Advertisement
Research Article

Small Changes in pH Have Direct Effects on Marine Bacterial Community Composition: A Microcosm Approach

  • Evamaria Krause mail,

    evamaria.krause@awi.de

    Affiliation: Alfred Wegener Institute for Polar and Marine Research, Biologische Anstalt Helgoland, Helgoland, Germany

    X
  • Antje Wichels,

    Affiliation: Alfred Wegener Institute for Polar and Marine Research, Biologische Anstalt Helgoland, Helgoland, Germany

    X
  • Luis Giménez,

    Affiliation: School of Ocean Sciences, Bangor University, Menai Bridge, Wales, UK

    X
  • Mirko Lunau,

    Affiliation: Leibniz Institute for Baltic Sea Research, Rostock, Germany

    X
  • Markus B. Schilhabel,

    Affiliation: Institute of Clinical Molecular Biology, Christian-Albrechts-University Kiel, Kiel, Germany

    X
  • Gunnar Gerdts

    Affiliation: Alfred Wegener Institute for Polar and Marine Research, Biologische Anstalt Helgoland, Helgoland, Germany

    X
  • Published: October 11, 2012
  • DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0047035

Abstract

As the atmospheric CO2 concentration rises, more CO2 will dissolve in the oceans, leading to a reduction in pH. Effects of ocean acidification on bacterial communities have mainly been studied in biologically complex systems, in which indirect effects, mediated through food web interactions, come into play. These approaches come close to nature but suffer from low replication and neglect seasonality. To comprehensively investigate direct pH effects, we conducted highly-replicated laboratory acidification experiments with the natural bacterial community from Helgoland Roads (North Sea). Seasonal variability was accounted for by repeating the experiment four times (spring, summer, autumn, winter). Three dilution approaches were used to select for different ecological strategies, i.e. fast-growing or low-nutrient adapted bacteria. The pH levels investigated were in situ seawater pH (8.15–8.22), pH 7.82 and pH 7.67, representing the present-day situation and two acidification scenarios projected for the North Sea for the year 2100. In all seasons, both automated ribosomal intergenic spacer analysis and 16S ribosomal amplicon pyrosequencing revealed pH-dependent community shifts for two of the dilution approaches. Bacteria susceptible to changes in pH were different members of Gammaproteobacteria, Flavobacteriaceae, Rhodobacteraceae, Campylobacteraceae and further less abundant groups. Their specific response to reduced pH was often context-dependent. Bacterial abundance was not influenced by pH. Our findings suggest that already moderate changes in pH have the potential to cause compositional shifts, depending on the community assembly and environmental factors. By identifying pH-susceptible groups, this study provides insights for more directed, in-depth community analyses in large-scale and long-term experiments.

Introduction

Since the beginning of the industrial period, the oceans have taken up one-quarter to one-third of anthropogenic CO2 emissions [1], [2]. This has already led to a reduction in surface ocean pH of 0.1 units, which may reach up to 0.7 units assuming the depletion of all fossil fuel reserves during the next three centuries [3]. In contrast, pH has constantly remained above 8.1 for the last 23 million years [4]. By the year 2100, atmospheric pCO2 values of 700 or 1000 ppm may lower mean surface pH in the southern North Sea to 7.82 or 7.67, respectively [5].

The effects of the anticipated rapid reduction in pH on marine organisms, and their ability to adapt, will determine future marine biodiversity and ecosystem functions. Yet the impact of ocean acidification on different groups of marine organisms remains under debate [6], [7], especially regarding heterotrophic bacteria as important players in marine biogeochemical cycles. Joint et al. [8] recently argued that microbe-dependent processes will not substantially change in a more acidic ocean, as marine microbes already experience large regional, temporal and depth-dependent pH variability, and even greater pH ranges are observed in freshwater lakes. This view was challenged by a meta-analysis on microbe-related ocean acidification research, which identified nitrogen fixation, cyanobacterial photosynthesis and elemental ratios as affected by changes in seawater carbonate chemistry [9]. Concerning other microbial processes and especially heterotrophic bacteria however, results have often been inconsistent and Liu et al. [9] concluded that “more research is needed at multi-species and community scales”.

What we know about ocean acidification effects on bacterial communities predominantly stems from complex systems such as symbiotic microbial communities of corals or large-scale mesocosm experiments. At reduced pH, coral microbial communities were found to shift to bacteria associated with stressed or diseased hosts [10], [11], which could however not be confirmed at natural CO2 vent sites [12]. Furthermore, a decrease in the relative abundance of Alphaproteobacteria and an increase in the relative abundance of Flavobacteriales were observed in natural biofilms from the Great Barrier Reef [13].

Knowledge on the seawater bacterial community has remained scarce though. In mesocosm experiments, only minor indications of bacterial community shifts with pH were found [14], [15]. Notably, these findings relied on only one or two replicates per pCO2 treatment, which is a common problem in mesocosm studies. Although these experiments are biologically highly complex, involving indirect pH effects through food web interactions, they are usually carried out in low replication, due to logistical challenges and high costs. As a consequence, these experimental designs preclude a robust statistical interpretation. Furthermore, the natural variability of bacterial communities, which is characterized by seasonally recurring patterns [16][18], is not taken into account.

Therefore, a straightforward small-scale approach is needed to allow for high replication and the consideration of differently assembled communities. The problem of limited culturability of marine bacteria can be addressed by dilution experiments. A certain fraction of natural bacterioplankton is able to grow in particle-free, unenriched seawater [19], although the confinement to experimental containers causes shifts in community structure often described as the “bottle effect” [20]. To alleviate this bias and select for typical marine bacteria, the concept of dilution culture was developed [21]. Originally, this approach followed a dilution to near extinction strategy to isolate previously uncultured marine strains [22]. The idea was developed further to study diluted cultures of entire bacterioplankton assemblages, in which depending on the dilution strategy, different parts of the bacterial community are selected for [23], [24]. Dilution experiments were successful in e.g. identifying selective grazing mortality of bacterial groups [25].

Here we present a highly replicated, culture-dependent investigation of direct pH effects on bacterial communities from the North Sea. The sampling station Helgoland Roads is well suited for this approach, as seasonal and long-term microbiological data are available [26][29] and dilution or enrichment experiments have been carried out before [25], [30]. We used three dilution approaches to study different bacterial groups and repeated the experiment in different seasons. We show that small changes in pH have direct effects on bacterial community composition and identify Gammaproteobacteria, Flavobacteriaceae, Rhodobacteraceae and Campylobacteraceae as phylogenetic groups responding most notably to differences in pH.

Materials and Methods

Ethics statement

No specific permits were required for the sampling and activities performed in the study.

Experimental set-up and sampling

We conducted the experiment in spring, summer and autumn, 2010, and in winter 2011 (Table 1) with surface water sampled at 1 m depth at sampling station Helgoland Roads (54°11.3′N, 7°54.0′E), North Sea. Water samples were subjected to three different dilution protocols and three different pH levels (see sections below), yielding a total of nine different treatments. Each treatment was replicated five times in autoclaved one liter borosilicate glass bottles. Bottles were filled with 1100 ml to keep the headspace small (volume 50–60 ml) to prevent excessive CO2 exchange at the air-seawater interface observed in systems open to the atmosphere [31]. Bottles were incubated in the dark at approximately in situ temperature (Table 1) and were mixed daily by inversion. Samples were taken after four weeks of incubation.

thumbnail

Table 1. Sampling dates, initial seawater characteristics and incubation temperatures.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0047035.t001

We used the following three dilution protocols: ‘no dilution’, ‘serial dilution’ (diluted weekly 1:1000 starting after one week), and ‘initial dilution’ (initially diluted 1:1000). Larger organisms were removed by filtration through 10 µm Isopore™ Membrane Filters (TCTP-type, Millipore, Eschborn, Germany). For the dilutions, we used seawater collected on the respective initial sampling date, which had been repeatedly sterilized by filtration (0.2 µm Isopore™ Membrane Filters, GTTP-type, Millipore).

The pH levels were the current in situ seawater pH (8.15–8.26, Table 1), pH 7.82 and 7.67. We acidified the initial seawater samples (fraction <10 µm) and the sterile-filtered seawater used for the dilutions with 2 M HCl. To determine pH at the beginning and after the four weeks of incubation, we used a ProLab 3000 pH meter with an IoLine pH combination electrode with temperature sensor (type IL-pHT-A170MF-DIN-N), calibrated with standard buffer solutions (pH 4.01, 6.87, 9.18) (all materials: SI Analytics, Mainz, Germany). All pH measurements were carried out at the respective incubation temperature and are reported on the National Bureau of Standards (NBS) scale.

For cell counts, samples of 4 ml were fixed with formaldehyde (1% [w/v] final concentration) for 1 h at room temperature and were subsequently stored at −80°C until further analysis. Aliquots of 500 µl were stained for 10 min with 10 µl of a freshly prepared 400× SYBR Green (invitrogen™, Life Technologies, Paisley, UK) solution in sterile filtered dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO). Directly prior to staining the cells, we added 10 µl of a diluted solution of Fluoresbrite® Polychromatic Red Microspheres 1.0 µm (Polysciences Europe, Eppelheim, Germany) as an internal counting standard (final concentration of about 10% of the expected number of cells). We analysed samples with an Accuri C6 flow cytometer (BD Accuri Cytometers, Ann Arbor, MI, USA) with the fluidics setting “slow” for 1.5 min. To reduce noise, we set a threshold on FL1-H of 550 for winter and spring and of 600 for summer and autumn samples, respectively. The actual flow through was calibrated with BD Trucount™ Controls (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA, USA).

Biomass was collected on 0.2 µm Isopore™ Membrane Filters (GTTP-type, 47 mm diameter, Millipore) and DNA extraction was performed as previously described [29]. DNA concentration and purity were determined by photometry using an Infinite 200 PRO NanoQuant (Tecan, Männedorf, Switzerland).

ARISA

For ARISA fingerprints, we used forward primer L-D-Bact-132-a-A-18 (5′-CCGGGTTTCCCCATTCGG-3′) and reverse primer S-D-Bact-1522-b-S-20 (5′-TGCGGCTGGATCCCCTCCTT-3′) [32], the latter labeled with an infrared dye. PCR reactions were performed in volumes of 25 µl containing 10 ng template DNA, 2.5 µl Taq Buffer (10×), 5 µl TaqMaster PCR Enhancer (5×), 0.7 µl of each primer (20 µM), 0.75 µl dNTPs (2.5 mM each), and 1.4 U Taq DNA polymerase (5 Prime, Hamburg, Germany). Cycling conditions were: 95°C for 3 min, followed by 30 cycles of 95°C for 1 min, 50°C for 1 min and 68°C for 1 min, with a final step at 68°C for 5 min. Aliquots of PCR products were verified on agarose gels and depending on agarose gel band intensities, original or diluted PCR products were mixed with an equal volume of formamide containing stop mix. Samples were heated to 95°C for 2 min, subsequently kept on ice for 10 min, and 0.25 to 0.5 µl were separated in 5.5% polyacrilamide gels. Running conditions were 1500 V for 14 h on a LI-COR 4300 DNA Analyzer. A pre-run of 15 min at 45°C was carried out to precondition the gel and sequencer prior to loading the samples. As a size reference, we used a 50–1500 bp standard (all materials: LI-COR Biosciences, Lincoln, NE, USA).

ARISA gels were analyzed with the Bionumerics 5.10 software (Applied Maths, Sint-Martens-Latem, Belgium). Bands with intensities lower than 4% of the maximum value of the respective lane and bands smaller than 300 bp were neglected. Binning to band classes was performed according to Brown et al. [33]. Beta-diversity was calculated with the Jaccard coefficient.

16S ribosomal amplicon pyrosequencing

Based on ARISA results, samples were selected for pyrosequencing of the bacterial 16S rDNA (pH in situ and 7.67 of all ‘no dilution’ and ‘serial dilution’ treatments and of the ‘initial dilution’ in summer; additionally starting communities). Primers used to construct the amplicon library were of the structure 5′-[Roche's adaptor for long reads (Lib-L)] - [template-specific sequence]-3′. As template specific sequences we used forward primer GM3 (5′-AGAGTTTGATCMTGGC-3′) and reverse primer 907 (5′-CCGTCAATTCMTTTGAGTTT-3′) [34]. To pool all 93 samples in a single run, 93 different forward primers were constructed, each containing a different 10 bp long Multiplex Identifier (Roche) between the adaptor sequence and the template specific sequence. Amplifications were conducted in two duplicate reactions of 50 µl, each containing 20 ng of template DNA, 5 µl Taq Buffer (10×), 10 µl TaqMaster PCR Enhancer (5×), 1.25 µl of each primer (20 µM), 5 µl dNTPs (2.5 mM each), and 2.5 U of Taq DNA polymerase (5 Prime). Cycling conditions were: 94°C for 10 min, followed by 20 cycles of 94°C for 1 min, 44°C for 1.5 min and 68°C for 2 min, with a final step at 68°C for 15 min. The duplicate reactions were combined and purified with the QIAquick PCR purification kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA, USA). Amplicons were pooled equimolarly, including 2 µl of a negative control with a separate Multiplex Identifier to check for contaminations, and sequenced on 1/2 plate on a Roche 454 GS-FLX Titanium platform at the Institute of Clinical Molecular Biology (IKMB), University of Kiel, Germany. Sequence data were deposited in the NCBI Sequence Read Archive (accession number SRP014019).

Sequences were processed with the MOTHUR software (version 1.23.0, [35]). Flowgrams were trimmed to 360 to 800 flows and the shhh.flows command with standard settings was used to remove sequencing noise. After the removal of primer and barcode sequences, unique sequences were aligned to the SILVA reference database. After removing chimeras (chimera.uchime routine) and chloroplast sequences, 163,029 sequences remained (20,419 of them unique). Sequences started and ended at the same alignment position, 95% being of a length between 381 and 420 bp. A distance matrix was created and sequences were grouped into operational taxonomic units (OTUs) on a 97% level. The number of sequences in each sample was normalized by randomly selecting the number of sequences present in the smallest sample (n = 494). This resulted in a subset containing 2133 OTUs which we used for all further analyses. Sample coverage and richness (observed number of OTUs) were obtained as implemented in MOTHUR. OTU abundance data were square root transformed and beta-diversity was calculated with the Bray-Curtis coefficient.

Statistical analysis

The experiment was based on a crossed factorial design, consisting of the three factors ‘season’ (four levels, fixed), ‘dilution’ (three levels, fixed), and ‘pH’ (three levels, fixed). For pyrosequencing, the factors ‘dilution’ and ‘pH’ consisted of only two levels and the summer ‘initial dilution’ was analyzed separately. In case of a significant influence of ‘pH’ or of an interaction term involving ‘pH’, post-hoc comparisons for the factor ‘pH’ within the highest ranking interaction were performed.

Bacterial abundance and richness were analyzed through factorial ANOVAs [36] with Statistica 7.1 (StatSoft, Tulsa, OK, USA), using Tukey's HSD test for post-hoc comparisons. Beta-diversity was analyzed by permutational multivariate ANOVA (PERMANOVA, [37]) and similarity percentage analysis (SIMPER). SIMPER allowed us to calculate the total similarity within and dissimilarity between treatments, and to determine characteristic and discriminatory OTUs. To visualize patterns of the influence of ‘pH’ within ‘season’-‘dilution’ combinations, we performed principal co-ordinate analysis (PCO, [38]). For all multivariate analyses, we used Primer 6 with the add-on package PERMANOVA+ (PRIMER-E Ltd, Plymouth, UK).

Results

Environmental data, pH manipulations, initial community composition and bacterial abundance

In situ pH varied from 8.15 to 8.22 and seawater temperature from 3.2 to 15.8°C (Table 1). At the end of the experiment, the mean absolute deviations from the initial pH values were 0.10±0.06 (‘no dilution’, n = 60), 0.07±0.05 (‘serial dilution’, n = 59) and 0.62±0.28 (‘initial dilution’, n = 60) (see Table S1 for pH in all ‘season’-‘dilution’ combinations). Initial bacterial abundance ranged from 3.3×105 to 1.9×106 cells ml−1 (Table 1). The starting community was more diverse in autumn and winter (134 and 181 observed OTUs) compared to spring and summer (69 and 54 observed OTUs). Starting communities were dominated by sequences of Alphaproteobacteria (especially in summer), Flavobacteria (especially in spring) and Gammaproteobacteria. Additionally, up to 20% Bacteria that could not be assigned to classes (autumn and winter) and 10% Betaproteobacteria (winter) occurred (Figure 1).

thumbnail

Figure 1. Relative abundance of bacterial classes in the starting communities (seawater fraction <10 µm).

The chart was constructed based on the relative abundances of OTUs (16S ribosomal amplicon pyrosequencing) in the standardized subsample (n = 494 sequences). Classes represented by less than 2% of sequences are summarized under “others”.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0047035.g001

After the four weeks of incubation, bacterial abundance ranged between 1.1×105 and 6.1×106 cells ml−1 and was significantly influenced by ‘season’ (F3,143 = 21.451, p<0.001), ‘dilution’ (F2,143 = 111.279, p<0.001), and their interaction (F6,143 = 14.399, p<0.001), but not by ‘pH’ (F2,143 = 1.6163, p = 0.202) (Figure S1).

Bacterial community composition

Based on ARISA fingerprints, all three experimental factors and their interactions significantly influenced bacterial community structure (PERMANOVA, Table 2). The highest amount of variation was explained by ‘season’, ‘dilution’ and their interaction term (Sq. root, Table 2). Communities in both ‘no dilution’ and ‘serial dilution’ were significantly influenced by ‘pH’ in all seasons (Table 3), predominantly already at pH 7.82. Additionally, communities from both lowered pH treatments differed from each other, except in summer. ‘Initial dilution’-communities in contrast were influenced by ‘pH’ only in spring and summer.

thumbnail

Table 2. PERMANOVA main tests of bacterial community composition based on Jaccard dissimilarities of ARISA profiles.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0047035.t002
thumbnail

Table 3. PERMANOVA pair-wise comparisons of bacterial community composition based on Jaccard dissimilarities of ARISA profiles.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0047035.t003

For 16S ribosomal amplicon pyrosequencing, we selected all ‘season’-‘dilution’ combinations for which significant differences between communities at pH in situ and 7.67 had been observed (Table 3). Sequencing data confirmed that community structure in both ‘no dilution’ and ‘serial dilution’ was significantly influenced by all experimental factors and interactions (PERMANOVA, Table 4). In accordance with ARISA results, ‘season’, ‘dilution’ and their interaction term were the highest sources of variation (Sq. root, Table 4). Except for the ‘serial dilution’ in autumn, all ‘pH’-dependent differences were confirmed (Table 5 and Table 6). PCO plots of ‘season’-‘dilution’ combinations are shown in Figure S2 (based on ARISA) and Figure S3 (based on 16S ribosomal amplicon pyrosequencing).

thumbnail

Table 4. PERMANOVA main tests of bacterial community composition based on Bray-Curtis dissimilarities of OTUs (16S ribosomal amplicon pyrosequencing; ‘no dilution’ and ‘serial dilution’).

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0047035.t004
thumbnail

Table 5. PERMANOVA pair-wise comparisons of bacterial community composition based on Bray-Curtis dissimilarities of OTUs (16S ribosomal amplicon pyrosequencing; ‘no dilution’ and ‘serial dilution’).

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0047035.t005
thumbnail

Table 6. PERMANOVA main tests of bacterial community composition based on Bray-Curtis dissimilarities of OTUs (16S ribosomal amplicon pyrosequencing; ‘initial dilution’ summer).

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0047035.t006

Sample coverage obtained by pyrosequencing ranged from 72.1 to 99.8% (Table S2), yielding bacterial richness estimates of 8 to 218 OTUs per sample (Figure S4). In both ‘no dilution’ and ‘serial dilution’, richness was significantly influenced by ‘season’ (F3,63 = 122.201, p<0.0001), ‘dilution’ (F1,63 = 1901.215, p<0.0001) and ‘pH’ (F1,63 = 29.608, p<0.0001), and the interactions ‘season’x‘dilution’ (F3,63 = 138.125, p<0.0001), ‘season’x‘pH’ (F3,63 = 9.317, p<0.0001), ‘dilution’x‘pH’ (F1,63 = 28.395, p<0.0001), and ‘season’x‘dilution’x‘pH’ (F3,63 = 2.880, p<0.05). For the ‘serial dilution’, no ‘pH’-dependent differences were found, whereas for the ‘no dilution’, richness was significantly higher at pH 7.67 than at pH in situ in spring (p<0.001) and autumn (p<0.001, Tukey's HSD test, 63 d.f.). In the ‘initial dilution’ in summer, richness was not significantly influenced by ‘pH’ (F1,7 = 1.093, p = 0.331).

Bacterial groups in the ‘season’-‘dilution’ combinations

Considering only pH in situ treatments, i.e. disregarding pH effects, communities in different dilutions within a given season differed between 86 and 97% from each other. Classes predominantly discriminating between ‘no dilution’ and ‘serial dilution’ were Flavobacteria, Alphaproteobacteria and Gammaproteobacteria. (Figure 2; see Table S3 for similarity and Table S4 for dissimilarity analyses).

thumbnail

Figure 2. Bacterial groups in the ‘season’-‘dilution’ combinations, based on SIMPER analysis of pH in situ levels.

Displayed are phylogenetic groups jointly contributing to 90% of the total similarity within and dissimilarity between pH in situ levels of the different dilution treatments, separately for each season (no: ‘no dilution’, serial: ‘serial dilution’, initial: ‘initial dilution’). The heat map summarizes the contributions of single OTUs (16S ribosomal amplicon pyrosequencing) on the family level. Av.Si%: average percentage contribution of the i th species to the total similarity, Av.δi%: average percentage contribution of the i th species to the total dissimilarity. Bacterial families contributing less than 1% to both totals are summarized under “others”. The amount of contribution is indicated by the color of cells, darker colors represent higher contributions.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0047035.g002

‘No dilution’-communities were characterized mainly by Flavobacteria, Alphaproteobacteria and Gammaproteobacteria which could not be assigned to families. Flavobacteria were the most important group in spring and winter, while in summer, Alphaproteobacteria, especially of the SAR11-clade, dominated. In autumn, the community was more diverse. Less abundant groups characteristic for ‘no dilution’-communities included Planctomycetacia, Betaproteobacteria, and Bacteria that could not be assigned to classes.

In contrast, ‘serial dilution’-communities were dominated by known representatives of the Gammaproteobacteria. Important groups were Oceanospirillaceae (all seasons), unclassified Alteromonadales (summer, autumn, winter), Colwelliaceae (spring, winter) and Pseudoalteromonadaceae (spring). In certain ‘serial dilution’-communities, Flavobacteriaceae and Rhodobacteraceae additionally accounted for high contributions to total similarities. The ‘initial dilution’-community in summer was dominated by Gammaproteobacteria, Flavobacteriaceae and Rhodobacteraceae as well. Within the Gammaproteobacteria however, Alteromonadaceae dominated.

Bacterial groups responding differently to pH

In ‘season’-‘dilution’ combinations with significant ‘pH’ effects (Table 5 and Table 6), communities of the two pH treatments differed between 49 and 63% from each other. The most important discriminatory classes were Gammaproteobacteria, Flavobacteria, Alphaproteobacteria and Epsilonproteobacteria (Figure 3; see Table S3 for similarity and Table S5 for dissimilarity analyses).

thumbnail

Figure 3. Bacterial groups responding differently to pH, based on SIMPER analysis.

Displayed are phylogenetic groups jointly contributing to 90% of the total similarity within and dissimilarity between pH levels, separately for each ‘season’-‘dilution’ combination (no: ‘no dilution’, serial: ‘serial dilution’, initial: ‘initial dilution’). The heat map summarizes the contributions of single OTUs (16S ribosomal amplicon pyrosequencing) on the family level. Av.Si%: average percentage contribution of the i th species to the total similarity, Av.δi%: average percentage contribution of the i th species to the total dissimilarity. Bacterial families contributing less than 1% to both totals are summarized under “others”. The amount of contribution is indicated by the color of cells, darker colors represent higher contributions.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0047035.g003

Gammaproteobacterial families contributing to total dissimilarities were Oceanospirillaceae, Colwelliaceae, Alteromonadaceae, Pseudoalteromonadaceae, and to a lesser extend Idiomarinaceae, Shewanellaceae and Vibrionaceae. In spring and winter, Oceanospirillaceae were more characteristic for pH in situ, while in summer, they were more characteristic for pH 7.67. Colwelliaceae contributed more to total similarities at pH in situ in the ‘serial dilution’ in spring and winter and the ‘initial dilution’ in summer. In the ‘no dilution’ however, the opposite occurred. Alteromonadaceae dominated in the summer ‘initial dilution’, were they contributed more to total similarity at pH in situ. The same was found for the ‘no dilution’ in autumn, but in spring, they were more characteristic for pH 7.67. Pseudoalteromonadaceae contributed to total dissimilarity in spring and summer, and were always more characteristic for pH 7.67. Concerning Gammaproteobacterial families occurring in only one ‘season’-‘dilution’ combination, Idiomarinaceae contributed more to total similarity at pH in situ, while Shewanellaceae and Vibrionaceae contributed more to total similarity at pH 7.67.

The Flavobacterial family Flavobacteriaceae was the group with the overall highest contributions to total dissimilarities. In spring, Flavobacteriaceae were more characteristic for pH 7.67, but in autumn and winter, they were more characteristic for pH in situ. In summer, no consistent trend was found.

Within the Alphaproteobacteria, high contributions to total dissimilarity were attributed to Rhodobacteraceae, and to lesser extends to SAR11-clade, Rhodospirillaceae and Sphingomonadaceae. For Rhodobacteraceae, higher contributions to total similarity were generally observed at pH in situ. SAR11-clade contributed more to total similarity at pH in situ in spring, but no important differences were found in the other seasons. The other Alphaproteobacterial families did not show consistent trends.

Within the Epsilonproteobacteria, Campylobacteraceae, represented exclusively by the genus Arcobacter, contributed a third to total similarity at pH 7.67 in the ‘serial dilution’ in winter but were absent at pH in situ. Similar but less pronounced tendencies were found in spring and autumn.

Discriminatory groups that were less abundant or present only in one or few ‘season’-‘dilution’ combinations predominantly belonged to the classes Sphingobacteria, Planctomycetacia, Actinobacteria, Betaproteobacteria and Opitutae. Notably, also various groups that could not be assigned to families contributed to ‘pH’-dependent dissimilarities.

Discussion

The impact of ocean acidification on bacterial communities remains under debate as studies conducted so far are highly complex but lack sufficient replication. Here we present a thorough analysis of diversely assembled bacterial communities, shaped by the experimental factors season and dilution. Season takes into account phenology, i.e. climate-driven annually recurring patterns of pelagic bacterial community composition [16]. Dilution on the other hand acts as a selective factor for the two major general ecological strategies observed among bacterioplankton: Groups efficiently competing at ambient nutrient levels and groups efficiently exploiting environmental patchiness, i.e. nutrient availability [39]. The first group was selected for in the undiluted incubations while different members of the second type were selected for by the dilution strategies. Despite the differently assembled communities, we observed community shifts in the undiluted incubations and in one of the dilution strategies in all seasons. We identified bacterial groups susceptible to changes in pH, highlighting that their specific response is often context-dependent.

Considerations on perturbations of the carbonate system using HCl

We used HCl to adjust pH to values expected for the North Sea for the year 2100. Values remained relatively stable for ‘no dilution’ and ‘serial dilution’ treatments, but larger deviations were observed for the ‘initial dilution’. Interestingly, pH-dependent community shifts were least frequently found in initially diluted communities, probably at least partly due to these pH instabilities. Thus our 16S ribosomal amplicon pyrosequencing analyses and consequently our main findings and conclusions predominantly rely on ‘no dilution’ and ‘serial dilution’ treatments. Despite the relatively high pH deviations in ‘initial dilution’ treatments, we decided to report these results as well to present the complete experiment.

Although acidifying seawater with HCl has been extensively applied in ocean acidification studies [31], [40], it is not the most accurate approach in mimicking future changes in carbonate chemistry. In the course of ocean acidification, seawater CO2 uptake will cause a reduction in pH accompanied by an increase in dissolved inorganic carbon (DIC, composed of the species H2CO3, CO2(aq), HCO3 and CO32−) but no change in total alkalinity (TA). In contrast, additions of HCl lead to a decrease in pH at constant DIC and decreasing TA [40], [41]. Still both methods lead to similar results, i.e. a decrease in pH and [CO32−] and an increase in [CO2] and [HCO3] [40]. For pCO2 values not considerably exceeding 700 ppm, all carbonate system parameters change in similar magnitude with both perturbation methods [40]. Higher acid perturbations lead to larger differences however, e.g. acidification by HCl to a pH of 7.5 leads to [HCO3] values being about 22% lower compared to values reached by acidification to this pH by CO2 uptake [41]. Whether the small differences in carbonate system parameters between the two methods are problematic thus depends on whether the processes investigated are sensitive to small differences in [HCO3] [40].

Concerning bacterial communities, the ability of certain groups to compete at different pH levels may depend both on changes in pH per se and on processes involving HCO3 availability. Changes in pH are likely to have a physiological effect, as bacteria living in the alkaline marine milieu (with pH values generally above 8.0) have to invert energy into the homeostasis of their cytoplasmic pH (7.4–7.8) [42]. Consequently, if the difference between external and internal pH becomes smaller due to ocean acidification, bacteria may profit energetically, depending on their pH homoeostasis mechanisms [43]. In a study investigating two marine bacterial strains, a Cytophaga strain exhibited a decreased respiration rate and thus enhanced growth efficiency at higher pCO2, which was not found for a Roseobacter strain though [43]. In addition, both strains exhibited higher rates of heterotrophic CO2 fixation, subsequently released as DOM, at higher pCO2 levels [43], which demonstrates that [HCO3] plays an important role as well. With our perturbation approach using HCl, pH-dependent changes were likely to be detected, while the consequences of rising DIC availability may have been underestimated. Yet as all carbonate system species ([CO2], [HCO3], [CO32−], [H+]) will change in the same direction with both HCl and CO2 perturbations, biological responses are unlikely to differ substantially and results should be directly comparable [31], [40]. This has already been demonstrated for other organisms in ocean acidification studies systematically comparing both methods for pCO2 values of up to 1200 ppm, namely for corals [44] and calcifying algae [45].

Influence of pH on bacterial community structure and abundance

We combined ARISA and extensive 16S ribosomal amplicon pyrosequencing to permit a robust statistical analysis. The strategy of simultaneously pyrosequencing a large number of samples, accepting fewer sequences instead of deep sampling, was recently applied to analyze bacterioplankton communities [46] and was highly suitable for our study regarding the comparatively low bacterial diversity in laboratory incubations.

Not surprisingly, both methods revealed that the greatest influence on bacterial community composition could be attributed to season and dilution. Within the differently assembled communities, pH had a significant effect on all ‘no dilution’ and ‘serial dilution’ incubations (excluding pyrosequencing results for the ‘serial dilution’ in autumn). This indicates that even at moderate pH differences, community shifts can be observed. Furthermore, analysis of the complete data set by ARISA revealed that differences in community structure were predominantly observed already at pH 7.82, suggesting that a tipping point for bacterial community shifts may be reached even earlier. Communities from pH 7.82 and 7.67 also differed from each other (except in summer) indicating that slight differences in the degree of pH reduction are crucial. For ‘initial dilution’-communities however, we observed pH-dependent differences only in spring and summer. Possibly, in addition to the pH instabilities discussed above, the variability between replicates introduced by the 1000-fold dilution at the beginning masked pH effects in autumn and winter, where initial diversity was higher.

In agreement with community structure, richness was predominantly influenced by season and dilution. Differences between pH levels were only observed in ‘no dilution’-communities in spring and autumn, with higher richness at pH 7.67. Increased bacterial diversity at reduced pH has been reported for coastal microbial biofilms exposed to natural CO2 vents under low, but not under ambient light conditions [47] and for coral microbial communities [10], where it was assumed to be the outcome of a temporary disturbance of community equilibrium [48]. Although our results provide only minor evidence to support this hypothesis, a moderate reduction in pH seems at least not to reduce bacterial diversity, as observed for other environmental stressors such as chemical compounds [49]. Despite the good agreement concerning community structure, bacterial richness estimates were not consistent between 16S ribosomal amplicon pyrosequencing and ARISA (data not shown). Limitations of ARISA in estimating bacterial richness have previously been reported [50], [51], but similarly, pyrosequencing can lead to an overestimation of richness due to sequencing errors and the presence of chimeric sequences [52]. Using a subsample of equal number of sequences for all analyses however, we at least “standardized” these error sources [53] and therefore consider pyrosequencing richness estimates comparable between samples of our study.

Concerning bacterial abundance, a reduction in pH down to 7.67 did not have an effect, which is in agreement with previous findings from mesocosm studies [14], [15], [54]. In this context, possible pH effects on nutrient availability and utilization should be considered. It has been reported that with decreasing seawater pH, bioavailability of dissolved iron decreases [55]. Additionally, significant changes in phosphate, silicate and ammonia have been predicted for the seawater pH reductions expected due to ocean acidification [56], [57]. For hydrolysis reactions of dissolved organic matter such as organic acids, proteins and humic materials, a strong pH influence was predicted as well [58], but no detailed investigations exist. Furthermore, lower pH was shown to lead to an increased activity of total protease in mesocosms [54] and extracellular α- and β-glucosidase in laboratory experiments investigating direct pH effects [59]. In contrast, different responses of these enzymes were found after short-term incubation (3 h) at reduced pH [60]. In our experiment, the lack of pH-dependent differences in bacterial abundances suggests no change in overall nutrient availability or utilization at reduced pH.

Bacterial groups in the ‘season’-‘dilution’ combinations

The specific members of bacterial groups establishing in the dilutions differed with the initial seasonal starting communities, but the following general trends were observed: Both dilution strategies resulted in the selection of known representatives of culturable Gammaproteobacteria, which has previously been reported for initially diluted seawater incubations [23], [25]. Dilution and unavoidable disruption of some cells during filtration result in more nutrients per individual cell than in the original sample, which Gammaproteobacteria exploit most efficiently [20], [23], [26], [61]. Apparently, when an incubation is diluted only after one week (and then repeatedly), other groups of Gammaproteobacteria establish than in an initial dilution. The comparatively high diversity maintained in the undiluted treatment may in turn be explained by the lack of nutrient input, preventing the dominance of fast-growing bacteria. The aspect of grazing may also have played a role in structuring the communities, as neither prefiltration nor dilution can completely prevent the development of grazers [25]. Likewise, lysis of bacterial cells due to bacteriophages cannot be excluded. Whether viral pressure differed between the pH levels cannot be determined as direct pH effects on marine planktonic bacteriophages have not been investigated so far [62].

Bacterial groups responding differently to pH

Various bacterial groups contributed to pH-dependent dissimilarities, predominantly different members of Gammaproteobacteria, Flavobacteriaceae, Rhodobacteraceae and Campylobacteraceae. Further discriminatory groups included Sphingobacteria, SAR11-clade, Planctomycetacia, Betaproteobacteria, Actinobacteria, Opitutae and bacteria that could not be assigned to families. Responses of bacterial groups were generally context-dependent, i.e. different in particular season and growth condition combinations.

Concerning Gammaproteobacteria, mostly the Oceanospirillaceae and families of the order Alteromonadales (Colwelliaceae, Alteromonadaceae, Pseudoalteromonadaceae, Idiomarinaceae, Shewanellaceae and others) were affected by pH. Among these groups, Pseudoalteromonadaceae were consistently found more characteristic for pH 7.67. In contrast, the response of Oceanospirillaceae and Alteromonadaceae was dependent on season, as Oceanospirillaceae were more characteristic for pH in situ in spring and winter, but more characteristic for pH 7.67 in summer; the opposite occurred for Alteromonadaceae. Colwelliaceae were more dependent on dilution, being more characteristic for pH in situ in undiluted treatments and more characteristic for pH 7.67 in diluted treatments. The dependence of the pH-response of Gammaproteobacteria on different environmental factors is supported by contrasting results obtained for two coral species transferred to high CO2 vent sites [12]. Although they occurred only in one ‘season’-‘dilution’ combination and did not reach high abundances, it is interesting to note that Vibrionaceae were more characteristic for pH 7.67, as an increase in Vibrionaceae and other disease-associated bacteria at reduced pH has previously been reported in corals [10], [11]. It remains to be elucidated whether this is a general trend, as the family contains human and animal pathogens [63], and is of increasing importance in temperate waters due to climate change [64][67].

Flavobacteriaceae were the family with overall highest contributions to pH-dependent dissimilarities, but no season or dilution specific trends were found. The Alphaproteobacterial groups Rhodobacteraceae and SAR11-clade were generally more characteristic for pH in situ. A change in the relative abundances of Flavobacteriaceae and Rhodobacteraceae in response to pH has previously been reported in biofilms from the Great Barrier Reef [13], with Rhodobacteraceae decreasing and Flavobacteriaeae increasing with decreasing pH. In contrast, in a laboratory experiment with coral microbial communities, an increase of the relative abundance of Rhodobacteraceae at low pH was reported [10]. Thus within both of these complex groups, pH responses differ.

A striking growth of Campylobacteraceae was observed in the winter ‘serial dilution’ at pH 7.67, but not at pH in situ. Also in the other seasons, Campylobacteraceae were generally more characteristic for pH 7.67. This family was only represented by members of the genus Arcobacter, which has previously been reported at the study site [26]. Members of this genus are considered emerging human pathogens, often associated with fecal contamination of waters [68], [69]. Arcobacter have also been described in terrestrial and marine animals, with shellfish being a potential source of human infection [70]. It may seem surprising that this group was most important in the winter experiment, but in context of food preservation, Arcobacter have previously been reported to grow at refrigeration temperatures [70]. Regarding pH tolerance, Arcobacter spp. were reported to grow at pH 5.5 to 8.0 with a growth optimum at pH 6.0 to 7.5 [71]. Moreover, members of the Campylobacteraceae generally grow within broad pH ranges, and growth especially at low pH values was often reported regarding the survival in contaminated foods and the stomach transit [71], [72], [73].

Concerning the less abundant groups, Opitutae (Verrucomicrobia) are noteworthy as Verrucomicrobia have only recently been reported to be nearly ubiquitously distributed and are especially abundant in waters around Helgoland [74]. They were represented by the family Puniceicoccaceae and were more characteristic for pH 7.67 in spring and autumn. Similarly in corals, members of Verrucomicrobiae were only present at reduced pH [10].

In summary, no consistent trend throughout all ‘season’-‘dilution’ combinations was found for the majority of bacterial groups. Notable exceptions (neglecting groups that were only present in one ‘season’-‘dilution’ combination) were Pseudoalteromonadaceae and Opitutae, which were always more characteristic for pH 7.67, suggesting that they may profit from pH reductions. The same tendency was found for Arcobacter. In contrast, groups that were generally more characteristic for pH in situ were Rhodobacteraceae and SAR11-clade, hinting at difficulties of these groups to cope with reductions in pH.

Regarding the lack of additional trends, the following aspects have to be considered: First, bacterial families such as the Rhodobacteraceae are highly diverse and different members occur at certain time points, while being of very low importance in other seasons [27], [75]. Thus, supposing that different responses to pH occur at the genus, species, or even ecotype level, an analysis on the family level can only depict very rough patterns. Second, different environmental factors are likely to influence the response of bacterial groups to pH. In our experiment, a dependence on season could - besides the identity aspect mentioned above - hint at temperature effects, while a dependence on dilution could be associated with nutrient effects. Additionally, the co-occurring species must be taken into account. The high contribution to total similarity of Arcobacter at pH 7.67 in the winter ‘serial dilution’-community for instance, may in turn have influenced the comparatively lower contribution of Oceanospirillaceae at this pH and vice versa.

In conclusion already moderate changes in pH have the potential to cause shifts in bacterial communities, depending on the pool of bacterial groups constituting this community and on the prevailing environmental conditions. We identified members of the Gammaproteobacteria, Flavobacteriaceae, Rhodobacteraceae and Campylobacteraceae as susceptible to changes in pH and confirmed some results obtained in previous studies. To ultimately draw conclusions about functional implications, the question remains whether a change in species composition observed in in vitro incubations starting with an abrupt change in pH is extendable to natural bacterioplankton communities and how adaptation will affect long-term consequences. Therefore, to test whether the patterns observed also exist in more complex environments, we suggest that the groups identified in this study deserve special attention in future long-term and mesocosm experiments.

Supporting Information

Figure S1.

Bacterial abundance in the different treatments. No significant pH effect on bacterial abundance was found (ANOVA).

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0047035.s001

(TIF)

Figure S2.

Influence of the factor ‘pH’ on bacterial community composition (ARISA). Displayed are principal co-ordinate analysis plots (PCOs) for each ‘season’-‘dilution’ combination based on Jaccard dissimilarities of ARISA profiles. Symbol shape represents the pH level (circles: pH in situ, squares: pH 7.82, triangles: pH 7.67).

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0047035.s002

(TIF)

Figure S3.

Influence of the factor ‘pH’ on bacterial community composition (16S ribosomal amplicon pyrosequencing). Displayed are principal co-ordinate analysis plots (PCOs) for each ‘season’-‘dilution’ combination based on Bray-Curtis dissimilarities of OTUs (16S ribosomal amplicon pyrosequencing). Symbol shape represents the pH level (circles: pH in situ, triangles: pH 7.67).

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0047035.s003

(TIF)

Figure S4.

Bacterial richness in the different treatments. Richness was determined based on the number of OTUs (16S ribosomal amplicon pyrosequencing) in the standardized subsample (n = 494 sequences) and was compared by ANOVA, with Tukey's HSD test for post-hoc comparisons. Asterisks (*) represent significant differences (p<0.05) between pH levels within a ‘season’-‘dilution’ combination.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0047035.s004

(TIF)

Table S1.

pH after the four weeks of incubation.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0047035.s005

(PDF)

Table S2.

Sample coverage obtained by 16S ribosomal amplicon pyrosequencing, based on the standardized subsample (n = 494 sequences).

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0047035.s006

(PDF)

Table S3.

Results of the SIMPER analysis giving the similarities within ‘season’-‘dilution’-‘pH’ combinations. Displayed are the OTUs (16S ribosomal amplicon pyrosequencing) that predominantly contributed to 90% of to the total similarity. Av.Ai: average abundance of the i th species over all samples of the treatment, Av.Si: average contribution of the i th species to the total similarity, Av.Si/SD: the average value of the i th species as a typifying species, Av.Si%: average percentage contribution of the i th species to the total similarity, ∑Av.Si%: average cumulative contribution to the total similarity.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0047035.s007

(PDF)

Table S4.

Results of the SIMPER analysis giving the dissimilarities between pH in situ levels of the different dilution treatments, separately for each season. Displayed are the OTUs (16S ribosomal amplicon pyrosequencing) that predominantly contributed to 90% of to the total dissimilarity. Av.Ai: average abundance of the i th species over all samples of the treatment (no: ‘no dilution’, serial: ‘serial dilution’, initial: ‘initial dilution’), Av.δi: average contribution of the i th species to the total dissimilarity, Av.δi/SD: the average value of the i th species as a discriminating species, Av.δi%: average percentage contribution of the i th species to the total dissimilarity, ∑Av.δi%: average cumulative contribution to the total dissimilarity.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0047035.s008

(PDF)

Table S5.

Results of the SIMPER analysis giving the dissimilarities between the pH levels in situ and 7.67 of ‘season’-‘dilution’ combinations significantly influenced by ‘pH’ according to PERMANOVA. Displayed are the OTUs (16S ribosomal amplicon pyrosequencing) that predominantly contributed to 90% of to the total dissimilarity. Av.Ai: average abundance of the i th species over all samples of the treatment (no: ‘no dilution’, serial: ‘serial dilution’, initial: ‘initial dilution’), Av.δi: average contribution of the i th species to the total dissimilarity, Av.δi/SD: the average value of the i th species as a discriminating species, Av.δi%: average percentage contribution of the i th species to the total dissimilarity, ΣAv.δi%: average cumulative contribution to the total dissimilarity.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0047035.s009

(PDF)

Acknowledgments

We thank the crew of the RV Aade from the Alfred Wegener Institute of Polar and Marine Research Helgoland for the sampling support.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: EK AW GG. Performed the experiments: EK. Analyzed the data: EK AW LG ML MBS GG. Wrote the paper: EK AW LG ML GG.

References

  1. 1. Feely RA, Doney SC, Cooley SR (2009) Ocean acidification: Present conditions and future changes in a high-CO2 world. Oceanography 22: 36–47. doi: 10.5670/oceanog.2009.95
  2. 2. Sabine CL, Feely RA, Gruber N, Key RM, Lee K, et al. (2004) The oceanic sink for anthropogenic CO2. Science 305: 367–371. doi: 10.1126/science.1097403
  3. 3. Caldeira K, Wickett ME (2003) Anthropogenic carbon and ocean pH. Nature 425: 365–365. doi: 10.1038/425365a
  4. 4. Pearson PN, Palmer MR (2000) Atmospheric carbon dioxide concentrations over the past 60 million years. Nature 406: 695–699.
  5. 5. Blackford JC, Gilbert FJ (2007) pH variability and CO2 induced acidification in the North Sea. J Mar Syst 64: 229–241. doi: 10.1016/j.jmarsys.2006.03.016
  6. 6. Dupont S, Dorey N, Thorndyke M (2010) What meta-analysis can tell us about vulnerability of marine biodiversity to ocean acidification? Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 89: 182–185. doi: 10.1016/j.ecss.2010.06.013
  7. 7. Hendriks IE, Duarte CM, Álvarez M (2010) Vulnerability of marine biodiversity to ocean acidification: A meta-analysis. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 86: 157–164. doi: 10.1016/j.ecss.2009.11.022
  8. 8. Joint I, Doney SC, Karl DM (2011) Will ocean acidification affect marine microbes? ISME J 5: 1–7. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2010.79
  9. 9. Liu JW, Weinbauer MG, Maier C, Dai M, Gattuso JP (2010) Effect of ocean acidification on microbial diversity and on microbe-driven biogeochemistry and ecosystem functioning. Aquat Microb Ecol 61: 291–305. doi: 10.3354/ame01446
  10. 10. Meron D, Atias E, Kruh LI, Elifantz H, Minz D, et al. (2011) The impact of reduced pH on the microbial community of the coral Acropora eurystoma. ISME J 5: 51–60. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2010.102
  11. 11. Vega Thurber R, Willner-Hall D, Rodriguez-Mueller B, Desnues C, Edwards RA, et al. (2009) Metagenomic analysis of stressed coral holobionts. Environ Microbiol 11: 2148–2163. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2009.01935.x
  12. 12. Meron D, Rodolfo-Metalpa R, Cunning R, Baker AC, Fine M, et al. (2012) Changes in coral microbial communities in response to a natural pH gradient. ISME J 6: 1775–1785. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2012.19
  13. 13. Witt V, Wild C, Anthony KRN, Diaz-Pulido G, Uthicke S (2011) Effects of ocean acidification on microbial community composition of, and oxygen fluxes through, biofilms from the Great Barrier Reef. Environ Microbiol 13: 2976–2989. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2011.02571.x
  14. 14. Allgaier M, Riebesell U, Vogt M, Thyrhaug R, Grossart HP (2008) Coupling of heterotrophic bacteria to phytoplankton bloom development at different pCO2 levels: A mesocosm study. Biogeosciences 5: 1007–1022. doi: 10.5194/bg-5-1007-2008
  15. 15. Newbold LK, Oliver AE, Booth T, Tiwari B, Desantis T, et al. (2012) The response of marine picoplankton to ocean acidification. Environ Microbiol 14: 2293–2307. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2012.02762.x
  16. 16. Andersson AF, Riemann L, Bertilsson S (2010) Pyrosequencing reveals contrasting seasonal dynamics of taxa within Baltic Sea bacterioplankton communities. ISME J 4: 171–181. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2009.108
  17. 17. Fuhrman JA, Hewson I, Schwalbach MS, Steele JA, Brown MV, et al. (2006) Annually reoccurring bacterial communities are predictable from ocean conditions. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 103: 13104–13109. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0602399103
  18. 18. Gilbert JA, Steele JA, Caporaso JG, Steinbrueck L, Reeder J, et al. (2012) Defining seasonal marine microbial community dynamics. ISME J 6: 298–308. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2011.107
  19. 19. Ammerman JW, Fuhrman JA, Hagstrom A, Azam F (1984) Bacterioplankton growth in seawater: I. Growth kinetics and cellular characteristics in seawater cultures. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 18: 31–39. doi: 10.3354/meps018031
  20. 20. Ferguson RL, Buckley EN, Palumbo AV (1984) Response of marine bacterioplankton to differential filtration and confinement. Appl Environ Microbiol 47: 49–55.
  21. 21. Button DK, Schut F, Quang P, Martin R, Robertson BR (1993) Viability and isolation of marine bacteria by dilution culture: Theory, procedures, and inital results. Appl Environ Microbiol 59: 881–891.
  22. 22. Schut F, Devries EJ, Gottschal JC, Robertson BR, Harder W, et al. (1993) Isolation of typical marine bacteria by dilution culture: Growth, maintenance, and characteristics of isolates under laboratory conditions. Appl Environ Microbiol 59: 2150–2160.
  23. 23. Fuchs BM, Zubkov MV, Sahm K, Burkill PH, Amann R (2000) Changes in community composition during dilution cultures of marine bacterioplankton as assessed by flow cytometric and molecular biological techniques. Environ Microbiol 2: 191–201. doi: 10.1046/j.1462-2920.2000.00092.x
  24. 24. Pinhassi J, Berman T (2003) Differential growth response of colony-forming α- and γ-proteobacteria in dilution culture and nutrient addition experiments from Lake Kinneret (Israel), the eastern Mediterranean Sea, and the Gulf of Eilat. Appl Environ Microbiol 69: 199–211. doi: 10.1128/aem.69.1.199-211.2003
  25. 25. Beardsley C, Pernthaler J, Wosniok W, Amann R (2003) Are readily culturable bacteria in coastal North Sea waters suppressed by selective grazing mortality? Appl Environ Microbiol 69: 2624–2630. doi: 10.1128/aem.69.5.2624-2630.2003
  26. 26. Eilers H, Pernthaler J, Glöckner FO, Amann R (2000) Culturability and in situ abundance of pelagic bacteria from the North Sea. Appl Environ Microbiol 66: 3044–3051. doi: 10.1128/aem.66.7.3044-3051.2000
  27. 27. Eilers H, Pernthaler J, Peplies J, Glöckner FO, Gerdts G, et al. (2001) Isolation of novel pelagic bacteria from the German Bight and their seasonal contributions to surface picoplankton. Appl Environ Microbiol 67: 5134–5142. doi: 10.1128/aem.67.11.5134-5142.2001
  28. 28. Gerdts G, Wichels A, Döpke H, Klings KW, Gunkel W, et al. (2004) 40-year long-term study of microbial parameters near Helgoland (German Bight, North Sea): Historical view and future perspectives. Helgol Mar Res 58: 230–242. doi: 10.1007/s10152-004-0189-z
  29. 29. Sapp M, Wichels A, Wiltshire KH, Gerdts G (2007) Bacterial community dynamics during the winter-spring transition in the North Sea. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 59: 622–637. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6941.2006.00238.x
  30. 30. Eilers H, Pernthaler J, Amann R (2000) Succession of pelagic marine bacteria during enrichment: A close look at cultivation-induced shifts. Appl Environ Microbiol 66: 4634–4640. doi: 10.1128/aem.66.11.4634-4640.2000
  31. 31. Gattuso JP, Lavigne H (2009) Technical note: Approaches and software tools to investigate the impact of ocean acidification. Biogeosciences 6: 2121–2133. doi: 10.5194/bg-6-2121-2009
  32. 32. Ranjard L, Brothier E, Nazaret S (2000) Sequencing bands of ribosomal intergenic spacer analysis fingerprints for characterization and microscale distribution of soil bacterium populations responding to mercury spiking. Appl Environ Microbiol 66: 5334–5339. doi: 10.1128/aem.66.12.5334-5339.2000
  33. 33. Brown MV, Schwalbach MS, Hewson I, Fuhrman JA (2005) Coupling 16S-ITS rDNA clone libraries and automated ribosomal intergenic spacer analysis to show marine microbial diversity: Development and application to a time series. Environ Microbiol 7: 1466–1479. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2005.00835.x
  34. 34. Teeling H, Fuchs BM, Becher D, Klockow C, Gardebrecht A, et al. (2012) Substrate-controlled succession of marine bacterioplankton populations induced by a phytoplankton bloom. Science 336: 608–611. doi: 10.1126/science.1218344
  35. 35. Schloss PD, Westcott SL, Ryabin T, Hall JR, Hartmann M, et al. (2009) Introducing mothur: Open-source, platform-independent, community-supported software for describing and comparing microbial communities. Appl Environ Microbiol 75: 7537–7541. doi: 10.1128/aem.01541-09
  36. 36. Underwood AJ (1996) Experiments in ecology - Their logical design and interpretation using analysis of variance. Camebridge: Camebridge University Press. 524 p.
  37. 37. Anderson MJ (2001) A new method for non-parametric multivariate analysis of variance. Austral Ecol 26: 32–46. doi: 10.1046/j.1442-9993.2001.01070.x
  38. 38. Legendre P, Legendre L (1998) Numerical ecology. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science B.V. 853 p.
  39. 39. Giovannoni SJ, Stingl U (2005) Molecular diversity and ecology of microbial plankton. Nature 437: 343–348. doi: 10.1038/nature04158
  40. 40. Schulz KG, Barcelos e Ramos JBE, Zeebe RE, Riebesell U (2009) CO2 perturbation experiments: Similarities and differences between dissolved inorganic carbon and total alkalinity manipulations. Biogeosciences 6: 2145–2153. doi: 10.5194/bg-6-2145-2009
  41. 41. Hurd CL, Hepburn CD, Currie KI, Raven JA, Hunter KA (2009) Testing the effects of ocean acidification on algal metabolism: Considerations for experimental designs. J Phycol 45: 1236–1251. doi: 10.1111/j.1529-8817.2009.00768.x
  42. 42. Padan E, Bibi E, Ito M, Krulwich TA (2005) Alkaline pH homeostasis in bacteria: New insights. Biochim Biophys Acta 1717: 67–88. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamem.2005.09.010
  43. 43. Teira E, Fernández A, Álvarez-Salgado XA, García-Martín EE, Serret P, et al. (2012) Response of two marine bacterial isolates to high CO2 concentration. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 453: 27–36. doi: 10.3354/meps09644
  44. 44. Schneider K, Erez J (2006) The effect of carbonate chemistry on calcification and photosynthesis in the hermatypic coral Acropora eurystoma. Limnol Oceanogr 51: 1284–1293. doi: 10.4319/lo.2006.51.3.1284
  45. 45. Hoppe CJM, Langer G, Rost B (2011) Emiliania huxleyi shows identical responses to elevated pCO2 in TA and DIC manipulations. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 406: 54–62. doi: 10.1016/j.jembe.2011.06.008
  46. 46. Fortunato CS, Herfort L, Zuber P, Baptista AM, Crump BC (2012) Spatial variability overwhelms seasonal patterns in bacterioplankton communities across a river to ocean gradient. ISME J 6: 554–563. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2011.135
  47. 47. Lidbury I, Johnson V, Hall-Spencer JM, Munn CB, Cunliffe M (2012) Community-level response of coastal microbial biofilms to ocean acidification in a natural carbon dioxide vent ecosystem. Mar Pollut Bull 64: 1063–1066. doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2012.02.011
  48. 48. Connell JH (1978) Diversity in tropical rain forests and coral reefs. Science 199: 1302–1310. doi: 10.1126/science.199.4335.1302
  49. 49. Atlas RM, Horowitz A, Krichevsky M, Bej AK (1991) Response of microbial populations to environmental disturbance. Microb Ecol 22: 249–256. doi: 10.1007/bf02540227
  50. 50. Crosby LD, Criddle CS (2003) Understanding bias in microbial community analysis techniques due to rrn operon copy number heterogeneity. Biotechniques 34: 790–802.
  51. 51. Kovacs A, Yacoby K, Gophna U (2010) A systematic assessment of automated ribosomal intergenic spacer analysis (ARISA) as a tool for estimating bacterial richness. Res Microbiol 161: 192–197. doi: 10.1016/j.resmic.2010.01.006
  52. 52. Kunin V, Engelbrektson A, Ochman H, Hugenholtz P (2010) Wrinkles in the rare biosphere: Pyrosequencing errors can lead to artificial inflation of diversity estimates. Environ Microbiol 12: 118–123. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2009.02051.x
  53. 53. Schloss PD, Gevers D, Westcott SL (2011) Reducing the effects of PCR amplification and sequencing artifacts on 16S rRNA-based studies. PloS One 6: e27310. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0027310
  54. 54. Grossart HP, Allgaier M, Passow U, Riebesell U (2006) Testing the effect of CO2 concentration on the dynamics of marine heterotrophic bacterioplankton. Limnol Oceanogr 51: 1–11. doi: 10.4319/lo.2006.51.1.0001
  55. 55. Shi D, Xu Y, Hopkinson BM, Morel FMM (2010) Effect of ocean acidification on iron availability to marine phytoplankton. Science 327: 676–679. doi: 10.1126/science.1183517
  56. 56. Raven J, Caldeira K, Elderfield H, Hoegh-Guldberg O, Liss P, et al. (2005) Ocean acidification due to increasing atmospheric carbon dioxide. Policy Document 12/05 Roy Soc Rep 12.
  57. 57. Zeebe RE, Wolf-Gladrow D (2001) CO2 in seawater: Equilibrium, kinetics, isotopes. Amsterdam: Elsevier. 346 p.
  58. 58. Doney SC, Fabry VJ, Feely RA, Kleypas JA (2009) Ocean acidification: The other CO2 problem. Ann Rev Mar Sci 1: 169–192. doi: 10.1146/annurev.marine.010908.163834
  59. 59. Piontek J, Lunau M, Händel N, Borchard C, Wurst M, et al. (2010) Acidification increases microbial polysaccharide degradation in the ocean. Biogeosciences 7: 1615–1624. doi: 10.5194/bg-7-1615-2010
  60. 60. Yamada N, Suzumura M (2010) Effects of seawater acidification on hydrolytic enzyme activities. J Oceanogr 66: 233–241. doi: 10.1007/s10872-010-0021-0
  61. 61. Goldman JC, Dennett MR (1985) Susceptibility of some marine-phytoplankton species to cell breakage during filtration and post-filtration rinsing. J Exp Mar Bio Ecol 86: 47–58. doi: 10.1016/0022-0981(85)90041-3
  62. 62. Danovaro R, Corinaldesi C, Dell'Anno A, Fuhrman JA, Middelburg JJ, et al. (2011) Marine viruses and global climate change. FEMS Microbiol Rev 35: 993–1034. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6976.2010.00258.x
  63. 63. Thompson FL, Iida T, Jean Swings J (2004) Biodiversity of Vibrios. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 68: 403–431. doi: 10.1128/mmbr.68.3.403-431.2004
  64. 64. Baker-Austin C, Stockley L, Rangdale R, Martinez-Urtaza J (2010) Environmental occurrence and clinical impact of Vibrio vulnificus and Vibrio parahaemolyticus: A European perspective. Environ Microbiol Rep 2: 7–18. doi: 10.1111/j.1758-2229.2009.00096.x
  65. 65. Colwell R (1996) Global climate and infectious disease: The cholera paradigm. Science 274: 2025–2031. doi: 10.1126/science.274.5295.2025
  66. 66. Oberbeckmann S, Wichels A, Wiltshire KH, Gerdts G (2011) Occurrence of Vibrio parahaemolyticus and Vibrio alginolyticus in the German Bight over a seasonal cycle. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 100: 291–307. doi: 10.1007/s10482-011-9586-x
  67. 67. Paz S, Bisharat N, Paz E, Kidar O, Cohen D (2007) Climate change and the emergence of Vibrio vulnificus disease in Israel. Environ Res 103: 390–396. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2006.07.002
  68. 68. Collado L, Inza I, Guarro J, Figueras MJ (2008) Presence of Arcobacter spp. in environmental waters correlates with high levels of fecal pollution. Environ Microbiol 10: 1635–1640. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2007.01555.x
  69. 69. Snelling WJ, Matsuda M, Moore JE, Dooley JSG (2006) Under the microscope: Arcobacter. Lett Appl Microbiol 42: 7–14. doi: 10.1111/j.1472-765x.2005.01841.x
  70. 70. Collado L, Figueras MJ (2011) Taxonomy, epidemiology, and clinical relevance of the genus Arcobacter. Clin Microbiol Rev 24: 174–192. doi: 10.1128/cmr.00034-10
  71. 71. D'Sa EM, Harrison MA (2005) Effect of pH, NaCl content, and temperature on growth and survival of Arcobacter spp. J Food Protect 68: 18–25.
  72. 72. Reid AN, Pandey R, Palyada K, Naikare H, Stintzi A (2008) Identification of Campylobacter jejuni genes involved in the response to acidic pH and stomach transit. Appl Environ Microbiol 74: 1583–1597. doi: 10.1128/aem.01507-07
  73. 73. Murphy C, Carroll C, Jordan KN (2006) Environmental survival mechanisms of the foodborne pathogen Campylobacter jejuni. J Appl Microbiol 100: 623–632. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2006.02903.x
  74. 74. Freitas S, Hatosy S, Fuhrman JA, Huse SM, Mark Welch DB, et al. (2012) Global distribution and diversity of marine Verrucomicrobia. ISME J 6: 1499–1505. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2012.3
  75. 75. Pernthaler J, Amann R (2005) Fate of heterotrophic microbes in pelagic habitats: Focus on populations. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 69: 440–461. doi: 10.1128/mmbr.69.3.440-461.2005
  76. 76. Wiltshire KH, Malzahn AM, Wirtz K, Greve W, Janisch S, et al. (2008) Resilience of North Sea phytoplankton spring bloom dynamics: An analysis of long-term data at Helgoland Roads. Limnol Oceanogr 53: 1294–1302. doi: 10.4319/lo.2008.53.4.1294