Figures
Abstract
Junctional epidermolysis bullosa (JEB) is a hereditary mechanobullous skin disease in humans and animals. A Herlitz type JEB was identified in German Black Headed Mutton (BHM) sheep and affected lambs were reproduced in a breeding trial. Affected lambs showed skin and mucous membranes blistering and all affected lambs died within the first weeks of life. The pedigree data were consistent with a monogenic autosomal recessive inheritance. Immunofluorescence showed a reduced expression of laminin 5 protein which consists of 3 subunits encoded by the genes LAMA3, LAMB3 and LAMC2. We screened these genes for polymorphisms. Linkage and genome-wide association analyses identified LAMC2 as the most likely candidate for HJEB. A two base pair deletion within exon 18 of the LAMC2 gene (FM872310:c.2746delCA) causes a frameshift mutation resulting in a premature stop codon (p.A928*) 13 triplets downstream of this mutation and in addition, introduces an alternative splicing of exon 18 LAMC2. This deletion showed a perfect co-segregation with HJEB in all 740 analysed BHM sheep. Identification of the LAMC2 deletion means an animal model for HJEB is now available to develop therapeutic approaches of relevance to the human form of this disease.
Citation: Mömke S, Kerkmann A, Wöhlke A, Ostmeier M, Hewicker-Trautwein M, Ganter M, et al. (2011) A Frameshift Mutation within LAMC2 Is Responsible for Herlitz Type Junctional Epidermolysis Bullosa (HJEB) in Black Headed Mutton Sheep. PLoS ONE 6(5): e18943. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0018943
Editor: You-Qiang Song, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
Received: November 14, 2010; Accepted: March 24, 2011; Published: May 4, 2011
Copyright: © 2011 Mömke et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Funding: A. Kerkmann was supported by the FAZIT foundation Gemeinnützige Verlagsgesellschaft mbH, Frankfurt/Main. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Introduction
Epidermolysis bullosa (EB) is a heritable heterogeneous group of skin disorders affecting the integrity of the skin and mucosa. Abnormalities of macromolecules which anchor the dermis to the epidermis lead to diminished cohesion of the skin layers, blister formation, and fragility. The condition is triggered by frictional movement as well as minor trauma [1]. This mechanobullous disease is well known in several livestock species and in human. Based on the cleavage levels of skin, EB has been classified into the main groups EB simplex, dystrophic EB and junctional EB (JEB). JEB involves cleavage within the lamina lucida which is a component of the basement membrane [2]. Herlitz type JEB is a lethal condition, whereas non-Herlitz type JEB is rarely related to death. In human, three genes are known to be associated with HJEB including laminin β3 (LAMB3), laminin γ2 (LAMC2) and laminin α3 (LAMA3). The defect is usually inherited in an autosomal recessive manner and also cases of compound heterozygosity were described [3]. In human, nonsense, splicing and deletion mutations of LAMB3, LAMC2 and LAMA3 have been reported as responsible for HJEB [4]. In domesticated animals, cases of JEB are described in horses [5]–[7], dogs [8]–[11] and cats [12]. In German Pointer dogs, a homozygous insertion of repetitive satellite DNA within intron 35 of LAMA3 was shown to be causal for the defect [10]. Another study in a French subpopulation of this dog breed gave evidence for a non-conservative change of 14 amino acids within LAMA3 causing JEB [11]. In Belgian draft horses, Comtois horses, and Breton horses affected by HJEB, a homozygous insertion of one nucleotide within exon 10 of LAMC2 was detected [5], [6]. Furthermore, in American Saddlebred horses HJEB was reported to be caused by a homozygous deletion spanning exons 24–27 of LAMA3 [7]. In sheep, cases of dystrophic EB have been described in the breeds Weisses Alpenschaf and Assaf sheep [13], [14]. In German Black Headed Mutton (BHM) sheep ovine HJEB has been ascertained in several flocks and after performing a breeding trial with a sample of parents which gave birth to HJEB-affected lambs, a monogenic autosomal recessive inheritance was most likely [15].
In this study, we employed animals from farms and a breeding trial to identify the mutation causing ovine HJEB in German BHM sheep. The most likely candidate gene LAMC2 was identified using the Illumina OvineSNP50 Beadchip and candidate gene-associated polymorphisms. We provide the complete ovine coding sequence of LAMC2 and characterize the transcriptional effects of the LAMC2-mutation responsible for HJEB.
Results
Phenotype
The clinical examination of 21 HJEB affected lambs revealed typical signs as shedding of hoof horn, erosion and ulcers of the skin as well as the mucous membranes (Figure 1). All affected lambs had to be euthanised due to the progressive deterioration of their condition. Electron microscopy showed that the separations of the dermoepidermal junction were located in the lamina lucida of the basement membrane. Hemidesmosomes were present in reduced numbers. Immunofluorescence showed a markedly reduced expression of laminin 5 protein whilst expression of collagen VII appeared to be normal. Laminin 5 consists of three subunits encoded by the genes LAMA3, LAMB2 and LAMC2 [4], which consequently were chosen for scanning polymorphisms that could be used for linkage and association analyses.
Typical signs are a kyphotic attitude and severe lameness (A), detachment of the epidermis from the underlying dermis (B, dorsal carpal joint), detachment of hoof horn from the corium and accumulation of bloody fluid in the cavity (C), erosion of mucous membranes (D) and of the tongue (E).
Mapping the Causative Gene
The ovine genome assembly v2.0 (http://www.livestockgenomics.csiro.au/) located LAMA3 on ovine chromosome (OAR) 23 at 34.8 Mb, LAMB3 on OAR12 at 78.8 Mb and LAMC2 also on OAR12 at 68.6 Mb. These genes were partly sequenced to detect polymorphisms, which were subsequently used for linkage analyses in the 21 affected sheep and their direct relatives. Within LAMA3 (FM872294), seven single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and one microsatellite were detected (Table S1). Of these markers, five were in a common linkage group and the remaining two in another one. None of these markers showed linkage with HJEB in the data analysed here. Within LAMB3 (FM872309), 15 SNPs distributed on seven linkage-disequilibrium blocks (Table S1) and within LAMC2 (FM872310), five SNPs within four linkage-disequilibrium blocks were detected and analysed (Table 1). The chromosome-wide p-values for linkage with HJEB were at p = 0.004 for LAMB3-associated SNPs and for LAMC2-associated SNPs at p<0.00001. Strong linkage disequilibrium among the markers within both genes obviated a further resolution among the two candidate genes. Thus, all these gene-associated SNPs were tested for association with HJEB. None of the markers within LAMA3 and LAMB3 showed a significant association with HJEB, while three of the five SNPs within LAMC2 were significantly associated with HJEB (p = 0.0003). In addition to the analysis of candidate gene-associated markers, we performed a genome-wide association study to validate linkage to LAMC2 and determine if additional genomic regions displayed evidence of association. DNA from 12 HJEB-affected BHM lambs (cases), 6 HJEB-unaffected BHM sheep representing parents or full-sibs of the cases and 6 control samples from the whole BHM population were genotyped using the ovine Illumina 50 K beadchip. Quality control for genotyping was performed using two duplicates. Consistency of genotyping was >0.999. After filtering for a minor allele frequency >0.05 and genotyping rate >0.99, 43,130 SNPs (single nucleotide polymorphisms) were left for a genome-wide association analysis among cases and controls. After genome-wide permutation to correct for multiple testing, only 11 SNPs were genome-wide significant (p<0.05). All these hits were located on ovine chromosome (OAR) 12 in a region spanning 63.1–70.4 Mb which contains the LAMC2 gene (at 68.8 Mb). The strongest association (p = 0.0001) with HJEB was obtained for SNP OAR12_65207540, OAR12_65811822, OAR12_66169798 and OAR12_s45876. A mixed linear model analysis including the fixed effect of the sex of the animal and the random animal effect parameterized through the identical-by-state relationship matrix gave the highest hits at 67.333 Mb (−log10 p-value = 22.4) and at 68.951 Mb on OAR12 (−log10 p-value = 21.1) as shown in the Q-Q and Manhattan plots of the −log10 p-values (Figure S1). Therefore, LAMC2 was confirmed through analysis of gene-associated SNPs and genome-wide SNPs as the most likely candidate harbouring the causal mutation for HJEB.
Mutation Analysis
After transcription of mRNA into cDNA, the complete coding sequence of LAMC2 was obtained in two unaffected and two HJEB-affected sheep. We identified a 3,576 bp open reading frame (ORF) in the healthy sheep, which corresponds to the bovine ORF of LAMC2. The ovine ORF sequence of the unaffected sheep had an identity of 96.8% with the orthologous bovine sequence. Comparing the sequences of unaffected and HJEB-affected sheep, we detected 14 SNPs and a 2-bp deletion. Of these polymorphisms, six were non-synonymous (c.367C>T, c.1523G>A, c.2546A>G, c.2746delCA, c.3001G>A, c.3455G>A) and led to an alternate amino acid sequence (p.L123F, p.R508H, p.H849R, p.Q916EfsX13, p.D1001N, p.G1152D) (Table 1). All non-conservative polymorphisms were analysed in all 21 HJEB-affected lambs and their relatives. The polymorphisms c.3001G>A and c.3455G>A were in the same linkage phase in all tested animals, while the other SNP alleles showed lower correlations with r2<0.8 (Figure S2). Only the c.2746delCA mutation showed a perfect co-segregation with HJEB and allows detection of all affected individuals, unaffected wildtype individuals and heterozygous carriers of HJEB in BHM sheep (Table 2). The χ2-values for genotypic and allelic distribution were at 68.0 and 50.4, respectively, and the corresponding p-values were at p<0.00001.
The c.2746delCA (p.Q916EfsX13) mutation causes a premature stop codon at position p.A928X and an alternative splicing of exon 18 (Figure S3). This deletion is located two base pairs upstream of the boundary between exon 18 and exon 19. The alternative splicing lead to an insertion of the first part of intron 18 into the alternatively spliced coding sequence of LAMC2 and could be found in all affected animals and carriers. Overlapping cDNA sequences in HJEB-affected sheep were amplified using primer pairs from exon 17 to intron 18 and primer pairs from intron 18 to exon 20. Sequencing of these amplicons in both directions gave evidence of a 51-bp insertion from intron 18 into the alternatively spliced coding sequence and a SNP within intron 18 (c.2749+51A>G). This SNP activates a cryptic splice donor site and terminates the transcription of intron 18 (Figure S4). In order to proof the distribution of the c.2749+51A>G SNP, we genotyped all affected sheep and their relatives for this mutation. All HJEB-affected sheep were homozygous G/G, the heterozygous carriers were also heterozygous at c.2749+51A>G, except for three individuals which were homozygous G/G. The unaffected wildtype sheep were homozygous A/A at c.2749+51A>G, except for four individuals which were heterozygous. Of one of these four wildtype individuals, tissue samples were available for cDNA analysis. These samples were used for PCR with primer pairs spanning from exon 17 to intron 18, from intron 18 to exon 20, and from exon 17 to exon 20. While the amplicon including exon 17 to exon 20 was clearly visible on an agarose gel, the other PCR-products could not be amplified indicating an absence of the alternative splicing. Therefore, the c.2746delCA mutation seems to be necessary for the alternative splicing and the c.2749+51A>G mutation for the size of the alternatively spliced product. The alternatively spliced product contains a stop codon at c.2749+41 (Figure S5).
To estimate the distribution of the mutant allele in the BHM sheep population, 645 randomly sampled, unaffected individuals of this breed were genotyped for the c.2746delCA. An association analysis using all 717 BHM sheep genotyped in this study resulted in χ2 values for genotypic and allelic distributions of 713 and 711, respectively. The corresponding p-values were p = 1.49e−155 and p = 1.08e−156. Of these sheep genotyped, no animal showed the homozygous mutant genotype and six individuals out of different flocks were heterozygous carriers of HJEB. These results allow the conclusion that about 0.9% of the BHM population are carriers for HJEB.
Since Suffolk sheep have contributed to the foundation of the BHM breed, the deletion identified in BHM sheep was genotyped in 175 unaffected and randomly sampled Suffolk sheep. However, not any of the genotyped animals carried the c.2746delCA mutation. Furthermore, random samples of each 50 white and brown colour variants of the breed East Friesian and 62 Leine sheep were genotyped (Table 2). None of these animals showed the c.2746delCA mutation either.
Discussion
A 2-bp deletion within exon 18 of LAMC2 (c.2746delCA) was identified as responsible for HJEB in BHM sheep. This c.2746delCA mutation causes a frameshift with a premature stop codon and an alternative splicing of exon 18. In all sheep exhibiting the c.2746delCA mutation, a second intronic c.2749+51A>G mutation could be shown. As the alternatively spliced RNA did also contain a stop codon 42 bp downstream of c.2746delCA, all HJEB-affected sheep in the present study will have a truncated LAMC2 protein. The presence of c.2746delCA mutation is sufficient to introduce the alternative splicing process because for individuals alone with the c.2749+51A>G mutation alternatively spliced cDNA could not be shown. We assume that the deletion of CA changes the 5′ splice donor site from GACAG/GT to GAG/GT and due to the missing C, the splice site at the 5′ end of exon 18 is not recognized in each case [16]. The c.2749+51A>G SNP located in intron 18 creates a cryptic splice site by converting the sequence CCAGTAAGA to CCGGTAAGA. Even if this splice site seems not to be perfect compared to the reported splice donor consensus sequences [16], the intronic insert was always terminated at this site. According to the splice site competition model, alternative splicing happens when one donor is sufficiently good to compete with the other donor for U1 snRNA binding [17]. In the case that both mutations are present, the splice sites are competitively used, which results in two different transcripts in sheep possessing these mutations.
LAMC2 encodes for laminin γ2, which is one of three distinct polypeptides that compose laminin 5. These laminin alpha, beta and gamma polypeptides generate a cruciform structure of three short arms formed by different chains and one long arm composed of all three chains. The long arm of laminin γ2, together with those of laminin α3 and laminin β3, spans the lamina lucida, ending right underneath the basal keratinocytes layer [18]. The short arm region contains the nidogen and fibulin binding sites, which integrate the laminin 5 protein into the basement membrane [19]. Mutations within laminin γ2 are most frequently located within the N-terminal LE domains and the L4 module, whereas mutations in the C-terminal α-helical domain are rare [4]. Compared with the human structure, the sheep mutation c.2746delCA (p.Q916EfsX13) is located within the α-helical domain and shortens the polypeptide chain by a premature stop codon 13 triplets downstream of the deletion. Therefore, this SNP mutation presumably influences the assembling of laminin γ2 with its partner chains leading to a non- or dysfunction of laminin 5.
The BHM breed has been introgressed by Suffolk sheep, which were reported to have shown signs of HJEB [20]. In order to confirm if the mutation was introduced by Suffolk sheep into the BHM breed, Suffolk from different flocks were randomly sampled and genotyped. However, none of the genotyped animals carried the HJEB mutation. This implies that either HJEB was not introduced into the BHM population by Suffolk sheep or the defect is more infrequent in the latter breed or maybe even eradicated. On the other hand, BHM sheep have been crossed into other breeds as white and brown colour variants of the breed East Friesian sheep and the Leine sheep. Therefore we checked random samples of these breeds for the presence of c.2746delCA. All individuals of these breeds were homozygous for the wild type sequence. This might indicate that HJEB has not been transmitted into these breeds or that the allele frequency is very low and the c.2746delCA mutation is limited to BHM. On the other hand, it should be noted that no symptomatic animals from these other breeds have been tested, which leaves open the possibility the c.2746delCA mutation is not confined to BHM or even more likely that other not yet known mutations within LAMC2, LAMA3 or LAMB3 are causing HJED in other sheep breeds. Though HJEB is known in many species, and causal mutations within LAMC2 have been identified in the human and horse [4], [6], the c.2746delCA mutation was not reported before and can therefore be regarded as new in this regard (Table S2).
In conclusion, we identified the causal mutation for ovine HJEB in BHM sheep. This mutation (c.2746delCA) is located within LAMC2 and leads to a frame shift of the ORF and a premature stop codon (p.Q916EfsX13) as well as induces an alternative splicing process for exon 18. The genetic test can be employed for eradication of this lethal mutation in the BHM sheep breed. Furthermore, this study provides a suitable animal model for therapeutic approaches of HJEB caused by a specific mutation. Due to the genetic complexity of HJEB, several animal models seem necessary to work out the specific effects caused by the different mutations within LAMC2, LAMA3 or LAMB3 and the sheep model proposed allows therapeutic interventions for several weeks before HJEB becomes lethal and in particular, to study the factors causing lethality.
Materials and Methods
Ethics Statement
All animal work has been conducted according to the national and international guidelines for animal welfare. The breeding experiment at the University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover was under the supervision of the Lower Saxony state veterinary office Niedersächsisches Landesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit, Oldenburg, Germany (registration number 33.42502-05/1023).
Animals
We obtained blood samples of a total of 21 HJEB affected BHM sheep, of which 19 were purebred and two were crossbred animals with German White Headed Mutton or Leine sheep relatives in second to fourth degree. The diagnosis of HJEB was ascertained by clinical, pathological and histological methods. In addition, immunofluorescence and electron microscopy were employed to distinguish HJEB from the non-Herlitz type of JEB. Fifteen of the HJEB affected lambs were born in three different flocks in Lower Saxony, Germany, and eight ewes from two farms and one ram which had already produced HJEB affected offspring were employed for a breeding experiment at the University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover and under the supervision of the state veterinary office (registration number 33.42502-05/1023). In this breeding experiment six HJEB affected lambs were born. Also 51 samples of unaffected sheep which were closely related with HJEB affected lambs were taken. Genome-wide association analyses were performed using DNA from 12 HJEB-affected BHM lambs (cases), 6 HJEB-unaffected BHM sheep representing parents and full-sibs of the cases and 6 control samples from the whole BHM population. We could not trace back the affected BHM lambs to a common founder due to missing information on some ancestors of the HJEB affected sheep (Figure S6). Furthermore, 645 samples of non-affected BHM sheep from 50 farms as well as 337 samples of non-affected sheep of other breeds as Suffolk sheep (175), East Friesian sheep (100), and Leine sheep (62) were used for genotyping. DNA was extracted from blood and tissue samples using the QIAamp 96 DNA Blood kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). We used skin and lung tissue of each two unaffected, carrier and affected sheep for extraction of RNA. The samples were harvested immediately after euthanasia and asserved in RNAlater RNA Stabilization Reagent (Qiagen) for stabilization and protection of cellular RNA in situ and then stored at −20°C. The RNA was extracted from tissue samples using the Nucleospin RNAII-kit (Macherey-Nagel, Düren, Germany) and transcribed into cDNA using SuperScript III Reverse Transcriptase (Invitrogen, Karlsruhe, Germany).
Sequence and mutation analysis of the ovine LAMA3, LAMB3 and LAMC2 genes
For analysis of LAMA3, LAMB3 and LAMC2, we designed primers with Primer3 software (http://frodo.wi.mit.edu/cgi-bin/primer3/primer3_www.cgi) using sequences derived from the ovine genome assembly v2.0 (http://www.livestockgenomics.csiro.au/) or, if ovine sequences were not available in the targeted region, we designed heterologous primers based on bovine sequences (Table S3). PCR products were sequenced on a MegaBACE 1000 capillary sequencer (GE Healthcare, Freiburg, Germany) and analysed using Sequencher 4.7 (GeneCodes, Ann Arbor, MI, USA). For the LAMC2 mutation analysis we sequenced overlapping cDNA fragments spanning the entire open reading frame in each two affected and non-affected sheep. All detected polymorphisms were genotyped in the 21 samples of HJEB affected sheep and 51 samples of closely related unaffected sheep. After this, single- and multipoint non-parametric linkage analysis were performed using the Merlin software, version 1.1.2 [21]. The only polymorphism in complete concordance with HJEB in the genotyped animals was sequenced on cDNA and genomic DNA in each two affected, unaffected and carrier animals. Genotyping of c.2746delCA was performed by sequencing as well as by digestion of PCR products using the MnlI enzyme (NEB, Frankfurt, Germany).
Non-parametric linkage and association analyses
Non-parametric single- and multipoint linkage (NPL) analyses were employed for the HJEB-affected lambs and their closely relatives, which were from three different farms. Sheep from farm I and farm II were connected by common progeny born in the breeding trial (Figure S4) Linkage analysis was based on allele sharing by identical-by-descent methods and the MERLIN 1.1.2 software [21]. The NPL statistics Zmeans and the LOD (logarithm of the odds) scores were employed for detection of allele sharing among affected family members. The minimum (min) and maximum (max) achievable Zmeans and LOD scores were high enough to reach genome-wide significant linkage. For the genome-wide type I error probability (Pg), a Bonferroni correction was applied with Pgenome-wide = 1−(1−Pchromosome-wide)1/r, where r = length of OAR12 (86.14 Mb) divided by the total ovine genome length in Mb (2647 Mb). Using this formula, the threshold for Pg of 0.05 and 0.01 is at a chromosome-wide p-value of 0.001668 and 0.000327. A significant co-segregation of a marker allele with the phenotypic expression of HJEB in the examined population was assumed for p-values <0.05.
Association of SNPs with HJEB was tested using the CASECONTROL procedure of SAS/Genetics (Statistical Analysis System, version 9.2, Cary, NC, USA, 2010) and PLINK, version 1.07 [22]. Genome-wide significance was obtained using 1,000,000 permutations with the max(T) permutation procedure of PLINK.
Statistical calculation of pairwise linkage disequilibrium (LD) was performed and pictured using HAPLOVIEW 4.0 [23]. We used the Tagger algorithm r2≥0.8 to detect SNPs with strong LD among alleles.
A mixed linear model (MLM) was employed to control for sex of the animals and the identity-by-state (IBS) kinship matrix among all individuals (K-matrix) using TASSEL [24]. The KIN option of TASSEL was used to create the K-matrix containing the IBS coefficients. Equations were solved via restricted maximum likelihood.
Supporting Information
Figure S1.
Results of the genome-wide association analysis. (A) Q-Q plot of the −log10 p-values from a mixed linear model analysis for association of genome-wide SNPs with Herlitz type junctional epidermolysis bullosa (HJEB) in Black Headed Mutton (BHM) sheep. (B) Manhattan-plot of the −log10 p-values for the genome-wide association analysis of Herlitz type junctional epidermolysis bullosa (HJEB) in Black Headed Mutton (BHM) sheep. The peaks of the −log10 p-values are only on OAR12.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0018943.s001
(DOC)
Figure S2.
Linkage disequilibrium (LD) of six non-conservative SNPs within LAMC2. The r2 values are shown for each SNP pair. The red square between the markers c.3001G>A and c.3455G>A indicates complete linkage.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0018943.s002
(DOC)
Figure S3.
cDNA sequence of an HJEB-unaffected lamb (A) in comparison with the cDNA sequence of an HJEB-affected lamb (B, C). The cDNA sequence of an HJEB-affected lamb is spanning from exon 17 to exon 19 (B) and the cDNA sequence of the same affected lamb is spanning from exon 17 to intron 18 (C). The vertical line marks the end of exon 18. In the affected individual (B/C), at the end of exon 18 two bases (CA) are missing and alternative splicing results in two transcripts with one of them including 51 bp of intron 18 (B). The presence of intronic DNA within the second transcript can be clearly shown by generating sequences starting from exon 17 and ending in intron 18 (C). The boundary between exon 17 and exon 18 of all products was smooth and used to verify that only cDNA was sequenced.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0018943.s003
(DOC)
Figure S4.
Cryptic intronic splice site in an HJEB-affected lamb. Section of the cDNA sequence of an HJEB-affected lamb showing the sequence of intron 18, which is spliced at the intronic base pair 51 to exon 19. The A>G mutation opening a cryptic splice site and therefore terminating this intronic insertion into the cDNA sequence is indicated.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0018943.s004
(DOC)
Figure S5.
Comparison of amino acid sequences among an unaffected and an HJEB-affected animal. Sequence labelled with 1 is from an unaffected lamb and sequences labelled 2 and 3 are from one HJEB-affected lamb. Sequence 2 demonstrates the transcript with correct and sequence 3 demonstrates the transcript with alternative splicing. Both variants (2 and 3) were present in every HJEB-affected lamb and both sequences lead to a premature stop codon and thus to a shortened, non-functional protein.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0018943.s005
(DOC)
Figure S6.
Pedigree of the HJEB-affected Black Headed Mutton sheep. Sheep from the three farms are marked by grey boxes in contrast to the progeny born in the mating experiment. Animals marked by an asterisk were genotyped on the ovine Illumina 50 K beadchip.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0018943.s006
(DOC)
Table S1.
Polymorphisms identified within ovine LAMA3 and LAMB3 used for linkage analysis and their location, polymorphism information content (PIC) and heterozygosity (HET).
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0018943.s007
(DOC)
Table S2.
Mutations within LAMC2 causing Herlitz and Non-Herlitz JEB in human and horse.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0018943.s008
(DOC)
Table S3.
Primer sequences with their product sizes (P) and annealing temperatures (AT) used for amplification of sequences within LAMA3 , LAMB3 , and LAMC2 as well as the targeted regions within these genes.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0018943.s009
(DOC)
Acknowledgments
We thank all members of the staff of the Institute for Animal Breeding and Genetics, Clinic for Small Ruminants and Swine, Forensic Medicine and Ambulatory Service and Institute for Pathology, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Germany, who supported this study. We thank all breeders for the samples and the pedigree information of their sheep. We thank H. Klippert-Hasberg and S. Neander for their technical support during the work in the laboratory.
Author Contributions
Conceived and designed the experiments: MG OD. Performed the experiments: SM AK AW MO MH MG. Analyzed the data: SM AK MO MH MG OD. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: MO MH MG JK OD. Wrote the paper: SM AK JK OD.
References
- 1. Nakano A, Chao SC, Pulkkinen L, Murrell D, Bruckner-Tuderman L, et al. (2002) Laminin 5 mutations in junctional epidermolysis bullosa: molecular basis of Herlitz vs. non-Herlitz phenotypes. Hum Genet 110: 41–51.
- 2. Bruckner-Tuderman L (1992) Pathogenesis of mechanobullous disorders. Exp Dermatol 1: 115–120.
- 3. Castiglia D, Posteraro P, Spirito F, Pinola C, Angelo P, et al. (2001) Novel mutations in the LAMC2 gene in non-Herlitz junctional epidermolysis bullosa: effects on laminin-5 assembly, secretion, and deposition. J Invest Dermatol 117: 731–739.
- 4. Schneider H, Mühle C, Pacho F (2007) Biological function of laminin-5 and pathogenic impact of its deficieny. Eur J Cell Biol 86: 701–717.
- 5. Spirito F, Charlesworth A, Linder K, Ortonne JP, Baird J, et al. (2002) Animal models for skin blistering conditions: absence of laminin 5 causes hereditary junctional mechanobullous disease in the Belgian horse. J Invest Dermatol 119: 684–691.
- 6. Milenkovic D, Chaffaux S, Taourit S, Guérin G (2003) A mutation in the LAMC2 gene causes the Herlitz junctional epidermolysis bullosa (H-JEB) in two French draft horse breeds. Genet Sel Evol 35: 249–256.
- 7. Graves KT, Henney PJ, Ennis RB (2009) Partial deletion of the LAMA3 gene is responsible for hereditary junctional epidermolysis bullosa in the American Saddlebred Horse. Anim Genet 40: 35–41.
- 8. Nagata M, Iwasaki T, Masuda H, Shimizu H (1997) Non-lethal junctional epidermolysis bullosa in a dog. Br J Dermatol 137: 445–449.
- 9. Dunstan RW, Sills RC, Wilkinson JE, Paller AS, Hashimoto KH (1988) A disease resembling junctional epidermolysis bullosa in a toy poodle. Am J Dermatopathol 10: 442–447.
- 10. Capt A, Spirito F, Guaguere E, Spadafora A, Ortonne JP, et al. (2005) Inherited junctional epidermolysis bullosa in the German Pointer: Establishment of a large animal model. J Invest Dermatol 124: 530–535.
- 11. Guaguere E, Capt A, Spirito F, Meneguzzi G (2003) L'Épidermolyse Bulleuse Jonctionnelle du Braque allemand: un modèle canin spontané de l'Épidermolyse Bulleuse Jonctionnelle de l'Homme. Bull Acad Vét France 157: 47–51.
- 12. Alhaidari Z, Olivry T, Spadafora A, Thomas RC, Perrin C, et al. (2006) Junctional epidermolysis bullosa in two domestic shorthair kittens. Vet Dermatol 16: 69–73.
- 13. Bruckner-Tuderman L, Guscetti F, Ehrensperger F (1991) Animal model for dermolytic mechanobullous disease: sheep with recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa lack collagen VII. J Invest Dermatol 96: 452–458.
- 14.
Pérez V, Benavides J, Herrera EL, Reyes LE, Ferreras MC, et al. (2005) Epidermolysis bullosa in Assaf lambs. Proceedings of the 23rd Meeting of the European Society of Veterinary Pathology, Naples, Italy 173.
- 15. Kerkmann A, Ganter M, Frase R, Ostmeier M, Hewicker-Trautwein M, et al. (2010) Epidermolysis bullosa in German black headed mutton sheep. Berl Münch Tierärztl Wochenschr 123: 413–421.
- 16. Zhang XHF, Heller KA, Hefter I, Leslie CS, Chasin LA (2003) Sequence information for the splicing of human pre-mRNA identified by support vector machine classification. Genome Res 13: 2637–2650.
- 17. Hiller M, Platzer M (2008) Widespread and subtle: alternative splicing at short-distance tandem sites. Trends Genet 24: 246–255.
- 18. Masunaga T, Shimizu H, Ishiko A, Tomita Y, Aberdam D, et al. (1996) Localization of laminin-5 in the epidermal basement membrane. J Histochem Cytochem 44: 1223–1230.
- 19. Sasaki T, Göhring W, Mann K, Brakebusch C, Yamada Y, et al. (2001) Short arm region of laminin-5 γ2 chain: Structure, mechanism of processing and binding to heparin and proteins. J Mol Biol 314: 751–763.
- 20. Alley MR, O'Hara JO, Middelberg A (1974) An epidermolysis bullosa of sheep. NZ Vet J 22: 55–59.
- 21. Abecasis GR, Cherny SS, Cookson WO, Cardon LR (2002) Merlin-rapid analysis of dense genetic maps using sparse gene flow trees. Nat Genet 30: 97–101.
- 22. Purcell S, Neale B, Todd-Brown K, Thomas L, Ferreira MAR, et al. (2007) PLINK: a toolset for whole-genome association and population-based linkage analysis. Am J Hum Genet 81: 559–575.
- 23. Barrett JC, Fry B, Maller J, Daly MJ (2005) Haploview: analysis and visualization of LD and haplotype maps. Bioinformatics 21: 263–265.
- 24. Bradbury PJ, Zhang Z, Kroon DE, Casstevens TM, Ramdoss Y, et al. (2007) TASSEL: software for association mapping of complex traits in diverse samples. Bioinformatics 23: 2633–2635.