Advertisement
Research Article

The Role of Late-Acting Self-Incompatibility and Early-Acting Inbreeding Depression in Governing Female Fertility in Monkshood, Aconitum kusnezoffii

  • Yi-Qi Hao,

    Affiliation: State Key Laboratory of Earth Surface Processes and Resource Ecology and MOE Key Laboratory for Biodiversity Science and Ecological Engineering, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China

    X
  • Xin-Feng Zhao,

    Affiliation: State Key Laboratory of Earth Surface Processes and Resource Ecology and MOE Key Laboratory for Biodiversity Science and Ecological Engineering, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China

    X
  • Deng-Ying She,

    Affiliation: State Key Laboratory of Earth Surface Processes and Resource Ecology and MOE Key Laboratory for Biodiversity Science and Ecological Engineering, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China

    X
  • Bing Xu,

    Affiliation: State Key Laboratory of Earth Surface Processes and Resource Ecology and MOE Key Laboratory for Biodiversity Science and Ecological Engineering, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China

    X
  • Da-Yong Zhang,

    Affiliation: State Key Laboratory of Earth Surface Processes and Resource Ecology and MOE Key Laboratory for Biodiversity Science and Ecological Engineering, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China

    X
  • Wan-Jin Liao mail

    liaowj@bnu.edu.cn

    Affiliation: State Key Laboratory of Earth Surface Processes and Resource Ecology and MOE Key Laboratory for Biodiversity Science and Ecological Engineering, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China

    X
  • Published: October 09, 2012
  • DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0047034

Abstract

Reduced seed yields following self-pollination have repeatedly been observed, but the underlying mechanisms remain elusive when self-pollen tubes can readily grow into ovaries, because pre-, post-zygotic late-acting self-incompatibility (LSI), or early-acting inbreeding depression (ID) can induce self-sterility. The main objective of this study was to differentiate these processes in Aconitum kusnezoffii, a plant lacking stigmatic or stylar inhibition of self-pollination. We performed a hand-pollination experiment in a natural population of A. kusnezoffii, compared seed set among five pollination treatments, and evaluated the distribution of seed size and seed set. Embryonic development suggested fertilization following self-pollination. A partial pre-zygotic LSI was suggested to account for the reduced seed set by two lines of evidence. The seed set of chase-pollination treatment significantly exceeded that of self-pollination treatment, and the proportion of unfertilized ovules was the highest following self-pollination. Meanwhile, early-acting ID, rather than post-zygotic LSI, was suggested by the findings that the size of aborted selfed seeds varied continuously and widely; and the selfed seed set both exhibited a continuous distribution and positively correlated with the crossed seed set. These results indicated that the embryos were aborted at different stages due to the expression of many deleterious alleles throughout the genome during seed maturation. No signature of post-zygotic LSI was found. Both partial pre-zygotic LSI and early-acting ID contribute to the reduction in selfed seed set in A. kusnezoffii, with pre-zygotic LSI rejecting part of the self-pollen and early-acting ID aborting part of the self-fertilized seeds.

Introduction

Reduced female fertility following self-pollination is generally attributed to either self-incompatibility or early-acting inbreeding depression (ID). Most self-incompatibility systems primarily function in a pre-zygotic manner via the failure of self-pollen to germinate and grow in the stigma or style [1], [2], [3]. However, for many plant species self-pollen tubes grow successfully in the styles and extend to the ovaries, thus implicating late-acting self-incompatibility (LSI) [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10]. In such cases, the inhibition of self-pollen tubes could occur either pre-zygotically or post-zygotically, which is commonly thought to be controlled by a single locus [5], [9], [10], [11], [12]. In post-zygotic LSI, the rejection occurs shortly after double fertilization, with little development of the embryos and/or embryo sacs [9], [13], [14]. Early-acting ID acts post-zygotically and leads to the abortion of developing embryos that are homozygous for many deleterious recessive alleles throughout the genome [15], [16], [17].

Inbreeding depression is thought to be one of the important selective forces that govern the evolution of plant reproductive strategies [15], [18], [19], [20], [21], and self-incompatibility can evolve in response to cumulative inbreeding depression [15]. Pre- and/or post-zygotic LSI and early-acting ID may interact and have complex consequences, and play a key role in determining the evolution of plant mating systems [22], [23]. In a study of Dipterocarpus tempehes, all the three processes are present and make contributions to outcrossing (Kenta et al., 2002). Despite the great importance, pre- vs. post-zygotic LSI and LSI vs. early-acting ID, have not been well distinguished to date. Indeed, it has been difficult to differentiate pre- and post-zygotic LSI because the data on pollen tube growth and differences in seed set between self- and cross-pollinations could not indicate the presence of double fertilization. Consequently, some studies did not take post-zygotic LSI into account and used the term ‘ovarian self-incompatibility’ to describe the situation in which self- pollen tubes grow into ovaries but result in low seed set [24], [25]. When double fertilization does occur following self-pollination, it remains difficult to distinguish post-zygotic LSI from early-acting ID, because there are many difficulties in scoring embryo development and identifying the mechanisms for reduced self-fertility. So far, only a few studies provided concrete evidence for the occurrence of late-acting self-incompatibility [8], [9], [11], [12], [26] or early-acting ID [24], [27], [28] or both [14].

Based on the timing of self-pollen rejection, at least two strategies have been proposed to differentiate pre-zygotic LSI from post-zygotic LSI and early-acting ID. Sectioning methods characterize the histological aspects of ovule-seed development following self- and cross-pollination [9], [13], [14]. Difference in the proportion of unfertilized ovules and seed set among various pollen chase experiments [24], [27] could provide evidence for the presence or absence of self fertilization.

The differentiation between early-acting ID and LSI is mainly based on the number of loci involved. A continuous distribution with large variation of aborted seed size and seed set after self-pollination would be interpreted as early-acting ID since the abortion of selfed embryos was due to many deleterious recessive alleles expressed at different developmental stages. To the contrary, a clumped distribution with little variation would be interpreted as LSI [5], [12], [27], [29], [30]. Besides, the positive correlation between selfed and crossed seed sets also supports the presence of early-acting ID [24]. According to the inbreeding depression model, an individual with more loci containing deleterious alleles will reduce both selfed and crossed seed sets [24], and hence such positive correlations between selfed and crossed seed sets may suggest that the maternal deleterious alleles are being expressed in both the selfed and crossed progeny [17], [27].

Other criteria include the response of embryos to rescue in tissue culture [5], [9], [31], induced mutations [5], [32], and segregation within families for self-incompatibility alleles [5], [9], [12]. However, the above-mentioned five approaches are the most amenable to empirical testing in the field through hand-pollination experiments.

In a previous study of Aconitum kusnezoffii Reichb. (Ranunculaceae), we found that self-pollination produced fewer seeds, even though self-pollen tubes entered ovaries at a similar growth rate as cross-pollen tubes [33]. We tentatively concluded that early-acting ID, rather than LSI, most likely reduces female function within large clones, but lacked concrete evidence for fertilization and ID during seed maturation [33].

In this study, we aimed to ascertain whether pre- or post-zygotic LSI and/or early-acting ID reduce female reproductive success after self-pollination in A. kusnezoffii. We focused on two major questions: (1) does self-pollination lead to self-fertilization; and (2) is embryo abortion following self-pollination attributable to early-acting inbreeding depression or post-zygotic self-incompatibility? We performed self-, cross-, chase-, and mixed-pollinations in a single A. kusnezoffii population and used the five methods described above to distinguish between LSI and ID.

Materials and Methods

Ethics Statement

No specific permits were required for the described field studies, and the field studies did not involve endangered or protected species.

Study Species and Sites

Aconitum kusnezoffii is a bumblebee-pollinated and predominantly outcrossing herb [33]. It grows clonally via tubers and thus has a clumped architecture. The flower is perfect, having 3–5 separated carpels. It flowers in August, with four to five days of pollen exposure, then about two days of stigma receptivity. The field work was conducted in a natural population of Xiaolongmen National Forest Park (39°57′32.1″N, 115°27′03.8″E, 1034 m elevation), West Beijing, China.

Hand-pollination

To account for fine-scale environmental variation, we used a randomized block design, combining different pollination treatments in the same terminal inflorescence. We randomly selected 41 clones and a total of 107 terminal inflorescences. For each inflorescence, five hermaphroditic flowers were randomly assigned to one of the following five pollination treatments: (1) self-pollination, with pollen from other open flowers of the same clone; (2) cross-pollination, with pollen from other clones; (3) chase-pollination, with flowers being self-pollinated first and then cross-pollinated after 24 h; (4) mixed-pollination, with pollen from pollen grain mixtures of two anthers (one from the same clone and the other from other clones) and applied simultaneously; and (5) open-pollinated, with flowers left unmanipulated and open to natural pollination.

We emasculated and bagged all sampled flowers, except those exposed to open pollination. Once the stigmas of the four bagged flowers became receptive, the flowers were marked and hand-pollinated with the appropriate pollen. We removed the bags 3 days after hand-pollination and collected all ripe fruits 4 weeks later. Because of herbivore damage, we obtained only 76 inflorescences from the 32 clones at harvest.

We counted the mature seeds, aborted seeds and unfertilized ovules for each fruit from all of the five pollination treatments. Mature seeds were relatively large, plump, fresh, and green, whereas aborted seeds were shrunken, light-colored, and flat. Unfertilized ovules were extremely small and round, but still visible. We estimated seed set as the ratio of mature seeds to the sum of mature seeds, aborted seeds, and unfertilized ovules, i.e. the total number of available ovules within a fruit. We also measured the lengths of all aborted and mature seeds from 13 self-pollinated fruits and 13 cross-pollinated fruits on the same ramets to the nearest 0.01 mm; unfertilized ovules were too small to measure.

Fertilization Following Self- and Cross-pollination

To compare the embryological development of the selfed seeds with crossed seeds, we emasculated and bagged another four flowers from two ramets, self-pollination performed on one ramet and cross-pollination performed on the other. One and three days following self- or cross-pollination, we collected one selfed and one crossed ovary, which were fixed in formalin-acetic acid-ethanol (FAA), and later washed and dehydrated by increasing gradients of alcohol. The ovaries were then infiltrated in dimethylbenzene, embedded in paraffin at a melting point of 60°C, sectioned and stained with eosin Y and fast green. The serial sections were scored using a light microscope for the occurrence of fertilization.

Data Analysis

The seed sets following the five pollination treatments were analyzed with a linear mixed model in R statistical package [34]. The seed set were arcsin transformed to meet the assumptions of normality and homogeneity of variance. Pollination treatment was considered as the fixed factor, and clone and ramet were considered as random factors, with ramet nested within clone. The variance in the seed set following self- and cross-pollination among all 76 ramets was also estimated. The data of proportion of unfertilized ovules was not normally distributed, so the data was analyzed using paired Wilcoxon’s test in R [34]. Lastly, we estimated the linear correlation between self- and cross-seed sets at both the ramet and clone levels.

Results and Discussion

Pre- and/or Post-zygotic Process

Serial sections of ovaries showed that zygotes have formed and begun to divide within 1 day after both self- and cross-pollination (Fig. 1). Suspensor and proembryo cells could be seen clearly, and there was no significant difference in the histological aspects of ovule-seed development following self- and cross-pollination. This provided direct evidence for the occurrence of fertilization following self- and cross-pollination.

thumbnail

Figure 1. Light micrographs of serial sections of fertilized Aconitum kusnezoffii ovaries.

(a ). ovary harvested one day after self-pollination. (b ). ovary harvested one day after cross-pollination. (c ). ovary harvested three days after self-pollination. (d ). ovary harvested three days after self-pollination. Abbreviations: s, suspensor; e, proembryo cell. Bar = 50 µm.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0047034.g001

The proportion of unfertilized ovules (Fig. 2) and seed set (Fig. 3) differed among pollination treatments. The unfertilized ovules following self-pollination only accounted for 0.033±0.011 (mean ± SE) of the total ovules, but it was significantly higher than the other four pollination treatments (P<0.05, Fig 2). The seed set after self-pollination was 0.402±0.031and significantly lower than after cross-pollination (0.587±0.026: t = 5.78, df = 300, P<0.01, Fig. 3), which suggested a significant reduction in female reproductive success after self-pollination.

thumbnail

Figure 2. The mean (± SE ) proportion of unfertilized ovules in Aconitum kusnezoffii following five pollination treatments.

Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences (P<0.05) in the proportion of unfertilized ovules.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0047034.g002

If a post-zygotic mechanism was wholly responsible for the reduction in female fitness with no associated pre-zygotic LSI, all of the ovules in the chase-pollination treatments would be fertilized by the first-arriving self-pollen grains, hence the seed set would be similar to that after self-pollination [24], [28]. However, in our study, the seed set from chase-pollination (0.505±0.030) was higher than from self-pollination when cross-pollen was applied one day after self-pollen (t = 3.15, df = 300, P<0.01, Fig. 3). These results support the hypothesis that pre-zygotic LSI occurs in A. kusnezoffii. However, if the pre-zygotic LSI prevented all of the self-pollen from fertilizing ovules, the first-arriving self-pollen grains would not be able to fertilize any ovules in the chase-pollination treatment, and the ovules would then be available to the ensuing cross-pollen grains, leading to a seed set similar to that of the cross-pollination treatment. We found that the seed set of the chase-pollination treatment was lower than that of the cross-pollination treatment (t = 2.63, df = 300, P<0.01, Fig. 3), indicating that the first-arriving self-pollen grains did fertilize some but not all of the ovules. Therefore, A kusnezoffii presents a partial pre-zygotic LSI, with a rejection of part of the self-pollen in the ovary. Besides, self pollen can disable ovules through affecting the development of the embryo sac rather than fertilizing the ovules [7], [9]. Taking such mechanisms into account, the chase experiment may underestimate the importance of pre-zygotic LSI.

thumbnail

Figure 3. Mean (± SE) seed sets in Aconitum kusnezoffii following five pollination treatments.

Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences (P<0.05) in the seed sets.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0047034.g003

The unfertilized ovules following self-pollination was only accounted for 0.033 of the total ovules (Fig. 2). Therefore, the pre-zygotic self-pollen rejection make a minimal contribution to the reduced seed set after self-pollination (0.402±0.031, a 32% reduction compared to cross-pollination), and the post-zygotic processes have a relatively large influence. However, in the chase-pollination the late-arriving cross-pollen significantly increased the seed set (0.505±0.030), thus it seems much more than 3.3% of the ovules were available for fertilization by cross-pollen in the chase-pollinated fruits. One possible explanation is that although self-pollen tube can grow into ovaries in 12 hours after hand-pollination [33], not all of the pollen tubes immediately released sperms and garnered the ovules; as a consequence, a higher-than-expected proportion of the ovules were still available when the cross-pollen tubes arrived one day later. Apparently further work is needed to confirm this conjecture.

Early-acting ID and/or LSI

Variation in seed size and selfed seed set is usually regarded as an important factor that discriminates between early-acting ID and post-zygotic LSI. We found that following self-pollination, aborted seeds varied widely and continuously in length (Fig. 4a). The coefficient of variation (CV) of the length of aborted selfed seeds (CV = 0.241) was larger than that of mature selfed seeds (CV = 0.095, t = −9.62, df = 12, P<0.01). Although the proportion of aborted seeds following cross-pollination (28%) was smaller than self-pollination (46%), the seed-size distribution of aborted and mature seeds was rather similar in both cases (Fig. 4b). Selfed seed set as estimated by measuring the one selfed fruit from each of 76 sampled ramets varied extensively and continuously, from 0–93% at the ramet-level (Fig. 5a) and from 0–82% at the clone-level (Fig. 5b).

thumbnail

Figure 4. Seed length distribution of mature and aborted seeds after self-pollination in Aconitum kusnezoffii.

Thirteen selfed fruits (a) and crossed fruits (b) were chosen randomly, and all of their aborted and mature seeds were measured.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0047034.g004
thumbnail

Figure 5. Variation in seed set (one selfed fruit for each of 76 ramets) following self-pollination in Aconitum kusnezoffii shows a continuous, widespread distribution.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0047034.g005

Early-acting ID generally involves the expression of recessive deleterious genes at multiple loci and hence often leads to a wide range of aborted seed sizes [5], [12], [27], [28] and/or a wide range of selfed seed sets [12], [17], [27]. While LSI is usually thought to be controlled by a few genes, so the distribution of aborted seed sizes and seed set after self-pollination should follow a clumped pattern. Therefore, the above results imply that abortion occurred at different stages during seed development, rather than at a uniform stage, which supported the idea that early-acting ID was operating in A. kusnezoffii and excluded the possibility of a complete post-zygotic LSI. In Vaccinium corymbosum, Krebs & Hancock (1991) found that the selfed seed set exhibited a great deal of variation, which was thought to be consistent with the expectations of the early-acting ID hypothesis [17].

Furthermore, selfed and crossed seed sets correlated positively at both the ramet- (correlation coefficient = 0.41, t = 3.91, df = 74, P<0.01, Fig. 6a) and clone-level (correlation coefficient = 0.45, t = 2.73, df = 30, P<0.05, Fig. 6b). These results were also consistent with the early-acting ID hypothesis but not with self-incompatibility, because with early-acting ID, the genotype with many deleterious alleles will experience poor seed set following both self- and cross-fertilization [24], so that self- and cross-pollination of pairs of flowers on individual plants should generate a significant positive correlation in seed sets among plants [17], [27]. In contrast, with LSI, the reduction in the selfed seed set can be attributed to the paternal parent carrying the same S alleles as the maternal parent [1], [12], [35], hence a correlation between selfed and crossed seed sets is not expected [24]. The positive correlations between self- and cross-fertility were also shown in several Vaccinium species, supporting early-acting ID hypothesis [17], [27]. However, environmental heterogeneity among the 76 ramets cannot be ruled out in present study as a confounding factor causing a spurious positive correlation between the selfed and crossed seed sets.

thumbnail

Figure 6. Correlation between the selfed and crossed seed sets in Aconitum kusnezoffii at the ramet level (a) and clone level (b).

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0047034.g006

Summary

We observed reduction of seed set following self-pollination in A. kusnezoffii, and differentiated the processes leading to such reduction. The results excluded the possibility of post-zygotic LSI. A partial pre-zygotic LSI was supported by the chase-experiment; and the early-acting ID was supported by the continuous distribution of the size of aborted selfed seed and selfed seed set, and the correlation between selfed and crossed seed sets. In summary, both partial pre-zygotic LSI and early-acting ID were suggested to contribute to the reduction in selfed seed set in A. kusnezoffii, with pre-zygotic LSI rejecting part of the self-pollen and early-acting ID aborting part of the self-fertilized seeds, whereas no signature of post-zygotic LSI was found.

Acknowledgments

We thank Professor Spencer Barrett, Lawrence Harder, and anonymous reviewers for providing helpful comments on the manuscript, and Dr. Ning Liu for assistance with the sectioning.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: WJL DYZ YQH. Performed the experiments: YQH XFZ DYS BX WJL. Analyzed the data: WJL DYZ YQH. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: WJL YQH. Wrote the paper: WJL DYZ YQH.

References

  1. 1. De Nettancourt D (1997) Incompatibility in angiosperms. Sexual Plant Reproduction 10: 185–199. doi: 10.1007/s004970050087
  2. 2. Franklin FHC, Lawrence MJ, Franklin-Tong VE (1995) Cell and molecular biology of self-incompatibility in flowering plants. In: Jeon KW, Jarvik J, editors. International Review of Cytology: A Survey of Cell Biology. San Diego: Academic Press. 1–64.
  3. 3. Matton DP, Nass N, Clarke AE, Newbigin E (1994) Self-incompatibility: how plants avoid illegitimate offspring. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 91: 1992–1997. doi: 10.1073/pnas.91.6.1992
  4. 4. Sears ER (1937) Cytological phenomena connected with self-sterility in the flowering plants. Genetics 22: 130–181.
  5. 5. Seavey SR, Bawa KS (1986) Late-acting self-incompatibility in angiosperms. The Botanical Review 52: 195–219. doi: 10.1007/bf02861001
  6. 6. Williams EG, Kaul V, Rouse JL, Palser BF (1986) Overgrowth of pollen tubes in embryo sacs of Rhododendron following interspecific pollinations. Australian Journal of Botany 34: 413–423. doi: 10.1071/bt9860413
  7. 7. Sage TL, Bertin RI, Williams EG (1994) Ovarian and other late-acting self-incompatibility systems. In: Williams AEC, Knox RB, editors. Genetic Control of Self-incompatibility and Reproductive Development in Flowering Plants. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers. 116–140.
  8. 8. Gibbs PE, Oliveira PE, Bianchi MB (1999) Postzygotic control of selfing in Hymenaea stigonocarpa (Leguminosae-Caesalpinioideae), a bat-pollinated tree of the Brazilian cerrados. International Journal of Plant Sciences 160: 72–78. doi: 10.1086/314108
  9. 9. Sage TL, Sampson FB (2003) Evidence for ovarian self-incompatibility as a cause of self-sterility in the relictual woody angiosperm, Pseudowintera axillaris (Winteraceae). Annals of Botany 91: 807–816.
  10. 10. Allen AM, Hiscock SJ (2008) Evolution and phylogeny of self-incompatibility systems in angiosperms. In: Franklin-Tong VE, editor. Self-incompatibility in flowering plants: evolution, diversity, and mechanisms. Berlin: Springer-Verlag. 73–101.
  11. 11. Gibbs PE, Bianchi MB (1999) Does late-acting self-incompatibility (LSI) show family clustering? Two more species of Bignoniaceae with LSI: Dolichandra cynanchoides and Tabebuia nodosa. Annals of Botany 84: 449–457.
  12. 12. Lipow SR, Wyatt R (2000) Single gene control of postzygotic self-incompatibility in poke milkweed, Asclepias exaltata L. Genetics. 154: 893–907.
  13. 13. Sage TL, Strumas F, Cole WW, Barrett SCH (1999) self- and cross-pollination: the basis of self-sterility in Narcissus triandrus (Amaryllidaceae). American Journal of Botany 86: 855–870. doi: 10.2307/2656706
  14. 14. Valtuena FJ, Rodriguez-Riano T, Espinosa F, Ortega-Olivencia A (2010) Self-sterility in two Cytisus species (Leguminosae, Papilionoideae) due to early-acting inbreeding depression. American Journal of Botany 97: 123–135. doi: 10.3732/ajb.0800332
  15. 15. Charlesworth D, Charlesworth B (1987) Inbreeding depression and its evolutionary consequences. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 18: 237–268. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.18.1.237
  16. 16. Husband BC, Schemske DW (1996) Evolution of the magnitude and timing of inbreeding depression in plants. Evolution 50: 54–70. doi: 10.2307/2410780
  17. 17. Krebs SL, Hancock JF (1991) Embryonic genetic load in the highbush blueberry, Vaccinium corymbosum (Ericaceae). American Journal of Botany 78: 1427–1437. doi: 10.2307/2445281
  18. 18. Darwin CR (1876) The effects of cross and self-fertilization in the vegetable kingdom. London: John Murray.
  19. 19. Lloyd DG (1979) Some reproductive factors affecting the selection of self-fertilization in plants. American Naturalist 113: 67–79. doi: 10.1086/283365
  20. 20. Barrett SCH (2002) The evolution of plant sexual diversity. Nature Reviews Genetics 3: 274–284. doi: 10.1038/nrg776
  21. 21. Lande R, Schemske DW (1985) The evolution of self-fertilization and inbreeding depression in plants. I. Genetic models. Evolution 39: 24–40. doi: 10.2307/2408514
  22. 22. Goodwillie C, Kalisz S, Eckert CG (2005) The evolutionary enigma of mixed mating systems in plants: Occurrence, theoretical explanations, and empirical evidence. Annual Review of Ecology Evolution and Systematics 36: 47–79. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.36.091704.175539
  23. 23. Porcher E, Kelly JK, Cheptou PO, Eckert CG, Johnston MO, et al. (2009) The genetic consequences of fluctuating inbreeding depression and the evolution of plant selfing rates. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 22: 708–717. doi: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2009.01705.x
  24. 24. Krebs SL, Hancock JF (1990) Early-acting inbreeding depression and reproductive success in the highbush blueberry, Vaccinium corymbosum L. Theoretical and Applied Genetics. 79: 825–832. doi: 10.1007/bf00224252
  25. 25. Mahy G, Jacquemart AL (1999) Early inbreeding depression and pollen competition in Calluna vulgaris (L.) Hull. Annals of Botany 83: 697–704.
  26. 26. Kenrick J, Kaul V, Williams EG (1986) Self-incompatibility in Acacia retinodes: site of pollen-tube arrest is the nucellus. Planta 169: 245–250. doi: 10.1007/bf00392321
  27. 27. Hokanson K, Hancock J (2000) Early-acting inbreeding depression in three species of Vaccinium (Ericaceae). Sexual Plant Reproduction 13: 145–150. doi: 10.1007/s004970000046
  28. 28. Nuortila C, Tuomi J, Aspi J, Laine K (2006) Early-acting inbreeding depression in a clonal dwarf shrub, Vaccinium myrtillus, in a northern boreal forest. Annales Botanici Fennici 43: 36–48.
  29. 29. Lipow SR, Broyles SB, Wyatt R (1999) Population differences in self-fertility in the “self-incompatible” milkweed Asclepias exaltata (Asclepiadaceae). American Journal of Botany 99: 1114–1120. doi: 10.2307/2656974
  30. 30. Wiens D, Calvin CL, Wilson CA, Davern CI, Frank D, et al. (1987) Reproductive success, spontaneous embryo abortion, and genetic load in flowering plants. Oecologia 71: 501–509. doi: 10.1007/bf00379288
  31. 31. Meinke DW, Sussex IM (1979) Embryo-lethal mutants of Arabidopsis thaliana: A model system for genetic analysis of plant embryo development. Developmental Biology 72: 50–61. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(79)90097-6
  32. 32. Meinke DW (1982) Embryo-lethal mutants of Arabidopsis thaliana: evidence for gametophytic expression of the mutant genes. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 63: 381–386. doi: 10.1007/bf00303912
  33. 33. Liao WJ, Hu Y, Zhu BR, Zhao XQ, Zeng YF, et al. (2009) Female reproductive success decreases with display size in monkshood, Aconitum kusnezoffii (Ranunculaceae). Annals of Botany 104: 1405–1412.
  34. 34. R Development Core Team (2011) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. 2.14.1 ed. Vienna,Austria.
  35. 35. Glover BJ (2007) Understanding Flowers and Flowering. New York: Oxford University Press