Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Open Access

Peer-reviewed

Research Article

Association of MDM2 SNP309 Variation with Lung Cancer Risk: Evidence from 7196 Cases and 8456 Controls

Abstract

Background

Evidence suggests that MDM2 T309G polymorphism may be a risk factor for several cancers. Increasing investigations have been conducted on the association of MDM2 T309G polymorphisms with lung cancer risk and have yielded conflicting results. Previous meta-analyses on this issue have reported inconclusive data. The aim of the present study was to derive a more precise estimation of the relationship.

Methods and Findings

Updated meta-analyses examining the association between MDM2 T309G polymorphism and lung cancer risk were performed. Separate analyses on ethnicity, smoking status, histological types and gender as well as source of controls were also implemented. Eligible studies were identified for the period up to Feb 2012. Lastly, ten publications including eleven case-control studies were selected for analysis. The overall data failed to indicate a significant association between MDM2 T309G polymorphism and lung cancer risk (GG vs TT OR = 1.14; 95%CI = 0.95−1.37; dominant model: OR = 1.05; 95%CI = 0.92−1.19; recessive model: OR = 1.12; 95%CI = 0.99−1.27). In a subgroup analysis by smoking status, increased lung cancer risk was shown among never-smokers (GG vs TT: OR = 1.76; 95%CI = 1.36−2.29; dominant model: OR = 1.48; 95%CI = 1.22−1.81; recessive model: OR = 1.37; 95%CI = 1.11−1.69). In subgroup analysis by gender, elevated risk was presented among women under a recessive model (OR = 1.29; 95%CI = 1.04−1.59). In the subgroup analysis by ethnicity, histological types and source of controls, no marked associations were observed.

Conclusions

Compared to the previous meta-analyses, the results of this study confirmed that MDM2 T309G polymorphism might be a risk factor for lung cancer among never-smokers. However, the data failed to suggest a marked association between the G allele of MDM2 T309G and lung cancer risk among Asians. More interestingly, subgroup analysis by gender indicated that homozygous GG alleles might raise lung cancer risk among females.

Citation: Zhuo W, Zhang L, Zhu B, Ling J, Chen Z (2012) Association of MDM2 SNP309 Variation with Lung Cancer Risk: Evidence from 7196 Cases and 8456 Controls. PLoS ONE 7(7): e41546. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0041546

Editor: Amanda Ewart Toland, Ohio State University Medical Center, United States of America

Received: March 9, 2012; Accepted: June 22, 2012; Published: July 23, 2012

Copyright: © 2012 Zhuo et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Funding: The authors have no support or funding to report.

Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Introduction

Lung cancer is the most commonly diagnosed cancer as well as the leading cause of cancer death worldwide [1]. Evidence suggests that cigarette smoking is its established major risk factor [2]. In addition, exposure to several environmental chemical carcinogens such as airborne genotoxic carcinogens and arsenic are also considered risk factors [3]. The mechanism of lung tumorigenesis is not fully understood. Interestingly, lung cancer develops only in a small proportion of people exposed to environmental risk factors and extensive tobacco consumption, implying that genetic factors might play a critical role in its carcinogenic mechanisms. Epidemiological evidence suggests that complex interactions between many genetic and environmental factors are important in carcinogenesis of lung carcinoma [4].

Genetic factors involved in lung cancers have been extensively studied and to date several genetic polymorphisms have been identified as candidates by meta-analyses. Previous studies indicated that variations of some genes such as CYP1A1 [5], GSTM1 [6], CYP1B1 [7] and TP53 [8] may be associated with increased susceptibility to lung cancer. Conversely, polymorphisms of NAT2 [9], ERCC1 [10] and TNF alpha [11] might not have significant association with tumorigenesis of lung cancer. However, although these genetic factors are important, only a few gene polymorphisms associated with lung cancer susceptibility have been identified.

Murine double minute-2 (MDM2) is a key negative regulator of the P53 tumor suppressor pathway that has been suggested to be mutated in a variety of cancers [12]. MDM2 can bind directly to the P53 protein and inhibit its activity, thus resulting in its degradation via the ubiquitination pathway [13]. Over-expression of MDM2 has been detected in some malignancies; therefore, MDM2 targeting via utilization of antagonists has been indicated as a potential approach to anti-cancer therapy [14].

thumbnail
Download:
Figure 1. The flow diagram of included/excluded studies.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0041546.g001

A MDM2 single nucleotide polymorphism at the 309th nucleotide in the first intron (rs2279744), with a T to G change, could increase the affinity for stimulatory protein (Sp) 1 binding and result in increased MDM2 expression and subsequent attenuation of the P53 pathway [15]. This polymorphism has been associated with several cancers including lung cancer. Published data on the possible association of MDM2 T309G polymorphism with lung cancer have generated inconclusive results.

Previously, Gui et al. and Bai et al. conducted meta-analyses concerning the relationship between MDM2 T309G polymorphism and lung cancer risk [16], [17]. These reports indicated a possible association of the MDM2 309G allele as a low-penetrant risk factor for lung cancer in Asians. However, the two meta-analyses only contained published data from prior to 2008. In addition, only ethnicity and smoking status were considered for the subgroup analysis.

In the present study, we carefully conducted a search and retrieved the possible publications up to Feb 2012. Then, we performed an updated meta-analysis that increases statistical power to derive a more precise estimation of the relationship.

thumbnail
Download:
Table 1. General characteristics of the studies included in the present meta-analysis.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0041546.t001

Materials and Methods

1. Literature Search Strategy

We carried out a search in the Medline, EMBASE, OVID, Sciencedirect, and Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) without a language limitation, covering all papers published up to Feb 2012, with a combination of the following keywords: Murine double minute-2, MDM2, lung, neoplasm, tumor, cancer, variation and polymorphism. All searched studies were retrieved and the bibliographies were checked for other relevant publications. Review articles and bibliographies of other relevant studies identified were hand searched to find additional eligible studies.

thumbnail
Download:
Table 2. Distribution of MDM2 T309G genotypes among lung cancer cases and controls included in the present meta-analysis.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0041546.t002

2. Inclusion Criteria

The following criteria were used for the literature selection: first, studies should concern association of MDM2 T309G polymorphism with lung cancer risk; second, studies must be observational studies (Case–control or cohort); and third, papers must offer the size of the sample, odds ratios (ORs) and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs), the genetic distribution or the information that can help infer the results. After rigorous searching, we reviewed all papers in accordance with the criteria defined above for further analysis.

thumbnail
Download:
Table 3. Main results of the pooled data in the present meta-analysis.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0041546.t003

3. Data Extraction

Data were carefully extracted from all eligible publications independently by two of the authors (Zhuo and Zhang) according to the inclusion criteria mentioned above. For conflicting evaluations, an agreement was reached following a discussion. If a consensus could not be reached, another author was consulted to resolve the dispute and then a final decision was made by the majority of the votes. Extracted information was entered into a database.

4. Statistical Analysis

The odds ratio (OR) of MDM2 T309G polymorphisms and lung cancer risk was estimated for each study. The pooled ORs were performed for additive model (GG versus TT), dominant model (GG+GT versus TT) and recessive model (GG versus GT+TT). For detection of any possible sample size bias, the OR and its 95% confidence interval (CI) for each study was plotted against the number of participants. I2 metric was applied to quantify heterogeneity between the included studies (I2 = 0–25%, no heterogeneity; I2 = 25–50%, moderate heterogeneity; I2>50%, large heterogeneity) [18]. Moreover, a chi-square based Q statistic test was performed to assess heterogeneity. If P>0.1 for a given Q-test indicated a lack of heterogeneity among the studies, then ORs were pooled according to the fixed-effect model (Mantel-Haenszel) [19]. Otherwise, the random-effect model (DerSimonian and laird) was used [20]. The significance of the pooled ORs was determined using the Z-test. The Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (HWE) was assessed via Fisher’s exact test.

Publication bias was assessed by visual inspection of funnel plots [21], in which the standard error of log (OR) of each study was plotted against its log (OR). An asymmetric plot indicates a possible publication bias. Symmetry of the funnel plot was further evaluated by Egger’s linear regression test [22]. Statistical analysis was undertaken using the program Review Manager 5 and STATA 11.0 softwares (Stata Corporation, Texas).

Results

1. Study Characteristics

Possible relevant publications were retrieved and screened. As shown in Figure 1, sixteen publications were preliminary eligible, of these one was excluded because of being a duplicate publication [23] whose relevant data had been published in one included study [24]. Next, five papers were discarded because they were not case-control studies [25], [26], [27], [28], [29]. Consequently, ten publications containing eleven case-control studies regarding MDM2 T309G polymorphism with respect to lung carcinoma were included [24], [30], [31], [32], [33], [34], [35], [36], [37], [38].

thumbnail
Download:
Figure 2. Meta-analysis for the association of lung cancer risk with MDM2 T309G polymorphism (GG+GT versus TT; stratified by ethnicity).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0041546.g002

thumbnail
Download:
Figure 3. Meta-analysis for the association of lung cancer risk with MDM2 T309G polymorphism (GG+GT versus TT; stratified by smoking status).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0041546.g003

thumbnail
Download:
Figure 4. Meta-analysis for the association of lung cancer risk with MDM2 T309G polymorphism (GG versus GT+TT; stratified by gender).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0041546.g004

Of the selected publications, all were written in English. We established a database according to the extracted information from each study. The relevant information was listed in Table 1. According to this table, the first author and the number and characteristics of cases and controls for each study as well as other necessary information were presented.

In the included studies, there were five groups of Caucasians [33], [34], [35], [36], [37], five of Asians [24], [30], [31], [32], [38] and one of Africans [37]. In the study by Pine et al., cases and controls were separated as Africans and Caucasians according to their race [37]. Therefore, the relevant data were divided for further analysis into two groups according to ethnicity.

Information about histological category could be extracted from six studies [24], [32], [33], [35], [36], [38], of which the study by Kohno et al. [32] provided only data on squamous cell carcinoma whereas the study by Mittelstrass et al. [36] presented data on adenocarcinoma. The remaining four studies provided data on both squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma. As for smoking status, sufficient data were available in four studies [24], [33], [35], [38]. Moreover, sufficient information regarding gender could be extracted from five studies [24], [33], [34], [35], [36].

The distributions of MDM2 T309G genotype as well as the genotyping methods of the included studies are presented in Table 2. The genetic distributions of the control groups in all studies were consistent with HWE.

thumbnail
Download:
Figure 5. Publication bias test for the overall data (GG+GT versus TT; A: Funnel plot; B: Egger’s linear regression test).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0041546.g005

2. Test of Heterogeneity

As shown in Table 3, we analyzed the heterogeneity for the three genetic models. Evident heterogeneity was observed for overall data in the additive model (P = 0.001 for Q-test; I2 = 67.5%), dominant model ((P = 0.001 for Q-test; I2 = 66.7%) and recessive model (P = 0.035 for Q-test; I2 = 48.7%).

However, when subgroup analyses regarding ethnicity, smoking status and histological types, gender as well as source of controls were further conducted, we found a reduced or loss of heterogeneity in some of the subgroups.

3. Meta-analysis Results

Table 3 lists the main results of the meta-analysis. The overall data in the additive (OR = 1.14; 95%CI = 0.95–1.37; P = 0.001 for heterogeneity), dominant (OR = 1.05; 95%CI = 0.92–1.19; P = 0.001 for heterogeneity) and recessive (OR = 1.12; 95%CI = 0.99–1.27; P = 0.035 for heterogeneity) did not show a marked association of MDM2 T309G polymorphism with lung cancer risk, indicating that individuals with homozygous G allele might not have an increased lung cancer risk compared with those who carry wild-type T allele.

In subgroup analyses (Table 3), when data were stratified according to ethnicity, no increased lung cancer risk was observed among Asians, Caucasians and Africans (Figure 2). Likewise, when data were stratified by histological types and source of controls, no significant increased lung cancer risk were observed. Nevertheless, in subgroup analysis regarding smoking status, increased lung carcinoma susceptibility was shown among the never-smoking subgroup (GG vs TT: OR = 1.76; 95%CI = 1.36–2.29; P = 0.926 for heterogeneity; dominant model: OR = 1.48; 95%CI = 1.22–1.81; P = 0.501 for heterogeneity; recessive model: OR = 1.37; 95%CI = 1.11–1.69; P = 0.994 for heterogeneity), suggesting that G allele of MDM2 might increase lung cancer risk among individuals who have no smoking history. No significant association of MDM2 polymorphism with lung cancer risk was shown in the smoking group (Figure 3). In subgroup analysis by sex, the data indicated no associations regarding lung cancer risk among male subgroup. However, as for the female group, increased lung cancer risk was shown under the recessive model (OR = 1.29; 95%CI = 1.04–1.59; P = 0.336 for heterogeneity) (Figure 4).

4. Sensitivity Analysis

When the effect-models were changed, the significance of the overall data for the three models was not statistically altered (data not shown). Additionally, we also conducted one-way sensitivity analysis [39] to evaluate the stability of the meta-analysis. The statistical significance of the results was not altered when any single study was omitted (data not shown), suggesting stability and credibility of the results.

5. Bias Diagnostics

Funnel plots were created for assessment of possible publication biases. Then, Egger’s linear regression tests were used to assess the symmetries of the plots. The funnel plots appeared to be symmetrical for the three models of the overall data (Figure 5A). Additionally, results of the Egger’s tests also support the notion that the funnel plots were symmetrical (GG vs TT: t = −0.58, P>0.05; dominant model: t = −0.14, P>0.05; recessive model: t = −0.72, P>0.05) (Figure 5B).

Discussion

For the overall data, the results showed that MDM2 T309G might not have a correlation with increased lung cancer risk. However, the subgroup analyses revealed an increased lung cancer risk among never-smokers who carry the G allele. Moreover, homozygous GG may increase lung cancer susceptibility among women.

Several genome-wide association studies (GWASs) on SNPs have identified three genomic loci at 15q25, 5p15 and 6p21, which associate with the risk of lung cancer in Caucasians [40], [41], [42]. Then, variations at chromosome 12p13.33 have been found to influence lung cancer risk among Europeans [43]. More recently, other genomic regions such as 18p11.22, 3q28, 13q12.12, and 22q12.2 have been identified to confer lung cancer susceptibility in Asians [44], [45], [46]. Nevertheless, associations of MDM2 polymorphisms were not investigated in the GWASs mentioned above because of the lack of probes to discriminate the polymorphisms used for GWASs [32].

Previous meta-analyses have been conducted on the association of MDM2 T309G polymorphisms with several other cancer risks. Reports suggest that MDM2 T309G variation could increase risk of sarcoma, endometrial, hepatocellular and breast cancers [47], [48], [49], [50]. Conversely, G allele may play a preventive role for head and neck cancer among Caucasians [51]. Thus, the roles of MDM2 T309G polymorphisms might differ in different cancers.

For lung carcinoma, in the studies by Bai et al. and Gui et al. only seven reports with eight groups containing 6063 cases and 6678 controls were involved [16], [17]. In the present meta-analysis, we carefully searched possible publications. Ten publications comprising eleven groups with 7196 cases and 8456 controls were selected. Compared with the mentioned meta-analyses by Bai et al. and Gui et al., one study involving Caucasians [36] and two recent studies involving Asians [30], [32] were added in the present updated meta-analysis. Moreover, in addition to ethnicity and smoking status, subgroup analysis regarding histological types, source of controls and sex were also carried out.

Smoking is an established risk factor for lung cancer and our data suggest that G allele carriers may have an approximately 48 percent higher lung cancer risk than the homozygous TT carriers who have no smoking history. However, the G allele seems to exert little effect on smokers. In the previous meta-analyses by Bai et al. and Gui et al., only the study by Bai et al. [16] concerned smoking status for subgroup analysis and the results were in line with the present one. The precise mechanisms are not fully understood. A recent study has shown that MDM2 may act as an oncogene or tumor suppressor according to particular context [52]. MDM2 may bind P53 and promote P53 degradation at baseline but stimulate P53 translation under stress [53]. Therefore, because tobacco smoking may lead to severe DNA damage [54], two probable events may be noticeable. On the one hand, under this cellular stress, MDM2 may increase P53 mRNA via ATM pathway and result in elevated P53 protein that can inhibit tumorigenesis of lung tissues [55]. On the other hand, severe DNA damage may directly trigger apoptosis in lung cells via the P53-independent pathways [56]. Consequently, the possibility of lung carcinogenesis might be reduced. This might help determine the possible reasons why gene-smoking interaction analyses showed that smoking lowered the risk.

When the data were stratified according to ethnicity, no marked increased lung cancer risk was observed among Asians, Caucasians or Africans, inconsistent with the two previous meta-analyses [16], [17]. The results in the study by Bai et al. [16] regarding ethnicity were the same as the data by Gui et al. [17] and showed an increased lung cancer risk among Asians. Notably, Bai et al. [16] only reported the results under the recessive model and thus concluded that no significant elevated risk was found in Asians. However, in other genetic models such as dominant model, evident increased risk could be found among Asians. Compared with these two meta-analyses [16], [17], the present study failed to indicate an excess lung cancer risk among Asians. The data may be more convincible due to the much larger number of the included studies. Nevertheless, considering the ethnicity-specific chromosomal aberrations [57] and epidemiological variation [58] of lung cancer in the world, more investigations with large sample sizes are required for clarification of the potential differences among different races.

In subgroup analysis according to gender, no increased lung cancer risk was presented in the male group. However, the recessive model showed increased lung cancer susceptibility among female individuals carrying GG alleles. The underlying mechanisms are still unclear. Evidence suggests that estrogen receptors have been widely detected in lung cancer cells, indicating that sex steroid may play a critical role in the pathogenesis of lung neoplastic diseases [59], [60]. Besides, MDM2 may act as a strong contributor via the P53-independent pathway during the process of estrogen-induced cell proliferation [61]. MDM2 can induce expression of the p65 subunit of NF-κB, which is an anti-apoptotic factor expressed in neoplastic cells [62]. In addition, SNP309 of MDM2 increases the binding affinity for Sp1, a coactivator of receptors for multiple hormones including estrogen. It could potentially affect the hormone-dependent regulation of MDM2 transcription and result in further elevation of the MDM2 protein levels [63], [64]. Thus, MDM2 T309G genetic variation might accelerate carcinogenesis of lung tissues in a gender-specific manner [65]. This may also be one reason why women are potentially more vulnerable to lung cancer development [66], [67]. However, the results should be interpreted with care because increased lung cancer risk was not shown in the additive and dominant models. Therefore, further studies concerning stratification for gender could increase power for the association estimation.

In the subgroups concerning histological type, no significant associations were observed in either the adenocarcinoma or the squamous cell carcinoma group. The results were in line with the overall data. We tried to extract information about other types of lung cancer. However, only sufficient data regarding adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma are available in the primary literature. Considering that possible differences may exist between these two most common subtypes of lung carcinoma due to the differences in genetic changes during tumorigenesis [68], a number of large sample studies concerning the histological types were needed.

In the present study, between-study heterogeneities for overall data were observed in the three genetic models, and thus a random-effect model was used. However, we found that the heterogeneities were removed or reduced in the subgroup analyses, suggesting that the heterogeneities may be multifactorial such as selection of controls, race variation, gender, and prevalence of lifestyle factors.

Publication biases were assessed via funnel plots and their symmetries were further evaluated by Egger’s linear regression tests. The data suggest that no evident biases were observed in the three genetic models, indicating the credibility and robustness of the results.

Whether MDM2 SNP309 polymorphism has a correlation with the prognosis of cancers remains controversial. Evidence indicates that MDM2 SNP309 genetic variation might confer poor outcomes in colorectal cancer and chronic lymphocytic leukemia [69], [70]. However, a study regarding prostate carcinoma failed to reveal such association [71]. In the present meta-analysis, only one included study conducted by Chua et al. [30] concerned the prognosis of lung carcinoma and showed no effect of MDM2 SNP309 polymorphism on the overall survival. Thus, the association between MDM2 SNP309 polymorphism and lung cancer outcomes has not been evaluated because of the insufficient information provided by the included studies. Future investigations on the issue are required.

Several limitations might be included in this study. First, in this meta-analysis, the subgroup analysis concerned only Caucasians, Asians and African. Data regarding African could be extracted from only one study. Thus, data regarding other ethnicity are desired. Second, subgroup analyses regarding age have not been conducted in the present study because the criteria for age division were different in the primary literature. Third, hospital-based controls were used in some included studies and hence, non-differential misclassification bias might exist. Nevertheless, subgroup analysis regarding source of controls was carried out and no evident influence on the results was found. Additionally, gene-gene and gene-environment interactions should also be considered in future studies. However, the sensitivity analysis and publication biases analysis suggest the stability and credibility of the present meta-analysis.

In summary, previous meta-analyses indicated a possible association of MDM2 T309G polymorphism with lung cancer risk among Asians and never-smokers. In the present updated meta-analysis, the data confirmed the relationship between MDM2 T309G genetic variation and lung cancer risk among individuals who have no smoking history. However, the data failed to show a significant increased lung carcinoma risk among Asians. More interestingly, subgroup analysis regarding histological types, source of controls and sex were performed and the data suggest that homozygous GG alleles might elevate lung cancer risk among females. Further investigations are needed to confirm the conclusions.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: ZC WZ. Performed the experiments: WZ LZ. Analyzed the data: LZ JL. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: LZ WZ BZ. Wrote the paper: WZ ZC BZ.

References

  1. 1. Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM, Ferlay J, Ward E, et al (2011) Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin 61: 69–90.
  2. 2. Steliga MA, Dresler CM (2011) Epidemiology of lung cancer: smoking, secondhand smoke, and genetics. Surg Oncol Clin N Am 20: 605–618.
  3. 3. Fucic A, Gamulin M, Ferencic Z, Rokotov DS, Katic J, et al. (2010) Lung cancer and environmental chemical exposure: a review of our current state of knowledge with reference to the role of hormones and hormone receptors as an increased risk factor for developing lung cancer in man. Toxicol Pathol 38: 849–855.
  4. 4. Yokota J, Shiraishi K, Kohno T (2010) Genetic basis for susceptibility to lung cancer: Recent progress and future directions. Adv Cancer Res 109: 51–72.
  5. 5. Wang JJ, Zheng Y, Sun L, Wang L, Yu PB, et al. (2011) CYP1A1 Ile462Val polymorphism and susceptibility to lung cancer: a meta-analysis based on 32 studies. Eur J Cancer Prev 20: 445–452.
  6. 6. Carlsten C, Sagoo GS, Frodsham AJ, Burke W, Higgins JP (2008) Glutathione S-transferase M1 (GSTM1) polymorphisms and lung cancer: a literature-based systematic HuGE review and meta-analysis. Am J Epidemiol 167: 759–774.
  7. 7. Chen B, Qiu LX, Li Y, Xu W, Wang XL, et al. (2010) The CYP1B1 Leu432Val polymorphism contributes to lung cancer risk: evidence from 6501 subjects. Lung Cancer 70: 247–252.
  8. 8. Li Y, Qiu LX, Shen XK, Lv XJ, Qian XP, et al. (2009) A meta-analysis of TP53 codon 72 polymorphism and lung cancer risk: evidence from 15,857 subjects. Lung Cancer 66: 15–21.
  9. 9. Cui D, Wang Z, Zhao E, Ma J, Lu W (2011) NAT2 polymorphism and lung cancer risk: a meta-analysis. Lung Cancer 73: 153–157.
  10. 10. Cao C, Zhang YM, Wang R, Sun SF, Chen ZB, et al. (2011) Excision repair cross complementation group 1 polymorphisms and lung cancer risk: a meta-analysis. Chin Med J (Engl) 124: 2203–2208.
  11. 11. Wang J, Cao C, Luo H, Xiong S, Xu Y, et al. (2011) Tumour necrosis factor alpha -308G/A polymorphism and risk of the four most frequent cancers: a meta-analysis. Int J Immunogenet 38: 311–320.
  12. 12. Wu H, Leng RP (2011) UBE4B, a ubiquitin chain assembly factor, is required for MDM2-mediated p53 polyubiquitination and degradation. Cell Cycle 10: 1912–1915.
  13. 13. Poyurovsky MV, Katz C, Laptenko O, Beckerman R, Lokshin M, et al. (2010) The C terminus of p53 binds the N-terminal domain of MDM2. Nat Struct Mol Biol 17: 982–989.
  14. 14. Toledo F, Wahl GM (2007) MDM2 and MDM4: p53 regulators as targets in anticancer therapy. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 39: 1476–1482.
  15. 15. Bond GL, Hu W, Bond EE, Robins H, Lutzker SG, et al. (2004) A single nucleotide polymorphism in the MDM2 promoter attenuates the p53 tumor suppressor pathway and accelerates tumor formation in humans. Cell 119: 591–602.
  16. 16. Bai J, Dai J, Yu H, Shen H, Chen F (2009) Cigarette smoking, MDM2 SNP309, gene-environment interactions, and lung cancer risk: a meta-analysis. J Toxicol Environ Health A 72: 677–682.
  17. 17. Gui XH, Qiu LX, Zhang HF, Zhang DP, Zhong WZ, et al. (2009) MDM2 309 T/G polymorphism is associated with lung cancer risk among Asians. Eur J Cancer 45: 2023–2026.
  18. 18. Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG (2003) Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ 327: 557–560.
  19. 19. Mantel N, Haenszel W (1959) Statistical aspects of the analysis of data from retrospective studies of disease. J Natl Cancer Inst 22: 719–748.
  20. 20. DerSimonian R, Laird N (1986) Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials 7: 177–188.
  21. 21. Munafo MR, Clark TG, Flint J (2004) Assessing publication bias in genetic association studies: evidence from a recent meta-analysis. Psychiatry Res 129: 39–44.
  22. 22. Egger M, Davey Smith G, Schneider M, Minder C (1997) Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ 315: 629–634.
  23. 23. Jun HJ, Park SH, Lee WK, Choi JE, Jang JS, et al. (2007) Combined effects of p73 and MDM2 polymorphisms on the risk of lung cancer. Mol Carcinog 46: 100–105.
  24. 24. Park SH, Choi JE, Kim EJ, Jang JS, Han HS, et al. (2006) MDM2 309T>G polymorphism and risk of lung cancer in a Korean population. Lung Cancer 54: 19–24.
  25. 25. Chien WP, Wong RH, Cheng YW, Chen CY, Lee H (2010) Associations of MDM2 SNP309, transcriptional activity, mRNA expression, and survival in stage I non-small-cell lung cancer patients with wild-type p53 tumors. Ann Surg Oncol 17: 1194–1202.
  26. 26. Dong J, Ren B, Hu Z, Chen J, Hu L, et al. (2011) MDM2 SNP309 contributes to non-small cell lung cancer survival in Chinese. Mol Carcinog 50: 433–438.
  27. 27. Han JY, Lee GK, Jang DH, Lee SY, Lee JS (2008) Association of p53 codon 72 polymorphism and MDM2 SNP309 with clinical outcome of advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer. Cancer 113: 799–807.
  28. 28. Heist RS, Zhou W, Chirieac LR, Cogan-Drew T, Liu G, et al. (2007) MDM2 polymorphism, survival, and histology in early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 25: 2243–2247.
  29. 29. Liu L, Wu C, Wang Y, Zhong R, Duan S, et al. (2011) Combined effect of genetic polymorphisms in P53, P73, and MDM2 on non-small cell lung cancer survival. J Thorac Oncol 6: 1793–1800.
  30. 30. Chua HW, Ng D, Choo S, Lum SS, Li H, et al. (2010) Effect of MDM2 SNP309 and p53 codon 72 polymorphisms on lung cancer risk and survival among non-smoking Chinese women in Singapore. BMC Cancer 10: 88.
  31. 31. Hu Z, Ma H, Lu D, Qian J, Zhou J, et al. (2006) Genetic variants in the MDM2 promoter and lung cancer risk in a Chinese population. Int J Cancer 118: 1275–1278.
  32. 32. Kohno T, Kunitoh H, Mimaki S, Shiraishi K, Kuchiba A, et al. (2011) Contribution of the TP53, OGG1, CHRNA3, and HLA-DQA1 genes to the risk for lung squamous cell carcinoma. J Thorac Oncol 6: 813–817.
  33. 33. Li G, Zhai X, Zhang Z, Chamberlain RM, Spitz MR, et al. (2006) MDM2 gene promoter polymorphisms and risk of lung cancer: a case-control analysis. Carcinogenesis 27: 2028–2033.
  34. 34. Lind H, Zienolddiny S, Ekstrom PO, Skaug V, Haugen A (2006) Association of a functional polymorphism in the promoter of the MDM2 gene with risk of nonsmall cell lung cancer. Int J Cancer 119: 718–721.
  35. 35. Liu G, Wheatley-Price P, Zhou W, Park S, Heist RS, et al. (2008) Genetic polymorphisms of MDM2, cumulative cigarette smoking and nonsmall cell lung cancer risk. Int J Cancer 122: 915–918.
  36. 36. Mittelstrass K, Sauter W, Rosenberger A, Illig T, Timofeeva M, et al. (2008) Early onset lung cancer, cigarette smoking and the SNP309 of the murine double minute-2 (MDM2) gene. BMC Cancer 8: 113.
  37. 37. Pine SR, Mechanic LE, Bowman ED, Welsh JA, Chanock SC, et al. (2006) MDM2 SNP309 and SNP354 are not associated with lung cancer risk. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 15: 1559–1561.
  38. 38. Zhang X, Miao X, Guo Y, Tan W, Zhou Y, et al. (2006) Genetic polymorphisms in cell cycle regulatory genes MDM2 and TP53 are associated with susceptibility to lung cancer. Hum Mutat 27: 110–117.
  39. 39. Tobias A (1999) Assessing the influence of a single study in the meta-analysis estimate. Stata Techn Bull 8: 15–17.
  40. 40. Landi MT, Chatterjee N, Yu K, Goldin LR, Goldstein AM, et al. (2009) A genome-wide association study of lung cancer identifies a region of chromosome 5p15 associated with risk for adenocarcinoma. Am J Hum Genet 85: 679–691.
  41. 41. Hung RJ, McKay JD, Gaborieau V, Boffetta P, Hashibe M, et al. (2008) A susceptibility locus for lung cancer maps to nicotinic acetylcholine receptor subunit genes on 15q25. Nature 452: 633–637.
  42. 42. Wang Y, Broderick P, Webb E, Wu X, Vijayakrishnan J, et al. (2008) Common 5p15.33 and 6p21.33 variants influence lung cancer risk. Nat Genet 40: 1407–1409.
  43. 43. Shi J, Chatterjee N, Rotunno M, Wang Y, Pesatori AC, et al. (2012) Inherited Variation at Chromosome 12p13.33, Including RAD52, Influences the Risk of Squamous Cell Lung Carcinoma. Cancer Discov 2: 131–139.
  44. 44. Ahn MJ, Won HH, Lee J, Lee ST, Sun JM, et al. (2012) The 18p11.22 locus is associated with never smoker non-small cell lung cancer susceptibility in Korean populations. Hum Genet 131: 365–372.
  45. 45. Hu Z, Wu C, Shi Y, Guo H, Zhao X, et al. (2011) A genome-wide association study identifies two new lung cancer susceptibility loci at 13q12.12 and 22q12.2 in Han Chinese. Nat Genet 43: 792–796.
  46. 46. Hosgood HD, 3rd, Wang WC, Hong YC, Wang JC, Chen K, et al (2012) Genetic variant in TP63 on locus 3q28 is associated with risk of lung adenocarcinoma among never-smoking females in Asia. Hum Genet.
    • 47. Cai X, Yang M (2011) The functional MDM2 T309G genetic variant but not P53 Arg72Pro polymorphism is associated with risk of sarcomas: a meta-analysis. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol.
      • 48. Li Y, Zhao H, Sun L, Huang L, Yang Q, et al. (2011) MDM2 SNP309 is associated with endometrial cancer susceptibility: a meta-analysis. Hum Cell 24: 57–64.
      • 49. Liu GY, Jiang DK, Shen SQ, Yu L (2011) MDM2 SNP309T>G polymorphism with hepatocellular carcinoma risk: a meta-analysis. Arch Med Res 42: 149–155.
      • 50. Economopoulos KP, Sergentanis TN (2010) Differential effects of MDM2 SNP309 polymorphism on breast cancer risk along with race: a meta-analysis. Breast Cancer Res Treat 120: 211–216.
      • 51. Liu J, Zheng Y, Lei D, Liu D, Xu F, et al. (2011) MDM2 309T>G Polymorphism and Risk of Squamous Cell Carcinomas of Head and Neck: a Meta-analysis. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 12: 1899–1903.
      • 52. Manfredi JJ (2010) The Mdm2-p53 relationship evolves: Mdm2 swings both ways as an oncogene and a tumor suppressor. Genes Dev 24: 1580–1589.
      • 53. Hamard PJ, Manfredi JJ (2012) Mdm2’s dilemma: to degrade or to translate p53? Cancer Cell 21: 3–5.
      • 54. Pfeifer GP, Denissenko MF, Olivier M, Tretyakova N, Hecht SS, et al. (2002) Tobacco smoke carcinogens, DNA damage and p53 mutations in smoking-associated cancers. Oncogene 21: 7435–7451.
      • 55. Gajjar M, Candeias MM, Malbert-Colas L, Mazars A, Fujita J, et al. (2012) The p53 mRNA-Mdm2 interaction controls Mdm2 nuclear trafficking and is required for p53 activation following DNA damage. Cancer Cell 21: 25–35.
      • 56. Roos WP, Kaina B (2006) DNA damage-induced cell death by apoptosis. Trends Mol Med 12: 440–450.
      • 57. Broet P, Dalmasso C, Tan EH, Alifano M, Zhang S, et al. (2011) Genomic profiles specific to patient ethnicity in lung adenocarcinoma. Clin Cancer Res 17: 3542–3550.
      • 58. Charloux A, Rossignol M, Purohit A, Small D, Wolkove N, et al. (1997) International differences in epidemiology of lung adenocarcinoma. Lung Cancer 16: 133–143.
      • 59. Bogush TA, Dudko EA, Beme AA, Bogush EA, Kim AI, et al. (2010) Estrogen receptors, antiestrogens, and non-small cell lung cancer. Biochemistry (Mosc) 75: 1421–1427.
      • 60. Verma MK, Miki Y, Sasano H (2011) Sex steroid receptors in human lung diseases. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 127: 216–222.
      • 61. Brekman A, Singh KE, Polotskaia A, Kundu N, Bargonetti J (2011) A p53-independent role of Mdm2 in estrogen-mediated activation of breast cancer cell proliferation. Breast Cancer Res 13: R3.
      • 62. Gu L, Findley HW, Zhou M (2002) MDM2 induces NF-kappaB/p65 expression transcriptionally through Sp1-binding sites: a novel, p53-independent role of MDM2 in doxorubicin resistance in acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Blood 99: 3367–3375.
      • 63. Hu W, Feng Z, Ma L, Wagner J, Rice JJ, et al. (2007) A single nucleotide polymorphism in the MDM2 gene disrupts the oscillation of p53 and MDM2 levels in cells. Cancer Res 67: 2757–2765.
      • 64. Petz LN, Ziegler YS, Schultz JR, Kim H, Kemper JK, et al. (2004) Differential regulation of the human progesterone receptor gene through an estrogen response element half site and Sp1 sites. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 88: 113–122.
      • 65. Bond GL, Hirshfield KM, Kirchhoff T, Alexe G, Bond EE, et al. (2006) MDM2 SNP309 accelerates tumor formation in a gender-specific and hormone-dependent manner. Cancer Res 66: 5104–5110.
      • 66. Pauk N, Kubik A, Zatloukal P, Krepela E (2005) Lung cancer in women. Lung Cancer 48: 1–9.
      • 67. Ben-Zaken Cohen S, Pare PD, Man SF, Sin DD (2007) The growing burden of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and lung cancer in women: examining sex differences in cigarette smoke metabolism. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 176: 113–120.
      • 68. Sato S, Nakamura Y, Tsuchiya E (1994) Difference of allelotype between squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma of the lung. Cancer Res 54: 5652–5655.
      • 69. Chaar I, Arfaoui TA, El Amine el HO, Mahmoud LB, Khiari M, et al. (2012) Impact of MDM2 polymorphism: increased risk of developing colorectal cancer and a poor prognosis in the Tunisian population. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 24: 320–327.
      • 70. Dong HJ, Fang C, Fan L, Zhu DX, Wang DM, et al. (2012) MDM2 promoter SNP309 is associated with an increased susceptibility to chronic lymphocytic leukemia and correlates with MDM2 mRNA expression in Chinese patients with CLL. Int J Cancer 130: 2054–2061.
      • 71. Jaboin JJ, Hwang M, Perez CA, Cooper C, Chen H, et al. (2011) No evidence for association of the MDM2–309 T/G promoter polymorphism with prostate cancer outcomes. Urol Oncol 29: 319–323.