Advertisement
Research Article

EZH2 Codon 641 Mutations are Common in BCL2-Rearranged Germinal Center B Cell Lymphomas

  • Russell J. H. Ryan mail,

    Ryan.Russell@mgh.harvard.edu

    Affiliations: Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America, Broad Institute of Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States of America

    X
  • Mai Nitta,

    Affiliation: Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America

    X
  • Darrell Borger,

    Affiliation: Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America

    X
  • Lawrence R. Zukerberg,

    Affiliation: Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America

    X
  • Judith A. Ferry,

    Affiliation: Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America

    X
  • Nancy Lee Harris,

    Affiliation: Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America

    X
  • A. John Iafrate,

    Affiliation: Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America

    X
  • Bradley E. Bernstein,

    Affiliations: Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America, Broad Institute of Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States of America, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Chevy Chase, Maryland, United States of America

    X
  • Aliyah R. Sohani equal contributor,

    equal contributor Contributed equally to this work with: Aliyah R. Sohani, Long Phi Le

    Affiliation: Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America

    X
  • Long Phi Le equal contributor

    equal contributor Contributed equally to this work with: Aliyah R. Sohani, Long Phi Le

    Affiliation: Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America

    X
  • Published: December 14, 2011
  • DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0028585

Abstract

Mutations at codon 641 of EZH2 are recurrent in germinal center B cell lymphomas, and the most common variants lead to altered EZH2 enzymatic activity and enhanced tri-methylation of histone H3 at lysine 27, a repressive chromatin modification. As an initial step toward screening patients for cancer genotype-directed therapy, we developed a screening assay for EZH2 codon 641 mutations amenable for testing formalin-fixed clinical specimens, based on the sensitive SNaPshot single nucleotide extension technology. We detected EZH2 mutations in 12/55 (22%) follicular lymphomas (FL), 5/35 (14%) diffuse large B cell lymphomas with a germinal center immunophenotype (GCB-DLBCL), and 2/11 (18%) high grade B cell lymphomas with concurrent rearrangements of BCL2 and MYC. No EZH2 mutations were detected in cases of Burkitt lymphoma (0/23). EZH2 mutations were frequently associated with the presence of BCL2 rearrangement (BCL2-R) in both the FL (28% of BCL-R cases versus 0% of BCL2-WT cases, p<0.05) and GCB-DLBCL groups (33% of BCL2-R cases versus 4% of BCL2-WT cases, p<0.04), and across all lymphoma types excluding BL (27% of BCL2-R cases versus 3% of BCL2-WT cases, p<0.003). We confirmed gain-of-function activity for all previously reported EZH2 codon 641 mutation variants. Our findings suggest that EZH2 mutations constitute an additional genetic “hit” in many BCL2-rearranged germinal center B cell lymphomas. Our work may be helpful in the selection of lymphoma patients for future trials of pharmacologic agents targeting EZH2 and EZH2-regulated pathways.

Introduction

Human mature B cell lymphomas encompass a diverse spectrum of biologically and clinically distinct entities, many of which appear to recapitulate a specific stage of B cell development by morphologic, immunophenotypic and/or gene expression criteria. Follicular lymphoma (FL), Burkitt lymphoma (BL), and a gene expression-defined subset of diffuse large B cell lymphoma (germinal center B cell-phenotype diffuse large B cell lymphoma, or GCB-DLBCL) all recapitulate biological features of normal germinal center B cells. [1], [2] As new discoveries have improved our understanding of the genetics and phenotypic characteristics of B cell lymphomas, it has become clear that some oncogenic mutations occur with increased frequency, or even exclusively, in lymphomas of a certain phenotype. One prominent example is the t(14;18)(q32;q21) IGH-BCL2 rearrangement, which leads to overexpression of the Bcl-2 oncoprotein, and is frequently present in follicular lymphoma and GCB-DLBCL, but not in other gene expression-defined subtypes of DLBCL. [3]

EZH2 encodes the enzymatic subunit of the polycomb repressive complex 2 (PRC2), which mediates gene repression through trimethylation of histone H3 at lysine 27 (H3K27). Point mutations affecting codon 641 of EZH2 were recently described in a subset of GCB-DLBCL and FL, [4] but were absent from activated B cell-phenotype DLBCL (ABC-DLBCL), small lymphocytic lymphoma, mantle cell lymphoma, and peripheral T cell lymphoma, all of which lack a germinal center phenotype. Lymphoma-associated mutations affecting EZH2 were initially reported to result in enzymatic loss-of-function based on in vitro studies which used unmodified histone tails as a substrate for modification by recombinant PRC2 complexes, but the most common variants have subsequently been shown to possess increased activity in trimethylation of H3K27 in the mono- or di-methylated state. [5], [6] Overexpression and hyperactivity of EZH2 have been implicated in the pathogenesis of several cancer types, including prostate, [7], [8] breast, and endometrial carcinomas, as well as melanoma. [9] The discovery that EZH2 is a mutant oncogene in germinal center-phenotype B cell lymphomas raises the possibility of targeting this pathway pharmacologically in the treatment of patients with these lymphomas. Important steps toward this goal include further delineation of the lymphoma types in which this mutation occurs, and development of assays amenable to detection of these mutations in routine clinical specimens.

In this study, we report the results of testing for EZH2 codon 641 mutations in a large series of B cell lymphomas of germinal center origin, using a sensitive and specific single nucleotide extension method (SNaPshot) which has been validated for clinical tumor genotyping at our institution. We detect EZH2 mutations in a significant proportion of BCL2-rearranged follicular lymphomas, BCL2-rearranged diffuse large B cell lymphomas, and high-grade B cell lymphomas with concurrent BCL2 and MYC rearrangements (so-called “double-hit lymphomas”), but not in BL. The data suggest that this mutation is not universally present in all germinal center-phenotype B cell lymphoma subtypes but appears to correlate with BCL2 status. Finally, we provide evidence that all previously reported EZH2 codon 641 mutation variants show the potential for enhanced H3K27 trimethylation activity.

Materials and Methods

Ethics statement

All research was conducted with the written approval of the Partners Healthcare Human Research Committee in accordance with the Ethical Principles and Guidelines for the Protection of Human Subjects of Research, generally known as the “Belmont Report.”

Case selection

Cases of FL, GCB-DLBCL, MYC and BCL2 rearranged “double hit” lymphomas (DHL), and BL were identified from our pathology archives. All cases were diagnosed according to WHO 2008 criteria, and cases of uncertain classification were reviewed by a panel of expert hematopathologists (A.R.S., L.R.Z., J.A.F., and N.L.H.). The follicular lymphoma cohort was enriched for cases of low morphologic grade and a Ki-67 proliferation index (PI) >30%, which prior work has suggested may represent a distinct poor prognosis subgroup. [10] GCB-DLBCL cases were identified on the basis of tumor expression of either CD10 or Bcl-6 without Mum-1. [11] DHL cases were classified as DLBCL or intermediate between DLBCL and BL by WHO 2008 criteria, but were analyzed as one unique group for this study.

Immunohistochemistry

Immunohistochemistry, including stains for CD10, Bcl-6, Mum-1, and Ki-67, was performed using protocols and antibodies validated for clinical use as described previously. [12]

DNA extraction

Areas showing at least 40% malignant cells on hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) or immunohistochemically stained slides were selected for coring (1.5 mm) of the respective formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue blocks. Total nucleic acid (TNA) was purified using the FormaPure method (Agencourt, Danvers, MA), which was automated on a Beckman Biomek II liquid handler (Beckman Coulter, Brea, CA).

SNaPshot genotyping

Our institution routinely uses the SNaPshot multiplex single-nucleotide extension assay for clinical genotyping of tumor-associated point mutations. [13] We designed polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and SNaPshot extension primers to redundantly genotype the first two nucleotides of EZH2 codon 641 in both the forward and reverse direction, a strategy that can detect all possible single point mutations leading to a missense substitution at that codon. Following initial validation we applied this assay to 124 cases of B cell lymphoma with a germinal center phenotype.

SNaPshot genotyping was performed in 96-well plates and is based on a one-tube protocol validated for clinical use in the Massachusetts General Hospital Diagnostic Molecular Pathology Laboratory. Genomic DNA containing EZH2 codon 641 was PCR amplified from TNA using the forward primer 5′-AGTTAGTATATACAATGCCACCTG-3′ and reverse primer 5′- CTCTAGCATCTATTGCTGGC-3′, followed by a cleanup reaction with shrimp acid phosphatase and exonuclease 1 (USB). The SNaPshot single-nucleotide extension reaction was performed using SNaPshot Ready Reaction mix (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA) and 4 multiplexed extension primers designed to interrogate the first two nucleotides of EZH2 codon 641 on both the coding and noncoding strands. Following a final shrimp acid phosphatase cleanup reaction, extension products were evaluated by capillary electrophoresis, using an Applied Biosystems 3500×L Genetic Analyzer. Extension primers used for initial screening of all samples were as follows:

EZH2_c.1921F.v1: 5′-ACTGACTGCAGAAAAATGAATTCATCTCAGAA-3′

EZH2_c.1922F.v1: 5′-GACTGACTGACTGACTGACTGACTGACTGCAGAAAAA​TGAATTCATCTCAGAAT-3′

EZH2_c.1921R.v1: 5′-GACTGACTGACTGACTGACTGACTGTGCCTTACCTCT​CCACAGT-3′

EZH2c.1922R.v1: 5′-AGTGCCTTACCTCTCCACAG-3′

A final set of optimized extension primers was used to confirm all detected mutations:

EZH2_c.1921F.v2: 5′-CAGAAAAATGAATTCATCTCAGAA-3′

EZH2_c.1922F.v2: 5′-AGTCAGTCAGTCAGAAAAATGAATTCATCTCAGAAT-​3′

EZH2_c.1921R.v2: 5′-AGTCAGTCAGTCAGTCAGTCAGTCAGGTGCCTTACCT​CTCCACAGT-3′

EZH2_c.1922R.v2: 5′-AGTCAGTCAGTCAGTCAGTCAGTCAGTCAGTCAGTCA​GTGCCTTACCTCTCCACAG-3′

All transcript sequence references are to the EZH2 coding sequence of RefSeq isoform C, NM_001203247.1, as explained subsequently.

Fluorescence in-situ hybridization

All cases of unknown BCL2 status were assessed for the presence of BCL2 rearrangement on 2–5 micron FFPE sections using the Vysis LSI BCL2 Dual Color Break Apart Rearrangement Probe (Abbott Molecular, Des Plaines, IL). Cases were scored as BCL2-rearranged (BCL2-R) on the basis of detecting unambiguous probe separation or splitting in at least 15% of observed cells (50-cell count) as scored by two independent observers (M.N. and R.J.H.R.).

Statistical analysis

Statistical significance of differences in EZH2 mutation frequency between lymphoma groups was calculated by the two-tailed Fisher's exact test using GraphPad QuickCalcs (GraphPad Software Inc., La Jolla, CA). Statistical significance was defined as p<0.05.

Cloning of EZH2 coding sequence

The EZH2 coding sequence was PCR amplified from pooled human bone marrow cDNA (Clontech) using the primers 5′-GGGGACAAGTTTGTACAAAAAAGCAGGCTGCACCATG​GACTACAAGGACGACGATGACAAAGGCCAGACTGGGAAG-​3′ and 5′-GGGGACCACTTTGTACAAGAAAGCTGGGTTAAGGCAG​CTGTTTCAGAGG-3′ which encode an N-terminal FLAG tag. PCR products were cloned into pDONR221 and confirmed by sequencing. A clone matching the coding sequence of EZH2 RefSeq isoform C was subcloned into pCDNA3.2/V5-DEST using the Gateway recombination system (Invitrogen). Codon 641 and 689 point mutations were generated in pENTRY vectors using the QuickChange Lightning kit (Stratagene) and were subcloned into pCDNA3.2/V5-DEST. SET domain-truncated EZH2 (EZH2ΔSET) was generated by PCR subcloning with the C-terminal primer 5′-GGGGACCACTTTGTACAAGAAAGCTGGGTTCATGCCA​GCAATAGATGCTTTTT-3′ as previously described. [7]

EZH2 transgene expression and western blotting

EZH2 vectors were transfected into sub-confluent NIH-3T3 murine fibroblasts with Fugene HD reagent (Roche) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Cells were harvested 72 hours later and conventional western blotting was performed on whole-cell extracts (targets: EZH2, Beta-actin), or acid-extracted histones (targets: total H3, H3K27me3, H3K27me2, H3K27me1, H3K9me3). Ponceau S was used to confirm transfer of equivalent total protein levels in all lanes prior to antibody binding. The antibodies used for western blot are as follows:

Beta-actin – Abcam (Cambridge, MA), Cat# ab8827 (rabbit)

EZH2 – Active Motif (Carlsbad, CA), Cat# 39639 (rabbit)

H3 (total) – Abcam, Cat# ab1791 (rabbit)

H3K9me3 – Abcam, Cat# ab8898 (rabbit)

H3K27me1 – Active Motif, Cat# 39377 (rabbit)

H3K27me2 – Abcam, Cat# ab24684 (rabbit)

H3K27me3 – Millipore (Billerica, MA), Cat# 07-449 (rabbit)

RNA-seq analysis

Published RNA-seq data for DLBCL cell lines Oci-Ly1, Oci-Ly7, and Oci-Ly19 (SRA accession SRP001599) [14] were aligned to the human genome (Hg19) using TopHat [15] and analyzed with the Integrative Genomics Viewer. [16]

Results

The results of SNaPshot genotyping in 124 germinal center B cell lymphomas are shown in Table 1. Overall, we detected EZH2 codon 641 mutations in 19/124 (15%) cases. All mutations were genotyped redundantly by the corresponding forward and reverse extension primers, and were detected in independent screening and confirmatory runs. Detected mutations included all of the four most common reported variants (Figure 1). No novel mutations were identified.

thumbnail

Figure 1. SNaPshot detection of EZH2 codon 641 mutations.

A: Representative electropherograms for SNaPshot genotyping of EZH2 in B cell lymphomas. Five representative tracings are shown, representing lymphomas with wild-type EZH2 codon 641 and each of the four distinct missense substitutions detected in this study. Two complementary mutant peaks (arrows) appear in each mutant sample, corresponding to detection of the missense substitution by both the forward and reverse primers at the same nucleotide position. B: Distribution of EZH2 codon 641 missense mutations detected by SNaPshot.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0028585.g001
thumbnail

Table 1. EZH2 and BCL2 aberrations in germinal center lymphomas by category.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0028585.t001

The frequency of EZH2 mutations within the various lymphoma subtypes is given in Table 1. Among the cases screened, EZH2 mutations were detected with relatively high frequency in FL (12/55, 22%). There was no difference in EZH2 mutation frequency between the low-PI and high-PI subgroups of grade 1–2 FL (low PI 7/23, 30%; high PI 4/18, 22%, p = 0.73) or between EZH2 mutation status and morphologic FL grade (Grade 1–2 11/41, 27%; Grade 3 1/14, 7%, p = 0.16). Within the grade 3 FL group, 3 cases were graded as 3B, and none of these cases showed an EZH2 mutation. We also detected EZH2 mutations in the GCB-DLBCL (5/35, 14%) and DHL (2/11, 18%) groups, but not in any case of BL (0/23). Four of the five DLBCL EZH2 mutations belonged to a group of nine DLBCL cases that had concurrent diagnoses of grade 3 FL.

We used FISH to screen for BCL2 rearrangements in all of our lymphoma cases that were not previously tested for this aberration. As expected, BCL2 rearrangements were detected in the majority of FL (78%) and in a smaller proportion of GCB-DLBCL (34%) (Table 1). We found these mutations to occur more frequently in BCL2-rearranged lymphomas than in lymphomas lacking a BCL2 rearrangement. The increased frequency of EZH2 mutations was statistically significant in the FL group (28% of BCL2-R cases versus 0% of BCL2-WT cases, p<0.05), the DLBCL group (33% of BCL-R cases versus 4% of BCL2-WT cases, p<0.04), and across all lymphoma types excluding BL, which universally lacked both BCL2 rearrangements and EZH2 mutations (27% of BCL2-R cases versus 3% of BCL2-WT cases, p<0.003) (Figure 2).

thumbnail

Figure 2. Frequency of EZH2 mutations in germinal center lymphomas by BCL2 status.

Within each class of germinal center lymphoma, EZH2 mutations were significantly more frequent in cases with rearrangements of BCL2. Burkitt lymphoma (not shown) universally lacked both aberrations. The two total columns at right include all lymphomas in the study (fourth column) or all lymphomas except BL (fifth column) – see table 1 for subtype distribution. Abbreviations: FL = follicular lymphoma, GCB-DLBCL = germinal center B-cell phenotype diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, DHL = “double hit” high-grade B-cell lymphoma (MYC and BCL2 rearranged), BL = Burkitt lymphoma.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0028585.g002

To determine the function of lymphoma-associated EZH2 mutations in a cellular context, we PCR cloned the EZH2 coding sequence from human bone marrow cDNA. Of the 7 independent clones we sequenced, all contained the exon 8–9 splice junction seen in EZH2 Refseq isoform C (NM_001203247), corresponding to the Y641 codon designation used in the initial description of the lymphoma mutation, [4] while no clones contained the exon 8–9 splice junction seen in the slightly longer EZH2 Refseq isoform A (NM_004456), which has been used as a reference transcript in some later work, resulting in designation of the same residue as Y646. [17], [14] Alignment of published RNA-seq data for GCB-DLBCL cell lines Oci-Ly1, Oci-Ly7, and Oci-Ly19 demonstrated that the vast majority of reads spanning the EZH2 exon 8–9 splice junction support the splice junction found in isoform C, and not the junction found in isoform A (Figure S1 and data not shown). Of the available spliced expressed sequence tags (ESTs) in GenBank (release 185.0, accessed August 30, 2011) derived from various tissues, 39/41 sequences match the exon 8–9 splice junction found in isoform C.

We generated expression vectors encoding wild-type EZH2, each of the five reported lymphoma-associated codon 641 mutants, and two well-characterized synthetic methyltransferase loss-of-function mutants, the point mutant H689A, [18] and a truncation mutant lacking the C-terminal methyltransferase (SET) domain. Western blotting of acid-extracted histones from transiently transfected NIH-3T3 fibroblasts showed no difference in global H3K27me3 levels between cells transfected with empty vector, wild-type EZH2, EZH2ΔSET (Figure 3), or EZH2 H689A (data not shown). In contrast, there was a marked increase in global H3K27me3 levels in cells transfected with each of the five lymphoma-associated mutants. There was no measurable difference in global levels of H3K27me2, H3K27me1, and H3K9me3 between the transfectants (Figure S2).

thumbnail

Figure 3. Western blot of mutant EZH2 expression in NIH-3T3 fibroblasts.

Transgenic expression of vectors encoding lymphoma-associated EZH2 codon 641 mutants, but not wild-type or SET domain-truncated (ΔSET) EZH2, leads to a consistent increase in global trimethylation of H3K27 compared to vector control. Western blot antibodies are listed on the right. Ponceau S depicts total protein at ~15 kDa on acid-extract blots.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0028585.g003

Discussion

Our findings confirm and extend prior work regarding the prevalence of EZH2 mutations in B cell lymphomas and the molecular function of these mutations. Clinical detection of oncogenic point mutations conferring enzymatic gain-of-function has been a fruitful strategy for triaging patients to molecularly targeted therapy in several cancer types, including lung adenocarcinoma (EGFR mutations) [19] and melanoma (BRAF V600E mutations). [20] While specific small-molecule inhibitors of EZH2 are not yet clinically available, there is ongoing interest in the development of such agents. [5] Our SNaPshot-based assay reproducibly detected EZH2 mutations in a substantial proportion of germinal center lymphomas from routine FFPE clinical specimens. The absence of EZH2 mutations in BL highlights both the biological specificity of the EZH2 codon 641 mutation for certain lymphoma subtypes, and the technical specificity of our assay.

In comparison to prior studies, we detected a relatively high rate of EZH2 mutations in FL (22% overall and 27% in the common grade 1–2 subtype) compared to prior reports (7% [4] and 12% [21] overall). This may be due, in part, to the higher sensitivity of SNaPshot compared to Sanger (chain terminator) sequencing for detection of mutations in heterogeneous tumor tissue. [13] Our results are consistent with those of a recent study which used deep-sequencing techniques (genome, exome, and RNA sequencing) on a small number of follicular lymphomas and reported EZH2 mutations in 4/13 cases (31%). [14] Thus, the true rate of EZH2 mutations in follicular lymphoma may be higher than originally reported. EZH2 mutations were not enriched in more proliferative subgroups of FL (low grade/high PI FL and grade 3 FL), suggesting that EZH2 mutations are not associated with known aggressive subtypes of FL. Larger studies with clinical follow-up will be required to determine whether this mutation carries independent prognostic significance in FL.

In contrast to the findings in FL, we detected mutations in a relatively low proportion of GCB-DLBCL (14%) compared to the original report (22%) [4]. Our use of an immunophenotypic surrogate for the GCB-DLBCL gene expression profile could partly explain this discrepancy, although our findings are similar to those of another recent study, which found EZH2 mutations in 14% of a cohort of 63 microarray-defined GCB-DLBCL. [22] Interestingly four of the five EZH2 mutations detected in the GCB-DLBCL cohort occurred in a subgroup of nine cases in which the diagnostic biopsy showed a large cell lymphoma with areas of both follicular and diffuse growth, resulting in concurrent diagnoses of DLBCL and grade 3 FL by current WHO criteria. [1] None of these nine patients had a prior history of follicular lymphoma, and these cases appear to represent de novo high-grade germinal center phenotype lymphomas with partial residual folliculotropism. This finding raises the possibility that EZH2-mutated DLBCL may have characteristic morphological and biological features, and merits further investigation.

The EZH2 codon 641 mutation was first identified through whole-genome sequencing of a follicular lymphoma that lacked a t(14;18) IGH-BCL2 rearrangement. [4] However, we found frequent, though not universal, co-occurrence of EZH2 codon 641 mutations with rearrangements of BCL2. This implies that EZH2 mutations do not substitute for BCL2 rearrangement, but rather represent a functionally distinct oncogenic “hit” in germinal center B cell lymphomagenesis. Targeted inhibitors of BCL2 have been developed, with some advancing into clinical trials. [23] Our finding that many lymphomas show oncogenic activation of both BCL2 and EZH2 raises the possibility that combined BCL2 and EZH2 inhibition may represent a potential therapeutic strategy for many patients.

BL is a prototypical germinal center-derived lymphoma, but shows substantial biologic, pathogenic, and epidemiologic differences from FL and DLBCL. [1] Our findings suggest that EZH2 mutations are rare or absent in this lymphoma type. We did detect EZH2 mutations in MYC and BCL2-rearranged “double hit” high grade B cell lymphomas, which often show morphologic, genetic, and immunophenotypic features intermediate between DLBCL and BL, and are associated with a poor prognosis [12]. Large-scale integrative studies including gene expression profiling have suggested that the relative paucity of large-scale genomic imbalances (“genetic complexity”) can be helpful in distinguishing “true” BL from other high-grade B cell lymphomas. [24] Our results suggest that EZH2 mutation status could also potentially contribute to this distinction.

The results of our mutant EZH2 expression experiments indicate that the mutant protein conferred a gain-of-function phenotype as evidenced by increased generation of the H3K27me3 histone mark, the mechanism of which has been demonstrated by others. [5] Interestingly, the mutation that was most common in our series, Y641N, was estimated to be the most potent of the four common mutations at generating H3K27me3 in the heterozygous state, based on in-vivo enzyme kinetics, [5] while Y641H, the least common mutation in our series, was predicted to be least potent. These results suggest that more potent mutations may undergo stronger oncogenic selection. Our novel demonstration of a similar gain-of-function activity for the Y641C mutant in an overexpression assay is consistent with the reported occurrence of this mutation in B cell lymphoma, [4] in which most EZH2 mutations are thought to confer gain-of-function. However, the Y641C mutation has also been reported in an acute myeloid leukemia cell line, despite the fact that many reported EZH2 mutations in myeloid tumors are clearly inactivating. [17] These findings suggest the possibility of a more complex function for some myeloid EZH2 mutations, and highlight the need for further functional investigation of these mutant proteins. While the H3K27me3 modification is known to have a repressive effect on gene expression, the precise genomic targets that are affected by the mutant protein during lymphomagenesis and confer selective advantage have not been identified.

For our transgenic work, we used a cDNA clone for EZH2 with a coding sequence matching that of the original reported EZH2 coding sequence [25] and EZH2 Refseq isoform C (NM_001203247). Our results suggest that this is the predominant long splice form of EZH2 in lymphoma and other tissues, and for this reason we prefer to designate the EZH2 codon affected by recurrent mutations in B cell lymphoma as Y641, rather than Y646. Shorter EZH2 transcripts produced by variant splicing of exons 3 and 4 are also well supported by ESTs and other public data, and are of uncertain significance.

In conclusion, we have developed a clinically applicable assay for sensitive detection of EZH2 codon 641 mutations in FFPE tissue, and demonstrate frequent occurrence of these gain-of-function mutations in the full biological spectrum of BCL2-rearranged germinal center phenotype B cell lymphomas, but not in Burkitt lymphoma.

Supporting Information

Figure S1.

RNA-seq analysis of EZH2 transcript splice variants in the DLBCL cell line Oci-Ly1. Alignment of RNA-seq data from the DLBCL cell line Oci-Ly-1 [14] to the 3′ splice junction of EZH2 exon 8 shows that the vast majority of transcripts contain the splice junction seen in EZH2 isoform C (NM-001203247), as marked by the black arrow. Only rare reads, marked with a red arrow, support the alternate splice site seen in EZH2 isoform A (NM_004456), which encodes an additional 5 amino acids. Findings in the DLBCL cell lines Oci-Ly7 and Oci-Ly19 (not shown) were similar.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0028585.s001

(TIF)

Figure S2.

Western blot of EZH2 mutant overexpression in NIH-3T3 fibroblasts. Transgenic overexpression of lymphoma-associated EZH2 codon 641 mutants was not associated with differences in the global levels of histone marks H3K27me1, H3K27me2, and H3K9me3 compared to vector control, wild-type, or SET domain-inactivated EZH2.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0028585.s002

(TIF)

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Kathy Vernovsky, Dora Dias-Santagata, and Julie Miller for assistance with the EZH2 SNaPshot assay, Eric Mendenhall for assistance with EZH2 cloning and transgenic experiments, Oren Ram for assistance with RNA-seq analysis, and Robert Hasserjian for helpful discussions.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: RJHR AJI BEB LPL. Performed the experiments: RJHR MN DB LPL. Analyzed the data: RJHR MN ARS LPL. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: DB LRZ JAF NLH AJI BEB ARS. Wrote the paper: RJHR. Revised the manuscript: JAF ARS LPL. Reviewed, classified, and selected cases for inclusion in the study: LRZ JAF NLH ARS.

References

  1. 1. Swerdlow SH, Campo E, Harris NL, Jaffe ES, Pileri SA, et al., editors. (2008) WHO Classification of Tumors of Haematopoietic and Lymphoid Tissues. 4th ed. Lyon: International Agency for Research on Cancer. 440 p.
  2. 2. Alizadeh AA, Eisen MB, Davis RE, Ma C, Lossos IS, et al. (2000) Distinct types of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma identified by gene expression profiling. Nature 403: 503–511. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10676​951. Accessed 26 Aug 2011.
  3. 3. Rosenwald A, Wright G, Chan WC, Connors JM, Campo E, et al. (2002) The use of molecular profiling to predict survival after chemotherapy for diffuse large-B-cell lymphoma. New England Journal of Medicine 346: 1937–47. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12075​054.
  4. 4. Morin R, Johnson N, Severson T (2010) Somatic mutations altering EZH2 (Tyr641) in follicular and diffuse large B-cell lymphomas of germinal-center origin. Nature Genetics 42: 181–5. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20081​860. Accessed 26 Aug 2011.
  5. 5. Sneeringer CJ, Scott MP, Kuntz KW, Knutson SK, Pollock RM, et al. (2010) Coordinated activities of wild-type plus mutant EZH2 drive tumor-associated hypertrimethylation of lysine 27 on histone H3 (H3K27) in human B-cell lymphomas. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 107: 20980. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21078​963. Accessed 26 Aug 2011.
  6. 6. Yap D, Chu J, Berg T, Schapira M, Cheng SWG, et al. (2011) Somatic mutations at EZH2 Y641 act dominantly through a mechanism of selectively altered PRC2 catalytic activity, to increase H3K27 trimethylation. Blood 117: 2451. Available: http://bloodjournal.hematologylibrary.or​g/content/117/8/2451.short. Accessed 14 Jul 2011.
  7. 7. Varambally S, Dhanasekaran SM, Zhou M, Barrette TR, Kumar-Sinha C, et al. (2002) The polycomb group protein EZH2 is involved in progression of prostate cancer. Nature 419: 624–629. Available: http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v41​9/n6907/abs/nature01075.html. Accessed 22 Jan 2011.
  8. 8. Varambally S, Cao Q, Mani R-S, Shankar S, Wang X, et al. (2008) Genomic loss of microRNA-101 leads to overexpression of histone methyltransferase EZH2 in cancer. Science 322: 1695–9. Available: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/article​render.fcgi?artid=2684823&tool=pmcentrez​&rendertype=abstract. Accessed 30 Jul 2010.
  9. 9. Bachmann I, Halvorsen O, Collett K (2006) EZH2 Expression Is Associated With High Proliferation Rate and Aggressive Tumor Subgroups in Cutaneous Melanoma and Cancers of the Endometrium, Prostate, and Breast. Journal of Clinical Oncology 24: 268–73. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16330​673. Accessed 26 Aug 2011.
  10. 10. Wang SA, Wang L, Hochberg EP, Muzikansky A, Harris NL, et al. (2005) Low histologic grade follicular lymphoma with high proliferation index: morphologic and clinical features. American Journal of Surgical Pathology 29: 1490–6. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16224​216.
  11. 11. Hans CP, Weisenburger DD, Greiner TC, Gascoyne RD, Delabie J, et al. (2004) Confirmation of the molecular classification of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma by immunohistochemistry using a tissue microarray. Blood 103: 275–82. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14504​078. Accessed 7 Jan 2011.
  12. 12. Snuderl M, Kolman OK, Chen Y-B, Hsu JJ, Ackerman AM, et al. (2010) B-cell lymphomas with concurrent IGH-BCL2 and MYC rearrangements are aggressive neoplasms with clinical and pathologic features distinct from Burkitt lymphoma and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. American Journal of Surgical Pathology 34: 327–40. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20118​770.
  13. 13. Dias-Santagata D, Akhavanfard S, David SS, Vernovsky K, Kuhlmann G, et al. (2010) Rapid targeted mutational analysis of human tumours: a clinical platform to guide personalized cancer medicine. EMBO Molecular Medicine 2: 146–58. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20432​502. Accessed 14 Jul 2011.
  14. 14. Morin RD, Mendez-Lago M, Mungall AJ, Goya R, Mungall KL, et al. (2011) Frequent mutation of histone-modifying genes in non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Nature 476: 298–303. Available: http://www.nature.com/doifinder/10.1038/​nature10351. Accessed 24 Aug 2011.
  15. 15. Trapnell C, Pachter L, Salzberg SL (2009) TopHat: discovering splice junctions with RNA-Seq. Bioinformatics 25: 1105–11. Available: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/article​render.fcgi?artid=2672628&tool=pmcentrez​&rendertype=abstract. Accessed 18 Jul 2011.
  16. 16. Interests CF (2011) Integrative genomics viewer. Genomics 29: 24–26. doi:10.1038/nbt0111–24.
  17. 17. Ernst T, Chase AJ, Score J, Hidalgo-Curtis CE, Bryant C, et al. (2010) Inactivating mutations of the histone methyltransferase gene EZH2 in myeloid disorders. Nature Genetics 1–20. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20601​953. Accessed 6 Jul 2010.
  18. 18. Kuzmichev A, Nishioka K, Erdjument-Bromage H, Tempst P, Reinberg D (2002) Histone methyltransferase activity associated with a human multiprotein complex containing the Enhancer of Zeste protein. Genes & Development 16: 2893–905. Available: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/article​render.fcgi?artid=187479&tool=pmcentrez&​rendertype=abstract.
  19. 19. Lynch TJ, Bell DW, Sordella R, Gurubhagavatula S, Okimoto RA, et al. (2004) Activating mutations in the epidermal growth factor receptor underlying responsiveness of non–small-cell lung cancer to gefitinib. New England Journal of Medicine 350: 2129–2139. Available: http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJ​Moa040938. Accessed 22 Jul 2011.
  20. 20. Flaherty KT, Puzanov I, Kim KB, Ribas A, McArthur Ga, et al. (2010) Inhibition of mutated, activated BRAF in metastatic melanoma. New England Journal of Medicine 363: 809–19. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20818​844.
  21. 21. Bödör C, O'Riain C, Wrench D, Matthews J, Iyengar S, et al. (2011) EZH2 Y641 mutations in follicular lymphoma. Leukemia 25: 726–729. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21233​829. Accessed 26 Aug 2011.
  22. 22. Pasqualucci L, Trifonov V, Fabbri G, Ma J (2011) Analysis of the coding genome of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Nature Genetics 43: 830–837. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21804​550. Accessed 30 Aug 2011.
  23. 23. Kang MH, Reynolds CP (2009) Bcl-2 inhibitors: targeting mitochondrial apoptotic pathways in cancer therapy. Clinical Cancer Research 15: 1126–32. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19228​717.
  24. 24. Hummel M, Bentink S, Berger H, Klapper W, Wessendorf S, et al. (2006) A biologic definition of Burkitt's lymphoma from transcriptional and genomic profiling. New England Journal of Medicine 354: 2419–2430. Available: http://www.nejm.org/doi/pdf/10.1056/NEJM​oa055351. Accessed 2 Apr 2011.
  25. 25. Laible G, Wolf A, Dorn R, Reuter G, Nislow C, et al. (1997) Mammalian homologues of the Polycomb-group gene Enhancer of zeste mediate gene silencing in Drosophila heterochromatin and at S. cerevisiae telomeres. The EMBO Journal 16: 3219–32. Available: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/article​render.fcgi?artid=1169939&tool=pmcentrez​&rendertype=abstract.