Advertisement
Research Article

miR-16 and miR-21 Expression in the Placenta Is Associated with Fetal Growth

  • Matthew A. Maccani,

    Affiliation: Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, United States of America

    X
  • James F. Padbury,

    Affiliation: Department of Pediatrics, Women and Infants Hospital, Providence, Rhode Island, United States of America

    X
  • Carmen J. Marsit mail

    Carmen_Marsit@brown.edu

    Affiliations: Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, United States of America, Center for Environmental Health and Technology, Department of Community Health, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, United States of America

    X
  • Published: June 15, 2011
  • DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0021210

Abstract

Background

Novel research has suggested that altered miRNA expression in the placenta is associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes and with potentially harmful xenobiotic exposures. We hypothesized that aberrant expression of miRNA in the placenta is associated with fetal growth, a measurable phenotype resulting from a number of intrauterine factors, and one which is significantly predictive of later life outcomes.

Methodology/Principal Findings

We analyzed 107 primary, term, human placentas for expression of 6 miRNA reported to be expressed in the placenta and to regulate cell growth and development pathways: miR-16, miR-21, miR-93, miR-135b, miR-146a, and miR-182. The expression of miR-16 and miR-21 was markedly reduced in infants with the lowest birthweights (p<0.05). Logistic regression models suggested that low expression of miR-16 in the placenta predicts an over 4-fold increased odds of small for gestational age (SGA) status (p = 0.009, 95% CI = 1.42, 12.05). Moreover, having both low miR-16 and low miR-21 expression in the placenta predicts a greater increase in odds for SGA than having just low miR-16 or miR-21 expression (p<0.02), suggesting an additive effect of both of these miRNA.

Conclusions/Significance

Our study is one of the first to investigate placental miRNA expression profiles associated with birthweight and SGA status. Future research on miRNA whose expression is associated with in utero exposures and markers of fetal growth is essential for better understanding the epigenetic mechanisms underlying the developmental origins of health and disease.

Introduction

Fetal development represents a critical period during which perturbations to the intrauterine environment through various factors in the extrauterine environment can have major ramifications on not only the proper growth and development of the fetus but also on risk for disease later in life [1]. Barker and Hales [1] hypothesized that fetuses receive a poor or rich maternal forecast depending, in part, on the intrauterine and extrauterine conditions during pregnancy, but that this maternal forecast may not always accurately predict the post-birth environment and that such mismatches give rise to disease risk later in life. This has played out in a number of epidemiologic studies linking low birthweight with morbidity and mortality in early infancy [2] as well as with an increased risk for certain diseases later in life, particularly coronary heart disease, diabetes mellitus type 2, and hypercholesterolemia [2].

The placenta is of critical importance to ensure the proper growth and development of the fetus while in utero. It is involved in providing the fetus with nutrients and is involved in waste and gas exchange. The placenta's metabolic activity is crucial for protecting the fetus from potentially harmful maternal factors and xenobiotic toxicants that may alter fetal growth and development. The environment during pregnancy is thought to impact the appropriate function of the placenta during development, thus identification of alterations to the placenta and to placental gene expression may serve as a record of in utero exposures and of the intrauterine and extrauterine environments during pregnancy [3].

The mechanisms by which in utero exposures may dysregulate the regulatory mechanisms of the placenta continue to be studied. One mode of alteration may be through the aberrant expression of microRNA (miRNA), 21–25 nucloeotide long non-coding RNA involved in post-transcriptional gene regulation [4], [5]. miRNA base-pair to the 3′-untranslated region of target mRNA and effectively silence gene expression by a mechanism of either translational repression or direct mRNA degradation. The particular mechanism of this post-transcriptional regulation depends greatly on the degree of complementarity of the miRNA to its mRNA target. Previous work has shown that partial complementarity of a miRNA to an mRNA target may result in effective repression of translation; therefore, a single miRNA can regulate a vast number of genes [5]. Through this mechanism of post-transcriptional gene regulation, miRNA have been shown to regulate a number of key cellular functions including migration, invasion, growth, and death [6]. miRNA exhibit tissue-specific expression and function and have been shown to be expressed in the placenta in addition to a variety of other tissues [7]. Alterations to placental miRNA expression have been associated with in utero exposures [8], [9] and adverse pregnancy outcomes [10], [11], [12], [13].

Since miRNA have been described as playing important roles in development and are susceptible to the environment, we sought to further characterize the expression of six candidate miRNA previously shown to be expressed in the placenta and previously reported to target genes in pathways crucial for regulating key cell processes – miR-16 [9], [14], miR-21 [9], [15], miR-93 [12], [13], miR-135b [11], miR-146a [9], [16], and miR-182 [10] – in a large series of human placentas for associations with fetal growth.

Results

One hundred seven human placenta samples were analyzed for the expression of candidate miRNA previously shown to be expressed in the placenta and involved in regulating cell growth and developmental processes by targeting genes in a variety of cell growth and cell functioning pathways, specifically, miR-16, miR-21, miR-93, miR-135b, miR-146a, and miR-182. The demographics of the sample population are given in Table 1. Of note, the study population was oversampled for small for gestational age (SGA) infants, defined as infants whose birth weight was the lowest 10th percentile for their gestational age, calculated as in Fenton [17]. Placentas from SGA neonates comprised approximately 30% of the study population. Table 2 describes the expression of the 6 candidate miRNA in all of the 107 samples, based on qRT-PCR and absolute quantification from a standard curve. The range of expression values differed for the miRNAs, with miR-146a and miR-182 exhibiting expression in the 0.001–3.95 amol range, while miR-16 and miR-21 expression was 2 orders of magnitude greater with expression ranging from 3.53–434.74 amol range. Within each miRNA, the majority of the samples exhibited relatively homogenous low levels of expression, but the distributions of expression exhibited a right skew, suggesting there were still a number of samples with relatively moderate to high expression. As these data were not normally distributed, and as we hypothesized that aberrant high or low expression may be associated with exposures or outcomes, the expression profiles were split into quartiles, and birthweight percentile was plotted by quartile of miRNA expression (Figure 1). Such an analytical strategy using birthweight percentile as a continuous variable allowed us to gain a broader observation of association of birthweight percentile with miRNA expression. Kruskal-Wallis tests were then used to assess differences in birthweight percentile across quartiles of miRNA expression (Figure 1). Analysis revealed that birthweight percentile significantly differed across quartiles of miR-16 and miR-21 expression, p = 0.04 and p = 0.02, respectively.

thumbnail

Figure 1. Distribution of infant birthweights (y-axis) by primary term human placenta miRNA expression quartiles (x-axis).

(A) miR-16 (p = 0.04), (B) miR-21 (p = 0.02), (C) miR-93 (p = 0.88), (D) miR-135b (p = 0.84), (E) miR-146a (p = 0.46), and (F) miR-182 (p = 0.55). Black bars indicate median of birthweight percentile within each quartile. Kruskal-Wallis tests revealed that birthweight percentile significantly differed across quartiles of miR-16 and miR-21 expression (p<0.05).

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0021210.g001
thumbnail

Table 1. Demographics of the study population (n = 107).

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0021210.t001
thumbnail

Table 2. Expression of miR-16, miR-21, miR-93, miR-135b, miR-146a, and miR-182 determined through qRT-PCR in 107 primary human term placenta samples.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0021210.t002

Observing that expression in the lowest quartiles of miR-16 and miR-21 was associated with reduced birthweight percentile, we more specifically examined the association between low expression (≤median vs. >median) of the miRNA and infants considered small for gestational age (SGA), using logistic regression to control for potential confounders. SGA status served as a more clinically-relevant marker of the multitude of in utero conditions which may comprise an adverse intrauterine environment which may be ultimately associated with low birthweight. These models (Table 3) demonstrate that low miR-16 expression in the placenta predicts an odds of 4.13 for SGA (95% CI = 1.42, 12.05) compared to infants with high placenta miR-16 expression, controlled for confounders. Additionally, low miR-21 expression in the placenta predicts an intriguing but nonetheless statistically insignificant, 2.43-fold increased odds for SGA (95% CI = 0.93, 6.37) compared to infants with high placenta miR-21 expression controlled for confounders. Maternal cigarette smoking during pregnancy, as expected, also demonstrated greatly increased risks for growth restriction in both models.

thumbnail

Table 3. Logistic regression for the association between individual miRNA expression and SGA status.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0021210.t003

As both miRNA demonstrated independent correlations with SGA status, we further examined if there was an interaction between expression of these 2 miRNA in their association with infant growth outcome. This model (Table 4) demonstrated that compared to infants having high expression (>median) of both miRNA, infants with low miR-21 only or low miR-16 only had non-significant elevation in SGA risk, but infants exhibiting reduced expression of both miR-16 and miR-21 were significantly more likely to be classified as SGA (OR 5.38, 95% CI 1.52, 19.01). Although a likelihood ratio test suggested no significant multiplicative interaction between miR-16 and miR-21 (p>0.05), there was a significant trend for increased risk of being classified as SGA from having only miR-21 reduced or only miR-16 reduced in expression to having both reduced in expression (p<0.02).

thumbnail

Table 4. Logistic regression to examine the interaction of low miR-16 and low miR-21 expression on the association with SGA status.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0021210.t004

Previous work has empirically validated PTEN as a target of miR-21 in a variety of cancers [18], [19]. We overexpressed miR-21 in TCL-1 placental cells, a third trimester human placental cell line, and used Western blot to assess PTEN protein levels in cells overexpressing miR-21 versus cells transfected with negative control. Cells overexpressing miR-21 had approximately 50% less PTEN protein relative to tubulin than cells transfected with negative control (Figure 2), suggesting that PTEN is a target of miR-21 in TCL-1 cells.

thumbnail

Figure 2. TCL-1 cells overexpressing miR-21 express approximately 50% less PTEN protein than TCL-1 cells transfected with negative control (p<0.05).

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0021210.g002

Discussion

We have demonstrated the expression of key candidate miRNA in a large, population-based series of primary human placenta samples and their association with poor fetal growth, specifically identifying that reduced expression of miR-16 and miR-21 are significantly associated with growth restriction. A number of groups have previously described placental miRNA expression associations with maternal conditions such as preeclampsia [10], with maternal cigarette smoking during pregnancy [20], and as markers of pregnancy itself [11]. Furthermore, more is being uncovered about the role of miR-16 and miR-21 in regulating key cellular processes, especially the involvement of miR-16 in regulating cell cycle progression [14] and miR-21's capability of regulating cell cycling and cell proliferation [15].

Differences in birthweight percentile were examined across quartiles of miRNA expression (Figure 1). Birthweight percentile significantly differed across quartiles of miR-16 and miR-21 expression, p = 0.04 and p = 0.02, respectively. Further analysis revealed that Q2, the moderate-low expression of miR-16 and miR-21, was especially associated with lower birthweight percentile; this is an intriguing observation possibly suggesting that the moderate-low expression of miR-16 and miR-21 associated with lower birthweight percentiles more than the extreme low expression of miR-16 and miR-21. These data suggest that lower expression of miR-16 and miR-21 in placenta does associate with lower birthweight percentiles but that the moderate-low expression of these miRNA in placenta may be particularly associative with reduced birthweight; such an observation merits further investigation in the future.

miR-21 has been described as an oncogene, plays a role in enhancing tumor phenotypes including proliferation and migration, and has been shown to target a number of key regulators of these processes, including but not limited to PLAG1 [21] and PTEN [18], [19]. Meng and coworkers showed that miR-21 regulates PTEN in human hepatocellular cancer [19], and Lou and colleagues demonstrated that in ovarian epithelial carcinomas, miR-21 promotes proliferation, invasion and migration abilities by inhibiting PTEN [18]. Previous work has demonstrated that PTEN is expressed in the placenta under normal conditions and may have expression profiles which differ associated with pregnancy stage [22]. Our proof-of-principle data suggest that TCL-1 placental cells overexpressing miR-21 have approximately 50% less PTEN protein than cells transfected with negative control, suggesting that PTEN may be a target of miR-21 in TCL-1 cells. As the function of the placenta, though, is to promote fetal growth through its own proliferation and invasion into the maternal decidua, downregulation of miR-21 in the placenta could, through dysregulation of PTEN, result in decreased invasion of the maternal decidua, decreased migration, and decreased growth – the opposite of what has been observed to occur in the case of upregulated miR-21 [19].

As with many miRNA, miR-16 exhibits tissue-specific function and expression. In a number of cancer cell lines, miR-16 has been shown to be involved in the induction of apoptosis by targeting BCL-2 [23] and in cell cycle regulation by targeting CDK6 [24], CDC27 [25], and CARD10 [26]. In other cell types, miR-16 has different functions, such as targeting HMGA1 and Caprin-1 [27], further suggesting that miR-16 may have cell-type function and expression [23], [27]. Dysregulation of miR-16 in the placenta may lead to aberrant expression of its targets and may lead to functional and developmental abnormalities in the placenta that might result in reduced infant birthweight. Mechanistic research using model systems is needed to further elucidate the pathways regulated by miR-16 and miR-21 and to better determine the functional consequence of downregulation of miR-16 and miR-21 in the placenta. Additionally, more work to determine the functional effects of miRNA crosstalk – that is, miRNAs whose differential expression may have additive associations with risk for phenotype or disease – will be necessary to better understand the complex regulatory networks involved.

Poor fetal growth associated with adverse intrauterine conditions continues to be characterized. Infants classified as small for gestational age (SGA) may have experienced a number of heterogeneous environmental and placental conditions associated with describe the complex phenotype that is SGA. Because of the complexity of the conditions that may be associated with SGA status, we used SGA status as a marker suggestive of the complex milieu of conditions that may be associated with small fetal growth. Fetal malnutrition linked to growth restriction has been shown occur in a variety of conditions, including but not limited to poverty, pregnancy in women with eating disorders, and pregnancy in high altitude [28]. Maternal cigarette smoking during pregnancy is associated with an increased risk of fetal growth restriction [29], [30], and exposure to environmental toxicants in utero, such as those found in cigarette smoke, is associated with increased placental aberrations [31] and decreased placental function [32]. Previous work in our lab has suggested that maternal cigarette smoking during pregnancy is associated with the downregulation of miR-16, miR-21, and miR-146a in the placenta [9]. Thus, maternal cigarette smoking during pregnancy was included in our multivariable linear regression models because of its status as a potential confounder due to its associations with both reduced birthweight as well as reduced placental miRNA expression. A number of animal models have been generated to further study low birthweight in a controlled, experimental system [30], [33], and it will be important to consider the role of miRNA in these animal models. Because poor maternal forecasts leading to low birthweight may not accurately predict the post-birth environment and because low birthweight increases one's risk for a number of diseases later in life [2], more research is necessary to more fully understand the pathways whose dysregulation may ultimately affect birthweight.

As described described above, the multitude of factors that may contribute to altered fetal growth contribute to the relative complexity of the intrauterine environment. As concluded by Avila et al., site-to-site variability of gene expression does exist in the human placenta [34], and thus it was important for us to collect biopsies from a number of sites within each placenta sample. Since the 12 biopsies of placenta were then homogenized and combined following homogenization and prior to further analysis, we would argue that exact location within the placenta would not likely contribute to the variation in miRNA expression across the 107 placentas. A more extensive analysis of placental cell type would be important for determining differences in miRNA expression among cell types but is currently beyond the scope of our current work.

Mouillet and colleagues published important work investigating circulating levels of a set of trophoblast miRNA found in plasma and their association with fetal growth [12]. Their work was an important step in determining associations of differential miRNA expression present in plasma with fetal growth restriction. While similar in overall hypothesis, namely, that a subset of miRNA may be associated with fetal growth, our study and the work by Mouillet and colleagues differed in the sampling site, the number of samples utilized, and the candidate miRNA investigated. Our study utilized samples taken directly from term human placenta while Mouillet and colleagues used plasma samples containing circulating trophoblast miRNA. Additionally, Mouillet and coauthors' sample set contained far fewer samples than ours. In addition, we provided covariate data that Mouillet and coauthors did not. While it may indeed prove to be of important clinical utility to be able to utilize plasma samples containing circulating miRNA for future tests investigating pregnancy stage, exposure, or even fetal growth, our work was different in that we specifically were interested in characterizing miRNA expression in placentas which may be associated with aberrant fetal growth. Furthermore, we investigated miRNA expression in term placentas which may serve as a record of the complex intrauterine environment capable of programming the fetus positively or negatively. Both our work and the work of Mouillet and colleagues are important steps in further examining associations of miRNA expression with altered fetal growth.

In summary, our data suggesting that low expression of miR-16 and miR-21 in the placenta is associated with poor fetal growth may have many important implications. Our data are an important step in discovering miRNA expression profiles associated with low birthweight which may be powerful predictors of risk for disease later in life, such as coronary heart disease, diabetes, and hypercholesterolemia. This study is an important stepping stone in that it establishes that miRNA have the potential to predict future health outcomes based, in part, on their altered expression in the placentas of low birthweight infants. More work is needed to investigate how particular insults to the fetal environment may associate with alterations to placental miRNA expression and how these aberrant expression profiles may be associated with differential fetal growth. Future work to determine the roles of miRNA in specific pathways leading to altered fetal growth will be key to better understanding fetal growth as both a marker of the intrauterine environment as well as a developmental outcome and in better comprehending the developmental origins of health and disease.

Materials and Methods

Ethics statement/Placenta samples

All placenta samples used were collected as part of the Rhode Island Child Health Study (RICHS), an ongoing, population-based birth cohort at Women and Infants' Hospital in Providence, RI. The ongoing Rhode Island Child Health Study enrolls mother-infant pairs following delivery at Women and Infants Hospital in Providence, Rhode Island, USA. Term infants born small for gestational age (SGA, lowest 10th percentile) based on birthweight and gestational age and calculated from the Fenton growth chart [17] were selected, and an appropriate for gestational age infant matched on infant gender, gestational age (±3 days), and maternal age (±2 years) is also enrolled. Only singleton, viable infants are included in the study. Other exclusion criteria are maternal age <18 years or a life-threatening medical complication in the mother, and congenital or chromosomal abnormality of the infant. A structured chart review was used to collect information from the maternal inpatient medical record from delivery, and mothers were subjected to an interviewer-administered structured questionnaire to obtain information on the lifestyle, demographics, and exposure histories of the participants. All study participants provided informed consent. For each placenta collected, 12 biopsies of placenta tissue, 3 from each of 4 quadrants (totaling approximately 1 g of tissue) were excised, from the maternal side of the placenta 2 cm from the umbilical cord insertion site, free of maternal decidua. The samples were placed immediately in RNAlater and stored at 4°C. At least 72 hours later, the 12 placenta biopsies were removed from RNAlater, blotted dry, snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen, homogenized using a mortar and pestle, combined to make one homogenized sample per placenta, and stored in sample tubes at −80°C until needed for examination. A structured chart review was used to collect information from the maternal inpatient medical record from delivery, and mothers were subjected to an interviewer-administered structured questionnaire to obtain information on the lifestyle, demographics, and exposure histories of the participants. All samples and information were collected under appropriate protocols approved by the Institutional Review Boards for Women and Infants' Hospital and Brown University.

RNA extraction

RNA was extracted from placenta samples and cultured cells using the miRvana miRNA Isolation Kit (Ambion) and manufacturer protocols as described previously [20]. For tissue samples, 200 mg of homogenized tissue was used for extraction. Extracted RNA was quantified using a Nanodrop spectrophotometer and then aliquoted into single-use aliquots and stored at −80°C.

Quantitative RT-PCR (qRT-PCR) for mature miRNA

Expression of mature miRNAs was measured using commercially available TaqMan microRNA Assays or TaqMan Gene Expression Assays (Applied Biosystems, Valencia, CA) on an Applied Biosystems 7900HT Real-Time PCR system and analyzed with 7900HT System Software. Absolute quantitation of miRNA was calculated using a standard curve generated from serial dilutions of miRNA-specific pre-miR oligonucleotides (Ambion) run on each plate for each miRNA of interest, as previously described for array analyses by Bissels and colleagues [35]. All reactions were run in triplicate on 384-well plates, and RNU-44 was used as an internal control for each sample to assess sample performance. No-RT controls were also run for each sample on each plate to assure samples were free of genomic DNA.

Cell culture and transfection

TCL-1 placental cells were cultured as described previously [9]. Placental cells were transfected using the pre-miR miRNA precursors (Ambion) system and siPORT NeoFX transfection agenet (Ambion) following manufacturer's protocols.

Western blot

Western blots were used to confirm that overexpression of miR-21 resulted in decreased protein levels of PTEN compared to cells transfected with negative control. Following cell harvest and lysate collection, total protein was quantified using the BCA assay (Thermo Scientific) and manufacturer protocols. Cell lysates were then separated electrophoretically using 10% Tris-HCl gels (Bio-Rad). Proteins were transferred to Immuno-Blot PVDF membranes (Bio-Rad) through overnight night transfer at 4 degrees C and following transfer, membranes were washed with TBSt (Boston Bioproducts) and blocked with 5% milk in TBSt. For Western blot analysis, antibodies against PTEN (Invitrogen) and gamma-Tubulin (Cell Signaling) were used to visualize corresponding proteins following established protocols for staining and washing. Proteins were visualized using the Amersham ECL Western Blotting Analysis System (GE Healthcare) following the manusfacturer's protocol. Resulting images were scanned and protein quantitation was performed using Image J software.

Statistical analysis

Birthweight percentile was calculated using the Fenton growth chart [17]. SGA was defined as the lowest 10% of birthweight percentile, as described previously by Fenton [17]. Kruskal-Wallis tests were used to determine if birthweight percentile significantly differed across quartiles of miRNA expression. Logistic regression models were used to analyze if differential expression of miRNA predicted increased risk for SGA while also considering potential confounders. All analyses were conducted in SAS 9.2 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC). Student's t-tests were used to determine if overexpression of candidate miRNA resulted in differential protein levels as determined by densitometry of PTEN and tubulin.

Acknowledgments

Many thanks to Michele Avissar-Whiting, Charlotte Wilhelm-Benartzi, Devin Koestler, and Luc Gagne for their helpful comments and criticisms during the preparation of this manuscript and to Carolyn Banister, Gilda Ferro, Joyce Lee, Keila Veiga, Andrew Rainey, and Alison Migliori for placenta sample, medical history, and questionnaire data collection and processing.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: MAM JFP CJM. Performed the experiments: MAM. Analyzed the data: MAM. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: JFP CJM. Wrote the paper: MAM CJM.

References

  1. 1. Hales CN, Barker DJ (1992) Type 2 (non-insulin-dependent) diabetes mellitus: the thrifty phenotype hypothesis. Diabetologia 35: 595–601.
  2. 2. Argente J, Mehls O, Barrios V (2010) Growth and body composition in very young SGA children. Pediatr Nephrol 25: 679–685.
  3. 3. Maccani MA, Marsit CJ (2009) Epigenetics in the placenta. Am J Reprod Immunol 62: 78–89.
  4. 4. Lee RC, Feinbaum RL, Ambros V (1993) The C. elegans heterochronic gene lin-4 encodes small RNAs with antisense complementarity to lin-14. Cell 75: 843–854.
  5. 5. Du T, Zamore PD (2007) Beginning to understand microRNA function. Cell Res 17: 661–663.
  6. 6. Miska EA (2005) How microRNAs control cell division, differentiation and death. Curr Opin Genet Dev 15: 563–568.
  7. 7. Bentwich I, Avniel A, Karov Y, Aharonov R, Gilad S, et al. (2005) Identification of hundreds of conserved and nonconserved human microRNAs. Nat Genet 37: 766–770.
  8. 8. Avissar-Whiting M, Veiga KR, Uhl KM, Maccani MA, Gagne LA, et al. (2010) Bisphenol A exposure leads to specific microRNA alterations in placental cells. Reprod Toxicol 29: 401–406.
  9. 9. Maccani MA, Avissar-Whiting M, Banister CE, McGonnigal B, Padbury JF, et al. (2010) Maternal cigarette smoking during pregnancy is associated with downregulation of miR-16, miR-21, and miR-146a in the placenta. Epigenetics 5: 583–589.
  10. 10. Pineles BL, Romero R, Montenegro D, Tarca AL, Han YM, et al. (2007) Distinct subsets of microRNAs are expressed differentially in the human placentas of patients with preeclampsia. Am J Obstet Gynecol 196: 261 e261–266.
  11. 11. Chim SS, Shing TK, Hung EC, Leung TY, Lau TK, et al. (2008) Detection and characterization of placental microRNAs in maternal plasma. Clin Chem 54: 482–490.
  12. 12. Mouillet JF, Chu T, Hubel CA, Nelson DM, Parks WT, et al. (2010) The levels of hypoxia-regulated microRNAs in plasma of pregnant women with fetal growth restriction. Placenta 31: 781–784.
  13. 13. Mouillet JF, Chu T, Nelson DM, Mishima T, Sadovsky Y (2010) MiR-205 silences MED1 in hypoxic primary human trophoblasts. FASEB J 24: 2030–2039.
  14. 14. Liu Q, Fu H, Sun F, Zhang H, Tie Y, et al. (2008) miR-16 family induces cell cycle arrest by regulating multiple cell cycle genes. Nucleic Acids Res 36: 5391–5404.
  15. 15. Wang P, Zou F, Zhang X, Li H, Dulak A, et al. (2009) microRNA-21 negatively regulates Cdc25A and cell cycle progression in colon cancer cells. Cancer Res 69: 8157–8165.
  16. 16. Hou J, Wang P, Lin L, Liu X, Ma F, et al. (2009) MicroRNA-146a feedback inhibits RIG-I-dependent Type I IFN production in macrophages by targeting TRAF6, IRAK1, and IRAK2. J Immunol 183: 2150–2158.
  17. 17. Fenton TR (2003) A new growth chart for preterm babies: Babson and Benda's chart updated with recent data and a new format. BMC Pediatr 3: 13.
  18. 18. Lou Y, Yang X, Wang F, Cui Z, Huang Y (2010) MicroRNA-21 promotes the cell proliferation, invasion and migration abilities in ovarian epithelial carcinomas through inhibiting the expression of PTEN protein. Int J Mol Med 26: 819–827.
  19. 19. Meng F, Henson R, Wehbe-Janek H, Ghoshal K, Jacob ST, et al. (2007) MicroRNA-21 regulates expression of the PTEN tumor suppressor gene in human hepatocellular cancer. Gastroenterology 133: 647–658.
  20. 20. Maccani MA, Avissar-Whiting M, Banister CE, McGonnigal B, Padbury JF, et al. (2010) Maternal cigarette smoking during pregnancy is associated with downregulation of miR-16, miR-21 and miR-146a in the placenta. Epigenetics 5:
  21. 21. Tran N, McLean T, Zhang X, Zhao CJ, Thomson JM, et al. (2007) MicroRNA expression profiles in head and neck cancer cell lines. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 358: 12–17.
  22. 22. Tokyol C, Aktepe F, Husniye Dilek F, Yilmazer M (2008) Comparison of placental PTEN and beta1 integrin expression in early spontaneous abortion, early and late normal pregnancy. Ups J Med Sci 113: 235–242.
  23. 23. Cimmino A, Calin GA, Fabbri M, Iorio MV, Ferracin M, et al. (2005) miR-15 and miR-16 induce apoptosis by targeting BCL2. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102: 13944–13949.
  24. 24. Linsley PS, Schelter J, Burchard J, Kibukawa M, Martin MM, et al. (2007) Transcripts targeted by the microRNA-16 family cooperatively regulate cell cycle progression. Mol Cell Biol 27: 2240–2252.
  25. 25. Calin GA, Cimmino A, Fabbri M, Ferracin M, Wojcik SE, et al. (2008) MiR-15a and miR-16-1 cluster functions in human leukemia. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 105: 5166–5171.
  26. 26. Chen RW, Bemis LT, Amato CM, Myint H, Tran H, et al. (2008) Truncation in CCND1 mRNA alters miR-16-1 regulation in mantle cell lymphoma. Blood 112: 822–829.
  27. 27. Kaddar T, Rouault JP, Chien WW, Chebel A, Gadoux M, et al. (2009) Two new miR-16 targets: caprin-1 and HMGA1, proteins implicated in cell proliferation. Biol Cell 101: 511–524.
  28. 28. Tamashiro KL, Moran TH (2010) Perinatal environment and its influences on metabolic programming of offspring. Physiol Behav 100: 560–566.
  29. 29. Shea AK, Steiner M (2008) Cigarette smoking during pregnancy. Nicotine Tob Res 10: 267–278.
  30. 30. Esposito ER, Horn KH, Greene RM, Pisano MM (2008) An animal model of cigarette smoke-induced in utero growth retardation. Toxicology 246: 193–202.
  31. 31. Abel EL (1984) Smoking and pregnancy. J Psychoactive Drugs 16: 327–338.
  32. 32. Shiverick KT, Salafia C (1999) Cigarette smoking and pregnancy I: ovarian, uterine and placental effects. Placenta 20: 265–272.
  33. 33. Desai M, Gayle D, Han G, Ross MG (2007) Programmed hyperphagia due to reduced anorexigenic mechanisms in intrauterine growth-restricted offspring. Reprod Sci 14: 329–337.
  34. 34. Avila L, Yuen RK, Diego-Alvarez D, Penaherrera MS, Jiang R, et al. (2010) Evaluating DNA methylation and gene expression variability in the human term placenta. Placenta 31: 1070–1077.
  35. 35. Bissels U, Wild S, Tomiuk S, Holste A, Hafner M, et al. (2009) Absolute quantification of microRNAs by using a universal reference. RNA 15: 2375–2384.