecting from the nucleus reticularis tegmenti pontis (NRTP), which receives a saccade command from the superior colliculus (SC). Rapid, simple spike discharges occur at the synapses of mossy fiber-parallel fiber inputs to PCs. The complex spike firing of the climbing fiber-PC synapses induces a long-term depression (LTD) of simple spikes that is thought to be the mechanism guiding saccade adaptation. Changes in PC simple spike bursts modify saccade trajectories by altering the level of inhibitory output to fastigial nuclei (FN), which in turn modulate inhibitory (IBN) and excitatory burst neuron activity (EBN) in the brainstem burst generator (BBG). The BBG innervates abducens motoneurons (MN) that control horizontal eye movements via lateral and medial extraocular muscles.

The majority of post-mortem brain studies of ASD examining the cerebellum have documented cellular and neurochemical alterations [6],[7],[9],[83][86]. Still, some individuals examined in post-mortem studies were taking anticonvulsant medications that could selectively affect Purkinje cell neurochemistry and anatomy. Adaptation abnormalities in medication-free individuals with ASD observed in the present study indicate that functional alterations implicating the vermis are not a result of medication effects.

A relatively high number of ASD subjects (30%) did not significantly adapt. This suggests variability in the extent to which the cerebellar vermis is functionally impaired in individuals with ASD, and these results might indicate the presence of a subgroup of individuals with more severe oculomotor disturbances. However, there was no clear bimodality in the distribution of adaptation rate, nor did we identify clinically distinct features of subjects who did not adapt. Further phenotypic and genotypic characterization of non-adapters and their unaffected family members may help resolve the possibility that they represent a distinct subgroup of individuals with ASD.

Manual motor error rates (dropping pegs during a pegboard test) were associated with saccadic adaptation rates in individuals with ASD, suggesting that cerebellar dysfunctions may involve circuits supporting motor control across multiple effectors. The clinical neuropsychology measures of manual motor function did not detect deficits in manual control or speed in subjects with ASD. This suggests that oculomotor studies may provide a more sensitive methodology for identifying impairments or that abnormalities are more profound in the oculomotor system. However, it is important to note that the measure of manual motor control used in the present study is likely not sensitive to subtle dysmetria or altered kinematics of movement. Direct comparisons of oculomotor and manual motor control utilizing similarly sensitive neurophysiological measures are needed to contrast eye and limb movement control in ASD.

We cannot completely rule out the possibility that adaptation deficits seen in individuals with ASD also may reflect dysfunctions in other brain regions. It has been suggested that retinal error signals may originate in the superior colliculus [87], although recent evidence indicates that motor activity in the superior colliculus is unaltered during saccade adaptation [88]. Inactivation of the superior colliculus typically affects non-adapted saccades as well, altering trajectories, lowering peak velocities, and extending durations and latencies [89]. Neither the present study (Table S3) nor previous reports examining non-adapted saccades suggest that saccade dynamics are disrupted in ASD [36],[39],[41] (although see [39] for evidence of reduced peak velocity of visually guided saccades in ASD).

Lesions affecting ventral and lateral thalamic nuclei impair saccade adaptation [90], suggesting that adaptation deficits in ASD could reflect alterations in these nuclei. Frontal and parietal eye fields also are involved in the control of saccade amplitudes, although there is less evidence that they are involved in adaptation of exogenously driven saccades such as those studied here [54]. Still, while there is a relatively strong rationale for interpreting the present neurophysiological findings as providing evidence for vermal dysfunction in ASD, research is needed to further link these behavioral observations to direct physiological studies of the vermis.


There is considerable evidence of cellular and gross anatomic changes of the vermis in ASD [10],[91]. The present study offers perhaps the most direct evidence to date that these alterations have functional implications in this disorder. Our study shows that individuals with ASD are not able to rapidly adjust to large errors in saccade landing position. They also have poor control over the consistency of their movement amplitudes as evidenced by greater trial-to-trial variability. We hypothesize that important plastic mechanisms within the cerebellar vermis involving Purkinje cell output to fastigial nuclei are impaired in ASD. The failure of these learning mechanisms may contribute to the motor control impairments in ASD and may have direct implications for understanding the cellular and molecular bases of this disorder.

Supporting Information

Table S1.

Relationships between adaptation performance and clinical/demographic characteristics for subjects with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD).



Table S2.

Relationships between adaptation performance and demographic characteristics for healthy control subjects.



Table S3.

Saccade characteristics of individuals with autism spectrum disorders (ASD) and healthy controls during baseline testing, adaptation and recovery.




We appreciate the statistical input of Dr. Robert Gibbons. We also gratefully acknowledge the families who graciously participated in these studies.

This study was conducted at the University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: BL CS NM JAS. Performed the experiments: BL CS NM JAS. Analyzed the data: MWM MKS CVN LHR CS JAS. Wrote the paper: MWM BL MKS CVN LHR CS NM JAS.


  1. 1. American Psychological Association (2000) Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders-4th edition Text Revision. Washington D.C.: American Psychiatric Press.
  2. 2. Developmental Disabilities Monitoring Network (2012) Prevalence of autism spectrum disorders–Autism and Developmental Disabilities Monitoring Network, 14 sites, United States, 2008. MMWR Surveill Summ 61: 1–19. doi: 10.1016/j.ypsy.2010.11.009
  3. 3. Fatemi SH, Aldinger KA, Ashwood P, Bauman ML, Blaha CD, et al. (2012) Consensus Paper: Pathological Role of the Cerebellum in Autism. Cerebellum 11: 777–807. doi: 10.1007/s12311-012-0355-9
  4. 4. Abrahams BS, Geschwind DH (2010) Connecting genes to brain in the autism spectrum disorders. Arch Neurol 67: 395–399. doi: 10.1001/archneurol.2010.47
  5. 5. Ritvo ER, Freeman BJ, Scheibel AB, Duong T, Robinson H, et al. (1986) Lower Purkinje cell counts in the cerebella of four autistic subjects: initial findings of the UCLA-NSAC Autopsy Research Report. Am J Psychiatry 143: 862–866.
  6. 6. Bailey A, Luthert P, Dean A, Harding B, Janota I, et al. (1998) A clinicopathological study of autism. Brain 121 (Pt 5): 889–905. doi: 10.1093/brain/121.5.889
  7. 7. Bauman M, Kemper TL (1985) Histoanatomic observations of the brain in early infantile autism. Neurology 35: 866–874. doi: 10.1212/wnl.35.6.866
  8. 8. Fatemi SH, Halt AR, Realmuto G, Earle J, Kist DA, et al. (2002) Purkinje cell size is reduced in cerebellum of patients with autism. Cell Mol Neurobiol 22: 171–175. doi: 10.1016/s0006-3223(00)00687-9
  9. 9. Whitney ER, Kemper TL, Bauman ML, Rosene DL, Blatt GJ (2008) Cerebellar Purkinje cells are reduced in a subpopulation of autistic brains: a stereological experiment using calbindin-D28k. Cerebellum 7: 406–416. doi: 10.1007/s12311-008-0043-y
  10. 10. Bauman ML, Kemper TL (2005) Neuroanatomic observations of the brain in autism: a review and future directions. Int J Dev Neurosci 23: 183–187. doi: 10.1016/j.ijdevneu.2004.09.006
  11. 11. Akshoomoff N, Lord C, Lincoln AJ, Courchesne RY, Carper RA, et al. (2004) Outcome classification of preschool children with autism spectrum disorders using MRI brain measures. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry 43: 349–357. doi: 10.1097/00004583-200403000-00018
  12. 12. Haas RH, Townsend J, Courchesne E, Lincoln AJ, Schreibman L, et al. (1996) Neurologic abnormalities in infantile autism. J Child Neurol 11: 84–92. doi: 10.1177/088307389601100204
  13. 13. Kaufmann WE, Cooper KL, Mostofsky SH, Capone GT, Kates WR, et al. (2003) Specificity of cerebellar vermian abnormalities in autism: a quantitative magnetic resonance imaging study. J Child Neurol 18: 463–470. doi: 10.1177/08830738030180070501
  14. 14. Mitchell SR, Reiss AL, Tatusko DH, Ikuta I, Kazmerski DB, et al. (2009) Neuroanatomic alterations and social and communication deficits in monozygotic twins discordant for autism disorder. Am J Psychiatry 166: 917–925. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2009.08101538
  15. 15. Scott JA, Schumann CM, Goodlin-Jones BL, Amaral DG (2009) A comprehensive volumetric analysis of the cerebellum in children and adolescents with autism spectrum disorder. Autism Res 2: 246–257. doi: 10.1002/aur.97
  16. 16. Webb SJ, Sparks BF, Friedman SD, Shaw DW, Giedd J, et al. (2009) Cerebellar vermal volumes and behavioral correlates in children with autism spectrum disorder. Psychiatry Res 172: 61–67. doi: 10.1016/j.pscychresns.2008.06.001
  17. 17. Courchesne E, Saitoh O, Yeung-Courchesne R, Press GA, Lincoln AJ, et al. (1994) Abnormality of cerebellar vermian lobules VI and VII in patients with infantile autism: identification of hypoplastic and hyperplastic subgroups with MR imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 162: 123–130. doi: 10.2214/ajr.162.1.8273650
  18. 18. Hardan AY, Minshew NJ, Harenski K, Keshavan MS (2001) Posterior fossa magnetic resonance imaging in autism. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 40: 666–672. doi: 10.1097/00004583-200106000-00011
  19. 19. Courchesne E, Yeung-Courchesne R, Press GA, Hesselink JR, Jernigan TL (1988) Hypoplasia of cerebellar vermal lobules VI and VII in autism. N Engl J Med 318: 1349–1354. doi: 10.1056/nejm198805263182102
  20. 20. Courchesne E, Karns CM, Davis HR, Ziccardi R, Carper RA, et al. (2001) Unusual brain growth patterns in early life in patients with autistic disorder: an MRI study. Neurology 57: 245–254. doi: 10.1212/wnl.57.2.245
  21. 21. Holttum JR, Minshew NJ, Sanders RS, Phillips NE (1992) Magnetic resonance imaging of the posterior fossa in autism. Biol Psychiatry 32: 1091–1101. doi: 10.1016/0006-3223(92)90189-7
  22. 22. Piven J, Saliba K, Bailey J, Arndt S (1997) An MRI study of autism: the cerebellum revisited. Neurology 49: 546–551. doi: 10.1212/wnl.49.2.546
  23. 23. Izawa J, Pekny SE, Marko MK, Haswell CC, Shadmehr R, et al. (2012) Motor learning relies on integrated sensory inputs in ADHD, but over-selectively on proprioception in autism spectrum conditions. Autism research : official journal of the International Society for Autism Research 5: 124–136. doi: 10.1002/aur.1222
  24. 24. Asperger H (1991/1944) Autism and Asperger Syndrome. New York: Cambridge University Press. 37–92.
  25. 25. Kanner L (1943) Autistic disturbances of affective contact. Nervous Child 2: 217–250.
  26. 26. MacNeil LK, Mostofsky SH (2012) Specificity of dyspraxia in children with autism. Neuropsychology 26: 165–171. doi: 10.1037/a0026955
  27. 27. Provost B, Heimerl S, Lopez BR (2007) Levels of gross and fine motor development in young children with autism spectrum disorder. Phys Occup Ther Pediatr 27: 21–36. doi: 10.1080/j006v27n03_03
  28. 28. Mosconi MW, Takarae Y, Sweeney JA (2011) Motor impairments and dyspraxia in autism. In: DG. Amaral GD, & DH Geschwind, editor. Autism Spectrum Disorders. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, Inc.
  29. 29. Bhat AN, Galloway JC, Landa RJ (2012) Relation between early motor delay and later communication delay in infants at risk for autism. Infant Behav Dev 35: 838–846. doi: 10.1016/j.infbeh.2012.07.019
  30. 30. Bryson SE, Zwaigenbaum L, Brian J, Roberts W, Szatmari P, et al. (2007) A prospective case series of high-risk infants who developed autism. J Autism Dev Disord 37: 12–24. doi: 10.1007/s10803-006-0328-2
  31. 31. Ozonoff S, Young GS, Goldring S, Greiss-Hess L, Herrera AM, et al. (2008) Gross motor development, movement abnormalities, and early identification of autism. J Autism Dev Disord 38: 644–656. doi: 10.1007/s10803-007-0430-0
  32. 32. Sutera S, Pandey J, Esser EL, Rosenthal MA, Wilson LB, et al. (2007) Predictors of optimal outcome in toddlers diagnosed with autism spectrum disorders. J Autism Dev Disord 37: 98–107. doi: 10.1007/s10803-006-0340-6
  33. 33. Bhat AN, Landa RJ, Galloway JC (2011) Current perspectives on motor functioning in infants, children, and adults with autism spectrum disorders. Phys Ther 91: 1116–1129. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20100294
  34. 34. Dewey D, Cantell M, Crawford SG (2007) Motor and gestural performance in children with autism spectrum disorders, developmental coordination disorder, and/or attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. J Int Neuropsychol Soc 13: 246–256. doi: 10.1017/s1355617707070270
  35. 35. Green D, Baird G, Barnett AL, Henderson L, Huber J, et al. (2002) The severity and nature of motor impairment in Asperger's syndrome: a comparison with specific developmental disorder of motor function. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 43: 655–668. doi: 10.1111/1469-7610.00054
  36. 36. Luna B, Doll SK, Hegedus SJ, Minshew NJ, Sweeney JA (2007) Maturation of executive function in autism. Biol Psychiatry 61: 474–481. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2006.02.030
  37. 37. Mosconi MW, Kay M, D'Cruz AM, Guter S, Kapur K, et al. (2010) Neurobehavioral abnormalities in first-degree relatives of individuals with autism. Arch Gen Psychiatry 67: 830–840. doi: 10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2010.87
  38. 38. Nowinski CV, Minshew NJ, Luna B, Takarae Y, Sweeney JA (2005) Oculomotor studies of cerebellar function in autism. Psychiatry Res 137: 11–19. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2005.07.005
  39. 39. Takarae Y, Minshew NJ, Luna B, Sweeney JA (2004) Oculomotor abnormalities parallel cerebellar histopathology in autism. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 75: 1359–1361. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.2003.022491
  40. 40. Takarae Y, Minshew NJ, Luna B, Krisky CM, Sweeney JA (2004) Pursuit eye movement deficits in autism. Brain 127: 2584–2594. doi: 10.1093/brain/awh307
  41. 41. Minshew NJ, Luna B, Sweeney JA (1999) Oculomotor evidence for neocortical systems but not cerebellar dysfunction in autism. Neurology 52: 917–922. doi: 10.1212/wnl.52.5.917
  42. 42. Rosenhall U, Johansson E, Gillberg C (1988) Oculomotor findings in autistic children. J Laryngol Otol 102: 435–439. doi: 10.1017/s0022215100105286
  43. 43. Allen G, Courchesne E (2003) Differential effects of developmental cerebellar abnormality on cognitive and motor functions in the cerebellum: an fMRI study of autism. American Journal of Psychiatry 160: 262–273. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.160.2.262
  44. 44. Muller RA, Kleinhans N, Kemmotsu N, Pierce K, Courchesne E (2003) Abnormal variability and distribution of functional maps in autism: an FMRI study of visuomotor learning. Am J Psychiatry 160: 1847–1862. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.160.10.1847
  45. 45. Mostofsky SH, Powell SK, Simmonds DJ, Goldberg MC, Caffo B, et al. (2009) Decreased connectivity and cerebellar activity in autism during motor task performance. Brain 132: 2413–2425. doi: 10.1093/brain/awp088
  46. 46. Takarae Y, Minshew NJ, Luna B, Sweeney JA (2007) Atypical involvement of frontostriatal systems during sensorimotor control in autism. Psychiatry Res 156: 117–127. doi: 10.1016/j.pscychresns.2007.03.008
  47. 47. MacAskill MR, Anderson TJ, Jones RD (2002) Adaptive modification of saccade amplitude in Parkinson's disease. Brain 125: 1570–1582. doi: 10.1093/brain/awf168
  48. 48. Scudder CA, McGee DM (2003) Adaptive modification of saccade size produces correlated changes in the discharges of fastigial nucleus neurons. J Neurophysiol 90: 1011–1026. doi: 10.1152/jn.00193.2002
  49. 49. Deubel H (1995) Separate adaptive mechanisms for the control of reactive and volitional saccadic eye movements. Vision research 35: 3529–3540. doi: 10.1016/0042-6989(95)00058-m
  50. 50. Diedrichsen J, Verstynen T, Lehman SL, Ivry RB (2005) Cerebellar involvement in anticipating the consequences of self-produced actions during bimanual movements. J Neurophysiol 93: 801–812. doi: 10.1152/jn.00662.2004
  51. 51. Izawa J, Criscimagna-Hemminger SE, Shadmehr R (2012) Cerebellar contributions to reach adaptation and learning sensory consequences of action. J Neurosci 32: 4230–4239. doi: 10.1523/jneurosci.6353-11.2012
  52. 52. Mostofsky SH, Bunoski R, Morton SM, Goldberg MC, Bastian AJ (2004) Children with autism adapt normally during a catching task requiring the cerebellum. Neurocase 10: 60–64. doi: 10.1080/13554790490960503
  53. 53. Gidley Larson JC, Bastian AJ, Donchin O, Shadmehr R, Mostofsky SH (2008) Acquisition of internal models of motor tasks in children with autism. Brain 131: 2894–2903. doi: 10.1093/brain/awn226
  54. 54. Desmurget M, Pelisson D, Grethe JS, Alexander GE, Urquizar C, et al. (2000) Functional adaptation of reactive saccades in humans: a PET study. Exp Brain Res 132: 243–259. doi: 10.1007/s002210000342
  55. 55. Xu-Wilson M, Chen-Harris H, Zee DS, Shadmehr R (2009) Cerebellar contributions to adaptive control of saccades in humans. J Neurosci 29: 12930–12939. doi: 10.1523/jneurosci.3115-09.2009
  56. 56. Golla H, Tziridis K, Haarmeier T, Catz N, Barash S, et al. (2008) Reduced saccadic resilience and impaired saccadic adaptation due to cerebellar disease. The European journal of neuroscience 27: 132–144. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2007.05996.x
  57. 57. Barash S, Melikyan A, Sivakov A, Zhang M, Glickstein M, et al. (1999) Saccadic dysmetria and adaptation after lesions of the cerebellar cortex. The Journal of Neuroscience 19: 10931–10939.
  58. 58. Ignashchenkova A, Dash S, Dicke PW, Haarmeier T, Glickstein M, et al. (2009) Normal spatial attention but impaired saccades and visual motion perception after lesions of the monkey cerebellum. J Neurophysiol 102: 3156–3168. doi: 10.1152/jn.00659.2009
  59. 59. Takagi M, Zee DS, Tamargo RJ (1998) Effects of lesions of the oculomotor vermis on eye movements in primate: saccades. Journal of neurophysiology 80: 1911–1931. doi: 10.1016/s0079-6123(03)42004-9
  60. 60. McLaughlin S (1967) Parametric adjustment in saccadic eye movements. Perceptual Psychophysyiology 2: 359–362. doi: 10.3758/bf03210071
  61. 61. Wechsler D (1999) Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence. San Antonio, TX.
  62. 62. Lord C, Rutter M, Le Couteur A (1994) Autism Diagnostic Interview-Revised: a revised version of a diagnostic interview for caregivers of individuals with possible pervasive developmental disorders. J Autism Dev Disord 24: 659–685. doi: 10.1007/bf02172145
  63. 63. Lord C, Risi S, Lambrecht L, Cook EH Jr, Leventhal BL, et al. (2000) The autism diagnostic observation schedule-generic: a standard measure of social and communication deficits associated with the spectrum of autism. J Autism Dev Disord 30: 205–223.
  64. 64. Reilly JL, Lencer R, Bishop JR, Keedy S, Sweeney JA (2008) Pharmacological treatment effects on eye movement control. Brain Cogn 68: 415–435. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2008.08.026
  65. 65. Gibbons RD, Hedeker D, DuToit S (2010) Advances in analysis of longitudinal data. Annu Rev Clin Psychol 6: 79–107. doi: 10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.032408.153550
  66. 66. Alahyane N, Pelisson D (2005) Retention of saccadic adaptation in humans. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1039: 558–562. doi: 10.1196/annals.1325.067
  67. 67. Straube A, Fuchs AF, Usher S, Robinson FR (1997) Characteristics of saccadic gain adaptation in rhesus macaques. Journal of neurophysiology 77: 874–895.
  68. 68. Straube A, Deubel H, Ditterich J, Eggert T (2001) Cerebellar lesions impair rapid saccade amplitude adaptation. Neurology 57: 2105–2108. doi: 10.1212/wnl.57.11.2105
  69. 69. Salman MS, Sharpe JA, Eizenman M, Lillakas L, To T, et al. (2006) Saccadic adaptation in children. J Child Neurol 21: 1025–1031. doi: 10.1177/7010.2006.00238
  70. 70. Desmurget M, Pelisson D, Urquizar C, Prablanc C, Alexander GE, et al. (1998) Functional anatomy of saccadic adaptation in humans. Nat Neurosci 1: 524–528. doi: 10.1038/2241
  71. 71. Greco CM, Navarro CS, Hunsaker MR, Maezawa I, Shuler JF, et al. (2011) Neuropathologic features in the hippocampus and cerebellum of three older men with fragile X syndrome. Mol Autism 2: 2. doi: 10.1186/2040-2392-2-2
  72. 72. Havermann K, Lappe M (2010) The influence of the consistency of postsaccadic visual errors on saccadic adaptation. J Neurophysiol 103: 3302–3310. doi: 10.1152/jn.00970.2009
  73. 73. Thier P, Dicke PW, Haas R, Barash S (2000) Encoding of movement time by populations of cerebellar Purkinje cells. Nature 405: 72–76. doi: 10.1038/35011062
  74. 74. Scudder CA, Batourina EY, Tunder GS (1998) Comparison of two methods of producing adaptation of saccade size and implications for the site of plasticity. J Neurophysiol 79: 704–715.
  75. 75. Imamizu H, Miyauchi S, Tamada T, Sasaki Y, Takino R, et al. (2000) Human cerebellar activity reflecting an acquired internal model of a new tool. Nature 403: 192–195. doi: 10.1038/35003194
  76. 76. Tseng YW, Diedrichsen J, Krakauer JW, Shadmehr R, Bastian AJ (2007) Sensory prediction errors drive cerebellum-dependent adaptation of reaching. J Neurophysiol 98: 54–62. doi: 10.1152/jn.00266.2007
  77. 77. Albus J (1971) A theory of cerebellar function. Math BioScience 10: 25–61. doi: 10.1016/0025-5564(71)90051-4
  78. 78. Ito M (1982) Cerebellar control of the vestibulo-ocular reflex–around the flocculus hypothesis. Annu Rev Neurosci 5: 275–296. doi: 10.1146/
  79. 79. Marr D (1969) A theory of cerebellar cortex. J Physiol 202: 437–470.
  80. 80. Ito M, Karachot L (1989) Long-term desensitization of quisqualate-specific glutamate receptors in Purkinje cells investigated with wedge recording from rat cerebellar slices. Neurosci Res 7: 168–171. doi: 10.1016/0168-0102(89)90058-8
  81. 81. Ohtsuka K, Noda H (1995) Discharge properties of Purkinje cells in the oculomotor vermis during visually guided saccades in the macaque monkey. J Neurophysiol 74: 1828–1840.
  82. 82. Kojima Y, Soetedjo R, Fuchs AF (2011) Effect of inactivation and disinhibition of the oculomotor vermis on saccade adaptation. Brain Res 1401: 30–39. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2011.05.027
  83. 83. Arin DM, Bauman ML, Kemper TL (1991) The distribution of Purkinje cell loss in the cerebellum in autism. Neurology 41: 307.
  84. 84. Lee M, Martin-Ruiz C, Graham A, Court J, Jaros E, et al. (2002) Nicotinic receptor abnormalities in the cerebellar cortex in autism. Brain 125: 1483–1495. doi: 10.1093/brain/awf160
  85. 85. Yip J, Soghomonian JJ, Blatt GJ (2008) Increased GAD67 mRNA expression in cerebellar interneurons in autism: implications for Purkinje cell dysfunction. J Neurosci Res 86: 525–530. doi: 10.1002/jnr.21520
  86. 86. Yip J, Soghomonian JJ, Blatt GJ (2007) Decreased GAD67 mRNA levels in cerebellar Purkinje cells in autism: pathophysiological implications. Acta Neuropathol 113: 559–568. doi: 10.1007/s00401-006-0176-3
  87. 87. Soetedjo R, Fuchs AF, Kojima Y (2009) Subthreshold activation of the superior colliculus drives saccade motor learning. J Neurosci 29: 15213–15222. doi: 10.1523/jneurosci.4296-09.2009
  88. 88. Quessy S, Quinet J, Freedman EG (2010) The locus of motor activity in the superior colliculus of the rhesus monkey is unaltered during saccadic adaptation. J Neurosci 30: 14235–14244. doi: 10.1523/jneurosci.3111-10.2010
  89. 89. Aizawa H, Wurtz RH (1998) Reversible inactivation of monkey superior colliculus. I. Curvature of saccadic trajectory. Journal of neurophysiology 79: 2082–2096.
  90. 90. Gaymard B, Rivaud-Pechoux S, Yelnik J, Pidoux B, Ploner CJ (2001) Involvement of the cerebellar thalamus in human saccade adaptation. Eur J Neurosci 14: 554–560. doi: 10.1046/j.0953-816x.2001.01669.x
  91. 91. Stanfield AC, McIntosh AM, Spencer MD, Philip R, Gaur S, et al. (2008) Towards a neuroanatomy of autism: a systematic review and meta-analysis of structural magnetic resonance imaging studies. Eur Psychiatry 23: 289–299. doi: 10.1016/j.eurpsy.2007.05.006