Advertisement
Research Article

Distinct Neurobehavioural Effects of Cannabidiol in Transmembrane Domain Neuregulin 1 Mutant Mice

  • Leonora E. Long,

    Affiliations: Schizophrenia Research Institute, Darlinghurst, New South Wales, Australia, Neuroscience Research Australia, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia

    X
  • Rose Chesworth,

    Affiliations: Schizophrenia Research Institute, Darlinghurst, New South Wales, Australia, Neuroscience Research Australia, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia

    X
  • Xu-Feng Huang,

    Affiliations: Schizophrenia Research Institute, Darlinghurst, New South Wales, Australia, Centre for Translational Neuroscience, School of Health Sciences, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia

    X
  • Alexander Wong,

    Affiliation: Department of Pharmacology, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia

    X
  • Adena Spiro,

    Affiliation: Department of Pharmacology, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia

    X
  • Iain S. McGregor,

    Affiliations: Brain and Mind Research Institute, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia, School of Psychology, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia

    X
  • Jonathon C. Arnold mail,

    jonathon.arnold@sydney.edu.au (JCA); t.karl@neura.edu.au (TK)

    Affiliations: Schizophrenia Research Institute, Darlinghurst, New South Wales, Australia, Department of Pharmacology, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia, Brain and Mind Research Institute, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia

    X
  • Tim Karl mail

    jonathon.arnold@sydney.edu.au (JCA); t.karl@neura.edu.au (TK)

    Affiliations: Schizophrenia Research Institute, Darlinghurst, New South Wales, Australia, Neuroscience Research Australia, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia

    X
  • Published: April 03, 2012
  • DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0034129

Abstract

The cannabis constituent cannabidiol (CBD) possesses anxiolytic and antipsychotic properties. We have previously shown that transmembrane domain neuregulin 1 mutant (Nrg1 TM HET) mice display altered neurobehavioural responses to the main psychoactive constituent of cannabis, Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol. Here we investigated whether Nrg1 TM HET mice respond differently to CBD and whether CBD reverses schizophrenia-related phenotypes expressed by these mice. Adult male Nrg1 TM HET and wild type-like littermates (WT) received vehicle or CBD (1, 50 or 100 mg/kg i.p.) for 21 days. During treatment and 48 h after withdrawal we measured behaviour, whole blood CBD concentrations and autoradiographic receptor binding. Nrg1 HET mice displayed locomotor hyperactivity, PPI deficits and reduced 5-HT2A receptor binding density in the substantia nigra, but these phenotypes were not reversed by CBD. However, long-term CBD (50 and 100 mg/kg) selectively enhanced social interaction in Nrg1 TM HET mice. Furthermore, acute CBD (100 mg/kg) selectively increased PPI in Nrg1 TM HET mice, although tolerance to this effect was manifest upon repeated CBD administration. Long-term CBD (50 mg/kg) also selectively increased GABAA receptor binding in the granular retrosplenial cortex in Nrg1 TM HET mice and reduced 5-HT2A binding in the substantia nigra in WT mice. Nrg1 appears necessary for CBD-induced anxiolysis since only WT mice developed decreased anxiety-related behaviour with repeated CBD treatment. Altered pharmacokinetics in mutant mice could not explain our findings since no genotype differences existed in CBD blood concentrations. Here we demonstrate that Nrg1 modulates acute and long-term neurobehavioural effects of CBD, which does not reverse the schizophrenia-relevant phenotypes.

Introduction

Cannabis abuse is linked with a moderate increase in the risk of developing schizophrenia [1] although this relationship has been discussed controversially in the field [2][5]. The association of a catechol-O-methyltransferase gene polymorphism with increased psychotic symptom occurrence after adolescent cannabis use [6] suggests that the extent and nature of the schizophrenia-relevant behavioural effects of cannabis may have a genetic underpinning. Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) is the most abundant of the >70 cannabis constituents and is responsible for the euphoric and psychotomimetic effects of cannabis. Cannabidiol (CBD) is another major cannabis constituent present in lower abundance than THC in most cannabis samples [7] that is not psychotropic and ameliorates some of the unpleasant psychoactive effects of THC [8], [9]. Therapeutic potential for CBD in treating psychiatric disorders is suggested by reports of its antidepressant [10], [11], anxiolytic- [12], [13] and antipsychotic-like effects [12][16] in rodent models. CBD also produces anxiolytic effects in healthy volunteers and those suffering from social anxiety disorders [17][19] and some antipsychotic-like effects in schizophrenia patients [20]. While the actions of CBD are not fully understood, it has a multitude of pharmacological effects such as antagonising the effects of cannabinoid receptor agonists [21], [22], behaving as an inverse agonist at cannabinoid CB2 receptors [22], blocking the orphan receptor GPR55 [23], inhibiting fatty acid amide hydrolase, and activating transient receptor potential vanilloid type 1 channels [24].

We have investigated the effects of cannabis constituents in the transmembrane domain neuregulin 1 heterozygous mutant (Nrg1 TM HET) mouse, a model for a schizophrenia susceptibility gene that offers partial construct, predictive and face validity for schizophrenia. These mice show age-dependent locomotor and exploratory hyperactivity [25] [reversible with clozapine [26]], impaired preference for social novelty [27] and cognitive deficits (e.g. contextual fear conditioning [28]). Furthermore, Nrg1 TM HET mice show altered susceptibility to the neurobehavioural effects of THC [29][32]. Here, we aimed to assess the effect of CBD on behaviour and receptor binding profiles in these mice. We hypothesised that CBD treatment would attenuate the hyperlocomotor activity of Nrg1 mutant mice, which is relevant to the psychomotor agitation observed in the ‘positive’ signs of schizophrenia [33]. Furthermore, we hypothesised that mutant and wild type-like (WT) controls would show differential sensitivity to CBD in a battery of tests relevant to schizophrenia [33] and that these behavioural effects would be accompanied by changes in receptor binding density of neurotransmitter systems known to be involved in these behavioural domains. Our study demonstrates that Nrg1 modulates acute and long-term neurobehavioural effects of CBD, which does not reverse the schizophrenia-relevant phenotypes.

Results

At the start of the study Nrg1 TM HET mice weighed significantly less than their WT littermates [Nrg1 TM HET = 27.4±0.3 g versus WT = 28.5±0.2 g; t(1,125) = 3.1, P<0.01] and this difference continued throughout the testing period. Importantly, there was no effect of CBD treatment on body weight development (data not shown). Also, there were no overt signs of CBD treatment, such as on general home cage activity levels, responsiveness to touch or piloerection.

Behavioural effects of acute CBD exposure

Locomotion and exploration.

The well-established hyperlocomotor phenotype of Nrg1 mutant mice was evident on the first test day as measured in the OF [day 1: F(1,117) = 11.3, P = 0.001; Fig. 1A]. Further analyses for the different treatment groups revealed that this increase in motor activity of mutant mice was only significant in animals treated with 1 mg/kg CBD, not in those treated with 50 or 100 mg/kg CBD (Fig. 1A). However, there was no significant genotype by treatment interaction. Nrg1 TM HET mice were also more explorative (i.e. vertical activity) than their WT littermates in the OF [day 1: F(1,114) = 7.6, P<0.01; three mice excluded due to equipment malfunction; Fig. 1B]. More specifically, OF exploration of mutant mice was significantly increased in animals treated with an acute dose of 50 mg/kg CBD (Fig. 1D).

thumbnail

Figure 1. Horizontal locomotor and vertical activity (i.e. rearing) in the open field test (10 min) after injection of CBD.

A–C: Overall distance travelled and D–F: Rearing on days 1, 13 and treatment withheld (WH) day. Data represent mean+S.E.M. Significant one-way ANOVA (split by ‘treatment’) results are shown: * P<0.05, ** P<0.01 (vs. WT receiving corresponding treatment).

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0034129.g001
Anxiety.

Anxiety parameters investigated in the OF (i.e. time spent in the centre and distance ratio) on day 1 were similar for both genotypes and were not affected by CBD treatment (Fig. 2A+D). However, as published previously, Nrg1 TM HET mice displayed an anxiolytic-like phenotype in the LD test (Fig. 3A+D). Time spent in the light compartment of the LD test was elevated in mutant mice on day 1 [F(1,117) = 9.0, P<0.01] compared with control mice. This anxiolytic-like phenotype was statistically confirmed for vehicle-treated mutants and mutants treated with 100 mg/kg CBD (Fig. 3A). Furthermore, Nrg1 mutant mice displayed an increase in distance ratio in the more aversive light compartment on test day 1 [F(1,115) = 6.6, P<0.05; two animals excluded due to equipment malfunction; Fig. 3D]. This genotype difference was only significant in the group of animals being treated with the highest dose of CBD (Fig. 3D). CBD had no impact on anxiety-related measures of the LD test across genotypes.

thumbnail

Figure 2. Anxiety-related measures in the open field test (10 min) after injection of CBD.

A–C: Time spent in the central area and D–F: Distance ratio on days 1, 13 and treatment withheld (WH) day. Data represent mean+S.E.M. Significant one-way ANOVA (split by corresponding factor) results are shown: # P<0.05 (vs. vehicle of corresponding genotype). ** P<0.01 (vs. WT receiving corresponding treatment).

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0034129.g002
thumbnail

Figure 3. Anxiety-related measures in the light-dark test (10 min) after injection of CBD.

A–C: Time spent in the light compartment and D–F: Distance ratio on days 1, 15 and treatment withheld (WH) day. Data represent means+S.E.M. Significant one-way ANOVA (split by ‘treatment’) results are shown: * P<0.05, ** P<0.01 (vs. WT receiving corresponding treatment).

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0034129.g003
Sensorimotor gating.

CBD treatment increased the mean startle response on day 1 [F(3,113) = 11.1, P<0.001]. This effect of CBD was evident at a dose of 100 mg/kg in both genotypes (Table 1). As expected, three-way RM ANOVA for ‘prepulse intensity’ confirmed that % PPI increased with increasing prepulse intensity on day 1 [F(2,226) = 432.8, P<0.001; Fig. 4A]. Acute CBD had a stimulating effect on % PPI of mice [F(3,113) = 4.7, P<0.01]. Specifically, CBD 100 mg/kg increased PPI in Nrg1 TM HET mice at the 86 dB prepulse intensity compared with vehicle-treated mutant mice (Fig. 4A).

thumbnail

Figure 4. Sensorimotor gating after injection of CBD.

A–C: % PPI on days 1, 21 and treatment withheld (WH) day. Data represent means+S.E.M. Significant one-way ANOVA (split by corresponding factor) results are shown: ## P<0.01 (vs. vehicle of corresponding genotype), * P<0.05, ** P<0.01 (vs. WT receiving corresponding treatment).

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0034129.g004
thumbnail

Table 1. Startle response.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0034129.t001

Behavioural effects of long-term CBD exposure

Locomotion and exploration.

Hyperlocomotion of Nrg1 mutant mice was evident on test day 13 [F(1,114) = 18.3, P<0.001; Fig. 1B]. This genotype effect was significant in animals treated with vehicle or 1 mg/kg CBD but not in those treated with 50 or 100 mg/kg CBD (Fig. 1B). No interactions were detected. Furthermore, mutant mice exhibited an overall explorative-like phenotype in the OF [F(1,111) = 9.3, P<0.01; three mice excluded due to equipment malfunction], although this increase in exploration failed to reach significance in any particular treatment group (Fig. 1E).

Anxiety.

CBD developed an anxiolytic-like effect in WT mice by day 13 [F(3,114) = 3.6, P<0.05], as indicated by an increase in OF distance ratio for the 1 mg/kg and 100 mg/kg treatment groups (Fig. 2E). No genotype-dependent effects were observed in the OF on this test day. Nrg1 mutant mice displayed an increase in distance ratio in the more aversive light compartment of the LD test on test day 15 [F(1,103) = 7.5, P<0.05; eleven mice excluded due to equipment malfunction] but only in those mutant mice that had been treated with 100 mg/kg CBD (Fig. 3E). CBD had no impact on anxiety-related measures of the LD test across genotypes.

Social interaction.

Social interaction data are presented in Table 2. Overall, CBD treatment increased social interaction as measured by total duration of active social interaction [F(3,112) = 4.7, P<0.01]. Furthermore, CBD had a stimulating effect on particular socio-positive behaviours in animals: nosing [duration: F(3,112) = 3.6, P<0.05] and anogenital sniffing [frequency: F(3,112) = 3.7, P<0.05 - duration: F(3,112) = 6.2, P = 0.001]. Treatment with 50 mg/kg CBD selectively increased total active social interaction time, nosing (duration and frequency) and anogenital sniffing frequency in Nrg1 TM HETs. Importantly, CBD at a dose of 50 mg/kg had no concomitant effect on locomotor activity (data not shown). Furthermore, 100 mg/kg CBD increased the duration of anogenital sniffing in mutant mice. Finally, Nrg1 TM HET mice displayed increased frequencies of nosing [F(1,112) = 7.7, P<0.01]. This genotype effect was significant in mutant animals treated with 1 mg/kg and 50 mg/kg CBD.

thumbnail

Table 2. Social interaction.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0034129.t002
Sensorimotor gating.

Our analysis did not reveal any significant effects of treatment or genotype on sensorimotor gating. As expected, % PPI increased with increasing prepulse intensity [day 21: F(2,220) = 532.9, P<0.001; Fig. 4B].

Behavioural effects of withholding CBD for 48 h

None of the test mice showed any drug withdrawal-like symptoms (e.g. wet dog shakes [34]) during OF, LD or PPI testing 48 h post final CBD treatment.

Locomotion and exploration.

The hyperlocomotor phenotype of Nrg1 mutants was still detectable in the OF on the last experimental day [WH day: F (1,112) = 16.7, P<0.001]. This increase in motor activity was significant for mutant mice of the vehicle or 1 mg/kg CBD treatment groups (Fig. 1C). No significant genotype by treatment interaction was found. Despite an overall effect of genotype on exploration [WH day: F(1,105) = 7.6, P<0.01; seven mice excluded due to equipment malfunction], only vehicle-treated Nrg1 HET mice showed a significantly increased frequency of vertical activity compared to WT mice in the OF (Fig. 1F).

Anxiety.

Nrg1 TM HET mice were less anxious (i.e. increase in distance ratio in the OF) compared with their WT littermates on WH day [F(1,112) = 8.9, P<0.01]. This phenotype was only significantly different between vehicle-treated animals of both genotypes (Fig. 2F). This finding was confirmed in the LD test (Fig. 3). Time spent in the light compartment of the LD test was increased in Nrg1 HET mice on WH day [F(1,112) = 7.5, P<0.01) compared with control mice. This anxiolytic-like phenotype was statistically confirmed for mutants treated with 100 mg/kg CBD (Fig. 3C). In addition, Nrg1 mutant mice exhibited higher levels of distance ratio in the light chamber of the LD test on WH day [F(1,109) = 4.8, P<0.05; three mice excluded due to equipment malfunction]. This genotype difference was only significant in the group of animals being treated with the highest dose of CBD (Fig. 3F). CBD had no impact on anxiety-related measures of the LD test across genotypes.

Sensorimotor gating.

We detected significant differences between the ASR of WT and Nrg1 mutant mice on WH day [F(1,111) = 8.3, P<0.01]. The startle response was reduced in Nrg1 TM HET mice treated with 1 mg/kg or 50 mg/kg CBD compared with the corresponding WT groups (Table 1). As on the other test days, % PPI was dependent on the prepulse intensity [WH day: F(2,222) = 498.6, P<0.001; Fig. 4C]. Importantly, our analyses detected a PPI deficit in mutant mice on WH day [F(1,111) = 4.8, P<0.05], as % PPI was reduced in vehicle-treated Nrg1 HET mice compared with WT controls at prepulse intensities of 82 dB and 86 dB (Fig. 4C).

CBD concentration in whole blood

GC-MS analysis of CBD in whole blood obtained from Nrg1 TM HET and WT mice immediately after the final behavioural test, performed 48 h after treatment cessation (48 h after the final of 21 CBD injections: WH day), is depicted in Figure 5. There was no difference between mutant and WT mice in CBD blood concentration, which increased in a dose-dependent manner in both genotypes [F(2,26) = 11.5, P<0.001].

thumbnail

Figure 5. Concentration (ng/ml) of CBD in whole blood 2 days after the last treatment.

Data represent means+S.E.M.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0034129.g005

Effects of CBD on autoradiographic receptor binding

Representative autoradiograms for [3H]ketanserin and [3H]muscimol binding in WT and Nrg1 TM HET mice are depicted in Figure 6, and receptor binding data for all radioligands 48 h after treatment cessation are reported in Table 3. There were no changes in CB1, 5-HT1A or NMDAR radioligand binding in any brain region (Table 3).

thumbnail

Figure 6. Representative autoradiograms showing [3H]ketanserin (5-HT2A receptors) and [3H]muscimol (GABAA receptors) binding in specific brain regions.

Abbreviations: Cg: anterior cingulate cortex; CPu: caudate putamen; HPC: hippocampus; LSD: dorsolateral septum; PrL: prelimbic cortex; RSG: granular retrosplenial cortex; SN: substantia nigra; Thal: thalamus.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0034129.g006
thumbnail

Table 3. Specific [3H]ketanserin, [3H]muscimol, [3H]CP 55,940, [3H]WAY 100.635 and [3H]MK-801 binding in different brain regions.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0034129.t003

5-HT2A binding in the substantia nigra was reduced in Nrg1 TM HET mice compared with WT and this effect was dose-dependent, as confirmed by an interaction of ‘genotype’ with ‘treatment’ [F(3,30) = 2.9, P<0.05]. Vehicle-treated Nrg1 mutants had lower levels of 5-HT2A binding than WT animals. Furthermore, 50 mg/kg CBD decreased specifically 5-HT2A binding in WT mice with no such effect observed in mutant mice (Table 3). There were no changes in 5-HT2A receptor binding in any other region.

GABAA receptor binding was similar across genotypes. However, a significant interaction of ‘genotype’ with ‘treatment’ for the granular retrosplenial cortex indicated, that treatment with 50 mg/kg CBD selectively increased GABAA receptor binding in Nrg1 TM HET mice compared with vehicle controls [interaction: F(3,31) = 3.0, P<0.05]. There were no CBD-induced changes in GABAA receptor binding in any other region (Table 3).

Discussion

Here we report a range of behavioural effects of acute and chronic CBD in wild type-like and Nrg1 TM HET mice. CBD had no effect on locomotor activity, although the typical hyperlocomotive phenotype of Nrg1 TM HET mutant mice was not present after long-term treatment and withholding of CBD (50 and 100 mg/kg). CBD selectively exerted anxiolytic-like effects in WT mice in the OF at both low (1 mg/kg) and high (100 mg/kg) doses. In contrast, high doses of CBD (50 and 100 mg/kg) selectively increased social interaction in Nrg1 TM HET mice. Acute administration of high-dose CBD enhanced PPI, but tolerance to this effect occurred such that PPI was no longer altered following chronic CBD. Nrg1 TM HET mice showed decreased 5-HT2A binding in the substantia nigra. CBD did not reverse this change, but enhanced 5-HT2A binding in the substantia nigra in WT mice and increased GABAA density in Nrg1 TM HET mice.

Behavioural effects of Nrg1 genotype and CBD treatment

Locomotion and exploration.

The lack of effects of acute or long-term CBD on locomotor or exploratory activity is consistent with its negligible motor effects reported for C57BL/6JArc mice, the same inbred mouse strain used as the background for our Nrg1 model [14]. Baseline locomotor hyperactivity and moderately increased exploratory activity in the OF were evident in Nrg1 TM HET mice on all three test days, as observed previously [25], [29], [31]. This hyperactivity was retained in Nrg1 TM HET mice treated with the lower dose of CBD (1 mg/kg), but Nrg1 TM HET mice treated with 50 and 100 mg/kg CBD did not express either locomotor hyperactivity nor increased rearing. Notably, this absence of hyperactivity persisted 48 h after cessation of CBD treatment. Repeated treatment with higher doses of CBD might reduce the potential for the hyperlocomotor phenotype to emerge, which would be in line with reports that acute CBD prevents hyperactivity induced by pharmacological agents such as dexamphetamine [13], [14]. Unfortunately, the response of Nrg1 TM HET mice to chronic treatment with antipsychotics has not been investigated and the behavioural response of mutant mice to an acute dose of clozapine was task-dependent (i.e. reversal of OF hyperlocomotion but not sensorimotor gating deficits [26]).

Anxiety.

Vehicle-treated Nrg1 TM HET mice showed reduced anxiety-like behaviour on test day 1 in the LD test and on the last test day in the OF paradigm. Furthermore, Nrg1 mutants, who had been exposed to acute or long-term 100 mg/kg CBD exhibited an anxiolytic-like LD phenotype. On the other hand, the anxiolytic effect of long-term CBD (1 and 100 mg/kg) in the OF in WT mice was not present in Nrg1 TM HET mice, suggesting that the effects of CBD on anxiety-related behaviour are dependent on an intact Nrg1 transmembrane domain. The fact that anxiolytic-like effects of CBD were only observed in the OF test reflects the importance of the choice of anxiety test used to explore the effects of pharmacological and genetic manipulations, as reported previously in Nrg1 TM HET [25], [35] and CBD-treated C57BL/6JArc mice [14].

Social interaction.

There were no pronounced baseline social interaction differences between Nrg1 TM HET and WT mice, in accordance with our previous observations in adult mice [29], [32]. Interestingly, long-term CBD robustly increased the total active social interaction time and specific social behaviours such as nosing and anogenital sniffing in Nrg1 TM HET but not WT mice, at a dose (50 mg/kg) which had no concomitant effect on locomotor activity (data not shown). This selective increase in social behaviour in Nrg1 TM HET mice suggests that Nrg1 mutation renders mice more responsive to the facilitatory effects of long-term CBD on social behaviour. Indeed, while CBD has previously been reported to have no outright effect on social interaction in wild type mouse and rat strains [14], [36] it reverses pharmacological deficits in social interaction induced by compounds such as THC [36], [37]. Together, these data suggest that the potential for CBD to improve social function may be unmasked by the Nrg1 mutation.

Sensorimotor gating.

Acute CBD (100 mg/kg) selectively increased both PPI and the startle response in Nrg1 TM HET mice. While it is possible that the enhanced PPI may be due to the concomitant increase in startle reactivity, previous reports have shown that baseline and pharmacologically-induced alterations in PPI are able to be dissociated from startle pulse- or prepulse-elicited reactivity [38], [39]. Indeed, acute (1, 5 and 50 mg/kg) and chronic (1 mg/kg) CBD enhanced PPI in male C57BL/6JArc mice without concomitant alteration in startle reactivity [14], while acute (1–15 mg/kg) CBD had no effect on PPI in male Swiss mice but increased the startle response [15]. This suggests a dose- and strain-dependent effect of CBD on ASR. However, additional research has to investigate this phenomenon further, as a recent study in rats suggests ASR-suppressing properties for CBD [40]. Interestingly, PPI was decreased in vehicle-treated Nrg1 TM HET mice only when tested after cessation of CBD treatment, reflecting the elusive and protocol-dependent nature of a definitive baseline PPI phenotype in Nrg1 TM HET mice [26], [41], [42].

Pharmacokinetics of CBD

Accumulation of CBD in blood in a dose-dependent manner was reflected by comparable CBD levels after treatment was withheld for 48 h in both Nrg1 TM HET and WT mice. Recent data suggest that a single dose of 120 mg/kg CBD administered i.p. to mice is undetectable in brain and plasma after 24 h using tandem liquid chromatography mass spectrometry [43]. However, our method detected CBD in whole blood 48 h after the last i.p. injection suggesting that CBD accrues in the body with repeated exposure. This effect of repeated administration might be due to CBD's hydrophobicity and would be similar to the characteristics of THC that is retained in lipid rich tissues [44], [45]. It is possible that residual CBD affected the behavioural performance of test mice during the WH day. However, the lack of difference between residual CBD levels suggests that the behavioural and receptor binding differences between genotypes are not due to simple differences in CBD blood concentration.

CBD alters 5-HT2A and GABAA receptor binding in a genotype-specific manner

Nrg1 TM HET mice displayed a baseline decrease in 5-HT2A receptor binding in the substantia nigra. CBD (50 mg/kg) selectively reduced binding of 5-HT2A receptors in the substantia nigra in WT mice and increased binding of GABAA receptors in the retrosplenial granular cortex in mutant mice. These changes in 5-HT2A and GABAA occur in areas relevant to both the behavioural changes we have observed and to the pathophysiology of schizophrenia. Midbrain 5-HT2 receptors regulate striatal dopaminergic transmission [46], [47]. Therefore, reduced 5-HT2A receptor density might be related to the hyperactivity that occurs in Nrg1 TM HET mice. On the other hand, increased 5-HT2A binding in the cortex of adult Nrg1 TM HET mice [48] suggests that changes in these receptors in response to Nrg1 mutation may occur in a region- and thus functionally specific manner. The GABAA binding increase in the granular retrosplenial cortex of mutant mice treated with CBD (50 mg/kg) occurred in the absence of baseline binding differences. Since the retrosplenial cortex mediates emotional responsivity and processing of emotional salience [49], [50], it is tempting to speculate that the selective increase in social interaction by the same dose of CBD in mutant mice is related to the change in GABAA binding. Indeed, GABAA agonists exert anxiolytic-like effects in the social interaction test [51].

Brains were collected from mice that had not received CBD for 48 h. It is possible that the binding changes we observed are related to a withdrawal-like state induced by withholding CBD treatment for 48 h, rather than to changes induced by the long-term treatment itself. However, the presence of CBD in blood at the same time as the collection of brain tissue and the absence of any withdrawal symptoms in the test cohorts suggest that withdrawal effects are unlikely.

It is tempting to speculate on mechanisms underlying the unmasking of certain effects of CBD, such as anxiolytic-like effects in Nrg1 mutant mice, since our data would suggest that the normal functioning of Nrg1 might suppress some effects of CBD. For example, Nrg1 mutation might enhance the responsiveness of targets of CBD suggested to be involved in modulating anxiety, such as the 5-HT1A receptor [12], [52]. We did not observe increased 5-HT1A receptor binding in our mutants; nevertheless this does not rule out enhanced signal transduction from this receptor that might be related to altered Nrg1 function. CBD might also modify behaviour via altering endocannabinoid tone, e.g. via inhibition of the anandamide hydrolysis enzyme fatty acid amide hydrolase [24]. Given that inhibition of this enzyme has documented anxiolytic effects [53], it would be worth investigating common signalling pathways between Nrg1 and the endocannabinoid system.

In conclusion, we present the novel findings that CBD alters specific aspects of the behavioural phenotype and brain receptor binding density in Nrg1 TM HET mice. CBD did not reverse several of the schizophrenia-related behavioural features of mutant mice, namely hyperactivity, reduced PPI and reduced 5-HT2A receptor density, although unlike those treated with vehicle, mutants treated with higher doses of CBD failed to express significant hyperactivity. CBD selectively enhanced social behaviour, prepulse inhibition, and retrosplenial GABAA binding in Nrg1 TM HET mice, supporting its potential therapeutic value in treating specific symptoms of schizophrenia. It appears that mutation in Nrg1 unmasks this behavioural effect of CBD, whereas intact Nrg1 is crucial for its anxiolytic effects. Future research has to investigate the effectiveness of long-term treatment with established antipsychotic drugs in this animal model to enable the evaluation of the current findings for schizophrenia therapy.

Materials and Methods

Animals

Male heterozygous Nrg1+/− (Nrg1 TM HET) and wild type-like control Nrg1+/+ (WT) littermates [25] aged 21±3 weeks were used as males exhibit a stronger sensitivity to cannabinoids than females [29], [32]. Standard social interaction opponents were age-matched male A/JArc mice (Animal Resources Centre, Canning Vale, Australia). Mice were pair-housed with limited environmental enrichment [mouse igloo (Bioserv, Frenchtown, USA) and a metal ring in the cage lid] under a 12:12 h light:dark schedule. Food and water were available ad libitum. Research and animal care procedures were approved by the University of New South Wales Animal Care and Ethics Committee in accordance with the Australian Code of Practice for the Care and Use of Animals for Scientific Purposes (ACEC approval number: 08/28A).

Drug treatment

CBD (THC Pharm GmbH, Frankfurt, Germany) was suspended in a 1:1:18 mixture of ethanol:Tween 80®:saline. Mice received 21 consecutive daily intraperitoneal (i.p.) injections of vehicle (1:1:18 ethanol:Tween 80®:saline mixture) or CBD (1, 50 or 100 mg/kg) at a volume of 10 ml/kg as published previously [14].

Behavioural testing

Treatment injections commenced 30 min after the start of the light cycle. Mice were behaviourally tested 30–45 min post injection on the first day of treatment (“acute” group) and on intermittent days throughout repeated treatment (“long-term” group), and after two days after the final dose of CBD treatment [“treatment withheld (WH day)” group] (Table 4). On behavioural testing days injections were staggered within the light cycle to standardise intervals between injection and testing [i.e. as groups of test mice (maximum of four mice at a time) were run consecutively, injections were administered the requisite number of minutes prior to testing to ensure consistent intervals between treatment and testing]. Mice were returned to the home cage following injection and behavioural testing. Environmental odours were removed from test apparatus between trials with 70% ethanol. The test order was based on an earlier study [14].

thumbnail

Table 4. Test biography of mice.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0034129.t004
Light–dark test (LD).

Mice were placed into the opening of a dark box insert in an open field (OF) activity chamber (41×41 cm; Tru-Scan Photo Beam Activity System: Coulbourn Instruments, Whitehall, USA) for 10 min. Horizontal activity (distance travelled) for both light (~70 lx) and dark chambers (<5 lx) was measured by the Tru-Scan system and ANY-maze™ video tracking software (Stoelting Co., Wood Dale, USA; light chamber only). Time in the dark chamber was interpolated by subtraction of time in the light chamber (measured by ANY-maze) from the total test time. The ratio of distance travelled in the light compartment to total distance travelled (distance ratio) and time spent in the light compartment were taken as measures of anxiety.

Spontaneous locomotor activity.

Locomotor activity was measured in the OF chamber for 10 min. Distance travelled and vertical activity (rearing) in central and peripheral zones (centre coordinates 7.6 cm×7.6 cm from the periphery) were measured by Tru-Scan and ANY-maze™ software. The ratio of central to total distance travelled (distance ratio) and time spent in the centre were taken as measures of anxiety [54].

Novel object recognition test (NORT).

The distinction between familiar and unfamiliar objects is an index of recognition memory [55], [56]. Mice were habituated to the empty NORT apparatus (grey perspex arena; 35×35×30 cm) for 5 min twice daily for 2 days. The following day, mice were habituated twice to the test procedure (i.e. exposure to identical objects placed in opposite corners). The next day, mice were placed in the arena for 10 min, which contained two novel identical objects, and allowed to explore freely (test trial 1). In test trial 2, 60 min later, the arena contained one copy of these objects (familiar object) and one novel object in the same positions as in test trial 1. Object exploration was scored for 5 min by the behaviours nosing (when the mouse directed its nose to an object at a distance of ≤1 cm) and rearing on the object. Data from NORT are not reported since the performance of WT mice at the novel object was not significantly different from chance (i.e. no indication of successful learning of objects).

Social interaction (SI).

SI between rodent pairs is used to measure anxiety-like behaviours [57]. Furthermore, reduction in SI models aspects of social withdrawal, which is also observed in schizophrenia patients [58]. Test mice and untreated, weight-matched (i.e. A/J body weight<test mice body weight) standard opponents were placed in opposite corners of the arena, which was used for NORT testing. Frequency and duration of the active socio-positive behaviours nosing [i.e. test mouse sniffs at the opponent's body, which is in close proximity to the test mouse (<1 cm)], anogenital sniffing, allogrooming, following and climbing over/under were scored for 10 min. Distance travelled was measured by ANY-maze™.

Prepulse inhibition (PPI).

PPI, an operational measure of sensorimotor gating impaired in schizophrenia patients [59], is the attenuation of the startle response by a non-startling stimulus (prepulse) presented before the startling stimulus (pulse). Startle reactivity was measured for 200 ms post pulse onset using SR-LAB startle chambers (San Diego Instruments, San Diego, USA). The PPI test consisted of 5 min acclimatisation to 70 dB background noise, followed by 105 trials in a pseudorandom order as published previously [41]: 5×70 dB trials (background); 5×80 dB trials; 5×100 dB trials; 15×120 dB trials (startle) and 5 sets of 15 trials comprising a prepulse of either 74, 82 or 86 dB presented 32, 64, 128, 256 or 512 ms (variable interstimulus interval; ISI) prior to a startling pulse of 120 dB (PPI response). The intertrial interval varied randomly from 10–20 s. Acoustic startle response (ASR) was calculated as the mean amplitude to the middle 5 startle trials to eliminate habituation effects [60]. Percentage PPI (% PPI) was calculated as [(mean startle response – PPI response)/mean startle response]×100. % PPI was averaged across ISIs.

Detection and quantification of CBD in whole blood samples

Trunk blood was collected in EDTA-coated tubes immediately after PPI testing on WH day. CBD concentration was measured as described previously [44] with modifications for CBD analysis [61], [62]. 50 µl of D3-CBD (0.25 mg/L; PM Separations, Capalaba, Australia) internal standard solution was added to 0.5 ml trunk blood. Acetate buffer was added (pH 4.0) and CBD extracted with 1-chloro-butane solvent. Following complete drying under nitrogen, samples underwent derivatisation of the polar functional groups (COOH, OH) with bis(trimethylsilyl)trifluroacetamide. Quantification (1.25 ng/ml limit of quantification) of the derivatised extract was performed by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) (Shimadzu 2010 Plus system: Shimadzu Scientific Instruments, Rydalmere, Australia).

Receptor autoradiography

Brains from a subset of sacrificed mice (n = 4–5 per factor; selected randomly) were dissected 48 h after the last CBD injection, snap frozen and stored at −80°C. Coronal sections (14 µm) were cut and thaw-mounted onto slides. Specific receptors were chosen to investigate the effects of CBD treatment on the endocannabinoid system (i.e. CB1) and to determine the impact of CBD on a selection of central neurotransmitter systems relevant to schizophrenia (i.e. NMDA, 5-HT1A, 5-HT2A and GABAA). For analysis, brain regions with relevance to schizophrenia and the endocannabinoid system were chosen in particular.

Autoradiographic binding.

For CB1 receptors, sections were incubated for in 50 mM Tris-HCl buffer (pH 7.4) containing 5% bovine serum albumin (30 min) then in the same buffer containing 10 nM [3H]CP-55,940 (168 Ci/mmol; Perkin Elmer, Boston, USA) in the presence (non-specific binding) or absence (total binding) of 10 µM CP 55,940 [63].

For 5-HT1A receptors, sections were incubated in 50 nM Tris-HCl buffer (30 min) then in the same buffer containing 5 nM [3H] WAY-100635 (83 Ci/mmol; Perkin Elmer) and 10 M pargyline in the presence (non-specific binding) or absence (total binding) of 10 µM 5-HT (150 min) [64].

For 5-HT2A receptors, sections were incubated in 170 mM Tris-HCl buffer (15 min) then in the same buffer containing 4 nM [3H]ketanserin (88 Ci/mmol; Perkin Elmer) in the presence (non-specific binding) or absence (total binding) of 2 µM spiperone (120 min) [65].

For NMDA receptors, sections were incubated in 30 mM HEPES buffer (pH 7.5) containing 100 µM glycine, 100 µM glutamate, 1 mM EDTA and 20 nM [3H]MK-801 (17.1 Ci/mmol; Perkin Elmer) in the presence (non-specific binding) or absence (total binding) of 20 µM MK-801 (2.5 h) [66].

For GABAA receptors, sections were incubated in 50 mM Tris-HCl buffer (pH 7.0) (3×5 min) then in the same buffer containing 3 nM [3H]muscimol (29.5 Ci/mmol) in the presence (non-specific binding) or absence (total binding) of 100 µM GABA (40 min) [67].

All sections were washed in ice-cold buffer, dipped in distilled water and air dried.

Quantification.

Slides were exposed to Kodak BioMax MR film. Developed films were analysed using a computer-assisted image analysis system, Multi-Analyst, connected to a GS-690 Imaging Densitometer (Bio-Rad, Hercules, USA). Binding quantification was performed by measuring the average density in brain regions identified using a mouse brain atlas [68] in 2–3 adjacent sections and comparing the values against autoradiographic standards (Amersham: GE Healthcare, Buckinghamshire, UK).

Statistical analysis

Behavioural measures and binding density were analysed with two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) (between-subjects factors: ‘treatment’ and ‘genotype’) to distinguish between acute (day 1), long-term (days 13–21), and treatment withheld (day 23) effects. Repeated measures (RM) three-way ANOVAs were used for NORT [within-subjects factor: ‘object’ (novel or familiar)] and PPI (within-subjects factor: ‘prepulse intensity’). Initial ANOVAs were followed by two- or one-way ANOVAs split by the corresponding factor(s) if appropriate as published previously [29][32]. Differences between CBD doses were determined with Dunnett's post-hoc test whereas body weight was compared using an unpaired t-test. Data are presented as means ± standard error of the mean (S.E.M.). Main effects were regarded as statistically significant when P<0.05. A total of 126 mice were tested (n = 14–17). Degrees of freedom, F-values and P-values are shown for three- and two-way ANOVAs (* versus WT receiving corresponding treatment; # versus vehicle of corresponding genotype) are presented. In case malfunction of software or test equipment occurred, data were excluded, resulting in altered degrees of freedom for some analyses. Analysis was performed using SPSS 17.0.

Acknowledgments

We thank Adam Bryan for taking care of test mice and Jerry Tanda for his critical comments on this manuscript.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: LEL XFH ISM JCA TK. Performed the experiments: LEL RC XFH AW AS JCA TK. Analyzed the data: XFH ISM JCA TK. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: XFH ISM JCA TK. Wrote the paper: LEL XFH ISM JCA TK.

References

  1. 1. Moore THM, Zammit S, Lingford-Hughes A, Barnes TRE, Jones PB, et al. (2007) Cannabis use and risk of psychotic or affective mental health outcomes: a systematic review. Lancet 370: 319–328.
  2. 2. Frisher M, Crome I, Macleod J, Millson D, Croft P (2005) Substance misuse and psychiatric illness: prospective observational study using the general practice research database. J Epidemiol Community Health 59: 847–850.
  3. 3. Koethe D, Giuffrida A, Schreiber D, Hellmich M, Schultze-Lutter F, et al. (2009) Anandamide elevation in cerebrospinal fluid in initial prodromal states of psychosis. Br J Psychiatry 194: 371–372.
  4. 4. Koethe D, Hoyer C, Leweke FM (2009) The endocannabinoid system as a target for modelling psychosis. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 206: 551–561.
  5. 5. Schwarcz G, Karajgi B, McCarthy R (2009) Synthetic delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (dronabinol) can improve the symptoms of schizophrenia. J Clin Psychopharmacol 29: 255–258.
  6. 6. Caspi A, Moffitt TE, Cannon M, McClay J, Murray R, et al. (2005) Moderation of the effect of adolescent-onset cannabis use on adult psychosis by a functional polymorphism in the catechol-O-methyltransferase gene: longitudinal evidence of a gene X environment interaction. Biological Psychiatry 57: 1117–1127.
  7. 7. McLaren J, Swift W, Dillon P, Allsop S (2008) Cannabis potency and contamination: a review of the literature. Addiction 103: 1100–1109.
  8. 8. Bhattacharyya S, Morrison PD, Fusar-Poli P, Martin-Santos R, Borgwardt S, et al. (2010) Opposite effects of delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol and cannabidiol on human brain function and psychopathology. Neuropsychopharmacology 35: 764–774.
  9. 9. Zuardi AW, Shirakawa I, Finkelfarb E, Karniol IG (1982) Action of cannabidiol on the anxiety and other effects produced by delta 9-THC in normal subjects. Psychopharmacology 76: 245–250.
  10. 10. El-Alfy AT, Ivey K, Robinson K, Ahmed S, Radwan M, et al. (2010) Antidepressant-like effect of [Delta]9-tetrahydrocannabinol and other cannabinoids isolated from Cannabis sativa L. Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior 95: 434–442.
  11. 11. Zanelati TV, Biojone C, Moreira FA, Guimaraes FS, Joca SR (2010) Antidepressant-like effects of cannabidiol in mice: possible involvement of 5-HT1A receptors. Br J Pharmacol 159: 122–128.
  12. 12. Campos AC, Guimaraes FS (2008) Involvement of 5HT1A receptors in the anxiolytic-like effects of cannabidiol injected into the dorsolateral periaqueductal gray of rats. Psychopharmacology 199: 223–230.
  13. 13. Moreira FA, Guimaraes FS (2005) Cannabidiol inhibits the hyperlocomotion induced by psychotomimetic drugs in mice. European Journal of Pharmacology 512: 199–205.
  14. 14. Long LE, Chesworth R, Huang X-F, McGregor IS, Arnold JC, et al. (2010) A behavioural comparison of acute and chronic delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol and cannabidiol in C57BL/6JArc mice. International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology 13: 861–876.
  15. 15. Long LE, Malone DT, Taylor DA (2006) Cannabidiol reverses MK-801-induced disruption of prepulse inhibition in mice. Neuropsychopharmacology 31: 795–803.
  16. 16. Moreira FA, Aguiar DC, Guimaraes FS (2006) Anxiolytic-like effect of cannabidiol in the rat Vogel conflict test. Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry 30: 1466–1471.
  17. 17. Bergamaschi MM, Queiroz RHC, Chagas MHN, de Oliveira DCG, De Martinis BS, et al. (2011) Cannabidiol reduces the anxiety induced by simulated public speaking in treatment-naive social phobia patients. Neuropsychopharmacology 36: 1219–1226.
  18. 18. Crippa JA, Zuardi AW, Garrido GE, Wichert-Ana L, Guarnieri R, et al. (2004) Effects of cannabidiol (CBD) on regional cerebral blood flow. Neuropsychopharmacology 29: 417–426.
  19. 19. Fusar-Poli P, Crippa JA, Bhattacharyya S, Borgwardt SJ, Allen P, et al. (2009) Distinct effects of {delta}9-tetrahydrocannabinol and cannabidiol on neural activation during emotional processing. Archives of General Psychiatry 66: 95–105.
  20. 20. Zuardi AW, Hallak JE, Dursun SM, Morais SL, Faria Sanches R, et al. (2006) Cannabidiol monotherapy for treatment-resistant schizophrenia. Journal of Psychopharmacology 20: 683–686.
  21. 21. Petitet F, Jeantaud B, Reibaud M, Imperato A, Dubroeucq MC (1998) Complex pharmacology of natural cannabinoids: evidence for partial agonist activity of delta9-tetrahydrocannabinol and antagonist activity of cannabidiol on rat brain cannabinoid receptors. Life Sciences 63: PL1–6.
  22. 22. Thomas A, Baillie GL, Phillips AM, Razdan RK, Ross RA, et al. (2007) Cannabidiol displays unexpectedly high potency as an antagonist of CB1 and CB2 receptor agonists in vitro. Br J Pharmacol 150: 613–623.
  23. 23. Ryberg E, Larsson N, Sjogren S, Hjorth S, Hermansson NO, et al. (2007) The orphan receptor GPR55 is a novel cannabinoid receptor. Br J Pharmacol 152: 1092–1101.
  24. 24. Bisogno T, Hanus L, De Petrocellis L, Tchilibon S, Ponde DE, et al. (2001) Molecular targets for cannabidiol and its synthetic analogues: effect on vanilloid VR1 receptors and on the cellular uptake and enzymatic hydrolysis of anandamide. British Journal of Pharmacology 134: 845–852.
  25. 25. Karl T, Duffy L, Scimone A, Harvey RP, Schofield PR (2007) Altered motor activity, exploration and anxiety in heterozygous neuregulin 1 mutant mice: implications for understanding schizophrenia. Genes, Brain and Behavior 6: 677–687.
  26. 26. Stefansson H, Sigurdsson E, Steinthorsdottir V, Bjornsdottir S, Sigmundsson T, et al. (2002) Neuregulin 1 and susceptibility to schizophrenia. Am J Hum Genet 71: 877–892.
  27. 27. O'Tuathaigh CMP, Babovic D, O'Sullivan GJ, Clifford JJ, Tighe O, et al. (2007) Phenotypic characterization of spatial cognition and social behavior in mice with ‘knockout’ of the schizophrenia risk gene neuregulin 1. Neuroscience 147: 18–27.
  28. 28. Duffy L, Cappas E, Lai D, Boucher A, Karl T (2010) Cognition in transmembrane domain neuregulin 1 mutant mice. Neuroscience 170: 800–807.
  29. 29. Boucher AA, Arnold JC, Duffy L, Schofield PR, Micheau J, et al. (2007) Heterozygous neuregulin 1 mice are more sensitive to the behavioural effects of Delta(9)-tetrahydrocannabinol. Psychopharmacology 192: 325–336.
  30. 30. Boucher AA, Hunt GE, Karl T, Micheau J, McGregor IS, et al. (2007) Heterozygous neuregulin 1 mice display greater baseline and Delta(9)-tetrahydrocannabinol-induced c-Fos expression. Neuroscience 149: 861–870.
  31. 31. Boucher AA, Hunt GE, Micheau J, Huang X-F, McGregor IS, et al. (2011) The schizophrenia susceptibility gene neuregulin 1 modulates tolerance to the effects of cannabinoids. International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology 14: 631–643.
  32. 32. Long LE, Chesworth R, Arnold JC, Karl T (2010) A follow-up study: acute behavioural effects of Δ9-THC in female heterozygous Neuregulin 1 transmembrane domain mutant mice. Psychopharmacology 211: 277–289.
  33. 33. Powell CM, Miyakawa T (2006) Schizophrenia-relevant behavioral testing in rodent models: a uniquely human disorder? Biological Psychiatry 59: 1198–1207.
  34. 34. Martin WR, Wikler A, Eades CG, Pescor FT (1963) Tolerance to and Physical Dependence on Morphine in Rats. Psychopharmacologia 4: 247–260.
  35. 35. O'Tuathaigh CM, O'Connor AM, O'Sullivan GJ, Lai D, Harvey R, et al. (2008) Disruption to social dyadic interactions but not emotional/anxiety-related behaviour in mice with heterozygous ‘knockout’ of the schizophrenia risk gene neuregulin-1. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry 32: 462–466.
  36. 36. Malone DT, Jongegan D, Taylor DA (2009) Cannabidiol reverses the reduction in social interaction produced by low dose Delta(9)-tetrahydrocannabinol in rats. Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior 93: 91–96.
  37. 37. Klein C, Karanges E, Spiro A, Wong A, Spencer J, et al. (2011) Cannabidiol potentiates Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) behavioural effects and alters THC pharmacokinetics during acute and chronic treatment in adolescent rats. Psychopharmacology. in press: epub 14/16/11.
  38. 38. Aubert L, Reiss D, Ouagazzal AM (2006) Auditory and visual prepulse inhibition in mice: parametric analysis and strain comparisons. Genes Brain Behav 5: 423–431.
  39. 39. Yee BK, Chang DT, Feldon J (2004) The effects of dizocilpine and phencyclidine on prepulse inhibition of the acoustic startle reflex and on prepulse-elicited reactivity in C57BL6 mice. Neuropsychopharmacology 29: 1865–1877.
  40. 40. Gururajan A, Taylor DA, Malone DT (2011) Effect of cannabidiol in a MK-801-rodent model of aspects of Schizophrenia. Behavioural Brain Research 222: 299–308.
  41. 41. Karl T, Burne TH, Van den Buuse M, Chesworth R (2011) Do transmembrane domain neuregulin 1 mutant mice exhibit a reliable sensorimotor gating deficit? Behav Brain Res 223: 336–341.
  42. 42. van den Buuse M, Wischhof L, Xi Lee R, Martin S, Karl T (2009) Neuregulin 1 hypomorphic mutant mice: enhanced baseline locomotor activity but normal psychotropic drug-induced hyperlocomotion and prepulse inhibition regulation. International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology 12: 1383–1393.
  43. 43. Deiana S, Watanabe A, Yamasaki Y, Amada N, Arthur M, et al. (2012) Plasma and brain pharmacokinetic profile of cannabidiol (CBD), cannabidivarine (CBDV), Δ9-tetrahydrocannabivarin (THCV) and cannabigerol (CBG) in rats and mice following oral and intraperitoneal administration and CBD action on obsessive–compulsive behaviour. Psychopharmacology 219: 859–873.
  44. 44. Gunasekaran N, Long LE, Dawson BL, Hansen GH, Richardson DP, et al. (2009) Reintoxication: the release of fat-stored delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) into blood is enhanced by food deprivation or ACTH exposure. British Journal of Pharmacology 158: 1330–1337.
  45. 45. Kreuz DS, Axelrod J (1973) Delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol: localization in body fat. Science 179: 391–393.
  46. 46. Porras G, Di Matteo V, Fracasso C, Lucas G, De Deurwaerdere P, et al. (2002) 5-HT2A and 5-HT2C/2B receptor subtypes modulate dopamine release induced in vivo by amphetamine and morphine in both the rat nucleus accumbens and striatum. Neuropsychopharmacology 26: 311–324.
  47. 47. Schmidt CJ, Fadayel GM, Sullivan CK, Taylor VL (1992) 5-HT2 receptors exert a state-dependent regulation of dopaminergic function: studies with MDL 100,907 and the amphetamine analogue, 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine. European Journal of Pharmacology 223: 65–74.
  48. 48. Dean B, Karl T, Pavey G, Boer S, Duffy L, et al. (2008) Increased levels of serotonin 2A receptors and serotonin transporter in the CNS of neuregulin 1 hypomorphic/mutant mice. Schizophrenia Research 99: 341–349.
  49. 49. Cato MA, Crosson B, Gökçay D, Soltysik D, Wierenga C, et al. (2004) Processing words with emotional connotation: an fMRI study of time course and laterality in rostral frontal and retrosplenial cortices. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 16: 167–177.
  50. 50. Keene CS, Bucci DJ (2008) Neurotoxic lesions of retrosplenial cortex disrupt signaled and unsignaled contextual fear conditioning. Behav Neurosci 122: 1070–1077.
  51. 51. Corbett R, Fielding S, Cornfeldt M, Dunn RW (1991) GABAmimetic agents display anxiolytic-like effects in the social interaction and elevated plus maze procedures. Psychopharmacology 104: 312–316.
  52. 52. Gomes F, Resstel L, Guimarães F (2011) The anxiolytic-like effects of cannabidiol injected into the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis are mediated by 5-HT1A receptors. Psychopharmacology 213: 465–473.
  53. 53. Piomelli D, Tarzia G, Duranti A, Tontini A, Mor M, et al. (2006) Pharmacological profile of the selective FAAH inhibitor KDS-4103 (URB597). CNS Drug Rev 12: 21–38.
  54. 54. Denenberg VH (1969) Open-field behavior in the rat: what does it mean? Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 159: 852–859.
  55. 55. Dere E, Huston JP, De Souza Silva MA (2007) The pharmacology, neuroanatomy and neurogenetics of one-trial object recognition in rodents. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews 31: 673–704.
  56. 56. Ennaceur A, Delacour J (1988) A new one-trial test for neurobiological studies of memory in rats. 1: Behavioral data. Behavioural Brain Research 31: 47–59.
  57. 57. File SE, Seth P (2003) A review of 25 years of the social interaction test. European Journal of Pharmacology 463: 35–53.
  58. 58. Ellenbroek BA, Cools AR (2000) Animal models for the negative symptoms of schizophrenia. Behavioural Pharmacology 11: 223–233.
  59. 59. Braff DL, Geyer MA, Swerdlow NR (2001) Human studies of prepulse inhibition of startle: normal subjects, patient groups, and pharmacological studies. Psychopharmacology 156: 234–258.
  60. 60. Geyer MA, Dulawa SC (2003) Assessment of murine startle reactivity, prepulse inhibition, and habituation. Curr Protoc Neurosci Chapter 8: Unit 8 17.
  61. 61. Karschner E, Barnes A, Lowe R, Scheidweiler K, Huestis M (2010) Validation of a two-dimensional gas chromatography mass spectrometry method for the simultaneous quantification of cannabidiol, Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), 11-hydroxy-THC, and 11-nor-9-carboxy-THC in plasma. Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry 397: 603–611.
  62. 62. Nadulski T, Sporkert F, Schnelle M, Stadelmann AM, Roser P, et al. (2005) Simultaneous and sensitive analysis of THC, 11-OH-THC, THC-COOH, CBD, and CBN by GC-MS in plasma after oral application of small doses of THC and cannabis extract. Journal of Analytical Toxicology 29: 782–789.
  63. 63. Deng C, Han M, Huang XF (2007) No changes in densities of cannabinoid receptors in the superior temporal gyrus in schizophrenia. Neuroscience Bulletin 23: 341–347.
  64. 64. Han M, Huang XF, du Bois TM, Deng C (2009) The effects of antipsychotic drugs administration on 5-HT1A receptor expression in the limbic system of the rat brain. Neuroscience 164: 1754–1763.
  65. 65. Kang K, Huang X-F, Wang Q, Deng C (2009) Decreased density of serotonin 2A receptors in the superior temporal gyrus in schizophrenia-a postmortem study. Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry 33: 867–871.
  66. 66. Newell KA, Zavitsanou K, Huang XF (2007) Short and long term changes in NMDA receptor binding in mouse brain following chronic phencyclidine treatment. Journal of Neural Transmission 114: 995–1001.
  67. 67. Deng C, Huang X-F (2006) Increased density of GABAA receptors in the superior temporal gyrus in schizophrenia. Experimental Brain Research 168: 587–590.
  68. 68. Paxinos G, Franklin KBJ (2004) The mouse brain in stereotaxic coordinates: Oxford Academic.