Figures
Abstract
Chemotherapy is a critical component of malaria control. However, the most deadly malaria pathogen, Plasmodium falciparum, has repeatedly mounted resistance against a series of antimalarial drugs used in the last decades. Southeast Asia is an epicenter of emerging antimalarial drug resistance, including recent resistance to the artemisinins, the core component of all recommended antimalarial combination therapies. Alterations in the parasitic membrane proteins Pgh-1, PfCRT and PfMRP1 are believed to be major contributors to resistance through decreasing intracellular drug accumulation. The pfcrt, pfmdr1 and pfmrp1 genes were sequenced from a set of P.falciparum field isolates from the Thai-Myanmar border. In vitro drug susceptibility to artemisinin, dihydroartemisinin, mefloquine and lumefantrine were assessed. Positive correlations were seen between the in vitro susceptibility responses to artemisinin and dihydroartemisinin and the responses to the arylamino-alcohol quinolines lumefantrine and mefloquine. The previously unstudied pfmdr1 F1226Y and pfmrp1 F1390I SNPs were associated significantly with artemisinin, mefloquine and lumefantrine in vitro susceptibility. A variation in pfmdr1 gene copy number was also associated with parasite drug susceptibility of artemisinin, mefloquine and lumefantrine. Our work unveils new candidate markers of P. falciparum multidrug resistance in vitro, while contributing to the understanding of subjacent genetic complexity, essential for future evidence-based drug policy decisions.
Citation: Veiga MI, Ferreira PE, Jörnhagen L, Malmberg M, Kone A, Schmidt BA, et al. (2011) Novel Polymorphisms in Plasmodium falciparum ABC Transporter Genes Are Associated with Major ACT Antimalarial Drug Resistance. PLoS ONE 6(5): e20212. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0020212
Editor: Steffen Borrmann, Kenya Medical Research Institute-Wellcome Trust Research Programme, Kenya
Received: February 15, 2011; Accepted: April 15, 2011; Published: May 25, 2011
Copyright: © 2011 Veiga, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Funding: This work was supported by project grants from Swedish Development Cooperation Agency-Department for Research Cooperation (SWE 2005–0017, SWE 2005–4596, SWE-2007-174 and SWE-2005-4027). MIV and PEF are recipients of PhD grants from Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia (FCT)/Ministerio da Ciência e Ensino Superior, Portugal-MCES (ref. SFRH/BD/28393/2006 and ref. SFRH/BD/28368/2006, respectively). The Shoklo Malaria Research Unit is part of the Mahidol Oxford University Tropical Medicine Research Unit, supported by the Wellcome Trust of Great Britain. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Introduction
In the 21st century, malaria is still regarded as a major global infectious disease, with a high pediatric mortality toll in the Developing World. Chemotherapy is a central tool for management of the disease. Unfortunately, the Plasmodium falciparum parasite, the most deadly human malaria pathogen, has shown an extraordinary ability to develop resistance to all antimalarials employed. From the first reports involving quinine [1], to the ultimate demise of chloroquine in the late 20th century, drug resistance has been a central factor in the expansion of the disease, associated with massive mortality and morbidity [2]. Now, in the 21st century, the introduction of new treatment strategies centered on the combinatorial use of short lived artemisinin derivatives with long half-life drugs (artemisinin combination therapy, ACT) has been able to halt resistance and disease spread for the first time in decades. After its spectacular decrease in incidence following ACT introduction in some regions [3], this has encouraged optimism for the prospects of eliminating malaria entirely [4]. Unfortunately, P. falciparum is again demonstrating its remarkable capacity to evolve mechanisms of avoiding drug action. Among the presently employed ACT drugs, decreased sensitivity has been reported to all the quinoline partner drugs in use, including amodiaquine [5]–[7], lumefantrine [8], [9] and mefloquine [10]. More recently, P.falciparum isolates in Cambodia were shown to have developed tolerance to artemisinin, the core component of the combinations [11], [12]. This tolerance is characterized by prolonged parasite clearance after treatment [12].
For most ACT partner drugs, the mechanisms behind antimalarial drug resistant phenotypes are known to be dependent on alterations in the food vacuole localized proteins Pgh-1 (pfmdr1) and PfCRT (pfcrt). Both PfCRT and Pgh-1 are drug transporters believed to contribute to P. falciparum drug resistance through the decrease of antimalarial accumulation in the target cellular compartment. PfCRT transports drugs from the food vacuole lumen to the cytoplasm [13], [14], an action particularly important to the development of resistance, considering that several antimalarials, such the 4-aminoquinolines amodiaquine, desethylamodiaquine and chloroquine, act in this organelle. In contrast, Pgh-1 has been proposed to actively pump drugs from the cytoplasm towards the food vacuole [15], which is protective against antimalarials operating on cytoplasmic targets. Such agents putatively include the aminoalcohol-quinolines (AAQs) [10], and possibly artemisinin and its derivatives [16].
There is an emerging idea that these resistance phenomena actually involve genetic contributions beyond the genes already mentioned [17], [18]. Accordingly, it is likely that another player could be added to the two transmembrane proteins discussed earlier: the parasite multidrug resistance protein homologue, PfMRP1 [19]–[21]. This class of ABC transporter is involved in drug evasion in a large range of organisms, and likely plays a similar function in P. falciparum. In support of this, pfmrp1 has been proposed to participate in in vivo and/or in vitro parasite response to chloroquine [18], [22], quinine [18], [23], lumefantrine [17] and artemisinin [22].
A full account of the simultaneous participation of each of these genes in parasite drug susceptibility to multiple drugs has not yet been performed in detail, in part due to the diversity of their full open reading frame (ORF). In this report, we have characterized the phenotype and genotype of a set of P. falciparum adapted parasites from the area of Mae Sot, Western Thailand-a known epicenter for multidrug resistance. The work has unveiled different genetic backgrounds containing a combination of different polymorphisms associated with resistance to antimalarial drugs used in ACT.
Results
In vitro antimalarial drug susceptibility
50% and 90% inhibitory concentration (IC50 and IC90) values were measured for artemisinin (ART), dihydroartemisinin (DHA), mefloquine (MQ) and lumefantrine (LUM) in 46 parasite field isolates originating from the Thai-Myanmar border. A relatively large range in IC values was observed for most of the antimalarials tested, including the artemisinin-type drugs. For these, the median IC50 values (Max-Min) were 7.4 nM (1.2–19.5 nM) for ART and 1.2 nM (0.3–5.3 nM) for DHA. For the arylaminoalcohols, IC50 values were: MQ and LUM, 92.5 nM (16.5–270.8 nM) and 11.9 nM (2.0–40.8 nM), respectively (Figure 1 and isolates individual data in Table S1).
Data are represented in boxplot. The lower and upper quartiles of the box are 25th and 75th percentile, respectively and the band near the middle of the box is the median. End of the whiskers represent the 10th and 90th percentile. Dots represent outliers.
There is a significant correlation between the parasitic response to structurally associated drugs such as sesquiterpene lactone (ART and DHA) and aminoalcohol quinolines (MQ and LUM) (Table 1). Interestingly, even though not structurally similar, the amino alcohol quinolines group and the artemisinin-type compounds form a cluster of cross response (P<0.001).
Polymorphisms detected in pfmdr1, pfmrp1 and pfcrt
Sequence analysis of the full pfmdr1 open reading frame (ORF) within the isolates revealed 7 SNPs, including two well studied polymorphic amino acid positions (Y184F and N1042D), as well as 4 other non-synonymous at positions E130K, A750T, S784L, F1226Y, recently described in parasites from Western Cambodia [24], and one synonymous at genomic position a747g (Table 2). Three variants were found within the triplet nucleotide AAT microsatellite hinge located near the central region of the gene (Table 2) where 31/46 of the isolates carry an insertion of one more AAT relative to 3D7 clone reference. Sequencing chromatograms of this gene revealed one isolate with mixed infection present at amino acid position 130, 249 and 750.
All Thai isolates carry an asparagine residue at position 86 and the SNP with the highest frequency detected was the F1226Y with 23/46 (50%) isolates being 1226Y. The remaining SNPs were found with low frequency (Table 2). Twenty six of the 46 isolates analyzed carried increased pfmdr1 copy number, as detected by realtime PCR. Specifically, 18 carried two copies, while 8 carried more than three copies (Table S1).
Analysis of the sequencing chromatograms of the pfmrp1 gene revealed one isolate with mixed infection present at a.a. position 325, 572, 785, 876 and 1007. This isolate does not correspond to the same mixed isolate detected with pfmdr1 gene sequencing. In total 11 SNPs (of which 2 synonymous) were identified in the pfmrp1 ORF. All of these SNPs were published following our previous global survey of the biodiversity of this gene [17]. SNPs at positions 191, 325, 437, 572, 785, 876, 1007, 1390 were found in the isolates with elevated occurrence (Table 2). Increased pfmrp1 gene copy number was not detected.
The pfcrt full open reading frame of each isolate sequenced from cDNA revealed that all isolates (46/46) carried the pfcrt Dd2-like open reading frame (ORF) haplotype (C72 /74I/75E/76T/220S/271E/326S/356T/371I) (Table 2).
After the in vitro analysis in the laboratory for drug susceptibility, the DNA was extracted from all isolates again to check for variance and/or selection. The recheck was solely performed in the polymorphisms with significant association with the in vitro phenotype. These were the pfmdr1 CNV, as well as the pfmdr1 F1226Y and pfmrp1 F1390I SNPs. Comparison of the DNA extracted before and after the parasites in vitro adaptation and expansion, revealed that two isolates lost copies in pfmdr1 gene during the procedure, changing from 2 to 1 copy (Table S1). Out of the 46 isolates analyzed, 24 carried increased pfmdr1 copy number, specifically, 16 carried two copies, while 8 carried more than three copies. Pyrosequencing of position F1226Y in pfmdr1 and F1390I in pfmrp1 performed in the DNA extracted after the drug susceptibility tests, revealed isolates with mixed infections (both alleles) at these polymorphic regions. Table S1 specifies the characteristics of each isolate including the individual genotype before and after the drug susceptibility tests performed.
Table 2 shows the genotype frequency of these three most relevant polymorphisms, from the re-extracted DNA, as this would reflect the genotype at that point in time. Table 1 also shows statistical values using data from the re-extracted DNA analysis for these three polymorphisms as this will reflect a more valid association with the in vitro drug susceptibility tests performed. To note that this genotype variance before and after adaptation, did not change the determined statistically significant genotype-phenotype association.
In vitro phenotype-genotype associations
Since all isolates had the same haplotype for the pfcrt gene, a possible association could not be assessed between the pfcrt SNPs and IC's values. As previously observed [8], [10], [16], [25], and herein confirmed, an increased gene copy number of pfmdr1 was clearly associated with higher IC50's for MQ, LUM and ART (P<0.0042) (Table 1, Figure 2). From the seven SNPs found in pfmdr1, only one, F1226Y, was found to be associated with decreased sensitivity to ART, MQ and LUM IC50 and IC90 (Table 1, Figure 3). The average IC50 (±SE) of the pfmdr1 1226Y allele was 10.09(±1.12), 135.18(±14.57), and 17.77(±1.95) nM, values significantly higher compared with the non-carriers: 5.43(±0.98), 73.06(±14.08) and 9.47(±1.90) nM, for each drug, respectively. Among the 11 SNPs found in pfmrp1 (Table 2), F1390I was documented to significantly modulate the in vitro drug response phenotypes (Table 1). Carriers of the F1390 allele were less susceptible to ART, MQ and LUM, with average IC50's of 8.96(±0.92), 121.71(±12.17) and 15.56(±1.71) nM, compared to 1390I carriers with values of 3.30(±0.86), 37.25 (±9.31) and 6.08(±1.87) nM, respectively (Figure 4). Interestingly, even though pfmdr1 F1226Y and pfmrp1 F1390I alleles have very similar association profiles, both seem to represent independent actions, as they were not found together in the same Thai isolate in more instances than would randomly be expected (P>0.05).
Significant relationship between average in vitro drugs tested IC50's and pfmdr1 CNV polymorphism. Data described in Table S2. <1.5: 1 gene copy of pfmdr1 (#22 isolates). >1.5: 2 and 3 gene copies of pfmdr1 (#24 isolates). T-test statistics was applied. P value <0.0042 is consider significant after Bonferroni correction. Error bars represent SE.
Significant relationship between average in vitro drugs tested IC50's and pfmdr1 F1226Y polymorphism. Data described in Table S2. Black bars are average IC50 of 22 isolates with F1226 allele. Grey bars are average IC50 of 23 isolates with 1226Y allele. T-test statistics was applied. P value <0.0042 is consider significant after Bonferroni correction. Error bars represent SE.
Significant relationship between average in vitro drugs tested IC50's and pfmrp1 F1390I polymorphism. Data described in Table S2. Black bars are average IC50 of 36 isolates with F1390 allele. Grey bars are average IC50 of 8 isolates with 1390I allele. T-test statistics was applied. P value <0.0042 is consider significant after Bonferroni correction. Error bars represent SE.
We have further analyzed the effects of the available combinations (haplotypes) of the most relevant polymorphisms, i.e. the pfmrp1 F1390I and pfmdr1 F1226Y SNPs, as well as pfmdr1 gene copy number variation (CNV). In particular, a trend for an identical progressive increase in IC50 was evident for the antimalarials ART, MQ and LUM (Figure 5), associated with the following sequence of haplotypes (from more sensitive to more resistant associated):
- IF1: pfmrp1 1390I+pfmdr1 F1226+pfmdr1 CNV<1.5;
- FF1: pfmrp1 F1390+pfmdr1 F1226+pfmdr1 CNV<1.5;
- FY1: pfmrp1 F1390+pfmdr1 1226Y+pfmdr1 CNV<1.5;
- FF2: pfmrp1 F1390+pfmdr1 F1226+pfmdr1 CNV>1.5;
- FY2: pfmrp1 F1390+pfmdr1 1226Y+pfmdr1 CNV>1.5.
Relationship between average in vitro drug tested IC50's and pfmrp1 F1390I, pfmdr1 F1226Y and pfmdr1 CNV polymorphisms. Bars represent different haplotypes. IF1 (#6 isolates): pfmrp1 1390I, pfmdr1 F1226 and 1 gene copy of pfmdr1. FF1 (#9 isolates): pfmrp1 F1390, pfmdr1 F1226 and 1 gene copy of pfmdr1. FY1 (#5 isolates): pfmrp1 F1390, pfmdr1 1226Y and 1 gene copy of pfmdr1. FF2 (#6 isolates): pfmrp1 F1390, pfmdr1 F1226 and >1 gene copy of pfmdr1. FY2 (#15 isolates): pfmrp1 F1390, pfmdr1 1226Y and >1 gene copy of pfmdr1. T-test statistics was applied to see significant difference between haplotypes. *: P<0.05. Error bars represent SE.
Crystal structures of ABC transporters from P. falciparum are still not available. In lieu of this, an approach based on computational molecular modeling with known reference structures was applied to explore putative functional implications of relevant polymorphisms.
As we previously reported [17], PfMRP1 contains 12 transmembranes domains (TMs) and 2 NBDs, presenting a full ABC transporter structure (i.e. 6+6 TMs), similar to Pgh-1 [26]. Residue 1390 is expected to be localized in transmembrane 11 (Figure 6A). Based on the Msba ABC transporter crystal 3B60 and using HHpred, a homology detection and structure prediction server, we were able to develop a model for the second transmembrane spanning domain 2 (Figure 6B).
A: Secondary structure analysis of transmembrane spanning domain 2 (TSD2) of PfMRP1 and F1390I SNP localization. B: Computational homology modelling was performed at HHpred. Alignment for best template was performed using Psi-blast and with local alignment. The template from the best E-score alignment was based in the Msba ABC transporter crystal 3B60 then used in Modeller software to generate a model. Models were visualized with Yasara software.
The residues 1034 and 1042 of Pgh-1 are located in TM11, an important domain for antimalarial resistance [27]. This is likely due to alterations in a drug pocket region of the transporter. Similarly, the involvement of polymorphisms related to antimalarial resistance in TM11 of PfMRP1 suggests the existence of a drug-binding pocket in this region. Amino acid residue 1226 in Pgh-1 is localized in a non-conserved insertion in the reference structure, not allowing the possibility to perform homology modeling.
Discussion
The global implementation of ACT has led to a significant world-wide reduction in malaria incidence. This, in turn, has motivated policymakers and donors to adopt a more optimistic view of the prospect of eliminating malaria completely in vast tropical endemic regions [4]. In order to make this a reality, and considering the epidemiological consequences of chloroquine resistance [2], we must understand the mechanisms behind incidences of parasite resistance to ACT. This is particularly urgent, as there is accumulating evidence of development of resistance in the field - or at least significant decreases in parasite response against artemisinin derivatives [11], [12] and to the long half-life ACT partner drugs [6], [9], [10], [16], [28], [29].
Through the search for drug resistance molecular markers, as expressed by their modulation of the specific parasite antimalarial in vitro IC's, our results reinforced the importance of pfmdr1 copy number as a central factor in the response of P. falciparum to drugs of different structures. The association between increased copy number and decreased sensitivity to ART, MQ and LUM confirms previous associative data in vivo [8], [10], as do strictly controlled gene knock-down experiments in parasite clones [30].
Most relevant, we have identified SNPs that constitute new drug resistance candidate markers. These are comprised of two recently described polymorphisms: pfmdr1 F1226Y [24] and pfmrp1 F1390I [17]. Structural analysis performed for polymorphism F1390I in PfMRP1 showed it to be localized within transmembrane 11, which has been proposed to be part of a substrate pocket in several ABC transporters, including Pgh-1. The similar localization and involvement of this polymorphism for antimalarial resistance suggests it has an analogous roll to the S1034C and N1042D SNPs observed in Pgh-1 [27], [31]. Importantly, directed mutagenesis studies performed in the human and murine PfMRP1 have pointed to TM16, putatively equivalent to the PfMRP1 TM11 in functional terms, as a central component that defines transport specificity [32]–[36]. In this context, it is conceivable that the TM11 located F1390I SNP is changing the specificity of the interactions between the PfMRP1 and the antimalarials ART, MQ and LUM .
The pfmdr1 F1226Y and pfmrp1 F1390I SNPs seem to have an inter-independent, but very similar quantitative effect on the simultaneous response in vitro drug susceptibility of the parasite against the ART/MQ/LUM, which to a certain extent parallels what is observed with the pfmdr1 increased copy number. In particular, successive accumulation of these SNPs, combined with the presence of pfmdr1 CNV polymorphism, seem to have a cumulative contribution (Figure 5). As for the pfmdr1 F1226Y SNP, it is conceivable that, as previously proposed for the pfmdr1 86N allele [37], its presence might enhance the contribution of the increased copy number of this gene. The preferential presence of F1226Y among the analyzed isolates with pfmdr1 copy number amplifications might hence be the result of a drug driven selection, reinforcing the notion that the phenotypical consequences of the pfmdr1 CNV polymorphism is modulated by the nature of the ORF sequence involved.
In this work we unveil a potential new candidate pathway towards resistance, particularly important for two of the most important ACTs used worldwide: artemether-LUM (Coartem®, Novartis, Basel) and artesunate-MQ (Artequin Paediatric®, Mepha Ltd, Aesch, Switzerland). It would be of interest to retrospectively explore in vivo trials with these combinations in search of confirmatory selection events for these mutations, in particular the case of artesunate-MQ, the definition of two categories of pfmdr1 CNV. For the F1226Y SNP, its association with clinical failure might be of relevance. Interpreting the pfmrp1 F1390I/ pfmdr1 F1226Y/ pfmdr1 CNV haplotype analysis, two observations deserve mention as is evident from figure 5. The introduction of the pfmdr1 CNV is associated with an abrupt leap in MQ IC50 values, confirming the well established status of this type of mutation as a valuable specific marker for P. falciparum resistance against MQ [10], [16], [38]. The pfmdr1 CNV alone seems to have a less dramatic but significant effect against ART and LUM, again confirming previous findings [8], [10], [27]. Fortunately, ART is not commonly used in ACT; the partners of LUM and MQ being artemether and artesunate, respectively.
Although previous reports have shown association of pfmdr1 CNV with artesunate and DHA [8], [10], this study did not find any significant association of DHA with pfmdr1 CNV neither with pfmrp1 F1390I or pfmdr1 F1226Y. Nevertheless, it showed significant positive correlation with ART, MQ and LUM in vitro susceptibility responses (Table 1).
Taken together, these data point towards the necessity for further research defining molecular markers for the development of resistance against the artemisinin derivative+amino-alcohol quinoline partner drugs, as these two structurally different classes of antimalarials seem to share, at least to some extent, mechanisms of drug action evasion. The pfmrp1 F1390I and pfmdr1 F1226Y SNPs, in conjugation with the well established pfmdr1 CNV, represent likely candidates. The selection of these SNPs might be a pivotal step towards understanding Coartem® resistance in locations where this ACT is a first line strategy, namely in a significant number of African countries, where pfmdr1 CNV are presently rare, but nevertheless existent [39]–[41].
The precise mechanistic contribution of each one of these mutations remains an open question. From our results and others, a simple model compiling the available data can be proposed (figure 7), partly extending from previous suggestions [17], [22], [29]. The central assumption is that ART, LUM and MQ drugs have their main pharmacological targets located in the cytoplasmic compartment [29] while PfMRP1, located in the plasma membrane, pumps them out of the cell, thereby reducing the intra-cytoplasmatic concentrations of the drugs. Pgh-1, inserted in the food vacuole membrane, would contribute to further drug expulsion from the cytoplasm by transporting these drugs towards the lumen of this organelle.
The central assumption is that ART, LUM and MQ drugs have their main pharmacological targets located in the cytoplasmic compartment while PfMRP1, operates by reducing the intra-cytoplasmatic concentrations by effluxing them out of the cell. Pgh-1, on its turn will contribute to further drug expulsion from the cytoplasm by transporting these drugs towards the lumen of the food vacuole.
From our research, we are aware that the pfmrp1 F1390I SNP is present in the African continent [17]. This is at least the case on the West coast where, incidentally, MQ has been traditionally considered to have lower efficacy compared with the Eastern regions of the continent. No information exists out of SE Asia concerning the pfmdr1 F1226Y SNP, highlighting the need for more comprehensive studies on this SNP, particularly in Africa, where Coartem® is the most common first line malaria treatment.
In conclusion, we propose novel potential markers of in vitro multidrug resistance against ACT drugs, particularly involving the pivotal artesunate-MQ and artemether-LUM combinations. These results further reinforce the complexity of emerging resistance to ACTs, consisting of several different molecular contributions, and hence multiple genetic markers.
Materials and Methods
Ethics statement
Collection protocols were approved by the Ethical Committee of the Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Bangkok and Oxford Tropical Research Ethics Committee (OXTREC) at University of Oxford, UK.
The attending physician assured provision of written informed consent in the local language. After having obtained the patients or parents informed consent, venous blood was collected.
Parasites
Isolates of P. falciparum were collected from malaria patients before treatment between the year 2002 and 2008 in Mae Sot, Thailand. Forty six isolates were chosen to be enrolled in this study. Parasites were cryo-preserved in liquid nitrogen until further use.
Culture adaptation of the isolates was performed in 5% human O+ RBCs in RPMI 1640 culture medium supplemented with 10% L-glutamine, 0.05% gentamicine (Gibco®/Invitrogen™, Carlsbad, CA, USA) and 10% human AB+ serum. The cultures were incubated at 37°C with addition of a gas mixture (5% O2, 5% CO2 in N2) and shook at 50 rpm.
In vitro drug susceptibility assays
Chemosensitivity testing in vitro was performed with 4 antimalarial drugs. Artemisinin-282.33 MW, dihydroartemisinin-284.35 MW and mefloquine hydrochloride-414.77 MW, were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St louis, MO, USA) and lumefantrine-530 MW (LUM) from Novartis (Basel, Switzerland). The drugs were reconstituted in different solvents depending on their solubility. The IC's values were assessed using a Histidine-Rich Protein 2 based Double-Site Sandwich Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay [42]. Briefly, the parasite isolates were cultured (synchronized at ring stage containing 0,05% parasitaemia and 1,5% hematocrite) in the presence of serial dilutions of antimalarial drugs (ART, DHA, LUM and MQ). After 72 hours of culturing at 37°C in candle jars, cells were then lysed by freeze-thawing for ELISA analysis. Four independent assays were performed for each field isolate and 3D7 reference strain IC50 measured once a month for drug quality control. 3D7 strain was obtained from Prof. D. Walliker (Department of Animal and population genetics, University of Edinburgh, UK).
Nucleic acids extraction
Blood samples from each culture-adapted isolate were centrifuged and 50 µL packed parasitized RBC frozen for DNA extraction. For RNA extraction 150 µL of PBS plus 300 µL of Lysis buffer (Applied Biosystems™, Fresno, CA, USA) were added to 50 µL packed parasitized RBC. The mix was kept at −20°C until RNA extraction. DNA and RNA extraction was carried out using an ABIPRISM®6100 Nucleic Acid PrepStation® (Applied Biosystems™, Fresno, CA, USA) according to the recommendations of the manufacturer. cDNA synthesis was carried out using a High-Capacity cDNA Reverse Transcription Kit (Applied Biosystems, Fresno, CA, USA).
Drug transporter genes open reading frame sequencing
All 46 isolates were fully sequenced for pfmdr1 and pfmrp1 genes from gDNA and the pfcrt gene was sequenced from cDNA. Amplification and sequencing primers for the pfmrp1 were as described [17] and for pfmdr1 and pfcrt genes the primers are shown in supplementary supporting information (Material and Methods S1). Amplicon fragments were sequenced by Macrogen Inc. (Seoul, Korea).
The Sequencher™ software versions 4.6 (Gene Codes Corporation, Ann Arbor, MI) was used to analyze the sequence output with the 3D7 sequence reference of PFE1150w (pfmdr1), PFA0590w (pfmrp1) and MAL7P1.27 (pfcrt) downloaded from Plasmo DataBase (http://plasmodb.org/).
Gene copy number amplification of pfmdr1 and pfmrp1
Relative quantification of pfmdr1 and pfmrp1 genes in all isolates was performed using housekeeping gene tubulin beta chain putative (PF10_0084). TaqMan® probes and primers for pfmdr1 were as described [10]. For pfmrp1, new primers (fw 5′-AGT AGA AGG AAG AGA CAT TCG AAC ATA-3′ and rev 5′-CAA AAG AAG ATT GAG CTA AAA TAC CAA-3′) and probe (6-FAM, MGBNFQ 5′-AAT AGA AAA GGA GAA GAT AG-3′) were designed (Applied Biosystems™, Fresno, CA, USA) to be performed as a multiplex using the same housekeeping gene primers and probe employed in pfmdr1 analysis.
P.falciparum DNA from 3D7, K1 and FCB reference strains were used as calibrators and positive controls (known copy number variation for pfmdr1 gene). Multiplex amplification reactions were done in triplicate in 96 well plates with 20 µl containing TaqMan® Gene Expression Mastermix (Applied Biosystems), 300 nM of each forward and reverse primer, 100 nM of TaqMan® probe from both target and housekeeping gene and 4 µL of gDNA. The thermal cycle profile was 50°C 2 min, 95°C 10 min and forty-five cycles of 95°C 15 s and 60°C 1 min. PCR was performed in ABI PRISM® 7000 Sequence Detection System (Applied Biosystems™, Fresno, CA, USA). The detection threshold was set above the mean baseline value for the first 6–15 cycles.
Genotype re-analysis after culture adaptation
To check the existence of any variance or selection of parasites genotypes in the field isolates after in vitro adaptation, the DNA was extracted from the culture plates (row “A”/no drug control) in which the last tests for ICs was performed.
Genotyping was done only in the polymorphisms herein observed to be significantly associated with in vitro susceptibility: the pfmdr1 CNV, pfmdr1 F1226Y and pfmrp1 F1390I. The method to recheck pfmdr1 CNV was the same as described above. For pfmdr1 F1226Y and pfmrp1 F1390I pyrosequencing was the preferred method due to time/cost efficiency. The pyrosequencing protocol and primers were designed with Pyrosequencing assay design software, version 1.0 (Biotage AB, Uppsala, Sweden). Amplification conditions, pyrosequencing primers and the nucleotide dispensation orders are described in supplementary supporting information (Material and Methods S1).
Computational molecular analysis
Secondary structure analysis of transmembrane spanning domain 2 (TSD2) of PfMRP1 was performed with SOSUI server [43]. Computational homology modeling was performed at HHpred-Homology detection & structure prediction by HMM-HMM comparison server (http://toolkit.tuebingen.mpg.de/hhpred). Alignment for best template was performed using Psi-blast with 8 interactions and with local alignment. The template from the best E-score alignment for the second transmembrane spanning domain 2 based in the Msba ABC transporter crystal 3B60, was then used in Modeller software to generate a model. Models were visualized with Yasara software [44].
Statistical analysis
50% and 90% inhibitory concentrations were calculated by nonlinear regression analysis (http://malaria.farch.net). Statistical analysis was carried out using SigmaPlot for windows version 11.0. Pearson Correlation was used to assess linear relations. In vitro drug susceptibility phenotype and genotype association (Table 1 and Table S2) was performed with T-test with equal variances assumed (2-tailed). For comparison, Bonferroni-adjusted level of significance would be: P value <0.0042. Isolates that harbors both alleles (mixed infection) in the determined polymorphic region were excluded from the statistical analysis.
Supporting Information
Material and Methods S1.
PCR program, mastermix and primer sequences for pfmdr1 and pfcrt ORF sequencing and pfmdr1 F1226Y and pfmrp1 F1390I genotyping by pyrosequencing.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0020212.s001
(DOC)
Table S1.
Comprehensive data of each isolate genotype and in vitro drug susceptibility values.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0020212.s002
(XLS)
Table S2.
Relationship between average in vitro drugs tested IC's and relevant polymorphisms.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0020212.s003
(XLS)
Author Contributions
Conceived and designed the experiments: MIV PEF JPG. Performed the experiments: MIV PEF LJ MM AK BAS . Analyzed the data: MIV PEF MP JPG . Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: FN AB JPG . Wrote the paper: MIV PEF LJ BAS AB FN JPG. Performed all statistics: MP.
References
- 1. Rodrigues Coura J (1987) [Memoir of the Memorias. Development of malaria hematozoa resistant to quinine. By Arthur Neiva, 1910]. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz 82: 303–309.
- 2. Trape JF (2001) The public health impact of chloroquine resistance in Africa. Am J Trop Med Hyg 64: 12–17.
- 3. Bhattarai A, Ali AS, Kachur SP, Martensson A, Abbas AK, et al. (2007) Impact of artemisinin-based combination therapy and insecticide-treated nets on malaria burden in Zanzibar. PLoS Med 4: e309.
- 4. WHO_websiteWord Malaria Report Available: http://www.who.int/malaria/world_malaria_report_2010/worldmalariareport2010.pdf. Accessed 2011 April 28.
- 5. Holmgren G, Gil JP, Ferreira PM, Veiga MI, Obonyo CO, et al. (2006) Amodiaquine resistant Plasmodium falciparum malaria in vivo is associated with selection of pfcrt 76T and pfmdr1 86Y. Infect Genet Evol 6: 309–314.
- 6. Holmgren G, Hamrin J, Svard J, Martensson A, Gil JP, et al. (2007) Selection of pfmdr1 mutations after amodiaquine monotherapy and amodiaquine plus artemisinin combination therapy in East Africa. Infect Genet Evol 7: 562–569.
- 7. Picot S, Olliaro P, de Monbrison F, Bienvenu AL, Price RN, et al. (2009) A systematic review and meta-analysis of evidence for correlation between molecular markers of parasite resistance and treatment outcome in falciparum malaria. Malar J 8: 89.
- 8. Price RN, Uhlemann AC, van Vugt M, Brockman A, Hutagalung R, et al. (2006) Molecular and pharmacological determinants of the therapeutic response to artemether-lumefantrine in multidrug-resistant Plasmodium falciparum malaria. Clin Infect Dis 42: 1570–1577.
- 9. Sisowath C, Stromberg J, Martensson A, Msellem M, Obondo C, et al. (2005) In vivo selection of Plasmodium falciparum pfmdr1 86N coding alleles by artemether-lumefantrine (Coartem). J Infect Dis 191: 1014–1017.
- 10. Price RN, Uhlemann AC, Brockman A, McGready R, Ashley E, et al. (2004) Mefloquine resistance in Plasmodium falciparum and increased pfmdr1 gene copy number. Lancet 364: 438–447.
- 11. Noedl H, Se Y, Schaecher K, Smith BL, Socheat D, et al. (2008) Evidence of artemisinin-resistant malaria in western Cambodia. N Engl J Med 359: 2619–2620.
- 12. Dondorp AM, Nosten F, Yi P, Das D, Phyo AP, et al. (2009) Artemisinin resistance in Plasmodium falciparum malaria. N Engl J Med 361: 455–467.
- 13. Bray PG, Martin RE, Tilley L, Ward SA, Kirk K, et al. (2005) Defining the role of PfCRT in Plasmodium falciparum chloroquine resistance. Mol Microbiol 56: 323–333.
- 14. Sanchez CP, Dave A, Stein WD, Lanzer M (2010) Transporters as mediators of drug resistance in Plasmodium falciparum. Int J Parasitol 40: 1109–1118.
- 15. Rohrbach P, Sanchez CP, Hayton K, Friedrich O, Patel J, et al. (2006) Genetic linkage of pfmdr1 with food vacuolar solute import in Plasmodium falciparum. EMBO J 25: 3000–3011.
- 16. Price RN, Cassar C, Brockman A, Duraisingh M, van Vugt M, et al. (1999) The pfmdr1 gene is associated with a multidrug-resistant phenotype in Plasmodium falciparum from the western border of Thailand. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 43: 2943–2949.
- 17. Dahlstrom S, Ferreira PE, Veiga MI, Sedighi N, Wiklund L, et al. (2009) Plasmodium falciparum multidrug resistance protein 1 and artemisinin-based combination therapy in Africa. J Infect Dis 200: 1456–1464.
- 18. Mu J, Ferdig MT, Feng X, Joy DA, Duan J, et al. (2003) Multiple transporters associated with malaria parasite responses to chloroquine and quinine. Mol Microbiol 49: 977–989.
- 19. Klokouzas A, Tiffert T, van Schalkwyk D, Wu CP, van Veen HW, et al. (2004) Plasmodium falciparum expresses a multidrug resistance-associated protein. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 321: 197–201.
- 20.
Martin RE, Henry RI, Abbey JL, Clements JD, Kirk K (2005) The ‘permeome’ of the malaria parasite: an overview of the membrane transport proteins of Plasmodium falciparum. Genome Biol. 6: R26. Epub 2005 Mar 2002.
- 21. Kavishe RA, van den Heuvel JM, van de Vegte-Bolmer M, Luty AJ, Russel FG, et al. (2009) Localization of the ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transport proteins PfMRP1, PfMRP2, and PfMDR5 at the Plasmodium falciparum plasma membrane. Malar J 8: 205.
- 22. Raj DK, Mu J, Jiang H, Kabat J, Singh S, et al. (2009) Disruption of a Plasmodium falciparum multidrug resistance-associated protein (PfMRP) alters its fitness and transport of antimalarial drugs and glutathione. J Biol Chem 284: 7687–7696. Epub 2008 Dec 7631.
- 23. Parquet V, Henry M, Wurtz N, Dormoi J, Briolant S, et al. (2010) Atorvastatin as a potential anti-malarial drug: in vitro synergy in combinational therapy with quinine against Plasmodium falciparum. Malar J 9: 139.
- 24. Imwong M, Dondorp AM, Nosten F, Yi P, Mungthin M, et al. (2010) Exploring the contribution of candidate genes to artemisinin resistance in Plasmodium falciparum. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 54: 2886–2892.
- 25. Cowman AF, Galatis D, Thompson JK (1994) Selection for mefloquine resistance in Plasmodium falciparum is linked to amplification of the pfmdr1 gene and cross-resistance to halofantrine and quinine. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 91: 1143–1147.
- 26. Peel SA (2001) The ABC transporter genes of Plasmodium falciparum and drug resistance. Drug Resist Updat 4: 66–74.
- 27. Sidhu AB, Valderramos SG, Fidock DA (2005) pfmdr1 mutations contribute to quinine resistance and enhance mefloquine and artemisinin sensitivity in Plasmodium falciparum. Mol Microbiol 57: 913–926.
- 28. Sisowath C, Ferreira PE, Bustamante LY, Dahlstrom S, Martensson A, et al. (2007) The role of pfmdr1 in Plasmodium falciparum tolerance to artemether-lumefantrine in Africa. Trop Med Int Health 12: 736–742.
- 29. Sisowath C, Petersen I, Veiga MI, Martensson A, Premji Z, et al. (2009) In vivo selection of Plasmodium falciparum parasites carrying the chloroquine-susceptible pfcrt K76 allele after treatment with artemether-lumefantrine in Africa. J Infect Dis 199: 750–757.
- 30. Sidhu AB, Uhlemann AC, Valderramos SG, Valderramos JC, Krishna S, et al. (2006) Decreasing pfmdr1 copy number in plasmodium falciparum malaria heightens susceptibility to mefloquine, lumefantrine, halofantrine, quinine, and artemisinin. J Infect Dis 194: 528–535.
- 31. Reed MB, Saliba KJ, Caruana SR, Kirk K, Cowman AF (2000) Pgh1 modulates sensitivity and resistance to multiple antimalarials in Plasmodium falciparum. Nature 403: 906–909.
- 32. Koike K, Conseil G, Leslie EM, Deeley RG, Cole SP (2004) Identification of proline residues in the core cytoplasmic and transmembrane regions of multidrug resistance protein 1 (MRP1/ABCC1) important for transport function, substrate specificity, and nucleotide interactions. J Biol Chem 279: 12325–12336.
- 33. Haimeur A, Conseil G, Deeley RG, Cole SP (2004) Mutations of charged amino acids in or near the transmembrane helices of the second membrane spanning domain differentially affect the substrate specificity and transport activity of the multidrug resistance protein MRP1 (ABCC1). Mol Pharmacol 65: 1375–1385.
- 34. Zhang DW, Nunoya K, Vasa M, Gu HM, Theis A, et al. (2004) Transmembrane helix 11 of multidrug resistance protein 1 (MRP1/ABCC1): identification of polar amino acids important for substrate specificity and binding of ATP at nucleotide binding domain 1. Biochemistry 43: 9413–9425.
- 35. Zhang DW, Nunoya K, Vasa M, Gu HM, Cole SP, et al. (2006) Mutational analysis of polar amino acid residues within predicted transmembrane helices 10 and 16 of multidrug resistance protein 1 (ABCC1): effect on substrate specificity. Drug Metab Dispos 34: 539–546.
- 36. Daoud R, Julien M, Gros P, Georges E (2001) Major photoaffinity drug binding sites in multidrug resistance protein 1 (MRP1) are within transmembrane domains 10-11 and 16-17. J Biol Chem 276: 12324–12330.
- 37. Hastings IM, Ward SA (2005) Coartem (artemether-lumefantrine) in Africa: the beginning of the end? J Infect Dis 192: 1303–1304;. author reply 1304-1305.
- 38. Cowman AF (1995) Mechanisms of drug resistance in malaria. Aust N Z J Med 25: 837–844.
- 39. Uhlemann AC, Ramharter M, Lell B, Kremsner PG, Krishna S (2005) Amplification of Plasmodium falciparum multidrug resistance gene 1 in isolates from Gabon. J Infect Dis 192: 1830–1835.
- 40. Ursing J, Kofoed PE, Rombo L, Gil JP (2006) No pfmdr1 amplifications in samples from Guinea-Bissau and Liberia collected between 1981 and 2004. J Infect Dis 194: 716–718;. author reply 718-719.
- 41. Witkowski B, Nicolau ML, Soh PN, Iriart X, Menard S, et al. (2010) Plasmodium falciparum isolates with increased pfmdr1 copy number circulate in West Africa. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 54: 3049–3051.
- 42. Noedl H, Bronnert J, Yingyuen K, Attlmayr B, Kollaritsch H, et al. (2005) Simple histidine-rich protein 2 double-site sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for use in malaria drug sensitivity testing. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 49: 3575–3577.
- 43. Hirokawa T, Boon-Chieng S, Mitaku S (1998) SOSUI: classification and secondary structure prediction system for membrane proteins. Bioinformatics 14: 378–379.
- 44. Krieger E, Koraimann G, Vriend G (2002) Increasing the precision of comparative models with YASARA NOVA-a self-parameterizing force field. Proteins 47: 393–402.