Advertisement
Research Article

Catecholate Siderophores Protect Bacteria from Pyochelin Toxicity

  • Conrado Adler,

    Affiliation: Departamento de Bioquímica de la Nutrición, INSIBIO (Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas-Universidad Nacional de Tucumán) San Miguel de Tucumán, Tucumán, Argentina

    X
  • Natalia S. Corbalán,

    Affiliation: Departamento de Bioquímica de la Nutrición, INSIBIO (Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas-Universidad Nacional de Tucumán) San Miguel de Tucumán, Tucumán, Argentina

    X
  • Mohammad R. Seyedsayamdost,

    Affiliation: Department of Biological Chemistry and Molecular Pharmacology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America

    X
  • María Fernanda Pomares,

    Affiliation: Departamento de Bioquímica de la Nutrición, INSIBIO (Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas-Universidad Nacional de Tucumán) San Miguel de Tucumán, Tucumán, Argentina

    X
  • Ricardo E. de Cristóbal,

    Affiliation: Departamento de Bioquímica de la Nutrición, INSIBIO (Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas-Universidad Nacional de Tucumán) San Miguel de Tucumán, Tucumán, Argentina

    X
  • Jon Clardy,

    Affiliation: Department of Biological Chemistry and Molecular Pharmacology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America

    X
  • Roberto Kolter,

    Affiliation: Department of Microbiology and Immunobiology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America

    X
  • Paula A. Vincent mail

    pvincent@fbqf.unt.edu.ar

    Affiliation: Departamento de Bioquímica de la Nutrición, INSIBIO (Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas-Universidad Nacional de Tucumán) San Miguel de Tucumán, Tucumán, Argentina

    X
  • Published: October 05, 2012
  • DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0046754

Abstract

Background

Bacteria produce small molecule iron chelators, known as siderophores, to facilitate the acquisition of iron from the environment. The synthesis of more than one siderophore and the production of multiple siderophore uptake systems by a single bacterial species are common place. The selective advantages conferred by the multiplicity of siderophore synthesis remains poorly understood. However, there is growing evidence suggesting that siderophores may have other physiological roles besides their involvement in iron acquisition.

Methods and Principal Findings

Here we provide the first report that pyochelin displays antibiotic activity against some bacterial strains. Observation of differential sensitivity to pyochelin against a panel of bacteria provided the first indications that catecholate siderophores, produced by some bacteria, may have roles other than iron acquisition. A pattern emerged where only those strains able to make catecholate-type siderophores were resistant to pyochelin. We were able to associate pyochelin resistance to catecholate production by showing that pyochelin-resistant Escherichia coli became sensitive when biosynthesis of its catecholate siderophore enterobactin was impaired. As expected, supplementation with enterobactin conferred pyochelin resistance to the entE mutant. We observed that pyochelin-induced growth inhibition was independent of iron availability and was prevented by addition of the reducing agent ascorbic acid or by anaerobic incubation. Addition of pyochelin to E. coli increased the levels of reactive oxygen species (ROS) while addition of ascorbic acid or enterobactin reduced them. In contrast, addition of the carboxylate-type siderophore, citrate, did not prevent pyochelin-induced ROS increases and their associated toxicity.

Conclusions

We have shown that the catecholate siderophore enterobactin protects E. coli against the toxic effects of pyochelin by reducing ROS. Thus, it appears that catecholate siderophores can behave as protectors of oxidative stress. These results support the idea that siderophores can have physiological roles aside from those in iron acquisition.

Introduction

In response to iron starvation, many bacteria synthesize and secrete siderophores, small molecules with high affinities for iron [1], [2]. While there is a very large number of different siderophores, they all belong to a few structural classes, including catecholate, carboxylate, hydroxamate, and mixed ligand siderophores [3]. Once ferrated, all siderophores - regardless of structural class - must be taken up into the cell, which is accomplished via dedicated transport systems [4]. Microbial cells are thus able to scavenge iron, usually present in short supply due to its low solubility. Interestingly, many microbes produce the transport systems for siderophores that they themselves do not synthesize, allowing for “siderophore piracy” [5].

The capacity to produce numerous iron uptake systems is exemplified by the enteric bacterium Escherichia coli, where the process has been extensively studied. E. coli produces its primary siderophore enterobactin and takes it up via the fep system [6]. In addition, E. coli strains may have up to eight other iron uptake systems including those for ferrichrome (fhu), ferric citrate (fec), aerobactin (iut), heme (chu), rhodotorulic acid and coprogen (fhuE), salmochelin (iro), yersiniabactin (ybt), and ferrous iron (feo) [7], [8], [9], [10], [11], [12], [13], [14], [15].

Aside from their ability to provide access to iron, siderophores may have alternative roles. A representative example is the production of pyochelin by the opportunistic pathogen Pseudomonas aeruginosa. This bacterium produces two siderophores: pyoverdine, with a high affinity for iron, and pyochelin, whose affinity for iron is much lower [16], [17]. Although P. aeruginosa can use pyochelin as a bona fide siderophore, pyochelin’s role remains unclear. Interestingly, pyochelin has been shown to have non-specific toxic effects on eukaryotic cells due to its ability to generate reactive oxygen species [18]. Watasemycins, molecules structurally related to pyochelin (Fig. 1), have been shown to have antibiotic activity as well [19]. There are previous reports showing antibiotic activity for other siderophores with varied chemical structures, e.g oxachelin [20], fusigen [21] and the sideromycins: albomycin and salmycin [22].

thumbnail

Figure 1. Chemical structures of the siderophores pyochelin, watasemycin A, yersiniabactin, enterobactin and citrate.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0046754.g001

Here we report an interesting interaction between pyochelin and enterobactin producers that occurs independent of the availability of iron. While investigating bacterial interspecies interactions, we discovered that P. aeruginosa kills Xanthomonas citri subsp citri in vitro. We purified the compound responsible for the antibiotic activity and showed that it was pyochelin (Fig. 1). This came as a surprise as there had been no prior reports of pyochelin’s antibacterial activity. Analysis of the spectrum of the antibacterial activity of pyochelin revealed that bacteria unable to produce catecholate siderophores were sensitive to pyochelin while catecholate siderophore producers were resistant. We also show that pyochelin toxicity is not a result of iron competition, but due to the generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS), and that catechol siderophores confer resistance to pyochelin by reducing ROS. These results further solidify the observations that pyochelin is not just a siderophore but can also have toxic effects on diverse cells, and suggest that catecholate siderophores can play a role as protectors against oxidative stress.

Results

Pyochelin Inhibits Non Catechol-siderophore-producer Strains

Our initial interest was to identify bacteria capable of killing Xanthomonas citri subsp. citri, the causative agent of citrus canker disease. In a screen for bacteria that had anti-Xanthomonas activity, we discovered that strains of P. aeruginosa displayed antibiosis against X. citri. We used HPLC-MS and UV spectral analyses to characterize the compound responsible for this antibiotic activity and found it to be pyochelin (Fig. S1). We began to investigate the properties of pyochelin by exploring the spectrum of its antibiotic activity. We tested eleven bacterial strains for their resistance or sensitivity to pyochelin. Table 1 shows the minimal inhibitory concentrations (MIC) for the strains tested. Several Xanthomonas species and Staphylococcus aureus were sensitive. In contrast, several members of the Enterobacteriaceae were resistant. We thus became interested in determining the molecular basis for the differential sensitivity to pyochelin among different bacteria.

thumbnail

Table 1. MIC of pyochelin against selected bacterial strains.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0046754.t001

Our initial hypothesis was that the range of sensitivity to pyochelin was due to differences among these bacteria in their ability to acquire iron in the presence of pyochelin. To test this hypothesis we determined the MIC of pyochelin on the sensitive strains in the presence of excess of iron (100 µM). Surprisingly, we observed virtually no change in MIC (at most a one-fold dilution difference) when iron was added (Table 2). This allowed us to rule out iron sequestration as a mechanism for pyochelin toxicity. These results required the formulation of an alternative hypothesis.

thumbnail

Table 2. Influence of iron on the MIC of pyochelin.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0046754.t002

We reasoned that perhaps differences in siderophore production might underlie pyochelin resistance. A literature survey indicated that all resistant strains were able to synthesize catecholate siderophores. Specifically, all resistant strains were able to synthesize the tri-catecholate siderophore enterobactin. In contrast, sensitive strains were not. Instead, they produce other structural types of siderophores; S. aureus produces the carboxylate siderophore staphyloferrin A [23] while Xanthomonas spp. produce α-hydroxycarboxylate-type siderophores [24], [25].

These insights from the literature allowed us to refine our hypothesis that enterobactin was, in some way, responsible for pyochelin resistance. To test this hypothesis we focused our attention on the genetically tractable model bacterium E. coli. We compared the sensitivity to pyochelin using a wild-type E. coli and a mutant impaired in enterobactin synthesis (E. coli entE). Consistent with our hypothesis, E. coli unable to synthesize enterobactin were highly sensitive to pyochelin (Table 3). As was the case with the naturally sensitive strains, iron supplementation did not rescue E. coli entE from pyochelin toxicity (Table 3).

thumbnail

Table 3. MIC of pyochelin in the presence of selected additives.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0046754.t003

Pyochelin Toxicity is Due to Generation of Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS)

It has been previously reported that pyochelin can catalyse the Haber-Weiss reaction in vitro and therefore generate reactive oxygen species (ROS) [26], [27]. In addition, it has been shown that endothelial cells exposed to pyochelin and pyocyanin together suffered from cellular damage due to the generation of hydroxyl radicals [18]. Taking into account that the pyochelin-induced bacterial growth inhibition was not affected by iron concentrations, we hypothesized that pyochelin could be inhibiting bacterial growth of the sensitive strains by causing oxidative damage. Quantitation of ROS using DCFA-DA, a fluorescent reporter of ROS [28], revealed increased ROS levels in E. coli entE after exposure to pyochelin (Fig. 2). Importantly and as expected, addition of the reducing agent ascorbic acid resulted in lower ROS levels (Fig. 2). Consistent with the idea that ROS are the cause of pyochelin sensitivity, ascorbic acid reduced the senstivity of E. coli entE to pyochelin (Table 3). In addition, anaerobic culture conditions rendered E. coli entE less sensitive to pyochelin (Table 4). These results indicate a correlation between ROS levels and pyochelin toxicity.

thumbnail

Figure 2. Levels of reactive oxygen species in E. coli wild type and entE mutant.

Quantitation of ROS levels using the DCFA-DA probe. Fluorescence intensities are relative to that of the control. Control: wt grown in 2 mL M9 medium; PCH indicates cells grown in the presence of 15 µM pyochelin; ASC indicates supplementation with 1 mM ascorbic acid; ENT designates addition of 1 µM of pure enterobactin; CIT indicates supplementation with 50 µM citrate. Error bars = SEM, n = 3.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0046754.g002
thumbnail

Table 4. Growth inhibition by pyochelin under aerobic and anaerobic culture conditions.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0046754.t004

Enterobactin Reduces the Levels of ROS and Sensitivity to Pyochelin

Given that a mutation in the enterobactin biosynthetic pathway rendered E. coli sensitive to pyochelin (Table 3), and that pyochelin toxicity was correlated with ROS levels, we wondered if enterobactin could reduce them. Because of their low radical reduction potentials, catechols can act as hydrogen atom donors and efficiently terminate radical chain reactions [29]. Fig. 2 shows that 1 µM enterobactin prevented pyochelin-mediated ROS generation in an entE mutant. Accordingly, a wild-type E. coli strain showed a small increase in ROS levels upon pyochelin addition (Fig. 2). As expected, addition of 1 µM enterobactin rendered E. coli entE resistant to pyochelin (Table 3). In contrast, addition of the carboxylate-type siderophore, citrate (50 µM) (Fig. 1), had no effect on the pyochelin sensitivity of the E. coli entE strain (Table 3). Moreover, citrate addition (50 µM) did not reduce pyochelin-induced ROS (Fig. 2). In addition, comparison of ROS levels in wild-type E. coli and E. coli entE in the absence of pyochelin showed increased ROS levels in the strain impaired in enterobactin synthesis (Fig. 2). Finally, supplementing E. coli entE with 1 µM enterobactin lowered ROS to the levels observed in the wild type (Fig. 2). Given that enterobactin contains three catechol groups (Fig. 1) and lowers ROS levels, we suggest a role for enterobactin as a protector from the damaging effects of ROS.

Discussion

The results presented in this work suggest two new activities for two old, known siderophores: First, that pyochelin acts as an antibacterial agent due to its capacity to generate ROS, and second, that enterobactin can protect against ROS. Bacterial species that produce catecholate siderophores such as enterobactin, are resistant to pyochelin while those that synthesize carboxylate-type siderophores are sensitive to it. Therefore, despite their ability to chelate and facillitate iron uptake, carboxylate siderophores do not have the capacity to protect cells from the toxic effects of pyochelin. Importantly, impairment of enterobactin synthesis by mutation rendered E. coli sensitive to pyochelin. The fact that sensitivity to pyochelin did not change by iron supplementation or by citrate addition further supports the protective role proposed for catechols. Given that both enterobactin and citrate facilitate iron uptake, we ruled out an enterobactin protection mechanism connected with simple iron acquisition. Then, we observed that pyochelin increased ROS levels in an E. coli entE culture and that addition of the reducing agent ascorbic acid or enterobactin counteracted this effect. In contrast, citrate did not reduce pyochelin-induced ROS. Based on iron affinity constants of enterobactin (1049 M−1) [4] and citrate (1024 M−1) [30], we reasoned that both siderophores would be able to displace iron from any pyochelin-iron complex (pyochelin Ka = 105 M−1) [31]. However, since only enterobactin protects against pyochelin toxicity, we can assume that the enterobactin protection mechanism would not imply lessening the generation of pyochelin-induced ROS by sequestering iron. Therefore, we suggest that enterobactin protects against pyochelin-induced oxidative stress by a mechanism involving radical scavenging, as is reported for polyphenols [32]. The reduced toxicity of pyochelin in anaerobic culture conditions strenghthens our hypothesis. In toto, our results provide additional evidence suggesting that molecules with siderophore activity can play other roles in microbial physiology.

Several features of pyochelin’s chemistry and biology are indicative that its major role may not be that of an iron chelator. Pyochelin’s affinity for iron is low and it binds other metals, e.g. copper, with similar affinities [31]. Pyochelin also lacks six chelating groups to participate in iron complexation, a feature typical of many bona fide siderophores [16]. At the same time, pyochelin’s ability to generate ROS and its antibacterial activity point to its potential to act as a toxin. Along these lines, it was previously shown that pyochelin along with pyoverdine were in part responsible for the P. aeruginosa-mediated suppression of Pythium-induced damping-off of tomato [33]. In addition, watasemycins, compounds structurally close to pyochelin (Fig. 1), have been reported to have antibiotic activity against S. aureus but not against E. coli [19]. On the other hand, yersiniabactin, a siderophore produced by Yersinia species [34], Pseudomonas syringae [35], and some uropathogenic E. coli strains [36], even though it is structurally close to pyochelin (Fig. 1), did not inhibit E. coli entE, X. citri subsp. citri or S. aureus at concentrations up to 2 mM (Data not shown). This indicates that structural differences between pyochelin, watasemycins and yersiniabactin are relevant in terms of the role each siderophore may play, perhaps by affecting their ability to reach their celullar targets and/or by affecting ROS generation. Like pyochelin, the redox-active phenazines, also produced by P. aeruginosa, have been shown to have antimicrobial activity through ROS generation and they also facilitate iron uptake [37], [38]. The primary role of phenazines may be to participate in intercelullar signalling that leads to extracelullar matrix synthesis and the consequent development of complex colony architecture [39]. The possibility of pyochelin taking part in similar developmental processes should not be overlooked. It will thus be important to further examine other physiological roles of pyochelin and the benefits that it confers to producer strains.

Siderophore biosynthesis is primarily regulated by iron availability but there is evidence that their production can be influenced by other stimuli, particularly agents that mediate oxidative damage. Catecholate siderophore biosynthesis in Azotobacter vinelandii has been shown to be under SoxS control and responsive to oxidative stress [40], [41]. When treated with paraquat, Bacillus anthracis accumulates the two catecholate siderophores bacillibactin and petrobactin [42]. Interestingly, iron-mediated repression of petrobactin synthesis is delayed under highly aerated culture conditions [42]. These results emphasize the existence of factors involved in the regulation of siderophore biosynthesis in addition to the lack of iron availability. Since enterobactin protects against the ROS-mediated toxic effects of pyochelin and impairment of enterobactin biosynthesis increases ROS levels, we suggest that catechols may be employed as protectants against oxidative stress. Thus, enterobactin should be added to the long list of defences that E. coli has evolved to cope with conditions of oxidative stress.

Materials and Methods

Bacterial Strains and Growth Conditions

Strains used in this work are listed in Table 5. Strains were grown in M9 medium supplemented with 0.2% Casamino acids, 0.2% glucose, 1 mM MgSO4 and 1 µg/mL vitamin B1. Solid media contained 1.5% agar. Kanamycin 50 µg/mL, was added when required. Standing cultures were performed in 2 mL tubes containing 1.5 mL of culture medium. 300 µL of mineral oil was added for anaerobic cultures.

thumbnail

Table 5. List of strains used in this work.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0046754.t005

Pyochelin Purification

Pyochelin was obtained from Pseudomonas aeruginosa PA01 cultures grown for 20 h at 30°C in M9 medium supplemented with 0.2% Casamino acids, 0.2% glucose, 1 mM MgSO4 and 1 µg/mL vitamin B1. The cell free supernatant was loaded into a 1 g C18 cartridge (Phenomenex) which had been equilibrated in 20% MeOH in water, and eluted stepwise with 40%, 60%, 80% and 100% methanol (in water). The 40% fraction was concentrated in vacuo and further purified by HPLC using a C18 Phenomenex Luna column (4.6×10 mm, 5 micron) and a gradient of 10 to 85% acetonitrile in water containing 0.1% trifluoracetic acid at a flow rate of 1 mL/min. Pyochelin I and II eluted at 42 and 46% MeCN, respectively. The structure of pyochelin was confirmed by HPLC-MS ([M+H]+exp 325.1, obs. 325.1 for both diastereomers) and UV spectral analyses (Fig. S1).

Antibacterial Activity

Minimal inhibitory concentrations (MIC) were determined in M9 medium supplemented with 0.2% Casamino acids, 0.2% glucose, 1 mM MgSO4 and 1 µg/mL vitamin B1. 10 µL of double dilutions from a 1 mg/mL pyochelin solution were spotted on M9 agar plates and a lawn of the corresponding strain was overlaid. The maximum dilution that showed a zone of clearing was recorded as the MIC. FeCl3, ascorbic acid, citrate, enterobactin, were used at concentrations of 100 µM,1 mM, 50 µM, and 1 µM, respectively. Antibacterial activity of yersiniabacin (EMC Microcollections) was evaluated following the same procedure as for pyochelin.

Purification of Enterobactin

Pure enterobactin was obtained from a ME9062 BW25113 culture supernatant following the protocol described by Winkelmann et al, 1994 [43]. Briefly, cells were grown for 20 hours at 37°C in M9 supplemented with 0.2% Casamino acids, 0.2% glucose, 1 mM MgSO4 and 1 µg/mL vitamin B1. The cell free supernatant was acidified to pH 2 using HCl, and enterobactin was extracted once with an equal volume of ethyl acetate. The extract was dried in vacuo and resuspended in methanol. Enterobactin was further purified by HPLC using a C18 Phenomenex Luna column (4.6×10 mm, 5 micron) and a gradient of 10 to 50% acetonitrile in water containing 0.1% trifluoracetic acid at a flow rate of 1 mL/min. The chromatographic profile obtained was similar to that reported by Winkelmann et al [43] (Fig. S2). The peak corresponding to enterobactin was corroborated using an enterobactin standard (EMC Microcollections). Enterobactin concentration was determined using the molar extinction coefficient (ε319 nm:11,200) [44].

Pure enterobactin was used in pyochelin MIC determinations by supplementing M9 plates with 1 µM enterobactin. Enterobactin was also used in ROS determinations at a concentration of 1 µM.

Measurement of Reactive Oxygen Species

To determine the level of reactive oxygen species (ROS), exponentially growing cells in M9 minimal medium, were washed and resuspended in 50 mM sodium phosphate buffer, pH 7 at a final OD600nm = 0.5. Then 2,7-dichlorofluorescein diacetate (H2DCFDA, the oxidation-sensitive probe dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide) was added at a final concentration of 10 µM and incubated for 30 min [28]. After incubation, the cells were washed, resuspended and sonicated in the same buffer. Fluorescence intensity was measured using a Perkin Elmer LS55 spectrofluorometer (excitation λ, 490 nm; emission λ, 519 nm). Results are expressed as relative fluorescence to that of the control.

Supporting Information

Figure S1.

Identification of pyochelin as the antibiotic compound produced by P. aeruginosa. (A) HPLC-MS analysis of authentic pyochelin (black trace), the active antibiotic fraction from P. aeruginosa (red trace), and the pchA mutant of P. aeruginosa (blue trace), which does not display antibiotic activity. Note that pyochelin is isolated as two diastereomers, which correspond to the major peaks (black and red traces) observed with retention times of 12.8 and 13.8 min. (B) UV-visible spectra of the two diastereomeric peaks in authentic pyochelin (black and gray traces) and in the active antibiotic fraction isolated from P. aeruginosa (red and orange traces). The black and gray spectra are obtained for the peaks at 12.8 and 13.8 min, respectively, from authentic pyochelin. The red and orange spectra are obtained for the peaks at 12.8 and 13.8 min, respectively, from the active P. aeruginosa fraction. (C–F) Positive-ion mode mass spectra of the two diastereomeric peaks in authentic pyochelin (C, D) and in the antibiotic fraction isolated from P. aeruginosa (E, F). The mass spectra for the peaks at 12.8 and 13.8 min in authentic pyochelin are shown in panels (C) and (D), respectively. The mass spectra for the peaks at 12.8 and 13.8 min in the active P. aeruginosa fraction are shown in panels (E) and (F), respectively. In each case, the inset corresponds to a magnified view of the major mass ion. In all four cases [M+H]+observed = 325.1. For pyochelin, [M+H]+calculated = 325.1. Together, the identical retention times, UV-visible spectra, and mass spectra show that the active antibiotic fraction from P. aeruginosa is pyochelin.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0046754.s001

(TIF)

Figure S2.

Enterobactin purification. HPLC analysis of ethyl acetate extracts from wild type (red trace) and E. coli entE (blue trace) culture supernatants. The chromatogram obtained for the wild type strain, shows the two characteristic major peaks described by Winkelmann et al [43] (inset), corresponding to enterobactin (E) and the monomer involved in enterobactin synthesis, dihydroxybenzoyl serine (M). The peak corresponding to enterobactin displayed the same retention time as the enterobactin standard (black trace) and both enterobactin solutions showed a protective activity against pyochelin toxicity. The two major peaks (E and M) are absent in the chromatogram profile for the entE mutant strain (blue trace) and no collected fraction showed protective activity as it was expected.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0046754.s002

(TIF)

Acknowledgments

We thank EEAOC and Cátedra de Bacteriología (UNT) for kindly providing strains.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: CA PAV. Performed the experiments: CA MRS NSC MFP. Analyzed the data: CA NSC MRS REDC JC RK PAV. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: RK JC PAV. Wrote the paper: CA MRS RK PAV.

References

  1. 1. Andrews SC, Robinson AK, Rodriguez-Quinones F (2003) Bacterial iron homeostasis. FEMS Microbiol Rev 27: 215–237. doi: 10.1016/s0168-6445(03)00055-x
  2. 2. Wooldridge KG, Williams PH (1993) Iron uptake mechanisms of pathogenic bacteria. FEMS Microbiol Rev 12: 325–348. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6976.1993.tb00026.x
  3. 3. Hider RC, Kong X (2010) Chemistry and biology of siderophores. Nat Prod Rep 27: 637–657. doi: 10.1039/b906679a
  4. 4. Miethke M, Marahiel MA (2007) Siderophore-based iron acquisition and pathogen control. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 71: 413–451. doi: 10.1128/mmbr.00012-07
  5. 5. D’Onofrio A, Crawford JM, Stewart EJ, Witt K, Gavrish E, et al. (2010) Siderophores from neighboring organisms promote the growth of uncultured bacteria. Chem Biol 17: 254–264. doi: 10.1016/j.chembiol.2010.02.010
  6. 6. Raymond KN, Dertz EA, Kim SS (2003) Enterobactin: an archetype for microbial iron transport. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 100: 3584–3588. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0630018100
  7. 7. Sorsa LJ, Dufke S, Heesemann J, Schubert S (2003) Characterization of an iroBCDEN gene cluster on a transmissible plasmid of uropathogenic Escherichia coli: evidence for horizontal transfer of a chromosomal virulence factor. Infect Immun 71: 3285–3293. doi: 10.1128/iai.71.6.3285-3293.2003
  8. 8. Faraldo-Gomez JD, Sansom MS (2003) Acquisition of siderophores in gram-negative bacteria. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 4: 105–116. doi: 10.1038/nrm1015
  9. 9. Chenault SS, Earhart CF (1991) Organization of genes encoding membrane proteins of the Escherichia coli ferrienterobactin permease. Mol Microbiol 5: 1405–1413. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.1991.tb00787.x
  10. 10. Clarke TE, Tari LW, Vogel HJ (2001) Structural biology of bacterial iron uptake systems. Curr Top Med Chem 1: 7–30. doi: 10.2174/1568026013395623
  11. 11. Kammler M, Schon C, Hantke K (1993) Characterization of the ferrous iron uptake system of Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol 175: 6212–6219.
  12. 12. Negre VL, Bonacorsi S, Schubert S, Bidet P, Nassif X, et al. (2004) The siderophore receptor IroN, but not the high-pathogenicity island or the hemin receptor ChuA, contributes to the bacteremic step of Escherichia coli neonatal meningitis. Infect Immun 72: 1216–1220. doi: 10.1128/iai.72.2.1216-1220.2004
  13. 13. Neilands JB (1992) Mechanism and regulation of synthesis of aerobactin in Escherichia coli K12 (pColV-K30). Can J Microbiol 38: 728–733. doi: 10.1139/m92-119
  14. 14. Ozenberger BA, Nahlik MS, McIntosh MA (1987) Genetic organization of multiple fep genes encoding ferric enterobactin transport functions in Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol 169: 3638–3646.
  15. 15. Torres AG, Payne SM (1997) Haem iron-transport system in enterohaemorrhagic Escherichia coli O157: H7. Mol Microbiol 23: 825–833. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.1997.2641628.x
  16. 16. Cox CD, Rinehart KL Jr, Moore ML, Cook JC Jr (1981) Pyochelin: novel structure of an iron-chelating growth promoter for Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 78: 4256–4260.
  17. 17. Cornelis P (2010) Iron uptake and metabolism in pseudomonads. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 86: 1637–1645. doi: 10.1007/s00253-010-2550-2
  18. 18. Britigan BE, Rasmussen GT, Cox CD (1994) Pseudomonas siderophore pyochelin enhances neutrophil-mediated endothelial cell injury. Am J Physiol 266: L192–198.
  19. 19. Sasaki TI, Igarashi Y, Saito N, Furumai T (2002) Watasemycins A and B, New Antibiotics Produced by Streptomyces sp. TP-A0597. J Antibiot (Tokyo) 55: 249–255. doi: 10.7164/antibiotics.55.249
  20. 20. Sontag B, Gerlitz M, Paululat T, Rasser HF, Grun-Wollny I, et al. (2006) Oxachelin, a novel iron chelator and antifungal agent from Streptomyces sp. GW9/1258. J Antibiot (Tokyo) 59: 659–663. doi: 10.1038/ja.2006.88
  21. 21. Wang WL, Chi ZM, Chi Z, Li J, Wang XH (2009) Siderophore production by the marine-derived Aureobasidium pullulans and its antimicrobial activity. Bioresour Technol 100: 2639–2641. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2008.12.010
  22. 22. Braun V, Pramanik A, Gwinner T, Koberle M, Bohn E (2009) Sideromycins: tools and antibiotics. Biometals 22: 3–13. doi: 10.1007/s10534-008-9199-7
  23. 23. Konetschny-Rapp S, Jung G, Meiwes J, Zahner H (1990) Staphyloferrin A: a structurally new siderophore from staphylococci. Eur J Biochem 191: 65–74. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1990.tb19094.x
  24. 24. Pandey A, Sonti RV (2010) Role of the FeoB protein and siderophore in promoting virulence of Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae on rice. J Bacteriol 192: 3187–3203. doi: 10.1128/jb.01558-09
  25. 25. Etchegaray A, Silva-Stenico ME, Moon DH, Tsai SM (2004) In silico analysis of nonribosomal peptide synthetases of Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. citri: identification of putative siderophore and lipopeptide biosynthetic genes. Microbiol Res 159: 425–437. doi: 10.1016/j.micres.2004.09.009
  26. 26. Britigan BE, Roeder TL, Rasmussen GT, Shasby DM, McCormick ML, et al. (1992) Interaction of the Pseudomonas aeruginosa secretory products pyocyanin and pyochelin generates hydroxyl radical and causes synergistic damage to endothelial cells. Implications for Pseudomonas-associated tissue injury. J Clin Invest 90: 2187–2196. doi: 10.1172/jci116104
  27. 27. Vinckx T, Wei Q, Matthijs S, Noben JP, Daniels R, et al. (2011) A proteome analysis of the response of a Pseudomonas aeruginosa oxyR mutant to iron limitation. Biometals 24: 523–532. doi: 10.1007/s10534-010-9403-4
  28. 28. Davidson JF, Whyte B, Bissinger PH, Schiestl RH (1996) Oxidative stress is involved in heat-induced cell death in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 93: 5116–5121. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.10.5116
  29. 29. Povie G, Villa G, Ford L, Pozzi D, Schiesser CH, et al. Role of catechol in the radical reduction of B-alkylcatecholboranes in presence of methanol. Chem Commun (Camb) 46: 803–805. doi: 10.1039/b917004a
  30. 30. Hussein S, Hantke K, Braun V (1981) Citrate-dependent iron transport system in Escherichia coli K-12. Eur J Biochem 117: 431–437. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1981.tb06357.x
  31. 31. Braud A, Hannauer M, Mislin GL, Schalk IJ (2009) The Pseudomonas aeruginosa pyochelin-iron uptake pathway and its metal specificity. J Bacteriol 191: 3517–3525. doi: 10.1128/jb.00010-09
  32. 32. Perron NR, Brumaghim JL (2009) A review of the antioxidant mechanisms of polyphenol compounds related to iron binding. Cell Biochem Biophys 53: 75–100. doi: 10.1007/s12013-009-9043-x
  33. 33. Buysens S, Heungens K, Poppe J, Hofte M (1996) Involvement of Pyochelin and Pyoverdin in Suppression of Pythium-Induced Damping-Off of Tomato by Pseudomonas aeruginosa 7NSK2. Appl Environ Microbiol 62: 865–871.
  34. 34. Sebbane F, Jarrett C, Gardner D, Long D, Hinnebusch BJ (2010) Role of the Yersinia pestis yersiniabactin iron acquisition system in the incidence of flea-borne plague. PloS One 5: e14379. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0014379
  35. 35. Jones AM, Wildermuth MC (2011) The phytopathogen Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato DC3000 has three high-affinity iron-scavenging systems functional under iron limitation conditions but dispensable for pathogenesis. J Bacteriol 193: 2767–2775. doi: 10.1128/jb.00069-10
  36. 36. Watts RE, Totsika M, Challinor VL, Mabbett AN, Ulett GC, et al. (2012) Contribution of siderophore systems to growth and urinary tract colonization of asymptomatic bacteriuria Escherichia coli. Infect Immun 80: 333–344. doi: 10.1128/iai.05594-11
  37. 37. Chin AWTF, van den Broek D, de Voer G, van der Drift KM, Tuinman S, et al. (2001) Phenazine-1-carboxamide production in the biocontrol strain Pseudomonas chlororaphis PCL1391 is regulated by multiple factors secreted into the growth medium. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 14: 969–979. doi: 10.1094/mpmi.2001.14.8.969
  38. 38. Cox CD (1986) Role of pyocyanin in the acquisition of iron from transferrin. Infect Immun 52: 263–270.
  39. 39. Dietrich LE, Teal TK, Price-Whelan A, Newman DK (2008) Redox-active antibiotics control gene expression and community behavior in divergent bacteria. Science 321: 1203–1206. doi: 10.1126/science.1160619
  40. 40. Tindale AE, Mehrotra M, Ottem D, Page WJ (2000) Dual regulation of catecholate siderophore biosynthesis in Azotobacter vinelandii by iron and oxidative stress. Microbiology 146 (Pt 7): 1617–1626.
  41. 41. Cornish AS, WJ P (1998) The catecholate siderophores of Azotobacter vinelandii: their affinity for iron and role in oxygen stress management. Microbiology 144: 1747–1754. doi: 10.1099/00221287-144-7-1747
  42. 42. Lee JY, Passalacqua KD, Hanna PC, Sherman DH (2011) Regulation of petrobactin and bacillibactin biosynthesis in Bacillus anthracis under iron and oxygen variation. PloS One 6: e20777. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0020777
  43. 43. Winkelmann G, Cansier A, Beck W, Jung G (1994) HPLC separation of enterobactin and linear 2,3-dihydroxybenzoylserine derivatives: a study on mutants of Escherichia coli defective in regulation (fur), esterase (fes) and transport (fepA). Biometals 7: 149–154. doi: 10.1007/bf00140485
  44. 44. Matzanke BF, Ecker DJ, Yang TS, Huynh BH, Muller G, et al. (1986) Escherichia coli iron enterobactin uptake monitored by Mossbauer spectroscopy. J Bacteriol 167: 674–680.