Figures
Abstract
Optimizing the in vivo stability of positron emission tomography (PET) tracers is of critical importance to cancer diagnosis. In the case of 64Cu-labeled monoclonal antibodies (mAb), in vivo behavior and biodistribution is critically dependent on the performance of the bifunctional chelator used to conjugate the mAb to the radiolabel. This study compared the in vivo characteristics of 64Cu-labeled TRC105 (a chimeric mAb that binds to both human and murine CD105), through two commonly used chelators: 1,4,7-triazacyclononane-1,4,7-triacetic acid (NOTA) and 1,4,7,10-tetraazacyclododecane-1,4,7,10-tetraacetic acid (DOTA). Flow cytometry analysis confirmed that chelator conjugation of TRC105 did not affect its CD105 binding affinity or specificity. PET imaging and biodistribution studies in 4T1 murine breast tumor-bearing mice revealed that 64Cu-NOTA-TRC105 exhibited better stability than 64Cu-DOTA-TRC105 in vivo, which resulted in significantly lower liver uptake without compromising the tumor targeting efficiency. In conclusion, this study confirmed that NOTA is a superior chelator to DOTA for PET imaging with 64Cu-labeled TRC105.
Citation: Zhang Y, Hong H, Engle JW, Bean J, Yang Y, Leigh BR, et al. (2011) Positron Emission Tomography Imaging of CD105 Expression with a 64Cu-Labeled Monoclonal Antibody: NOTA Is Superior to DOTA. PLoS ONE 6(12): e28005. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0028005
Editor: Michael P. Bachmann, Carl-Gustav Carus Technical University-Dresden, Germany
Received: September 29, 2011; Accepted: October 29, 2011; Published: December 9, 2011
Copyright: © 2011 Zhang et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Funding: This work is supported, in part, by the University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center, the Department of Defense (W81XWH-11-1-0644 and W81XWH-11-1-0648), National Center for Research Resources 1UL1RR025011, and the National Institutes of Health (NIH) through the UW Radiological Sciences Training Program 5 T32 CA009206-32. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. No additional external funding was received for this study.
Competing interests: The authors have read the journal's policy and have the following conflicts: BRL is an employee of TRACON Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Patent Number: US 5,928,641 Date Patent Issued: July 27, 1999 Title of Patent: Anti-Endoglin Monoclonal Antibodies and Their Use in Antiangiogenic Therapy Assignee: Health Research Inc., Buffalo, NY Inventor: Ben K. Seon, Williamsville, NY Patent Number: US 6,190,660 B1 Date Patent Issued: February 20, 2001 Title of Patent: Anti-Endoglin Monoclonal Antibodies and Their Use in Antiangiogenic Therapy - Continuation in Part 1 Assignee: Health Research Inc., Buffalo, NY Inventor: Ben K. Seon, Williamsville, NY Patent Number: US 6,200,566 B1 Date Patent Issued: March 13, 2001 Title of Patent: Anti-Endoglin Monoclonal Antibodies and Their Use in Antiangiogenic Therapy - Continuation in Part 2 Assignee: Health Research Inc., Buffalo, NY Inventor: Ben K. Seon, Williamsville, NY Patent Number: European Patent No. 0,938,505 Date Patent Issued: March 6, 2002 Title of Patent: Anti-Endoglin Monoclonal Antibodies and Their Use in Antiangiogenic Therapy Assignee: Health Research Inc., Buffalo, NY Inventor: Ben K. Seon, Williamsville, NY Patent File Number: US 7,097,836 Date Patent Issued: August 29, 2006 Title of Patent: Method for Increasing Efficacy of Anti-Tumor Agents by Anti-Endoglin Antibody Assignee: Health Research Inc., Buffalo, NY Inventor: Ben K. Seon, Williamsville, NY Patent File Number: US 7,691,374 Date Patent Filed: April 6, 2010 Title of Patent: Method for Increasing Efficacy of Anti-Tumor Agents by Anti-Endoglin Antibody Assignee: Health Research Inc., Buffalo, NY Inventor: Ben K. Seon, Williamsville, NY The other authors declare that they have no conflict of interest. This does not alter the authors' adherence to all the PLoS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.
Introduction
Radiolabeled antibodies have been used in the clinic for diagnostic and therapeutic applications for over 40 years [1], [2]. Monoclonal antibody (mAb)-based positron emission tomography (PET), termed “immunoPET”, is an attractive method for non-invasive tumor detection since this strategy combines the high sensitivity of PET with the high antigen specificity of mAbs. If the mAb is used for systemic therapy of cancer, either as a single agent or in combination with other anti-cancer drugs, immunoPET with the radiolabeled mAb can be used for tumor detection, patient selection, as well as treatment planning [3].
Commonly used PET isotopes for antibody labeling include 64Cu (t1/2 = 12.7 h), 86Y (t1/2 = 14.7 h), 89Zr (t1/2 = 3.3 d), 124I (t1/2 = 4.2 d), among others [4]. Currently, 64Cu is the most widely used isotope for immunoPET, partly due to its wide availability, low cost, and versatile chemistry. The Emax of 656 keV for its positron emission, which is comparable to that of 18F and lower than that of 124I, can produce PET images with good spatial resolution. In addition, there are several radioisotopes of Cu available, which allow for both diagnostic imaging (with 60/61/62/64Cu) and therapeutic applications (with 64/67Cu) [5].
One of the key requirements for accurate PET imaging with 64Cu-labeled mAbs is that the tracer should be sufficiently stable during the imaging period, since PET scanners detect the distribution of 64Cu instead of the mAb itself. Over the years, many bifunctional chelators have been investigated for 64Cu-labeling, such as 1,4,7,10-tetraazacyclododecane-1,4,7,10-tetraacetic acid (DOTA) [6], [7], 1,4,7-triazacyclononane-1,4,7-triacetic acid (NOTA) [8]–[11], 1,4,8,11-tetraazacyclotetradecane-1,4,8,11-tetraacetic acid (TETA) [12], 1,4,8,11-tetraazacyclotetradecane-N,N′,N″,N‴-tetraacetic acid (BAT) [13], 4,11-bis(carboxymethyl)-1,4,8,11-tetraazabicyclo[6.6.2]hexadecane (CB-TE2A) [14], [15], 1,8-diamino-3,6,10,13,16,19-hexaazabicyclo(6,6,6)eicosane (Diamsar) [16], [17], among many others [4], [18].
CD105 (endoglin), a 180 kDa disulfide-linked homodimeric transmembrane protein, is one of the most suitable markers for tumor angiogenesis [19], [20]. In contrast to CD31, which is expressed on both normal and proliferating vasculature, CD105 is only over-expressed on proliferating tumor endothelial cells and CD105 immunohistochemistry (IHC) is the accepted standard for detecting proliferating vessels (i.e. neovessels) within tumors. Not surprisingly, high microvessel density (MVD) of CD105-expressing vessels correlates with poor prognosis and/or survival in more than 10 solid tumor types [19], [21]. TRC105 is a human/murine chimeric IgG1 mAb which binds to both human and murine CD105 [22]. The murine parent antibody of TRC105 (SN6j) has demonstrated anti-cancer efficacy in animal tumor models [20]. Recently, a multicenter Phase 1 first-in-human dose-escalation trial of TRC105 was completed in the United States and Phase 2 therapy trials are underway in ovarian, prostate, bladder, liver, and breast cancer [23].
We recently reported the first PET imaging of CD105 expression using 64Cu-DOTA-TRC105 in 4T1 murine breast tumor-bearing mice [24]. Prominent and persistent tracer uptake in the 4T1 tumor was observed. In addition, blocking experiments with unlabeled TRC105, control studies with 64Cu-DOTA-cetuximab (an isotype matched chimeric mAb that binds to the human epidermal growth factor receptor [25], [26]), as well as ex vivo histology all confirmed the in vivo target specificity of 64Cu-DOTA-TRC105. In order to further improve the in vivo behavior of 64Cu-labeled TRC105, this study investigated the performance of TRC105 conjugated to 64Cu using a NOTA chelator (i.e. 64Cu-NOTA-TRC105) through PET imaging and biodistribution studies. Through direct comparison with data obtained from our previous study of 64Cu-DOTA-TRC105 [24], we evaluated the effect of bifunctional chelators (i.e. DOTA and NOTA) on the in vivo behavior of the PET tracers.
Results
In Vitro Investigation of NOTA-TRC105
The chemistry for NOTA and DOTA conjugation to TRC105 was similar (Figure 1). NOTA conjugation of TRC105 did not alter its CD105 binding affinity, as evidenced by fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) analysis (Figure 2). At non-antigen-saturating conditions, FACS analysis of human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs, CD105-positive [24]) revealed no observable difference between TRC105 and NOTA-TRC105 at 1 µg/mL or 5 µg/mL. The binding to HUVECs was CD105-specific, as neither TRC105 nor NOTA-TRC105 bound to CD105-negative MCF-7 cells. These data were comparable to our previous studies using DOTA-TRC105 [24], with neither NOTA or DOTA conjugation affecting the antigen binding avidity or specificity of TRC105.
64Cu-Labeling
64Cu-labeling including final purification using PD-10 columns took 80±10 min (n = 5). The decay-corrected radiochemical yield was >85% based on 25 µg of TRC105 (DOTA-TRC105 or NOTA-TRC105) per 37 MBq of 64Cu, and the radiochemical purity was >98%. The specific activity of 64Cu-NOTA-TRC105 was about 3.0 GBq/mg protein, virtually identical to that of 64Cu-DOTA-TRC105 [24], assuming complete recovery of NOTA-TRC105 after size exclusion chromatography. Based on the specific activity of 64Cu (∼5% of the theoretical value of 254 Ci/µmol) and the amount of NOTA-TRC105 used for radiolabeling, it was calculated that there were 0.42±0.04 (n = 3) 64Cu ion per molecule of TRC105.
Small Animal PET Studies
The time points of 4, 24, and 48 h post-injection (p.i.) were chosen for serial PET scans after intravenous tracer injection, based on our previous studies with 64Cu-DOTA-TRC105 and other 64Cu-labeled mAbs [6], [24], [25], [27]. Coronal slices containing the 4T1 tumor are shown in Figure 3A and representative PET/CT fused images of a mouse at 48 h p.i. of 64Cu-NOTA-TRC105 are shown in Figure 3C. The quantitative data obtained from ROI analysis are shown in Figure 3B&D. Consistent with our previous findings of radiolabeled antibodies, the uptake of 64Cu-NOTA-TRC105 in the liver (due to hepatic clearance and potential trans-chelation of 64Cu) and blood pool (due to long circulation half-life of the antibody) was prominent at early time points and gradually declined over time. Liver uptake of 64Cu-NOTA-TRC105 was 11.9±1.4, 8.5±1.8, and 6.7±0.6 percentage injected dose per gram of tissue (%ID/g) at 4, 24, and 48 h p.i. respectively, while the radioactivity in the blood was 16.2±1.9, 10.7±2.0, and 8.3±0.9%ID/g at 4, 24, and 48 h p.i. respectively (n = 3; Figure 3B). Uptake of 64Cu-NOTA-TRC105 in the 4T1 tumor was clearly visible at 4 h p.i. and plateaued after 24 h p.i. (7.5±2.7, 11.4±1.9, and 13.0±1.2%ID/g at 4, 24, and 48 h p.i. respectively; n = 3; Figure 3B&D), indicating antigen specific binding.
A. Serial coronal PET images at 4, 24, and 48 h post-injection of 64Cu-NOTA-TRC105. Tumors are indicated by arrowheads. B. Time-activity curves of tumor, liver, blood, and muscle after intravenous injection of 64Cu-NOTA-TRC105 into 4T1 tumor-bearing mice (n = 3) C. Representative PET/CT images of 64Cu-NOTA-TRC105 in 4T1 tumor-bearing mice at 48 h post-injection. D. Comparison of the 4T1 tumor uptake of 64Cu-NOTA-TRC105 and 64Cu-DOTA-TRC105. *: P<0.05.
Comparing the two TRC105-based tracers, tumor uptake of 64Cu-NOTA-TRC105 increased over time while that of 64Cu-DOTA-TRC105 peaked at 24 h p.i. and slightly decreased at 48 h p.i. At the 48 h time point, the difference between tumor uptake of the two tracers was statistically significant (P<0.05; n = 3; Figure 3D).
Biodistribution Studies
Following the terminal PET scans at 48 h p.i., all mice were euthanized for biodistribution studies. In addition, a separate group of three mice were injected with 64Cu-NOTA-TRC105 and euthanized at 24 h p.i. for biodistribution studies (Figure 4A). The uptake of 64Cu-NOTA-TRC105 in the liver and spleen was significantly lower than that of 64Cu-DOTA-TRC105 at 24 h p.i., while the radioactivity in the blood pool showed an opposite trend, suggesting significantly better in vivo stability and prolonged circulation half-life of 64Cu-NOTA-TRC105. Uptake of 64Cu-NOTA-TRC105 in all tissues (except blood) was lower than that in the 4T1 tumor at 24 h p.i. However, the 4T1 tumor uptake of the two tracers was similar at 24 h p.i., based on both region-of-interest (ROI) analysis of PET data and biodistribution results.
A. Biodistribution of 64Cu-NOTA-TRC105 and 64Cu-DOTA-TRC105 at 24 h post-injection (n = 3). B. Biodistribution of 64Cu-NOTA-TRC105 and 64Cu-DOTA-TRC105 at 48 h post-injection (n = 3). *: P<0.05.
Comparing the biodistribution of 64Cu-NOTA-TRC105 and 64Cu-DOTA-TRC105 at 48 h p.i. (Figure 4B), blood radioactivity was still prominent for 64Cu-NOTA-TRC105, which was significantly higher than that of 64Cu-DOTA-TRC105. The 4T1 tumor uptake of 64Cu-NOTA-TRC105 was also higher than that of 64Cu-DOTA-TRC105 at 48 h p.i., suggesting higher stability of 64Cu-NOTA-TRC105 than 64Cu-DOTA-TRC105. Interestingly, the uptake of 64Cu-DOTA-TRC105 dropped significantly in all major organs from 24 h p.i. to 48 h p.i., while the uptake of 64Cu-NOTA-TRC105 remained stable in all organs. This phenomenon may be attributed to the longer circulation half-life of 64Cu-NOTA-TRC105, which resulted in sufficient amount of the tracer circulating in the blood available for antigen binding, whereas 64Cu-DOTA-TRC105 was gradually cleared with little surplus tracer available within the circulation. In addition, the difference in stability of 64Cu-NOTA and 64Cu-DOTA complexes certainly played a role.
At both 24 h and 48 h p.i., tumor uptake of 64Cu-NOTA-TRC105 was higher than all major organs in the mice, thus providing excellent tumor contrast (Figure 3&4). For 64Cu-DOTA-TRC105, such tumor contrast was only achieved at 48 h p.i., after the majority of initial liver and spleen uptake of the tracer cleared over time. Overall, the quantification results obtained from biodistribution studies and PET scans matched very well, confirming that quantitative ROI analysis of non-invasive microPET scans accurately reflected the distribution of PET tracers in vivo.
Discussion
In vivo stability of 64Cu-chelates has been hotly debated over the last decade, and many chelators have been designed and evaluated for 64Cu-labeling of various targeting ligands [4]. Based on available literature data, the in vitro thermodynamic stability constants of Cu-DOTA and Cu-NOTA are similar at 25°C [28], [29]. However, these constants were measured in a simple in vitro chemical system, which does not represent the biological environment in vivo. Furthermore, attaching a mAb to the chelator will significantly improve the stability of the 64Cu-chelator complex, since trans-chelation of Cu requires conformational change of the chelator, which is much more difficult when a mAb is attached. In this study, we evaluated the in vivo behavior of two PET tracers, 64Cu-DOTA-TRC105 and 64Cu-NOTA-TRC105, and compared the effect of the bifunctional chelator on 64Cu/tracer biodistribution.
The two conjugates showed similar tumor targeting efficiency at 24 h p.i., indicating that different chelators do not significantly impact tracer uptake in the tumor. However, tracer uptake in many normal organs exhibited significant differences, including the liver, spleen, and kidneys. Since liver is one of the major organs for 64Cu trans-chelation [30], liver uptake of 64Cu-DOTA-TRC105 was much higher than that of 64Cu-NOTA-TRC105 at 24 h p.i. Lung uptake of 64Cu-NOTA-TRC105 was also much higher than that of 64Cu-DOTA-TRC105 at 48 h p.i., which is likely due to the prolonged circulation half-life of 64Cu-NOTA-TRC105 (as the lung is a very well-perfused organ). Although tumor uptake of the two tracers was similar at 24 h p.i., uptake of 64Cu-DOTA-TRC105 dropped slightly from 24 h to 48 h p.i. while the uptake of 64Cu-NOTA-TRC105 remained relatively stable. One possible explanation for this finding is the acidic environment in the tumor tissue. It has been suggested that the kinetic stability of a Cu complex is a function of the change of its degree of protonation as a response to changes in pH, and Cu-NOTA was found to be more stable than Cu-DOTA at pH 4.6 [11]. Although the tumor pH value may not be as low as 4.6 in many cases, the typically acidic microenvironment of the tumor [31] may be one cause for a decrease in tumor uptake of 64Cu-DOTA-TRC105 over time.
Recently, an elegant study compared the effect of several bifunctional chelators on the biodistribution of a 64Cu-labeled antibody [11], which concluded that thermodynamic stability of 64Cu-chelator complexes did not significantly influence tumor uptake of the tracer. However, there were significant differences in tracer concentration in other tissues, including those involved in clearance of the radioimmunoconjugate (e.g., liver and spleen). Our findings are in agreement with these data, as tumor uptake of the two tracers was similar while the liver/spleen uptake was quite different for 64Cu-NOTA-TRC105 and 64Cu-DOTA-TRC105. Taken together the findings from these two studies and various other literature reports, we conclude that NOTA is one of the best chelators for 64Cu-labeling of macromolecules, proteins, or nanomaterials [8]–[10], [32].
One key challenge in antibody labeling is to minimize the potential interference with its antigen binding affinity/specificity. There is only one lysine residue in each of the complementarity-determining regions (CDRs) of TRC105 [20], which has a total of ∼1400 amino acid residues and ∼70 lysines. Therefore, the possibility of DOTA/NOTA conjugation at the lysine residue within the CDR is extremely low, which was confirmed by FACS analysis at several non-antigen-saturating conditions (Figure 2). To confirm that tumor uptake of TRC105-based imaging probes measured by non-invasive imaging techniques was indeed CD105 specific, various control experiments (e.g. blocking study with unconjuagted TRC105, as well as the use of cetuximab as an isotype-matched control), in vitro/ex vivo studies (e.g. FACS and histological analysis), as well as biodistribution and ex vivo imaging studies were performed for validation purposes [24], [33], [34].
The primary focus of this study was to compare 64Cu-labeled TRC105 through DOTA and NOTA, and we found that NOTA was superior to DOTA in many aspects as detailed above. However, even though the in vivo kinetic stability of Cu-DOTA is lower than Cu-NOTA, DOTA is a universal chelator which can complex a wide variety of both imaging and therapeutic radioisotopes. The same DOTA-mAb conjugate can therefore be employed for both imaging and therapeutic applications, with the use of appropriate isotopes, without altering its pharmacokinetics and tumor targeting efficacy. With future clinical translation and cGMP (current good manufacturing practice) compliance in mind, using the same mAb conjugate for both imaging and therapeutic applications (i.e. “theranostics”) is undoubtedly more advantageous than using two different conjugates. If the major goal of a future study is to reduce the radiation dose to the liver, NOTA is the chelator of choice for 64Cu. If the same antibody will be used for radioimmunotherapy applications (e.g. with 90Y and/or 177Lu), DOTA may be a better option.
In conclusion, we investigated the properties of 64Cu-NOTA-TRC105 both in vitro and in vivo. Compared with our previous study of 64Cu-DOTA-TRC105, 64Cu-NOTA-TRC105 was more stable in vivo which is in agreement with previous literature reports [11], [35]. We found that the nature of the bifunctional chelator affected the biodistribution of 64Cu-labeled mAb to some extent. However, tumor targeting efficacy was not significantly impacted by the bifunctional chelator. Since TRC105 is already in Phase 2 trials and therapeutic efficacy has been shown in various animal tumor models and certain cancer patients, clinical translation of 64Cu-NOTA-TRC105 is desirable where it may be used for patient selection/stratification, as well as evaluating the pharmacokinetics, tumor targeting efficacy, dose optimization, and dose interval of TRC105 and TRC105-based cancer therapeutics in the clinic.
Materials and Methods
Reagents
TRC105 was provided by TRACON pharmaceuticals Inc. (San Diego, CA). AlexaFluor488-conjugated secondary antibody was purchased from Jackson Immunoresearch Laboratories, Inc. (West Grove, CA). 2-S-(4-Isothiocyanatobenzyl)-1,4,7-triazacyclononane-1,4,7-triacetic acid (p-SCN-Bn-NOTA) was purchased from Macrocyclics, Inc. (Dallas, TX) and Chelex 100 resin (50–100 mesh) was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO). Water and all buffers were of Millipore grade and pre-treated with Chelex 100 resin to ensure that the aqueous solution was heavy-metal free. PD-10 desalting columns were purchased from GE Healthcare (Piscataway, NJ). 64Cu was produced via a 64Ni(p,n)64Cu reaction using a cyclotron at the University of Wisconsin-Madison.
Cell Lines and Animal Model
All animal studies were conducted under a protocol approved by the University of Wisconsin Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (M02239). 4T1 murine breast cancer, MCF-7 human breast cancer, and HUVECs were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC, Manassas, VA) and cultured as previously described [24], [33], [34]. Cells were used for in vitro and in vivo experiments when they reached ∼80% confluence. To generate the 4T1 tumor model, four- to five-week-old female Balb/c mice (Harlan, Indianapolis, IN) were each subcutaneously injected with 2×106 cells, suspended in 100 µL of 1∶1 mixture of RPMI 1640 and matrigel (BD Biosciences, Franklin lakes, NJ) [36]. The tumor sizes were monitored every other day and mice were used for in vivo experiments when the tumor diameter reached 6–8 mm (typically less than 2 weeks after inoculation).
NOTA Conjugation and 64Cu-Labeling
NOTA conjugation was carried out at pH 9.0, with the ratio of p-SCN-Bn-NOTA∶TRC105 being 25∶1, the same as that used previously for DOTA-TRC105 (Figure 1). NOTA-TRC105 was purified using PD-10 columns. For radiolabeling, 64CuCl2 (74 MBq) was diluted in 300 µL of 0.1 M sodium acetate buffer (pH 6.5) and added to 50 µg of NOTA-TRC105. The reaction mixture was incubated for 30 min at 40°C with constant shaking. 64Cu-NOTA-TRC105 was purified using PD-10 columns with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) as the mobile phase. The radioactive fractions containing 64Cu-NOTA-TRC105 were collected and passed through a 0.2 µm syringe filter for in vivo experiments.
Flow Cytometry
The immunoreactivity of TRC105 and NOTA-TRC105 to HUVECs (high CD105 expression [37], [38]) and MCF-7 (CD105-negative [38]) cells were evaluated by flow cytometry. Cells were harvested and suspended in cold PBS with 2% bovine serum albumin (BSA) at a concentration of 5×106 cells/ml. These cells were incubated with TRC105 or NOTA-TRC105 (1 or 5 µg/ml) for 30 min at room temperature (RT), washed three times with cold PBS, and centrifuged at 1,000 rpm for 5 min. The cells were then incubated with AlexaFluor488-labeled goat anti-human IgG for 30 min at RT. Afterwards, the cells were washed and analyzed by flow cytometry using a BD FACSCalibur 4-color analysis cytometer equipped with 488 nm and 633 nm lasers (Becton-Dickinson, San Jose, CA) and FlowJo analysis software (Tree Star, Inc., Ashland, OR).
PET Imaging and Biodistribution Studies
PET and PET/CT scans at various time points p.i., image reconstruction, and ROI analysis were performed using a microPET/microCT Inveon rodent model scanner (Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc.) as described previously [34]. Each tumor-bearing mouse was injected with 5–10 MBq of 64Cu-NOTA-TRC105 via tail vein and 3–15 min static PET scans were performed. Quantitative data were presented as %ID/g. Biodistribution studies were carried out after the last PET scans to validate the PET results.
Author Contributions
Conceived and designed the experiments: YZ HH WC. Performed the experiments: YZ HH JWE YY TEB. Analyzed the data: YZ HH JWE BRL WC. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: BRL. Wrote the paper: YZ HH JB BRL WC.
References
- 1. McCardle RJ, Harper PV, Spar IL, Bale WF, Andros G, et al. (1966) Studies with iodine-131-labeled antibody to human fibrinogen for diagnosis and therapy of tumors. J Nucl Med 7: 837–847.
- 2. Wu AM (2009) Antibodies and antimatter: the resurgence of immuno-PET. J Nucl Med 50: 2–5.
- 3. Wu AM, Senter PD (2005) Arming antibodies: prospects and challenges for immunoconjugates. Nat Biotechnol 23: 1137–1146.
- 4. Wadas TJ, Wong EH, Weisman GR, Anderson CJ (2010) Coordinating radiometals of copper, gallium, indium, yttrium, and zirconium for PET and SPECT imaging of disease. Chem Rev 110: 2858–2902.
- 5. Blower PJ, Lewis JS, Zweit J (1996) Copper radionuclides and radiopharmaceuticals in nuclear medicine. Nucl Med Biol 23: 957–980.
- 6. Cai W, Wu Y, Chen K, Cao Q, Tice DA, et al. (2006) In vitro and in vivo characterization of 64Cu-labeled Abegrin™, a humanized monoclonal antibody against integrin αvβ3. Cancer Res 66: 9673–9681.
- 7. Niu G, Li Z, Xie J, Le QT, Chen X (2009) PET of EGFR antibody distribution in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma models. J Nucl Med 50: 1116–1123.
- 8. Prasanphanich AF, Nanda PK, Rold TL, Ma L, Lewis MR, et al. (2007) [64Cu-NOTA-8-Aoc-BBN(7–14)NH2] targeting vector for positron-emission tomography imaging of gastrin-releasing peptide receptor-expressing tissues. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104: 12462–12467.
- 9. Liu Z, Li ZB, Cao Q, Liu S, Wang F, et al. (2009) Small-animal PET of tumors with 64Cu-labeled RGD-bombesin heterodimer. J Nucl Med 50: 1168–1177.
- 10. Yang X, Hong H, Grailer JJ, Rowland IJ, Javadi A, et al. (2011) cRGD-functionalized, DOX-conjugated, and 64Cu-labeled superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles for targeted anticancer drug delivery and PET/MR imaging. Biomaterials 32: 4151–4160.
- 11. Dearling JLJ, Voss SD, Dunning P, Snay E, Fahey F, et al. (2011) Imaging cancer using PET – the effect of the bifunctional chelator on the biodistribution of a 64Cu-labeled antibody. Nucl Med Biol 38: 29–38.
- 12. Anderson CJ, Dehdashti F, Cutler PD, Schwarz SW, Laforest R, et al. (2001) 64Cu-TETA-octreotide as a PET imaging agent for patients with neuroendocrine tumors. J Nucl Med 42: 213–221.
- 13. Seo JW, Zhang H, Kukis DL, Meares CF, Ferrara KW (2008) A novel method to label preformed liposomes with 64Cu for positron emission tomography (PET) imaging. Bioconjug Chem 19: 2577–2584.
- 14. Garrison JC, Rold TL, Sieckman GL, Figueroa SD, Volkert WA, et al. (2007) In vivo evaluation and small-animal PET/CT of a prostate cancer mouse model using 64Cu bombesin analogs: side-by-side comparison of the CB-TE2A and DOTA chelation systems. J Nucl Med 48: 1327–1337.
- 15. Wadas TJ, Anderson CJ (2006) Radiolabeling of TETA- and CB-TE2A-conjugated peptides with copper-64. Nat Protoc 1: 3062–3068.
- 16. Huang CW, Li Z, Cai H, Shahinian T, Conti PS (2011) Biological stability evaluation of the alpha2beta1 receptor imaging agents: diamsar and DOTA conjugated DGEA peptide. Bioconjug Chem 22: 256–263.
- 17. Wei L, Ye Y, Wadas TJ, Lewis JS, Welch MJ, et al. (2009) 64Cu-labeled CB-TE2A and diamsar-conjugated RGD peptide analogs for targeting angiogenesis: comparison of their biological activity. Nucl Med Biol 36: 277–285.
- 18. Wadas TJ, Wong EH, Weisman GR, Anderson CJ (2007) Copper chelation chemistry and its role in copper radiopharmaceuticals. Curr Pharm Des 13: 3–16.
- 19. Fonsatti E, Nicolay HJ, Altomonte M, Covre A, Maio M (2010) Targeting cancer vasculature via endoglin/CD105: a novel antibody-based diagnostic and therapeutic strategy in solid tumours. Cardiovasc Res 86: 12–19.
- 20. Seon BK, Haba A, Matsuno F, Takahashi N, Tsujie M, et al. (2011) Endoglin-targeted cancer therapy. Curr Drug Deliv 8: 135–143.
- 21. Dallas NA, Samuel S, Xia L, Fan F, Gray MJ, et al. (2008) Endoglin (CD105): a marker of tumor vasculature and potential target for therapy. Clin Cancer Res 14: 1931–1937.
- 22. Zhang Y, Yang Y, Hong H, Cai W (2011) Multimodality molecular imaging of CD105 (Endoglin) expression. Int J Clin Exp Med 4: 32–42.
- 23. Mendelson DS, Gordon MS, Rosen LS, Hurwitz H, Wong MK, et al. (2010) Phase I study of TRC105 (anti-CD105 [endoglin] antibody) therapy in patients with advanced refractory cancer. J Clin Oncol 28: 15s.
- 24. Hong H, Yang Y, Zhang Y, Engle JW, Barnhart TE, et al. (2011) Positron emission tomography imaging of CD105 expression during tumor angiogenesis. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 38: 1335–1343.
- 25. Cai W, Chen K, He L, Cao Q, Koong A, et al. (2007) Quantitative PET of EGFR expression in xenograft-bearing mice using 64Cu-labeled cetuximab, a chimeric anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 34: 850–858.
- 26. Cai W, Niu G, Chen X (2008) Multimodality imaging of the HER-kinase axis in cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 35: 186–208.
- 27. Cai W, Ebrahimnejad A, Chen K, Cao Q, Li ZB, et al. (2007) Quantitative radioimmunoPET imaging of EphA2 in tumour-bearing mice. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 34: 2024–2036.
- 28. Delgado R, Sun Y, Motekaitis RJ, Martell AE (1993) Stabilities of divalent and trivalent metal ion complexes of macrocyclic triazatriacetic acids. Inorg Chem 32: 3320–3326.
- 29. Clarke ET, Martell AE (1991) Stabilities of the alkaline earth and divalent transition metal complexes of the tetraazamacrocyclic tetraacetic acid ligands. Inorg Chim Acta 190: 27–36.
- 30. Boswell CA, Sun X, Niu W, Weisman GR, Wong EH, et al. (2004) Comparative in vivo stability of copper-64-labeled cross-bridged and conventional tetraazamacrocyclic complexes. J Med Chem 47: 1465–1474.
- 31. Tannock IF, Rotin D (1989) Acid pH in tumors and its potential for therapeutic exploitation. Cancer Res 49: 4373–4384.
- 32. Hong H, Benink HA, Zhang Y, Yang Y, Uyeda HT, et al. (2011) HaloTag: a novel reporter gene for positron emission tomography. Am J Transl Res 3: 392–403.
- 33. Yang Y, Zhang Y, Hong H, Liu G, Leigh BR, et al. (2011) In vivo near-infrared fluorescence imaging of CD105 expression. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 38: 2066–2076.
- 34. Hong H, Severin GW, Yang Y, Engle JW, Zhang Y, et al. (2011) Positron emission tomography imaging of CD105 expression with 89Zr-Df-TRC105. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging: Epub.
- 35. Ait-Mohand S, Fournier P, Dumulon-Perreault V, Kiefer GE, Jurek P, et al. (2011) Evaluation of 64Cu-labeled bifunctional chelate-bombesin conjugates. Bioconjug Chem 22: 1729–1735.
- 36. Wang H, Cai W, Chen K, Li ZB, Kashefi A, et al. (2007) A new PET tracer specific for vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 34: 2001–2010.
- 37. Takahashi N, Haba A, Matsuno F, Seon BK (2001) Antiangiogenic therapy of established tumors in human skin/severe combined immunodeficiency mouse chimeras by anti-endoglin (CD105) monoclonal antibodies, and synergy between anti-endoglin antibody and cyclophosphamide. Cancer Res 61: 7846–7854.
- 38. Fonsatti E, Jekunen AP, Kairemo KJ, Coral S, Snellman M, et al. (2000) Endoglin is a suitable target for efficient imaging of solid tumors: in vivo evidence in a canine mammary carcinoma model. Clin Cancer Res 6: 2037–2043.