Advertisement
Research Article

The Vasculome of the Mouse Brain

  • Shuzhen Guo mail,

    sguo@partners.org (SG); Lo@helix.mgh.harvard.edu (EHL)

    Affiliation: Neuroprotection Research Laboratory, Departments of Radiology and Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America

    X
  • Yiming Zhou,

    Affiliations: Neuroprotection Research Laboratory, Departments of Radiology and Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America, Broad Institute, Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America

    X
  • Changhong Xing,

    Affiliation: Neuroprotection Research Laboratory, Departments of Radiology and Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America

    X
  • Josephine Lok,

    Affiliations: Neuroprotection Research Laboratory, Departments of Radiology and Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America, Department of Pediatrics, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America

    X
  • Angel T. Som,

    Affiliation: Neuroprotection Research Laboratory, Departments of Radiology and Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America

    X
  • MingMing Ning,

    Affiliations: Neuroprotection Research Laboratory, Departments of Radiology and Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America, Clinical Proteomics Research Center, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America

    X
  • Xunming Ji,

    Affiliation: Cerebrovascular Research Center, XuanWu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, Peoples Republic of China

    X
  • Eng H. Lo mail

    sguo@partners.org (SG); Lo@helix.mgh.harvard.edu (EHL)

    Affiliations: Neuroprotection Research Laboratory, Departments of Radiology and Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America, Clinical Proteomics Research Center, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America

    X
  • Published: December 20, 2012
  • DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0052665

Abstract

The blood vessel is no longer viewed as passive plumbing for the brain. Increasingly, experimental and clinical findings suggest that cerebral endothelium may possess endocrine and paracrine properties – actively releasing signals into and receiving signals from the neuronal parenchyma. Hence, metabolically perturbed microvessels may contribute to central nervous system (CNS) injury and disease. Furthermore, cerebral endothelium can serve as sensors and integrators of CNS dysfunction, releasing measurable biomarkers into the circulating bloodstream. Here, we define and analyze the concept of a brain vasculome, i.e. a database of gene expression patterns in cerebral endothelium that can be linked to other databases and systems of CNS mediators and markers. Endothelial cells were purified from mouse brain, heart and kidney glomeruli. Total RNA were extracted and profiled on Affymetrix mouse 430 2.0 micro-arrays. Gene expression analysis confirmed that these brain, heart and glomerular preparations were not contaminated by brain cells (astrocytes, oligodendrocytes, or neurons), cardiomyocytes or kidney tubular cells respectively. Comparison of the vasculome between brain, heart and kidney glomeruli showed that endothelial gene expression patterns were highly organ-dependent. Analysis of the brain vasculome demonstrated that many functionally active networks were present, including cell adhesion, transporter activity, plasma membrane, leukocyte transmigration, Wnt signaling pathways and angiogenesis. Analysis of representative genome-wide-association-studies showed that genes linked with Alzheimer’s disease, Parkinson’s disease and stroke were detected in the brain vasculome. Finally, comparison of our mouse brain vasculome with representative plasma protein databases demonstrated significant overlap, suggesting that the vasculome may be an important source of circulating signals in blood. Perturbations in cerebral endothelial function may profoundly affect CNS homeostasis. Mapping and dissecting the vasculome of the brain in health and disease may provide a novel database for investigating disease mechanisms, assessing therapeutic targets and exploring new biomarkers for the CNS.

Introduction

In recent years, mechanistic investigations into brain function and disease have shifted away from a purely “neurocentric” focus into a more integrative perspective that involves all cell types in the central nervous system [1], [2], [3], [4]. For example, interactions between neurons and glia are required for normal neurotransmission as well as remodeling and recovery after brain injury [5]. Signals from astrocytes and pericytes provide important regulatory mechanisms for the blood-brain barrier [6], [7], [8]. And overlapping mediators underlie crosstalk between neurogenesis, angiogenesis, and common patterning of neural and blood vessel architectures [9].

Blood vessels in the brain are no longer viewed as passive or inert plumbing to simply carry blood flow for oxygen and glucose delivery. Increasingly, it is now recognized that the cerebral endothelium provide a rich source of signaling and trophic factors that influence brain function. Cerebral endothelium can produce growth factors that promote neurogenesis [10]. Cerebral endothelium can release neuroprotective factors such as brain derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) and fibroblast growth factor (FGF) that defend neurons against a wide range of metabolic and toxic insults [11], [12], [13], [14]. Conversely, “sick” endothelium can contribute to CNS disease. In diabetes, oxidatively stressed cerebral endothelium produce lower levels of neurotrophic factors that may lead to increased neuronal susceptibility to stroke and neurodegeneration [15]. Dysfunctional microvessels and disrupted blood-brain barrier function have been proposed to worsen neuronal dysfunction in Alzheimer’s disease and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis [16], [17], [18]. Hence, understanding the full functional profile of cerebral endothelium may be extremely important for investigations into CNS physiology and pathophysiology.

To date, many studies of brain endothelial gene expression have been performed. The majority of these efforts primarily focus on the blood-brain barrier [19], [20], [21], some of them are from the microvascular fragments [22]. However, a broader approach that connects the entire vascular blueprint to brain function and disease has not been attempted. Here, we propose the concept of a brain vasculome, i.e. a systematic mapping of transcriptome profiles of endothelial cells from brain in comparison with those from two other major organs, the heart and kidney glomeruli, in order to potentially reveal differential vascular function at a whole genome level. Our database here is then dissected to assess the hypothesis that the brain vasculome may contribute to CNS disease in terms of mechanisms and circulating biomarkers.

Results

Quality Control of Vasculome Gene Expression

Two levels of quality control were assessed. First, quality and integrity of RNA samples were tested with standard NanoDrop and Bioanalyzer approaches to ensure sufficient RNA concentrations, 260/280 ratios, 28 s/18 s ratios and RNA integrity number (RIN) scores. Second, the quality of microarray hybridization was also assessed by manually checking the distribution of hybridization signals, percentage of positive signals, ratio of 3′ to 5′ end of housekeeping genes (GAPDH and β-Actin), and applying principal component analysis to identify potential outliers. All samples passed these various checkpoints. For the final data sets, RNA from n = 5 mice were pooled per microarray, and n = 3 independent microarrays were used for each group (see Methods).

Next, we asked whether our vasculome was contaminated by parenchymal cells. For the brain vasculome, we compared our data with gene markers for different brain cells in public GEO GSE13379 datasets [23], [24], that contain gene expression profiles for neurons, astrocytes and oligodendrocytes. This analysis demonstrated that genes known to be representative of neurons, astrocytes and oligodendrocytes had extremely low expression levels (signals <50,) in our brain vasculome, whereas gene markers of endothelial cells had much higher expression levels than others (Table 1). These data suggest that our brain vasculome is endothelial-specific and not contaminated by surrounding parenchymal brain cells. Another check of endothelial purity was performed using RT-PCR to assess the expression of gene markers in the vasculome from brain, heart and kidney glomeruli (Table S1). Compared to corresponding whole organ tissue, each vasculome had higher expression of endothelial markers (≥ 3 fold), whereas gene expression levels were enriched for neuron and astrocyte markers in whole brain samples; myocyte markers in heart tissue samples; and kidney tubular markers in kidney tissue samples, respectively (Figure S1). Taken together, these analyzes suggest that the various organ vasculomes were not overtly contaminated with parenchymal genes.

thumbnail

Table 1. Differential expression of cell-type specific markers in brain vasculome versus other cell types in brain.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0052665.t001

Brain Vasculome Specific Genes and Enriched Pathways

Although the microarrays revealed a large amount of data, we only focused on genes whose maximal expression values across all microarrays were greater than 200. Based on these criteria, we identified 3,557 genes expressed in brain endothelial cells. Next, we asked whether this brain vasculome differed from patterns found in our comparative heart and kidney glomerular vasculomes. Applying criteria of p<0.01, fold change ≥ 4, and maximal expression value across all samples >200, we identified 318 probes corresponding to 243 genes found to be highly expressed in brain endothelial cells, 143 probes corresponding to 110 genes highly expressed in heart endothelial cells, and 114 probes corresponding to 81 genes highly expressed in kidney glomerular endothelial cells. A heat-map analysis demonstrated that each vasculome was highly organ-specific. Gene expression patterns in the brain vasculome significantly differed from those in heart or kidney glomeruli (Figure 1).

thumbnail

Figure 1. The vasculome of mouse brain is unique and different from those found in mouse heart and kidney.

Heatmap for visualization of the expression levels of organ-specific endothelial genes across brain, heart and kidney glomeruli. X-axis represents individual samples and y-axis represents different genes. The expression levels of genes are indexed by color.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0052665.g001

In the brain vasculome, as expected, blood-brain barrier genes were easily detected. These included occludin (OCLN) and claudin-5 (CLDN5), two major components of tight junctions in the blood-brain barrier. Another known feature of cerebral endothelium is the presence of glutamate receptors that influence barrier function [25], [26], [27]. In our datasets, both ionotrophic and metabtrophic glutamate receptors (Gria2, Gria3, Grin2b and Grm5 for AMPA2, AMPA3, NMDA2B and mGluR5 respectively) were specifically expressed in the vasculome from mouse brain but not heart and kidney glomeruli. Overactivation of glutamate receptors may cause excitotoxicity in neuronal compartments. Similarly, activation of NMDA or mGluR5 receptors could also mediate vascular responses caused by hyperhomocysteinemia and nitrosative stress in brain endothelial cells [28], [29]. The glutamate transporter Slc1a1 (solute carrier family 1, member 1), known as EAAC1/EAAT3, was also enriched in the brain vasculome. In neurons, this transporter plays a key role in regulating synaptic glutamate kinetics. But vascular functions may also exist, since brain endothelial cells co-cultured with astrocytes displayed a polarized brain-to-blood transport of glutamate, suggesting that transporter responses in brain microvessels may participate in the regulation of potentially excitotoxic amino acid concentrations [30]. Overall, the brain vasculome demonstrated many mediators commonly found in neural systems. For example, semaphorins comprise a family of factors that control neurite extension and axon guidance [31], [32]. Here, we saw that Sema3C and Sema4D were enriched in the vasculome of brain compared to heart and kidney. Both Sema3C and Sema4D have been implicated in angiogenesis regulation [33], [34], [35], [36], so their involvement in brain vascular homeostasis may also be important. Finally, another parallel with neural signaling may also be underscored by the detection of CamKIIα (calcium/calmodulin-stimulated protein kinase II alpha) [37], [38], indicating that common responses to intracellular calcium fluxes may occur in both neuronal and non-neuronal systems in the brain.

Using the Fisher’s exact test to probe GO (Gene Ontology) and KEGG databases, many signaling and regulatory pathways were found to be enriched in the brain vasculome (Table 2). These included transporter activity, cell adhesion molecules (CAMs), and the Wnt signaling pathway. Besides well-known brain endothelial transporters such as Glut1 (glucose transporter type 1, or slc2a1, solute carrier family 2, member 1) and P-gp (multidrug resistence poly-glycoprotein, or Abcb1a, ATP-binding cassette, sub-family B, member1A), high levels of transferrin (Tf), transferrin receptor (TfR) and exporter ferroportin (slc40a1) were also detected in the brain vasculome. For cell adhesion molecules, NrCAM (neuronal cell adhesion molecule) appeared to be enriched in the brain vasculome. NrCAM was originally known as a neuron-specific gene required for axon guidance and organization of neural circuitry [39], [40], [41]. However, NrCAM has recently been discovered in dermal and umbilical venous endothelium as well, with potential function in angiogenesis regulation and stress response in endothelial cells [42], [43]. The presence of NrCAM in our initial draft of the brain vasculome but not the heart or glomerular vasculome, further suggest close interactions and potential crosstalk between vascular systems and the organ milieu they inhabit. Similar enrichment in membrane proteins was found in the neurexin network. We detected the expression of neurexin and neuroligin in our mouse brain vasculome. In particular, neurexin-1 showed high level of expression in the brain vasculome rather than heart and kidney vasculomes. Once again, expression of neural-related guidance systems in the brain vasculome suggests crosstalk and signaling functions between blood vessels and brain parenchyma [36], [44].

thumbnail

Table 2. Enriched pathways detected in the vasculome of mouse brain.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0052665.t002

In addition to physiologic pathways that underlie normal function, pathophysiologic pathways related to inflammation were also expressed in the brain vasculome. In the context of brain injury and neurodegeneration, cytokines and chemokines comprise a key network for regulating inflammation. In this vasculome project, 236 probes were screened for 150 cytokines/chemokines. Overall, low signals were detected for most cytokines/chemokines (<50). Applying the criteria of signal intensity >200, only 17 probes for 11 cytokines/chemokines were expressed in the normal mouse brain vasculome - ccl3, ccl9, ccl27, csf1, cxcl12 (SDF1), kitl, pdgfb, pglyrp1, ptn, socs7 and tgfb2 (Table 3). Compared to heart and kidney glomeruli, ccl3 (chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 3), ccl27 (chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 27) and pglyrp1 peptidoglycan recognition protein 1) appeared to be enriched in the brain vasculome (Table 3). Examination of the existing literature suggested that these may be relevant hits. Ccl3 is released by stimulated brain endothelial cells [45], and it has been reported that it may be elevated in brain vessels of Alzheimer’s disease patients [46]. CCL27 is well known for mediating skin inflammation but has also been detected in the brain [47]. Unlike other chemokines, CCL27 has both secreted and nuclear targeting forms that directly modulate transcription of many response genes, thus any involvement of this factor in the brain vasculome could potentially act as a potent amplifier of inflammation [48], [49]. PGLYRPs (or PGRPs, peptidoglycan recognition proteins) have four isoforms, PGLYRP1-4, that function in antibacterial immunity and inflammation [50]. PGLYRP1 can bind with the key stress response proteins such as Hsp70 and S100A4 to trigger cytotxicity for antibacterial activity [51], [52]. Expression pglyrp1 in the brain have been reported, but its endothelial function is currently unknown [53].

thumbnail

Table 3. List of cytokines/chemokines expressed in the vasculome of mouse brain.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0052665.t003

Another inflammatory example was found in pathways involved in leukocyte transendothelial migration (Figure 2A). The brain vasculome-enriched genes in this pathway included Ncf1 (neutrophil cytosolic factor1, or p47 phox), Prkcb (protein kinase C, beta) and Prkcc (protein kinase C, gamma). Ncf1 is a subunit of NADPH oxidase, a critical enzyme for ROS production in injured or diseased vascular systems [54], [55]. It was reported that Ncf1 mediated the Abeta42 and RAGE ligation induced ROS production and downstream ERK1/2 phosphorylation and cPLA2 (cytosolic phospholipase A2) phosphorylation in cerebral endothelial cells [56]. The PKC family is known to regulate the phosphorylation and uptake of SLC6 family of neurotransmitter transporters [57], also reported to be present in brain endothelial cells and regulate the blood-brain barrier [58], [59], [60]. Whether Prkcb and Prkcc in the brain vasculome contribute to disease phenomena involved in cerebral ischemia, brain injury and neurodegeneration remains to be fully elucidated.

thumbnail

Figure 2. Protein-protein interaction (PPI) networks in the vasculome of mouse brain.

A, PPI network for leukocyte transendothelial migration. B, PPI network for the WNT signaling pathway. C, PPI network for adherence junctions. The expression levels of genes in the vasculome of mouse brain are indexed by color.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0052665.g002

Finally, a prominent network that was enriched in the brain vasculome comprised the Wnt pathway (Figure 2B). Wnt is known to regulate neuronal stem cells, neurogenesis and neuroplasticity [61], [62], [63], [64]. But recently, Wnt signaling has been reported to also participate in the development of CNS vasculature, blood-brain barrier formation, and the protection of endothelial cells after injury [65], [66], [67], [68], [69]. In our draft of the brain vasculome, β-cantenin (CTNNB1) was presented in the hub position of the Wnt protein-protein interaction network, along with brain endothelial-specific genes Axin2, MAPK10 (mitogen-activated protein kinase 10) and Lef1 (lymphoid enhancer binding factor 1). Axin2 is a transcriptional target of active Wnt signaling that also serves to autoregulate and repress the pathway by promoting β-cantenin degradation [70]; In the conditional transgenic mice overexpressing β-Catenin, Axin2 is one of the antagonists changed in the brain [71]. MAPK10 was originally described in neurons but it was recently reported to also mediate endothelial migration via eNOS [72]. And Lef1 is the specific transcriptional factor in the downstream effectors of the Wnt pathway [73], [74]. A critical role of Wnt signaling in cell-cell communication can also be seen because its central hub β-Catenin also serves in the protein-protein interaction network for adherens junctions (Figure 2C) for brain endothelial cells, linking specifically with the brain vasculome genes of Igf1r (insulin-like growth factor 1 receptor), Tgfbr1 (transforming growth factor, beta receptor 1) and Lef1 in this network.

Angiogenesis and the Brain Vasculome

In terms of functional networks, angiogenesis should comprise a central part of any vasculome. Probing the GO database revealed a dense protein-protein interaction network for angiogenesis-related genes in the brain vasculome, with hub positions occupied by β-catenin, Rtn4, HIF-1α, Mapk14, Notch1, Ptk2 (protein tyrosine kinase 2, also called focal adhesion kinase 1) and Tgfbr2 (Figure 3A). As described in above, β-catenin is highly expressed in the brain and in the hub positions of other pathways, connecting angiogenesis with these pathways, including Wnt pathway and adherens junctions. Also, Rtn4 (also called Nogo) was highly expressed in the brain. Rtn4 produces 3 isoforms (Nogo-A, Nogo-B, Nogo-C) that may play overlapping roles in vascular as well as neuronal systems in the CNS. Nogo-A is a well-characterized inhibitor of axonal growth and repair [75], whereas Nogo-B is already known to be highly expressed in endothelial cells [76]. Nogo-B regulates vascular homeostasis and remodeling, in part by controlling endothelial cell migration, macrophage infiltration, leukocyte transmigration, and overall inflammation response after tissue ischemia and injury [76], [77], [78]. Overall, Nogo-B may be protective since it is lost after injury [76].

thumbnail

Figure 3. Angiogenesis networks.

A, Protein-protein interaction network for angiogenesis in the vasculome of mouse brain (including nearest neighbors). Circles for genes in angiogenesis and squares for the neighbor genes. The expression levels of genes in the vasculome of mouse brain are indexed by color. B, Heatmap comparison of expression profiles of genes in the VEGF signaling pathway from the vasculome of mouse brain, heart and kidney glomeruli. The expression levels of genes are indexed by color.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0052665.g003

Another angiogeneis gene with high expression levels in the brain vasculome is Gpx-1 (glutathione peroxidase 1), an intracellular antioxidant enzyme that converts hydrogen peroxide to water [79]. Various studies with Gpx-1 transgenic mice suggest that this mediator may be neuroprotective against amyloid toxicity [80], Parkinsons-related pathologies [81], ischemia-reperfusion [82], or trauma [83]. These underlying mechanisms of vascular neuroprotection may broadly include amelioration of cell death, suppression of astrocyte and microglia activation, preservation of BBB function, and a reduction of inflammatory infiltration [82], [84], [85]. Furthermore, Gpx-1 may also contribute to CNS recovery, in part by interacting with hypoxia inducible factor 1 (HIF-1) and its target genes such as VEGF to regulate the angiogenesis process for tissue repair [86]. Gpx-1-deficient mice show decreased recruitment and activation of endothelial progenitor cells after ischemic injury, leading to impaired angiogenesis and revascularization [87].

Within the CNS context, VEGF signaling may be especially important because this mediator may participate in both angiogenesis as well as neurogenesis [88], [89]. Comparison of VEGF signaling pathways showed that these were highly conserved across all three vasculomes in brain, heart and kidney glomeruli (Figure 3B). This may not be surprising since VEGF-mediated angiogenesis may be commonly required network regardless of organ systems. However, it is worth noting that there were two VEGF signaling mediators that appeared to be specifically expressed in the brain vasculome - Prkcb and Prkcc. These two signals were also identified in the leukocyte transendothelial migration network of the brain vasculome (see previous section). Thus, it is possible that particular brain vasculome-specific components may critically influence how the CNS responds to injury and disease. Angiogenesis is a physiological process involving the growth of new blood vessels. This phenomenon is vital not only for organ development but also for tissue repair and wound healing. Insofar as the brain vasculome may be a critical component of CNS plasticity and remodeling, these angiogenesis networks may represent a rich database to probe for potential mechanisms and targets for neurorecovery after stroke, brain injury or neurodegeneration.

Correlation between Brain Vasculome and CNS Disease Associated Genes

Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) provide valuable information for identifying molecular risk factors and mechanisms for many diseases [90]. For CNS disorders, however, GWAS may be complicated by the fact that disease processes operate not only in neuronal cells but also in other cells from glial and vascular compartments. In the context of stroke and neurodegeneration, pathophysiologic mechanisms are increasingly known to take place in the neurovascular system [1], [2], [3], [4], [16]. So we next asked whether GWAS-defined genes for major CNS diseases could be found in our initial draft of the mouse brain vasculome. Genes implicated in Alzheimer’s disease (AD), Parkinson’s disease (PD) and stroke were compiled from the Database of Genotypes and Phenotypes (dbGaP) at NCBI. A substantial portion of these disease genes was expressed in the brain vasculome –41 AD genes, 53 PD genes and 133 stroke genes (Table 4; complete gene list is provided in Table S2). Representative genes are briefly surveyed below.

thumbnail

Table 4. Expression of disease-related genes in the vasculome of mouse brain.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0052665.t004
Alzheimer’s Disease.

CD2-associated protein (CD2AP), as an adapter molecule, is mainly studied in kidney glomeruli. It is highly expressed by podocytes and binds with nephrin to maintain glomerular slit diaphragm function. Mice lacking CD2AP exhibit a congenital nephritic syndrome at early age of 3 weeks [91]. In other tissues, including brain and heart, CD2AP is located in endothelial or epithelial cells, but the functions of CD2AP in brain and heart are still unknown [92].

PAKs (p21-activated kinases), comprising two subfamilies and at least 6 members (PAK1-6), are serine/threonine protein kinases that act downstream of Rho family GTPases Cdc42 and Rac. PAK2 (also known as gamma-PAK), bind with actin and become activated in response to a variety of stresses, and these responses have been implicated in regulation of cytoskeletal structure, apoptosis angiogenesis, vascular integrity and endothelial cell contraction [93], [94], [95], [96]. PAK2 deletion leads to cerebral hemorrhage in redhead zebrafish and this defect is rescued by endothelial-specific expression of PAK2, demonstrating the important role of PAK2 in brain vessels [94].PAK2 may also mediate the VEGF-induced increase of vascular permeability [97]. In the brain, PAK1-3 was reported to regulate the morphology of embryonic cortical neurons, whereas inhibiting Pak activity causing misorientation and branching process of neurons, with increased numbers of nodes, terminals and length of processes [98]. In this regard, PAK may represent yet another example of overlaps between neural and vascular signals in AD pathophysiology.

Ataxin-1 (ATXN1), is a causative gene for spinocerebellar ataxia type 1 (SCA1), with mutation of expanded CAG trinucleotide repeats encoding a polyglutamine tract (polyQ) in the gene [99]. ATXN1 is expressed in both brain and non-neuronal tissues, and may participate in calcium homeostasis, glutamate signaling/excitotoxicity, and Notch signaling pathways [100], [101] through the regulation of transcriptional repression and protein degradation [102], [103], [104]. In primary neuron cultures, knock-down of ATXN1 significantly increases Aβ40 and Aβ42, with increased APP cleavage by β-secretase; while overexpression of ATXN1 decreases Aβ levels [105]. The role of ATXN1 in endothelial cells is not presently well understood, so whether vascular responses in ATXN1 may also affect Aβ homeostasis remains unknown.

Angiomotin (AMOT), first identified as a binding protein to angiostatin, is a transmembrane protein associated with actin. AMOT controls cell migration and motility, cell polarity, tight junction formation and angiogenesis, and also plays critical roles in the tumor suppressor Hippo pathway [106], [107], [108]. AMOT is expressed mostly in endothelial cells and in some epithelial cells, with two protein isoforms, p80 and p130 [109]. The ratio of the two isoforms may regulate the switch between migration and stabilization of endothelial cells [110], [111]. Most of Amot knockout mice die between embryonic day E11 and E11.5 and exhibit severe vascular insufficiency in the intersomitic region as well as dilated vessels in the brain [81]. Whether AMOT contributes to dysfunctional remodeling of brain vessels in the face of progressive Alzheimer’s neurodegeneration is a hypothesis that remains to be fully assessed.

STK24 (sterile20-like kinase 24, also known as Mst3 (Mammalian sterile 20-like kinase-3)) mediates the axon-promoting effects of trophic factors, and may help regulate axon regeneration in damaged neurons [112], [113]. Stk24 has also been reported to regulate cell morphology, migration and apoptosis [114], [115], [116]. In the context of AD or PD, Stk24 may contribute to neuronal Tau phosphorylation, neurite outgrowth and synaptic plasticity modulation by binding with LRRK2 (leucine-rich repeat kinase 2), the most common genetic cause of PD [117]. Recently, Stk24 has also been associated with vascular functions. Stk24, when linked with striatin into a large signaling complex, acts as an essential downstream effector of CCM signaling during cardiovascular development. CCM3 is the disease gene for cerebral cavernous malformations (CCMs), a condition that leads to characteristic changes in brain capillary architecture resulting in neurologic deficits, seizures, or stroke [118]. How these vascular effects interact with neuronal phenomenon remains unclear.

Parkinson’s Disease.

Regulator of G protein signaling (RGS) proteins form a large family of GTPase-activating proteins (GAP activity) for heterotrimeric G protein alpha subunits that negatively regulate G-protein-coupled receptor signaling. RGS2 selectively accelerates the GTPase activity of Gq/11α and Gi/oα subunits. RGS2 deficiency in mice leads to hypertension and cardiac hypertrophy [119]. Endothelium-specific deletion of RGS2 caused endothelial dysfunction with impaired EDHF-dependent vasodilatation [120]. In the brain, both clinical and animal models showed that lower RGS2 expression is associated with anxiety disorders [121], [122]. In neurons, RGS2 was reported to regulate ionic channel function and synaptic plasticity in the hippocampus [123], [124], [125], [126]. But how RGS2 in brain vessels interacts with neuronal sequelae in PD remains unknown.

HnRNP U (heterogeneous ribonuclear protein U, also scaffold attachment facrot A, SFA) is a multi-functional nuclear matrix protein that has been implicated in multiple inflammatory pathways [127], [128]. Proinflammatory toll-like receptor signaling can stimulate the translocation of hnRNP U from nuclear to cytoplasmic compartments, which then allows it to bind and stabilize mRNA of various proinflammatory cytokines [129]. How these inflammatory actions affect the brain vasculome in PD remains to be determined.

RNF114 (RING finger protein 114, also as ZNF313, zinc finger protein 313), first identified and reported in 2003, is an ubiquitin binding protein and disease susceptibility gene for psoriasis, an immune-mediated skin disorder [130]. RNF114 is reported to regulate a positive feedback loop that enhances pathogenic double-stranded RNA induced production of type 1 interferon by modulating RIG-1/MDA5 signaling [131].

ITSN2 (intersectins 2), a Cdc42 guanine nucleotide exchange factor (GEF), is a multidomain adaptor/scaffold protein involved in clatherin- and caveolin-mediated endocytosis, exocytosis, actin cytoskeleton rearrangement and signal transduction [132]. Several isoforms of ITSN protein can be assembled from alternative splicing, including a brain specific isoform [133]. A role of ITSN-2L in regulating endocytosis within endothelial cells has been reported [134].

PAK1 belongs to the family of p21 activated kinases. In neurons, PAK1 is known to regulate migration [135], [136], spine morphogenesis and synapse formation [137], neuronal polarity [138], and hippocampal long-term potentiation [139]. Besides being a PD GWAS gene, PAK1 may also modulate or bind with other disease proteins, including Fragile X mental retardation 1 (FMR1) for Fragile X syndrome (FXS), the most commonly inherited form of mental retardation and autism [140]; Disrupted-in-Schizophrenia 1 (DISC1) for schizophrenia [141]; ALS2/Alsin for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) [142], and Down syndrome cell adhesion molecule (DSCAM) [143]. In endothelial cells, PAK1 may regulate barrier function in different organs [144], [145], and the migration of endothelial cells during angiogenesis [146]. In the context of inflammation, Pak1 is known to assist the invasion of Escherichia coli through human brain microvascular endothelial cells [147], [148].

Ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolase 5 (UCHL5), is one of the proteasome 19S regulatory-particle-associated deubiquitinase. Inhibiting the activity of UCHL5 leads to cell apoptosis by altering Bax/Bcl-2 ratios and activating caspase-9 and caspase-3 [149]. Through Rpn13, UCHL5 is recruited in the 26 s proteasome complex during the deubiquitination process. it is reported to regulate the degradation of iNOS and IkappaB-alpha and participated in the process of inflammation and host defense regulation [150], [151]. In the nucleus, UCHL5 is also associated with human Ino80 chromatin-remodeling complex and kept in inactive state, and then activated by transient interaction of the Ino80 complex with proteasome, suggesting that it may cooperate to regulate transcription or DNA repair [152]. UCHL5 interacts with Smads and potentially reverse Smurf-mediated degradation; it also stabilizes type 1 TGF-beta receptor and regulates TFG-beta signaling [153]. It is possible that these inflammatory phenomenons may also be important in the brain vasculome.

TGF-beta signaling is necessary for the development of blood vessels in many organs including brain and heart. Selective deletion of TGF-beta in endothelial cells, but not in neural cells, led to brain-specific vascular pathologies, including intracerebral hemorrhage [154]. Inactivation of TGF-beta type II receptor (Tgfbr2) in endothelial cells in mouse embryo resulted in deficient ventricular separation and haemorrhage from cerebral blood vessels [155]. At the same time, TGF-beta signaling is also important for neural cells. In the midbrain, Tgfbr2 ablation results in ectopic expression of Wnt1/β-Catenin and FGF8, activation of Wnt target genes for regulating neural stem cell expansion [156]. These overlapping actions in neuronal and vascular compartments may allow TGF-beta to play a key role as a PD GWAS gene.

Transcription factor 6 (ATF6) is one of the effectors of endoplasmic reticulum stress [157]. Both oxidized LDL and phospholipolyzed LDL can induce endoplasmic reticulum stress in endothelial cells with ATF6 activation, and this process has been implicated in the initiation of vascular inflammation with progression of atherosclerosis. Via endoplasmic reticulum stress, ATF6 may also regulate responses in angiogenesis and expression of tight junction proteins [158], [159].

Stroke.

BRM (Brahma), ATPase subunit in the chromatin-remodeling complex SWI/SNF, has important role in gene regulation, inflammation response, tumorigenesis and embryo development and differentiation. BRM is preferentially expressed in brain, liver, fibromuscular stroma and endothelial cell [160]. It is reported that BRM and Brahma/SWI2-related gene 1(Brg1) regulate HIF-1 induced gene expression after hypoxia [161]. Two single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) sites were found to be associated with schizophrenia in a Japanese population. A risk allele of a missense polymorphism (rs2296212) induced a lower nuclear localization efficiency of BRM, and risk alleles of intronic polymorphisms (rs3793490) were associated with low SMARCA2 expression levels in the postmortem prefrontal cortex [162].

MBD2 belongs to family of methyl-CpG binding domain (MBD)-containing factors, and mediate epigenetic effects through gene expression regulation. It has been reported that MBD2 was induced in hippocampus within few hours post-ischemia and maintained at high levels for several days [163]. Furthermore, Mbd2 deficient mice were protected against hind-limb ischemia evidenced by improved perfusion recovery and increased capillary and arteriole formation [164]. In vitro experiment also confirmed that knockdown of MBD2 significantly enhanced angiogenesis and provided protection against H2O2-induced apoptosis [164].

NF-κb inhibitor kappa B alpha (NFKBIA, also known as IκB-alpha) is the major regulator of NF-κB activation. Since NF-κB is a central factor in the vast network of inflammation pathways, this stroke GWAS gene is likely to contribute to multiple vascular responses in the brain. In damaged endothelium, dynamic response and inhibitory feedback loops exist between the rapid increase of IκB-alpha and the original NF-κB signal [165]. Links to oxidative stress and vasoregulation may also be important as eNOS-derived nitric oxide can be an endogenous inhibitor of NF-κB activity through IκB-alpha regulation [166].

WNK1, is a member of novel serine/threonine kinase family, With-No-K(lysine), with pleiotropic actions. Intronic deletions in WNK1 gene cause Gordon’s Syndrome, an autosomal dominant, hypertensive and hyperkalemic disorder [167]. WNK1 polymorphisms have also been associated with common essential hypertension [168]. Mechanistically, the WNK1 to ste20/SPAK/OSR1 signaling cascade regulates cation-chloride cotransporters (NKCC1-2), which may be vital for sodium homeostasis regulation, blood pressure response and vascular contractions [168], [169]. Endothelial-specific expression of WNK1 is essential for angiogenesis and heart development in mice, as WNK1 deficiency leads to cardiovascular developmental defects with smaller chambers and reduced myocardial trabeculation, together with defective angiogenesis in both arteries and veins [170]. Overlap with neural responses may also be important. WNK1 mutations have been identified as the cause of hereditary sensory and autonomic neuropathy type II, an early-onset autosomal disease of peripheral sensory nerves. WNK1 can interact with LINGO-1 (a component of tripartite receptor complexes) to regulate nogo-induced inhibition of neurite extension, through activation of RhoA [171].

ADD1 is one of three adducin proteins. ADD1 is a well-known hypertension risk gene. Altered adducin function might cause hypertension through enhanced constitutive tubular sodium reabsorption [172]. Polymorphisms of the ADD1 gene are associated with many physiological responses in hypertensive individuals as well as healthy subjects. For example, the Trp460 ADD1 allele is associated with higher systolic and diastolic blood pressure [173], with increased incidence of peripheral arterial disease (PAD) and coronary heart disease (CHD) [174], increased carotid artery intima-media thickness (IMT) [175], [176], increased risk of stroke [176], and reduced acetylcholine-stimulated forearm blood flow (FBF) response via an impaired endothelium-dependent vasodilation [177]. Again, the study of variants in risk genes suggested that there are physiological interaction between ADD1 and WNK1-NEDD4L pathways to regulate the renal sodium handling, blood pressure and antihypertensive responses to drugs [178]. Furthermore, the overexpression of rat wild type ADD1 in endothelial cells Increased tube formation in vitro and enhanced capillary formation in Matrigel implants in vivo, suggesting ADD1 could regulate angiogenesis process [179].

Among all of these disease genes, there are some with brain vasculome specificity compared to heart and kidney glomeruli. For example, the AD disease gene Pllp (plasma membrane proteolipid, also known as transmembrane 4 superfamily member 11 or plasmolipin), is a myelin structure protein and mainly expressed in brain oligodendrocytes and kidney tubular epithelial cells [180]. It was reported that pllp could form voltage-dependent and K(+)-selective ion channels in the membrane, or act as entry receptor for a kind endogenous retrovirous [181]. The expression of Pllp was signifiacantly reduced in the temporal cortex of patients with schizophrenia and patients with major depressive disorder, suggesting its role in the mental disorders [182], [183]. The PD disease gene Foxf1 (forkhead box F1, also known as HFH-8 or Freac-1), is a developmentally important transcriptional factor. The deficiency of Foxf1 could cause severe abnormalities in the development of many organs including lung, liver and gallbladder, with reduced expression of intergrin-beta3 [184]. As the target of hedgehog, foxf1 and its target gene Bmp4 mediate the induction of vasculogenesis [185] or link hedgehog signaling with Wnt signaling, to regulate the development of organs [186]. The expression of foxf1 in endothelial cells has been reported, and may regulate the inflammation response [187]. For stroke, Apcdd1, Atp2b2, Axin2, ITIH-5 and Slc1a1 are specifically expressed in brain vasculome. As previously discussed, Slc1a1 and Axin2 may be involved in cerebral glutamate handling and vascular development and patterning respectively. Apcdd1(adenomatosis polyposis coli down-regulated 1), a membrane-bound glycoprotein, is the target gene of Wnt/β-Catenin signaling pathway [188], [189], also a novel inhibitor to Wnt signaling in a cell-autonomous manner and acts upstream of β-Catenin [190]. Apcdd1 has an essential role in hair growth [190], or regulate astro-gliogenesis in the brain [191]. ITIH 5 is one of heavy chain subunits of Inter-alpha-trypsin inhibitors (ITIs), a family of serine protease inhibitors. ITIHs stabilize the extracellular matrix (ECM) by interacting with hyaluronic acid, which is a major ECM component [192]. So far, ITIH molecules have been reported to play a particulary important role in inflammation and carcinogenesis [193]. ITIH5 may also be a regulator of human metabolism, as the expression of ITIH5 in adipose tissue was increased in obesity, and associated with measures of body size and metabolism [194]. Hypermethylation in the upstream region of the promoter-associated CpG island of ITIH5, has been detected in breast cancer, and associated with adverse clinical outcome, suggesting ITIH5 as a potential prognostic marker [195]. Atp2b2 is also known as PMCA2 for plasma membrane calcium-transporting ATPase 2, encoding a plasma membrane Ca2+-ATPase type 2 pump, which extrudes calcium from the cytosol into the extracellular space. The mutation of Atp2b2 may cause deafness and imbalance in mice probably by affecting sensory transduction in stereocilia as well as neurotransmitter release from the basolateral membrane [196]. In human primary endothelial cells, Atp2b2 is found to bind with endogenous eNOS, leading to the phosphorylation of eNOS and downregulation of its activity; furthermore, NO production by endothelial cells was significantly reduced by ectopic expression of Atp2b2 [197].

Overlap between Brain Vasculome and Plasma Protein Databases

By acting as a sensor and integrator of brain dysfunction, endothelial cells within the vast network of cerebral microvessels may represent a critical contributor to CNS biomarkers in circulating blood [198]. We compared our mouse brain vasculome with four independent proteomic databases of human plasma proteins (PMID16041672, PMID16335952, PMID16684767, and PMID18632595) [199], [200], [201], [202], [203], [204]. Protein products corresponding to 754, 1211, 781, and 723 genes respectively, were detected in the mouse brain vasculome (Table 5; complete gene list is provided in Table S3). To be more conservative, we defined a core plasma protein set as the intersection of all 4 databases. This yielded 387 proteins. Out of this core plasma protein dataset, 100 proteins (25.8%) were expressed in the brain vasculome. Whether these “hits” from the normal brain vasculome or future analyses of diseased brain vasculomes may eventually lead to measurable biomarkers in blood remains to be determined.

thumbnail

Table 5. Expression of plasma proteins in the vasculome of mouse brain.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0052665.t005

Discussion

This study presented initial proof-of-concept for a brain vasculome. The dense network of microvessels in the brain can no longer be simply viewed as inert plumbing. Cerebral endothelium may also be an important source of signaling and trophic factors that communicate with the brain parenchyma. Hence, the brain vasculome may offer a critical tool for investigating how the neurovascular system contributes to the physiology of normal brain function, the pathophysiology of stroke, brain injury and neurodegeneration, as well as provide a database for potential circulating biomarkers that are produced by endothelium in CNS disorders. Our initial analyses suggest that the mouse brain vasculome (1) is unique and significantly different from heart and glomerular vascular systems; (2) is enriched in many vital signaling networks; (3) includes key elements that may contribute to CNS disorders; (4) contain many common genes that have been identified in GWAS databases for stroke, AD and PD; and (5) show significant overlap with plasma protein databases of potential biomarkers in circulating blood.

Taken together, this proof-of-concept study suggests that, when integrated with other genomic and proteomic databases, the brain vasculome may provide a valuable tool for dissecting disease mechanisms, assessing new therapeutic targets as well as searching for new biomarkers in CNS disorders. Nevertheless, there are several caveats that must be kept in mind. First, there is the possibility of gene contributions from non-cerebral-endothelial cell types. Comparisons with other neuronal and glial databases suggest that this may not be a major problem. But we still can not unequivocally exclude this potential source of false positives. Second, although we only focus on endothelial cells in this initial draft of the vasculome, the neurovascular system obviously includes perivascular cells such as pericytes and smooth muscle cells. How the brain vasculome interacts with and is regulated by these other cells warrant deeper studies. Third, our database is based on samples prepared from the entire brain cortex in order to maximize signal-to-noise. But it is likely that the neurovascular system differs in genomic status and function depending on brain region. Whether higher resolution maps of the brain vasculome can be rigorously obtained in the future remains to be determined. Fourth, our vasculome will not operate in isolation but should significantly interact with multiple systems in the entire body. Our data already suggest that vasculome profiles are regulated by the different milieus of each “host” organ. It is likely that the vasculome would also interact with circulating blood cells insofar as genomic signatures in circulating blood are affected by stroke, trauma and various CNS disorders [205]. Fifth, the current draft of our brain vasculome is focused only on mRNA, i.e. the transcriptome. However, other modes of genomic information, including single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP), copy-number variation (CNV), and epigenomics should also be studied and integrated, in order to obtain a full molecular landscape of the neurovascular system. Ultimately, proteomic and metabolic maps of the brain vasculome should also be extremely useful. Finally, the brain vasculome should be mapped across disease models and states in stroke, brain trauma and neurodegeneration. The normal vasculome presented here only provides a physiologic baseline. Clearly, the vasculome is connected to CNS disease as suggested by the significant overlaps with many GWAS studies of stroke, AD and PD. Mapping the brain vasculome in aged and diseased mouse models may allow us to understand how this system is pathophysiologically affected by and responds to various triggers of injury and disease.

In conclusion, this study provided initial proof-of-concept for a mouse brain vasculome. Mapping and dissecting the full profile of the brain vasculome in health and disease may provide a novel database for investigating disease mechanisms, assessing therapeutic targets and exploring new biomarkers for the CNS.

Materials and Methods

Preparation of Microvessel Endothelial Cells

Ten week old male C57BLKS/J mice (Jackson Labs) were used. All experiments were reviewed and approved by a Subcommittee for Research Animal Care of the Massachusetts General Hospital IACUC (Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee) and all these institutionally-approved animal protocols are consistent with the NIH Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. To measure the vasculome, we extracted endothelial cells from brain, heart and kidney glomeruli, with modified method from previously published protocols [206], [207]. Briefly, mice were anesthetized by isofluorane and perfused with 8×107 inactivated Dynabeads diluted in 40 ml of HBSS (Invitrogen). The cerebral cortex, heart and kidneys were dissected and combined from 5 mice, minced and digested in Collagenase A at 37°C for 30–40 minutes with vigorous shaking (2 mg/ml for cortex and heart, 1 mg/ml for kidney). The digested tissue were mechanically dissociated by titurating, filtered through a 70 µM cell strainer (Becton Dickinson Labware, Bedford, MA), and centrifuged at 500×g for 5 minutes at 4°C. For kidney, materials were further filtered twice with a 100 µM and a 70 µM cell strainer. Cell pellets from brain cortex and heart were resuspended in cold HBSS and mounted on magnetic separator to remove Dynabeads, then supernatant was collected and centrifuged, and incubated with PECAM-1 coated Dynabeads (5 µl for each organ from one mouse) for 30 minutes at 4°C with rotation. A magnetic separator was used to recover bead-bound endothelial cells. Cell pellets from kidney were also resuspended in HBSS and mounted directly on the magnetic separator to select glomeruli containing Dynabeads. Purified glomeruli were further digested with 5 mg/ml of type V Collagenase (Sigma) at 37°C for 30 minutes with agitation, magnetically separated, and then Digested glomeruli were centrifuged, resuspended and incubated with PECAM-1 coated Dynabeads. After washing all materials with HBSS for 5 times, recovered endothelial cells from all organs were lysed with buffer RLT plus for RNA preparation, with RNeasy Micro Plus kit (Qiagen).

Real Time PCR

Relative expressions of selected markers for different types of cells were tested with RT-PCR, with pre-designed primers and Syber Green system from Bioscience. First strand cDNA was synthesized with QuantiTect reverse transcription system (Qiagen). Date normalization was performed by quantification of the endogenous 18S rRNA, and fold change was measured with 2−ΔΔCt method. The markers for endothelial cells included VE-cadherin, PECAM-1 and eNOS. To ensure that our brain vasculome was not contaminated by parenchymal non-endothelial cells, we also checked markers for astrocytes (Aquaporin-4, GFAP), markers for neurons (MAP-2, Neurogranin), and markers for pericytes and smooth muscle cells (smooth muscle alpha-Actin Acta2), calponin 1 CNN1, desmin, myosin heavy polypeptide 11 Myh11, transgelin Tagln). For heart and glomerular preparations, we checked markers for myocytes (Myh6, NKX 2–5), markers for glomerular podocytes (Nphs-1, Nphs-2) and markers for kidney tubules (Cadherin-16, Claudin-16, Lrp2).

Transcriptional Profiling with Microarray

Three RNA samples for each organ were individually hybridized to Affymetrix GeneChip Mouse Genome 430 2.0 microarrays, after checking the RNA quantity and quality. RNA concentration was measured by Nanodrop, and the integrity of RNA was tested with RNA integrity number (RIN) score on Agilent Bioanalyzer 2010. All samples were used only when RIN scores were verified to be larger than 7.0. Microarray hybridization and scanning was performed after amplification with the NuGEN Ovation WTA Pico kit and fragmentation and labeling with Encore Biotin Module. Raw expression data for each chip was summarized and normalized using RMA algorithm, to allow direct comparison of results obtained among different chips. The quality of each chip was determined by manually checking mean values, variances and paired scatter plots as well as Principal Component Analysis (PCA) plots. All chips passed the quality check. Among the large amount of probes/genes, we only focused on genes whose maximal expression values across all microarrays were great than 200, while the probes with intensity less than 200 were eliminated for further analysis.

Identification of Organ Specifically Expressed Genes

The specific genes between two groups were identified based on both statistical significances, which were determined using SAM algorithm (a variant of t-test and specifically designed for microarray data), and fold change. To minimize false positives, only the genes with maximum expression values across all microarrays greater than 200 were analyzed here. The genes with p<0.01 and fold change >4 were considered as specifically expressed. The combination of p value and fold change threshold serves to eliminate most false positives, as suggested from a large microarray study led by FDA [208]. Fisher’s exact test was used to identify the potential enriched pathways from these brain endothelial specific genes.

Protein-protein Interaction (PPI) Networks

PPI datasets for human and mouse were downloaded from BIOGRID database at version 3.1.71. Since there were only 2314 proteins and 4118 interactions in the mouse PPI dataset, we transformed human PPI information into mouse’s based on the homolog genes between human and mouse according to NCBI HomolGene database. The human PPI dataset contained 10121 proteins and 52693 interactions. After combining the native mouse dataset and the transformed mouse dataset and deleting repeated records and self-self interaction records, a mouse PPI network with 9189 proteins and 36073 interactions was built. Since not all proteins in the networks are expressed in the endothelial cells under this study, we further shrink the network to EC-specific PPI (EC-PPI) network by deleting the proteins that are not expressed and their corresponding interactions. The EC-PPI contains 4243 proteins and 10825 interactions. The properties of network were calculated with IGRAPH package in R. The PPI networks were visualized by Cytoscape software with force-directed layout.

GWAS and Plasma Protein Databases

Genome-wide- association-studies of disease select the risk genes for the disease. GWAS-identified disease genes for stroke, Alzheimer’s disease and Parkinson’s disease were collected (dbGAP: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/projects/gap​plusprev/sgap_plus.htm) to analyze the expression of such disease-related genes in endothelial cells. The expression of human plasma proteins were also tested in the brain vasculome. Human plasma proteins determined by proteomics from 4 different studies were used [199], [200], [201], [202], [203], [204]. A core set of human plasma proteins was build with proteins detected in all of these 4 studies, consisting of 387 individual proteins. It is worthwhile to notice that GWAS and plasma protein databases evolve and grow over the time, correlations with our brain vasculome will have to be continually re-assessed in future studies.

Statistical Methods

All statistical analyses were performed with the statistics software R (Version 2.6.2; available from http://www.r-project.org) and R packages developed by the BioConductor project (available from http://www.bioconductor.org). Overall, raw expression data for each chip was summarized and normalized using RMA algorithm, genes with maximum expression levels across all microarrays great than 200 were considered for further analysis. Organ specifically expressed genes were identified using SAM algorithm; Fisher’s exact test was used to identify the enriched pathways from these organ specific genes. Only genes with p<0.01 and fold change >4 were considered as specifically expressed. The combination of p value and fold change threshold serves to eliminate most false positives, as validated by a large microarray study led by FDA [208]. Fisher’s exact test was also used to test the enrichment of GWAS genes for each disease in the vasculome of mouse brain.

Supporting Information

Figure S1.

Purity of isolation protocols for brain, heart and kidney glomerular endothelial cells. The expression of different cell type specific genes were tested by RT-PCR, and compared between endothelial cells and corresponding whole tissue samples.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0052665.s001

(PDF)

Table S1.

List of endothelial genes specifically expressed in brain, heart and kidney glomeruli.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0052665.s002

(XLSX)

Table S2.

Full list of GWAS disease associated genes expressed in brain vasculome. The label “brain EC expressed” indicates whether the gene is expressed in brain vasculome (True) or not (False).

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0052665.s003

(XLSX)

Table S3.

Full list of plasma proteins expressed in brain vasculome.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0052665.s004

(XLSX)

Acknowledgments

Thanks to Francis Luscinskas and Veronica Azcutia Criado (Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA) for helpful discussions about the isolation of endothelial cells.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: SG YZ EHL. Performed the experiments: SG JL CX ATS. Analyzed the data: YZ EHL SG. Wrote the paper: SG YZ JL MMN XJ EHL.

References

  1. 1. Gorelick PB, Scuteri A, Black SE, Decarli C, Greenberg SM, et al. (2011) Vascular contributions to cognitive impairment and dementia: a statement for healthcare professionals from the american heart association/american stroke association. Stroke 42: 2672–2713. doi: 10.1161/str.0b013e3182299496
  2. 2. Guo S, Lo EH (2009) Dysfunctional cell-cell signaling in the neurovascular unit as a paradigm for central nervous system disease. Stroke 40: S4–7. doi: 10.1161/strokeaha.108.534388
  3. 3. Lecrux C, Hamel E (2011) The neurovascular unit in brain function and disease. Acta Physiol (Oxf) 203: 47–59. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-1716.2011.02256.x
  4. 4. Zlokovic BV (2011) Neurovascular pathways to neurodegeneration in Alzheimer’s disease and other disorders. Nat Rev Neurosci 12: 723–738. doi: 10.1038/nrn3114
  5. 5. Attwell D, Buchan AM, Charpak S, Lauritzen M, Macvicar BA, et al. (2010) Glial and neuronal control of brain blood flow. Nature 468: 232–243. doi: 10.1038/nature09613
  6. 6. Abbott NJ (2002) Astrocyte-endothelial interactions and blood-brain barrier permeability. J Anat 200: 629–638. doi: 10.1046/j.1469-7580.2002.00064.x
  7. 7. Bell RD, Winkler EA, Singh I, Sagare AP, Deane R, et al. (2012) Apolipoprotein E controls cerebrovascular integrity via cyclophilin A. Nature. 485: 512–516. doi: 10.1038/nature11087
  8. 8. Ronaldson PT, Davis TP (2012) Blood-Brain Barrier Integrity and Glial Support: Mechanisms that can be Targeted for Novel Therapeutic Approaches in Stroke. Curr Pharm Des 18: 3624–3644. doi: 10.2174/138161212802002625
  9. 9. Zacchigna S, Ruiz de Almodovar C, Carmeliet P (2008) Similarities between angiogenesis and neural development: what small animal models can tell us. Curr Top Dev Biol 80: 1–55. doi: 10.1016/s0070-2153(07)80001-9
  10. 10. Shen Q, Goderie SK, Jin L, Karanth N, Sun Y, et al. (2004) Endothelial cells stimulate self-renewal and expand neurogenesis of neural stem cells. Science 304: 1338–1340. doi: 10.1126/science.1095505
  11. 11. Dugas JC, Mandemakers W, Rogers M, Ibrahim A, Daneman R, et al. (2008) A novel purification method for CNS projection neurons leads to the identification of brain vascular cells as a source of trophic support for corticospinal motor neurons. J Neurosci 28: 8294–8305. doi: 10.1523/jneurosci.2010-08.2008
  12. 12. Guo S, Kim WJ, Lok J, Lee SR, Besancon E, et al. (2008) Neuroprotection via matrix-trophic coupling between cerebral endothelial cells and neurons. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 105: 7582–7587. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0801105105
  13. 13. Leventhal C, Rafii S, Rafii D, Shahar A, Goldman SA (1999) Endothelial trophic support of neuronal production and recruitment from the adult mammalian subependyma. Mol Cell Neurosci 13: 450–464. doi: 10.1006/mcne.1999.0762
  14. 14. Guo S, Som AT, Waeber C, Lo EH (2012) Vascular neuroprotection via TrkB- and Akt-dependent cell survival signaling. J Neurochem 123 Suppl 258–64. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2012.07944.x
  15. 15. Navaratna D, Guo SZ, Hayakawa K, Wang X, Gerhardinger C, et al. (2011) Decreased cerebrovascular brain-derived neurotrophic factor-mediated neuroprotection in the diabetic brain. Diabetes 60: 1789–1796. doi: 10.2337/db10-1371
  16. 16. Garbuzova-Davis S, Rodrigues MC, Hernandez-Ontiveros DG, Louis MK, Willing AE, et al. (2011) Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a neurovascular disease. Brain Res 1398: 113–125. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2011.04.049
  17. 17. Neuwelt EA, Bauer B, Fahlke C, Fricker G, Iadecola C, et al. (2011) Engaging neuroscience to advance translational research in brain barrier biology. Nat Rev Neurosci 12: 169–182. doi: 10.1038/nrn2995
  18. 18. Zlokovic BV (2008) The blood-brain barrier in health and chronic neurodegenerative disorders. Neuron 57: 178–201. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2008.01.003
  19. 19. Daneman R, Zhou L, Agalliu D, Cahoy JD, Kaushal A, et al. (2010) The mouse blood-brain barrier transcriptome: a new resource for understanding the development and function of brain endothelial cells. PLoS One 5: e13741. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0013741
  20. 20. Enerson BE, Drewes LR (2006) The rat blood-brain barrier transcriptome. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 26: 959–973. doi: 10.1038/sj.jcbfm.9600249
  21. 21. Pardridge WM (2007) Blood-brain barrier genomics. Stroke 38: 686–690. doi: 10.1161/01.str.0000247887.61831.74
  22. 22. Wallgard E, Larsson E, He L, Hellstrom M, Armulik A, et al. (2008) Identification of a core set of 58 gene transcripts with broad and specific expression in the microvasculature. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 28: 1469–1476. doi: 10.1161/atvbaha.108.165738
  23. 23. Dougherty JD, Schmidt EF, Nakajima M, Heintz N (2010) Analytical approaches to RNA profiling data for the identification of genes enriched in specific cells. Nucleic Acids Res 38: 4218–4230. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkq130
  24. 24. Doyle JP, Dougherty JD, Heiman M, Schmidt EF, Stevens TR, et al. (2008) Application of a translational profiling approach for the comparative analysis of CNS cell types. Cell 135: 749–762. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2008.10.029
  25. 25. Andras IE, Deli MA, Veszelka S, Hayashi K, Hennig B, et al. (2007) The NMDA and AMPA/KA receptors are involved in glutamate-induced alterations of occludin expression and phosphorylation in brain endothelial cells. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 27: 1431–1443. doi: 10.1038/sj.jcbfm.9600445
  26. 26. Parfenova H, Fedinec A, Leffler CW (2003) Ionotropic glutamate receptors in cerebral microvascular endothelium are functionally linked to heme oxygenase. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 23: 190–197. doi: 10.1097/00004647-200302000-00006
  27. 27. Collard CD, Park KA, Montalto MC, Alapati S, Buras JA, et al. (2002) Neutrophil-derived glutamate regulates vascular endothelial barrier function. J Biol Chem 277: 14801–14811. doi: 10.1074/jbc.m110557200
  28. 28. Beard RS Jr, Reynolds JJ, Bearden SE (2011) Hyperhomocysteinemia increases permeability of the blood-brain barrier by NMDA receptor-dependent regulation of adherens and tight junctions. Blood 118: 2007–2014. doi: 10.1182/blood-2011-02-338269
  29. 29. Mayo JN, Beard RS Jr, Price TO, Chen CH, Erickson MA, et al. (2012) Nitrative stress in cerebral endothelium is mediated by mGluR5 in hyperhomocysteinemia. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 32: 825–834. doi: 10.1038/jcbfm.2011.185
  30. 30. Helms HC, Madelung R, Waagepetersen HS, Nielsen CU, Brodin B (2012) In vitro evidence for the brain glutamate efflux hypothesis: brain endothelial cells cocultured with astrocytes display a polarized brain-to-blood transport of glutamate. Glia 60: 882–893. doi: 10.1002/glia.22321
  31. 31. Pasterkamp RJ, Giger RJ (2009) Semaphorin function in neural plasticity and disease. Curr Opin Neurobiol 19: 263–274. doi: 10.1016/j.conb.2009.06.001
  32. 32. Kruger RP, Aurandt J, Guan KL (2005) Semaphorins command cells to move. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 6: 789–800. doi: 10.1038/nrm1740
  33. 33. Sakurai A, Doci CL, Gutkind JS (2012) Semaphorin signaling in angiogenesis, lymphangiogenesis and cancer. Cell Res 22: 23–32. doi: 10.1038/cr.2011.198
  34. 34. Banu N, Teichman J, Dunlap-Brown M, Villegas G, Tufro A (2006) Semaphorin 3C regulates endothelial cell function by increasing integrin activity. FASEB J 20: 2150–2152. doi: 10.1096/fj.05-5698fje
  35. 35. Conrotto P, Valdembri D, Corso S, Serini G, Tamagnone L, et al. (2005) Sema4D induces angiogenesis through Met recruitment by Plexin B1. Blood 105: 4321–4329. doi: 10.1182/blood-2004-07-2885
  36. 36. Arese M, Serini G, Bussolino F (2011) Nervous vascular parallels: axon guidance and beyond. Int J Dev Biol 55: 439–445. doi: 10.1387/ijdb.103242ma
  37. 37. Krizbai IA, Deli MA, Pestenacz A, Siklos L, Szabo CA, et al. (1998) Expression of glutamate receptors on cultured cerebral endothelial cells. J Neurosci Res 54: 814–819. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-4547(19981215)54:6<814::aid-jnr9>3.3.co;2-v
  38. 38. Deli MA, Joo F, Krizbai I, Lengyel I, Nunzi MG, et al. (1993) Calcium/calmodulin-stimulated protein kinase II is present in primary cultures of cerebral endothelial cells. J Neurochem 60: 1960–1963. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.1993.tb13429.x
  39. 39. Sakurai T (2012) The role of NrCAM in neural development and disorders–beyond a simple glue in the brain. Mol Cell Neurosci 49: 351–363. doi: 10.1016/j.mcn.2011.12.002
  40. 40. Demyanenko GP, Riday TT, Tran TS, Dalal J, Darnell EP, et al. (2011) NrCAM deletion causes topographic mistargeting of thalamocortical axons to the visual cortex and disrupts visual acuity. J Neurosci 31: 1545–1558. doi: 10.1523/jneurosci.4467-10.2011
  41. 41. Moy SS, Nonneman RJ, Young NB, Demyanenko GP, Maness PF (2009) Impaired sociability and cognitive function in Nrcam-null mice. Behav Brain Res 205: 123–131. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2009.06.021
  42. 42. Nadadur SS, Haykal-Coates N, Mudipalli A, Costa DL (2009) Endothelial effects of emission source particles: acute toxic response gene expression profiles. Toxicol In Vitro 23: 67–77. doi: 10.1016/j.tiv.2008.10.004
  43. 43. Glienke J, Schmitt AO, Pilarsky C, Hinzmann B, Weiss B, et al. (2000) Differential gene expression by endothelial cells in distinct angiogenic states. Eur J Biochem 267: 2820–2830. doi: 10.1046/j.1432-1327.2000.01325.x
  44. 44. Bottos A, Destro E, Rissone A, Graziano S, Cordara G, et al. (2009) The synaptic proteins neurexins and neuroligins are widely expressed in the vascular system and contribute to its functions. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106: 20782–20787. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0809510106
  45. 45. Chui R, Dorovini-Zis K (2010) Regulation of CCL2 and CCL3 expression in human brain endothelial cells by cytokines and lipopolysaccharide. J Neuroinflammation 7: 1. doi: 10.1186/1742-2094-7-1
  46. 46. Tripathy D, Thirumangalakudi L, Grammas P (2007) Expression of macrophage inflammatory protein 1-alpha is elevated in Alzheimer’s vessels and is regulated by oxidative stress. J Alzheimers Dis 11: 447–455.
  47. 47. Homey B, Alenius H, Muller A, Soto H, Bowman EP, et al. (2002) CCL27-CCR10 interactions regulate T cell-mediated skin inflammation. Nat Med 8: 157–165. doi: 10.1038/nm0202-157
  48. 48. Baird JW, Nibbs RJ, Komai-Koma M, Connolly JA, Ottersbach K, et al. (1999) ESkine, a novel beta-chemokine, is differentially spliced to produce secretable and nuclear targeted isoforms. J Biol Chem 274: 33496–33503. doi: 10.1074/jbc.274.47.33496
  49. 49. Nibbs RJ, Graham GJ (2003) CCL27/PESKY: a novel paradigm for chemokine function. Expert Opin Biol Ther 3: 15–22. doi: 10.1517/14712598.3.1.15
  50. 50. Liu C, Gelius E, Liu G, Steiner H, Dziarski R (2000) Mammalian peptidoglycan recognition protein binds peptidoglycan with high affinity, is expressed in neutrophils, and inhibits bacterial growth. J Biol Chem 275: 24490–24499. doi: 10.1074/jbc.m001239200
  51. 51. Dukhanina EA, Romanova EA, Dukhanin AS, Kabanova OD, Lukyanova TI, et al. (2008) Interactions and possible functional characteristics of Tag7-S100A4 protein complex. Bull Exp Biol Med 145: 191–193. doi: 10.1007/s10517-008-0047-0
  52. 52. Yashin DV, Dukhanina EA, Kabanova OD, Romanova EA, Lukyanova TI, et al. (2011) The heat shock-binding protein (HspBP1) protects cells against the cytotoxic action of the Tag7-Hsp70 complex. J Biol Chem 286: 10258–10264. doi: 10.1074/jbc.m110.163436
  53. 53. Rehman A, Taishi P, Fang J, Majde JA, Krueger JM (2001) The cloning of a rat peptidoglycan recognition protein (PGRP) and its induction in brain by sleep deprivation. Cytokine 13: 8–17. doi: 10.1006/cyto.2000.0800
  54. 54. Frey RS, Ushio-Fukai M, Malik AB (2009) NADPH oxidase-dependent signaling in endothelial cells: role in physiology and pathophysiology. Antioxid Redox Signal 11: 791–810. doi: 10.1089/ars.2008.2220
  55. 55. Chrissobolis S, Faraci FM (2008) The role of oxidative stress and NADPH oxidase in cerebrovascular disease. Trends Mol Med 14: 495–502. doi: 10.1016/j.molmed.2008.09.003
  56. 56. Askarova S, Yang X, Sheng W, Sun GY, Lee JC (2011) Role of Abeta-receptor for advanced glycation endproducts interaction in oxidative stress and cytosolic phospholipase A(2) activation in astrocytes and cerebral endothelial cells. Neuroscience 199: 375–385. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2011.09.038
  57. 57. Kristensen AS, Andersen J, Jorgensen TN, Sorensen L, Eriksen J, et al. (2011) SLC6 neurotransmitter transporters: structure, function, and regulation. Pharmacol Rev 63: 585–640. doi: 10.1124/pr.108.000869
  58. 58. Krizbai I, Szabo G, Deli M, Maderspach K, Lehel C, et al. (1995) Expression of protein kinase C family members in the cerebral endothelial cells. J Neurochem 65: 459–462. doi: 10.1046/j.1471-4159.1995.65010459.x
  59. 59. Yang T, Roder KE, Bhat GJ, Thekkumkara TJ, Abbruscato TJ (2006) Protein kinase C family members as a target for regulation of blood-brain barrier Na,K,2Cl-cotransporter during in vitro stroke conditions and nicotine exposure. Pharm Res 23: 291–302. doi: 10.1007/s11095-005-9143-2
  60. 60. Fleegal MA, Hom S, Borg LK, Davis TP (2005) Activation of PKC modulates blood-brain barrier endothelial cell permeability changes induced by hypoxia and posthypoxic reoxygenation. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 289: H2012–2019. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00495.2005
  61. 61. Park M, Shen K (2012) WNTs in synapse formation and neuronal circuitry. EMBO J 31: 2697–2704. doi: 10.1038/emboj.2012.145
  62. 62. Varela-Nallar L, Alfaro IE, Serrano FG, Parodi J, Inestrosa NC (2010) Wingless-type family member 5A (Wnt-5a) stimulates synaptic differentiation and function of glutamatergic synapses. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107: 21164–21169. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1010011107
  63. 63. Kalani MY, Cheshier SH, Cord BJ, Bababeygy SR, Vogel H, et al. (2008) Wnt-mediated self-renewal of neural stem/progenitor cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 105: 16970–16975. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0808616105
  64. 64. Zechner D, Fujita Y, Hulsken J, Muller T, Walther I, et al. (2003) beta-Catenin signals regulate cell growth and the balance between progenitor cell expansion and differentiation in the nervous system. Dev Biol 258: 406–418. doi: 10.1016/s0012-1606(03)00123-4
  65. 65. Tam SJ, Richmond DL, Kaminker JS, Modrusan Z, Martin-McNulty B, et al. (2012) Death receptors DR6 and TROY regulate brain vascular development. Dev Cell 22: 403–417. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2011.11.018
  66. 66. Stenman JM, Rajagopal J, Carroll TJ, Ishibashi M, McMahon J, et al. (2008) Canonical Wnt signaling regulates organ-specific assembly and differentiation of CNS vasculature. Science 322: 1247–1250. doi: 10.1126/science.1164594
  67. 67. Liebner S, Corada M, Bangsow T, Babbage J, Taddei A, et al. (2008) Wnt/beta-catenin signaling controls development of the blood-brain barrier. J Cell Biol 183: 409–417. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200806024
  68. 68. Daneman R, Agalliu D, Zhou L, Kuhnert F, Kuo CJ, et al. (2009) Wnt/beta-catenin signaling is required for CNS, but not non-CNS, angiogenesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106: 641–646. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0805165106
  69. 69. Chong ZZ, Shang YC, Maiese K (2007) Vascular injury during elevated glucose can be mitigated by erythropoietin and Wnt signaling. Curr Neurovasc Res 4: 194–204. doi: 10.2174/156720207781387150
  70. 70. Fancy SP, Harrington EP, Yuen TJ, Silbereis JC, Zhao C, et al. (2011) Axin2 as regulatory and therapeutic target in newborn brain injury and remyelination. Nat Neurosci 14: 1009–1016. doi: 10.1038/nn.2855
  71. 71. Diep DB, Hoen N, Backman M, Machon O, Krauss S (2004) Characterisation of the Wnt antagonists and their response to conditionally activated Wnt signalling in the developing mouse forebrain. Brain Res Dev Brain Res 153: 261–270. doi: 10.1016/j.devbrainres.2004.09.008
  72. 72. Pi X, Wu Y, Ferguson JE 3rd, Portbury AL, Patterson C (2009) SDF-1alpha stimulates JNK3 activity via eNOS-dependent nitrosylation of MKP7 to enhance endothelial migration. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106: 5675–5680. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0809568106
  73. 73. Planutiene M, Planutis K, Holcombe RF (2011) Lymphoid enhancer-binding factor 1, a representative of vertebrate-specific Lef1/Tcf1 sub-family, is a Wnt-beta-catenin pathway target gene in human endothelial cells which regulates matrix metalloproteinase-2 expression and promotes endothelial cell invasion. Vasc Cell 3: 28. doi: 10.1186/2045-824x-3-28
  74. 74. Phng LK, Potente M, Leslie JD, Babbage J, Nyqvist D, et al. (2009) Nrarp coordinates endothelial Notch and Wnt signaling to control vessel density in angiogenesis. Dev Cell 16: 70–82. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2008.12.009
  75. 75. GrandPre T, Li S, Strittmatter SM (2002) Nogo-66 receptor antagonist peptide promotes axonal regeneration. Nature 417: 547–551. doi: 10.1038/417547a
  76. 76. Acevedo L, Yu J, Erdjument-Bromage H, Miao RQ, Kim JE, et al. (2004) A new role for Nogo as a regulator of vascular remodeling. Nat Med 10: 382–388. doi: 10.1038/nm1020
  77. 77. Di Lorenzo A, Manes TD, Davalos A, Wright PL, Sessa WC (2011) Endothelial reticulon-4B (Nogo-B) regulates ICAM-1-mediated leukocyte transmigration and acute inflammation. Blood 117: 2284–2295. doi: 10.1182/blood-2010-04-281956
  78. 78. Yu J, Fernandez-Hernando C, Suarez Y, Schleicher M, Hao Z, et al. (2009) Reticulon 4B (Nogo-B) is necessary for macrophage infiltration and tissue repair. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106: 17511–17516. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0907359106
  79. 79. de Haan JB, Cristiano F, Iannello RC, Kola I (1995) Cu/Zn-superoxide dismutase and glutathione peroxidase during aging. Biochem Mol Biol Int 35: 1281–1297.
  80. 80. Crack PJ, Cimdins K, Ali U, Hertzog PJ, Iannello RC (2006) Lack of glutathione peroxidase-1 exacerbates Abeta-mediated neurotoxicity in cortical neurons. J Neural Transm 113: 645–657. doi: 10.1007/s00702-005-0352-y
  81. 81. Aase K, Ernkvist M, Ebarasi L, Jakobsson L, Majumdar A, et al. (2007) Angiomotin regulates endothelial cell migration during embryonic angiogenesis. Genes Dev 21: 2055–2068. doi: 10.1101/gad.432007
  82. 82. Ishibashi N, Prokopenko O, Weisbrot-Lefkowitz M, Reuhl KR, Mirochnitchenko O (2002) Glutathione peroxidase inhibits cell death and glial activation following experimental stroke. Brain Res Mol Brain Res 109: 34–44. doi: 10.1016/s0169-328x(02)00459-x
  83. 83. Xiong Y, Shie FS, Zhang J, Lee CP, Ho YS (2004) The protective role of cellular glutathione peroxidase against trauma-induced mitochondrial dysfunction in the mouse brain. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 13: 129–137. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2004.05.001
  84. 84. Wong CH, Bozinovski S, Hertzog PJ, Hickey MJ, Crack PJ (2008) Absence of glutathione peroxidase-1 exacerbates cerebral ischemia-reperfusion injury by reducing post-ischemic microvascular perfusion. J Neurochem 107: 241–252. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2008.05605.x
  85. 85. Ishibashi N, Prokopenko O, Reuhl KR, Mirochnitchenko O (2002) Inflammatory response and glutathione peroxidase in a model of stroke. J Immunol 168: 1926–1933. doi: 10.1016/s0169-328x(02)00459-x
  86. 86. Tajima M, Kurashima Y, Sugiyama K, Ogura T, Sakagami H (2009) The redox state of glutathione regulates the hypoxic induction of HIF-1. Eur J Pharmacol 606: 45–49. doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2009.01.026
  87. 87. Galasso G, Schiekofer S, Sato K, Shibata R, Handy DE, et al. (2006) Impaired angiogenesis in glutathione peroxidase-1-deficient mice is associated with endothelial progenitor cell dysfunction. Circ Res 98: 254–261. doi: 10.1161/01.res.0000200740.57764.52
  88. 88. Greenberg DA, Jin K (2005) From angiogenesis to neuropathology. Nature 438: 954–959. doi: 10.1038/nature04481
  89. 89. Sun Y, Jin K, Xie L, Childs J, Mao XO, et al. (2003) VEGF-induced neuroprotection, neurogenesis, and angiogenesis after focal cerebral ischemia. J Clin Invest 111: 1843–1851. doi: 10.1172/jci17977
  90. 90. Gandhi S, Wood NW (2010) Genome-wide association studies: the key to unlocking neurodegeneration? Nat Neurosci 13: 789–794. doi: 10.1038/nn.2584
  91. 91. Tossidou I, Kardinal C, Peters I, Kriz W, Shaw A, et al. (2007) CD2AP/CIN85 balance determines receptor tyrosine kinase signaling response in podocytes. J Biol Chem 282: 7457–7464. doi: 10.1074/jbc.m608519200
  92. 92. Li C, Ruotsalainen V, Tryggvason K, Shaw AS, Miner JH (2000) CD2AP is expressed with nephrin in developing podocytes and is found widely in mature kidney and elsewhere. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 279: F785–792.
  93. 93. Bokoch GM (1998) Caspase-mediated activation of PAK2 during apoptosis: proteolytic kinase activation as a general mechanism of apoptotic signal transduction? Cell Death Differ 5: 637–645. doi: 10.1038/sj.cdd.4400405
  94. 94. Buchner DA, Su F, Yamaoka JS, Kamei M, Shavit JA, et al. (2007) pak2a mutations cause cerebral hemorrhage in redhead zebrafish. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 104: 13996–14001. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0700947104
  95. 95. Goeckeler ZM, Masaracchia RA, Zeng Q, Chew TL, Gallagher P, et al. (2000) Phosphorylation of myosin light chain kinase by p21-activated kinase PAK2. J Biol Chem 275: 18366–18374. doi: 10.1074/jbc.m001339200
  96. 96. Zeng Q, Lagunoff D, Masaracchia R, Goeckeler Z, Cote G, et al. (2000) Endothelial cell retraction is induced by PAK2 monophosphorylation of myosin II. J Cell Sci 113 (Pt 3): 471–482.
  97. 97. Gavard J, Gutkind JS (2006) VEGF controls endothelial-cell permeability by promoting the beta-arrestin-dependent endocytosis of VE-cadherin. Nat Cell Biol 8: 1223–1234. doi: 10.1038/ncb1486
  98. 98. Demyanenko GP, Halberstadt AI, Rao RS, Maness PF (2010) CHL1 cooperates with PAK1–3 to regulate morphological differentiation of embryonic cortical neurons. Neuroscience 165: 107–115. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2009.09.077
  99. 99. Zoghbi HY, Orr HT (2009) Pathogenic mechanisms of a polyglutamine-mediated neurodegenerative disease, spinocerebellar ataxia type 1. J Biol Chem 284: 7425–7429. doi: 10.1074/jbc.r800041200
  100. 100. Matilla-Duenas A, Goold R, Giunti P (2008) Clinical, genetic, molecular, and pathophysiological insights into spinocerebellar ataxia type 1. Cerebellum 7: 106–114. doi: 10.1007/s12311-008-0009-0
  101. 101. Tong X, Gui H, Jin F, Heck BW, Lin P, et al. (2011) Ataxin-1 and Brother of ataxin-1 are components of the Notch signalling pathway. EMBO Rep 12: 428–435. doi: 10.1038/embor.2011.49
  102. 102. Lam YC, Bowman AB, Jafar-Nejad P, Lim J, Richman R, et al. (2006) ATAXIN-1 interacts with the repressor Capicua in its native complex to cause SCA1 neuropathology. Cell 127: 1335–1347. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2006.11.038
  103. 103. Tsai CC, Kao HY, Mitzutani A, Banayo E, Rajan H, et al. (2004) Ataxin 1, a SCA1 neurodegenerative disorder protein, is functionally linked to the silencing mediator of retinoid and thyroid hormone receptors. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 101: 4047–4052. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0400615101
  104. 104. Al-Ramahi I, Lam YC, Chen HK, de Gouyon B, Zhang M, et al. (2006) CHIP protects from the neurotoxicity of expanded and wild-type ataxin-1 and promotes their ubiquitination and degradation. J Biol Chem 281: 26714–26724. doi: 10.1074/jbc.m601603200
  105. 105. Zhang C, Browne A, Child D, Divito JR, Stevenson JA, et al. (2010) Loss of function of ATXN1 increases amyloid beta-protein levels by potentiating beta-secretase processing of beta-amyloid precursor protein. J Biol Chem 285: 8515–8526. doi: 10.1074/jbc.m109.079079
  106. 106. Bratt A, Birot O, Sinha I, Veitonmaki N, Aase K, et al. (2005) Angiomotin regulates endothelial cell-cell junctions and cell motility. J Biol Chem 280: 34859–34869. doi: 10.1074/jbc.m503915200
  107. 107. Troyanovsky B, Levchenko T, Mansson G, Matvijenko O, Holmgren L (2001) Angiomotin: an angiostatin binding protein that regulates endothelial cell migration and tube formation. J Cell Biol 152: 1247–1254. doi: 10.1083/jcb.152.6.1247
  108. 108. Zhao B, Li L, Lu Q, Wang LH, Liu CY, et al. (2011) Angiomotin is a novel Hippo pathway component that inhibits YAP oncoprotein. Genes Dev 25: 51–63. doi: 10.1101/gad.2000111
  109. 109. Ernkvist M, Aase K, Ukomadu C, Wohlschlegel J, Blackman R, et al. (2006) p130-angiomotin associates to actin and controls endothelial cell shape. FEBS J 273: 2000–2011. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-4658.2006.05216.x
  110. 110. Ernkvist M, Birot O, Sinha I, Veitonmaki N, Nystrom S, et al. (2008) Differential roles of p80- and p130-angiomotin in the switch between migration and stabilization of endothelial cells. Biochim Biophys Acta 1783: 429–437. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2007.11.018
  111. 111. Roudier E, Chapados N, Decary S, Gineste C, Le Bel C, et al. (2009) Angiomotin p80/p130 ratio: a new indicator of exercise-induced angiogenic activity in skeletal muscles from obese and non-obese rats? J Physiol 587: 4105–4119. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2009.175554
  112. 112. Lorber B, Howe ML, Benowitz LI, Irwin N (2009) Mst3b, an Ste20-like kinase, regulates axon regeneration in mature CNS and PNS pathways. Nat Neurosci 12: 1407–1414. doi: 10.1038/nn.2414
  113. 113. Irwin N, Li YM, O’Toole JE, Benowitz LI (2006) Mst3b, a purine-sensitive Ste20-like protein kinase, regulates axon outgrowth. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103: 18320–18325. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0605135103
  114. 114. Huang CY, Wu YM, Hsu CY, Lee WS, Lai MD, et al. (2002) Caspase activation of mammalian sterile 20-like kinase 3 (Mst3). Nuclear translocation and induction of apoptosis. J Biol Chem 277: 34367–34374. doi: 10.1074/jbc.m202468200
  115. 115. Lu TJ, Lai WY, Huang CY, Hsieh WJ, Yu JS, et al. (2006) Inhibition of cell migration by autophosphorylated mammalian sterile 20-like kinase 3 (MST3) involves paxillin and protein-tyrosine phosphatase-PEST. J Biol Chem 281: 38405–38417. doi: 10.1074/jbc.m605035200
  116. 116. Stegert MR, Hergovich A, Tamaskovic R, Bichsel SJ, Hemmings BA (2005) Regulation of NDR protein kinase by hydrophobic motif phosphorylation mediated by the mammalian Ste20-like kinase MST3. Mol Cell Biol 25: 11019–11029. doi: 10.1128/mcb.25.24.11019-11029.2005
  117. 117. Zach S, Felk S, Gillardon F (2010) Signal transduction protein array analysis links LRRK2 to Ste20 kinases and PKC zeta that modulate neuronal plasticity. PLoS One 5: e13191. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0013191
  118. 118. Zheng X, Xu C, Di Lorenzo A, Kleaveland B, Zou Z, et al. (2010) CCM3 signaling through sterile 20-like kinases plays an essential role during zebrafish cardiovascular development and cerebral cavernous malformations. J Clin Invest 120: 2795–2804. doi: 10.1172/jci39679
  119. 119. Tsang S, Woo AY, Zhu W, Xiao RP (2010) Deregulation of RGS2 in cardiovascular diseases. Front Biosci (Schol Ed) 2: 547–557. doi: 10.2741/s84
  120. 120. Osei-Owusu P, Sabharwal R, Kaltenbronn KM, Rhee MH, Chapleau MW, et al. (2012) Regulator of G protein signaling 2 deficiency causes endothelial dysfunction and impaired endothelium-derived hyperpolarizing factor-mediated relaxation by dysregulating Gi/o signaling. J Biol Chem 287: 12541–12549. doi: 10.1074/jbc.m111.332130
  121. 121. Lifschytz T, Broner EC, Zozulinsky P, Slonimsky A, Eitan R, et al.. (2011) Relationship between Rgs2 gene expression level and anxiety and depression-like behaviour in a mutant mouse model: serotonergic involvement. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol: 1–12.
  122. 122. Smoller JW, Paulus MP, Fagerness JA, Purcell S, Yamaki LH, et al. (2008) Influence of RGS2 on anxiety-related temperament, personality, and brain function. Arch Gen Psychiatry 65: 298–308. doi: 10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2007.48
  123. 123. Doupnik CA, Davidson N, Lester HA, Kofuji P (1997) RGS proteins reconstitute the rapid gating kinetics of gbetagamma-activated inwardly rectifying K+ channels. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 94: 10461–10466. doi: 10.1073/pnas.94.19.10461
  124. 124. Han J, Mark MD, Li X, Xie M, Waka S, et al. (2006) RGS2 determines short-term synaptic plasticity in hippocampal neurons by regulating Gi/o-mediated inhibition of presynaptic Ca2+ channels. Neuron 51: 575–586. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2006.07.012
  125. 125. Hutchison RM, Chidiac P, Leung LS (2009) Hippocampal long-term potentiation is enhanced in urethane-anesthetized RGS2 knockout mice. Hippocampus 19: 687–691. doi: 10.1002/hipo.20582
  126. 126. Kammermeier PJ, Ikeda SR (1999) Expression of RGS2 alters the coupling of metabotropic glutamate receptor 1a to M-type K+ and N-type Ca2+ channels. Neuron 22: 819–829. doi: 10.1016/s0896-6273(00)80740-0
  127. 127. Xiao R, Tang P, Yang B, Huang J, Zhou Y, et al. (2012) Nuclear matrix factor hnRNP U/SAF-A exerts a global control of alternative splicing by regulating U2 snRNP maturation. Mol Cell 45: 656–668. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2012.01.009
  128. 128. Kukalev A, Nord Y, Palmberg C, Bergman T, Percipalle P (2005) Actin and hnRNP U cooperate for productive transcription by RNA polymerase II. Nat Struct Mol Biol 12: 238–244. doi: 10.1038/nsmb904
  129. 129. Zhao W, Wang L, Zhang M, Wang P, Qi J, et al. (2012) Nuclear to cytoplasmic translocation of heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein U enhances TLR-induced proinflammatory cytokine production by stabilizing mRNAs in macrophages. J Immunol 188: 3179–3187. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1101175
  130. 130. Capon F, Bijlmakers MJ, Wolf N, Quaranta M, Huffmeier U, et al. (2008) Identification of ZNF313/RNF114 as a novel psoriasis susceptibility gene. Hum Mol Genet 17: 1938–1945. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddn091
  131. 131. Bijlmakers MJ, Kanneganti SK, Barker JN, Trembath RC, Capon F (2011) Functional analysis of the RNF114 psoriasis susceptibility gene implicates innate immune responses to double-stranded RNA in disease pathogenesis. Hum Mol Genet 20: 3129–3137. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddr215
  132. 132. Tsyba L, Nikolaienko O, Dergai O, Dergai M, Novokhatska O, et al. (2011) Intersectin multidomain adaptor proteins: regulation of functional diversity. Gene 473: 67–75. doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2010.11.016
  133. 133. Seifert M, Ampofo C, Mehraein Y, Reichrath J, Welter C (2007) Expression analysis of human intersectin 2 gene (ITSN2) minor splice variants showing differential expression in normal human brain. Oncol Rep 17: 1207–1211. doi: 10.3892/or.17.5.1207
  134. 134. Klein IK, Predescu DN, Sharma T, Knezevic I, Malik AB, et al. (2009) Intersectin-2L regulates caveola endocytosis secondary to Cdc42-mediated actin polymerization. J Biol Chem 284: 25953–25961. doi: 10.1074/jbc.m109.035071
  135. 135. Causeret F, Terao M, Jacobs T, Nishimura YV, Yanagawa Y, et al. (2009) The p21-activated kinase is required for neuronal migration in the cerebral cortex. Cereb Cortex 19: 861–875. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhn133
  136. 136. Schmid RS, Midkiff BR, Kedar VP, Maness PF (2004) Adhesion molecule L1 stimulates neuronal migration through Vav2-Pak1 signaling. Neuroreport 15: 2791–2794.
  137. 137. Zhang H, Webb DJ, Asmussen H, Niu S, Horwitz AF (2005) A GIT1/PIX/Rac/PAK signaling module regulates spine morphogenesis and synapse formation through MLC. J Neurosci 25: 3379–3388. doi: 10.1523/jneurosci.3553-04.2005
  138. 138. de la Torre-Ubieta L, Gaudilliere B, Yang Y, Ikeuchi Y, Yamada T, et al. (2010) A FOXO-Pak1 transcriptional pathway controls neuronal polarity. Genes Dev 24: 799–813. doi: 10.1101/gad.1880510
  139. 139. Asrar S, Meng Y, Zhou Z, Todorovski Z, Huang WW, et al. (2009) Regulation of hippocampal long-term potentiation by p21-activated protein kinase 1 (PAK1). Neuropharmacology 56: 73–80. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2008.06.055
  140. 140. Hayashi ML, Rao BS, Seo JS, Choi HS, Dolan BM, et al. (2007) Inhibition of p21-activated kinase rescues symptoms of fragile X syndrome in mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 104: 11489–11494. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0705003104
  141. 141. Chen SY, Huang PH, Cheng HJ (2011) Disrupted-in-Schizophrenia 1-mediated axon guidance involves TRIO-RAC-PAK small GTPase pathway signaling. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 108: 5861–5866. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1018128108
  142. 142. Tudor EL, Perkinton MS, Schmidt A, Ackerley S, Brownlees J, et al. (2005) ALS2/Alsin regulates Rac-PAK signaling and neurite outgrowth. J Biol Chem 280: 34735–34740. doi: 10.1074/jbc.m506216200
  143. 143. Li W, Guan KL (2004) The Down syndrome cell adhesion molecule (DSCAM) interacts with and activates Pak. J Biol Chem 279: 32824–32831. doi: 10.1074/jbc.m401878200
  144. 144. Ke Y, Lum H, Solaro RJ (2007) Inhibition of endothelial barrier dysfunction by P21-activated kinase-1. Can J Physiol Pharmacol 85: 281–288. doi: 10.1139/y06-100
  145. 145. Stockton R, Reutershan J, Scott D, Sanders J, Ley K, et al. (2007) Induction of vascular permeability: beta PIX and GIT1 scaffold the activation of extracellular signal-regulated kinase by PAK. Mol Biol Cell 18: 2346–2355. doi: 10.1091/mbc.e06-07-0584
  146. 146. Kanda S, Miyata Y, Kanetake H (2004) Role of focal adhesion formation in migration and morphogenesis of endothelial cells. Cell Signal 16: 1273–1281. doi: 10.1016/j.cellsig.2004.03.010
  147. 147. Rudrabhatla RS, Selvaraj SK, Prasadarao NV (2006) Role of Rac1 in Escherichia coli K1 invasion of human brain microvascular endothelial cells. Microbes Infect 8: 460–469. doi: 10.1016/j.micinf.2005.07.012
  148. 148. Rudrabhatla RS, Sukumaran SK, Bokoch GM, Prasadarao NV (2003) Modulation of myosin light-chain phosphorylation by p21-activated kinase 1 in Escherichia coli invasion of human brain microvascular endothelial cells. Infect Immun 71: 2787–2797. doi: 10.1128/iai.71.5.2787-2797.2003
  149. 149. D’Arcy P, Brnjic S, Olofsson MH, Fryknas M, Lindsten K, et al. (2011) Inhibition of proteasome deubiquitinating activity as a new cancer therapy. Nat Med 17: 1636–1640. doi: 10.1038/nm.2536
  150. 150. Mazumdar T, Gorgun FM, Sha Y, Tyryshkin A, Zeng S, et al. (2010) Regulation of NF-kappaB activity and inducible nitric oxide synthase by regulatory particle non-ATPase subunit 13 (Rpn13). Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107: 13854–13859. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0913495107
  151. 151. Yao T, Song L, Xu W, DeMartino GN, Florens L, et al. (2006) Proteasome recruitment and activation of the Uch37 deubiquitinating enzyme by Adrm1. Nat Cell Biol 8: 994–1002. doi: 10.1038/ncb1460
  152. 152. Yao T, Song L, Jin J, Cai Y, Takahashi H, et al. (2008) Distinct modes of regulation of the Uch37 deubiquitinating enzyme in the proteasome and in the Ino80 chromatin-remodeling complex. Mol Cell 31: 909–917. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2008.08.027
  153. 153. Wicks SJ, Haros K, Maillard M, Song L, Cohen RE, et al. (2005) The deubiquitinating enzyme UCH37 interacts with Smads and regulates TGF-beta signalling. Oncogene 24: 8080–8084. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1208944
  154. 154. Nguyen HL, Lee YJ, Shin J, Lee E, Park SO, et al. (2011) TGF-beta signaling in endothelial cells, but not neuroepithelial cells, is essential for cerebral vascular development. Lab Invest 91: 1554–1563. doi: 10.1038/labinvest.2011.124
  155. 155. Robson A, Allinson KR, Anderson RH, Henderson DJ, Arthur HM (2010) The TGFbeta type II receptor plays a critical role in the endothelial cells during cardiac development. Dev Dyn 239: 2435–2442. doi: 10.1002/dvdy.22376
  156. 156. Falk S, Wurdak H, Ittner LM, Ille F, Sumara G, et al. (2008) Brain area-specific effect of TGF-beta signaling on Wnt-dependent neural stem cell expansion. Cell Stem Cell 2: 472–483. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2008.03.006
  157. 157. Rzymski T, Petry A, Kracun D, Riess F, Pike L, et al. (2012) The unfolded protein response controls induction and activation of ADAM17/TACE by severe hypoxia and ER stress. Oncogene 31: 3621–3634. doi: 10.1038/onc.2011.522
  158. 158. Yoshikawa T, Ogata N, Izuta H, Shimazawa M, Hara H, et al. (2011) Increased expression of tight junctions in ARPE-19 cells under endoplasmic reticulum stress. Curr Eye Res 36: 1153–1163. doi: 10.3109/02713683.2011.606592
  159. 159. Salminen A, Kauppinen A, Hyttinen JM, Toropainen E, Kaarniranta K (2010) Endoplasmic reticulum stress in age-related macular degeneration: trigger for neovascularization. Mol Med 16: 535–542.
  160. 160. Reisman DN, Sciarrotta J, Bouldin TW, Weissman BE, Funkhouser WK (2005) The expression of the SWI/SNF ATPase subunits BRG1 and BRM in normal human tissues. Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol 13: 66–74. doi: 10.1097/00129039-200503000-00011
  161. 161. Wang F, Zhang R, Beischlag TV, Muchardt C, Yaniv M, et al. (2004) Roles of Brahma and Brahma/SWI2-related gene 1 in hypoxic induction of the erythropoietin gene. J Biol Chem 279: 46733–46741. doi: 10.1074/jbc.m409002200
  162. 162. Koga M, Ishiguro H, Yazaki S, Horiuchi Y, Arai M, et al. (2009) Involvement of SMARCA2/BRM in the SWI/SNF chromatin-remodeling complex in schizophrenia. Hum Mol Genet 18: 2483–2494. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddp166
  163. 163. Jung BP, Zhang G, Ho W, Francis J, Eubanks JH (2002) Transient forebrain ischemia alters the mRNA expression of methyl DNA-binding factors in the adult rat hippocampus. Neuroscience 115: 515–524. doi: 10.1016/s0306-4522(02)00383-4
  164. 164. Rao X, Zhong J, Zhang S, Zhang Y, Yu Q, et al. (2011) Loss of methyl-CpG-binding domain protein 2 enhances endothelial angiogenesis and protects mice against hind-limb ischemic injury. Circulation 123: 2964–2974. doi: 10.1161/circulationaha.110.966408
  165. 165. Laflamme N, Rivest S (1999) Effects of systemic immunogenic insults and circulating proinflammatory cytokines on the transcription of the inhibitory factor kappaB alpha within specific cellular populations of the rat brain. J Neurochem 73: 309–321. doi: 10.1046/j.1471-4159.1999.0730309.x
  166. 166. Blais V, Rivest S (2001) Inhibitory action of nitric oxide on circulating tumor necrosis factor-induced NF-kappaB activity and COX-2 transcription in the endothelium of the brain capillaries. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 60: 893–905.
  167. 167. McCormick JA, Ellison DH (2011) The WNKs: atypical protein kinases with pleiotropic actions. Physiol Rev 91: 177–219. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00017.2010
  168. 168. Bergaya S, Faure S, Baudrie V, Rio M, Escoubet B, et al. (2011) WNK1 regulates vasoconstriction and blood pressure response to alpha 1-adrenergic stimulation in mice. Hypertension 58: 439–445. doi: 10.1161/hypertensionaha.111.172429
  169. 169. Flatman PW (2008) Cotransporters, WNKs and hypertension: an update. Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens 17: 186–192. doi: 10.1097/mnh.0b013e3282f5244e
  170. 170. Xie J, Wu T, Xu K, Huang IK, Cleaver O, et al. (2009) Endothelial-specific expression of WNK1 kinase is essential for angiogenesis and heart development in mice. Am J Pathol 175: 1315–1327. doi: 10.2353/ajpath.2009.090094
  171. 171. Zhang Z, Xu X, Zhang Y, Zhou J, Yu Z, et al. (2009) LINGO-1 interacts with WNK1 to regulate nogo-induced inhibition of neurite extension. J Biol Chem 284: 15717–15728. doi: 10.1074/jbc.m808751200
  172. 172. Manunta P, Citterio L, Lanzani C, Ferrandi M (2007) Adducin polymorphisms and the treatment of hypertension. Pharmacogenomics 8: 465–472. doi: 10.2217/14622416.8.5.465
  173. 173. Lanzani C, Citterio L, Jankaricova M, Sciarrone MT, Barlassina C, et al. (2005) Role of the adducin family genes in human essential hypertension. J Hypertens 23: 543–549. doi: 10.1097/01.hjh.0000160210.48479.78
  174. 174. Morrison AC, Bray MS, Folsom AR, Boerwinkle E (2002) ADD1 460W allele associated with cardiovascular disease in hypertensive individuals. Hypertension 39: 1053–1057. doi: 10.1161/01.hyp.0000019128.94483.3a
  175. 175. Sarzani R, Cusi D, Salvi F, Barlassina C, Macciardi F, et al. (2006) The 460Trp allele of alpha-adducin increases carotid intima-media thickness in young adult males. J Hypertens 24: 697–703. doi: 10.1097/01.hjh.0000217852.89745.dc
  176. 176. van Rijn MJ, Bos MJ, Yazdanpanah M, Isaacs A, Arias-Vasquez A, et al. (2006) Alpha-adducin polymorphism, atherosclerosis, and cardiovascular and cerebrovascular risk. Stroke 37: 2930–2934. doi: 10.1161/01.str.0000248760.67039.2b
  177. 177. Perticone F, Sciacqua A, Barlassina C, Del Vecchio L, Signorello MC, et al. (2007) Gly460Trp alpha-adducin gene polymorphism and endothelial function in untreated hypertensive patients. J Hypertens 25: 2234–2239. doi: 10.1097/hjh.0b013e3282ef3a50
  178. 178. Manunta P, Lavery G, Lanzani C, Braund PS, Simonini M, et al. (2008) Physiological interaction between alpha-adducin and WNK1-NEDD4L pathways on sodium-related blood pressure regulation. Hypertension 52: 366–372. doi: 10.1161/hypertensionaha.108.113977
  179. 179. Cappuzzello C, Melchionna R, Mangoni A, Tripodi G, Ferrari P, et al. (2007) Role of rat alpha adducin in angiogenesis: null effect of the F316Y polymorphism. Cardiovasc Res 75: 608–617. doi: 10.1016/j.cardiores.2007.04.020
  180. 180. Fischer I, Cochary EF, Konola JT, Romano-Clark G (1991) Expression of plasmolipin in oligodendrocytes. J Neurosci Res 28: 81–89. doi: 10.1002/jnr.490280108
  181. 181. Miller AD, Bergholz U, Ziegler M, Stocking C (2008) Identification of the myelin protein plasmolipin as the cell entry receptor for Mus caroli endogenous retrovirus. J Virol 82: 6862–6868. doi: 10.1128/jvi.00397-08
  182. 182. Aston C, Jiang L, Sokolov BP (2004) Microarray analysis of postmortem temporal cortex from patients with schizophrenia. J Neurosci Res 77: 858–866. doi: 10.1002/jnr.20208
  183. 183. Aston C, Jiang L, Sokolov BP (2005) Transcriptional profiling reveals evidence for signaling and oligodendroglial abnormalities in the temporal cortex from patients with major depressive disorder. Mol Psychiatry 10: 309–322. doi: 10.1038/sj.mp.4001565
  184. 184. Malin D, Kim IM, Boetticher E, Kalin TV, Ramakrishna S, et al. (2007) Forkhead box F1 is essential for migration of mesenchymal cells and directly induces integrin-beta3 expression. Mol Cell Biol 27: 2486–2498. doi: 10.1128/mcb.01736-06
  185. 185. Astorga J, Carlsson P (2007) Hedgehog induction of murine vasculogenesis is mediated by Foxf1 and Bmp4. Development 134: 3753–3761. doi: 10.1242/dev.004432
  186. 186. Ormestad M, Astorga J, Landgren H, Wang T, Johansson BR, et al. (2006) Foxf1 and Foxf2 control murine gut development by limiting mesenchymal Wnt signaling and promoting extracellular matrix production. Development 133: 833–843. doi: 10.1242/dev.02252
  187. 187. Kalin TV, Meliton L, Meliton AY, Zhu X, Whitsett JA, et al. (2008) Pulmonary mastocytosis and enhanced lung inflammation in mice heterozygous null for the Foxf1 gene. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 39: 390–399. doi: 10.1165/rcmb.2008-0044oc
  188. 188. Zirn B, Samans B, Wittmann S, Pietsch T, Leuschner I, et al. (2006) Target genes of the WNT/beta-catenin pathway in Wilms tumors. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 45: 565–574. doi: 10.1002/gcc.20319
  189. 189. Jukkola T, Sinjushina N, Partanen J (2004) Drapc1 expression during mouse embryonic development. Gene Expr Patterns 4: 755–762. doi: 10.1016/j.modgep.2004.03.006
  190. 190. Shimomura Y, Agalliu D, Vonica A, Luria V, Wajid M, et al. (2010) APCDD1 is a novel Wnt inhibitor mutated in hereditary hypotrichosis simplex. Nature 464: 1043–1047. doi: 10.1038/nature08875
  191. 191. Kang P, Lee HK, Glasgow SM, Finley M, Donti T, et al. (2012) Sox9 and NFIA coordinate a transcriptional regulatory cascade during the initiation of gliogenesis. Neuron 74: 79–94. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2012.01.024
  192. 192. Bost F, Diarra-Mehrpour M, Martin JP (1998) Inter-alpha-trypsin inhibitor proteoglycan family–a group of proteins binding and stabilizing the extracellular matrix. Eur J Biochem 252: 339–346. doi: 10.1046/j.1432-1327.1998.2520339.x
  193. 193. Hamm A, Veeck J, Bektas N, Wild PJ, Hartmann A, et al. (2008) Frequent expression loss of Inter-alpha-trypsin inhibitor heavy chain (ITIH) genes in multiple human solid tumors: a systematic expression analysis. BMC Cancer 8: 25. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-8-25
  194. 194. Anveden A, Sjoholm K, Jacobson P, Palsdottir V, Walley AJ, et al. (2012) ITIH-5 expression in human adipose tissue is increased in obesity. Obesity (Silver Spring) 20: 708–714. doi: 10.1038/oby.2011.268
  195. 195. Veeck J, Chorovicer M, Naami A, Breuer E, Zafrakas M, et al. (2008) The extracellular matrix protein ITIH5 is a novel prognostic marker in invasive node-negative breast cancer and its aberrant expression is caused by promoter hypermethylation. Oncogene 27: 865–876. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1210669
  196. 196. Street VA, McKee-Johnson JW, Fonseca RC, Tempel BL, Noben-Trauth K (1998) Mutations in a plasma membrane Ca2+-ATPase gene cause deafness in deafwaddler mice. Nat Genet 19: 390–394. doi: 10.1038/1284
  197. 197. Holton M, Mohamed TM, Oceandy D, Wang W, Lamas S, et al. (2010) Endothelial nitric oxide synthase activity is inhibited by the plasma membrane calcium ATPase in human endothelial cells. Cardiovasc Res 87: 440–448. doi: 10.1093/cvr/cvq077
  198. 198. Ning M, Sarracino DA, Kho AT, Guo S, Lee SR, et al. (2011) Proteomic temporal profile of human brain endothelium after oxidative stress. Stroke 42: 37–43. doi: 10.1161/strokeaha.110.585703
  199. 199. Qian WJ, Kaleta DT, Petritis BO, Jiang H, Liu T, et al. (2008) Enhanced detection of low abundance human plasma proteins using a tandem IgY12-SuperMix immunoaffinity separation strategy. Mol Cell Proteomics 7: 1963–1973. doi: 10.1074/mcp.m800008-mcp200
  200. 200. Liu T, Qian WJ, Gritsenko MA, Xiao W, Moldawer LL, et al. (2006) High dynamic range characterization of the trauma patient plasma proteome. Mol Cell Proteomics 5: 1899–1913. doi: 10.1074/mcp.m600068-mcp200
  201. 201. Liu T, Qian WJ, Gritsenko MA, Camp DG 2nd, Monroe ME, et al (2005) Human plasma N-glycoproteome analysis by immunoaffinity subtraction, hydrazide chemistry, and mass spectrometry. J Proteome Res 4: 2070–2080. doi: 10.1021/pr0502065
  202. 202. Muthusamy B, Hanumanthu G, Suresh S, Rekha B, Srinivas D, et al. (2005) Plasma Proteome Database as a resource for proteomics research. Proteomics 5: 3531–3536. doi: 10.1002/pmic.200401335
  203. 203. Ping P, Vondriska TM, Creighton CJ, Gandhi TK, Yang Z, et al. (2005) A functional annotation of subproteomes in human plasma. Proteomics 5: 3506–3519. doi: 10.1002/pmic.200500140
  204. 204. Omenn GS, States DJ, Adamski M, Blackwell TW, Menon R, et al. (2005) Overview of the HUPO Plasma Proteome Project: results from the pilot phase with 35 collaborating laboratories and multiple analytical groups, generating a core dataset of 3020 proteins and a publicly-available database. Proteomics 5: 3226–3245. doi: 10.1002/pmic.200500358
  205. 205. Sharp FR, Xu H, Lit L, Walker W, Apperson M, et al. (2006) The future of genomic profiling of neurological diseases using blood. Arch Neurol 63: 1529–1536. doi: 10.1001/archneur.63.11.1529
  206. 206. Lim YC, Luscinskas FW (2006) Isolation and culture of murine heart and lung endothelial cells for in vitro model systems. Methods Mol Biol 341: 141–154. doi: 10.1385/1-59745-113-4:141
  207. 207. Takemoto M, Asker N, Gerhardt H, Lundkvist A, Johansson BR, et al. (2002) A new method for large scale isolation of kidney glomeruli from mice. Am J Pathol 161: 799–805. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9440(10)64239-3
  208. 208. Shi L, Reid LH, Jones WD, Shippy R, Warrington JA, et al. (2006) The MicroArray Quality Control (MAQC) project shows inter- and intraplatform reproducibility of gene expression measurements. Nat Biotechnol 24: 1151–1161. doi: 10.1038/nbt1239