Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Gene Transfer in Leptolyngbya sp. Strain BL0902, a Cyanobacterium Suitable for Production of Biomass and Bioproducts

  • Arnaud Taton,

    Affiliation Division of Biological Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, United States of America

  • Ewa Lis,

    Current address: Genomatica, Inc., San Diego, California, United States of America

    Affiliation Division of Biological Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, United States of America

  • Dawn M. Adin,

    Affiliation Division of Biological Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, United States of America

  • Guogang Dong,

    Current address: Joule Unlimited Technologies, Inc., Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States of America

    Affiliation Division of Biological Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, United States of America

  • Scott Cookson,

    Current address: West Wireless Health Institute, La Jolla, California, United States of America

    Affiliation Division of Biological Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, United States of America

  • Steve A. Kay,

    Affiliation Division of Biological Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, United States of America

  • Susan S. Golden,

    Affiliation Division of Biological Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, United States of America

  • James W. Golden

    jwgolden@ucsd.edu

    Affiliation Division of Biological Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, United States of America

Abstract

Current cyanobacterial model organisms were not selected for their growth traits or potential for the production of renewable biomass, biofuels, or other products. The cyanobacterium strain BL0902 emerged from a search for strains with superior growth traits. Morphology and 16S rRNA sequence placed strain BL0902 in the genus Leptolyngbya. Leptolyngbya sp. strain BL0902 (hereafter Leptolyngbya BL0902) showed robust growth at temperatures from 22°C to 40°C and tolerated up to 0.5 M NaCl, 32 mM urea, high pH, and high solar irradiance. Its growth rate under outdoor conditions rivaled Arthrospira (“pirulina” strains. Leptolyngbya BL0902 accumulated higher lipid content and a higher proportion of monounsaturated fatty acids than Arthrospira strains. In addition to these desirable qualities, Leptolyngbya BL0902 is amenable to genetic engineering that is reliable, efficient, and stable. We demonstrated conjugal transfer from Escherichia coli of a plasmid based on RSF1010 and expression of spectinomycin/streptomycin resistance and yemGFP reporter transgenes. Conjugation efficiency was investigated in biparental and triparental matings with and without a “elper”plasmid that carries DNA methyltransferase genes, and with two different conjugal plasmids. We also showed that Leptolyngbya BL0902 is amenable to transposon mutagenesis with a Tn5 derivative. To facilitate genetic manipulation of Leptolyngbya BL0902, a conjugal plasmid vector was engineered to carry a trc promoter upstream of a Gateway recombination cassette. These growth properties and genetic tools position Leptolyngbya BL0902 as a model cyanobacterial production strain.

Introduction

Great interest is being focused on photosynthetic microorganisms for their ability to convert solar energy and CO2 into fuels and other bioproducts. Cyanobacteria provide an excellent platform for the production of renewable biofuels and other products [1], [2]. Cyanobacterial carbohydrate and lipid metabolism has been studied by several laboratories but much remains to be understood [3][5]. Cyanobacteria typically accumulate glycogen and polyhydroxyalkanoates rather than lipids as stored energy, but their photosynthetic membranes are rich with glycolipids and they naturally produce hydrocarbons [4], [6], the major constituents of gasoline, diesel, and jet fuel [7].

Cyanobacteria have been a major component of our biosphere for over 2.5 billion years [8]. Architects of our atmosphere, these photosynthetic organisms still play an essential role in biogeochemical transformations, particularly in the oceans where they may account for more than 50% of phytoplankton biomass and primary production [9]. With a wide range of metabolic capabilities and few nutritional demands, cyanobacteria live in diverse environmental conditions [8]. Some fix nitrogen, reducing the need for nitrogen fertilizer and the associated production of nitrous oxide, a major greenhouse gas [10], [11]. Most species tolerate high pH and some tolerate high salt concentration, conditions that help to control contaminants and predators in outdoor ponds. Certain cyanobacteria produce a mucilaginous envelope for protection against predators and desiccation. Regulation of photosynthetic antenna complexes called phycobilisomes allow cyanobacteria to adapt to changes in light quality and to extremely low light levels [12], and extracellular and intracellular screening pigments protect them against high light or UV radiation [13]. Cyanobacteria usually have higher growth rates than other phytoplankton under low light [14]. In addition to their physiological and ecological variety, cyanobacteria are also diverse in terms of morphology, including multicellular filamentous species that may bioflocculate or float to the surface of a pond for easier harvesting. These characteristics reflect their genetic diversity and make them good sources for gene mining.

As prokaryotic, gram-negative bacteria, cyanobacteria are easy to manipulate genetically. Extensive genetic tools have been developed for a variety of different species. DNA can be introduced into cyanobacteria by transformation, conjugation, and electroporation and then propagated in the strain if carried on a replicating plasmid or if integrated into the host chromosome [15], [16]. However, genetic approaches have been developed for only a limited number of model strains used to investigate fundamental processes such as photosynthesis, nitrogen fixation, and circadian rhythmicity [16][18]. Productivity, particularly outside of the highly regulated environment of the laboratory, and the ability to grow in a wide range of ecological conditions were not determining factors in the selection of these strains for laboratory studies.

Research featuring genetically engineered cyanobacteria for the production of liquid biofuels including ethanol [19], isobutyraldehyde and isobutanol [20], and free fatty acids [21] has recently flourished. Although using cyanobacteria as cell factories has become more common, studies are still carried out with standard laboratory model organisms rather than with potential production strains. For their desirable growth qualities, much consideration has been given to strains of the genus Arthrospira (“pirulina”, which are grown at industrial scale mostly as a nutritional supplement. However, several attempts to transform Arthrospira strains have had only limited success [22], [23], and to our knowledge there is no reliable genetic system for the stable transformation of Arthrospira spp.

We have identified and characterized the cyanobacterial strain Leptolyngbya sp. strain BL0902 (hereafter Leptolyngbya BL0902), which emerged from a screen of cyanobacterial strains for superior growth traits, and show that it is amenable to genetic manipulation. Leptolyngbya BL0902 has good growth characteristics when compared to two common outdoor production strains of the genus Arthrospira. We show that Leptolyngbya BL0902 can receive and maintain conjugal shuttle vectors, express an antibiotic resistance gene and a yemGFP reporter gene, and be subjected to transposon-tagging mutagenesis.

Results

Morphological description and identification

Leptolyngbya BL0902 is a filamentous cyanobacterium without heterocysts, akinetes, or true or false branching; filaments are composed of single trichomes (chains of cells) that are straight to wavy and lack conspicuous motility. Trichomes are cylindrical and usually unsheathed, but a very thin hyaline sheath might be observed at trichome breakage; necridic cells are absent. Trichomes are slightly constricted at the cross-walls; cells are 1.3 to 3.3 times longer than wide with an average size of 1.42±0.15 (1.12 – 1.66) µm wide, 3.11±0.57 (2.09 – 4.18) µm long; and end cells are rounded. The cytoplasm is homogeneous with a few granules but no gas vesicles (Fig. 1).

thumbnail
Figure 1. Photomicrographs of wild-type Leptolyngbya BL0902 (a, b, c, and d), and its growth in a microalgae farm in Imperial Valley, California (e and f).

Bright field (a and b), differential interference contrast (c), and phase contrast microscopy (d). 1-acre paddle-wheel raceway microalgae pond (e) and filamentous cyanobacteria collected with a vibrating screen (f). Scale bars, 5 µm.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0030901.g001

Molecular identification based on 16S rRNA gene and ITS

Based on 16S rRNA data, Leptolyngbya BL0902 may be considered novel. The top hit identified by BLAST was Spirulina laxissima SAG 256.80 with 97.8% identity (Table 1) and to which no detailed morphological description is associated, leaving the possibility of misidentification. The uniqueness of Leptolyngbya BL0902 was verified by the Internal Transcribed Spacer (ITS) between the 16S and 23S rRNA genes, which shared only 89% identity with the first hit identified by BLAST (Table 2).

thumbnail
Table 1. BLAST results obtained by querying the 16S rRNA gene of Leptolyngbya BL0902 with GenBank, and geographical and ecological origins of the hits.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0030901.t001

thumbnail
Table 2. BLAST results obtained by querying the ITS of Leptolyngbya BL0902 with GenBank, and geographical and ecological origins of the hits.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0030901.t002

Nevertheless, Leptolyngbya BL0902 belongs to a relatively tight cluster of thin oscillatorians (Fig. 2), mostly assigned to the genus Leptolyngbya, including the strains OBB30S02, UTEX 2910, ANT.ACE.1, ANT.ACE.V6.1, 0BB19S12, MXI, 0BB24S04, PCC 7104 (formerly identified as belonging to the LPP group B [24]), UTEX 2910, 0BB32S02, and Kovacik 1999/1. Based on morphological features, “scillatoria neglecta”IAM M-82 corresponds more likely to an unknown species of the genus Leptolyngbya Anagnostidis & Komárek 1988 (R. Rippka, personal communication). No morphological descriptions of Spirulina laxissima SAG 256.80, Phormidium sp. 195-A12, Phormidium sp. MBIC10025, Phormidium sp. SAG 61.90, or Oscillatoria sp. [AJ133106] are available. The different taxonomic assignments might be related to either the use of other taxonomic systems or misidentifications.

thumbnail
Figure 2. Phylogenetic tree inferred from 16S rRNA gene sequences (E. coli positions 110–1440) by maximum likelihood (Likelihood = −58560.000282); branch support values are indicated at the node.

Clusters observed using at least 3 construction methods were collapsed or indicated with a black spot at the node. The E. coli sequence was used as out-group. The evolutionary distance between two sequences is obtained by adding the lengths of the horizontal branches connecting them and using the scale bars (0.1 mutation per position). The box in the upper right corner displays a subtree comprising sequences not included in the main figure and that share more than 95% similarity with Leptolyngbya BL0902.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0030901.g002

Characterization of growth traits

Growth traits including ranges of tolerance for temperature, salinity, pH, light, and urea were determined for Leptolyngbya BL0902 and two strains of Arthrospira, A. platensis BL0909, and A. maxima CS-328 (Table 3) as well as 40 other strains (data not shown). A. platensis BL0909 had a strict requirement for bicarbonate addition and was unable to grow in BG-11 medium that did not contain bicarbonate. Leptolyngbya BL0902 was more versatile with respect to growth media and grew well in both BG-11 and Zarrouk media. All three strains grew well in the 22–40°C temperature range and tolerated up to 0.5 M NaCl, high pH up to 11, and high solar irradiance. Unlike A. maxima, Leptolyngbya BL0902 was able to tolerate urea at 32 mM, which is commonly used in algal outdoor growth ponds for control of rotifer and amoebae predators.

thumbnail
Table 3. Growth traits of A. maxima, A. platensis, and Leptolyngbya BL0902.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0030901.t003

Growth rate and productivity measurements

The doubling time of Leptolyngbya BL0902 was measured and compared to Arthrospira strains under laboratory and outdoor growth conditions (Table 4). Leptolyngbya BL0902 grew faster than both Arthrospira species under laboratory conditions. In outdoor open-pond conditions, Leptolyngbya sp. BL0902 outperformed A. maxima CS-328 and had productivity on par with A. platensis BL0909. Importantly, Leptolyngbya BL0902 showed good culture stability during 3 months of continuous growth in 1-acre cultivation ponds during the summer 2009 season (Fig. 1e). Additionally, Leptolyngbya BL0902 formed long filaments that could be harvested with a vibrating screen similarly to Arthrospira spp. (Fig. 1f).

thumbnail
Table 4. Doubling time under laboratory conditions and productivity measurements in outdoor ponds.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0030901.t004

Heterotrophic growth

We tested Leptolyngbya BL0902 for heterotrophic growth with glycerol and 8 different sugars: glucose, fructose, sucrose, lactose, galactose, arabinose, maltose, and mannose. To prevent growth of potential contaminants, we used a genetically engineered Leptolyngbya BL0902 strain expressing the aadA gene and supplemented the media with Sp and Sm to a final concentration of 2 µg/ml for each of those antibiotics. The engineered Leptolyngbya BL0902 was incubated in the presence of glycerol and each of the 8 sugars at 10 mM final concentration, kept in complete darkness for over 3 weeks or incubated in the light in the presence of the photosynthesis inhibitor DCMU (3-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-1,1-dimethylurea) at 10 µM final concentration. In both conditions, none of the 8 sugars or glycerol supported growth of Leptolyngbya BL0902, demonstrating that Leptolyngbya BL0902 cannot grow heterotrophically or photoheterotrophically under these conditions. However, in the presence of glucose, fructose, or sucrose, survival of Leptolyngbya BL0902 was improved in the tested conditions.

Cellular composition and fatty acid profile

The composition of major cellular components (protein, carbohydrate, fat, ash, fiber, moisture, and fatty acid methyl ester [FAME]) was determined for A. maxima CS-328 and Leptolyngbya BL0902 (Table 5). Calculated as ash-free dry weight, Leptolyngbya BL0902 produced 28.8% FAME compared to 15.6% for A. maxima CS-328. Fatty acid profiles are shown in Figure 3. A. platensis BL0909 and A. maxima CS-328 both contained high levels of tri-unsaturated fatty acids, whereas Leptolyngbya BL0902 contained a higher proportion of monounsaturated fatty acids.

thumbnail
Figure 3. Fatty acid profiles of A. maxima CS-328, Leptolyngbya BL0902, and A. platensis BL0909.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0030901.g003

thumbnail
Table 5. Cellular composition and FAME content as measured by Inventure Chemical.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0030901.t005

Antibiotic sensitivity

The antibiotic sensitivity of Leptolyngbya BL0902 was evaluated for nine antibiotics in BG-11 liquid culture media and on nitrocellulose filters on BG-11 agar plates, which mimics conditions used for genetic conjugations (Table 6). Leptolyngbya BL0902 was sensitive to low concentrations of Sp, Sm, Em, and Cm and moderate concentrations of Nm. Leptolyngbya BL0902 was somewhat resistant to Km, Gm, and G418 at commonly used concentrations; therefore, these antibiotics could be used to prevent growth of other organisms in laboratory settings. These data provide a panel of antibiotics that could be used as selective markers in genetic manipulations with Leptolyngbya BL0902.

Conjugal transfer and maintenance of RSF1010-based plasmids

Conjugation from E. coli donor cells has been used to introduce DNA into a wide variety of cyanobacteria, and broad-host-range plasmids derived from RSF1010 have been shown to replicate in many strains [18]. To determine whether these methods could be used with Leptolyngbya BL0902, we performed biparental matings with Leptolyngbya BL0902 and a conjugal E. coli donor strain (AM4338) that contained the cargo plasmid pRL1383a, the conjugal plasmid pRL443, and the helper plasmid pRL623. Transconjugant colonies became apparent on selective mating plates after about one week and showed robust growth after transfer to fresh selective plates. Control conjugations without the cargo plasmid never showed any antibiotic resistant colonies.

The ability to genetically modify Leptolyngbya BL0902 was further demonstrated by the heterologous expression of the yemGFP gene. The recombinant plasmid pAM4413 carrying the yemGFP gene was electroporated into AM1359, and the resulting strain was conjugated with Leptolyngbya BL0902. After one week, isolated transconjugant colonies were restreaked on fresh selective plates, and isolated colonies were then patched to fresh selective plates. Liquid cultures were grown in selective BG-11 medium. Expression of yemGFP was observed by fluorescence microscopy (Fig. 4).

thumbnail
Figure 4. Photomicrographs of wild-type Leptolyngbya BL0902 (a, b, and c) and a strain of Leptolyngbya BL0902 harboring pAM4418-yemGFP expressing the yemGFP gene (d, e, and f).

(a, d) Differential interference contrast (DIC); (b, e) DIC and green fluorescence; (c, f) Chlorophyll (red) and green fluorescence. Scale bar, 10 µm.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0030901.g004

Our initial conjugation experiments were performed with donor strains carrying the helper plasmid pRL623, which carries 3 methylase genes. The methylase genes are required for efficient conjugation into Anabaena recipient strains [25]. To assess the necessity of these genes for Leptolyngbya BL0902 conjugation, we determined the efficiency of conjugal transfers in biparental and triparental matings with and without the helper plasmid pRL623 and with two different conjugal plasmids: pRL443 and pRK2013 (Table 7). The conjugation protocol was modified as described in the methods to yield more reproducible data for transconjugant colony forming units (CFUs).

thumbnail
Table 7. Comparison of conjugal transfer efficiencies in Leptolyngbya BL0902 mating experiments.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0030901.t007

Approximately 3% of potential colony-forming units were transformed by conjugal transfer in bi- or tri-parental matings, which was increased about two-fold when a methylase-expressing helper plasmid was included (Table 7). We did not observe significant differences between bi-parental and tri-parental matings or between the conjugal plasmids pRL443 and pRK2013 (Table 7).

Transposon mutagenesis

To determine if transposon mutagenesis could be used as a genetic tool with Leptolyngbya BL0902, biparental matings were carried out with the E. coli strain AM4353, which harbors the Spr Smr Emr Tn5-692 transposon on the suicide plasmid pRL692, as well as helper and conjugal plasmids (Table 8). Hundreds of Spr Smr transconjugant colonies were obtained on mating plates after incubation for a week, and selected Spr Smr colonies grew normally on fresh Sp+Sm BG-11 plates and in liquid medium. However, no colonies grew on medium containing Em at concentrations as low as 1.25 µg/ml. BL0902 is very sensitive to Em, and the Tn5-692 Emr gene may not be expressed in Leptolyngbya BL0902. A repetition of the transposon-tagging experiment produced similar results.

The integration of the Tn5-692 transposon into the Leptolyngbya BL0902 chromosome was confirmed by a set of PCR assays carried out on three putative transconjugant clones. The clones were grown in BG-11 liquid culture, which resulted in the loss of all viable donor E. coli cells. The absence of E. coli was confirmed by a lack of colony formation when transconjugant cyanobacterial samples were inoculated on BG-11 plates supplemented with 0.04% (wt/vol) glucose and 5% (vol/vol) LB broth and incubated in the dark at 30°C, or on LB plates incubated at 37°C. Two pairs of primers were used for the PCR assays. The primer pair pRL692-6976F/7350R (Table 9) amplifies a 421-bp fragment within the origin of transfer (OriT) of the plasmid backbone from position 6953 to position 7373 of pRL692. The primer pair pRL692-2118F/2418R amplifies a 347-bp fragment within the transposon Tn5-692 from position 2095 to position 2441 of pRL692. The OriT primer pair produced PCR products in the positive-control samples only (Fig. 5, lanes 4 and 5), indicating the absence of the suicide plasmid in any of the three transconjugants and confirming the loss of all E. coli cells. The Tn5-692 primer pair produced PCR products from all three transconjugant strains and the positive controls, but not from WT Leptolyngbya BL0902. These data show that the Tn5-692 transposon can be used for transposon tagging in Leptolyngbya BL0902.

thumbnail
Figure 5. PCR assays showing integration of the Tn5-692 transposon into the chromosome of Leptolyngbya BL0902.

(lanes 1, 2, 3) Transconjugant Leptolyngbya BL0902 clones, (lane 4) E. coli strain AM4353 harboring pRL692, (lane 5) pRL692 DNA, (lane 6) WT Leptolyngbya BL0902, (lane 7) no template DNA, (lane M) 100-bp ladder size marker. Primer pairs used to amplify the plasmid backbone (left) and the Tn5-692 transposon (right) are shown at the bottom.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0030901.g005

Construction and testing of the pAM4418 expression vector

To facilitate the ability to introduce and express genes or noncoding and antisense RNAs in Leptolyngbya BL0902 and other cyanobacterial strains, we constructed plasmid pAM4418 based on the conjugal vector pRL1383a (Fig. 6). pAM4418 contains an E. coli lacIq gene and the inducible trc promoter upstream of a Gateway recombination cassette. Genes of interest that are cloned in a pENTR vector can be introduced into pAM4418 by an LR recombination reaction. We monitored the expression of yemGFP as fluorescence emission intensity in Leptolyngbya BL0902 harboring pAM4418-yemGFP for two days following induction with IPTG. The reporter was constitutively expressed at moderately high levels, but there was no significant increase in yemGFP fluorescence intensity with IPTG addition at final concentrations ranging from 0.1 to 10 mM. We conclude that the trc promoter functions well in Leptolyngbya BL0902, but that either the lacIq gene is not expressed or the LacI protein fails to repress expression from the trc promoter on pAM4418.

thumbnail
Figure 6. Map of the engineered shuttle plasmid pAM4418 carrying trpA terminator, lacIq promoter and gene, terminator from the E. coli lpp gene, trc promoter, Gateway recombination cassette, T2 terminator from rrnB, and backbone of pRL1383a.

Map drawn with SeqBuilder (Lasergene 8, DNASTAR).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0030901.g006

Discussion

Leptolyngbya BL0902 provides a new experimental model for cyanobacterial research that is focused on the goal of outdoor commercial production. Its growth traits related to harvestability, temperature range, and tolerance of high salt, pH, and light, paired with facile genetic manipulation, make Leptolyngbya BL0902 a potential commercial production platform strain. Leptolyngbya BL0902 growth rates in the laboratory and in outdoor ponds were similar to those of Arthrospira spp. that are currently grown at commercial scales, and large-scale outdoor pond cultures showed excellent stability during 3 months of growth in the summer of 2009. This is noteworthy because 13 out of 15 tested strains failed attempts to scale up to 1-acre growth ponds (unpublished observations).

Morphology and molecular data (16S rRNA and ITS gene sequences) place Leptolyngbya BL0902 as a novel isolate of this genus, within a cluster of thin oscillatorians isolated from a variety of biotopes and locations, which suggests a high resilience and competitiveness in a range of environmental conditions. The Leptolyngbya genus is heterogeneous and polyphyletic with a high genotypic diversity hidden behind a simple morphology. Specimens have been reported from hypersaline, marine, and freshwater habitats ranging from Antarctic lakes to hot springs. Most would have originally been identified as species of Lyngbya Agardh 1824, Phormidium Kutzing 1843, Plectonema Thuret 1875, or Oscillatoria Vaucher 1803, and were grouped under the name LPP [24], [26]. This group was later revised to form a new genus, Leptolyngbya [27].

Leptolyngbya BL0902 accumulated higher FAME content and a higher proportion of mono-unsaturated fatty acids, preferable for a biodiesel feedstock, than two strains of Arthrospira spp.; the latter have high levels of tri-unsaturated fatty acids, preferable for nutritional applications but not desirable for fuel applications due to low oxidative stability. FAME recovery by a proprietary direct conversion process (Inventure Chemical, Inc.) for Leptolyngbya BL0902 and other cyanobacterial strains was significantly higher than has been reported by standard Bligh-Dyer extraction for cyanobacterial strains [28]. Further improvement of the Leptolyngbya BL0902 fatty acid profile may be achieved by overexpressing the native or a heterologous Δ-9 acyl-lipid desaturase to increase the proportion of monounsaturated fatty acids.

Microalgal industrial production strains will need to be genetically manipulable. At least thirty-three different strains of cyanobacteria have been transformed, and a variety of genetic tools have become available since the unicellular cyanobacterium S. elongatus PCC 7942 (formerly Anacystis nidulans R2) was transformed four decades ago [18], [29]. While transformation and electroporation are used for some strains, including a few naturally transformable cyanobacteria [16], conjugation, first shown in Anabaena sp. strain PCC 7120 [30], is generally the most successful and efficient method for gene transfer into cyanobacteria [31]. Conjugal plasmids derived from the related IncPα plasmids RP4 and RK2 [32], including pRL443 and pRK2013, have been used to mediate transfer of engineered cargo plasmids into several strains [16]. We demonstrated that broad host range plasmid vectors based on RSF1010 can be efficiently transferred to and stably maintained in Leptolyngbya BL0902. Previous studies have found that pRK2013 and its Kms derivative pRK2073 promote increased conjugal transfer efficiencies in 3 strains of Chroococcidiopsis species and Nostoc punctiforme ATCC 29133 [33], [34], but pRL443 and pRK2013 performed similarly in our study.

The presence of the helper plasmid pRL623, which carries three restriction methylase genes and is necessary to overcome restriction barriers in Anabaena sp. strain PCC 7120 [25], increased conjugation efficiency in Leptolyngbya BL0902 by only two-fold. Restriction systems usually result in order-of-magnitude differences in conjugation efficiencies, but our results indicated little protective role for the methyltransferases carried by pRL623. Therefore, restriction systems do not appear to pose a significant barrier to genetic manipulation of Leptolyngbya BL0902, and the conjugation efficiency with or without a helper plasmid is on par with the efficiency reported for Anabaena sp. strain PCC 7120 [25]. Triparental and biparental matings involving the same set of plasmids performed similarly. Triparental matings, in which the conjugal and mobilizable cargo plasmids are not in the same cell at the start of mating [35] allow the use of plasmids from the same incompatibility group or that carry the same selectable markers.

Transposon mutagenesis is a powerful tool for gene discovery. As in the heterocystous and unicellular cyanobacterial strains Anabaena variabilis ATCC 29413 and S. elongatus [36], Tn5-692 is capable of transposition in Leptolyngbya BL0902. The high frequency of stable antibiotic-resistant colonies indicate that transposon mutagenesis will be a useful method for identifying new genes in Leptolyngbya BL0902 that are involved in traits related to large-scale growth, such as growth rate in open ponds and resistance to predators and pathogens. Gene discovery in Leptolyngbya BL0902 will be enhanced by the availability of a complete genome sequence, which is underway. Application of these genetic tools can lead to rapid strain modifications for improved growth properties, and the production of biomass and desired molecules such as renewable biofuels. Leptolyngbya species are not generally known to produce toxins, however there is a report of a toxin-related gene in a marine Leptolyngbya strain [37]. Identification and targeted inactivation of toxin genes would be another obvious goal for engineered strain improvement. Our work also provides a basis for developing gene transfer methods and genetic engineering tools for new strains of cyanobacteria that possess desirable characteristics for growth in a variety of different conditions and geographic locations.

Materials and Methods

Ethics Statement

This research involved field studies of algal strains grown in outdoor ponds at Carbon Capture Corporation' Algae Research Center in Imperial Valley, California, which was leased by Biolight Harvesting, Inc. during the field studies described in this work. No specific permits were required for the described field studies, which were performed at a leased commercial facility, and which did not involve endangered or protected species.

Strain isolation

Plasmids and strains related to this work are listed in Table 8. Leptolyngbya BL0902 was isolated from an open pond at the Carbon Capture Corporation Algae Research Center in Imperial Valley, CA. A sample of the pond water was serially diluted and incubated in 96 well plates at 30°C under 100-µmol photons m−2 s−1 constant light in BG-11 or Zarrouk medium. Unialgal wells were subcultured and, following visual examination, the best-growing non-redundant cultures were chosen as representatives of the strains present in the open ponds. Leptolyngbya BL0902 was one of the isolates. An axenic culture of Leptolyngbya BL0902 was obtained by picking isolated and “lean”filaments under a dissecting microscope and repeatedly streaking on agar-solidified BG-11 and BG-11 supplemented with 0.04% (wt/vol) glucose and 5% (vol/vol) LB (Lennox broth) (BG-11 Omni medium) followed by repeated serial dilution of the culture in liquid BG-11. To verify that the strain was axenic, cloned isolates were inoculated into 4 different solid and liquid media: (1) BG-11 Omni medium, (2) BG-11 supplemented with 0.01% (wt/vol) glucose, yeast extract (Difco), and Bacto-Peptone (Difco), (3) Gram-negative broth (GNB) medium (Difco), and (4) LB. Solid and liquid cultures were incubated at room temperature, 30°C, and 37°C in the dark. If no growth of heterotrophic bacteria was observed under any of the conditions after incubation for 1 month, the cultures were judged axenic. The isolates were also checked for contamination by differential interference contrast (DIC) and fluorescence microscopy after being stained with DAPI (4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole) at 10 µg ml−1. Strains were stored at −80°C in medium supplemented with 8% DMSO.

Microscopy, morphological description, and identification

Bright field, DIC, and phase contrast photomicroscopy were carried out with a Zeiss Axioskop microscope equipped with Plan-Neofluar 40x/0.75 and 100x/1.30 objectives and a SPOT RT3 25.4 2 Mp Slider camera. DIC and fluorescence microscopy were carried out and images were captured on a Delta Vision (Applied Precision, Inc.) microscope system composed of an Olympus IX71 inverted microscope equipped with an Olympus UPlanSApo 100×/1.40 objective and a CoolSNAP HQ2/ICX285 camera. Tetramethylrhodamine isothiocyanate (TRITC) filters (S555/25 excitation and S630/60 emission) were used to image autofluorescence of photosynthetic pigments, and GFP filters (S484/16 excitation and S515/30 emission) were used to image GFP fluorescence. Image acquisition, deconvolution, and analysis (cell measurements) were performed using Resolve3D softWoRx-Acquire (Version 4.0.0) and Adobe Photoshop CS4.

Morphological description and identification were based on the taxonomic work of Komárek and Anagnostidis [38].

Molecular identification

PCR amplification of the 16S rRNA gene plus the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) between the 16S rRNA gene and the 23S rRNA gene was carried out from an isolated colony of Leptolyngbya BL0902 using the primer pair 16S27F/23S30R as described previously [39]. Sequencing was carried out by GENEWIZ (La Jolla, CA, USA) using the primers: 16S27F, 16S378F, 16S1490R, and 23S30R [39]. Base calling and sequence assemblies were made using the software package Phred/Phrap and Consed [40][42].

The 16S rRNA gene sequence (E. coli positions: 101–1449) and the ITS of Leptolyngbya BL0902 were initially analyzed by similarity search using the basic local alignment search tool (BLAST) software. The 16S rRNA gene sequence of Leptolyngbya BL0902 was added to the database of the ARB software package [43] and aligned with the reference alignment ‘ILVA SSU Ref 100’[44]. For further analyses, 328 sequences covering the E. coli positions 110–1440 were chosen with the software mothur [45] as one representative sequence per OTU (operational taxonomic unit), which was defined as a group of sequences sharing at least 97.5% identity. Ambiguously aligned positions were deleted from the alignment using Gblocks 0.91b [46] with settings that allowed the most relaxed selection of blocks. Phylogenetic trees were constructed using four methods: (1) The Maximum Likelihood of PHYML [47] using a SH-like branch support and based on a GTR+I+G model using 4 categories of substitution rate; the GTR+I+G model was determined to be the most appropriate to our dataset according to the Perl script MrAIC (version 1.4.3, Evolutionary Biology Centre, Uppsala University, Sweden [http://www.abc.se/~nylander/mraic/mraic.html]); the proportion of invariant sites and gamma distribution parameter were estimated by PHYML from the dataset. (2) The Wagner parsimony of DNAPARS as implemented in PHYLIP 3.69 [48] with the jumble option set to 10 and global rearrangements that involved the construction of 4800 trees. (3) The Bayesian Markov Chain Monte Carlo method as implemented in BEAST [49] based on a GTR+I+G model using 4 categories of substitution rate (ChainLength = 1.106, LogEvery = 100). (4) The Neighbour joining method on a Jukes and Cantor distances matrix as implemented in PHYLIP with a bootstrap analysis involving the construction of 1000 trees. Related sequences sharing more than 95% similarity with Leptolyngbya BL0902 not included in the above-mentioned selection were incorporated in Figure 2 as a subtree (boxed) built according to the first method afore mentioned.

Characterization of growth traits

Ranges of tolerances for temperature, salinity, pH, light intensity, and urea concentration were determined for Leptolyngbya BL0902 and compared with 40 other cyanobacterial strains (data not shown) including two strains of Arthrospira, A. platensis BL0909 and A. maxima CS-328. Traits were assessed in 6- or 24-well plates containing liquid BG-11 or BG-11 supplemented with 20 mM NaHCO3 for Arthrospira spp. Unless temperature or light intensity was being investigated, cultures were maintained at 30°C under continuous light with an intensity of 125 µmol photons m−2 s−1 as measured with a QSL-100 Quantum light meter (Biospherical Instruments, Inc.). The temperature effect on growth was evaluated at 10°C, 22°C, 30°C, and 40°C, and the effect of light intensity was evaluated at 15, 125, 250, and 500 µmol photons m−2 s−1. To assess growth at various NaCl concentrations, BG-11 medium containing 20 mM HEPES (pH 8.0) was adjusted to final concentrations of 0.1, 0.25, 0.5, 1, and 2 M NaCl. The influence of pH on growth was investigated with culture media adjusted to pH 8.0 with 10 mM HEPES, pH 9.0 and 10.0 with 10 mM CHES, and pH 11.0 with 10 mM CAPS. Unbuffered BG-11 (pH∼7.5) was used as a control. Tolerance to urea was determined by addition of urea to final concentrations of 8, 16.7, 32, 64, and 100 mM. All experiments included control BG-11 samples. Cultures were incubated for 2 weeks except for growth at 10°C, for which plates were incubated for up to one month. Growth was determined by visual assessment.

The doubling time of Leptolyngbya BL0902 was measured and compared to A. platensis BL0909 and A. maxima CS-328 under both laboratory and outdoor growth conditions. Laboratory cultures were grown in 100 ml Zarrouk medium in 250 ml flasks on orbital shakers illuminated with 100 µmol photons m−2 s−1 in 12∶12 h light:dark and 35∶25°C temperature cycles. Optical densities at 750 nm were used to determine doubling times. Leptolyngbya BL0902 cultures were also grown in outdoor raceway ponds of an algae farm located in the Imperial Valley, CA, USA for more than 3 months continuously during the summer of 2009. The biggest ponds were about 1.2 acres and 15 cm deep, with a paddle wheel-driven flow speed of about 9 m/min (Fig. 1e). Daily average air temperatures in the Imperial Valley during the summer of 2009 (June 1 - September 30) were between 25.6°C and 40.8°C, with the lowest and highest temperatures being 16.6°C and 46.6°C, respectively. During this period, there was between 12 and 14 h of daylight with no significant precipitation and little to no cloud cover. Cyanobacterial filaments were harvested using a sloped 50 µm vibrating screen (Fig. 1f). The slurry from the screen was rinsed with fresh water, dewatered using the vibrating screen, and then spread on a cement slab to dry for two days.

Heterotrophic growth

Leptolyngbya BL0902 was tested for heterotrophic growth with glycerol and 8 different sugars: glucose, fructose, sucrose, lactose, galactose, arabinose, maltose, and mannose. To suppress growth of bacterial contaminants, these experiments were performed with a Leptolyngbya BL0902 strain containing pRL1383a, and 2 µg/ml each of spectinomycin and streptomycin were added to the growth media. The strain was incubated in the presence of glycerol or each of the 8 sugars at 10 mM final concentration and either kept in complete darkness for over 3 weeks or incubated in the light in the presence of the photosynthesis inhibitor DCMU (3-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-1,1-dimethylurea) at 10 µM final concentration.

Cellular composition and fatty acid profile

Proportions of the major cellular components including protein, carbohydrate, fat, ash, fiber, and moisture were determined by New Jersey Feed Lab. Inventure Chemical determined the percentage of fatty acid methyl ester (FAME) using 100 g dried samples collected from an outdoor open pond.

To determine fatty acid profiles, lipids were isolated from cell pellets using a modified Bligh-Dyer extraction [50] followed by transesterification with sodium methoxide, and GC-MS analysis. Samples (5 ml) of an exponentially growing culture (OD750 ∼0.8) were collected by centrifugation and resuspended in 0.8 ml of H2O. 3 ml CHCl3:MeOH (1∶2) was added and the vials were vortexed for 1 min. After 1 h incubation at 60°C, 1 ml of CHCl3 was added and the vials were vortexed for 1 min. Then, 1 ml of H2O was added, the vials were vortexed for 1 min and briefly centrifuged. The lower layer was recovered into a fresh vial and solvent was removed under a stream of nitrogen. 1 ml of 0.5 M sodium methoxide in MeOH was used to resuspend the dried crude lipid and the reaction was incubated for 30 min at room temperature. The reaction was quenched with 1 ml of H2O and the resulting methyl esters were recovered into 2 ml of hexane by vortexing for 1 min. The hexane layer was clarified by centrifugation and sampled for GCMS analysis. The extracts were analyzed on an Agilent 6890N GC equipped with a DB-FFAP column (30 m length, 0.25 mm ID, and 0.50 µm film thickness) coupled to a 5973 inert mass selective detector (Agilent Technologies, Inc.). Helium was used as the carrier gas with a flow rate of 1.2 ml/min, and 1 µl was injected into the column with a 50∶1 split ratio. The column temperature was held at 100°C for 5 min and then ramped at 10°C/min to 250°C and held for 10 min. The total run time was 30 min. Identification of the fatty acids was based on retention times and fragmentation patterns of standards.

Antibiotic sensitivity evaluation

The antibiotic sensitivity of Leptolyngbya BL0902 was evaluated against a panel of antibiotics in BG-11 liquid culture media and on 25 mm nitrocellulose filters laid on BG-11 agar. The tested antibiotic concentrations were ¼, ½, 1, 2, and 4 times the concentrations commonly used in our laboratory for the selection of recombinant cyanobacterial strains: 5 µg/ml kanamycin (Km), 2 µg/ml gentamicin (Gm), 20 µg/ml erythromycin (Em), 7.5 µg/ml chloramphenicol (Cm), 25 µg/ml neomycin (Nm), and 10 µg/ml G418. 2 µg/ml each of streptomycin (Sp) and spectinomycin (Sm) were used together for Spr/Smr strains to limit the appearance of spontaneous resistant mutants.

Mating and conjugal transfer of plasmid DNA

Transformations of Leptolyngbya BL0902 through biparental and triparental conjugations followed published protocols [25], [51], [52] with minor modifications. Our standard biparental matings involved the cyanobacterial strain Leptolyngbya BL0902 and an E. coli strain (DH10B) that harbored the following three plasmids: (i) the conjugal plasmid pRL443, an Apr Tcr Kms derivative of RP4 [51], or pRK2013, a Kmr plasmid containing the transfer genes of RK2 cloned onto a ColE1 replicon [34], [53], (ii) the “elper”plasmid pRL623, which carries the gene for MobColK and methylase genes encoding M.AvaI, M.Eco47II, whose product methylates AvaII sites, and M.EcoT22I, an isoschizomer of M.AvaIII [25], and (iii) the cargo plasmid pRL1383a, pAM4413, or pRL692. Plasmid pRL1383a (GenBank Accession No. AF403426) is a Spr Smr derivative of RSF1010 [54] and pRL692 (GenBank Accession No. AF424805) carries the Spr/Smr and Emr mobile element Tn5-692 [36]. Triparental matings involved the strain BL0902 and two E. coli strains: a cargo strain carrying the cargo plasmid with or without a helper plasmid and a conjugal strain carrying a conjugal plasmid.

E. coli strains were grown in 3 ml LB with the appropriate antibiotic(s) and incubated at 37°C overnight. Cells were harvested from 2 ml of each E. coli culture by centrifugation and resuspended in 2 ml fresh LB. This step was repeated twice to wash the cells. After the third centrifugation, the cells were resuspended in 200 µl BG-11. Five milliliters of a growing Leptolyngbya BL0902 culture were harvested by centrifugation at low speed (4000 × g) and resuspended in 1 ml BG-11. The filaments were then fragmented in a water bath sonicator for 5 to 15 min so that more than half of the filaments were shorter than 5 cells. Fragmentation of filaments is not essential for efficient conjugation but is required for quantitative experiments. The cyanobacterial cells were collected by centrifugation for 2 min and resuspended in 1 ml BG-11. The cargo strain, the conjugal strain (for triparental mating), and Leptolyngbya BL0902 were combined, pelleted by centrifugation, and finally resuspended in 200 µl BG-11. The conjugation mixture was incubated for about 1 h in low light at 30°C; however this incubation step may be unnecessary and is possibly even detrimental to conjugation efficiency. The cells were collected by centrifugation, resuspended with a small volume of BG-11, and then spread on sterile nitrocellulose filters laid on BG−11+5% (vol/vol) LB agar plates (mating plates). The mating plates were incubated without antibiotic selection for 18 to 24 h in low light at 30°C, and then the filters were transferred to BG-11 agar with 2 µg/ml each Sp and Sm. After incubation for 6 to 8 days, isolated transconjugant colonies were patched on fresh selective BG-11 plates. Finally, cyanobacterial cells scraped from grown patches were transferred to 100 ml of selective liquid BG-11 in 250 ml flasks and grown at 27–30°C and 100 µmol photons m−2 s−1.

For experiments to test conjugation efficiency the protocol was modified slightly to allow better reproducibility for comparisons between experiments. The E. coli strains were grown overnight in 3 ml LB containing appropriate antibiotic(s), and 2 ml of culture were transferred to 25 or 50 ml LB plus antibiotic(s) and grown for a few hours to an OD600 of 0.6 to 0.8. Each culture was then diluted to an OD600 of 0.6, and for each mating, 2 ml samples were washed twice with LB medium and resuspended in 0.2 ml BG-11. For triparental matings, 2 ml of each of the two E. coli strains were combined before resuspension in 0.2 ml BG-11. For the recipient cells, a 100 ml BG-11 culture of Leptolyngbya BL0902 was grown to an OD750 of 0.7. Four aliquots of the culture (approximately 25 ml each) were transferred to 50 ml conical centrifugation tubes, and the filaments were fragmented by sonication using a needle probe with ten 5-second pulses separated by 5-second pauses at a power setting of 20%, which resulted in short filaments of which about half were 3 or fewer cells in length. The fragmented filaments were collected by centrifugation at 4000 × g for 10 min and resuspended in 20 ml BG-11. Each mating contained 1 ml of Leptolyngbya BL0902 concentrated cells and 0.2 ml of concentrated E. coli cells. For each mating, 7.5 and 30 µl of the conjugation mixture, corresponding to about 3×106 and 1×107 short filaments (estimated microscopically with a hemocytometer), respectively, were adjusted to 150 µl with BG-11, and the cells were evenly spread on 90 mm nitrocellulose filters lying on mating plates using about 2 g of sterilized glass beads (2 to 4 mm diameter). To determine the total number of CFU in each conjugation mixture, 1 µl was serially diluted to 10−4 and 10−5, and 150 µl of each dilution, corresponding to about 6×102 and 6×103 short filaments per ml, respectively, was plated and grown in parallel with the conjugation experiments.

Construction of recombinant plasmids based on the pRL1383a backbone

The pRL1383a backbone includes the following modules: multiple cloning site, SP6 promoter from pBAC108L (GenBank U51114), aadA promoter and gene conferring Spr Smr, rrnC terminator from Lorist6 (GenBank X98450), origin of replication, mob genes, rep genes, trpA terminator from Lorist6 (GenBank X98450), and T7 promoter from pBAC108L (GenBank U51114).

To construct pAM4413, a PCR fragment that included a lacIq gene with an S289L mutation (pAM2255) and a trc promoter with an R80I mutation (pAM2255), a yemGFP (yeast-enhanced monomeric green fluorescent protein) gene with F64L, S65T, and A206K mutations, and a rrnB transcriptional terminator (pAM2255) was amplified from the pEXP_1ax-yemGFP plasmid with the primers laclq_F and rrnB_R (Table 9) carrying the restriction sites EcoRI and AvrII, respectively. The PCR fragment was gel purified and ligated into pRL1383a to replace the fragment between the EcoRI and AvrII restriction sites.

The destination vector pAM4418 was constructed by ligation of a pDEST_M3 fragment and pRL1383a. The pDEST_M3 fragment included the following modules: trpA terminator [55], lacIq promoter with −35 to +1 region replaced by the conII synthetic promoter [56], lacIq gene (synthetic ORF codon optimized for Synechococcus elongatus PCC 7492), Ipp transcriptional terminator [57], trc promoter (ends defined by the overlap between pTrcHis2-A for the 5′ end and pAM2255 for the 3′ end), Gateway cassette reading frame A comprising cat (chloramphenicol resistance) and ccdB (DNA gyrase toxin [58]) genes flanked by attR1 and attR2 recombination sites (Invitrogen), and the rrnB T2 terminator [59]. The pDEST_M3 fragment was isolated with NaeI and HindIII, treated with the T4 polymerase to generate blunt ends, and gel purified by electrophoresis. pRL1383a was linearized with HincII and dephosphorylated with CIP to prevent self-ligation. The ligation was transformed into One Shot ccdB Survival T1 Phage-Resistant (T1R) chemically competent E. coli (Invitrogen).

To construct pAM4418-based expression plasmids, the gene of interest needs to be amplified by PCR using a forward primer carrying a CACC motif at the 5′ end. The resulting PCR product then can be cloned into a pENTR-SD/D-TOPO vector (Invitrogen) and subsequently used in an LR recombination reaction (Gateway Technology, Invitrogen) with the pAM4418 vector. To test the pAM4418 vector, the yemGFP gene was amplified by PCR from pJS151 using the primer pair yemGFP_F/yemGFP_R and cloned as described above to make the plasmid pAM4418-yemGFP.

GenElute HP Plasmid Miniprep Kits (Sigma-Aldrich) were used for isolation of plasmid DNA from E. coli strains. Plasmids were digested with restriction endonucleases from New England BioLabs or other suppliers in buffers recommended by the suppliers. All plasmid constructs were first screened by restriction analyses, and one positive clone was confirmed by DNA sequencing. Sequences were deposited in GenBank under the following accession numbers: JN376076-JN376080.

IPTG induction of the trc promoter in pAM4418-yemGFP

Leptolyngbya BL0902 wild type and derivatives harboring the plasmid pAM4418-yemGFP or only pAM4418 were grown in BG-11 liquid medium, diluted to an OD750 of 0.15, and grown as 25 ml samples in 125 ml flasks on a shaker under standard conditions. After two days, the cultures were supplemented with IPTG to final concentrations of 0.1, 0.2, 0.5, 1, 2, 5, and 10 mM for pAM4418-yemGFP and 1 mM for the control strains. The emission intensities of yemGFP from samples of the cultures were measured with a Tecan Infinite(R) M200 plate reader (TECAN) after induction for 0, 1.5, 3, 6, 12, 21, 24, 27, and 48 h. The excitation wavelength was set at 488 nm, and the emission was measured at 518 nm.

Acknowledgments

We thank Jim Demattia and Martin Gordon for expert management of and information related to open-pond growth at Carbon Capture Corporation facilities, and Michael Melnick for his suggestions and support.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: AT EL DMA GD SC SAK SSG JWG. Performed the experiments: AT EL DMA GD SC. Analyzed the data: AT EL DMA GD SC SAK SSG JWG. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: AT EL DMA GD SC. Wrote the paper: AT EL DMA GD SC SSG JWG.

References

  1. 1. Ducat DC, Way JC, Silver PA (2011) Engineering cyanobacteria to generate high-value products. Trends Biotechnol 29: 95–103.
  2. 2. Heidorn T, Camsund D, Huang HH, Lindberg P, Oliveira P, et al. (2011) Synthetic biology in cyanobacteria engineering and analyzing novel functions. Methods Enzymol 497: 539–579.
  3. 3. Wada H, Gombos Z, Sakamoto T, Murata N (1992) Genetic manipulation of the extent of desaturation of fatty acids in membrane lipids in the cyanobacterium Synechocystis PCC6803. Plant Cell Physiol 33: 535–540.
  4. 4. Sato N, Wada H (2009) Lipid biosynthesis and its regulation in cyanobacteria. In: Wada H, Murata N, editors. Lipids in photosynthesis: essential and regulatory functions. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer. pp. 157–177.
  5. 5. Osanai T, Azuma M, Tanaka K (2007) Sugar catabolism regulated by light- and nitrogen-status in the cyanobacterium Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803. Photochem Photobiol Sci 6: 508–514.
  6. 6. Mendez-Perez D, Begemann MB, Pfleger BF (2011) Modular synthase-encoding gene involved in alpha-olefin biosynthesis in Synechococcus sp. strain PCC 7002. Appl Environ Microbiol 77: 4264–4267.
  7. 7. Schirmer A, Rude M, Li X, Popova E, Del Cardayre S (2010) Microbial biosynthesis of alkanes. Science 329: 559–562.
  8. 8. Herrero A, Flores E, editors. (2008) Cyanobacteria: Molecular Biology, Genomics and Evolution. Norfolk, UK: Caister Academic Press.
  9. 9. Pearl HW (2000) Marine Plankton. In: Whitton BA, Potts M, editors. The ecology of cyanobacteria: their diversity in time and space. Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic. pp. 121–148.
  10. 10. Flores E, Herrero A (2010) Compartmentalized function through cell differentiation in filamentous cyanobacteria. Nat Rev Micro 8: 39–50.
  11. 11. Kumar K, Mella-Herrera RA, Golden JW (2010) Cyanobacterial heterocysts. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 2009 2: a000315.
  12. 12. Kehoe DM (2010) Chromatic adaptation and the evolution of light color sensing in cyanobacteria. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107: 9029–9030.
  13. 13. Gao Q, Garcia-Pichel F (2011) Microbial ultraviolet sunscreens. Nat Rev Microbiol 9: 791–802.
  14. 14. Mur LR, Skulberg OM, Utkilen H (1999) Cyanobacteria in the environment. In: Chorus I, Bartram J, editors. Toxic cyanobacteria in water: A guide to their public health consequences, monitoring and management. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organisation. pp. 25–40.
  15. 15. Elhai J (1994) Genetic techniques appropriate for the biotechnological exploitation of cyanobacteria. J Appl Phycol 6: 177–186.
  16. 16. Flores E, Muro-Pastor AM, Meeks JC (2008) Gene transfer to cyanobacteria in the laboratory and in nature. In: Herrero A, Flores E, editors. The cyanobacteria: molecular biology, genomics and evolution. Norfolk, UK: Caister Academic Press. pp. 45–57.
  17. 17. Clerico EM, Ditty JL, Golden SS (2007) Specialized techniques for site-directed mutagenesis in cyanobacteria. Methods Mol Biol 362: 155–171.
  18. 18. Koksharova OA, Wolk CP (2002) Genetic tools for cyanobacteria. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 58: 123–137.
  19. 19. Deng MD, Coleman JR (1999) Ethanol synthesis by genetic engineering in cyanobacteria. Appl Environ Microbiol 65: 523–528.
  20. 20. Atsumi S, Higashide W, Liao JC (2009) Direct photosynthetic recycling of carbon dioxide to isobutyraldehyde. Nature Biotechnol 12: 1177–1180.
  21. 21. Roessler PG, Chen Y, Liu B, Dodge CN (2009) Secretion of fatty acids by photosynthetic microorganisms. US patent. 20090298143.
  22. 22. Toyomizu M, Suzuki K, Kawata Y, Kojima H, Akiba Y (2001) Effective transformation of the cyanobacterium Spirulina platensis using electroporation. J Appl Phycol 13: 209–214.
  23. 23. Kawata Y, Yano S, Kojima H, Toyomizu M (2004) Transformation of Spirulina platensis strain C1 (Arthrospira sp. PCC9438) with Tn5 transposase-transposon DNA-cation liposome complex. Mar Biotechnol 6: 355–363.
  24. 24. Rippka R, Deruelles J, Waterbury JB, Herdman M, Stanier RY (1979) Generic assignments, strain histories and properties of pure cultures of cyanobacteria. J Gen Microbiol 111: 1–61.
  25. 25. Elhai J, Vepritskiy A, Muro-Pastor AM, Flores E, Wolk CP (1997) Reduction of conjugal transfer efficiency by three restriction activities of Anabaena sp. strain PCC 7120. J Bacteriol 179: 1998–2005.
  26. 26. Castenholz RW, Rippka R, Herdman M, Wilmotte A (2001) Form-genus V. Leptolyngbya Anagnostidis and Komárek 1988. In: Boone DR, Castenholz RW, Garrity GM, editors. Bergey' Manual of Systematic Bacteriology. 2nd ed. New York: Springer. pp. 544–546.
  27. 27. Anagnostidis K, Komárek J (1988) Modern approach to the classification system of cyanophytes. 3 - Oscillatoriales. Arch Hydrobiol, Suppl 80 50–53: 327–472.
  28. 28. Sheng J, Vannela R, Rittmann BE (2011) Evaluation of methods to extract and quantify lipids from Synechocystis PCC 6803. Bioresour Technol 102: 1697–1703.
  29. 29. Shestakov S, Khyen N (1970) Evidence for genetic transformation in blue-green alga Anacystis nidulans. Mol Gen Genet 107: 372–375.
  30. 30. Wolk CP, Vonshak A, Kehoe P, Elhai J (1984) Construction of shuttle vectors capable of conjugative transfer from Escherichia coli to nitrogen-fixing filamentous cyanobacteria. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 81: 1561–1565.
  31. 31. Tsinoremas NF, Kutach AK, Strayer CA, Golden SS (1994) Efficient gene transfer in Synechococcus sp. strains PCC 7942 and PCC 6301 by interspecies conjugation and chromosomal recombination. J Bacteriol 176: 6764–6768.
  32. 32. Thomas CM, Smith CA (1987) Incompatibility group P plasmids: genetics, evolution, and use in genetic manipulation. Annu Rev Microbiol 41: 77–101.
  33. 33. Billi D, Friedmann EI, Helm RF, Potts M (2001) Gene transfer to the desiccation-tolerant cyanobacterium Chroococcidiopsis. J Bacteriol 183: 2298–2305.
  34. 34. Cohen MF, Wallis JG, Campbell EL, Meeks JC (1994) Transposon mutagenesis of Nostoc sp. strain ATCC 29133, a filamentous cyanobacterium with multiple cellular differentiation alternatives. Microbiology 140: 3233–3240.
  35. 35. Ditta G, Stanfield S, Corbin D, Helinski DR (1980) Broad host range DNA cloning system for gram-negative bacteria: construction of a gene bank of Rhizobium meliloti. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 77: 7347–7351.
  36. 36. Koksharova OA, Wolk CP (2002) A novel gene that bears a DnaJ motif influences cyanobacterial cell division. J Bacteriol 184: 5524–5528.
  37. 37. Frazao B, Martins R, Vasconcelos V (2010) Are known cyanotoxins involved in the toxicity of picoplanktonic and filamentous North Atlantic marine cyanobacteria? Mar Drugs 8: 1908–1919.
  38. 38. Komárek J, Anagnostidis K (2005) Cyanoprokaryota 2. In: Büdel B, Gärtner G, Krienitz L, Schagerl M, editors. Heidelberg: Elsevier GmbH, Spektrum Akademischer Verlag. Teil Oscillatoriales 759 p.
  39. 39. Taton A, Grubisic S, Brambilla E, De Wit R, Wilmotte A (2003) Cyanobacterial diversity in natural and artificial microbial mats of Lake Fryxell (McMurdo Dry Valleys, Antarctica): a morphological and molecular approach. Appl Environ Microbiol 69: 5157–5169.
  40. 40. Ewing B, Hillier L, Wendl MC, Green P (1998) Base-calling of automated sequencer traces using phred. I. Accuracy assessment. Genome Res 8: 175–185.
  41. 41. Ewing B, Green P (1998) Base-calling of automated sequencer traces using phred. II. Error probabilities. Genome Res 8: 186–194.
  42. 42. Gordon D (2003) Viewing and editing assembled sequences using Consed. Curr Protoc Bioinform 2: 11.12.11–11.12.43.
  43. 43. Ludwig W, Strunk O, Westram R, Richter L, Meier H, et al. (2004) ARB: a software environment for sequence data. Nucleic Acids Res 32: 1363–1371.
  44. 44. Pruesse E, Quast C, Knittel K, Fuchs BM, Ludwig W, et al. (2007) SILVA: a comprehensive online resource for quality checked and aligned ribosomal RNA sequence data compatible with ARB. Nucleic Acids Res 35: 7188–7196.
  45. 45. Schloss PD, Westcott SL, Ryabin T, Hall JR, Hartmann M, et al. (2009) Introducing mothur: open-source, platform-independent, community-supported software for describing and comparing microbial communities. Appl Environ Microbiol 75: 7537–7541.
  46. 46. Talavera G, Castresana J (2007) Improvement of phylogenies after removing divergent and ambiguously aligned blocks from protein sequence alignments. Syst Biol 56: 564–577.
  47. 47. Guindon S, Gascuel O (2003) A Simple, fast, and accurate algorithm to estimate large phylogenies by maximum likelihood. Syst Biol 52: 696–704.
  48. 48. Felsenstein J (2005) PHYLIP (Phylogeny Inference Package) version 3.6. Distributed by the author Department of Genome Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle.
  49. 49. Drummond AJ, Rambaut A (2007) BEAST: Bayesian evolutionary analysis by sampling trees. BMC Evol Biol 7: 214–222.
  50. 50. Bligh EG, Dyer WJ (1959) A rapid method of total lipid extraction and purification. Can J Biochem Physiol 37: 911–917.
  51. 51. Elhai J, Wolk CP (1988) Conjugal transfer of DNA to cyanobacteria. Meth Enzymol 168: 747–754.
  52. 52. Liu D, Golden JW (2002) hetL overexpression stimulates heterocyst formation in Anabaena sp. strain PCC 7120. J Bacteriol 184: 6873–6881.
  53. 53. Wu X, Lee DW, Mella RA, Golden JW (2007) The Anabaena sp. strain PCC 7120 asr1734 gene encodes a negative regulator of heterocyst development. Mol Microbiol 64: 782–794.
  54. 54. Huang G, Fan Q, Lechno-Yossef S, Wojciuch E, Wolk CP, et al. (2005) Clustered genes required for the synthesis of heterocyst envelope polysaccharide in Anabaena sp. strain PCC 7120. J Bacteriol 187: 1114–1123.
  55. 55. Wilson KJ, Sessitsch A, Corbo JC, Giller KE, Akkermans AD, et al. (1995) beta-Glucuronidase (GUS) transposons for ecological and genetic studies of rhizobia and other gram-negative bacteria. Microbiology 141: 1691–1705.
  56. 56. Li R, Golden SS (1993) Enhancer activity of light-responsive regulatory elements in the untranslated leader regions of cyanobacterial psbA genes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 90: 11678–11682.
  57. 57. Nakamura K, Inouye M (1979) DNA sequence of the gene for the outer membrane lipoprotein of E. coli: an extremely AT-rich promoter. Cell 18: 1109–1117.
  58. 58. Bahassi E, O'Dea M, Allali N, Messens J, Gellert M, et al. (1999) Interactions of CcdB with DNA gyrase. Inactivation of GyrA, poisoning of the gyrase-DNA complex, and the antidote action of CcdA. J Biol Chem 274: 10936–10944.
  59. 59. Orosz A, Boros I, Venetianer P (1991) Analysis of the complex transcription termination region of the Escherichia coli rrnB gene. Eur J Biochem 201: 653–659.
  60. 60. Castiglioni B, Rizzi E, Frosini A, Sivonen K, Rajaniemi P, et al. (2004) Development of a universal microarray based on the ligation detection reaction and 16S rRNA gene polymorphism to target diversity of cyanobacteria. Appl Environ Microbiol 70: 7161–7172.
  61. 61. Siegesmund MA, Johansen JR, Karsten U, Friedl T (2008) Coleofasciculus Gen. Nov (Cyanobacteria): Morphological and molecular criteria for revision of the genus Microcoleus Gomont. J Phycol 44: 1572–1585.
  62. 62. Taton A, Grubisic S, Ertz D, Hodgson DA, Piccardi R, et al. (2006) Polyphasic study of Antarctic cyanobacterial strains. J Phycol 42: 1257–1270.
  63. 63. Taton A, Grubisic S, Balthasart P, Hodgson DA, Laybourn-Parry J, et al. (2006) Biogeographical distribution and ecological ranges of benthic cyanobacteria in East Antarctic lakes. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 57: 272–289.
  64. 64. Li Z, Brand J (2007) Leptolyngbya nodulosa sp. nov. (Oscillatoriaceae), a subtropical marine cyanobacterium that produces a unique multicellular structure. Phycologia 46: 396–401.
  65. 65. Ishida T, Yokota A, Sugiyama J (1997) Phylogenetic relationships of filamentous cyanobacterial taxa inferred from 16S rRNA sequence divergence. J Gen Appl Microbiol 43: 237–241.
  66. 66. Janse I, Kardinaal WE, Agterveld MK, Meima M, Visser PM, et al. (2005) Contrasting microcystin production and cyanobacterial population dynamics in two Planktothrix-dominated freshwater lakes. Environ Microbiol 7: 1514–1524.
  67. 67. Marquardt J, Palinska KA (2007) Genotypic and phenotypic diversity of cyanobacteria assigned to the genus Phormidium (Oscillatoriales) from different habitats and geographical sites. Arch Microbiol 187: 397–413.
  68. 68. Gorelova OA, Kosevich IA, Baulina OI, Fedorenko TA, Torshkhoeva AZ, et al. (2009) Associations between the white sea invertebrates and oxygen-evolving phototrophic microorganisms. Moscow Univ Biol Sci Bull 64: 16–22.
  69. 69. Wood SA, Rueckert A, Cowan DA, Cary SC (2008) Sources of edaphic cyanobacterial diversity in the Dry Valleys of Eastern Antarctica. ISME J 2: 308–320.
  70. 70. Mutsuda M, Michel K-P, Zhang X, Montgomery BL, Golden SS (2003) Biochemical properties of CikA, an unusual phytochrome-like histidine protein kinase that resets the circadian clock in Synechococcus elongatus PCC 7942. J Biol Chem 278: 19102–19110.
  71. 71. Cormack BP, Valdivia RH, Falkow S (1996) FACS-optimized mutants of the green fluorescent protein (GFP). Gene 173: 33–38.
  72. 72. Zacharias DA, Violin JD, Newton AC, Tsien RY (2002) Partitioning of lipid-modified monomeric GFPs into membrane microdomains of live cells. Science 296: 913–916.
  73. 73. Yoon HS, Golden JW (1998) Heterocyst pattern formation controlled by a diffusible peptide. Science 282: 935–938.