Oligonucleotides

All oligonucleotides for the N. gonorrhoeae qPCR assay were purchased from DNA Technology A/S (Risskov, Denmark) except the unmodified match forward primer, which was purchased from Eurofins (Ebersberg, Germany) on a 0.2 µmol synthesis scale. The oligonucleotides for the diarrheagenic E. coli octaplex end-point PCR assay were purchased from Eurofins (Ebersberg, Germany) on a 0.2 µmol synthesis scale. All primers were synthesized on an ABI-3900 with reverse phase high performance liquid chromatography (RP-HPLC) purification and a final quality control by mass spectrometry analysis before lyophilization. The ortho-TINA amidite, used for the oligonucleotide synthesis, was synthesized as reported in [6] and 5′-o-TINA modified primers for research purposes are available through Eurofins (Ebersberg, Germany).

The forward and reverse primer sequences used for amplification of the porA pseudogene from N. gonorrhoeae were 5′- CCG GAA CTG GTT TCA TCT G -3′ and 5′- GTT TCA GCG GCA GCA TTC A -3′, respectively. The sequences of the 5′-o-TINA (Z) modified primers were 5′- ZCC GGA ACT GGT TTC ATC TG -3′ and 5′- ZGT TTC AGC GGC AGC ATT CA -3′. Primer sequences containing single nucleotide mismatches are included in Table S1. The primer sequences used for the diarrheagenic E. coli octaplex PCR assay were identical to the sequences published by Brandal LT et al [18] and the sequences are listed below as 5′-o-TINA (Z) modified primers. The sequences for the unmodified primers are identical, but without the Z modification. The primer sequences were: aggR forward 5′- ZGT ATA CAC AAA AGA AGG AAG C -3′, aggR reverse 5′- ZAC AGA ATC GTC AGC ATC AGC -3′, eae forward 5′- ZTC AAT GCA GTT CCG TTA TCA GTT -3′, eae reverse 5′- ZGT AAA GTC CGT TAC CCC AAC CTG -3′, elt forward 5′- ZTC TCT ATG TGC ATA CGG AGC -3′, elt reverse 5′- ZCC ATA CTG ATT GCC GCA AT -3′, estAh forward 5′- ZAT TTT TCT TTC TGT ATT GTC TT -3′, estAh reverse 5′- ZCA CCC GGT ACA AGC AGG ATT -3′, ipaH forward 5′- ZGT TCC TTG ACC GCC TTT CCG ATA CCG TC -3′, ipaH reverse 5′- ZGC CGG TCA GCC ACC CTC TGA GAG TAC -3′, rrs forward 5′- ZCC CCC TGG ACG AAG ACT GAC -3′, rrs reverse 5′- ZAC CGC TGG CAA CAA AGG ATA -3′, stx1 forward 5′- ZAA ATC GCC ATT CGT TGA CTA CTT CT -3′, stx1 reverse 5′- ZTG CCA TTC TGG CAA CTC GCG ATG CA -3′, stx2 forward 5′- ZCA GTC GTC ACT CAC TGG TTT CAT CA -3′ and stx2 reverse 5′- ZGG ATA TTC TCC CCA CTC TGA CAC C -3′. The molecular weight of an o-TINA monomer inserted into an oligonucleotide with all protecting groups removed is 467.4 g/mol with an extinction coefficient of 24,090 at 260 nm.

The primers were delivered as lyophilized primers and redissolved in double-distilled water to a stock concentration of 100 µM (based upon the reported UV measurements from the oligonucleotide supplier) and left overnight at 4°C before use. Primer concentrations were verified by triplicate UV-absorbance measurements for each primer on a NanoDrop™ 1000 (Thermo Scientific Inc., Wilmington, NC, USA). The absorbance added by the 5′-o-TINA modification was not taken into account for the determination of primer concentrations. For the diarrheagenic E. coli octaplex PCR assay, a 10-fold standard mix of either all unmodified or 5′-o-TINA modified primers was made based upon the UV-absorbance measurements from the NanoDrop™ 1000. Both standard mixes contained two µM of each primer, except for the estAh primer pair for which four µM of each primer was used. For the N. gonorrhoeae qPCR assay, the average primer concentration of the 19 unmodified primers from DNA Technology A/S was 106.1 µM (range 86.9 µM to 134.0 µM), whereas the average primer concentration of the 20 5′-o-TINA modified primers from DNA Technology A/S was 96.2 µM (range 81.1 µM to 110.8 µM). The average concentration of the match unmodified forward primer for the N. gonorrhoeae qPCR assay from Eurofins was 125.4 µM. The triplicate measurements on the NanoDrop™ 1000 differed in average by 1.0% (range 0.1% to 2.5%). The purity of the redissolved primers for the N. gonorrhoeae qPCR assay was verified by Liquid chromatography – mass spectrometry (LC-MS) by DNA Technology A/S (Risskov, Denmark). LC-MS analyses for the N. gonorrhoeae qPCR assay primers were run on a Thermo LCQ Fleet (Thermo Scientific Inc., Wilmington, NC, USA) in negative mode and calculations were done in Promass for Xcalibur (Novatia, LCC, Monmouth Junction, NJ). For LC-MS, an ACE-3 C18-300, 50×2.1 mm column (Advanced Chromatography Technologies, Aberdeen, United Kingdom) was used with the analytical conditions of 50°C; A gradient from 0-D% B over 20 minutes, A being water; 10 µM EDTA; 1% HFIPA; 0.1% DIEA, B being water: acetonitrile (35∶65); 10 µM EDTA; 1% HFIPA; 0.1% DIEA and D being 25 for unmodified or 50 for 5′-o-TINA modified primers. The LC-MS indicates equal purity of unmodified and 5′-o-TINA modified primers for the N. gonorrhoeae qPCR assay. To avoid introduction of bias by the correction of concentrations without taking the absorbance added by the 5′-o-TINA modification into account, we used the primers for the N. gonorrhoeae qPCR assay as delivered from the suppliers. This was done as all match unmodified primers and almost all mismatch unmodified primers were higher concentrated and with similar purity compared to the 5′-o-TINA modified primers and thereby would favor the efficiency of the unmodified qPCR compared to the reactions, where 5′-o-TINA modified primers were applied. Data for all primers for the N. gonorrhoeae qPCR assay are included in Table S1.

Target DNA

As N. gonorrhoeae target, we used N. gonorrhoeae quantitated bacterial DNA (cat.no. 08-924-000, Advanced Biotechnologies Inc., Columbia MD, USA). For all experiments, we used lot number A0705 containing 15,000 copies/µL determined by qPCR targeting the B protein gene of N. gonorrhoeae by the supplier. All target dilutions were done with double-distilled water, on ice immediately before use. The nucleotide sequence of the N. gonorrhoeae porA pseudogene is included as Figure S1 based on N. gonorrhoeae NCCP11945, GenBank sequence CP001050.1, from nucleotide 736237 to 737148 (912 nucleotides) equaling locus tag NGK 0907 and protein ID ACF29586.1.

As target material for the diarrheagenic E. coli multiplex PCR, we used eight clinical E. coli strains entailing one or more virulence genes with the rrs gene (encoding 16S rRNA) as internal control. The clinical strains were provided by Alice Friis-Møller (Department of Clinical Microbiology, University Hospital of Hvidovre, Copenhagen, Denmark). The clinical strains were identified according to Standard Operating Procedures and are presented by name and virulence factor(s) in brackets: fr1368 (ipaH), 55989 (aggR), D2259 (estAh), D2260 (elt), D2168 (estAh, elt), D2432 (stx2), D3522 (stx1), D2188 (eae, stx1, stx2). Bacterial DNA was extracted after suspension of approximately half a plated bacterial colony in 100 µL of double distilled water by boiling for 15 minutes and centrifugation at 14,500 rpm for one minute in an Eppendorf MiniSpin plus (Eppendorf Nordic Aps, Hørsholm, Denmark). All target dilutions were done with double-distilled water, on ice immediately before use.

Preparation of Genomic DNA for Spiking Experiments

Human genomic DNA was purified from the human hepatoma cell line Huh-7.5 [19] provided by Jens Bukh (University of Copenhagen, Denmark) or the leukocyte fraction from whole blood discarded for clinical use provided by the Department of Clinical Immunology - Blood Bank (Rigshospitalet, Denmark) using NucleoBond® AXG columns and the NucleoBond® buffer set IV with addition of buffer G1 (Macherey-Nagel GmbH, Düren, Germany). The protocol was taken from “Genomic DNA and total RNA purification protocols” of December 2010, revision 4 (Macherey-Nagel GmbH, Düren, Germany) following the “Protocol for NucleoBond® CB 500” for “Isolation of genomic DNA from blood and cell cultures”. Eluation was done in double-distilled water. The concentration of dsDNA (dsDNA-50) was measured in triplicate on the NanoDrop™ 1000 (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., Wilmington, USA) and the purified DNA was stored at –20°C until use. The concentration of dsDNA from the Huh-7.5 cell line was 927 ng/µL (range 921 ng/µL to 933 ng/µL) with a purity in terms of A₂₆₀/A₂₈₀ of 1.85 (range 1.78 to 1.91), whereas the DNA isolated from whole blood leukocytes had a concentration of 254 ng/µL (range 244 ng/µL to 262 ng/µL) with an A₂₆₀/A₂₈₀ purity of 1.88 (range 1.85 to 1.90).

Genomic DNA from the E. coli ATCC 25922 strain was isolated from bacteria harvested in the exponential growth phase using NucleoBond® AXG columns and the NucleoBond® buffer set III (Macherey-Nagel GmbH, Düren, Germany). The protocol was based on “Genomic DNA and total RNA purification protocols”, December 2010, revision 4 (Macherey-Nagel GmbH, Düren, Germany) following the protocol for “Isolation of genomic DNA from bacteria” with the following recommended modifications. For cell disruption 10 mg of lysozyme was added and incubation time was set to one hour. Eluation was done in double-distilled water. The concentration of dsDNA was measured to 1,098 ng/µL on the NanoDrop™ 1000 (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., Wilmington, USA) with an A₂₆₀/A₂₈₀ of 1.94. dsDNA was stored at −20°C until use.

Quantitative PCR Protocol

qPCR was performed in a 10 µL reaction volume using in-house 1x Euro-Optima buffer (10.4 mM Tris-HCl, 56.8 mM Trizma-base, 16.1 mM (NH₄)₂SO₄, 30 mM NaCl, 0.01% Tween80), 3 mM MgCl₂, 0.08% Bovine Serum Albumine (non-acetylated), 1×SYBR Green I (cat.no. 11988131001, Roche Diagnostics A/S, Hvidovre, Denmark), 0.2 mM of each dNTP (a mixture of dTTP and dUTP was applied as 0.066 mM dTTP and 0.133 mM dUTP), 0.25 Unit of Uracil DNA Glycosylase (cat.no. EN0361, Fermentas GmbH, St. Leon-Rot, Germany), 1 Unit KAPA2G Robust HS (KapaBiosystems, Cape Town, South Africa) in an Abgene® SuperPlate™ 96-well PCR plate (AB gene, Epsom, United Kingdom) sealed with Optically clear, adhesive Microseal® ‘B’ Film (BioRad Laboratories, Copenhagen, Denmark). All qPCR setups were performed manually on ice.

qPCR was performed on the CFX96™ Real-Time System (BioRad Laboratories, Copenhagen, Denmark) utilizing the following cycling conditions: UNG treatment for 10 minutes at 40°C; UNG inactivation and Hot-Start polymerase activation for 10 minutes at 95°C; 45 cycles of denaturation at 95°C for 10 seconds; annealing at different temperatures for 5 seconds; and elongation at 72°C for 5 seconds and plate read. A melting curve profile was collected consisting of 10 seconds at 95°C and a melt curve from 65°C to 90°C with 0.5°C increments per 5 seconds and the samples were cooled for 10 minutes at 10°C. The length of the qPCR amplicon was 102 base pairs (bp).

The primer concentrations used in the experiments were 50, 75, 100, 150, 200, 300, 400, 600 and 800 nM of each primer. The primer “chessboard titration” included the combinations of 100, 200 and 400 nM of each primer. For efficiency curves, we used a three-fold dilution series in triplicates starting from 10,000 copies/well down to 14 copies/well and a negative control (double-distilled water) in triplicate. In all other experiments, the quantification cycle (Cq, previously known as threshold cycle, Ct) values were determined using triplicate measurements of 1,000 copies of target per well with negative control in triplicate utilizing the highest relevant primer concentration. Spiked samples were either added as 10 ng or 100 ng of genomic DNA from E. coli ATCC 25922 or the Huh-7.5 cell line per well, which was also added to the negative controls. Annealing temperatures were either 58.0, 60.0, 62.0, 64.0, 66.0, 68.0, 70.0 or 72.0°C. Frequently used annealing temperatures were 60.0°C for unmodified DNA primers and 66.0°C for 5′-o-TINA modified primers or a temperature gradient of 60.0 (used for negative controls), 61.0, 63.0, 65.9, 69.5, 72.5, 74.2 and 75.0. In experiments with different annealing times, the annealing time was set to 5, 10 and 30 seconds at 66.0 or 70.0°C to evaluate the influence of annealing time on qPCR efficiency. Specifications of reaction conditions for each experiment can be found in the figure legends and the supplementary figure files.

End-point Multiplex PCR Protocol and Gel Electrophoresis

The octaplex end-point PCR targeting diarrheagenic E. coli was performed in a 50 µL reaction volume in an Eppendorf twin.tec 96-well PCR plate (Eppendorf Nordic Aps, Hørsholm, Denmark) sealed with Optically clear, adhesive Microseal® ‘B’ Film (BioRad Laboratories, Copenhagen, Denmark). 1x Qiagen Multiplex PCR Master Mix (Qiagen Denmark, København Ø, Denmark) was mixed with a primer mix of either unmodified primers or 5′-o-TINA modified primers to a final concentration of 200 nM of each primer, except for the estAh primer pair for which a final concentration of 400 nM of each primer was used as published by Brandal LT et al [18]. Two µL of boiled bacterial supernatant was added as the maximal target concentration and lower target concentrations were prepared as 10-fold dilution series to a 10,000 dilution of the maximal target concentration and a negative control (double-distilled water). All PCR setups were performed manually on ice.

The octaplex PCR was performed on a SensoQuest Labcycler (SensoQuest GmbH, Göttingen, Germany) utilizing the following cycling conditions: Hot-Start polymerase activation for 15 minutes at 95°C; 30 cycles of denaturation at 94°C for 30 seconds; annealing at 57°C for 30 seconds; and elongation at 72°C for 30 seconds and a final extension step at 72°C for 10 minutes. In the published PCR program from Brandal LT et al. [18], the applied annealing time and elongation time is 90 seconds each. The lengths of the PCR amplicons were 190 bp for estAh, 254 bp for aggR, 283 bp for stx2, 322 bp for elt, 370 bp for stx1, 401 bp for rrs, 482 bp for eae and 619 bp for ipaH. Amplicons were visualised on 3% agarose gel stained by 1x Gel Red (Biotium Inc, Hayward, CA, USA) with GeneRuler 100 bp Plus DNA Ladder (Fermentas GmbH, St. Leon-Rot, Germany). Pictures were taken on an UV-table with a fixed illumination time of 0.120 seconds.

For evaluation of the octaplex PCR in an E. coli DNA free PCR buffer, we used our in-house 1x Euro-Optima buffer system as described for the N. gonorrhoeae qPCR assay with unaltered PCR program except for an annealing temperature of 60°C in a 50 µL reaction volume. For crude bacterial lysates spiked with human genomic DNA, we used one µg of human genomic DNA isolated from leukocytes per well. Evaluation of different primer concentrations was done by dilution of the two primer standard mixes containing either unmodified primers or 5′-o-TINA modified primers. All dilutions of primer mixes contained equal amounts of each primer, except for the estAh primer pair for which the double concentration of each primer was used. Final primer concentrations of 50, 100, 150, 200, 300 and 400 nM of each primer (double for estAh primers) were tested for a crude bacterial lysate from strain D2259, a 10-fold dilution of strain D2168 and D3522 and a 100-fold dilution of strain 55989 and D2260. Final primer concentrations of 25, 50, 100, 150, 200 and 300 nM of each primer (double for estAh primers) were tested for a 10-fold dilution of strain D2432 and D2188, whereas final primer concentrations of 12.5, 25, 50, 100, 150 and 200 nM of each primer (double for estAh primers) were tested for a 100-fold dilution of strain fr1368. For evaluation of the annealing temperature, a temperature gradient of 55.0, 56.6, 57.9, 59.4, 60.8, 62.3, 63.7, 65.2, 66.6, 68.1, 69.5 and 71.0°C was tested for a crude bacterial lysate from strain D2168 and a 10-fold dilution of strain 55989, whereas a temperature gradient of 60.0, 61.5, 62.9, 64.4, 65.8, 67.3, 68.7, 70.2, 71.6, 73.1, 74.5 and 76°C was tested for a 10-fold dilution of strain D2188. As the PCR primers for the ipaH gene worked extremely well, a temperature gradient of 65.0, 66.5, 67.9, 69.4, 70.8, 72.3, 73.7, 75.2, 76.6, 78.1, 79.5 and 81.0°C for 60 seconds and with the omission of the 30 seconds of elongation at 72°C was tested for a 100-fold dilution of strain fr1368.

Data Analysis

For data analysis of the N. gonorrhoeae qPCR assay we used the Bio-Rad CFX Manager software, Version 1.1. Raw data were baseline subtracted with curve fit and the single threshold method was used for Cq determinations. The single threshold defined by the software was checked for each plate to be in the middle part of the exponential phase of all amplification curves, and if necessary corrected to the midmost part of the exponential phase. Inter-assay normalization of the Cq determinations were based on triplicate measurement of a control, holding 800 nM of each unmodified primer at 61°C. For each experiment with inter-assay normalization, the threshold was adjusted to be within the middle part of the exponential phase, allowing a mean Cq of 25.11 for the control with a standard deviation (SD) of 0.1 for the experimental controls on each of the four inter-assay normalized plates.

qPCR efficiency was calculated as 10^−1/slope–1 with the logarithm of the template concentration on the x axis and the Cq plotted on the y axis. A qPCR efficiency of 100% thereby indicates that the amount of PCR product doubles with each cycle.

The melting curves for all samples were checked prior to data analysis. Samples with changes in melting point or major changes in the melting curve profile were excluded from the data analysis. This was done for all samples, except for the experiments with spiked samples, as the visualization of melting curves changes is necessary for the evaluation of these experiments. Negative control melting curves were analyzed to rule out contamination. Exclusion of outliers was held to a minimum, and was only done if single reactions in the triplicate measurements differed significantly (defined as mean +/−1.96×SD). An asterisk in the supplementary data files indicates these excluded outliers. Melting points were defined as the peak of the first derivative. The melting point was a half to one °C higher for all qPCR amplicons modified by 5′-o-TINA molecules compared to unmodified DNA amplicons.

5′-o-TINA Modified Primers Improved qPCR Efficiency

The unmodified DNA primers were found to allow for a qPCR efficiency of 100%, when a Cprimers of 400 nM or more was used at a Ta of 66°C or less (Figure 2). A similar (100%) qPCR efficiency at 66°C was obtained with a 5′-o-TINA modified Cprimers of 200 nM or more (Figure 2). For both unmodified and 5′-o-TINA modified primers, the qPCR efficiency decreased equally as Cprimers were further incrementally decreased, as expected (Figure 2). To address the effect of different Cprimers on the quantification cycle threshold (Cq) [20], we compared unmodified and 5′-o-TINA modified Cprimers in the range 50 to 800 nM and a Ta from 58 to 72°C with 1000 copies of target per reaction (Figure S2). At all Cprimers and Ta, the Cq of 5′-o-TINA modified primers was similar to or lower compared to unmodified primers. Cq indisputably increased at lower Cprimers and increasing Ta for both unmodified and 5′-o-TINA modified primers. The difference in Cq between the unmodified primers and the 5′-o-TINA modified primers indisputably increased in favor of the 5′ o-TINA modified primers as Ta was increased towards 72°C, e.g. at 68°C, a DNA Cprimers of 800 nM reached the minimal Cq level, whereas a 5′-o-TINA Cprimers of 300 nM or higher reached the same Cq (Figure S2). As the Ta increased from 58°C towards 72°C, we observed that the minimal Cq level was lowered. This was caused by a decrease in Cq threshold level, since the background signals of the assay decreased by increasing Ta and thereby increased the signal-to-noise ratio of the assay (Figure S2). We used temperature gradient experiments with inter-assay normalization to evaluate the effect of Ta on Cq at different Cprimers for both unmodified and 5′-o-TINA modified primers (Figure 3). For unmodified primers at Cprimers of 400 nM or more, the minimal Cq was observed at a Ta below 69°C (Figure 3a). For 5′-o-TINA modified primers, a similar Cq was observed at Cprimers of 200 nM or more and at a Ta below 72°C (Figure 3b). We conclude that 5′-o-TINA modified primers compared to unmodified DNA primers sustain a qPCR efficiency of 100% at significantly lower Cprimers, higher Ta and combinations of both.

Download:

• PPT
  PowerPoint slide
• PNG
  larger image
• TIFF
  original image

Figure 2. Efficiency curves for unmodified and 5′-o-TINA modified primers.

All experiments were conducted at an annealing temperature (Ta) of 66.0°C and primer concentrations (Cprimers) of unmodified and o-TINA modified primers were compared on the same plate. The melting curves corresponding to the amplification curves used for efficiency curve determination are included for the lowest Cprimers that allows an efficiency of 100% for unmodified and 5′-o-TINA modified primers.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0038451.g002

Download:

• PPT
  PowerPoint slide
• PNG
  larger image
• TIFF
  original image

Figure 3. Comparison of unmodified and 5′-o-TINA modified primer concentrations on a temperature gradient.

(a) Unmodified DNA primer concentrations from 50 nM (⧫) to 800 nM (▾). (b) 5′-o-TINA modified primer concentrations from 50 nM (◊) to 800 nM (∇). Each threshold cycle (Cq) determination is presented as mean +/− standard deviation (SD) established by triplicate measurements with 1000 copies per well of target. Inter-plate normalization was based on triplicate measurements using 800 nM of unmodified primers and an annealing temperature of 61.0°C (mean Cq for normalization was 25.11 with a SD of 0.1 on each plate).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0038451.g003

No Difference in qPCR Specificity between Unmodified and 5′-o-TINA Modified Primers

To compare the specificity (potential for cross-reactivity) of unmodified DNA and 5′-o-TINA modified qPCR primers with single nucleotide mismatches, we applied a Ta for each Cprimers that allowed for a qPCR efficiency of 100% for match primers. For each Cprimers, it was demonstrated that an increase in Ta would reduce the qPCR efficiency below 100%, implying that the assay was performed at the most stringent conditions that allowed for a qPCR efficiency of 100% with the match primers (Table S2). Single nucleotide mismatches were introduced in both primers at 5′-, central and 3′- positions in the primers to evaluate the effect of the 5′- terminally placed o-TINA molecule on the mismatch discrimination of the primers. The changes in Cq observed by introduction of single nucleotide mismatches in the primers were equal for both unmodified and 5′-o-TINA modified primers (Table S2 and Table S3). As expected, Cq increased significantly, when single nucleotide mismatches were introduced in the 3′- part of the primers and diminished towards the 5′- end of the primers (Table S2). As expected, the increase in Cq was enlarged, when the qPCR efficiency for match primers dropped below 100%. All Cprimers for unmodified and 5′-o-TINA modified primers with single nucleotide mismatches were found to increase the Cq equally (Table S2 and Table S3). In conclusion, unmodified and 5′-o-TINA modified primers equally impacted the discrimination of single nucleotide mismatches located within the primer sequences.

5′-o-TINA Modified Primers Increased the Robustness When qPCR Samples were Spiked with Human or Bacterial Genomic DNA

As 5′-o-TINA modified primers allow for higher Ta and lower Cprimers in a qPCR assay without compromising the cross-reactivity of the primers, we would expect that primer cross-reactivity with non-target sequences in clinical samples would diminish compared to unmodified primers. Figure 4 indeed demonstrates that addition of 10 or 100 ng of human genomic DNA to the assay hampered accurate qPCR efficiency determinations for unmodified primers, whereas 5′-o-TINA modified primers were left unaffected. For non-spiked samples, 200 nM of unmodified primers at a Ta of 60.0°C resulted in a qPCR efficiency of 100%, whereas samples spiked with human genomic DNA resulted in loss of target dilution linearity (qPCR efficiencies far above 100% in combination with very low coefficient of determination (R²) for data used for efficiency curve determinations) and loss of melting curve uniformity at especially lower target concentrations for the unmodified primers, which would normally lead to exclusion of the data before efficiency curve determinations (Figure 4). However, we have included these data to show the difference in qPCR efficiency and robustness between unmodified and 5′-o-TINA modified primers in samples spiked with human genomic DNA. In contrast, 200 nM of 5′-o-TINA modified primers at a Ta of 66.0°C spiked with equal amounts of human genomic DNA only lead to a minor parallel shift in Cq of the target dilution series, due to an increased background and thereby threshold of the assay. Furthermore, only minor changes in the melting curve profiles were observed (Figure 4). To verify the results, we replicated the experiment, spiking the samples with genomic DNA purified from Escherichia coli and observed similar results (Figure S3). The non-target cross-reactivity of the unmodified primers could be eliminated by increasing Cprimers to 400 nM and Ta to 66.0°C (Figure S3).

Download:

• PPT
  PowerPoint slide
• PNG
  larger image
• TIFF
  original image

Figure 4. Comparison of primers in samples spiked with human genomic DNA (gDNA).

(a-c) unmodified DNA primers and (d-f) 5′-o-TINA modified primers. Each ○ on the efficiency curves represents one threshold cycle (Cq) determination on an amplification curve with a corresponding melting curve, reported as the first derivative. Cq determinations highlighted in red would normally have been excluded based on the amplification curve and melting curve evaluation. (a, d) Unspiked samples. (b, e) All samples and negative controls spiked with 10 ng gDNA. (c, f) All samples and negative controls spiked with 100 ng gDNA. A uniform primer concentration of 200 nM was used in all samples and negative controls. The annealing temperatures for unmodified and o-TINA primers were 60.0°C and 66.0°C, respectively.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0038451.g004

Prolongation of Annealing Times Changed the qPCR Efficiency Equally for Unmodified and 5′-o-TINA Modified Primers

In the design of the present study, we performed the qPCR assays utilizing a relatively short annealing time to increase the stringency of the assay. As expected, prolongation of the annealing time, while keeping the Ta and Cprimers constant, increased the qPCR efficiency, but at the cost of assay stringency (Figure S4). The influence of annealing time on stringency was observed to be equal for both unmodified and 5′-o-TINA modified primers, as expected (Figure S4).

The Unmodified qPCR Primers Showed Equal Limiting Effect on Cq, whereas for 5′-o-TINA Modified Primers the Reverse Primer Limited Cq

The limiting effect on Cq by different primer concentrations was evaluated by primer “chessboard titration” (Table S4). For unmodified primers, no significant difference in Cq was observed when equal concentrations of forward and reverse primer were limiting the qPCR assay. For 5′-o-TINA modified primers the reverse primer was the limiting primer (Table S4). To ease the comparison of different primer concentrations throughout the study, we used equal concentrations of forward and reverse primers in all other experiments.

5′-o-TINA Modified Primers Significantly Reduced the Optimal PCR Program Length in Octaplex End-point PCR

As seen in Figure 5a, the unmodified primers and 5′-o-TINA modified primers amplified the three specific targets in the D2168 strain with equal analytical sensitivity using the published PCR program from Brandal LT et al. [18]. For both the unmodified and 5′-o-TINA modified primers an amplification product for the rrs internal control gene was amplified in the negative control and the unmodified PCR primers contrary to the 5′-o-TINA modified primers also amplified a non-specific product with a mass below the estAh amplification product in the two highest target concentrations. As the PCR program length was shortened by 60 minutes from a total PCR program length of approximately 130 minutes to approximately 70 minutes, all three specific amplicons could still be observed with similar analytical sensitivity for the 5′-o-TINA modified primers, whereas an estAh amplification product could not be detected by the unmodified primers (red box in Figure 5b). Using the faster PCR program, amplification of the rrs internal control gene in the negative controls was still observed. To ensure that both PCR programs worked equally well for the remaining five targets, we tested the remaining seven bacterial strains. The D2259 strain, which entail the estAh target confirmed the observations for the D2168 strain, whereas the remaining strains showed no difference in amplification, analytical sensitivity or non-specific amplification between unmodified and 5′-o-TINA modified primers connected to the length of the PCR program (Figure S5). For all strains and both unmodified primers and 5′-o-TINA modified primers, the rrs internal control gene was amplified in the negative control. We therefore changed the PCR buffer to our in-house Euro-Optima buffer system and for all eight bacterial strains the negative controls became negative. Unfortunately the Euro-Optima buffer system gave rise to a non-specific product for the unmodified primers with a mass equaling the mass of the stx2 amplification product in strain 55989, D2259, D2260 and D3522 (Figure S5). In the remaining experiments, we continued to use the Qiagen Multiplex PCR Master Mix containing traces of genomic E. coli DNA, but not the virulence factors.

Download:

• PPT
  PowerPoint slide
• PNG
  larger image
• TIFF
  original image

Figure 5. Amplification of an octaplex end-point PCR by unmodified primers and 5′-o-TINA modified primers.

Data are shown for the D2168 strain entailing the rrs (401 bp), elt (322 bp) and estAh (190 bp) genes. (a) PCR program length of approximately 130 minutes, with a 10-fold target dilution series on crude bacterial lysate to 10,000-fold dilution and a negative control (NC) for unmodified primers and 5′-o-TINA modified primers. (b) Set-up identical to (a), but with a PCR program length of approximately 70 minutes. The red box highlights the lack of amplicons for the estAh gene with unmodified primers. (c) Set-up identical to (b), but additionally spiked with one µg of human genomic DNA per well. Red boxes highlight a non-specific amplicon with a size equaling the ipaH product. (d) 10-fold dilution of strain D2168 with different primer concentrations (Cprimers) of 50, 100, 150, 200, 300 and 400 nM for unmodified primers and 5′-o-TINA modified primers. Red lines are placed at the minimum Cprimers for unmodified primers. (e, f) Increasing annealing temperatures (Ta) of 55.0, 56.6, 57.9, 59.4, 60.8, 62.3, 63.7, 65.2, 66.6, 68.1, 69.5 and 71.0°C on crude bacterial lysate for unmodified primers (e) and 5′-o-TINA modified primers (f). Red lines are placed at the maximum Ta for unmodified primers. In (a-c, e, f), a Cprimers of 200 nM was used for each primer, except the estAh primers for which 400 nM of each primer was used. The PCR program with a length of approximately 70 minutes was used in (b-f).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0038451.g005

5′-o-TINA Modified Primers Increased the Robustness of the Octaplex End-point PCR on Spiked Samples

Four strains (fr1368, 55989, D2168 and D2188) collectively containing all eight targets were spiked with one µg of human genomic DNA isolated from the leukocyte fraction of whole blood. As seen in Figure 5c for strain D2168, all specific targets were amplified with a tendency towards lower analytical sensitivity for both unmodified primers and 5′-o-TINA modified primers. For all four bacterial strains, the spiking induced the amplification of a non-specific product with a size equaling the ipaH product and the non-specific product was marked in the spiked negative controls and highly diluted spiked bacterial strains (red boxes in Figure S6). Especially the unmodified DNA primers lead to the formation of the non-specific product, which could be detected at 10-fold to 100-fold higher bacterial target concentrations compared to the 5′-o-TINA modified primers (red boxes in Figure 5c and Figure S6). Based on these results we conclude that 5′-o-TINA modified primers were less prone to off-target amplification compared to unmodified primers, increasing the robustness for amplification of spiked targets in the octaplex end-point PCR.

5′-o-TINA Modified Primers Amplified the Octaplex End-point PCR at Reduced Primer Concentrations and Increased Annealing Temperatures

As for the N. gonorrhoeae qPCR assay, we compared the effect of lower Cprimers and increasing Ta for unmodified primers and 5′-o-TINA modified primers in the octaplex end-point PCR assay with subsequent gel electrophoresis. Figure 5d illustrates the difference in detection of PCR products between unmodified and 5′-o-TINA modified primers at lower Cprimers for the elt, estAh and rrs genes in D2168. For the elt, estAh, rrs, partly stx1 (D2188) and stx2 targets, we observed a PCR product at half the Cprimers with 5′-o-TINA modified primers compared to unmodified primers, whereas we for the aggR, eae, ipaH and partly stx1 (D3522) targets observed a stronger band at the lowest Cprimers that formed PCR products implying that 5′-o-TINA modified primers allow amplification at lower Cprimers compared to unmodified primers (Figure S7). Figure 5e and 5f shows the amplification by unmodified primers and 5′-o-TINA modified primers, respectively, on a temperature gradient for strain D2168 entailing the elt, estAh and rrs target genes. For all three targets 5′-o-TINA modified primers allowed visual detection of target amplification at Ta increased by 1.5°C to above 3.0°C compared to amplification by unmodified primers. Similar results were obtained for Ta evaluation for strain fr1368, 55989 and D2188 collectively, covering the remaining six targets when 5′-o-TINA modified primers were compared to unmodified primers. Thus, 5′-o-TINA modified primers increased the Ta for all targets in the octaplex end-point PCR compared to unmodified primers (Figure S8).