Advertisement
Research Article

17DD and 17D-213/77 Yellow Fever Substrains Trigger a Balanced Cytokine Profile in Primary Vaccinated Children

  • Ana Carolina Campi-Azevedo equal contributor mail,

    equal contributor Contributed equally to this work with: Ana Carolina Campi-Azevedo, Luiza Pacheco de Araújo-Porto

    accampi@cpqrr.fiocruz.br

    Affiliation: Laboratório de Biomarcadores de Diagnóstico e Monitoração, Centro de Pesquisas René Rachou, FIOCRUZ, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brasil

    X
  • Luiza Pacheco de Araújo-Porto equal contributor,

    equal contributor Contributed equally to this work with: Ana Carolina Campi-Azevedo, Luiza Pacheco de Araújo-Porto

    Affiliation: Laboratório de Biomarcadores de Diagnóstico e Monitoração, Centro de Pesquisas René Rachou, FIOCRUZ, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brasil

    X
  • Maria Luiza-Silva,

    Affiliation: Laboratório de Biomarcadores de Diagnóstico e Monitoração, Centro de Pesquisas René Rachou, FIOCRUZ, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brasil

    X
  • Maurício Azevedo Batista,

    Affiliation: Núcleo de Pesquisas em Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto, Ouro Preto, Minas Gerais, Brasil

    X
  • Marina Angela Martins,

    Affiliation: Laboratório de Biomarcadores de Diagnóstico e Monitoração, Centro de Pesquisas René Rachou, FIOCRUZ, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brasil

    X
  • Renato Sathler-Avelar,

    Affiliation: Laboratório de Biomarcadores de Diagnóstico e Monitoração, Centro de Pesquisas René Rachou, FIOCRUZ, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brasil

    X
  • Denise da Silveira-Lemos,

    Affiliation: Núcleo de Pesquisas em Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto, Ouro Preto, Minas Gerais, Brasil

    X
  • Luiz Antonio Bastos Camacho,

    Affiliation: Escola Nacional de Saúde Pública - FIOCRUZ, Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brasil

    X
  • Reinaldo de Menezes Martins,

    Affiliation: Instituto de Tecnologia em Imunobiológicos, Bio-Manguinhos - FIOCRUZ - Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brasil

    X
  • Maria de Lourdes de Sousa Maia,

    Affiliation: Instituto de Tecnologia em Imunobiológicos, Bio-Manguinhos - FIOCRUZ - Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brasil

    X
  • Roberto Henrique Guedes Farias,

    Affiliation: Instituto de Tecnologia em Imunobiológicos, Bio-Manguinhos - FIOCRUZ - Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brasil

    X
  • Marcos da Silva Freire,

    Affiliation: Instituto de Tecnologia em Imunobiológicos, Bio-Manguinhos - FIOCRUZ - Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brasil

    X
  • Ricardo Galler,

    Affiliation: Instituto de Tecnologia em Imunobiológicos, Bio-Manguinhos - FIOCRUZ - Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brasil

    X
  • Akira Homma,

    Affiliation: Instituto de Tecnologia em Imunobiológicos, Bio-Manguinhos - FIOCRUZ - Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brasil

    X
  • José Geraldo Leite Ribeiro,

    Affiliation: Secretaria de Estado de Saúde, Governo do Estado de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brasil

    X
  • Jandira Aparecida Campos Lemos,

    Affiliation: Secretaria de Estado de Saúde, Governo do Estado de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brasil

    X
  • Maria Auxiliadora-Martins,

    Affiliation: Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto, Universidade de São Paulo-USP, Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, Brasil

    X
  • Iramaya Rodrigues Caldas,

    Affiliation: Diretoria Regional de Brasília, FIOCRUZ, Brasília, Distrito Federal, Brasil

    X
  • Silvana Maria Elói-Santos,

    Affiliation: Departamento de Propedêutica Complementar, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brasil

    X
  • Andréa Teixeira-Carvalho,

    Affiliation: Laboratório de Biomarcadores de Diagnóstico e Monitoração, Centro de Pesquisas René Rachou, FIOCRUZ, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brasil

    X
  • Olindo Assis Martins-Filho

    Affiliation: Laboratório de Biomarcadores de Diagnóstico e Monitoração, Centro de Pesquisas René Rachou, FIOCRUZ, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brasil

    X
  • Published: December 10, 2012
  • DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0049828

Abstract

Background

This study aimed to compare the cytokine-mediated immune response in children submitted to primary vaccination with the YF-17D-213/77 or YF-17DD yellow fever (YF) substrains.

Methods

A non-probabilistic sample of eighty healthy primary vaccinated (PV) children was selected on the basis of their previously known humoral immune response to the YF vaccines. The selected children were categorized according to their YF-neutralizing antibody titers (PRNT) and referred to as seroconverters (PV-PRNT+) or nonseroconverters (PV-PRNT). Following revaccination with the YF-17DD, the PV-PRNT children (YF-17D-213/77 and YF-17DD groups) seroconverted and were referred as RV-PRNT+. The cytokine-mediated immune response was investigated after short-term in vitro cultures of whole blood samples. The results are expressed as frequency of high cytokine producers, taking the global median of the cytokine index (YF-Ag/control) as the cut-off.

Results

The YF-17D-213/77 and the YF-17DD substrains triggered a balanced overall inflammatory/regulatory cytokine pattern in PV-PRNT+, with a slight predominance of IL-12 in YF-17DD vaccinees and a modest prevalence of IL-10 in YF-17D-213/77. Prominent frequency of neutrophil-derived TNF-α and neutrophils and monocyte-producing IL-12 were the major features of PV-PRNT+ in the YF-17DD, whereas relevant inflammatory response, mediated by IL-12+CD8+ T cells, was the hallmark of the YF-17D-213/77 vaccinees. Both substrains were able to elicit particular but relevant inflammatory events, regardless of the anti-YF PRNT antibody levels. PV-PRNT children belonging to the YF-17DD arm presented gaps in the inflammatory cytokine signature, especially in terms of the innate immunity, whereas in the YF-17D-213/77 arm the most relevant gap was the deficiency of IL-12-producing CD8+T cells. Revaccination with YF-17DD prompted a balanced cytokine profile in YF-17DD nonresponders and a robust inflammatory profile in YF-17D-213/77 nonresponders.

Conclusion

Our findings demonstrated that, just like the YF-17DD reference vaccine, the YF-17D-213/77 seed lot induced a mixed pattern of inflammatory and regulatory cytokines, supporting its universal use for immunization.

Introduction

Yellow fever (YF) vaccines have been available since the 1930s and constitute the most important method of disease control [1]. The 17D and 17DD substrains of the YF vaccine have been recommended by the World Health Organization (WHO) [2]. These substrains present minor differences in their nucleotide sequences and are considered to be safe and immunogenic [2][5].

Between 1938 and 1941, some weakly immunogenic vaccine substrains were identified after a varying number of passages, and some substrains exhibited greater neurovirulence contamination. The seed lot system was designed in 1942, so as to reduce the variability of vaccine lot production. In this system, a large lot of virus is produced and extensively verified for titer, sterility, and viral attenuation [6].

Bio-Manguinhos-Fundação Oswaldo Cruz is a WHO-prequalified manufacturer linked to the Brazilian Ministry of Health. It supplies the 17DD substrain YF vaccine to Brazil and other countries in South America and Africa. Because supplies may be insufficient in an emergency, comparative safety and immunogenicity studies of other YF vaccines substrains constitute a relevant challenge.

In the 1970s, a seed lot free of contaminants was developed from the YF-17D-204 substrain and maintained as stock reference (designated WHO-YF-17D-213/77), and it has been available to new manufacturers since 1977 [7]. The whole history of seed lots that have been used for production at Bio-Manguinhos since 1940 is well documented [8]. The last production seed lot, named 102/84 at passage level 285, corresponds to the YF-17DD vaccine strain and is currently available for immunization programs in Brazil. The National Immunization Program recommends YF vaccination of every Brazilian child aged between 6 and 9 months as well as the residents of endemic regions or transition areas, and a booster must be received after 10 years [9]. Vaccination is also recommended for those traveling to areas at risk of YF [10], which have expanded due to a recent YF outbreak in southeastern Brazil [11]. Because the demand for YF vaccination has increased over the last decade, the working seed lot will soon be used up and an alternative to maintain ongoing vaccine production is to use a new seed lot. According to the WHO guidelines, the following criteria must be met for approval of a new YF vaccine seed lot: i) self-limited viremia for viscerotropism analysis; ii) development of specific anti-17D antibodies by neutralization test in at least 90% of the experimental vaccinees during the immunogenicity assay; and iii) clinical score for the test virus equal to or lower than that achieved for the reference virus in terms of reactogenicity, besides a satisfactory histological score measured by appropriate tests [6].

The immunogenicity and reactogenicity of the YF-17D-213/77 substrain have been demonstrated to be equivalent to those of YF-17DD in a placebo-controlled double-blind randomized trial [12], [13][15]. However, despite all efforts to characterize the immune response elicited by YF vaccines, the cellular and molecular events triggered by distinct YF vaccine substrains have not been compared yet. Therefore, the major goal of the present investigation is to conduct a pioneer investigation to characterize the cytokine-mediated immune response in children submitted to primary vaccination with the YF-17D-213/77 or YF-17DD substrains and provide additional criteria to be met during the approval of a new YF vaccine seed lot. We intended to verify whether the similar cytokine-mediated immune response is linked to anti-YF humoral profile triggered by the YF-17D-213/77 or YF-17DD substrains, upon primary vaccination. We have also investigated the cytokine microenvironment elicited by the revaccination of nonresponders at primary vaccination and the association between titers of anti-YF neutralizing antibodies and the overall cytokine profile.

Methods

Ethics Statement

This study was approved by the Ethical Committee of Centro de Pesquisas René Rachou (CPqRR), Oswaldo Cruz Foundation – FIOCRUZ (protocol number CPqRR 21/2010), CEP-FIOCRUZ (protocol number 236A/03), SISNEP/CAAE (protocol number: 0038.1.011.000-03), CEP-SES-DF (protocol number 069/2005), and the WHO international clinical trial registration platform under the protocol number ISRCTN72367932. The complete clinical trial performed for evaluation of the reactogenicity and the immunogenicity of both vaccines has been previously published [14], [15]. The children were formally included in the study only if the free and informed consent form was signed by their parents or legal guardians.

Study Population

The present immunological study is an additional investigation linked to a major clinical trial performed by the Collaborative Group for Studies of Yellow Fever Vaccine aiming to compared the reactogenicity and immunogenicity of two YF-vaccine substrains, 17DD and 17D-213/77 [14] and included 80 healthy children out of the “Primary Target Sample” that comprised 3,060 children, aged between 9 and 12 months, living in the metropolitan area of Belo Horizonte (n = 519) and Juiz de Fora (n = 818), Minas Gerais and Brasília (n = 1,723), Distrito Federal, Brazil. These volunteers were elected for an epidemiological studies reported elsewhere [14]. Eligibility criteria for inclusion and exclusion in the study followed the recommendations of the Brazilian National Immunization Program for routine YF vaccination is provide elsewhere [14]. A flowchart of selection and follow-up of the study population from the “Primary Target Sample” is presented in the Figure 1.

thumbnail

Figure 1. Flowchart of selection and follow-up of the Study Population from the Primary Target Sample.

A total of 3,060 children, 9–12 months-old were elected for an epidemiological studies reported elsewhere [14] and referred as “Primary Target Sample”. The Clinical Trial design is highlighted by dashed format. The study population enrolled in the present investigation was selected from the “Primary Target Sample” according to the PRNT results and comprise 30 PV-PRNT+ and 10 PV-PRNT individuals on each experimental arm (17DD and 17D-213/77), reaching a total of 80 volunteers. The current Immunological Study design is highlighted by solid format.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0049828.g001

The 17DD substrain vaccine used in the present investigation was produced from the seed lot 993FB013Z, and the WHO 17D-213/77 substrain vaccine was obtained from the seed batch of the WHO available to new manufacturers since 1977 [7]. These two substrains were utilized in a randomized placebo-controlled study defined as the YF-17DD and YF-17D-213/77 groups of volunteers, referred to as the “experimental arms” [14]. Thirty days after vaccination, children provided a 3mL sample of whole blood for quantification of the anti-YF neutralizing antibodies titers, determined by the plaque reduction neutralization test (PRNT) performed as described by Stefano et al. [16]. The PRNT tests were carried out at Laboratório de Tecnologia Virológica, Bio-Manguinhos/FIOCRUZ, under the supervision of one of the researchers (M.S.F.). A PRNT value of 2.5 log10 mIU/mL served as the cut-off for discrimination between seroconverters (PRNT+≥2.5 log10 mIU/mL) and nonseroconverters (PRNT <2.5 log10 mIU/mL). The PRNT levels measured prior to vaccination showed that the children did not have previous YF antibodies. The PRNT cut-off was defined for each experimental batch based on the reactivity of the levels of PRNT observed for the internal control (mean±2SD) of un-vaccinated individuals.

The study was based on a non probabilistic sample of volunteers selected on the basis of their humoral immune response to the vaccine, aiming at clarifying the patterns of cellular immune response. For this purpose additional blood samples were collected from a selected group of children (80 out of 3,060) according to the previously known levels of neutralizing antibodies, and included 60 from Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais and 20 from Brasília, Distrito Federal, Brazil, whose parents gave written consent. Since the additional whole blood sample was collected from the same volunteer who already donated 3 mL of whole blood for PRNT serological test, we were not able to include a larger number of children on each experimental sub-group. Mainly due to ethical restriction to work with 9–12 month-old children, we have to decide to work with the minimal sample size required for immunological analysis (n = 10) reaching a total of 100 blood collections (40 volunteers on each experimental arm plus 10 volunteers to compose each revaccinated groups).

The study design was performed under block-blind conditions, using alphanumerical sample labeling. Sequential numbers were assigned to each volunteer according to the order of arrival of the specimens, within experimental groups (“A” and “B”). The tag A or B was necessary to guide the antigen specific in vitro stimulation of whole blood samples, while disguising the type of vaccine received by the volunteer. Moreover, the sequential numbers precluded the disclosure of the neutralizing antibody response. Based on the PRNT results, an independent physician at the Coordinating Study Center created a randomization list of volunteers to reach a total of 40 primary vaccinated children (PV), including 30 PV-PRNT+ children and 10 PV-PRNT children from each experimental arm. The YF-17DD arm was comprised of 30 PV-PRNT+ children (15 boys and 15 girls) and 10 PV-PRNT children (6 boys and 4 girls). The YF-17D-213/77 arm also consisted of 30 PV-PRNT+ children (18 boys and 12 girls) and 10 PV-PRNT children (6 boys and 4 girls). The selected volunteers remained with their original numerical code and received, by an independent physician, an additional alpha tag to identify the vaccine used at primary vaccination (“A” for 17DD and “B” for the 17D-213/77). This alpha tag was also applied to the vaccine vials used for in vitro specific antigenic stimulation of whole blood cultures. The codes were only opened after the conclusion of all laboratorial analysis, during data entry for data analysis. The PV-PRNT+ children from each vaccination arm, were initially categorized into three subgroups of ten volunteers each as they present “low”, “intermediate” or “high” titers of PRNT antibodies. During analysis the “low” and “intermediate” were referred to as PV-PRNTMEDIUM+ (2.5≤PRNT≤3.5 log10 mIU/mL) and the “high” referred to as PV-PRNTHIGH+ (PRNT >3.5 log10 mIU/mL).

One year after the primary vaccination, the PV-PRNT children from both primary vaccination arms were submitted to revaccination with the YF-17DD reference vaccine as defined in the original research protocol registered at the WHO international clinical trial platform under the number ISRCTN72367932 and also presented in the flowcharts of recruiting and follow-up of study subjects described elsewhere by the Collaborative Group for Studies with Yellow Fever Vaccine [14]. The protocol informed that all volunteers presenting “NEGATIVE” YF (PRNT) serological test after primary vaccination should be submitted to revaccination. Although, according to Brazilian Healthy Ministry policy, the YF-revaccination of children and adults should be performed after 10 years, due to ethical reasons, once identified as seronegative primary vaccinees, the volunteers must be submitted to revaccination and to a complementary PRNT serological test to confirm seroconversion. From the PV-PRNT children, we have selected 10 from each experimental arm, to be included in the present investigation. All PV-PRNT children seroconverted after revaccination and were designated RV-PRNT+. One year after primary vaccination or revaccination, coded peripheral blood samples (7 mL) were collected into Vacationer tubes containing sodium heparin (Becton Dickinson, San Jose, CA). These coded samples were used for in vitro short-term whole blood cultures and intracytoplasmic cytokine analyses by flow cytometry.

Immunophenotyping and intracytoplasmic cytokine analysis by flow cytometry

Short-term in vitro cultures of whole blood samples were performed as described by Luiza-Silva et al. [17] and modified as follows: aliquots of heparinized peripheral blood were incubated with RPMI 1640 medium (GIBCO, Grand Island, NY; control culture), live attenuated YF-17DD vaccine (lot 055VFA054P, Bio-Manguinhos, FIOCRUZ), or the YF-17D-213/77 seed lot (lot 05475VFA, Bio-Manguinhos, FIOCRUZ) for 6 hours at 37°C and 5% CO2. YF-17DD and YF-17D-213/77 were used at a final concentration of 2.5×103 Plaque Forming Units – PFU/mL (approximately 450 mouse lethal dose - MLD50) in RPMI 1640. After in vitro YF-17DD or YF-17D-213/77 antigen priming, the cells were reinsulated with Brefeldin A (BFA; Sigma Chemical Company, St. Louis, MO) at 10 µg/mL for an additional period of 4 hours at 37°C and 5% CO2, which was followed by treatment with ethylenediamine tetraacetic acid (EDTA; Sigma Chemical Company) at a final concentration of 2 mM for 10 minutes at room temperature. The cell suspension was washed with fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) buffer (phosphate-buffered saline [PBS], pH 7.2, supplemented with 0.5% bovine serum albumin and 0.1% sodium azide, all from Sigma Chemical Company), and aliquots were stained with fluorescent anti-human cell surface monoclonal antibodies (all from Caltag, Burlingame, CA): anti-CD4-TC (clone #S3.5), anti-CD8-TC (clone #3B.5), anti-CD14-TC (clone #TüK4), anti-CD16-TC (clone #3G8), and anti-CD19-TC (clone #ST25-C1) for 30 minutes at room temperature. After membrane staining, erythrocyte lysis, and leukocyte fixation, the cell suspension was permeabilized with FACS perm-buffer (FACS buffer supplemented with 0.5% saponin). Next, aliquots were incubated with fluorescent anti-cytokine monoclonal antibodies (all from BD-Pharmingen, San Jose, CA), including anti-IL-12-PE (clone #C11.5), anti-IFN-γ-PE (clone #4S.B3), anti-TNF-α-PE (clone #Mab11), anti-IL-4-PE (clone #8D4-8), anti-IL-5-PE (clone #TRFK5), and anti-IL-10-PE (clone #JES3-19F1), for 30 minutes at room temperature in the dark. After intracytoplasmic cytokine staining, the leukocytes were washed with FACS perm-buffer and FACS buffer, followed by fixation in FACS fixing solution (10 g/L paraformaldehyde, 10.2 g/L sodium cacodylate, and 6.63 g/L sodium chloride, pH 7.2).

Flow Cytometry Acquisition and Analysis

Immunostained samples were acquired using a FACScalibur™ flow cytometer equipped with a four-color detection system (Becton Dickinson, San Jose, CA, USA); the CELLQUEST software (Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA) was employed for data acquisition and analysis. A total of 30,000 events/tube were registered and stored for further analysis. Distinct gating strategies were utilized for analysis of the cytokine-expressing leukocytes subsets, including neutrophils, monocytes, natural killer (NK) cells, and lymphocytes (CD4+ and CD8+ T-cell subsets, and B cells), as previously reported by Luiza-Silva et al. [17]. At first, the results were expressed as percentages of cytokine-positive cells for each leukocyte subpopulation.

Overall Pattern and Cytokine Signature Analysis

The cytokine-mediated immune response elicited by the YF-17D-213/77 seed lot and the YF-17DD licensed vaccine was assessed after in vitro recall with specific antigenic stimulation. Analysis of the intracytoplasmic cytokine profile of peripheral blood leukocytes initially yielded the percentage of cytokine-positive cells. The cytokine index was then calculated as the ratio between the percentages of cytokine-positive cells observed in the stimulated cultures (YF-17DD or YF-17D-213/77) and the percentage of cytokine-positive cells detected in the unstimulated cultures (control).

Taking all data recorded for both experimental arms (YF-17DD and YF-17D-213/77, referred to as YF-Ag as a whole), we computed the global median of cytokine indexes (YF-Ag/control) for each leukocyte subpopulations, including neutrophil (NEU), monocyte (MON), and lymphocyte subsets. The global median of IL-12+NEU = 0.92; IFN-γ+NEU = 0.84; TNF-α+NEU = 1.11; IL-4+NEU = 0.96; IL-10+NEU = 0.95; IL-12+MON = 1.14; TNF-α+MON = 1.92; IL-10+MON = 0.95; IFN-γ+NK = 1.15; TNF-α+NK = 1.25; IL-4+NK = 1.25; IL-12+CD4+ = 1.13; IFN-γ+CD4+ = 1.11; TNF-α+CD4+ = 1.46; IL-4+CD4+ = 1.51; IL-5+CD4+ = 1.32; IL-10+CD4+ = 1.32; IL-12+CD8+ = 1.11; IFN-γ+CD8+ = 1.24; TNF-α+CD8+ = 1.21; IL-4+CD8+ = 1.26; IL-5+CD8+ = 1.24; IL-10+CD8+ = 1.53; TNF-α+CD19+ = 0.71; IL-4+CD19+ = 0.79; IL-10+CD19+ = 0.75 was utilized as the cut-off, in order to segregate low, high inflammatory, or high regulatory cytokine indexes. This strategy allowed for computation of the percentage of volunteers displaying high cytokine indexes. The cytokine signature for each experimental arm was also calculated for each assembled leukocyte subset. The cytokine-mediated immune response was first addressed as the “overall cytokine pattern” of the whole leukocyte population (NEU, MON, and lymphocyte subsets). Next, a detailed analysis of the major sources of each cytokine, denominated “cytokine signatures” as previously suggested by Luiza-Silva et al. [17], was carried out. These data were assembled as the ascendant frequency of high cytokine indexes for PV-PRNT+ that was taken as the reference cytokine curve for the YF-17DD or the YF-17D-213/77 arm, in order to identify changes in the overall cytokine patterns observed for the other experimental arms. Each axis represents the frequency (%) of volunteers exhibiting high cytokine indexes.

Comparative Data Analysis

The cytokine patterns and signatures triggered by the YF-17DD and YF-17D-213/77 substrains were compared by overlapping the PV-PRNT+ ascendant profiles of each experimental arm. Relevant differences were considered when the frequency for a given cytokine emerged outside the 50th percentile, compared with the cytokine pattern or signature from the other experimental arm (Figures 2 and 3). The difference between the PV-PRNTMEDIUM+ and PV-PRNTHIGH+ subgroups in terms of the cytokine-mediated immune response was analyzed by considering as relevant the percentages of a given inflammatory cytokine that emerged higher than the 50th percentile (Figure 4). A comparative analysis among PV-PRNT+, PV-PRNT, and RV-PRNT+ within the same experimental arm was performed by taking the ascendant cytokine curve of the YF-17DD or YF-17D-213/77 group as reference, and relevant differences were considered when the percentage of a given cytokine emerged below the quartile (25th percentile) of the reference cytokine signatures (Figure 5). The use of 25th and 50th percentile as a limit to identify relevant differences in the cytokine signatures between groups was previously proposed by Luiza-Silva et al [17]. This approach showed to be relevant to detect subtle changes in the cytokine signatures not detectable by conventional statistical approaches. The value of this qualitative method was emphasized during data analysis, as the patterns of cytokine signature were consistent with the profile of humoral immune response in both experimental arms.

thumbnail

Figure 2. Overall inflammatory and regulatory cytokine pattern triggered by the YF-17DD and YF-17D-213/77 substrains upon the in vitro recall of whole blood leukocytes from seroconverter children (PV-PRNT+) with specific YF-Ag.

The overall pattern of inflammatory (black bar) and regulatory (gray bar) cytokines is presented as the ascendant percentages of volunteers with high cytokine indexes, taking the cytokine profile of the whole leukocyte population (neutrophils, monocytes, and lymphocytes) for each experimental arm. Comparative analysis of the overall cytokine patterns from YF-17DD (lines with black or gray triangles) and YF-17D-213/77 (lines with black or gray squares) vaccines were further compared by overlapping the ascendant cytokine curves (bottom panel). Dotted lines highlight the 25th and 50th percentiles used as reference for comparative analysis. *Relevant differences were considered when the frequency for a given cytokine emerged outside the 50th percentile as compared to the reference cytokine pattern or signature.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0049828.g002
thumbnail

Figure 3. Comparative analysis of the cytokine signatures of innate and adaptive immunity triggered by the YF-17DD and YF-17D-213/77 substrains upon the in vitro recall of whole blood leukocytes from seroconverter children (PV-PRNT+) with specific YF-Ag.

The diagrams highlight each leukocyte subsets with distinct tags as they display low (white rectangle) or high (black rectangle = inflammatory, gray rectangle = regulatory) cytokine producers (top panel). The ascendant frequency of volunteers with high cytokine indexes of the innate and adaptive immunity was assembled for each experimental arm and is demonstrated by bar graphs (medium panel). Comparative analysis of the overall cytokine patterns of YF-17DD (lines with black or gray triangles) and YF-17D-213/77 (lines with black or gray squares) vaccinees were further compared by overlapping the ascendant cytokine curves (bottom panel). Dotted lines highlight the 25th and 50th percentiles used as reference for comparative analysis. *Differences were considered relevant when the frequency for a given cytokine emerged outside the 50th percentile as compared to the reference cytokine pattern or signature.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0049828.g003
thumbnail

Figure 4. Impact of serum titers of anti-YF neutralizing antibodies on the cytokine-mediated immune response triggered by the YF-17DD and YF-17D-213/77 substrains upon in vitro recall of whole blood leukocytes from seroconverter children (PV-PRNT+) with specific YF-Ag.

The PRNT+ groups from each experimental arm were first categorized into two subgroups referred to as PV-PRNTMEDIUM+ (2.5≤ serum titers ≤3.5 log10 mIU/mL) and PV-PRNTHIGH+ (serum titers >3.5 log10 mIU/mL). The cytokine profile of the PV-PRNTMEDIUM+ and PV-PRNTHIGH+ subgroups were evaluated, considering relevant the percentages of a given inflammatory cytokine that emerged higher than the 50th percentile, as indicate by an upward arrow (↑).

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0049828.g004
thumbnail

Figure 5. Comparative inflammatory and regulatory cytokine signatures triggered by the YF-17DD and YF-17D-213/77 substrains upon the in vitro recall of whole blood leukocytes from (A) seroconverter (PV-PRNT+) and nonseroconverter primary vaccinees (PV-PRNT) as well as (B) seroconverter revaccinees (RV-PRNT+) with specific YF-Ag.

The ascendant frequency of volunteers with high inflammatory and regulatory cytokine indexes was assembled for each experimental arm and demonstrated by bar graphs. Comparative analysis between PV-PRNT+, PV-PRNT, and RV-PRNT+ within the same experimental arm was performed taking the ascendant cytokine curve of the YF-17DD (lines with black or gray triangles) or YF-17D-213/77 (lines with black or gray squares) groups as reference. #Differences were considered relevant when the percentage of a given cytokine emerged below the quartile of the reference cytokine signatures.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0049828.g005

Results

The YF-17DD substrain and the YF-17D-213/77 seed lot trigger a balanced inflammatory and regulatory overall cytokine pattern in seroconverter children

Aiming to characterize whether the cytokine-mediated immune response elicited by the YF-17D-213/77 seed lot substrain is similar to that triggered by the YF-17DD reference vaccine, we investigated the impact of specific YF-17DD/control or YF-17D-213/77/control in vitro recall on the cytokine profile of peripheral blood leukocytes from primary vaccinated children. For this purpose, we first characterized the overall pattern of inflammatory and regulatory cytokines as the ascendant frequency of high cytokine producers by considering the whole leukocyte population (neutrophils, monocytes, and lymphocytes).

Data regarding the overall cytokine pattern of the whole leukocyte population demonstrated that the YF-17D-213/77 and the YF-17DD substrains triggered a balanced inflammatory and regulatory cytokine pattern in PV-PRNT+ children, with the frequency of high cytokine producers confined between the 25th and 50th percentiles. A detailed analysis of the ascendant cytokine patterns revealed that the PV-PRNT+ group from the YF-17DD arm was characterized by IL-10<IL-5<IFN-γ<IL-4<TNF-α<IL-12, whereas PV-PRNT+ vaccinees from the YF-17D-213/77 arm displayed TNF-α<IFN-γ<IL-12<IL-4<IL-5<IL-10 (Figure 2, top panel).

Analysis of the overlapping curves revealed a slight predominance of high IL-12 producers among the YF-17DD vaccinees and a modest prevalence of high IL-10 producers in the YF-17D-213/77 arm (Figure 2, bottom panel).

The cytokine signature triggered by the YF-17DD substrain counts on a relevant involvement of inflammatory status of the innate immunity, whereas the YF-17D-213/77 substrain displays a relevant inflammatory component at the adaptive immunity

We investigated the major sources of inflammatory and regulatory cytokines underlying the immune response in YF-17DD and YF-17D-213/77 vaccinees by using the global median cytokine index (YF-Ag/control) in order to highlight each leukocyte subset with distinct tags according to whether it displayed low or high cytokine production (Figure 3, top panel). After this procedure, we calculated the frequency of volunteers with high cytokine indexes for each leukocyte subset. We then used these data for assembly of the ascendant cytokine signatures of the innate and adaptive immunity.

Analysis of the cytokine signatures of PV-PRNT+ children demonstrated that the YF-17DD substrain triggered a prominent involvement of inflammatory status of the innate immunity, especially due to high cytokine indexes of IL-12 in neutrophils and monocytes and of TNF-α in neutrophils. In the YF-17D-213/77 arm, the PV-PRNT+ presented a relevant participation of regulatory cytokines from the innate immunity, especially due to enhanced IL-4 and IL-10 indexes in neutrophils (Figure 3, middle panel). Analysis of the cytokine signature promoted by the YF-17DD in terms of adaptive immunity revealed a balanced involvement of inflammatory and regulatory cytokines from T-cell subsets and B lymphocytes with prominent participation of IL-12 and IL-10 from CD4+ T cells. The YF-17D-213/77 substrain triggered a mixed involvement of inflammatory and regulatory cytokines, particularly due to enhanced IL-12 index in CD8+ T cells (Figure 3, middle panel).

Our findings also showed that the cytokine signature of PV-PRNT+ triggered by the YF-17D-213/77 substrain was characterized by higher involvement of regulatory neutrophils via IL-4 and IL-10. Moreover, the cytokine signature of PV-PRNT+ triggered by the YF-17D-213/77 substrain with respect to adaptive immunity displayed a regulatory profile characterized by IL-10 from CD4+ T cells and IL-10 and IL-4 from B cells, as well as prominent participation of an inflammatory response via IL-12 from CD8+ T cells (Figure 3, middle panel).

Comparative analysis of cytokine signature curves highlighted the particularities of the cytokine-mediated immune response prompted by the YF-17DD in vitro recall, as shown by the shift of innate immunity inflammatory cytokines+ cells toward higher frequencies (specially IFN-γ+NEU, TNF-α+NK, IL-12+NEU, IL-12+MON, and TNF-α+NEU). On the other hand, we noted the contribution of inflammatory cells of adaptive immunity (IL-12+CD8+) for the YF-17D-213/77 arm (Figure 3, bottom panel).

The serum levels of anti-YF-neutralizing antibodies are associated with distinct cytokine-mediated immune response following YF-17DD and 17D-213/77 vaccinations

Aiming to verify whether the level of anti-YF neutralizing antibodies would play a role in controlling the cytokine-mediated immune response triggered by the in vitro recall with YF-Ag, the PV-PRNT+ children from each vaccination arm were further categorized into two subgroups, namely PV-PRNTMEDIUM+ (2.5≤serum titers ≤3.5 log10 mIU/mL) and PV-PRNTHIGH+ (serum titers >3.5 log10 mIU/mL). The serum levels of both anti-YF PRNT antibodies in the PRNTMEDIUM+ and PRNTHIGH+ subgroups did not differ from those of the YF-17DD and YF-17D-213/77 seroconverters (Figure 4, top panel). However, there was a distinct association between the serum titers of anti-YF-neutralizing antibodies and the cytokine-mediated immune response in YF-17DD and YF-17D-213/77 primary vaccinees.

We observed a generally balanced inflammatory and regulatory cytokine profile of innate and adaptive immunity in the PV-PRNTMEDIUM+ subgroups from both experimental arms. In contrast, the PV-PRNTHIGH+ subgroup from the YF-17DD arm exhibited a polarized inflammatory cytokine profile especially in the case of the innate immunity, whereas the PV-PRNTHIGH+ subgroup from the YF-17D-213/77 arm had a predominant regulatory cytokine profile for both the innate and adaptive immune responses (Figure 4, bottom panel). It is noteworthy that, despite the overall distinct molecular mechanisms triggered by the cellular–humoral immunological interface in the YF-17-DD and YF-17D-213/77 arms, both vaccines were able to elicit particular but relevant inflammatory events regardless of the anti-YF PRNT antibody levels (Figure 5, arrows). These inflammatory events consisted of putative biomarkers of protection mechanisms that would be relevant in an eventual contact with wild YF strains.

The lack of seroconversion upon primary vaccination with YF-17DD and YF-17D-213/77 substrains is associated with distinct gaps in the cytokine-mediated immune response

To further evaluate the cytokine-mediated immune response triggered by the YF-17DD and the YF-17D-213/77 vaccines, we generated the inflammatory and regulatory cytokine signature curves for the PV-PRNT+ groups of both experimental arms, namely YF-17DD and YF-17D-213/77 (Figure 5A, top panel). These cytokine signatures were used as reference curves for comparative analysis for identifying changes in the cytokine-mediated immune response in nonseroconverters primary vaccinees (PV-PRNT) (Figure 5A). Data analysis demonstrated that the PV-PRNT children in the YF-17DD arm presented a relevant gap in the cytokine signature, especially in the inflammatory profile of the innate immunity. In fact, the PV-PRNT group from the YF-17DD arm had a relevant deficiency of neutrophil- and monocyte-derived IL-12 and TNF-α. In addition, they displayed considerably deficient synthesis of IL-10 and IL-12 by CD4+ T cells as well as of IL-4 by CD8+ T cells (Figure 5A).

On the other hand, the PV-PRNT children of the YF-17D-213/77 arm exhibited a relevant gap in the synthesis of inflammatory cytokines, particularly a deficiency of IL-12 produced by CD8+ T cells, besides the drop in the IL-10 produced by B cells as compared to the reference cytokine signature (Figure 5A).

Revaccination with YF-17DD brings out an overall balanced cytokine profile in YF-17DD nonresponders and a robust inflammatory profile in YF-17D-213/77 nonresponders

Aiming to investigate whether revaccination would restore the cytokine-mediated immune response of nonseroconverter primary vaccinees, we re-evaluated the immunological status of the PV-PRNT groups from both experimental arms. Our findings demonstrated that revaccination with YF-17DD was able to induce seroconversion in all revaccinees (data not shown). Interestingly, revaccination with the YF-17DD substrain was able to restore most of the gaps observed in the cytokine signature, leading to an overall balanced cytokine profile in YF-17DD nonresponders (Figure 5B). In fact, revaccination restored the ability of neutrophils from RV-PRNT+ children belonging to the YF-17DD arm to produce TNF-α and IL-12 as well as the capacity of CD4+ T cells to generate IL-12 and IL-10 (Figure 5B). Similarly, the YF-17DD revaccination of nonseroconverter children from the YF-17D-213/77 arm re-established the ability of CD8+ cells to produce IL-12 as well as the capacity of CD19+ B cells to generate IL-10 (Figure 5B).

Together, these findings indicated that revaccination not only repaired the serological status but also re-established the overall balanced cytokine profile in YF-17DD nonresponders and a robust inflammatory profile in YF-17D-213/77 nonresponders to primary vaccination, filling most of the gaps observed in nonseroconverters.

Discussion

As YF immunization increases worldwide and the demand for vaccine becomes higher, an alternative to maintain ongoing vaccine production is to use the new seed lot that can provide vaccines for immunization programs. Hence, new seed lots must be prepared and tested according to the Good Clinical Practice guidelines. These guidelines include a comparative analysis of immunogenicity and reactogenicity with the already licensed vaccine.

Aiming to further contribute to the validation of the YF-17D-213/77 and the YF-17DD substrains for use in immunization programs, in the present investigation we assessed the cellular and humoral immune response triggered by these vaccine substrains. This research was conducted as a complementary parameter under Good Clinical Practice guidelines, and it could aid national immunization programs in Brazil and other parts of Latin America and Africa with respect to clinical validation studies of a new seed lot. Moreover, analysis of these YF vaccine substrains with different passage histories should reveal the extent of immunological alterations associated with the already reported genetic variability between the YF-17D-213/77 seed lot and the YF-17DD vaccine.

First, we characterized the overall cytokine-mediated immune response to YF vaccination using a recently proposed approach for identifying the frequency of high cytokine producers amongst the YF-17D-213/77 and the YF-17DD seroconverters primary vaccinees. Our findings demonstrated that the YF-17D-213/77 and the YF-17DD substrains trigger a balanced overall inflammatory and regulatory cytokine-mediated immune response among the seroconverter primary vaccinated children. These results agree with previous reports that the induction of complex immune response, including activation and modulation events as well as a mixed and balanced pro-inflammatory and regulatory cytokine profile, is relevant to the development of a nondeleterious immune response in YF-17DD primary vaccinees [17], [18][23]. This would be relevant in terms of guaranteeing the establishment of protective events in an eventual contact with the wild YF virus. Insights from the past decade arising from advances in our understanding of innate and adaptive immunity following YF vaccination have provided a clearer idea that an extensive inflammatory response is deleterious to establishing immunity. Hence, it is not surprising that mechanisms exist to shut off inflammation and regulate the overall immune response following vaccination and induction of an inflammatory response [17], [18][24].

In this study, we observed that several cytokine sources are elicited by YF vaccination in the innate and adaptive arms of the immune response. Using flow cytometry, we demonstrated that the YF-17D-213/77 and the YF-17DD seroconverter primary vaccinees differ with respect to the “cytokine signatures” of innate and adaptive immunity. In fact, while the YF-17DD vaccine induces an important inflammatory cytokine signature in terms of innate immunity, particularly that mediated by TNF-α+ neutrophils and neutrophil- and monocyte-derived IL-12, which ensures the inflammatory profile in YF-17D PRNT+ primary vaccinees. Meanwhile, the YF-17D-213/77 experimental arm had a prominent inflammatory signature mainly represented by the outstanding adaptive immunity mediated by IL-12+ CD8+ T cells. However, it is important to mention that both substrains are able to trigger counter-balancing regulatory immune events of innate and adaptive immune response, as illustrated by the IL-10 production by CD4+ T cells in YF-17DD PV-PRNT+ subjects and the prominent frequency of IL-10+ neutrophils in YF-17D-213/77 PRNT+ primary vaccinees.

It is well recognized that the YF vaccines in current clinical use display an outstanding capacity for prompting antibody responses, particularly those that provide protection by neutralizing the YF virus [25]. The equivalent immunogenicity of YF vaccines from the 17D-213/77 and 17DD substrains has already been demonstrated by placebo-controlled double blind randomized trial [12]. Our investigation of whether the neutralizing antibody titer predicts specific cytokine-mediated immune response has shown that the serum levels of anti-YF-neutralizing antibodies are associated with distinct cytokine profiles in the YF-17DD and YF-17D-213/77 arms. However, regardless of the anti-YF PRNT antibody levels, both vaccines are able to elicit particular but relevant inflammatory events required for protection against natural infection.

It is important to bear in mind that both the cellular and humoral arms of the immune system are required for effective protection against YF natural infection [26]. Insights from innate immunity research have led to a better appreciation of how existing vaccines work and have also contributed to the rational development of new vaccines [27]. In fact, previous studies have demonstrated that the Toll-like receptors (TLR) involved in the NK-cell activation following vaccination with the YF-17DD substrain seems to play a potential role in the development of long-lasting protective memory to the YF virus [28]. Progress has been made in defining the contribution of these receptor-ligand interactions to YF-vaccine–mediated protection. Impaired cytokine production was observed when dendritic cells from TLR-deficient mice were stimulated with the 17D-204 vaccine [18].

Some of the studies that address the complex interactions between the virus and the immune system suggest that the ability of YF-vaccines to rapidly produce neutralizing PRNT antibodies as well as the CD8+ T cell effectors. A cardinal property of memory CD8+ T cells is their ability to undergo rapid proliferation upon reencountering the priming antigen. This is an important component of protective immunity; a higher proliferative potential implies a larger pool of secondary effectors. Akondy et al [29] have define the attributes of a human CD8+ T cell response that generates high-quality immune memory by performing a comprehensive analysis of the CD8+ T cells elicited after vaccination with the efficacious yellow fever live virus vaccine. The YF-specific CD8+ T cells displayed broad specificity, high magnitude, multiple functions, robust proliferative potential, and long-term persistence, all characteristics of protective cellular immunity.

To our knowledge, there are no systematic data on the magnitude and relevance of the antigen-specific CD8+ T-cell response necessary for protection against YF infection. However, evidence has shown that both the CD8+ T-cell and the antibody responses can be critical parameters of protective immunity upon YF-17D-204 vaccination. Using the systems biology approach, recent studies have identified relevant aspects of the innate immunity that can be used to predict both neutralizing antibody and CD8+ T-cell responses to YF-17D-204 vaccination [24]. In the case of the present investigation, it is noteworthy that the YF-17D-213/77 substrain, a close relative of the YF-17D-204 substrain, prompts a cytokine-mediated immune response with important contribution from CD8+ T cells. On the other hand, the YF-17DD (derived from the YF-17D substrain with independent passage in tissue culture prior to propagation in embryonated chicken eggs) presents a more robust involvement of the innate immune compartment. These particularities in the source of inflammatory cytokines of innate and adaptive immunity can represent events associated with the genetic variability incorporated in the YF-17D-213/77 seed lot and the YF-17DD vaccine during the passage history of the original YF Asibi strain.

The high immunogenicity of YF vaccines has been confirmed by studies in adults and children. The YF vaccine immunogenicity in adults can reach over 95% seroconversion among subjects that were previously seronegative and it probably persists for at least 35 years [30]. However, the seroconversion rates range from 77.5% to 90% in children, with distinct seroconversion rates being observed according to the age at vaccination [15], [16], [31][35]. Despite the great public health success of YF vaccination programs, the lack of seroconversion in some vaccinees is a problem, since these subjects are not protected against natural YF infection. Our present evaluation of the cytokine-mediated immune response of a group of nonseroconverters after YF-17D-213/77 or YF-17DD vaccination confirmed that, besides the lack of relevant titers of anti-YF neutralizing antibodies detected by PRNT, the PV-PRNT subjects from both experimental arms exhibited relevant gaps in the inflammatory cytokine response of circulating leukocytes upon antigen-specific in vitro recall. Interestingly, the gaps could be selectively observed in the most relevant inflammatory component induced by each YF substrain; i.e., pro-inflammatory innate immunity in the YF-17DD arm and IL-12 response of CD8+ T cells in the YF-17D-213 nonseroconverters. Most importantly, our findings demonstrate that these deficiencies in the cytokine-mediated immune response can be repaired upon revaccination of the subjects that were seronegative after primary vaccination. This phenomenon has been discussed in more details elsewhere [17].

In conclusion, despite the particular sources of cytokine-mediated immune response in the innate and adaptive compartments, both vaccines (YF-17DD and YF-17D-213/77) trigged a balanced cytokine signatures, thereby corroborating their already reported attenuated phenotype [6], [10]. These findings suggest that both the YF-17DD reference vaccine and the YF-17D-213/77 seed lot trigger an overall balanced cytokine-mediated immune response, which supports their universal use for immunization purposes when it comes to preventing YF outbreaks worldwide. It is important to notify that these hypotheses should be taken with the appropriate prudence considering the qualitative and observational nature of the present investigation.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the program for technological development in tools for health-PDTIS-FIOCRUZ for the use of its facilities. OAMF and ATC thank CNPq for fellowships (PQ). ACCA acknowledges the FAPEMIG for the fellowship (PDJ 00265/09). We are also thankful to Dr. Ivone Perez de Castro from the Secretaria de Saúde do Distrito Federal for coordinating the field work in Brasilia, DF, Brazil and Rosângela Aparecida de Azevedo for the logistical support during field work in Minas Gerais, Brazil.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: LABC RMM MLSM RHGF MSF RG AH JGLR JACL ATC OAMF. Performed the experiments: ACCA LPAP MLS MAB M. Angela Martins RSA DSL. Analyzed the data: ACCA LPAP MLS. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: LABC M. Auxiliadora-Martins IRC SMES ATC OAMF. Wrote the paper: ACCA LPAP MLS OAMF.

References

  1. 1. Monath TP (2005) Yellow fever vaccine. Expert Rev Vaccines 4: 553–574.
  2. 2. World Health Organization. Global programme for vaccines and immunization (1998) Expanded programme on immunization. Yellow fever. Geneva. Available: http://www.who.int/vaccines-documents/Do​csPDF/www9842.pdf. Accessed 2012 Mar 6.
  3. 3. Santos CND, Post PR, Carvalho R, Ferreira II, Rice CM, et al. (1995) Complete nucleotide sequence of yellow fever virus vaccine strains 17DD and 17D-213. Vírus Res 35: 35–41.
  4. 4. Fleiss JL (1986) The design and analysis of clinical experiments. New York: John Wiley & Sons Inc. DOI: 10.1002/9781118032923.
  5. 5. Freestone DS (1994) Yellow fever vaccine. In: Plotkin SA, Mortimer EA, editors. Vaccines 2nd ed. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders. pp. 741–779.
  6. 6. World Health Organization (1998) Requirements for yellow fever vaccine. WHO Tech Rep Ser 872: 31–68.
  7. 7. Monath TP, Nichols R, Archambault WT, Moore L, Marchesani R, Tian J, et al. (2002) Comparative safety and immunogenicity of two yellow fever 17D vaccines (ARILVAX and YF-VAX) in a phase III multicenter, double-blind clinical trial. Am J Trop Med Hyg 66: 533–541.
  8. 8. Marchevsky RS, da Luz Leal M, Homma A, Coutinho ES, Camacho LA, et al. (2006) Molecular and phenotypic analysis of a working seed lot of yellow fever virus 17DD vaccine strain produced from the secondary seed lot 102/84 with an additional passage in chicken embryos. Biologicals 34: 191–197.
  9. 9. Ministério da Saúde (2001) Fundação Nacional de Saúde. Programa Nacional de Imunizações. Manual de Procedimentos para Vacinação. 4a Ed. Brasília: Fundação Nacional de Saúde. Available: http://dtr2001.saude.gov.br/svs/pub/MPV/​mpv00.htm. Accessed 2012 Mar 20.
  10. 10. World Health Oraganization (2007) Vaccine-preventable diseases and vaccines. In: International Travel and Health. pp. 93–145.
  11. 11. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2011) In the News Yellow Fever in Brazil: Current Situation. Available: http://wwwnc.cdc.gov/travel/notices/in-t​he-news/yellow-fever-brazil.htm. Accessed 2012 Feb 26.
  12. 12. Camacho LAB, Freire MS, Leal MLF, Aguiar SG, Nascimento JP, et al. (2004) Collaborative Group for the Study of Yellow Fever Vaccines. Immunogenicity of WHO-17D and Brazilian 17DD yellow fever vaccines: a randomized trial. Rev Saúde Pública 38: 671–678.
  13. 13. Belmusto-Worn VE, Sanchez JL, McCarthy K, Nichols R, Bautista CT, et al. (2005) Randomized, double-blind, phase III, pivotal field trial of the comparative immunogenicity, safety, and tolerability of two yellow ferver 17D vaccines (Arilvax and YF-VAX) in healthy infants and children in Peru. Am J Trop Med Hyg 72: 189–197.
  14. 14. Collaborative Group for Studies with Yellow Fever Vaccine (2007) Randomized, double-blind, multicenter study of the immunogenicity and reactogenicity of 17DD and WHO 17D-213/77 yellow fever vaccines in children: implications for the Brazilian National Immunization. Vaccine 25: 3118–3123.
  15. 15. Camacho LA, de Aguiar SG, Freire Mda S, Leal Mda L, do Nascimento JP, et al. (2005) Collaborative Group for the Study of Yellow Fever Vaccines. Reactogenicity of yellow fever vaccines in a randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Rev Saúde Pública 39: 413–420.
  16. 16. Stefano I, Sato HK, Pannuti CS, Omoto TM, Mann G, et al. (1999) Recent immunization against measles does not interfere with the seroresponse to yellow fever vaccine. Vaccine 17: 1042–1046.
  17. 17. Luiza-Silva M, Campi-Azevedo AC, Batista MA, Martins MA, Avelar RS, et al. (2011) Cytokine signatures of innate and adaptive immunity in 17DD yellow fever vaccinated children and its association with the level of neutralizing antibody. J Infect Dis 15: 873–883.
  18. 18. Querec T, Bennouna S, Alkan S, Laouar Y, Gorden K, et al. (2006) Yellow fever vaccine YF-17D activates multiple dendritic cell subsets via TLR2, 7, 8, and 9 to stimulate polyvalent immunity. J Exp Med 203: 413–424.
  19. 19. Martins MA, Silva ML, Elói-Santos SM, Ribeiro JG, Peruhype-Magalhães V, et al. (2008) Innate immunity phenotypic features point toward simultaneous raise of activation and modulation events following 17DD live attenuated yellow fever first-time vaccination. Vaccine 26: 1173–1184.
  20. 20. Gaucher D, Therrien R, Kettaf N, Angermann BR, Boucher G, et al. (2008) Yellow fever vaccine induces integrated multilineage and polyfunctional immune responses. J Exp Med 205: 3119–3131.
  21. 21. Santos AP, Matos DC, Bertho AL, Mendonça SC, Marcovistz R (2008) Detection of Th1/Th2 cytokine signatures in yellow fever 17DD first-time vaccinees through ELISpot assay. Cytokine 42: 152–155.
  22. 22. Bae HG, Domingo C, Tenorio A, de Ory F, Muñoz J, et al. (2008) Immune response during adverse events after 17D-derived yellow fever vaccination in Europe. J Infect Dis 197: 1577–1584.
  23. 23. Silva ML, Espírito-Santo LR, Martins MA, Silveira-Lemos D, Peruhype- Magalhaães V, et al. (2010) Clinical and immunological insights on severe, adverse neurotropic and viscerotropic disease following 17D yellow fever vaccination. Clin Vaccine Immunol 17: 118–126.
  24. 24. Querec TD, Akondy RS, Lee EK, Cao W, Nakaya HI, et al. (2009) Systems biology approach predicts immunogenicity of the yellow fever vaccine in humans. Nat Immunol 10: 116–125.
  25. 25. Ahmed R, Pulendran B, Ahmed R, Pulendran B (2011) Learning vaccinology from viral infections. J Exp Med 208: 2347–2349.
  26. 26. Wuthrich M, Filutowicz HI, Warner T, Deepe GS Jr, Klein BS (2003) Vaccine immunity to pathogenic fungi overcomes the requirement for CD4 help in exogenous antigen presentation to CD8+ T cells: implications for vaccine development in immune-deficient hosts. J Exp Med 197: 1405–1416.
  27. 27. Levitz SM, Golenbock DT (2012) Beyond Empiricism: Informing Vaccine Development through Innate Immunity Research. Cell 148: 1284–1292.
  28. 28. Neves PC, Matos DC, Marcovistz R, Galler R (2009) TLR expression and NK cell activation after human yellow fever vaccination. Vaccine 27: 5543–5549.
  29. 29. Akondy RS, Monson ND, Miller JD, Edupuganti S, Teuwen D, et al. (2009) The yellow fever virus vaccine induces a broad and polyfunctional human memory CD8+ T cell response. J Immunol 15: 7919–7930.
  30. 30. Poland JD, Calisher CH, Monath TP, Downs WG, Murphy K (1981) Persistence of neutralizing antibody 30–35 years after immunization with 17D yellow fever vaccine. Bull World Health Organ 59: 895–900.
  31. 31. Meyer HM Jr, Hostetler DD Jr, Bernhein BC, Rogers NG, Lambin P, et al. (1964) Response of Volta children to jet inoculation of combined live measles, smallpox and yellow fever vaccines. Bull World Health Organ 30: 783–794.
  32. 32. Robertson SE (1993) The Immunological Basis for Immunization. Module 8: Yellow Fever. Geneva: World Health Organization, WHO/EPI/GEN/93.18. Available: http://www.who.int/vaccines-documents/Do​csPDF-IBIe/mod8_e.pdf. Accessed 2012 Apr 4.
  33. 33. Georges AJ, Tible F, Meunier DMY, Gonzalez JP, Beraud AM, et al. (1985) Thermostability and efficacy in the field of a new, stabilized yellow fever virus vaccine. Vaccine 3: 313–315.
  34. 34. Lhuillier M, Mazzariol MJ, Zadi S, Le Cam N, Bentejac MC, et al. (1989) Study of combined vaccination against yellow fever and measles in infants from six to nine months. J Biol Stand 17: 9–15.
  35. 35. Mouchon D, Pignon D, Vicens R, Tu-Ha-Thanh, Tekaia F, et al. (1990) The combined measles–yellow fever vaccination in African infants aged 6 to 10 months. Bull Soc Pathol Exot 83: 537–551.