Advertisement
Research Article

Expression Profile in Rice Panicle: Insights into Heat Response Mechanism at Reproductive Stage

  • Xianwen Zhang,

    Affiliations: Key Laboratory for Crop Germplasm Innovation and Utilization of Hunan Province, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha, China, College of Bioscience and Biotechnology, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha, China

    X
  • Jiaping Li,

    Affiliation: College of Bioscience and Biotechnology, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha, China

    X
  • Ailing Liu,

    Affiliations: Key Laboratory for Crop Germplasm Innovation and Utilization of Hunan Province, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha, China, College of Bioscience and Biotechnology, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha, China

    X
  • Jie Zou,

    Affiliation: College of Bioscience and Biotechnology, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha, China

    X
  • Xiaoyun Zhou,

    Affiliations: Key Laboratory for Crop Germplasm Innovation and Utilization of Hunan Province, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha, China, College of Bioscience and Biotechnology, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha, China

    X
  • Jianhua Xiang,

    Affiliation: College of Bioscience and Biotechnology, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha, China

    X
  • Wirat Rerksiri,

    Affiliation: College of Bioscience and Biotechnology, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha, China

    X
  • Yan Peng,

    Affiliation: Key Laboratory for Crop Germplasm Innovation and Utilization of Hunan Province, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha, China

    X
  • Xingyao Xiong mail,

    xiongxingyao@yahoo.cn (XX); xinbochen@live.cn (XC)

    Affiliation: Key Laboratory for Crop Germplasm Innovation and Utilization of Hunan Province, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha, China

    X
  • Xinbo Chen mail

    xiongxingyao@yahoo.cn (XX); xinbochen@live.cn (XC)

    Affiliations: Key Laboratory for Crop Germplasm Innovation and Utilization of Hunan Province, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha, China, College of Bioscience and Biotechnology, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha, China

    X
  • Published: November 14, 2012
  • DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0049652

Abstract

Rice at reproductive stage is more sensitive to environmental changes, and little is known about the mechanism of heat response in rice panicle. Here, using rice microarray, we provided a time course gene expression profile of rice panicle at anther developmental stage 8 after 40°C treatment for 0 min, 20 min, 60 min, 2 h, 4 h, and 8 h. The identified differentially expressed genes were mainly involved in transcriptional regulation, transport, cellular homeostasis, and stress response. The predominant transcription factor gene families responsive to heat stress were Hsf, NAC, AP2/ERF, WRKY, MYB, and C2H2. KMC analysis discovered the time-dependent gene expression pattern under heat stress. The motif co-occurrence analysis on the promoters of genes from an early up-regulated cluster showed the important roles of GCC box, HSE, ABRE, and CE3 in response to heat stress. The regulation model central to ROS combined with transcriptome and ROS quantification data in rice panicle indicated the great importance to maintain ROS balance and the existence of wide cross-talk in heat response. The present study increased our understanding of the heat response in rice panicle and provided good candidate genes for crop improvement.

Introduction

Currently, the burden of environmental stresses on crop plants is likely to increase because of global warming, and heat stress is a major abiotic stress limiting plant growth and productivity in many areas of the world [1]. As the staple food for more than half of the world’s population, rice (Oryza sativa L.) is the model system for genetic and genomic studies of grasses. It was estimated that rice grain yields decline by 10% for each 1°C increase in minimum temperature during the growing season [2]. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) predicted that only if global mean temperature rises by more than 5.5°C will global food prices increase because of failure of supply to keep full pace with demand [3]. Therefore, the importance to understand the molecular basis of rice heat tolerance is driven by both the interest in basic knowledge and the prospect that such knowledge might provide new strategies for improving heat tolerance in rice.

It’s well known that heat shock directly or indirectly leads to the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) like H2O2, which is called oxidative stress [4]. H2O2 is an early component of the heat-signaling pathway [5], which is required for the activation of small heat shock proteins (sHSP) synthesis as well as the over-production of the ROS scavengers such as catalase, superoxide dismutase and peroxidase [4]. The induction of heat-shock protein (HSP) expression is one of the best-characterized responses to high temperature stress, which is similar mechanism of response to high temperatures in all organisms [6][8]. A lot of heat-responsive genes and proteins including Hsps, Hsfs, antioxidant enzymes, various transcription factors and calmodulin have been identified and their functions were well elucidated [9][12].

Due to the high correlation between the rice growth at reproductive stage and yield, the great attentions were paid to uncovering the actions of rice reproductive tissues. Expression atlases on reproductive stage and entire life cycle of rice were investigated [13], [14]. Using laser-capture technology, 1,158 pollen mother cells-preferential genes were identified as candidate genes involved in meiotic recombination and meiotic cell cycle control [15]. It was reported that high temperature causes rice male sterility during pollen development [16]. A joint analysis of metabolome and transcriptome was performed to comprehend the impact of high temperature on rice grain filling [17]. It’s an important way to uncover the heat response mechanism using rice varieties differing in heat tolerance. The results from Chen’s research group showed that the heat-tolerant rice species 996 exhibited better anther dehisence and pollen fertility rate than heat-sensitive cultivar 4628 [18], which is consistent with the observations on the other rice species [19]. Chen’s group also found that 996 and 4628 were significantly different in high-temperature tolerance. The seed setting percentage of 996 and 4628 were 66.31% and 36.11%, respectively, under seven days with 37°C/30°C high temperature treatment at reproductive stage [20]. Even so, little is known about the heat response mechanism in rice reproductive tissues. Consequently, understanding the heat response mechanism in rice still remains to be an urgent task, and the reproductive tissues undoubtedly become important targets for the researches on stress response.

So far, as a powerful high throughput technique, microarray has been widely used to systematically investigate the molecular reactions by which plants respond and adapt to complicated environment [21][23]. It was also applied to profile the tissue- and stress-specific gene expression [13], [14], [16], [24] as well as transcriptome of rice developing caryopses under high temperature [17].

Here, we reported the time course gene expression profile of young panicle from heat-tolerant rice cultivar 996 from 0 min to 8 h after 40°C treatment using Agilent 44K rice microarray to identify heat responsive genes in rice panicle. The motif co-occurrence analysis on promoters of co-expressed genes and a molecular regulation model central to ROS combined with ROS quantification data revealed the importance of ROS balance and complex cross-talk in response to heat shock in rice panicle.

Results

Replicate Analysis

To check the quality of our microarray data, the normalized data were log2 transformed, and Hierachical Clustering (HCL) was carried out using Mev. The results show good correlations between sample replicates with correlation coefficient of more than 0.99 (Table S1).

Differentially Expressed Genes at All the Time Points

The differentially expressed genes at the time point of 20 min, 60 min, 2 h, 4 h and 8 h heat treatment were determined by more than 3-fold change of expression level compared with the control, and the numbers of up- and down-regulated genes at the five time points are shown in Figure 1. The number of differentially expressed genes at the time point of 2 h heat shock is smaller than that at 20 min and 4 h, therefore, it could be concluded that the time point of 2 h may be the transition and key point for rice panicle in response to high temperature. The Venn diagram analysis shows that there are 198 genes (262 probes) that were significantly-regulated at all the time points of heat stress (Fig. 2A), most of which were early up-regulated (Fig. 2B). These genes are mainly involved in stress-response and transcription regulation according to GO analysis and annotation from RAP-DB, such as zinc finger transcription factors, Hsf, sHsp and ROS-related genes (Table S2).

thumbnail

Figure 1. Distribution of the differentially expressed genes at all time points.

The numbers on the horizontal axis represented for the time after heat treatment, and that on the vertical axis for the numbers of up- and down-regulated probes.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0049652.g001
thumbnail

Figure 2. Significantly-regulated probes on the time course of heat stress.

A, Venn diagram analysis on the differentially expressed probes at all time points identified 262 significantly regulated probes on the time course of heat stress. B, Expression pattern of the 262 significantly regulated probes using Hierachical Clustering (HCL) algorithm. The color scale (representing the average of normalized values) is shown at the right, and green bar indicates low expression, and red for high expression.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0049652.g002

Identification of the Heat-responsive Genes

The heat-responsive (HR) genes were defined as the ones that have more than 3-fold expression change in at least two of the five time points and 2449 genes (3364 probes) were identified as HR genes on the time course (Table S3). Gene Ontology (GO) classification demonstrated that most of these HR genes were related to transporter, protein binding, antioxidant, catalysis, transcription regulation, reproduction and development, stress response categories (Fig. 3).

thumbnail

Figure 3. Gene Ontology (GO) classification of the heat-responsive (HR) genes.

The HR genes were designated as those have more than 3-fold expression changes compared with the control (untreated sample) in at least two of the five time points.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0049652.g003

The above GO classifications were further validated with analysis of specific important pathways using MapMan. The cellular response-related genes are mainly involved in biotic stress, heat stress, thioredoxin, cell cycle and development, and they are characteristic of early or constitutive up-regulation during the time course of heat stress such as Hsp family members and dnaJ proteins (Fig. 4A). The secondary metabolism-related genes, which significantly participate in the synthesis of phenylpropanoid, lignin, simple phenols and flavonoids, mainly exhibited late up-regulation under heat stress (Fig. 4B). We further investigated the ubiquitin–proteasome system (UPS) and found that RING/U-box- and SCF-related genes from E3 family constitute a major group with significant and complex expression changes under heat stress (Fig. 4C, Table S9).

thumbnail

Figure 4. Expression profiles of the genes in cellular response, secondary metabolism and the ubiquitin-proteasome system.

MapMan was used to visualize the HR genes in the cellular response (A), secondary metabolism (B) and ubiquitin-proteasome system (C). Each BIN or subBIN is represented as a block with each transcript colored red for up-regulation or blue for down-regulation.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0049652.g004

Expression Pattern on the Time Course of Heat Shock

Considering the complex changes of genome-wide gene expression on the time course of heat stress, we used k-Means Clustering (KMC) together with HCL to see the gene expression pattern in rice panicle under heat stress. The HR genes on the time course of heat stress were divided into 12 clusters (Fig. 5). The cluster 1 represents for early down-regulation, cluster 2 for early-down and late-up-regulation, cluster 3 for late down-regulation, cluster 4 for continuous down-regulation, cluster 5, 6, 8 and 9 for early up-regulation, cluster 7, 10 and 11 for late-up-regulation, and cluster 12 for continuous up-regulation. GO analysis on the clusters from KMC showed that the genes involved in protein binding and degradation were early up-regulated, the catalysis-related genes were early down-regulated, and the genes for electron carrier and signal transduction were late down-regulated (p = 0.05) (Fig. 6).

thumbnail

Figure 5. Expression patterns of the HR genes.

The HR genes were divided into 12 clusters (from #1 to #12) based on their expression level using k-Means clustering (KMC) algorithm, and #1 belongs to early down-regulated, #2 for early down and late up-regulated, #3 for late down-regulation, #4 for continuous down-regulation, #5, #6, #8 and #9 for early up-regulation, #7, #10 and #11 for late up-regulation, #12 for continuous up-regulation. The vertical axis represented for the gene expression signal value, and the horizontal axis represented for the 12 samples in order (from left to right: CK-1, 2; 20 min-1, 2; 60 min-1, 2; 2 h-1, 2; 4 h-1, 2; 8 h-1, 2 ).

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0049652.g005
thumbnail

Figure 6. GO analysis on the clusters from KMC.

Functional distribution of the early-up- and early-down-regulated (A, B) plus late-up- and late-down-regulated (C, D) clusters showed that the genes are mainly involved in stress response, transcription factor, transporter, secondary metabolism, development as well as reproduction (p = 0.05).

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0049652.g006

Major Functional Categories of HR Genes in Rice Panicle

Transcription factors.

The rice genome has at least 1,930 predicted transcription factors (TFs), which have been classified into 63 families [25], and the rice microarray contains 1,702 TF genes. In this study, the identified TF genes mainly belong to the HSF, AP2/ERF, bHLH, bZIP, MYB, WRKY, NAC and C2H2 families (Table S4). Among the 9 heat responsive Hsf genes, 5 belong to HsfA sub-family (HsfA2a, HsfA2d, HsfA9, OsHsfA3, OsHsfA2f) and 3 belong to HsfB sub-family (HsfB2a, HsfB2b, HsfB2c). They exhibited early-up- or constitutive-up-regulation during the period of heat treatment. Notably, the transcript for HsfA2a and HsfA2f were induced over 200-fold at the beginning of heat shock. Twenty-four of the 164 AP2/ERF TF genes were identified as HR, and only one AP2 and 5 DREB sub-family members were significantly expressed. The ERF subfamilies, B1, B2, B3 and B4, constitute the major groups. Among them, Os01g0313300, Os03g0182800 and Os02g0546800 showed continuous up-regulation upon heat stress. Among the 9 HR genes in the 178 bHLH members, only Os08g0487700 was early up-regulated, and all the others were repressed during heat stress. Among the 13 HR bZIP family genes, OsbZIP-IV and VI subfamilies were major groups. Only 3 genes from OsbZIP-VI, 2 from OsbZIP-III and 1 from OsbZIP-I were early up-regulated. In addition, among the Myb family genes, 9 genes for (R1)R2R3, 7 for MYB-related and 3 for atypical MYB were identified as HR. The 11 identified HR WRKY family genes were mainly from group II and III. Only 3 genes (Os05g0537100, Os11g0117400 and Os12g0116600) were continuously up-regulated during heat shock, and the others were characteristic of early induction. There are 13 HR genes from NAC family, and SNAC_B subfamily is predominant. Similarly, among the 11 HR genes in C2H2 family, a large part of them were early induced in rice panicle under heat shock.

Hsp and other chaperone genes.

It is well known that plant HSPs and other chaperones play important roles both in response to adverse environmental conditions and in various developmental processes. Our experiments identified 39 Hsp genes and 33 other unclassified Hsp genes responsive to heat (Table S5). Among the HR Hsp genes, 3 genes represented for Hsp100, 11 for Hsp70, 6 for Hsp90, and the other 19 genes for sHsp. All HR members from Hsp100 family and most HR genes from Hsp70 and Hsp90 families exhibited significant elevation at the transcript level within 4 h after heat treatment in rice panicle. Only 4 genes for Hsp70 and 2 genes for Hsp90 were persistently induced by heat. Notably, almost all of the HR sHsp subfamily genes were greatly and continuously up-regulated during the period of high temperature, and constituted a major group of the significantly-regulated genes on the time course of heat treatment (Table S2, Table S5). Most of the unclassified HR Hsp genes were early induced. A few genes for DnaJ protein, dehydrin, and hypothetical proteins were persistently elevated more than 10-fold during heating in rice panicle.

Transporters.

In the rice genome, transporter family genes are grouped into 4 distinct types: ATP-dependent transporters, secondary transporters, ion channels, and unclassified transporters. Among 1,286 transporter-encoding genes, 1,147 genes were present in rice microarray, and 115 were significantly altered at the transcript level under heat treatment and considered as HR genes (Table S6). Among the 8 ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporter genes responsive to heat, 2 genes (Os09g0572400 and Os03g0332700) responded to early heat stress, 2 genes (Os03g0281900 and Os12g0132800) exhibited early repression and late induction. The rest 4 genes were significantly down-regulated. Among the genes related to sugar, peptide, amino acid and other metabolites transport, 7 genes were remarkably early heat-induced. At the same time, 8 genes for aquaporin were identified as HR genes. Only OsNIP2;1 (Os02g0745100) and OsTIP1;2 (Os01g0975900) were continuously up-regulated during heating in rice panicle, and both of OsNIP4;1 (Os01g0112400) and OsTIP4;1 (Os05g0231700) were late elevated. The other 4 genes including OsPIP2;4 (Os07g0448100) were repressed.

ROS-related genes.

ROS-related antioxidant enzyme systems mainly include superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase (CAT), ascorbate peroxidase (APX), peroxidase (Prx), glutathione peroxidase (GPX), glutathione-S-transferase (GST), alternative oxidase (AOX) and peroxiredoxin (PrxR), and they have pivotal roles in ROS clearance and balance. In the present report, 225 ROS-related genes were detected among HR genes, and mainly comprised P450 family, GST, Prx and thioredoxin (Trx) (Table S7). Most of the P450 family HR genes were repressed to some extent, and only 10 P450 family genes were up-regulated at the late stage of heat stress in rice panicle. Most of the Prx genes were repressed during heat stress, and just a few were late induced. All HR Trx genes were early induced. Notably, the genes for AOX1b (Os04g0600300) and PrxR gene (Os07g0638300) were up-regulated more than one hundred-fold at the early stage of heat stress, and remained at high level at the late stage. One gene (Os07g0665200) for SOD was slightly induced during heat treatment.

Signal transduction.

In our microarray data, 55 phytohormone-related genes were detected as HR genes, and they are mainly involved in auxin, ethylene and ABA metabolism and signaling (Table S8). Among 24 auxin-related HR genes, most were down-regulated under heat treatment, and the 6 up-regulated genes encoded ripening-associated protein (Os03g0796000), SAUR-like protein (Os08g0118500, Os02g0643800 and Os06g0714300), nitrilase (Os02g0635200) and auxin efflux carrier (Os01g0802700), respectively. One SAUR family gene (Os09g0545300) remained at high transcript level during heating. Three ABA signaling-related genes encoding bZIP proteins were early up-regulated. And only one gene for SAPK9 (Os12g0586100) was late induced under high temperature. Among the 9 HR genes involved in ethylene signaling, three were continuously induced more than 2-fold under heat shock (Os02g0574800 for EIN3, Os06g0592500 for ERF and Os09g0570800).

At the same time, six light-responsive genes were identified as HR, and one encoding a light regulated Lir1 family protein was up-regulated over 2-fold after 2 h of heat treatment, three for early light-induced protein (ELIP) and one for BTB domain containing protein were all early induced upon heat shock (Table S8).

Furthermore, downstream events of phytohormone and other signal molecules would be mediated through various protein kinases. The HR protein kinases mainly comprise LRR family, G-proteins, DUF26 family, calcium-related genes and other kinases (Table S8). Overall, most of the genes from LRR and DUF26 were down-regulated. In contrast, most of calcium-related and G-protein genes exhibited higher expression level. Several genes encoding calmodulin binding protein (Os01g0134700, Os03g0436300, Os06g0256300 and Os12g0547600), Ca2+-ATPase isoform 9 (Os08g0517200) and EF hand domain containing protein (Os08g0558100) exhibited early up-regulation. A calmodulin gene (Os01g0810300) was continuously up-regulated. In addition, some genes from the small GTPase family were early up-regulated such as Ras (Os12g0631100), RhoGAP (Os07g0486500), Rab-21 (Os05g0341600) and Ran-2 (Os01g0611100).

Promoter Analysis of Co-expressed Genes

To get more understanding of the gene expression regulation under heat shock, the promoter motifs were scanned using FIMO in the −3000−bp upstream ATG of all genes in rice. The enrichment of the motif in clusters from KMC and significance of co-occurring motifs were assessed by the hypergeometric distribution. Then the data were imported into Cytoscape (Fig. 7). The results indicated that, only in the early up-regulated Cluster 9, the important stress-responsive motifs including GCC box, CE3, ABRE, HSE, GC-repeat and Box I were significantly enriched. The enriched elements constituted two co-occurrence networks, and GCC box and CE3 were the centers of the two networks, respectively. HSE exhibited close relationship with both core elements, but ABRE only with GCC box. In addition, GC-repeat and Box I co-occurred significantly, and they showed close relationship with GCC box and CE3.

thumbnail

Figure 7. Co-occurrence analysis on the promoters of the HR genes from Cluster 9 of KMC.

The motifs were scanned using FIMO in the −3000 bp upstream ATG of all genes in cluster 9. The motif enrichment and significance of motifs co-occurrence were assessed by the hypergeometric distribution, and the data were imported into Cytoscape. The important stress-responsive motifs such as GCC box, CE3, ABRE and HSE were significantly enriched (marked by yellow). Diamond represents the nodes most significantly enriched (p<0.001), triangle for significantly enriched (0.001<p<0.05), and circle for not significantly (0.05<p). Solid lines are referred as the p-value of co-occurrence less than 0.01, and dash lines as p-value between 0.01 and 0.05.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0049652.g007

Quantitative Real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) to Confirm Microarray Data

To validate microarray data and investigate the dynamic profile of gene expression, expression level of the 10 genes significantly-altered during heat stress was analyzed by qRT-PCR. The results showed that the expression patterns of all candidate genes by qRT-PCR were consistent with the microarray data (Fig. 8).

thumbnail

Figure 8. Quantitative Real-Time PCR verification of the genes expression level.

Transcript levels were presented as relative values that were normalized with respect to the level of actin 1 gene. Error bars in the figures indicate standard deviation. Log2FC, log2 transformed fold change.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0049652.g008

Discussion

Transcriptional Regulation may Play Vital Roles in Rice Panicle Response to Heat

As triggers for gene expression, TFs play important regulatory roles in almost all aspects of plant life including growth, development, and responses to adverse environmental conditions such as high temperature, drought, high salinity, flood and pathogen attack. In the present study, we identified 8 HR TF families that include Hsf, AP2/ERF, bHLH, bZIP, Myb, WRKY, NAC and C2H2.

There are 25 Hsf members in rice genome, 21 Hsf genes in rice microarray, and they were divided into three conserved classes, A, B and C, based on sequence homology and domain architecture [9]. Our data demonstrated that HsfA2a, HsfA2d, HsfA2f, HsfA3 and HsfB2a, b and c were remarkably induced within 4 h after heat treatment in rice panicle (Table S4). The genome-wide expression analysis showed that HsfA2a and HsfA2d were induced over thousand-fold upon heat shock in rice root and shoot, and exhibited high expression level at all stages of panicle development, and that the three HsfB2 family members, a, b and c, were greatly induced under heat shock in roots, shoot and panicle. It was also demonstrated that HsfA2f and HsfA3 were induced upon heat shock in rice panicle [26]. The previous work in our lab showed that HsfA2a and HsfA2d were also quickly induced by heat treatment in rice seedling [27]. Further investigation uncovered that HsfA2 is indispensable for acquired thermotolerance in Arabidopsis [28]. These data implied the important functions of the HR genes from HsfA2 and HsfB2 sub-families to activate cellular protection system in reproductive development and heat response in rice panicle.

As one of the largest TF families, AP2/ERF gene family can be classified broadly into four subfamilies: AP2, RAV, DREB and ERF [29]. Previous microarray analysis showed that a DREB_A1 gene was continuously up-regulated under various virus infections, and an ERF_B3 was significantly induced by drought [30]. In our case, the first gene was induced only at the beginning of heat shock, and the latter one was late up-regulated during heat stress (Table S4). Tissue expression profile elucidated that one DREB gene and three ERF genes were greatly repressed in rice panicle under normal condition [29], and they were greatly induced by heat in our research (Table S4), which may suggest they play important roles in rice panicle in response to heat shock. Therefore, ERF and DREB sub-family genes may be good candidates for improving crop abiotic stress tolerance [31].

The OsbHLH family in rice genome has 178 genes [32], and there are 170 OsbHLH genes in rice microarray. The previous work revealed that OsbHLH148 (Os03g0741100) was induced under the treatment of dehydration, high salinity, low temperature and wounding in rice [33], and that OrbHLH2 from wild rice (Oryza rufipogon) may positively regulate salt-stress signals independent of ABA in Arabidopsis [34]. Among the 9 HR bHLH genes in our data, only Os08g0487700 was early up-regulated during heat stress, and the rest were down-regulated to different extent (Table S4), which implied that bHLH family genes may be mainly involved in negative regulation of heat response in rice panicle.

In the genome-wide expression analysis on the OsbZIP genes, only OsbZIP45 was strongly induced by dehydration, salt and cold, and OsbZIP12, OsbZIP60 and OsbZIP66 were induced by both dehydration and salt, but not by cold. Nevertheless, OsbZIP45 was up-regulated at one or more stages of panicle development [35]. The bZIP transcription factor, OsABI5 isolated from rice panicle, could regulate the adaptive stress response and plant fertility [36]. In the present study, 13 HR bZIP genes were identified, and 9 of them belong to group III, IV and VI (Table S4). The 2 genes (OsbZIP50, OsbZIP60) from group III and 4 genes (OsbZIP45, OsbZIP12, OsbZIP60 and OsbZIP66) from group IV and VI were early induced under heat stress in rice panicle. The data suggested the OsbZIP family genes may participate in cross-talk in stress responses.

The overexpression of a salt-inducible gene, TaMYB32, enhanced the tolerance to salt stress in transgenic Arabidopsis [37]. MYBS3 activated cold signaling pathway in rice [38]. However, MYBC1 negatively regulated the freezing tolerance of Arabidopsis [39]. Our data showed that, among 24 HR Myb genes, 10 were early elevated, only Os02g0114800 and Os07g0137000 were late up-regulated during heating, and the rest were repressed (Table S4). The recent report demonstrated that OsWRKY24 and OsWRKY28 were strongly induced by water-deficit, cold and salt, but OsWRKY82 was greatly down-regulated [40]. Other reports illustrated the up-regulation of OsWRKY24 by ABA in aleurone cells [41], [42], OsWRKY12 in response to SA, JA, wounding [43] and OsWRKY11 in heat and drought stress response [44]. Our data showed that, among 11 HR WRKY genes, OsWRKY12, OsWRKY24, OsWRKY28 and OsWRKY82 were early induced, and only OsWRKY07, OsWRKY56 and OsWRKY100 were continuously elevated during heat shock (Table S4). Our comprehensive expression analysis would be helpful for deciphering important roles of Myb and WRKY family genes in heat response in rice panicle.

In the present study, 13 NAC family genes were identified as HR. Recent researches revealed that SNAC factors can be useful for improving stress tolerance in transgenic plants [45], an ENAC transcription factor was early induced by abiotic stresses in rice [46], and OsNAC5 can enhance tolerance to drought stress by up-regulating the expression of stress-inducible rice genes [47]. The 189 C2H2 zinc-finger protein (ZFP) genes in rice are also called ZOS (ZPTs of Oryza sativa). In the genome-wide expression study [48], ZOS5-06 (Os05g0279400) gene had a high signal value in all tested tissues including 6 panicle development stages (P1–P6) and was also up-regulated during dehydration stress, and only ZOS3-21 (Os03g0820300) was up-regulated under all the stresses of cold, drought and salt. Meanwhile, ZOS5-11 (Os05g0495100) was up-regulated in P1, P2. The present study demonstrated that ZOS5-06 and ZOS4-02 were early induced upon heat stress in rice panicle, and only ZOS3-21 was induced in the consecutive stages of heat shock (Table S4). Taken together, these NAC and C2H2 family genes may play important roles in rice panicle development under heat.

The Roles of Hsp and Other Chaperones in Heat Response

Hsps generally function as molecular chaperones, and are divided into Hsp100, Hsp90, Hsp70, Hsp60, Hsp40 and Hsp20 or small heat shock proteins (sHsps). The induction of heat shock proteins when plants are exposed to elevated temperature has been well documented. Our results revealed that chaperone genes constitute the largest family responsive to heat (Table S5).

The analysis showed that Hsp100 proteins are responsive to heat stress in plants [49]. Previous reports proved that Hsp101 is primarily a high-temperature tolerance mechanism in Arabidopsis [50] and reached at maximal mRNA levels under 45°C for 2 h [51]. In the present study, all the HR Hsp100 genes exhibited early induction during heating (Table S5). Therefore, the Hsp100 family genes may play important positive roles in heat stress response among plant kingdom.

The protective HSP70 and HSP90 had increased levels of protein and gene expression following heat treatment [11]. OsHsp90 from rice maintained E. coli growth well at high temperatures [52]. In contrast, overexpressing AtHsp90.3 impaired plant tolerance to heat stress, which suggested that proper homeostasis of Hsp90 be critical for cellular stress response and/or tolerance in plants [53]. Our data showed that, among the 6 HR Hsp90 family genes, only Os04g0107900 was continuously induced under heat shock, the others were early elevated. It indicated the HR Hsp90 genes were mainly involved in early heat response in rice panicle.

Hsp70 confers tolerance to heat and other abiotic stresses in Arabidopsis [54]. The investigation suggested that mitochondrial Hsp70 may suppress programmed cell death in rice protoplasts by inhibiting the amplification of ROS [55]. Earlier studies showed that Hsp70 protein interacts with unfolded proteins [56] and is crucial for the survival of bacteria, yeast and plants under stress conditions [57]. In our case, most of the HR Hsp70 genes were greatly induced at the early stage of heat stress (Table S5), which is consistent with other reseach [58], and three genes remained at high transcript level during heating. Thus, the Hsp70 genes play an important part in response to heat stress in rice panicle.

Among 23 sHsp genes in rice genome [59] that are all present in rice microarray, 19 HR sHsp genes were identified (Table S5). OsHSP26 plays an important role in the protection of PSII during heat (42°C) [60]. Sarkar et al. reported that 19 sHsp genes were induced by high temperature in rice [59]. Constitutive expression of RcHSP17.8 from Rosa chinensis confers wide resistance to heat, salt, osmotic and drought stresses in Arabidopsis thaliana [61]. Another group found that sHSP proteins have a non-redundant function in acquired thermotolerance in hypocotyl elongation [62]. Our results showed that most of the sHsp genes were remarkably and continuously elevated during heat shock, and constitute the major Hsp sub-family responsive to heat (Table S5). Therefore, sHsp genes may play a big part in response to heat stress in rice panicle.

The members from DnaJ cochaperone family played important roles in the response to heat and other stresses [63]. DnaJ proteins were involved in correct folding of proteins under stress conditions [64]. The interaction between Hsp70 and unfolded proteins was regulated by cochaperones including DnaJ proteins [65]. In our case, the HR genes for DnaJ or DnaJ -like proteins were significantly altered under heat stress, and most of them were early up-regulated (Table S5). The data demonstrated the importance of DnaJ protein in the heat tolerance in rice panicle.

Significant Gene Expression Changes to Maintain the Cellular Homeostasis

It’s well known that ROS are rapidly produced upon various stresses in plants, and also lead to series of downstream events such as protein activation, lipid oxidation, and further establishment of new gene expression pattern [66]. Earlier works elucidated that plant Prxs gave rise to ROS production to actively participate in defense reaction [67]. Our data showed that most of Prx genes were down-regulated, and only a few genes were late up-regulated during heat treatment (Table S6), which suggested Prxs may not be the major source of ROS production at the early stage and come into action in the late period of heat shock.

ROS are often important signal molecules to activate ROS-scavenging enzyme system, which is the key to maintain cellular homeostasis. Analysis on two japonica rice genotypes revealed that increased cold tolerance was related to the higher constitutive SOD, APX and CAT expression [68]. Overexpression of the SOD and APX genes improves seed longevity and germination under various environmental stresses [12]. NtAOX1a from Nicotiana tabacum is necessary for plants to survive oxidative stress [69]. The progress on P450s in plant development and reproduction was reviewed [70], and the roles of P450 in ROS handling and utilization were discussed [71]. Our transcriptomic analysis revealed that the above HR genes constitute the major group involved in ROS-scavenging and signaling (Table S6), and may be important in response to heat shock in rice panicle.

Transporters are usually located in the membrane, and play important roles in metabolism, signal transduction, defense and development. ABC-transporters utilize the energy of ATP hydrolysis to carry out certain biological processes across membranes [72], and are involved in the transport of ABA in response to stresses in Arabidopsis [73]. In our case, the genes from ABC family and involved in iron and metabolites transport showed diverse expression pattern during high temperature (Table S6), especially most of them were down-regulated, which may imply some physiological and biochemical processes of transporting be slowed down upon heat in rice panicle.

Moreover, a comprehensive expression analysis in rice identified 33 aquaporin genes, and demonstrated that OsNIP2;1, OsNIP4;1 and OsTIP1;2 had low expression level in anther, only OsTIP4;1 had high mRNA level in anther [74]. In our data, OsNIP2;1 and OsTIP1;2 were continuously up-regulated during heat shock in rice panicle, and OsNIP4;1 and OsTIP4;1 were late induced (Table S6). The low background and highly heat-induced expression suggested the positive roles of both OsNIP2;1 and OsTIP1;2 genes in rice panicle under heat stress.

In plants, the ubiquitination of a target protein requiring the sequential actions of the E1, E2 and E3 enzymes from the UPS is emerging as a significant regulatory system to result in specific protein degradation. The roles of the E3 ubiquitin ligase in plant growth, development and stress responses have been reviewed [75]. SIZ1, a SUMO E3 ligase, regulated rice anther dehiscence [76] and in responses to high and low temperature [77]. The early analysis revealed that at least 43 F-box genes of E3 ligase family were differentially expressed in rice seedlings under abiotic stresses [78]. The advances of the UPS in coping with stresses to maintain cellular homeostasis were highlighted [79]. In the present study, among 123 HR genes from the UPS, 58 E3 ligase genes constituted the major group in the UPS (Fig. 4C). Most E3 ligase genes were early or late up-regulated, and only 5 genes were continuously induced, and 11 were repressed during heat shock (Table S9). The data demonstrated the important roles of specific protein degradation at different stage of heat shock. We observed that an FtsH gene (Os06g0229000) was continuously induced during heating, which is consistent with the previous finding that FtsH11 protease plays a critical role in Arabidopsis thermotolerance [80]. Therefore, it suggested that the HR UPS genes may be vital to rice panicle development and heat response.

Taken together, it is concluded that significant expression changes of genes for ROS-scavenger, transporter, and UPS have important roles in maintaining the cellular homeostasis to cope with heat stress in rice panicle.

Heat Signal Transduction Facilitates Re-establishing Cellular Balance

It’s a great task to uncover the mechanism of stress signal transduction. We found that, in rice panicle, heat stress signal transduction system consists of the genes encoding calcium-related protein, receptor kinase, G-protein, and light signal-related protein as well as the genes for phytohormone signaling and metabolism.

It was found that the application of auxin can reverse the male sterility caused by high temperature stress in barley and Arabidopsis [81]. Nitrilase plays important roles in maintaining auxin homeostasis through hydrolyzing IAA [82]. SAUR39 from the small auxin-up RNA (SAUR) family was characteristic of negative regulator for auxin synthesis and transport, and thus resulted in lower shoot and lower yield [83]. In our case, the induction of one nitrilase and four SAUR genes suggested the regulation of auxin and the delay of rice panicle development under high temperature (Table S8).

ABA signaling pathway has been primarily established [84]. It was uncovered that the relatively high concentrations of ethylene and ABA in inferior spikelets lead to a low grain-filling rate [85]. Ten SnRK2 genes of ABA signaling pathway in the rice genome were identified and designated SAPK1 through SAPK10 that were activated in response to hyperosmotic stress and ABA [86]. Besides, phospholipase D (PLD) and its product phosphatidic acid (PA) mediate the signaling of various plant hormones. PLDβ1 stimulates ABA signaling by activating SAPK, thus inhibiting seed germination [87], and also functions as a negative regulator in salt response in rice [88]. In the present study, three ABA-related bZIP genes and one SAPK9 were early and late up-regulated, respectively. And all HR PLD-encoding genes were repressed during heating (Table S8). Our data verified important roles of the bZIP and SAPK9 as well as PLD genes in rice panicle under heat shock via ABA signaling pathway.

EIN3 was found as the key gene in the response to ethylene in plant [89]. The ERF gene family was identified as one group of the major HR transcription factors (Table S4), and may play vital roles in response to heat stress. In addition, our data showed that an ERF coactivator gene (Os06g0592500) was continuously induced under heat shock (Table S8). Therefore, the genes involved in ethylene signaling including EIN3, ERF and ERF coactivator gene may actively participate in heat response in rice panicle via stimulating ethylene-mediated pathway.

Generally, high temperature is accompanied by high light, and so perception of light plays a very important role in heat response. Earlier studies showed that ELIP is correlated with light stress [90] and heat shock [91]. ELIPs were induced under salt and wounding treatments [92]. In addition, Lir1 gene in rice was controlled by light [93]. In our case, the early-induction of the three ELIP genes and the great up-regulation of Lir1 gene after 2 h of heat shock implied their important functions in heat shock response in rice panicle (Table S8).

A proteomic analysis suggested the possible involvement of CaM in resistance to Mungbean Yellow Mosaic India Virus in Vigna mungo [94]. AtCaM3 was found a key component with positive function in the Ca2+-CaM heat shock signal transduction pathway in Arabidopsis [95]. A stress-responsive Ca2+-ATPase gene is an essential component for abiotic stress adaptation in Physcomitrella [96]. Due to remarkable up-regulation of the genes for the calmodulin-binding proteins and EF-hand containing proteins in the present study, it would be acceptable that the HR calcium-related genes take an active part in heat response in rice panicle through perception and transduction of calcium signal.

Small GTPases are GTP-binding proteins [97], and include Rho, Rab, Arf, and Ran families in plant. RAC/ROP GTPases belonging to Rho-like small GTPases function in auxin-regulated gene expression and directional auxin transport [98], and play multiple roles in diverse cellular activities including ROS production and cell death in rice [99]. The Arabidopsis RabE enhanced plant defenses [100]. Overexpression of TaRAN1 in wheat demonstrated that Ran has vital roles in auxin signaling meristem initiation [101]. The activation of the small GTPases requires a GTPase-activating protein (GAP). A putative ArfGAP gene in Arabidopsis is specifically expressed in roots, pollen grains, and pollen tubes [102]. The guanine nucleotide dissociation inhibitor (GDI) negatively regulated the GTPases activity [103]. In our case, the 9 HR small GTPases genes were early or continuously increased during heat stress, and only the 4 genes for Rab11D, RacGAP, Arf and ArfGAP were repressed (Table S8). Therefore, the small GTPase family genes may play very important roles in response to heat shock in rice panicle and they exhibited sophisticated and antagonistic functions to maintain cellular balance.

Cross-talk in Heat Stress Response

It’s widely known that ROS generation is a general plant-cell response to various stresses. Models for roles of ROS in stress responses [104], [105] as well as in GA and ABA signaling in barley aleurone cells [106] had previously been proposed and discussed. Based on these previous work and our microarray data, we have proposed a regulation model central to ROS to pinpoint the cross-talk in response to heat stress in rice panicle (Fig. 9).

thumbnail

Figure 9. Regulation model central to ROS.

The catalysis by Prx, SOD and NADPH oxidase (also called Rboh) lead to ROS accumulation (1, 2A,), and Rboh activity is controlled by the small GTPase (2B) that were positively regulated with PLD-derived PA (2C) and GAP proteins (2D), and negatively regulated by GDI2 (2E). PLD is a component of ABA signaling pathway to activate SAPK (3) and is the key point at which ethylene and ABA showed negative interplay (4). ABA can be diffused through ABC transporters (5). In ethylene signaling pathway, EIN3 activates ERF genes (6), and was degraded by the UPS (7). The UPS reglated plant growth and stress tolerance (8). ROS could be abolished by PrxR, AOX (9), CAT, APX (10) and P450 (11). The CAT and APX genes were trans-activated by ERF (12) and HSF (13). ROS activate calcium influx channel (14A), and stimulates Ca2+ release from internal Ca2+ stores (14B). Ca2+ stimulates CaM (14C), which activates HSF activity (14D). ROS stimulate HSF (15) and NAC (16). ROS exert negative regulation on auxin signaling pathway that is suppressed by SAUR and stimulated by nitrilase, respectively (17). Furthermore, ROS could be diffused through aquaporin (18). The HR genes in the present study were mapped on this model. The color bar represents the log2 transformed relative expression level on the time course of heat treatment (from left to right: 20 min, 60 min, 2 h, 4 h, and 8 h in sequence). The color scale is shown at the right. Blue: down-regulation, red: up-regulation.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0049652.g009

ROS production is promoted by series of enzymes such as Prx, SOD, and NADPH oxidase. Prx mediated H2O2 synthesis that causes stomatal closure in Vicia faba epidermal strips under UV-B radiation [107]. The membrane-bound respiratory burst oxidase homologue (Rboh)-NADPH oxidase can be enhanced by the small GTPase that are activated through PLD-derived PA [108]. PLD stimulates ABA signaling by activating SAPK and downstream components [87]. And ethylene negatively regulates ABA signaling through inhibiting PLD activity, and reciprocally, PA directly regulates ethylene signaling [108]. In addition, the direct binding of Rac1 of small GTPase to RbohB in rice leads to an increase in ROS [109].

It’s well known that CAT, APX, PrxR, AOX and P450 family genes lead to ROS clearance. CAT and APX were activated by SUB1A, an ERF transcription factor, resulting in enhanced tolerance to drought stress [110], and ERF genes were regulated through EIN3 in ethylene signaling [111]. EIN3 was found to be targeted and eliminated by the UPS [89].

ROS are diffused through aquaporin to amplify their effects [112], and activate plasma membrane Ca2+-permeable channels, resulting in an increase in cytoplasmic Ca2+, which further stimulates Ca2+ release from internal Ca2+ stores [113]. ROS regulate Na+/K+ homeostasis through elevating cytosolic Ca2+ levels followed by inhibition of NSCC (non-selective cation channels) and KOR (the outward-rectifying K+ channels), and activation of the inward-rectifying K+ channels (KIRs) in plants [114]. Besides, ROS signature can be perceived by CaM [115], NAC family proteins [116] and HSFs [117].

The HR genes in the present study were mapped on this model (Fig. 9). Our analysis showed that the genes for ROS generation were induced under high temperature, such as SOD, NADPH oxidase and the small GTPase genes. However, the genes encoding PLD and GAP were largely down-regulated, and GDI2 was greatly elevated, which implied that there is a fine mechanism to regulate the small GTPase activity. At the same time, SUB1A gene that is absent in rice microarray and can activate CAT and APX gene expression was early induced by heat shock in rice panicle by qRT-PCR (data not shown). However, the genes for CAT and APX were down-regulated. PrxR and AOX genes were significantly induced, and 10 P450 family genes were up-regulated at the late stage of heat stress to repress ROS burst. It suggested the possible complicated mechanism to maintain ROS homeostasis. Moreover, the data showed that auxin, ethylene and ABA signaling pathways were tightly regulated. The aquaporin and ABC genes were induced to some extent, which facilitates ROS and ABA spread though these channels to magnify their effects. Taken together, our data revealed complex cross-talk and the importance of ROS balance in response to heat stress.

To obtain the concrete evidence for this model, we detected the dynamic characters of the major ROS, superoxide anion and hydrogen peroxide, during heat treatment in rice panicle using NBT and DAB staining, respectively. The results showed that ROS were characteristic of the immediate accumulation upon heat shock and decrease at the late stage of heat shock compared with the untreated samples (Fig. 10, Table 1), which is basically consistent with previous work [4]. The dynamic changes of superoxide anion and hydrogen peroxide in rice panicle supported the hypothesis that ROS balance is pivotal for rice panicle survival under heat stress.

thumbnail

Figure 10. Accumulation of superoxide anion and hydrogen peroxide in rice panicle under heat shock.

Plants at the reproductive stage were treated at 40°C for 8 h, and the florets of young panicles were collected at 0 min (as a control), 20 min, 60 min, 2 h, 4 h and 8 h. Immediately following heat-treatment, the florets were treated with NBT solution to detect superoxide anion or DAB solution to detect hydrogen peroxide in the dark for 3 h and 24 h, respectively.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0049652.g010
thumbnail

Table 1. Detection and quantification of superoxide anion and hydrogen peroxide in rice panicle under heat shock.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0049652.t001

Furthermore, the promoter analysis on co-regulated genes provided more evidence for the cross-talk during heat treatment. It indicated that, among 12 clusters of KMC, GCC box, CE3, ABRE and HSE were significantly enriched only in the early up-regulated Cluster 9, and GCC box and CE3 were the centers of two co-occurrence networks, respectively (Fig. 7), which implies their important roles in heat response. Earlier study elucidated the function of GCC box in ethylene-induced gene expression [118][120]. Recently, OsDERF1, a novel ERF transcriptional activator, was found that binds to GCC box to activate the expression of repressors, subsequently suppress ethylene synthesis and reduce drought tolerance in rice [121]. Moreover, CE3 and ABRE were proved to be essential and sufficient for ABA signaling and other stimuli such as Ca2+ and drought [122][124]. It’s also widely known that HSE can be recognized and bound by activated HSF to respond to cellular and environmental changes, especially to heat shock [125][127]. Our data showed that ethylene signaling involved in GCC box and ABA signaling with CE3 plus ABRE may have indispensable roles in response to heat. In addition, the outstanding function of HSE should be highlighted due to its close relationship with CE3 and GCC box in the co-occurrence network, which indicates the complexity and wide existence of cross-talk during heat shock.

Materials and Methods

Plant Materials and Heat Treatments

Heat-tolerant rice cultivar 996 was cultivated in the university experimental rice field until reaching at the anther development stage 8 as defined by Zhang and Wilson [128], and then was moved into a growth chamber (Binder, Tuttlingen, Germany). The plants were pretreated under the condition of 32°C/28°C (day/night) with 80% humidity for one day (12 h/12 h) in the growth chamber, and then the control samples were collected before continuous heat treatment at 40°C with 80% relative humidity and illumination intensity of 600 µmol m−2 s−1. Young florets at the anther development stage 8 at the middle of main panicles were collected at the time points of 0 min, 20 min, 60 min, 2 h, 4 h, and 8 h after heat treatment, frozen in liquid nitrogen immediately, and stored at −80°C for hybridization.

RNA Isolation, Microarray Hybridization, Signal Scanning and Normalization

Total RNA was isolated using Trizol (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA), and further purified using QIAGEN RNeasy kit (Qiagen Valencia, CA) following manufacturer’s specifications. Agilent 4×44K rice oligo microarray with 42489 60-mer oligonucleotide probes was used for expression profile analysis. Twelve microarrays of single dye with two independent replicates for each time point were performed according to the manufacturer’s protocol.

The above hybridization signal data files in text format from the Feature Extraction Software were imported into GeneSpring GX (Agilent Technologies). The detected, not detected and compromised data were marked with specific flag of P, A, M, respectively. The data were normalized by Quantile algorithm followed by the process of baseline to median of all samples. The normalized data were log2 transformed, and the correlation coefficient of replicates was determined by hierarchical clustering using complete linkage algorithm as implemented TIGR MeV version 4.0 [129], [130].

Data Filtering, Clustering and Functional Classification

Data filtering was conducted with the criteria that at least 6 out of 12 samples have P flag to ensure the quality of the normalized data. The average expression value of each time point was used to get the ratio of the expression change between the treatment and un-treatment samples, and obtain the differentially expressed genes with 3-fold change at each time point of heat treatment, and the Venn diagram analysis was carried out to see the significantly regulated genes by heat. The heat-responsive genes were screened if the ratio of expression level has 3-fold change or greater in at least two time points on the time course, HCL and KMC incorporated in Mev were performed to get co-expression pattern. The gene classification based on gene ontology was conducted as described by Hobo et al. [131]. The pathway analysis was performed with MapMan [132] after converting RAP_ID into TIGR_ID according to the annotation from RAP_DB (http://rapdb.dna.affrc.go.jp/).

Analysis on Promoters of Co-expressed Genes

To better understand the gene expression regulation in heat response, promoters of co-expressed genes from the 12 clusters of KMC were analyzed. The known cis-acting elements was extracted from PlantCARE database [133]. The motifs were scanned by FIMO [134] in the −3000 bp upstream ATG of all genes in rice genome. The output results were stored in a local database as background for further analysis. The enrichment ratio of the motif in a promoter was defined as:

Here, m is the number of genes containing the specific motif in the individual cluster. M is the gene number of specific cluster. And n is the number of genes containing the specific motif in our database. N is the gene number in the database.

The enrichment of a motif in a cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric distribution. The p-value for a motif in the cluster was defined as:

The motif was considered as enriched in the specific cluster when p<0.05.

Finally, motif co-occurrence analysis was performed to find the relationship of cis-acting elements under heat stress in rice panicle. When two motifs were found within 250 bp in a promoter, it was considered as co-occurring once. When the two motifs co-occur multiple times in one promoter, they are only counted as one co-occurrence. The significance of co-occurrence was assessed by the hypergeometric distribution [135]:

K and T are the gene numbers in the database and in the individual cluster, respectively. The k and t are the numbers of genes containing the specific motif in the database and in the individual cluster, respectively. The adjacent two motifs in the specific cluster were considered as significantly co-occurring when p<0.05.

The number of genes containing the specific motif, enrichment ratio for a single motif and p-value of motifs co-occurrence were imported into Cytoscape [136] as the node size, the color of nodes, and the shape of nodes, respectively.

qRT-PCR Analysis

To validate microarray results, 10 genes expression with significant expression changes in the microarray data was verified by qRT-PCR. Among the multiple probes, only one probe with the most significant expression data was chosen and its fold change was calculated by comparing the average data at each time point of heat stress with that of the control. Gene specific oligonucleotide primers were designed for amplicons about 200 bp for each gene (Table S10) using Primer Premier 6.0. A rice actin1 gene [137] was used as an internal control in each reaction.

The same RNA samples for microarray hybridization were used for qRT-PCR. Prior to synthesis of cDNA, any residual genomic DNA was removed by DNase I treatment (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. First-strand cDNA was synthesized with Oligo (dT) primer using SuperScript III RT (Toyobo, Osaka, Japan).

Polymerase chain reactions were carried out in 96-well in the iCycler iQ5 (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA) using SYBR Green I PCR Master Mix (Bio-Rad). Each 25 µL real-time PCR reaction mixture containing 10.5 µL dd-water, 0.5 µL 200 nM each of forward and reverse primers, 12.5 µL of SYBR Green I Master, and 100 ng of cDNA. PCR reaction conditions were as follows: 95°C for 20 s, and followed by 40 cycles of 95°C for 5 s, 60°C for 20 s and 72°C for 31 s.

A negative control without cDNA template was run with each analysis to evaluate the overall specificity. For each gene, three technical replicates and two biological replicates were used at each sampling time point. The quantification of gene expression was performed using the relative quantification method (2−ΔΔCT) [138] and comparing data with internal control.

Detection and Quantification of ROS

ROS accumulation in rice panicle under heat shock was detected according to Fukao et al [139]. Plants grown under normal condition were used as a control. All samples were collected at 0 min, 20 min, 60 min, 2 h, 4 h and 8 h after heat treatment for ROS detection, respectively. To visualize superoxide accumulation, the young florets at the middle of main panicles of heat-treated or untreated control rice were excised and immediately placed in a 0.5 mg/mL NBT solution in 10 mM potassium phosphate buffer, pH 7.6, at 25°C for 3 h in the dark. For hydrogen peroxide detection, the young florets were treated with 1 mg/mL DAB in 50 mM Tris acetate buffer, pH 5.0, at 25°C for 24 h in the dark. Each experiment was repeated on at least three different plants, and representative images are shown.

Data Deposition

Our microarray data were deposited in the Gene Expression Omnibus under accession number GSE38665.

Supporting Information

Table S1.

Correlation coefficient of microarray replicates.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0049652.s001

(XLS)

Table S2.

The significantly regulated genes on the time course.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0049652.s002

(XLS)

Table S3.

The HR genes on the time course of heat stress.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0049652.s003

(XLSX)

Table S4.

The HR transcription factors.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0049652.s004

(XLS)

Table S5.

The HR Hsp and other chaperone genes.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0049652.s005

(XLSX)

Table S6.

The HR transporter genes.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0049652.s006

(XLS)

Table S7.

The HR ROS-related genes.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0049652.s007

(XLSX)

Table S8.

The HR signaling-related genes.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0049652.s008

(XLSX)

Table S9.

The HR ubiquitin-proteasom system genes.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0049652.s009

(XLSX)

Table S10.

qRT-PCR primer sequence.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0049652.s010

(XLSX)

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge Professor Liyun Chen for kindly providing the rice cultivar 996 seeds. We thank Xing Deng and Songhua Long (Institute of Bast Fiber Crops, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences) for help in qRT-PCR experiments.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: XC XX XWZ. Performed the experiments: XWZ AL JZ XYZ. Analyzed the data: XWZ JL AL JZ WR XC. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: JL JX YP. Wrote the paper: XWZ XC XX.

References

  1. 1. Semenov MA, Halford NG (2009) Identifying target traits and molecular mechanisms for wheat breeding under a changing climate. J Exp Bot 60: 2791–2804. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erp164
  2. 2. Peng S, Huang J, Sheehy JE, Laza RC, Visperas RM, et al. (2004) Rice yields decline with higher night temperature from global warming. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 101: 9971–9975. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0403720101
  3. 3. Long SP, Ort DR (2010) More than taking the heat: crops and global change. Curr Opin Plant Biol 13: 241–248. doi: 10.1016/j.pbi.2010.04.008
  4. 4. Konigshofer H, Tromballa HW, Loppert HG (2008) Early events in signalling high-temperature stress in tobacco BY2 cells involve alterations in membrane fluidity and enhanced hydrogen peroxide production. Plant Cell Environ 31: 1771–1780. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2008.01880.x
  5. 5. Huang XY, Chao DY, Gao JP, Zhu MZ, Shi M, et al. (2009) A previously unknown zinc finger protein, DST, regulates drought and salt tolerance in rice via stomatal aperture control. Genes Dev 23: 1805–1817. doi: 10.1101/gad.1812409
  6. 6. Gusev NB, Bukach OV, Marston SB (2005) Structure, properties, and probable physiological role of small heat shock protein with molecular mass 20 kD (Hsp20, HspB6). Biochemistry (Mosc) 70: 629–637. doi: 10.1007/s10541-005-0162-8
  7. 7. Kotak S, Larkindale J, Lee U, von Koskull-Doring P, Vierling E, et al. (2007) Complexity of the heat stress response in plants. Curr Opin Plant Biol 10: 310–316. doi: 10.1016/j.pbi.2007.04.011
  8. 8. Mayer MP, Bukau B (2005) Hsp70 chaperones: cellular functions and molecular mechanism. Cell Mol Life Sci 62: 670–684. doi: 10.1007/s00018-004-4464-6
  9. 9. Guo J, Wu J, Ji Q, Wang C, Luo L, et al. (2008) Genome-wide analysis of heat shock transcription factor families in rice and Arabidopsis. J Genet Genomics 35: 105–118. doi: 10.1016/s1673-8527(08)60016-8
  10. 10. Ramamoorthy R, Jiang SY, Kumar N, Venkatesh PN, Ramachandran S (2008) A comprehensive transcriptional profiling of the WRKY gene family in rice under various abiotic and phytohormone treatments. Plant Cell Physiol 49: 865–879. doi: 10.1093/pcp/pcn061
  11. 11. Scafaro AP, Haynes PA, Atwell BJ (2010) Physiological and molecular changes in Oryza meridionalis Ng., a heat-tolerant species of wild rice. J Exp Bot 61: 191–202. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erp294
  12. 12. Lee YP, Baek KH, Lee HS, Kwak SS, Bang JW, et al. (2010) Tobacco seeds simultaneously over-expressing Cu/Zn-superoxide dismutase and ascorbate peroxidase display enhanced seed longevity and germination rates under stress conditions. J Exp Bot 61: 2499–2506. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erq085
  13. 13. Fujita M, Horiuchi Y, Ueda Y, Mizuta Y, Kubo T, et al. (2010) Rice expression atlas in reproductive development. Plant Cell Physiol 51: 2060–2081. doi: 10.1093/pcp/pcq165
  14. 14. Wang L, Xie W, Chen Y, Tang W, Yang J, et al. (2010) A dynamic gene expression atlas covering the entire life cycle of rice. Plant J 61: 752–766. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313x.2009.04100.x
  15. 15. Tang X, Zhang ZY, Zhang WJ, Zhao XM, Li X, et al. (2010) Global gene profiling of laser-captured pollen mother cells indicates molecular pathways and gene subfamilies involved in rice meiosis. Plant Physiol 154: 1855–1870. doi: 10.1104/pp.110.161661
  16. 16. Endo M, Tsuchiya T, Hamada K, Kawamura S, Yano K, et al. (2009) High temperatures cause male sterility in rice plants with transcriptional alterations during pollen development. Plant Cell Physiol 50: 1911–1922. doi: 10.1093/pcp/pcp135
  17. 17. Yamakawa H, Hakata M (2010) Atlas of rice grain filling-related metabolism under high temperature: joint analysis of metabolome and transcriptome demonstrated inhibition of starch accumulation and induction of amino acid accumulation. Plant Cell Physiol 51: 795–809. doi: 10.1093/pcp/pcq034
  18. 18. Zhang G, Chen L, Zhang S, Liu G, Tang W, et al. (2008) Effects of high temperature stress on pollen characters and anther microstructure of rice. Acta Ecol Sin 28: 1089–1097.
  19. 19. Cao Y, Duan H, Yang L, Wang Z, Zhou S, et al. (2008) Effect of Heat Stress During Meiosis on Grain Yield of Rice Cultivars Differing in Heat Tolerance and Its Physiological Mechanism. Acta Agron Sin 34: 2134–2142. doi: 10.3724/sp.j.1006.2008.02134
  20. 20. Luo L, Liu G, Xiao Y, Tang W, Chen L (2005) Influences of high-temperature stress on the fertility of pollen, spikelet and grain-weight in rice. J Hunan Agri Univ 31: 593–596.
  21. 21. Gonzali S, Loreti E, Novi G, Poggi A, Alpi A, et al. (2005) The use of microarrays to study the anaerobic response in Arabidopsis. Ann Bot 96: 661–668.
  22. 22. Brown PO, Botstein D (1999) Exploring the new world of the genome with DNA microarrays. Nat Genet 21: 33–37. doi: 10.1038/4462
  23. 23. Lockhart DJ, Winzeler EA (2000) Genomics, gene expression and DNA arrays. Nature 405: 827–836. doi: 10.1038/35015701
  24. 24. Jung KH, Dardick C, Bartley LE, Cao P, Phetsom J, et al. (2008) Refinement of light-responsive transcript lists using rice oligonucleotide arrays: evaluation of gene-redundancy. PLoS One 3: e3337. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0003337
  25. 25. Chi WC, Fu SF, Huang TL, Chen YA, Chen CC, et al. (2011) Identification of transcriptome profiles and signaling pathways for the allelochemical juglone in rice roots. Plant Mol Biol 77: 591–607. doi: 10.1007/s11103-011-9841-6
  26. 26. Chauhan H, Khurana N, Agarwal P, Khurana P (2011) Heat shock factors in rice (Oryza sativa L.): genome-wide expression analysis during reproductive development and abiotic stress. Mol Genet Genomics 286: 171–187. doi: 10.1007/s00438-011-0638-8
  27. 27. Liu AL, Zou J, Zhang XW, Zhou XY, Wang WF, et al. (2010) Expression Profiles of Class A Rice Heat Shock Transcription Factor Genes Under Abiotic Stresses. J Plant Biol 53: 142–149. doi: 10.1007/s12374-010-9099-6
  28. 28. Cohen-Peer R, Schuster S, Meiri D, Breiman A, Avni A (2010) Sumoylation of Arabidopsis heat shock factor A2 (HsfA2) modifies its activity during acquired thermotholerance. Plant Mol Biol 74: 33–45. doi: 10.1007/s11103-010-9652-1
  29. 29. Sharoni AM, Nuruzzaman M, Satoh K, Moumeni A, Attia K, et al. (2012) Comparative transcriptome analysis of AP2/EREBP gene family under normal and hormone treatments, and under two drought stresses in NILs setup by Aday Selection and IR64. Mol Genet Genomics 287: 1–19. doi: 10.1007/s00438-011-0659-3
  30. 30. Sharoni AM, Nuruzzaman M, Satoh K, Shimizu T, Kondoh H, et al. (2011) Gene structures, classification and expression models of the AP2/EREBP transcription factor family in rice. Plant Cell Physiol 52: 344–360. doi: 10.1093/pcp/pcq196
  31. 31. Xu ZS, Chen M, Li LC, Ma YZ (2011) Functions and application of the AP2/ERF transcription factor family in crop improvement. J Integr Plant Biol 53: 570–585. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-7909.2011.01062.x
  32. 32. Carretero-Paulet L, Galstyan A, Roig-Villanova I, Martinez-Garcia JF, Bilbao-Castro JR, et al. (2010) Genome-wide classification and evolutionary analysis of the bHLH family of transcription factors in Arabidopsis, poplar, rice, moss, and algae. Plant Physiol 153: 1398–1412. doi: 10.1104/pp.110.153593
  33. 33. Seo JS, Joo J, Kim MJ, Kim YK, Nahm BH, et al. (2011) OsbHLH148, a basic helix-loop-helix protein, interacts with OsJAZ proteins in a jasmonate signaling pathway leading to drought tolerance in rice. Plant J 65: 907–921. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313x.2010.04477.x
  34. 34. Zhou J, Li F, Wang JL, Ma Y, Chong K, et al. (2009) Basic helix-loop-helix transcription factor from wild rice (OrbHLH2) improves tolerance to salt- and osmotic stress in Arabidopsis. J Plant Physiol 166: 1296–1306. doi: 10.1016/j.jplph.2009.02.007
  35. 35. Nijhawan A, Jain M, Tyagi AK, Khurana JP (2008) Genomic survey and gene expression analysis of the basic leucine zipper transcription factor family in rice. Plant Physiol 146: 333–350. doi: 10.1104/pp.107.112821
  36. 36. Zou M, Guan Y, Ren H, Zhang F, Chen F (2008) A bZIP transcription factor, OsABI5, is involved in rice fertility and stress tolerance. Plant Mol Biol 66: 675–683. doi: 10.1007/s11103-008-9298-4
  37. 37. Zhang L, Zhao G, Jia J, Liu X, Kong X (2012) Molecular characterization of 60 isolated wheat MYB genes and analysis of their expression during abiotic stress. J Exp Bot 63: 203–214. doi: 10.1093/jxb/err264
  38. 38. Su CF, Wang YC, Hsieh TH, Lu CA, Tseng TH, et al. (2010) A novel MYBS3-dependent pathway confers cold tolerance in rice. Plant Physiol 153: 145–158. doi: 10.1104/pp.110.153015
  39. 39. Zhai H, Bai X, Zhu Y, Li Y, Cai H, et al. (2010) A single-repeat R3-MYB transcription factor MYBC1 negatively regulates freezing tolerance in Arabidopsis. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 394: 1018–1023. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2010.03.114
  40. 40. Ray S, Dansana PK, Giri J, Deveshwar P, Arora R, et al. (2011) Modulation of transcription factor and metabolic pathway genes in response to water-deficit stress in rice. Funct Integr Genomics 11: 157–178. doi: 10.1007/s10142-010-0187-y
  41. 41. Xie Z, Zhang ZL, Zou X, Huang J, Ruas P, et al. (2005) Annotations and functional analyses of the rice WRKY gene superfamily reveal positive and negative regulators of abscisic acid signaling in aleurone cells. Plant Physiol 137: 176–189. doi: 10.1104/pp.104.054312
  42. 42. Zhang ZL, Shin M, Zou X, Huang J, Ho TH, et al. (2009) A negative regulator encoded by a rice WRKY gene represses both abscisic acid and gibberellins signaling in aleurone cells. Plant Mol Biol 70: 139–151. doi: 10.1007/s11103-009-9463-4
  43. 43. Liu XQ, Bai XQ, Qian Q, Wang XJ, Chen MS, et al. (2005) OsWRKY03, a rice transcriptional activator that functions in defense signaling pathway upstream of OsNPR1. Cell Res 15: 593–603. doi: 10.1038/sj.cr.7290329
  44. 44. Wu X, Shiroto Y, Kishitani S, Ito Y, Toriyama K (2009) Enhanced heat and drought tolerance in transgenic rice seedlings overexpressing OsWRKY11 under the control of HSP101 promoter. Plant Cell Rep 28: 21–30. doi: 10.1007/s00299-008-0614-x
  45. 45. Nakashima K, Takasaki H, Mizoi J, Shinozaki K, Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K (2012) NAC transcription factors in plant abiotic stress responses. Biochim Biophys Acta 1819: 97–103. doi: 10.1016/j.bbagrm.2011.10.005
  46. 46. Sun H, Huang X, Xu X, Lan H, Huang J, et al. (2012) ENAC1, a NAC Transcription Factor, is an Early and Transient Response Regulator Induced by Abiotic Stress in Rice (Oryza sativa L.). Mol Biotechnol 52: 101–110. doi: 10.1007/s12033-011-9477-4
  47. 47. Takasaki H, Maruyama K, Kidokoro S, Ito Y, Fujita Y, et al. (2010) The abiotic stress-responsive NAC-type transcription factor OsNAC5 regulates stress-inducible genes and stress tolerance in rice. Mol Genet Genomics 284: 173–183. doi: 10.1007/s00438-010-0557-0
  48. 48. Agarwal P, Arora R, Ray S, Singh AK, Singh VP, et al. (2007) Genome-wide identification of C2H2 zinc-finger gene family in rice and their phylogeny and expression analysis. Plant Mol Biol 65: 467–485. doi: 10.1007/s11103-007-9199-y
  49. 49. Lee U, Rioflorido I, Hong SW, Larkindale J, Waters ER, et al. (2007) The Arabidopsis ClpB/Hsp100 family of proteins: chaperones for stress and chloroplast development. Plant J 49: 115–127. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313x.2006.02940.x
  50. 50. Tonsor SJ, Scott C, Boumaza I, Liss TR, Brodsky JL, et al. (2008) Heat shock protein 101 effects in A. thaliana: genetic variation, fitness and pleiotropy in controlled temperature conditions. Mol Ecol 17: 1614–1626. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294x.2008.03690.x
  51. 51. Agarwal M, Sahi C, Katiyar-Agarwal S, Agarwal S, Young T, et al. (2003) Molecular characterization of rice hsp101: complementation of yeast hsp104 mutation by disaggregation of protein granules and differential expression in indica and japonica rice types. Plant Mol Biol 51: 543–553.
  52. 52. Liu D, Lu Z, Mao Z, Liu S (2009) Enhanced thermotolerance of E. coli by expressed OsHsp90 from rice (Oryza sativa L.). Curr Microbiol 58: 129–133. doi: 10.1007/s00284-008-9288-4
  53. 53. Xu X, Song H, Zhou Z, Shi N, Ying Q, et al. (2010) Functional characterization of AtHsp90.3 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Arabidopsis thaliana under heat stress. Biotechnol Lett 32: 979–987. doi: 10.1007/s10529-010-0240-x
  54. 54. Montero-Barrientos M, Hermosa R, Cardoza RE, Gutierrez S, Nicolas C, et al. (2010) Transgenic expression of the Trichoderma harzianum hsp70 gene increases Arabidopsis resistance to heat and other abiotic stresses. J Plant Physiol 167: 659–665. doi: 10.1016/j.jplph.2009.11.012
  55. 55. Qi Y, Wang H, Zou Y, Liu C, Liu Y, et al. (2011) Over-expression of mitochondrial heat shock protein 70 suppresses programmed cell death in rice. FEBS Lett 585: 231–239. doi: 10.1016/j.febslet.2010.11.051
  56. 56. Bhattacharya A, Kurochkin AV, Yip GN, Zhang Y, Bertelsen EB, et al. (2009) Allostery in Hsp70 chaperones is transduced by subdomain rotations. J Mol Biol 388: 475–490. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2009.01.062
  57. 57. Mogk A, Haslberger T, Tessarz P, Bukau B (2008) Common and specific mechanisms of AAA+ proteins involved in protein quality control. Biochem Soc Trans 36: 120–125. doi: 10.1042/bst0360120
  58. 58. Zhang ZL, Zhu JH, Zhang QQ, Cai YB (2009) Molecular characterization of an ethephon-induced Hsp70 involved in high and low-temperature responses in Hevea brasiliensis. Plant Physiol Biochem 47: 954–959. doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2009.06.003
  59. 59. Sarkar NK, Kim YK, Grover A (2009) Rice sHsp genes: genomic organization and expression profiling under stress and development. BMC Genomics 10: 393. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-10-393
  60. 60. Kim KH, Alam I, Kim YG, Sharmin SA, Lee KW, et al. (2012) Overexpression of a chloroplast-localized small heat shock protein OsHSP26 confers enhanced tolerance against oxidative and heat stresses in tall fescue. Biotechnol Lett 34: 371–377. doi: 10.1007/s10529-011-0769-3
  61. 61. Jiang C, Xu J, Zhang H, Zhang X, Shi J, et al. (2009) A cytosolic class I small heat shock protein, RcHSP17.8, of Rosa chinensis confers resistance to a variety of stresses to Escherichia coli, yeast and Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell Environ 32: 1046–1059. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2009.01987.x
  62. 62. Dafny-Yelin M, Tzfira T, Vainstein A, Adam Z (2008) Non-redundant functions of sHSP-CIs in acquired thermotolerance and their role in early seed development in Arabidopsis. Plant Mol Biol 67: 363–373. doi: 10.1007/s11103-008-9326-4
  63. 63. Sato M, Yamahata H, Watanabe S, Nimura-Matsune K, Yoshikawa H (2007) Characterization of dnaJ multigene family in the cyanobacterium Synechococcus elongatus PCC 7942. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem 71: 1021–1027. doi: 10.1271/bbb.60691
  64. 64. Ben-Zvi AP, Goloubinoff P (2001) Review: mechanisms of disaggregation and refolding of stable protein aggregates by molecular chaperones. J Struct Biol 135: 84–93. doi: 10.1006/jsbi.2001.4352
  65. 65. Awad W, Estrada I, Shen Y, Hendershot LM (2008) BiP mutants that are unable to interact with endoplasmic reticulum DnaJ proteins provide insights into interdomain interactions in BiP. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 105: 1164–1169. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0702132105
  66. 66. Cheng C, Yun KY, Ressom HW, Mohanty B, Bajic VB, et al. (2007) An early response regulatory cluster induced by low temperature and hydrogen peroxide in seedlings of chilling-tolerant japonica rice. BMC Genomics 8: 175. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-8-175
  67. 67. Almagro L, Gomez Ros LV, Belchi-Navarro S, Bru R, Ros Barcelo A, et al. (2009) Class III peroxidases in plant defence reactions. J Exp Bot 60: 377–390. doi: 10.1093/jxb/ern277
  68. 68. Bonnecarrere V, Borsani O, Diaz P, Capdevielle F, Blanco P, et al. (2011) Response to photoxidative stress induced by cold in japonica rice is genotype dependent. Plant Sci 180: 726–732. doi: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2011.01.023
  69. 69. Zhang Y, Xi D, Wang J, Zhu D, Guo X (2009) Functional analysis reveals effects of tobacco alternative oxidase gene (NtAOX1a) on regulation of defence responses against abiotic and biotic stresses. Biosci Rep 29: 375–383. doi: 10.1042/bsr20080133
  70. 70. Pinot F, Beisson F (2011) Cytochrome P450 metabolizing fatty acids in plants: characterization and physiological roles. FEBS J 278: 195–205. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-4658.2010.07948.x
  71. 71. Blokhina O, Fagerstedt KV (2010) Oxidative metabolism, ROS and NO under oxygen deprivation. Plant Physiol Biochem 48: 359–373. doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2010.01.007
  72. 72. Davidson AL, Dassa E, Orelle C, Chen J (2008) Structure, function, and evolution of bacterial ATP-binding cassette systems. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 72: 317–364. doi: 10.1128/mmbr.00031-07
  73. 73. Conde A, Chaves MM, Geros H (2011) Membrane Transport, Sensing and Signaling in Plant Adaptation to Environmental Stress. Plant Cell Physiol 52: 1583–1602. doi: 10.1093/pcp/pcr107
  74. 74. Sakurai J, Ishikawa F, Yamaguchi T, Uemura M, Maeshima M (2005) Identification of 33 rice aquaporin genes and analysis of their expression and function. Plant Cell Physiol 46: 1568–1577. doi: 10.1093/pcp/pci172
  75. 75. Mazzucotelli E, Belloni S, Marone D, De Leonardis A, Guerra D, et al. (2006) The E3 ubiquitin ligase gene family in plants: regulation by degradation. Curr Genomics 7: 509–522. doi: 10.2174/138920206779315728
  76. 76. Thangasamy S, Guo CL, Chuang MH, Lai MH, Chen J, et al. (2011) Rice SIZ1, a SUMO E3 ligase, controls spikelet fertility through regulation of anther dehiscence. New Phytol 189: 869–882. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2010.03538.x
  77. 77. Park HC, Kim H, Koo SC, Park HJ, Cheong MS, et al. (2010) Functional characterization of the SIZ/PIAS-type SUMO E3 ligases, OsSIZ1 and OsSIZ2 in rice. Plant Cell Environ 33: 1923–1934. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2010.02195.x
  78. 78. Jain M, Nijhawan A, Arora R, Agarwal P, Ray S, et al. (2007) F-box proteins in rice. Genome-wide analysis, classification, temporal and spatial gene expression during panicle and seed development, and regulation by light and abiotic stress. Plant Physiol 143: 1467–1483. doi: 10.1104/pp.106.091900
  79. 79. Aiken CT, Kaake RM, Wang X, Huang L (2011) Oxidative stress-mediated regulation of proteasome complexes. Mol Cell Proteomics 10: R110 006924.
  80. 80. Chen J, Burke JJ, Velten J, Xin Z (2006) FtsH11 protease plays a critical role in Arabidopsis thermotolerance. Plant J 48: 73–84. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313x.2006.02855.x
  81. 81. Sakata T, Oshino T, Miura S, Tomabechi M, Tsunaga Y, et al. (2010) Auxins reverse plant male sterility caused by high temperatures. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107: 8569–8574. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1000869107
  82. 82. Kriechbaumer V, Park WJ, Piotrowski M, Meeley RB, Gierl A, et al. (2007) Maize nitrilases have a dual role in auxin homeostasis and -cyanoalanine hydrolysis. J Exp Bot 58: 4225–4233. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erm279
  83. 83. Kant S, Bi YM, Zhu T, Rothstein SJ (2009) SAUR39, a small auxin-up RNA gene, acts as a negative regulator of auxin synthesis and transport in rice. Plant Physiol 151: 691–701. doi: 10.1104/pp.109.143875
  84. 84. Qin F, Shinozaki K, Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K (2011) Achievements and Challenges in Understanding Plant Abiotic Stress Responses and Tolerance. Plant Cell Physiol 52: 1569–1582. doi: 10.1093/pcp/pcr106
  85. 85. Zhu G, Ye N, Yang J, Peng X, Zhang J (2011) Regulation of expression of starch synthesis genes by ethylene and ABA in relation to the development of rice inferior and superior spikelets. J Exp Bot 62: 3907–3916. doi: 10.1093/jxb/err088
  86. 86. Kobayashi Y, Yamamoto S, Minami H, Kagaya Y, Hattori T (2004) Differential activation of the rice sucrose nonfermenting1-related protein kinase2 family by hyperosmotic stress and abscisic acid. Plant Cell 16: 1163–1177. doi: 10.1105/tpc.019943
  87. 87. Li G, Lin F, Xue HW (2007) Genome-wide analysis of the phospholipase D family in Oryza sativa and functional characterization of PLD beta 1 in seed germination. Cell Res 17: 881–894. doi: 10.1038/cr.2007.77
  88. 88. Darwish E, Testerink C, Khalil M, El-Shihy O, Munnik T (2009) Phospholipid signaling responses in salt-stressed rice leaves. Plant Cell Physiol 50: 986–997. doi: 10.1093/pcp/pcp051
  89. 89. Guo H, Ecker JR (2003) Plant responses to ethylene gas are mediated by SCF(EBF1/EBF2)-dependent proteolysis of EIN3 transcription factor. Cell 115: 667–677. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(03)00969-3
  90. 90. Adamska I, Kloppstech K, Ohad I (1992) UV light stress induces the synthesis of the early light-inducible protein and prevents its degradation. J Biol Chem 267: 24732–24737.
  91. 91. Harari-Steinberg O, Ohad I, Chamovitz DA (2001) Dissection of the light signal transduction pathways regulating the two early light-induced protein genes in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol 127: 986–997. doi: 10.1104/pp.010270
  92. 92. Savenstrand H, Olofsson M, Samuelsson M, Strid A (2004) Induction of early light-inducible protein gene expression in Pisum sativum after exposure to low levels of UV-B irradiation and other environmental stresses. Plant Cell Rep 22: 532–536. doi: 10.1007/s00299-003-0743-1
  93. 93. Reimmann C, Dudler R (1993) Circadian rhythmicity in the expression of a novel light-regulated rice gene. Plant Mol Biol 22: 165–170. doi: 10.1007/bf00039006
  94. 94. Kundu S, Chakraborty D, Pal A (2011) Proteomic analysis of salicylic acid induced resistance to Mungbean Yellow Mosaic India Virus in Vigna mungo. J Proteomics 74: 337–349. doi: 10.1016/j.jprot.2010.11.012
  95. 95. Zhang W, Zhou RG, Gao YJ, Zheng SZ, Xu P, et al. (2009) Molecular and genetic evidence for the key role of AtCaM3 in heat-shock signal transduction in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol 149: 1773–1784. doi: 10.1104/pp.108.133744
  96. 96. Qudeimat E, Faltusz AM, Wheeler G, Lang D, Holtorf H, et al. (2008) A PIIB-type Ca2+-ATPase is essential for stress adaptation in Physcomitrella patens. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 105: 19555–19560. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0800864105
  97. 97. Bourne HR, Sanders DA, McCormick F (1991) The GTPase superfamily: conserved structure and molecular mechanism. Nature 349: 117–127. doi: 10.1038/349117a0
  98. 98. Wu H-m, Hazak O, Cheung AY, Yalovsky S (2011) RAC/ROP GTPases and Auxin Signaling. Plant Cell 23: 1208–1218. doi: 10.1105/tpc.111.083907
  99. 99. Chen L, Shiotani K, Togashi T, Miki D, Aoyama M, et al. (2010) Analysis of the Rac/Rop Small GTPase Family in Rice: Expression, Subcellular Localization and Role in Disease Resistance. Plant Cell Physiol 51: 585–595. doi: 10.1093/pcp/pcq024
  100. 100. Speth EB, Imboden L, Hauck P, He SY (2009) Subcellular localization and functional analysis of the Arabidopsis GTPase RabE. Plant Physiol 149: 1824–1837. doi: 10.1104/pp.108.132092
  101. 101. Wang X, Xu Y, Han Y, Bao S, Du J, et al. (2006) Overexpression of RAN1 in rice and Arabidopsis alters primordial meristem, mitotic progress, and sensitivity to auxin. Plant Physiol 140: 91–101. doi: 10.1104/pp.105.071670
  102. 102. Song XF, Yang CY, Liu J, Yang WC (2006) RPA, a class II ARFGAP protein, activates ARF1 and U5 and plays a role in root hair development in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol 141: 966–976. doi: 10.1104/pp.106.077818
  103. 103. Seabra MC, Wasmeier C (2004) Controlling the location and activation of Rab GTPases. Curr Opin Cell Biol 16: 451–457. doi: 10.1016/j.ceb.2004.06.014
  104. 104. Atkinson NJ, Urwin PE (2012) The interaction of plant biotic and abiotic stresses: from genes to the field. J Exp Bot 63: 3523–3543. doi: 10.1093/jxb/ers100
  105. 105. Foyer CH, Shigeoka S (2011) Understanding oxidative stress and antioxidant functions to enhance photosynthesis. Plant Physiol 155: 93–100. doi: 10.1104/pp.110.166181
  106. 106. Ishibashi Y, Tawaratsumida T, Kondo K, Kasa S, Sakamoto M, et al. (2012) Reactive oxygen species are involved in gibberellin/abscisic acid signaling in barley aleurone cells. Plant Physiol 158: 1705–1714. doi: 10.1104/pp.111.192740
  107. 107. He J, Yue X, Wang R, Zhang Y (2011) Ethylene mediates UV-B-induced stomatal closure via peroxidase-dependent hydrogen peroxide synthesis in Vicia faba L. J Exp Bot. 62: 2657–2666. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erq431
  108. 108. Jakubowicz M, Galganska H, Nowak W, Sadowski J (2010) Exogenously induced expression of ethylene biosynthesis, ethylene perception, phospholipase D, and Rboh-oxidase genes in broccoli seedlings. J Exp Bot 61: 3475–3491. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erq177
  109. 109. Wong HL, Pinontoan R, Hayashi K, Tabata R, Yaeno T, et al. (2007) Regulation of Rice NADPH Oxidase by Binding of Rac GTPase to Its N-Terminal Extension. Plant Cell 19: 4022–4034. doi: 10.1105/tpc.107.055624
  110. 110. Fukao T, Yeung E, Bailey-Serres J (2011) The Submergence Tolerance Regulator SUB1A Mediates Crosstalk between Submergence and Drought Tolerance in Rice. Plant Cell 23: 412–427. doi: 10.1105/tpc.110.080325
  111. 111. Zhao Q, Guo HW (2011) Paradigms and paradox in the ethylene signaling pathway and interaction network. Mol Plant 4: 626–634. doi: 10.1093/mp/ssr042
  112. 112. Bienert GP, Moller AL, Kristiansen KA, Schulz A, Moller IM, et al. (2007) Specific aquaporins facilitate the diffusion of hydrogen peroxide across membranes. J Biol Chem 282: 1183–1192. doi: 10.1074/jbc.m603761200
  113. 113. Mori IC, Schroeder JI (2004) Reactive oxygen species activation of plant Ca2+ channels. A signaling mechanism in polar growth, hormone transduction, stress signaling, and hypothetically mechanotransduction. Plant Physiol 135: 702–708. doi: 10.1104/pp.104.042069
  114. 114. Ma L, Zhang H, Sun L, Jiao Y, Zhang G, et al. (2012) NADPH oxidase AtrbohD and AtrbohF function in ROS-dependent regulation of Na(+)/K(+)homeostasis in Arabidopsis under salt stress. J Exp Bot 63: 305–317. doi: 10.1093/jxb/err280
  115. 115. Reddy ASN, Ali GS, Celesnik H, Day IS (2011) Coping with Stresses: Roles of Calcium- and Calcium/Calmodulin-Regulated Gene Expression. Plant Cell 23: 2010–2032. doi: 10.1105/tpc.111.084988
  116. 116. Wu A, Allu AD, Garapati P, Siddiqui H, Dortay H, et al. (2012) JUNGBRUNNEN1, a reactive oxygen species-responsive NAC transcription factor, regulates longevity in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 24: 482–506. doi: 10.1105/tpc.111.090894
  117. 117. Miller G, Mittler R (2006) Could heat shock transcription factors function as hydrogen peroxide sensors in plants? Ann Bot 98: 279–288.
  118. 118. Sessa G, Meller Y, Fluhr R (1995) A GCC element and a G-box motif participate in ethylene-induced expression of the PRB-1b gene. Plant Mol Biol 28: 145–153. doi: 10.1007/bf00042046
  119. 119. Zhang H, Huang Z, Xie B, Chen Q, Tian X, et al. (2004) The ethylene-, jasmonate-, abscisic acid-and NaCl-responsive tomato transcription factor JERF1 modulates expression of GCC box-containing genes and salt tolerance in tobacco. Planta 220: 262–270. doi: 10.1007/s00425-004-1347-x
  120. 120. Yamamoto YY, Yoshioka Y, Hyakumachi M, Maruyama K, Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K, et al. (2011) Prediction of transcriptional regulatory elements for plant hormone responses based on microarray data. BMC Plant Biol 11: 39. doi: 10.1186/1471-2229-11-39
  121. 121. Wan L, Zhang J, Zhang H, Zhang Z, Quan R, et al. (2011) Transcriptional activation of OsDERF1 in OsERF3 and OsAP2–39 negatively modulates ethylene synthesis and drought tolerance in rice. PLoS One 6: e25216. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0025216
  122. 122. Kaplan B, Davydov O, Knight H, Galon Y, Knight MR, et al. (2006) Rapid Transcriptome Changes Induced by Cytosolic Ca2+ Transients Reveal ABRE-Related Sequences as Ca2+-Responsive cis Elements in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 18: 2733–2748. doi: 10.1105/tpc.106.042713
  123. 123. Li W, Cui X, Meng Z, Huang X, Xie Q, et al. (2012) Transcriptional regulation of Arabidopsis MIR168a and argonaute1 homeostasis in abscisic acid and abiotic stress responses. Plant Physiol 158: 1279–1292. doi: 10.1104/pp.111.188789
  124. 124. Kim JS, Mizoi J, Yoshida T, Fujita Y, Nakajima J, et al. (2011) An ABRE promoter sequence is involved in osmotic stress-responsive expression of the DREB2A gene, which encodes a transcription factor regulating drought-inducible genes in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell Physiol 52: 2136–2146. doi: 10.1093/pcp/pcr143
  125. 125. Yamamoto A, Mizukami Y, Sakurai H (2005) Identification of a novel class of target genes and a novel type of binding sequence of heat shock transcription factor in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Biol Chem 280: 11911–11919. doi: 10.1074/jbc.m411256200
  126. 126. Volkov RA, Panchuk II, Mullineaux PM, Schoffl F (2006) Heat stress-induced H(2)O (2) is required for effective expression of heat shock genes in Arabidopsis. Plant Mol Biol 61: 733–746. doi: 10.1007/s11103-006-0045-4
  127. 127. Nishizawa-Yokoi A, Nosaka R, Hayashi H, Tainaka H, Maruta T, et al. (2011) HsfA1d and HsfA1e involved in the transcriptional regulation of HsfA2 function as key regulators for the Hsf signaling network in response to environmental stress. Plant Cell Physiol 52: 933–945. doi: 10.1093/pcp/pcr045
  128. 128. Zhang DB, Wilson ZA (2009) Stamen specification and anther development in rice. Chinese Science Bulletin 54: 2342–2353. doi: 10.1007/s11434-009-0348-3
  129. 129. Saeed AI, Sharov V, White J, Li J, Liang W, et al. (2003) TM4: a free, open-source system for microarray data management and analysis. Biotechniques 34: 374–378.
  130. 130. Eisen MB, Spellman PT, Brown PO, Botstein D (1998) Cluster analysis and display of genome-wide expression patterns. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 95: 14863–14868. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.25.14863
  131. 131. Hobo T, Suwabe K, Aya K, Suzuki G, Yano K, et al. (2008) Various spatiotemporal expression profiles of anther-expressed genes in rice. Plant Cell Physiol 49: 1417–1428. doi: 10.1093/pcp/pcn128
  132. 132. Usadel B, Nagel A, Thimm O, Redestig H, Blaesing OE, et al. (2005) Extension of the visualization tool MapMan to allow statistical analysis of arrays, display of corresponding genes, and comparison with known responses. Plant Physiol 138: 1195–1204. doi: 10.1104/pp.105.060459
  133. 133. Rombauts S, Dehais P, Van Montagu M, Rouze P (1999) PlantCARE, a plant cis-acting regulatory element database. Nucleic Acids Res 27: 295–296. doi: 10.1093/nar/27.1.295
  134. 134. Grant CE, Bailey TL, Noble WS (2011) FIMO: scanning for occurrences of a given motif. Bioinformatics 27: 1017–1018. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr064
  135. 135. Chang WC, Lee TY, Huang HD, Huang HY, Pan RL (2008) PlantPAN: Plant promoter analysis navigator, for identifying combinatorial cis-regulatory elements with distance constraint in plant gene groups. BMC Genomics 9: 561. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-9-561
  136. 136. Shannon P, Markiel A, Ozier O, Baliga NS, Wang JT, et al. (2003) Cytoscape: a software environment for integrated models of biomolecular interaction networks. Genome Res 13: 2498–2504. doi: 10.1101/gr.1239303
  137. 137. Lee S, Chiecko JC, Kim SA, Walker EL, Lee Y, et al. (2009) Disruption of OsYSL15 leads to iron inefficiency in rice plants. Plant Physiol 150: 786–800. doi: 10.1104/pp.109.135418
  138. 138. Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD (2001) Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) Method. Methods 25: 402–408. doi: 10.1006/meth.2001.1262
  139. 139. Fukao T, Yeung E, Bailey-Serres J (2011) The submergence tolerance regulator SUB1A mediates crosstalk between submergence and drought tolerance in rice. Plant Cell 23: 412–427. doi: 10.1105/tpc.110.080325