Advertisement
Research Article

Long-Term Nitrogen Addition Leads to Loss of Species Richness Due to Litter Accumulation and Soil Acidification in a Temperate Steppe

  • Ying Fang,

    Affiliations: State Key Laboratory of Vegetation and Environmental Change, Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Xiangshan, Beijing, China, Graduate School of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Yuquanlu, Beijing, China

    X
  • Fen Xun,

    Affiliations: State Key Laboratory of Vegetation and Environmental Change, Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Xiangshan, Beijing, China, Graduate School of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Yuquanlu, Beijing, China

    X
  • Wenming Bai mail,

    bwming@ibcas.ac.cn

    Affiliation: State Key Laboratory of Vegetation and Environmental Change, Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Xiangshan, Beijing, China

    X
  • Wenhao Zhang,

    Affiliation: State Key Laboratory of Vegetation and Environmental Change, Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Xiangshan, Beijing, China

    X
  • Linghao Li

    Affiliation: State Key Laboratory of Vegetation and Environmental Change, Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Xiangshan, Beijing, China

    X
  • Published: October 12, 2012
  • DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0047369

Abstract

Background

Although community structure and species richness are known to respond to nitrogen fertilization dramatically, little is known about the mechanisms underlying specific species replacement and richness loss. In an experiment in semiarid temperate steppe of China, manipulative N addition with five treatments was conducted to evaluate the effect of N addition on the community structure and species richness.

Methodology/Principal Findings

Species richness and biomass of community in each plot were investigated in a randomly selected quadrat. Root element, available and total phosphorus (AP, TP) in rhizospheric soil, and soil moisture, pH, AP, TP and inorganic N in the soil were measured. The relationship between species richness and the measured factors was analyzed using bivariate correlations and stepwise multiple linear regressions. The two dominant species, a shrub Artemisia frigida and a grass Stipa krylovii, responded differently to N addition such that the former was gradually replaced by the latter. S. krylovii and A. frigida had highly-branched fibrous and un-branched tap root systems, respectively. S. krylovii had higher height than A. frigida in both control and N added plots. These differences may contribute to the observed species replacement. In addition, the analysis on root element and AP contents in rhizospheric soil suggests that different calcium acquisition strategies, and phosphorus and sodium responses of the two species may account for the replacement. Species richness was significantly reduced along the five N addition levels. Our results revealed a significant relationship between species richness and soil pH, litter amount, soil moisture, AP concentration and inorganic N concentration.

Conclusions/Significance

Our results indicate that litter accumulation and soil acidification accounted for 52.3% and 43.3% of the variation in species richness, respectively. These findings would advance our knowledge on the changes in species richness in semiarid temperate steppe of northern China under N deposition scenario.

Introduction

Nitrogen (N) is recognized as a primary factor limiting plant growth in many terrestrial ecosystems, and N fertilization has been widely used to stimulate plant growth and improve productivity [1], [2]. As a result, annual N input into terrestrial ecosystem has been increased from 34 Tg N yr−1(1860s) to 100 Tg N yr−1 (1990s) through the use of N fertilizer, N-fixation of legume plants, fuel combustion and other anthropogenic activities [3]. It is predicted that annual N input will reach to 200 Tg N yr−1 by the year of 2050 [3]. This increase in N input has great impacts on ecosystem N cycling [4], [5], ecosystem structures and other functions [6], [7], [8], [9].

The nutrient availability is an important factor to determine the species composition of vegetation [10], [11]. There are many reports demonstrating that N addition alters the community structure and composition in different terrestrial ecosystems. For instance, Bobbink et al. (1998) found that an increase of N availability in several vegetation types results in competitive exclusion of characteristic plant species by nitrophilic species [10]. Several dominant species including grasses and forbs usually dominate in a typical steppe in Inner Mongolia [12]. However, the gramineous Stipa krylovii becomes predominant after N fertilization for a few years [12]. Duprè et al (2010) analyzed data associated with long-term N in European grasslands, and they detected that N deposition significantly affects vascular plants, bryophytes and dicotyledon, leading to the loss of distinct dicotyledon [13]. However, few studies have addressed the reasons for the changes in individual species in response to N addition.

Species diversity is an important property for the community as it determines ecosystem productivity [14]. The knowledge about the mechanisms responsible for the loss of species diversity is crucial for the conservation of species [15]. Although many experimental studies found that species diversity is decreased after N addition [16][22], no mechanistic explanation has been given so far [21]. Moreover, the explanation for loss of distinct species after N addition remains unclear [22]. N addition has potential effects on ecosystems, including, acidification and eutrophication, and these factors may contribute to species diversity loss and changes in species composition [23], [24]. It has been suggested that light competition may account for the disappearance of some species because those species at the top of the canopy and/or with fast growth rate can preferentially use light resources [25][28]. There are also reports suggesting that loss of species diversity caused by N fertilization may result from disruption of nutrient absorption due to alteration of nutrient status in soil by soil acidification [13], [18], [29]. In addition, N fertilization can inhibit photosynthetic rate resulting from disturbance of nutrient balance in plants, leading to an increase in plant mortality [10], [30]. However, Lamb (2008) analyzed the effects of below-ground biomass, light availability, litter accumulation and other factors on grassland species richness using a structural equation modeling, and found that litter accumulation may account for the loss of species diversity [31]. Therefore, more experimental studies are required to clarify the primary mechanism underlying the N fertilization-induced loss of species richness.

To experimentally elucidate the mechanism by which loss of species richness occurs under N addition, a field experiment with five different N addition rates was conducted in a typical steppe in Inner Mongolian grassland. The following three questions were addressed. (1) How does long-term N addition affect community structure? (2) What are the mechanisms for species-specific responses? (3) Which is the primary factor to determine to the species loss after N fertilization?

Methods

Study Site

This study was conducted at the Duolun Restoration Ecology Station of the Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences Experimental design in Duolun County (116°17′E, 42°02′N, 1324 m a.s.l.), Inner Mongolia, China. The area is located in the temperate climatic zone, and its mean annual temperature is 2.1°C with mean monthly temperature ranging from −17.5°C in January to 18.9°C in July [32]. Mean annual precipitation is 382.2 mm, and approx. 90% of the precipitation occurs from May to October. The soil in this area is classified as chestnut according to the Chinese classification and Haplic Calcisols based on the FAO classification [32]. Soil bulk density was 1.31 g cm−3 and pH was 6.84. Vegetation in this area is a typical steppe community and the dominating species are perennials, including Stipa krylovii, Artemisia frigida, Potentilla acaulis, Cleistogenes squarrosa, Allium bidentatum, Leymus chinensiss, Carex korshinskyi, Salsola collina, Melilotoides ruthenica and Agropyron cristatum [33].

Experimental Design

The experimental area was fenced to exclude livestock grazing in July, 2003. A total of 64 plots of 15 m×10 m was established, and each of them was surrounded by a buffer strip with a width of 4 m. Eight treatments were included in our study, including one control treatment (no nutrient addition) and seven treatments of N enrichment at various levels. The experiment used a Latin square design to receive urea containing 46% N addition treatment on the middle growth time (July) of every year since 2003, by evenly spreading urea with hand. Eight N fertilization treatments, including 0 (N0), 1 (N1), 2 (N2), 4 (N4), 8 (N8), 16 (N16), 32 (N32) and 64 (N64) g N m−2, were randomly assigned to 64 plots [12]. In our study, samples were collected from 40 plots with five treatments (N0, N2, N8, N16 and N32). The N treatments used in the present study include those N levels that are higher than the average farmland fertilization (10 g m−2) and the local N deposition rate (18 kg ha−2 y−1). The use of higher N levels allows us to evaluate long-term extreme N supply on steppe ecosystem.

Investigation of Community Composition

Vegetation survey was conducted in the peak of biomass in mid-August of 2010. Species composition of community in each plot was investigated in a randomly selected quadrat (1 m × 1 m). Species richness was defined as the total species number per square meter [34], [17]. Aboveground biomass in every quadrat was clipped at the ground level, and both living and standing dead parts belonging to a same species were pooled together. Surface litter in the same quadrate was also collected. All plant samples including litter were oven-dried at 70°C for 48 h and then the biomass was determined separately. The height of each species within a quadrat was calculated as the average of species’ natural height from at least five random measurements [32].

Measurement of Root Element, Available Phosphorus (AP) and Total Phosphorus (TP) in Rhizospheric Soil

Three individuals of S. krylovii or A. frigida were randomly selected in each plot in June, 2010, and were dug out with roots using a shovel. We chose S. krylovii and A. frigida, because they are two dominant species and most sensitive to N supply. A composite sample for each plot was obtained by combining three strains from every species. Plants were gently shaken by hand, and then rhizospheric soil was collected with a brush [35], [36]. Finally, all the roots from these three strains were excised with scissors. Roots were washed with de-ionized water and oven-dried at 70°C for 48 h. Dry roots were ground to pass through a 0.25-mm sieve, and then ground powder was solvented with Microwave Acceleration Reaction System (CEM Corporation, USA) after the digestion with H2SO4 and HNO3. Finally, contents of sodium (Na), calcium (Ca) and phosphorus (P), potassium (K) and sulfur (S) in the roots of S. krylovii and A. frigida were determined using an inductively coupled plasma emission spectrometer (Thermo Electron Corporation, USA). After the samples were digested with H2SO4-HClO4, total phosphorus contents in rhizospheric soil were determined by molybdenum-stibium colorimetry method [37] with a UV-visible spectrophotometer (UV-2550, SHIMADZU Corporation, China). To determine the available phosphorus contents, rhizospheric soil was ground with a mill and passed through a 0.25-mm sieve, and the filtered soil was digested with NaHCO3 [37].

Measurement of Moisture, pH, TP, AP and Inorganic N in the Soil

In each plot, a soil core (3-cm diameter) of fresh soil from 0–10 cm soil layer was randomly sampled in June, July and August of 2010, respectively. Gravimetric method was used to determine the soil moisture. Soil samples were weighed before and after they were oven-dried at 105°C for 48 h. The mean value of three determinations was used to analyze the correlation between species richness and soil moisture. In mid-June, an additional soil core was sampled in the same way from each plot, and was used to measure the pH and concentrations of AP and TP and inorganic N. Some fresh soil in each soil core was extracted by 2 mol L−1 KCl solution (soil:KCl solution; 1:10) [38] after passed through a 2-mm sieve, and then inorganic N concentrations were analyzed with Auto Analyzer 3 System (SEAL Analytical Gmbh, Germany). Here, inorganic N concentration was defined as the sum of NO3N and NH4+-N concentrations. Some other air-dried soil from the same soil core was passed through a 2-mm sieve for determination of soil pH, and TP and AP concentrations. Soil pH was determined with Russell RL060P portable pH meter (Thermo Electron Corporation 166 Cummings Center, USA), and the water/soil ratio was 1:2.5. Soil AP and TP concentrations were analyzed with the same method as for rhizospheric soil of S. krylovii and A. frigida.

Statistical Analysis

One-way ANOVA (SPSS software package) was used to evaluate the effects of an 8-year-long N addition on soil parameters, plant biomass, plant height, species richness and root element contents. Pairs of mean values were compared with least significant difference (LSD). Bivariate correlations were used to determine the correlation of species richness with soil pH, litter amount, soil moisture, soil inorganic N concentrations and AP concentrations. Stepwise multiple linear regressions were further used to identify the most important factor affecting species richness after the 8-year-long N addition. All the statistical analyses were performed with SPSS software package (SPSS 16.0 for windows, SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). P value of less than 0.05 was considered as statistically significant.

Results

Effect of N Addition on Soil pH, Soil Moisture, Inorganic N Concentrations, and AP and TP Concentrations

Soil pH was significantly reduced by 9%, 12% and 18% in N8, N16 and N32 plots compared with the control, respectively (Table 1). Soil moisture in N16 and N32 plots was increased by 30% and 44% respectively compared with that in control (N0 plot). Soil inorganic N concentration in N8, N16 and N32 plots was 6, 7 and 10 times greater than that in N0 plot, respectively. In contrast, N addition had no effect on soil available phosphorus (AP) and total phosphorus (TP) concentrations (Table 1).

thumbnail

Table 1. Effects of long-term N addition on soil pH, soil moisture, and inorganic N concentration, soil available phosphorus (AP) and total phosphorus (TP) concentration in 0–10 cm soil layer.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0047369.t001

Effect of N Addition on Biomass, Height, Root and Rhizospheric Soil Element Contents of S. krylovii and A. frigida

There was a sigmoidal increase in aboveground biomass of S. krylovii with increases in N addition levels. For example, the biomass reached peak value in N8 and N16 plots, and declined to a level comparable to that in N0 plot when N level was further increased to N32 level. In contrast to S. krylovii, a linear decrease in biomass of A. frigida with increases in N addition levels was observed (Fig. 1A). For example, the biomass in N2, N8, N16 and N32 plots was decreased by 39%, 89%, 94% and 97%, respectively (Fig. 1A). In contrast to biomass, N addition had no impact on plant height of S. krylovii (Fig. 1B). There were no significant differences in plant height of A. frigida among N0, N2, N8 and N16 plots, but plant height in N32 plot was significantly lower than that in other 4 N added plots (Fig. 1B).

thumbnail

Figure 1. Biomass and height of Stipa krylovii and Artemisia frigida along 5 N addition treatments in 2010.

All data were expressed as mean ± standard error (SE). Means that are significantly different are indicated with different letters (P<0.05).

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0047369.g001

Root Ca content of S. krylovii in N8, N16 and N32 plots was reduced by 13%, 18% and 20% compared with that in N0 (Table 2). Root Ca content of A. frigida in N2 and N32 plots was increased by 24% and decreased by 19% compared with that in N0 plot, respectively (Table 2). Moreover, root P content of S. krylovii in N2 plot was increased by 12% compared with that in N32 plot. However, no significant differences were observed in root P content of A. frigida among the five N addition levels (Table 2). For S. krylovii, root Na content in N8 and N16 plots was decreased by 22% and 24% compared with that in N32 plot, respectively. For A. frigida, root Na content in N2 and N8 plots was increased by 104% and 138% compared with that in N0 plot, respectively (Table 2). In addition, No significant differences in root K and S contents among the five N addition levels in both S. krylovii and A. frigida were observed (unpublished data).

thumbnail

Table 2. Root element contents and rhizospheric soil available phosphorus (RAP) contents of Stipa krylovii and Artemisia frigida along 5 N addition treatments.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0047369.t002

We also found that rhizospheric AP contents of S. krylovii and A. frigida were responsive to N fertilization (Table 2). Rhizospheric AP contents of S. krylovii in N16 and N32 plots were increased by 18% and 37% compared with that in N0 plot, respectively. A similar change in rhizospheric AP contents of A. frigida was also found in response to N addition. For instance, rhizospheric AP contents of A. frigida N8, N16 and N32 plots were increased by 30%, 30% and 19% (Table 2) compared with those in N0 plot, respectively.

Aboveground Biomass and Species Richness of Community

The aboveground biomass of community in N8 and N16 plots was increased by 61.04% and 69.32% compared with that in N0 plots, respectively. Further increase in N to N32 level led to a reduction in the aboveground biomass of community such that the biomass in N32 plot was not significantly different from that in N0 and N2 plots (Fig. 2A). A linear decease in species richness with increases in N addition levels was observed (Fig. 2B).

thumbnail

Figure 2. Aboveground biomass and species richness of community along 5 N addition treatments in 2010 (A, MEAN±SE, n = 8).

All data were expressed as mean ± standard error (SE). Means that are significantly different are indicated with different letters (P<0.05).

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0047369.g002

Correlations between Species Richness and Soil pH, Litter Amount, Soil Moisture, Soil AP Concentration, and Inorganic N Concentration

Species richness was positively correlated with soil pH (Fig. 3A), while a negative correlation between species richness and litter amount (Fig. 3B), soil moisture (Fig. 3C), AP concentration (Fig. 3D) and inorganic N concentration (Fig. 3E) was observed. Stepwise multiple regression analyses revealed that litter amount and soil pH accounted for 52.3% (r2 = 0.523, P = 0.0001) and 43.3% (r2 = 0.433, P = 0.0001) of variations in species richness after long-term N addition in semi-arid steppe, respectively.

thumbnail

Figure 3. Species richness and correlation with soil pH (A), litter amount (B), soil moisture (C), soil AP concentration (D) and inorganic N concentration (E).

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0047369.g003

Discussion

Community Structure Changes after Long-term N Addition

In the present study, we found that long-term N addition had contrasting effect on biomass of the two dominant species, S. krylovii and A. frigida such that biomass of S. krylovii and A. frigida was enhanced and suppressed by N addition, respectively (Fig. 1). As a shrub, A. frigida was gradually replaced by S. krylovii, a grass species in response to N addition. The mechanism underlying this change remains to be dissected. The difference in the fine root morphology between the two species may contribute to the community change. S. krylovii has a highly-branched fibrous root system that is mainly distributed in the soil surface, whereas A. frigida has an unbranched tap root system that can reach deep soil [12]. The fibrous root system may have advantage to absorb more surface soil nutrient than tap root system. Huang et al. (2008) showed that N use efficiency of S. krylovii is increased after N addition [12]. In addition, as light has an important effect on community, we thus investigated the effect of N addition on plant height of the two species. Our results revealed that S. krylovii was higher than A. frigida in both control and N addition plots (P < 0.05). No effect of N addition on S. krylovii height was found, while an inhibitory effect on A. frigida height was observed in N32 plot exclusively (Fig. 1). It has been widely accepted that species with high height preferentially would capture more light resource than species with short height, and that the short height species would tend to be excluded from light competition [25], [26], [27], [28]. A similar argument may also be used to explain the replacement of A. frigida by S. krylovii in plots with high levels of N addition. We found that N addition had significant impact on root Ca content in both S. krylovii and A. frigida such that Ca content was decreased with the increased amount of N (Table 2). Our result is consistent with previous reports that Ca2+ loss is stimulated by N deposition [39], [40]. This observation is partly because redundant N loses from soil occurs in the forms of NO3 and Ca2+, and other basic cations eluviate to imbalance electric charges [39], [41]. Another reason may be that N enrichment results in an increase of NH4+ concentration, thus leading to reduction in the absorption of Ca2+ and other basic cations since many plants absorb NH4+ first [30]. The alteration of nutrient balance may have negative effects on plant growth [42], [43]. The root Ca contents in S. krylovii were higher than those in A. frigida in plots supplemented with N addition (Table 2). These results suggest that the two species may have distinct strategies for Ca acquisition, and that S. krylovii may be more effective to acquire Ca than A. frigida. Finally, the N addition induced a greater loss of Ca in A. frigida than in S. krylovii (Table 2). This may lead to damages to A. frigida, thus accounting for the replacement of A. frigida by S. krylovii. Another important observation in the present study is that long-term N addition resulted in acidification and increases in activities of rhizospheric AP (Table 2). More specifically, we found that N addition-induced change in root P content in S. krylovii was more evident than that in A. frigida, suggesting that A. frigida may be more sensitive to change soil P availability. This feature may facilitate growth of S. krylovii under conditions of N addition. The N addition-induced increase in Na content in A. frigida was greater than that in S. krylovii (Table 2). This result indicates that the greater accumulation of Na may have a toxic effect on A. frigida, thus disrupting a number of physiological processes associated with growth and development [44][46].

Species Richness Loss after Long-term N Addition

We found that species richness was significantly reduced after an 8-year-long N fertilization (Fig. 1). This result is consistent with those reported in the literature [8], [11], [17], [18], [20], [28]. Moreover, our result showed that N addition significantly induced soil acidification, and that species richness was positively correlated with soil pH. It is conceivable that some plant species would not adapt to the acidic soil due to alteration of nutrient balance in soil, thus leading to disruption of nutrient acquisition by plants [10], [47]. We observed that litter accumulation was increased with the increased amount of N, and that species richness was negatively correlated with the litter accumulation. This result may be accounted for by that a deep litter layer would decrease light intensities at ground surface in the community, thereby suppressing seed germination, inhibiting seedling establishment and increasing the mortality of other small plants [48], [49]. This effect may finally result in the loss of species richness. We also found that soil moisture was increased with the increase in N addition rate, and that species richness was negatively correlated with soil moisture. Litter accumulation may improve soil moisture by retaining more water or reducing water loss [50]. In the same area, it has been reported that plant productivity is limited by water, therefore improvement of soil moisture would contribute to plant growth [33]. However, these positive effects cannot offset the negative effects caused by litter accumulation. As a consequence, long-term N addition would lead to the loss of species richness.

We found that species richness was negatively correlated with soil AP concentrations, although the AP concentration was not significantly affected by long-term N addition. Previous studies reported that P plays an important role in plant growth under N sufficient conditions. It has been shown that N addition at a low rate enhances C and P accumulation, thus improving P use efficiency and absorption efficiency, while a high N addition rate has no effect or even inhibits P accumulation and P use efficiency [51], [52]. Our results revealed that species richness was negatively correlated with concentration of soil inorganic N. An increase in inorganic N concentration imposes a positive effect on soil nutrients, resulting in an increase in plant productivity [53], [54], [55]. However, N addition increases the competition between community species [26], [56]. Huang et al. (2008) found that N-resorption efficiency (NRE) of S. krylovii is most sensitive to changes in soil N regime. This may explain its success over other species at a wide range of soil N availability. For example, height of S. krylovii was higher than that of A. frigida in the absence and presence of N addition. The stimulatory effect of N addition on S. krylovii height would reduce light and other resources available to other small plants. Finally, S. krylovii may be of more advantage to compete for resources than other species, thus leading to a decline in species richness. A similar result has been reported in the literature [26], [56].

Our results from the stepwise multiple linear regression analyses indicate that litter accumulation and soil acidification were the two primary factors for the loss of species richness in a typical temperate steppe after long-tem N addition (Fig. 3). Lamb (2008) confirmed that litter accumulation is the primary mechanism responsible for species richness in grassland by structural equation modeling. However, the modeling budget is different from the experimental results. Our findings in the present study provide some experimental evidence indicating that litter accumulation and soil acidification may underlie the loss of species richness by long-term N addition in grassland ecosystems.

Conclusion

Atmospheric N deposition is continually increased due to frequent anthropogenic activities, fuel combustion and usage of fertilizers. Therefore, the effects of N deposition on terrestrial ecosystems have attracted much more attention in recent years. In this study, we found that long-term N addition caused the changes in community structure in temperate steppe, Inner Mongolia, China, and that shrub A. frigida was largely replaced by the dominant graminoid, S. krylovii. Species richness was notably decreased with the increase in amount of N addition. We further showed that the loss of species richness after long-term N fertilization may be accounted for by litter accumulation and soil acidification.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Guangquan Wang and Yang Li for their help in field and laboratory work.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: WB LL. Performed the experiments: YF FX. Analyzed the data: YF FX WB. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: FX WB. Wrote the paper: WB WZ.

References

  1. 1. Vitousek PM, Howarth RW (1991) Nitrogen limitation on land and in the sea: how can it occur? Biogeochem 13: 87–115. doi: 10.1007/bf00002772
  2. 2. Frink CR, Waggoner PE, Ausubel JH (1999) Nitrogen fertilizer: retrospect and prospect. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 96: 1175–1180. doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.4.1175
  3. 3. Galloway JN, Townsend AR, Erisman JW, Bekunda M, Cai ZC, et al. (2008) Transformation of the nitrogen cycle: recent trends, questions, and potential solutions. Science 320: 889–892. doi: 10.1126/science.1136674
  4. 4. Galloway JN, Dentener FJ, Capone DG, Boyer EW, Howarth RW, et al. (2004) Nitrogen cycles: past, present, and future. Biogeochem 70: 153–226. doi: 10.1007/s10533-004-0370-0
  5. 5. Martinelli LA, Howarth RW, Cuevas E, Filoso S, Austin AT, et al. (2006) Sources of reactive nitrogen affecting ecosystems in Latin America and the Caribbean: current trends and future perspectives. Biogeochem 79: 3–24. doi: 10.1007/s10533-006-9000-3
  6. 6. Aerts R, Chapin FS (2000) The mineral nutrition of wild plants revisited: a reevaluation of processes and patterns. Adv Ecol Res 30: 167. doi: 10.1016/s0065-2504(08)60016-1
  7. 7. Gilliam FS (2006) Response of the herbaceous layer of forest ecosystems to excess nitrogen deposition. J Ecol 94: 1176–1191. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2745.2006.01155.x
  8. 8. Mack MC, Schuur EAG, Bret-Harte MS, Shaver GR, Chapin FS (2004) Ecosystem carbon storage in arctic tundra reduced by long-term nutrient fertilization. Nature 431: 440–443. doi: 10.1038/nature02887
  9. 9. Reay DS, Dentener F, Smith P, Grace J, Feely RA (2008) Global nitrogen deposition and carbon sinks. Nature Geosci 1: 430–437. doi: 10.1038/ngeo230
  10. 10. Bobbink R, Hornung M, Roelofs JGM (1998) The effects of air-borne nitrogen pollutants on species diversity in natural and semi-natural European vegetation. J Ecol 86: 717–738. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2745.1998.8650717.x
  11. 11. Sullivan PF, Sommerkorn M, Rueth HM, Nadelhoffer KJ, Shaver GR, et al. (2007) Climate and species affect fine root production with long-term fertilization in acidic tussock tundra near Toolik Lake, Alaska. Oecologia 153: 643–652. doi: 10.1007/s00442-007-0753-8
  12. 12. Huang JY, Zhu XG, Yuan ZY, Song SH, Li X, et al. (2008) Changes in nitrogen resorption traits of six temperate grassland species along a multi-level N addition gradient. Plant Soil 306: 149–158. doi: 10.1007/s11104-008-9565-9
  13. 13. Duprè C, Stevens CJ, Ranke T, Bleeker A, Peppler-lisbach C, et al. (2010) Changes in species richness and composition in European acidic grasslands over the past 70 years: the contribution of cumulative atmospheric nitrogen deposition. Global Change Biol 16: 344–357. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2009.01982.x
  14. 14. Tilman D (2000) Causes, consequences and ethics of biodiversity. Nature 405: 208–211. doi: 10.1038/35012217
  15. 15. Tilman D, Cassman KG, Matson PA, Naylor R, Polasky S (2002) Agricultural sustainability and intensive production practices. Nature 418: 671–677. doi: 10.1038/nature01014
  16. 16. Zavaleta ES, Shaw MR, Chiariello NR, Mooney HA, Field CB (2003) Additive effects of simulated climate changes, elevated CO2, and nitrogen deposition on grassland diversity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 100: 7650–7654. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0932734100
  17. 17. Stevens CJ, Dise NB, Mountford JO, Gowing DJ (2004) Impacts of nitrogen deposition on the species richness of grasslands. Science 303: 1876–1879. doi: 10.1126/science.1094678
  18. 18. Silvertown J, Poulton P, Johnson E, Edwards G, Heard M, et al. (2006) The park grass experiment 1856–2006: its contribution to ecology. J Ecol 94: 801–814. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2745.2006.01145.x
  19. 19. Harpole WS, Tilman D (2007) Grassland species loss resulting from reduced niche dimension. Nature 446: 791–793. doi: 10.1038/nature05684
  20. 20. Bai YF, Wu JG, Clark CM, Naeem S, Pan QM, et al. (2010) Tradeoffs and thresholds in the effects of nitrogen addition on biodiversity and ecosystem functioning: evidence from inner Mongolia Grasslands. Global Change Biol 16: 358–372. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2009.01950.x
  21. 21. Clark CM, Tilman D (2008) Loss of plant species after chronic low-level nitrogen deposition to prairie grasslands. Nature 451: 712–715. doi: 10.1038/nature06503
  22. 22. Reicnch PB (2009) Elevated CO2 reduced losses of plant diversity caused by nitrogen deposition. Science 326: 1399–1402. doi: 10.1126/science.1178820
  23. 23. Jones MLM, Ashenden TW (2000) Critical loads of nitrogen for acidic and calcareous grasslands in relation to management by grazing. Contract report for DETR.
  24. 24. Carroll JA, Caporn SJM, Johnson D, Morecroft MD, Lee JA (2003) The interactions between plant growth, vegetation structure and soil processes in semi-natural acidic and calcareous grasslands receiving long-term inputs of simulated pollutant nitrogen deposition. Environ Pollution 121: 363–376. doi: 10.1016/s0269-7491(02)00241-5
  25. 25. Emery NC, Ewanchuk PJ, Bertness MD (2001) Competition and salt-marsh plant zonation: Stress tolerators may be dominant competitors. Ecology 82: 2471–2485. doi: 10.2307/2679929
  26. 26. Suding KN, Collins SL, Gough L, Clark C, Cleland EE, et al. (2005) Functional- and abundance-based mechanisms explain diversity loss due to N fertilization. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102: 4387–4392. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0408648102
  27. 27. Vojtech E, Turnbull LA, Hector A (2007) Differences in light interception in Grass Monocultures predict short-term competitive outcomes under productive conditions. PLoS One 2: e499. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0000499
  28. 28. Hautier Y, Niklaus PA, Hetor A (2009) Competition for light causes plant biodiversity loss after eutrophication. Science 324: 636–638. doi: 10.1126/science.1169640
  29. 29. Maskell LC, Smart SM, Bullock JM, Thompson K, Stevens CJ (2010) Nitrogen deposition causes widespread loss of species richness in British habitats. Global Change Biol 16: 671–679. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2009.02022.x
  30. 30. Schulze ED (1989) Air pollution and forest decline in a spruce (Picea abies) forest. Science 244: 776–783. doi: 10.1126/science.244.4906.776
  31. 31. Lamb EG (2008) Direct and indirect control of grassland community structure by litter, resources, and biomass. Ecology 89: 216–225. doi: 10.1890/07-0393.1
  32. 32. Yang HJ, Wu MY, Liu WX, Zhang Z, Zhang NL, et al. (2011) Community structure and composition in response to climate change in a temperate steppe. Global Change Biol 17: 452–465. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2010.02253.x
  33. 33. Niu SL, Wu MY, Han Y, Xia JY, Li LH, et al. (2008) Water mediated responses of ecosystem carbon fluxes to climatic change in a temperate steppe. New Phytol 177: 209–219. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2007.02237.x
  34. 34. Mittelbach GG, Steiner CF, Scheiner SM, Gross KL, Reynolds HL, et al. (2001) What is the observed relationship between species richness and productivity? Ecology 82: 2381–2396. doi: 10.1890/0012-9658(2001)082[2381:witorb]2.0.co;2
  35. 35. Yang YS, He ZM, Zhou SQ, Yu XT (1998) A Study on the soil microbes and biochemistry of rhizospheric and total soil in natural forest and plantation of Castanopsis Kauakamii. Acta Ecol Sinica 18: 198–202.
  36. 36. He B, Qin WM, Liu YH, Liang J, Tan YH, et al. (2007) Changes of chemical properties and enzyme activities of rhizosphere soil under Acacia mangium plantation. J Northeast Forest University 35: 35–37.
  37. 37. Jackson ML (1979) Soil Chemical Analysis. Advanced course, 2nd edn. University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI.
  38. 38. Mulvaney RL (1996) Nitrogen: inorganic forms. In: Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 3. Chemical Methods (eds Sparks DL, Page AL, Helmke PA, et al.), 1123–1184. Soil Science Society of American and American Society of Agronomy, Madison, WI, USA.
  39. 39. Linkens GE, Driscoll CT, Buso DC (1996) Long-term effects of acid rain: response and recovery of a forest ecosystem. Science 272: 244–246. doi: 10.1126/science.272.5259.244
  40. 40. Perakis S, Maguire D, Bullen T, Cromack K, Waring R, et al. (2006) Coupled nitrogen and calcium cycles in forests of the Oregon Coast Range. Ecosystems 9: 63–74. doi: 10.1007/s10021-004-0039-5
  41. 41. Matson PA, McDowell WH, Townsend AR, Vitousek PM (1999) The globalization of N deposition: ecosystem consequences in tropical environments. Biogeochem 46: 67–83. doi: 10.1007/bf01007574
  42. 42. Magill AH, Aber JD, Currie WS, Nadelhoffer KJ, Martin ME, et al. (2004) Ecosystem response to15 years of chronic nitrogen additions at the Harvard Forest LTER, Massachusetts, USA. Forest Ecol Manag 196: 7–28. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2004.03.033
  43. 43. Bowman WD, Cleveland CC, Halada L´, Hreško J, Baron JS (2008) Negative impact of nitrogen deposition on soil buffering capacity. Nature Geosci 1: 767–770. doi: 10.1038/ngeo339
  44. 44. Khan MA, Ungar IA, Showalter AM (2000) The effect of salinity on the growth, water status, and ion content of a leaf succulent perennial halophyte, Suaeda fruticosa (L.) Forssk. J Arid Environ 45: 73–84. doi: 10.1006/jare.1999.0617
  45. 45. Tester M, Davenport R (2003) Na+ tolerance and Na+ transport in higher plants. Ann Bot 91: 503–527.
  46. 46. Zhang JL, Flowers TJ, Wang SM (2010) Mechanisms of sodium uptake by roots of higher plants. Plant and Soil 2010 326: 45–60. doi: 10.1007/s11104-009-0076-0
  47. 47. Lee KH, Jose S (2003) Soil respiration, fine root production, and microbial biomass in cottonwood and loblolly pine plantations along a nitrogen fertilization gradient. Forest Ecol Manag 185: 263–273. doi: 10.1016/s0378-1127(03)00164-6
  48. 48. Foster BL, Gross KL (1998) Species richness in a successional grassland: effects of nitrogen enrichment and plant litter. Ecology 79: 2593–2602. doi: 10.1890/0012-9658(1998)079[2593:sriasg]2.0.co;2
  49. 49. Berendse F (1999) Implications of increased litter production for plant biodiversity. Trends Ecol Evolution 14: 4–5. doi: 10.1016/s0169-5347(98)01451-7
  50. 50. Deutsch ES, Bork EW, Willms WD (2010) Soil moisture and plant growth responses to litter and defoliation impacts in Parkland grasslands. Agr Ecosystems Environ 135: 1–9. doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2009.08.002
  51. 51. Hyvönen R, Persson T, Andersson S, Olsson B, Ågren GI, et al. (2008) Impact of long-term nitrogen addition on carbon stocks in trees and soils in northern Europe. Biogeochem 89: 121–137. doi: 10.1007/s10533-007-9121-3
  52. 52. Wu FZ, Bao WK, Zhou ZQ, Wu N (2009) Carbon accumulation, nitrogen and phosphorus use efficiency of Sophora davidii seedlings in response to nitrogen supply and water stress. J Arid Environ 73: 1067–1073. doi: 10.1016/j.jaridenv.2009.06.007
  53. 53. Elser JJ, Bracken MES, Cleland EE, Gruner DS, Harpole WS, et al. (2007) Global analysis of nitrogen and phosphorus limitation of primary producers in freshwater, marine and terrestrial ecosystems. Ecol Lett 10: 1135–1142. doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2007.01113.x
  54. 54. LeBauer DS, Treseder KK (2008) Nitrogen limitation of net primary productivity in terrestrial ecosystems is globally distributed. Ecology 89: 371–379. doi: 10.1890/06-2057.1
  55. 55. Xia JY, Wan SQ (2008) Global response patterns of terrestrial plant species to nitrogen addition. New Phytol 179: 428–439. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2008.02488.x
  56. 56. Craine JM, Tilman D, Wedin D, Reich P, Tjoelker M, et al. (2002) Functional traits, productivity and effects on nitrogen cycling of 33 grassland species. Funct Ecol 16: 563–574. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2435.2002.00660.x