Figures
Abstract
Background
The diagnosis of gastrointestinal (GI) involvement in Kaposi's sarcoma (KS) is important to make because the need for treatment depends on the extent of the disease. Moreover, severe GI lesions can cause serious complications. Endoscopy with biopsy is an extremely useful method to diagnose GI-KS. However, determining the indications for endoscopy is difficult because KS can occur without GI symptoms or cutaneous KS. This study sought to clarify predictive clinical factors for GI-KS and its severity on endoscopy.
Methodology/Principal Findings
A total of 1,027 HIV-infected patients who underwent endoscopy were analyzed. Sexual behavior, CD4 count, HIV RNA, history of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART), GI symptoms, and cutaneous KS were assessed. Endoscopic severity including bulky tumor, ulceration, and number of lesions were evaluated. Thirty-three patients had GI-KS and 46 patients cutaneous KS. Among the GI-KS patients, 78.8% (26/33) had no GI symptoms and 24.2% (8/33) had no cutaneous KS. Univariate analysis identified men who have sex with men (MSM), CD4 <100 cells/µL, HIV RNA ≥10,000 copies/mL, no history of HAART, and cutaneous KS were significantly associated with GI-KS. Among these factors, cutaneous KS was closely related to GI-KS on multivariable analysis. Among patients without cutaneous KS, MSM and CD4 count <100 cells/µL were the only independent clinical factors related to GI-KS. Bulky tumor was significantly associated with CD4 <100 cells/µL and large number of lesions was significantly associated with HIV-RNA ≥10,000 copies/mL.
Conclusions
To diagnose GI-KS, clinical factors need to be considered before endoscopy. The presence of GI symptoms is not useful in predicting GI-KS. MSM and CD4 count <100 cells/µL are predictive factors among patients without cutaneous KS. Caution should be exercised especially in patients with low CD4 counts or high HIV viral loads as they are more likely to develop severe GI-KS lesions.
Citation: Nagata N, Shimbo T, Yazaki H, Asayama N, Akiyama J, Teruya K, et al. (2012) Predictive Clinical Factors in the Diagnosis of Gastrointestinal Kaposi's Sarcoma and Its Endoscopic Severity. PLoS ONE 7(11): e46967. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0046967
Editor: Jianming Tang, University of Alabama at Birmingham, United States of America
Received: June 16, 2012; Accepted: September 7, 2012; Published: November 30, 2012
Copyright: © 2012 Nagata et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Funding: This study was partly supported by Medicine for Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, Health and Labour Sciences Research Grants, Research on Clinical Trials' Infrastructure Development and grants for research and development in National Center for Global Health and Medicine. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Introduction
Kaposi's sarcoma (KS) is a rare type of cancer of the lymphatic and blood vessels that most commonly involves the skin [1]–[3]. KS is more prevalent in HIV-infected patients, especially among men who have sex with men (MSM) [2], [3]. Although the rate of AIDS-related KS has decreased dramatically since the introduction of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) [4]–[6], KS remains the most common malignancy among patients with AIDS [7].
The diagnosis of visceral involvement of KS is important to make because the need for treatment and choice of treatment depend on the extent of the disease [4]–[11]. The gastrointestinal (GI) tract is a common site of visceral involvement [12]–[16]. Endoscopy with biopsy is extremely useful for diagnosing GI-KS and is usually indicated for patients with GI symptoms and the presence of cutaneous KS [17], [18]. However, GI-KS can occur without GI symptoms [19], [20] and in the absence of cutaneous disease [20], [21]. Moreover, few studies have investigated the clinical factors of GI-KS [19]–[21] and most of those have been case series or case reports without control subjects. Therefore, the indications for endoscopy to detect GI-KS in patients with HIV/AIDS, especially those without GI symptoms or cutaneous disease, have been difficult to determine.
Endoscopically, GI-KS can vary from flat maculopapular or polypoid masses to severe lesions. The latter can cause serious complications such as hemorrhage, perforation, and obstruction and may require emergent treatment [14], [22]–[26]. However, there are no reports to date on the predictive clinical factors for finding severe GI-KS lesions on endoscopy.
In Japan, screening endoscopy is frequently performed for the early detection of malignant or premalignant lesions, even as part of the examination for patients who are asymptomatic. In this study, we performed endoscopy in a large number of HIV-infected patients with or without GI symptoms and cutaneous involvement.
Methods
Objectives
We conducted a case-control study to identify predictive clinical factors for diagnosing GI-KS, especially among patients without GI symptoms and cutaneous disease. We also assessed macroscopic appearance in detail looking for predictors of severe GI-KS lesions on endoscopy.
Participants
We recruited 1,064 HIV-infected patients who had undergone endoscopy between 2003 and 2009 at the National Center for Global Health and Medicine (NCGM), a 900-bed hospital located in the Tokyo metropolitan area and the largest referral center for HIV/AIDS in Japan. We excluded patients who had received endoscopy for follow-up evaluation shortly after treatment for GI disease.
Ethics statement
The institutional review board at NCGM approved this study. All patients from whom clinical samples were obtained during endoscopy or biopsy had provided written informed consent prior to endoscopy. No ethical problems exist with regard to the publication of this manuscript. We used anonymized data from patient medical records.
Clinical factors
Before endoscopy, we routinely enter “purposes of the inspection” into the electronic endoscopic database. Purposes include examination for symptoms, screening for malignant or premalignant lesions, and follow up for endoscopic procedure or surgery. GI symptoms were assessed by the physician who interviewed each patient in detail. Those without GI symptoms and negative screening endoscopy were considered to be symptom-free.
CD4 cell counts were checked within 1 week of endoscopy. We categorized CD4 cell counts into four groups: ≥300 cells/µL; 200–299 cells/µL; 100–199 cells/µL; and <100 cells/µL. HIV-RNA viral load (VL) as determined by real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was reviewed within 1 month of endoscopy. The minimum detection level was 40 copies/mL of plasma. A positive result for real-time HIV RNA was defined as ≥40 copies/mL. HIV-RNA VL was categorized into four groups: VL ≤40 copies/mL (normal range); 40<VL≤10,000 copies/ml; 10,000<VL≤100,000 copies/mL; and VL>100,000 copies/mL.
History of HAART was collected from medical records prior to endoscopy and was categorized into five groups according to duration of administration: without history of HAART; duration ≤6 months; 6 months<duration ≤1 year; 1 year<duration ≤5 years; duration >5 years.
HIV infection route was determined by the medical staff who interviewed each patient on the first visit to our hospital and classified into five categories: MSM, heterosexual, hemophiliac, injection drug user, and unknown. We defined sexual behavior as MSM or heterosexual. Patients who were not homosexual or bisexual were regarded as heterosexual.
Diagnosis of GI-KS
We performed biopsy when abnormal findings were encountered on upper or lower endoscopy. If we performed both upper and lower endoscopy in the same individual, this was defined as one case. GI-KS was suspected based on endoscopic appearance, such as the presence of submucosal nodules, polypoid nodules, or deep-red mucosa (Fig. 1A–C), as previously reported [16], [19], [27]. Endoscopic severity was evaluated in terms of appearance, including size, ulceration, and number of lesions. Regarding size, we defined bulky tumors (Fig. 1D) as circumferential or obstructive lesions and small tumors as all other cases [23]. Ulceration was defined endoscopically as a distinct, visible crater >5 mm in diameter with a slough base (Fig. 1E). The number of lesions was classified into two groups: large number (≥10) (Fig. 1F) or small number (<10).
A) Dark-reddish flat lesions in the esophagus. B) Chromoendoscopy with indigo carmine dye showed a polypoid nodule in the terminal ileum. C). Submucosal lesions in the rectum. D) Bulky tumor surrounding the antrum of the stomach and causing pyloric stenosis. E) Circumferential flat lesions with ulceration in the duodenum. F) Multiple nodules in the stomach.
GI-KS was defined as the presence of proliferating spindle cells in biopsy specimens as seen on hematoxylin and eosin (HE) staining (Fig. 2A). Spindle cells were consistently positive on immunohistochemical staining for D2–40 (Fig. 2B), CD34 (Fig. 2C), and HHV-8 (Fig. 2D), as previously reported [28], [29]. We assessed the presence of lesions in the esophagus, stomach, duodenum, terminal ileum, colon, and rectum. Before endoscopy, we examined all patients for cutaneous lesions of KS.
A) Spindle cell proliferation found in the submucosa on hematoxylin and eosin (HE) staining. B) Immunohistochemical staining revealing strong expression of CD34. C) Immunohistochemical staining revealing expression of D2–40. Vascular gaps are lined with endothelial cells on staining for CD34 and D2–40. D) Some endothelial cells are positive for human herpes virus 8 (HHV-8).
Statistical analysis
After summarizing the descriptive patient characteristics, to identify predictive clinical factors for diagnosing GI-KS, we calculated odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The relationship between GI-KS and categories of CD4 cell count, HIV-RNA VL, and HAART duration were evaluated using the chi-square test for linear trends. For multivariable analysis, we used a multiple logistic regression model that included all factors showing values of p<0.1 on univariate analysis. Exact logistic regression was also used if the number in a cell was 0. A final model was then developed by backward selection of factors showing values of p<0.10.
The relationships between endoscopic severity of GI-KS and clinical factors were also evaluated using the chi-square test. Values of p<0.10 were considered significant. All statistical analysis was performed using Stata version 10 software (StataCorp LP, College Station, TX).
Results
Participants
Of the 1,064 potential study subjects recruited who underwent endoscopy, we excluded 37 who underwent endoscopy for follow-up evaluation shortly after treatment for GI diseases. Ultimately, the remaining 1,027 patients were selected for data analysis.
Baseline characteristics
Characteristics of the 1,027 patients with HIV are shown in Table 1. Median age was 44 years (interquartile range [IQR], 36–56 years). Patients were predominantly male (91.8%).
Routes of HIV infection included MSM (67.0%), heterosexual (17.0%), hemophilia (13.6%), drug usage (0.2%), and unknown (2.1%). Median CD4 count was 239 cells/µL (IQR, 100–406 cells/µL). Median HIV-RNA VL was <40 copies/mL (IQR, <40–33,000 copies/mL). A total of 739 patients (72.0%) had received HAART.
GI symptoms were noted in 368 patients (35.8%) as follows: appetite loss (n = 6); throat pain (n = 8); dysphagia (n = 11); reflux or heartburn (n = 22); epigastric pain (n = 87); nausea or vomiting (n = 36); hematemesis (n = 25); tarry stool (n = 43); hematochezia (n = 54); diarrhea (n = 87); distended abdomen (n = 2); and lower abdominal pain (n = 17).
Characteristics of GI-KS
Of the 1,027 patients, 33 (3.2%) were diagnosed with GI-KS (Table 1). GI lesions were found in the esophagus (n = 10), stomach (n = 20), duodenum (n = 17), terminal ileum (n = 7), colon (n = 13), and rectum (n = 9). Of the patients with GI-KS, 78.8% (26/33) had no GI symptoms and 24.2% (8/33) had no cutaneous KS (Table 1).
Five of eight GI-KS patients without cutaneous involvement underwent HAART for a mean duration of 1.84 months.
Predictive clinical factors of GI-KS
Univariate analysis identified MSM, CD4 count <100 cells/µL, HIV RNA VL ≥10,000 copies/mL, no history of HAART, and the presence of cutaneous KS as significant clinical factors for the development of GI-KS (Table 2).
As the CD4 count decreased (≥300; 200–299; 100–199; and <100 cells/µL), occurrence of GI-KS increased significantly (p<0.01 for trend in odds, Table 1). As HIV RNA viral load increased (VL≤40; 40<VL≤10,000; 10,000<VL≤100,000; and VL>100,000 copies/ml), the occurrence of GI-KS increased significantly (p<0.01 for trend in odds, Table 1). Multivariable analysis showed cutaneous KS (OR, 144.8, 95%CI, 58.5–358.2, p<0.01) was the only independent clinical factor related to GI-KS.
Predictive clinical factors of GI-KS in patients without GI symptoms
Univariate analysis identified MSM, CD4 count <100 cells/µL, HIV RNA VL≥10,000 copies/mL, no history of HAART, and presence of cutaneous KS as significant clinical factors for the development of GI-KS (Table 2). Multivariable analysis showed cutaneous KS (OR, 128.7, 95%CI, 44.1–376.1, p<0.01) was the only independent clinical factor related to GI-KS.
Predictive clinical factors of GI-KS in patients without cutaneous KS
Univariate analysis identified MSM and CD4 count <100 cells/µL as significant clinical factors for the development of GI-KS (Table 2). Multivariable analysis showed MSM (OR, 5.18, 95%CI, 0.79–∞, p = 0.09) and CD4 count <100 cells/µL (OR, 9.55, 95%CI, 1.69–97.7, p<0.01) were the only independent clinical factors related to GI-KS.
Predictive clinical factors for endoscopic severity of GI-KS
Endoscopic severity was found in the form of bulky tumors (n = 10), ulcerous lesions (n = 11), and multiple lesions (n = 9). Relationships between endoscopic severity of GI-KS and clinical factors are shown in Table 3. In the analysis of GI-KS patients, endoscopic severity in the form of bulky tumors was found to be associated with CD4 cell count <100 cells/µL (p = 0.04). Endoscopic severity in the form of multiple lesions was found to be associated with HIV RNA VL≥10,000 copies/mL (p<0.05). No significant difference was noted in the presence of cutaneous KS between the mild groups and the severe group on endoscopy.
Discussion
Endoscopy is clearly a valuable diagnostic method for identifying GI-KS, but it is not recommended for all HIV-infected patients because of considerations of cost and invasiveness. The present study therefore sought to answer which HIV-infected patients need endoscopy to detect visceral KS.
We found that MSM, low CD4 (<100 cells/µL), high HIV RNA VL (>10,000 copies/mL), no history of HAART, and presence of cutaneous KS were predictive clinical factors for GI-KS on univariate analysis. Our findings are consistent with past studies on HIV-infected patients from Western countries that showed an association between clinical factors and cutaneous KS or visceral KS [2], [2], [4]–[7], [9]–[13].
Endoscopy is usually considered to be indicated for GI-KS diagnosis in patients who have GI symptoms [17], [18]. However, GI-KS can reportedly be detected even in patients without GI symptoms [19], [20]. Indeed, we found that 79% of the patients we identified with GI-KS were asymptomatic. Both uni- and multivariable analysis showed that the presence of GI symptoms is not useful in predicting GI-KS. Furthermore, predictive factors for GI-KS were unchanged among patients without GI symptoms.
Previous studies have shown that KS occurs more commonly among MSM with AIDS than among heterosexual individuals with AIDS [2], [7], [8]. However, the true sexual behavior of a patient might not be able to be ascertainable in interviews, as was attempted in this study. Some MSM patients may well have been included among the unknown cases of non-GI-KS patients, in whom the OR of sexual behavior would be difficult to evaluate.
HAART is known to represent a highly effective treatment for GI-KS, and can improve the immune status of patients [4]–[6], [9]–[11]. The present study found that a history of long-term administration of HAART reduced the occurrence of GI-KS.
It has previously been shown that patients with KS typically have a low CD4 cell count (<150 cells/µL) and a high HIV RNA VL (>10,000 copies/mL) [9]–[11]. However, CD4 levels and HIV-RNA VLs have yet to be fully investigated in GI-KS patients. The present study demonstrated that the prevalence of GI-KS tended to increase significantly with low CD4 cell count and with high HIV RNA VL. The presence of GI involvement with KS may vary according to immune status.
KS manifests primarily as a cutaneous disorder, with visceral involvement considered to occur subsequently [2], [12]. In this study, the presence of cutaneous KS was found to be closely related to GI-KS on uni- and multivariable analysis. These results suggest that endoscopy may be indicated for patients with cutaneous KS.
It has been reported that GI-KS can occur in the absence of cutaneous disease [20], [21]. Thus, we assessed the clinical factors among patients without cutaneous disease. We found that MSM and CD4 count <100 cells/µL were the only independent clinical factors related to GI-KS. Our results represent the first confirmation of this finding evaluated in a case-control study.
We investigated the possibility that HAART administration led to the disappearance of cutaneous KS prior to the diagnosis of GI-KS in patients without cutaneous involvement. In fact, five of eight GI-KS patients without cutaneous KS had a history of HAART. However, the mean duration of the administration was less than 2 months, and it is difficult to imagine that cutaneous KS disappeared from the whole body in such a short period of time. Therefore, it is unlikely that HAART administration had any involvement in the absence of cutaneous KS in these GI-KS patients.
In this study, we assessed endoscopic severity such as tumor bulk, ulceration, and multiple lesions as these may cause obstruction, hemorrhage, and perforation [14], [22]–[26]. We found, for the first time, that CD4 count (<100 cells/µL) or high HIV RNA VL (≥10,000 copies/mL) were key clinical factors to predict severe GI lesions on endoscopy.
A key limitation of this study was the single-center, retrospective nature of the investigation. When considering indications for endoscopy, a randomized controlled study is required to identify whether endoscopy can prevent the development of severe GI complications in HIV-infected patients, particularly among those with a low CD4 count. Second, the number of GI-KS patients was relatively small, especially those without cutaneous KS. The statistical power of the study might thus have been low due to the small number of cases.
Conclusions
To diagnose GI-KS, clinical factors need to be considered before endoscopy is undertaken. Presence of GI symptoms is not useful in predicting GI-KS. The presence of cutaneous KS, MSM sexual behavior, low CD4 count (<100 cells/µL), high HIV RNA VL, and no history of HAART are predictive factors for GI-KS. Even if patients have no cutaneous KS, endoscopy may be suitable for patients with MSM and low CD4 count (<100 cells/µL). Caution should be exercised especially in patients with a low CD4 count (<100 cells/µL) or high HIV RNA VL (≥10,000 copies/mL) as they are more likely to develop severe GI-KS lesions. This diagnostic strategy could facilitate early diagnosis of GI-KS.
Acknowledgments
We are grateful to Hisae Kawashiro (Clinical Research Coordinator) for help with data collection.
Author Contributions
Conceived and designed the experiments: NN SO NU. Performed the experiments: NN TI. Analyzed the data: KT NO TS. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: HY NA. Wrote the paper: NN SO NU JA KT NO.
References
- 1. Braun M (1982) Classics in oncology. idiopathic multiple pigmented sarcoma of the skin by kaposi. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians 32: 340–347.
- 2. Beral V, Peterman TA, Berkelman RL, Jaffe HW (1990) Kaposi's sarcoma among persons with AIDS: A sexually transmitted infection? Lancet 335: 123–128.
- 3. Chang Y, Cesarman E, Pessin MS, Lee F, Culpepper J, et al. (1994) Identification of herpesvirus-like DNA sequences in AIDS-associated kaposi's sarcoma. Science 266: 1865–1869.
- 4. Buchacz K, Baker RK, Palella FJ Jr, Chmiel JS, Lichtenstein KA, et al. (2010) AIDS-defining opportunistic illnesses in US patients, 1994–2007: A cohort study. AIDS (London, England) 24: 1549–1559.
- 5. Engels EA, Pfeiffer RM, Goedert JJ, Virgo P, McNeel TS, et al. (2006) Trends in cancer risk among people with AIDS in the united states 1980–2002. AIDS (London, England) 20: 1645–1654.
- 6. Biggar RJ, Rabkin CS (1996) The epidemiology of AIDS–related neoplasms. Hematology/oncology Clinics of North America 10: 997–1010.
- 7. Mocroft A, Kirk O, Clumeck N, Gargalianos-Kakolyris P, Trocha H, et al. (2004) The changing pattern of kaposi sarcoma in patients with HIV, 1994–2003: The EuroSIDA study. Cancer 100: 2644–2654.
- 8. Beral V, Bull D, Darby S, Weller I, Carne C, et al. (1992) Risk of kaposi's sarcoma and sexual practices associated with faecal contact in homosexual or bisexual men with AIDS. Lancet 339: 632–635.
- 9. Lodi S, Guiguet M, Costagliola D, Fisher M, de Luca A, et al. (2010) Kaposi sarcoma incidence and survival among HIV-infected homosexual men after HIV seroconversion. Journal of the National Cancer Institute 102: 784–792.
- 10. Gallafent JH, Buskin SE, De Turk PB, Aboulafia DM (2005) Profile of patients with kaposi's sarcoma in the era of highly active antiretroviral therapy. Journal of Clinical Oncology: Official Journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology 23: 1253–1260.
- 11. Stebbing J, Sanitt A, Nelson M, Powles T, Gazzard B, et al. (2006) A prognostic index for AIDS-associated kaposi's sarcoma in the era of highly active antiretroviral therapy. Lancet 367: 1495–1502.
- 12. Dezube BJ (1996) Clinical presentation and natural history of AIDS–related kaposi's sarcoma. Hematology/oncology Clinics of North America 10: 1023–1029.
- 13. Ngendahayo P, Mets T, Bugingo G, Parkin DM (1989) [Kaposi's sarcoma in rwanda: Clinico-pathological and epidemiological aspects]. Bulletin Du Cancer 76: 383–394.
- 14. Danzig JB, Brandt LJ, Reinus JF, Klein RS (1991) Gastrointestinal malignancy in patients with AIDS. The American Journal of Gastroenterology 86: 715–718.
- 15. Laine L, Amerian J, Rarick M, Harb M, Gill PS (1990) The response of symptomatic gastrointestinal kaposi's sarcoma to chemotherapy: A prospective evaluation using an endoscopic method of disease quantification. The American Journal of Gastroenterology 85: 959–961.
- 16. Ioachim HL, Adsay V, Giancotti FR, Dorsett B, Melamed J (1995) Kaposi's sarcoma of internal organs. A multiparameter study of 86 cases. Cancer 75: 1376–1385.
- 17. Krown SE, Testa MA, Huang J (1997) AIDS-related kaposi's sarcoma: Prospective validation of the AIDS clinical trials group staging classification. AIDS clinical trials group oncology committee. Journal of Clinical Oncology: Official Journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology 15: 3085–3092.
- 18. Nasti G, Talamini R, Antinori A, Martellotta F, Jacchetti G, et al. (2003) AIDS-related kaposi's sarcoma: Evaluation of potential new prognostic factors and assessment of the AIDS clinical trial group staging system in the haart era–the italian cooperative group on AIDS and tumors and the italian cohort of patients naive from antiretrovirals. Journal of Clinical Oncology: Official Journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology 21: 2876–2882.
- 19. Friedman SL, Wright TL, Altman DF (1985) Gastrointestinal kaposi's sarcoma in patients with acquired immunodeficiency syndrome. endoscopic and autopsy findings. Gastroenterology 89: 102–108.
- 20. Kahl P, Buettner R, Friedrichs N, Merkelbach-Bruse S, Wenzel J, et al. (2007) Kaposi's sarcoma of the gastrointestinal tract: Report of two cases and review of the literature. Pathology, Research and Practice 203: 227–231.
- 21. Barrison IG, Foster S, Harris JW, Pinching AJ, Walker JG (1988) Upper gastrointestinal kaposi's sarcoma in patients positive for HIV antibody without cutaneous disease. British Medical Journal (Clinical Research Ed.) 296: 92–93.
- 22. Yoshida EM, Chan NH, Chan-Yan C, Baird RM (1997) Perforation of the jejunum secondary to AIDS-related gastrointestinal kaposi's sarcoma. Canadian Journal of Gastroenterology = Journal Canadien De Gastroenterologie 11: 38–40.
- 23. Nagata N, Yazaki H, Oka S (2011) Kaposi's sarcoma presenting as a bulky tumor mass of the colon. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 9: A22.
- 24. Lingenfelser T, Daiss W, Overkamp D, Weber P (1994) Successful monochemotherapy of extensive gastrointestinal kaposi's sarcoma with bowel obstruction in acquired immunodeficiency syndrome. Zeitschrift Fur Gastroenterologie 32: 688–690.
- 25. Carratala J, Lacasa JM, Mascaro J, Torras JT (1992) AIDS presenting as duodenal perforation due to kaposi's sarcoma. AIDS (London, England) 6: 241–242.
- 26. Ravalli S, Vincent RA, Beaton H (1990) Primary kaposi's sarcoma of the gastrointestinal tract presenting as acute appendicitis. The American Journal of Gastroenterology 85: 772–773.
- 27. Weprin L, Zollinger R, Clausen K, Thomas FB (1982) Kaposi's sarcoma: Endoscopic observations of gastric and colon involvement. Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology 4: 357–360.
- 28. Kahn HJ, Bailey D, Marks A (2002) Monoclonal antibody D2–40, a new marker of lymphatic endothelium, reacts with kaposi's sarcoma and a subset of angiosarcomas. Modern Pathology: An Official Journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc 15: 434–440.
- 29. Rosado FG, Itani DM, Coffin CM, Cates JM (2012) Utility of immunohistochemical staining with FLI1, D2–40, CD31, and CD34 in the diagnosis of acquired immunodeficiency syndrome-related and non-acquired immunodeficiency syndrome-related kaposi sarcoma. Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine 136: 301–304.