Advertisement
Research Article

miR-205 Expression Promotes Cell Proliferation and Migration of Human Cervical Cancer Cells

  • Hong Xie mail,

    hong.xie@ki.se (HX); weng-onn.lui@ki.se (WL)

    Affiliation: Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Cancer Center Karolinska, Stockholm, Sweden

    X
  • Yungang Zhao,

    Affiliations: Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Cancer Center Karolinska, Stockholm, Sweden, Tianjin Key Laboratory of Exercise Physiology and Sports Medicine, Tianjin Sport University, Tianjin, China

    X
  • Stefano Caramuta,

    Affiliation: Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Cancer Center Karolinska, Stockholm, Sweden

    X
  • Catharina Larsson,

    Affiliation: Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Cancer Center Karolinska, Stockholm, Sweden

    X
  • Weng-Onn Lui mail

    hong.xie@ki.se (HX); weng-onn.lui@ki.se (WL)

    Affiliation: Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Cancer Center Karolinska, Stockholm, Sweden

    X
  • Published: October 03, 2012
  • DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0046990

Abstract

MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are short non-coding RNA regulators that control gene expression mainly through post-transcriptional silencing. We previously identified miR-205 in a signature for human cervical cancer using a deep sequencing approach. In this study, we confirmed that miR-205 expression was frequently higher in human cervical cancer than their matched normal tissue samples. Functionally, we demonstrate that miR-205 promotes cell proliferation and migration in human cervical cancer cells. To further understand the biological roles of miR-205, we performed in vivo crosslinking and Argonaute 2 immunoprecipitation of miRNA ribonucleoprotein complexes followed by microarray analysis (CLIP-Chip) to identify its potential mRNA targets. Applying CLIP-Chip on gain- and loss-of-function experiments, we identified a set of transcripts as potential targets of miR-205. Several targets are functionally involved in cellular proliferation and migration. Two of them, CYR61 and CTGF, were further validated by Western blot analysis and quantification of mRNA enrichment in the Ago2 immunoprecipitates using qRT-PCR. Furthermore, both CYR61 and CTGF were downregulated in cervical cancer tissues. In summary, our findings reveal novel functional roles and targets of miR-205 in human cervical cancer, which may provide new insights about its role in cervical carcinogenesis and its potential value for clinical diagnosis.

Introduction

Cervical cancer, the third most common cancer among women worldwide [1], is strongly associated with infection and subsequent transformation of cervical cells by specific human papillomavirus (HPV) subtypes [2]. The fact that cervical cancer develops from well-recognized pre-malignant forms, offers an important opportunity for early diagnosis and prevention. Today such primary screening includes cytological analyses and HPV identification. However, these examinations cannot reliably distinguish the lesions with invasive potential from the lesions that will spontaneously regress. Therefore, development of more robust markers for disease progression would be valuable supplements to the current screening methods.

MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are short non-coding RNAs (~22-nucleotides) that generally control gene expression at the post-transcriptional level through mRNA degradation and/or translational repression [3]. These tiny molecules have been demonstrated to play important roles in a broad range of physiological and pathological processes, including cancer development and progression. We, and others, have previously identified altered miRNA expression signatures in human cervical cancer [4][10]. Several of these miRNAs have consistently been reported as dysregulated in cervical cancer (e.g. miR-143, miR-145, miR-21 and miR-205). A few have also been functionally characterized in human cervical cancer cells. Among them, miR-143, miR-145 and miR-34a have been shown to inhibit cell proliferation, and miR-146a and miR-21 to increase cell growth [8], [10], [11]. miR-23b was recently found to repress the expression of urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA) and induce cell migration in human cervical cancer cells [12]. Taken together, these observations suggest that dysregulated miRNAs have a functional role in cervical cancer development and may become applied as diagnostic tools.

In this study, we examined the functional role of miR-205 in human cervical cancer. This miRNA was one of the most significant miRNAs used for cervical cancer class prediction and was significantly overexpressed in cervical cancer samples compared to matched normal counterparts [9]. Increased expression of miR-205 has also been observed in endometrial adenocarcinoma [13], head and neck squamous cell carcinoma cell lines [14], squamous cell lung carcinoma [15] and ovarian cancer [16]. By contrast, reduced expression of miR-205 has been reported in melanoma [17] and cancers of the esophagus [18], kidney [19], bladder [20], [21], breast [22], and prostate [23].

Based on the above studies, miR-205 may function as an oncogene or tumor suppressor gene depending on the cellular contexts. Consistent with its dual role, several studies have demonstrated its tumor promoting and suppressive roles in different cancer cell lines. For examples, miR-205 has been shown to suppress cell migration/invasion through epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition in both human prostate and breast cancer cells [23], [24], as well as to target HER3 tyrosine kinase receptor in breast cancer cells [22]. In support of an oncogenic function, miR-205 was found to target SHIP2 for Akt survival signaling in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma cells [14]. Given the complexity of its functionality, it would be of interest to investigate the functional roles of miR-205 in cervical cancer development.

Here we describe the functional consequences of miR-205 regulation in human cervical cancer cells. In gain- and loss-of-function experiments, we demonstrate that miR-205 regulates cell proliferation and migration in human cervical cancer cells. We further identified a set of putative miR-205 targets using a biochemical approach. Several of these candidate targets are functionally associated with cell proliferation and migration. Two of the potential miR-205 mRNA targets were further validated in cell culture experiments. Our findings provide an important lead for further insights into the functional role of miR-205 in human cervical cancer development.

Results

miR-205 Expression in Human Cervical Cancer Samples

We previously identified a set of miRNAs that could distinguish cervical cancer samples from their normal counterparts using a sequencing-based miRNA profiling approach [9]. In that classifier, miR-205 had the highest score, suggesting an important function in cervical cancer development. To confirm the altered expression level of miR-205 in cervical cancer, we measured miR-205 expression by real-time quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (qRT-PCR) in 27 matched pairs of cervical cancer and normal tissue. In agreement with the sequencing-based results, miR-205 was found significantly overexpressed in human cervical cancer as compared with their normal counterparts P<0.001; Figure 1A). In 19 cases (~70%) the expression of miR-205 was strongly increased in the tumor samples as compared to their normal counterparts; while in the remaining 8 cases, the cancer and normal samples exhibited low but comparable expression levels of miR-205 (Figure 1B).

thumbnail

Figure 1. Real time quantitative RT-PCR of miR-205 expression in human cervical tumors, normal cervices and cervical cancer cell lines, normalized to the geometric mean of RNU6B and RNU43.

(A) miR-205 expression was significantly higher in the tumors than the normal samples (P<0.001; paired t-test). (B) Relatively higher expression of miR-205 was found in a majority of tumor samples as compared to their normal counterparts. (C) High expression of miR-205 was detected in ME-180, C4I and CaSki cells, and low or undetectable expression level was found in HeLa, SW756, SiHa and C33A cells. Data presented represent mean of three independent experiments with triplicates. Error bars represent standard deviations from the mean.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0046990.g001

Functional Consequences of miR-205 Regulation in Human Cervical Cancer Cells

The functional consequences of altered miR-205 expression were investigated in cervical cancer cell lines with high or low levels of endogenous miR-205. For this purpose miR-205 was quantified in human cervical cancer cell lines by qRT-PCR. Among the 7 cell lines analyzed, miR-205 was found highly expressed in ME-180, C4I and CaSki, while low expression/barely detectable levels were found in HeLa, SW756, SiHa and C33A (Figure 1C). Next we transfected CaSki cells with a miRNA inhibitor (Anti-miR-205), and HeLa and SW756 cells with a miRNA mimic (Pre-miR-205), and determined the effect of miR-205 silencing or overexpression on cell proliferation, apoptosis and migration. As negative controls, we used a miRNA precursor or inhibitor without sequence homology to any human transcripts.

We observed that inhibition of miR-205 expression in CaSki cells led to a significant decrease in cell growth (~15%; P<0.001), while overexpression of miR-205 in HeLa and SW756 cells resulted in significant increases of cell proliferation (~20% and ~11%, respectively; P<0.05), as compared to the respective negative controls (Figure 2A). Taken together, both gain- and loss-of-function experiments consistently supported effects on cell proliferation.

Effects on cell migration were demonstrated using the Transwell and wound healing migration assays. Using the Transwell assay, we showed that cell migration was significantly enhanced by miR-205 overexpression in both HeLa and SW756 cell lines (~20% and ~30%, respectively; P<0.05). However, miR-205 suppression in CaSki cells did not lead to a significant decrease of cell migration (Figure 2B). The wound healing migration assay revealed that miR-205 overexpression in HeLa cells enhanced the ability to close the wound compared with the Pre-miR negative control-treated and mock-transfected cells. Similarly, wound closure was retarded upon silencing of miR-205 expression in CaSki cells (Figure 2C).

Treatment with miR-205 mimic in HeLa or inhibitor in CaSki cells did not result in any significant change of apoptosis (Figure S1). In control experiments efficient transfection was demonstrated by significantly altered miR-205 level, and significant induction of apoptosis was observed after camptothecin treatment (Figure S1).

Identification of miR-205 Target Genes

To further understand the biological function of miR-205, we identified miR-205 targets using in vivo crosslinking and RNA immunoprecipitation coupled with microarray (CLIP-Chip). mRNAs bound to the miRNA machinery were purified by Argonaute 2 immunoprecipitation (Ago2 IP). The mRNA targets recovered from treated and control samples were differentially labeled with fluorescent dyes, and then hybridized to oligonucleotide microarrays to identify the mRNAs associated to microRNA ribonucleoprotein complex (miRNP). Here, we performed CLIP-Chip experiments for both miR-205 overexpression in HeLa cells and inhibition in CaSki cells.

To verify the efficiency of Ago2 IP, we quantified the expression levels of miR-21 and miR-30a-5p using qRT-PCR. These miRNAs were used as internal controls to evaluate the enrichment of miRNAs after CLIP because of their previously reported high expression levels in both HeLa and CaSki cells [5], [8]. We observed a significant enrichment of both miR-21 (>100-fold, P<0.01) and miR-30a-5p (>10-fold, P<0.01) in anti-Ago2 IP compared to anti-IgG IP or input controls (Figure S2).

In our CLIP-Chip analysis, we excluded one of the replicate microarrays from the miR-205 overexpression experiments due to poor hybridization signals. After filtering of background signals, we performed unsupervised hierarchical clustering of the five microarrays based on their mRNA expression patterns. We focused on the six clusters (including 270 transcripts/252 annotated genes) in which the expression patterns displayed enrichment in miR-205 overexpression and depletion in miR-205 suppression experiments (Figure S3 and Table S1). We performed functional annotation on the CLIP-Chip targets using GENECODIS program. Several functional groups were significantly enriched (P<0.05), including cell cycle, viral reproduction, DNA repair, apoptosis, cell proliferation and migration (Table 1). A detailed list of functional annotations is given in Table S2. Among the 75 candidate targets listed in Table 1, 71 were also predicted as miR-205 targets in at least one prediction program (Table S3), and four targets (BOD1, SEPT2, AAGAB and DCAF13) were not predicted by any of the programs used in this study.

thumbnail

Table 1. Selected functional categories of miR-205 targets obtained from CLIP-Chip experiments*.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0046990.t001

Among the candidate target genes, we found CYR61 and CTGF were associated with both cell proliferation and migration (Table 1), and it is consistent with our functional consequences observed in this study. To further understand the expression relationship between miR-205 and CYR61 or CTGF, we determined the expression of CYR61 and CTGF in 28 matched pairs of cervical cancer and normal tissues using qRT-PCR. Our results revealed significantly lower expression of both CYR61 and CTGF in human cervical cancer samples as compared with their normal counterparts (P = 0.002 and P<0.001, respectively; Figure 3A–C). Interestingly, the expression patterns of these two selected genes were inversely correlated with the miR-205 expression (CYR61, Corr = -0.241, P = 0.091; CTGF, Corr = -0.304, P = 0.032; Figure 3D). The observed inverse expression patterns, together with the predicted miR-205 binding sites (Table S3, Figure S4), provide further evidence for CYR61 and CTGF as miR-205 targets.

thumbnail

Figure 2. Functional analyses of miR-205 regulation in cervical cancer cell lines.

(A) Cell proliferation was assessed in human cervical cancer cell lines transfected with a miR-205 mimic (Pre-miR-205), inhibitor (Anti-miR-205) or corresponding negative control (Anti-miR Neg control or Pre-miR Neg control) using WST-1 assay. Relative cell growth was normalized to its respective control-treated cells. (B) Graphs showing relative cell migration in both miR-205 inhibition and overexpression experiments as evaluated by Transwell migration assay. (C) Representative images of cell migration evaluated by wound healing assay. Scratch wounds were made on confluent monolayer cultures after 48 h of transfection. Images of wound repair were taken at 0, 18 and 24 h after wound (left panel). The percentage of wound closure was normalized by wound area at 0 h (right panel). Data presented represent mean of three independent experiments. Error bars represent standard deviations from the mean. All comparisons were evaluated using t-test. *P<0.05; **P<0.01; ***P<0.001; n.s. = not significant.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0046990.g002
thumbnail

Figure 3. CYR61 and CTGF mRNAs expression in human cervical samples, and their correlations with miR-205 expression.

Relatively lower expression of CYR61 (A) and CTGF (B) was found in a majority of tumor samples as compared to their normal counterparts (n = 28). (C) The expression of CYR61 and CTGF was significantly lower in the tumors than the normal samples (P = 0.002 and P<0.001, respectively; paired t-test). (D) Inverse correlation between the expression level of miR-205 and CYR61 (upper) or CTGF (lower). The expression relationship was evaluated by Pearson’s correlation analysis. P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0046990.g003

Validation of CYR61 and CTGF as miR-205 Target Genes

To determine if CYR61 and CTGF could be targets of miR-205 in human cervical cancer cells, we applied two different approaches. First, we evaluated the protein expression levels of CYR61 and CTGF in both miR-205-overexpressing and -depleted cervical cancer cells using Western blot analysis. As shown in Figure 4 (A and B), miR-205 over-expression in HeLa cells resulted in a significant decrease in CYR61 protein expression (~30%, P = 0.045). Inhibition of endogenous miR-205 expression in CaSki cells significantly increased CYR61 protein level (~15%, P = 0.016). For CTGF, we observed a slight decrease or increase (but not statistically significant) protein expression in miR-205-overexpressing or -depleted cells, respectively. A plausible explanation is that CTGF can be regulated by multiple miRNAs or factors, and modulating miR-205 expression alone was not sufficient to yield significant changes on CTGF protein expression level.

thumbnail

Figure 4. Evaluation of CYR61 and CTGF as targets of miR-205.

(A) Representative Western blot showing the protein expression levels of CYR61 and CTGF in cells transfected with a miR-205 mimic, miR-205 inhibitor, or corresponding scramble and mock transfection controls. (B) CYR61 protein expression was significantly repressed in miR-205-overexpressing (treated with Pre-miR-205) cells and significantly increased in miR-205-depleting (treated with Anti-miR-205) cells as compared to their respective negative controls. CTGF protein expression was slightly repressed in HeLa cells treated with Pre-miR-205, and slightly increased in CaSki cells treated with Anti-miR-205, but the effect was not statistically significant. Data presented represent mean of at least four independent experiments. qRT-PCR analysis of CYR61 (C) and CTGF (D) mRNA in the Ago2-immunoprecipitated RNAs of miR-205-overexpressing or -depleted cells as compared to mock-transfection control. Relative expression level of individual mRNAs was normalized to miR-21 expression (as endogenous control for Ago2 IP RNA). Fold change was calculated by dividing the normalized expression values of Ago2-immunoprecipiated samples by the normalized expression values of its respective input samples. Data presented represent mean of at least three independent experiments. Error bars represent standard deviations from the mean. All comparisons were evaluated using t-test. *P<0.05; **P<0.01; ***P<0.001; n.s. = not significant.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0046990.g004

In the second approach, we quantified CYR61 and CTGF mRNAs in Ago2-immunoprecipitated mRNAs in both miR-205-overexpressing and depleted cells using qRT-PCR, and compared their levels with mock-transfected controls. This experiment is based on the assumption that miRNAs and their mRNA targets are physically associated with the Ago2-containing protein complex. Therefore, we expected enrichment of target mRNAs in miR-205 over-expressing cells, or depletion of targets in cells with miR-205 inhibition. Indeed, we observed significant enrichments of CYR61 (P = 0.050) and CTGF (P = 0.007) mRNAs in HeLa cells with overexpression of miR-205, and depletions of both transcripts in CaSki cells with miR-205 inhibition (P<0.001 for both targets; Figure 4C and 4D). These results suggest that both CYR61 and CTGF are targets of miR-205 in human cervical cancer cells.

Discussion

Observations of increased or decreased expression of miR-205 in different tumor types suggest that miR-205 may have different functions in cancer development depending on the cell type involved. In line with this notion, previous studies have demonstrated its tumor suppression function in both breast and prostate cancer cells [22][24], and its tumor promotion function in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma cells [14]. In this work, we further investigated its functional consequences and targets in human cervical cancer cells.

miR-205 Regulates Cell Proliferation and Migration in Human Cervical Cancer Cells

Here, we first confirmed by qRT-PCR that miR-205 is significantly overexpressed in cervical cancer samples as compared to their normal counterparts. The result is in agreement with our previous sequencing based findings [9], and with the microarray data reported by Wang et al. [8]. Given the observed increased expression of miR-205 in cervical cancer tissues, we further investigated the functional consequences of miR-205 regulation in human cervical cancer cells. In both miR-205-overexpressing cells (HeLa and SW756), we observed significant effects on cell proliferation and migration. Following miR-205 inhibition in CaSki cells, proliferation was significantly decreased, however the effect on cell migration was only revealed in the wound healing assay but not in the Transwell migration assay. One possible reason for this discrepancy is that cell migration depends on different factors in the respective assays. The cell migration that occurs during wound healing is dependent on cell-matrix interaction. However, in the Transwell assay, cells are first prepared in single cells suspension, which will disrupt cell-cell and cell-matrix interactions. Furthermore, cell migration in the Transwell assay may depend on the chemotactic gradient, which is not available in the wound healing assay.

Effects on cell proliferation and migration similar to those observed here in human cervical cancer have also been reported in other cell types. For example, miR-205 overexpression led to an increased cell proliferation in mouse mammary epithelial cell progenitors [25] and cell migration in human keratinocytes [26]. By contrast, increased expression of miR-205 was found to suppress cell proliferation in melanoma [17] and breast cancer cells [27], as well as cell migration in a variety of cancer cell lines, including SK-LU-1 small cell lung cancer [28], U87 glioblastoma [28] and A498 renal cancer [19]. Taken together, these findings further support the dual function of miR-205 as a tumor suppressor or an oncogene.

CYR61 and CTGF as Novel Targets of miR-205

Because of its functional complexity, we applied a biochemical approach (CLIP-Chip) to identify the miR-205-target interactions in vivo. Using this approach, we identified a set of miR-205 targets from both gain- and loss-of-function experiments. Among these, several are functionally related to cell proliferation and migration; which is consistent with the functional consequences observed in this study. Two of the target genes, CYR61 and CTGF, were further validated at protein and/or RNA levels. However, their precise interaction site(s) needs to be further determined by luciferase reporter assays. In this study, we did not perform CYR61 and CTGF inhibition in cervical cancer cells, it is possible that other direct target(s) contributes to the miR-205-mediated effects on cellular proliferation and migration. Yet, these genes had significantly lower expression in cervical cancer samples than their normal counterparts, suggesting that they may play an important role in cervical carcinogenesis.

CYR61 and CTGF proteins are members of the cysteine rich 61/connective tissue growth factor/nephroblastoma (CCN) family of growth regulators. These proteins play diverse roles in many cellular processes, including development, cell proliferation, adhesion, migration, angiogenesis and tumorigenesis [29]. CCNs are aberrantly expressed in a wide range of tumor types [29]. Interestingly, both CYR61 and CTGF can function as tumor suppressors or oncogenes depending on the cellular context (see examples below); which is similar to the dual function of miR-205.

In concordance to our observations, deregulation of CYR61 and CTGF has also been shown in several other studies. For example, CYR61 expression is down-regulated in cervical cancer [30], lung cancer [31][33], endometrial cancer [34] and hepatocellular carcinoma [35]; however, its up-regulation has been reported in multiple tumor types, including osteosarcoma [36], glioma [37], [38], and breast cancer [39], [40]. Similar to CYR61, previous studies have revealed conflicting expression patterns of CTGF in different tumor types. For example, decreased CTGF expression has been reported in lung cancer [31], breast cancer [40], Wilm’s tumor [41] and ovarian cancer [42]; while increased expression was found in papillary thyroid cancer [43], colorectal cancer [44], head and neck squamous cell carcinoma [45], [46] and glioblastoma [47].

Interestingly, miR-205, CYR61 and CTGF are involved in common functional processes and pathways. Similar to the functional consequences of miR-205 observed in this study, CYR61 has been shown to suppress cell growth in lung cancer [32] and hepatocellular cancer [35]. On the other hand, silencing of CYR61 suppresses cell proliferation and migration in glioma [37] and pancreatic cancer cells [48]. Loss of miR-205 expression leads to induction of epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) [23], [24], while silencing of CYR61 expression inhibits EMT [48]. Depletion of miR-205 and CYR61 expression inhibits Akt signaling in keratinocytes, oral squamous cell carcinoma cells [14] and glioma cells [37]. Like CYR61 and miR-205, CTGF has also been demonstrated to play both oncogenic and suppressor roles in a wide range of cancer cell types [45], [47], [49][51], and it is also involved in both EMT [52], [53] and the Akt pathway [54][56]. Despite the numerous studies mentioned above, the roles of CYR61 and CTGF in human cervical cancer remain unclear. It will be of interest to determine the functional roles of these factors in cervical cancer and to evaluate their interactions with miR-205 in different cancer types.

In summary, we report functional effects on tumor phenotypes and novel targets of miR-205 in human cervical cancer cells. We show that miR-205 plays an oncogenic role in human cervical cancer by promoting cell proliferation and migration. Furthermore, we identified a set of novel miR-205 targets using a combination of biochemical and microarray approach. Among them, CYR61 and CTGF were further verified at protein and/or RNA levels. Importantly, these two genes were downregulated in human cervical cancer samples. Our findings suggest that miR-205 and its targets (e.g. CYR61 and CTGF) may play important roles in the pathogenesis of cervical cancer, and that miR-205 (and its targets) may provide potential diagnostic values for cervical pathology.

Materials and Methods

Tissue Samples and Ethics Statement

Thirty pairs of snap-frozen cervical tumor and matched normal tissues from adjacent regions of 30 patients were provided by the Gynecologic Oncology Group Tissue Bank (Columbus, Ohio). Tumor and normal tissue samples had been verified as tumor or non-tumor by histopathological examination of hematoxylin and eosin-stained paraffin sections. Twenty-nine pairs of the samples were included in our previous small RNA profiling by deep sequencing technology [9]. The study was approved by Karolinska Institutet Ethics Committee. No written informed consent was needed because all clinical materials were deidentified. The ethic committee board of the Karolinska Institutet specifically waived the need for consent.

Cervical Cancer Cell Lines

Seven human cervical cancer cell lines were used: CaSki, HeLa, SW756, ME-180, SiHa, C4I and C33A. CaSki and ME-180 cells were originally established from metastatic sites of cervical cancer, and the other cell lines were derived from primary cervical tumors [57][61]. These lines were kindly provided by Dr. Keng-Ling Wallin (Karolinska University Hospital, Sweden), and had been purchased from American Type Tissue Culture (ATCC). CaSki and ME-180 cells were grown in RPMI 1640, while HeLa, SW756, SiHa, C4I and C33A cells were cultured in DMEM medium. All cells were supplemented with 10% FBS and 1% penicillin/streptomycin (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) and cultured at 37°C and 5% CO2 in a humidified incubator.

TaqMan Quantitative Reverse Transcription-PCR (qRT-PCR)

Expression of mature miRNAs and mRNAs was quantified by qRT-PCR using an Applied Biosystems 7500 Fast Real-time PCR system (Applied Biosystems). RNA was extracted using mirVana miRNA isolation kit (Applied Biosystems/Ambion, Austin, TX), applying small RNA enrichment from tissue samples and total RNA isolation from cell lines. RNA concentrations were measured using a NanoDrop ND-1000 spectrophotometer (NanoDrop Technologies, Wilmington, DE).

For mature miRNA, cDNA was synthesized from 25 ng small RNA-enriched RNA for tissue samples, 120 ng total RNA for cell lines or 15 ng Ago2-immunoprecipitated RNAs using Taqman MicroRNA Reverse Transcription Kit (Applied Biosystems). Predesigned TaqMan MicroRNA Assays for miR-205 (ID 000509), miR-21 (ID 000397) and miR-30a-5p (ID 000417) were purchased from Applied Biosystems. All reactions were performed in triplicate on three independent occasions, and relative expression levels were normalized to the geometric mean of RNU6B (ID 001093) and RNU43 (ID 001095), and reported as 2−ΔCT.

For mRNA quantification, cDNA was synthesized from 200 ng large RNA fraction (i.e. RNA fraction remained after small RNA enrichment) for tissue samples or 50 ng Ago2-immunoprecipitated RNAs using High Capacity cDNA Reverse Transcription kit (Applied Biosystems). qRT-PCR was performed for CYR61 (Hs00155479_m1; Applied Biosystems) and CTGF (Hs00170014_m1; Applied Biosystems) mRNAs. All reactions were done in triplicate. For tissue samples, relative expression levels were normalized against 18S (Hs99999901_s1; Applied Biosystems) and reported as 2−ΔCT. For quantification of mRNA enrichment in Ago2-immunoprecipitated RNAs, we used the endogenous miR-21 for normalization due to the high abundance of miR-21 in both CaSki and HeLa cells, and their direct association with Ago2 complexes. Furthermore, miR-21 expression is not expected to be influenced in both miR-205 overexpressing and depleted cells. To calculate the fold enrichment of individual target mRNA, the normalized expression level of target mRNA in the Ago2-immunoprecipitated RNAs was divided by its respective input RNA.

miR-205 Inhibition and Overexpression

For miR-205 inhibition, CaSki cells were transiently transfected with 50 nM of Anti-miR-205 (Applied Biosystems/Ambion). As negative controls, the cells were transfected with mock reagent or Anti-miR Negative control #1 (Applied Biosystems/Ambion) in parallel. For miR-205 overexpression, HeLa and SW756 cells were transfected with 10 nM Pre-miR-205, and Pre-miR Negative control #1 (Applied Biosystems/Ambion) or mock were used as negative controls. All cells were transfected with siPORT NeoFX transfection agent (Applied Biosystems/Ambion). Cells were collected 48–72 hours after transfection for subsequent experiments. Transfection efficiency was measured by quantification of the endogenous miR-205 expression using qRT-PCR.

Cell Proliferation Assay

Cell proliferation was measured using the WST-1 (4-[3-(4-iodophenyl)-2-(4-nitrophenyl)-2​H-5-tetrazolio]-1,3-benzenedisulfonate; 11644807001; Roche Applied Science, Mannheim, Germany) colorimetric assay. After 48 hours of transfection, 1×104 cells/well (in 100 µl culture medium) were seeded into a 96-well plate and incubated for another 24 hours. Then, 10 µl of WST-1 reagent was added and incubated for 3 hours at 37°C. Absorbance was subsequently determined at wavelengths 450 nm (for measurements) and 650 nm (as reference) by a VERSAmax microplate reader (Molecular Devices, Sunnyvale, CA) and analyzed with SoftMax Pro 5 software (Molecular Devices). At least 8 replicate wells were included for each experimental group, and all experiments were repeated at least three times independently. Cell proliferation was calculated by subtracting the absorbance values of the samples from the media alone (background level). The relative cell proliferation was normalized by the respective control.

Transwell Cell Migration Assay

BD Falcon™ 8.0-µm pore Transwell cell culture inserts (353097; BD Biosciences, Franklin lakes, NJ) were used to evaluate cell migration. The inserts were placed in a 24-well plate, containing 700 µl of medium with 10% FBS (lower chamber), for 30 minutes before seeding cells. After 48 hours of transfection, cells were harvested and counted by trypan blue staining in a TC10™ automated cell counter (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA). 5×104 cells/well (in 100 µl serum-free medium) were added to the upper chamber and incubated for 18 hours (HeLa and SW756 cells) or 48 hours (CaSki cells) at 37°C and 5% CO2. At the end of incubation, non-migrated cells on the top surface of membrane were removed using cotton swabs, followed by washing with PBS. Migrated cells on the bottom surface of membrane were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde solution (19943, USB Corporation, Cleveland, OH) for 10 minutes, washed with PBS and stained with 0.5% crystal violet (prepared in 20% ethanol) for 10 minutes. The inserts were rinsed with tapped water and air-dried. For quantification of migrated cells, the stained cells were dissolved in 95% ethanol by gently shaking for 6 hours at room temperature. Absorbance was determined at 595 nm using a VERSAmax microplate reader (Molecular Devices). Cell migration was calculated by comparing the absorbance values of the samples after background subtraction and negative control-treated cells were used as negative controls. All the experiments were performed independently in triplicate.

Wound Healing Assay

For wound-healing migration assay, cells (3.5×105 in 2.5 ml/well) were transfected and seeded on 6-well plates. After 48 hours of transfection, a scratch wound was made on a confluent monolayer culture of HeLa and CaSki cells with a 100-µl-pipette tip and fresh media was added for further 24 hours incubation. The cells were imaged at three different time points (0 h, 18 h and 24 h) using an inverted microscopy system (Leica DM IL LED, Leica Microsystems GmbH, Wetzlar, Germany) equipped with ProgRes® MF camera (Jenoptik GmbH, Jena, Germany). All images were processed and quantified using Image J version 1.43 u (http://rsbweb.nih.gov/ij/). The percentage of wound closure (cell migration) was calculated as relative wound area at a given time point normalized by wound area at 0 h. All experiments were performed independently in triplicate.

Apoptosis Assay

Apoptosis assay was performed using the caspase-3 colorimetric assay kit (K106-200; BioVision, Mountain View, CA) according to the manufacturer’s recommendations. In brief, 3×106 transfected cells were harvested after 72 hours of transfection and re-suspended in 50 µl of chilled cell lysis buffer, followed by incubation on ice for 10 minutes. Protein lysates were quantified by BCA protein assay kit (23227; Pierce Biotechnology, Rockford, IL). 100 µg protein lysate was mixed with 50 µl of 2× Reaction Buffer and 5 µl of 4 mM caspase-3 substrate (DEVD-pNA), and incubated for 1 hour at 37°C. Detection of the chromophore p-nitroaniline (pNA) after cleavage from the labeled substrate DEVD-pNA was measured at 405 nm using a VERSAmax microplate reader (Molecular Devices) and analyzed with SoftMax Pro 5 software (Molecular Devices). Relative caspase-3 activity was determined by the absorbance values of the samples after background subtraction and compared with the respective negative control-treated cells. All experiments were replicated three times independently. As positive controls, HeLa and CaSki cells were treated with 100 µM camptothecin (an apoptosis inducer) for 15–18 hours.

Argonaute 2 Immunoprecipitation (Ago2 IP)

After 72 hours of transfection, cells (from ten 10-cm tissue culture plates for each condition) were washed with cold PBS and irradiated for 120 mJ/cm2 in an UV cross-linker (UVC 500; Amersham Life Science, Arlington Heights, IL) for 30 seconds. Cell pellet was collected and then re-suspended in an equal volume (w/v) of lysis buffer [FNN0021; Invitrogen; supplemented with 1 mM Phenylmethanesulfonyl fluoride (PMSF, P7626; Sigma-Aldrich), 1 mM Dithiothreitol (DTT, 495714; Invitrogen), 1% Protease Inhibitor Cocktail (P8340; Sigma-Aldrich) and 200 U/ml RNaseOUT (10777-019; Invitrogen)], incubated for 10 minutes on ice, and lysed by vortexing. The cell lysate was stored at −80°C until use. After thawing on ice, the lysates were cleared by centrifugation at 14 000 rpm for 30 minutes at 4°C. To prepare antibody-coated beads, 120 µl of Protein G Sepharose 4 Fast Flow bead slurry (17-0618-01; GE Healthcare) was rinsed five times with 1 ml of NT2 buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM MgCl2, 0.5% NP-40) and then incubated with 5 µg of mouse anti-human Ago2 (ab57113; Abcam, Cambridge, UK) or mouse IgG (I8765; Sigma-Aldrich) as isotype antibody control overnight at 4°C. The beads were then washed with cold NT2 buffer three times to remove the unbound antibodies. For immunoprecipitation, the cleared lysates were incubated with the antibody-coated Sepharose beads (in NT2 buffer supplemented with 1 mM DTT, 200 U/ml RNaseOUT, and 20 mM EDTA) overnight at 4°C on a rocker. The beads were washed three times with cold NT2 buffer for 10 minutes each at 4°C, followed by incubation with proteinase K (10 mg/ml) for 30 minutes at 55°C. Ago2-bound RNA was extracted with TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen).

Microarray Experiments and Data Analysis

HEEBO oligonucleotide microarrays used in this study were produced by Stanford Functional Genomics Facility (http://www.microarray.org/sfgf/). The HEEBO microarrays contain ~44,500 70-mer oligonucleotide probes, representing ~30,000 unique transcripts. A detailed description of this probe set can be found at Stanford Functional Genomics Facility (http://www.microarray.org/sfgf/heebo.do).

RNAs obtained by Ago2 IP (~250 ng of each sample) from six replicate experiments (Anti-miR-205 vs. mock control in CaSki cells and Pre-miR-205 vs. mock control in HeLa cells) were amplified using the Amino Allyl MessageAMP II aRNA kit (1753; Ambion). The amplified RNAs were fluorescently labeled by coupling to NHS-Cy3 (for Anti-miR-205 or Pre-miR-205 treated cells) or NHS-Cy5 (for mock transfected cells used as negative control). Samples were hybridized to the HEEBO microarrays at 65°C for 18–22 hours [62]. Arrays were stringently washed and immediately scanned using an Axon GenePix 4200A scanner (Molecular Devices). Images and fluorescence ratios were processed using GenePix Pro6.0 software (Molecular Devices), and data were uploaded into the Stanford Microarray Database (SMD; http://smd.stanford.edu/) for analysis.

To minimize errors, data were filtered to exclude measurements that did not have a regression correlation ≥0.6 between Cy3 and Cy5 signal, and intensity/background ratio ≥3 in at least one channel, for 80% of the arrays. Hierarchical clustering was performed with cluster 3.0 (http://bonsai.hgc.jp/~mdehoon/software/c​luster/software.htm#ctv) and visualized with Java TreeView version 1.1.3 (http://jtreeview.sourceforge.net).

Computational Analysis of miR-205 Targets

Functional annotation of potential miR-205 target genes obtained from CLIP-Chip data was performed using GENECODIS 2.0 (http://genecodis.dacya.ucm.es/analysis/). miR-205 predicted targets were retrieved from miRecords (http://mirecords.biolead.org/) and the binding site predictions were performed using RNAhybrid (http://bibiserv.techfak.uni-bielefeld.de​/rnahybrid/).

Western Blot Analysis

Cells were collected after 72 hours post-transfection and lysed in NP-40 Cell Lysis Buffer (FNN0021; Invitrogen), with fresh addition of 1% Protease Inhibitor Cocktail (P8340; Sigma-Aldrich) and 1 mM PMSF (P7626; Sigma-Aldrich). After quantification with the BCA protein assay kit (23227; Pierce Biotechnology, Rockford, IL), 50 µg of whole cell lysate was separated in 10–20% Novex® Tricine gels (EC6625; Invitrogen) and transferred to nitrocellulose membranes (LC2001; Invitrogen). Novex Sharp Pre-stained Protein Standards (57318; Invitrogen) were used as molecular weight standards. Membranes were blocked with 5% non-fat milk in TBST (Tris-buffered saline/0.05% Tween 20), followed by incubating with CYR61 (1:500 dilution; ab24448; Abcam) or CTGF (1:5000 dilution; ab6992; Abcam) antibody overnight at 4°C. After washing for 3×10 minutes with TBST, an anti-rabbit IgG-HRP (1:3000; 170-6515; Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA) was used as secondary antibody. Detection was performed using the Novex ECL HRP chemiluminescent substrate reagent (WP20005; Invitrogen). Further incubation of the membranes with a GAPDH antibody (1:10000, sc-47724; Santa Cruz Biotechnology Inc.) and an anti-mouse IgG-HRP secondary antibody (1:10000; sc-2005; Santa Cruz Biotechnology Inc.) were performed for normalization purposes. Signals were visualized on high performance chemiluminescence films (Hyperfilm ECL; GE healthcare) and protein expressions were quantified on the immunoblots using ImageJ version 1.43 u (http://rsb.info.nih.gov/ij/).

Statistical Analysis

All analyses were performed using MS office Excel 2007, unless otherwise specified. Paired student’s t-test was conducted to compare miR-205 expression in paired clinical samples, and to analyze differences between two experimental groups. Student t-test with equal variance was performed to compare mean relative changes between the tested and control samples from three independent experiments. Pearson’s correlation analysis was used to determine the association between miR-205 and CYR61 or CTGF expression levels. All analyses were 2-tailed and P-values <0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Supporting Information

Figure S1.

Evaluation of miR-205 regulation on apoptosis in human cervical cancer cell lines, as evaluated by caspase-3 colorimetric assay. (A) No significant change of apoptosis was observed in both miR-205 overexpression and suppression experiments. (B) Positive control for the apoptosis assay. Significant induction of apoptosis was observed in both cell lines after treatment with camptothecin (100 µM) for 15–18 hours. Expression of miR-205 was significant reduced after treatment with a miRNA inhibitor (C), or increased upon treatment with a miRNA mimic (D). Data represent mean of three independent experiments and error bars indicate standard deviations from the mean. All comparisons were assessed by t-test. **P<0.01; ***P<0.001; n.s. = not significant.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0046990.s001

(PDF)

Figure S2.

Evaluation of Ago2 immunoprecipitation efficiency by qRT-PCR. Comparisons of miR-21 (A) and miR-30a-5p (B) expression levels before and after immunoprecipitation using anti-Ago2 or anti-IgG isotype control in Pre-miR-205-treated and mock transfected HeLa cells. Error bars indicate standard deviations from the mean of three independent experiments. **P<0.01, t-test.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0046990.s002

(PDF)

Figure S3.

Clustering analysis of CLIP-Chip expression data. This figure shows six clusters of enriched and depleted genes in miR-205 overexpression and suppression experiments, respectively. The details of the gene list for each cluster are provided in Table S1.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0046990.s003

(PDF)

Figure S4.

miR-205 binding site predictions of CYR61 (A) and CTGF (B) by RNAhybrid.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0046990.s004

(PDF)

Table S1.

Expression of Cluster 1–6 gene transcripts enriched at miR-205 over-expression or depleted at miR-205 suppression.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0046990.s005

(XLS)

Table S2.

Functional annotations of miR-205 targets from CLIP-Chip using GENECODIS 2.0.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0046990.s006

(XLS)

Table S3.

Candidate targets from CLIP-Chip experiments were also identified as miR-205 targets by computational methods.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0046990.s007

(XLS)

Acknowledgments

We thank the GOG Tissue Bank in Columbus, Ohio, for frozen tissue specimens, Dr. Keng-Ling Wallin for providing human cervical cancer cell lines and all members of Medical Genetics group for helps, discussions and suggestions.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: HX WOL. Performed the experiments: HX YZ SC. Analyzed the data: HX YZ WOL. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: HX YZ SC CL. Wrote the paper: HX CL WOL.

References

  1. 1. Jemal A, Bray F (2011) Center MM, Ferlay J, Ward E, et al (2011) Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin 61: 69–90. doi: 10.3322/caac.20107
  2. 2. zur Hausen H (2002) Papillomaviruses and cancer: from basic studies to clinical application. Nat Rev Cancer 2: 342–350. doi: 10.1038/nrc798
  3. 3. Siomi H, Siomi MC (2010) Posttranscriptional regulation of microRNA biogenesis in animals. Mol Cell 38: 323–332. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2010.03.013
  4. 4. Lee JW, Choi CH, Choi JJ, Park YA, Kim SJ, et al. (2008) Altered MicroRNA expression in cervical carcinomas. Clin Cancer Res 14: 2535–2542. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-07-1231
  5. 5. Lui WO, Pourmand N, Patterson BK, Fire A (2007) Patterns of known and novel small RNAs in human cervical cancer. Cancer Res 67: 6031–6043. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.can-06-0561
  6. 6. Martinez I, Gardiner AS, Board KF, Monzon FA, Edwards RP, et al. (2008) Human papillomavirus type 16 reduces the expression of microRNA-218 in cervical carcinoma cells. Oncogene 27: 2575–2582. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1210919
  7. 7. Pereira PM, Marques JP, Soares AR, Carreto L, Santos MA (2010) MicroRNA expression variability in human cervical tissues. PLoS One 5: e11780. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0011780
  8. 8. Wang X, Tang S, Le SY, Lu R, Rader JS, et al. (2008) Aberrant expression of oncogenic and tumor-suppressive microRNAs in cervical cancer is required for cancer cell growth. PLoS One 3: e2557. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0002557
  9. 9. Witten D, Tibshirani R, Gu SG, Fire A, Lui WO (2010) Ultra-high throughput sequencing-based small RNA discovery and discrete statistical biomarker analysis in a collection of cervical tumours and matched controls. BMC Biol 8: 58. doi: 10.1186/1741-7007-8-58
  10. 10. Yao Q, Xu H, Zhang QQ, Zhou H, Qu LH (2009) MicroRNA-21 promotes cell proliferation and down-regulates the expression of programmed cell death 4 (PDCD4) in HeLa cervical carcinoma cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 388: 539–542. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2009.08.044
  11. 11. Wang X, Wang HK, McCoy JP, Banerjee NS, Rader JS, et al. (2009) Oncogenic HPV infection interrupts the expression of tumor-suppressive miR-34a through viral oncoprotein E6. RNA 15: 637–647. doi: 10.1261/rna.1442309
  12. 12. Au Yeung CL, Tsang TY, Yau PL, Kwok TT (2011) Human papillomavirus type 16 E6 induces cervical cancer cell migration through the p53/microRNA-23b/urokinase-type plasminogen activator pathway. Oncogene 30: 2401–2410. doi: 10.1038/onc.2010.613
  13. 13. Chung TK, Cheung TH, Huen NY, Wong KW, Lo KW, et al. (2009) Dysregulated microRNAs and their predicted targets associated with endometrioid endometrial adenocarcinoma in Hong Kong women. Int J Cancer 124: 1358–1365. doi: 10.1002/ijc.24071
  14. 14. Yu J, Ryan DG, Getsios S, Oliveira-Fernandes M, Fatima A, et al. (2008) MicroRNA-184 antagonizes microRNA-205 to maintain SHIP2 levels in epithelia. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 105: 19300–19305. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0803992105
  15. 15. Lebanony D, Benjamin H, Gilad S, Ezagouri M, Dov A, et al. (2009) Diagnostic assay based on hsa-miR-205 expression distinguishes squamous from nonsquamous non-small-cell lung carcinoma. J Clin Oncol 27: 2030–2037. doi: 10.1200/jco.2008.19.4134
  16. 16. Iorio MV, Visone R, Di Leva G, Donati V, Petrocca F, et al. (2007) MicroRNA signatures in human ovarian cancer. Cancer Res 67: 8699–8707. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.can-07-1936
  17. 17. Dar AA, Majid S, de Semir D, Nosrati M, Bezrookove V, et al. (2011) miRNA-205 suppresses melanoma cell proliferation and induces senescence via regulation of E2F1 protein. J Biol Chem 286: 16606–16614. doi: 10.1074/jbc.m111.227611
  18. 18. Feber A, Xi L, Luketich JD, Pennathur A, Landreneau RJ, et al.. (2008) MicroRNA expression profiles of esophageal cancer. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 135: 255–260; discussion 260.
  19. 19. Majid S, Saini S, Dar AA, Hirata H, Shahryari V, et al. (2011) MicroRNA-205 inhibits Src-mediated oncogenic pathways in renal cancer. Cancer Res 71: 2611–2621. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.can-10-3666
  20. 20. Neely LA, Rieger-Christ KM, Neto BS, Eroshkin A, Garver J, et al. (2010) A microRNA expression ratio defining the invasive phenotype in bladder tumors. Urologic oncology 28: 39–48. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2008.06.006
  21. 21. Wiklund ED, Bramsen JB, Hulf T, Dyrskjot L, Ramanathan R, et al. (2011) Coordinated epigenetic repression of the miR-200 family and miR-205 in invasive bladder cancer. Int J Cancer 128: 1327–1334. doi: 10.1002/ijc.25461
  22. 22. Iorio MV, Casalini P, Piovan C, Di Leva G, Merlo A, et al. (2009) microRNA-205 regulates HER3 in human breast cancer. Cancer Res 69: 2195–2200. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.can-08-2920
  23. 23. Gandellini P, Folini M, Longoni N, Pennati M, Binda M, et al. (2009) miR-205 Exerts tumor-suppressive functions in human prostate through down-regulation of protein kinase Cepsilon. Cancer Res 69: 2287–2295. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.can-08-2894
  24. 24. Gregory PA, Bert AG, Paterson EL, Barry SC, Tsykin A, et al. (2008) The miR-200 family and miR-205 regulate epithelial to mesenchymal transition by targeting ZEB1 and SIP1. Nat Cell Biol 10: 593–601. doi: 10.1038/ncb1722
  25. 25. Greene SB, Gunaratne PH, Hammond SM, Rosen JM (2010) A putative role for microRNA-205 in mammary epithelial cell progenitors. J Cell Sci 123: 606–618. doi: 10.1242/jcs.056812
  26. 26. Yu J, Peng H, Ruan Q, Fatima A, Getsios S, et al. (2010) MicroRNA-205 promotes keratinocyte migration via the lipid phosphatase SHIP2. FASEB J 24: 3950–3959. doi: 10.1096/fj.10-157404
  27. 27. Wu H, Zhu S, Mo YY (2009) Suppression of cell growth and invasion by miR-205 in breast cancer. Cell Res 19: 439–448. doi: 10.1038/cr.2009.18
  28. 28. Song H, Bu G (2009) MicroRNA-205 inhibits tumor cell migration through down-regulating the expression of the LDL receptor-related protein 1. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 388: 400–405. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2009.08.020
  29. 29. Dhar A, Ray A (2010) The CCN family proteins in carcinogenesis. Exp Oncol 32: 2–9.
  30. 30. Song JY, Lee JK, Lee NW, Jung HH, Kim SH, et al. (2008) Microarray analysis of normal cervix, carcinoma in situ, and invasive cervical cancer: identification of candidate genes in pathogenesis of invasion in cervical cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer 18: 1051–1059. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1438.2007.01164.x
  31. 31. Chen PP, Li WJ, Wang Y, Zhao S, Li DY, et al. (2007) Expression of Cyr61, CTGF, and WISP-1 correlates with clinical features of lung cancer. PLoS One 2: e534. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0000534
  32. 32. Tong X, O'Kelly J, Xie D, Mori A, Lemp N, et al. (2004) Cyr61 suppresses the growth of non-small-cell lung cancer cells via the beta-catenin-c-myc-p53 pathway. Oncogene 23: 4847–4855. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1207628
  33. 33. Tong X, Xie D, O'Kelly J, Miller CW, Muller-Tidow C, et al. (2001) Cyr61, a member of CCN family, is a tumor suppressor in non-small cell lung cancer. J Biol Chem 276: 47709–47714. doi: 10.1074/jbc.m107878200
  34. 34. Chien W, Kumagai T, Miller CW, Desmond JC, Frank JM, et al. (2004) Cyr61 suppresses growth of human endometrial cancer cells. J Biol Chem 279: 53087–53096. doi: 10.1074/jbc.m410254200
  35. 35. Feng P, Wang B, Ren EC (2008) Cyr61/CCN1 is a tumor suppressor in human hepatocellular carcinoma and involved in DNA damage response. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 40: 98–109. doi: 10.1016/j.biocel.2007.06.020
  36. 36. Fromigue O, Hamidouche Z, Vaudin P, Lecanda F, Patino A, et al. (2011) CYR61 downregulation reduces osteosarcoma cell invasion, migration, and metastasis. J Bone Miner Res 26: 1533–1542. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.343
  37. 37. Goodwin CR, Lal B, Zhou X, Ho S, Xia S, et al. (2010) Cyr61 mediates hepatocyte growth factor-dependent tumor cell growth, migration, and Akt activation. Cancer Res 70: 2932–2941. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.can-09-3570
  38. 38. Xie D, Yin D, Tong X, O'Kelly J, Mori A, et al. (2004) Cyr61 is overexpressed in gliomas and involved in integrin-linked kinase-mediated Akt and beta-catenin-TCF/Lef signaling pathways. Cancer Res 64: 1987–1996. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.can-03-0666
  39. 39. Hirschfeld M, zur Hausen A, Bettendorf H, Jager M, Stickeler E (2009) Alternative splicing of Cyr61 is regulated by hypoxia and significantly changed in breast cancer. Cancer Res 69: 2082–2090. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.can-08-1997
  40. 40. Xie D, Nakachi K, Wang H, Elashoff R, Koeffler HP (2001) Elevated levels of connective tissue growth factor, WISP-1, and CYR61 in primary breast cancers associated with more advanced features. Cancer Res 61: 8917–8923.
  41. 41. Li MH, Sanchez T, Pappalardo A, Lynch KR, Hla T, et al. (2008) Induction of antiproliferative connective tissue growth factor expression in Wilms’ tumor cells by sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor 2. Mol Cancer Res 6: 1649–1656. doi: 10.1158/1541-7786.mcr-07-2048
  42. 42. Kikuchi R, Tsuda H, Kanai Y, Kasamatsu T, Sengoku K, et al. (2007) Promoter hypermethylation contributes to frequent inactivation of a putative conditional tumor suppressor gene connective tissue growth factor in ovarian cancer. Cancer Res 67: 7095–7105. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.can-06-4567
  43. 43. Cui L, Zhang Q, Mao Z, Chen J, Wang X, et al. (2011) CTGF is overexpressed in papillary thyroid carcinoma and promotes the growth of papillary thyroid cancer cells. Tumour Biol 32: 721–728. doi: 10.1007/s13277-011-0173-6
  44. 44. Ladwa R, Pringle H, Kumar R, West K (2011) Expression of CTGF and Cyr61 in colorectal cancer. J Clin Pathol 64: 58–64. doi: 10.1136/jcp.2010.082768
  45. 45. Deng YZ, Chen PP, Wang Y, Yin D, Koeffler HP, et al. (2007) Connective tissue growth factor is overexpressed in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma and promotes tumorigenicity through beta-catenin-T-cell factor/Lef signaling. J Biol Chem 282: 36571–36581. doi: 10.1074/jbc.m704141200
  46. 46. Mullis TC, Tang X, Chong KT (2008) Expression of connective tissue growth factor (CTGF/CCN2) in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. J Clin Pathol 61: 606–610. doi: 10.1136/jcp.2007.052795
  47. 47. Yin D, Chen W, O'Kelly J, Lu D, Ham M, et al. (2010) Connective tissue growth factor associated with oncogenic activities and drug resistance in glioblastoma multiforme. Int J Cancer 127: 2257–2267. doi: 10.1002/ijc.25257
  48. 48. Haque I, Mehta S, Majumder M, Dhar K, De A, et al. (2011) Cyr61/CCN1 signaling is critical for epithelial-mesenchymal transition and stemness and promotes pancreatic carcinogenesis. Mol Cancer 10: 8. doi: 10.1186/1476-4598-10-8
  49. 49. Bennewith KL, Huang X, Ham CM, Graves EE, Erler JT, et al. (2009) The role of tumor cell-derived connective tissue growth factor (CTGF/CCN2) in pancreatic tumor growth. Cancer Res 69: 775–784. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.can-08-0987
  50. 50. Mao Z, Ma X, Rong Y, Cui L, Wang X, et al. (2011) Connective tissue growth factor enhances the migration of gastric cancer through downregulation of E-cadherin via the NF-kappaB pathway. Cancer Sci 102: 104–110. doi: 10.1111/j.1349-7006.2010.01746.x
  51. 51. Pandey DP, Lappano R, Albanito L, Madeo A, Maggiolini M, et al. (2009) Estrogenic GPR30 signalling induces proliferation and migration of breast cancer cells through CTGF. EMBO J 28: 523–532. doi: 10.1038/emboj.2008.304
  52. 52. Gore-Hyer E, Shegogue D, Markiewicz M, Lo S, Hazen-Martin D, et al. (2002) TGF-beta and CTGF have overlapping and distinct fibrogenic effects on human renal cells. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 283: F707–716. doi: 10.1152/ajprenal.00007.2002
  53. 53. Liu BC, Li MX, Zhang JD, Liu XC, Zhang XL, et al. (2008) Inhibition of integrin-linked kinase via a siRNA expression plasmid attenuates connective tissue growth factor-induced human proximal tubular epithelial cells to mesenchymal transition. Am J Nephrol 28: 143–151. doi: 10.1159/000110019
  54. 54. Chien W, Yin D, Gui D, Mori A, Frank JM, et al. (2006) Suppression of cell proliferation and signaling transduction by connective tissue growth factor in non-small cell lung cancer cells. Mol Cancer Res 4: 591–598. doi: 10.1158/1541-7786.mcr-06-0029
  55. 55. Chuang JY, Yang WY, Lai CH, Lin CD, Tsai MH, et al. (2011) CTGF inhibits cell motility and COX-2 expression in oral cancer cells. Int Immunopharmacol 11: 948–954. doi: 10.1016/j.intimp.2011.02.008
  56. 56. Crean JK, Furlong F, Mitchell D, McArdle E, Godson C, et al. (2006) Connective tissue growth factor/CCN2 stimulates actin disassembly through Akt/protein kinase B-mediated phosphorylation and cytoplasmic translocation of p27(Kip-1). FASEB J 20: 1712–1714. doi: 10.1096/fj.05-5010fje
  57. 57. Auersperg N, Hawryluk AP (1962) Chromosome observations on three epithelial-cell cultures derived from carcinomas of the human cervix. J Natl Cancer Inst 28: 605–627.
  58. 58. Friedl F, Kimura I, Osato T, Ito Y (1970) Studies on a new human cell line (SiHa) derived from carcinoma of uterus. I. Its establishment and morphology. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med 135: 543–545. doi: 10.3181/00379727-135-35091a
  59. 59. Pattillo RA, Hussa RO, Story MT, Ruckert AC, Shalaby MR, et al. (1977) Tumor antigen and human chorionic gonadotropin in CaSki cells: a new epidermoid cervical cancer cell line. Science 196: 1456–1458. doi: 10.1126/science.867042
  60. 60. Scherer WF, Syverton JT, Gey GO (1953) Studies on the propagation in vitro of poliomyelitis viruses. IV. Viral multiplication in a stable strain of human malignant epithelial cells (strain HeLa) derived from an epidermoid carcinoma of the cervix. J Exp Med 97: 695–710. doi: 10.1084/jem.97.5.695
  61. 61. Sykes JA, Whitescarver J, Jernstrom P, Nolan JF, Byatt P (1970) Some properties of a new epithelial cell line of human origin. J Natl Cancer Inst 45: 107–122.
  62. 62. Hendrickson DG, Hogan DJ, Herschlag D, Ferrell JE, Brown PO (2008) Systematic identification of mRNAs recruited to argonaute 2 by specific microRNAs and corresponding changes in transcript abundance. PloS one 3: e2126. doi: 10.1371/annotation/c8902b4c-30fc-42e7-b506-fc756a3cdd4e