Figures
Abstract
Background
Prostate cancer represents the leading cause of male death across the world. A recent genome-wide association study (GWAS) identified five novel susceptibility loci for prostate cancer in the Japanese population. This study is to replicate and fine map the potential association of these five loci with prostate cancer in the Chinese Han population.
Methods
In Phase I of the study, we tested the five single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) which showed the strongest association evidence in the original GWAS in Japanese. The study sample consists of 1,169 Chinese Hans, comprising 483 patients and 686 healthy controls. Then in phase II, flanking SNPs of the successfully replicated SNPs in Phase I were genotyped and tested for association with prostate cancer to fine map those significant association signals.
Results
We successfully replicated the association of rs13385191 (located in the C2orf43 gene, P = 8.60×10−5), rs12653946 (P = 1.33×10−6), rs1983891 (FOXP4, P = 6.22×10−5), and rs339331 (GPRC6A/RFX6, P = 1.42×10−5) with prostate cancer. The most significant odds ratio (OR) was recorded as 1.41 (95% confidence interval 1.18–1.68) for rs12653946. Rs9600079 did not show significant association (P = 8.07×10−2) with prostate cancer in this study. The Phase II study refined these association signals, and identified several SNPs showing more significant association with prostate cancer than the very SNPs tested in Phase I.
Conclusions
Our results provide further support for association of the C2orf43, FOXP4, GPRC6A and RFX6 genes with prostate cancer in Eastern Asian populations. This study also characterized the novel loci reported in the original GWAS with more details. Further work is still required to determine the functional variations and finally clarify the underlying biological mechanisms.
Citation: Long Q-Z, Du Y-F, Ding X-Y, Li X, Song W-B, Yang Y, et al. (2012) Replication and Fine Mapping for Association of the C2orf43, FOXP4, GPRC6A and RFX6 Genes with Prostate Cancer in the Chinese Population. PLoS ONE 7(5): e37866. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0037866
Editor: Karl X. Chai, University of Central Florida, United States of America
Received: January 4, 2012; Accepted: April 26, 2012; Published: May 25, 2012
Copyright: © 2012 Long et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Funding: This work was supported by the following: National Science Foundation of China (grant number: 30900800, 30901500; URL: http://www.nsfc.gov.cn); Science and Technology Program of Shaan-Xi Province; New Teacher Start Fund of Xi’an Jiaotong University; the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities - Innovation Program of Xi’an Jiaotong University. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Introduction
Prostate cancer (MIM 176807) represents the leading cause of male death in Western countries. With lifestyle transition, it has also become more and more prevalent in Asia. It is widely accepted that genetics play important roles in susceptibility to almost all human cancers. Now, genome-wide association study (GWAS) has become a feasible, powerful and effective approach for identification of novel genes underlying susceptibility to cancers and other complex diseases.
A recently conducted GWAS on prostate cancer identified five novel susceptibility loci in the Japanese population [1]. These loci had not been associated with prostate cancer before. Investigation in diverse populations of the variants discovered from GWASs may contribute to a more comprehensive understanding of genetic mechanisms of prostate cancer. Here, we report our replication efforts in the Chinese Han population for potential association of these five loci with prostate cancer. Specifically, five SNPs that showed the strongest association evidence respectively in their situated loci in the original GWAS were genotyped and tested for potential association with prostate cancer. This is the first replication study on these five novel loci with prostate cancer in the Chinese population. Furthermore, as an effort to fine map the replicated association signals, we genotyped a total of another 259 SNPs encompassing the successfully replicated SNPs and tested for their association with prostate cancer.
Materials and Methods
Ethics Statement
The study was approved by the institutional review board of Xi’an Jiaotong University. Signed informed-consent documents were obtained from all study participants.
Study Sample
The study sample consisted of 483 patients and 686 healthy geography- and age-matched controls. The patients were recruited from in- and outpatients of the participating hospitals from 2007 to the present. All patients were independently and consistently diagnosed by two senior urologists and a senior pathologist based on medical records and pathological evaluation of prostate biopsy. We preferentially recruited patients who had a self-reported family history of prostate cancer or a high-grade Gleason score (≥7) at the time of diagnosis. Each study subject filled in a structured questionnaire form covering family history, medical history, alcohol consumption, smoking, diet structure, socioeconomic factors, etc. The control subjects were drawn from a growing database comprising more than 3,000 randomly-enrolled unrelated Han Chinese from Xi’an city and its neighboring area. Individuals having serious chronic diseases/conditions that may have potential influence on endocrine and metabolism were excluded. The inclusion and exclusion criteria have been described in details elsewhere [2], [3]. Potential confounding factors, including native place, alcohol consumption, smoking, diet structure and socioeconomic factors, were maximally considered to match the patient and control groups.
SNP Selection and Genotyping
In Phase I, we selected the five SNPs that showed the strongest association evidence respectively in their situated loci in the original GWAS. As for Phase II, the SNP markers were selected based on a comprehensive consideration of: (1) coverage of the coding sequence and up to 300 kbp upstream of the gene under scrutiny; (2) validation of the SNP from both dbSNP and HapMap databases; (3) degree of heterozygosity, i.e., minor allele frequency ≥5%; (4) inclusion of the SNP in Affymetrix and Illumina SNP chips. This is for convenience of comparison of association results between this study and others.
Genomic DNA was extracted from peripheral blood leukocytes applying standard protocols. SNP genotyping was performed with a primer-extension method with MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry on a MassARRAY system as suggested by the manufacturer (Sequenom, Inc., San Diego, CA). Genotype frequencies of all the five SNPs in both case and control groups did not deviate significantly from Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (P>0.05). In phase II, 66, 40 and 81 SNPs were successfully genotyped and past the Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium test, respectively for the loci around the C2orf43 (Chromosome 2 Open Reading Frame [MIM 613570]), FOXP4 (Forkhead Box P4 [MIM 608924]) and GPRC6A/RFX6 (G Protein-coupled Receptor, family C, group 6, member A [MIM 613572] and regulatory factor X, 6 [MIM 612659]) genes. Given rs12653946 was not mapped to any known gene, 72 flanking SNPs of rs12653946 were genotyped in phase II.
Statistical Analyses
The genotype distributions of the tested SNPs between case and control groups were analyzed with logistic regression models controlling for age and alcohol consumption as covariates. In the frame of logistic regression model, odds ratio (OR) with the corresponding 95% confidence intervals were also computed. We adopted the conservative Bonferroni method to account for the multiple-testing problem respectively for the study of Phase I and Phase II. Because five SNPs were tested in the replication phase, the significance level was set as 1.00×10−2 (i.e., 0.05/5). In phase II, the significance level for the study was set as 1.93×10−4 (i.e., 0.05/259).
We utilized online FASTSNP (http://fastsnp.ibms.sinica.edu.tw) in order to analyze the potential functions of the pinpointed SNPs. The analysis is based on up-to-date information extracted from 11 external bioinformatic databases at query time [4].
Results
Clinical characteristics of the patient subjects are presented in Table 1. The average age of patients and controls was 67.3±6.9 and 66.3±6.4, respectively. All study subjects are Han Chinese recruited from the Xi’an city and its neighboring area. Our previous studies [2], [3] did not detect significant population stratification in the study sample database, from which all the control subjects of this study were drawn. Some interesting characteristics of the case and control samples are presented in Table 2.
Our results of the Phase I study provided supportive evidence for four of the five tested SNPs as true susceptibility loci of prostate cancer. We confirmed association of rs13385191, rs12653946, rs1983891, and rs339331 at P = 8.60×10−5, 1.33×10−6, 6.22×10−5, and 1.42×10−5, respectively, with the same high-risk alleles to those in the original GWAS in the Japanese population. Characteristics of the studied SNPs and corresponding association test results in the replication phase are showed in Table 3.
In Phase II, we found two SNPs showing even stronger association than their corresponding two SNPs tested in Phase I. Rs16988102 obtained a P value of 5.29×10−5 compared to rs13385191 with a P value of 8.60×10−5. Rs9489065 got a P value of 1.40×10−5, compared to rs339331 with a P value of 1.42×10−5. When jointly modeling prostate cancer with rs16988102 and rs13385191, the OR (95% CI) increased to 1.71 (1.47–1.96), compared to OR of 1.33 (1.11–1.58) when considering rs13385191 alone. When jointly modeling the four SNPs which got the most significant association signals in their respective loci, the OR (95% CI) turned out 2.06 (1.79–2.35). LD (linkage disequilibrium) structure of the tested SNPs and results of the association tests in Phase II for the four loci around rs13385191, rs12653946, rs1983891, and rs339331 are presented in Figure 1, 2, 3 and 4. The LD map was generated by the use of Haploview (Broad Institute, MA, USA) based on D-Prime using the genotype data of case and controls in the Phase II study.
Discussion
Rs13385191 is located in intron region of the C2orf43 gene, which encoding a hypothetical protein LOC60526. The C2orf43 gene is conserved among chimpanzee, cow, mouse, rat, chicken, zebrafish, fruit fly, mosquito, C.elegans, A.thaliana, and rice. This suggests the existence of important functional variants around the gene region. Notably, the chromosome region 2p24 harboring the C2orf43 gene was linked to prostate cancer in European and American populations [5]. This complies with the detected association of the C2orf43 gene with prostate cancer in this study. FASTSNP analyses suggested that rs13385191 may be a location of intronic enhancer.
Rs1983891 is mapped to intron region of the FOXP4 gene. The FOXP4 gene was first reported as a novel forkhead transcription factor [6]. FOXP4 belongs to subfamily P of the forkhead box (FOX) transcription factor family. Forkhead box transcription factors play important roles in the regulation of tissue- and cell type-specific gene transcription. Many members of the forkhead box gene family, including members of subfamily P, participate in mammalian oncogenesis [6]. The FOXP4 gene is located at chromosome region 6p21, which region was also ever linked to prostate cancer [5], [7].
Rs339331 resides close to two genes, GPRC6A and RFX6. FASTSNP showed that rs339331 may be a location of intronic enhancer of the GPRC6A gene. Prostate does not express GPRC6A in normal conditions [8]. Nevertheless, interestingly, GPRC6A is highly expressed in the Leydig cells of the testis, and mice deficient in Gprc6a show male feminization and a metabolic manifestation of higher circulating estradiol and reduced levels of testosterone. These two hormones are critical for initiation and progression of prostate cancer [9]. As another supporting evidence for the significant association, GPRC6A is functionally important in regulating non-genomic effects of androgens in multiple tissues [10]. Rs339331 resides in the chromosome region 6q22, which was found to be a susceptibility loci of prostate cancer in US Whites [11].
The RFX6 gene encodes a member of the regulatory factor X (RFX) family of transcription factors [12]. The coded DNA-binding protein RFX6 plays an important role in the pathology of neonatal hemochromatosis [13]. Association of the HFE (hemochromatosis) gene with prostate cancer [14] highlight the crosstalk between pathology of hemochromatosis and prostate cancer.
Rs12653946 and rs9600079 are not mapped to any known gene. Nevertheless, 5p15, the locus harboring the rs12653946 polymorphism, was ever linked to prostate cancer aggressiveness [15], [16]. This is in accordance with the detected association of rs12653946 with prostate cancer in this study.
Possible reasons for failure of replication for rs9600079 might include different ethnic backgrounds, difference in selection criteria of study subjects, and/or ethnic heterogeneity of genetics mechanisms of prostate cancer.
In Phase II of fine mapping for the replicated loci in Phase I, rs16988102 and rs9489065 got more significant association signals with prostate cancer than their neighboring SNPs replicated in Phase I. The association of Rs16988102 with prostate cancer was also supported by strong associations of multiple surrounding SNPs with prostate cancer. Rs16988102 is located in 5′ upstream of the C2orf43 gene. The distance between rs16988102 and rs13385191 is more than 300 kb, which is much longer than general distance of LD. Thus, we prefer to claim the rs16988102 as a risk locus for prostate cancer independent to rs13385191. This is in accordance with the significantly lifted OR by adding rs16988102 to the risk model of prostate cancer which only took the variation of rs13385191 into account. Rs9489065 is located in intron region of the RFX6 gene. Rs9489065 and rs339331 are in strong LD (D′ = 0.97), and their association signals with prostate cancer are largely comparative. This implies that one of rs9489065 and rs339331 is the true susceptibility loci, or that both these two SNPs are in strong LD with the true susceptibility loci. Notably, around the loci of the GPRC6A and RFX6 genes, the SNPs significantly associated with prostate cancer narrowed to the region of the RFX6 gene, compared to a wide distribution of significantly associated SNPs across the whole region of these two genes in the original GWAS. This suggests the RFX6 gene variation may be the susceptibility loci underlying the observed association signal of the GPRC6A/RFX6 loci with prostate cancer in the original GWAS.
In the original GWAS, Takata et al. failed to replicate association of 12 SNPs among the total of tested 31 SNPs which are significantly associated with prostate cancer in European populations. This highlighted the genetic heterogeneity of prostate cancer among diverse ethnic populations. In this study, four among five tested SNPs which are significantly associated with prostate cancer in Japanese are successfully replicated in Chinese Han population. Compared with the replication ratio of 12/31, the sharply higher replication ratio of 4/5 raised the possibility of similar genetic pathology of prostate cancer between the Japanese and Chinese Han populations. This is not unexpected given the genetic homogeneity between the Chinese and Japanese populations [17].
In summary, our results provide further evidence for significant association of SNPs rs13385191, rs12653946, rs1983891, and rs339331 with susceptibility to prostate cancer in Eastern Asian populations. The related genes, C2orf43, FOXP4, GPRC6A and RFX6, are warranted for further efforts to determine the functional variations and finally to clarify the genetic mechanism of susceptibility to prostate cancer.
Author Contributions
Conceived and designed the experiments: QZL YFD XGL. Performed the experiments: XYD XL. Analyzed the data: QZL YFD PZ JPZ XGL. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: XYD WBS YY PZ JPZ. Wrote the paper: QZL YFD XGL. Subject recruitment: QZL YFD XYD XL WBS YY PZ JPZ.
References
- 1. Takata R, Akamatsu S, Kubo M, Takahashi A, Hosono N, et al. (2010) Genome-wide association study identifies five new susceptibility loci for prostate cancer in the Japanese population. Nat Genet 42: 751–754.
- 2.
Guo Y, Tan LJ, Lei SF, Yang TL, Chen XD, et al. (2010) Genome-Wide Association Study Identifies ALDH7A1 as a Novel Susceptibility Gene for Osteoporosis. Plos Genetics 6: -.
- 3. Peng YM, Lei SF, Guo Y, Xiong DH, Yan H, et al. (2008) Sex-specific association of the glucocorticoid receptor gene with extreme BMD. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research 23: 247–252.
- 4. Yuan HY, Chiou JJ, Tseng WH, Liu CH, Liu CK, et al. (2006) FASTSNP: an always up-to-date and extendable service for SNP function analysis and prioritization. Nucleic Acids Res 34: W635–641.
- 5. Christensen GB, Baffoe-Bonnie AB, George A, Powell I, Bailey-Wilson JE, et al. (2010) Genome-wide linkage analysis of 1,233 prostate cancer pedigrees from the International Consortium for Prostate Cancer Genetics using novel sumLINK and sumLOD analyses. Prostate 70: 735–744.
- 6. Teufel A, Wong EA, Mukhopadhyay M, Malik N, Westphal H (2003) FoxP4, a novel forkhead transcription factor. Biochim Biophys Acta 1627: 147–152.
- 7.
Cropp CD, Simpson CL, Wahlfors T, Ha N, George A, et al. (2011) Genome-wide linkage scan for prostate cancer susceptibility in finland: Evidence for a novel locus on 2q37.2 and confirmation of signal on 17q21-q22. Int J Cancer.
- 8. Wellendorph P, Brauner-Osborne H (2004) Molecular cloning, expression, and sequence analysis of GPRC6A, a novel family C G-protein-coupled receptor. Gene 335: 37–46.
- 9. Pi M, Chen L, Huang MZ, Zhu W, Ringhofer B, et al. (2008) GPRC6A null mice exhibit osteopenia, feminization and metabolic syndrome. PLoS One 3: e3858.
- 10. Pi M, Parrill AL, Quarles LD (2010) GPRC6A mediates the non-genomic effects of steroids. J Biol Chem 285: 39953–39964.
- 11. Gillanders EM, Xu J, Chang BL, Lange EM, Wiklund F, et al. (2004) Combined genome-wide scan for prostate cancer susceptibility genes. J Natl Cancer Inst 96: 1240–1247.
- 12. Aftab S, Semenec L, Chu JS, Chen N (2008) Identification and characterization of novel human tissue-specific RFX transcription factors. BMC Evol Biol 8: 226.
- 13. Martinovici D, Ransy V, Vanden Eijnden S, Ridremont C, Pardou A, et al. (2010) Neonatal hemochromatosis and Martinez-Frias syndrome of intestinal atresia and diabetes mellitus in a consanguineous newborn. Eur J Med Genet 53: 25–28.
- 14. Syrjakoski K, Fredriksson H, Ikonen T, Kuukasjarvi T, Autio V, et al. (2006) Hemochromatosis gene mutations among Finnish male breast and prostate cancer patients. Int J Cancer 118: 518–520.
- 15. Slager SL, Zarfas KE, Brown WM, Lange EM, McDonnell SK, et al. (2006) Genome-wide linkage scan for prostate cancer aggressiveness loci using families from the University of Michigan Prostate Cancer Genetics Project. Prostate 66: 173–179.
- 16. Witte JS, Suarez BK, Thiel B, Lin J, Yu A, et al. (2003) Genome-wide scan of brothers: replication and fine mapping of prostate cancer susceptibility and aggressiveness loci. Prostate 57: 298–308.
- 17. Cho YS, Go MJ, Kim YJ, Heo JY, Oh JH, et al. (2009) A large-scale genome-wide association study of Asian populations uncovers genetic factors influencing eight quantitative traits. Nat Genet 41: 527–534.