Advertisement
Research Article

Epidemiology of Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma and Its Association with Epstein Barr Virus in Northern China

  • Xin Huang,

    Affiliations: Department of Pathology and Medical Biology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands, Department of Pathology, Health Science Center, Peking University, Beijing, China

    X
  • Ilja Nolte,

    Affiliation: Unit of Genetic Epidemiology and Bioinformatics, Department of Epidemiology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands

    X
  • Zifen Gao,

    Affiliation: Department of Pathology, Health Science Center, Peking University, Beijing, China

    X
  • Hans Vos,

    Affiliation: Department of Pathology and Medical Biology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands

    X
  • Bouke Hepkema,

    Affiliation: Department of Laboratory Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands

    X
  • Sibrand Poppema,

    Affiliation: Department of Pathology and Medical Biology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands

    X
  • Anke van den Berg,

    Affiliation: Department of Pathology and Medical Biology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands

    X
  • Arjan Diepstra mail

    a.diepstra@path.umcg.nl

    Affiliation: Department of Pathology and Medical Biology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands

    X
  • Published: June 10, 2011
  • DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0021152

Abstract

Background

The incidence of classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) and its association with Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) varies significantly with age, sex, ethnicity and geographic location. This is the first report on epidemiological features of cHL patients from Northern regions of China. These features are compared to data from a previously published Dutch cHL population.

Methodology/Principal Findings

157 cHL patients diagnosed between 1997 and 2008 in the North of China were included after histopathological re-evaluation. The Dutch population-based cohort consisted of 515 cHL patients diagnosed between 1987 and 2000. EBV status was determined by in situ hybridization of EBV- encoded small RNAs. In the Chinese population, tumor cells of 39% of the cHL patients were EBV+ and this was significantly associated with male sex, mixed cellularity subtype and young age (<20 y). The median age of the Chinese patients was 9 years younger than that of the Dutch patients (28 y vs. 37 y). In addition, the age distribution between the two populations was strikingly different in both the EBV+ subgroups (p<0.001) and the EBV- subgroups (p = 0.01). The mixed cellularity subtype was almost 3x more frequent amongst the Chinese (p<0.001).

Conclusion/Significance

CHL patients from Northern regions of China show a distinctive age distribution pattern with a striking incidence peak of EBV+ mixed cellularity cases among children and adolescents and another high incidence peak of EBV- nodular sclerosis cases in young adults. In comparison to Dutch cHL patients there are pronounced differences in age distribution, subtype and EBV status, presumably caused by complex gene-environmental interactions.

Introduction

Classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) is a heterogeneous malignancy with a complex etiology and epidemiology. In general, cHL accounts for about 1% of all cancers and ~30% of the lymphoid malignancies worldwide [1]. Epidemiologic studies of cHL demonstrate a remarkable diversity of the incidence according to age, sex, ethnic background, geographic location and socioeconomic status [2], [3]. The highest incidence was reported among Caucasians, followed by African Americans and Hispanics, and the lowest incidence was found in Orientals [3]. Data from the International Agency for Research on Cancer (http://globocan.iarc.fr/) shows a nearly 6-fold difference between Western Europe and East Asia with an incidence of 2.3 and 0.4 per 100,000 inhabitants per year respectively in 2008. A genetic explanation for this difference has been shown in a multi-ethnic study of cHL in the United States that reported the lowest incidence rate in Asian immigrants in comparison to other ethnic origins [4]. However, a trend of increasing incidence of cHL was reported among Chinese immigrants in western countries [4], [5], suggesting an influence of westernization. The incidence pattern by age was also shown to be different between Caucasian and Oriental populations [6], [7]. Western populations typically have a bimodal age distribution with two peaks near 25 and 60 ys. In Orientals, a first incidence peak usually presents in childhood with a second peak in the elderly, although in Japanese cHL patients the early incidence peak was reported to be absent [4], [8].

Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) is present in the tumor cells in a proportion of patients and EBV is accepted as a causal agent in these patients [7], [9]. There is a striking variability in the percentage of EBV involved cases between racial groups and geographic locations [2], [10]. The proportion of EBV involvement is almost 100% in Hispanic cHL patients [11], much lower in Caucasians (20~40%) [2], [12] and intermediate in Orientals [13], [14]. In general, the EBV association with cHL is related to age, being the strongest in children and the elderly [15], [16]. In addition, male sex and the mixed cellularity (MC) histological subtype are associated with EBV+ cHL worldwide [15], [17].

The current study was undertaken to investigate the epidemiological characteristics of cHL patients from Northern China. In addition, these characteristics were compared to data from a previously reported Dutch cHL patient population [18].

Materials and Methods

Patient selection and data collection

157 cHL patients were included in this study [19]. These patients resided in the Northern area of China and were diagnosed with cHL during the period of 1997 to 2008 at the Dept. of Pathology, Health Science Center, Peking University (n = 78), Zhanye Regional Hospital, Gansu Province (n = 22), First Hospital of Jilin University (n = 14), Beijing Air Army General Hospital (n = 14), Shougang Hospital, Peking University (n = 13) and a number of other smaller hospitals (1 to 3 patients per hospital; n = 16). For all patients we retrieved the original data from the pathology database, including histological subtype, patients' sex and age at the time of diagnosis. Ethical approval for this study was not required by these institutions as the experiments carried out did not relate to patients privacy or treatment. Research was conducted adhering to the Declaration of Helsinki and according to Dutch regulations (http://www.federa.org/). The institutional review board (the Medical Ethics Review Board of the University Medical Center Groningen) specifically waived the needs for ethics approval and consent.

Histopathological re-evaluation

Formalin fixed paraffin embedded tissue blocks from 157 patients were available and were used to cut slides for haematoxylin and eosin staining and for determining EBV status. Histological re-evaluation was done according to the most recent WHO classification system [1] which categorizes cHL into four histological subgroups, i.e. nodular sclerosis (NS), mixed cellularity (MC), lymphocyte rich (LR) and lymphocyte depletion (LD). Cases without enough tissue for proper evaluation of the background architecture were designated as cHL not otherwise specified (NOS).

EBV status

Presence of EBV in tumor cells was determined by EBER in situ hybridization (ISH) with a fluorescein-conjugated PNA probe specific for the EBV-encoded EBER RNAs (DAKO, Glostrup, Denmark) using standard laboratory protocols. Appropriate positive and negative controls were included in all analyses.

Statistical analysis

Differences between EBV+ and EBV- groups in relation to age, sex and histopathological subtype were assessed by Chi square test, Fisher's exact test or Mann Whitney U test. The data were analyzed with SPSS for Windows, version 17.0. A p-value <0.05 was considered significant.

Results

Histopathological re-evaluation and EBV status

The 157 cHL cases were re-evaluated for histological subtype. The subtype could not be unequivocally determined in 29 (18%) cases and was designated cHL-NOS. Six and 9 of these cases were previously classified as LR and MC subtype respectively. Discrepancies in the classification were observed in 5 out of 13 LR cases and 6 out of 57 MC cases which were reclassified as MC and NS subtype respectively. All original NS diagnoses were re-evaluated as NS subtype. A consistent classification was achieved for 117 of 128 (91.4%) cHL cases.

NS was the most common subtype in the Chinese patient population, accounting for 61% of cases (n = 78), followed by MC with 36% (n = 46) and LR with 3% (n = 4) of cases. The lymphocyte depleted subtype was not represented. EBER ISH was positive in 39% of Chinese cHL patients (n = 62; Table 1).

thumbnail

Table 1. Distribution of age, sex and histology by EBV status in Chinese cHL patients.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0021152.t001

Distribution of age, sex and histological subtypes

The male to female ratio was 1.8 in the total group, 3.1 in the EBV+ group and 1.3 in the EBV- group (p = 0.015). The MC subtype was more common in EBV+ cHL patients (71%) and the NS subtype was more common in the EBV- group (82%) (p<0.001). Although the median age of cHL patients in the EBV+ group did not differ much from that of the EBV- cHL patient group (31 years, range: 4–74 ys and 27 years, range: 8–74 ys respectively) (Table 1), the 10 years age group distribution between EBV+ and EBV- patients did show a highly significant difference (p<0.001). Patients in the age groups from 0 to 10 were significantly more often EBV+ (p = 0.003), while patients aged 21 to 30 were significantly more often EBV- (p<0.001).

Comparison between Chinese and Dutch cHL patients

Characteristics of the Dutch cHL population were consistent with the epidemiology of cHL in Western Europe (Table 2). There was a small difference in the sex distribution between Dutch and Chinese cHL patients with a male to female ratio of 1.8 in the Chinese and 1.4 in the Dutch population. In the EBV+ group males were overrepresented in the Chinese as compared to the Dutch population (male to female ratio of 3.1 vs. 1.8); however, these differences were not significant. In the EBV- group the Chinese male to female ratio was comparable to the Dutch (1.3 vs. 1.2).

thumbnail

Table 2. Distribution of age, sex and histology by EBV status in Dutch cHL patients.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0021152.t002

In the Chinese patients, the MC subtype was much more frequent than in the Dutch patients (36% vs. 13%) (p<0.001) (Table 3). In both populations the MC subtype was highly and equally associated with EBV positivity (Chinese 74% vs. Dutch 76%). The NS subtype was less often EBV associated in the Chinese as compared to the Dutch cHL patients (15% vs. 28%) (p = 0.024).

thumbnail

Table 3. Differences in subtype distribution in Chinese and Dutch cHL patients.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0021152.t003

The median age of Chinese patients (28 ys, range: 4–74 ys) was 9 years younger than that of the Dutch population (37 ys, range: 8–94 ys) (p<0.001) and the age distribution in 10-year intervals was significantly different (p<0.001) (Figure 1, Table 4). Similar to the Chinese patients, stratification by EBV status showed significant differences in median age between EBV+ (43 ys, range: 8–94) and EBV- (33 ys, range: 9–90) Dutch cHL patients (p<0.001). Comparison of the EBV+ Chinese patient group with the EBV+ Dutch patient group showed a striking difference in the age distribution (p<0.001) (Figure 2A, Table 4). In young Chinese patients (younger than 16 years), there was a high number of MC subtype (14 out of 20) and all of these MC cases were EBV associated (Table 3). In addition, the age distribution of the EBV- Chinese patients was significantly different from the EBV- Dutch patients (p = 0.01) (Figure 2B, Table 4).

thumbnail

Figure 1. Age distribution of Dutch and Chinese cHL patients in consecutive 10-year intervals.

Age distribution is shown for 157 patients from Northern regions of China (black) and 515 patients from the Northern part of the Netherlands (grey). The two curves exhibit a somewhat similar trend with significant differences at the first, second, eighth and ninth decade (* = p<0.01, ** = p<0.001) between the Chinese and the Dutch population (6% vs. 1%, 22% vs. 12%, 1% vs. 7% and 0% vs. 3% respectively). The Chinese population has more patients among the first three decades as compared to the Dutch population, both having the highest peak in the third decade. The Chinese population does not show a second incidence peak at around 60 years.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0021152.g001
thumbnail

Figure 2. Age distribution of Dutch and Chinese cHL patients stratified by EBV status.

A represents the comparison of the age distribution in the two EBV+ cHL subpopulations. Chinese EBV+ cHL patients (black) exhibited a significant single peak in the first and second decade with a maximum percentage of 26% (* = p<0.01). In contrast, Dutch EBV+ cHL patients (grey) demonstrated a clear bimodal age distribution pattern with two peaks occurring in the third and seventh decade respectively with a similar incidence for both peaks (17% and 18%). B shows the age distribution curve of the EBV- cHL patients. There is a single incidence peak in the third decade for both populations, which is more pronounced in the Chinese population (39% vs. 27%).

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0021152.g002
thumbnail

Table 4. Differences in age distribution in Chinese and Dutch cHL patients.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0021152.t004

Discussion

Epidemiological cHL studies have shown significant variations in age and EBV positivity in relation to ethnic background and geographic location. Asians are known to have the lowest incidence of cHL and an intermediate level of EBV association [3]. Previously, a few studies reported on cHL epidemiology in Taiwan and Hong Kong, populations that are closely related to the Southern Chinese population [13], [20][22]. Importantly, the Northern Chinese population is genetically different from the Southern Chinese population, especially in the distribution of Human Leukocyte Antigen (HLA) types. Undifferentiated nasopharyngeal carcinoma (UNPC), another EBV-associated malignancy with a latent EBV expression pattern similar to EBV+ cHL, is endemic in Southern China but not in Northern China. Previous studies have proposed that geographic differences in the allele frequency of the UNPC susceptibility allele HLA-A*02:07 might well explain the high incidence of UNPC in the Southern Chinese population. Thus, differences in cHL incidence and EBV association might also be expected in different Chinese regions. The main aim of this study was to analyze the epidemiology of cHL in patients from the Northern part of China, a population that has not been studied before.

Previous studies found a relatively high level of EBV association in cHL patients from Hong Kong (65%, n = 23, EBER ISH), China (61%, n = 28, EBER ISH) and Taiwan (63%, n = 70, EBER ISH and LMP1 immunohistochemistry combined) [13], [14], [21]. These frequencies are higher than the 39% of EBV positivity identified in the present patient cohort (n = 157). Besides the population size, differences in EBV prevalence might also be influenced by intra-ethnic environmental and genetic variations. Consistent with previous findings in Chinese and other ethnic groups of cHL patients, the incidence of EBV+ cHL was significantly higher in males and the MC subtype [2].

A shift in the histological classification upon histopathological re-examination was observed in 8.6% (n = 11) of the cases, partly explained by changes in the WHO classification guidelines. Agreement was specifically poor for the LR and MC subtypes. Due to the lack of enough tissue for evaluating the background architecture, 15 cases previously diagnosed as LR or MC subtype were re-assigned as cHL-NOS. Overall, the histological distribution was similar to those reported in previous Chinese populations from Hong Kong and Taiwan [13], [23].

Until now, there are four studies that investigated the age distribution of cHL in the Chinese population [13], [20][22]. Three studies, including two from Hong Kong (n = 23 and n = 92) [13], [20] and another one from Taiwan (n = 70) [21], identified a bimodal age distribution with two peaks at the second and sixth decades respectively, whereas another study from Taiwan (n = 42) [22] found a single age peak at the 3rd decade. Consistent with this last study, we also found a unimodal age distribution with a distinctive peak incidence occurring at the 3rd decade. Only two of the four studies (Hong Kong and Taiwan) included EBV status into the analyses [13], [21]. Our results were consistent with these studies for EBV- cHL patients with a single incidence peak in young-adults. However, our EBV+ cHL patients did not show an incidence peak in the elderly, in contrast to both other studies.

Comparison of the Chinese and Dutch cHL patient groups revealed a significant inter-ethnic difference in the age distribution in the total populations and also in the EBV+ and EBV- subgroups separately. A bimodal pattern for the age distribution of cHL in general as well as in the EBV+ subgroup is considered typical for the Western population and this was also present in our Dutch cohort. It has been reported that in the Asian cHL population, an early peak should be less obvious and at a younger age compared to the Western population, whereas a second peak at older age should be similar [4], [8]. Intriguingly, our Chinese population had an evident early peak similar to the Dutch population but lacked the peak at older age. The relative lack of elderly patients in our study might partially be explained by a lower life expectancy in China as compared to the Netherlands. In addition, there might be a bias of elderly patients being diagnosed in smaller, rural hospitals that were not included in this study. It is unclear whether these potential effects could have affected an incidence peak in the 61 to 70 years age group.

According to the literature, EBV+ Asian cHL shows a similar age distribution as EBV- Asian cHL. However, in the present study EBV+ cHL had a different and pronounced incidence peak at adolescence and was strongly associated with the MC subtype. This incidence peak of EBV+ cHL at young age closely resembles that seen in various developing regions in the world, including South America, Mexico and the Middle East and is associated with a low socioeconomic status and early exposure to EBV [24][30]. In both the Chinese and the Dutch populations a clear peak for EBV- NS patients was observed at the 3rd decade. This peak was higher in the Chinese population than in the Dutch population (39% vs. 27%), which is surprising because this peak has been associated with developed, industrialized populations [31]. Thus, the epidemiology of our cHL patient cohort from the Northern part of China shows characteristics of both a developing and a well-developed population.

In conclusion, we demonstrate a distinctive age distribution pattern in a large group of Northern Chinese cHL patients with a striking incidence peak among young adults. Moreover, we identified large inter-ethnic differences in the distribution of age, EBV status and histological subtype in comparison to a Caucasian population. Both genetic and environmental factors are expected to play a role in these differences.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: AvdB ZG SP BH AD. Performed the experiments: XH HV. Analyzed the data: XH AvdB IN AD. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: ZG. Wrote the paper: XH AD.

References

  1. 1. Swerdlow SH, Campo E, Harris NL, Jaffe ES, Pileri SA, et al. (2008) WHO Classification of Tumors: Pathology and Genetics of Tumors of Haematopoietic and Lymphoid Tissues. Lyon: IARC Press. pp. 321–334.
  2. 2. Jarrett AF, Armstrong AA, Alexander E (1996) Epidemiology of EBV and Hodgkin's lymphoma. Ann Oncol 7: Suppl 45–10.
  3. 3. Cartwright RA, Watkins G (2004) Epidemiology of Hodgkin's disease: a review. Hematol Oncol 22: 11–26.
  4. 4. Glaser SL, Hsu JL (2002) Hodgkin's disease in Asians: incidence patterns and risk factors in population-based data. Leuk Res 26: 261–269.
  5. 5. Au WY, Gascoyne RD, Gallagher RE, Le N, Klasa RD, et al. (2004) Hodgkin's lymphoma in Chinese migrants to British Columbia: a 25-year survey. Ann Oncol 15: 626–630.
  6. 6. Armstrong AA, Alexander FE, Cartwright R, Angus B, Krajewski AS, et al. (1998) Epstein-Barr virus and Hodgkin's disease: further evidence for the three disease hypothesis. Leukemia 12: 1272–1276.
  7. 7. Jarrett RF (2002) Viruses and Hodgkin's lymphoma. Ann Oncol 13: Suppl 123–29.
  8. 8. MacMahon B (1957) Epidemiological evidence of the nature of Hodgkin's disease. Cancer 10: 1045–1054.
  9. 9. Kapatai G, Murray P (2007) Contribution of the Epstein Barr virus to the molecular pathogenesis of Hodgkin lymphoma. J Clin Pathol 60: 1342–1349.
  10. 10. Weinreb M, Day PJ, Niggli F, Powell JE, Raafat F, et al. (1996) The role of Epstein-Barr virus in Hodgkin's disease from different geographical areas. Arch Dis Child 74: 27–31.
  11. 11. Gulley ML, Eagan PA, Quintanilla-Martinez L, Picado AL, Smir BN, et al. (1994) Epstein-Barr virus DNA is abundant and monoclonal in the Reed-Sternberg cells of Hodgkin's disease: association with mixed cellularity subtype and Hispanic American ethnicity. Blood 83: 1595–1602.
  12. 12. Jarrett RF, Krajewski AS, Angus B, Freeland J, Taylor PR, et al. (2003) The Scotland and Newcastle epidemiological study of Hodgkin's disease: impact of histopathological review and EBV status on incidence estimates. J Clin Pathol 56: 811–816.
  13. 13. Chan JK, Yip TT, Tsang WY, Lau WH, Wong CS, et al. (1995) Detection of Epstein-Barr virus in Hodgkin's disease occurring in an Oriental population. Hum Pathol 26: 314–318.
  14. 14. Zhou XG, Hamilton-Dutoit SJ, Yan QH, Pallesen G (1993) The association between Epstein-Barr virus and Chinese Hodgkin's disease. Int J Cancer 55: 359–363.
  15. 15. Gandhi MK, Tellam JT, Khanna R (2004) Epstein-Barr virus-associated Hodgkin's lymphoma. Br J Haematol 125: 267–281.
  16. 16. Jarrett RF, Gallagher A, Jones DB, Alexander FE, Krajewski AS, et al. (1991) Detection of Epstein-Barr virus genomes in Hodgkin's disease: relation to age. J Clin Pathol 44: 844–848.
  17. 17. Nakatsuka S, Aozasa K (2006) Epidemiology and pathologic features of Hodgkin lymphoma. Int J Hematol 83: 391–397.
  18. 18. Diepstra A, van Imhoff GW, Schaapveld M, Karim-Kos H, van den Berg A, et al. (2009) Latent Epstein-Barr virus infection of tumor cells in classical Hodgkin's lymphoma predicts adverse outcome in older adult patients. J Clin Oncol 27: 3815–3821.
  19. 19. Huang X, van den Berg A, Gao Z, Visser L, Nolte I, et al. (2010) Expression of HLA class I and HLA class II by tumor cells in Chinese classical Hodgkin lymphoma patients. PLoS One 5: e10865.
  20. 20. Liang R, Choi P, Todd D, Chan TK, Choy D, et al. (1989) Hodgkin's disease in Hong Kong Chinese. Hematol Oncol 7: 395–403.
  21. 21. Liu SM, Chow KC, Chiu CF, Tzeng CH (1998) Expression of Epstein-Barr virus in patients with Hodgkin's disease in Taiwan. Cancer 83: 367–371.
  22. 22. Lee MY, Tan TD, Feng AC (2005) Clinico-pathological study of Hodgkin's lymphoma in a cancer center in Taiwan. Clin Lab Haematol 27: 379–383.
  23. 23. Wu SJ, Chen CY, Su IJ, Tang JL, Chou WC, et al. (2008) Clinical characteristics and treatment response of Hodgkin's lymphoma in Taiwan. J Formos Med Assoc 107: 4–12.
  24. 24. Elgui de Oliveira D, Bacchi MM, Abreu ES, Niero-Melo L, Bacchi CE (2002) Hodgkin disease in adult and juvenile groups from two different geographic regions in Brazil: characterization of clinicopathologic aspects and relationship with Epstein-Barr virus infection. Am J Clin Pathol 118: 25–30.
  25. 25. Zarate-Osorno A, Roman LN, Kingma DW, Meneses-Garcia A, Jaffe ES (1995) Hodgkin's disease in Mexico. Prevalence of Epstein-Barr virus sequences and correlations with histologic subtype. Cancer 75: 1360–1366.
  26. 26. De Matteo E, Barón AV, Chabay P, Porta J, Dragosky M, et al. (2003) Comparison of Epstein-Barr virus presence in Hodgkin lymphoma in pediatric versus adult Argentine patients. Arch Pathol Lab Med 127: 1325–1329.
  27. 27. Huh J, Park C, Juhng S, Kim CE, Poppema S, et al. (1996) A pathologic study ofHodgkin's disease in Korea and its association with Epstein-Barr virus infectionCancer. 77: 949–955.
  28. 28. Araujo I, Bittencourt AL, Barbosa HS, Netto EM, Mendonça N, et al. (2006) The high frequency of EBV infection in pediatric Hodgkin lymphoma is related to the classical type in Bahia, Brazil. Virchows Arch 449: 315–319.
  29. 29. Al-Salam S, John A, Daoud S, Chong SM, Castella A (2008) Expression of Epstein-Barr virus in Hodgkin lymphoma in a population of United Arab Emirates nationals. Leuk Lymphoma 49: 1769–77.
  30. 30. Belgaumi A, Al-Kofide A, Joseph N, Jamil-Malik R, Khafaga Y, et al. (2008) Hodgkin lymphoma in very young children: Clinical characteristics and outcome of treatment. Leuk Lymphoma 49: 910–916.
  31. 31. Flavell KJ, Murray PG (2000) Hodgkin's disease and the Epstein-Barr virus. Mol Pathol 53: 262–269.