Advertisement
Research Article

Vitamin D Status and Cause-Specific Mortality: A General Population Study

  • Tea Skaaby mail,

    tea.skaaby.01@regionh.dk

    Affiliation: Research Centre for Prevention and Health, Glostrup Hospital, Glostrup, Denmark

    X
  • Lise Lotte Nystrup Husemoen,

    Affiliation: Research Centre for Prevention and Health, Glostrup Hospital, Glostrup, Denmark

    X
  • Charlotta Pisinger,

    Affiliation: Research Centre for Prevention and Health, Glostrup Hospital, Glostrup, Denmark

    X
  • Torben Jørgensen,

    Affiliations: Research Centre for Prevention and Health, Glostrup Hospital, Glostrup, Denmark, Faculty of Health Science, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark, Faculty of Medicine, Alborg University, Alborg, Denmark

    X
  • Betina Heinsbæk Thuesen,

    Affiliation: Research Centre for Prevention and Health, Glostrup Hospital, Glostrup, Denmark

    X
  • Mogens Fenger,

    Affiliation: Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Hvidovre Hospital, Hvidovre, Denmark

    X
  • Allan Linneberg

    Affiliation: Research Centre for Prevention and Health, Glostrup Hospital, Glostrup, Denmark

    X
  • Published: December 20, 2012
  • DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0052423

Abstract

Background

Vitamin D deficiency is associated with an increased risk of all-cause mortality in observational studies. The specific causes of death underlying this association lack clarity. We investigated the association between vitamin D status and cause-specific mortality.

Methods

We included a total of 9,146 individuals from the two population-based studies, Monica10 and Inter99, conducted in 1993–94 and 1999–2001, respectively. Vitamin D status was assessed as serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D. Information on causes of death was obtained from The Danish Register of Causes of Death until 31 December 2009. There were a total of 832 deaths (median follow-up 10.3 years).

Results

Multivariable Cox regression analyses with age as underlying time axis and vitamin D quartiles showed significant associations between vitamin D status and death caused by diseases of the respiratory system, the digestive system, and endocrine, nutritional and metabolic diseases with hazard ratios (HRs) 0.26 (ptrend = 0.0042), 0.28 (ptrend = 0.0040), and 0.21 (ptrend = 0.035), respectively, for the fourth vitamin D quartile compared to the first. We found non-significantly lower HRs for death caused by mental and behavioural diseases and diseases of the nervous system, but no association between vitamin D status and death caused by neoplasms or diseases of the circulatory system.

Conclusion

The associations of vitamin D status and cause-specific mortality suggest that we also look elsewhere (than to cardiovascular disease and cancer) to explain the inverse association between vitamin D status and mortality.

Introduction

Vitamin D is an essential regulator of calcium homeostasis and bone mineralization; deficiency causing rickets, osteomalacia and osteoporosis. A growing body of evidence, however, indicates a broader role of vitamin D in various biological processes. The hormonally active form of vitamin D, 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin-D, has a diverse array of biological functions ranging from antiproliferative and antiangiogenic effects to modulation of the immune system [1].

Vitamin D is produced in sun exposed skin and retrieved from the diet and dietary supplements. It is metabolized in the liver and kidneys to its active form [1]. Even if dietary intake is low, the skin has the capability to produce adequate amounts of vitamin D given enough sunlight but due to our indoor lifestyle, and use of sunscreens, it often does not suffice; vitamin D deficiency is common worldwide [1][3].

An inverse association between vitamin D status and all-cause mortality has been established in prospective studies [4]; [5]. A meta-analysis of vitamin D supplementation reported a decrease in mortality, whereas a recent one found a reduced mortality with vitamin D and calcium supplementation in the elderly but no effect of vitamin D supplementation alone [6]; [7]. The specific causes of death underlying the association with mortality lack clarity. Vitamin D deficiency is in observational studies associated with an increased risk of cancers such as colorectal cancer [8], lung cancer [9], and breast cancer [10]; cardiovascular disease (CVD) [11]; endocrine and metabolic diseases such as diabetes mellitus [12], obesity [13], and metabolic syndrome [14]; respiratory disease such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) [15]; [16], and respiratory infections [17]; diseases of the digestive system such as liver disease [18]; [19], inflammatory bowel disease [20], and celiac disease [20]; and mental disorders such as dementia [21]; [22], and depression [23]. To the best of our knowledge, no studies have investigated the association of vitamin D status and different specific causes of death in the same study population.

We investigated the prospective association between vitamin D status as assessed by serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25-OH-D) and cause-specific mortality according to The International Classification of disease in two cohorts from a general Danish population.

Methods

Ethics Statement

Participants gave their written informed consent, and the studies were approved by the local ethics committee of Copenhagen County and the Danish Data Protection Agency. The recommendations of the Declaration of Helsinki were followed.

Study Populations

We used the two population based studies, Monica10 and Inter99. The Monica10 study was a 10 year follow-up of the MonicaI study which was conducted in 1982–1984 and included examinations of 3,785 individuals. The MonicaI population was recruited from the Danish Central Personal Register as an age- and sex-stratified random sample of the population. Of the 3785 persons re-invited to the Monica10 study, 70.2% chose to participate; the study included 2,656 individuals between the ages 40–71 years and was carried out in 1993–1994 [24]. A total of 2,649 participants from the Monica10 study with measurements of vitamin D status were included in the study.

The Inter99 study carried out in 1999–2001 included 6,784 individuals aged 30–60 years drawn from an age- and sex-stratified random sample of the population in the same area as MonicaI [25]. The baseline participation rate was 52.5%. The Inter99 study was a population-based randomized controlled trial (CT00289237, ClinicalTrials.gov) investigating the effects of lifestyle intervention on CVD. Details on the study and the intervention program are described elsewhere [25]. To summarise, participants were pre-randomized into two groups, A and B, and given a lifestyle consultation with personal health advice. Participants from group A at high risk of ischemic heart disease (IHD) (60%) were furthermore offered group-based lifestyle counseling on smoking cessation, increased physical activity, and healthier dietary habits. Participation at baseline was associated with non-smoking, and fewer admissions for CVD and diabetes. A total of 6,497 participants from Inter99 with measurements of vitamin D were included in the study. Inter99 data were considered observational, and analyses were adjusted for study group.

In both studies, the health examination included a self-administered questionnaire, a physical examination, and various blood tests. The questionnaires provided information on education, intake of fish, leisure time physical activity, smoking habits, and alcohol consumption. Height and weight were measured without shoes and with light clothes. Body mass index (BMI) was calculated as weight (kg) divided by height (m) squared. Blood was drawn after an overnight fast.

Exposure

Serum samples from the participants in the Monica10 and Inter99 studies had been stored at −20°C until the analyses of 25-OH-D in 2009 and 2010, respectively. Measurements of serum 25-OH-D in the Monica10 population were carried out by chemiluminescence immunoassay IDS-iSYS (Immunodiagnostic Systems, Boldon Tyne & Wear, UK) traceable to company standard UV/LC-MS-MS [26]. Samples were pre-treated to denature the vitamin D binding protein and neutralised in assay buffer. A specific anti-25-OH-D acridinium-labelled antibody was added. After an incubation step, magnetic particles linked to 25-OH-D were added. Following a further incubation step, a magnet captured the magnetic particles. After washing and addition of trigger reagents, the light emitted by the acridinium-label was inversely proportional to the concentration of 25-OH-D in the original sample. CV%: 16.9% (level 16.7), 8.9% (level 185.2). Specificity: 25-OH-D2 100%, 25-OH -D3 100%, co-determines 1,25-(OH)2-D3>100%. Detection limit was 9.0 nmol/l [27].

In Inter99, analyses of 25-OH-D were performed by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). Serum samples were deproteinized with acetonitrile after addition of 1-alfa-D3-vitamin as internal standard. A 90% heptan/10% dichlormethane mixture was added and thoroughly mixed. The upper organic phase was evaporated after centrifugation, and the samples were solubilized in acetonitrile. Samples were analyzed using a Phenomenex LUNA C18 3µm column and the mobile phase 90% methanol in water for separation and a Dionex HPLC equipment with a diode array detector at 267 nm for detection. The 25-OH-D2 and 25-OH-D3 were eluted at the same time, but as the absorption coefficient is the same for the two metabolites, the measured values reflect the biological active vitamin D in serum. The detection limit was 10 nmol/l [28]. The intra- and intercoefficients of variance were 7.1% and 13%, respectively.

Assessing the accuracy of the used HPLC-method, 40 serum samples were measured both by the used HPLC method and by a validated HPLC method including certified reference materials (no. 968c; NIST, Gaithersburg, Md., USA) at the National Food Institute, Technical University of Denmark (DTU) as part of the OPTIFORD-project and compared [29].

Registry-based Diagnoses

All residents in Denmark have a unique and permanent personal civil registration number allowing linkage of data from complete national registers on an individual level. The Danish Registry of Causes of Death provided up to three diagnoses suspected to be the cause of death [30]. Denmark never used the ICD-9 but went directly from the ICD-8 to the ICD-10 before the studies took place. Consequently, the major groups of diagnoses of death were (all ICD-10): neoplasms, C00–D48; endocrine, nutritional and metabolic diseases, E00–E90; mental and behavioural disorders, F00–F99; diseases of the nervous system, G00–G99; diseases of the circulatory system, I00–I99; diseases of the respiratory system, J00–J99; and diseases of the digestive system, K00–K93. The remaining deaths (n = 96) consisted mainly of deaths caused by “Symptoms, signs and abnormal clinical and laboratory findings, not elsewhere classified” (R) and external causes of morbidity and mortality (X). Participants were followed until 31 December 2009.

Statistical Analyses

The analyses were performed with SAS, version 9.2 (SAS Institute Inc. Cary, NC USA). All p-values were two-sided, and p-values <0.05 were considered statistically significant. Descriptive characteristics of the participants presented as percent or median according to vitamin D quartiles were compared with non-parametric statistics (table 1). Vitamin D status according to the main causes of death is presented in table 2.

thumbnail

Table 1. Baseline characteristics stratified by vitamin D quartiles (N = 9,146).

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0052423.t001

Data from the Monica10 and Inter99 studies were merged. Multivariate Cox regression analysis was used to determine the association of baseline vitamin D status and cause-specific mortality. Vitamin D levels were divided into quartiles before merging the two studies to account for the different methods of measuring vitamin D and different storage time. The first (lowest) quartile was used as reference. Estimates are presented as hazard ratios, HRs (95% confidence intervals, CIs). For each outcome, only participants with complete information on all considered variables were included.

We used age as underlying time axis and delayed entry. Participants were followed and contributed with risk time in the analyses until date of death, date of emigration or 31 December 2009, whichever came first. We checked the proportional hazards assumption; time-dependent covariates; and Schoenfeld residuals.

In model 1 (table 3), we adjusted for study group (no intervention [participants from Monica10], lifestyle counseling [group B from Inter99], lifestyle and group counseling [group A from Inter99]). Model 2 was further adjusted for gender; education/vocational training (no education, education including students); season of blood sample (March-May, June-August, September-November, or December-February); intake of fish (<twice a week, ≥ twice a week); physical activity during leisure time (sedentary, light, or moderate/vigorous); smoking habits (never smokers, ex-smokers, occasional smokers, current smokers <15 g/day; 15-<25 g/day, or ≥25 g of tobacco/day; 1 cigarette = 1 g, 1 cheroot = 2 g, 1 cigar = 3 g, pipe = stated in g); BMI [31] (underweight <18.5 kg/m2, normal weight ≥18.5–25 kg/m2, overweight ≥25–30 kg/m2, and obese ≥30 kg/m2); and alcohol consumption (0, >0–7, >7–14, or >14 drinks per week). To allow the effect of vitamin D on the outcomes to differ between the study groups, we checked the interaction between study group and vitamin D status (non-significant in all models). Likewise, the interaction between vitamin D status and BMI was non-significant in all models.

In supplemental analyses, we excluded participants with a diagnosis of respiratory disease (ICD-8:240–279, ICD-10: J00–J99), digestive disease (ICD-8:52–57, ICD-10: K00–K93), or endocrine, nutritional or metabolic disease (ICD-8:240–279, ICD-10: E00–E90) before baseline to reduce the risk of reverse causation.

Results

The baseline characteristics of the study populations stratified by vitamin D quartiles are shown in table 1. In crude baseline analyses, vitamin D status was associated with alcohol consumption, education, BMI, season of blood test, physical activity, and smoking habits. The median vitamin D levels at baseline were 61.0 nmol/l (interquartile range, IQR, 44.7–80.9 nmol/l) and 48.0 nmol/l (IQR 32.0–65.0 nmol/l) in the Monica10 and Inter99 studies, respectively.

Most deaths were caused by neoplasms and diseases of the circulatory system accounting for approximately 40 percent, and one fourth of deaths, respectively (table 2). Vitamin D status was lowest among the persons dying of endocrine, nutritional and metabolic diseases, mental and behavioural disorders, and diseases of the digestive system, and highest among the persons dying of diseases of the nervous system or the circulatory system (table 2). The median follow-up time was approximately 10 years.

thumbnail

Table 2. Main causes of death during follow-up in the Monica10 and Inter99 studies and vitamin D status.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0052423.t002

We found significant inverse associations between vitamin D status and death caused by diseases of the respiratory system, the digestive system, and endocrine, nutritional and metabolic diseases (table 3). The estimates were stable through multiple adjustments. The hazard ratio for the fourth vitamin D quartile with the first quartile as reference was approximately 0.25 for all three groups.

thumbnail

Table 3. Hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals for the prospective associations between serum 25-OH vitamin D status and cause-specific mortality (individuals included = 8,329, person years at risk = 85,719).

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0052423.t003

In model 1, we found a significant inverse linear trend between vitamin D quartiles and death caused by neoplasms. The association, however, was no longer significant in the fully adjusted model when further adjusting for intake of fish, physical activity, smoking habits, body mass index, and alcohol consumption.

We found non-significantly lower HRs for mental and behavioural diseases and diseases of the nervous system. However, we found no association between vitamin D status and death caused by diseases of the circulatory system.

In additional analyses (data not shown) of the three major causes of death showing significant associations with vitamin D status, we excluded participants with a baseline diagnosis of the disease. Thus, we excluded persons with baseline respiratory disease (n = 929) for the outcome “death caused by diseases of the respiratory system”, persons with baseline digestive disease (n = 1,367) for the outcome “death caused by diseases of the digestive system, and persons with baseline endocrine, nutritional and metabolic diseases (n = 408) for the outcome “death caused by endocrine, nutritional and metabolic diseases”. The estimates remained stable for all three outcomes but for death caused by endocrine, nutritional and metabolic diseases, the association was no longer statistically significant.

Discussion

To the best of our knowledge, no studies have investigated the association of vitamin D status and different specific causes of death in the same study population. We found a significant inverse association between vitamin D status and death caused by diseases of the respiratory and the digestive system and by endocrine, nutritional and metabolic diseases, but no association with death caused by neoplasms or diseases of the circulatory system.

Our results regarding an inverse association between vitamin D status and death caused by respiratory disease are in line with previous studies. Romme et al found that vitamin D deficiency was present in the majority of patients with COPD entering pulmonary rehabilitation [15], and Black et al found a dose-response relationship between the serum concentration of 25-hydroxyvitamin D and FEV1 [16]. Likewise, a study by Ginde et al found an inverse association between 25-OH-D levels and recent upper respiratory tract infections [17]. Vitamin D could affect respiratory disease in a number of ways: it inhibits the formation of matrix metalloproteinases as well as fibroblast proliferation, and influences collagen synthesis thereby possibly influencing tissue remodeling [32]. In addition, it is suggested that vitamin D plays an important role in innate immunity, particularly through the antimicrobial peptide cathelicidin [33]. Since low BMI is an independent risk factor for mortality in subjects with COPD [34], it may be speculated whether vitamin D status is just a reflection of the level of malnutrition. The association, however, remained significant after adjusting for BMI and also after excluding the participants with a diagnosis of respiratory disease before the study, thereby providing some support for a possible causal effect of vitamin D on respiratory disease.

The observed inverse association between vitamin D status and death caused by digestive disease –liver disease accounting for over half– is consistent with previous findings of a high prevalence of vitamin D deficiency in patients with liver disease [18], and Putz-Bankuti et al found that low 25-OH-D levels predicted hepatic decompensation and mortality in patients with chronic liver failure [35]. Vitamin D deficiency might contribute to liver damage by increased inflammation and fibrosis and by reduced antiviral response [20]; [36][38]. Barchetta et al proposed a causal role of vitamin D in the development of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease by exerting a dose-dependent effect on fat accumulation into the hepatocytes [39].

However, the low vitamin D levels associated with liver disease could be a consequence of the disease rather than a cause. Patients with digestive disease are particularly prone to vitamin D deficiency due to fat malabsorption; bile salt deficiency; loss of absorptive surface; increased intestinal permeability; loss of liver function causing impaired hepatic hydroxylation of vitamin D, reduced hepatic production of vitamin D binding protein (DBP); or an impaired cutaneous production due to reduced sun exposure or jaundice [18]; [20]. The total levels of 25-OH-D are highly correlated with levels of DBP and albumin, and adjusting for liver function would have been an advantage. We attempted to reduce the bias of reverse causation by excluding the persons with a diagnosis of digestive disease (including liver disease) before the study. The association remained significant, strengthening our belief in a causal relationship between vitamin D and development of liver disease.

The observed lack of association between vitamin D status and circulatory disease mortality supports the results from a study by Melamed et al [40]. It is, however, inconsistent with several other observational studies [4]; [41]; [42], including a recent study by Thomas et al who found an optimal vitamin D level to lower all-cause and cardiovascular disease mortality in patients with the metabolic syndrome [43]. There may be several reasons for the different results. Most of the mentioned studies examined older people, or subgroups, where vitamin D could be more important regarding CVD risk. Worth mentioning, two studies of vitamin D supplementation found no effect on CVD [44]; [45].

Our results regarding an association between vitamin D status and death caused by endocrine, nutritional and metabolic diseases – diabetes mellitus accounting for three fourths – conform with results from previous observational studies [12]; [46]. The possible mechanisms are uncertain but vitamin D may preserve glucose tolerance through effects on insulin secretion and sensitivity [47].

The observed lack of association between vitamin D status and death caused by neoplasms is consistent with a study by Freedman et al reporting no overall relationship between 25-OH-D and cancer mortality risk in the general population [48]. However, despite a proposed role for vitamin D in some of the common pathways of cancer –i.e. through induction of apoptosis and prevention of angiogenesis in malignant cells, thereby reducing the potential for the malignant cell to survive [1]– different types of cancer may not share the same possible vitamin D dependent pathway. A meta-analysis by Ma et al thus reported an inverse association between blood 25-OH-D levels and the risk of colorectal cancer [8], whereas a meta-analysis on 25-OH-D levels and breast cancer by Yin et al found no significant association in the cohort studies measuring vitamin D status at baseline before cancer diagnosis [49]. As yet, results regarding a potential role for vitamin D in the prevention of cancer are conflicting [50].

Although non-significant, the observed inverse association between vitamin D status and mental and behavioural disorders, is consistent with a previous study by Annweiler et al reporting an inverse association between vitamin D intake and risk of Alzheimer’s disease [21] and a study by Hogberg et al showing amelioration of depressive symptoms after vitamin D supplementation in 54 depressed adolescents [23]. On the one hand, low cognitive function may lead to low dietary intakes of vitamin D and a lack of sunlight exposure leading to lower vitamin D levels. On the other hand, since vitamin D is a steroid hormone exerting neurosteroid actions in the central nervous system, it may partially explain neuronal degeneration and dementia [51]. Interestingly, recent studies found yet a significant positive association of vitamin D with cognition after adjusting for nutritional and physical status [51].

As mentioned above, some of the diseases are likely to cause rather than be caused by the low vitamin D status. Possible examples include liver disease and mental disease caused by alcohol abuse which may also have reduced liver function. Likewise, vitamin D could simply be a marker of a healthy lifestyle as shown in table 1. Thus, the associations may at least be explained partly by residual confounding.

The strengths of our study include the longitudinal population-based design and the large random sample of the Danish population highly prevalent of low vitamin D status [28]; a long-term follow-up and the use of standardised registry-based diagnoses with almost no individuals lost to follow-up; and the available information on potential confounders.

The limitations of the study include the loss of information when merging studies; the different methods of vitamin D measurements in the merged studies; the non-specific nature of the main causes of death; the interventional design of the Inter99 study; the lack of objective markers of liver and kidney function; and the single vitamin D measurement. A single 25-OH-D measurement may lose predictive power over time. Thus, Grant found a diminishing utility over time of a single measurement of 25-OH-D for determining the effect of vitamin D in reducing the risk of cancer [52]. Somewhat supportive of the use of a single 25-OH-D measurement to predict future health outcomes, Jorde et al found vitamin D status to be as stable a predictor as blood pressure and lipids [53], but the findings are likely an underestimate of the true associations. The mortality is generally low in this general population sample with median age just below 50 years giving a low number of events in some of the major causes of death, especially among the non-cardiovascular and non-neoplasm groups. Thus, the power for statistical analysis in most of these categories is low.

In conclusion, we found significant inverse associations between vitamin D status and death caused by diseases of the endocrine, the respiratory, and the digestive system but no associations with death caused by neoplasms or diseases of the circulatory system. Due to the explorative nature of the study and the low number of events in some of the disease categories, the results need to be confirmed in other studies. The results, however, suggest that we also look elsewhere (than to cardiovascular disease and cancer) to explain the inverse association between vitamin D status and mortality.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the participants and all members of the Inter99 staff at Research Centre for Prevention and Health. The Inter99 study was initiated by Torben Jørgensen, DMSci (principal investigator); Knut Borch-Johnsen, DMSci, (co-principal investigator); Troels Thomsen, PhD; and Hans Ibsen, DMSci. The Steering Committee comprises the former two and Charlotta Pisinger, PhD, MPH.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: LNH CP TJ BHT MF AL TS. Analyzed the data: TS AL LNH. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: MF. Wrote the paper: TS.

References

  1. 1. Holick MF (2007) Vitamin D deficiency. N Engl J Med 357: 266–81. doi: 10.1056/nejmra070553
  2. 2. Hagenau T, Vest R, Gissel TN, Poulsen CS, Erlandsen M, et al. (2009) Global vitamin D levels in relation to age, gender, skin pigmentation and latitude: an ecologic meta-regression analysis. Osteoporos Int 20: 133–40. doi: 10.1007/s00198-008-0626-y
  3. 3. Holick MF (2005) The vitamin D epidemic and its health consequences. J Nutr 135: 2739S–48S.
  4. 4. Ginde AA, Scragg R, Schwartz RS, Camargo CA Jr (2009) Prospective study of serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D level, cardiovascular disease mortality, and all-cause mortality in older U.S. adults. J Am Geriatr Soc 57: 1595–603. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2009.02359.x
  5. 5. Hutchinson MS, Grimnes G, Joakimsen RM, Figenschau Y, Jorde R (2010) Low serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels are associated with increased all-cause mortality risk in a general population: the Tromso study. Eur J Endocrinol 162: 935–42. doi: 10.1530/eje-09-1041
  6. 6. Autier P, Gandini S (2007) Vitamin D supplementation and total mortality: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Arch Intern Med 167: 1730–7. doi: 10.1001/archinte.167.16.1730
  7. 7. Rejnmark L, Avenell A, Masud T, Anderson F, Meyer HE, et al. (2012) Vitamin D with calcium reduces mortality: patient level pooled analysis of 70,528 patients from eight major vitamin D trials. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 97: 2670–81. doi: 10.1210/jc.2011-3328
  8. 8. Ma Y, Zhang P, Wang F, Yang J, Liu Z, et al. (2011) Association between vitamin D and risk of colorectal cancer: a systematic review of prospective studies. J Clin Oncol 29: 3775–82. doi: 10.1200/jco.2011.35.7566
  9. 9. Kilkkinen A, Knekt P, Heliovaara M, Rissanen H, Marniemi J, et al. (2008) Vitamin D status and the risk of lung cancer: a cohort study in Finland. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 17: 3274–8. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.epi-08-0199
  10. 10. Abbas S, Chang-Claude J, Linseisen J (2009) Plasma 25-hydroxyvitamin D and premenopausal breast cancer risk in a German case-control study. Int J Cancer 124: 250–5. doi: 10.1002/ijc.23904
  11. 11. Wang TJ, Pencina MJ, Booth SL, Jacques PF, Ingelsson E, et al. (2008) Vitamin D deficiency and risk of cardiovascular disease. Circulation 117: 503–11. doi: 10.1161/circulationaha.107.706127
  12. 12. Pittas AG, Sun Q, Manson JE, Dawson-Hughes B, Hu FB (2010) Plasma 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentration and risk of incident type 2 diabetes in women. Diabetes Care 33: 2021–3. doi: 10.2337/dc10-0790
  13. 13. Hypponen E, Power C (2006) Vitamin D status and glucose homeostasis in the 1958 British birth cohort: the role of obesity. Diabetes Care 29: 2244–6. doi: 10.2337/dc06-0946
  14. 14. Forouhi NG, Luan J, Cooper A, Boucher BJ, Wareham NJ (2008) Baseline serum 25-hydroxy vitamin d is predictive of future glycemic status and insulin resistance: the Medical Research Council Ely Prospective Study 1990–2000. Diabetes 57: 2619–25. doi: 10.2337/db08-0593
  15. 15. Romme EA, Rutten EP, Smeenk FW, Spruit MA, Menheere PP, et al.. (2012) Vitamin D status is associated with bone mineral density and functional exercise capacity in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Ann Med.
  16. 16. Black PN, Scragg R (2005) Relationship between serum 25-hydroxyvitamin d and pulmonary function in the third national health and nutrition examination survey. Chest 128: 3792–8. doi: 10.1378/chest.128.6.3792
  17. 17. Ginde AA, Mansbach JM, Camargo CA Jr (2009) Association between serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D level and upper respiratory tract infection in the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Arch Intern Med 169: 384–90. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2008.560
  18. 18. Malham M, Jorgensen SP, Ott P, Agnholt J, Vilstrup H, et al. (2011) Vitamin D deficiency in cirrhosis relates to liver dysfunction rather than aetiology. World J Gastroenterol 17: 922–5. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v17.i7.922
  19. 19. Arteh J, Narra S, Nair S (2010) Prevalence of vitamin D deficiency in chronic liver disease. Dig Dis Sci 55: 2624–8. doi: 10.1007/s10620-009-1069-9
  20. 20. Pappa HM, Bern E, Kamin D, Grand RJ (2008) Vitamin D status in gastrointestinal and liver disease. Curr Opin Gastroenterol 24: 176–83. doi: 10.1097/mog.0b013e3282f4d2f3
  21. 21. Annweiler C, Rolland Y, Schott AM, Blain H, Vellas B, et al.. (2012) Higher Vitamin D Dietary Intake Is Associated With Lower Risk of Alzheimer's Disease: A 7-Year Follow-up. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci.
  22. 22. Llewellyn DJ, Lang IA, Langa KM, Muniz-Terrera G, Phillips CL, et al. (2010) Vitamin D and risk of cognitive decline in elderly persons. Arch Intern Med 170: 1135–41. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2010.173
  23. 23. Hogberg G, Gustafsson SA, Hallstrom T, Gustafsson T, Klawitter B, et al.. (2012) Depressed adolescents in a case-series were low in vitamin D and depression was ameliorated by vitamin D supplementation. Acta Paediatr.
  24. 24. Olsen MH, Hansen TW, Christensen MK, Gustafsson F, Rasmussen S, et al. (2007) N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide, but not high sensitivity C-reactive protein, improves cardiovascular risk prediction in the general population. Eur Heart J 28: 1374–81. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehl448
  25. 25. Jorgensen T, Borch-Johnsen K, Thomsen TF, Ibsen H, Glumer C, et al. (2003) A randomized non-pharmacological intervention study for prevention of ischaemic heart disease: baseline results Inter99. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil 10: 377–86. doi: 10.1097/01.hjr.0000096541.30533.82
  26. 26. Carter GD, Carter R, Jones J, Berry J (2004) How accurate are assays for 25-hydroxyvitamin D? Data from the international vitamin D external quality assessment scheme. Clin Chem 50: 2195–7. doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2004.040683
  27. 27. Thyssen JP, Thuesen B, Huth C, Standl M, Carson CG, et al.. (2012) Skin barrier abnormality caused by filaggrin (FLG) mutations is associated with increased serum 25-hydroxy vitamin D concentrations. J Allergy Clin Immunol.
  28. 28. Thuesen B, Husemoen L, Fenger M, Jakobsen J, Schwarz P, et al. (2012) Determinants of vitamin D status in a general population of Danish adults. Bone 50: 605–10. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2011.12.016
  29. 29. Jakobsen J, Bysted A, Andersen R, Bennett T, Brot C, et al. (2009) Vitamin D status assessed by a validated HPLC method: within and between variation in subjects supplemented with vitamin D3. Scand J Clin Lab Invest 69: 190–7. doi: 10.1080/00365510802471570
  30. 30. Juel K, Helweg-Larsen K (1999) The Danish registers of causes of death. Dan Med Bull 46: 354–7.
  31. 31. Obesity: preventing and managing the global epidemic. Report of a WHO consultation (2000) World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser. 894: i–253. doi: 10.1017/s0021932003245508
  32. 32. Dobak J, Grzybowski J, Liu FT, Landon B, Dobke M (1994) 1,25-Dihydroxyvitamin D3 increases collagen production in dermal fibroblasts. J Dermatol Sci 8: 18–24. doi: 10.1016/0923-1811(94)90316-6
  33. 33. Adams JS, Hewison M (2008) Unexpected actions of vitamin D: new perspectives on the regulation of innate and adaptive immunity. Nat Clin Pract Endocrinol Metab 4: 80–90. doi: 10.1038/ncpendmet0716
  34. 34. Landbo C, Prescott E, Lange P, Vestbo J, Almdal TP (1999) Prognostic value of nutritional status in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 160: 1856–61. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.160.6.9902115
  35. 35. Putz-Bankuti C, Pilz S, Stojakovic T, Scharnagl H, Pieber TR, et al. (2012) Association of 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels with liver dysfunction and mortality in chronic liver disease. Liver Int 32: 845–51. doi: 10.1111/j.1478-3231.2011.02735.x
  36. 36. Bouillon R, Carmeliet G, Verlinden L, van EE, Verstuyf A, et al. (2008) Vitamin D and human health: lessons from vitamin D receptor null mice. Endocr Rev 29: 726–76. doi: 10.1210/er.2008-0004
  37. 37. Bikle DD (2007) Vitamin D insufficiency/deficiency in gastrointestinal disorders. J Bone Miner Res 22 Suppl 2V50–V54. doi: 10.1359/jbmr.07s208
  38. 38. Petta S, Camma C, Scazzone C, Tripodo C, Di M, V, et al (2010) Low vitamin D serum level is related to severe fibrosis and low responsiveness to interferon-based therapy in genotype 1 chronic hepatitis C. Hepatology. 51: 1158–67. doi: 10.1002/hep.23489
  39. 39. Barchetta I, Angelico F, Del BM, Baroni MG, Pozzilli P, et al. (2011) Strong association between non alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and low 25(OH) vitamin D levels in an adult population with normal serum liver enzymes. BMC Med 9: 85. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-9-85
  40. 40. Melamed ML, Michos ED, Post W, Astor B (2008) 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels and the risk of mortality in the general population. Arch Intern Med 168: 1629–37. doi: 10.1001/archinte.168.15.1629
  41. 41. Semba RD, Houston DK, Bandinelli S, Sun K, Cherubini A, et al. (2010) Relationship of 25-hydroxyvitamin D with all-cause and cardiovascular disease mortality in older community-dwelling adults. Eur J Clin Nutr 64: 203–9. doi: 10.1038/ejcn.2009.140
  42. 42. Pilz S, Dobnig H, Nijpels G, Heine RJ, Stehouwer CD, et al. (2009) Vitamin D and mortality in older men and women. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 71: 666–72. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2265.2009.03548.x
  43. 43. Thomas GN, Hartaigh B, Bosch JA, Pilz S, Loerbroks A, et al. (2012) Vitamin D levels predict all-cause and cardiovascular disease mortality in subjects with the metabolic syndrome: the Ludwigshafen Risk and Cardiovascular Health (LURIC) Study. Diabetes Care 35: 1158–64. doi: 10.2337/dc11-1714
  44. 44. Hsia J, Heiss G, Ren H, Allison M, Dolan NC, et al. (2007) Calcium/vitamin D supplementation and cardiovascular events. Circulation 115: 846–54. doi: 10.1161/circulationaha.106.673491
  45. 45. Trivedi DP, Doll R, Khaw KT (2003) Effect of four monthly oral vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol) supplementation on fractures and mortality in men and women living in the community: randomised double blind controlled trial. BMJ 326: 469. doi: 10.1136/bmj.326.7387.469
  46. 46. Anderson JL, May HT, Horne BD, Bair TL, Hall NL, et al. (2010) Relation of vitamin D deficiency to cardiovascular risk factors, disease status, and incident events in a general healthcare population. Am J Cardiol 106: 963–8. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2010.05.027
  47. 47. Alvarez JA, Ashraf A (2010) Role of vitamin d in insulin secretion and insulin sensitivity for glucose homeostasis. Int J Endocrinol 2010: 351385. doi: 10.1155/2010/351385
  48. 48. Freedman DM, Looker AC, Abnet CC, Linet MS, Graubard BI (2010) Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D and cancer mortality in the NHANES III study (1988–2006). Cancer Res 70: 8587–97. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.can-10-1420
  49. 49. Yin L, Grandi N, Raum E, Haug U, Arndt V, et al. (2010) Meta-analysis: serum vitamin D and breast cancer risk. Eur J Cancer 46: 2196–205. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2010.03.037
  50. 50. IARC/WHO. Vitamin D and Cancer. 2008.
  51. 51. Annweiler C, Beauchet O (2011) Vitamin D-mentia: randomized clinical trials should be the next step. Neuroepidemiology 37: 249–58. doi: 10.1159/000334177
  52. 52. Grant WB (2011) Effect of interval between serum draw and follow-up period on relative risk of cancer incidence with respect to 25-hydroxyvitamin D level: Implications for meta-analyses and setting vitamin D guidelines. Dermatoendocrinol 3: 199–204.
  53. 53. Jorde R, Sneve M, Hutchinson M, Emaus N, Figenschau Y, et al. (2010) Tracking of serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels during 14 years in a population-based study and during 12 months in an intervention study. Am J Epidemiol 171: 903–8. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwq005