Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Molecular Mining of Alleles in Water Buffalo Bubalus bubalis and Characterization of the TSPY1 and COL6A1 Genes

  • Sudeep Kumar ,

    Contributed equally to this work with: Sudeep Kumar, Ruchi Gupta

    Affiliation Molecular Genetics Laboratory, National Institute of Immunology, New Delhi, Delhi, India

  • Ruchi Gupta ,

    Contributed equally to this work with: Sudeep Kumar, Ruchi Gupta

    Affiliation Molecular Genetics Laboratory, National Institute of Immunology, New Delhi, Delhi, India

  • Sudhir Kumar,

    Affiliation Department of Zoology, University of Lucknow, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India

  • Sher Ali

    alisher@nii.res.in

    Affiliation Molecular Genetics Laboratory, National Institute of Immunology, New Delhi, Delhi, India

Abstract

Background

Minisatellites are an integral part of eukaryotic genomes and show variation in the complexity of their organization. Besides their presence in non-coding regions, a small fraction of them are part of the transcriptome, possibly participating in gene regulation, expression and silencing. We studied the minisatellite (TGG)n tagged transcriptome in the water buffalo Bubalus bubalis across various tissues and the spermatozoa, and characterized the genes TSPY1 and COL6A1 discovered in the process.

Results

Minisatellite associated sequence amplification (MASA) conducted using cDNA and oligonucleotide primer (TGG)5 uncovered 38 different mRNA transcripts from somatic tissues and gonads and 15 from spermatozoa. These mRNA transcripts corresponded to several known and novel genes. The majority of the transcripts showed the highest level of expression either in the testes or spermatozoa with exception of a few showing higher expression levels in the lungs and liver. Transcript SR1, which is expressed in all the somatic tissues and gonads, was found to be similar to the Bos taurus collagen type VI alpha 1 gene (COL6A1). Similarly, SR29, a testis-specific transcript, was found to be similar to the Bos taurus testis-specific Y-encoded protein-1 representing cancer/testis antigen 78 (CT78). Subsequently, full length coding sequences (cds) of these two transcripts were obtained. Quantitative PCR (q-PCR) revealed 182-202 copies of theTSPY1 gene in water buffalo, which localized to the Y chromosome.

Conclusions

The MASA approach enabled us to identify several genes, including two of clinical significance, without screening an entire cDNA library. Genes identified with TGG repeats are not part of a specific family of proteins and instead are distributed randomly throughout the genome. Genes showing elevated expression in the testes and spermatozoa may prove to be potential candidates for in-depth characterization. Furthermore, their possible involvement in fertility or lack thereof would augment animal biotechnology.

Introduction

Satellite DNA, an integral part of eukaryotic genomes [1], present as long uninterrupted arrays, often in genetically silent heterochromatic regions [2]. These dynamic elements include transposable elements, major satellites and simple sequence repeats (SSRs) [2], [3] and represent a fast-evolving part of the genome conforming to the random processes of molecular drive [4]. Satellite sequences are involved in both gene conversion and unequal crossing over. These events are responsible for the rapid horizontal spread of mutations [5], changes in copy number and even the loss of satellite sequences from the genome. Owing to these rearrangements, copy number variation is caused even amongst the closely related species [6], [7].

Usually, satellites are present in non-coding regions but a small fraction can be found in the transcriptome [8], [9] and this subset participates in gene regulation and silencing [10], [11]. In the context of disease, pathogenic trimeric repeat expansion in humans has been well established. Similar structures may act as substrates for genome-wide pathogenic rearrangements [12]. The expansion and contraction of these SSRs within the exonic regions are reported to cause several diseases, such as Myotonic dystrophy, Huntington's disease and fragile X syndrome [13][15]. Further, the presence of ITRs (internal tandem repeats) at exon-intron boundaries may give rise to novel alternatively spliced transcripts [16]. Notwithstanding these observations, the precise arrangement of tandem repeats in a given species in the context of genomic organization and gene expression still remains unclear.

Another aspect of gene expression relates to germline genetics. In the past, the spermatozoon was considered to be merely the carrier of the paternal genome. However, this perception has changed since it was discovered that spermatozoa contribute (except in mice) a centriole [17] and a soluble factor that activates the egg [18]. Despite being in a transcriptionally dormant state [19], spermatozoa retain a pool of mRNAs. These messages are transcribed long before nuclear shutdown [20][22] and encode the proteins needed for the subsequent re-packaging of DNA and micro-RNAs [23]. Approximately 3,000–5,000 mRNA transcripts have been reported to be present in spermatozoa [21], [23][27]. As spermatozoon development results in the loss of rRNA, translation in spermatozoa is not possible. The delivery of the spermatozoal transcripts to the ooplasm is hypothesized to have biological significance during fertilization, embryogenesis and subsequent morphogenesis. However, the spermatozoon's genomic organization, cellular expression and association with regulatory elements remain unexplored.

In exons, trinucleotide repeats are favored evolutionarily due to selection against frame shift mutations [28]. These repeats could serve as markers to discover novel genes [29]. The tandem repeat length polymorphism of (CCA)n/(TGG)n resulting in conformational variability of the DNA sequence is well documented in the human genome [30]. We have used (TGG)5 repeats to uncover somatic, gonadal and spermatozoal transcripts in the water buffalo Bubalus bubalis, which is an important livestock animal in the Indian subcontinent. Thus far, this repeat has been studied in the context of human genetic diseases but it has not been studied in a non-human system. The unexplored status of the water buffalo genome makes molecular mining of the alleles even more relevant. The detailed insight into the repeat tagged mRNA transcripts across the tissues including spermatozoa in the water buffalo appears to be the first such study. This expression profile is expected to increase our understanding of the involvement of minisatellites in the regulation of gene expression in a tissue specific manner.

Materials and Methods

Ethics statement

Tissue samples from both sexes of water buffalo were collected from the Gazipur slaughter house, New Delhi, India, with the help of an on-site veterinary officer. Fresh water buffalo semen samples were procured from an in-vitro fertilization (IVF) center (Frozen Semen Production Center, Chak Gajaria), in Lucknow (U.P), India. These collections were performed in accordance with the guidelines of the Institute's Ethical and Bio-safety committees. There was no additional requirement for use of these samples. Therefore, any additional approvals were not applicable in this case.

Sperm purification and RNA isolation

Fresh water buffalo semen samples were procured from the IVF center as described above and utmost care was taken to avoid diploid cell contamination. Collected samples were subjected to the percoll gradient method to select for motile sperm. RNA isolation was performed using TRIzol reagent (Sigma-Aldrich) following standard protocols [20], [31], [32]. Isolated RNA was quantified using a spectrophotometer (Amersham Life Sciences) and tested for the presence of residual DNA by PCR using primers against beta-actin (ACTB; [GenBank: DQ661647]) and Protamine-1 (PRM1; [GenBank: NM_174156]) following standard procedures [20], [32] (Table S1). Subsequently, cDNA synthesis was performed using a high capacity cDNA reverse transcription kit (ABI, USA). The absence of non-sperm cells in the processed semen samples was confirmed by PCR using primers specific to common leukocyte antigen (CD45) and epithelial E-cadherin (CDH1) gene markers (Table S1) as described previously [33].

Total RNA isolation and cDNA synthesis from tissue samples

Tissue samples from both sexes of water buffalo were collected from the local slaughter house as described above. Total RNA was isolated from cardiac, renal, hepatic, pulmonary, splenic, testicular and ovarian tissue using TRIzol reagent (Sigma-Aldrich) following standard protocols [20], [31], [32]. After quantification of the RNA by spectrophotometry, each sample was tested for genomic DNA contamination by PCR using primers specific to beta-actin (ACTB) [GenBank: DQ661647]. Synthesis of cDNA was conducted using a high capacity cDNA reverse transcription kit (ABI, USA). The quality of the cDNA produced was confirmed by PCR amplification using beta-actin primers.

Minisatellite associated sequence amplification (MASA)

To conduct MASA, a 15 bp oligo (5' TGGTGGTGGTGGTGG 3') was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. MASA reactions were performed using cDNA templates from different somatic and gonadal tissues of two individuals and from spermatozoa of four individuals following standard procedures [32], [34]. Representative gel pictures are shown in figure 1. The annealing temperature of the repeat primer was 52°C. The resultant amplicons were resolved on a 2% (w/v) agarose gel using 1x TAE buffer.

thumbnail
Figure 1. Minisatellite associated sequence amplification conducted using decoy primer (TGG)5.

Panel (A)shows bands uncovered by MASA from different somatic tissues and gonads and (B) from spermatozoa. The corresponding tissues are indicated above.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0024958.g001

Cloning, sequencing and characterization of MASA amplicons

After the MASA reactions, the amplicons resolved on the agarose gel were excised. DNA was eluted (Qiagen Gel Extraction kit, Germany), cloned into the pGEMT-easy vector (Promega, USA) and used to transform DH5-alpha cells. The positive clones were identified by EcoR1 digestion (New England Biolabs). All of the sequencing reactions were performed on the Applied Biosystems 3130xl Genetic Analyzer. It used an initial cycle sequencing reaction mixture of 10 µl with BigDye®Terminator V3.1 cycle sequencing RR-100. Subsequent product was purified by ethanol/EDTA/sodium acetate precipitation as per the manufacturer's instructions. Finally, the precipitate was resuspended in 10 µl of Hi-Di™ Formamide Genetic Analysis Grade. Gel electrophoresis was run on a 36 cm capillary array with POP-7TM polymer. The raw data obtained was analyzed with the Genetic Analyzer Data collection Software v3.0. Multiple clones were sequenced to validate the obtained sequences, which were then deposited in GenBank. A database search was conducted to determine the homology of these sequences with other entries in GenBank using the default server [35] with the megablast “highly similar” and blastn “somewhat similar” algorithms. Each sequence was first subjected to blast search across the database of reference mRNA sequences (refseq_mRNA), then against the nucleotide collection (nr/nt) of all organisms, and finally to those of Bos taurus (Table S2).

RT-PCR and relative expressional studies using q-PCR

The expression status of the identified genes was determined in the different tissues and spermatozoa by both RT-PCR and q-PCR. For this, equal amounts of RNA from the different tissues were reverse transcribed into cDNA. An expression profile was ascertained by RT-PCR (Figure 2) using this cDNA and internal primers (Table S3). These primers were designed from the individual mRNA transcripts using Primer 3 Input (version 0.4.0). Beta-actin was used as an endogenous control.

thumbnail
Figure 2. RT-PCR analysis of the (TGG)n tagged mRNA transcripts using internal primers and cDNA from different somatic tissues and the gonads.

The quality and quantity of the cDNA samples were assessed using beta-actin specific primers and are shown at the bottom. The transcript IDs are indicated on the left and the tissues IDs at the top of the panel. NTC denotes non-template control.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0024958.g002

To compare the relative expression of different genes and gene fragments, SYBR green assays were conducted using Real Time PCR (Sequence Detection System, 7500, ABI) according to established protocols [34], [36]. GAPDH (Glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase) was used as an endogenous control. Primers for determining relative expression (Table S4) for each of the transcripts were designed with “Primer Express Software” (ABI, USA). The q-PCR assay was performed individually for all transcripts by Real Time PCR using Power SYBR® green (Part No. 4367659, ABI). For each transcript, a calibrator tissue that showed basal expression level 1 was chosen. This calibrator was selected based on the lowest expression of that transcript in the tissues studied. Primer specificity and comparable PCR efficiencies for all of the studied genes and the endogenous control (GAPDH) were ensured. For this, standard and melting curves were generated using ten-fold serial dilutions of the cDNA templates. Standard curves with a slope ranging from 3.3 to −3.6, R2>0.99 (Regression coefficient) were considered to have acceptable PCR efficiencies, and a single dissociation peak indicated primer specificity (Figure 3). The expression level of the genes was calculated using this formula: relative expression  =  (1+E) ΔΔCt, where E is the efficiency of the PCR and ΔΔCt is the cycle threshold normalized first with the endogenous control GAPDH (Ct sample – Ct GAPDH  =  ΔCt) and then with the calibrator sample (ΔCt Sample - ΔCt Calibrator  =  ΔΔCt).

thumbnail
Figure 3. Representative standard and dissociation curves and amplification plots from Real Time PCR assays.

Melting (dissociation) curve showing a single peak corresponds to a single amplicon. (A) Representative curves for GAPDH, (B) RS3 and (C) RS5.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0024958.g003

Amplification of the full length coding sequence of identified transcripts

The amplicon SR1 [GenBank: GU433053] of Bubalus bubalis is a partial cds showing >95% identity with Bos taurus collagen type VI alpha 1 (COL6A1) mRNA. The full length SR1 transcript was amplified using cDNA from a Bubalus bubalis ovary with primers (Table S5) designed from the Bos taurusCOL6A1 coding sequence [GenBank: NM_001143865.1]. The PCR amplicons were cloned and subsequent sequencing detected four overlapping clones. These sequences were aligned to obtain the full length cds of COL6A1 of Bubalus bubalis.

The amplicon SR29 [GenBank: GU433091], a partial cds, showed >95% identity with Bos taurus testis-specific Y-encoded protein-1 representing cancer/testis antigen 78 (CT78) mRNA [GenBank: XM_001254382.2]. The full length sequence of this gene was obtained using the 3′ RACE System for Rapid Amplification of cDNA ends (Invitrogen) and with a gene specific primer (Table S5) designed for the 5′ start site of Bos taurus TSPY1-like mRNA. The final product was ligated into the pJET1.2/blunt cloning vector (Fermentas) and was used to transform DH5- alpha E. coli cells. Sequencing of this fragment was done commercially (Bioserve Biotechnologies Pvt. Ltd., India).

Chromosomal localization of theTSPY1-like gene by Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH)

Water buffalo metaphase chromosomes were prepared according to the standard protocol [37]. FISH was conducted using Bos taurus Y Chr CH240-127C20 BAC (bacterial artificial chromosome) [GenBank: AC234853.4] procured from BACPAC (Resource Centre, Oakland, California, USA). The BAC DNA was verified with gene specific primers by end point PCR. The BAC DNA was labeled with Fluorescein tagged dUTP (Invitrogen) using the Nick Translation Kit from Abott Molecular Inc. (IL, USA). FISH was subsequently conducted following established protocols [38]. The slides were screened under an Olympus fluorescence microscope (BX 51) fitted with a vertical fluorescence illuminator U-LH100HG UV, excitation and barrier filters. The images were captured and analyzed with Applied Imaging Systems Cytovision 3.92. Chromosomal identification was performed in accordance with ISCNDB 2000 (International system for chromosome nomenclature of domestic bovids) [39].

Copy number calculation of theTSPY1-like gene in the water buffalo genome

The copy number of the Bubalus bubalis TSPY1-like gene was calculated using a SYBR green assay with the Real Time PCR Sequence detection system 7500 (ABI, USA) as per the standard protocol [40]. Briefly, a standard curve was generated using 10-fold serial dilutions of the recombinant plasmids in the range of 3,000 to 3,00 million copies. The copy number of the gene in the water buffalo genome was estimated by extrapolation from the standard curve.

Results

(TGG)n tagged mRNA transcripts include several known and novel genes

MASA conducted with cDNA from somatic and gonadal tissues of two individuals using a (TGG)5 repeat primer uncovered 41 amplicons, and the same primer yielded 28 amplicons from the spermatozoa derived from 4 different animals. Cloning, sequencing and subsequent bioinformatics analysis of these amplicons resulted in the identification of 38 distinct mRNA transcripts corresponding to different genes from the somatic tissues and gonads and an additional 15 from the spermatozoa. Based on RT-PCR, SR1 was found to have similar expression levels in all the somatic and gonadal tissues studied, while the other transcripts showed varying expression across these tissues. Of the 15 spermatozoal transcripts, only one was detected in all the somatic tissues. Thus, the expression of 14 mRNA transcripts was exclusive to spermatozoa.

Of the 38 transcripts from somatic and gonadal tissues, 18 showed significant identity with cDNA sequences from the refseq_mRNA database. Of these, 14 had 90–99% query coverage (Table S6). The remaining ones had regions lacking identity at either the 5′/3′ region or the intervening sequences of the characterized genes. Surprisingly, none of the spermatozoa-specific mRNA transcripts had significant identity with any of the sequences in the database, suggesting that these genes have yet to be characterized.

Differential expression of the (TGG)n tagged mRNA transcripts

Significantly, of the 38 mRNA transcripts from somatic and gonadal tissues, about ∼90% showed the highest level of expression in the testes and spermatozoa, while an additional 8% were most highly expressed in the lungs. One (SR2) [GenBank: GU433054] showed the highest level of expression in liver. Of all the transcripts first identified in the testes, only one (SR29) [GenBank: GU433091] showed the highest level of expression in the spermatozoa (5113.16-fold higher as compared with samples from the heart, which was used as the calibrator representing basal level 1), although the testes did show the second highest level of expression (1052.8-fold) for this transcript. The transcript was similar to that of the Bos taurus Testis-specific Y-encoded protein 1 (Cancer/testis antigen 78) (CT78). Expression of the transcript SR7 [GenBank: GU433064] was confined mainly to the heart and spermatozoa. This transcript showing the highest level of expression in the heart was found to be homologous with the Equus caballus gene for beta-myosin heavy chain [GenBank: D84227.1]. Details from the expression analysis of the transcripts detected in tissue samples, their corresponding accession numbers and relative expression (expressed in folds) are given in table 1. Graphical representation of the expression of a few of the transcripts is shown in figure 4.

thumbnail
Figure 4. Quantification of mRNA transcripts originating from different tissues.

The bar represents the expression level of the transcripts, which are labeled at the top left. The tissue IDs are displayed at the bottom. Maximum expression observed in a tissue is shown in green. To obtain a comparative profile, subsequent q-PCR using internal primers was conducted on all cDNA samples including that from semen. Note the highest expression level of most of the fragments occurs in the testes or spermatozoa.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0024958.g004

thumbnail
Table 1. Relative expression for all the TGG tagged transcripts uncovered from somatic tissues and gonads of water buffalo Bubalus bubalis.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0024958.t001

Of the 15 transcripts identified in the spermatozoa, expression studies (Table 2) were performed on only 12 because one had already been identified in the tissues sampled and the other two did not have significant ct values (≥40) to be considered for further study. RS11 was most highly expressed in the testes, whereas the remaining 11 showed the greatest level of expression in the spermatozoa. Details from the expression analysis of these 12 spermatozoal mRNA transcripts are shown in figure 5. Notably, 80% of these transcripts were found to have negligible expression in the ovaries, which supports our hypothesis that these transcripts have male-specific functions.

thumbnail
Figure 5. Quantification of mRNA transcripts originating from semen samples.

Except forRS11, all mRNA transcripts were most highly expressed in the semen samples (green). To obtain a comparative profile, subsequent q-PCR using internal primers was conducted on all cDNA samples.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0024958.g005

thumbnail
Table 2. Relative quantitative expression of TGG tagged transcripts uncovered from the spermatozoa of Buffalo Bubalus bubalis.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0024958.t002

Full length CDS of theTSPY1-like and COL6A1 genes

Using 3′ RACE, we obtained the 1222 bp cDNA sequence of the TSPY1-like gene [GenBank: HQ104923], which has 975 bp of protein coding sequence. The amino acid sequence of the TSPY1-like protein was derived in silico from the Transeq Nucleotide to Protein Sequence Conversion/EMBOSSES Transeq/EBI [41]. A nucleotide blast of the water buffalo TSPY1-like gene found that it had>90% identity with Bos taurus TSPY1, which is consistent with the results from a protein blast (Figure S1). However, the water buffalo cDNA sequence of TSPY1 showed approximately 40–60% identity with other mammalian species.

Full length 3154 bp cds of the COL6A1 gene [GenBank: HQ104922] was obtained from the assembly of four clones (Figure 6). The COL6A1 gene of Bubalus bubalis has 3084 bp of protein coding sequence. The amino acid sequence of the COL6A1 protein was derived in silico. This gene seems to be conserved across the mammalian species showing a very high percent identity between cattle and water buffalo (98% with Bos taurus COL6A1). However, the water buffalo COL6A1 gene showed sequence identity in the range of 73–90% with other mammals (Figure S2).

thumbnail
Figure 6. Schematic illustration showing the cloning strategy for the water buffalo COL6A1 gene.

Different overlapping clones of the water buffalo COL6A1 gene were generated to obtain the full length cds. Shown here are the nucleotide boundaries and positions of start and stop codons.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0024958.g006

Chromosomal localization and copy number status of the TSPY1-like gene

FISH of the TSPY1-like gene using the bovine BAC probe CH240-127C20 [GenBank: AC234853.4] resulted in signals on the water buffalo Y chromosome (Figure 7). Based on the Q-PCR, the copy number of this gene was found to vary from 182–202 per genome (Figure 8).

thumbnail
Figure 7. Chromosomal localization of TSPY1-like gene.

TheTSPY1-like gene probe (arrows) localized to the water buffalo metaphase chromosome Y (A) (i and ii) and interphase nuclei (B) (i–iv).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0024958.g007

thumbnail
Figure 8. Copy number assessment of TSPY1-like gene by q-PCR.

q-PCR amplification plot from a 10-fold serial dilution of the plasmid for copy number calculation. (A) Standard curve, (B) Dissociation curve showing single peak, which indicates primer specificity with the target DNA. (C) Delta Rn vs Cycle showing amplification plots of the standard plasmid and water buffalo genomic DNA.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0024958.g008

Discussion

Satellite sequences have attracted a great deal of attention due to their involvement in gene regulation and genomic imprinting [11], [42][45]. We identified 53 transcripts tagged with the trimeric repeat (TGG)n in the water buffalo genome, which seems to be the first such study in any animal system. This is significant because TGG repeats, owing to their shrinkage and expansion, affect gene expression and are implicated in human diseases [12], [46]. Differential expression of these transcripts across the tissues sampled and dramatically high expression of 11 in the spermatozoa suggests that a set of these genes are reserved for testicular functions. It was not possible for us to molecularly characterize all 53 genes in this study; we therefore focused on two genes, TSPY1 and COL6A1. TSPY1 was found to be testis-specific by RT-PCR corroborating earlier studies [47], [48], whereas COL6A1 showed ubiquitous expression. In the present study, we did not depend on RT-PCR data for assessing the level of expression of a gene and instead conducted q-PCR. Thus, the expression levels detected by q-PCR could be used to support a tissue-specific function of a gene.

The TSPY1-like sequence amplified from Bubalus bubalis showed >95% identity with that of Bos taurus [GenBank: XM_001254382.2] and the BAC clone of Bos taurus Y Chromosome CH240-127C20 [GenBank: AC234853.4]. In other species, this gene showed approximately 50% identity and a high level of heterogeneity. Invariably, this gene is referred to as TSPY1-like gene. We propose that the same may be referred to as TSPY1 because we have detected its high level of expression in testes and localized it to the water buffalo Y chromosome. There is a remarkable degree of variation in the copy number of this gene among different mammalian species. The rat has one pseudo and one functional copy while the mouse has only one pseudo gene [49], [50]. Recent study of the different breeds of Bos taurus confirms gross variation in the copy number of this gene [51]. Significantly, an increase in copy number of tspy in humans is linked with male infertility [52], while a decrease is associated with prostate cancer [53]. The copy number of tspy ranges 20–60 in human males and 50–200 in bovid males [54], [55], which is consistent with our present study. More copies are associated with an enhanced level of protein synthesis [56]. However, it is not clear if more copies of this gene protect a human male from prostate cancer. Even if they do, a high copy number of this gene in humans is associated with infertility [52]. Taken together, we purpose that a critical balance of the copy number of TSPY1 is maintained across the mammalian species. Arguably, the high copy number may act as a compensatory strategy against the decay or loss of other genes involved in fertility [57]. It would be of relevance to undertake a detailed study on the copy number variation of this gene amongst different categories of infertility in both human and animal males to resolve this issue. This would determine if a greater number of copies are indeed associated with infertility.

The transcripts (having significant identity of up to >90%) uncovered by MASA were studied further to determine the family of proteins to which they belong using the conserved domain database of NCBI [58]. The results suggest that these repeats are not specific to genes belonging to a particular protein family and are instead distributed throughout the coding genome.

TSPY (Testis specific protein, Y-encoded), a member of the greater SET (Su(var)3–9, Enhancer-of-zeste, Trithorax)/NAP (Nucleosome assembly protein) family of molecules, has been implicated in the regulation of gene expression, malignant development of gonadoblastoma and testicular and prostate cancer [59], [60]. These proteins are involved in nucleosome assembly, chromatin fluidity and trafficking histones into the nucleus [61][63].

The COL6A1 gene encodes the alpha-1 subunit of type VI collagen and belongs to the vWFA (von Willebrand factor (vWF) type A) superfamily. Collagens are involved in the formation of the fibrillar and microfibrillar networks of the extracellular matrix, basement membranes and other structures of the extracellular matrix. Some collagens contain approximately 15–18 vWA domains. The vWA domains of extracellular eukaryotic proteins mediate adhesion via metal ion-dependent adhesion sites (MIDAS) [64]. Mutations in any one of these genes that code for collagen VI subunits results in the autosomal dominant disorder Bethlem myopathy and Ullrich scleroatonic muscular dystrophy [65]. Our MASA-based approach enabled us to identify genes in animal systems that are known to have clinical significance.

Earlier, using decoy oligo primers based on GACA/GATA [37], with a consensus of 33.15 [35] and 33.6 repeat loci [40], we demonstrated an association between a large number of mRNA transcripts and these repeat elements in water buffalo. The genes tagged with these STRs are likely favored evolutionarily. Accordingly, we also studied satellite tagged mRNA transcripts in spermatozoa. A number of signaling molecules and transcription factors have been reported to be both present in spermatozoa and transported into the zygotic cytoplasm [23], [25], [27]. The presence of TGG tagged transcripts that are most highly expressed in spermatozoa and the testes adds to this finding.

Conclusion

The water buffalo has several recognized and undocumented breeds of which a few are considered to be superior livestock and belong to elite categories. However, the genetic basis of their superiority is not yet established. Present work demonstrates that the trimeric repeats (TGG) is present in a number of functional genes of the water buffalo that show tissue-specific expression. Genes showing high levels of expression in the testes and spermatozoa are potential candidates for in-depth characterization in both normal and genetically infertile animals. In-depth analysis of such genes is hoped to focus the search for the elusive ones that confer desired characteristics to livestock. This would add a new dimension to genome analysis and augment animal biotechnology.

Supporting Information

Figure S1.

Nucleotide sequence alignment (i) and amino acid sequence (ii) of theTSPY1-like gene of water buffalo and cattle. Water buffalo and cattle show ∼95% identity at the nucleotide level.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0024958.s001

(DOC)

Figure S2.

Multiple alignment of theCOL6A1 gene (i), phylogenetic tree based on nucleotide sequence (ii), multiple alignment of amino acid sequence of the COL6A1 protein (iii) and phylogenetic tree based on amino acid sequence (iv) of different species. Note the close relationship between cattle and water buffalo in the phylogenetic tree. Horse, as expected, has a distant relationship with water buffalo and cattle, whereas mouse and rat group together.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0024958.s002

(DOC)

Table S1.

List of primers used to test for genomic DNA contamination in the samples. The primers for ACTB were designed in our lab, while those for CD45 and CDH1 genes were based on an earlier report [31]. Primers corresponding to CD45 and CDH1 span several introns but their positions were not defined.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0024958.s003

(DOC)

Table S2.

Detailed analysis of MASA identified somatic, gonadal and spermatozoal mRNA transcripts tagged with the TGG repeat from the water buffalo Bubalus bubalis. (i), Transcripts identified from the somatic and gonadal tissues. (ii), Transcripts identified from spermatozoa. All transcripts, their accession number and their homology status are listed in this table.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0024958.s004

(DOC)

Table S3.

List of primers used for RT-PCR on cDNA from different tissues (i) and semen (ii). The primer IDs and corresponding gene accession number of the amplified transcripts are given in the table.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0024958.s005

(DOC)

Table S4.

List of primers used for q-PCR on cDNA from different tissues (i) and semen samples (ii).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0024958.s006

(DOC)

Table S5.

List of primers used for obtaining full length CDS of the COL6A1 gene (i) and TSPY1 -like gene (ii).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0024958.s007

(DOC)

Table S6.

Details of the clones corresponding to different mRNA transcripts uncovered by MASA showing significant homologies with the cDNA sequences in the Database. This table shows details of only 14 mRNA transcripts of the 38 identified from different somatic tissues and gonads. Significantly, all the query sequences, irrespective of their size, showed >95% identity with the sequences in the GenBank.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0024958.s008

(DOC)

Acknowledgments

Equipment donation from the Alexander Von Humboldt Foundation, Bonn, Germany, is gratefully acknowledged. We thank Khem Singh Negi for technical assistance.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: Sudeep Kumar RG SA. Performed the experiments: Sudeep Kumar RG. Analyzed the data: Sudeep Kumar RG SA. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: Sudhir Kumar SA. Wrote the paper: Sudeep Kumar RG SA Sudhir Kumar.

References

  1. 1. Nadir E, Margalit H, Gallily T, Ben-Sasson SA (1996) Microsatellite spreading in the human genome: evolutionary mechanisms and structural implications. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 93(13): 6470–75.
  2. 2. Charlesworth B, Sniegowski P, Stephan W (1994) The evolutionary dynamics of repetitive DNA in eukaryotes. Nature 371: 215–20.
  3. 3. Jeffereys AJ, Royle NJ, Wilson V, Wong Z (1998) Spontaneous mutation rates to new length alleles at tandem-repetitive hyper-variable loci in human DNA. Nature 332(6161): 278–81.
  4. 4. Ugarkovic D (1995) Functional elements residing within satellite DNA's. EMBO reports 6(11): 1035–39.
  5. 5. Dover GA (1986) Molecular drive in multigene families: How biological novelties arise, spread and are assimilated. Trends Genet 2: 159–65.
  6. 6. Ugarkovic D, Plohl M (2002) Variation in satellite DNA profiles—causes and effects. EMBO J 21: 5955–59.
  7. 7. Hall SE, Kettler G, Preuss D (2003) Centromere satellites from Arabidopsis populations: maintenance of conserved and variable domains. Genome Res 13: 195–205.
  8. 8. Bennett P (2000) Demystified … microsatellites. Mol Pathol 53(4): 177–83.
  9. 9. Jasinska A, Krzyzosiak WJ (2004) Repetitive sequences that shape the human transcriptome. FEBS letters 567: 136–41.
  10. 10. Rocha EPC, Matric I, Taddei F (2002) Over-expression of repeats in stress response genes: a strategy to increase versatility under stressful conditions. Nucleic Acids Res 30: 1886–94.
  11. 11. Li YC, Korol AB, Fahima T, Nevo E (2004) Microsatellites within genes: structure, function and evolution, Mol Biol Evol 21: 991–1007.
  12. 12. Béna F, Gimelli S, Migliavacca E, Brun-Druc N, Buiting K, et al. (2010) A recurrent 14q32.2 microdeletion mediated by expanded TGG repeats. Hum Mol Genet 19: 1967–73.
  13. 13. Di Prospero NA, Fischbeck KA (2005) Therapeutic development for triplet repeat expansion diseases. Nat Rev Genet 6: 756–65.
  14. 14. Sutherland GR, Richards RI (1995) Simple tandem repeats and human genetic disease. Proc Natl Aca Sci USA 92: 3636–41.
  15. 15. Richards RI (2001) Dynamic mutations: a decade of unstable expanded repeats in human genetic disease. Hum Mol Genet 10(20): 2187–94.
  16. 16. De. Grassi A, Ciccarelli FA (2009) Tandem repeats modify the structure of human genes hosted in segmental duplications. Genome biology 10: R137.
  17. 17. Simerly C, Wu GJ, Zoran S, Ord T, Rawlins R, et al. (1995) The paternal inheritance of the centrosome, the cell's microtubule-organizing center, in humans, and the implications for infertility. Nat Med 1: 47–52.
  18. 18. Saunders CM, Larman GM, Parrington J (2002) PLC zeta: a sperm-specific trigger of Ca(2+) oscillations in eggs and embryo development. Development 129(15): 3533–44.
  19. 19. Hecht NB (1998) Molecular mechanisms of male germ cell differentiation. Bioessays 20: 555–61.
  20. 20. Miller D, Tang PZ, Skinner C, Lilford R (1994) Differential RNA fingerprinting as a tool in the analysis of spermatozoal gene expression. Hum Reprod 9(5): 864–69.
  21. 21. Wykes SM, Visscher DW, Krawetz SA (1997) Haploid transcripts persist in mature human spermatozoa. Mol Hum Reprod 3: 15–19.
  22. 22. Ostermeier GC, Dix DJ, Miller D, Khatri P, Krawetz SA (2002) Spermatozoal RNA profiles of normal fertile men. Lancet 360: 772–77.
  23. 23. Ostermeier GC, Goodrich RJ, Moldenhauer JS, Diamond MP, Krawetz SA (2005) A suite of novel human spermatozoal RNAs. J Androl 26: 70–74.
  24. 24. Krawetz SA (2005) Paternal contribution: new insights and future challenges. Nat Rev Genet 6: 633–42.
  25. 25. Miller D, Ostermeier GC, Krawetz SA (2005) The controversy, potential and roles of spermatozoal RNA. Trends Mol Med 11(4): 156–63.
  26. 26. Miller D (2000) Analysis and significance of messenger RNA in human ejaculated spermatozoa. Mol Reprod Dev 56: 259–64.
  27. 27. Lambard S, Galeraud-Denis I, Martin R, Levy G, Chocat A, et al. (2004) Analysis and significance of mRNA in human ejaculated sperm from normozoospermic donors: relationship to sperm motility and capacitation. Mol Hum Reprod 10(7): 535–41.
  28. 28. Metzgar D, Bytof J, Wills C (2000) Selection against frameshift mutations limits microsatellite expansion in coding DNA. Genome Res 10: 72–80.
  29. 29. Hilario E, Fraser LG, McNeilage M (2009) Trinucleotide repeats as bait for vectorette PCR: a tool for developing genetic mapping markers. Mol Biotechnol 42(3): 320–26.
  30. 30. Zemanek M, Kypr J, Vorlickova M (2005) Conformational properties of DNA containing (CCA)n and (TGG)n trinucleotide repeats. Int J Biol Macromol 36(1-2): 23–32.
  31. 31. Lalancette C, Thibault C, Bachand L, Caron N, Bissonnette N (2008) Transcriptome Analysis of Bull Semen with Extreme Nonreturn Rate: Use of Suppression-Subtractive Hybridization to Identify Functional Markers for Fertility. Biol Reprod 78: 618–35.
  32. 32. Srivastava J, Premi S, Kumar S, Parwez I, Ali S (2007) Characterization of Smoc-1 uncovers two transcript variants showing differential tissue and age specific expression in Bubalus bubalis. BMC Genomics 8: 436.
  33. 33. Srivastava J, Premi S, Kumar S, Ali S (2009) Expressional dynamics of minisatellite 33.15 tagged spermatozoal transcriptome in Bubalus bubalis. BMC Genomics 10: 303.
  34. 34. Srivastava J, Premi S, Pathak D, Ahsan Z, Tiwari M, et al. (2006) Transcriptional Status of Known and Novel Genes Tagged with Consensus of 33.15 Repeat Loci Employing Minisatellite Associated Sequence Amplification (MASA) and Real Time PCR in Water Buffalo Bubalus bubalis. DNA Cell Biol 25(1): 31–48.
  35. 35. BLAST: Basic Local Alignment Search Tool [Website. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/blast/Blast.cgi. Accessed 2010 Aug 20].
  36. 36. Srivastava J, Premi S, Kumar S, Ali S (2008) Organization and differential expression of the GACA/GATA tagged somatic and spermatozoal transcriptomes in buffalo Bubalus bubalis. BMC Genomics 9: 132.
  37. 37. Bashamboo A, Rahman MM, Prasad A, Chandy SP, Ahmad J, et al. (2004) Fate of SRY, PABY, DYS1, DYZ3 and DYZ1 loci in Indian patients harbouring sex chromosomal anomalies. Molecular human reproduction 11: 117–27.
  38. 38. Rahman MM, Bashamboo A, Prasad A, Pathak D, Ali S (2004) Organizational Variation of DYZ1 Repeat Sequences on the Human Y Chromosome and Its Diagnostic Potentials. DNA and Cell Biology 23: 561–71.
  39. 39. Cribiu EP, Di Berardino D, Di Meo GP, Eggen A, Gallagher DS, et al. (2001) International system for chromosome nomenclature of domestic bovids (ISCNDB 2000) Cytogenet Cell Genet 92: 283–99.
  40. 40. Pathak D, Srivastava J, Samad R, Parwez I, Kumar S, et al. (2010) Genome wide search of the genes tagged with the consensus of 33.6 repeat loci in buffalo Bubalus bubalis employing minisatellite associated sequence amplification. Chromosome research 18: 441–58.
  41. 41. Transeq Nucleotide to Protein Sequence Conversion/EMBOSS Transeq/EBI [Website. Available: http://www.ebi.ac.uk/Tools/emboss/transeq/index.html. Accessed 2010 Aug 10].
  42. 42. Cummings CJ, Zoghbi HY (2000) Trinucleotide repeats: mechanisms and pathophysiology. Ann Rev Genomics Hum Genet 1: 281–328.
  43. 43. Toth G, Gaspari Z, Jurka J (2000) Microsatellites in different eukaryotic genomes: survey and analysis. Genome Res 10: 967–81.
  44. 44. Katti MV, Ranjekar PK, Gupta VS (2001) Differential distribution of simple sequence repeats in eukaryotic genome sequences. Mol Biol Evol 18(7): 1161–67.
  45. 45. Vergnaud G, Denoeud F (2000) Minisatellites: Mutability and Genome architecture. Genome Res 10: 899–907.
  46. 46. Lindblad K, Zander C, Schalling M, Hudson T (1994) Growing triplet repeats. Nature genetics 2: 124.
  47. 47. Vogel T, Schmidtke J (1998) Structure and function of TSPY, the Y-chromosome gene coding for the “testis-specific protein”. Cytogenet Cell Genet 80: 209–13.
  48. 48. Vogel T, Borgmann S, Dechend F, Hecht W, Schmidtke J (1997) Conserved Y-chromosomal location of TSPY in Bovidae. Chromosome research 5: 182–85.
  49. 49. Dechend F, Schubert S, Nanda I, Vogel T, Schmid M, et al. (1998) Organization and expression of rat TSPY. Cytogenet Cell Genet 83: 270–74.
  50. 50. Schubert S, Dechend F, Skawran B, Krawczak M, Schmidtke J (2000) Molecular evolution of the murine Tspy genes. Cytogenet Cell Genet 91: 239–42.
  51. 51. Hamilton CK, Favetta LA, Di Meo GP, Floriot S, Perucatti A, et al. (2009) Copy Number Variation of Testis-Specific Protein, Y-Encoded (TSPY) in 14 Different Breeds of Cattle (Bos taurus). Sex Dev 3: 205–13.
  52. 52. Vodicka R, Vrtel R, Dusek L, Singh AR, Krizova K, et al. (2007) TSPY gene copy number as a potential new risk factor for male infertility. Reprod Biomed Online 14: 579–87.
  53. 53. Vijayakumar S, Hall DC, Reveles XT, Troyer DA, Thompson IM, et al. (2006) Detection of recurrent copy number loss at Yp11.2 involving TSPY gene cluster in prostate cancer using arraybased comparative genomic hybridization. Cancer Res 66: 4055–63.
  54. 54. Jakubiczka S, Schnieders F, Schmidtke J (1993) A bovine homologue of the human TSPY gene. Genomics 17: 732–35.
  55. 55. Manz E, Schnieders F, Brechlin AM, Schmidtke J (1993) TSPY -related sequences represent a microheterogeneous gene family organized as constitutive elements in DYZ5 tandem repeat units on the human Y chromosome. Genomics 17: 726–31.
  56. 56. Graham GJ (1995) Tandem genes and clustered genes. J Theor Biol 175: 71–87.
  57. 57. Aitken RJ, Marshall Graves JA (2002) The future of sex. Nature 415: 963.
  58. 58. Conserved Domain Database [Website. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Structure/cdd/wrpsb.cgi. Accessed 2011 Feb 10].
  59. 59. Lau YF (1999) Gonadoblastoma, testicular and prostate cancers, and the TSPY gene. Am J Hum Genet 64: 921–27.
  60. 60. Krick R, Aschrafi A, Hasgün D, Arnemann J (2006) CK2-dependent C-terminal phosphorylation at T300 directs the nuclear transport of TSPY protein. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun 341(2): 343–50.
  61. 61. Schnieders F, Dörk T, Arnemann J, Vogel T, Werner M, et al. (1996) Testis-specific protein, Y-encoded (TSPY) expression in testicular tissues. Hum. Mol. Genet 5(11): 1801–07.
  62. 62. Rodriguez P, Munroe D, Prawitt D, Chu LL, Bric E, et al. (1997) Functional characterization of human nucleosome assembly protein-2 (NAP1L4) suggests a role as a histone chaperone. Genomics 44(3): 253–65.
  63. 63. Park YJ, Luger K (2006) The structure of nucleosome assembly protein 1. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103(5): 1248–53.
  64. 64. Whittaker CA, Hynes RO (2002) Distribution and Evolution of von Willebrand/Integrin A Domains: Widely Dispersed Domains with Roles in Cell Adhesion and Elsewhere. Mol Biol Cell 10: 3369–87.
  65. 65. Bertini E, Pepe G (2002) Collagen type VI and related disorders: Bethlem myopathy and Ullrich scleroatonic muscular dystrophy. Eur J Paediatr Neurol 6: 193–98.