Figures
Abstract
Anguilla japonica and Anguilla marmorata share overlapping spawning sites, similar drifting routes, and comparable larval durations. However, they exhibit allopatric geographical distributions in East Asia. To clarify this ecological discrepancy, glass eels from estuaries in Taiwan, the Philippines, Indonesia, and China were collected monthly, and the survival rate of A. marmorata under varying water salinities and temperatures was examined. The composition ratio of these 2 eel species showed a significant latitude cline, matching the 24°C sea surface temperature isotherm in winter. Both species had opposing temperature preferences for recruitment. A. marmorata prefer high water temperatures and die at low water temperatures. In contrast, A. japonica can endure low water temperatures, but their recruitment is inhibited by high water temperatures. Thus, A. japonica glass eels, which mainly spawn in summer, are preferably recruited to Taiwan, China, Korea, and Japan by the Kuroshio and its branch waters in winter. Meanwhile, A. marmorata glass eels, which spawn throughout the year, are mostly screened out in East Asia in areas with low-temperature coastal waters in winter. During summer, the strong northward currents from the South China Sea and Changjiang River discharge markedly block the Kuroshio invasion and thus restrict the approach of A. marmorata glass eels to the coasts of China and Korea. The differences in the preferences of the recruitment temperature for glass eels combined with the availability of oceanic currents shape the real geographic distribution of Anguilla japonica and Anguilla marmorata, making them “temperate” and “tropical” eels, respectively.
Citation: Han Y-S, Yambot AV, Zhang H, Hung C-L (2012) Sympatric Spawning but Allopatric Distribution of Anguilla japonica and Anguilla marmorata: Temperature- and Oceanic Current-Dependent Sieving. PLoS ONE 7(6): e37484. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0037484
Editor: Cédric Sueur, Institut Pluridisciplinaire Hubert Curien, France
Received: February 16, 2012; Accepted: April 24, 2012; Published: June 4, 2012
Copyright: © 2012 Han et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Funding: This study was funded by the National Science Council (NSC) of the Executive Yuan, Taiwan (NSC 99-2923-B-002-005-MY3 and NSC 99-2313-B-002-021-MY3), and by the Council of Agriculture of the Executive Yuan, Taiwan (98 AS-10.3.1-F2-5 and 99 AS-9.1-F-01-15-2). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Introduction
Freshwater eels (genus Anguilla) are catadromous fish and have a complex life history [1]. All anguillids spawn in the tropical/subtropical ocean and have leptocephalus larvae that disperse from their oceanic spawning area to continental habitats via ocean currents where they metamorphose into glass eels [2]–[5]. After growing for years in rivers and estuaries, they return to their birthplace to spawn and subsequently die. Nineteen species and subspecies of genus Anguilla are reported worldwide; 6 of them are temperate eels that mostly have well-defined spawning and recruitment seasons [1], [3], long larval durations [3], and panmictic populations [6]–[8]. In contrast, tropical eels usually have year-round recruitment because of protracted spawning seasons [3], [9]–[11] and shorter larval durations than those of temperate eels [3], [9], and may have multiple populations/spawning areas such as those of Anguilla marmorata [12]–[14].
In general, temperate eels are distributed mainly in subtropical/temperate areas, whereas tropical eels are distributed mainly in tropical/subtropical regions [1]. Despite the different biogeographical distributions of these 2 types of eels, some of them utilize the same oceanic currents for larval transportation. For example, A. japonica, A. marmorata, and A. bicolor pacifica are transported by the North Equatorial Current (NEC) [3], [11], [15]. Meanwhile, A. bicolor bicolor, A. nebulosa labiata, A. mossambica, and A. marmorata in East Africa are transported by the South Equatorial Current [4]. Moreover, A. australis and A. reinhardtii use the South Equatorial Current for larval transportation [2], [16]. However, why eel species utilizing the same oceanic currents for transportation have different biogeographical distributions is poorly understood. Some differences in life history strategies between temperate and tropical eels may be responsible for their adaptation to different climate patterns and geographical environments.
The sampling locations of the glass eels are indicated by asterisks. No. 1: Yakushima Is., n = 2050 (Yamamoto et al., 2001); No. 2: Danshui R., n = 2547; No. 3: Yilan R., n = 3279; No. 4: Tungkang R., n = 673; No. 5: Siouguluan R., n = 7170; No. 6: Cagayan R., n = 1974 (Tabeta et al., 1976); No. 7: Cagayan area., n = 2075; No. 8: Buayan R., n = 552; No. 9: Manado, n = 350; No. 10: Poigar R., n = 4997 (Arai et al., 1999).
The tropical giant mottled eel, A. marmorata, has the widest geographic distribution among Anguilla species; it is distributed longitudinally from the east coast of Africa to the central South Pacific and latitudinally from Japan to Southern Africa [11], [17]. Genetic and morphological studies show that this species consists of several distinct spawning populations [13], [14], [18]. One spawning population known as the North Pacific population ranges from Northern Indonesia to Southern Japan [11], [13], [14]. According to surveys of larvae [14] and mature silver eels [19] collected from the NEC region, the spawning area of A. marmorata is around 12–17° N, 131–143°E [11], [15], which overlaps with that of the Japanese eel A. japonica (12–17° N, 137–143°E) [20], [21]. Newly hatched A. japonica and A. marmorata larvae in the NEC drift west from their spawning area. When the NEC arrives at the east coast of the Philippines, it divides into northbound (Kuroshio) and southbound flows (Mindanao Current). The leptocephali rely on these oceanic currents for transportation before metamorphosing into glass eels [5], [11], [21]. A. japonica and A. marmorata metamorphose at similar ages: at around 3–5 months of age [3], [22]–[24]. The overlapping spawning areas, transportation routes, and leptocephalus durations between A. marmorata and A. japonica suggest that both should be dispersed in similar geographic areas. However, the real distribution ranges of these 2 eel species are distinct. A. japonica glass eels are found mainly in Taiwan, China, Korea, and Japan [5], [11], [24], [25]. Meanwhile, A. marmorata glass eels are abundant in the Philippines and Indonesia [9]–[11], [26]. The sympatric spawning but allopatric distribution between A. japonica and A. marmorata is an interesting ecological phenomenon.
DS: Danshui R.; YL: Yilan R.; DG: Donggang R.; SL: Siouguluan R.
Kimura et al. [25] reported that eel larvae exhibit vertical migration behavior and may move to near-surface seawater (∼50–100 m) at night–the depth affected by northward Ekman transportation. The smaller larval size of A. marmorata compared with that of A. japonica might reduce their migration up to the surface Ekman layer at night. Thus, most A. japonica larvae are thought to enter the Kuroshio and reach their East Asian habitats. In contrast, A. marmorata larvae can enter both the northbound and southbound flows to reach their growth habitats [25]. On the other hand, Kuroki et al. [11] suggested that A. marmorata might tend to spawn further south in the NEC than A. japonica, thus enhancing their southward transport. This hypothesis could well explain the relative abundances of these 2 species in the northern and southern areas of East Asia. However, A. marmorata is also found to be abundant in Luzon Island, Philippines, where the Kuroshio passes by [26], whereas A. japonica is unusually rare throughout the Philippines and Indonesia. Some additional biotic/abiotic factors may also affect the distinct distribution patterns of these 2 species.
Previous studies have demonstrated that the feeding, swimming, pigmentation, and otolith growth of Japanese glass eels are hampered under low water temperatures [24], [27], [28]. The time lag in recruitment of Japanese glass eels to Northeast Asian habitats in winter can be accounted for by a longer leptocephalus stage combined with a low temperature-driven delay to upstream migration [24]. Therefore, it is possible that behaviors such as the temperature preference of the glass eels may help determine recruitment dynamics. In East Asia, the coastal waters of Taiwan in winter are affected by the cold northeastern monsoon and cold Chinese coastal water as well as the warm Kuroshio and its branch waters, thus forming a significant thermal front in the waters around Taiwan [5], [29], [30]. Furthermore, both A. japonica and A. marmorata are abundant in the rivers in Taiwan. The geographical location of Taiwan makes it an excellent site for investigating these environmental effects on the recruitment dynamics of these eel species. Thus, the present study aimed to clarify if the water temperature and oceanic current regime may affect the glass eel recruitment of A. japonica and A. marmorata by examining their temperature preferences and relative abundances in Taiwan, Philippines, China, and Indonesia as well as the available oceanic currents in East Asia.
Materials and Methods
Sample Collection
Glass eels from Taiwan were collected monthly from the estuaries of the Danshui River (Northwestern Taiwan), Donggang River (Southwestern Taiwan), Yilan River (Northeastern Taiwan), and Siouguluan River (Eastern Taiwan) (Fig. 1). Glass eels were caught using fyke nets at night between February 2009 and December 2011. One to three samplings taking 2 hours each were performed every month at each location. The data for each monthly collection were averaged. By using fyke nets, glass eels from the Philippines were collected from the estuary of the Cagayan River in northern Luzon Island and from the Buayan River in Mindanao Island (Fig. 1). Between July 2008 and April 2010, glass eels were purchased every month from the local fishermen. Glass eels were also collected from Manado in Indonesia (by using hand nets) and Shanghai in China (by using fyke nets) (Fig. 1). After collection, the glass eels were immediately preserved in 95% ethanol. Glass eel collections are allowed in these countries without need of any permission.
The image was obtained using the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration AVHRR sensor data.
Species Identification
Eel species were identified using both morphological and genetic methods. The total length, pre-dorsal length, and pre-anal length (to the nearest 0.1 mm) of each glass eel were measured under a stereomicroscope. The following equation was used to calculate the fin difference as an index to classify whether an eel was long finned or short finned: AD/TL × 100% = fin difference, where AD is the vertical distance from the origin of the dorsal fin to the anus and TL is the total length. Moreover, morphological characteristics were studied by determining the presence or absence of caudal cutaneous pigmentation according to Tabeta et al. [26]. A. bicolor pacifica (short finned) and A. japonica (no pigmentation on tail) are easily distinguished from other species. To identify other possible eel species in Taiwan, China, and Luzon Island, one piece of muscle from each individual was removed and used for genetic identification. Primer sets for cytochrome b (universal forward primer + species-specific reverse primer) were designed from A. marmorata, A. celebesensis, and A. luzonensis (synonyms of A. huangi) (Table 1); A. luzonensis is a newly reported eel species found around Luzon Island and Taiwan [31], [32]. All glass eel specimens caught in Mindanao Island and Indonesia were PCR amplified using a universal cytochrome b primer set (Table 1) followed by gene sequencing for direct species identification. A commercial DNA purification and extraction kit (Bioman Scientific Ltd., Taiwan) was used for genomic DNA extraction. PCR was performed as described previously [33]. The PCR products were then subjected to 2% agarose gel electrophoresis for band checking. Samples that failed to show species-specific bands were then PCR amplified using a universal primer set of cytochrome b (Table 1) for direct species identification.
Oceanic and coastal currents in summer (June–August), and the distribution of A. marmorata (bold lines) in East Asia were shown in (A). Oceanic and coastal currents in winter (December–February), and the distribution of A. japonica (bold lines) in East Asia were shown in (B). CDW: Changjiang Diluted Water; SCSW: South China Sea Water; TSWC: Taiwan Strait Warm Current; TWC: Taiwan Warm Current; JWC: Jeju Warm Current; TsWC: Tsushima Warm Current; YSWC: Yellow Sea Warm Current; WKCC: Western Korea Cold Current.
Temperature and Salinity Experiments with A. marmorata
By using fyke nets, A. marmorata glass eels were collected from the coastal waters of Yilan, Taiwan in August 2010. The glass eels were kept in a bag with saline and oxygen, and were immediately transported to the laboratory at the Institute of Fisheries Science, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan. Before the experiments, the glass eels were divided and kept in 12 aqua tanks in the dark without feeding. Each tank contained 100 individuals. They were gradually acclimatized from room temperature to 5°C, 10°C, 15°C, and 20°C for 1 day under varying salinity at 0, 17, or 35 psu for each temperature. After 1 week, the survival rates with respect to salinity and temperature for each tank were determined. Differences in the survival rates among temperature and salinity groups were tested by two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). Data were considered significant at p<0.05. The same experiment was repeated in November 2011. The experiments were performed in fish rearing laboratory of Institute of Fisheries Science, National Taiwan University following the protocol for the care and use of laboratory animals of the National Taiwan University. The animal use has been reviewed and approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC Number: 98-126, by chairman Jih-Tay Hsu on March 2010). Every effort was made to minimize suffering.
Current and Temperature Patterns of East Asian Waters
The average sea surface temperatures (SSTs) in East Asia in July 2009 (summer) and January 2010 (winter) were estimated from the advanced very-high resolution radiometer (AVHRR) sensors on the TIROS-N series satellite of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) by the Department of Environmental Biology and Fisheries Science, National Taiwan Ocean University, which provides high-quality SST data with a spatial resolution of 1.1 km. The major surface currents of the East Asian continental shelf in winter (December–February) and summer (June–August) were modified based on Chen’s studies [29], [34].
Results
Monthly Glass Eel Composition by Location
Glass eel sampling and monthly composition by location are shown in Table 2 and Fig. 2. A total of 4 Anguilla species were identified in Taiwan: A. japonica, A. marmorata, A. bicolor pacifica, and A. luzonensis. Three eel species were found in Luzon Island: A. marmorata, A. bicolor pacifica, and A. luzonensis. Five eel species were identified in Mindanao Island: A. marmorata, A. bicolor pacifica, A. luzonensis, A. celebesensis, and A. interioris. Four species were found in Manado, Sulawesi, Indonesia: A. marmorata, A. bicolor pacifica, A. celebesensis, and A. interioris. Only A. japonica and A. marmorata were identified in Shanghai, China. In this study, all eel species other than A. japonica and A. marmorata were excluded from analysis.
The Siouguluan River, Taiwan was dominated by A. marmorata (>99%) throughout the year; only few A. japonica glass eels were found in winter (Table 2; Fig. 2). In the Yilan River, Taiwan, A. marmorata was found throughout the year, whereas A. japonica was abundant in winter (Table 2; Fig. 2). In the Donggang River, Taiwan, A. marmorata was observed during most of the year and was more abundant in summer, whereas A. japonica was more abundant in winter (Table 2; Fig. 2). In the Danshui River, Taiwan, A. japonica was far more abundant than A. marmorata in winter, and A. marmorata was found almost year round but was more abundant in spring (Table 2; Fig. 2). In Shanghai, China, A. marmorata was only observed in May during the sampling period from January to May (Table 2). In the Philippines and Manado, A. marmorata was the most dominant eel species and no A. japonica specimens were found (Table 2).
Temperature and Salinity Tolerance of A. marmorata
A. marmorata glass eels were maintained at 5°C, 10°C, 15°C, or 20°C; each temperature group was kept under 3 salinity conditions: 0% (0 psu), 50% (17 psu), or 100% (35 psu) seawater. The same experiment was repeated on November 2011, and similar results were obtained. Thus, the data were pooled for analysis. All glass eels died within 1 day at 5°C in all salinity groups (Table 3). In the 10°C and 15°C groups, glass eels only died in 100% (35 psu) seawater (Table 3). In the 20°C groups, no glass eels died at any salinity level after 1 week of observation (Table 3). The effect of water temperature on the survival rate of glass eels was significant (p = 0.01, F = 9.88, df = 3). Although the effect of salinity on the survival rate of glass eels was not significant overall (p = 0.14, F = 2.76, df = 2), A. marmorata glass eels exhibited temperature-dependent mortality in 100% seawater (Table 3).
SST and Surface Currents in East Asia
The mean SST of East Asian coastal waters in summer (July 2009) and winter (January 2010) are shown in Fig. 3. During summer, the mean SST was >24°C in all areas except the Japan Sea (Fig. 3A). However, in winter, when the warm Kuroshio waters flow northward and the cold coastal waters flow southward, clear temperature fronts exist on the continental shelf of East Asia. The SST around northern Luzon Island was high (>25°C) in winter but <20°C on the coast of Southern China and Pacific coast of Japan and <15°C on the southern coast of Korea and central coast of China. SST was usually <5°C north of the Changjiang River in China and on the western coast of Korea (Fig. 3B). In the coastal waters around Taiwan, the mean SST in winter was higher in southeast sites (>24°C) than in northwest sites (<20°C), forming a clear temperature front (Fig. 3B).
In summer (June–August), the southwest warm monsoon prevails in East Asia. The main stream of the Kuroshio in the East China Sea typically flows along the steep continental slope [29]. The Taiwan Strait waters are dominated by waters from the South China Sea (Fig. 4A). The South China Sea Water flows northward from the South China Sea, passes through the Taiwan Strait, and finally merges with the Changjiang Diluted Water (CDW) (Fig. 4A). The Taiwan Warm Current flows northward and merges together with waters from the Taiwan Strait. Because of the high discharge of the outflow from the Changjiang River, it forms the CDW and flows eastward toward Jeju Island and the Japan Sea (Fig. 4A).
In winter (December–February) in East Asia, the Kuroshio intrudes into the Luzon Strait, which flows westward toward southern China and northward along the Taiwan Strait, forming the Taiwan Strait Warm Current (Fig. 4B). The Taiwan Warm Current flows northward toward the Changjiang River estuary throughout the year, even during strong northeast cold monsoons in winter [35]. The Kuroshio branch water turns westward at Kyushu Island, Japan, and forms the Jeju Warm Current (Fig. 4B). The Jeju Warm Current bifurcates into the eastward Tsushima Warm Current and the westward Yellow Sea Warm Current [36], [37]. Part of the Yellow Sea Warm Current flows into the Bohai Sea to compensate for the southward flow of cold coastal waters (Fig. 4B) [38]. The strong northeastern winds in winter push the coastal cold waters flowing southward along the coasts of China; they also push the eastern branch of the coastal waters of the Bohai Sea, namely, the West Korea Coast Current, to follow the western coast of Korea southward.
Discussion
A. marmorata and A. japonica have overlapping spawning sites and comparable larval durations [3], [12], [22]. In theory, glass eels of these species should be transported by the Kuroshio and its branch waters to similar habitats in East Asia. However, the present results show that their distribution patterns on the Kuroshio route are quite different. A. marmorata was found in abundance throughout the year in Luzon Island and the Siouguluan River, Taiwan, whereas A. japonica was rare in these locations [26] (Table 2). In the Donggang River in Taiwan and Yakushima Island in Southern Japan, A. marmorata and A. japonica were mainly found during summer and winter, respectively [39] (Table 2). In the Danshui River, Taiwan, A. marmorata recruitment occurred mainly in spring, while A. japonica recruitment occurred in winter and spring. In the Yilan River, Taiwan, A. marmorata was abundant almost throughout the year, while A. japonica was abundant in winter. It is known that the time differences among the recruitment sites for glass eels in Taiwan are only 1–3 weeks [5]. However, the distribution patterns and timings of both eel species in Taiwan are dramatically different. Furthermore, in Shanghai, only A. japonica was observed in winter and A. marmorata was found in May (spring). A. japonica glass eels were not found in the Philippines or Indonesia (Fig. 1, Table 2). These phenomena strongly suggest that some biotic or environmental factors may be involved in the distinct distribution patterns of these species in East Asia.
The salinity and temperature tests in the present study clearly show that A. marmorata cannot survive in cold waters regardless of salinity; the species also exhibits temperature-dependent mortality in seawater. In contrast, a previous study indicates that A. japonica glass eels can endure temperatures of 4°C for several months [24]. Meanwhile, the mean SST in Southeastern Taiwan, the Philippines, and Indonesia are all well above 24°C in winter (Fig. 3B)–locations where the A. marmorata glass eels but not the A. japonica glass eels are predominant. In contrast, the mean SSTs in northwestern Taiwan, China, Japan, and Korea are all well below 20°C in winter (Fig. 3B) where the A. japonica glass eels but not the A. marmorata glass eels are predominant. Therefore, the 24°C SST isotherm clearly separates the recruitment of these 2 eel species. The failed acclimation in cold seawater and predominant recruitment in hot areas indicate that A. marmorata glass eels prefer higher temperatures for recruitment. In contrast, the good acclimation of A. japonica glass eels in cold seawater and failed recruitment in hot areas indicate that A. japonica glass eels prefer lower recruitment temperatures. In Yakushima Island, A. marmorata glass eels are mainly found during hot summers [39]. Recruitment is concentrated during the hot season at higher latitudes. The lowest mean SST in the Danshui River, Taiwan, in winter coincides with the relative abundance of A. japonica glass eels over those of A. marmorata. On the other hand, the mean SST in the Yilan River in winter is at least 2°C lower than that in the Siouguluan River due to the upwelling effect of the Kuroshio there (Fig. 3B). The contrast recruitment patterns of both glass eels between the nearby Yilan and Siouguluan Rivers in Taiwan highlights the significant effect of seawater temperature on glass eel recruitment dynamics.
A. japonica glass eels spawn mainly in summer and are distributed in Taiwan, China, Korea, and Japan [40], [41]. Their recruitment occurs first in Taiwan around late October and ends in Northern China and the western coast of Korea around May [24]. The distribution of A. japonica glass eels matches the recorded flow of oceanic currents, indicating the strong dependence of larval transportation on available oceanic currents (Fig. 4B) [5]. Sinclair [42] proposed the “member–vagrant” hypothesis, which states that the marine larvae that survive to settle in appropriate habitats are retained by indicated oceanic currents; in this case, A. japonica glass eels transported to the appropriate habitats are “members,” while those transported to unsuitable habitats are “vagrants.” The recruitment of A. japonica glass eels preferably occurs in estuaries with mean SSTs <24°C (Fig. 5); those transported by the Mindanao Current and Kuroshio to non-preferable areas may not actively perform upstream migration in estuaries and are thus retained at sea. Although yellow-stage eels are able to survive in brackish water and seawater [43]–[45], seawater seems to be an unsuitable niche for marine anguillid eels since very few adults can be caught in the seawaters of tropical areas.
Glass eels could sense changes in water temperature as little as 1°C [46]. Matsui [47] found that Japanese glass eels can be caught in rivers with temperatures above 8–10°C. Han [24] suggested that Japanese glass eels do not migrate upstream when temperatures are below 5°C. In this study, the recruitment of Japanese glass eels ceased when the temperature exceeded 24°C. Based on Xiong et al. [48] and interviews with fishermen, the most suitable recruitment temperature for Japanese glass eels is between 14°C and 18°C. Thus, the recruitment tendency of Japanese glass eels is dependent upon temperature, forming a bell-shaped curve (Fig. 5). This explains why Japanese glass eels are very rare around Luzon Island and why there is almost no recruitment in Indonesia. Similar bell-shaped recruitment temperature preferences also exist in 2 other temperate eels, A. australis and A. dieffenbachii, which have optimal recruitment temperatures around 16.5°C and inhibitory migration temperatures of <12°C and >22°C [49]. When cold fronts invade Taiwan, the catch of A. marmorata glass eels decreases significantly; meanwhile, glass eels are far more abundant in Eastern Taiwan (i.e., the Siouguluan and Yilan Rivers) than in Northwestern Taiwan (Danshui River). In Shanghai, no A. marmorata glass eels were caught during the winter, suggesting that its recruitment ceases at temperatures below 15°C. Taken together, the higher the water temperature, the more upstream activity A. marmorata glass eels perform (Fig. 5). The opposite water temperature preferences of the A. marmorata and the A. japonica glass eels is possibly one important behavior trait that shapes their distinct dispersal patterns in East Asia.
The mean SSTs in Korea and the coasts north of the Changjiang River in China are <5°C in winter–a temperature that does not allow the survival of A. marmorata glass eels (Fig. 3B); the mean SSTs around Japan, the central areas of China, and the East China Sea are generally <15°C, which is also a temperature unsuitable for their survival. Thus, in winter, A. marmorata glass eels are “screened out” in large numbers in the northern areas of East Asia even if they are transported to these areas. However, in summer, the SSTs in all of East Asia are suitable for A. marmorata glass eel recruitment. Despite this, A. marmorata glass eels are seldom found in China or Korea during this time. In summer, there is a strong coastal current coming from the South China Sea that flows northward along the Chinese coast to the Changjiang River where it finally merges with the CDW (Fig. 4A). The outflow of the Changjiang River flows northeastward toward Jeju Island; these 2 waters efficiently block the invasions of Kuroshio and its branch waters into China and Korea (Fig. 4A). Thus, the approach of A. marmorata glass eels to China and Korea coasts is impaired in summer. Indeed, in Taiwan, A. marmorata glass eels are far more abundant in eastern sites than in western ones in summer (Fig. 2B; Han, per. comm.); this suggests that the Taiwan Strait Warm Current, which delivers glass eels to the Taiwan Strait [5], is also blocked by the South China Sea Water. Taken together, cold SSTs inhibit the distribution of A. marmorata glass eels to Northern China and Korea in winter. Furthermore, in summer, the coastal current from the South China Sea and CDW also block their approach to China and Korea. Thus, A. marmorata glass eels are mainly distributed in areas along the main stream of the Kuroshio and Mindanao Current (Fig. 1, 4A).
Some anguillid species may also share overlapping spawning areas and be transported by similar oceanic currents. For example, the American eel A. rostrata and the European eel A. anguilla both spawn in the Sargasso Sea [50]. The significantly longer larval duration of the European eel compared to that in the American eel allows their offspring to disperse separately on either side of the Atlantic Ocean [51]. Similarly, both A. reinhardtii and A. australis are dispersed by the South Equatorial Current [2]; the former ranges mainly between 20° and 34° S (tropical/subtropical waters) but the latter is distributed mainly from 35–44° S (temperate waters) in Australia [52], [53]. The longer duration of marine larval period in A. australis compared to that in A. reinhardtii is thought to be responsible for determining its geographical distribution [16]. On the other hand, the A. bicolor bicolor and A. mossambica glass eels supposedly spawn east of Madagascar [54]; the former species reaches the rivers of the eastern coast of Africa preferentially north of 20° S, while those of the latter are south of 20° S and are predominant in South Africa rivers [55], [56]. However, both species have comparable larval durations [57]. The distinct geographical distributions of these 2 eel species may possibly be because of their different temperature preferences, similar to the case in the present study.
In conclusion, the clear thermal fronts of seawaters around Taiwan in winter are important for the distinct biogeography of A. marmorata and A. japonica. Biological factors such as the length of larval duration, behavioral traits of the leptocephali, and temperature preferences of the glass eels combined with environmental factors such as spawning locations and available oceanic currents act together as limiting factors to shape the realized geographic distributions of these species. This provides some clues for other marine fish species that share overlapping spawning areas but are recruited to different habitats.
Acknowledgments
The authors thank the eel farmers and traders of Taiwan for providing related information. The average SST data of East Asia were calculated by the Department of Environmental Biology and Fisheries Science, National Taiwan Ocean University.
Author Contributions
Conceived and designed the experiments: YSH. Performed the experiments: AVY HZ CLH. Analyzed the data: YSH. Wrote the paper: YSH.
References
- 1.
Tesch FW (2003) The eel. Oxford: Blackwell Science. pp. 100–103.
- 2. Kuroki M, Aoyama J, Miller MJ, Watanabe S, Shinoda A, et al. (2008) Distribution and early life-history characteristics of anguillid leptocephali in the western South Pacific. Mar Freshw Res 59: 1035–1047.
- 3. Aoyama J (2009) Life history and evolution of migration in catadromous eels (genus Anguilla). Aqua-BioSci Monogr 2: 1–42.
- 4. Pous S, Feunteun E, Ellien C (2010) Investigation of tropical eel spawning area in the South-Western Indian Ocean: Influence of the oceanic circulation. Prog Oceanog 86: 396–413.
- 5.
Han YS, Zhang H, Tseng YH, Shen ML (2012) Larval Japanese eel (Anguilla japonica) as the sub-surface current bio-tracers in East Asia continental shelf. Fish Oceanog. In press.
- 6. Dannewitz J, Maes GE, Johansson L, Wickström H, Volckaert FAM (2005) Panmixia in the European eel: a matter of time. Proc R Soc B-Biol Sci 272: 1129–1137.
- 7. Han YS, Hung CL, Liao YF, Tzeng WN (2010) Population genetic structure of the Japanese eel Anguilla japonica: panmixia in spatial and temporal scales. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 41: 221–232.
- 8.
Han YS (2012) Wide geographic distribution with little population genetic differentiation: A case study of the Japanese eel Anguilla japonica. In: Sachiko N, Fujimoto M, editors. Eels: Physiology, Habitat and Conservation. New York: Nova Science Publishers, Inc. In Press.
- 9. Arai T, Limbong D, Otake T, Tsukamoto K (2001) Recruitment mechanisms of tropical eels Anguilla spp. and implications for the evolution of oceanic migration in the genus Anguilla. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 216: 253–264.
- 10. Sugeha HY Arai T, Miller MJ, Limbong D, Tsukamoto K (2001) Inshore migration of the tropical eels Anguilla spp. recruiting to the Poigar River estuary on north Sulawesi Island. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 221: 233–243.
- 11. Kuroki M, Aoyama J, Miller MJ, Yoshinaga T, Shinoda A, et al. (2009) Sympatric spawning of Anguilla marmorata and Anguilla japonica in the western North Pacific Ocean. J Fish Biol 74: 1853–1856.
- 12. Arai T, Aoyama J, Ishikawa S, Otake T, Miller MJ, et al. (2001) Early life history of tropical Anguilla leptocephali in the western Pacific Ocean. Mar Biol 138: 887–895.
- 13. Ishikawa S, Tsukamoto K, Nishida M (2004) Genetic evidence for multiple geographic populations of the giant mottled eel Anguilla marmorata in the Pacific and Indian oceans. Jpn J Ichthyol 51: 343–353.
- 14. Minegishi Y, Aoyama J, Tsukamoto K (2008) Multiple population structure of the giant mottled eel, Anguilla marmorata. Mol Ecol 17: 3109–3122.
- 15. Kuroki M, Aoyama J, Miller MJ, Wouthuyzen S, Arai T, et al. (2006) Contrasting patterns of growth and migration of tropical anguillid leptocephali in the western Pacific and Indonesian Seas. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 309: 233–246.
- 16. Shiao JC, Tzeng WN, Collins A, Iizuka Y (2002) Role of marine larval duration and growth rate of glass eels in determining the distribution of Anguilla reinhardtii and A. australis on Australian eastern coasts. Mar Freshwat Res 53: 687–695.
- 17. Ege V (1939) A revision of the genus Anguilla Shaw: a systematic, phylogenetic and geographical study. Dana Rep 16: 1–256.
- 18. Watanabe S, Aoyama J, Miller MJ, Ishikawa S, Feunteun E, et al. (2008) Evidence of population structure in the giant mottled eel, Anguilla marmorata, using total number of vertebrae. Copeia 3: 680–688.
- 19. Chow S, Kuroki H, Mochioka N, Kaji S, Okazaki M, et al. (2009) Discovery of mature freshwater eels in the open ocean. Fish Sci 75: 257–259.
- 20. Tsukamoto K (1992) Discovery of the spawning area for Japanese eel. Nature 356: 789–791.
- 21. Tsukamoto K (2006) Spawning of eels near a seamount: tiny transparent larvae of the Japanese eel collected in the open ocean reveal a strategic spawning site. Nature 493: 929.
- 22. Arai T, Marui M, Otake T, Tsukamoto K (2002) Inshore migration of tropical eel, Anguilla marmorata, from Taiwanese and Japanese coasts. Fish Sci 68: 152–157.
- 23. Cheng PW, Tzeng WN (1996) Timing of metamorphosis and estuarine arrival across the dispersal rang of Japanese eel Anguilla japonica. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 131: 87–86.
- 24. Han YS (2011) Temperature-dependent recruitment delay of the Japanese glass eel Anguilla japonica in East Asia. Mar Biol 158: 2349–2358.
- 25. Kimura S, Tsukamoto K, Sugimoto T (1994) A model for the larval migration of the Japanese eel: roles of the trade winds and salinity front. Mar Biol 119: 185–190.
- 26. Tabeta O, Tanimoto T, Takai T, Matsui I, Imamura T (1976) Seasonal occurrence of anguillid elvers in Cagayan River, Luzon Island, Philippines. Bull Jpn Soc Sci Fish 42: 421–426.
- 27. Dou S, Miller MJ, Tsukamoto K (2003) Growth, pigmentation and activity of juvenile Japanese eels in relation to temperature and fish size. J Fish Biol 63: 152–165.
- 28. Fukuda N, Kuroki M, Shinoda A, Yamada Y, Okamura A, et al. (2009) Influence of water temperature and feeding regime on otolith growth in Anguilla japonica glass eels and elvers: does otolith growth cease at low temperatures? J Fish Biol 74: 1915–1933.
- 29. Chen CTA (2009) Chemical and physical fronts in the Bohai, Yellow and East China Seas. J Mar Sys 78: 394–410.
- 30. Jan S, Wang J, Chern CS, Chao SY (2002) Seasonal variation of the circulation in the Taiwan Strait. J Mar Sys 35: 249–268.
- 31. Teng HY, Lin YS, Tzeng CS (2009) A new Anguilla species and a reanalysis of the phylogeny of freshwater eels. Zool Stud 48: 808–822.
- 32. Watanabe S, Aoyama J, Tsukamoto K (2009) A new species of freshwater eel Anguilla luzonensis (Teleostei: Anuguillidae) from Luzon Island of the Philippines. Fish Sci 75: 387–392.
- 33. Han YS, Yu CH, Yu HT, Chang CW, Liao IC, et al. (2002) The exotic American eel in Taiwan: ecological implications. J Fish Biol 60: 1608–1612.
- 34. Chen CTA (2008) Distributions of nutrients in the East China Sea and the South China Sea connection. J Oceanog 64: 737–751.
- 35. Su JL, Guan BX, Jiang JZ (1990) The Kuroshio. Part I. Physical features. Oceanog. March Biol Ann Rev 28: 11–71.
- 36. Hsueh Y, Lie HJ, Ichikawa H (1996) On the branching of the Kuroshio west of Kyushu J Geophys Res 101: 3851–3857.
- 37. Hsueh Y (2000) The Kuroshio in the ECS. J Mar Syst 24: 131–139.
- 38.
Guan BX (1994) Patterns and structures of the currents in Bohai, Huanghai and East China Seas. In: Zhou D, Liang YB, Zeng CK, editors. Oceanology of China Seas V1. London: Kluwer Academic Publishers. pp. 17–26.
- 39. Yamamoto T, Mochioka N, Nakazono A (2001) Seasonal occurrence of anguillid glass eels at Yakushima Island, Japan. Fish Sci 67: 530–532.
- 40. Tsukamoto K, Yamada Y, Okamura A, Kaneko T, Tanaka H, et al. (2009) Positive buoyancy in eel leptocephali: an adaptation for life in the ocean surface layer. Mar Biol 156: 835–846.
- 41. Zenimoto K, Kitagawa T, Miyazaki S, Sasai Y, Sasaki H, et al. (2009) The effects of seasonal and interannual variability of oceanic structure in the western Pacific North Equatorial Current on larval transport of the Japanese eel Anguilla japonica. J Fish Biol 74: 1878–1890.
- 42.
Sinclair M (1988) Marine populations: an essay on population regulation and speciation. Seattle: University of Washington Press. 252 p.
- 43. Tsukamoto K, Nakai I, Tesch FW (1998) Do all freshwater eels migrate? Nature 396: 635–636.
- 44. Tsukamoto K, Arai T (2001) Facultative catadromy of the eel Anguilla japonica between freshwater and seawater habitats. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 220: 265–276.
- 45. Tzeng WN, Shiao JC, Iizuka Y (2002) Use of otolith Sr:Ca ratios to study the riverine migratory behaviors of Japanese eel Anguilla japonica. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 245: 213–221.
- 46. Kim WS, Yoon SJ, Moon HT, Lee TW (2002) Effects of water temperature changes on the endogenous and exogenous rhythms of oxygen consumption in glass eels Anguilla japonica. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 243: 209–216.
- 47. Matsui I (1952) Studies on the morphology, ecology, and pond-culture of the Japanese eel (Anguilla japonica Temminck & Schlegel). J Shimonoseki Coll Fish 2: 1–245.
- 48. Xiong GQ, Deng SM, Zang ZJ, Xu XL (1992) Stocks identification of the anguillid elvers from the coastal regions in China. Acta Zool Sinica 38: 254–265.
- 49. August SM, Hicks BJ (2008) Water temperature and upstream migration of glass eels in New Zealand: implications of climate change. Environ. Biol. Fish 81: 195–205.
- 50.
Schmidt J (1925) The breeding places of the eel. Ann Rep Smithson Inst 1924: 279–316. pp. 279–316.
- 51. Wang CH, Tzeng WN (2000) The timing of metamorphosis and growth rates of American and European eel leptocephali–a mechanism of larval segregative migration. Fish Res 46: 191–205.
- 52. Beumer JP, Sloane R (1990) Distribution and abundance of glass-eels Anguilla spp. in East Australian waters. Internat Rev der Ges Hydrobiol 75: 721–36.
- 53.
Beumer JP (1996) Freshwater eels. In: McDowall RM, editor. Freshwater Fishes of Southeastern Australia. Sydney: Reed Books. 247 p.
- 54. Robinet T, Lecomte-Finiger R, Escoubeyrou K, Feunteun E (2003) Tropical eels Anguilla spp. recruiting to Réunion Island in the Indian Ocean: taxonomy, patterns of recruitment and early life histories. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 259: 263–272.
- 55. Jubb RA (1964) The eels of South African rivers and observations on their ecology. Monogr Biol 14: 186–205.
- 56. Bruton MN, Bok AH, Davies MTT (1987) Life history styles of diadromous fishes in inland waters of southern Africa. Am Fish Soc Symp 1: 104–121.
- 57. Robinet T, Réveillac E, Kuroki M, Aoyama J, Tsukamoto K, et al. (2008) New clues for freshwater eels (Anguilla spp.) migration routes to eastern Madagascar and surrounding islands. Mar Biol 154: 453–463.