Research Article

Efficient and Scalable Purification of Cardiomyocytes from Human Embryonic and Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells by VCAM1 Surface Expression

  • Hideki Uosaki,

    Affiliations: Laboratory of Stem Cell Differentiation, Stem Cell Research Center, Institute for Frontier Medical Sciences, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan, Department of Cell Growth and Differentiation, Center for iPS Cell Research and Application, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan

  • Hiroyuki Fukushima,

    Affiliations: Laboratory of Stem Cell Differentiation, Stem Cell Research Center, Institute for Frontier Medical Sciences, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan, Department of Cell Growth and Differentiation, Center for iPS Cell Research and Application, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan

  • Ayako Takeuchi,

    Affiliation: Department of Physiology and Biophysics, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan

  • Satoshi Matsuoka,

    Affiliation: Center for Innovation in Immunoregulative Technology and Therapeutics, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan

  • Norio Nakatsuji,

    Affiliation: Department of Development and Differentiation, Institute for Frontier Medical Sciences, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan

  • Shinya Yamanaka,

    Affiliation: Department of Reprogramming Science, Center for iPS Cell Research and Application, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan

  • Jun K. Yamashita mail

    Affiliations: Laboratory of Stem Cell Differentiation, Stem Cell Research Center, Institute for Frontier Medical Sciences, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan, Department of Cell Growth and Differentiation, Center for iPS Cell Research and Application, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan

  • Published: August 18, 2011
  • DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0023657



Human embryonic and induced pluripotent stem cells (hESCs/hiPSCs) are promising cell sources for cardiac regenerative medicine. To realize hESC/hiPSC-based cardiac cell therapy, efficient induction, purification, and transplantation methods for cardiomyocytes are required. Though marker gene transduction or fluorescent-based purification methods have been reported, fast, efficient and scalable purification methods with no genetic modification are essential for clinical purpose but have not yet been established. In this study, we attempted to identify cell surface markers for cardiomyocytes derived from hESC/hiPSCs.

Method and Result

We adopted a previously reported differentiation protocol for hESCs based on high density monolayer culture to hiPSCs with some modification. Cardiac troponin-T (TNNT2)-positive cardiomyocytes appeared robustly with 30–70% efficiency. Using this differentiation method, we screened 242 antibodies for human cell surface molecules to isolate cardiomyocytes derived from hiPSCs and identified anti-VCAM1 (Vascular cell adhesion molecule 1) antibody specifically marked cardiomyocytes. TNNT2-positive cells were detected at day 7–8 after induction and 80% of them became VCAM1-positive by day 11. Approximately 95–98% of VCAM1-positive cells at day 11 were positive for TNNT2. VCAM1 was exclusive with CD144 (endothelium), CD140b (pericytes) and TRA-1-60 (undifferentiated hESCs/hiPSCs). 95% of MACS-purified cells were positive for TNNT2. MACS purification yielded 5−10×105 VCAM1-positive cells from a single well of a six-well culture plate. Purified VCAM1-positive cells displayed molecular and functional features of cardiomyocytes. VCAM1 also specifically marked cardiomyocytes derived from other hESC or hiPSC lines.


We succeeded in efficiently inducing cardiomyocytes from hESCs/hiPSCs and identifying VCAM1 as a potent cell surface marker for robust, efficient and scalable purification of cardiomyocytes from hESC/hiPSCs. These findings would offer a valuable technological basis for hESC/hiPSC-based cell therapy.


Recent advances of stem cell biology have provided a basis of novel regenerative therapy, in which human embryonic stem cells (hESCs) and induced pluripotent stem cells (hiPSCs) can provide cardiomyocytes for transplantation [1]. To establish hESC/hiPSC-based cardiac cell therapy, efficient induction, purification and transplantation methods for cardiomyocytes are required. High differentiation efficiencies of cardiomyocytes (approximately 30–80%) have been reported in some protocols [1][3]. Nevertheless, these efficient methods still did not provide pure cardiomyocytes. Contamination of undifferentiated hESC/hiPSCs would cause teratoma formation after transplantation. Moreover, for application of hESC/hiPSC-derived cardiomyocytes to clinical purpose, large-scale purification with no genetic modification would be required. Thus, the establishment of human cardiomyocyte purification methods with cell surface markers has been long awaited.

We have been investigating cardiovascular cell differentiation and regeneration using mouse and human ESCs and iPSCs. We reported a systematic cardiovascular cell differentiation method with mouse iPSCs [4] and an enhancement method of hiPSC differentiation to cardiomyocytes with an immunosuppressant, cyclosporin-A [5]. In this study, to further improve differentiation efficiency of hiPSCs to cardiomyocytes and identify cell surface markers for human cardiomyocytes, we adopted an efficient differentiation method that was previously established in hESCs [1] to hiPSCs with some modifications, and screened an antibody library for human cell surface molecules with this modified method. We succeeded in identifying CD106 (vascular cell adhesion molecule 1/VCAM1) as a potent marker to efficiently purify human cardiomyocytes derived from hESCs/hiPSCs.


hESC/hiPSC culture and differentiation

hESCs (KhES1) and hiPSCs (4-factor (Oct3/4, Sox2, Klf4, and c-Myc) lines: 201B6, 201B7 and 3-factor (Oct3/4, Sox2, and Klf4) lines: 253G1, 253G4) were established previously [6][8]. 201B6 was used as the human pluripotent cell representative in all experiments unless stated otherwise. These cells were adapted and maintained on thin-coat matrigel (Growth factor reduced; 1:60 dilution; Invitrogen) in mouse embryonic fibroblast conditioned medium (MEF-CM) supplemented with 4 ng/mL human basic fibroblast growth factor (hbFGF; WAKO) [9]. Cells were passaged as small clumps once in every 4–6 days using CTK solution (0.1% Collagenase IV, 0.25% Trypsin, 20% Knockout serum replacement (KSR), and 1 mM CaCl2 in Phosphate buffered saline (PBS)) [6]. MEF cells were treated with Mitomycin-C (MMC) (WAKO) for 2.5 hours, harvested and seeded at approximately 55,000 cells/cm2 in MEF medium (Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM) containing 10% fetal calf serum (FCS), 2 mM L-glutamine, 1% nonessential amino acids (NEAA)). After 1 day, the culture medium was exchanged with ES medium (80% KNOCKOUT–DMEM, 20% KSR, 1 mM L-glutamine, 0.1 mM β-mercaptoethanol, 1% NEAA, and 4 ng/ml hbFGF; 0.5 mL/cm2). MEF-CM was collected daily for 7 days and supplemented with an additional 4 ng/mL of hbFGF before feeding hES/hiPS cells.

Cardiomyocyte differentiation was induced as previously reported [1] with some modifications as shown in figure 1A (modified-directed differentiation protocol). Cells were detached by 3–5 min incubation with Versene (Invitrogen) and seeded onto Matrigel-coated plates at a density of 10,000 cells/cm2 in MEF-CM plus 4 ng/mL bFGF for 2–3 days before induction. Cells were covered with matrigel (1:60 dilution) on the day before induction. To induce cardiac differentiation, we replaced MEF-CM with RPMI+B27 medium (RPMI1640, 2 mM L-glutamine, x1 B27 supplement without insulin) supplemented with 100 ng/mL of Activin A (ActA; R&D Systems) for 24 hours, followed by 10 ng/mL human Bone morphogenetic protein 4 (BMP4; R&D) and 10 ng/mL hbFGF for 4 days with no culture medium replacement. The culture medium was subsequently replaced with RPMI+B27 supplemented with 100 ng/mL of Dkk1 for 2 days. At day 7, the culture medium was changed to RPMI+B27 without supplementary cytokines; culture medium was refreshed every 1–2 days. Beating cells appeared at day 8–9 and beating area spread by day 11.


Figure 1. Efficient induction of cardiomyocytes from hiPSCs.

(A) Schematic representation of cardiomyocyte induction protocol. (B) Expression profiles of cardiac troponin-T (TNNT2) during differentiation. Open line indicates isotype control and blue line indicates TNNT2 staining. (C–F) qPCR of differentiation stage-specific genes. (C) Pluripotency marker genes (NANOG, POU5F1); normalized to d0 expression (D) Mesodermal marker genes (T, MESP1); normalized to d2 expression (E) Cardiac progenitor genes (KDR, ISL1); normalized to d5 expression (F) Cardiac marker genes (NKX2-5, MYH6, MYH7, MYL7, MYL2); normalized to d11 expression. Mean±SD, n = 3.


Flow Cytometry, Cell Sorting, and Fluorescent Microscopy

Cells after hESC/hiPSC differentiation were dissociated by incubation with Accumax (Innovative Cell Technologies) and were stained with one of the markers listed in Table 1. For cell surface markers, staining was carried out in PBS with 5% FCS. To eliminate dead cells, cells were stained with 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) for surface marker staining or with LIVE/DEAD fixable Aqua dead cell staining kit (Invitrogen) for intracellular staining. For intracellular proteins, staining was carried out on cells fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) in PBS. Cells were stained with anti-cardiac isoform of Troponin T (TNNT2) (clone 13−11, Thermo Fisher scientific) labeled with Alexa-488 using Zenon technology (Invitrogen). The staining was performed in PBS with 5% FCS and 0.75% Saponin (Sigma). Stained cells were analyzed and sorted on an AriaII flow cytometer (BD). Data was collected from at least 10,000 events. For magnetic activated cell sorting (MACS; Milteny), cells were stained with anti-VCAM1 antibody conjugated with allophycocyanin (APC) followed by anti-APC microbeads (Milteny). Sorted cells were fixed and stained with TNNT2-alexa-488. Data were analyzed with DIVA software (BD) or FlowJo software (Treestar).


Table 1. Antibody list.


For fluorescent microscopy, hiPSC-derived VCAM1-positive cells were sorted at d11 and recultured on 0.1% gelatin-coated plates in 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS)/alpha MEM (Invitrogen) for 5–7 days. Cells were stained for TNNT2, or sarcomeric α-actinin (Sigma) with DAPI.

Surface screening of cardiomyocytes derived from hiPSCs

50,000 harvested cells were stained with each antibody from Lyoplate human cell surface marker screening panel (BD), followed by anti-Mouse IgG conjugated with Alexa-647 or anti-Rat IgG conjugated with Alexa-647. Cells stained with surface marker were fixed by 4% PFA, and stained with TNNT2-antibody labeled with Alexa-488 using zenon technology. Stained cells were analyzed on an LSRFortessa equipped with a High Throughput Sampler (BD).

Quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction

Total RNA was prepared with the RNeasy mini kit. 500 ng RNA was reverse transcribed into cDNA via random hexamers and Oligo (dT) with Superscript III Reverse Transcriptase SuperMix (Invitrogen). Quantitative Real-time PCR (qPCR) was performed on a StepOne Plus (Applied Biosystems). All experiments were performed in biological triplicate with TaqMan fast advanced master mix (Applied Biosystems). qPCR was performed for at least three independent experiments at each time point. All TaqMan probes listed in Table 2 were purchased from Applied Biosystems. Expression level was calculated by the ddCt method and normalized to ribosomal 18S RNA and indicated time point.


Table 2. TaqMan probe list.


To demonstrate transgene expression, qPCR was performed with Power SYBR Green PCR master mix (Applied Biosystems) and primers as reported previously [7]. Expression level was compared to human dermal fibroblast (HDF) 7 days after the transduction with the four retroviruses (HDF/4f-7d) [7].

Electrophysiological studies

Electrophysiological studies were carried out as previously described [10], [11]. Briefly, VCAM1-positive cells after 11 days of induction were collected by MACS sorting and re-seeded on gelatin-coated coverslips in RPMI+B27 medium. The purified cells were cultured for 7–8 days under this condition before use. The coverslips were then transferred to a patch clamp recording chamber, and electrophysiological measurements were carried out using Axopatch200B amplifier and Digidata 1440A interface (Molecular Devices, CA). Self beating cells were selected for this study.

Composition of Solutions. Physiological bathing solution contained (in mM) 140 NaCl, 5.4 KCl, 1.8 CaCl2, 1.0 MgCl2, 0.33 NaH2PO4, 5 dextrose, and 10 HEPES, adjusted to pH 7.40 with NaOH. Pipette solution contained 135 KCl, 5 Na2 creatine phosphate, 5 MgATP and 10 HEPES, adjusted to pH 7.20 with KOH. The electrode resistance was 4–6 MOhm. The action potential recordings were carried out at 29–31°C. The temperature was measured at the beginning of each cell measurement (approximately every 30 min).


Efficient induction of cardiomyocytes from hiPSCs

hiPSCs (201B6) were differentiated toward cardiomyocytes using modified-directed differentiation protocol (Method, Figure 1A). This differentiation method was based on a previous report [1] with the following modifications. Firstly, matrigel was added prior to induction to support cell survival during differentiation following a recent report (Zhang, Circulation, 2010: Abstract A20724). Secondly, we further added bFGF during d1-5 to enhance mesoderm differentiation and Dkk1 during d5-7 to improve cardiac differentiation from mesoderm [2], [12]. Beating clusters were first observed at day 8–9 and spread by day 11 after induction (Movie S1). TNNT2-positive cells appeared at day 7–8 after induction and were increased up to 30–70% (48±12%, n = 17) of total cells at day 11 (Figure 1B) whereas only 10% of cells from 201B6 were positive for TNNT2 without these modifications (Data not shown). qPCR analysis reflected the differentiation processes from an undifferentiated state to cardiomyocytes (Figure 1C–F). Rapid downregulation of pluripotent stem cell markers such as NANOG and POU5F1 (Figure 1C) was observed within two days of differentiation. Early and cardiac mesodermal genes (T, MESP1, KDR, ISL1) were expressed during day 2–5 (Figure 1D and E) and cardiac genes (NKX2-5, MYH6, MYH7, MYL2, and MYL7) were expressed after day 7 (Figure 1F). Though very faint expressions of the OCT3/4 and SOX2 transgenes were detected by qPCR after day 5 (data not shown), the expression level of total Oct3/4 and Sox2 mRNA continued to be suppressed after differentiation, suggesting that reactivation of transgenes should be functionally negligible.

VCAM1 is specifically expressed on cardiomyocytes derived from hiPSCs

Using this efficient method, we screened 242 anti-human antibodies (Lyoplate human cell surface marker screening panel (BD)) of cell surface markers on TNNT2-positive cells at day 11 after induction. We co-stained total cells at day 11 with anti-TNNT2 antibody and one of the antibodies in the library, and examined their expression pattern with flow cytometry. We classified the antibodies into four groups as class 1: no expression, class 2: non-specific, class 3: non-cardiac, and class 4: cardiac expression (Figure 2A; Dataset S1). Among them, 154 and 48 antibodies were classified as class 1 and 2. Thirty-nine antibodies including some undifferentiated ESC, endothelial, hematopoietic, and pericyte markers were classified as class 3 (Figure 2A and B). Only one antibody, anti-CD106 (vascular cell adhesion molecule 1; VCAM1) antibody was classified as class 4 (Figure 2C).


Figure 2. Cell surface marker screening.

(A) Classification of cell surface markers and schematic dot plot diagrams for each class. (B) Exclusive expression pattern of TNNT2 and PDGFRβ (Class 3) (C) Concordant expression pattern of TNNT2 and VCAM1 (Class 4). (D) qPCR of TNNT2 and VCAM1. VCAM1 was expressed concordantly with the cardiac gene. (E–I) Representative flow-cytometry analysis. (E) Expression time course of TNNT2 and VCAM1. (F) VCAM1 expression in TNNT2-positive cells. (G–I) Dot plots of VCAM1 and TRA-1-60 (undifferentiated hESC/hiPSC marker) at day 0 and 11 (G), PDGFRβ (mesoderm/pericyte marker) (H), and VE-cadherin (endothelial marker) (I) at day 11. These markers were exclusively expressed.


We further characterized VCAM1 as a cardiomyocyte marker. qPCR revealed that the expression of VCAM1 appeared at day 7–9 after induction (Figure 2D). Detailed expression time course of VCAM1 and TNNT2 by flow cytometry revealed TNNT2 expression preceded VCAM1 appearance (Figure 2E). A small number of TNNT2-positive cells were positive for VCAM1 at day 7 and double positive cells increased to approximately 80% of TNNT2-positive cells by day 11 (Figure 2E and F). VCAM1/TNNT-double positive cells should represent a later stage cardiomyocytes than VCAM1-negative/TNNT-positive cells.

Importantly, VCAM1 expression was mutually exclusive with an undifferentiated hESC/hiPSC marker, TRA-1-60, and a mesoderm and vascular pericyte marker, platelet-derived growth factor receptor beta (PDGFRβ/CD140b) (Figure 2G and H). Though VCAM1 was reported to be expressed on cytokine-activated endothelium, an endothelial marker, CD144 (VE-cadherin) and VCAM1 were also mutually exclusive in our study (Figure 2I). Thus, VCAM1 is an exclusive marker of cardiomyocytes appearing shortly after TNNT2.

Purification of cardiomyocytes from hiPSC culture with VCAM1

Next, we purified VCAM1-positive cells by MACS at d11. VCAM1-positive cells were obtained by MACS with around 98% purity (98.2±1.3%, n = 6). Approximately 95% (95.6±2.5%, n = 6) of purified cells were positive for TNNT2 (Figure 3A and B). 5−10×105 VCAM1-positive cells were sorted from a single well of a six-well culture plate in which 10×105 undifferentiated hiPSCs were plated. Purified VCAM1-positive cells at day 11 highly expressed various mRNAs of cardiac genes compared with control (FACS-purified VCAM1-negative cells) (Figure 3C). Re-cultured VCAM1-positive cells showed structural and functional cardiomyocyte features such as clear sarcomere formation (Figure 3D), self-beating (Movie S2) and action potentials resembling ventricular and pacemaker cells (Figure 3E and Table 3). Thus, human cardiomyocytes can be highly purified with this antibody even with MACS.


Figure 3. Purification of cardiomyocytes with VCAM1.

(A) Representative flow-cytometry histogram of pre- and post-MACS purification with VCAM1 at d11. (B) Purity of VCAM1- and TNNT2-positive cells after MACS purification with VCAM1. 98.2±1.3% and 95.6±2.5% of sorted cells were positive for VCAM1 and TNNT2, respectively (n = 6). (C) qPCR for cardiac marker genes. Open bars: MACS-purified VCAM1-positive cells. Closed bars: control (FACS-purified VCAM1-negative cells). (D) Fluorescent staining of purified VCAM1 stained with TNNT2 or α-actinin. Clear sarcomere structures were observed. (E) Electrophysiological study of single VCAM1-positive cell. Action potentials with ventricular-like pattern (left) and pacemaker-like pattern (right).


Table 3. Summary for EPS.


VCAM1 is a robust marker for cardiomyocytes from various human ESC and iPSC lines

To further demonstrate the utility of this method, we evaluated several hESC/hiPSC lines (Figure 4). TNNT2-positive cardiomyocytes were induced from a hESC line (KhES1) and three hiPSC lines (253G1, 253G4, 201B7) with 4.1–34.3% efficiency. Differentiation efficiencies of these lines were lower than that of 201B6, but were not related to their derivation methods. VCAM1 specifically marked a subset of TNNT2-positive cells, but percentage of VCAM1-positive cells within TNNT2-positive cells varied from 33% to 64%, reflecting differences in cardiomyocyte differentiation and maybe maturation propensities among cell lines [13]. Even with such variations, TNNT2-positive cardiomyocytes could be highly purified with VCAM1 in various human pluripotent stem cell lines (>95%) (Figure 4). Thus we conclude that VCAM1 is a very useful marker to purify cardiomyocytes derived from hESCs and hiPSCs.


Figure 4. Robust expression of VCAM1 on cardiomyocytes.

Representative plots of flow-cytometry for TNNT2 and VCAM1 in various hESC/hiPSC lines at day 11. Left panels: dot plots for TNNT2 and VCAM1. Middle panels: histograms for VCAM1 expression in TNNT2-positive cells. Right panels: histograms for TNNT2 expression in VCAM1-positive cells.



Here we reported an efficient cardiomyocyte induction method from hESCs/hiPSCs and demonstrated VCAM1 as a potent surface marker for cardiomyocytes induced with this method. Some purification methods have been previously established [14][16]. Tetramethylrhodamine methyl ester perchlorate, a mitochondrial fluorescent dye could selectively enrich hESC/hiPSC-derived cardiomyocytes (>99% purity) by fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) [14]. As this technique depends on FACS purification, there is a scale limitation due to cell sorting capacity. ALCAM was reported as a cell surface marker for cardiomyocytes derived from a mouse embryo and hESCs [15], [17]. ALCAM is also expressed on other cell types, thus, purity using MACS was relatively low (>85%). A genetic approach, which would not be applicable for clinical purpose, was also reported using drug selection with lenti-viral vector that encodes a drug resistant gene [16]. After myocardial infarction, up to 109 cardiomyocytes would be lost in human. Our method, with which we can highly purify cardiomyocytes with cell surface marker VCAM1 using MACS, is a scalable, selective and non-genetic method to prepare cardiomyocytes for clinical purpose.

With this method, a very small subset of TNNT2-negative, non-cardiomyocyte population was still observed in MACS-purified VCAM1-positive cells (<5%). Currently, the identity of VCAM1-positive/TNNT2-negative cells is still unclear. VCAM1 was negative for undifferentiated hESCs/hiPSCs, a mesoderm and vascular pericyte marker, PDGFRβ/CD140b, and an endothelial marker, CD144 (VE-cadherin) (Figure 2G–I). VCAM1 expression is reported in developing allantois and the heart [18], and bone marrow stroma [19]. Thus, VCAM1-positive/TNNT2-negative cells should probably be mesoderm derivatives or mesenchymal lineage cells, but should not include undifferentiated cells.

To apply this method for clinical application, transplantation methods should be developed. Regenerative potential and side effects such as tumor formation should be examined in each transplantation method. There was almost no undifferentiated cell contamination after purification, but safety issue in our method should be confirmed before moving to clinical usage. Nevertheless, this efficient cardiomyocyte induction method and a potent cell surface marker for robust, efficient and scalable purification of cardiomyocytes from hESCs/hiPSCs would offer a valuable technological basis for future cardiac cell therapy using hESCs/hiPSCs.

Supporting Information

Dataset S1.

Results of cell surface marker screening. Percentages of each quadrant, classification and antibody information for each antibody are shown.



Movie S1.

Beating clusters at day 11 after induction.



Movie S2.

Single beating cell at day 5 after VCAM1 sorting.




We thank Dr. M.A. Laflamme (University of Washington) for the detailed protocol of cardiac differentiation. We also thank Dr. Meiko Takahashi for the critical reading of the manuscript.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: HU JKY. Performed the experiments: HU HF AT SM. Analyzed the data: HU JKY. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: SY NN. Wrote the paper: HU JKY.


  1. 1. Laflamme MA, Chen KY, Naumova AV, Muskheli V, Fugate JA, et al. (2007) Cardiomyocytes derived from human embryonic stem cells in pro-survival factors enhance function of infarcted rat hearts. Nat Biotechnol 25: 1015–1024.
  2. 2. Yang L, Soonpaa MH, Adler ED, Roepke TK, Kattman SJ, et al. (2008) Human cardiovascular progenitor cells develop from a KDR+ embryonic-stem-cell-derived population. Nature 453: 524–528.
  3. 3. Kattman SJ, Witty AD, Gagliardi M, Dubois NC, Niapour M, et al. (2011) Stage-Specific Optimization of Activin/Nodal and BMP Signaling Promotes Cardiac Differentiation of Mouse and Human Pluripotent Stem Cell Lines. Cell Stem Cell 8: 228–240.
  4. 4. Narazaki G, Uosaki H, Teranishi M, Okita K, Kim B, et al. (2008) Directed and systematic differentiation of cardiovascular cells from mouse induced pluripotent stem cells. Circulation 118: 498–506.
  5. 5. Fujiwara M, Yan P, Otsuji TG, Narazaki G, Uosaki H, et al. (2011) Induction and enhancement of cardiac cell differentiation from mouse and human induced pluripotent stem cells with cyclosporin-a. PLoS One 6: e16734.
  6. 6. Suemori H, Yasuchika K, Hasegawa K, Fujioka T, Tsuneyoshi N, et al. (2006) Efficient establishment of human embryonic stem cell lines and long-term maintenance with stable karyotype by enzymatic bulk passage. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 345: 926–932.
  7. 7. Takahashi K, Tanabe K, Ohnuki M, Narita M, Ichisaka T, et al. (2007) Induction of pluripotent stem cells from adult human fibroblasts by defined factors. Cell 131: 861–872.
  8. 8. Nakagawa M, Koyanagi M, Tanabe K, Takahashi K, Ichisaka T, et al. (2008) Generation of induced pluripotent stem cells without Myc from mouse and human fibroblasts. Nat Biotechnol 26: 101–106.
  9. 9. Xu C, Inokuma MS, Denham J, Golds K, Kundu P, et al. (2001) Feeder-free growth of undifferentiated human embryonic stem cells. Nat Biotechnol 19: 971–974.
  10. 10. Yanagi K, Takano M, Narazaki G, Uosaki H, Hoshino T, et al. (2007) Hyperpolarization-activated cyclic nucleotide-gated channels and T-type calcium channels confer automaticity of embryonic stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes. Stem cells 25: 2712–2719.
  11. 11. Zhu WZ, Xie Y, Moyes KW, Gold JD, Askari B, et al. (2010) Neuregulin/ErbB signaling regulates cardiac subtype specification in differentiating human embryonic stem cells. Circ Res 107: 776–786.
  12. 12. Yamashita JK, Takano M, Hiraoka-Kanie M, Shimazu C, Peishi Y, et al. (2005) Prospective identification of cardiac progenitors by a novel single cell-based cardiomyocyte induction. FASEB J 19: 1534–1536.
  13. 13. Osafune K, Caron L, Borowiak M, Martinez RJ, Fitz-Gerald CS, et al. (2008) Marked differences in differentiation propensity among human embryonic stem cell lines. Nat Biotechnol 26: 313–315.
  14. 14. Hattori F, Chen H, Yamashita H, Tohyama S, Satoh Y, et al. (2009) Nongenetic method for purifying stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes. Nat Methods 7: 61–66:
  15. 15. Rust W, Balakrishnan T, Zweigerdt R (2009) Cardiomyocyte enrichment from human embryonic stem cell cultures by selection of ALCAM surface expression. Regen Med 4: 225–237.
  16. 16. Kita-Matsuo H, Barcova M, Prigozhina N, Salomonis N, Wei K, et al. (2009) Lentiviral vectors and protocols for creation of stable hESC lines for fluorescent tracking and drug resistance selection of cardiomyocytes. PLoS ONE 4: e5046.
  17. 17. Murakami Y, Hirata H, Miyamoto Y, Nagahashi A, Sawa Y, et al. (2007) Isolation of cardiac cells from E8.5 yolk sac by ALCAM (CD166) expression. Mech Dev 124: 830–839.
  18. 18. Kwee L, Baldwin HS, Shen HM, Stewart CL, Buck C, et al. (1995) Defective development of the embryonic and extraembryonic circulatory systems in vascular cell adhesion molecule (VCAM-1) deficient mice. Development 121: 489–503.
  19. 19. Simmons PJ, Masinovsky B, Longenecker BM, Berenson R, Torok-Storb B, et al. (1992) Vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 expressed by bone marrow stromal cells mediates the binding of hematopoietic progenitor cells. Blood 80: 388–395.