Advertisement
Research Article

Drosophila Signal Peptidase Complex Member Spase12 Is Required for Development and Cell Differentiation

  • Erin Haase Gilbert,

    Affiliation: Department of Molecular and Human Genetics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, United States of America

    X
  • Su-Jin Kwak,

    Affiliation: Department of Pathology and Immunology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, United States of America

    X
  • Rui Chen,

    Affiliations: Department of Molecular and Human Genetics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, United States of America, Program in Developmental Biology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, United States of America, Human Genome Sequencing Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, United States of America

    X
  • Graeme Mardon mail

    gmardon@bcm.edu

    Affiliations: Department of Molecular and Human Genetics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, United States of America, Department of Pathology and Immunology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, United States of America, Program in Developmental Biology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, United States of America, Department of Neuroscience, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, United States of America, Department of Ophthalmology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, United States of America

    X
  • Published: April 03, 2013
  • DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0060908

Abstract

It is estimated that half of all proteins expressed in eukaryotic cells are transferred across or into at least one cellular membrane to reach their functional location. Protein translocation into the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) is critical to the subsequent localization of secretory and transmembrane proteins. A vital component of the translocation machinery is the signal peptidase complex (SPC) - which is conserved from yeast to mammals – and functions to cleave the signal peptide sequence (SP) of secretory and membrane proteins entering the ER. Failure to cleave the SP, due to mutations that abolish the cleavage site or reduce SPC function, leads to the accumulation of uncleaved proteins in the ER that cannot be properly localized resulting in a wide range of defects depending on the protein(s) affected. Despite the obvious importance of the SPC, in vivo studies investigating its function in a multicellular organism have not been reported. The Drosophila SPC comprises four proteins: Spase18/21, Spase22/23, Spase25 and Spase12. Spc1p, the S. cerevisiae homolog of Spase12, is not required for SPC function or viability; Drosophila spase12 null alleles, however, are embryonic lethal. The data presented herein show that spase12 LOF clones disrupt development of all tissues tested including the eye, wing, leg, and antenna. In the eye, spase12 LOF clones result in a disorganized eye, defective cell differentiation, ectopic interommatidial bristles, and variations in support cell size, shape, number, and distribution. In addition, spase12 mosaic tissue is susceptible to melanotic mass formation suggesting that spase12 LOF activates immune response pathways. Together these data demonstrate that spase12 is an essential gene in Drosophila where it functions to mediate cell differentiation and development. This work represents the first reported in vivo analysis of a SPC component in a multicellular organism.

Introduction

Processing by the signal peptidase complex (SPC) is critical to the localization and function of secretory and membrane proteins which must enter the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) before they can be directed to their final destination. As proteins are transferred into the ER, the SPC cleaves the signal peptide sequence (SP), an N-terminal stretch of amino acids – usually 20–30 residues in length – that directs proteins to the ER [1]. SPs possess a tripartite structure that includes a positively charged amino terminal domain, a 7–13 residue hydrophobic domain, and a hydrophilic domain that includes the cleavage site [2]. While the SP sequence is not conserved, the properties associated with each domain are static and ensure that SP-bearing polypeptides are recognized by the cell and translocated into the ER [1], [3].

Signal peptidases have been extensively studied in yeast and bacteria, yet little has been done to investigate their role in multicellular organisms. In S. cerevisiae, four proteins, Sec11, Spc1p, Spc2p and Spc3p, comprise the SPC [4], [5] (Table 1). Sec11 and Spc3p are required for SPC catalytic function and cell viability. Temperature-sensitive sec11 and spc3p mutants accumulate uncleaved SPC targets at non-permissive temperatures, indicating that both are required for SP cleavage [6][8]. Spc1p and Spc2p do not have catalytic function and are dispensable for SPC cleavage activity and viability at normal growth temperatures. However, over-expression of Spc1p attenuates the sec11 temperature-sensitive phenotype [5], while depletion of Spc2p at high temperatures leads to the accumulation of uncleaved protein [9], suggesting that Spc1p and Spc2p contribute to SPC function in yeast although the mechanism has yet to be identified.

thumbnail

Table 1. The SPC is conserved from yeast to humans.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0060908.t001

In mammals, the SPC consists of five subunits: SPC18, SPC21, SPC22/23, SPC12 and SPC25 [10]. SPC18 and SPC21 have high identity to each other [11] and are homologous to Sec11 [6], [12], [13]. SPC22/23 is homologous to Spc3p [14][17] while SPC12 and SPC25 are homologous to Spc1p and Spc2p, respectively [5], [9], [18], [19] (Table 1). SPC18, SPC21 and SPC22/23 are single-pass transmembrane proteins, the bulk of which reside within the ER lumen. SPC12 and SPC25 are double-pass transmembrane proteins each containing a small lumenal domain, while the N- and C-termini of both are cytosolic [11]. SPC18, SPC21, and SPC22/23 have catalytic function and the residues required for cleavage activity are localized to the ER lumen [11].

Four SPC homologs have been identified in Drosophila: Spase18/21, Spase22/23, Spase12 and Spase25 (Table 1). Spase18/21 is homologous to yeast Sec11, as well as mammalian SPC18 and SPC21 [20]. ER vesicles (microsomes) purified from Drosophila embryos and added to an in vitro translation system results in cleavage of murine myeloma light-chain IgG, demonstrating that the Drosophila SPC is functionally conserved [21].

Despite playing a key role in protein sorting, in vivo studies of SPC function in metazoans have not been reported. We have used the Drosophila eye as a model system to investigate the role of spase12 and the SPC in a higher eukaryote. The eye originates from a developmental structure called the eye imaginal disc, an epithelial monolayer of cells that begin to differentiate during the third instar larval stage. The eye continues to develop through larval and pupal stages into a highly organized array comprised of approximately 800 unit eyes (ommatidia). Each ommatidium contains eight photoreceptor cells and four cone cells enclosed by two primary, six secondary, and three tertiary pigment cells, as well as three interommatidial bristles (IOBs) [22], [23]. The genetic approaches available in Drosophila, coupled with the well characterized development and structure of the eye, make it an ideal model for developmental studies.

In this report, we characterize spase12 loss-of-function (LOF) phenotypes in the Drosophila eye through clonal analysis. Our findings show that spase12 mutants are embryonic lethal, while spase12 LOF clones result in developmental defects in all tissues tested. Specifically, spase12 LOF in the Drosophila eye leads to errors in cell differentiation. Together, these data indicate that spase12 is required for viability, development, and differentiation.

Results

spase12 is required for development

To determine the effects of spase12 LOF on Drosophila development, we utilized three spase12 mutant alleles. spase12d4 is a lethal 4 kb deletion that removes two additional genes of unknown function: CG2006 and CG2310 (Figure 1A). spase12EY10774 carries a P-element inserted into the second exon of spase12 (Figure 1B). spase12C24 is a 303 bp deletion generated through imprecise excision of EY10774 that removes the first and second exons of spase12, as well as a portion of exon three (Figure 1B). These three alleles are embryonic lethal, recessive, and fail to complement one another.

thumbnail

Figure 1. spase12 mutant alleles.

(A) spase12d4 is a 4 kb deletion (purple shaded region). (B) spase12EY10774 contains a transposon inserted in the second exon. (B) spase12C24 is a 303 bp deletion (purple shaded region). spase12 GR (A) is a 29 kb genomic construct.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0060908.g001

To investigate spase12 function, we focused on the eye, which is unnecessary for viability and the development of which is well characterized. Using the ey-flp cell lethal (cl) method, clones were induced in the eye imaginal disc during the second larval instar stage and that comprise approximately 90% of the adult eye field [24]. yw ey-flp/+; FRT 82B P[w+] cl/FRT 82B spase12d4 P[w+] (ey-flp; spase12d4), yw ey-flp/+; FRT 82B P[w+] cl/FRT 82B spase12EY10774 P[w+] (ey-flp; spase12C24), and yw ey-flp/+; FRT 82B P[w+] cl/FRT 82B spase12C24 (spase12C24) animals have a disorganized adult eye (Figure 2B–D). Additionally, loss of pigmentation is observed in spase12d4 clones where clonal tissue appears to be a light yellow-orange color (Figure 2B) rather than the strong red P[w+] color observed in spase12d4/+ heterozygotes (Figure 2B''). This specific phenotype cannot be observed with spase12EY10774 (weak P[w+] allele with light orange eye color) or spase12C24 (w- allele) clones (Figure 2C'', D'').

thumbnail

Figure 2. spase12 LOF results in a disorganized eye, loss of pigmentation, and melanotic mass formation.

(A) yw ey-flp/+; FRT 82B P[w+] cl/FRT 82B where w+ marks control tissue and w- marks the clone. yw ey-flp/+; FRT 82B P[w+] cl/FRT 82B spase12d4 P[w+] (ey-flp; spase12d4) (B), yw ey-flp/+; FRT 82B P[w+] cl/FRT 82B spase12EY10774 P[w+] (ey-flp; spase12EY10774) (C) and yw ey-flp/+; FRT 82B P[w+] cl/FRT 82B spase12C24 (ey-flp; spase12C24) (D) eyes are disrupted compared to the control (A). Clonal tissue in ey-flp; spase12d4 eyes (B) appears lighter in color than spase12d4/+ which exhibits a strong P[w+] eye color (B''). spase12EY10774/+ (C''). spase12C24/+ (D''). Examples of melanotic masses in ey-flp; spase12d4 (B'), spase12EY10774 (C'), and spase12C24 (D') mosaic eyes. A single copy of spase12 GR rescues spase12d4 in yw ey-flp/+; FRT 82B P[w+] cl/FRT 82B spase12d4 P[w+], spase12 GR P[w+] (E). spase12rev complements spase12d4 (F). Ubiquitous expression of UAS-spase12 rescues spase12 phenotypes in w; ubi-gal4/UAS-spase12; spase12d4 P[w+]/FRT 82B spase12C24 flies (G).

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0060908.g002

We tested whether spase12 LOF is responsible for the observed phenotypes using rescue with both genomic DNA constructs and the Gal4/UAS system. A single copy of a 29 kb spase12 genomic rescue (spase12 GR) construct – which extends 10 kb both 5′ and 3′ of the spase12 locus and is intended to cover the deleted region and encompass all necessary regulatory elements (Figure 1A), rescues all known spase12d4 eye phenotypes (Figure 2E). spase12rev, a precise excision of the EY10774 insertion, complements spase12d4 suggesting that phenotypes observed in spase12EY10774 mutants are caused by the P-element insertion and spase12 LOF (Figure 2F). UAS-spase12 expressed under a ubiquitous promoter is sufficient to rescue spase12d4/spase12C24 lethality and eye phenotypes (Figure 2G). Because spase12 is embedded in the 3′ UTR of another gene, CG2006 (Figure 1B), rescue with UAS-spase12 further demonstrates that spase12 is responsible for the observed phenotypes and that CG2006 LOF does not significantly contribute to lethality or developmental defects.

Beyond the eye phenotypes observed, spase12 expression is also required for the development of other tissues. spase12C24 clones were generated in the wing using ubx-flp Minute (M) and result in crumpled, melanized wings (Figure 3A'). Clones induced via heat shock 48 hours after egg lay in yw hs-flp/+; FRT 82B (M) P[w+ ubi-GFP]/FRT 82B spase12C24 larvae yields flies with developmental defects in multiple tissues including the leg, which may become twisted and stunted (Figure 3B'), and in the head region resulting in eye, bristle, and antennal defects as well as melanotic masses (Figure 3C').

thumbnail

Figure 3. spase12 LOF disrupts development in multiple tissues.

yw ubx-flp/+; FRT 82B (M) P[w+ ubi-GFP]/FRT control (A), yw ubx-flp/+; FRT 82B (M) P[w+ ubi-GFP]/FRT 82B spase12C24 wings are crumpled and melanized (A'). Clones in the distal portion of yw hs-flp/+; FRT 82B (M) P[w+ ubi-GFP]/FRT 82B spase12C24 legs (B') are twisted and stunted compared to yw hs-flp/+; FRT 82B (M) P[w+ ubi-GFP]/FRT 82B control (B). yw hs-flp/+; FRT 82B (M) P[w+ ubi-GFP]/FRT 82B control (C). Clones in the head region of yw hs-flp/+; FRT 82B (M) P[w+ ubi-GFP]/FRT 82B spase12C24 result in eye, bristle, and antennal defects as well as melanotic mass formation (C').

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0060908.g003

spase12 mosaic eyes have disrupted retinal structure

Adult eyes were sectioned to assay whether the disorganized appearance of spase12 mosaic eyes is indicative of a compromised retinal structure. In sections of wild-type animals (Figure 4A), ommatidia are arranged in a stereotyped, lattice pattern and aligned such that rows of ommatidia share the same polarity (Figure 4A'–A''). However, sections of ey-flp; spase12d4 (Figure 4B–B''), ey-flp; spase12EY10774 (Figure 4C–C''), and ey-flp; spase12C24 (Figure 4D–D'') animals reveal widely disorganized ommatidia with polarity defects. Furthermore, multiple ommatidia have varying numbers of rhabdomeres – the light-sensing organelles of photoreceptor cells. Within a single wild-type ommatidium, rhabdomeres appear as dark circles arranged in a trapezoidal pattern and indicate the presence of photoreceptors. Each wild-type ommatidium includes eight photoreceptors, but only seven rhabdomeres can be observed in each section because the inner R7 rhabdomere is positioned above the more basal R8 rhabdomere (Figure 4A). In ey-flp; spase12 mutants, both ectopic and missing rhabdomeres are observed (Figure 4B, C). Variations in rhabdomere number suggest that there are incorrect numbers of photoreceptor cells in ey-flp; spase12 mutant eyes. The appearance of supernumerary rhabdomeres could also be the result of a split rhabdomere or misplaced inner photoreceptor cells allowing for overlapping rhabdomeres. Additionally, spaces between ommatidia suggest possible retinal degeneration (Figure 4C, D).

thumbnail

Figure 4. spase12 adult eyes have ectopic and missing rhabdomeres and polarity defects.

Thin plastic sections of yw ey-flp/+; FRT 82B P[w+] cl/FRT 82B control (A), yw ey-flp/+; FRT 82B P[w+] cl/FRT 82B spase12d4 P[w+] (ey-flp; spase12d4) (B), yw ey-flp/+; FRT 82B P[w+] cl/FRT 82B spase12EY10774 P[w+] (ey-flp; spase12EY10774) (C) and yw ey-flp/+; FRT 82B P[w+] cl/FRT 82B spase12C24 (ey-flp; spase12C24) (D) mosaic eyes are disorganized and exhibit spacing defects between ommatidia (red asterisks) and varying rhabdomere numbers. Red circles mark ommatidia with an ectopic inner rhabdomere while yellow circles mark ommatidia with a missing inner rhabdomeres. Polarity of individual ommatidia within ey-flp; 82B (A', A''), ey-flp; spase12d4 (B', B''), ey-flp; spase12EY10774 (C', C''), and ey-flp; spase12C24 (D', D'') is represented by red arrows. Section through ey-flp; spase12C24 melanotic mass (D''') reveals degenerating tissue with large black dots consistent with dying cells (red arrows).

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0060908.g004

Loss of spase12 causes melanotic mass formation and apoptosis

One of the most striking phenotypes observed in spase12 mutants are black lesions called melanotic masses that occur in approximately 15% of spase12 mosaic eyes (2B'–D'). ey-flp; spase12 mutants typically eclose without lesions, which then appear within one to three days. They may appear and remain static or they may expand to cover the entire eye. spase12 mosaic tissue in the wings (Figure 3A') and in the head region (Figure 3C') may also result in melanizations. Melanotic masses represent an inflammatory response that occurs when the immune system recognizes a foreign body or abnormal or dying tissue that is too large to be phagocytosed [25], [26]. Specialized hemocytes converge upon and encapsulate the threat forging an indestructible barrier that is subsequently melanized preventing further damage to the surrounding tissues [27], [28]. Melanizations in ey-flp; spase12C24 animals are restricted to mosaic tissue suggesting that lesions are directly associated with abnormal tissue induced by spase12 LOF rather than a defect in hemocyte function. Sections through melanotic masses in ey-flp; spase12C24 animals (Figure 4D''') reveal degenerating tissue with large black inclusions that are consistent with dying cells.

Notably, melanotic masses have been observed in apoptosis mutants [25] and in LOF PINK-1 (PTEN-induced protein kinase 1) mutants with degenerative eye phenotypes [29]. To test whether spase12 LOF results in increased cell death, spase12 mosaic third instar discs were stained with Caspase antibody. Increased expression of Caspase was observed in all ey-flp; spase12C24 mutant discs (Figure 5B–B'') that also exhibit severe defects in retinal differentiation as judged by expression of Elav, a pan-neuronal marker. Such disruption and cell death is observed in approximately 10% of larval eye discs examined. Together these data suggest that spase12 LOF results in disrupted differentiation, increased apoptosis, and melanotic mass formation.

thumbnail

Figure 5. spase12 LOF leads to increased apoptosis.

yw ey-flp/+; FRT 82B P[w+] cl/FRT 82B (ey-flp; 82B) control (A–A'') has limited Caspase expression and normal Elav expression compared to yw ey-flp/+; FRT 82B P[w+] cl/FRT 82B spase12C24 (ey-flp; spase12C24) (B–B'') mosaic discs in which Caspase is upregulated and Elav expression strongly disrupted.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0060908.g005

spase12 LOF results in cell differentiation errors

The extensive disorganization of the usually stereotypic retina as well as aberrant rhabdomere numbers observed in spase12 mosaic eyes suggests defects in tissue structure and cell differentiation. Therefore, immunohistochemistry (IHC) was used to examine the structure and appearance of retinal support cells (pigment cells) during pupal development. Using the hs-flp (M) method, we generated spase12C24 homozygous mutant tissue in a heterozygous background in which clones are marked by the absence of GFP.

We examined the eye at 48 hours after pupal formation, at which time the pupal eye structure is consistent with the organization of the adult retina. Staining for Armadillo, an adherens junction protein expressed at cell boundaries, marks support cells and cone cells, revealing the precise lattice pattern of the developing eye in control tissue (Figure 6A). Each individual ommatidium forms a hexagonal shape framed by secondary pigment cells intersected with tertiary pigment cells and interommatidial bristles (IOBs) positioned at every other vertex (Figure 6A'''). At the center of each ommatidium is a cluster of four cone cells enclosed by two primary pigment cells. This arrangement is severely disrupted in spase12C24 mutant tissue (Figure 6B''', C'''). In spase12 clonal tissue, many ommatidia lack the normal hexagonal pattern, instead having only four or five sides or a rounded shape, and some have lost one or both primary pigment cell(s). Additionally, many IOBs and tertiary pigment cells are improperly placed at neighboring vertices, and multiple IOBs may be present at a single vertex. There is also evidence of ommatidial fusions where support cells do not fully surround and enclose each ommatidium (Figure 6B', C'). In the example presented in Figure 6B''', the ommatidium is misshapen, IOBs and tertiary cells are present at only two vertices, three IOBs are located at a single vertex, and the identity of several support cells cannot be determined based on their shape and placement. The ommatidium in Figure 6C''' retains its hexagonal shape, yet IOBs and tertiary cells are not properly positioned in relation to one another, a secondary pigment cell fails to fully extend and enclose the ommatidium resulting in an ommatidial fusion, and an extra primary pigment cell is present. Unlike larval clones where severe defects are observed in only about 10% of discs examined, strong disruption of development in pupal clones is fully penetrant.

thumbnail

Figure 6. Loss of spase12 leads to defects in cell differentiation.

yw hs-flp/+; FRT 82B (M) P[w+ ubi-GFP]/FRT 82B spase12C2448 APF eye discs stained with Armadillo (Arm) (A, B, C). GFP negatively marks clones (A', B', C'). Red dashed boxes outline representative ommatidia which are highlighted in A'', B'', C''. Support cells are color-coded according to their identity: interommatidial bristles (magenta), secondary pigment cells (cyan) and tertiary pigment cells (green) (A''', B''', C'''). The center of each ommatidium contains four cone cells, which strongly express Arm, surrounded by two primary pigment cells. spase12C24 mutant tissue (B, B' and C, C') exhibit multiple defects: ommatidia missing one or both primary pigment cells (stars), ectopic IOBs (arrowheads), ectopic primary pigment cell (asterisk), and gaps in the support cell structure that allow contact between primary pigment cells of neighboring ommatidia (red arrows). (B''') A spase12C24 mutant ommatidium is misshapen and has a cluster of three IOBs. Additionally, support cells are not properly placed and the identity of three support cells (purple) cannot be determined by their shape or placement. (C''') A spase12C24 mutant ommatidium fails to maintain the appropriate pattern of cell types at the vertices and possesses an ectopic primary pigment cell (asterisk). A secondary pigment cell (red arrow) does not fully extend to separate one ommatidium from its neighbor and one side of the ommatidium has two secondary pigment cells rather than one (white arrow).

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0060908.g006

Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was used to image the external surface of the eye to determine whether these defects are maintained in adults and the results are consistent with the phenotypes observed in the pupal eye. The wild-type eye is well organized, with properly placed IOBs (Figure 7A–A''). ey-flp; spase12C24 eyes, however, are highly disrupted (Figure 7B–B''). Overall, the eye appears misshapen and the surface lens material of all ommatidia is highly irregular. Consistent with the pupal eye phenotype, bristles are not properly placed at every other vertex, and malformed ommatidia and ommatidial fusions are observed. There are multiple examples of ectopic IOBs in clusters of two and three bristles.

thumbnail

Figure 7. spase12 LOF results in ectopic IOBs and ommatidial fusions.

Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) of (A) yw ey-flp/+; FRT 82B P[w+] cl/FRT 82B control and (B) yw ey-flp/+; FRT 82B P[w+] cl/FRT 82B spase12C24at 200X, (A', B') 1000X, and (A'', B'') 2000X. Adult ey-flp; spase12C24 eyes (B–B'') are disorganized with ectopic interommatidial bristles (red arrows) and ommatidial fusions (white arrows).

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0060908.g007

spase12 fails to genetically interact with Notch

The Notch (N) pathway is a predicted SPC target as N and its ligands, Delta and Serrate, are SP-bearing transmembrane proteins [30][32]. Interestingly, spase12 LOF mosaics exhibit Notch-like phenotypes, in particular, defects in cell differentiation [33][35]. However, IHC failed to detect changes in the expression of N or Delta in spase12 LOF clones. If loss of spase12 function compromises SPC capacity, it would presumably reduce but not abolish expression of a wide range of proteins – though IHC may be insufficiently sensitive to distinguish changes in expression. To overcome this possibility, we tested whether spase12 and N genetically interact. We generated N54l9/FM7 P[w+ ubi-GFP]; FRT 82B spase12C24/TM6B flies and crossed virgins to yw ey-flp/Y; FRT 82B P[w+] cl/TM6B males. Progeny were screened for yw ey-flp/N54l9; FRT 82B cl/FRT 82B spase12C24 and yw ey-flp/FM7 P[w+ ubi-GFP]; FRT 82B cl/FRT 82B spase12C24 mosaic flies to determine whether removing a single copy of N could exacerbate spase12 mutant phenotypes. We observed no effect in response to reduced expression of N; however, these results do not rule out the possibility of a spase12-N interaction (data not shown).

Discussion

In the current study, we investigated the developmental role of Drosophila Spase12, a signal peptidase complex member. Thus far, the SPC has been studied primarily in S. cerevisiae. This work represents an effort to expand our understanding of this critical complex in a multicellular model system that is physiologically relevant for the study of human disease. We generated two spase12 LOF alleles, spase12d4 and spase12C24, that are recessive and embryonic lethal. Clonal analysis using both of these alleles, and the P-element mutant spase12EY10774, results in defective development of all tissues tested, including the eye, head, antenna, leg and wing. Further investigation into the retinal defects in spase12 mosaics reveals increased apoptosis in the developing eye, errors in cell differentiation, disrupted alignment of ommatidia, and melanotic mass formation. From these data we conclude that spase12 is required for viability and development in Drosophila. Although it does not appear to be essential for SPC function, the data show that spase12 mediates cell differentiation, possibly through regulation of SPC activity on specific substrates or through contributing to SPC efficiency. In addition, this study reveals that loss of spase12 function causes melanotic mass formation, suggesting that spase12 LOF may lead to activation of the immune response pathway.

Deducing the role of spase12 in the SPC

In yeast, spc1p mutants are viable, but accumulate uncleaved pre-proteins in the ER. However, over-expression of spc1p rescues lethality of temperature-sensitive sec11 mutants shifted to the restrictive temperature suggesting that Spc1p contributes to the efficiency of the SPC complex in yeast [5]. Although Drosophila spase12 LOF is lethal to the animal as a whole, the fact that many spase12 null mutant cells are viable and can develop and differentiate normally suggests that Spase12, like its yeast homolog Spc1p, is expendable for SPC function. If spase12 were essential for catalytic function of the SPC, we would expect spase12 LOF to result in a fully penetrant cell lethal phenotype.

Spase12 may promote SPC cleavage by facilitating the translocation of SPC substrates into the ER. Human SPC12 is predicted to interact with nearly 100 proteins that are directly involved in this process, including more than 70 ribosomal subunits, as well as the translocon, signal sequence binding proteins, and signal recognition particle components [36], [37]. This is consistent with topographical data indicating that mammalian SPC12 is primarily localized to the cytosol [11] where it could interact with ribosomes and translocation machinery on the ER surface. Such interactions may function to stabilize the ribosome-translocon interaction, facilitating the entry of newly translated proteins into the ER.

Loss of spase12 function causes highly variable phenotypes and does not appear to affect any one specific step in differentiation with full penetrance. For example, in the developing eye we observe both loss and gain of photoreceptors as well as supporting pigment and bristle cells. Furthermore, melanotic masses were observed in only 15% of mosaic animals with varying severity. Cleavage of each of the many SPC substrates may be disproportionately affected from cell to cell and animal to animal resulting in mutable phenotypes and incomplete penetrance. Although strong defects are observed in only 10% of mosaic larval eye discs, disruption of pupal differentiation is fully penetrant, perhaps reflecting a strong maternal contribution of spase12 transcript that rescues most zygotic null phenotypes into larval stages.

Lethality, however, is a fully penetrant phenotype. The SPC is required for the translocation and subsequent localization of transmembrane and secretory factors, many of which play a role in cell signaling. Even a potentially mild disruption of cell signaling during embryogenesis through loss of spase12 expression may be an insurmountable obstacle compared to the induction of spase12 LOF clones at later developmental stages using ey-flp or hs-flp clonal analysis.

SPC targets in Drosophila

In eukaryotes, all secretory and transmembrane proteins are expected to be translocated to the ER and cleaved by the SPC before they can be properly localized; however, few putative SPC targets have been confirmed in Drosophila. In vitro experiments provide strong evidence that vitellogenins and Crumbs are cleaved by the SPC. In vitro translation of vitellogenins, which are secreted from the fat body, yields preproteins that are significantly larger than endogenously synthesized vitellogenins, suggesting that they are likely to possess an SP that is cleaved by the SPC [38]. In the presence of microsomes derived from either canine pancreas or Drosophila embryos, in vitro translation of vitellogenins results in polypeptides that are the same size as what is produced in vivo [21]. Crumbs, a transmembrane protein with an exceptionally long SP, is co-translationally cleaved in an in vitro system to which canine pancreas or Drosophila S2 cell-derived microsomes are added [39].

Our investigation in Drosophila reveals that pathways populated by SP-bearing proteins may be affected by spase12 LOF. Loss-of-pigmentation phenotypes in ey-flp; spase12 mutants suggest that spase12 may affect the expression of proteins involved in eye pigmentation, such as the pigment cell membrane localized ABC transporter [40]. Additionally, defects in cell differentiation observed in ey-flp; spase12 mutants suggest that cell signaling pathways that function in retinal development, such as Notch, Hedgehog, Dpp, and EGFR [41], may be sensitive to spase12 expression.

In an effort to identify specific proteins that are disrupted by spase12 LOF and understand the mechanisms resulting in spase12 phenotypes, we conducted IHC in third instar and pupal spase12 mosaic eye discs. Expression of Crumbs, a known SPC substrate, was unaltered in spase12 mosaic tissue. Additionally, IHC failed to detect any changes in the expression of DE-Cadherin, Fasciclin 2, and Notch pathway members Notch and Delta – all of which are SP-bearing, transmembrane proteins. These results, however, do not rule out the possibility that the expression and function of these potential targets are impacted by spase12 LOF. If Spase12 promotes the overall activity of the SPC but is not absolutely required for SPC function, there may not be a sufficient reduction in the expression or localization of any one protein to be detected with IHC. Conversely, Spase12 may not be necessary for SPC cleavage and subsequent localization of the putative SPC substrates tested. Because spase12 LOF in the entire animal is lethal, S2 cells may present a viable alternative to identify SPC substrates that require spase12 expression for localization and function. Partial RNAi knockdown of spase12 in S2 cells, coupled with quantitative approaches to assay the expression levels of putative SPC targets may aid the identification of proteins affected by spase12 LOF.

Melanotic masses in spase12 mutants

spase12C24 mosaic flies are susceptible to melanotic mass formation. Mutated genes that result in melanization can be divided into two groups. Class I genes are not involved with the immune pathway, but may induce an immune reaction when altered in response to abnormal or degenerating tissue that is recognized and attacked by the immune system. Class II genes include those known to function in immune response pathways such as Toll and JAK/STAT [42], [43].

Although spase12 mosaic animals develop melanotic masses, it is unclear whether Spase12 functions directly in immunity pathways. However, melanotic mass formation is executed by hemocytes which circulate freely in the hemolymph and throughout the organism. Therefore, mutations that promote melanization are likely to result in a systemic phenotype [25]. In contrast, melanotic mass formation in spase12 mosaic flies is restricted to the mutant tissue, suggesting that spase12 may be a Class I gene.

Several studies have suggested that melanotic masses correlate with both necrotic and apoptotic cell death. In necrotic (nec) mutants, necrosis was shown to correspond with melanotic mass formation [44]. PINK-1 (PTEN-induced protein kinase 1) LOF in the eye results in photoreceptor degeneration, melanizations, and necrosis [29]. Mutations in apoptosis genes dronc (Nedd2-like caspase), dcp-1 (Decapping protein 1) and ark (Apaf-1-related-killer) also result in melanotic mass formation [25]. We observe an increase in apoptotic cell death in developing spase12 mosaic eyes, and melanotic masses, degeneration, and evidence of cell death in adult eyes suggesting a correlation between cell death and melanization in spase12 mutant tissue.

It is also interesting to note that Drosophila homologs of five of the proteins that human SPC12 is predicted to interact with are linked with melanotic mass formation and each has a role in protein synthesis and translocation into the ER [36], [37], [45]. These include Gtb-bp and Srp54k, which target SP-bearing proteins to the ER, and ribosomal subunits RpL26, RpL6, and RpS5b [45]. Further investigation into the link between spase12 LOF, melanotic mass formation, and cell death may shed light on the functional role of Spase12 in the SPC.

In this report we have shown that Drosophila Spase12 is required for viability, development, and cell differentiation. Furthermore, spase12 LOF lethal results in increased incidence of cell death in the developing eye, as well as retinal degeneration and melanotic mass formation in adults. This work demonstrates that, in Drosophila, spase12 is essential to development in higher eukaryotes, and suggests that future studies investigating the function of Spase12 may enhance our understanding of the intricacies of protein translocation regulation.

Methods

Drosophila stocks

Flies were cultured at 25°C on standard media. The following stocks were used: ubi-gal4, spase12d4 P[w+], spase12C24, spase12rev, spase12EY10774 P[w+] [46], yw ey-flp/+; FRT 82B P[w+] cl/TM6B, yw hs-flp/+; FRT 82B (M) P[w+ ubi-GFP]/TM6B, yw ubx-flp/+; FRT 82B (M) P[w+ ubi-GFP]/FRT 82B/TM6B, UAS-spase12, spase12 GR and N54l9/FM7 P[w+ ubi-GFP]. spase12d4 P[w+] was generated using FRT-bearing transposons e01743 and d06279 (Exelixis) as described [47]. spase12rev and spase12C24 were generated via precise and imprecise excision, respectively, of spase12EY10774 P[w+] using □ 2–3 transposase following standard methods.

Constructs

UAS-spase12 was generated by inserting spase12 cDNA (RE02772, DGRC) into pUAST-attB [48]. spase12 GR was generated by recombineering a 29 kb fragment of BACR28B07 into p[ACMAN] [49]. p[ACMAN] was a gift from Hugo Bellen (Jan and Dan Duncan Neurological Research Institute, Houston, TX, USA). Transgenics were generated by injection into VK1 (UAS-spase12) and P2 (spase12 GR) [49].

Clonal analysis

spase12d4 P[w+], spase12EY10774 P[w+] and spase12C24 were recombined onto FRT82B. Clonal analysis was conducted using yw ey-flp/+; FRT 82B P[w+] cl/TM6B, yw hs-flp/+; FRT 82B (M) P[w+ ubi-GFP]/TM6B, and yw ubx-flp/+; FRT 82B (M) P[w+ ubi-GFP]/FRT 82B/TM6B stocks. hs-flpclones in pupal eye discs were generated via a 1 hour heat shock at 37°C to induce hs-flp expression at 48 hours after egg lay. Pupal discs were dissected 48 hours after pupation.

Immunohistochemistry and confocal microscopy

Antibody staining of third instar and pupal eye discs was performed as described [50]. The following primary antibodies were used: rabbit anti-GFP (1:1000, Molecular Probes), mouse anti-GFP (1:1000, Molecular Probes), rabbit anti-Caspase (Cell Signaling), mouse anti-Arm (1:500, DSHB) [51], and rat anti-Elav (1:500, DSHB) [52]. The following secondary antibodies were used: Alexa goat anti-rabbit (1:500, Molecular Probes), Alexa goat anti-mouse (1:500, Molecular Probes), CY3 goat anti-mouse (1:500, Jackson ImmunoResearch), CY5 goat anti-rabbit (1:500, Jackson ImmunoResearch), and CY3 goat anti-rat (1:500, Jackson ImmunoResearch). Images were captured using a Zeiss LSM 510 confocal microscope (Zeiss, Jena, Germany) and processed with ImageJ (NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA) and Adobe Photoshop software (Adobe Systems Incorporated, San Jose, CA, USA).

Thin plastic sections and light microscopy

Thin plastic, tangential sections of the adult retina were performed as described [53]. Images of external Drosophila morphology and thin plastic sections were captured using a Zeiss Axioplan 2 microscope, Zeiss AxioCam digital camera and AxioVision software and processed with ImageJ (NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA) and Adobe Photoshop software (Adobe Systems Incorporated, San Jose, CA, USA).

Electron microscopy

Flies were prepared and fixed in HMDS as described [54]. The samples were then coated under vacuum using a Balzer MED 010 evaporator (Technotrade International, Manchester, NH) with platinum alloy for a thickness of 25 nm, then immediately flash carbon coated under vacuum. The samples were transferred to a desiccator for examination at a later date. Samples were examined in a JSM-5910 scanning electron microscope (JEOL, USA, Inc., Peabody, MA) at an accelerating voltage of 5 kV.

Acknowledgments

We thank Kenneth Dunner of the High Resolution Electron Microscopy Facility at UTMDACC (Institutional Core Grant CA16672) for assistance with scanning electron microscopy; the Bloomington Stock Center, Exelixis, and VDRC for providing Drosophila reagents; and the Baylor College of Medicine Ophthalmology Core (5P30EY002520-32) for confocal access.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: EHG SK RC GM. Performed the experiments: EHG SK. Analyzed the data: EHG. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: EHG SK. Wrote the paper: EHG GM.

References

  1. 1. Paetzel M, Karla A, Strynadka NC, Dalbey RE (2002) Signal peptidases. Chem Rev 102: 4549–4580.
  2. 2. von Heijne G (1985) Signal sequences. The limits of variation. J Mol Biol 184: 99–105.
  3. 3. Blobel G, Dobberstein B (1975) Transfer of proteins across membranes. I. Presence of proteolytically processed and unprocessed nascent immunoglobulin light chains on membrane-bound ribosomes of murine myeloma. J Cell Biol 67: 835–851.
  4. 4. YaDeau JT, Klein C, Blobel G (1991) Yeast signal peptidase contains a glycoprotein and the Sec11 gene product. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 88: 517–521.
  5. 5. Fang H, Panzner S, Mullins C, Hartmann E, Green N (1996) The homologue of mammalian SPC12 is important for efficient signal peptidase activity in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Biol Chem 271: 16460–16465.
  6. 6. Bohni PC, Deshaies RJ, Schekman RW (1988) SEC11 is required for signal peptide processing and yeast cell growth. J Cell Biol 106: 1035–1042.
  7. 7. Fang H, Mullins C, Green N (1997) In addition to SEC11, a newly identified gene, SPC3, is essential for signal peptidase activity in the yeast endoplasmic reticulum. The Journal of Biological Chemistry 272: 13125–13158.
  8. 8. Meyer HA, Hartmann E (1997) The yeast SPC22/23 homolog Spc3p is essential for signal peptidase activity. J Biol Chem 272: 13159–13164.
  9. 9. Mullins C, Meyer HA, Hartmann E, Green N, Fang H (1996) Structurally related Spc1p and Spc2p of yeast signal peptidase complex are functionally distinct. J Biol Chem 271: 29094–29099.
  10. 10. Evans EA, Gilmore R, Blobel G (1986) Purification of microsomal signal peptidase as a complex. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 83: 581–585.
  11. 11. Shelness GS, Lin L, Nicchitta CV (1993) Membrane topology and biogenesis of eukaryotic signal peptidase. J Biol Chem 268: 5201–5208.
  12. 12. Greenburg G, Shelness GS, Blobel G (1989) A subunit of mammalian signal peptidase is homologous to yeast SEC11 protein. J Biol Chem 264: 15762–15765.
  13. 13. Shelness GS, Blobel G (1990) Two subunits of the canine signal peptidase complex are homologous to yeast SEC11 protein. J Biol Chem 265: 9512–9519.
  14. 14. Baker RK, Lively MO (1987) Purification and characterization of hen oviduct microsomal signal peptidase. Biochemistry 26: 8561–8567.
  15. 15. Shelness GS, Kanwar YS, Blobel G (1988) cDNA-derived primary structure of the glycoprotein component of canine microsomal signal peptidase complex. J Biol Chem 263: 17063–17070.
  16. 16. Newsome AL, McLean JW, Lively MO (1992) Molecular cloning of a cDNA encoding the glycoprotein of hen oviduct microsomal signal peptidase. Biochem J 282 (Pt 2): 447–452.
  17. 17. Lively MO, Newsome AL, Nusier M (1994) Eukaryote microsomal signal peptidases. Methods Enzymol 244: 301–314.
  18. 18. Greenburg G, Blobel G (1994) cDNA-derived primary structure of the 25-kDa subunit of canine microsomal signal peptidase complex. J Biol Chem 269: 25354–25358.
  19. 19. Kalies KU, Hartmann E (1996) Membrane topology of the 12- and the 25-kDa subunits of the mammalian signal peptidase complex. J Biol Chem 271: 3925–3929.
  20. 20. Abrams EW, Andrew DJ (2005) CrebA regulates secretory activity in the Drosophila salivary gland and epidermis. Development 132: 2743–2758.
  21. 21. Brennan MD, Warren TG, Mahowald AP (1980) Signal peptides and signal peptidase in Drosophila melanogaster. J Cell Biol 87: 516–520.
  22. 22. Wolff T, Ready DF (1991) The beginning of pattern formation in the Drosophila compound eye: the morphogenetic furrow and the second mitotic wave. Development 113: 841–850.
  23. 23. Cagan RL, Ready DF (1989) The emergence of order in the Drosophila pupal retina. Dev Biol 136: 346–362.
  24. 24. Newsome TP, Asling B, Dickson BJ (2000) Analysis of Drosophila photoreceptor axon guidance in eye-specific mosaics. Development 127: 851–860.
  25. 25. Minakhina S, Steward R (2006) Melanotic mutants in Drosophila: pathways and phenotypes. Genetics 174: 253–263.
  26. 26. Roman G, He J, Davis RL (2000) kurtz, a novel nonvisual arrestin, is an essential neural gene in Drosophila. Genetics 155: 1281–1295.
  27. 27. Lanot R, Zachary D, Holder F, Meister M (2001) Postembryonic hematopoiesis in Drosophila. Dev Biol 230: 243–257.
  28. 28. Sorrentino RP, Carton Y, Govind S (2002) Cellular immune response to parasite infection in the Drosophila lymph gland is developmentally regulated. Dev Biol 243: 65–80.
  29. 29. Wang D, Qian L, Xiong H, Liu J, Neckameyer WS, et al. (2006) Antioxidants protect PINK1-dependent dopaminergic neurons in Drosophila. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103: 13520–13525.
  30. 30. Petersen TN, Brunak S, von Heijne G, Nielsen H (2011) SignalP 4.0: discriminating signal peptides from transmembrane regions. Nat Methods 8: 785–786.
  31. 31. Boeckmann B, Bairoch A, Apweiler R, Blatter MC, Estreicher A, et al. (2003) The SWISS-PROT protein knowledgebase and its supplement TrEMBL in 2003. Nucleic Acids Res 31: 365–370.
  32. 32. Cagan RL, Ready DF (1989) Notch is required for successive cell decisions in the developing Drosophila retina. Genes Dev 3: 1099–1112.
  33. 33. Artavanis-Tsakonas S, Rand MD, Lake RJ (1999) Notch signaling: cell fate control and signal integration in development. Science 284: 770–776.
  34. 34. Justice NJ, Jan YN (2002) Variations on the Notch pathway in neural development. Curr Opin Neurobiol 12: 64–70.
  35. 35. Bray SJ (2006) Notch signalling: a simple pathway becomes complex. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 7: 678–689.
  36. 36. Murali T, Pacifico S, Yu J, Guest S, Roberts GG 3rd, et al. (2011) DroID 2011: a comprehensive, integrated resource for protein, transcription factor, RNA and gene interactions for Drosophila. Nucleic Acids Res 39: D736–743.
  37. 37. Yu J, Pacifico S, Liu G, Finley RL Jr (2008) DroID: the Drosophila Interactions Database, a comprehensive resource for annotated gene and protein interactions. BMC Genomics 9: 461.
  38. 38. Warren TG, Brennan MD, Mahowald AP (1979) Two processing steps in maturation of vitellogenin polypeptides in Drosophila melanogaster. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 76: 2848–2852.
  39. 39. Kilic A, Klose S, Dobberstein B, Knust E, Kapp K (2010) The Drosophila Crumbs signal peptide is unusually long and is a substrate for signal peptide peptidase. Eur J Cell Biol 89: 449–461.
  40. 40. Mackenzie SM, Brooker MR, Gill TR, Cox GB, Howells AJ, et al. (1999) Mutations in the white gene of Drosophila melanogaster affecting ABC transporters that determine eye colouration. Biochim Biophys Acta 1419: 173–185.
  41. 41. Kumar JP (2009) The molecular circuitry governing retinal determination. Biochim Biophys Acta 1789: 306–314.
  42. 42. Dearolf CR (1998) Fruit fly "leukemia". Biochim Biophys Acta 1377: M13–23.
  43. 43. Watson KL, Johnson TK, Denell RE (1991) Lethal(1) aberrant immune response mutations leading to melanotic tumor formation in Drosophila melanogaster. Dev Genet 12: 173–187.
  44. 44. Green C, Levashina E, McKimmie C, Dafforn T, Reichhart JM, et al. (2000) The necrotic gene in Drosophila corresponds to one of a cluster of three serpin transcripts mapping at 43A1.2. Genetics 156: 1117–1127.
  45. 45. Avet-Rochex A, Boyer K, Polesello C, Gobert V, Osman D, et al. (2010) An in vivo RNA interference screen identifies gene networks controlling Drosophila melanogaster blood cell homeostasis. BMC Dev Biol 10: 65.
  46. 46. Bellen HJ, Levis RW, Liao G, He Y, Carlson JW, et al. (2004) The BDGP gene disruption project: single transposon insertions associated with 40% of Drosophila genes. Genetics 167: 761–781.
  47. 47. Parks AL, Cook KR, Belvin M, Dompe NA, Fawcett R, et al. (2004) Systematic generation of high-resolution deletion coverage of the Drosophila melanogaster genome. Nat Genet 36: 288–292.
  48. 48. Bischof J, Maeda RK, Hediger M, Karch F, Basler K (2007) An optimized transgenesis system for Drosophila using germ-line-specific phiC31 integrases. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 104: 3312–3317.
  49. 49. Venken KJ, He Y, Hoskins RA, Bellen HJ (2006) P[acman]: a BAC transgenic platform for targeted insertion of large DNA fragments in D. melanogaster. Science 314: 1747–1751.
  50. 50. Pepple KL, Atkins M, Venken K, Wellnitz K, Harding M, et al. (2008) Two-step selection of a single R8 photoreceptor: a bistable loop between senseless and rough locks in R8 fate. Development 135: 4071–4079.
  51. 51. Riggleman B, Schedl P, Wieschaus E (1990) Spatial expression of the Drosophila segment polarity gene armadillo is posttranscriptionally regulated by wingless. Cell 63: 549–560.
  52. 52. O'Neill EM, Rebay I, Tjian R, Rubin GM (1994) The activities of two Ets-related transcription factors required for Drosophila eye development are modulated by the Ras/MAPK pathway. Cell 78: 137–147.
  53. 53. Tomlinson A, Ready DF (1987) Neuronal differentiation in Drosophila ommatidium. Dev Biol 120: 366–376.
  54. 54. Wolff T (2011) Preparation of Drosophila eye specimens for scanning electron microscopy. Cold Spring Harb Protoc 2011: 1383–1385.