Arthropod-borne apicomplexan pathogens that cause asymptomatic persistent infections present a significant challenge due to their life-long transmission potential. Although anti-microbials have been used to ameliorate acute disease in animals and humans, chemotherapeutic efficacy for apicomplexan pathogen elimination from a persistently infected host and removal of transmission risk is largely unconfirmed. The recent re-emergence of the apicomplexan Theileria equi in U.S. horses prompted testing whether imidocarb dipropionate was able to eliminate T. equi from naturally infected horses and remove transmission risk. Following imidocarb treatment, levels of T. equi declined from a mean of 104.9 organisms/ml of blood to undetectable by nested PCR in 24 of 25 naturally infected horses. Further, blood transfer from treated horses that became nested PCR negative failed to transmit to naïve splenectomized horses. Although these results were consistent with elimination of infection in 24 of 25 horses, T. equi-specific antibodies persisted in the majority of imidocarb treated horses. Imidocarb treatment was unsuccessful in one horse which remained infected as measured by nested PCR and retained the ability to infect a naïve recipient via intravenous blood transfer. However, a second round of treatment eliminated T. equi infection. These results support the utility of imidocarb chemotherapy for assistance in the control and eradication of this tick-borne pathogen. Successful imidocarb dipropionate treatment of persistently infected horses provides a tool to aid the global equine industry by removing transmission risk associated with infection and facilitating international movement of equids between endemic and non-endemic regions.
Citation: Ueti MW, Mealey RH, Kappmeyer LS, White SN, Kumpula-McWhirter N, et al. (2012) Re-Emergence of the Apicomplexan Theileria equi in the United States: Elimination of Persistent Infection and Transmission Risk. PLoS ONE 7(9): e44713. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0044713
Editor: Ulrike Gertrud Munderloh, University of Minnesota, United States of America
Received: May 9, 2012; Accepted: August 7, 2012; Published: September 6, 2012
This is an open-access article, free of all copyright, and may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. The work is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 public domain dedication.
Funding: This work was supported by United States Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service 5348-32000-034-00D. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Effective strategies to control and eradicate arthropod-borne infectious diseases in animals and humans remain elusive –. Although large-scale immunization campaigns and/or arthropod control programs can be successful in preventing disease or the transmission of some vector-borne infections, diversity among pathogen strains and the presence of competent vectors can contribute to disease re-emergence , –. Arthropod-borne pathogens that establish persistent infections in their mammalian hosts represent a particularly challenging control problem. A broad range of pathogens including viruses, bacteria, and protozoan parasites can establish persistent infection without causing overt signs of disease –. Among the apicomplexan protozoan parasites, Theileria equi, closely related to bovine pathogens such as Babesia bovis and other Theileria spp, exemplifies this disease pattern , –. This tick-borne pathogen of horses can cause severe acute disease characterized by fever, anemia, hemoglobinuria and in some cases death. Infected horses that recover from acute infection become persistently infected for life with parasite loads ranging from 103 to 106 T. equi/ml of blood , , . These persistently infected horses serve as sources of iatrogenic and tick-borne transmission , . Iatrogenic blood transfer that transmitted T. equi, resulted in outbreaks of equine piroplasmosis associated with unsanctioned horse racing in Florida in 2008 . In 2009, an outbreak of equine piroplasmosis in Texas was associated with natural transmission by Amblyomma cajennense and Dermacentor variabilis ticks, both of which are known biological vectors for T. equi , .
Although T. equi continues to be considered a foreign animal pathogen in the United States, the presence of infected horses, along with the discovery of ticks capable of transmitting parasites, raise the concern that T. equi could become widespread. Currently in the U.S., infected horses are managed under life-time quarantine with intensive transmission mitigation strategies. In isolated cases, euthanasia of infected horses has been used to control small outbreaks associated with limited iatrogenic transmission such as those in Florida . However, euthanasia alone would be an inappropriate control strategy for outbreaks associated with natural vector transmission involving large numbers of horses as occurred in Texas. In addition to animal welfare concerns, attempting to control transmission by euthanasia of all T. equi infected horses would be costly due to the loss of valuable genetics, the economic value of individual animals, and expenses associated with long-term surveillance to monitor regional and national infection status. An effective control and eradication strategy that does not involve euthanasia is therefore desirable.
The purpose of the current study was to evaluate a chemotherapeutic approach for elimination of T. equi in naturally infected horses, with the goal of eliminating transmission risk. Several anti-protozoal drugs have been used with variable results for the treatment of T. equi, including imidocarb dipropionate, parvaquone, buparvaquone, and artemisinin derivatives –. However, the lack of a confirmatory test for parasite elimination and the variability in anti-protozoal drug susceptibility among different strains have contributed to the difficulty in determining chemotherapeutic efficacy –. Although our previous work demonstrated that imidocarb dipropionate eliminates Babesia caballi infection (another related vector-borne apicomplexan hemoprotozoan of horses) and removes the risk of experimental transmission by both iatrogenic blood transfer and tick feeding , the efficacy of imidocarb dipropionate for T. equi elimination in naturally, persistently infected horses is unknown. Imidocarb dipropionate (Imizol®; Schering Plough Animal Health) is an aromatic diaminide of the carbanilide series of antiprotozoal compounds, labeled for the treatment of babesiosis in dogs. Although the precise mechanism of action is not known, chromatin clumping, nuclear membrane dissolution, and cytoplasmic vacuolization of intraerythrocytic protozoan parasites occurs within 48 hours of imidocarb dipropionate treatment of infected horses . Four intramuscular doses of 4 mg/kg of the dihydrochloride derivative of imidocarb, administered every 72 hours, reportedly eliminated T. equi infection in horses . In contrast, the same dosing regimen of imidocarb dipropionate in naturally infected horses has been ineffective for T. equi elimination . Moreover, imidocarb dipropionate treatment has resulted in transient lack of T. equi detection followed by recrudescence of parasitemia .
Based on studies to date, the efficacy of imidocarb dipropionate for the elimination of T. equi infection remains unclear. In the study reported herein, we tested whether imidocarb dipropionate eliminates T. equi infection from naturally infected horses and removes transmission risk. Parasite elimination from naturally infected horses was determined by quantitative PCR and nested PCR at multiple time-points following imidocarb treatment, and post-treatment transmission risk was assessed by blood transfer into susceptible naïve splenectomized horses.
Figure 1. Sensitivity of nested PCR targeting Theileria equi ema-1.
A 2% agorose gel showing ema-1 amplicons from serial 10-fold dilutions of Theileria equi infected erythrocytes. N: negative control. The position of the molecular size markers are indicated on the left.doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0044713.g001
Materials and Methods
This study was approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Protocol Committee of the University of Idaho, Moscow. In addition, we have obtained the owner’s consent for all the horses involved in this study.
Table 1. Elimination of Theileria equi in the peripheral blood following imidocarb dipropionate treatment.doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0044713.t001
Animals and Pathogen
A Quarter Horse mare from Kleberg County, Texas with clinical signs of equine piroplasmosis was diagnosed with T. equi infection . Subsequently, all 360 horses on the ranch were serologically tested at the Animal Plant Health Inspection Service, National Veterinary Service Laboratories, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Ames, IA and 292 (81%) were positive for T. equi antibodies screened by competitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (VMRD, Inc.). Twenty five of these 292 naturally infected horses were chosen at random for inclusion in this study and were individually identified with the following numbers: L1, L2, L4, S2, 1, 84, 92, 100, 113, 115, 118, 119, 120 121, 122, 125, 126, 131, 153, 200, 300, 309, 311, 319, and 324. The age of the horses included in this study ranged from 2 to 13 years. Blood samples from these infected horses were collected prior to treatment and genomic DNA isolated. Briefly, blood was collected in ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) and washed once with phosphate buffered saline, pH 7.2, to remove the white blood cells. One hundred µl of packed cells were added to 500 µl of RBC lysis solution (QIAGEN, Inc.). The pellets were re-suspended in 450 µl of Cell lysis solution (QIAGEN, Inc.) with 50 µl of proteinase K (2 mg/ml of Cell lysis solution) and incubated at 56°C overnight. Following incubation, 1 µl of glycogen (20 mg/ml) was added to the samples. Then proteins were precipitated with protein precipitation solution (QIAGEN, Inc.). Genomic DNA was recovered in isopropanol, washed in 70% ethanol, and resuspended in 50 µl of DNA hydration solution (QIAGEN, Inc.). All genomic DNA samples were tested for confirmation of T. equi infection prior to imidocarb treatment by quantitative PCR and nested PCR as previously described .
Table 2. Blood transfer following imidocarb dipropionate treatment into naïve horse.doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0044713.t002
Imidocarb Dipropionate Treatment of Persistently Infected T. equi Horses
All 25 naturally infected horses were treated with imidocarb dipropionate (Imizol®; Schering Plough Animal Health) using a dose of 4.0 mg/kg, intramuscularly, at 72 h intervals for a total of four injections . These horses were divided into three treatment groups and each group was treated at five month intervals to demonstrate reproducibility of the results. A persistently infected horse (horse 98) was left untreated and was used as a positive control for blood transfer transmission studies. Adverse effects associated with the anticholinesterase activity of imidocarb dipropionate as previously described  were common in the treated horses. These effects manifested clinically as diarrhea and spasmodic colic, which occurred within 15–20 minutes of injection. The anticholinergic drug N-butylscopolammonium bromide (Buscopan®, Boehringer Ingelheim Animal Health), administered intravenously at 0.3 mg/kg, was effective in ameliorating these adverse cholinergic effects. To lower the probability of exposure to infected ticks, all treated horses were moved to pastures which had never pastured horses and were separated from infected pastures by 0.25 to two miles. An additional buffer zone was added in these pastures with two fence lines and mowed strips of grass in between. All horses were sprayed topically every 14 days with pyrethroid acaricides to prevent tick infestation.
Table 3. Percentage of inhibition of specific horse antibodies to Theileria equi.doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0044713.t003
Detection of T. equi Elimination and Serological Status of Treated Horses
Prior to treatment and at multiple time-points following treatment, the presence of the parasite in peripheral whole blood was tested by nested PCR and level of parasites was quantified by real-time PCR targeting the T. equi single copy ema-1 gene as previously described . To determine the sensitivity of nested PCR, infected blood from a splenectomized horse with high parasitemia (Giemsa stained blood smears: 1.4×108 infected erythrocytes/ml of blood) was collected and genomic DNA extracted. Real time PCR determined that the level of organisms was 4.2×108 T. equi/ml of blood. Then 10 fold dilutions (106−100 infected erythrocytes), followed by genomic DNA isolation as described above and nested PCR, were performed to determine the sensitivity. The sensitivity of nested PCR was determined to be <10 parasites (Fig. 1). A previous publication demonstrated similar sensitivity results in which nested PCR was capable of detecting six infected erythrocytes corresponding to parasitemia of 6×10−6% . The sensitivity of quantitative real-time PCR was determined to be between 10 to 100 parasites as previously described . The official regulatory cELISA was used to detect T. equi specific serum antibodies. Treated horses with antibody levels resulting in <40% inhibition in the cELISA were considered seronegative (VMRD, Inc.).
Blood Transfer to Determine T. equi Transmission Risk in Imidocarb Dipropionate Treated Horses
From each of the horses treated with imidocarb dipropionate, 500 ml whole blood was collected in citrate phosphate dextrose anticoagulant (Fenwal Inc.) at 4–5 months post-treatment and shipped on ice (cooler packs) overnight to the U.S. Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service-Animal Disease Research Unit facility in Pullman, WA for subsequent intravenous inoculation into a naïve splenectomized horse . Blood was shipped for this purpose on three separate occasions. To minimize the number of recipient horses, 120 ml blood from each of 4–5 treated horses was inoculated separately into a single recipient upon arrival. Recipient Ho-193 received a total of 600 ml whole blood from treated horses 1, 84, 92, 200 and 300; Ho-178 received 600 ml whole blood from treated horses 113, 115, 118, 119 and 120; Ho-231 received 480 ml whole blood from treated horses 121, 122, 125 and 126; Ho-268 received 600 ml whole blood from treated horses L2, L4, 52, 100 and 131; and Ho-176 received 600 ml whole blood from treated horses 153, 309, 311, 319 and 324. As a positive control for the first two shipments of blood, recipient horses Ho-194 and Ho-228 each received 120 ml of blood from untreated infected horse 98. Finally, as a positive control for the third shipment, recipient horse Ho-267 received 120 ml of blood from infected horse L1 that was treated with imidocarb dipropionate but remained infected as determined by nested PCR. All recipient horses were monitored daily for clinical signs of piroplasmosis for approximately 60 days post-blood transfer. Blood samples were collected weekly to determine T. equi infection status by microscopic examination of Giemsa stained blood smears and by nested PCR.
A Fisher’s exact test was performed using SAS 9.2 software (SAS Institute, Cary, NC) to determine the two-tailed p value and exact 95% confidence interval for the proportion of successfully treated horses (those in which peripheral blood elimination of T. equi occurred as determined above).
Imidocarb Dipropionate Treatment of Persistently Infected T. equi Horses
Prior to imidocarb dipropionate treatment, all 25 naturally infected horses had levels of T. equi parasitemia consistent with the persistent phase of infection , ranging from 1.4×103 to 2.2×105 parasites per ml of peripheral blood (Table 1). After imidocarb dipropionate treatment, T. equi was no longer detectable in peripheral blood by either quantitative real-time PCR or nested PCR assays in 24 of the treated horses. These horses remained nested PCR negative through 12 months of follow-up (Table 1). In contrast, imidocarb dipropionate failed to eliminate T. equi in horse L1, which remained PCR positive with levels of parasitemia ranging from 1.9×105 to 4.3×106 T. equi per ml of blood.
Transfer of Blood from Treated Horses into Naive Recipient Horses
With the exception of horse L1, transfer of blood from treated horses into naive splenectomized horses did not transmit T. equi to the recipients, as determined by lack of clinical disease and failure to detect parasites in peripheral blood on Giemsa stained blood smears or by nested PCR throughout 60 days of follow-up (Table 2). In contrast, blood transfers from untreated PCR positive control horse 98, and unsuccessfully treated horse L1, readily transmitted T. equi to naïve recipient splenectomized horses, which developed signs of equine piroplasmosis between 7 to 14 days post blood transfer (Table 2). Overall, imidocarb dipropionate treatment resulted in peripheral blood T. equi elimination in 24 of 25 horses (96%). This level of therapeutic efficacy was highly significant, with a Fisher’s exact test 95% CI range of 79.7–99.9% (p<0.0001). Importantly, detection of T. equi by nested PCR was 100% concordant with the results of blood transfer transmission to naïve splenectomized recipients, suggesting that nested PCR could be used to predict peripheral blood elimination of T. equi in naturally infected horses.
To determine if the T. equi subset population in horse L1 was resistant to imidocarb dipropionate, at 12 months after the first round of treatment, a second round of treatment was performed which eliminated infection as determined by nested PCR and confirmed by blood transfer into a naïve splenectomized horse. The recipient horse showed no clinical signs of equine piroplasmosis and nested PCR was negative throughout 60 days of follow-up (data not shown).
T. equi Antibody Levels following Peripheral Blood Elimination of Parasites
Despite the therapeutic efficacy of imidocarb dipropionate for T. equi peripheral blood elimination as determined above, EMA-1-specific serum antibody levels as measured by cELISA were slow to decline following treatment, persisting throughout the 12 month follow-up period in some horses. For the first treatment group, levels of T. equi-specific serum antibodies declined three months post-treatment in four horses, but remained unchanged in one horse (Table 3). At 11 months post-treatment, two horses became seronegative, while three remained seropositive (Table 3).
For the second treatment group, serum antibody levels at three months post treatment declined in five horses and one horse became seronegative (horse 122). No decline in T. equi-specific serum antibody levels was observed at three months post-treatment in the other three horses in this group. In addition to horse 122, four other horses in this group became seronegative at eight months post-treatment (horses 113, 115, 118 and 119), while four horses remained seropositive. At twelve months post-treatment, the five seronegative horses remained seronegative and one other horse became seronegative while the three seropositive remained seropositive (Table3).
For the third treatment group, serum antibody declined at three months post treatment in ten horses with a further slight decline at eight months post-treatment (Table 3). At twelve months post treatment, one horse (horse 319) became seronegative while the nine other horses remained seropositive (Table 3). In contrast, horse L1, which remained consistently PCR positive following the first imidocarb dipropionate treatment, showed no changes in the levels of T. equi antibodies throughout the 12 months of follow-up (Table 3).
Naturally infected T. equi carrier horses without overt signs of infection represent a source of pathogen for iatrogenic and/or tick transmission to susceptible horses , . Chemotherapeutic elimination of T. equi from persistently infected horses represents a critical component of a control strategy for preventing the spread of this pathogen in non-endemic areas such as the United States. However, the achievement of chemotherapeutic elimination and the subsequent confirmation thereof can be problematic when treating infectious diseases caused by persistent parasites. In this study, we demonstrated that imidocarb dipropionate was efficacious for the elimination of T. equi from the peripheral blood of naturally infected carrier horses. This conclusion is supported by two lines of evidence: i) the inability to detect T. equi organisms in the peripheral blood by nested PCR at multiple time points following imidocarb dipropionate treatment, and ii) the inability of transfused whole blood from nested PCR negative treated horses to infect highly susceptible naïve splenectomized horses. In contrast, T. equi organisms were consistently detected in the peripheral blood of an untreated persistently infected horse, and blood transfer from this horse was able to establish infection in naïve splenectomized horses.
We hypothesized that chemotherapeutic T. equi elimination would result in declining levels of T. equi-specific serum antibodies, and that treated horses would become seronegative within several months . Although nested PCR failed to detect T. equi in successfully treated horses throughout the study, the official regulatory cELISA diagnostic test indicated that only a few treated horses became seronegative, with the majority of horses remaining seropositive up to 12 months post-treatment. The possible explanations of long-term antibody persistence in these nested PCR negative treated horses include: i ) a low level of T. equi organisms not detectible by nested PCR stimulating an immune response; and ii) long lived plasma cells secreting T. equi-specific antibodies. Low levels of T. equi in the peripheral blood were excluded by testing treated horses at multiple time points using nested PCR. Studies with Babesia bovis, a closely related pathogen of cattle, indicate that levels of parasitemia fluctuate during chronic infection, and that testing peripheral blood at multiple time-points using PCR readily detects parasites . In contrast, transfer of large volumes of whole blood into naïve splenectomized horses in the current study failed to reveal low levels of parasitemia, consistent with our negative nested PCR results. Taken together, these results indicated that T. equi was eliminated by imidocarb dipropionate. The most likely explanation for long-term T. equi-specific antibody persistence was the maintenance of long-lived plasma cells secreting antibodies in the absence of specific antigens. Long-term antibody persistence in other infectious disease models following elimination of infection has been reported , .
The extended time between chemotherapeutic elimination of T. equi and the first seronegative result could be problematic, as horses that no longer pose a transmission risk would remain under prolonged quarantine according to current regulations. Based on this potential challenge, our laboratory is focused on identifying an antigen against which post-elimination antibodies decline more rapidly than the Equi Merozoite Antigens 1 and 2 (EMA1 and EMA2)-specific antibodies detected in the currently licensed cELISA. The goal is to identify antigens that could serve as potential immunologic markers for the development of a rapid and accurate serologic assay to confirm chemotherapeutic elimination of T. equi.
An important observation in this study is that imidocarb dipropionate treatment failed to eliminate T. equi from the peripheral blood of one of the 25 treated horses. In this horse, T. equi organisms persisted after treatment as determined by positive nested PCR at multiple time points, and parasite viability was demonstrated by blood transfer into a naïve splenectomized horse. Interestingly, the second treatment of horse L1 eliminated infection indicating that this T. equi subset population was not resistant to imidocarb dipropionate. The failure of one course of imidocarb treatment to eliminate T. equi infection in one horse could be due to individual differences in drug metabolism or drug distribution. Alternatively, the relapsing of parasites in the peripheral blood following one course of treatment may have been caused by the failure of imidocarb to completely eliminate the pre-erythrocytic stages of T. equi in this horse infected through natural tick-borne transmission. Previous studies have demonstrated that T. equi sporozoites infect peripheral blood mononuclear cells and then develop into schizonts prior to the infection of erythrocytes . In a closely related human pathogen, Plasmodium vivax, sporozoites infect liver cells prior to infecting erythrocytes. Anti-malaria drugs such as chloroquine have failed to eliminate P. vivax liver stages . These liver stages can develop into schizonts which are then released as merozoites into the peripheral blood causing relapsing malaria . Whether a similar mechanism during the initial T. equi mononuclear cell infection contributed to the initial treatment failure in the horse of the current study is unknown. Due to the limited number of anti-protozoal drugs available with efficacy against T. equi, horses that remained infected following one course of treatment with imidocarb dipropionate pose a significant transmission risk , .
In conclusion, the results of this study provide an alternative strategy to control and potentially eradicate equine piroplasmosis in non-endemic areas. In addition to improving animal health, the chemotherapeutic elimination of T. equi from persistently infected horses removes the risk of transmission. However, there is a risk that some horses will remain infected after imidocarb treatment. These infected horses represent reservoirs that could maintain the transmission cycle. The ability of imidocarb dipropionate to eliminate T. equi infection from persistently infected horses provides a feasible strategy to control sporadic outbreaks and will greatly benefit the international equine trade industry by removing T. equi infection as a global restriction on equine movement.
We appreciate the excellent assistance of James Allison, Shelby Beckner, Ralph Horn, and Melissa Schmidt. We also thank Wendy C. Brown of the Department of Veterinary Microbiology and Pathology, Washington State University, for her critical review of the manuscript.
Conceived and designed the experiments: MWU RHM DPK. Performed the experiments: LSK NKM. Analyzed the data: SNW LSK NKM JLTD TOB AS AH AJG WKF. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: BE AMP JFG. Wrote the paper: MWU.
- 1. Palacpac NM, Leung BW, Arisue N, Tanabe K, Sattabongkot J, et al. (2006) Plasmodium vivax serine repeat antigen (SERA) multigene family exhibits similar expression patterns in independent infections. Mol Biochem Parasitol 150: 353–358. doi: 10.1016/j.molbiopara.2006.07.006
- 2. Futse JE, Brayton KA, Dark MJ, Knowles DP Jr, Palmer GH (2008) Superinfection as a driver of genomic diversification in antigenically variant pathogens. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 105: 2123–2127. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0710333105
- 3. Gardner CL, Ryman KD (2010) Yellow fever: a reemerging threat. Clin Lab Med 30: 237–260. doi: 10.1016/j.cll.2010.01.001
- 4. Sardelis MR, Turell MJ, Dohm DJ, O’Guinn ML (2001) Vector competence of selected North American Culex and Coquillettidia mosquitoes for West Nile virus. Emerg Infect Dis 7: 1018–1022. doi: 10.3201/eid0706.010617
- 5. Vasconcelos PF, Bryant JE, da Rosa TP, Tesh RB, Rodrigues SG, et al. (2004) Genetic divergence and dispersal of yellow fever virus, Brazil. Emerg Infect Dis 10: 1578–1584. doi: 10.3201/eid1009.040197
- 6. Luz PM, Vanni T, Medlock J, Paltiel AD, Galvani AP (2011) Dengue vector control strategies in an urban setting: an economic modelling assessment. Lancet 377: 1673–1680. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(11)60246-8
- 7. Ranson H, N’guessan R, Lines J, Moiroux N, Nkuni Z, et al. (2011) Pyrethroid resistance in African anopheline mosquitoes: what are the implications for malaria control? Trends Parasitol 27: 91–98. doi: 10.1016/j.pt.2010.08.004
- 8. Turell MJ, Dohm DJ, Sardelis MR, Oguinn ML, Andreadis TG, et al. (2005) An update on the potential of north American mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae) to transmit West Nile Virus. J Med Entomol 42: 57–62. doi: 10.1603/0022-2585(2005)042[0057:auotpo]2.0.co;2
- 9. Eriks IS, Palmer GH, McGuire TC, Allred DR, Barbet AF (1989) Detection and quantitation of Anaplasma marginale in carrier cattle by using a nucleic acid probe. J Clin Microbiol 27: 279–284.
- 10. Bowman MC, Archin NM, Margolis DM (2009) Pharmaceutical approaches to eradication of persistent HIV infection. Expert Rev Mol Med 11: e6. doi: 10.1017/s1462399409000970
- 11. Howell JM, Ueti MW, Palmer GH, Scoles GA, Knowles DP (2007) Persistently infected calves as reservoirs for acquisition and transovarial transmission of Babesia bovis by Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus. J Clin Microbiol 45: 3155–3159. doi: 10.1128/jcm.00766-07
- 12. Cheevers WP, McGuire TC (1985) Equine infectious anemia virus: immunopathogenesis and persistence. Rev Infect Dis 7: 83–88. doi: 10.1093/clinids/7.1.83
- 13. Holbrook AA, Frerichs WM (1968) Equine piroplasmosis. Proc Annu Meet U S Anim Health Assoc 72: 220–222.
- 14. Ueti MW, Palmer GH, Scoles GA, Kappmeyer LS, Knowles DP (2008) Persistently infected horses are reservoirs for intrastadial tick-borne transmission of the apicomplexan parasite Babesia equi. Infect Immun 76: 3525–3529. doi: 10.1128/iai.00251-08
- 15. Gubbels MJ, Katzer F, Shiels BR, Jongejan F (2001) Study of Theileria annulata population structure during bovine infection and following transmission to ticks. Parasitology 123: 553–561. doi: 10.1017/s0031182001008757
- 16. Mehlhorn H, Schein E (1998) Redescription of Babesia equi Laveran, 1901 as Theileria equi Mehlhorn, Schein 1998. Parasitol Res 84: 467–475. doi: 10.1007/s004360050431
- 17. Ueti MW, Palmer GH, Kappmeyer LS, Statdfield M, Scoles GA, et al. (2005) Ability of the vector tick Boophilus microplus to acquire and transmit Babesia equi following feeding on chronically infected horses with low-level parasitemia. J Clin Microbiol 43: 3755–3759. doi: 10.1128/jcm.43.8.3755-3759.2005
- 18. Short MA, Clark CK, Harvey JW, Wenzlow N, Hawkins IK, et al. (2012) Outbreak of equine piroplasmosis in Florida. J Am Vet Med Assoc 240: 588–595. doi: 10.2460/javma.240.5.588
- 19. Stiller D, Goff WL, Johnson LW, Knowles DP (2002) Dermacentor variabilis and Boophilus microplus (Acari: Ixodidae): experimental vectors of Babesia equi to equids. J Med Entomol 39: 667–670. doi: 10.1603/0022-2585-39.4.667
- 20. Scoles GA, Hutcheson HJ, Schlater JL, Hennager SG, Pelzel AM, et al. (2011) Equine Piroplasmosis Associated with Amblyomma cajennense Ticks, Texas, USA. Emerg Infect Dis 17: 1903–1905. doi: 10.3201/eid1710.101182
- 21. Frerichs WM, Allen PC, Holbrook AA (1973) Equine piroplasmosis (Babesia equi): therapeutic trials of imidocarb dihydrochloride in horses and donkeys. Vet Rec 93: 73–75. doi: 10.1136/vr.93.3.73
- 22. Kuttler KL, Zaugg JL, Gipson CA (1987) Imidocarb and parvaquone in the treatment of piroplasmosis (Babesia equi) in equids. Am J Vet Res 48: 1613–1616.
- 23. Zaugg JL, Lane VM (1992) Efficacy of buparvaquone as a therapeutic and clearing agent of Babesia equi of European origin in horses. Am J Vet Res 53: 1396–1399.
- 24. Butler CM, Nijhof AM, van der Kolk JH, de Haseth OB, Taoufik A, et al. (2008) Repeated high dose imidocarb dipropionate treatment did not eliminate Babesia caballi from naturally infected horses as determined by PCR-reverse line blot hybridization. Vet Parasitol 151: 320–322. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2007.11.010
- 25. Bruning A (1996) Equine piroplasmosis an update on diagnosis, treatment and prevention. Br Vet J 152: 139–151. S0007–1935(96)80070–4 [pii].
- 26. Schwint ON, Ueti MW, Palmer GH, Kappmeyer LS, Hines MT, et al. (2009) Imidocarb dipropionate clears persistent Babesia caballi infection with elimination of transmission potential. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 53: 4327–4332. doi: 10.1128/aac.00404-09
- 27. Simpson CF, Neal FC (1980) Ultrastructure of Babesia equi in ponies treated with imidocarb. Am J Vet Res 41: 267–271.
- 28. Ueti MW, Palmer GH, Kappmeyer LS, Scoles GA, Knowles DP (2003) Expression of equi merozoite antigen 2 during development of Babesia equi in the midgut and salivary gland of the vector tick Boophilus microplus. J Clin Microbiol 41: 5803–5809. doi: 10.1128/jcm.41.12.5803-5809.2003
- 29. Adams LG (1981) Clinicopathological aspects of imidocarb dipropionate toxicity in horses. Res Vet Sci 31: 54–61.
- 30. Nicolaiewsky TB, Richter MF, Lunge VR, Cunha CW, Delagostin O, et al. (2001) Detection of Babesia equi (Laveran, 1901) by nested polymerase chain reaction. Vet Parasitol 101: 9–21. doi: 10.1016/s0304-4017(01)00471-x
- 31. Calder JA, Reddy GR, Chieves L, Courtney CH, Littell R, et al. (1996) Monitoring Babesia bovis infections in cattle by using PCR-based tests. J Clin Microbiol 34: 2748–2755.
- 32. Slifka MK, Ahmed R (1998) Long-lived plasma cells: a mechanism for maintaining persistent antibody production. Curr Opin Immunol 10: 252–258. doi: 10.1016/s0952-7915(98)80162-3
- 33. Ndungu FM, Cadman ET, Coulcher J, Nduati E, Couper E, et al. (2009) Functional memory B cells and long-lived plasma cells are generated after a single Plasmodium chabaudi infection in mice. PLoS Pathog 5: e1000690. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1000690
- 34. Baird JK, Rieckmann KH (2003) Can primaquine therapy for vivax malaria be improved? Trends Parasitol 19: 115–120. doi: 10.1016/s1471-4922(03)00005-9
- 35. Kumar S, Gupta AK, Pal Y, Dwivedi SK (2003) In-vivo therapeutic efficacy trial with artemisinin derivative, buparvaquone and imidocarb dipropionate against Babesia equi infection in donkeys. J Vet Med Sci 65: 1171–1177. doi: 10.1292/jvms.65.1171