Advertisement
Research Article

Determinants of Arterial Stiffness in Chronic Kidney Disease Stage 3

  • Natasha J. McIntyre,

    Affiliation: Department of Renal Medicine, Royal Derby Hospital, Derbyshire, United Kingdom

    X
  • Richard J. Fluck,

    Affiliation: Department of Renal Medicine, Royal Derby Hospital, Derbyshire, United Kingdom

    X
  • Christopher W. McIntyre,

    Affiliations: Department of Renal Medicine, Royal Derby Hospital, Derbyshire, United Kingdom, Department of Vascular Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom

    X
  • Apostolos Fakis,

    Affiliation: Department of Renal Medicine, Royal Derby Hospital, Derbyshire, United Kingdom

    X
  • Maarten W. Taal mail

    maarten.taal1@nhs.net

    Affiliation: Department of Renal Medicine, Royal Derby Hospital, Derbyshire, United Kingdom

    X
  • Published: January 30, 2013
  • DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0055444

Abstract

Background

Early chronic kidney disease (CKD) is associated with increased cardiovascular (CV) risk but underlying mechanisms remain uncertain. Arterial stiffness (AS) is associated with increased CV risk in advanced CKD, but it is unclear whether AS is relevant to CV disease (CVD) in early CKD.

Study Design

Cross-sectional.

Setting and participants

1717 patients with previous estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) 59–30 mL/min/1.73 m2; mean age 73±9y, were recruited from 32 general practices in primary care.

Outcomes

Increased arterial stiffness.

Measurements

Medical history was obtained and participants underwent clinical assessment, urine and serum biochemistry testing. Carotid to femoral pulse wave velocity (PWV) was determined as a measure of AS, using a Vicorder™ device.

Results

Univariate analysis revealed significant correlations between PWV and risk factors for CVD including age (r = 0.456; p<0.001), mean arterial pressure (MAP) (r = 0.228; p<0.001), body mass index (r = −0.122; p<0.001), log urinary albumin to creatinine ratio (r = 0.124; p<0.001), Waist to Hip ratio (r = 0.124, p<0.001), eGFR (r = −0.074; p = 0.002), log high sensitivity c-reactive protein (r = 0.066; p = 0.006), HDL (r = −0.062; p = 0.01) and total cholesterol (r = −0.057; p = 0.02). PWV was higher in males (9.6 m/sec vs.10.3 m/sec; p<0.001), diabetics (9.8 m/sec vs. 10.3 m/sec; p<0.001), and those with previous CV events (CVE) (9.8 m/s vs. 10.3 m/sec; p<0.001). Multivariable analysis identified age, MAP and diabetes as strongest independent determinants of higher PWV (adjusted R2 = 0.29). An interactive term indicated that PWV increased to a greater extent with age in males versus females. Albuminuria was a weaker determinant of PWV and eGFR did not enter the model.

Limitations

Data derived from one study visit, with absence of normal controls.

Conclusion

In this cohort, age and traditional CV risk factors were the strongest determinants of AS. Albuminuria was a relatively weak determinant of AS and eGFR was not an independent determinant. Long-term follow-up will investigate AS as an independent risk factor for CVE in this cohort.

Introduction

Multiple epidemiological studies attest that chronic kidney disease (CKD) is associated with increased cardiovascular risk compared to the general population, and may account for up to 50% of all deaths in this group [1]. In many studies people with early stage CKD are more likely to die from cardiovascular disease than progress to end stage kidney disease (ESKD) [2]. Hallan [3] reported that the risk of CKD progression is low until eGFR falls below 30 ml/min/1.73 m2. In contrast even modest reductions in eGFR are incrementally associated with reduced survival [4]. The increased cardiovascular (CV) risk associated with advanced stages of CKD cannot be explained by traditional risk factors alone, but is attributable to a combination of traditional and non-traditional factors [5], [6]. Arterial stiffness (AS) has been identified as one non-traditional risk factor associated with the large cardiovascular risk burden in CKD [7], [8]. Arterial stiffness in CKD is proposed to provoke an increase in systolic blood pressure (SBP) and pulse pressure (PP). This in turn leads to an increase in ventricular afterload, myocyte hypertrophy and reduced coronary perfusion, resulting in systolic and diastolic dysfunction. Elevated systolic and pulse pressures may also contribute to vascular damage, further increasing CV risk [9].

Aortic pulse wave velocity (aPWV) is a measure of AS and has predicted cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in a number of populations including the healthy elderly and people with hypertension, diabetes or ESKD on haemodialysis [10], [11], [12], [13], [14]. On the other hand, data regarding the relationship between AS and CKD in earlier stages appear conflicting. Several studies have reported an increase in arterial stiffness and CV risk associated with early CKD [15], [16], [17] but others have not [18], [19], [20]. More data are therefore required regarding the relationship between AS and markers of kidney disease in early stage CKD. The aim of our study was to investigate if previously identified determinants of AS are also relevant in a population of predominantly elderly people with CKD stage 3, representing the majority affected by CKD.

Study Population and Methods

Participants and Recruitment

We studied 1741 patients with CKD stage 3 recruited from general practitioner (GP) practices. The methods have previously been described in detail and are summarised here with emphasis on the measurement of aPWV [21], [22]. Participants were recruited as part of the Renal Risk in Derby (RRID) study, a prospective cohort study planned to continue for 10 years, with the aim of studying renal and CV risk factors in patients with CKD stage 3 in a primary care setting. Eligible participants were 18 years or over, met the KDOQI criteria for CKD stage 3 (eGFR of 30–59 mL/min/1.73 m2 on 2 or more occasions at least 3 months apart), were able to give informed consent and attend their GP practice for assessments. People who had previously received a solid organ transplant or who were terminally ill (expected survival <1 year) were excluded. The RRID study is being conducted by a single Nephrology Department, but participants were recruited directly from 32 GP practices in Derbyshire, UK. Study visits were conducted at participating GP practices by the researchers. Twenty four participants were unable to have their aPWV measured due to a combination of technical failure or inability of the participant to lie at a 30 degree angle. Thus 1717 participants with aPWV readings were included in this analysis.

Data Collection

First study visits were conducted from August 2008 to March 2010. Screening and baseline visits were combined due to the large proportion of elderly participants and the logistical challenges associated with conducting study visits in multiple primary care centres. Participants were sent a medical questionnaire as well as 3 urine specimen bottles, and were asked not to eat cooked meat for at least 12 hours prior to the assessment [23]. At the assessment information on questionnaires was checked, anthropomorphic measurements and blood pressure taken, and urine analysis was performed. Blood and urine specimens were submitted for biochemical analysis to a single laboratory.

Previous diabetes was defined by having a previous clinical diagnosis according to WHO criteria [24]. Previous cardiovascular event (CVE) was defined as subject reported myocardial infarction, stroke, transient ischaemic attack, revascularisation or amputation due to peripheral vascular disease, or aortic aneurysm. Anaemia was defined as hemoglobin <11.5 g/dL for women and <13.5 g/dL for men. Obesity was defined as BMI>30 kg/m2. Central fat distribution was defined as a waist to hip ratio (WHR) of ≥0.9 for men or ≥0.8 for women [25].

Blood pressure.

Blood pressure (BP) was measured after a minimum of five minutes rest in the sitting position, using a calibrated oscillometric device, recommended by the British Hypertension Society (Digital Blood Pressure Monitor Model UA-767, A&D Instruments Ltd, Abingdon, UK). A single device was used for all readings. Measurements were taken until three readings that were within 10% of each other were obtained. BP was calculated as the mean of these three readings. Hypertension was defined as a systolic BP≥140 mmHg, diastolic BP≥90 mmHg, or current antihypertensive medication [26]. Mean arterial pressure (MAP) was calculated as 1/3 the average SBP plus 2/3 the average DBP.

Pulse wave velocity.

Carotid to femoral pulse wave velocity was measured as a marker of arterial stiffness, a critical determinant of cardiovascular outcomes in CKD [7], [27], [28], and considered the gold standard measurement of AS [12]. Measurements were performed using a Vicorder™ device (Skidmore Medical Ltd, Bristol, UK). The Vicorder™ is small, portable, non-invasive and non-operator dependant making it well suited for use in community based studies. Readings take only 2–3 minutes to complete. Assessments were performed after at least 5 minutes of rest, according to manufacturers’ instructions in the semi-prone position (at approximately 30°) to prevent venous contamination of the arterial signal. The participant had a neck-pad placed around their neck with the pressure pad over the right carotid area. A blood pressure cuff was placed around the patients’ upper right thigh. The distance between the supra-sternal notch and the thigh cuff was measured using the direct method. To eliminate the potential effect of abdominal obesity on the distance measurement, an imaginary line was drawn from the supra-sternal notch to the right shoulder and the measurement to the thigh cuff was made along the side of the body. The neck-pad and thigh cuff were inflated by the Vicorder to 60 mmHg and then deflated to obtain a pressure tracing. Aortic PWV is calculated by the Vicorder by comparing carotid and femoral pressure tracings after a stable pattern is obtained. The mild discomfort caused by the inflation of a cuff placed around the neck precluded us from doing multiple readings. The intra-observer coefficient of variation for PWV measurements was 6.3%.

Skin Autofluorescence

Skin autofluorescence (AF), a measure of skin Advanced Glycation Endproduct (AGE) deposition that has been identified as a marker of cumulative metabolic stress [29], [30], [31], was assessed on the left forearm using an AGE Reader™ device (DiagnOptics, Groningen, Netherlands). Three readings were taken and the average calculated. It was not possible to conduct these readings on dark skin. Values are expressed in arbitrary units [22].

Albuminuria.

Albuminuria was assessed by measuring the urine albumin to creatinine ratio (ACR) on three consecutive early morning urine specimens collected prior to the clinic visit and stored in a refrigerator. Microalbuminuria was defined as a mean urine ACR of >2.5 mg/mmol in males or >3.5 mg/mmol in females and overt albuminuria as >30 mg/mmol [23].

Estimation of glomerular filtration rate (eGFR).

Biochemical assessments were performed by autoanalyser in a single laboratory. The creatinine assay has been standardised against an isotope dilution mass spectrometry (IDMS) method and the 4-variable MDRD equation modified for use with IDMS standardised creatinine measurement was used to estimate GFR. This study was commenced prior to publication of the CKD-EPI formula and eGFR derived from the MDRD formula was therefore used for recruitment and baseline study assessments.

The study was approved by the Nottingham Research Ethics Committee 1 and abided by the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. All participants provided written informed consent. The study was included on the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Clinical Research Portfolio (NIHR Study ID:6632) and was independently audited by QED Clinical Services in November 2009.

Statistical Analysis

Results presented are a cross sectional analysis of data from the first study visit. Continuous variables are reported as the mean and standard deviation (SD) if normally distributed or the median and inter-quartile range (IQR) if not. A t-test was used to compare two groups where variables were normally distributed and a Mann U Whitney test used if not. Pearson’s test was used to assess univariate correlations with aPWV for variables with normal distribution or Spearman’s test if distribution was not normal. Partial correlations were used to correct for MAP. Variables with skewed distribution (exponential) were log transformed for the correlations. SPSS version 15.0 was used for univariate analysis. P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Multivariable linear regression analysis, using the forward stepwise method, was used to identify independent determinants of arterial stiffness. P<0.05 was used for a variable to enter the model. The model was built using a hierarchical approach that introduced variables one-by-one on the basis of biological plausibility as well as strength of association in univariate analyses adjusted for age and diabetes. Nested models were tested using the Akaike Information Criterion (AIC). Models with a smaller AIC value were selected. An interactive term for age by gender was also tested in the final model. A scatter plot of regression residuals versus predicted values and Cook’s Distance plot were used for testing the assumptions of linear regression and identifying any outliers. The adjusted R-squared value is reported as a measure of goodness-of-fit. The regression coefficients (95% Confidence Intervals) and standardised coefficients (Beta) from the final multivariable model are presented. STATA version 11.1 was used for multivariable analysis.

Results

Baseline characteristics are summarised in Table 1. Over a third of participants were obese (37%). Most (88%) had hypertension and 65% were treated with a renin angiotensin aldosterone system inhibitor (RAASi).

thumbnail

Table 1. Baseline characteristics.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0055444.t001

Mean aPWV was 9.9±2 m/sec. Aortic PWV was significantly higher in participants who were male, had diabetes, had had previous CVE, had albuminuria (microscopic or overt), were hypertensive, were not obese (as defined by BMI), had a blood pressure over 130/80 mmHg or were ≥75 years of age (Table 2). People who evidenced increased central fat distribution (central obesity), anaemia, were receiving antihypertensive medication, had CKD stage 3B or who had previously smoked also had significantly higher aPWV (Table 2). Age evidenced the strongest correlation with aPWV before and after adjusting for MAP (Table 3). Mean arterial pressure was also strongly correlated with aPWV. Other significant correlations are shown in Table 3. Adjustment for MAP produced little change in the correlations.

thumbnail

Table 2. aPWV readings in selected subgroups.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0055444.t002
thumbnail

Table 3. Significant Correlations with aPWV.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0055444.t003

Multivariable analysis was performed to identify independent determinants of a higher aPWV (Table 4; adjusted R2 = 0.29). The strongest and most significant of these were age, MAP, diabetes and BMI. Interestingly, BMI showed a negative relationship with aPWV. Other relatively weak independent determinants included serum total protein, log urine ACR and HDL cholesterol. An interactive term indicated that PWV increased to a greater extent with age in males versus females.

thumbnail

Table 4. Independent Determinants of higher aPWV.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0055444.t004

Discussion

We have identified age as the strongest determinant of arterial stiffness in this cohort of predominantly elderly patients with CKD stage 3. Other significant independent determinants of aPWV included traditional cardiovascular risk factors such as blood pressure, diabetes, obesity and a marker of dyslipidaemia. Markers of CKD were associated with aPWV only in univariate analysis (eGFR) or were weak determinants of aPWV (albuminuria). Our data therefore suggest that markers of kidney disease are not strong determinants of AS in early CKD and that traditional risk factors for CVD may be more important, or that mechanisms unrelated to AS mediate the association between early CKD and increased cardiovascular risk in this population.

Published data regarding the relationship between AS and CKD appear contradictory. Studies of patients receiving dialysis or with advanced CKD reported significantly increased AS compared with the general population [32], [33] but results from studies that included those with earlier stages of CKD are variable. A number of studies have reported associations with reduced GFR and increased AS [15], [17], [34]. In a relatively small study of 102 people with a wide spectrum of CKD (stages 1–5) a clear stepwise increase corresponding to stage of CKD was reported [15]. Multivariable analysis confirmed an independent association between GFR and aPWV; however only a small number of participants (n = 45) had CKD stage 3–4 and GFR was substantially lower than in our cohort (mean eGFR of 38 mL/min/1.73 m2). In a larger study of 2564 patients with CKD who were not receiving dialysis (almost half with diabetes, mean age 60.7 years, mean eGFR 40.7 mL/min/1.73 m2), Townsend et al. also found an increase in aPWV with declining GFR [17]. Similarly, a population-based study of 767 people (mean age 68 years, eGFR 60.6 mL/min/1.73 m2 and ACR 0.57 mg/mmol) targeting screening for type 2 diabetes, found that AS increased as GFR decreased in those with mild CKD (stage 2–3) [34]. In addition urinary ACR was positively associated with increased AS. On the other hand Briet et al [18] reported that AS was higher in patients with CKD than in hypertensive patients without CKD, but in the analysis of patients with CKD stage 3–5 they did not find a significant relationship between measured GFR and aPWV. Similarly, in a study of 150 patients with CKD stages 2–5D, aPWV was significantly higher in patients with CKD versus controls without CKD, but aPWV was not higher in those with more advanced CKD [20]. In another study of patients with CKD, blood pressure was the major determinant of PWV and although PWV correlated with GFR in a univariate analysis, GFR was not an independent determinant of PWV in a multivariable analysis [35]. Similarly, in 113 patients with CKD, PWV increased with increasing number of components of the metabolic syndrome irrespective of GFR [36]. In one analysis of data from the Framingham Heart Study that included 181 patients with early CKD and characteristics very similar to ours (mean age 70 years, mean eGFR 51 mL/min/1.73 m2, median urinary ACR 10 mg/g), AS was not different between those with or without CKD (defined by reduced GFR) after multivariable adjustment at baseline. In a longitudinal analysis, increased AS was not associated with increased risk of developing CKD [6]. On the other hand, higher aPWV was associated with elevated urinary albumin excretion at baseline and increased risk of developing microalbuminuria. Finally, in the Nephro Test cohort of 180 patients with CKD (mean age 59.6years, eGFR 32 mL/min/1.73 m2) aortic PWV remained stable during 3.5 years of follow up despite a significant decline in GFR and an increase in albuminuria. Interestingly, increased carotid circumferential wall stress and pulse pressure were associated with a greater risk of progression to ESKD [19]. Taken together, published data show that arterial stiffness increases in advanced stages of CKD but that changes are more variable in early stages, probably reflecting differences in the populations studied, particularly with respect to age. Thus the lack of an independent negative association between eGFR and increased aPWV in our study as well as the weak association between urinary ACR and increased aPWV are probably attributable to the fact that our study population was predominantly elderly, the range of eGFR values was relatively small and albuminuria was present only in a small minority. These observations are nevertheless important because our study cohort is representative of the majority of people affected by early stage CKD, at least in the UK.

Previous studies have also identified age, blood pressure and the presence of diabetes as determinants of higher aPWV [6], [17], [20]. Our observation that aPWV increased to a greater extent with age in males versus females is consistent with data from another study that identified male gender as an independent determinant of increased aPWV in a large cohort of people with CKD [17].The increase in AS with age is proposed to be due to overproduction of abnormal collagen fibres and a loss of elastin from the extracellular matrix [9], [37]. It is not clear, however, whether this is a time dependant phenomenon directly related to chronological age or if it reflects exposure to other risk factors. Hypertension has long been recognised as a major determinant of arterial stiffness due to the associated medial hypertrophy [38]. The association between diabetes and arterial stiffness may be due to accumulation of advanced glycation endproducts (AGE) that provoke structural changes in the arterial wall [22] and the generation of reactive oxygen species that deactivate nitric oxide resulting in endothelial dysfunction [39].

BMI had an inverse relationship with aPWV. This is surprising because AS has previously been associated with obesity, particularly abdominal obesity [40], and increased waist to hip ratio was associated with higher aPWV in our univariate analysis. We have previously described that BMI decreased with age in our cohort, likely reflecting a loss of muscle mass [21]. Our observation may therefore be explained by lower BMI acting as marker of increased age (the dominant determinant of aPWV) that could not be completely corrected for in the multi-variable analysis. Furthermore, we have previously shown that measures of obesity that include central fat distribution are more closely related to important risk factors in those with CKD than BMI [41].

There are a several limitations to this study. First, this analysis includes only cross-sectional data and we are therefore unable to draw any firm conclusions regarding possible causal relationships between AS and the determinants identified. However, the planned 10-year follow up of the cohort will allow us to investigate the factors that contribute to AS prospectively. Many studies have used aplanation tonometry devices (SphygmoCor™ or Complior™) to measure PWV [17], [19], [20], but these are operator dependant, time consuming to use and not easy to transport. We therefore used the more portable Vicorder™ device which is also operator independent and requires only minutes to obtain a reading. Vicorder™ measurements of aPWV have been shown to be reproducible and correlate well with SphygmoCor™ measurements [42] but as yet there is no agreed method for making direct comparisons between results obtained by different methods [43]. A third limitation of our study is the absence of normal controls. Finally, participants comprised only 22% of people invited to participate and may therefore not be representative of all people with CKD stage 3. We were unable for ethical reasons to obtain data on non-participants but our study population was similar to a large population of people with CKD stage 3 derived by pooling data on all patients from several GP databases, suggesting that our participants were broadly representative of patients with CKD stage 3 in primary care in the UK, though with a low proportion of people from ethnic minorities [44]. Strengths of the study include the large cohort size, robust measures of eGFR and UACR, and detailed clinical assessment of each participant. A single operator performed all assessments, eliminating inter-observer variability.

Conclusion

Age was the strongest determinant of arterial stiffness in this cohort of predominantly elderly patients with CKD stage 3. Other significant independent determinants of aPWV included traditional cardiovascular risk factors such as blood pressure, diabetes, obesity and a marker of dyslipidaemia. Markers of CKD were associated with aPWV only in univariate analysis (eGFR) or were weak determinants of aPWV (albuminuria). Long term follow-up will investigate the importance of arterial stiffness as an independent risk factor for cardiovascular events in this cohort.

Acknowledgments

Thanks go to the collaborating GP practices and their staff. In addition we gratefully acknowledge the invaluable assistance of: Mrs Diane Taal, Ms Rani Uppal, Mrs Rebecca Packington, Mrs Maureen Franklin, Mrs Sue Hodkinson, Mr Richard Turck and Mrs Paula Welch. We also thank all the participants for their time and commitment.

The results presented in this paper have not been published previously in whole or in part, except in abstract form.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: NJM RJF CWM AF MWT. Performed the experiments: NJM MWT. Analyzed the data: NJM AF MWT. Wrote the paper: NJM RJF CWM AF MWT.

References

  1. 1. Vanholder R, Massy Z, Argiles A, Spasovski G, Verbeke F, et al. (2005) Chronic kidney disease as cause of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Nephrol Dial Transplant 20: 1048–1056. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfh813
  2. 2. Keith DS, Nichols GA, Gullion CM, Brown JB, Smith DH (2004) Longitudinal follow-up and outcomes among a population with chronic kidney disease in a large managed care organization. Arch Intern Med 164: 659–663. doi: 10.1001/archinte.164.6.659
  3. 3. Hallan SI, Dahl K, Oien CM, Grootendorst DC, Aasberg A, et al. (2006) Screening strategies for chronic kidney disease in the general population: follow-up of cross sectional health survey. BMJ 333: 1047. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39001.657755.be
  4. 4. Go AS, Chertow GM, Fan D, McCulloch CE, Hsu CY (2004) Chronic kidney disease and the risks of death, cardiovascular events, and hospitalization. New Engl J Med 351: 1296–1305. doi: 10.1056/nejmoa041031
  5. 5. Stenvinkel P, Carrero JJ, Axelsson J, Lindholm B, Heimburger O, et al. (2008) Emerging biomarkers for evaluating cardiovascular risk in the chronic kidney disease patient: how do new pieces fit into the uremic puzzle? Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 3: 505–521. doi: 10.2215/cjn.03670807
  6. 6. Upadhyay A, Hwang SJ, Mitchell GF, Vasan RS, Vita JA, et al. (2009) Arterial stiffness in mild-to-moderate CKD. J Am Soc Nephrol 20: 2044–2053. doi: 10.1681/asn.2009010074
  7. 7. Safar ME, London GM, Plante GE (2004) Arterial stiffness and kidney function. Hypertension 43: 163–168. doi: 10.1161/01.hyp.0000114571.75762.b0
  8. 8. Mitchell GF (2004) Increased aortic stiffness: an unfavorable cardiorenal connection. Hypertension 43: 151–153. doi: 10.1161/01.hyp.0000114581.77705.29
  9. 9. Chue CD, Townend JN, Steeds RP, Ferro CJ (2010) Arterial stiffness in chronic kidney disease: causes and consequences. Heart 96: 817–823. doi: 10.1136/hrt.2009.184879
  10. 10. Sutton-Tyrrell K, Najjar SS, Boudreau RM, Venkitachalam L, Kupelian V, et al. (2005) Elevated aortic pulse wave velocity, a marker of arterial stiffness, predicts cardiovascular events in well-functioning older adults. Circulation 111: 3384–3390. doi: 10.1161/circulationaha.104.483628
  11. 11. Cruickshank K, Riste L, Anderson SG, Wright JS, Dunn G, et al. (2002) Aortic pulse-wave velocity and its relationship to mortality in diabetes and glucose intolerance: an integrated index of vascular function? Circulation 106: 2085–2090. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.0000033824.02722.f7
  12. 12. Laurent S, Cockcroft J, Van Bortel L, Boutouyrie P, Giannattasio C, et al. (2006) Expert consensus document on arterial stiffness: methodological issues and clinical applications. Eur Heart J 27: 2588–2605. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehl254
  13. 13. Blacher J, London GM, Safar ME, Mourad JJ (1999) Influence of age and end-stage renal disease on the stiffness of carotid wall material in hypertension. J Hypertens 17: 237–244. doi: 10.1097/00004872-199917020-00008
  14. 14. London GM, Blacher J, Pannier B, Guerin AP, Marchais SJ, et al. (2001) Arterial wave reflections and survival in end-stage renal failure. Hypertension 38: 434–438. doi: 10.1161/01.hyp.38.3.434
  15. 15. Wang MC, Tsai WC, Chen JY, Huang JJ (2005) Stepwise increase in arterial stiffness corresponding with the stages of chronic kidney disease. Am J Kidney Dis 45: 494–501. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2004.11.011
  16. 16. Mourad JJ, Pannier B, Blacher J, Rudnichi A, Benetos A, et al. (2001) Creatinine clearance, pulse wave velocity, carotid compliance and essential hypertension. Kidney Int 59: 1834–1841. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1755.2001.0590051834.x
  17. 17. Townsend RR, Wimmer NJ, Chirinos JA, Parsa A, Weir M, et al. (2010) Aortic PWV in chronic kidney disease: a CRIC ancillary study. Am J Hypertens 23: 282–289.
  18. 18. Briet M, Bozec E, Laurent S, Fassot C, London GM, et al. (2006) Arterial stiffness and enlargement in mild-to-moderate chronic kidney disease. Kidney Int 69: 350–357. doi: 10.1038/sj.ki.5000047
  19. 19. Briet M, Collin C, Karras A, Laurent S, Bozec E, et al. (2011) Arterial remodeling associates with CKD progression. J Am Soc Nephrol 22: 967–974. doi: 10.1681/asn.2010080863
  20. 20. Temmar M, Liabeuf S, Renard C, Czernichow S, Esper NE, et al. (2010) Pulse wave velocity and vascular calcification at different stages of chronic kidney disease. J Hypertens 28: 163–169. doi: 10.1097/hjh.0b013e328331b81e
  21. 21. McIntyre NJ, Fluck RJ, McIntyre CW, Taal MW (2011) Risk Profile in Chronic Kidney Disease Stage 3: Older versus Younger Patients. Nephron Clinical Practice 119: c269–c276. doi: 10.1159/000329109
  22. 22. McIntyre NJ, Fluck RJ, McIntyre CW, Taal MW (2011) Skin Autofluorescence and the Association with Renal and Cardiovascular Risk Factors in Chronic Kidney Disease Stage 3. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol.
  23. 23. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (2008) Chronic Kidney Disease: National clinical guideline for early identification and management in adults in primary and secondary care. The National Institute for Health and Clincal Excellence. www.nice.org.uk/nicemedia/pdf/CG073NICEG​uideline.pdf.
  24. 24. The World Health Organisation and the International Diabetes Federation. (2006) The definition and diagnosis of diabetes mellitus and intermediate glycaemia. WHO Press.
  25. 25. Pinto-Sietsma SJ, Navis G, Janssen WM, de Zeeuw D, Gans RO, et al. (2003) A central body fat distribution is related to renal function impairment, even in lean subjects. Am J Kidney Dis 41: 733–741. doi: 10.1016/s0272-6386(03)00020-9
  26. 26. Chobanian AV, Bakris GL, Black HR, Cushman WC, Green LA, et al. (2003) The Seventh Report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure: the JNC 7 report. JAMA 289: 2560–2572. doi: 10.1001/jama.289.19.2560
  27. 27. Blacher J, Safar ME, Guerin AP, Pannier B, Marchais SJ, et al. (2003) Aortic pulse wave velocity index and mortality in end-stage renal disease. Kidney Int 63: 1852–1860. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1755.2003.00932.x
  28. 28. Blacher J, Guerin AP, Pannier B, Marchais SJ, Safar ME, et al. (1999) Impact of aortic stiffness on survival in end-stage renal disease. Circulation 99: 2434–2439. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.99.18.2434
  29. 29. Meerwaldt R, Graaff R, Oomen PH, Links TP, Jager JJ, et al. (2004) Simple non-invasive assessment of advanced glycation endproduct accumulation. Diabetologia 47: 1324–1330. doi: 10.1007/s00125-004-1451-2
  30. 30. Meerwaldt R, Lutgers HL, Links TP, Graaff R, Baynes JW, et al. (2007) Skin autofluorescence is a strong predictor of cardiac mortality in diabetes. Diabetes Care 30: 107–112. doi: 10.2337/dc06-1391
  31. 31. Hartog JW, Gross S, Oterdoom LH, van Ree RM, de Vries AP, et al. (2009) Skin-autofluorescence is an independent predictor of graft loss in renal transplant recipients. Transplantation 87: 1069–1077. doi: 10.1097/tp.0b013e31819d3173
  32. 32. London GM, Marchais SJ, Safar ME, Genest AF, Guerin AP, et al. (1990) Aortic and large artery compliance in end-stage renal failure. Kidney Int 37: 137–142. doi: 10.1038/ki.1990.19
  33. 33. Shinohara K, Shoji T, Tsujimoto Y, Kimoto E, Tahara H, et al. (2004) Arterial stiffness in predialysis patients with uremia. Kidney Int 65: 936–943. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1755.2004.00468.x
  34. 34. Hermans MM, Henry R, Dekker JM, Kooman JP, Kostense PJ, et al. (2007) Estimated glomerular filtration rate and urinary albumin excretion are independently associated with greater arterial stiffness: the Hoorn Study. J Am Soc Nephrol 18: 1942–1952. doi: 10.1681/asn.2006111217
  35. 35. Lilitkarntakul P, Dhaun N, Melville V, Blackwell S, Talwar DK, et al. (2011) Blood pressure and not uraemia is the major determinant of arterial stiffness and endothelial dysfunction in patients with chronic kidney disease and minimal co-morbidity. Atherosclerosis 216: 217–225. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2011.01.045
  36. 36. Lilitkarntakul P, Dhaun N, Melville V, Kerr D, Webb DJ, et al. (2012) Risk factors for metabolic syndrome independently predict arterial stiffness and endothelial dysfunction in patients with chronic kidney disease and minimal comorbidity. Diabetes Care 35: 1774–1780. doi: 10.2337/dc11-2345
  37. 37. Greenwald SE (2007) Ageing of the conduit arteries. J Pathol 211: 157–172. doi: 10.1002/path.2101
  38. 38. Haider AW, Larson MG, Franklin SS, Levy D (2003) Systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, and pulse pressure as predictors of risk for congestive heart failure in the Framingham Heart Study. Ann Intern Med 138: 10–16. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-138-1-200301070-00006
  39. 39. Bucala R, Tracey KJ, Cerami A (1991) Advanced glycosylation products quench nitric oxide and mediate defective endothelium-dependent vasodilatation in experimental diabetes. J Clin Invest 87: 432–438. doi: 10.1172/jci115014
  40. 40. Orr JS, Gentile CL, Davy BM, Davy KP (2008) Large artery stiffening with weight gain in humans: role of visceral fat accumulation. Hypertension 51: 1519–1524. doi: 10.1161/hypertensionaha.108.112946
  41. 41. Evans PD, McIntyre NJ, Fluck RJ, McIntyre CW, Taal MW (2012) Anthropomorphic measurements that include central fat distribution are more closely related with key risk factors than BMI in CKD stage 3. PLoS One 7: e34699. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0034699
  42. 42. Hickson SS, Butlin M, Broad J, Avolio AP, Wilkinson IB, et al. (2009) Validity and repeatability of the Vicorder apparatus: a comparison with the SphygmoCor device. Hypertens Res 32: 1079–1085. doi: 10.1038/hr.2009.154
  43. 43. The Reference Values for Arterial Stiffness’ Colaboration (2010) Determinants of pulse wave velocity in healthy people and in the presence of cardiovascular risk factors: ‘establishing normal and reference values’. Eur Heart J 31: 2338–2350. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehq165
  44. 44. de Lusignan S, Tomson C, Harris K, van Vlymen J, Gallagher H (2010) Creatinine Fluctuation Has a Greater Effect than the Formula to Estimate Glomerular Filtration Rate on the Prevalence of Chronic Kidney Disease. Nephron Clin Pract 117: c213–c224. doi: 10.1159/000320341