Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Substrate Specifity Profiling of the Aspergillus fumigatus Proteolytic Secretome Reveals Consensus Motifs with Predominance of Ile/Leu and Phe/Tyr

  • Douglas S. Watson,

    Affiliation Center for Advanced Drug Research, Biosciences Division, SRI International, Harrisonburg, Virginia, United States of America

  • Xizhi Feng,

    Affiliation Department of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio, United States of America

  • David S. Askew,

    Affiliation Department of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio, United States of America

  • Kalyani Jambunathan,

    Affiliation Center for Advanced Drug Research, Biosciences Division, SRI International, Harrisonburg, Virginia, United States of America

  • Krishna Kodukula,

    Affiliation Center for Advanced Drug Research, Biosciences Division, SRI International, Harrisonburg, Virginia, United States of America

  • Amit K. Galande

    amit.galande@sri.com

    Affiliation Center for Advanced Drug Research, Biosciences Division, SRI International, Harrisonburg, Virginia, United States of America

Abstract

Background

The filamentous fungus Aspergillus fumigatus (AF) can cause devastating infections in immunocompromised individuals. Early diagnosis improves patient outcomes but remains challenging because of the limitations of current methods. To augment the clinician's toolkit for rapid diagnosis of AF infections, we are investigating AF secreted proteases as novel diagnostic targets. The AF genome encodes up to 100 secreted proteases, but fewer than 15 of these enzymes have been characterized thus far. Given the large number of proteases in the genome, studies focused on individual enzymes may overlook potential diagnostic biomarkers.

Methodology and Principal Findings

As an alternative, we employed a combinatorial library of internally quenched fluorogenic probes (IQFPs) to profile the global proteolytic secretome of an AF clinical isolate in vitro. Comparative protease activity profiling revealed 212 substrate sequences that were cleaved by AF secreted proteases but not by normal human serum. A central finding was that isoleucine, leucine, phenylalanine, and tyrosine predominated at each of the three variable positions of the library (44.1%, 59.1%, and 57.0%, respectively) among substrate sequences cleaved by AF secreted proteases. In contrast, fewer than 10% of the residues at each position of cleaved sequences were cationic or anionic. Consensus substrate motifs were cleaved by thermostable serine proteases that retained activity up to 50°C. Precise proteolytic cleavage sites were reliably determined by a simple, rapid mass spectrometry-based method, revealing predominantly non-prime side specificity. A comparison of the secreted protease activities of three AF clinical isolates revealed consistent protease substrate specificity fingerprints. However, secreted proteases of A. flavus, A. nidulans, and A. terreus strains exhibited striking differences in their proteolytic signatures.

Conclusions

This report provides proof-of-principle for the use of protease substrate specificity profiling to define the proteolytic secretome of Aspergillus fumigatus. Expansion of this technique to protease secretion during infection could lead to development of novel approaches to fungal diagnosis.

Introduction

Filamentous fungi of the genus Aspergillus, most commonly Aspergillus fumigatus (AF), can cause devastating infections in immunocompromised individuals [1], [2], [3]. Mortality due to AF infection has doubled since 1980 and is strikingly high in chemotherapy-induced neutropenics (60%) and allogeneic bone marrow transplant recipients (90%) [4], [5]. Early diagnosis of AF infection enables timely therapy and is thus critical to a successful outcome [6], [7]. Unfortunately, many of the clinical signs of AF infection are nonspecific, and reliable early diagnosis remains challenging because of limitations in the sensitivity or specificity of existing tools, including mycological growth, radiology, detection of cell wall components by ELISA, and PCR amplification of fungal DNA [8], [9].

To augment the clinician's toolkit for rapid diagnosis of AF infections, we are investigating AF secreted proteases as novel diagnostic biomarkers. In nature, AF contributes to the recycling of carbon and nitrogen by degrading organic debris with numerous secreted hydrolases, including proteases [10]. Like many other environmental saprophytes, AF is highly specialized for this task, with more than 1% of its genome dedicated to the synthesis of secreted proteases alone [11], [12], [13], [14]. Metabolic studies have suggested that AF relies extensively on its ability to degrade protein to acquire essential nutrients during infection [15], [16], and these findings are consistent with the detection of AF proteases in the host environment [17], [18]. These enzymes degrade the extracellular matrix and disrupt the barrier function of the lung, allowing entry of the organism into the vasculature and hematogenous dissemination to other tissues [19], [20]. In addition, transcriptional profiling of AF isolated from infected mouse lungs revealed at least 11 protease-encoding mRNAs with greater abundance in vivo than in vitro, providing strong evidence that AF increases its repertoire of protease gene expression in the lung environment [21].

According to the MEROPS database, the AF genome encodes 136 proteases [22], predominantly serine/threonine proteases (39%) and metalloproteases (43%). Moreover, estimates of the number of secreted proteases range from 47 to 100 depending on the computational method used [10], [14], [19], [22], but fewer than 15 individual secreted proteases have been functionally characterized [23], [24], [25], [26], [27], [28], [29]. Given the large number of AF secreted proteases, the traditional reductionist approach of cloning and expressing individual enzymes has left most AF secreted proteases unexplored as diagnostic targets. In addition, the protease repertoire of AF is known to change in vivo [21], so the proteases that are most abundant in vitro may not be the most abundant or the most enzymatically active in vivo. Thus, a robust method for profiling the proteolytic signature of AF in vitro and in vivo addresses a deficit in the current literature and provides an alternative platform for discovery of AF secreted proteases as diagnostic biomarkers on the basis of enzymatic activity.

Activity-based protease substrate profiling provides a snapshot of the overall protease activity of a particular sample under a given set of conditions. Profiling techniques include active site-directed covalent probes [30], [31], which allow affinity purification of tagged enzymes; synthetic libraries of internally quenched fluorogenic probes (IQFPs), which fluoresce upon enzymatic cleavage [32], [33]; and phage display libraries, which are tethered to a solid surface and elute upon proteolysis [34]. These techniques are classically employed to define the substrate specificities of homogenous preparations of individual proteases [35], [36] or to purify individual components from mixtures [37], but they are not typically used to profile the proteolytic activities of complex samples.

We have recently reported a robust method for profiling protease substrate specificities of complex biological mixtures using a concise combinatorial IQFP library [38]. In this library, 15 amino acids that are commonly found in protease substrates are represented at each of three variable positions, flanked by appropriate spacer sequences and fluorophore or quencher moieties (Figure 1). The resulting 3375 IQFP sequences are combined into pools of up to 8 similar sequences and the resulting 512 peptide pools are arrayed in six 96 well microplates. Library “hits” are then deconvoluted by synthesizing the constituent IQFPs of a particular well to obtain fine substrate specificity information. In our previous study, we used this library to define the quantitative proteolytic fingerprints of two body fluids, bronchoalveolar lavage and serum, that have clinical relevance for diagnosis of AF infection.

thumbnail
Figure 1. Strategy for protease activity profiling of AF secreted proteases.

A. Structure and description of a typical IQFP probe from the library (variable sequence shown: Ala-Ile-Leu). B. Graphical depiction of IQFP cleavage by AF culture supernatant. N- and C-terminal substrate fragments were readily detected by MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry following ZipTip® C18 sample preparation. C. As an example, spectra of the sequence Ala-Ile-Leu before and after proteolytic cleavage are shown, with calculated fragments identified. A summary of all MS data is presented in Table 3.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0021001.g001

In this study, we profiled the dominant substrate specificities of an AF clinical isolate in vitro. We also determined the functional characteristics of the AF proteases that cleave these substrates. Through comparative profiling of human serum, we showed that the proteolytic signatures of these AF secreted proteases and human serum are largely distinct. In addition, we observed little intraspecies variability in protease substrate specificities but found that multiple Aspergillus species could be distinguished through characteristic differences in their proteolytic signatures. These experiments represent an important first step toward the long-term goal of developing a diagnostic assay that detects AF infection through identification of the specific proteolytic signature of AF secreted proteases.

Results

Protease activity profiling of AF secreted proteases

Secreted proteases are novel targets for diagnosis of AF infection. Although serine endoproteases are predicted to be abundant among AF secreted proteases, only two have been characterized to date (Alp1 and SedA), only one of which is secreted at neutral pH (Alp1) [25], [27]. We reasoned that screening a combinatorial IQFP library against culture supernatant of an AF clinical isolate under classical serine protease buffer conditions would reveal an overall profile of the substrate specificities of AF secreted serine proteases. An initial comparison of buffer conditions of major protease classes (serin, metallo-, aspartic, and cysteine) using a generic fluorescent substrate (fluorescein-labeled casein) indicated that pH 8.0 gave the highest activity (data not shown), further supporting the rationale for screening under these conditions. Peptides in the IQFP library contain three variable residues, flanked on either side by a series of glycines, followed by either a fluorophore or a quencher (Figure 1). Each variable residue consists of an equimolar mixture of two closely related amino acids (for a more detailed description, see Materials and Methods). Thus, each well of the library contains an equimolar mixture of up to eight individual IQFPs. For example, the well containing the motif Ser/Thr–Ile/Leu–Asn/Gln contains the following eight sequences: Ser-Ile-Asn, Ser-Ile-Gln, Ser-Leu-Asn, Ser-Leu-Gln, Thr-Ile-Asn, Thr-Ile-Gln, Thr-Leu-Asn, and Thr-Ile-Gln.

Comparative protease activity profiling of AF H237 culture supernatant and complement preserved normal human serum revealed striking differences in their proteolytic signatures (Figure 2A–B). Of the 512 wells in the library, 212 exhibited greater than 2-fold fluorescence enhancement upon exposure to AF culture supernatant but were not detectably cleaved by human serum (Figure 2C). In addition, 93 library wells exhibited greater than 4-fold fluorescence enhancement upon exposure to AF culture supernatant. 92 of these 93 substrate motifs contained isoleucine, leucine, phenylalanine, or tyrosine at one or more variable positions; 46.2% of the sequences contained one of these residues at one position, 45.2% at two positions, and 7.5% at all three positions (Figure 2D). These four residues accounted for 44.1% of Xaa, 59.1% of Yaa, and 57.0% of Zaa (Table 1). Positively charged residues (Lys, Arg) accounted for less than 10% of the residues at each variable position, hydroxyl-containing residues (Ser, Thr) less than 15%, negatively charged residues (Asp, Glu) less than 5%, and proline less than 5%. Of the 93 wells exhibiting 4-fold fluorescence enhancement or greater, several motifs (two constant positions and one variable position) appeared five or more times (Table 2). Four of the five motifs contained Ile/Leu at the Yaa position. The Xaa and Zaa positions were more varied but hydrophobic residues still predominated at the fixed positions of all five motifs except one, which contained Ser/Thr at the Xaa position.

thumbnail
Figure 2. Substrate specificity of AF secreted proteases and human serum.

A. Cleavage of an IQFP library by AF H237 culture supernatant. Each square corresponds to a single well of a 96 well microplate. The brightness of a given square corresponds to its fluorescence intensity, quantified as fluorescence fold change, which in turn indicates the extent of cleavage of the IQFP probes in that well. Of the 512 wells in the library, 93 exhibited greater than 4-fold fluorescence enhancement upon incubation with AF culture supernatant. B. Cleavage of the same IQFP library by complement preserved normal human serum. C. Number of IQFP sequences distinctly cleaved by only AF culture supernatant, only human serum, or both. D. Graphical depiction of amino acid preferences at each variable position of the library sequences cleaved by AF secreted proteases. Isoleucine, leucine, phenylalanine, and tyrosine were predominant at each position. Amino acid preference data are summarized in Table 1.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0021001.g002

thumbnail
Table 1. Amino acid preferences of IQFP sequences cleaved by AF secreted proteases.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0021001.t001

From each of the first four IQFP motifs shown in Table 2, a representative well that was not cleaved by human serum was selected for further study. The IQFPs selected were: Ile/Leu–Phe/Tyr–Phe/Tyr, Ala/Val–Ile/Leu–Ile/Leu, Ser/Thr–Ile/Leu–Phe/Tyr, and Ser/Thr–Ile/Leu–Asn/Gln. The eight constituent sequences of each well were individually synthesized and confirmed by mass spectrometry. Fine amino acid substrate specificity was determined by quantifying endpoint fluorescence fold change following incubation of AF culture supernatant with each individual substrate (Figure 3). Three of the four motifs demonstrated a clear preference at one or more variable positions. The Ser/Thr–Ile/Leu–Asn/Gln motif required glutamine at the Zaa position, whereas the Ala/Val–Ile/Leu–Ile/Leu motif required leucine at the Zaa position. The Ile/Leu–Phe/Tyr–Phe/Tyr motif required phenylalanine at the Yaa position and also preferred tyrosine at the Zaa position. In contrast, the 8 constituent peptides of the Ser/Thr – Ile/Leu – Phe/Tyr motif were cleaved to a similar extent without dramatic preferences at any of the variable positions. From each motif, the two most efficiently cleaved IQFP sequences were selected for further characterization: Ser-Ile-Phe, Thr-Ile-Phe, Ser-Ile-Gln, Thr-Ile-Gln, Leu-Phe-Tyr, Leu-Phe-Phe, Ala-Ile-Leu, and Ala-Leu-Leu. Cleavage of each of these IQFPs was optimal at pH 8.0, although some exhibited broader pH maxima (Ser-Ile-Phe, Thr-Ile-Phe, Leu-Phe-Phe, Leu-Phe-Tyr) than others (Ser-Ile-Gln, Thr-Ile-Gln, Ala-Ile-Leu, Ala-Leu-Leu) (Figure 4A). Cleavage of these sequences was consistent across multiple independent culture preparations (Figure 4B).

thumbnail
Figure 3. Deconvolution of AF protease substrate consensus motifs.

For each IQFP motif with five or more wells demonstrating proteolytic cleavage by AF secreted proteases (listed in Table 2), a representative well was selected for deconvolution and further study. Individual IQFP sequences were synthesized and fine substrate specificity was determined. Although cleavage of the Ser/Thr–Ile/Leu–Phe/Tyr motif was promiscuous (A), others exhibited clear amino acid preferences, particularly at the Zaa position (B, D). Data represent fluorescence fold change after 2 h incubation.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0021001.g003

thumbnail
Figure 4. Properties of AF secreted proteases.

A. Effect of buffer pH on activity of AF secreted proteases. Cleavage of each of the IQFP consensus motifs was optimal at approximately pH 8. Cleavage of three probes (Thr-Ile-Gln, Lue-Phe-Tyr, Ala-Ile-Leu) showed a narrow activity peak at pH 8 and a loss of activity at pH 9, whereas cleavage of Thr-Ile-Phe was near maximal in a broad range of assay buffer pH values. B. Cleavage of 8 IQFPs by 4 independent preparations of AF H237 culture supernatant. Proteolytic activities did not differ significantly among preparations.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0021001.g004

Properties of AF secreted proteases

MALDI-MS is a valuable tool for identification of biomarkers in complex samples [39], [40]. In this study, precise proteolytic cleavage sites of individual IQFPs were reliably determined by a simple, rapid mass spectrometry-based method without the need for liquid chromatography fractionation (Figure 1). At the conclusion of appropriate proteolytic cleavage assays, samples were purified using ZipTip® C18 pipette tips and directly eluted onto MALDI target plates. Assignment of cleavage sites based on predicted N- and C-terminal IQFP fragments revealed that three of the four motifs were cleaved at the Zaa-Gly bond, suggesting that the substrate specificity arises from non-prime side residues (Table 3). However, the Leu-Phe-Phe and Leu-Phe-Tyr sequences were cleaved at the Yaa-Zaa bond, indicating a contribution of both prime side and non-prime side residues to specificity.

thumbnail
Table 3. Assignment of IQFP cleavage sites by mass spectrometry.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0021001.t003

Since enzymes derived from thermotolerant organisms are frequently thermostable, we explored the thermal properties of the secreted proteases responsible for these proteolytic activities with the long-term goal of using these characteristics to distinguish fungal proteases from their mammalian counterparts. When AF culture supernatant was heated for 30 min at variable temperature before starting the assays, cleavage of all four IQFP motifs retained full activity up to 45°C before exhibiting a sharp drop at 50°C and losing all detectable activity at 55°C (Figure 5A). Accordingly, incubation at 56°C for 15 min reduced activity by 80% (Figure 5B). To determine the effect of temperature on enzymatic activity, culture supernatant and IQFPs were combined and heated for 1 h before measurement of fluorescence. In this assay, three of the four IQFP motifs exhibited a slight, non-significant increase in activity up to 45°C and subsequent drop at 50°C, as compared to activity at room temperature (Figure 5C). Cleavage of Leu-Phe-Tyr, however, was significantly increased at 45°C and activity at 50°C was essentially equivalent to activity at room temperature. This difference in thermal properties, combined with a disparity in prime side substrate specificity, suggests that this proteolytic activity could arise from a distinct secreted protease as compared to the other IQFP motifs analyzed.

thumbnail
Figure 5. Thermostability and thermophilicity of AF secreted proteases.

AF culture supernatants were heated before (A,B) or during (C) IQFP cleavage assays. A. AF culture supernatant was heated for 30 min at the indicated temperatures before addition of IQFPs. Proteolysis of each sequence sharply declined after heating at 50°C and was undetectable after heating at 55°C. B. AF culture supernatant was heated at 56°C for the indicated times before addition of IQFPs. Proteolysis of each sequence decreased markedly after heating for 15 min and was undetectable after heating for 30 min. C. AF culture supernatant and IQFPs were pre-heated for 15 min, combined, and incubated at the indicated temperature. Fluorescence was promptly measured after 1 hr. All IQFPs exhibited slightly increased cleavage at 45°C as compared to room temperature except LFY, which increased significantly. For all panels, data represent fluorescence fold change after 1 hr incubation. * p≤0.01 compared to room temperature.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0021001.g005

To test the hypothesis that our IQFP library screening conditions would identify serine protease activity, we determined the effects of class-specific protease inhibitors on cleavage of individual IQFPs by AF culture supernatant. A serine protease inhibitor, AEBSF, completely inhibited proteolytic activity of all four motifs in a dose-dependent manner (Figure 6). A metalloprotease inhibitor (EDTA), an aspartic protease inhibitor (Pepstatin A), and a cysteine protease inhibitor (E-64) had no effect when assayed at the high end of the range of typical inhibitor concentrations. Therefore, we conclude that the observed proteolytic activities arise from serine proteases.

thumbnail
Figure 6. Inhibition of AF secreted protease activity by a serine protease inhibitor.

A. AEBSF (8 mM) completely inhibited cleavage of all four IQFP motifs. No inhibition was observed with a metalloprotease inhibitor (EDTA; 20 mM), an aspartic protease inhibitor (Pepstatin A, 20 µM), or a cysteine protease inhibitor (E-64; 20 µM). B. The effect of AEBSF was dose-dependent. For each IQFP, data are normalized to a positive control sample lacking inhibitor. For both panels, data represent fluorescence fold change after 1 h incubation. * p≤0.05 for all IQFPs as compared to each of the three inhibitors and the positive control.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0021001.g006

Proteolytic activity of Aspergillus species and strains

Distinguishing among Aspergillus species may be clinically useful because species can differ in their resistance to some antifungals [41]. Although the genomes of common Aspergillus species each encode more than 100 proteases [22], substantial differences in overall protease activity have been reported [10], [42], which could serve as a basis for distinguishing among species in a diagnostic assay. It is also important to determine the extent to which proteolytic activities vary among strains within a particular species. Thus, we compared the proteolytic profiles of culture supernatants derived from three strains each of A. fumigatus, A. flavus, and A. nidulans, along with one A. terreus strain. Proteolytic activities were normalized by dry weights of fungal cultures to account for slight differences in growth. A. niger was excluded from the comparison because it grew poorly under the conditions used for this study.

In two independent experiments, we observed that protease substrate specificity patterns were consistent within species and no significant intraspecies variation was observed (Figure 7A). The lone exception was A. fumigatus strain CEA10, which had greater proteolytic activity than the other two A. fumigatus strains, although the cleavage patterns were consistent. In contrast, several important differences were observed when comparing species. Overall, proteolytic activity was generally greater in A. fumigatus strains, followed by A. nidulans, with A. flavus exhibiting the lowest level of proteolytic cleavage of the three species (Figure 7B). A. terreus proteolytic cleavage was undetectable at the dilution studied (data not shown). Differences in substrate specificities were also observed among species; cleavage preferences for the Ser/Thr-Ile/Leu-Asn/Gln and Ala/Val-Ile/Leu-Ile/Leu motifs were consistent, but interspecies differences in substrate specificities of the other two motifs were evident. While A. fumigatus proteases cleaved Ser/Thr-Ile/Leu-Phe/Tyr promiscuously, A. nidulans proteases preferred sequences containing Ile at the Yaa position and A. flavus proteases preferred sequences containing Leu at the Yaa position. In addition, cleavage of the Ile/Leu-Phe/Tyr-Phe/Tyr motif was detectable in culture supernatants of all three A. flavus isolates but almost entirely absent in A. nidulans culture supernatants.

thumbnail
Figure 7. Comparative activity of secreted proteases of Aspergillus strains and species.

A. Cleavage of individual IQFPs by Aspergillus culture supernatants. The brightness of a given square corresponds to the extent of cleavage of the IQFP probe in that well, as described in Figure 2. Fluorescence measurements were normalized by the biomass of each culture according to dry weight to facilitate absolute comparisons across strains. Data represent the mean of two independent experiments. A. fumigatus exhibited the greatest extent of proteolytic activity, followed by A. nidulans, then A. flavus. IQFP probes used for the experiments in panels B and C are highlighted in red. B. Cleavage of selected IQFPs by three Aspergillus species. Values represent the mean of three strains per species. C. Effect of heating at 50°C for 30 min on the proteolytic activity of A. fumigatus H237 and A. nidulans A4 culture supernatants. A. nidulans supernatant retained >80% of activity under these conditions, whereas A. fumigatus supernatant retained only 30–40%. * p≤0.01 as compared to A. fumigatus. For panels A and B, data represent fluorescence fold change after 2 h incubation; for panel C, data represent fluorescence fold change after 1 h incubation. Error bars represent standard deviations.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0021001.g007

Discussion

We are investigating secreted fungal proteases as novel biomarkers for diagnosis of AF infection. In this regard, studies focused on individual proteases have provided limited insight, given the large number of proteases in the genome. We reasoned that a profile of overall AF secreted protease activity would reveal the most actively cleaved substrate motifs, addressing a significant deficit in the current literature and facilitating development of protease-targeted diagnostics. As proof-of-principle, we defined the proteolytic secretome of AF H237, a clinical isolate commonly used for studies of AF pathogenesis [43], [44]. Here, we report the identities of those substrate motifs and the characteristics of the fungal proteases that cleave them.

Aspergillus protease secretion is greatly affected by growth conditions, including medium composition, pH, and duration of culture [23], [24], [45], [46]. AF is also known to secrete a different repertoire of proteases in the lung as compared to in vitro [21], and the protease repertoire may be further altered in serum. Thus, any particular in vitro culture condition may not closely resemble the in vivo growth environment as it progresses from colonization to infection to dissemination. In selecting the growth conditions for this study, we struck a balance between two factors – mimicking the in vivo environment while simultaneously using growth conditions that were amenable to comparison with other studies of Aspergillus secreted proteases in the literature. A relevant biological fluid (either bronchoalveolar lavage fluid or serum) was an appropriate choice as the sole carbon/nitrogen source. We selected serum because preliminary experiments showed that AF grew reasonably well in human serum but very poorly in BALF (data not shown). We complemented serum with a salt solution (Aspergillus minimal salt solution) and buffer (pH 6.5) that facilitated direct comparison with existing literature [45], [47], [48].

Substrate specificities of AF secreted serine proteases

Serine/threonine proteases are abundant in the AF genome and a serine protease, Alp1, is actively expressed during infection [17]. Thus, serine proteases were natural targets for our study. The virulence of mutant fungal strains lacking “Alp1-like” elastase activity is lessened considerably [17], but fungal strains in which Alp1 has been genetically deleted retain virulence [17], [26], [49], [50], [51]. Therefore, additional serine proteases may be expressed during infection [51]. Isoelectric separation of AF culture supernatant revealed at least six distinct fractions with serine protease activity [52], further supporting the possibility that multiple serine proteases are present during infection and may be suitable diagnostic targets.

By screening a diverse library of 3375 IQFPs we identified the substrate sequences most actively cleaved by AF secreted proteases under serine protease buffer conditions (pH 8.0) (Figure 2 and Table 1). Many of these substrates were not cleaved by human serum, suggesting that they may be suitable candidates for detection of AF protease activity in the host. Collectively, there is a significant preference for isoleucine, leucine, phenylalanine, and tyrosine in the substrates cleaved by AF secreted proteases. This is an important finding because the most abundant AF secreted serine protease, Alp1, hydrolyzes peptide bonds after both hydrophobic and cationic non-prime side residues [52]; the relative contribution of each has not been determined. The proteolytic activities we observed were inhibited by AEBSF, a serine protease inhibitor, but not by other class-specific inhibitors, suggesting that serine proteases are indeed responsible (Figure 6). In addition, Alp1 is reported to have potent collagenolytic activity, which may allow it to efficiently degrade collagen in the lung [25]. Thus, it is somewhat surprising that cleavage of proline-containing IQFPs was poor (Figure 2; Table 1). However, prolyl endopeptidase activity could occur under alternative conditions [23]. Although we do not yet know if Alp1 is responsible for the proteolytic activities reported here, the identity of the protease(s) is not essential for diagnostic assay development.

Schwienbacher and colleagues determined the major proteins secreted by AF strain NCTC2109 during growth in several different media [45]. In that study, the most abundant proteins secreted by AF during culture in AMM at 37°C were mitogillin, chitosanase Csn, chitinase ChiB1, and a ß-1,3-endoglucanase. An aspartic protease, aspergillopepsin i, was induced by growth in a more acidic medium, further underscoring the extent to which AF adjusts hydrolase secretion to match its environment. When Schwienbacher et al. comparatively profiled the secreted proteins of other Aspergillus species, they observed qualitatively different protein profiles by SDS-PAGE, consistent with the differences in protease specificity we observed among species (Figure 7A). The authors of that study also found A. nidulans and A. terreus protein secretion to be below their limit of detection, consistent with the lower levels of protease activity we observed as compared to A. fumigatus. We do not yet know if interspecies differences in secreted protease activity arise from alterations in specific activity or substrate specificity of particular proteases or simply from globally reduced levels of protein secretion.

Mass spectrometry-based proteomics approaches are essential tools for gaining insight into biological phenomena, including proteolysis [30], [53]. Although powerful, many of these sophisticated techniques require state-of-the-art instrumentation and laborious methodology. The method reported here allows cleavage sites to be determined in a standard MALDI-TOF mass spectrometer after a one step ZipTip® purification without the need for liquid chromatography fractionation. The three amino acid variable region allows substrate specificity to be determined rapidly with only one cleavage site per sequence. However, because this information is largely restricted to non-prime side residues (Table 3), more diverse synthetic libraries may be necessary to determine prime side specificity [54]. Emerging computational, quantitative, or targeted proteomic methods would also be useful in this regard [55], [56], [57].

Schaal and coworkers previously assayed AF culture supernatant against a panel of 360 protease substrates with the goal of identifying fungus-specific proteolytic activity in blood for diagnosis of AF infection [58]. The authors of that study identified 10 substrate sequences that were cleaved by AF culture supernatant but not by human serum. Several of these sequences contained aliphatic or aromatic residues, but the consensus motifs identified in our study were not explicitly present. A comprehensive comparison of our data to those reported by Schaal is difficult because the sequences assayed by Schaal were longer (eight amino acids) and thus could have multiple cleavage sites. By expanding the pool of candidate substrate sequences in an unbiased manner, our technique complements the work of Schaal and coworkers.

Thermostability of AF proteases

The thermotolerance of AF is unique among pathogenic molds [59], and secreted hydrolases of multiple Aspergillus species exhibit both thermostable (resistant to irreversible inactivation at high temperature) and thermophilic (able to maintain enzymatic activity at high temperature) properties [60], [61]. These thermal properties may be useful in distinguishing their activity from that of mammalian proteases in diagnostic samples. In our study, the proteases corresponding to the most strongly cleaved substrates were thermostable up to 45°C, with activity declining sharply above that temperature (Figure 5A). This finding agrees closely with previous studies of Alp1 [25] and with studies of additional AF secreted serine proteases [52]. We also demonstrated that these proteases exhibit thermophilic behavior, with at least one IQFP motif demonstrating significantly greater cleavage at 45°C than at room temperature. To our knowledge, this is the first report of thermophilicity of AF secreted proteases. In the future, a combination of differences in thermostability and proteolytic signature could be exploited to distinguish among pathogenic Aspergillus species.

The observed thermostability of A. nidulans secreted proteases was surprising, since A. fumigatus has been considered uniquely thermotolerant among Aspergillus species [62]. However, A. nidulans is capable of growing at 48°C in vitro [59]. In addition, a recent report described a secreted alkaline protease from A. nidulans with biochemical characteristics that closely match the proteolytic activity we observed (pH optimum 8.0, thermostability up to 50°C) [63]. Taken together, these observations suggest that further investigation of the thermotolerance of Aspergillus nidulans is warranted.

Relevance to pathogenesis and diagnosis

The role of secreted proteases in AF pathogenesis has been difficult to prove. Early studies suggested a correlation between fungal elastase activity and virulence in vivo [17], and AF secreted proteases have recently been implicated in fungal evasion of complement [64], [65]. However, deletion strains lacking two major AF secreted proteases (Alp1, Mep) do not exhibit reduced virulence in animals [26], [49], [50]. Because the AF genome encodes 136 proteases [22], any role of AF proteases in virulence may thus far have been overlooked because of redundancy in the large number of secreted proteases in the genome. The transcription factor PrtT, which drives expression of many AF secreted proteases in vitro, is not a virulence factor [66], [67]. However, these genetically modified strains were not completely devoid of proteolytic activity, and a role for proteases not controlled by PrtT cannot be discounted. Thus, alternative experimental approaches may provide additional insight into the role of secreted proteases in AF pathogenesis.

Protease activity profiling represents a new means of comparison of Aspergillus protease activities. Protease secretion in vitro is highly dependent on the growth conditions [23], [46], [68], but these differences have not been studied at the level of substrate specificity. This tool may also be helpful in addressing the role of AF proteases in virulence through correlation of proteolytic signature with pathogenicity of AF strains. Characterization of genetically modified strains is also possible; for example, we recently identified protease activities that are disproportionately affected in genetically modified AF strains that are deficient in an endoplasmic reticulum stress response pathway [47].

Substrate-based design of covalent active-site inhibitors is another field that could benefit from a more complete picture of protease activity of pathogenic organisms [30], [53]. In addition, protease activity profiling of culture supernatants, lysates, or even intact organisms may lead to the development of protease-targeted therapeutics for other organisms as well. For example, secreted aspartic proteases are confirmed virulence factors in Candida albicans [69]. Proteases have also been suggested as targets for therapy and diagnosis of cancer, inflammation, and numerous bacterial and viral infections [70], [71].

Our data demonstrate that IQFP protease profiling can accurately and reproducibly measure the substrate specificity and extent of cleavage of AF proteases within culture supernatant. To advance this technique toward development of a diagnostic assay for AF infection, it will be important to ascertain whether this method is sufficiently sensitive to detect AF-specific proteolysis in body fluids such as BALF and serum that contain abundant host proteases. Our earlier study indicated that activity of an exogenous protease is detectable in BALF at concentrations below 1 µg/mL [38]. Ultimately, protease profiling must done with biological fluids obtained from infected patients or appropriate animal models [72]. Indeed, comparative profiling of diseased and healthy fluids obtained from a guinea pig model of invasive aspergillosis has identified proteolytic motifs that are preferentially cleaved during infection (manuscript in preparation). Future studies will determine if this observation can be translated into a sensitive and specific diagnostic assay for AF infection.

Summary

By using a combinatorial substrate library to comparatively profile the proteolytic activitites of human serum and the secretome of an AF clinical isolate, we found the two samples to have markedly distinct proteolytic signatures. We identified consensus substrate motifs of AF secreted proteases, revealing a striking preference for isoleucine, leucine, phenylalanine, and tyrosine. These motifs were cleaved by thermostable serine proteases, which retained activity up to 50°C. Dramatic differences in these secreted protease activities were observed between Aspergillus species. Therefore, an IQFP-based assay could distinguish among multiple Aspergillus species by identifying differences in their characteristic proteolytic signatures, and the thermostability of AF proteases may permit their differentiation from host enzymes. This approach will supplement the biochemist's toolkit for studying the role of proteases in disease, and the substrate motifs that we identified may be suitable targets for diagnosis of AF. Current efforts are focused on profiling the proteolytic signatures of serum and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid derived from experimentally infected animals to discover IQFPs that are cleaved preferentially during infection.

Materials and Methods

Strains and culture conditions

A. fumigatus H237, AF293, and CEA10 are clinical isolates [73], [74], [75]. A. flavus (A1120, A1168, A249), A. nidulans (A4, A991, A92), and A. terreus A1156 strains were obtained from the Fungal Genetics Stock Center at the University of Missouri. Strains were maintained on and harvested from Aspergillus minimal medium (AMM) agar plates. AMM is composed of a minimal salt solution (0.5% KCl, 0.5% MgSO4, 1.4% KH2PO4, and trace elements) supplemented with a nitrogen source (10 mM ammonium tartrate) and a carbon source (1% glucose). Culture supernatants were harvested from Aspergillus cultures grown as described [76] with modifications. In brief, conidia were inoculated at a concentration of 5×106/mL in 50 mL of Aspergillus minimal salt solution, pH 6.5, supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated human serum (blood group type AB, Innovative Research, Novi, MI) as the sole carbon/nitrogen source and incubated at 37°C for 72 h at 150 rpm. The fungus was grown for 72 h because the biomass of the culture peaked at that time (data not shown). In addition, these are standard growth conditions used by our group and others to prepare fungal cultures for downstream biochemical analysis [45], [47], [48].

Cultures were centrifuged at 4°C for 5 min at 4500 rpm, decanted, and supernatants were filtered with sterilized Miracloth (EMD Chemicals). The total biomass in liquid cultures was determined by lyophilization of the fungal pellet from pre-weighed, sterile conical tubes before a final weight was recorded. In control experiments, repeated additional filtration through 200 nm syringe filters did not diminish proteolytic activity (data not shown). Supernatants were stored at 4°C and assayed within 5 days, over which time no change was observed in caseinolysis or in proteolysis of any of the peptides used in this study (data not shown). For each preparation of fungal culture supernatant, proteolytic activity was measured as described below using positive and negative control peptides to confirm consistent proteolytic activity between preparations (Figure 4B).

An initial comparison of buffer conditions for maximal proteolytic activity of culture supernatant preperations was performed using casein labeled with fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC) as follows: 10 µL of a 100 µM solution of FITC-casein (Anaspec) in water was added to 10 µL culture supernatant (diluted 1∶10 in assay buffer) and incubated at room temperature for 5 h in the dark. After this incubation, proteins were precipitated by the addition of 50 µL 10% trichloroacetic acid, further incubated for 30 min at RT, and centrifuged at 15,000 rpm on a tabletop centrifuge for 15 min. Following centrifugation, 40 µL supernatant was diluted into 1 mL HEPES buffer (composition described below), 50 µL of each sample was added to a low-volume black microplate (Molecular Devices), and fluorescence intensity was recorded on an Analyst HT instrument (Molecular Devices) using excitation and emission filters of 485 nm and 530 nm, respectively. The following assay buffers were compared: serine protease – 50 mM HEPES, 100 mM NaCl, 10 mM CaCl2, pH 8.0; metalloprotease – 50 mM Tris, 100 mM NaCl, 10 mM CaCl2, 10 µM ZnCl2, pH 7.5; cysteine protease – 50 mM citrate, 100 mM NaCl, 1 mM DTT, 1 mM EDTA, pH 5.5; aspartyl protease – 50 mM citrate, 100 mM NaCl, pH 4.0.

Protease activity profiling

Analysis of secreted protease specificities of AF culture supernatant was performed using a library of 3375 IQFP peptide substrates divided into 512 microtiter plate wells (Mimotopes). This library has been validated previously through substrate specificity profiling of both purified recombinant proteases and complex biological fluids [38], [77]. These probes remain optically silent in the uncleaved state, but upon cleavage they emit a fluorescent signal with intensity proportional to the extent of cleavage. Peptides in this library contain the sequence MCA-Gly-Gly-Gly-Xaa-Yaa-Zaa-Gly-Gly-DPA-Lys-Lys where MCA corresponds to 7-methoxycoumarin-4-acetic acid (fluorophore) and DPA corresponds to Nb-(2,4-dinitrophenyl)-L-2,3-diaminopropionic acid (quencher) (Figure 1). Two C-terminal lysines are included to improve aqueous solubility of hydrophobic sequences. Xaa, Yaa, and Zaa correspond to variable residues comprised of equimolar mixtures of Ala/Val, Asp/Glu, Phe/Tyr, Ile/Leu, Lys/Arg, Asn/Gln, Ser/Thr, or Pro. Thus, each well of the library contains an equimolar mixture of up to eight individual peptides. Excluded residues either are chemically incompatible (Cys, Met), interfere with fluorescence (Trp), or are rarely found in protease cleavage sites (His).

Library wells (5 nmol total peptide per well) were dissolved in 5 µL 50% acetonitrile (ACN) in ultrapure water, further diluted in 45 µL sterile-filtered HEPES buffer (50 mM HEPES, 100 mM NaCl, 10 mM CaCl2, pH 8.0), and subdivided into 2 aliquots of 25 µL each. For each assay, one aliquot of this solution was transferred to low-volume black microplates. Immediately before the assay, AF supernatant was diluted 1∶100 in HEPES buffer. At t = 0 min, diluted fungal culture supernatant (20 µL per well) was added to the black microplates containing the IQFP library. For protease activity profiling of human serum, complement preserved human serum (Innovative Research) was thawed on ice and diluted 1∶1 in HEPES buffer. At t = 0 min, diluted serum (20 µL per well) was added to the black microplates containing the IQFP library as described above.

Time-resolved fluorescence data were obtained on an Analyst HT instrument using excitation and emission filters of 320 nm and 420 nm, respectively, with readings taken every 3 min. Endpoint fluorescence intensity fold change after 5 h at room temperature was calculated as Ffinal/Finitial. No fluorescence enhancement was observed in wells containing IQFPs only or in wells containing control culture medium (Aspergillus minimal salt solution plus 10% heat-inactivated human AB serum) lacking fungal supernatant (data not shown). Heatmaps were generated from these data in which each square corresponds to a single assay well of stacked 96 well microplates (Heatmap Builder, Ashley Lab, Stanford University) [78]. Unless otherwise indicated, all chemicals and reagents were obtained from Sigma or VWR.

Protease activity assays

Proteolytic cleavage of individual IQFPs was assayed as described in the library screening procedure with modifications. IQFPs were custom-synthesized, confirmed by mass spectrometry, and provided as lyophilized powders (Mimotopes). IQFP stock solutions were prepared at 10 mM in dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO) by addition of 200–300 µL DMSO to 2–3 µmol peptide and stored at −20°C. In control experiments, the presence of organic solvents (ACN or DMSO) at the low levels used in these studies did not affect fluorescence or proteolytic cleavage (data not shown). IQFPs were diluted to 100 µM in assay buffer (HEPES buffer as described above, unless otherwise indicated) and fungal culture supernatant was diluted 1∶100 in assay buffer immediately before use. Working dilutions of IQFPs and fungal culture supernatant (25 µL each per well) were added to low-volume black microplates and time-resolved fluorescence data were recorded as described above.

For deconvolution of selected IQFP motifs, the 8 individual sequences derived from each selected well were assayed as described and fluorescence fold change after 2 h was calculated as Ffinal/Fcontrol where Fcontrol represents the fluorescence intensity of wells containing IQFPs incubated with control culture medium lacking fungal supernatant. For this experiment, measurements were obtained in triplicate. The two IQFPs demonstrating the highest level of activity from each selected library well were selected for additional characterization. To measure the variability of AF secreted protease activity between fungal culture preparations, cleavage of these 8 IQFPs (2 each from 4 different motifs) was compared for 4 independent AF H237 supernatant preparations. Unless otherwise noted, fluorescence fold change and percent activity values for all subsequent assays were calculated at 1 h to facilitate comparison across substrates and strains because proteolytic cleavage and fluorescence of all IQFPs were in the linear range at this time point (data not shown). Percent activity relative to the appropriate control was calculated as follows, where fluorescence fold change for each sample (‘Fold’) was calculated as Ffinal/Finitial:The effect of buffer pH on proteolytic cleavage of the selected substrates was determined by diluting both peptide and fungal culture supernatant in buffers of variable pH corresponding to increments of 0.5 pH units from pH 4 to 9. Buffers contained 100 mM NaCl, 10 mM CaCl2, and 50 mM of the buffering agent (Citrate pH 4–5.5, MES pH 6–6.5, HEPES pH 7–8, Tris pH 8.5–9). Changes in protease activity in different assay buffers are quantified as percent activity relative to the highest fluorescent signal for each individual IQFP in the assay.

Thermostability and thermophilicity of AF secreted proteases were determined by submerging an aliquot of culture supernatant in a heated water bath before or during proteolytic cleavage. For heating before proteolytic cleavage, undiluted culture supernatant was incubated at the temperatures and times indicated, then diluted into assay buffer and assayed as described above. For heating during the assay, undiluted culture supernatant and assay buffers were preheated at the indicated temperature for 15 min, then diluted, mixed at a 1∶1 ratio, and further heated for 1 h. At precisely 1 h, samples were removed from heat, added to microplate wells, and fluorescence readings were obtained. For all assays conducted in this manner, sample handling was staggered to ensure accurate timekeeping. Changes in protease activity at different temperatures are quantified as percent activity relative to activity at room temperature.

To determine the effect of class-specific protease inhibitors on the activity of AF secreted proteases, culture supernatant and IQFPs were diluted in assay buffer with the indicated concentration of inhibitor and incubated for 30 min at room temperature before starting the assay. The inhibitors were 4-(2-aminoethyl) benzenesulfonyl fluoride (AEBSF; serine proteases), ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA; metalloproteases), E-64 (cysteine proteases), and pepstatin A (aspartic proteases). Changes in protease activity in the presence of inhibitors are quantified as percent activity relative to activity in buffer lacking inhibitor.

For comparison of proteolytic activity among Aspergillus strains and species, assays were performed as described with A. fumigatus, A. flavus, and A. nidulans supernatants diluted 1∶100 in assay buffer. In this experiment, fold change values were calculated at 2 h. To compensate for slight differences in fungal growth, fluorescence fold change values were normalized according to the dry weight of each fungal culture. The effect of heating at 50°C on proteolytic activity of A. nidulans A4 culture supernatant as compared to AF H237 culture supernatant was determined as described above.

Determination of cleavage sites

Substrate cleavage sites were determined by identification of N-terminal and C-terminal substrate fragments by matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight (MALDI-TOF) mass spectrometry (Figure 1). At the conclusion of the protease assays described above, 10 µL per well was removed, desalted, and concentrated with solid phase extraction micropipette tips (ZipTip® C18, Millipore, Billerica, MA) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Samples were eluted directly (1 µL each) onto a MALDI target plate and air-dried. Matrix solution (a-cyano-4-hydroxycinnamic acid in 50∶50∶0.3 water∶acetonitrile∶trifluoroacetic acid; 1 µL) was subsequently spotted on top of each sample and allowed to dry. Spectra were then acquired with an ABI 4800 MALDI-TOF/TOF mass spectrometer (Applied Biosystems, Carlsbad, CA) with an m/z range of 400–1500 Da. The instrument is routinely calibrated using the 4700 Mass Standards Kit (Applied Biosystems). Intact parent peptides were identified through an analogous procedure from control wells containing IQFPs mixed with culture media lacking fungal supernatant. Cleavage sites were assigned by comparing observed peaks with calculated expected masses corresponding to cleavage at each possible site.

Statistical analysis

Statistical significance was assessed by analysis of variance and two-tailed Student's t-test. Differences were considered significant if they exhibited p values<0.05 in Student's t-test. Data analyses were performed with Microsoft Excel. All measurements were obtained in duplicate unless otherwise noted. All data are representative of at least two independent experiments performed with separate preparations of fungal culture supernatant.

Acknowledgments

Thanks are extended to Dr. Tom Patterson, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, and members of his laboratory, Laura Najvar and Rick Kirkpatrick. Encouragement and guidance from Dr. Walter Moos, Vice President of Biosciences at SRI, are also gratefully acknowledged.

The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases or the National Institutes of Health.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: AKG DSW DSA. Performed the experiments: DSW XF KJ. Analyzed the data: DSW DSA KJ AKG KK. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: XF DSA. Wrote the paper: DSW AKG.

References

  1. 1. Segal BH (2009) Aspergillosis. N Engl J Med 360: 1870–1884.
  2. 2. Latge JP (1999) Aspergillus fumigatus and aspergillosis. Clin Microbiol Rev 12: 310–350.
  3. 3. Mylonakis E, Barlam TF, Flanigan T, Rich JD (1998) Pulmonary aspergillosis and invasive disease in AIDS: review of 342 cases. Chest 114: 251–262.
  4. 4. McNeil MM, Nash SL, Hajjeh RA, Phelan MA, Conn LA, et al. (2001) Trends in mortality due to invasive mycotic diseases in the United States, 1980–1997. Clin Infect Dis 33: 641–647.
  5. 5. Denning DW (1998) Invasive aspergillosis. Clin Infect Dis 26: 781–803; quiz 804–785.
  6. 6. Caillot D, Casasnovas O, Bernard A, Couaillier JF, Durand C, et al. (1997) Improved management of invasive pulmonary aspergillosis in neutropenic patients using early thoracic computed tomographic scan and surgery. J Clin Oncol 15: 139–147.
  7. 7. Caillot D, Mannone L, Cuisenier B, Couaillier JF (2001) Role of early diagnosis and aggressive surgery in the management of invasive pulmonary aspergillosis in neutropenic patients. Clin Microbiol Infect 7: Suppl 254–61.
  8. 8. Hope WW, Walsh TJ, Denning DW (2005) Laboratory diagnosis of invasive aspergillosis. Lancet Infect Dis 5: 609–622.
  9. 9. Alexander BD (2002) Diagnosis of fungal infection: new technologies for the mycology laboratory. Transpl Infect Dis 4: Suppl 332–37.
  10. 10. Robson GD, Huang J, Wortman J, Archer DB (2005) A preliminary analysis of the process of protein secretion and the diversity of putative secreted hydrolases encoded in Aspergillus fumigatus: insights from the genome. Med Mycol 43: Suppl 1S41–47.
  11. 11. Machida M, Asai K, Sano M, Tanaka T, Kumagai T, et al. (2005) Genome sequencing and analysis of Aspergillus oryzae. Nature 438: 1157–1161.
  12. 12. Tekaia F, Latge JP (2005) Aspergillus fumigatus: saprophyte or pathogen? Curr Opin Microbiol 8: 385–392.
  13. 13. Galagan JE, Calvo SE, Cuomo C, Ma LJ, Wortman JR, et al. (2005) Sequencing of Aspergillus nidulans and comparative analysis with A. fumigatus and A. oryzae. Nature 438: 1105–1115.
  14. 14. Nierman WC, Pain A, Anderson MJ, Wortman JR, Kim HS, et al. (2005) Genomic sequence of the pathogenic and allergenic filamentous fungus Aspergillus fumigatus. Nature 438: 1151–1156.
  15. 15. Ibrahim-Granet O, Dubourdeau M, Latge JP, Ave P, Huerre M, et al. (2008) Methylcitrate synthase from Aspergillus fumigatus is essential for manifestation of invasive aspergillosis. Cell Microbiol 10: 134–148.
  16. 16. Willger SD, Grahl N, Cramer RA Jr (2009) Aspergillus fumigatus metabolism: clues to mechanisms of in vivo fungal growth and virulence. Med Mycol 47: Suppl 1S72–79.
  17. 17. Kolattukudy PE, Lee JD, Rogers LM, Zimmerman P, Ceselski S, et al. (1993) Evidence for possible involvement of an elastolytic serine protease in aspergillosis. Infect Immun 61: 2357–2368.
  18. 18. Markaryan A, Morozova I, Yu H, Kolattukudy PE (1994) Purification and characterization of an elastinolytic metalloprotease from Aspergillus fumigatus and immunoelectron microscopic evidence of secretion of this enzyme by the fungus invading the murine lung. Infect Immun 62: 2149–2157.
  19. 19. Askew DS (2008) Aspergillus fumigatus: virulence genes in a street-smart mold. Curr Opin Microbiol 11: 331–337.
  20. 20. Iadarola P, Lungarella G, Martorana PA, Viglio S, Guglielminetti M, et al. (1998) Lung injury and degradation of extracellular matrix components by Aspergillus fumigatus serine proteinase. Exp Lung Res 24: 233–251.
  21. 21. McDonagh A, Fedorova ND, Crabtree J, Yu Y, Kim S, et al. (2008) Sub-telomere directed gene expression during initiation of invasive aspergillosis. PLoS Pathog 4: e1000154.
  22. 22. Rawlings ND, Barrett AJ, Bateman A (2010) MEROPS: the peptidase database. Nucleic Acids Res 38: D227–233.
  23. 23. Sriranganadane D, Waridel P, Salamin K, Reichard U, Grouzmann E, et al. (2010) Aspergillus protein degradation pathways with different secreted protease sets at neutral and acidic pH. J Proteome Res 9: 3511–3519.
  24. 24. Monod M, Capoccia S, Lechenne B, Zaugg C, Holdom M, et al. (2002) Secreted proteases from pathogenic fungi. Int J Med Microbiol 292: 405–419.
  25. 25. Monod M, Togni G, Rahalison L, Frenk E (1991) Isolation and characterization of an extracellular alkaline protease of Aspergillus fumigatus. J Med Microbiol 35: 23–28.
  26. 26. Jaton-Ogay K, Paris S, Huerre M, Quadroni M, Falchetto R, et al. (1994) Cloning and disruption of the gene encoding an extracellular metalloprotease of Aspergillus fumigatus. Mol Microbiol 14: 917–928.
  27. 27. Reichard U, Lechenne B, Asif AR, Streit F, Grouzmann E, et al. (2006) Sedolisins, a new class of secreted proteases from Aspergillus fumigatus with endoprotease or tripeptidyl-peptidase activity at acidic pHs. Appl Environ Microbiol 72: 1739–1748.
  28. 28. Reichard U, Eiffert H, Ruchel R (1994) Purification and characterization of an extracellular aspartic proteinase from Aspergillus fumigatus. J Med Vet Mycol 32: 427–436.
  29. 29. Sriranganadane D, Reichard U, Salamin K, Fratti M, Jousson O, et al. (2011) Secreted glutamic protease rescues aspartic protease Pep deficiency in Aspergillus fumigatus during growth in acidic protein medium. Microbiology 157: 1541–1550.
  30. 30. Simon GM, Cravatt BF (2010) Activity-based proteomics of enzyme superfamilies: serine hydrolases as a case study. J Biol Chem 285: 11051–11055.
  31. 31. Hemelaar J, Galardy PJ, Borodovsky A, Kessler BM, Ploegh HL, et al. (2004) Chemistry-based functional proteomics: mechanism-based activity-profiling tools for ubiquitin and ubiquitin-like specific proteases. J Proteome Res 3: 268–276.
  32. 32. Tung CH (2004) Fluorescent peptide probes for in vivo diagnostic imaging. Biopolymers 76: 391–403.
  33. 33. Harris JL, Backes BJ, Leonetti F, Mahrus S, Ellman JA, et al. (2000) Rapid and general profiling of protease specificity by using combinatorial fluorogenic substrate libraries. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, U S A 97: 7754–7759.
  34. 34. Matthews DJ, Wells JA (1993) Substrate phage: selection of protease substrates by monovalent phage display. Science 260: 1113–1117.
  35. 35. Li J, Lim SP, Beer D, Patel V, Wen D, et al. (2005) Functional profiling of recombinant NS3 proteases from all four serotypes of dengue virus using tetrapeptide and octapeptide substrate libraries. J Biol Chem 280: 28766–28774.
  36. 36. Choe Y, Leonetti F, Greenbaum DC, Lecaille F, Bogyo M, et al. (2006) Substrate profiling of cysteine proteases using a combinatorial peptide library identifies functionally unique specificities. J Biol Chem 281: 12824–12832.
  37. 37. Li YM, Xu M, Lai MT, Huang Q, Castro JL, et al. (2000) Photoactivated gamma-secretase inhibitors directed to the active site covalently label presenilin 1. Nature 405: 689–694.
  38. 38. Watson DS, Jambunathan K, Askew DS, Kodukula K, Galande AK (2011) Robust substrate profiling method reveals striking differences in specificities of serum and lung fluid proteases. Bio Techniques 50: In press.
  39. 39. Teutschbein J, Albrecht D, Potsch M, Guthke R, Aimanianda V, et al. (2010) Proteome profiling and functional classification of intracellular proteins from conidia of the human-pathogenic mold Aspergillus fumigatus. J Proteome Res 9: 3427–3442.
  40. 40. Chen P, Lu Y, Harrington PB (2008) Biomarker profiling and reproducibility study of MALDI-MS measurements of Escherichia coli by analysis of variance-principal component analysis. Anal Chem 80: 1474–1481.
  41. 41. Steinbach WJ, Perfect JR, Schell WA, Walsh TJ, Benjamin DK Jr (2004) In vitro analyses, animal models, and 60 clinical cases of invasive Aspergillus terreus infection. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 48: 3217–3225.
  42. 42. Monod M (2008) Secreted proteases from dermatophytes. Mycopathologia 166: 285–294.
  43. 43. Bhabhra R, Miley MD, Mylonakis E, Boettner D, Fortwendel J, et al. (2004) Disruption of the Aspergillus fumigatus gene encoding nucleolar protein CgrA impairs thermotolerant growth and reduces virulence. Infect Immun 72: 4731–4740.
  44. 44. Richie DL, Miley MD, Bhabhra R, Robson GD, Rhodes JC, et al. (2007) The Aspergillus fumigatus metacaspases CasA and CasB facilitate growth under conditions of endoplasmic reticulum stress. Mol Microbiol 63: 591–604.
  45. 45. Schwienbacher M, Weig M, Thies S, Regula JT, Heesemann J, et al. (2005) Analysis of the major proteins secreted by the human opportunistic pathogen Aspergillus fumigatus under in vitro conditions. Med Mycol 43: 623–630.
  46. 46. Gifford AH, Klippenstein JR, Moore MM (2002) Serum stimulates growth of and proteinase secretion by Aspergillus fumigatus. Infect Immun 70: 19–26.
  47. 47. Richie DL, Fend Z, Hartl L, Aimanianda V, Powers-Fletcher MV, et al. (2011) Endoplasmic reticulum-associated degradation (ERAD) synergizes with the unfolded protein response (UPR) to support virulence in the pathogenic mold Aspergillus fumigatus. Virulence 2: 12–21.
  48. 48. Larcher G, Bouchara JP, Annaix V, Symoens F, Chabasse D, et al. (1992) Purification and characterization of a fibrinogenolytic serine proteinase from Aspergillus fumigatus culture filtrate. FEBS Lett 308: 65–69.
  49. 49. Monod M, Paris S, Sarfati J, Jaton-Ogay K, Ave P, et al. (1993) Virulence of alkaline protease-deficient mutants of Aspergillus fumigatus. FEMS Microbiol Lett 106: 39–46.
  50. 50. Tang CM, Cohen J, Krausz T, Van Noorden S, Holden DW (1993) The alkaline protease of Aspergillus fumigatus is not a virulence determinant in two murine models of invasive pulmonary aspergillosis. Infect Immun 61: 1650–1656.
  51. 51. Reichard U, Jousson O, Monod M (2008) [Secreted proteases from the mold Aspergillus fumigatus]. Mycoses 51: Suppl 330–32.
  52. 52. Kunert J, Kopecek P (2000) Multiple forms of the serine protease Alp of Aspergillus fumigatus. Mycoses 43: 339–347.
  53. 53. Cravatt BF, Simon GM, Yates JR 3rd (2007) The biological impact of mass-spectrometry-based proteomics. Nature 450: 991–1000.
  54. 54. Backes BJ, Harris JL, Leonetti F, Craik CS, Ellman JA (2000) Synthesis of positional-scanning libraries of fluorogenic peptide substrates to define the extended substrate specificity of plasmin and thrombin. Nat Biotechnol 18: 187–193.
  55. 55. Adav SS, Li AA, Manavalan A, Punt P, Sze SK (2010) Quantitative iTRAQ secretome analysis of Aspergillus niger reveals novel hydrolytic enzymes. J Proteome Res 9: 3932–3940.
  56. 56. Kleifeld O, Doucet A, auf dem Keller U, Prudova A, Schilling O, et al. (2010) Isotopic labeling of terminal amines in complex samples identifies protein N-termini and protease cleavage products. Nat Biotechnol 28: 281–288.
  57. 57. Tsang A, Butler G, Powlowski J, Panisko EA, Baker SE (2009) Analytical and computational approaches to define the Aspergillus niger secretome. Fungal Genet Biol 46: Suppl 1S153–S160.
  58. 58. Schaal R, Kupfahl C, Buchheidt D, Neumaier M, Findeisen P (2007) Systematic identification of substrates for profiling of secreted proteases from Aspergillus species. J Microbiol Methods 71: 93–100.
  59. 59. Chang YC, Tsai HF, Karos M, Kwon-Chung KJ (2004) THTA, a thermotolerance gene of Aspergillus fumigatus. Fungal Genet Biol 41: 888–896.
  60. 60. Gill PK, Manhas RK, Singh P (2006) Comparative analysis of thermostability of extracellular inulinase activity from Aspergillus fumigatus with commercially available (Novozyme) inulinase. Bioresour Technol 97: 355–358.
  61. 61. Wang Y, Gao X, Su Q, Wu W, An L (2007) Cloning, expression, and enzyme characterization of an acid heat-stable phytase from Aspergillus fumigatus WY-2. Curr Microbiol 55: 65–70.
  62. 62. Bhabhra R, Askew DS (2005) Thermotolerance and virulence of Aspergillus fumigatus: role of the fungal nucleolus. Med Mycol 43: Suppl 1S87–93.
  63. 63. Charles P, Devanathan V, Anbu P, Ponnuswamy MN, Kalaichelvan PT, et al. (2008) Purification, characterization and crystallization of an extracellular alkaline protease from Aspergillus nidulans HA-10. J Basic Microbiol 48: 347–352.
  64. 64. Rambach G, Dum D, Mohsenipour I, Hagleitner M, Wurzner R, et al. (2010) Secretion of a fungal protease represents a complement evasion mechanism in cerebral aspergillosis. Mol Immunol 47: 1438–1449.
  65. 65. Behnsen J, Lessing F, Schindler S, Wartenberg D, Jacobsen ID, et al. (2010) Secreted Aspergillus fumigatus protease Alp1 degrades human complement proteins C3, C4 and C5. Infect Immun.
  66. 66. Sharon H, Hagag S, Osherov N (2009) Transcription factor PrtT controls expression of multiple secreted proteases in the human pathogenic mold Aspergillus fumigatus. Infect Immun 77: 4051–4060.
  67. 67. Bergmann A, Hartmann T, Cairns T, Bignell EM, Krappmann S (2009) A regulator of Aspergillus fumigatus extracellular proteolytic activity is dispensable for virulence. Infect Immun 77: 4041–4050.
  68. 68. Beauvais A, Monod M, Debeaupuis JP, Diaquin M, Kobayashi H, et al. (1997) Biochemical and antigenic characterization of a new dipeptidyl-peptidase isolated from Aspergillus fumigatus. J Biol Chem 272: 6238–6244.
  69. 69. Schaller M, Borelli C, Korting HC, Hube B (2005) Hydrolytic enzymes as virulence factors of Candida albicans. Mycoses 48: 365–377.
  70. 70. Turk B (2006) Targeting proteases: successes, failures and future prospects. Nat Rev Drug Discov 5: 785–799.
  71. 71. Galande AK, Hilderbrand SA, Weissleder R, Tung CH (2006) Enzyme-targeted fluorescent imaging probes on a multiple antigenic peptide core. J Med Chem 49: 4715–4720.
  72. 72. Patterson TF (2005) The future of animal models of invasive aspergillosis. Med Mycol 43: Suppl 1S115–119.
  73. 73. Rhodes JC, Oliver BG, Askew DS, Amlung TW (2001) Identification of genes of Aspergillus fumigatus up-regulated during growth on endothelial cells. Med Mycol 39: 253–260.
  74. 74. Pain A, Woodward J, Quail MA, Anderson MJ, Clark R, et al. (2004) Insight into the genome of Aspergillus fumigatus: analysis of a 922 kb region encompassing the nitrate assimilation gene cluster. Fungal Genet Biol 41: 443–453.
  75. 75. d'Enfert C (1996) Selection of multiple disruption events in Aspergillus fumigatus using the orotidine-5′-decarboxylase gene, pyrG, as a unique transformation marker. Curr Genet 30: 76–82.
  76. 76. Richie DL, Hartl L, Aimanianda V, Winters MS, Fuller KK, et al. (2009) A role for the unfolded protein response (UPR) in virulence and antifungal susceptibility in Aspergillus fumigatus. PLoS Pathog 5: e1000258.
  77. 77. Thomas DA, Francis P, Smith C, Ratcliffe S, Ede NJ, et al. (2006) A broad-spectrum fluorescence-based peptide library for the rapid identification of protease substrates. Proteomics 6: 2112–2120.
  78. 78. King JY, Ferrara R, Tabibiazar R, Spin JM, Chen MM, et al. (2005) Pathway analysis of coronary atherosclerosis. Physiol Genomics 23: 103–118.