Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Phylogenetic Analysis of Bolivian Bat Trypanosomes of the Subgenus Schizotrypanum Based on Cytochrome b Sequence and Minicircle Analyses

  • Lineth García,

    Affiliation Instituto de Investigaciones Biomédicas IIBISMED, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Mayor de San Simón, Cochabamba, Bolivia

  • Sylvia Ortiz,

    Affiliation Programa de Biología Celular y Molecular, ICBM, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile

  • Gonzalo Osorio,

    Affiliation Programa de Microbiología, ICBM, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile

  • Mary Cruz Torrico,

    Affiliation Instituto de Investigaciones Biomédicas IIBISMED, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Mayor de San Simón, Cochabamba, Bolivia

  • Faustino Torrico,

    Affiliation Instituto de Investigaciones Biomédicas IIBISMED, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Mayor de San Simón, Cochabamba, Bolivia

  • Aldo Solari

    asolari@med.uchile.cl

    Affiliation Programa de Biología Celular y Molecular, ICBM, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile

Abstract

The aim of this study was to establish the phylogenetic relationships of trypanosomes present in blood samples of Bolivian Carollia bats. Eighteen cloned stocks were isolated from 115 bats belonging to Carollia perspicillata (Phyllostomidae) from three Amazonian areas of the Chapare Province of Bolivia and studied by xenodiagnosis using the vectors Rhodnius robustus and Triatoma infestans (Trypanosoma cruzi marenkellei) or haemoculture (Trypanosoma dionisii). The PCR DNA amplified was analyzed by nucleotide sequences of maxicircles encoding cytochrome b and by means of the molecular size of hyper variable regions of minicircles. Ten samples were classified as Trypanosoma cruzi marinkellei and 8 samples as Trypanosoma dionisii. The two species have a different molecular size profile with respect to the amplified regions of minicircles and also with respect to Trypanosoma cruzi and Trypanosoma rangeli used for comparative purpose. We conclude the presence of two species of bat trypanosomes in these samples, which can clearly be identified by the methods used in this study. The presence of these trypanosomes in Amazonian bats is discussed.

Introduction

Short-tailed bats of the genus Carollia are widely distributed in the New World tropics. Also, there are detailed altitudinal records from the Peruvian Andes and samples of the three South American species found on both sides of the Andes are available, allowing testing of models of diversification across the Andes. Given the ability to fly, it would be expected dispersal might be expected to play a stronger role than vicariance in shaping bat phylogeographical patterns of variation [1]. Although Artibeus, Carollia, and Glossophaga generally feed on plant sources, it is clear that they also frequently consume significant quantities of insects [2]. Bats play a crucial role in tropical ecosystems by dispersing seeds, pollinating flowers, and controlling insect populations. C. perspicillata may be considered as understorey specialists (from 0–2.5 m high). The short-tailed fruit-eating bats, C. perspicillata and C. brevicauda, feed primarily on understorey plants such as Piper, Solanum and Vismia [3]. Roosting habits of these bats are caves, abandoned mine and rail tunnels, active road tunnel, hollow trees, drain pipes and culverts, unused/abandoned buildings or rooms, attics, basements, under bridges, unused cisterns, darkened recesses in rock formations or stream banks. Although there is limited field and experimental evidence, haematophagous arthropods can act as vectors of trypanosomes among bats [2]. Trypanosomes (genus Trypanosoma) are widespread blood parasites of vertebrates, usually transmitted by arthropod or leech vectors. Most trypanosome-infected bats are insectivorous and infection could also occur through the ingestion of infected arthropods. Bats are long-lived species and infections persist for years, with trypanosomes localising in skeletal, cardiac and stomach muscle cells [4], [5]. Variable prevalence of trypanosomes in bats has been reported in surveys conducted throughout the world. In South American bats, prevalence varied widely. Colombian bats had a prevalence of approximately 9.0% infected with Schizotrypanum spp. [6], [7]. Surveys performed in the Amazonia of Brazil; detected trypanosomes prevalence of 2.4–4.6%, by means of blood smears [8], [9]. The strong association between Chiroptera order and all Schizotrypanum spp. suggests a long shared evolutionary history. Trypanosomatids parasitize many vertebrate and invertebrate phyla. Several trypanosome species are agents of disease in humans and/or livestock particularly in the tropics. For example, Trypanosoma brucei causes human African trypanosomiasis or sleeping sickness, while Trypanosoma cruzi causes Chagas disease in South and Central America. There is also strengthened support for two deep clades, one comprising a wide selection of mammalian trypanosomes and a tsetse fly-transmitted reptilian trypanosome, and the other combining two bird trypanosome subclades. Most clades are associated with a type of vertebrate or invertebrate host, or both, indicating that ‘host fitting’ has been the principal mechanism for evolution of trypanosomes [10]. The type species of the subgenus Schizotrypanum is T. cruzi, which infects man and a wide variety of mammalian hosts. Six different T. cruzi lineages have been described, named TcI-TcVI [11]. In the southern cone of South America, isolates from humans and vectors of domestic and peridomestic transmission cycles are predominantly of lineages TcII,Tc V and Tc VI. Tc I and Tc bat have been reported in the sylvatic cycle throughout Latin America (Tc I present in bat genus such as Thyroptera, Carollia and Tc bat in Myotis, Noctilio). Tc I predominantly infects humans in endemic areas northwest of the Amazon basin [12]. In contrast, all other species traditionally classified as Schizotrypanum are restricted to bats. Trypanosoma cruzi marinkellei is indigenous to South and Central America, and restricted to bats [13]. T. c. marinkellei is, apparently, only transmitted by triatomines of the genus Cavernicola, which is found associated with bat colonies in caverns, hollow trees and palms [6], [5]. Also strains of Trypanosoma vespertilionis and Trypanosoma dionisii from European bats have been distinguished from other Schizotrypanum species [13], [14]. T. dionisii, T.c. marinkellei and T. cruzi, belonging to the subgenus Schizotrypanum, can invade mammalian cells. These Trypanosoma species display distinct surface profiles but invade host cells through a common mechanism involving lysosome mobilization to the site of parasite entry [15]. Anti -T. dionisii monoclonal antibodies were tested against various strains of T. dionisii, T. vespertilionis, T. cruzi and T. c. marinkellei. The cross reactions between T. dionisii and T. cruzi demonstrate a strong correlation between T. dionisii and TcII-TcVI. Similarly TcI and T. c. marinkellei show very similar antigenic pattern [16]. The subgenus Schizotrypanum includes several trypanosome species that are difficult to discriminate by morphological examination [17]. Molecular phylogenetic data based on the SSU rRNA indicated that the broad host-range trypanosome Trypanosoma rangeli and the rat trypanosome Trypanosoma cornohini should also be reclassified in the subgenus Schizotrypanum [18]. T. rangeli are kinetoplastid protozoa which have been largely recognized and defined in several Latin American countries in relation to T. cruzi, because the two trypanosome species are frequently found in mixed infections in triatominae vectors, humans and a variety of wild and domestic mammals [19].

Trypanosomes are protozoa belonging to the Kinetoplastida order. The characteristic of this order is a highly unusual, concatenated mitochondrial DNA structure, the kinetoplast DNA (kDNA). Two types of DNA molecules are present, the maxicircles and minicircles. The maxicircles are 22,000 to 33,000 bp in size; they encode mitochondrial proteins. Along with other mitochondrial genes cytochrome b (cytB) are present in 10 to 20 identical copies. The cytB genes are transcribed but they suffer a posttranscriptional modification at the 5′end called editing, in which the mature messenger RNA changes its sequence by multiple insertions and deletions of uridines [20]. In contrast, minicircles are highly heterogeneous in nucleotide sequence; however, the size of minicircles is virtually conserved in T. cruzi populations [21]. Restriction endonuclease and sequence analyses showed that a T. cruzi minicircle is composed of 4,3,2 or 1 conserved regions of approximately 100 to 150 bp that contain 3 hyper conserved sequence blocks used as universal probes, which are flanked by variable regions with sequences that diverge almost completely as determined in T. cruzi and T. rangeli [22]. No information is available about trypanosomes minicircles size circulating in bats. With the goal to establish the phylogenetic relationships of trypanosomes present in blood samples of Bolivian Carollia bats, we determined the nucleotide sequence of a portion of the cytB gene and characterized the size of the minicircle variable region in trypanosome stocks isolated from Amazonian bats of Bolivia. We include in this work T. cruzi and Schizotrypanum stocks available information of the cytB in GenBank from Brazilian bats for comparative purposes.

Methods

Origin of the Stocks and Ethics Statement

Bats were captured and manipulated using nets and procedures permitted by the Viceministerio de Medio Ambiente, Biodiversidad, Cambios Climáticos y Gestión y Desarrollo Forestal of Bolivia.

Peripheral blood samples were taken from all bats through xenodiagnosis to further culture in NNN agar medium for T.c. marenkellei isolation and haemoculture for T.dionisii. All bats were analyzed by xenodiagnosis using five nymphs each of the species R. robustus and T. infestans. All positive isolates were finally cloned [23] and harvested by centrifugation in the log phase. DNA purification was performed using the High Pure DNA preparation kit from ROCHE according to the manufacturer instructions.

PCR Amplification and Analysis of Cytochrome b Sequences

PCR amplification and sequencing of the partial sequences (≈ 516 bp) of cytB from eighteen bat isolates was performed as described previously. The primers used for amplification of the 5′ half of cytB were: p18 (5′-GACAGGATTGAGAAGCGAGAGAG-3′) and p20 (5′-CAAACCTATCACAAAAAGCATCTG-3′). Reaction conditions were the same as described before. [24]. Thirty-five cycles (94°C, 1 min; 50°C, 30 s; 72°C, 90 s) followed by a final elongation step (5 min, 72°C) were performed. Sequence determination of PCR products was carried out with the Dye Terminator Cycle Sequencing Ready Reaction kit (Perkin-Elmer) on an ABI-373 Automated DNA Sequencer. Sequences of bat trypanosomes derived from this study were aligned with sequences determined in previous studies of bat T. cruzi stocks, other trypanosomes isolated from bats and T. rangeli available in GenBank [24], [25]. Sequences obtained from this work have accession numbers JN651278 to JN651295. Reference sequences used for tree construction are the following: FJ900248, FJ002262, FJ900247, AJ130927, AJ130932, AJ130933, EU856368, AJ439725, AJ439721, FJ555642, FJ555651, FJ002261, FJ002258, AJ130938, FJ549392, FJ555639, FJ900255, FJ002263 and FJ900249. Sequences Tcm B3 and Tcm B34 were provided directly by Dr. S. Brisse [24]. The evolutionary history was inferred by using the Maximum Likelihood method based on the Tamura-Nei model. A discrete Gamma distribution was used to model evolutionary rate differences among sites (5 categories). All positions containing gaps and missing data were eliminated. There were a total of 382 positions in the final dataset. Alignments were made using ClustalW and manually refined. Phylogenetic analysis was performed using maximum likelihood (ML) method (using the Kimura two-parameter model) listed in the MEGA 5.05 analytical package.

Minicircle PCR Assay

The amplification reactions were performed in triplicate with oligonucleotides 121 (5′-AAATAATGTACGGGT/GGAGATGCATGA-3′) and 122 (5′- GGTTCGATTGGGGTTGGTGTAATATA-3′), which anneal to the four conserved regions present in trypanosomes minicircles [26]. The DNA samples for PCR were boiled for 15 minutes and 5 µl of supernatant was used as DNA template in 50 µl final volumen [22]. Each experiment included a negative control that contained water instead of DNA and a positive control that contained purified DNA of T. cruzi. The PCR products were analyzed by electrophoresis in 2% agarose gels and visualized by staining with ethidium bromide.

Results

A total of 115 bats were caught in three Amazonian areas of Chapare Province, Bolivia [Fig. 1]. All 22 bats from San Cristobal, belongs to Carollia perspicillata species. From 24 bats found at Ivirgarzama, 2 were Desmodus rotundus, 2 Glossophaga soricina and 20 C. perspicillata. In Guacharos, 68 bats were found; 6 Platyrrhinus helleri, 14 Desmodus rotundus and 48 C. perspicillata. All 18 trypanosomes isolated in this study were recovered from bats belonging to C. perspicillata the most abundant species in the area (78%). Tc. marinkellei was present in bats from San Cristóbal (5), Ivirgarzama (4) and Guacharos (1). T. dionisii was isolated only from bats caught in Ivirgarzama (1) and Guacharos (7) [Table 1]. Isolates of T. dionisii were obtained only by haemoculture, while T.c. marinkellei isolates were obtained by haemoculture, and xenodiagnosis, showing that these species were able to establish infection in triatomines of the genus Rhodnius, the endemic triatomine species in the studied Amazonian biodeme. There was no positive xenodiagnosis when T. infestans was used. The comparison of sequences from Bolivian bat isolates with those previously studied from Brazil allowed the classification of the isolates in two species, T. c. marinkellei and T. dionisii; both equally frequent in infected bats. Ten trypanosome isolates (24, 26, 27, 79, 80, 82, 84, 225, 232 and 278) from Bolivian bats grouped closely with the Brazilian stocks of T. c. marinkellei 1089 (FJ900248), 1093 (FJ002262) and 1067 (FJ900247), even though they form a separate cluster with a high bootstrap value and all had the same haplotype. Only the reference strain Tcm 34 clustered outside.Other isolates (83, 266, 297, 272, 274, 286, 289 and 296) grouped closely with the T. dionisii stock 1110 (FJ 002263) from Brazil and more distantly with the T. dionisii stock 211 (FJ 900249) from Brazil [Fig. 2]. This figure also shows phylogenetic relationships between T. cruzi clones and T. cruzi from bats (Tc bat), including the T. rangeli San Agustín stock (FJ 900255). The total DNA of each bat trypanosome isolates and T. cruzi clone was used as a template for minicircle PCR amplification with the universal primers 121 and 122 which align in the hyper conserved sequences present in all trypanosomes. The T. cruzi clones belonging to all DTUs (Tc I-TcVI) displayed a unique band close to 330 bp, while the PCR of a T. rangeli isolate generated bands close to 330 and 380 bp [Fig. 3]. However, isolates 80, 82, 84 belonging to T. c. marinkellei and 24, 26, 27, 79, Tcm 1909, Tcm B3 (not shown) displayed a different pattern of amplicons close to 280 and 350 bp. Other bat isolates belonging to T. dionisii, on the contrary, displayed a unique band around 600 bp. Results not shown indicate the smaller size of the cultured forms of the Bolivian T. dionisii isolates compared to those of T. c. marinkellei.

thumbnail
Figure 1. Geographic origin of Trypanosomes isolated from bats in the Amazonian Bioma of Province Chapare, Bolivia.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0036578.g001

thumbnail
Figure 2. Phylogenetic analysis of sequences of the mitochondrial cytochrome b (cyt B) gene of Trypanosomatidae isolated from bats.

The evolutionary history was inferred by using the Maximum Likelihood method based on the Tamura-Nei model. Evolutionary analyses were conducted in MEGA5. Numbers at nodes are bootstrap values derived from 1000 replicates. For sequence information see Materials and Methods section.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0036578.g002

thumbnail
Figure 3. Minicircle PCR amplified analysis with primers 121–122.

A. Electrophoresis pattern obtained for 10 Trypanosome stocks: six T. cruzi reference stocks DTUs I-VI (lanes 2–7); three T.c. marinkellei representative samples from this study (lanes 8–10); one T. rangeli reference stock (lane 11). B. Profiles obtained for three T. dionisii samples from this study (lanes 2–4); M: molecular weight marker.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0036578.g003

thumbnail
Table 1. Sample identification, geographical origin, reservoir and Trypanosome species studied and minicircle PCR assay.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0036578.t001

Discussion

We show in this work that T. cruzi is different from T.c. marinkellei and T. dionisii in the minicircle variable region size. We used the faster-evolving gene cytB to investigate further the genetic distinctness and phylogenetic relationships among Schizotrypanum taxa. Phylogenetic relationships among cytB sequences have recently been shown to be congruent with rRNA promoter sequence data [27]. CytB phylogenetic analysis fully supported the high distinctness among T. rangeli, T. dionisii, T. cruzi and T. c. marinkellei. Bolivian trypanosomes from bats, studied here, were grouped as T. c. marinkellei or T. dionisii, in contrast to Brazil, which also includes the T. cruzi lineages TcI, TcII and TcIII (present in bat genus such as Carollia, Myotis, Noctilio and Thyroptera) [25], and T. rangeli as described [28], [29]. All taxa appeared to be roughly equidistant in our analysis, with the exception of T. cruzi and T. c. marinkellei, which appeared to be more closely related, as described for Brazilian bat trypanosomes.

However the Bolivian T. c. marinkellei are genetically distant from the Brazilian ones, indicating that trypanosomes of this species are genetically heterogeneous as described [24]. Most of bats studied here belong to the family Phyllostomidae, which exhibit varied alimentary habits, including insectivorous, therefore this represents the probable infection route by feeding of Cavernicola triatomines. A common ancestry of T. cruzi and T.c.marinkellei was suggested by 18S rRNA data [18] and phylogenetic analyses demonstrated that Tc bat indeed belongs to T. cruzi and not to other closely related bat trypanosomes of the subgenus Schizotrypanum, and that although separated by large genetic distances Tcbat is closest to lineage Tc I [12].

In the present study, comprising a survey for bat trypanosomes in an Amazonian biome of Bolivia, the majority of cultures were identified as T.c. marinkellei and T. dionisii based on cytB gene. The prevalence of T.c. marinkellei was 9.0% and 7% of T. dionisii. The results strongly supported the suitability of this sequence for analysis of phylogenetic relationships among Schizotrypanum, as previously demonstrated for other clades of trypanosomes from mammals [30].

Phylogenetic relationships inferred using ssrRNA, gGAPDH and cytB generated trees with similar topologies and were also congruent with results based on cytB sequences. Three major clades of bat trypanosomes within the subgenus Schizotrypanum were strongly supported in all phylogenies regardless of data sets and analytical methods in which the clade containing T. cruzi was closer to that containing T.c. marinkellei than to T. dionisii. No other species of Schizotrypanum besides these species before mentioned were isolated from bats in this study, suggesting that other species of this subgenus are rare in this area of Bolivia and/or difficult to cultivate. Closest to the T. cruzi clade is T. rangeli, another American trypanosome of wild mammals also transmitted by triatomine bugs but rarely found in bats, except in Brazil. Only two cultures of T. rangeli from bats have been confirmed using morphological, biological and molecular parameters [29]. Phylogeographical, ecological and biological analyses of isolates classified as Schizotrypanum disclosed some patterns of association with bat species, biomes and geographic origin, as well as with their behavior in culture, triatomine bugs and mice. Our results show overlapping geographic areas of the two Schizotrypanum species in the Amazonia of Bolivia. T. c. marinkellei was found in bats from phyllostomid species (insectivorous, frugivorous) corroborating a strong association with this bat family, as suggested previously [6]. However, bats of this family were also infected by T. dionisii as shown in this and other studies [31]. The prevalence of T. c. marinkellei may be explained by the abundance of phyllostomid bat, whereas its distribution may be determined by that or its triatomine vector, Cavernicola pillosa, which shares caves, holes in trees, and palm leafs with bats.

We have demonstrated the existence in Bolivia of T. dionsii, another trypanosome found in neotropical bats. However the scarcity of T. dionisii in two areas studied here can be explained by the abundance and distribution of its vectors. The genetic distances of bat trypanosomes provided by this study are better explained by the ability of bats to disperse over large areas, crossing oceans and continents rather than by vicariance events. The reconstruction of the evolutionary histories of parasites has been linked to the comparable histories of their host. Phylogenetic and biogeographic analyses have suggested that Africa is the centre of origin of modern-day bat families, with a Southern Hemisphere origin in the Cretaceous. Two scenarios could account for the dispersal of bats from Africa in the Eocene: northwards dispersal to Eurasia and via Beringia into America or transatlantic dispersal from Africa to America through island hopping or direct flight [32], [33].

The estimates of divergence time based on nuclear and mitochondrial genes suggested that T. cruzi may have evolved from bat-restricted trypanosomes 10–20 mya [34]. Limited divergence among Schizotrypanum spp. is compatible with recent diversification, and their present day distribution is equally consistent with hypotheses that T. cruzi evolved from a bat-restricted trypanosome or vice versa [18], [24].

Comparative analyses performed in this study showed that the morphology of blood and axenic culture forms (data not shown) and minicircle variable region size should be considered as the preliminary parameters to assign trypanosomes to the subgenus Schizotrypanum. A broad phylogeographical analysis including to determine the abiotic factors affecting the distribution patterns of flora and fauna, to compare the adaptations of organisms to different environmental conditions, to explain the historical and geographical reasons that determine the distribution of an organism in space and time, to evaluate the biological interactions that affect the distribution pattern of organisms, to recognize pattern of distribution of bat trypanosomes at the regional and global from Africa, Europe and America, is still required to understand the evolutionary history of Schizotrypanum and bat trypanosomes in general.

Acknowledgments

We dedicate this work in the memory of Dr. Cornelis J. Marinkelle, pioneer of tropical medicine studies who died on 18 th January 2012. View Within Article. The authors thank JC Huaranca, O. Tenorio and J. Espinoza from the University of San Simon for their technical assistance in the field work and identification of animals and triatomines.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: AS LG SO. Performed the experiments: SO. Analyzed the data: GO SO. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: LG MT FT. Wrote the paper: AS SO LG.

References

  1. 1. Hoffmann FG, Baker RJ (2003) Comparative phylogeography of short-tailed bats (Carollia: Phyllostomidae). Molec Ecol 12(12): 3403–3414.
  2. 2. Thomas ME, Rasweiler IV JJ, D’Alessandro A (2007) Experimental transmission of the parasitic flagellates Trypanosoma cruzi and Trypanosoma rangeli between triatomine bugs or mice and captive neotropical bats. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz 102(5): 559–65.
  3. 3. Bernard E (2001) Vertical stratification of bat communities in 4. primary forests of Central Amazon, Brazil. J Tropic Ecol 17: 115–126.
  4. 4. Gardner RA, Molyneux DH (1988) Schizotrypanum in British bats. Parasitology 97: 43–50.
  5. 5. Molyneux DH (1991) Trypanosomes of bats. In: Kreier, JP Baker, JR (eds) Parasitic Protozoa. Academic Press, New York, 95–223:
  6. 6. Marinkelle CJ (1976) The biology of the trypanosomes of bats. In: Lumdsen, W.H.R., Evans, DA (Eds.), Biology of the Kinetoplastida. Academic Press, New York, 175–216:
  7. 7. Marinkelle CJ (1982) Prevalence of Trypanosoma cruzi-like infection of Colombian bats. Ann Trop Med Parasitol 76: 125–134.
  8. 8. Dias E, Mello GB, Costa D, Damasceno R, Azevedo M (1942) Investigacoes sobre esquizotripanose de morcegos no Estado do Pará. Encontro do barbeiro “Carvenicola pilosa” como transmisor. Rev Bras Biol 2: 03–110.
  9. 9. Deane L (1961) Tripanossomídeos de mamíferos da Regiao Amazonica I. Alguns flagelados encontrados no sangue de mamíferos silvestres do Estado do Pará. Rev Inst Med Trp Sao Paulo 3: 5.
  10. 10. Hamilton PB, Gibson WC, Stevens JR (2007) Patterns of co-evolution between trypanosomes and their hosts deduced from ribosomal RNA and protein-coding gene phylogenies. Mol Phylogenet Evol 44(1): 15–25.
  11. 11. Zingales B, Andrade SG, Briones MR, Campbell DA, Chiari E, et al. (2009) Second Satellite Meeting. (7): A new consensus for Trypanosoma cruzi intraspecific nomenclature: second revision meeting recommends TcI to TcVI. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 104. pp. 1051–4.
  12. 12. Marcili A, Lima L, Cavazzana M, Junqueira ACV, Veludo HH, et al. (2009) A new genotype of Trypanosome cruzi associated with bats evidenced by phylogenetic analyses using SSU rDNA, cytochrome b and Histone H2B genes and genotyping based in ITS1 rDNA. Parasitology 136: 641–655.
  13. 13. Baker JR, Miles MA, Godfrey DG, Barrett TV (1978) Biochemical characterization of some species of Trypanosoma (Schizotrypanum) from bats (Microchiroptera). Am J Trop Med Hyg 27: 483–491.
  14. 14. Taylor AER, Edwards YH, Smith V, Baker JR, Woo PTK, et al. (1982) Trypanosoma (Schizotrypanum) species from insectivorous bats (Microchiroptera): characterization by polypeptide profiles. Syst Parasitol 4: 155–168.
  15. 15. Maeda FY, Cortez C, Alves RM, Yoshida N (2012) Mammalian cell invasion by closely related Trypanosoma species Trypanosoma dionisii and Trypanosoma cruzi. Acta Trop 121(2): 141–7.
  16. 16. Petry K, Baltz T, Schottelius J (1986) Differentiation of Trypanosoma cruzi, Trypanosoma cruzi marinkellei, Trypanosoma dionisii and Trypanosoma vespertilionis by monoclonal antibodies. Acta Trop 43(1): 5–13.
  17. 17. Hoare CA (1972) The Trypanosomes of Mammals. Blackwell, Scientific Publications, Oxford, 1–748:
  18. 18. Stevens JR (2008) Kinetoplastid phylogenetics, with special reference to the evolution of parasitic trypanosomes. Parasite 15: 226–232.
  19. 19. Vallejo GA, Guhl F, Carranza JC, Moreno J, Triana O, et al. (2003) Parity between kinetoplast DNA and mini-exon gene sequences supports either clonal evolution or speciation in Trypanosoma rangeli strains isolated from Rhodnius colombiensis, Rhodnius pallescens and Rhodnius prolixus in Colombia. Infect Genet Evol 3(1): 39–45.
  20. 20. Westenberger SJ, Cerqueira GC, El-Sayed NM, Zingales B, Campbell DA, et al. (2006) Trypanosome cruzi mitochondrial maxicircles display species- and strain-specific variation and a conserved element in the non-coding region. Genomics 7: 60.
  21. 21. Telleria J, Lafay B, Virreira M, Barnabé C, Tibayrenc M, et al. (2006) Trypanosoma cruzi: sequence analysis of the variable region of kinetoplast minicircles. Exp Parasitol 114(4): 279–88.
  22. 22. Botero A, Ortiz S, Muñoz S, Triana O, Solari A (2010) Differentiation of Trypanosoma cruzi and Trypanosome rangeli of Colombia using minicircle hybridization tests. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 68(3): 265–70.
  23. 23. Yeo M, Lewis MD, Carrasco HJ, Acosta N, Llewellyn M, et al. (2007) Resolution of multiclonal infections of Trypanosoma cruzi from naturally infected triatomine bugs and from experimentally infected mice by direct plating on a sensitive solid medium. Int J Parasitol 37(1): 111–20.
  24. 24. Barnabe C, Brisse S, Tibayrenc M (2003) Phylogenetic diversity of bat trypanosomes of subgenus Schizotrypanum based on multilocus enzyme electrophoresis, random amplified polymorphic DNA, and cytochrome b nucleotide sequence analyses. (3): Infect Genet Evol 2. pp. 201–208.
  25. 25. Cavazzana M, Marcili A, Lima L, Maia da Silva F, Junqueira ACV, et al. (2010) Phylogeographical, ecological and biological pattern shown by nuclear (ssrRNA) and (gGAPDH) and mitochondrial (Cyt b) genes of trypanosomes of the subgenus Schizotrypanum parasitic in Brazilian bats. Int J Parasitol 40: 345–355.
  26. 26. Wincker P, Britto C, Pereira JB, Cardoso MA, Oelemann W, et al. (1994) Use of a simplified polymerase chain reaction procedure to detect Trypanosoma cruzi in blood samples from chronic chagasic patients in a rural endemic area. Am J Trop Med Hyg 51(6): 771–777.
  27. 27. Brisse S, Henriksson J, Barnabé C, Douzery EJ, Berkvens D, et al. (2003) Evidence for genetic exchange and hybridization in Trypanosoma cruzi based on nucleotide sequences and molecular karyotype. Infect Genet Evol 2: 173–183.
  28. 28. Lisboa CV, Pinho APS, Herrera H, Gerhard M, Cupolillo E, et al. (2008) Trypanosoma cruzi (Kinetoplastida, Trypanosomatidae) genotypes in neotropical bats in Brazil. Vet Parasitol 156: 314–318.
  29. 29. Maia da Silva F, Marcilli A, Lima L, Cavazzana M Jr, Ortiz PA, et al. (2009) Trypanosoma rangeli isolates of bats from Central Brazil: genotyping and phylogenetic analysis enable description of a new lineage using spliced-leader gene sequences. Acta Trop 109: 199–207.
  30. 30. Maia da Silva F, Noyes H, Campaner M, Junqueira AC, Coura JR, et al. (2004) Phylogeny, taxonomy and grouping of Trypanosoma rangeli isolates from man, triatomines and sylvatic mammals from widespread geographical origin based on SSU and ITS ribosomal sequences. Parasitology 129: 549–561.
  31. 31. Cavazzana M Jr, Marcili A, Campaner M, Veludo HH, Takata CSA, et al. (2003) Biological and morphological characterization and phylogenetic relationships of bat trypanosomes. Rev Inst Med Trop São Paulo 45: 228.
  32. 32. Eick GN, Jacobs DS, Matthee CA (2005) A nuclear DNA phylogenetic perspective on the evolution of echolocation and historical biogeography of extant bats Chiroptera). Mol Biol Evol 22: 1869–1886.
  33. 33. Teeling EC, Springer MS, Madsen O, Bates P, O’Brien SJ, et al. (2005) A molecular phylogeny for bats illuminates biogeography and the fossil record. Science 307: 580–584.
  34. 34. Machado CA, Ayala FJ (2001) Nucleotide sequences provide evidence of genetic exchange among distantly related lineages of Trypanosoma cruzi. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 19: 7396–7401.