Figures
Abstract
Background
Intestinal ischemia-reperfusion (I/R) plays an important role in critical illnesses. Gut flora participate in the pathogenesis of the injury. This study is aimed at unraveling colonic microbiota alteration pattern and identifying specific bacterial species that differ significantly as well as observing colonic epithelium change in the same injury model during the reperfusion time course.
Methodology/Principal Findings
Denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) was used to monitor the colonic microbiota of control rats and experimental rats that underwent 0.5 hour ischemia and 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, and 72 hours following reperfusion respectively. The microbiota similarity, bacterial diversity and species that characterized the dysbiosis were estimated based on the DGGE profiles using a combination of statistical approaches. The interested bacterial species in the gel were cut and sequenced and were subsequently quantified and confirmed with real-time PCR. Meanwhile, the epithelial barrier was checked by microscopy and D-lactate analysis. Colonic flora changed early and differed significantly at 6 hours after reperfusion and then started to recover. The shifts were characterized by the increase of Escherichia coli and Prevotella oralis, and Lactobacilli proliferation together with epithelia healing.
Citation: Wang F, Li Q, Wang C, Tang C, Li J (2012) Dynamic Alteration of the Colonic Microbiota in Intestinal Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury. PLoS ONE 7(7): e42027. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0042027
Editor: Markus M. Heimesaat, Charité, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Germany
Received: April 13, 2012; Accepted: June 29, 2012; Published: July 27, 2012
Copyright: © 2012 Wang et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Funding: This work was supported by the Key Project of National Natural Science Foundation in China (30830098), National Natural Science Foundation in China (81070375), National High-tech R&D Program (863 Program) of China (2012AA021007), National Basic Research Program (973 Program) in China (no. 2009CB522405) and Scientific Research Fund in Jiangsu Province (BK2009317). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Introduction
Intestinal ischemia-reperfusion (I/R) is a frequent phenomenon during intestinal stricture, gangrene, fulminant universal colitis, and mesenteric low flow secondary to other critical diseases, such as trauma, shock and major surgeries, carrying high mortality rate [1], [2]. Diagnosis and management are clinically challenging. The main therapy remains supportive, other than in cases that surgeries are mandatory. Therefore, it is important to investigate the pathophysiological mechanisms that initiate and propagate the intestinal I/R.
The gut luminal flora had been described as “a forgotten organ” [3]. The large bowel is the most heavily colonized part of the gastrointestinal tract, which accommodates nearly 400 different species of bacteria, comprising 1013 to 1014 microorganisms whose genome is over 100 times as large as human beings’ genome [4], [5]. Majority of gut microbes have a profound influence on human physiology, such as energy and vitamins harvest from food [6], [7], epithelial cell growth and differentiation [8], immune system development and homoeostasis [9], and prevention of noncommensal organisms from expanding [10]. Meanwhile, changes of colonal microbiome are associated with ulcerative colitis [11], infectious colitis [12], colon cancer [13], critical illnesses [14] and small bowel transplantation [15].
One of the essential functions of the intestine is to maintain a barrier which prevents the entry of potentially harmful microorganisms to adjacent and distant sterile organs. The mechanical barrier gets impaired through splanchnic hypoxic and subsequent reperfusion, and results in bacterial translocation [16], [17], [18]. Moreover, most translocating bacteria originate from colonic resident identical ones [19], and the incidence of bacteria translocation is associated with colon [20].
Intestinal microbial community changes have been investigated in critical ill patients and animal models using conventional bacteriological analysis techniques [21], [22], [23], while few study applies culture-independent methods [24]. Since the majority of our indigenous microbial community members are unculturable, it is meaningful to investigate the changes of colonic microbiota in intestinal ischemia and reperfusion injury using molecular techniques. Until now, it has never been elucidated how gut ecology changes according to the reperfusion time course. Furthermore, there is no assessment of both colonic mechanical and bacterial barriers at the same time.
Therefore, we undertook the study (1) to characterize the changes of colonic microbiota in relation to intestinal ischemia-reperfusion using denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) method and (2) to observing both epithelial barrier and gut flora impairment and recovery in the same model longitudinally.
Results
Intestinal Ischemia-reperfusion Induces Dynamic Changes of the Colonic Microbiota
Temporal changes of colonic community pattern.
The DGGE profiles of proximal colonic flora from different reperfusion time groups showed shifts of colonic microbial community composition during the reperfusion time (Figure 1). It could be observed that some bands became more intense and appeared more prevalently, such as band C30. However, the changes of the DGGE band profiles were difficult to be quantified by observation. Therefore, we utilized Dice coefficient and UPGMA as a cluster method to demonstrate band pattern similarity (Figure 2). There were two primary clusters. The left cluster contained all normal samples and samples of 1 and 3 hours after reperfusion, whereas the right one contained all other groups of later reperfusion time points. There were variations in DGGE profiles between early injury rats and normal rats. Total similarity of the first cluster was 64%, while similarity of colonic microbiota within the group of normal rats was 71%. Sub-clusters of the right cluster also showed that the composition of the microbiota had a time dependent behavior. Colonic microbiota patterns of 6 hours of reperfusion were distinct from patterns of other later time points, except for only one individual.
Sample numbers above lanes indicate hours after reperfusion and M denotes marker lane, which was used for gel to gel comparison. Each band represents a bacterial clone. Band numbers and arrowheads indicate the position of bands excised for sequence analyses. (e.g. “C20” means band C20).
Metric scale denotes degree of similarity. The numbers and color coded symbols denote samples in a group at the particular hours after reperfusion, while the letter C denotes samples in the control group.
Principal component analysis (PCA) of DGGE fingerprints of colonic microbiota (Figure 3) confirmed and exhibited the temporal changes of colonic flora according to different reperfusion time points more thoroughly. The distance between 2 data points represents the extent of difference between of the 2 rats’ gut microbial compositions. Microbial structure of 1 and 3 hours of reperfusion showed a separation from normal colonal microbiota by PCA axis 1 and 2. Furthermore, 6 hours reperfusion colonic microbiota differed considerably from normal samples by moving towards left of PCA axis 1 and up of PCA axis 2, and described the largest variation (circled in a solid circle upper left in Figure 3). From then on, the composition of gut flora composition began moving back towards normal groups according to the lasting of reperfusion time along axis 2.
Each color coded symbol represents a single sample according to reperfusion time. Samples grouped in a solid circle represent colonic microbiota of five 6-hr intestinal ischemia-reperfusion rats.
Colonic microbiota diversity.
The species richness was lower in the control, 1 hour and 3 hours reperfusion groups versus the following four time points groups. Means of species richness are 28.33, 27.50 and 25.83, versus 36.33, 35.83, 33.83 and 32.83. A similar result was obtained using the Shannon’s diversity index (Figure 4A and B). There was no significant difference in the colonal microbial evenness for all groups of rats in the experiments (Figure 4C).
(A) Shannon’s diversity index. (B) Species richness. (C) Shannon’s evenness index. Columns within class (labeled a or b) not sharing letters are different (p<.05).
Bacterial species in relation to intestinal ischemia-reperfusion.
To more specifically define changes in the microbiota induced by gut I/R, we identified bacterial species that mainly contributed to the PCA clustering by species scores on axes of PCA analysis results [25]. For example, bands that have largest projections on the positive axis 1 are correlated with the bacterial populations increased in 1 and 3 hours of reperfusion. Therefore, every 3 bands that had the largest absolute values of species scores on each axis were excised from the DGGE gel and sequenced to identify which species they are. The bands were assigned to a bacterial species based on highest (≥90%) sequence similarity match to GenBank sequences obtained by BLAST analysis (Table 1). Band C12 was too weak to be amplified, thus we excised band C20, whose species scores ranked fourth. Band C25 was excluded because of low alignment score, while band C5 was also excluded for no significant similar sequence was found. In general, the microbial shifts occurred in four major patterns (a) bacterial groups that increased early at reperfusion hour 1 and 3 (positive axis 1), two strains of Escherichia coli (band C38 and C29) and an Uncultured Firmicutes bacterium (band C26); (b) bacterial groups that increased later, especially characterized at hour 6 (negative axis 1), 2 species of Lactobacillus (band C30 and C20) and an Uncultured Firmicutes bacterium (band C39); (c) bacterial groups that increased within a longer time, from reperfusion hour 1 to hour 6 (positive axis 2), a Prevotella oralis (band C2) and an Escherichia coli (band C32) and (d) bacterial groups that decreased together with groups which increased in pattern (c) (negative axis 2), a Lactobacillus sp. (band C1) and an Escherichia coli (band C24). These species were subsequently confirmed by clustering analysis with sequences and their closest phylogenetic neighbours (Figure 5).
The bar indicates 5% sequence divergence.
Quantitative validation of characteristic bacterial species with real-time PCR.
Quantitative real-time PCR was performed to verify the changes found by DGGE. There was a trend that more Escherichia coli were present in 1 and 3 hours of reperfusion (p<.001 and p<.05 respectively) (Figure 6A). Lactobacillus 16S rRNA gene content was not significantly higher until 6 hours of reperfusion (Figure 6B), whereas number of Prevotella oralis elevated during 1 hour to 12 hours of reperfusion (Figure 6C). The differences in the quantitative data of the three bacteria groups in the intestinal I/R time course reflect the disproportions identified in the DGGE analysis.
The relative quantity of specific groups of bacteria was determined by real-time PCR of 16S rRNA gene of (A) Escherichia coli, (B) Lactobacilli and (C) Prevotella oralis, and normalized to total bacteria 16S rRNA gene amount using the 2–ΔCT method. Quantification values are represented by fold changes relative to control rats. ***p<.001, **p<.01 *p<.05.
Colonic Epithelial Barrier Impairment and Recovery Precedes Gut Flora Dysbiosis
Damage and repair of colonic mucosa after intestinal ischemia-reperfusion.
The microscopic inspection of colonic mucosa showed focal epithelial edema and necrosis at 1 hour after ischemia and reperfusion (Figure 7B). Three hours of reperfusion group showed the highest injury scores (3.17±0.31) compared with normal group (0.17±0.17, p<.001) (Figure 7E). Severe and widespread necroses with hemorrhage were detected at that time (Figure 7C). Whereas at 6 hours of reperfusion, morphological alteration of colonal mucosa tended to recover (Figure 7D). Histological injury scores of ischemia and 24 hours of reperfusion colon were not significantly different from those non-ischemia colon.
(A–D), representative graphs of control, 1-hr, 3-hr and 6-hr reperfusion groups, respectively. (E), comparison of colon damage scores of control group with the grades of different reperfusion time groups. ***p<.001, **p<.01 *p<.05.
Serum D-lactate levels.
Three to six hours after intestinal ischemia and reperfusion, serum D-lactate levels (0.68±0.04 and 0.74±0.07) were significantly elevated compared with normal and other groups (p<.001). After 12 hours of reperfusion, the serum D-lactate concentration (0.34±0.02) dropped back to nearly the normal level (0.27±0.02). (Figure 8).
Columns within class (labeled a or b) not sharing letters are different (p<.05) in D-lactate concentrations.
Comparison between timing of gut flora and epithelial barrier changes.
Examination of proximal colon and its contents that suffered ischemia-reperfusion demonstrated that earlier damage and repair of the epithelium compared with later dysbiosis and tendency of recovery of colonic microbiota. Colon damage scores and serum D-lactate concentration elevated as early as 1 hour after reperfusion and reach the highest level at hour 3 (Figure 7E and Figure 8), while colonic community’s pattern showed a slight change at those time (Figure 2 and 3). Community’s pattern presented the most prominent change at 6 hours of reperfusion. Epithelial barrier started repairing after 3 hours and gained full recovery at 24 hours of reperfusion. However, the colonic luminal composition did not cluster with normal microbiome during the same time period and neither at 72 hours of reperfusion.
Discussion
Several reports have demonstrated that intestinal microbiome dysbiosis exits in critical illnesses. However, precisely how and when the composition of gut flora alters after intestinal ischemia-reperfusion remains unclear. In this study, we observed kinetics of colonic flora alteration during rats intestinal I/R, identified distinctive bacteria species in the pathogenesis and showed that colonic epithelial barrier impairment and recovery precedes gut flora dysbiosis.
Our study showed for the first time that intestinal I/R does affect the bacterial construction of colon of rats. Clustering analysis revealed distinct clusters (Figure 2) that we designated as 2 microbiome patterns and 2 sub types within each. This suggests that colonic flora started to change as early as 1 hour reperfusion and reached the most distinct microbial construction at 6 hours reperfusion. The result was then confirmed by PCA, which in addition demonstrated that colonic community pattern began shifted back towards normal pattern after 6 hours reperfusion. To the best of our knowledge, this is also the first time that 16S rRNA based bacterial community profiling has been used to monitor colonic flora change in a model of intestinal ischemia and reperfusion.
We next sought to determine whether the changes of profiling were due to several reduced and/or increased bacteria. Apart from two kinds of uncultured Firmicutes, Escherichia coli (band C38 and C29) growth responded to ischemia and reperfusion injury quickly, while Lactobacilli (band C20 and C30) tended to proliferate a bit later. Served as a potential pathological bacterium, Escherichia coli could increase colonic wall permeability [26] and has pro-inflammation potential on the intestinal tissue [27]. In addition, Escherichia coli accumulation could be seen in rodent experimental colitis [27], [28] and resulted in more bacteria translocation [29]. Moreover, our previous studies demonstrated that enteropathogenic Escherichia coli invades intestinal epithelial barrier by redistribution of tight junction proteins both in vivo and in vitro [30], [31]. In a similar in vitro model, intestinal epithelial cells incubated with Escherichia coli and subjected to hypoxia and reoxygenation would underwent increased deaths [32]. These investigations and the present study reassure that Escherichia coli overgrowth plays an important role in gut inflammation and bacteria translocation.
Lactobacilli are normal components of the intestinal flora. In our study, we found that Lactobacilli increased later in the injury of intestinal I/R. However, in a murine colitis model, numbers of Lactobacilli remained unaffected [27], while IL-10 gene deficient mice have deceased levels of colonic Lactobacilli [33]. The inconsistency may be explained by model differences. Our model is such a more acute ischemia-reperfusion model that the colonic mucosa started recovering at 6-hr reperfusion. This time point is consistent with the moment Lactobacilli accumulated prominently in our study. Likewise, some studies proved that certain strains of Lactobacillus may improve the colonic barrier [26], [34], normalizing Lactobacilli levels even reduced colonic mucosal adherent, bacterial translocation and colitis injury [33].
Considering the second principal component, Prevotella oralis (band C2) proliferation characterizes the community change throughout the first 6 hours. Although Prevotella oralis was mostly isolated from the oral cavity [35], this species could be isolated from infected mice intestinal contents [36] and feces of a patient who was prolonged high-dose ciprofloxacin treated [37]. Prevotella oralis is a gram-negative, rod-shaped anaerobic bacterium and has been reported translocating to systemic circulation [38], the heart [39] and the lungs [40]. A possible role for Prevotella oralis in the pathogenesis of intestinal I/R may be an overgrowth in the injured colon, followed by translocation through the impaired gut wall and causing infection in remote organs. Other bacteria that contribute to the second principal component were two Escherichia coli and a Lactobacillus. The shifting tendencies of these bacteria are not equal to each other and the ones previous described. The theory that could explain the phenomenon is that bacteria species also compete with their kin in a bacterial ecological community [41].
The acute stage of colonic ischemia and reperfusion was characterized by a shift towards more members of bacteria and much more complexity, whereas a loss of bacterial microflora diversity was seen in IBD colonic mucosa [42]. This phenomenon may be attributed to differences of diseases and flora locations. In addition, in our rat’s model, we can rule out the possibility that antibiotic treatments and nutrition starvation may affect the intestinal microbiota, which is common in critical ill patients underwent intestinal ischemia- reperfusion.
Colonic epithelia showed healing at 6 hours after reperfusion while the gut flora reached the highest diversity and the most different pattern. It indicates that the histological injury precedes gut flora dysbiosis and gut I/R had a longer effect on the luminal microbiota. Observations of the epithelial barrier and gut flora at the same time were novel of this injury model and consistent with the theory that gut is the motor of critical illness [43]. Previous study has shown that host inflammation disrupted intestinal microbiota and supported the growth of Enterobacteriaceae family [28]. The colonic epithelial cells got inflammation after ischemia and reperfusion. It has been proved that inflammation harms colon epithelium’s ability of expressing antimicrobial peptides [44]. Other mechanisms such as pattern recognition receptors, mucin production and IgA secretion might also participate in interactions between the epithelium and gut flora [43].
Although there are several previous studies focused on gut flora changes in critical illnesses [45], molecular analyses based on 16S rRNA gene are few. DGGE is able to identify bacterial populations that constitute 1% or more of the total bacterial community [46]. Therefore, our results demonstrated a new opportunistic pathogen species Prevotella oralis that proliferated in gut ischemia and reperfusion as well as Escherichia coli. Culture based or quantitative PCR methods only examine species that are designed to detect, which do change but usually do not alter predominantly and contribute significantly in the pathogenesis of the disease.
Together, our study showed that gut ischemia-reperfusion affected the colonic microbiota pattern dynamically and promoted overgrowth of Escherichia coli and Prevotella oralis. Proliferation of Lactobacilli in the later reperfusion phase was concordant with the colonic epithelium recovery time course. In addition, epithelial barrier impairment and repair preceded gut flora dysbiosis and restoration in this injury model.
Materials and Methods
Animals, Surgical Procedures and Sample Collection
Male Sprague-Dawley rats (200–250 g) were kept in the Laboratory Animals Center of Jinling Hospital with standard chow and water available ad libitum except during experimental procedures. Every two rats shared one cage. The lights were maintained on a 12-h: 12-h light-dark schedule. All procedures were carried out in accordance with the “Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals” published by the National Institutes of Health (NIH publication 86–23 revised 1985). And the protocols were approved by Animal Care and Use Committee of Jinling Hospital. Rats were anesthetized with ketamine (100 mg/kg, intraperitoneal). To perform superior mesenteric artery ischemia-reperfusion, a midline laparotomy was made, and then a clamp was placed on the superior mesenteric artery for 30 minutes, after which the tissue is reperfused. Forty-two rats were divided randomly into 7 groups with 6 animals per group. A group of rats were sacrificed just after anesthesia as the control group, while other six groups were euthanized at 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, 72 hours of reperfusion respectively. Blood samples and tissues were harvested for further analysis. Rats were then killed by over-dosed anesthesia. Colonic samples and its contents at 1 cm distal to the cecal-colonic junction, were immersed in liquid nitrogen, and stored at −80°C for further analysis.
Microbial Analysis of the Proximal Colonal Content
DGGE profiling.
Extraction of DNA from proximal colonal contents was carried out using the QIAamp DNA Stool Mini Kit (QIAGEN, Hilden, Germany), according to the manufacturer’s instructions, and stored at −20°C until use. To investigate bacterial community composition in extracted DNA, PCR amplifications of V3 variable region of the 16S rRNA gene were carried out using the forward primer (GC357f 5′-CGCCCGGGGCGCGCCCCGGGCGGGGCGGGGGCACGGGGGGATTACCGCGGCTGCTGG-3′) and reverse primer (518r 5′-CCTACGGGAGGCAGCAG-3′). The 50 µl PCR reaction mixture were: 1 µl of extracted bacterial DNA, 5 µl of 10×PCR buffer, 1 µl of dNTP mixture (2.5 mM each), 1 µl of each primer (10 pM), 0.5 µl of Taq-Polymerase (5 U/µl), 40.5 µl sterile water. A touchdown PCR was run in an Applied Biosysterm 2720 Thermal Cycler. Initial denaturation was at 94°C for 5 min, amplification was carried out using 20 cycles including denaturation at 94°C for 30 sec, annealing at 65°C for 30 sec decreased by 0.5°C for each cycle, and extension at 68°C for 30 sec. This was followed by additional 10 cycles of denaturation at 94°C for 30 sec, annealing at 55°C for 30 sec, extension at 68°C for 30 sec, and a final extension at 68°C for 7 min.
DGGE was carried out as previously described [15] using the DCode Universal Mutation Detection System (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA, USA). Gels that contained 8% polyacrylamide (ratio of acrylamide to bisacrylamide was 37.5∶1) in 1×TAE buffer (40mM Tris–acetate, 1mM EDTA; pH 7.4) in a gradient of 35%–50% denaturant were used to separate PCR fragments where 100% denaturant was defined as 7M urea and 40% formamide. The electrophoresis was conducted first at 200V for 10 minutes and then at 120V for 7.5 hours in 1×TAE buffer and at a constant temperature of 60°C with the DCode system. All gels were stained with SYBR Green Ι (Invitrogen) for 30 min, and scanned under U.V illumination. Images were captured by ChemiDoc XRS Camera (BIO-RAD).
Digital processing of DGGE profiles.
On each DGGE gel, two common samples were loaded on both outer sides for digital gel normalization and to allow comparison among gels. Gel images were aligned using Adobe Photoshop CS4, and digitized by Quantity One software (version 4.6). The latter software was used to detect Individual bands in each sample lane, using a match tolerance of 0.5%, followed by manual correction if necessary. Bands occupying the same position across different lanes were matched and identified as the same band type. The relative quantity of a given band was expressed as a proportion (%) of the sum of all defined bands in the same lane. The quantitative information derived from relative band quantities per band type per sample was exported as a data matrix.
Comparative analyses of the DGGE profiles.
Dice Coefficient was used to calculate similarity between two lanes. Dendrogram was constructed by the unweighted pair group method with arithmetic mean (UPGMA). Principal component analysis (PCA) was performed using Canoco (version 4.5) based on the data matrix mentioned in Digital processing of DGGE profiles. Richness was calculated as the total number of each sample lane’s bands. Diversity was calculated using Shannon’s diversity and evenness index with quantitative information. [47].
Sequencing of DGGE bands.
DGGE bands that differed significantly in different reperfusion time points according to the multivariate analysis were excised with a sterile scalpel and placed into a single Eppendorf tube. The DNA was eluted form the gel slice into 20 µl of sterile water overnight at 4°C. The resulting DNA solution was then amplified again using the V3 16S rRNA forward primer (without GC clamp) (357f 5′- ATTACCGCGGCTGCTGG -3′) and the reverse primer (518r 5′-CCTACGGGAGGCAGCAG-3′). The 50 µl PCR reaction mixture were: 4 µl of template DNA, 5 µl of 10×PCR buffer, 1 µl of dNTP mixture (2.5 mM each), 1 µl of each primer (10 pM), 0.5 µl of Taq-Polymerase (5 U/µl), 37.5 µl sterile water. A touchdown PCR was run in an Applied Biosysterm 2720 Thermal Cycler. Initial denaturation was at 94°C for 5 min, amplification was carried out using 20 cycles including denaturation at 94°C for 30 sec, annealing at 65°C for 30 sec decreased by 0.5°C for each cycle, and extension at 68°C for 30 sec. This was followed by additional 15 cycles of denaturation at 94°C for 30 sec, annealing at 55°C for 30 sec, extension at 68°C for 30 sec, and a final extension at 68°C for 7 min.
Purified PCR products were sequenced using the Sanger’s method on an ABI 3730 automated sequencing system. The retrieved sequences were compared with NCBI GenBank databases using the BLAST tool. Based on the BLAST results, reference sequences of phylogenetic neighbor species (up to 90% similarity) were included for constructing phylogenetic tree using the MEGA 4.0 program in the method of neighbor-joining based on evolutionary distances.
Real-time PCR.
Bacterial species that differed significantly in the ischemia-reperfusion injury in the DGGE comparative analyses were quantified by quantitative PCR using the 7300 Real-Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems, USA) and the primer pairs specific for the bacteria are shown in Table 2.
The real-time PCR was carried out in a 20 µl total reaction mixture using 1 µl of DNA, 0.4 µl of each primer, 10 µl 2 × SYBR Green Realtime PCR Master Mix (TOYOBO, Japan) and 8.2 µl sterile water. The amplification program consisted of one cycle of 95 for 5 min, followed by 40 cycles of 95°C for 15 sec, and 55°C (except for Prevotella Oralis 60°C) for 60 sec. Species specific bacteria 16S rRNA gene amount was normalized to total bacteria 16S rRNA gene amount using the 2–ΔCT method. Quantification values are represented by fold changes relative to control rats.
Measurement of Intestinal Permeability
D-lactate concentration.
Serum levels of D-lactate was assayed using a enzymatic-spectrophotometric method described previously [48] with the kit (GENMED SCIENTIFICS INC. U.S.A.) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.
Morphologic analysis of gut injury.
At sacrifice, proximal colon was fixed in 10% buffered formalin, embedded, sectioned, stained with hematoxylin and eosin and examined by light microscopy. For each animal, the criteria used to score the degree of colonal injury were based on an established grading system [49]. The numerical scores were the following: 0 = normal mucosa; 1 = partial epithelial edema and necrosis; 2 = diffuse swelling and necrosis of the epithelia; 3 = necrosis with submucosal neutrophil infiltration; 4 = widespread necrosis with massive neutrophil infiltration and hemorrhage. The degree of damage was blindly scored.
Statistical Analyses
Statistical significance among groups for bacterial richness, evenness, diversity, injury score and d-lactate concentration were determined by one-way ANOVA analysis followed by post hoc Bonferroni’s multiple comparison test. For non-parametric data, Kruskal-Wallis followed by Dunn’s multiple comparison test was used. P values less than .05 were considered statistically significant. All data were presented as mean ± standard error of the mean. The analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism version 5.
Acknowledgments
We acknowledge the statistical assistance of Xingyu Wang. We acknowledge Dongmei Yuan for valuable work in real-time PCR.
Author Contributions
Conceived and designed the experiments: FW QL JL. Performed the experiments: FW. Analyzed the data: FW. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: CW CT. Wrote the paper: FW.
References
- 1. (2000) American Gastroenterological Association medical position statement: Guidelines on intestinal ischemia. Gastroenterology 118: 951–953.
- 2. Sakai L, Keltner R, Kaminski D (1980) Spontaneous and shock-associated ischemic colitis. The American Journal of Surgery 140: 755–760.
- 3. O’Hara AM, Shanahan F (2006) The gut flora as a forgotten organ. EMBO Rep 7: 688–693.
- 4. Eckburg PB, Bik EM, Bernstein CN, Purdom E, Dethlefsen L, et al. (2005) Diversity of the human intestinal microbial flora. Science 308: 1635–1638.
- 5. Gill SR, Pop M, DeBoy RT, Eckburg PB, Turnbaugh PJ, et al. (2006) Metagenomic Analysis of the Human Distal Gut Microbiome. Science 312: 1355–1359.
- 6. Cummings JH, Englyst HN (1987) Fermentation in the human large intestine and the available substrates. Am J Clin Nutr 45: 1243–1255.
- 7. Conly JM, Stein K, Worobetz L, Rutledge-Harding S (1994) The contribution of vitamin K2 (menaquinones) produced by the intestinal microflora to human nutritional requirements for vitamin K. Am J Gastroenterol 89: 915–923.
- 8. Frankel WL, Zhang W, Singh A, Klurfeld DM, Don S, et al. (1994) Mediation of the trophic effects of short-chain fatty acids on the rat jejunum and colon. Gastroenterology 106: 375–380.
- 9. Round JL, Mazmanian SK (2009) The gut microbiota shapes intestinal immune responses during health and disease. Nat Rev Immunol 9: 313–323.
- 10. Bernet MF, Brassart D, Neeser JR, Servin AL (1994) Lactobacillus acidophilus LA 1 binds to cultured human intestinal cell lines and inhibits cell attachment and cell invasion by enterovirulent bacteria. Gut 35: 483–489.
- 11. Lepage P, Häsler R, Spehlmann ME, Rehman A, Zvirbliene A, et al. (2011) Twin Study Indicates Loss of Interaction Between Microbiota and Mucosa of Patients With Ulcerative Colitis. Gastroenterology 141: 227–236.
- 12. Winter SE, Thiennimitr P, Winter MG, Butler BP, Huseby DL, et al. (2010) Gut inflammation provides a respiratory electron acceptor for Salmonella. Nature 467: 426–429.
- 13. Moore WE, Moore LH (1995) Intestinal floras of populations that have a high risk of colon cancer. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 61: 3202–3207.
- 14. Shimizu K, Ogura H, Goto M, Asahara T, Nomoto K, et al. (2006) Altered gut flora and environment in patients with severe SIRS. J Trauma 60: 126–133.
- 15. Li Q, Zhang Q, Wang C, Tang C, Zhang Y, et al. (2011) Fish Oil Enhances Recovery of Intestinal Microbiota and Epithelial Integrity in Chronic Rejection of Intestinal Transplant. PLoS ONE 6: e20460.
- 16. Tadros T, Traber DL, Heggers JP, Herndon DN (2003) Effects of interleukin-1alpha administration on intestinal ischemia and reperfusion injury, mucosal permeability, and bacterial translocation in burn and sepsis. Ann Surg 237: 101–109.
- 17. Doty JM, Oda J, Ivatury RR, Blocher CR, Christie GE, et al. (2002) The Effects of Hemodynamic Shock and Increased Intra-abdominal Pressure on Bacterial Translocation. The Journal of Trauma 52: 13–17.
- 18. Li Q, Zhang Q, Wang C, Liu X, Qu L, et al. (2009) Altered distribution of tight junction proteins after intestinal ischaemia/reperfusion injury in rats. J Cell Mol Med 13: 4061–4076.
- 19. Reddy BS, MacFie J, Gatt M, Macfarlane-Smith L, Bitzopoulou K, et al. (2007) Commensal bacteria do translocate across the intestinal barrier in surgical patients. Clinical Nutrition 26: 208–215.
- 20. Cicalese L, Sileri P, Green M, Abu-Elmagd K, Kocoshis S, et al. (2001) Bacterial Translocation in Clinical Intestinal Transplantation. Transplantation 71: 1414–1417.
- 21. Marshall JC, Christou NV, Horn R, Meakins JL (1988) The microbiology of multiple organ failure. The proximal gastrointestinal tract as an occult reservoir of pathogens. Arch Surg 123: 309–315.
- 22. Shimizu K, Ogura H, Hamasaki T, Goto M, Tasaki O, et al. (2011) Altered Gut Flora Are Associated with Septic Complications and Death in Critically Ill Patients with Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome. Digestive Diseases and Sciences 56: 1171–1177.
- 23. MacFie J, O’Boyle C, Mitchell CJ, Buckley PM, Johnstone D, et al. (1999) Gut origin of sepsis: a prospective study investigating associations between bacterial translocation, gastric microflora, and septic morbidity. Gut 45: 223–228.
- 24. Hayakawa M, Asahara T, Henzan N, Murakami H, Yamamoto H, et al. (2011) Dramatic Changes of the Gut Flora Immediately After Severe and Sudden Insults. Digestive Diseases and Sciences 56: 2361–2365.
- 25. Mondani L, Benzerara K, Carrière M, Christen R, Mamindy-Pajany Y, et al. (2011) Influence of Uranium on Bacterial Communities: A Comparison of Natural Uranium-Rich Soils with Controls. PLoS ONE 6: e25771.
- 26. García-Lafuente A, Antolín M, Guarner F, Crespo E, Malagelada J-R (2001) Modulation of colonic barrier function by the composition of the commensal flora in the rat. Gut 48: 503–507.
- 27. Heimesaat MM, Fischer A, Siegmund B, Kupz A, Niebergall J, et al. (2007) Shift Towards Pro-inflammatory Intestinal Bacteria Aggravates Acute Murine Colitis via Toll-like Receptors 2 and 4. PLoS ONE 2: e662.
- 28. Lupp C, Robertson ML, Wickham ME, Sekirov I, Champion OL, et al. (2007) Host-mediated inflammation disrupts the intestinal microbiota and promotes the overgrowth of Enterobacteriaceae. Cell Host Microbe 2: 119–129.
- 29. Eleftheriadis E, Kotzampassi K, Papanotas K, Heliadis N, Sarris K (1996) Gut Ischemia, Oxidative Stress, and Bacterial Translocation in Elevated Abdominal Pressure in Rats. World Journal of Surgery 20: 11–16.
- 30. Li Q, Zhang Q, Wang C, Li N, Li J (2008) Invasion of enteropathogenic Escherichia coli into host cells through epithelial tight junctions. FEBS Journal 275: 6022–6032.
- 31. Zhang Q, Li Q, Wang C, Liu X, Li N, et al. (2010) Enteropathogenic Escherichia coli changes distribution of occludin and ZO-1 in tight junction membrane microdomains in vivo. Microbial Pathogenesis 48: 28–34.
- 32. Diebel LN, Liberati DM, Dulchavsky SA, Diglio CA, Brown WJ (2003) Enterocyte apoptosis and barrier function are modulated by SIgA after exposure to bacteria and hypoxia/reoxygenation. Surgery 134: 574–580.
- 33. Madsen KL, Doyle‡ JS, Jewell‡ LD, Tavernini* MM, Fedorak* RN (1999) Lactobacillus species prevents colitis in interleukin 10 gene–deficient mice. Gastroenterology 116: 1107–1114.
- 34. Mao Y, Nobaek S, Kasravi B, Adawi D, Stenram U, et al. (1996) The effects of Lactobacillus strains and oat fiber on methotrexate- induced enterocolitis in rats. Gastroenterology 111: 334–344.
- 35. Garcez AS, Ribeiro MS, Tegos GP, Núñez SC, Jorge AOC, et al. (2007) Antimicrobial photodynamic therapy combined with conventional endodontic treatment to eliminate root canal biofilm infection. Lasers in Surgery and Medicine 39: 59–66.
- 36. Heimesaat MM, Bereswill S, Fischer A, Fuchs D, Struck D, et al. (2006) Gram-Negative Bacteria Aggravate Murine Small Intestinal Th1-Type Immunopathology following Oral Infection with Toxoplasma gondii. The Journal of Immunology 177: 8785–8795.
- 37. Kourbeti I, Alegakis D, Maraki S, Samonis G (2010) Impact of prolonged treatment with high-dose ciprofloxacin on human gut flora: a case report. Journal of Medical Case Reports 4: 1–3.
- 38. Savarrio L, Mackenzie D, Riggio M, Saunders WP, Bagg J (2005) Detection of bacteraemias during non-surgicalroot canal treatment. Journal of dentistry 33: 293–303.
- 39. Quaglio G, Anguera I, Miró JM, Sureda C, Marco F, et al. (1999) Prevotella oralis Homograft-Valve Endocarditis Complicated by Aortic-Root Abscess, Intracardiac Fistula, and Complete Heart Block. Clinical Infectious Diseases 28: 685–686.
- 40. Marina M, Strong CA, Civen R, Molitoris E, Finegold SM (1993) Bacteriology of Anaerobic Pleuropulmonary Infections: Preliminary Report. Clinical Infectious Diseases 16: S256–S262.
- 41. Hibbing ME, Fuqua C, Parsek MR, Peterson SB (2010) Bacterial competition: surviving and thriving in the microbial jungle. Nat Rev Micro 8: 15–25.
- 42. Ott SJ, Musfeldt M, Wenderoth DF, Hampe J, Brant O, et al. (2004) Reduction in diversity of the colonic mucosa associated bacterial microflora in patients with active inflammatory bowel disease. Gut 53: 685–693.
- 43. Clark JA, Coopersmith CM (2007) Intestinal crosstalk: a new paradigm for understanding the gut as the "motor" of critical illness. Shock 28: 384–393.
- 44. Nenci A, Becker C, Wullaert A, Gareus R, van Loo G, et al. (2007) Epithelial NEMO links innate immunity to chronic intestinal inflammation. Nature 446: 557–561.
- 45. Morowitz MJ, Babrowski T, Carlisle EM, Olivas A, Romanowski KS, et al. (2011) The human microbiome and surgical disease. Ann Surg 253: 1094–1101.
- 46. Muyzer G, de Waal EC, Uitterlinden AG (1993) Profiling of complex microbial populations by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis analysis of polymerase chain reaction-amplified genes coding for 16S rRNA. Appl Environ Microbiol 59: 695–700.
- 47. Wacklin P, Makivuokko H, Alakulppi N, Nikkila J, Tenkanen H, et al. (2011) Secretor genotype (FUT2 gene) is strongly associated with the composition of Bifidobacteria in the human intestine. PLoS ONE 6: e20113.
- 48. Jiang H, Qu L, Li Y, Gu L, Shi Y, et al. (2011) Bone Marrow Mesenchymal Stem Cells Reduce Intestinal Ischemia/Reperfusion Injuries in Rats. Journal of Surgical Research 168: 127–134.
- 49. Di Paola R, Mazzon E, Patel NSA, Genovese T, Muià C, et al. (2005) Beneficial effects of GW274150 treatment on the development of experimental colitis induced by dinitrobenzene sulfonic acid. European Journal of Pharmacology 507: 281–289.
- 50. Suzuki MT, Taylor LT, DeLong EF (2000) Quantitative Analysis of Small-Subunit rRNA Genes in Mixed Microbial Populations via 5′-Nuclease Assays. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 66: 4605–4614.
- 51. Huijsdens XW, Linskens RK, Mak M, Meuwissen SGM, Vandenbroucke-Grauls CMJE, et al. (2002) Quantification of Bacteria Adherent to Gastrointestinal Mucosa by Real-Time PCR. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 40: 4423–4427.
- 52. Haarman M, Knol J (2006) Quantitative Real-Time PCR Analysis of Fecal Lactobacillus Species in Infants Receiving a Prebiotic Infant Formula. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 72: 2359–2365.
- 53. Matsuki T, Watanabe K, Fujimoto J, Miyamoto Y, Takada T, et al. (2002) Development of 16S rRNA-Gene-Targeted Group-Specific Primers for the Detection and Identification of Predominant Bacteria in Human Feces. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 68: 5445–5451.