Research Article

Warming Increases the Spread of an Invasive Thistle

  • Rui Zhang mail,

    Affiliation: Department of Biology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania, United States of America

  • Eelke Jongejans,

    Affiliation: Department of Experimental Plant Ecology, Institute for Water and Wetland Research, Radboud University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands

  • Katriona Shea

    Affiliation: Department of Biology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania, United States of America

  • Published: June 29, 2011
  • DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0021725



Global warming and shifted precipitation regimes increasingly affect species abundances and distributions worldwide. Despite a large literature on species' physiological, phenological, growth, and reproductive responses to such climate change, dispersal is rarely examined. Our study aims to test whether the dispersal ability of a non-native, wind-dispersed plant species is affected by climate change, and to quantify the ramifications for future invasion spread rates.

Methodology/Principal Findings

We experimentally increased temperature and precipitation in a two-cohort, factorial field study (n = 80). We found an overwhelming warming effect on plant life history: warming not only improved emergence, survival, and reproduction of the thistle Carduus nutans, but also elevated plant height, which increased seed dispersal distances. Using spatial population models, we demonstrate that these empirical warming effects on demographic vital rates, and dispersal parameters, greatly exacerbate spatial spread. Predicted levels of elevated winter precipitation decreased seed production per capitulum, but this only slightly offset the warming effect on spread. Using a spread rate decomposition technique (c*-LTRE), we also found that plant height-mediated changes in dispersal contribute most to increased spread rate under climate change.


We found that both dispersal and spread of this wind-dispersed plant species were strongly impacted by climate change. Dispersal responses to climate change can improve, or diminish, a species' ability to track climate change spatially, and should not be overlooked. Methods that combine both demographic and dispersal responses thus will be an invaluable complement to projections of suitable habitat under climate change.


In the face of climate change, dispersal imposes a major limit on a species' ability to keep pace with environmental shifts [1], [2], and thus determines the fate of individuals, population persistence, and species distributions [3], [4]. Species with low dispersal ability are more likely to suffer from range contraction and eventual extinction, particularly in fragmented habitats [5]. This is especially true for species with limited environmental tolerances and when evolutionary responses occur more slowly than climate change [6]. Invasive species, on the other hand, are often associated with high dispersal and may become more problematic under changing climate [7].

Although the importance of including dispersal in climate change studies has been raised repeatedly [8], dispersal is rarely examined in this context [9]. The lack of dispersal data often leads to unrealistic assumptions of unlimited dispersal, or no dispersal at all, when predicting future species distributions [8]. The disparate predictions resulting from these two extreme cases [10], [11] underline the necessity of including explicit dispersal information to reduce the significant uncertainties caused by spread when projecting species distribution shifts. Furthermore, even when dispersal under current climate is known, extrapolation of present dispersal abilities to the future remains a challenge. Factors affecting dispersal processes, such as the architectural features of maternal plants, the morphology of dispersal units [12], and dispersal vectors [7] may not stay constant over environmental gradients; thus, dispersal may also be altered by climate change. Therefore it is necessary to evaluate possible changes in dispersal when examining species' responses to climate change. However, no study so far has examined dispersal-related plant responses to future climate scenarios. Neither does any study couple altered dispersal processes with altered population dynamics under climate change to assess future population performance, although theoretical approaches exist to reach this goal [13], [14], [15].

Here we present an experimental and theoretical study which addresses dispersal responses in addition to responses of survival, growth, and reproduction of a wind-dispersed invasive thistle, Carduus nutans, to climate change. Dispersal, although recognized as a critical component in invasion processes [16], [17], is generally overlooked when examining responses of invasive species under climate change. We divide the responses of C. nutans into two categories: i). responses in demographic vital rates, such as seedling emergence, rosette survival, bolting rate, capitulum production, seed production per capitulum; ii). responses that relate to dispersal characteristics, such as plant height at flowering (which affects seed release height), and propagule terminal velocity (which depends on seed weight and pappus morphology).


We examined two independent cohorts in a former pasture in central Pennsylvania. We manipulated both temperature and precipitation. In half of our plots, fiberglass open top chambers (OTCs) passively increased daily average temperature on the soil surface by 0.58°C across seasons in the two years of experiment (corresponding to an annual increase of 97 degree days). We also achieved a 30% increase in winter precipitation with or without a 15% increase in summer precipitation by manually adding rain or snow – these percentages are the extremes from regional climate projections for this area [18], [19]. Other vegetation was suppressed in all plots to mimic the disturbed environments (e.g. overgrazed pastures) in which this species attains maximum invasion success.

Although our increase in temperature was mild compared to regional projections (increases of 2.9°C–5.3°C in annual surface air temperature by the end of this century [19]), we found significant responses of C. nutans to warming. Seedling emergence in the fall was enhanced in warmed plots (25±3% versus 19±3%, mean±s.e., n = 80, generalized linear mixed-effects model (GLMM) with quasibinomial error structure to account for overdispersion, n = 80, P<0.001). Warming also increased rosette overwinter survival (95±2% versus 87±3%, binomial GLMM, n = 80, P = 0.0085). Bolting probability was not different between warmed and ambient plots for plants that survived the winter (86±4% versus 90±3%, binomial GLMM, n = 79, P = 0.70). Plant reproduction was significantly increased by warming. Both mature flower head production (49.84±5.60 versus 36.65±4.08, GLMM based on log linear transformed data, n = 77, P = 0.0028) and total (including buds) capitulum production (76.04±9.62 versus 57.41±6.75, GLMM based on log linear transformed data, n = 77, P = 0.028) were higher in warmed plots. Seed number per capitulum was not affected by warming (522±29 versus 476±31, GLMM, n = 77, P = 0.19). Precipitation addition in both winter and summer had no significant effect on any of the above vital rates. Increased precipitation in winter alone only reduced seed number per capitulum (427±50 versus 539±28, GLMM, n = 77, P = 0.0080).

We combined the percentage increases in seedling emergence (+29.53%), survival (+9.35%), and total capitulum production (+32.44%) due to warming, and decreases in seed number per capitulum due to increased winter precipitation (−20.79%) with a baseline 4×4 demographic matrix model (based on vital rates for an invasion experiment population at the same site from a previous study [14], see also Text S1, Table S1, Table S2) to calculate the long-term population growth rate λ under three climate change scenarios: warming, winter precipitation addition, and warming with winter precipitation addition. We assumed that the proportional responses to warming are size-independent, the establishment rate of emerging seedlings is not changed under warming, and all buds counted at harvest would have continued to set seed. We projected an 87% increase in per capita population growth rate under warming (680 versus 363), a 20% decrease under winter precipitation addition alone (288 versus 362), and a 49% increase under both warming and increased winter precipitation (539 versus 362).

In our study, plant height, a dispersal-related trait, was enhanced in warmed plots by 11.88 cm, or 9% (151.75±4.94 cm versus 139.87±4.23 cm, GLMM, n = 77, P = 0.0033). Warming did not have any significant effect on seed terminal velocity (0.75±0.04 m/s (ambient) versus 0.74 ± 0.04 m/s (warmed), GLMM, n = 66, P = 0.80), seed weight (3.42±0.09 mg versus 3.36±0.12 mg, GLMM, n = 66, P = 0.80), or pappus diameter (21.67±1.0 mm versus 21.58±1.0 mm, GLMM, n = 66, P = 0.81). Increased precipitation did not have any significant effect on seed weight (n = 66, GLMM, P = 0.90): 3.38±0.09 mg (ambient), 3.38±0.16 mg (winter precipitation addition), 3.46±0.18 mg (winter and summer precipitation addition). The effects of precipitation addition on pappus diameter and terminal velocity were not consistent for the two cohorts (Table S1). Therefore the only consistent and significant effects of climate change on dispersal are mediated via the enhanced plant height at flowering. We calculated dispersal kernels for both ambient and warmed conditions using the Wald analytical long-distance dispersal (WALD) model [20], [21]. We parameterized the model with terminal velocities and plant flowering height (assumed to be the same as seed release height) from our experiment, while horizontal wind velocity data from a nearby weather station collected during the main dispersal months were used to estimate mean wind speed and a turbulence parameter [14]. Increased plant flowering height under warming led to a distinct dispersal kernel compared to the control (Figure 1); each seed has a higher probability of travelling farther under warmed than under ambient conditions.


Figure 1. Seed dispersal kernels for C. nutans grown in ambient and warmed conditions.

The bands (grey for ambient; pink for warmed) illustrate the standard deviations based on bootstrapped plant height from the experiment, while the lines represent the mean of the bootstrapped curves (see Text S1).


Spatial population spread results from a combination of 1) local demographic processes (which determine how many propagules are produced) and 2) the dispersal process itself (which determines how far each propagule moves). We coupled demographic models with dispersal models to project the population spread rate, c*, using integrodifference equations [13][15]. We used baseline data from an earlier invasion study [14] and modified the models based on our experimental results (Table S1, Table S2). The population spread rate increased by 27% under warming (66 m/year versus 52 m/year, the medians of 100,000 simulations under increased or ambient temperatures, see simulations in Figure 2). In other words, it takes about 19 years for the invasion front to move 1 km under ambient conditions, while only 15 years under warming. Increased winter precipitation alone, which affected seed production per capitulum, did not have a large impact on the spread rate (50 m/year versus 52 m/year). Increased winter precipitation and warming together led to a 23% increase in the spread rate (64 m/year versus 52 m/year). This implies that warming (with or without precipitation increases) is likely to cause more rapid spread of this invasive species once it establishes, even in the absence of other (e.g. human-mediated) dispersal pathways. We used a c*- LTRE [14] approach to decompose the increase in c* under warming with increased winter precipitation into contributions by the parameter differences. Increased height made a much larger contribution to increased spread rate than did the demographic vital rates (Figure 3); warming-induced changes in plant height may have the strongest influence on population spread of C. nutans under climate change.


Figure 2. Visualizations of invasion waves in 20 years based on two random simulations.

A) Ambient condition. B) Warmed condition. Note that the front of the wave converged to a constant speed and shape after a few years.


Figure 3. Changes in demographic and dispersal-related traits and their contributions to increased spread rate.

A) Mean percentage changes in demographic and dispersal- related traits. B) Their corresponding contributions to increased spread rate. Warming induced changes in fall seedling emergence, survival, capitulum production, and flowering plant height: W and in red. Mean percentage change in seed number per capitulum due to increased winter precipitation: P and in blue. Solid: demographic vital rates. Hatched: dispersal-related traits.



As shown by our results, climate change affects many aspects of species life histories. While enhanced emergence, survival and reproduction directly contribute to local population dynamics [22], altered dispersal characteristics can affect the ability of offspring to arrive in suitable habitats and to buffer against harsh environments spatially. Here warming enhances the spread rate of an invasive wind-dispersed species through both demographic and dispersal processes, with enhanced dispersal contributing disproportionately to increased spread. This is because the invasion wave speed is very sensitive to plant height [14]. While we parameterized our model with data from an experimental population where growing conditions were optimal for invasion (i.e. little competition and abundant resources), we also assessed the spread rate using data from a naturally established population in Kansas. Though its contribution diminishes compared to the increased contribution of emergence (probably due to strong competition in natural populations), increased dispersal still plays an important role in increased spread under warming (Figure S1).

Our results suggest that the invasion of this species can be exacerbated by climate change, resulting largely from enhanced dispersal because of elevated plant height. Previous studies have documented that many invasive species are able to track local climate change, via adjusted phenology [23], improved establishment [24], and enhanced biomass and reproduction [25][28]. Our study demonstrates that some invasive species can also benefit from enhanced dispersal-related traits, which may increase their chance of reaching in newly suitable habitats. Furthermore, although possible changes in dispersal processes accompanied with climate change have been raised in recent reviews [7], [16], these studies consider extrinsic factors, such as altered transportation and deliberate introduction, rather than the traits of the plant itself. Our results, however, illustrate the possibility of altered plant dispersal traits due to climate change, which can interact with extrinsic factors involved in dispersal processes to produce synergistic or antagonistic outcomes.

Our experiment was conducted to maximize the invasion response of this species. In particular, plants were grown with very little competition from surrounding vegetation, thus mimicking scenarios in frequently disturbed areas, such as overgrazed pastures. Spread rates in such habitats are projected to increase under climate change, and our results suggest that management efforts should be focused more on the control of dispersal relative to demographic processes. While our study focuses on the maximal responses of the species, future studies should also address other biotic factors, such as the responses of surrounding vegetation to climate change and thereby possibly modified competition, and interference with dispersal. As well as biotic responses, future research based on this approach may also include environmental factors that affect dispersal processes, such as changes in wind speed [29] and turbulence [30] under future climate scenarios. For example, a recently published study by Nathan et al. [31] combined demographic and dispersal processes with projected wind speed changes to project wind-driven spread of tree species under climate change. Such approaches will complement biotic envelope models, most of which do not address biotic processes such as population dynamics and dispersal [32]. Evaluations of species dispersal and spread abilities, and changes in these abilities, under climate change will provide important insights for both conservation of endangered species, which often lack efficient dispersal, and management of invasive species.

Materials and Methods

Study species

Carduus nutans L. (Asteraceae) is an introduced Eurasian weed, which causes major economic problems in many regions in the world [15]. C. nutans is a monocarpic, short-lived (winter annual in our experiment) thistle and produces a large number of wind-dispersed seeds [21].

Field site descriptions

We conducted our experiments at The Russell E. Larson Agricultural Research Farm at Rock Springs, Pennsylvania, USA (latitude 40.71°, longitude −77.94°). The field site was a former pasture, which was dominated by Arrhenatherum elatius, Dactylis glomerata, Elytrigia repens, Phleum pratense, Taraxacum spp., Plantago lanceolata, Linaria vulgaris, Trifolium spp., and Galium spp. The field site was disked and all aboveground vegetation was removed prior to planting each cohort, to mimic the high invasion success of this opportunistic species in disturbed habitats.


Our climate manipulation incorporated both elevated temperature and increased precipitation according to the regional climate projections in the Northeastern U.S. Open top chambers (OTCs) were used to elevate temperature in the experiment. These OTCs were 0.4 m in height and 1.5 m in basal diameter, and were constructed according to the International Tundra Experiment Manual [33]. Cumulative degree-days for C. nutans, calculated based on McCarty [34], were significantly higher in plots with OTCs, with the largest increase in each spring (81.40±11.65 degree-days). OTCs did not have a significant effect on soil moisture or snow depth based on field measurements. Therefore we assume that elevated temperature was the predominant abiotic factor altered by the OTCs. We manipulated both winter (December - February) and summer (June–July) precipitation. Passive precipitation collectors were used to collect natural precipitation in the field. Rain and snow were manually added after each precipitation event.

Experimental design

In each cohort, we set up ten blocks, each containing four plots (one control, one with warming, one with added precipitation, and one with both treatments). As most climate projections agree with increasing future winter precipitation in U.S. Northeast, whereas summer projections are highly variable [35], precipitation plots in half of the blocks received winter precipitation addition only (+30%), while precipitation plots in the other blocks also received summer addition (+15%). In each fall, we transplanted four three-week-old rosettes into 2 m×2 m plots, either with or without OTCs. Field censuses were conducted weekly in the following growing season. Other plot vegetation was kept short by hand clipping. We terminated our experiments in the following late July by harvesting all aboveground biomass. Capitula were separated and counted based on developmental stage. One mature flower head per plot was used to examine seed production per capitulum, seed traits, and terminal velocities (i.e. the speed at which a propagule eventually falls in still air when drag equals the force of gravity; faster drops lead to shorter travel distances), following the methods of Marchetto et al. [36]. Fall seedling emergence was examined by sowing twenty-five seeds into the center of each plot in the October of 2008 and 2009. Emerged seedlings were recorded and killed every two days until December.


Analyses based on plot averages were performed in R [37] using mixed linear models (lmer) with appropriate error structure specifications or transformations of the responses. Shapiro-Wilks tests were used to verify normality. Full models started with fixed effects of warming, precipitation and their interaction (except for seedling emergence where precipitation was not relevant), and the random effects of cohort and block. Initial rosette size at transplanting was a covariate (except for seedling emergence). Stepwise model simplifications were based on lower AIC values. Bolting probability was analyzed as the conditional probability given rosettes survived the winter. Responses of reproduction and height were averaged for flowering plants in each plot before the analyses. The arithmetic means of seed weight and pappus diameter, as well as the geometric mean of terminal velocity of seeds within each flower head were used when analyzing effects of climate change on seed dispersal.


We used intergrodifference equations to couple matrix models of population dynamics with a WALD model of dispersal to calculate spread rates (Text S1). We used the c*- LTRE technique to decompose the increase in spread rate into contributions of model parameter changes as in [14].

Supporting Information

Figure S1.

Modelling results based on a natural population. A) Mean percentage changes in fall seedling emergence, survival, capitulum production, and flowering plant height due to warming (W, in red) and mean percentage change in seed number per capitulum due to both warming and increased winter precipitation (WP, in purple). B) Their corresponding contributions to increased spread rate. Solid: demographic vital rates. Hatched: dispersal-related traits. The spread rate was 21 m/year for ambient treatments and 32 m/year for warmed treatments with increased winter precipitation. Spread rates were calculated based on a natural population in Kansas [3] using the c*-LTRE technique. The calculated percentage change in reproduction (+4.9%) combines both increased capitulum production and decreased seed production per capitulum, as the original data only contained the product of these two terms: seed production per flowering plants [9].



Table S1.

Summary of the main results of the study.



Table S2.

Vital rates and dispersal-related parameters used in the demographic models and spread models.



Text S1.

Supporting Information.




We are grateful for logistical assistance and/or comments from E. Post, S. Isard, S. Yang, A. Miller, L. Russo, S. Smiles, B. Teller, D. Mortensen, and many Shea lab undergraduates.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: RZ KS. Performed the experiments: RZ. Analyzed the data: RZ EJ KS. Wrote the paper: RZ KS EJ.


  1. 1. Kokko H, Lopez-Sepulcre A (2006) From Individual Dispersal to Species Ranges: Perspectives for a Changing World. Science 313: 789–791.
  2. 2. Brooker RW, Travis JMJ, Clark EJ, Dytham C (2007) Modelling species' range shifts in a changing climate: The impacts of biotic interactions, dispersal distance and the rate of climate change. Journal of Theoretical Biology 245: 59–65.
  3. 3. Alsos IG, Eidesen PB, Ehrich D, Skrede I, Westergaard K, et al. (2007) Frequent long-distance plant colonization in the changing Arctic. Science 316: 1606–1609.
  4. 4. Loarie SR, Duffy PB, Hamilton H, Asner GP, Field CB, et al. (2009) The velocity of climate change. Nature 462: 1052–1055.
  5. 5. Matlack GR, Monde J (2004) Consequences of low mobility in spatially and temporally heterogeneous ecosystems. Journal of Ecology 92: 1025–1035.
  6. 6. Jump AS, Penuelas J (2005) Running to stand still: adaptation and the response of plants to rapid climate change. Ecology Letters 8: 1010–1020.
  7. 7. Hellmann JJ, Byers JE, Bierwagen BG, Dukes JS (2008) Five potential consequences of climate change for invasive species. Conservation Biology 22: 534–543.
  8. 8. Engler R, Guisan A (2009) MIGCLIM: Predicting plant distribution and dispersal in a changing climate. Diversity and Distributions 15: 590–601.
  9. 9. Berg MP, Kiers ET, Driessen G, van der Heijden M, Kooi BW, et al. (2010) Adapt or disperse: understanding species persistence in a changing world. Global Change Biology 16: 587–598.
  10. 10. Thomas CD, Cameron A, Green RE, Bakkenes M, Beaumont LJ, et al. (2004) Extinction risk from climate change. Nature 427: 145–148.
  11. 11. Thuiller W, Lavorel S, Araujo MB, Sykes MT, Prentice IC (2005) Climate change threats to plant diversity in Europe. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 102: 8245–8250.
  12. 12. Jablonski LM, Wang XZ, Curtis PS (2002) Plant reproduction under elevated CO2 conditions: a meta-analysis of reports on 79 crop and wild species. New Phytologist 156: 9–26.
  13. 13. Neubert MG, Caswell H (2000) Demography and dispersal: Calculation and sensitivity analysis of invasion speed for structured populations. Ecology 81: 1613–1628.
  14. 14. Jongejans E, Shea K, Skarpaas O, Kelly D, Sheppard AW, et al. (2008) Dispersal and demography contributions to population spread of Carduus nutans in its native and invaded ranges. Journal of Ecology 96: 687–697.
  15. 15. Shea K, Jongejans E, Skarpaas O, Kelly D, Sheppard AW (2010) Optimal management strategies to control local population growth or population spread may not be the same. Ecological Applications 20: 1148–1161.
  16. 16. Theoharides KA, Dukes JS (2007) Plant invasion across space and time: factors affecting nonindigenous species success during four stages of invasion. New Phytologist 176: 256–273.
  17. 17. Wilson JRU, Dormontt EE, Prentis PJ, Lowe AJ, Richardson DM (2009) Something in the way you move: dispersal pathways affect invasion success. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 24: 136–144.
  18. 18. Chen M, Mao HT, Talbot R, Pollard D (2005) Changes in precipitation characteristics over North America for doubled CO2. Geophysical Research Letters 32:
  19. 19. Hayhoe K, Wake CP, Huntington TG, Luo LF, Schwartz MD, et al. (2007) Past and future changes in climate and hydrological indicators in the US Northeast. Climate Dynamics 28: 381–407.
  20. 20. Katul GG, Porporato A, Nathan R, Siqueira M, Soons MB, et al. (2005) Mechanistic analytical models for long-distance seed dispersal by wind. American Naturalist 166: 368–381.
  21. 21. Skarpaas O, Shea K (2007) Dispersal patterns, dispersal mechanisms, and invasion wave speeds for invasive thistles. American Naturalist 170: 421–430.
  22. 22. Doak DF, Morris WF (2010) Demographic compensation and tipping points in climate-induced range shifts. Nature 467: 959–962.
  23. 23. Willis CG, Ruhfel BR, Primack RB, Miller-Rushing AJ, Losos JB, et al. (2010) Favorable Climate Change Response Explains Non-Native Species' Success in Thoreau's Woods. PLoS ONE 5(1): e8878. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0008878.
  24. 24. Polley HW, Johnson HB, Tischler CR (2003) Woody invasion of grasslands: evidence that CO2 enrichment indirectly promotes establishment of Prosopis glandulosa. Plant Ecology 164: 85–94.
  25. 25. Smith SD, Huxman TE, Zitzer SF, Charlet TN, Housman DC, et al. (2000) Elevated CO2 increases productivity and invasive species success in an arid ecosystem. Nature 408: 79–82.
  26. 26. Dukes JS (2002) Comparison of the effect of elevated CO2 on an invasive species (Centaurea solstitialis) in monoculture and community settings. Plant Ecology 160: 225–234.
  27. 27. Ziska LH (2003) Evaluation of the growth response of six invasive species to past, present and future atmospheric carbon dioxide. Journal of Experimental Botany 54: 395–404.
  28. 28. Nagel JM, Huxman TE, Griffin KL, Smith SD (2004) CO2 enrichment reduces the energetic cost of biomass construction in an invasive desert grass. Ecology 85: 100–106.
  29. 29. Soons MB, Bullock JM (2008) Non-random seed abscission, long-distance wind dispersal and plant migration rates. Journal of Ecology 96: 581–590.
  30. 30. Kuparinen A, Katul G, Nathan R, Schurr FM (2009) Increases in air temperature can promote wind-driven dispersal and spread of plants. Proceedings of the Royal Society B-Biological Sciences 276: 3081–3087.
  31. 31. Nathan R, Horvitz N, He Y, Kuparinen A, Schurr FM, et al. (2011) Spread of North American wind-dispersed trees in future environments. Ecology Letters 14: 211–219.
  32. 32. Jeltsch F, Moloney KA, Schurr FM, Kochy M, Schwager M (2008) The state of plant population modelling in light of environmental change. Perspectives in Plant Ecology Evolution and Systematics 9: 171–189.
  33. 33. Molau U, P. Mølgaard P (1996) International Tundra Experiment Manual. Danish Polar Centre, Copenhagen.
  34. 34. McCarty MK (1985) A Nursery Study of Large-Flowered Taxa of Carduus. Weed Science 33: 664–668.
  35. 35. Frumhoff PC, McCarthy JJ, Melillo JM, Moser SC, Wuebbles DJ (2007) Confronting climate change in the U.S. Northeast: science, impacts, and solutions. Synthesis report of the Northeast Climate Impacts Assessment (NECIA). Union of Concerned Scientists (UCS), Cambridge, MA.
  36. 36. Marchetto KM, Jongejans E, Jennis ML, Haner EM, Sullivan CT, et al. (2010) Shipment and storage effects on the terminal velocity of seeds. Ecological Research 25: 83–92.
  37. 37. R Development Core Team (2009) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing,.