Figures
Abstract
The production of acetic acid during wine fermentation is a critical issue for wineries since the sensory quality of a wine can be affected by the amount of acetic acid it contains. We found that the C2H2-type zinc-finger transcription factor YML081Wp regulated the mRNA levels of ALD4 and ALD6, which encode a cytosolic acetaldehyde dehydrogenase (ACDH) and a mitochondrial ACDH, respectively. These enzymes produce acetate from acetaldehyde as part of the pyruvate dehydrogenase bypass. This regulation was also reflected in the protein levels of Ald4p and Ald6p, as well as total ACDH activity. In the absence of ALD6, YML081W had no effect on acetic acid levels, suggesting that this transcription factor’s effects are mediated primarily through this gene. lacZ reporter assays revealed that Yml081wp stimulates ALD6 transcription, in large part from a GAGGGG element 590 base pairs upstream of the translation start site. The non-annotated ORF YML081W therefore encodes a transcription factor that regulates acetate production in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. We propose AAF1 as a gene name for the YML081W ORF.
Citation: Walkey CJ, Luo Z, Madilao LL, van Vuuren HJJ (2012) The Fermentation Stress Response Protein Aaf1p/Yml081Wp Regulates Acetate Production in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. PLoS ONE 7(12): e51551. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0051551
Editor: Turgay Unver, Cankiri Karatekin University, Turkey
Received: September 27, 2012; Accepted: November 2, 2012; Published: December 11, 2012
Copyright: © 2012 Walkey et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Funding: This research was supported by Genome Canada/Genome BC grant WIN151 and NSERC grant 217271-09 to HJJvV. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist. A patent application on low acetic acid (VA) producing wine yeasts has been submitted to the US Patent and Trade Mark Office (13-011 USP).
Introduction
During fermentation, yeast cells are exposed to a challenging environment: low pH, hypoxia, high osmotic pressure, and a rising ethanol concentration. The yeast cells respond to these stresses by activating a gene expression program called the Fermentation Stress Response (FSR) [1]. We previously found that mRNA levels for 224 genes were elevated in a significant and sustained manner. Interestingly, 62 of these genes are non-annotated; they are not linked to any specific function. Therefore, we have been exploring wine fermentation as a means for elucidating a role for these genes in yeast metabolism.
We created wine yeast strains that carry null mutations for each of the 62 non-annotated FSR genes. As well, we created strains that overexpress each non-annotated FSR gene. These strains were used to perform wine fermentations. We observed that the null strain for one FSR gene, YML081W, produced less acetic acid than its wild-type counterpart. The strain overexpressing YML081W produced wine with elevated acetic acid levels. Yml081wp is classified as a putative transcription factor, containing a C2H2-like zinc finger domain at the N-terminus. However, its biological role is largely unknown; it has only been linked to resistance to topoisomerase I-induced DNA damage [2]. Therefore, we investigated the role and mechanism of Yml081Wp in regulating acetic acid production.
The primary biosynthetic pathway for acetate is the pyruvate dehydrogenase bypass [3]. In the cytoplasm, pyruvate is decarboxylated to acetaldehyde, a portion of which is subsequently oxidized to acetate, with the concomitant reduction of NADP+ to NADPH. Acetate is the sole source of acetyl-CoA in the cytoplasm, which is a crucial precursor for anabolic processes in the yeast cell. Excess acetate is excreted from the cell as acetic acid. ALD6 encodes the primary cytosolic acetaldehyde dehydrogenase (ACDH) activity. Cells lacking ALD6 are defective in growth [4], and produce less acetic acid during fermentation [5], [6]. ALD2 and ALD3 also encode cytosolic aldehyde dehydrogenases, but these genes do not play a role in acetic acid production [6], [7].
Acetaldehyde can also be oxidized to acetate in mitochondria by two different ACDH enzymes, encoded by ALD4 and ALD5. Deletion studies suggest that these enzymes are not as important as ALD6 for the production of acetic acid, although cells lacking ALD5 did produce slightly less acetic acid during wine fermentation [6].
Given our preliminary data linking YML081W to extracellular acetic acid levels, we investigated this transcription factor’s regulation of intracellular acetate production. This paper shows that Yml081wp stimulates expression of both the ALD4 and ALD6 genes, and that the regulation of ALD6 in particular is the basis of its acetic acid phenotype. We propose naming this gene AAF1, for Acetic Acid Factor 1.
Materials and Methods
Strain Construction
All strains used in this paper were based on the industrial M2 wine yeast [8], [9]. This strain of Saccharomyces cerevisiae was chosen for its amenability to genetic manipulation, as well as its ability to carry out industrial wine fermentations. DNA cassettes designed to alter specific genes were generated by PCR, using the oligonucleotides listed in Table S1. For YML081W-null and RSF2-null strains, a loxP-kanMX4-loxP cassette was amplified from the plasmid pUG6 [10]. For ALD4-null and ALD6-null strains, an hphMX4 cassette was amplified from the plasmid pAG32 [11]. The PCR primers contained 17–19 nucleotides at the 3′ end designed to amplify the cassette, and 60–70 nucleotides at the 5′ends identical to the flanking sequences of each targeted open reading frame (ORF). iProof kits (Bio-Rad) were used for PCR amplification. The amplicons were introduced into the target cells by standard lithium acetate transformation. Following recombination, each target gene’s ORF was replaced by the loxP-kanMX4-loxP or hphMX4 cassette. Transformants were selected by antibiotic resistance, and the correct DNA recombination confirmed by colony PCR. Since the M2 strain is diploid, the transformed cells were sporulated, and the resulting tetrads dissected. The haploid colonies, which spontaneously revert to diploid, were selected for antibiotic resistance, thus generating strains that were homozygous for the intended mutation. The absence of the target gene was confirmed by colony PCR.
In order to generate strains overexpressing our genes of interest, the pCW1 plasmid containing the PGK1 promoter was constructed. Briefly, 788 bp upstream of the PGK1 gene were amplified from the pHVX2 vector [12], and cloned into the Sal1 site of pUG6. InFusion HD kits (Clontech) were used for cloning. The resulting plasmid was used as a template to generate the amplicons containing the PGK1 promoter linked the kanMX4 selection cassette. Transformations were carried out as above.
Table S2 contains the complete list of yeast strains.
Wine Fermentations
Wine fermentations were carried out as described previously [13], using 70 ml filter-sterilized Calona Chardonnay grape juice at 19°C, in triplicate. At the completion of fermentation, the major wine components (glucose, fructose, glycerol, acetic acid and ethanol) were assayed by HPLC, with a 5 µl injection volume [14].
Aerobic Growth
Yeast cells were also grown aerobically at 30°C, in triplicate. Typically, the cells were grown to mid-log phase (OD600 = 1.5–2.0) in YPD media (1% yeast extract, 2% peptone, 2% dextrose). Media components (except fructose) were assayed as above by HPLC. Injection volumes were doubled to 10 µl, to compensate for the lower concentrations of these components in lab media compared to wine.
Quantitative PCR
Total RNA was isolated from mid-log phase cells using a yeast-specific RiboPure kit (Ambion); 1 µg of total RNA was converted to cDNA using the Vilo reverse transcription kit (Invitrogen). mRNA levels were determined by PCR on an Applied Biosystems 7500 Real Time PCR System, using SYBR Green, and calculating ΔΔCt. The primers used for amplification are listed in Table S1. All primers were validated for linear amplification. mRNA levels in each strain were determined from three separate cultures, and resulting sample was amplified in triplicate. Amplification of TAF10 cDNA was used for normalization.
Immunoblotting
Yeast cells were grown to mid-log phase, and crude lysates prepared in SDS loading buffer as previously described [13]. Lysates corresponding to ∼0.1 OD600 units of cells were electrophoresed on a 4–15% gradient gel, and then transferred to nitrocellulose membrane. The membrane was stained (MemCode, Pierce) in order to confirm equal loading. Immunoblotting was carried out according to standard protocols. The primary antibody was α-FLAG (M2 variant, Sigma), diluted 10000-fold.
ACDH Assay
Acetaldehyde dehydrogenase activity was assayed in whole cell lysates, as previously described [6], [15]. Each strain was assayed in triplicate from separate cultures. Approximately 1 OD600 unit of mid-log phase yeast cells was pelleted by brief microcentrifugation, and then washed twice in 10 mM potassium phosphate buffer, pH 7.5. The washed cells were resuspended in 100 µl of lysis buffer (100 mM potassium phosphate buffer, pH 7.5, 2 mM MgCl2, 1 mM dithiothreitol), and lysed by mechanical shearing. The cell debris was removed by microcentrifugation.
The ACDH assay was performed by adding 10 µl of lysate to 1 ml of assay buffer (100 mM potassium phosphate, pH 8.0, 15 mM pyrazole, 10 mM MgCl2, 0.4 mM NAD+, 0.4 mM NADP+, 0.4 mM dithiothreitol). Following pre-incubation at 30°C, the reaction was started by addition of acetaldehyde to a final concentration of 0.3 mM. The progress of the reaction was followed by measuring the increase in A340 at 10 minute intervals for 2 hours.
The total protein content of the cell lysates was measured using the BCA protein assay kit according to the manufacturer’s (Pierce) instructions. The final specific enzyme activity was calculated from the rate of change of A340, and converted to NAD(P)H concentration with an extinction coefficient of 6220. The units are [nmol NAD(P)H formed/min]/mg protein.
lacZ Reporter Assays
Because our experiments were performed in an industrial wine strain without auxotrophic selection, it was necessary to construct a lacZ translational fusion reporter plasmid that encoded a marker for positive selection. Using the pMELβ2 plasmid as a template [16], the lacZ cassette was amplified by PCR, and cloned into the SalI site of pYC140 [17]. The PCR primers were designed to maintain the SalI site at the 5′ end of the lacZ sequence for subsequent cloning of promoter fragments, but abolished the SalI site at the 3′ end. The resulting plasmid, labeled pCW5, contained a hygromycin resistance cassette for selection, and the CEN/ARS sequence for replication.
In order to construct ALD6 promoter reporters, the upstream region of the ALD6 gene, plus the first 22 nucleotides of the coding region, was amplified by PCR, using purified M2 strain genomic DNA as a template. A series of reporters was created, covering different lengths of the ALD6 upstream region (−782, −636, −586, −520 and −414). These fragments were cloned into the SalI site of pCW5 to generate ALD6 promoter-lacZ reporters. The resulting plasmids were sequenced to confirm the fidelity of the PCR reaction.
The lacZ reporter plasmids were transformed into the M2 wine strains, both wild-type and yml081WΔ::KanMX4, using the LiOAc method. Transformants were selected by growth on YPD plates containing 300 µg/ml hygromycin B (Invitrogen). For each experiment, three independent transformants for each strain and plasmid were chosen and grown to mid-log phase in YPD/hygromycin. Cell density was measured by OD600, and each sample was assayed for β-galactosidase activity with a kit (Pierce), using 100 µl of culture in a final volume of 0.3 ml. Yellow colour development after a 30-minute incubation at 37°C was measured by absorbance at 420 nm. β-galactosidase activity was calculated in Miller units from the formula activity = A420×1000/(OD600×30 min×0.3 ml).
In order to create mutations of potential YML081W binding sites in the ALD6 promoter, site-directed mutagenesis of the ALD6 promoter lacZ reporters was performed using the Quikchange II kit (Stratagene). The resulting plasmids were sequenced to ensure the presence of the expected mutation.
Results
Yml081Wp Controls Acetic Acid Levels
Two modified S. cerevisiae M2 wine yeast strains were constructed: (1) a YML081W-null strain, and (2) a YML081W-overexpression strain. These strains were used to perform wine fermentations in Chardonnay grape juice, which contains negligible amounts of acetic acid. At the completion of fermentation after 21 days, the wine was assayed for acetic acid, by HPLC. The YML081W-null strain produced 39.1% less acetic acid in the wine than the wild-type strain (Figure 1A). The strain over-expressing YML081W produced 4.14-fold more acetic acid than its wild-type counterpart. These results showed a positive correlation between YML081W and acetic acid levels.
(A) Wild-type, YML081W-null and YML081W-overexpressing M2 yeast cells were used in a wine fermentation with sterile Chardonnay grape juice. Once fermentation was complete, the wine was assayed for acetic acid by HPLC. YML081W-null cells produced significantly less acetic acid, while YML081W-overexpressing cells produced significantly more acetic acid. In this figure, and all subsequent figures, * indicates p<0.05 for a two-tailed Student t-test, compared to wild-type. (B) These same strains were grown in triplicate in YPD media. At 4 hour intervals, media samples were removed, and assayed for acetic acid as above. YML081-null cells (▪, dotted line) produced significantly less acetic acid in the media than wild-type cells (•, solid line), while YML081W-overexpressing cells (⧫, dashed line) produced significantly more acetic acid.
To further investigate this phenotype, we examined the role of YML081W in acetic acid production during standard lab growth. YML081W-null and YML081W –overexpressing strains, along with the wild-type M2 control strain, were grown in YPD media. Media samples were removed periodically, and assayed for acetic acid. As shown in Figure 1B, yeast cells lacking YML081W produced significantly less acetic acid than wild-type yeast cells during the first 12 hours of growth. Conversely, yeast cells overexpressing YML081W produced significantly more acetic acid. After 12–16 hours of growth, the diauxic shift occurred, and the cells began consuming acetic acid from the media. These results in YPD media are similar to those seen during wine fermentation. Subsequent experiments were performed with these strains during YPD growth, since the effects were detectable within hours, rather than the weeks-long time frame of wine fermentation.
Yml081Wp is closely related to another transcription factor, Rsf2p. This pairing most likely arose from whole genome duplication, and is hence considered ohnologous. Their sequences share 38.0% identity and 54.5% similarity. Within the zinc-finger domains near the N-terminus of each protein, the sequences are 80.0% identical. Previous studies have indirectly implicated RSF2 in the regulation of acetic acid levels [18]. Therefore, we constructed an M2-based RSF2-null strain, and tested it for its ability to produce acetic acid. As shown in Figure 2, RSF2-null cells produced slightly less acetic acid when grown in YPD, compared to wild-type cells. However, the effect of deleting YML081W was significantly stronger. Therefore, we consider YML081W to be much more important for regulating acetic acid levels than its ohnolog RSF2.
Wild-type, YML081W-null and RSF2-null strains were grown in triplicate to mid-log phase in YPD media, and the resulting media was assayed for acetic acid. The dashed line indicates the initial acetic acid level of the media. Elimination of YML081W has a much more dramatic effect on acetic acid levels than elimination of RSF2.
Yml081Wp Regulates Expression of ALD4 and ALD6 Genes
The primary pathway for intracellular acetate biosynthesis occurs through the oxidation of acetaldehyde, catalyzed by the enzyme acetaldehyde dehydrogenase (ACDH) (Figure 3A). In yeast, five genes, ALD2-6, have been identified as encoding ACDH activity [7]. However, ALD4 and especially ALD6 have been identified as the major genes responsible for acetate biosynthesis. As YML081W encodes a potential transcription factor, its role on the acetic acid production might be through its regulation on the transcription of the ALD genes. Therefore, we tested the effects of altering YML081W expression on the expression of ALD genes. Using quantitative PCR, we found that deletion of YML081W resulted in significant reductions in the mRNA of ALD4 and ALD6 (Figure 3B). Gene expression of ALD4 was reduced 47.3% compared to wild-type, while gene expression of ALD6 was reduced 85.3%. The mRNA levels of ALD2, ALD3 and ALD5 were not significantly altered by YML081W deletion. We also tested the effect of YML081W overexpression on ALD gene expression. Insertion of the highly active PGK1 promoter resulted in an 18.1-fold increase in the YML081W mRNA level (Figure 3C), ALD4 and ALD6 gene expression were also dramatically increased. The ALD4 mRNA level was boosted 73.6-fold, while the ALD6 mRNA level was increased 17.7-fold. ALD2 showed a very small (1.25-fold), but statistically significant increase in gene expression. ALD3 and ALD5 mRNA levels were not affected by YML081W overexpression.
(A) Acetate biosynthesis pathway, adapted from Saint-Prix et al. [6]. (B) ALD gene expression was measured in mid-log phase wild-type and YML081W-null cells by quantitative PCR. Removal of YML081W resulted in a significant reduction in ALD4 and ALD6 mRNA levels. (C) ALD gene expression was measured in mid-log phase yeast cells overexpressing YML081W under the control of the PGK1 promoter, and compared to wild-type cells. YML081W-overexpressing cells produced significantly higher levels of ALD4 and ALD6 mRNA compared to wild-type cells. (D) ALD4 and ALD6 genes were tagged with the FLAG epitope at the C-terminus in wild-type, YML081W-null and YML081Woverexpressing strains. The cells were grown to mid-log phase, then harvested and lysed. The lysates were immunoblotted with an α-FLAG antibody to detect the levels of Ald4p-FLAG and Ald6p-FLAG protein. Cells lacking YML081W produced lower levels of FLAG-tagged Ald4p and Ald6p, compared to wild-type cells. Cells overexpressing YML081W produced significantly higher levels of Ald4p-FLAG protein compared to wild-type cells. ALD6p-FLAG levels did not appear to change significantly. Membrane staining shown below the immunoblots indicates the equivalance of total protein loading between lanes.
ALD4-null and ALD6-null M2 yeast strains with and without YML081W were grown to mid-log phase, and then assayed for acetic acid production by HPLC. The dashed line indicates the initial acetic acid level of the media. As expected, with the full complement of ALD genes, eliminating YML081W produced a significant reduction in acetic acid levels (compare the two leftmost columns). Eliminating ALD6 produced a lower acetic acid level compared to wild-type (compare the first and fifth columns). However, the further elimination of YML081W had no effect (compare the fifth and sixth columns). Therefore, YML081W requires ALD6 to mediate its effects on acetic acid levels.
Next, we tested whether these changes at the mRNA level were reflected at the protein level. We constructed YML081W wild-type, null, and overexpression strains with the FLAG epitope linked to the C-terminus of the ALD4 and ALD6 genes. By immunoblotting with a commercially available α-FLAG antibody, we measured the effects of changing Yml081Wp levels on Ald4p and Ald6p expression. Deletion of YML081W resulted in lower levels of FLAG-tagged Ald4p and Ald6p (Figure 3D). Conversely, overexpression of YML081W resulted in a significant increase in the expression of Ald4p-FLAG. Interestingly, although ALD6 mRNA was significantly increased by YML081W overexpression, Ald6p-FLAG levels were unaffected, suggesting a dysregulation between mRNA and protein levels under these particular conditions.
Therefore, given the clear positive correlation between YML081W and ALD genes, we examined whether YML081W affected the total acetaldehyde dehydrogenase activity in the yeast cells. ACDH was assayed in the presence of K+, Mg++, NAD+ and NAD(P)+, to avoid discriminating against any particular isoform. As shown in Table 1, deletion of YML081W resulted in a 59.0% reduction in ACDH activity. Overexpression of YML081W produced a 3.24-fold increase in ACDH activity. Therefore, the changes in ALD gene and protein levels produced by altering Yml081wp levels were reflected in the final enzyme activity.
ALD6 is Required for the Acetic Acid Phenotype of the YML081W Deletion Mutant
The previous results clearly showed a relationship between YML081W and acetaldehyde dehydrogenase gene expression and activity. Therefore, we wished to confirm whether this correlation was responsible for YML081W’s acetic acid phenotype. We constructed strains lacking either ALD4 or ALD6, in the presence or absence of Yml081Wp. Cells with the full complement of ALD genes produced 77.7% less acetic acid (after correcting for the baseline acetic acid in the media) when YML081W was eliminated (Figure 4). Cells lacking ALD6 produce 78.2% less acetic acid than their wild-type counterparts, demonstrating the importance of this gene for acetate production. However, in the absence of ALD6, the further elimination of YML081W produced no significant changes in acetic acid levels. Therefore, YML081W requires the presence of ALD6 in order to regulate acetic acid levels.
ALD4 had a smaller effect on acetic acid levels. With wild-type YML081W levels, ALD4-null cells produced 21.9% less acetic acid. When YML081W was deleted in an ALD4-null background, there was an additional 63.1% reduction in acetic acid levels. These results suggest that while YML081W regulates both ALD4 and ALD6, this transcription factor’s acetic acid effects are mediated primarily through ALD6.
Yml081Wp Stimulates ALD6 Transcription
Based on its primary sequence, Yml081Wp is classified as a C2H2-type zinc finger transcription factor. Its localization is strongly nuclear [19]. Therefore, we tested whether Yml081Wp stimulates transcription from the ALD6 promoter. We constructed lacZ reporter plasmids based on the ALD6 promoter (Figure 5A). When transformed into wild-type M2 cells, the plasmid containing the full-length ALD6 promoter from 782 nucleotides upstream of the translation start site to 22 nucleotides downstream produced a significant β-galactosidase activity, indicative of transcriptional activity. However, in cells lacking YML081W, the same reporter plasmid produced 85% less β-galactosidase activity (Figure 5B). Plasmids without the ALD6 promoter produced no detectable β-galactosidase activity (not shown). Therefore, the activity of the ALD6 promoter is strongly dependent on the presence of Yml081Wp.
(A) A schematic diagram of the ALD6 promoter sequence. Numbers on the left indicate the position of the first nucleotide in the promoter construct relative to the start codon. The positions and sequences of sites matching the previously published Yml081Wp binding sites are highlighted above the full-length promoter. (B) LacZ reporter activity from the ALD6 promoter. Reporter plasmids carrying ALD6 promoter fragments of the indicated lengths were transformed into wild-type M2 and YML081W-null strains. Three independent transformants for each reporter were grown to log phase, and assayed for β-galactosidase activity. Truncation of the reporter resulted in progressively lower activity levels. Importantly, cells lacking Yml081Wp produced significantly lower β-galactosidase activity than their wild-type counterparts (except for the shortest reporter fragment), suggesting that this transcription factor plays a positive role in stimulating ALD6 transcription. (C) A consensus binding site at −590 plays an important role in mediating Yml081Wp transcriptional activity on the ALD6 promoter. A reporter plasmid carrying a mutation of the YML081W consensus binding site was constructed for comparison to its wild-type counterpart. In cells producing normal levels of Yml081Wp, the mutation resulted in a 54% reduction in β-galactosidase activity (* indicates p<0.05 for a two-tailed Student t-test, compared to wild-type). However, in cells lacking Yml081Wp, the mutation had no significant effect on β-galactosidase activity. This result suggests that the consensus binding site at position −590 mediates Yml081Wp transcriptional activity on the ALD6 promoter.
Global screens based on protein binding microarrays have identified the motif CCCCNC as a preferred DNA binding site for Yml081Wp [20]. The ALD6 promoter contains five instances of this motif at the positions indicated in Figure 5A, in both orientations. To determine if one or more of these motifs are necessary for Yml081Wp activity, we constructed a series of truncated ALD6 promoter reporters, designed specifically to eliminate one of these motifs at a time. In wild-type M2 cells, truncations that eliminated the motifs at positions −708, −590 and −488 produced significant reductions in β-galactosidase activity (Figure 5B). However, in YML081W-null cells, these truncations produced reductions in β-galactosidase activity of similar relative magnitude. The sole exception was the truncation that eliminated the segment between −636 and −586, where there is no difference in β-galactosidase activity in YML081W-null cells. This result suggested that the 60% drop in transcriptional activity between cells carrying the reporter plasmid with the −636 fragment of the ALD6 promoter, and cells carrying the reporter plasmid with the −586 fragment of the ALD6 promoter, is YML081W-dependent.
The segment of the ALD6 promoter between −636 and −586 contains one putative Yml081Wp binding site: GAGGGG centered at position −590. To determine if this site is required for Yml081Wp-induced transcriptional activity, we constructed a mutated version of the ALD6 promoter-lacZ reporter where this site was changed to atatat. In wild-type M2 cells, this mutation produced a 54% reduction in β-galactosidase activity (Figure 5C). In YML081W-null cells, the mutation had no significant effect on β-galactosidase activity. Therefore, this site required for Yml081Wp to fully stimulate transcription from the ALD6 promoter.
Discussion
During ethanolic yeast fermentation, pyruvate from glycolysis is decarboxylated to acetaldehyde. Most of this acetaldehyde is reduced to ethanol. However, a small portion is oxidized to acetate. This acetate serves as a precursor for acetyl-CoA, an important building block for anabolic metabolism, particularly lipid biosynthesis. This pathway, called the pyruvate dehydrogenase bypass, is critical for yeast, since it is the only source for acetyl-CoA in the cytoplasm [3], [7], [21]. Unused acetate diffuses into the media as acetic acid. Pyruvate that enters the mitochondria is also converted to acetyl-CoA by pyruvate dehydrogenase or by the mitochondrial pyruvate dehydrogenase bypass, but this acetyl-CoA is inaccessible to the rest of the cell.
Three yeast genes, ALD2, ALD3 and ALD6, encode cytosolic aldehyde dehydrogenases. However, studies with ALD-null strains have conclusively shown that Ald6p is the primary acetaldehyde dehydrogenase (ACDH) in the yeast cell responsible for the oxidation of acetaldehyde to acetate [5], [6]. This enzyme is Mg++- and NAD(P)+-dependent [4], [22]. The precise roles for Ald2p and Ald3p are unclear. Null mutations of ALD2 and ALD3 have little effect on acetic acid levels during fermentation [6], [7]. More recent evidence suggests that they may play a role in beta-alanine synthesis [23].
We found that Yml081Wp is a critical regulator of ALD6 expression, and hence acetic acid levels. Yeast cells that lack Yml081Wp produce significantly less acetic acid, both during standard lab growth, and during wine fermentation. These cells contain reduced amounts of ALD6 mRNA and protein than their wild-type counterparts, and lower levels of ACDH activity. Interestingly, overexpression of YML081W boosted levels of ALD6 mRNA, but not protein. In the absence of ALD6, deletion of YML081W had no effect on acetic acid levels during lab growth. Therefore, we concluded that Yml081Wp mediates its effect on acetic acid primarily through regulation of ALD6.
Since Yml081Wp is a C2H2-type zinc-finger transcription factor, we investigated whether it mediates its effects on acetic acid levels by directly stimulating transcription from the ALD6 promoter. This class of transcription factors, the largest in yeast, typically binds as monomers to target promoters [24]. Using a custom-designed lacZ reporter plasmid, we found that the expression of Yml081Wp is necessary for full ALD6 promoter expression. Therefore, we began searching for elements with the ALD6 promoter that could be necessary for YML081W activity. We initially focused on a putative binding site, CACCCC, identified in a broad transcription factor binding survey using protein-binding microarrays. Using a series of reporter truncations and site-directed mutagenesis, we identified a site containing this sequence in reverse 590 base pairs upstream of the ALD6 start codon that was required for the full activity of YML081W on this promoter. Interestingly, mutation of this site did not completely abolish Yml081Wp-mediated transcription, suggesting the presence of multiple Yml081Wp sites on the ALD6 promoter. In a global scan of transcription factor binding sites by chromatin immunoprecipitation and genomic microarray analysis, ALD6 was not identified as a Yml081Wp target [25]. However, a dubious ORF, YPL062W, which spans a region from 290 to 694 base pairs upstream of the ALD6 start site, was identified as being proximal to a Yml081Wp binding site. This result is further evidence of a direct interaction between Yml081Wp and ALD6.
Yeast mitochondria also contain two ACDH isoforms, encoded by ALD4 and ALD5. Ald4p uses both NAD+ and NADP+ as co-factors, and is K+-dependent [26]. Previous studies have shown that deletion of ALD4 has little effect on acetate production, except in the absence of ALD6, where it appears to play a compensatory role [5]. Ald5p is also K+-dependent but only uses NADP+ as a co-factor. ALD5 encodes only 20% of the total mitochondrial ACDH activity [27]. However, during wine fermentation, deletion of ALD5 had a significantly larger effect on acetic acid levels than deletion of ALD4 [6].
We found that deletion of YML081W specifically reduced the mRNA level of ALD4, though not to the same extent as for ALD6. The level of the FLAG-tagged Ald4p isoform was also reduced. Conversely, the overexpression of YML081W dramatically increased the levels of ALD4 mRNA and Ald4p protein (unlike Ald6p). Most likely, the elevated Ald4p level was responsible for the higher ACDH activity in YML081W-overexpressing yeast. However, in the absence of ALD4, deletion of YML081W still reduced acetic acid levels, suggesting that this transcription factor’s regulation of ALD4 is not its primary route for controlling acetic acid levels.
Control of volatile acidity (VA) is a critical issue for the industrial use of yeast. During wine fermentation, the production of acetic acid, the most abundant volatile acid, can have a dramatic effect on the quality of the final product. At levels typically found in wine, 0.02–0.06% (g/100 ml), acetic acid adds a pleasant tartness. Also, it serves as a precursor to acetate esters, which are responsible for the fruity character of many wines. However, acetic acid in wine is generally considered to be a spoilage product; acetic acid production can result in the formation of other unpleasant volatile compounds such as ethyl acetate that smells like fingernail polish. High VA can also lead to stuck alcoholic fermentations. The legal limits for VA in red and white table wines in the U.S. are 0.12% (g/100 ml) and 0.11% (g/100 ml), respectively. The VA concentration in wines for export may not exceed 0.09% (g/100 ml) (http://waterhouse.ucdavis.edu/winecomp/va.htm). In Australia, the maximum VA allowed is 0.15% (g/100 ml) (as acetic acid) (http://www.foodstandards.gov.au/foodstandards/foodstandardscode.cfm). In the European Community, the maximum limit for red wines is 0.12% (g/100 ml) and 0.108% (g/100 ml) for white wines (http://www.awbc.com.au/exporting/exportgrid/index.asp). Botrytis infected wines may contain a maximum level of 0.15% (g/100 ml). Once the VA exceeds the legal limit, wines have to be blended with wine containing lower amounts of acetic acid, which leads to a reduction in the quality of wine. Therefore, the ability to regulate acetic acid levels is a critical tool for controlling wine quality. Here we have shown that a transcription factor, Yml081Wp, controls acetaldehyde dehydrogenase by regulating the expression of the genes, particularly ALD6, that encode this activity. As a consequence, the conversion of acetaldehyde to acetate and the level of acetic acid in the media can be controlled. We propose renaming the YML081W ORF as AAF1, for Acetic Acid Factor.
Supporting Information
Table S1.
Oligonucleotide primer list. Sequences of primers used for the amplification of DNA cassettes by PCR are listed, along with the DNA template, and the purpose of each PCR reaction. The amplification products were either used directly for transformation into yeast cells, or cloning into vectors.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0051551.s001
(DOC)
Table S2.
S. cerevisiae strains used in these experiments. A listing of the genotypes of each strain described in the text of this paper.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0051551.s002
(DOC)
Acknowledgments
The authors wish to thank Brandon Chau and Chloe Sharpe for superb technical assistance.
Author Contributions
Conceived and designed the experiments: CW ZL LM HJJvV. Performed the experiments: CW ZL LM. Analyzed the data: CW ZL LM HJJvV. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: HJJvV. Wrote the paper: CW ZL HJJvV.
References
- 1. Marks VD, Ho Sui SJ, Erasmus D, van der Merwe GK, Brumm J, et al. (2008) Dynamics of the yeast transcriptome during wine fermentation reveals a novel fermentation stress response. FEMS Yeast Res 8(1): 35–52.
- 2. Reid RJ, Gonzalez-Barrera S, Sunjevaric I, Alvaro D, Ciccone S, et al. (2011) Selective ploidy ablation, a high-throughput plasmid transfer protocol, identifies new genes affecting topoisomerase I-induced DNA damage. Genome Res 21(3): 477–486.
- 3. Flikweert MT, Van Der Zanden L, Janssen WM, Steensma HY, Van Dijken JP, et al. (1996) Pyruvate decarboxylase: An indispensable enzyme for growth of Saccharomyces cerevisiae on glucose. Yeast 12(3): 247–257.
- 4. Meaden PG, Dickinson FM, Mifsud A, Tessier W, Westwater J, et al. (1997) The ALD6 gene of Saccharomyces cerevisiae encodes a cytosolic, mg(2+)-activated acetaldehyde dehydrogenase. Yeast 13(14): 1319–1327.
- 5. Remize F, Andrieu E, Dequin S (2000) Engineering of the pyruvate dehydrogenase bypass in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: Role of the cytosolic mg(2+) and mitochondrial K(+) acetaldehyde dehydrogenases Ald6p and Ald4p in acetate formation during alcoholic fermentation. Appl Environ Microbiol 66(8): 3151–3159.
- 6. Saint-Prix F, Bonquist L, Dequin S (2004) Functional analysis of the ALD gene family of Saccharomyces cerevisiae during anaerobic growth on glucose: The NADP+-dependent Ald6p and Ald5p isoforms play a major role in acetate formation. Microbiology 150(Pt 7): 2209–2220.
- 7. Navarro-Avino JP, Prasad R, Miralles VJ, Benito RM, Serrano R (1999) A proposal for nomenclature of aldehyde dehydrogenases in Saccharomyces cerevisiae and characterization of the stress-inducible ALD2 and ALD3 genes. Yeast 15(10A): 829–842.
- 8. Richards KD, Goddard MR, Gardner RC (2009) A database of microsatellite genotypes for Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 96(3): 355–359.
- 9. Deed NK, van Vuuren HJJ, Gardner RC (2011) Effects of nitrogen catabolite repression and di-ammonium phosphate addition during wine fermentation by a commercial strain of S. cerevisiae. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 89(5): 1537–1549.
- 10. Guldener U, Heck S, Fielder T, Beinhauer J, Hegemann JH (1996) A new efficient gene disruption cassette for repeated use in budding yeast. Nucleic Acids Res 24(13): 2519–2524.
- 11. Goldstein AL, McCusker JH (1999) Three new dominant drug resistance cassettes for gene disruption in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast 15(14): 1541–1553.
- 12. Volschenk H, Viljoen M, Grobler J, Petzold B, Bauer F, et al. (1997) Engineering pathways for malate degradation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nat Biotechnol 15(3): 253–257.
- 13. Walkey CJ, Luo Z, Borchers CH, Measday V, van Vuuren HJJ (2011) The Saccharomyces cerevisiae fermentation stress response protein Igd1p/Yfr017p regulates glycogen levels by inhibiting the glycogen debranching enzyme. FEMS Yeast Res 11(6): 499–508.
- 14. Adams C, van Vuuren HJJ (2010) Effect of timing of diammonium phosphate addition to fermenting grape must on the production of ethyl carbamate in wine. Am J Enol Vitic 61(1): 125.
- 15. Postma E, Verduyn C, Scheffers WA, Van Dijken JP (1989) Enzymic analysis of the crabtree effect in glucose-limited chemostat cultures of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Appl Environ Microbiol 55(2): 468–477.
- 16. Melcher K, Sharma B, Ding WV, Nolden M (2000) Zero background yeast reporter plasmids. Gene 247(1–2): 53–61.
- 17. Hansen J, Felding T, Johannesen PF, Piskur J, Christensen CL, et al. (2003) Further development of the cassette-based pYC plasmid system by incorporation of the dominant hph, nat and AUR1-C gene markers and the lacZ reporter system. FEMS Yeast Res 4(3): 323–327.
- 18. Grabowska D, Chelstowska A (2003) The ALD6 gene product is indispensable for providing NADPH in yeast cells lacking glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase activity. J Biol Chem 278(16): 13984–13988.
- 19. Huh WK, Falvo JV, Gerke LC, Carroll AS, Howson RW, et al. (2003) Global analysis of protein localization in budding yeast. Nature 425(6959): 686–691.
- 20. Zhao Y, Stormo GD (2011) Quantitative analysis demonstrates most transcription factors require only simple models of specificity. Nat Biotechnol 29(6): 480–483.
- 21. Kispal G, Cseko J, Alkonyi I, Sandor A (1991) Isolation and characterization of carnitine acetyltransferase from S. cerevisiae. Biochim Biophys Acta 1085(2): 217–222.
- 22. Seegmiller JE (1953) Triphosphopyridine nucleotide-linked aldehyde dehydrogenase from yeast. J Biol Chem 201(2): 629–637.
- 23. White WH, Skatrud PL, Xue Z, Toyn JH (2003) Specialization of function among aldehyde dehydrogenases: The ALD2 and ALD3 genes are required for beta-alanine biosynthesis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 163(1): 69–77.
- 24. Hahn S, Young ET (2011) Transcriptional regulation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: Transcription factor regulation and function, mechanisms of initiation, and roles of activators and coactivators. Genetics 189(3): 705–736.
- 25. Harbison CT, Gordon DB, Lee TI, Rinaldi NJ, Macisaac KD, et al. (2004) Transcriptional regulatory code of a eukaryotic genome. Nature 431(7004): 99–104.
- 26. Tessier WD, Meaden PG, Dickinson FM, Midgley M (1998) Identification and disruption of the gene encoding the K(+)-activated acetaldehyde dehydrogenase of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEMS Microbiol Lett 164(1): 29–34.
- 27. Kurita O, Nishida Y (1999) Involvement of mitochondrial aldehyde dehydrogenase ALD5 in maintenance of the mitochondrial electron transport chain in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEMS Microbiol Lett 181(2): 281–287.