Figures
Abstract
During limb development, posterior Hox genes of the Hoxa- and Hoxd cluster provide positional information along the limb axis. Here we report a new function for Hoxa11 and Hoxd11 in regulating the early steps of chondrocyte differentiation. We analyzed forelimbs of Hoxa11−/−;d11−/− and Ulnaless mice, which are characterized by specifically shortened zeugopods. By detailed morphological and molecular analyses, we show that loss of Hoxa11 and Hoxd11 in the ulna of both mutants leads to an arrest of chondrocyte differentiation at a step before the separation into round and columnar cells takes place. Furthermore, we demonstrate that Hoxa11 and Hoxd11 act upstream of Runx2 and Shox2, two key regulators of chondrocyte differentiation. We hypothesize that Runx2 activates Shox2 in early chondrocytes, which at later stages induces Runx2 expression to regulate hypertrophic differentiation. These results give insight into mechanisms by which positional information might be translated into a specific bone pattern.
Citation: Gross S, Krause Y, Wuelling M, Vortkamp A (2012) Hoxa11 and Hoxd11 Regulate Chondrocyte Differentiation Upstream of Runx2 and Shox2 in Mice. PLoS ONE 7(8): e43553. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0043553
Editor: Christoph Englert, Leibniz Institute for Age Research - Fritz Lipmann Institute (FLI), Germany
Received: February 29, 2012; Accepted: July 23, 2012; Published: August 20, 2012
Copyright: © Gross et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Funding: This work was supported by a grant of the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (VO620/5) to AV. The funder had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Introduction
The long bones of vertebrates are formed by the process of endochondral ossification, during which a cartilage intermediate is established and subsequently replaced by bone [1]–[3]. Endochondral ossification is initiated by mesenchymal cells that condense and differentiate into chondrocytes, which form the cartilage anlagen of the future skeletal elements. The cartilage anlagen are surrounded by a layer of fibroblast-like cells, the perichondrium. In the center of the cartilage anlagen, the cells start to successively differentiate into several types of chondrocytes, each showing a characteristic cell shape. Initially, the proliferating chondrocytes separate into two cell types: round, low-proliferating chondrocytes at the distal end of the skeletal element and columnar, high-proliferating chondrocytes in the center [4], [5]. The columnar chondrocytes are flattened and arranged in columns along the longitudinal axis. Once the chondrocytes stop proliferating, they differentiate into hypertrophic chondrocytes, which finally undergo apoptosis. During hypertrophic differentiation the chondrocytes increase their volume and produce a mineralized extracellular matrix. In parallel with hypertrophic differentiation, cells of the perichondrium differentiate into osteoblasts forming the periosteum. From the periosteum, blood vessels invade the hypertrophic region providing osteoblasts and osteoclasts to replace the cartilage by bone [1]–[3].
Hox genes belong to the highly conserved family of homeobox transcription factors that play a critical role in defining regional identity along the primary body and limb axis during embryonic development [6], [7]. In mice, 39 Hox genes are organized in 4 clusters (Hoxa-Hoxd), each of which is located on a different chromosome. Based on sequence similarities and the relative position in the cluster, Hox genes are divided into 13 paralogous groups [8], [9]. The formation of limbs is mainly regulated by posterior genes of the Hoxa- and Hoxd-cluster (Hoxa9-a13, Hoxd9-d13).
The expression of Hox genes is tightly regulated in time and space. Along the anterior-posterior body and limb axis the order of Hox gene expression reflects their arrangement on the chromosome with 3′ genes being expressed earlier and more anteriorly than 5′ genes [10], [11]. During limb development, the expression of Hoxd genes is under the control of two enhancers that are located on either side of the Hoxd cluster [12]–[16]. In a first phase of Hoxd gene expression, the colinear activation is regulated by the “Early Limb Control Region” (ELCR), which is located at the 3′end of the cluster. During this phase, the Hoxd genes are successively expressed, starting with Hoxd1 being expressed throughout the early limb bud and ending with the expression of posterior Hox genes progressively restricted to the posterior region of the limb bud. In a second phase of Hoxd gene expression, only the posterior Hoxd genes (Hoxd9-d13) are expressed in reverse colinearity. This phase is regulated by the “Global Control Region” (GCR) that is located at the 5′ side of the Hoxd cluster [13], [15], [16]. This nested expression pattern of Hoxd genes in combination with genes of the Hoxa cluster generates a “Hox code” that specifies the identity of the limb skeletal elements [17].
Mutations of posterior Hoxa and Hoxd genes cause distinct limb deformities. Loss of single Hox genes leads to mild alterations of individual skeletal elements, whereas the deletion of additional paralogous Hox genes enhances the severity of the phenotype. For example, loss of Hoxa11 or Hoxd11 in mice leads to mild alterations of ulna and radius [18], [19], whereas compound Hoxa11−/−;d11−/− mice display a severe shortening of ulna and radius. Other skeletal elements develop more or less normally [20], [21]. A similar forelimb phenotype has been observed in the dominant mouse mutant Ulnaless, which carries a radiation induced inversion of the complete Hoxd cluster [13], [22]–[26]. Due to this inversion, the GCR is separated from the Hoxd cluster [13] leading to an altered temporal and spatial activation of posterior Hoxd genes. As a result, Hoxd12 and Hoxd13 are ectopically expressed in the zeugopod region, whereas the expression of Hoxa11 and Hoxd11 is significantly reduced [24], [25]. Based on the similarities of the forelimb phenotype and the loss of Hoxa11 and Hoxd11 expression, Ulnaless mice have been hypothesized to mimic the Hoxa11−/−;d11−/− mutation.
In this study, we investigated the molecular mechanisms acting downstream of Hox genes by analyzing chondrocyte differentiation in ulna and radius of Hoxa11−/−;d11−/− and Ulnaless mutant mice. Since the Ulnaless mutation is dominant (50% mutant embryos), this mouse strain facilitates the analysis of the phenotype compared to the double homozygous Hoxa11−/−;d11−/− embryos (6.25% mutant embryos).
By detailed morphological and molecular analyses, we show that the ulna is similarly affected in both mutants. Although chondrogenesis in the cartilage anlagen is initiated similar as in wild type mice at E12.5, the differentiation of chondrocytes is inhibited at an early step of the differentiation program at least until E16.5, when wild type limbs clearly have undergone hypertrophic differentiation. Molecular analyses indicate that the differentiation into round and columnar chondrocytes is disturbed. Furthermore, Shox2 and Runx2 expression cannot be detected in the mutant ulna, indicating that they act downstream of posterior Hox genes during chondrocyte differentiation.
Results and Discussion
The Ulna of Ulnaless Mice Serves as a Model for the Hoxa11−/−;d11−/− Mutation
Previously, it has been reported that Hoxa11−/−;d11−/− mice display a defect in hypertrophic chondrocyte differentiation in ulna and radius [20]. To gain insight into the molecular mechanisms acting downstream of Hox genes in chondrocytes, we investigated the process of chondrocyte differentiation in Hoxa11−/−;d11−/− mice at different developmental stages in detail and compared it to that of Ulnaless mutants. To confirm the similarity of the Hoxa11−/−;d11−/− and Ulnaless forelimb phenotypes, we analyzed forelimb sections of both mutants on a morphological level after Safranin-Weigert staining. At E14.5 and E16.5, ulna and radius of both mutants are significantly shortened compared to wild type limbs (Fig. 1). In addition, the radius is bent towards the anterior side (Fig. 1B, C, H, I). At both stages, the wild type cartilage elements of both zeugopod bones show well organized zones of chondrocytes: round chondrocytes located at the distal end of the cartilage element are followed by columnar and hypertrophic chondrocytes towards the center (Fig. 1A, D, G, J). In contrast, in the ulna of Hoxa11−/−;d11−/− mice no columnar or hypertrophic chondrocytes are detectable at E14.5 or E16.5 (Fig. 1E, K). In the radius hypertrophic differentiation is delayed at both stages, but a few columnar chondrocytes can be detected in the anterior curve at E16.5 (Fig. 1H). Interestingly, while columns in the radius of the control limb are aligned along the longitudinal axis, they are arranged in anterior-posterior direction in the Hoxa11−/−;d11−/− mutant radius (Fig. 1G, H, higher magnification of boxed regions). In the ulna of Ulnaless mutants hypertrophic differentiation is similarly blocked as in the ulna of Hoxa11−/−;d11−/− mutants (Fig. 1E, F, K, L). However, chondrocyte differentiation in the radius of Ulnaless mutants is less severely affected. Few cells with hypertrophic appearance can be detected at E14.5 and a distinct hypertrophic region is found at E16.5 (Fig. 1C arrow, I).
Safranin-Weigert staining of E14.5 (A–F) and E16.5 (G–L) control (A, D, G, J), Hoxa11−/−;d11−/− (B, E, H, K) and Ulnaless (C, F, I, L) forelimb sections reveals disturbed chondrocyte differentiation. Hypertrophic chondrocytes are absent in ulna (E, K) and radius (B, H) of Hoxa11−/−;d11−/− mice and in the ulna (F, L) of Ulnaless mice. Only in the curve of the radius of E14.5 Ulnaless mice hypertrophic chondrocytes are detectable (C, arrow). At E16.5, mineralized matrix is produced in the radius of Ulnaless mice (I, arrow), while in the radius of Hoxa11−/−;d11−/− mice columnar chondrocytes are formed (H). These cells are not organized in columns along the longitudinal axis as in the control, but in anterior-posterior direction (G, H, see encircled columns in higher magnification of boxed regions). 160x magnification; P = proximal, D = Distal.
To further characterize the chondrocyte differentiation defect on a molecular level, we analyzed the expression of genes demarcating distinct chondrocyte subpopulations by in situ hybridization. The extracellular matrix protein Type II collagen (Col2a1) and the transcription factor SRY-box containing gene 9 (Sox9) are markers for cartilage condensations and proliferating chondrocytes [27]–[29] (Fig. 2A and data not shown). Although in Hoxa11−/−;d11−/− mice the condensations of ulna and radius are smaller than in wild type mice [20] (Fig. 1), Col2a1 and Sox9 are expressed in all chondrocytes at E14.5 (Fig. 2B and data not shown). A similar expression pattern of Col2a1 and Sox9 was detected in E14.5 Ulnaless mice (Fig. 2C and data not shown) indicating that cells condense and differentiate into chondrocytes. Indian hedgehog (Ihh), a key regulator of endochondral ossification, is expressed in early hypertrophic chondrocytes of E14.5 and E16.5 wild type limbs [30], [31] (Fig. 2D, arrow and data not shown). Corresponding to the morphological analysis (Fig. 1), no hypertrophic, Ihh-expressing cells are found in the ulna of Hoxa11−/−;d11−/− or Ulnaless mutants at E14.5 and E16.5 (Fig. 2E, F and data not shown) [20]. However, cells in the radius of Ulnaless mice that appear hypertrophic by morphology (Fig. 1C, arrow) express Ihh at E14.5 (Fig. 2F, arrow).
Sections of E14.5 forelimbs of control (A, D, G), Hoxa11−/−;d11−/− (B, E, H) and Ulnaless embryos (C, F, I) were hybridized with antisense riboprobes for Col2a1 (A–C), Ihh (D–F) and Ptch1 (G–I). At E14.5, Col2a1 is expressed in all chondrocytes of ulna and radius of Hoxa11−/−;d11−/− and Ulnaless mutants similar as in control limbs (A–C). In contrast, Ihh, which is expressed in early hypertrophic chondrocytes in E14.5 control limbs (D, arrow), is not expressed in the ulna of both mutants (E, F). Ptch1 is strongly expressed in wild type chondrocytes adjacent to the Ihh expression domain (G, yellow arrow), but only basal expression levels are detected in chondrocytes of the ulna of Hoxa11−/−;d11−/− and Ulnaless mice (G–I, red arrows). 80x magnification; R = radius, U = ulna.
To exclude an early delay in chondrogenesis as the cause for the inhibition of hypertrophic differentiation we analyzed Col2a1 expression in E12.5 Ulnaless mice. Similar to data published for E12.5 Hoxa11−/−;d11−/− mice [20], we detected no significant difference in Col2a1 expression in the zeugopod of E12.5 Ulnaless mice ( Fig. S1) indicating that chondrocyte differentiation is properly initiated.
In summary, although the initial condensation of chondrocytes is not severely affected, we detected a severe inhibition of further chondrocyte differentiation in the zeugopod of Hoxa11−/−;d11−/− mutants that is maintained at least until E16.5. A comparable delay in chondrocyte differentiation was detected in the zeugopod of Ulnaless mice. Interestingly, chondrocyte differentiation seems to be more severely delayed in the ulna of both mutants, whereas the radius is less affected. To understand the role of posterior Hox genes in regulating chondrocyte differentiation, we thus concentrated our analysis on the ulna of both mutants.
Chondrocytes in the Ulna of E13.5 Ulnaless Mice are not Competent to Undergo Hypertrophic Differentiation
It has previously been described that Ihh-deficient mice undergo accelerated hypertrophic differentiation [31]. Here we show that despite the lack of Ihh expression in the ulna of the Hox mutants at E14.5 and E16.5, no sign of hypertrophic differentiation can be detected (Fig. 1E, F, K, L; Fig. 2E, F and data not shown). To exclude that the level of Ihh expression is below the sensitivity of the in situ hybridization, we analyzed the expression of the Ihh receptor Patched homolog 1 (Ptch1), which is highly expressed in cells receiving a Hedgehog signal. In E14.5 wild type skeletal elements, Ptch1 is expressed in all proliferating chondrocytes with highest expression level adjacent to the Ihh expression domain [31] (Fig. 2G, yellow arrow). However, in the ulna of both Hox mutants, Ptch1 expression is only detected at basal expression levels (Fig. 2H, I, red arrows). To further exclude residual levels of Ihh activity, we treated E13.5 forelimb explants of the dominant Ulnaless mutant with cyclopamine, which inhibits Ihh signaling thereby accelerating hypertrophic differentiation [32], [33]. In cyclopamine treated wild type cultures, hypertrophic differentiation was accelerated, as indicated by the increased expression domain of the hypertrophic marker Ihh and the shortened zone of proliferating chondrocytes in ulna, radius and in the digits (Fig. 3A, C). In contrast, in cyclopamine treated explant cultures of Ulnaless mice, we did not observe any Ihh-expressing hypertrophic chondrocytes in the ulna (Fig. 3B, D, red arrows), although Ihh expression was induced in the digits (Fig. 3B, D, yellow arrows). To confirm that hypertrophic differentiation is blocked in the mutants, we analyzed the expression of Type X collagen (Col10a1), another marker specifically expressed in hypertrophic cells [34]. Similar to Ihh, we did not detect any Col10a1-expressing chondrocytes in the ulna of cyclopamine treated Ulnaless limbs (Fig. 3F, H, red arrows), but observed accelerated hypertrophic differentiation in the digits (Fig. 3F, H, yellow arrows).
Sections of E13.5 control (A, C, E, G) and Ulnaless forelimbs (B, D, F, H) that had been cultured for 4 days in control medium (A, B, E, F) or in medium supplemented with cyclopamine (C, D, G, H), were hybridized with the antisense probes for Ihh (A–D) and Col10a1 (E–H). Premature activation of Ihh as well as Col10a1 expression can be detected in the digits of cyclopamine treated control (C, G) and Ulnaless (D, H, yellow arrows) forelimbs. In contrast, in the ulna of Ulnaless mice Ihh and Col10a1 expression was not induced by cyclopamine (D, H, red arrows). 50x magnification (A–D), 80x magnification (E–H); R = radius, U = ulna.
We can thus conclude that chondrocytes in the ulna of E13.5 Ulnaless mice are not competent to initiate hypertrophic differentiation upon lack of Ihh signaling.
Furthermore, it is interesting to note that the differentiation defect is maintained in the serum free organ cultures, in which the surrounding tissue is rapidly lost. We thus hypothesize that information inhibiting chondrocyte differentiation in the ulna is contained in the skeletal element itself, either in the perichondrium or in the chondrocytes.
Hoxa11 and Hoxd11 Control Early Steps of Chondrocyte Differentiation
Since loss of Hoxa11 and Hoxd11 impairs chondrocyte differentiation, we wished to identify the specific step of the differentiation program affected in the Hox mutants. As described above, proliferating chondrocytes can be subdivided into round and columnar cells. To define the subpopulations of proliferating chondrocytes in the mutants, we analyzed the expression of Fibroblast growth factor receptor 3 (Fgfr3). In E14.5 wild type limbs, Fgfr3 is expressed at high levels in columnar chondrocytes (Fig. 4A, yellow arrow) and at lower levels in round cells (Fig. 4A, red arrow) [35]. In the ulna of both Hox mutants, we observed only low levels of Fgfr3 expression (Fig. 4B, C, red arrows) indicating that the separation into round and columnar chondrocytes had not taken place. This supports the morphological observation that no columnar chondrocytes are formed. To further test if the chondrocytes represent the round cell type, we analyzed the expression of Upper zone of growth plate and matrix associated protein (Ucma), which is strongly expressed in these cells at E16.5 in wild type skeletal elements [36] (Fig. 4D, arrow). Surprisingly, in both mutants the majority of chondrocytes in the ulna do not express Ucma. Instead, Ucma expression is restricted to the joint region in the ulna of Hoxa11−/−;d11−/− mice (Fig. 4E, arrow) and displays a diffuse pattern in single chondrocytes in Ulnaless mice (Fig. 4F, arrow).
Sections of E14.5 (A–C) and E16.5 (D–F) forelimbs of control (A, D), Hoxa11−/−;d11−/− (B, E) and Ulnaless embryos (C, F) were hybridized with antisense riboprobes for Fgfr3 (A–C) and Ucma (D–F). High Fgfr3 expression (A–C, yellow arrows), which demarcates columnar chondrocytes in control limbs (A), is significantly reduced in the ulna of the Hox mutants (B, C). The observed Fgfr3 expression level is comparable with the expression in round chondrocytes of the control mice (A–C, red arrows). Ucma, a marker for round cells (D, arrow), is not expressed in the majority of chondrocytes indicating that the differentiation is blocked before round and columnar chondrocytes are formed (E, F, arrows). 80x magnification; R = radius, U = ulna.
Together these results demonstrate that the chondrocyte differentiation process in both Hox mutants is disturbed before the differentiation into round and columnar chondrocytes takes place.
Shox2 and Runx2 Act Downstream of Hoxa11 and Hoxd11
Mice deficient for Runt related transcription factor 2 (Runx2) and Runx3 and mice carrying a limb specific deletion of the gene Short stature homeobox 2 (Shox2) exhibit a similar phenotype as Hoxa11−/−;d11−/− and Ulnaless mice. Both show shortened limbs, an arrest in chondrocyte differentiation and the absence or severe reduction of Ihh expression [37], [38]. Runx2 and Shox2 are thus good candidates to mediate the effect of Hox genes in chondrocyte differentiation. To test this hypothesis, we analyzed the expression of Runx2 and Shox2 in the ulna of the E14.5 Hox mutants by in situ hybridization. In E14.5 wild type limbs, Runx2 is expressed in early hypertrophic chondrocytes (Fig. 5C, yellow arrow) and in the perichondrium [39] (Fig. 5C, red arrow), whereas Shox2 is expressed in proliferating chondrocytes at E14.5 and E16.5 [40] (Fig. 6A, E, yellow arrows). In contrast, neither Runx2 nor Shox2 expression can be detected in chondrocytes of the ulna of either mutant (Fig. 5D, E; Fig. 6B, C, F, G, red arrows), although both genes are strongly expressed in other cartilage anlagen of the forelimbs (Fig. 5D, E, yellow arrows; Fig. 6B, C, G, yellow arrows).
Sections of E12.5 (A, B) and E14.5 (C–E) control (A, C), Hoxa11−/−;d11−/− (D) and Ulnaless (B, E) forelimbs were hybridized with Runx2 antisense riboprobe. In control forelimbs, Runx2 is expressed in the condensing cartilage anlagen of the zeugopod at E12.5 (A) and in early hypertrophic chondrocytes (C, yellow arrow) and the perichondrium at E14.5 (C, red arrow). In the ulna of both E14.5 Hox mutants, Runx2 expression cannot be detected in chondrocytes, but in the perichondrium (D, E, red arrows). In E12.5 Ulnaless mice, Runx2 expression is restricted to the region of the future, posterior perichondrium (B, red arrow). 80x magnification; R = radius, U = ulna.
Shox2 in situ hybridization on E14.5 (A–D) and E16.5 (E–H) control (A, E), Hoxa11−/−;d11−/− (B, F), Ulnaless (C, G) and Runx2−/−;Runx3−/− (D, H) forelimbs revealed the absence of its expression in the ulna of both Hox mutants (B, C, F, G, red arrows) and in ulna and radius of Runx2−/−;Runx3−/− mutant mice (D, H, red arrows). However, Shox2 expression was detected in other regions of the analyzed forelimbs (B, C, D, G, yellow arrows). 80x magnification (A–C, E–H), 100x magnification (D); R = radius, U = ulna.
Interestingly, in addition to being expressed in hypertrophic chondrocytes, Runx2 has been described to be expressed in the cartilage condensations [41], [42]. To investigate if this early expression is regulated by Hox genes, we analyzed the expression of Runx2 at E12.5. In wild type limbs, strong Runx2 expression was detected in the condensing cartilage anlagen of the forelimb zeugopod (Fig. 5A). In contrast, already at this early stage, Runx2 expression is severely reduced in the condensing chondrocytes of the ulna of Ulnaless mutants and could only be detected in the region of the future perichondrium (Fig. 5B, red arrow). This restriction of the Runx2 expression to the perichondrium was observed in the E14.5 ulna of both Hox mutants as well (Fig. 5D, E, red arrows).
To further investigate the epistatic relationship of Runx2 and Shox2, we analyzed the expression of Shox2 in E14.5 Runx2 mutants. As Runx2 and Runx3 have highly redundant functions during chondrocyte differentiation and compound mutants display a similar arrest in chondrocyte differentiation as Hoxa11−/−;d11−/− and Ulnaless mutants [37], we used Runx2−/−;Runx3−/− double mutant forelimbs for this analysis. Although we detected strong expression of Shox2 in the surrounding limb tissue (Fig. 6D, yellow arrow), its expression was severely reduced in chondrocytes at E14.5 (Fig. 6D, red arrow). To exclude that the lack of Shox2 expression reflects a delay in development, we analyzed Runx2−/−;Runx3−/− as well as Hoxa11−/−;d11−/− and Ulnaless forelimbs at E16.5, but could not detect expression of Shox2 in the ulna of either mutant (Fig. 6F–H, red arrows). It is thus likely that early Runx2/Runx3 expression acts upstream of Shox2.
The role of Runx2 in inducing hypertrophic differentiation has been intensively studied [39]. The loss of Ihh-expressing cells in the Hox mutants is likely due to the absence of this inducer of hypertrophic differentiation. Furthermore, previous experiments indicated that Shox2c/− mutants show reduced Runx2 expression in the humerus [38], [40] placing Shox2 upstream of Runx2. Interestingly, our investigation of Runx2−/−;Runx3−/− double mutants revealed a lack of Shox2 expression placing Runx2 upstream of Shox2. This is supported by our expression analysis, in which we detect Shox2 expression in chondrocytes starting from E13.5 (data not shown), whereas the early expression of Runx2 can already be detected at E12.5 (Fig. 5A).
Runx2/Runx3 and Shox2 seem thus to interact in a complex relationship downstream of Hox genes in chondrocytes. At early stages Runx2/Runx3 seem to act upstream of Shox2, whereas at later stages Shox2 appears to act upstream of Runx genes. If Runx2/Runx3 induce the differentiation of round and columnar cells, which in turn express Shox2, or if Shox2 together with Runx2/Runx3 is required to drive the chondrocyte differentiation program has to be investigated in future experiments. In this respect it is interesting to note that loss of Runx2 affects hypertrophic differentiation strongest in the humerus [39], but loss of Runx2 and Runx3 inhibits differentiation in all skeletal elements of the limbs [37]. Similarly, the defects in Shox2c/− mice are strongest in humerus and femur [38]. Interestingly, humans express the two paralog genes, SHOX and SHOX2, whereas mice only contain Shox2. Mutations in SHOX are associated with Léri-Weill dyschondrosteosis [43], Turner syndrome [44] and Langer mesomelic dysplasia [45], which are associated with pronounced limb defects in the zeugopod. Which gene replaces the role of SHOX in mice and if deletion of both would affect zeugopod and stylopod to similar degrees remains a question for future studies.
Conclusions
Our analysis demonstrates that Hoxa11 and Hoxd11 regulate an early step of chondrocyte differentiation in the zeugopod of mice (Fig. 7). Although the differentiation of mesenchymal cells into Col2a1-expressing chondrocytes is not significantly affected by loss of Hoxa11 and Hoxd11, chondrocytes fail to undergo differentiation into Ihh-expressing hypertrophic chondrocytes. Here we further define the stage at which chondrocyte differentiation is arrested. We show that, although the condensation of the skeletal elements is not obviously affected at E12.5, chondrocytes stay arrested at an early step in the differentiation program, before the differentiation into columnar and round chondrocytes takes place. In addition, our data identify a new chondrocyte subtype expressing low levels of Fgfr3 but no Ucma, which is not competent to undergo hypertrophic differentiation in absence of Ihh signaling.
Hoxa11 and Hoxd11 regulate the differentiation into round and columnar chondrocytes upstream of the transcription factors Runx2 and Shox2. Black arrows: chondrocyte differentiation steps; red arrows: gene regulation, dashed arrows: predicted epistatic relationship.
We further demonstrate that Hox genes act upstream of the transcription factors Runx2 and Shox2, two key regulators of the chondrocyte differentiation program (Fig. 7), which are expressed in most cartilage anlagen of wild type long bones. The observation that their expression is specifically affected in the ulna of the Hox mutants make them likely candidates to translate the positional information established by the ulna-specific “Hox code” into a skeletal pattern. As individual skeletal elements seem to react with different sensitivity to changes in the expression of Runx2, Runx3 and Shox2, fine-tuning their expression by specific combinations of Hox genes might provide a mechanism to modulate size and shape of a cartilage element.
Materials and Methods
Ethics Statement
Mice were kept and bred according to the institutional guidelines of the University Duisburg-Essen and the University Hospital Essen, specifically approved by the animal welfare officer of the University Duisburg-Essen. Mouse husbandry was approved by the city of Essen (Az: 32-2-11-80-71/203) in accordance with § 11 (1) 1a of the “Tierschutzgesetz”. Work with transgenic animals was approved by the “Bezirksregierung Duesseldorf” (Az: 53.02.01-D-1.57/09, Anlagen-Nr. 965) in accordance with § 8 Abs. 4 Satz 2 GenTG of the “Gentechnikgesetz”.
Mice and Genotyping
For time pregnancies, noon of the day, when a vaginal plug was observed, was considered to be embryonic day (E) 0.5. Double mutant Hoxa11−/−;d11−/− embryos were generated by mating compound heterozygous parental mice as described before [20], [21]. Embryos with at least one wild type allele for each gene were used as a control. Genotyping was performed by three primer-PCR with the following primers: Hoxa11for: 5′-gctggcttttatctgaagccgg-3′, Hoxa11rev: 5′-ctcccaattccagtaggctgg-3′, Hoxa11Neo: 5′-ggttgttcagactacaatctgacc-3′, Hoxd11for: 5′-cctttttcctatctcagtgccag-3′, Hoxd11rev: 5′-ggggtacatcctggagttctca-3′, Hoxd11Neo: 5′-ttcaagcccaagctttcgcgag-3′. Ulnaless mice were obtained from The Jackson Laboratory (Bar Harbor, Maine) and kept in the B6EiC3 background. Heterozygous Ulnaless embryos were generated by mating heterozygous Ulnaless females with wild type males of the Ulnaless colony. Wild type embryos of Ulnaless matings were used as controls. Genotyping of the Ulnaless allele was performed by PCR with the following primers: Ul-for: 5′-acccttggactaaagaccaaa-3′, Ul-rev: 5′-ttgctgtaaactcatcaggaag-3′. Runx2−/−;Runx3−/− mice have previously been described [37]. Runx2+/−;Runx3+/+ and Runx2+/−;Runx3+/− embryos were used as a control. Genotyping for Runx2 was performed by using the following primers: Runx2-wt-for: 5′-cttgaaggccacgggcag-3′, Runx2-wt-rev: 5′-agcgacgtgagcccggtg-3′, Runx2-Neo-for: 5′-tctggattcatcgactgtgg-3′, Runx2-Neo-rev: 5′-cttgaaggccacgggcag-3′. Runx3 genotyping was performed as previously described [37].
Histological Analysis and in situ Hybridization
Embryos were dissected in phosphate buffered saline (PBS). Forelimbs were fixed overnight in 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) at 4°C, dehydrated and embedded in paraffin wax. Serial sections of 5 µm were stained or used for in situ hybridization. Safranin-Weigert staining was performed with a series of Weigert’s hematoxylin (Roth), 0.1% fast green (Sigma) and 0.1% safranin O (Sigma) according to the staining procedure [46]. For radioactive in situ hybridization, antisense riboprobes were labeled with [P33]-UTP (Hartman Analytic). Hybridization was performed in 50% formamide at 70°C as described previously [30]. Developed slides were counterstained with 0.2% toluidine blue O (Sigma) in 1% sodium borate. The following probes were used for in situ hybridization: Ihh [47], Ptch1 [48], Fgfr3 [35], Ucma [36], Col2a1 [49], Col10a1 [50], Runx2 [42]. The Shox2 probe was amplified from cDNA of E15.5 wild type limbs using primers Shox2-for: 5′-ttgcaacgtgacgcccttgtc-3′, Shox2-rev: 5′-ggcgctatccacttctcactg-3′ and cloned into pCR4-TOPO (Invitrogen).
Unless otherwise indicated, forelimbs of at least two individual mice were analyzed by Safranin-Weigert staining or hybridized with the same antisense probe showing the same result.
Limb Explant Cultures
Forelimbs of E13.5 Ulnaless embryos were dissected by removing skin and muscle. The limbs were cultured for 4 days in Biggers or BGJb medium (Invitrogen) supplemented with 1% antibiotic/antimycotic (Invitrogen), 0.1% bovine serum albumin (BSA) (Roth) and 1.4 mM glutamine (Invitrogen) in in vitro fertilization dishes (BD Biosciences Falcon) at 37°C, 5% CO2. One forelimb of the embryo was treated with 10 µM cyclopamine (Calbiochem), whereas the other forelimb was used as untreated control. The medium was changed every day. The limbs were fixed for 3 hours in 4% PFA at 4°C and embedded in paraffin wax.
Supporting Information
Figure S1.
Chondrocyte differentiation is initiated normally in the zeugopod of Ulnaless mice. In situ hybridization on E12.5 control (A) and Ulnaless (B) forelimbs with a Col2a1 antisense riboprobe reveals no difference in the Col2a1 expression in Ulnaless forelimbs compared to control (A, B). 80x magnification; R = radius, U = ulna.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0043553.s001
(TIF)
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank M. Capecchi for providing the Hoxa11+/−;d11+/− mice and S. Schneider and E. Neiße for technical assistance.
Author Contributions
Conceived and designed the experiments: SG MW AV. Performed the experiments: SG YK. Analyzed the data: SG YK MW AV. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: AV. Wrote the paper: SG MW AV.
References
- 1. Erlebacher A, Filvaroff EH, Gitelman SE, Derynck R (1995) Toward a molecular understanding of skeletal development. Cell 80: 371–378.
- 2. Kronenberg HM (2003) Developmental regulation of the growth plate. Nature 423: 332–336.
- 3. Olsen BR, Reginato AM, Wang W (2000) Bone development. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 16: 191–220.
- 4. Kobayashi T, Chung UI, Schipani E, Starbuck M, Karsenty G, et al. (2002) PTHrP and Indian hedgehog control differentiation of growth plate chondrocytes at multiple steps. Development 129: 2977–2986.
- 5. Long F, Zhang XM, Karp S, Yang Y, McMahon AP (2001) Genetic manipulation of hedgehog signaling in the endochondral skeleton reveals a direct role in the regulation of chondrocyte proliferation. Development 128: 5099–5108.
- 6. Duboule D (1992) The vertebrate limb: a model system to study the Hox/HOM gene network during development and evolution. Bioessays 14: 375–384.
- 7. Krumlauf R (1994) Hox genes in vertebrate development. Cell 78: 191–201.
- 8. Krumlauf R (1992) Evolution of the vertebrate Hox homeobox genes. Bioessays 14: 245–252.
- 9. McGinnis W, Krumlauf R (1992) Homeobox genes and axial patterning. Cell 68: 283–302.
- 10. Dolle P, Izpisua-Belmonte JC, Falkenstein H, Renucci A, Duboule D (1989) Coordinate expression of the murine Hox-5 complex homoeobox-containing genes during limb pattern formation. Nature 342: 767–772.
- 11. Izpisua-Belmonte JC, Falkenstein H, Dolle P, Renucci A, Duboule D (1991) Murine genes related to the Drosophila AbdB homeotic genes are sequentially expressed during development of the posterior part of the body. EMBO J 10: 2279–2289.
- 12. Kmita M, Fraudeau N, Herault Y, Duboule D (2002) Serial deletions and duplications suggest a mechanism for the collinearity of Hoxd genes in limbs. Nature 420: 145–150.
- 13. Spitz F, Gonzalez F, Duboule D (2003) A global control region defines a chromosomal regulatory landscape containing the HoxD cluster. Cell 113: 405–417.
- 14. Spitz F, Gonzalez F, Peichel C, Vogt TF, Duboule D, et al. (2001) Large scale transgenic and cluster deletion analysis of the HoxD complex separate an ancestral regulatory module from evolutionary innovations. Genes Dev 15: 2209–2214.
- 15. Zakany J, Kmita M, Duboule D (2004) A dual role for Hox genes in limb anterior-posterior asymmetry. Science 304: 1669–1672.
- 16. Deschamps J (2004) Developmental biology. Hox genes in the limb: a play in two acts. Science 304: 1610–1611.
- 17. Nelson CE, Morgan BA, Burke AC, Laufer E, DiMambro E, et al. (1996) Analysis of Hox gene expression in the chick limb bud. Development 122: 1449–1466.
- 18. Small KM, Potter SS (1993) Homeotic transformations and limb defects in Hox A11 mutant mice. Genes Dev 7: 2318–2328.
- 19. Davis AP, Capecchi MR (1994) Axial homeosis and appendicular skeleton defects in mice with a targeted disruption of hoxd-11. Development 120: 2187–2198.
- 20. Boulet AM, Capecchi MR (2004) Multiple roles of Hoxa11 and Hoxd11 in the formation of the mammalian forelimb zeugopod. Development 131: 299–309.
- 21. Davis AP, Witte DP, Hsieh-Li HM, Potter SS, Capecchi MR (1995) Absence of radius and ulna in mice lacking hoxa-11 and hoxd-11. Nature 375: 791–795.
- 22.
Morris T (1967) New mutants. Mouse News Letter.
- 23. Davisson MT, Cattanach BM (1990) The mouse mutation ulnaless on chromosome 2. J Hered 81: 151–153.
- 24. Herault Y, Fraudeau N, Zakany J, Duboule D (1997) Ulnaless (Ul), a regulatory mutation inducing both loss-of-function and gain-of-function of posterior Hoxd genes. Development 124: 3493–3500.
- 25. Peichel CL, Prabhakaran B, Vogt TF (1997) The mouse Ulnaless mutation deregulates posterior HoxD gene expression and alters appendicular patterning. Development 124: 3481–3492.
- 26. Peichel CL, Abbott CM, Vogt TF (1996) Genetic and physical mapping of the mouse Ulnaless locus. Genetics 144: 1757–1767.
- 27. Wright E, Hargrave MR, Christiansen J, Cooper L, Kun J, et al. (1995) The Sry-related gene Sox9 is expressed during chondrogenesis in mouse embryos. Nat Genet 9: 15–20.
- 28. Ng LJ, Wheatley S, Muscat GE, Conway-Campbell J, Bowles J, et al. (1997) SOX9 binds DNA, activates transcription, and coexpresses with type II collagen during chondrogenesis in the mouse. Dev Biol 183: 108–121.
- 29. Zhao Q, Eberspaecher H, Lefebvre V, De Crombrugghe B (1997) Parallel expression of Sox9 and Col2a1 in cells undergoing chondrogenesis. Dev Dyn 209: 377–386.
- 30. Vortkamp A, Lee K, Lanske B, Segre GV, Kronenberg HM, et al. (1996) Regulation of rate of cartilage differentiation by Indian hedgehog and PTH-related protein. Science 273: 613–622.
- 31. St-Jacques B, Hammerschmidt M, McMahon AP (1999) Indian hedgehog signaling regulates proliferation and differentiation of chondrocytes and is essential for bone formation. Genes Dev 13: 2072–2086.
- 32. Minina E, Wenzel HM, Kreschel C, Karp S, Gaffield W, et al. (2001) BMP and Ihh/PTHrP signaling interact to coordinate chondrocyte proliferation and differentiation. Development 128: 4523–4534.
- 33. Chen JK, Taipale J, Cooper MK, Beachy PA (2002) Inhibition of Hedgehog signaling by direct binding of cyclopamine to Smoothened. Genes Dev 16: 2743–2748.
- 34. Elima K, Eerola I, Rosati R, Metsaranta M, Garofalo S, et al. (1993) The mouse collagen X gene: complete nucleotide sequence, exon structure and expression pattern. The Biochemical journal 289 (Pt 1): 247–253.
- 35. Minina E, Schneider S, Rosowski M, Lauster R, Vortkamp A (2005) Expression of Fgf and Tgfbeta signaling related genes during embryonic endochondral ossification. Gene Expr Patterns 6: 102–109.
- 36. Tagariello A, Luther J, Streiter M, Didt-Koziel L, Wuelling M, et al. (2008) Ucma–A novel secreted factor represents a highly specific marker for distal chondrocytes. Matrix Biol 27: 3–11.
- 37. Yoshida CA, Yamamoto H, Fujita T, Furuichi T, Ito K, et al. (2004) Runx2 and Runx3 are essential for chondrocyte maturation, and Runx2 regulates limb growth through induction of Indian hedgehog. Genes Dev 18: 952–963.
- 38. Cobb J, Dierich A, Huss-Garcia Y, Duboule D (2006) A mouse model for human short-stature syndromes identifies Shox2 as an upstream regulator of Runx2 during long-bone development. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103: 4511–4515.
- 39. Kim IS, Otto F, Zabel B, Mundlos S (1999) Regulation of chondrocyte differentiation by Cbfa1. Mech Dev 80: 159–170.
- 40. Yu L, Liu H, Yan M, Yang J, Long F, et al. (2007) Shox2 is required for chondrocyte proliferation and maturation in proximal limb skeleton. Dev Biol 306: 549–559.
- 41. Ducy P, Zhang R, Geoffroy V, Ridall AL, Karsenty G (1997) Osf2/Cbfa1: a transcriptional activator of osteoblast differentiation. Cell 89: 747–754.
- 42. Stricker S, Fundele R, Vortkamp A, Mundlos S (2002) Role of Runx genes in chondrocyte differentiation. Dev Biol 245: 95–108.
- 43. Shears DJ, Vassal HJ, Goodman FR, Palmer RW, Reardon W, et al. (1998) Mutation and deletion of the pseudoautosomal gene SHOX cause Leri-Weill dyschondrosteosis. Nature genetics 19: 70–73.
- 44. Rao E, Weiss B, Fukami M, Rump A, Niesler B, et al. (1997) Pseudoautosomal deletions encompassing a novel homeobox gene cause growth failure in idiopathic short stature and Turner syndrome. Nature genetics 16: 54–63.
- 45. Zinn AR, Wei F, Zhang L, Elder FF, Scott CI Jr, et al. (2002) Complete SHOX deficiency causes Langer mesomelic dysplasia. American journal of medical genetics 110: 158–163.
- 46. Kahveci Z, Minbay FZ, Cavusoglu L (2000) Safranin O staining using a microwave oven. Biotech Histochem 75: 264–268.
- 47. Bitgood MJ, McMahon AP (1995) Hedgehog and Bmp Genes Are Coexpressed at Many Diverse Sites of Cell-Cell Interaction in the Mouse Embryo. Developmental Biology 172: 126–138.
- 48. Goodrich LV, Johnson RL, Milenkovic L, McMahon JA, Scott MP (1996) Conservation of the hedgehog/patched signaling pathway from flies to mice: induction of a mouse patched gene by Hedgehog. Genes Dev 10: 301–312.
- 49. Ng LJ, Tam PP, Cheah KS (1993) Preferential expression of alternatively spliced mRNAs encoding type II procollagen with a cysteine-rich amino-propeptide in differentiating cartilage and nonchondrogenic tissues during early mouse development. Dev Biol 159: 403–417.
- 50. Minina E, Kreschel C, Naski MC, Ornitz DM, Vortkamp A (2002) Interaction of FGF, Ihh/Pthlh, and BMP signaling integrates chondrocyte proliferation and hypertrophic differentiation. Developmental Cell 3: 439–449.