Figures
Abstract
The evolution of Neotropical Primates (NP) is permeated by factors associated with the pattern of diversification and the biogeography of the major lineages. These questions can be better understood by providing a robust estimate of the chronological scenario of NP evolution, a reason why molecular dating methods have been widely applied. One aspect of especial interest is the timing of diversification of the major NP lineages (pitheciids, atelids and cebids), which may have resulted from rapid episodes of adaptive radiation, a question that requires NP divergence time estimates with accurate statistical certainty. In this study, we evaluated the primate timescale focused on the age of nodes of NP radiation. We investigated the performance of complete primate mitochondrial genomes as traditional molecular markers of primate evolution and further including original mitochondrial data from the endangered muriqui, Brachyteles arachnoides (Accession No. JX262672). Comparisons of the age estimates at NP nodes based on mitochondrial genomes with those obtained from a nuclear supermatrix showed similar degrees of uncertainty. Further molecular data and more informative calibration priors are required for a more precise understanding of the early NP diversification.
Citation: Schrago CG, Menezes AN, Moreira MAM, Pissinatti A, Seuánez HN (2012) Chronology of Deep Nodes in the Neotropical Primate Phylogeny: Insights from Mitochondrial Genomes. PLoS ONE 7(12): e51699. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0051699
Editor: William J. Murphy, Texas A&M University, United States of America
Received: July 12, 2012; Accepted: November 5, 2012; Published: December 14, 2012
Copyright: © 2012 Schrago et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Funding: CGS was funded by the Brazilian Research Council-CNPq grant 308147/2009-0 and the Rio de Janeiro State Science Foundation-FAPERJ grants 110.028/2011 and 111.831/2011. HNS was funded by CNPq grant 303306/2010-6 and FAPERJ grant E-26/103.012/2011. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Introduction
Although the diversification of Neotropical Primates (NP; Primates, Anthropoidea, Platyrrhini) has recently been a subject of detailed analyses [1], [2], [3], [4] several aspects of the evolutionary history of this group still remains poorly understood. This is the case of how NP emerged and the geoclimatic scenario that enabled the ancestral old world anthropoid stock to reach the New World island-continent in the Eocene/Oligocene transition, a setting requiring a well-established timescale [5]. Similarly, the different propositions on the diversification patterns of the crown Platyrrhini clade and the phylogenetic affinities of NP fossils from Miocene deposits from Argentina are tightly dependent on the timing of NP evolution [6].
Furthermore, the conspicuous spatial distribution of some NP lineages has triggered the investigation of the underlying ecological and geological factors operating during their biogeographic history. This is particularly noticeable in lineages comprising Amazonian and non-Amazonian representatives, like the (Mico, Cebuella)/Callithrix sister genera [7], the gracile and robust Cebus groups [8], and Callicebus species [9]. The genus Brachyteles is also of biogeographic interest because its two extant species are distributed in the Atlantic forest contrary to other representatives of the tribe Atelini which inhabit the Amazonian forest.
Phylogenomic analyses have been crucial for more accurate age estimations of NP nodes in topologies based on high number of genes for inferring NP timescales [10], while an increasing number of NP genome projects is presently underway [11]. Thus, the amount of molecular data available in the years to come will likely reduce the inherent stochastic error of divergence time inferences.
Mitochondrial genomes comprise the most abundant genomic material per species for studying primate evolution. At present, while only some 12 nuclear primate genomes have been partially or completely analyzed, more than 50 complete primate mitochondrial genomes are publicly available. It is therefore relevant to investigate whether timescales based on this genomic component are equivalent to those inferred from nuclear DNA supermatrices.
In this study, we have inferred the primate timescale based on mitochondrial genomes, with special emphasis on NP diversification, a controversial point in NP systematics. Studies conducted to present have reported that the diversification of pitheciids, atelids and cebids has been a rapid event, an evolutionary pattern that could only be understood by estimating divergence times with minimum uncertainty. In order to increase taxonomic sampling of NP nodes, we sequenced the complete mitochondrial genome of the endangered muriqui, Brachyteles arachnoides. Our findings indicated that divergence time estimates inferred from mitochondrial genomes were similar to estimates with nuclear gene supermatrices, and that the amount of effective informative data of mitochondrial genomes was equivalent to the one provided by nuclear supermatrices.
Materials and Methods
Collection of Samples and Ethical Considerations
Peripheral blood samples were obtained from a captive, male Brachyteles arachnoides (CPRJ2506) kept in the Centro de Primatologia do Rio de Janeiro (CPRJ-INEA). Samples used in this study were part of the blood samples regularly collected for checkups and control of captive animals. Sample collection was carried out following the national guidelines and provisions of IBAMA (Instituto Brasileiro do Meio Ambiente e dos Recursos Naturais Renováveis, Brazil; permanent license number 11375-1). The granting of this licence by IBAMA followed approval by its Ethics Committee. The Centro de Primatologia do Rio de Janeiro is located 100 km northeast of the city of Rio de Janeiro, in a protected forest area of the Serra dos Órgãos mountain range. The Centro is not open to visitors. In this facility, animals are housed in groups in outdoor enclosures consisting of wire mesh, being exposed to the Atlantic Forest conditions such as sounds, temperature, and rainfall. The Brachyteles enclosures measure 16.0 m×6.0 m×6.0 m high with an additional area of 2 m×6 m×3 m high for feeding. Food and fresh water were provided twice a day. The diet consisted of bread, bananas, eggs, raisins, meat, and various commercially prepared protein supplements.
Genomic DNA was extracted with QIAamp® DNA Mini and Blood Mini kit (Quiagen®). DNA was quantified with a NanoDrop spectrophotometer and its quality and integrity were checked by electrophoresis in 1% agarose gels. Genomic DNA was fragmented with an Invitrogen nebulizer under 40 psi for 40 seconds in TE buffer and 25% glicerol. Following the observation of 300–400 bp fragments by electrophoresis, DNA was quantified using a Qubit 2.0 fluorometer. Library preparation followed Illumina Sequencing Workflow protocols for the HiSeq2000 platform. DNA containing 400–500 bp fragments, checked with Agilent Bioanalyzer 2100 DNA using a high sensitivity DNA chip, was subsequently tested by qPCR using a Library Quantification kit for library validation (KAPA – KK4824). DNA Cluster generation was prepared for 2 lanes of a PE Flowcell v.3 following the manufacturer’s protocol. A 75×75 run was carried out in an Illumina HiSeq2000 platform. Cycles registered 84.4% base calls with Q30 quality score. The mitochondrial genome was assembled using the CLC Genomics Workbench 5.1 with default settings. Genome assembly was performed using published Platyrrhini mitochondrial genomes as references. We also restricted minimum contig length to >13,000 bp to speed up the process. On average, coverage of the mitochondrial genome was 165X.
Open reading frames were manually annotated.
Evolutionary Analysis
Complete mitochondrial genomes of 42 selected primates were downloaded from GenBank (Table 1). We have independently aligned the 13 protein coding mitochondrial genes, which were subsequently concatenated in an 11,672 bp supermatrix. The supermatrix was partitioned into codon positions. Evolutionary model choice was implemented with HyPhy using the likelihood ratio test [12]. Bayesian phylogenetic inference was conducted with MrBayes 3.2 [13] allowing for independent evolutionary parameters of the GTR+G model (nst = 6 and rates = gamma) for each partition, i.e., codon position. In MrBayes, Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) was run independently 3 times (nruns = 3) with one cold and two hot chains (nchains = 3). In each run, chains were sampled every 100th cycle until 100,000 topologies were obtained. When topologies were summarized, the first 10,000 trees were discarded as burn-in. Convergence of the MCMC run was diagnosed by the potential scale reduction factor, which approached 1.00 for all parameters. We have also conducted maximum likelihood (ML) phylogenetic inference in PhyML 3 [14] using the GTR+G model. Tree topology search was implemented using both the nearest neighbor interchange and subtree pruning and regrafting methods. In PhyML, we used the approximate likelihood ratio test for obtaining statistical support of the clades [15].
Estimation of divergence time was conducted with the MCMCTree program of the PAML 4.5 package [16]. This program implements the method of Rannala and Yang [17] which models the evolution of substitution rates along branches using a log-normal distribution in which the mean rate of a branch is independent of the rate of its ancestral branch (clock = 2). To approximate the posterior density of divergence times, the MCMC algorithm was run for 50,000,000 generations and sampled every 100th cycle; 10,000 generations were discarded as burn-in. Prior distribution settings for node ages (birth and death model) and evolutionary rates (gamma distribution) were as follows: BDparas = 1 1 0.1; rgene_gamma = 2 2; sigma2_gamma = 1 10. Convergence of the MCMC run was diagnosed by the potential scale reduction factor, which approached 1.00 for all parameters and by calculating effective sample sizes, which were greater than 200 for all parameters.
Calibration data used to constrain the prior distribution of age nodes was carried out as follows. The age of the basal diversification of the Primates was constrained to be older than 55.6 Ma, based on the fossil record of Altiatlasius sp. [18]. The split between lemuroid and lorisoid prosiminans was modeled by a uniform distribution with minimum and maximum limits at 33.7 Ma (Mega annum, or million years ago) and 55.6 Ma respectively [19]. The minimum value of the basal Anthropoid diversification was set at 33.7 Ma, based on the age of Catopithecus sp., a stem Catarrhine primate [20]. The Hominoid/Cercopithecoid split was calibrated by a uniform distribution from 34.0 Ma to 23.5 Ma based on the age of Proconsul sp. [21]. The separation of the Pongo lineage to the other great apes was constrained by a uniform prior from 33.7 Ma to 11.2 Ma [22]. The Gorilla split was enforced to be older than 7.25 Ma and, finally, the Homo/Pan divergence was constrained between 5.7 Ma and 10.0 Ma [23].
With the purpose of investigating whether the information contained in mitochondrial genomes approached its theoretical limit, we plotted the width of the 95% credibility interval (the highest probability density, HPD, interval) of posterior densities of age estimates against their mean values. Theoretically, when alignment size approaches infinity, we would expect a perfect linear relationship between node age (t) and credibility intervals (w) [17], [24]. Thus, by fitting a regression line on the w × t plot, we calculated the degree of uncertainty of estimates associated with sequence length, i.e., the stochastic error. If the fit is well supported, further increase in precision of estimates is only possible by the adoption of more informative calibration priors. For the sake of comparison, we also measured the fit of the w × t regression line for estimates of the recent comprehensive analysis of Perelman et al. [10] who used a 34,941 bp supermatrix of nuclear genes with 190 terminals.
Results
The Brachyteles arachnoides mitochondrial genome was 16,491 bp long (GenBank JX262672); gene order being the same as in mammals (Table 2) and with base frequencies corresponding to values recorded for platyrrhines: fA = 31.4%, fC = 27.5%, fG = 12.5% and fT = 28.6%.
Phylogenetic analyses showed identical Bayesian and ML tree topologies except for the position of Semnopithecus entellus as a sister lineage of the ((Rhinopithecus, Pygathrix), Nasalis) clade in ML (Figure 1). Our inferred primate phylogeny based on mitochondrial genomes was similar to the topological arrangement proposed by Perelman et al. [10] although differences were found in the evolutionary affinities of colobine monkeys. With respect to NP, we confirmed that the Pitheciidae represented the first basal offshoot, supporting the sister taxa relationship of Atelidae and Cebidae (100% posterior probability and 0.94 approximate likelihood ratio statistic). Among cebids, Saimiri and Cebus were arranged as sister groups and Aotus formed a monophyletic assemblage with Saguinus (a callitrichine), as recently proposed. Brachyteles grouped with the Amazonian spider monkey, Ateles belzebuth.
Nodes were supported by 100% Bayesian posterior probability (PP) and 100% approximate likelihood ratio statistic (aLRT). Exceptions are illustrated by the values of PP/aLRT on nodes. Bars indicate 95% credibility intervals. (*) Node not recovered in ML analysis.
The inferred timescale placed the time to the recent common ancestor (TMRCA) of extant neotropical primates in the early Miocene, ca. 22 Ma, with a 95% HPD interval ranging from 17.8 to 26.6 Ma, from the late Oligocene to early Miocene (Figure 1). Following the early pitheciid diversification, atelids also separated from cebids in the early Miocene, 19.6 Ma; the credibility interval ranging from the beginning to the end of the early Miocene, 23.9 to 15.9 Ma. The TMRCA of modern cebids was inferred as 17.8 Ma, also in the early Miocene while the Aotus/callitrichinae and Cebus/Saimiri splits were estimated to have taken place in the transition period from the early to middle Miocene (ca. 16 Ma). Within Cebus, the gracile and robust groups diverged at approximately 6 Ma. Finally, the TMRCA of Atelinae, the splitting between Ateles from the Brachyteles/Lagothrix common stock, was estimated to have occurred 12.6 Ma, from middle to late Miocene. The 95% credibility interval encompasses the whole middle Miocene transition, from 9.3 to 16.4 Ma.
The plot of the credibility interval against divergence time estimates from mitochondrial genomes showed a significant fit to the linear regression line w = 0.32t (R2 = 0.92, p<0.01) (Figure 2a), indicating that, for each 10 Ma of age estimates, the width of the credibility interval approximately increased by 3.2 Ma. Although significant, the fit to the regression line was below 95%, pointing that improvement of divergence time estimates might be achieved by increasing amounts of sequence data, using additional informative calibration priors or both.
All regressions were significant at p<0.01. (a) Mitochondrial genomes; (b) Neotropical primate data reported by Perelman et al [10]; Catarrhine data reported by Perelman et al [10].
Analyses of NP data reported by Perelman et al. [10] showed that the width of credibility intervals and divergence times were associated, with a coefficient equal to 0.47 (R2 = 0.79, p<0.01) (Figure 2b) showing that, for every 10 Ma, the uncertainty associated with the time estimates increased by 4.7 Ma. For catarrhines, the angular coefficient equaled 0.44, but the regression line showed a better fit (R2 = 0.95, p<0.01) (Figure 2c).
Discussion
The NP timescale estimated from mitochondrial genomes was similar to recent findings using nuclear [25] or combined [26] phylogenomic datasets. This was also the case of the latest extensive analysis of Perelman et al. [10] placing the TMRCA of extant NP at the late Oligocene (25 Ma). Moreover, the age of the Atelidae/Cebidae separation, as well as the TMRCA of modern cebids, were also estimated to have occurred in the early Miocene. Likewise, the separation of Cebus/Saimiri, Aotus/callitrichinae and gracile from robust Cebus groups were all in agreement with estimates using mitochondrial genomes.
These similarities show that mitochondrial genomes provide useful data to study primate evolution. Moreover, an assessment of the analyses carried out for NP by Perelman et al. [10] showed that the precision of their estimates was actually lower than those observed in this study. This discrepancy might result from the selected set of calibration priors, although the low R2 estimate of Perelman et al. [10] indicated that informative sequence data were not saturated, and that the NP timescale might be improved by including additional genes in analyses. It should be noted that a different scenario was apparent when analyzing the catarrhine data reported by Perelman et al. [10] because the regression line between w and t showed a better fit (R2 = 0.95), indicating that increasing the number of genes may not improve the precision of estimates. This can only be achieved with better calibration priors.
In conclusion, mitochondrial genomes were shown to be as effective as nuclear supermatrices for dating the diversification of extant NP lineages. Nevertheless, it is evident that available data are still far below the ideal theoretical limit, and that sequencing of additional genomes will reduce uncertainties associated with the evolution of the major NP lineages.
Acknowledgments
We are grateful to Carolina Furtado for helping us with library construction and sequencing.
Author Contributions
Conceived and designed the experiments: CGS MAM ANM. Performed the experiments: MAM. Analyzed the data: ANM. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: HNS. Wrote the paper: HNS CGS. Provided blood samples and was responsible for keeping the male B. arachnoides in captivity: AP.
References
- 1. Schrago CG (2007) On the time scale of new world primate diversification. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 132: 344–354.
- 2. Loss-Oliveira L, Aguiar BO, Schrago CG (2012) Testing Synchrony in Historical Biogeography: The Case of New World Primates and Hystricognathi Rodents. Evolutionary Bioinformatics 8: 127–137.
- 3. Poux C, Chevret P, Huchon D, de Jong WW, Douzery EJ (2006) Arrival and diversification of caviomorph rodents and platyrrhine primates in South America. Systematic Biology 55: 228–244.
- 4. Hodgson JA, Sterner KN, Matthews LJ, Burrell AS, Jani RA, et al. (2009) Successive radiations, not stasis, in the South American primate fauna. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 106: 5534–5539.
- 5.
de Oliveira FB, Molina EC, Marroig G (2008) Paleogeography of the South Atlantic: a Route for Primates and Rodents into the New World? In: Garber PA, Estrada A, Bicca-Marques JC, Heymann EW, editors. South American Primates, Developments in Primatology: Progress and Prospects: Springer.
- 6. Kay RF, Fleagle JG, Mitchell TR, Colbert M, Bown T, et al. (2008) The anatomy of Dolichocebus gaimanensis, a stem platyrrhine monkey from Argentina. Journal of Human Evolution 54: 323–382.
- 7. Schneider H, Bernardi JAR, da Cunha DB, Tagliaro CH, Vallinoto M, et al. (2012) A molecular analysis of the evolutionary relationships in the Callitrichinae, with emphasis on the position of the dwarf marmoset. Zoologica Scripta 41: 1–10.
- 8. Alfaro JWL, Silva JDE, Rylands AB (2012) How Different Are Robust and Gracile Capuchin Monkeys? An Argument for the Use of Sapajus and Cebus. American Journal of Primatology 74: 273–286.
- 9. van Roosmalen MGM, van Roosmalen T, Mittermeier RA (2002) A taxonomic review of the titi monkeys, genus Callicebus Thomas, 1903, with the description of two new species, Callicebus bernhardi and Callicebus stephennashi, from Brazilian Amazonia. Neotropical Primates 10: 1–52.
- 10. Perelman P, Johnson WE, Roos C, Seuanez HN, Horvath JE, et al. (2011) A molecular phylogeny of living primates. Plos Genetics 7: e1001342.
- 11. Haussler D, O’Brien SJ, Ryder OA, Barker FK, Clamp M, et al. (2009) Genome 10K: A Proposal to Obtain Whole-Genome Sequence for 10,000 Vertebrate Species. Journal of Heredity 100: 659–674.
- 12. Pond SLK, Frost SDW, Muse SV (2005) HyPhy: hypothesis testing using phylogenies. Bioinformatics 21: 676–679.
- 13. Huelsenbeck JP, Ronquist F (2001) MRBAYES: Bayesian inference of phylogenetic trees. Bioinformatics 17: 754–755.
- 14. Guindon S, Gascuel O (2003) A simple, fast, and accurate algorithm to estimate large phylogenies by maximum likelihood. Systematic Biology 52: 696–704.
- 15. Anisimova M, Gascuel O (2006) Approximate likelihood-ratio test for branches: A fast, accurate, and powerful alternative. Systematic Biology 55: 539–552.
- 16. Yang ZH (2007) PAML 4: Phylogenetic analysis by maximum likelihood. Molecular Biology and Evolution 24: 1586–1591.
- 17. Rannala B, Yang ZH (2007) Inferring speciation times under an episodic molecular clock. Systematic Biology 56: 453–466.
- 18. Tabuce R, Mahboubi M, Tafforeau P, Sudre J (2004) Discovery of a highly-specialized plesiadapiform primate in the early-middle Eocene of northwestern Africa. Journal of Human Evolution 47: 305–321.
- 19. Seiffert ER (2007) Early evolution and biogeography of Lorisiform strepsirrhines. American Journal of Primatology 69: 27–35.
- 20. Simons EL, Rasmussen DT (1996) Skull of Catopithecus browni, an early tertiary catarrhine. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 100: 261–292.
- 21. Gebo DL, MacLatchy L, Kityo R, Deino A, Kingston J, et al. (1997) A hominoid genus from the early Miocene of Uganda. Science 276: 401–404.
- 22. Chaimanee Y, Jolly D, Benammi M, Tafforeau P, Duzer D, et al. (2003) A Middle Miocene hominoid from Thailand and orangutan origins. Nature 422: 61–65.
- 23. Ruff C (2010) Body size and body shape in early hominins - implications of the Gona Pelvis. Journal of Human Evolution 58: 166–178.
- 24. Yang ZH, Rannala B (2006) Bayesian estimation of species divergence times under a molecular clock using multiple fossil calibrations with soft bounds. Molecular Biology and Evolution 23: 212–226.
- 25. Steiper ME, Young NM (2006) Primate molecular divergence dates. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 41: 384–394.
- 26. Chatterjee HJ, Ho SY, Barnes I, Groves C (2009) Estimating the phylogeny and divergence times of primates using a supermatrix approach. BMC Evolutionary Biology 9: 259.