Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Open Access

Peer-reviewed

Research Article

RET/GFRα Signals Are Dispensable for Thymic T Cell Development In Vivo

Abstract

Identification of thymocyte regulators is a central issue in T cell biology. Interestingly, growing evidence indicates that common key molecules control neuronal and immune cell functions. The neurotrophic factor receptor RET mediates critical functions in foetal hematopoietic subsets, thus raising the possibility that RET-related molecules may also control T cell development. We show that Ret, Gfra1 and Gfra2 are abundantly expressed by foetal and adult immature DN thymocytes. Despite the developmentally regulated expression of these genes, analysis of foetal thymi from Gfra1, Gfra2 or Ret deficient embryos revealed that these molecules are dispensable for foetal T cell development. Furthermore, analysis of RET gain of function and Ret conditional knockout mice showed that RET is also unnecessary for adult thymopoiesis. Finally, competitive thymic reconstitution assays indicated that Ret deficient thymocytes maintained their differentiation fitness even in stringent developmental conditions. Thus, our data demonstrate that RET/GFRα signals are dispensable for thymic T cell development in vivo, indicating that pharmacological targeting of RET signalling in tumours is not likely to result in T cell production failure.

Citation: Almeida ARM, Arroz-Madeira S, Fonseca-Pereira D, Ribeiro H, Lasrado R, Pachnis V, et al. (2012) RET/GFRα Signals Are Dispensable for Thymic T Cell Development In Vivo. PLoS ONE 7(12): e52949. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0052949

Editor: Antonio A. Freitas, Institut Pasteur, France

Received: November 13, 2012; Accepted: November 22, 2012; Published: December 27, 2012

Copyright: © 2012 Almeida et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Funding: ARMA and DF-P were supported by scholarships from Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia, Portugal (SFRH/BPD/44426/2008 and SFRH/BD/44960/2008). Work in this article was funded by Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia (PTDC/SAU-MII/104931/2008), Portugal; European Molecular Biology Organization (Project 1648) and European Research Council (Project 207057). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Introduction

T cell development occurs mainly in the thymus [1]. However, by the time T cell precursors reach this primary lymphoid organ, they are not fully committed, and only later receive the cues that engage them on a T cell fate [1], [2], [3]. Thus, the thymic microenvironment is thought to provide appropriate signals that maintain a balance between thymocyte selection, proliferation and cell death [4], [5]. These signals are dependent on thymocyte receptors and their cognate ligands, either soluble or membrane bound, which are obtained from the thymic microenvironment. Determinant factors to T cell precursor development have a mesenchymal or hematopoietic cell origin and are believed to trigger a gene expression program leading to specific cell fates [1], [2], [3]. Among major known molecular players in T cell development are Notch-Delta and TCR-MHC interactions [6], [7]. However, identification of additional regulators of thymocyte development is still an unmet need in T cell biology.

Although recent advances have added into the complexity of T cell developmental stages, the latter can still be defined based on the expression of the T cell receptor (TCR) and the co-receptors CD4 and CD8 [2], [4], [8]. Initially, immature (CD3−) thymocytes are double-negative (DN) CD4−CD8−, then develop into double-positive (DP) CD4+CD8+ thymocytes through an immature CD8+CD3− (ImmCD8) intermediate stage, and ultimately are selected into CD4+CD3+ or CD8+CD3+ mature compartments [2], [8].

T cell development starts in embryonic life [4], [9]. Seeding of the embryonic thymus occurs around E13.5 and few thymocytes are beyond DN stage until E16.5 [4]. Full maturation of αβ T cells is residual before E19.5, but some unique γδ T cell populations are produced exclusively at defined foetal stages [2], [4].

Previous studies showed expression of neurotrophic factors of the glial cell-line derived neurotrophic factor (GDNF) family (GFLs) in the thymus [10], [11]. Productive signalling by GFLs is dependent on their association to a co-receptor (GFRα1 to 4), which also confers a degree of specificity to each GFL. Thus, GFRα1 is required to GDNF signalling, GFRα2 to NRTN, GFRα3 to ARTN and GFRα4 to PSPN [12]. GFRα molecules cooperate mainly with the transmembrane tyrosine kinase receptor RET for downstream signalling [12].

Activating mutations of Ret have been linked to cancer, i.e., somatic chromosomal rearrangements result in Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma, point mutations of RET lead to Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia 2 syndrome and RET is also differentially expressed in acute myeloid leukaemia [13], [14]. Thus, RET inhibitors were recently developed for specific human cancer therapies [15], [16].

RET signalling axes are critical to the neuronal system and kidney [12], but recent evidence indicates that RET signals are also key to intestinal lymphoid organ development [17], [18]. Interestingly, it was shown that RET is expressed by mature lymphocytes [19] and GDNF promotes DN thymocytes survival in vitro [11]; thus, raising the exciting possibility that RET signalling may control thymocyte development in vivo.

In this study, we used cellular, molecular and genetic approaches to investigate the role of RET in foetal and adult thymic T cell development in vivo. We show that Ret, Gfra1 and Gfra2 are abundantly expressed in developing thymocytes, particularly in the earliest DN stages. Despite the developmentally regulated expression of these genes, analysis of E18.5 thymi from Ret−/−, Gfra1−/− or Gfra2−/− embryos revealed an insignificant impact of these molecules in T cell development. Sequentially, we used Ret conditional knockout mice in order to ablate Ret expression in T cell development. Similarly to foetal life, we found that RET is dispensable to thymocyte development in adulthood. This conclusion was further supported by the fact that RET gain of function mutations did not alter thymocyte differentiation. Finally, we employed competitive reconstitution chimeras to uncover subtle effects of Ret deficiency within the thymus. This very sensitive method revealed that the competitive fitness of developing Ret deficient thymocytes was intact. Thus, our data demonstrate that RET signalling is dispensable to thymic T cell development in vivo.

Results

Ret, Gfra1, Gfra2, Gdnf and Nrtn are expressed in the foetal thymus

Previous reports have shown the expression of Ret, Gfra1 and Gdnf in the thymus [10], [11]. Initially we investigated the expression of Ret and its co-receptors in E15.5 thymocyte subsets by RT-PCR. Although most E15.5 thymocytes are at the DN stage [4], due to minute cell numbers available at this developmental stage we sorted DN1+DN2 (pooling CD4−CD8−CD3−CD44+CD25− and CD4−CD8−CD3−CD44+CD25+ cells) and DN3+DN4 thymocytes (CD4−CD8−CD3−CD44−CD25+ and CD4−CD8−CD3−CD44−CD25−) by flow cytometry. We found that while Ret, Gfra1 and Gfra2 were expressed in the foetal thymus, Gfra3 and Gfra4 were absent (Fig. 1A). Sequentially, quantitative RT-PCR analysis confirmed expression of Ret and Gfra1 in thymocytes at all DN developmental stages, a finding also confirmed at the protein level for RET (Fig. 1B, 1C). In contrast, Gfra2 was present in DN1+DN2 but absent from later DN stages (Fig. 1B). Sequentially, we evaluated the expression of the RET-ligands Gdnf and Nrtn in the thymic environment. We found that the main source of these transcripts were CD45− cells (Fig. 1D), while hematopoietic (CD45+) DN thymocytes only expressed minute levels of Gdnf and Nrtn (Fig. 1D, 1E). Thus, we confirmed that the molecules required for active RET signalling are expressed in the embryonic thymus, suggesting a role for these neurotrophic factor signalling axes in the early stages of foetal thymocyte development.

thumbnail
Download:
Figure 1. Expression of Ret and its signalling partners in foetal thymic populations.

A. E15.5 DN1–2 and DN3–4 thymocytes were purified by flow cytometry. Results show RT-PCR analysis. B. E15.5 DN1–2 and DN3–4 thymocytes were purified by flow cytometry. Results show quantitative RT-PCR normalized to Hprt1. Error bars show s.e. Results from three independent measurements are represented. C. RET expression in DN1–2 and DN3–4 thymocytes was determined by flow cytometry. RET: black bold line; Isotype control: grey line. D. Thymic E15.5 CD45+ or CD45− cells were purified by flow cytometry. Quantitative RT-PCR analysis was normalized to Hprt1. Error bars show s.e.. Results from three independent measurements are represented. E. DN1–2 and DN3–4 thymocytes were obtained and analyzed as in Figure 1B.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0052949.g001

RET, GFRα1 and GFRα2 are dispensable for foetal thymocyte development

In order to determine whether RET mediated signals are required for foetal thymocyte development, we analyzed E18.5 thymus from Ret−/−, Gfra1−/− or Gfra2−/− animals [20], [21], [22], thus including in our analysis DN thymocytes and emergent immCD8, DP and γδ TCR thymocytes.

Since expression of Ret, Gfra1 and Gfra2 is higher in early DN thymocytes (DN1 and DN2) (Fig. 1B), we initially evaluated these differentiation stages in Ret, Gfra1 or Gfra2 deficient embryos. We found that both the percentage and cell number of DN1–4 subsets were similar between Ret, Gfra1 or Gfra2 deficient embryos and their respective WT littermate controls (Fig. 2A; Fig. S1). Similarly, we found that total DN and ImmCD8 were equally represented in mutant embryos and their WT controls (Fig. 2B; Fig. S1).

thumbnail
Download:
Figure 2. Impact of Ret, Gfra1 or Gfra2 ablation in embryonic thymocyte development.

E18.5 thymocytes were analyzed by flow cytometry. A. DN thymocytes were gated on CD45+Lin−CD3−CD4−CD8− cells. Results show percentage of DN1–DN4 in Ret, Gfra1and Gfra2 deficient mice. Null mice: open symbols; WT littermate controls: full symbols; Mean value: dash line. B. Percentage of DN and DP thymocytes gated on CD45+Lin−γδTCR− analyzed as in Figure 2A. C. Percentage of γδ TCR expressing thymocytes analyzed as in Figure 2A. D. Absolute number of total thymocytes in Ret, Gfra1and Gfra2 deficient mice analyzed as in Figure 2A. Two-tailed student t-test analysis was performed between knockouts and respective WT littermate controls. No statistically significant differences were found.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0052949.g002

Sequentially, we analyzed later stages of the αβ TCR lineage development. Absolute numbers of DP thymocytes from Ret−/−, Gfra1−/− or Gfra2−/− embryos were identical to WT littermate controls (Fig. 2B; Fig. S1). Similarly, the fraction and absolute numbers of γδ TCR thymocytes, which are the majority of CD3+ cells at E18.5 [4], were unperturbed in Ret, Gfra1 or Gfra2 deficient animals (Fig. 2C; Fig. S1). Consequently, absolute numbers of total thymocytes from Ret, Gfra1 or Gfra2 deficient embryos were similar to their WT littermate controls (Fig. 2D). Thus, we conclude that signals mediated by RET or by its co-receptors GFRα1 or GFRα2 are not required for foetal thymocyte development in vivo.

RET and its co-receptors are expressed in adult thymocytes

The thymic environment supports T cell development in embryonic and adult life. Nevertheless, T cell development in the foetus and adult thymus employs differential pathways, leading to different viability, proliferation and lineage commitment [4]. Thus, we investigated whether Ret related genes maintain their expression through adult thymopoiesis.

DN (CD4−CD8−CD3−), DP, single-positive CD4+ T cells (SPCD4) and single positive CD8+ T cells (SPCD8) were FACS sorted and analyzed by quantitative RT-PCR analysis. RT-PCR analysis revealed that similarly to the foetal thymus only Ret and its co-receptors Gfra1 and Gfra2 were expressed in the adult thymus (Fig. S2). Quantitative RT-PCR confirmed that Ret, Gfra1 and Gfra2 expression was mainly expressed by DN thymocytes, although low levels of Gfra1 and Gfra2 expression were also expressed by DP thymocytes, a finding also confirmed at the protein level for RET (Fig. 3A, 3B). Sequentially, we evaluated the expression of the RET-ligands Gdnf and Nrtn in the adult thymus. While Gdnf expression was mostly found on CD45− cells, Nrtn was expressed both by CD45− and CD45+ DN and DP thymocytes (Fig. 3C).

thumbnail
Download:
Figure 3. Expression of Ret and its signalling partners in adult thymic populations.

A. DN, DP, SPCD8+ and SPCD4+ thymocytes were purified by flow cytometry. Results show quantitative RT-PCR normalized to Hprt1. Error bars show s.e.. Results from three independent measurements are represented. B. RET expression in DN and DP thymocytes was determined by flow cytometry. RET: black bold line; Isotype control: grey line. C. Thymic DN, DP, SPCD8+ and SPCD4+ thymocytes and CD45− cells were purified by flow cytometry. Quantitative RT-PCR analysis was normalized to Hprt1. Error bars show s.e.. Results from three independent measurements are represented. D. DN1–2 and DN3–4 thymocytes were purified by flow cytometry. Results show quantitative RT-PCR normalized to Hprt1. Error bars show s.e.. Results from three independent measurements are represented.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0052949.g003

Dissection of DN cells into DN1-DN4 subsets further revealed that DN1 thymocytes were the only DN subset that co-expressed appreciable levels of Ret, Gfra1 and Gfra2, while all other DN subsets expressed Gfra1 but only minute levels of Ret (Fig. 3D). Thus, we conclude that the expression of RET signalling partners in adult thymocytes mirrors to large extend the expression patterns of foetal thymocytes, ie, Ret, Gfra1and Gfra2 are most abundant in the earliest stages of T cell development, while Gdnf and Nrtn are mainly produced by non-hematopoietic thymic cells.

RET-mediated signals are dispensable for adult T cell development

Ret−/− animals die perinatally due to kidney failure, hindering analysis of adult T cell development [22]. Thus, in order to determine the role of RET signalling in adult thymopoiesis, we developed a Ret conditional knockout model (Retfl/fl) that allows a lineage targeted strategy for Ret ablation. These mice were bred to human CD2-Cre animals that ensure Cre activity from DN1 stage onwards [23] (Fig. S2). Analysis of the offspring of this breeding at 8 weeks of age showed that despite a marginal reduction in DN1 thymocyte numbers in CD2Cre/Retnull/fl animals, the subsequent DN stages were similarly represented in CD2Cre/Retnull/fl and CD2Cre/RetWT/fl mice (Fig. 4A; Fig. S3). Analysis of DN to SP αβ T cell development showed similar fractions and absolute numbers of thymocytes within each subset (DN, DP, SP4 and SP8) in both CD2Cre/Retnull/fl and CD2Cre/RetWT/fl mice (Fig. 4B; Fig. S3). Finally, the fraction and absolute numbers of thymic γδ TCR expressing T cells and total thymocyte numbers were not affected by Ret deletion (Fig. 4C, 4D). Thus, altogether our data indicate that RET-mediated signals are dispensable for foetal and adult thymic T cell development in vivo.

thumbnail
Download:
Figure 4. Impact of Ret ablation in adult thymic development.

8 week old Ret conditional knockout hCD2Cre/Retnull/fl and control hCD2Cre−/Retwt/fl mice were analyzed by flow cytometry. A. Left: representative flow cytometry analysis of CD4−CD8−CD3− thymocytes. Percentages are indicated. Right: Results show percentage of DN1-DN4 in hCD2Cre/Retnull/fl (open circle) and control hCD2Cre−/Retwt/fl (full circle) mice. Mean value: dash line. B. Left: representative flow cytometry analysis of CD4 versus CD8 expression profile. Percentages are indicated. Right: Results show percentage of DN, DP, SP4 and SP4 in hCD2Cre/Retnull/fl (open circle) and control hCD2Cre−/Retwt/fl (full circle) mice. Mean value: dash line. C. Proportion and absolute numbers of γδ TCR expressing thymocytes in hCD2Cre/Retnull/fl (open circle) and control hCD2Cre−/Retwt/fl (full circle) mice. Mean value: dash line. D. Absolute thymocyte numbers. Two-tailed student t-test analysis was performed between mutant and respective control mice. No statistically significant differences were found.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0052949.g004

Ret gain-of-function mutations do not affect thymopoiesis

Over expression and expression of gain-of-function forms of RET are characteristic of proliferative cell phenotypes and oncogenic diseases [13]. Thus, in order to elucidate whether improved RET signals could affect thymopoiesis, we used a genetic model that drives a constitutively activated form of RET in Ret expressing cells (RetMEN2B) [24]. These mice harbour a single point mutation (Met919Thr) introduced into the endogenous Ret gene locus, thus resulting in improved ligand-dependent RET activation [24].

Analysis of RetMEN2B/MEN2B and their WT littermate controls at 8 weeks of age revealed that DN (DN1–DN4) to SP mature αβ T cell development had similar fractions and absolute numbers (Fig. 5A–C; Fig. S4). Consequently, total thymocyte numbers were not affected by the RetMEN2B gain-of-function mutation (Fig. 5D), demonstrating that this Ret gain-of-function mutation does not affect thymopoiesis.

thumbnail
Download:
Figure 5. RetMEN2B gain-of-function mutation in adult thymocyte development.

8 week old RetMEN2B/MEN2B (MEN2B) and their WT littermate controls were analyzed by flow cytometry. A. Left: representative flow cytometry analysis of CD4−CD8−CD3− thymocytes. Percentages are indicated. Right: Results show percentage of DN1–DN4 in MEN2B (open squares) and WT control (full circle) mice. Mean value: dash line. B. Left: representative flow cytromety analysis of CD4 versus CD8 expression profile. Percentages are indicated. Right: Results show percentage of DN, DP, SP4 and SP4 in in MEN2B (open squares) and WT control (full circle) mice. Mean value: dash line. C. Proportion and absolute numbers of γδ TCR expressing thymocytes in MEN2B (open squares) and WT control (full circle) mice. Mean value: dash line. D. Absolute thymocyte numbers. Two-tailed student t-test analysis was performed between knockouts and respective controls. No statistically significant differences were found.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0052949.g005

RET signalling is dispensable for thymic reconstitution

Ret signalling has been implicated in the survival of a variety of peripheral and central neural cells, including motor, sensory and autonomic neurons [12]. Furthermore, it was shown that the RET ligand GDNF could promote thymocyte survival in foetal thymus organ culture (FTOC) systems [11]. Thus, it is plausible that subtle effects of RET signalling on thymocyte development might be masked in Ret conditional knockouts by compensatory mechanisms at later stages of thymocyte differentiation.

In order to specifically address that hypothesis, we performed sensitive competitive thymic repopulation assays to assess whether T cell progenitors lacking RET are able to compete with RET competent T cell progenitors. Bone marrow cells from CD2Cre/Retnull/fl or CD2Cre/RetWT/fl (CD45.2) were transplanted into lethally irradiated Rag1−/− (CD45.1) recipients with C57Bl6 (CD45.1/2) competitor bone marrow cells in a 1∶1 ratio (Fig. 6A). 8 weeks after transplantation Ret-deficient (CD2Cre/Retnull/fl) and Ret-competent (CD2Cre/RetWT/fl) thymocytes had similar fitness when compared to the third part competitor thymocytes (C57Bl6 (CD45.1/2)) across all analyzed stages of T cell development (DN1 to mature SP) (Fig. 6B, 6C). Thus, we conclude that RET signalling is dispensable for thymocyte competitive fitness and thymic reconstitution.

thumbnail
Download:
Figure 6. Competitive fitness and thymic reconstitution of Ret-null thymocytes.

A. Experimental scheme: 9Gy irradiated hosts (Rag1−/−, CD45.1) received WT competitor precursors (CD45.1/2) together with hCD2Cre/Retnull/fl or control hCD2Cre−/Retwt/fl precursors (CD45.2). B. 8 weeks after transplantation the thymus of the generated chimeras was analyzed by flow cytometry. Results show the ratio between hCD2Cre/Retnull/fl (grey bar) or hCD2Cre−/Retwt/fl (black bar) and the third part WT competitor (CD45.1/2) through thymic T cell development. hCD2Cre/Retnull/fl precursor chimeras: n = 4; hCD2Cre−/Retwt/fl precursor chimeras n = 4. Error bars show s.d. Two-tailed student t-tests were performed. No significant differences were found.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0052949.g006

Discussion

Our data indicate that the neuroregulatory genes Ret, Gfra1 and Gfra2 are expressed in discrete DN thymocytes, while Gfra3 and Gfra4 transcripts were absent in thymocytes. Interestingly, the RET ligands Gdnf and Nrtn are predominantly produced by non-hematopoietic thymic cells. These gene expression patterns raised the exciting possibility that RET signalling axes could control T cell development, adding to the growing body of evidence that the nervous and immune systems share similar key molecular signals [11], [14], [17], [18], [19], [25]. In line with this hypothesis, it was previously shown that GDNF could promote survival and maturation of thymocytes in vitro [11].

In order to test whether RET signalling axes control T cell development, we analyzed the thymus of genetically mutant embryos for Ret, Gfra1 or Gfra2 at E18.5 [20], [21], [22]. Despite expression of Ret in foetal thymocytes, Ret deficient embryos showed normal DN, immCD8 DP and γδ T cell development. These findings were also consistent with normal T cell development in null mice for the RET co-receptors that provide specificity to the neurotrophic factors GDNF and NRTN, respectively Gfra1−/− and Gfra2−/− mice. Thus, we conclude that RET and its signalling partners GFRα1 and GFRα2, are dispensable for foetal T cell development.

Since T cell development in adulthood employs additional molecular mechanisms to foetal thymopoiesis, we investigated whether Ret related genes controlled adult T cell development. Our data indicate co-expression of Ret, Gfra1 and Gfra2 in the early DN1 stage, and production of Gdnf and Nrtn in the adult thymic microenvironment. Both foetal and adult immature thymocytes co-express Ret, Gfra1 and Gfra2. These data are in line with a previous report indicating expression of these genes in the foetal thymus by in situ hybridization [10]. However, DP thymocytes expressed the RET co-receptors Gfra1 and Gfra2, despite absence of Ret expression, and similarly, adult DN2–4 expressed Gfra1 but lacked significant Ret expression. This observation is in line with previous reports showing that GFRαs are more abundantly expressed than RET [26], [27], which suggests that GFRαs may modulate RET signalling in a non-cell-autonomous manner (signalling in trans) [28], [29]. Accordingly, we have recently shown that Lymphoid Tissue initiator cells use unconventional RET signalling in which receptor activation is provided by soluble ligand and co-receptors in trans secreted from nearby cells [17]. Thus, it is possible that RET negative, GFRα positive thymocytes may modulate the activity of neighbouring non-hematopoietic RET expressing cells.

Analysis of adult conditional Ret mutant mice (Retfl/fl) bred to CD2Cre mice revealed a significant, but small impact on the absolute numbers of DN1 thymocytes. However, this reduction was not translated into consecutive developmental stages, indicating that RET mediated signals are dispensable to T cell production in vivo. The co-expression of Ret/Gfra1 in DN1 and the decreased number of DN1 cells in Retfl/fl mice are consistent with a previous report indicating that GDNF promotes thymocyte survival in foetal thymic organ cultures (FTOCs) [11]. Nevertheless, our data does not support a major role for this signalling axis in vivo, since Ret mutant thymocytes develop normally and positive modulation of RET-signalling (RetMEN2B) was not beneficial for T cell development. Thus, the contribution of RET signalling to T cell development in vivo appears to be insignificant. Moreover, while FTOCs reproduce several aspects of T cell development [30], they fail to mimic the exact events in T cell development [31], [32], and therefore these different methodologies may also contribute to the observed discrepancies.

GDNF/GFRα1 have been shown to activate the transmembrane receptor RET and the neural cell adhesion molecule (NCAM) in neurons [33], [34]. Thus, although activation of a putative NCAM analogue by GDNF cannot be fully discarded in thymocytes, this is unlikely to have a significant physiological relevance since NCAM downstream signalling requires GFRα1 and Gfra1−/− embryos displayed normal thymopoiesis [33].

In order to overcome possible viability/proliferative compensatory mechanisms that may arise through T cell development, we performed sensitive competitive reconstitution assays in vivo with Ret deficient (CD2Cre/Retnull/fl) and Ret competent (CD2Cre/RetWT/fl) thymocytes. Our data demonstrate that even in a very sensitive competitive setting the fitness of Ret deficient T cell precursors is intact.

Finally, our findings indicate that pharmacological inhibition of the RET pathway in severe pathologies, such as medullary thyroid cancer, should not be confronted with undesirable T cell production failure [15], [16].

In summary, our data demonstrate that RET signalling is dispensable to foetal and adult T cell development in vivo. Nevertheless, RET and its signalling partners are also expressed by mature T cells [19], thus, lineage targeted strategies will be critical to elucidate the contribution of RET signals to T cell function.

Materials and Methods

Mice

C57Bl/6J (CD45.2, CD45.1 and CD45.1/CD45.2), Rag1−/− (CD45.2 and CD45.1) [35], CD2Cre [23], Gfra1−/− [20], Gfra2−/− [21], Ret−/− [22], and RetMEN2B [24] all in C57Bl/6J background, were bred and maintained at the IMM animal facility. All animal procedures were performed in accordance to national guidelines from the Direçao Geral de Veterinaria (permit number 420000000/2008) and approved by the committee on the ethics of animal experiments of the Instituto de Medicina Molecular.

Generation of Ret conditional knockout mice

To generate mice harbouring a conditional Ret knock-out allele we engineered a targeting construct that firstly, included the introduction of a floxed 2.1 kb, Neomycin resistance (Neor) cassette under the control of the phosphoglycerate kinase-1 (PGK) promoter and a polyA tail (pA). This cassette (PGK-NEOr-pA) was inserted approximately 4.5 kb upstream at the Xho I site of the pBluescript KS (pBS KS) vector that carried approximately 13 kb of the 5′ end of mouse Ret genomic locus flanking exon 1. The second modification included an insertion of a loxP ∼2.5 kb downstream of exon 1, at the Hind III site in the intron between exons 1 and 2 of the mouse Ret locus. Finally, a viral thymidine kinase cassette (∼3 kb) under the control of the PGK promoter (PGK-TK-pA) was inserted at the Hind III site ∼5 kb downstream of the inserted LoxP site. To obtain homologous recombination, this targeting construct was linearised by Xho I, purified by gel elution and extraction using the Qiaquick gel extraction kit (Qiagen), prior to electroporation into 129SvJ-derived R1 ES cells grown on mouse embryonic fibroblast (MEF) feeder layers. Following double selection with 300 µg/ml Geneticin (G418, Invitrogen) and 2 µM Gancyclovir (Sigma), positive clones were identified by Southern blotting. Genomic DNA was digested with Hind III restriction enzymes and a 5′ external probe of 500 bp was used to screen for positive clones. With the Hind III digest the WT and mutant alleles showed a band size of 16.5 kb and 6 kb respectively. Positive animals were subsequently crossed with transgenic mice expressing Vav1-iCre [23] in order to delete the PGK-NEOr-pA cassette. This recombination resulted in generating the floxed Ret mice wherein the two remaining LoxP sites were found flanking the first exon of the Ret locus, or the complete deletion of the first exon. These mice are further designated as Ret floxed (Retfl) and Ret null (Retnull). Mice were further screened by PCR. Primer sequences were: P1: AAG CTC CCT CCT ACC GTG CT; P2: TGG GAT GAA CTC TGC CCA TT; P3: TGC TGC TCC ATA CAG ACA CA; P4: TAC ATG CTG TCT GCT CTC AG.

Flow cytometry

Embryonic thymi were micro-dissected and either homogenized in 70 µM cell strainers or digested with Accutase medium (PAA Laboratories, Austria), 30′ at 37°. Adult thymi were homogenized in 70 µm cell strainers. Single cell suspensions were stained with the following antibodies from ebioscience, Biolegend, or BD: anti-CD3 (145-2C11), anti-CD4 (RM4-5), anti-CD8 (53-6.7), anti-CD44 (IM7), anti-CD25 (7D4), anti-CD45 (30-F11), anti-CD45.1 (A20), antiCD45.2 (104), anti-γδ TCR (GL3), anti-CD117 (2B8), anti-Sca1 (D7), Lineage (Lin) cocktail (anti-CD19 (eBio1D3), anti-CD11b (M1/70), anti-Gr.1 (RB6-8C5), anti-Ly79 (Ter119) and anti-NK1.1 (PK136)). Antibodies were coupled to FITC, PE, PerCP, PerCP-Cy5, PE-Cy7, APC, APC-Cy7, Pacific Blue, Brilliant Violet 421 and Horizon V500 fluorochromes or to biotin. Secondary incubation with fluorochrome binding streptavidin was performed when biotin coupled antibodies were used. Anti hRET was performed with antibody from R&D (132507) and respective anti-mouse IgG1 isotype control. Flow cytometry analysis was performed on a LSR Fortessa (BD) and data was analyzed with FlowJo 8.8.7 software (Tree Star). Cell-sorting was performed on a FACSAria I or FACSAria III (BD), and purity of obtained samples was >97%. CD45+ and CD45− populations were sorted from the same samples.

Real-time PCR analysis

RNA was extracted from sorted cell suspensions using RNeasy Micro Kit (Qiagen). RT-PCR was performed as previously described [18] and quantitative Real-time PCR for Gfra1 and Gfra2 were done as previously described [18], [36]. Hprt1 was used as housekeeping gene. For TaqMan assays (Applied Biosystems) RNA was retro-transcribed using High Capacity RNA-to-cDNA Kit (Applied Biosystems), followed by a pre-amplification PCR using TaqMan PreAmp Master Mix (Applied Biosystems). TaqMan Gene Expression Master Mix (Applied Biosystems) was used in real-time quantitative PCR. TaqMan Gene Expression Assays bought from Applied Biosystems were: Gapdh Mm99999915_g1; Hprt1 Mm00446968_m1; Nrtn Mm03024002_m1; Gdnf Mm00599849_m1; Ret Mm00436304_m1.

Competitive reconstitution chimeras

Foetal livers from C57Bl/6 (CD45.1/CD45.2), CD2Cre/Retnull/fl (CD45.2, conditional knockouts) or CD2Cre/RetWT/fl (CD45.2, controls) were made into single cell suspensions and enriched for precursors by staining with anti-CD117-APC followed by magnetic cell sorting with anti- APC microbeads (Miltenyi Biotec). Cells were then mixed in a 1∶1 ratio (50% CD45.1/CD45.2 and 50% CD45.2) and injected intra venous into irradiated (9Gy) Rag1−/− (CD451) hosts (4×106 progenitor cells/host). Chimeras were analyzed 8 weeks after reconstitution.

Statistics

Statistical analysis was done using Prism. Variance was analyzed using F- test. Student's t-test was performed on homocedastic populations and student's t-test with Welch correction was applied on samples with different variances.

Supporting Information

Figure S1.

Impact of Ret, Gfra1 or Gfra2 ablation in embryonic thymocytes. E18.5 thymocytes were analyzed by flow cytometry. A. Top: CD44 and CD25 expression profiles within the CD45+LinnegCD3−DN compartment for Ret−/−, Gfra1−/−, Gfra2−/− and respective WT littermate controls. Bottom: absolute numbers of DN1–DN4 in Ret, Gfra1and Gfra2 deficient mice. B. Dot plots: CD4 and CD8 expression profiles within the CD45+LinnegγδTCR− compartment from an example of Ret−/−and respective WT littermate controls. Similar gates were used in results shown. Note that within SPCD4 and SPCD8 gates >90% of cells were CD3− and are thus immature thymocytes. Results show percentage and absolute numbers of immature CD8+ thymocytes and absolute numbers of DN and DP thymocytes in Ret, Gfra1and Gfra2 deficient mice. C. Absolute numbers of γδ TCR+ thymocytes in Ret, Gfra1and Gfra2 deficient mice. In all panels: Null mice: open symbols; WT littermate controls: full symbols; Mean value: dash line. Two-tailed student t-test analysis was performed between knockouts and respective WT littermate controls. No statistically significant differences were found.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0052949.s001

(TIF)

Figure S2.

Generation of Ret conditional knockout mice. A. Adult (8 weeks old) DN, DP, single-positive CD8 (SP8) and single-positive CD4 (SP4) thymocytes were purified by flow cytometry. RT-PCR analysis was performed. B. (A) The floxed Neomycin cassette was inserted ∼4.5 kb upstream of exon 1 of mouse Ret locus, a third loxP (LoxP3) was introduced downstream of exon 1 and ∼5 kb downstream the PGK-TK-pA cassette was inserted to aid negative selection. Targeted events were identified by Southern analysis of either Hind III digests of genomic DNA using the 5′ external probe. (B) The floxed allele was identified by PCR and the primers P1/P2 were used to identify the loxP that remained after excision of the Neomycin cassette (PGK-Neo-PA), while the loxP3 was identified using primers P3/P4. The primer sequences are in the methods section. (C) To screen for the null allele, primers P1 and P4 were used. C. Genotyping results from a litter of mice obtained from a cRet131WT/null×cRet131fl/fl breeding. In the loxP sites PCRs, upper band corresponds to the sequence with the loxP site and the lower band to the WT sequence. D. In order to evaluate the activity of Cre recombinase driven by hCD2, we bred hCD2Cre-expressing animals to Rosa26 eYFP animals. Histograms show flow cytometry analysis of eYFP expression in DN1 to DN4 thymocytes.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0052949.s002

(TIF)

Figure S3.

Impact of Ret ablation in adult thymic development. 8 week old Ret conditional knockout hCD2Cre/Retnull/fl and control hCD2Cre−/Retwt/fl mice were analyzed by flow cytometry. Results show absolute numbers of DN1–DN4 (top) and DN to mature single positive (bottom) in hCD2Cre/Retnull/fl (open circle) and control hCD2Cre−/Retwt/fl (full circle) mice. Mean value: dash line. All WT and conditional Ret knockout deficient pairs were compared using two-tailed student t-tests, and no significant differences were found except where noted. *p<0.05.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0052949.s003

(TIF)

Figure S4.

Impact of Ret gain-of-function mutation RetMEN2B in adult thymic development. 8 week old RetMEN2B/MEN2B (MEN2B) and their WT littermate controls were analyzed by flow cytometry. Results show absolute numbers of DN1–DN4 (top) and DN to mature SP (bottom) in MEN2B (open squares) and WT control (full circle) mice. Mean value: dash line. Two-tailed student t-test analysis was performed between knockouts and respective controls. No statistically significant differences were found.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0052949.s004

(TIF)

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the IMM animal facility and flow cytometry units for technical assistance and Dr. Frank Costantini for RetMEN2B mice.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: ARMA HV-F. Performed the experiments: ARMA SA-M DF-P HR HV-F. Analyzed the data: ARMA SA-M DF-P HR HV-F. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: RL VP. Wrote the paper: ARMA HV-F.

References

  1. 1. Petrie HT, Zuniga-Pflucker JC (2007) Zoned out: functional mapping of stromal signaling microenvironments in the thymus. Annu Rev Immunol 25: 649–679.
  2. 2. Hayday AC, Pennington DJ (2007) Key factors in the organized chaos of early T cell development. Nat Immunol 8: 137–144.
  3. 3. Rothenberg EV (2012) Transcriptional drivers of the T-cell lineage program. Curr Opin Immunol 24: 132–138.
  4. 4. David-Fung ES, Yui MA, Morales M, Wang H, Taghon T, et al. (2006) Progression of regulatory gene expression states in fetal and adult pro-T-cell development. Immunol Rev 209: 212–236.
  5. 5. Almeida AR, Borghans JA, Freitas AA (2001) T cell homeostasis: thymus regeneration and peripheral T cell restoration in mice with a reduced fraction of competent precursors. J Exp Med 194: 591–599.
  6. 6. Kreslavsky T, Gleimer M, Garbe AI, von Boehmer H (2010) alphabeta versus gammadelta fate choice: counting the T-cell lineages at the branch point. Immunol Rev 238: 169–181.
  7. 7. Radtke F, Fasnacht N, Macdonald HR (2010) Notch signaling in the immune system. Immunity 32: 14–27.
  8. 8. Godfrey DI, Kennedy J, Suda T, Zlotnik A (1993) A developmental pathway involving four phenotypically and functionally distinct subsets of CD3−CD4−CD8− triple-negative adult mouse thymocytes defined by CD44 and CD25 expression. J Immunol 150: 4244–4252.
  9. 9. Porritt HE, Gordon K, Petrie HT (2003) Kinetics of steady-state differentiation and mapping of intrathymic-signaling environments by stem cell transplantation in nonirradiated mice. J Exp Med 198: 957–962.
  10. 10. Golden JP, DeMaro JA, Osborne PA, Milbrandt J, Johnson EM Jr (1999) Expression of neurturin, GDNF, and GDNF family-receptor mRNA in the developing and mature mouse. Exp Neurol 158: 504–528.
  11. 11. Kondo S, Kishi H, Tokimitsu Y, Muraguchi A (2003) Possible involvement of glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor and its receptor, GFRalpha1, in survival and maturation of thymocytes. Eur J Immunol 33: 2233–2240.
  12. 12. Airaksinen MS, Saarma M (2002) The GDNF family: signalling, biological functions and therapeutic value. Nat Rev Neurosci 3: 383–394.
  13. 13. Arighi E, Borrello MG, Sariola H (2005) RET tyrosine kinase signaling in development and cancer. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev 16: 441–467.
  14. 14. Gattei V, Celetti A, Cerrato A, Degan M, De Iuliis A, et al. (1997) Expression of the RET receptor tyrosine kinase and GDNFR-alpha in normal and leukemic human hematopoietic cells and stromal cells of the bone marrow microenvironment. Blood 89: 2925–2937.
  15. 15. Houvras Y (2012) Completing the Arc: targeted inhibition of RET in medullary thyroid cancer. J Clin Oncol 30: 200–202.
  16. 16. Wells SA Jr, Robinson BG, Gagel RF, Dralle H, Fagin JA, et al. (2012) Vandetanib in patients with locally advanced or metastatic medullary thyroid cancer: a randomized, double-blind phase III trial. J Clin Oncol 30: 134–141.
  17. 17. Patel A, Harker N, Moreira-Santos L, Ferreira M, Alden K, et al. (2012) Differential RET Signaling Pathways Drive Development of the Enteric Lymphoid and Nervous Systems. Sci Signal 5: ra55.
  18. 18. Veiga-Fernandes H, Coles MC, Foster KE, Patel A, Williams A, et al. (2007) Tyrosine kinase receptor RET is a key regulator of Peyer's patch organogenesis. Nature 446: 547–551.
  19. 19. Vargas-Leal V, Bruno R, Derfuss T, Krumbholz M, Hohlfeld R, et al. (2005) Expression and function of glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor family ligands and their receptors on human immune cells. J Immunol 175: 2301–2308.
  20. 20. Cacalano G, Farinas I, Wang LC, Hagler K, Forgie A, et al. (1998) GFRalpha1 is an essential receptor component for GDNF in the developing nervous system and kidney. Neuron 21: 53–62.
  21. 21. Rossi J, Luukko K, Poteryaev D, Laurikainen A, Sun YF, et al. (1999) Retarded growth and deficits in the enteric and parasympathetic nervous system in mice lacking GFR alpha2, a functional neurturin receptor. Neuron 22: 243–252.
  22. 22. Schuchardt A, D'Agati V, Larsson-Blomberg L, Costantini F, Pachnis V (1994) Defects in the kidney and enteric nervous system of mice lacking the tyrosine kinase receptor Ret. Nature 367: 380–383.
  23. 23. de Boer J, Williams A, Skavdis G, Harker N, Coles M, et al. (2003) Transgenic mice with hematopoietic and lymphoid specific expression of Cre. Eur J Immunol 33: 314–325.
  24. 24. Smith-Hicks CL, Sizer KC, Powers JF, Tischler AS, Costantini F (2000) C-cell hyperplasia, pheochromocytoma and sympathoadrenal malformation in a mouse model of multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2B. EMBO J 19: 612–622.
  25. 25. Nakayama S, Iida K, Tsuzuki T, Iwashita T, Murakami H, et al. (1999) Implication of expression of GDNF/Ret signalling components in differentiation of bone marrow haemopoietic cells. Br J Haematol 105: 50–57.
  26. 26. Trupp M, Belluardo N, Funakoshi H, Ibanez CF (1997) Complementary and overlapping expression of glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor (GDNF), c-ret proto-oncogene, and GDNF receptor-alpha indicates multiple mechanisms of trophic actions in the adult rat CNS. J Neurosci 17: 3554–3567.
  27. 27. Carlomagno F, Melillo RM, Visconti R, Salvatore G, De Vita G, et al. (1998) Glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor differentially stimulates ret mutants associated with the multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2 syndromes and Hirschsprung's disease. Endocrinology 139: 3613–3619.
  28. 28. Ledda F, Paratcha G, Ibanez CF (2002) Target-derived GFRalpha1 as an attractive guidance signal for developing sensory and sympathetic axons via activation of Cdk5. Neuron 36: 387–401.
  29. 29. Paratcha G, Ledda F, Baars L, Coulpier M, Besset V, et al. (2001) Released GFRalpha1 potentiates downstream signaling, neuronal survival, and differentiation via a novel mechanism of recruitment of c-Ret to lipid rafts. Neuron 29: 171–184.
  30. 30. Anderson G, Jenkinson EJ (2008) Bringing the thymus to the bench. J Immunol 181: 7435–7436.
  31. 31. Bleul CC, Boehm T (2005) BMP signaling is required for normal thymus development. J Immunol 175: 5213–5221.
  32. 32. Ciofani M, Zuniga-Pflucker JC (2007) The thymus as an inductive site for T lymphopoiesis. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 23: 463–493.
  33. 33. Paratcha G, Ledda F, Ibanez CF (2003) The neural cell adhesion molecule NCAM is an alternative signaling receptor for GDNF family ligands. Cell 113: 867–879.
  34. 34. Trupp M, Arenas E, Fainzilber M, Nilsson AS, Sieber BA, et al. (1996) Functional receptor for GDNF encoded by the c-ret proto-oncogene. Nature 381: 785–789.
  35. 35. Mombaerts P, Iacomini J, Johnson RS, Herrup K, Tonegawa S, et al. (1992) RAG-1-deficient mice have no mature B and T lymphocytes. Cell 68: 869–877.
  36. 36. Peixoto A, Monteiro M, Rocha B, Veiga-Fernandes H (2004) Quantification of multiple gene expression in individual cells. Genome Res 14: 1938–1947.