Advertisement
Research Article

A Field Guide to Pandemic, Epidemic and Sporadic Clones of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus

  • Stefan Monecke mail,

    monecke@rocketmail.com

    Affiliations: Institute for Medical Microbiology and Hygiene, Technical University of Dresden, Dresden, Germany, Alere Technologies GmbH, Jena, Germany

    X
  • Geoffrey Coombs,

    Affiliation: Department of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, PathWest Laboratory Medicine - WA, Royal Perth Hospital, Perth, Western Australia, Australia

    X
  • Anna C. Shore,

    Affiliation: Microbiology Research Unit, Dublin Dental University Hospital, University of Dublin, Trinity College, Dublin, Ireland

    X
  • David C. Coleman,

    Affiliation: Microbiology Research Unit, Dublin Dental University Hospital, University of Dublin, Trinity College, Dublin, Ireland

    X
  • Patrick Akpaka,

    Affiliation: Department of Para-Clinical Sciences, The University of the West Indies, St. Augustine, Trinidad and Tobago

    X
  • Michael Borg,

    Affiliation: Infection Control Unit, Mater Dei Hospital, Msida, Malta

    X
  • Henry Chow,

    Affiliation: Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong, China

    X
  • Margaret Ip,

    Affiliation: Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong, China

    X
  • Lutz Jatzwauk,

    Affiliation: Infection Control Unit, Dresden University Hospital, Dresden, Germany

    X
  • Daniel Jonas,

    Affiliation: Department of Environmental Health Sciences, Freiburg University Medical Centre, Freiburg, Germany

    X
  • Kristina Kadlec,

    Affiliation: Institute of Farm Animal Genetics, Friedrich-Loeffler-Institut (FLI), Neustadt-Mariensee, Germany

    X
  • Angela Kearns,

    Affiliation: Staphylococcus Reference Unit, Centre for Infections, Health Protection Agency, London, United Kingdom

    X
  • Frederic Laurent,

    Affiliation: Université Lyon, Centre National de Référence des Staphylocoques, Lyon, France

    X
  • Frances G. O'Brien,

    Affiliation: School of Biomedical Sciences, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia

    X
  • Julie Pearson,

    Affiliation: Department of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, PathWest Laboratory Medicine - WA, Royal Perth Hospital, Perth, Western Australia, Australia

    X
  • Antje Ruppelt,

    Affiliation: Institute for Medical Microbiology and Hygiene, Technical University of Dresden, Dresden, Germany

    X
  • Stefan Schwarz,

    Affiliation: Institute of Farm Animal Genetics, Friedrich-Loeffler-Institut (FLI), Neustadt-Mariensee, Germany

    X
  • Elizabeth Scicluna,

    Affiliation: Infection Control Unit, Mater Dei Hospital, Msida, Malta

    X
  • Peter Slickers,

    Affiliation: Alere Technologies GmbH, Jena, Germany

    X
  • Hui-Leen Tan,

    Affiliation: Department of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, PathWest Laboratory Medicine - WA, Royal Perth Hospital, Perth, Western Australia, Australia

    X
  • Stefan Weber,

    Affiliation: Sheikh Khalifa Medical City, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates

    X
  • Ralf Ehricht

    Affiliation: Alere Technologies GmbH, Jena, Germany

    X
  • Published: April 06, 2011
  • DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0017936

Abstract

In recent years, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) have become a truly global challenge. In addition to the long-known healthcare-associated clones, novel strains have also emerged outside of the hospital settings, in the community as well as in livestock. The emergence and spread of virulent clones expressing Panton-Valentine leukocidin (PVL) is an additional cause for concern. In order to provide an overview of pandemic, epidemic and sporadic strains, more than 3,000 clinical and veterinary isolates of MRSA mainly from Germany, the United Kingdom, Ireland, France, Malta, Abu Dhabi, Hong Kong, Australia, Trinidad & Tobago as well as some reference strains from the United States have been genotyped by DNA microarray analysis. This technique allowed the assignment of the MRSA isolates to 34 distinct lineages which can be clearly defined based on non-mobile genes. The results were in accordance with data from multilocus sequence typing. More than 100 different strains were distinguished based on affiliation to these lineages, SCCmec type and the presence or absence of PVL. These strains are described here mainly with regard to clinically relevant antimicrobial resistance- and virulence-associated markers, but also in relation to epidemiology and geographic distribution. The findings of the study show a high level of biodiversity among MRSA, especially among strains harbouring SCCmec IV and V elements. The data also indicate a high rate of genetic recombination in MRSA involving SCC elements, bacteriophages or other mobile genetic elements and large-scale chromosomal replacements.

Introduction

Staphylococcus aureus is a ubiquitous bacterium colonising 20–30% of the human population [1]. Beyond asymptomatic carriage, S. aureus causes a wide range of infections, such as skin and soft tissue infections (SSTI), bone, joint and implant infections, pneumonia, septicaemia and various toxicoses such as toxic shock syndrome. It also occurs in many different species of animals, where it may cause comparable disease such as bovine mastitis.

Shortly after the introduction of penicillin in the 1940s, the first penicillinase-producing S. aureus strains were detected, leading to the development of the penicillinase-resistant semi-synthetic penicillins such as methicillin, oxacillin and the first/second generation cephalosporins. Within a year after the introduction of these drugs, methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) were reported in the United Kingdom (UK) [2]. Resistance is due to a modified penicillin binding protein (PBP2' or PBP2a) encoded by the mecA gene. Apart from ceftobiprole [3], the presence of PBP2a confers resistance towards all β-lactam antibiotics. As methicillin and oxacillin can be used as indicators of resistance, PBP2a- or mecA-positive S. aureus are referred to as either methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) or oxacillin-resistant S. aureus (ORSA). The mecA gene is located on complex mobile genetic elements, known as SCCmec (“staphylococcal cassette chromosome” or “staphylococcal chromosomal cassette” harbouring mecA). In addition to mecA, SCCmec elements comprise recombinase genes, regulatory elements and, variably, additional genes encoding resistance to other antimicrobials, such as aminoglycosides or macrolides, and to heavy metal ions [4]; [ 5]. SCCmec types I, II and III (or 1B, 2A, 3A, [6]) are typically restricted to MRSA strains associated with healthcare infections and are not found widely among the healthy population. These strains, which initially were known as “Epidemic MRSA” (EMRSA), are now frequently referred to as “hospital-acquired” or “healthcare-associated” MRSA (HA-MRSA). The presence of their SCCmec elements correlates with a relatively slower growth rate and it has been assumed that they may confer a selective disadvantage in the absence of antibiotics [7]; [ 8]. Subsequently, strains carrying these elements may be less fit to survive in a competitive environment with faster growing wild type strains once antibiotic therapy is discontinued.

The epidemiology of MRSA has changed since the 1990s with the emergence of new SCCmec elements such as types IV and V (2B, 5C2). Strains carrying these elements evolved predominantly outside of healthcare settings or proved capable of spreading outside of hospitals, infecting not only patients but also colonising healthy contact persons. Many different strains of so-called “community-acquired” or “community-associated” MRSA (CA-MRSA) have spread worldwide. Some CA-MRSA strains harbour genes encoding the bi-component toxin Panton-Valentine leukocidin (PVL, [9]). Although this toxin was identified in S. aureus as early as 1932 [10], its presence in MRSA is a very recent phenomenon [11]. These strains are frequently associated with chronic/recurrent SSTI as well as with life-threatening necrotising pneumonia [12], often in previously healthy young people. PVL-positive CA-MRSA have become a serious public health concern because of their virulence, their ability to cause outbreaks in households and close contact social groups, and their rapid spread in many countries.

Since 2003, some notable MRSA strains carrying SCCmec IV or V have spread among livestock revealing the truly zoonotic potential of S. aureus/MRSA. These strains have been dubbed “livestock-associated“ MRSA (LA-MRSA, [13]).

Additional novel SCCmec elements have been described [6]; [14][17] which indicate an ongoing evolution of antibiotic resistance in S. aureus. As β-lactam antibiotics are the first-line compounds for treatment of staphylococcal infections, this development may significantly limit therapeutic options. Alternative drugs that may be used to treat MRSA infections are generally expensive (e.g., quinupristin-dalfopristin, tigecycline, daptomycin and linezolid), or are problematic with regard to tissue penetration and efficiency (e.g., vancomycin) or toxicity (e.g., rifampicin). Of further concern is that resistance of MRSA to these compounds has already been observed, e.g., vanA-mediated vancomycin resistance [18] and cfr-mediated linezolid resistance [19][21].

The limited choice of therapeutic options available has made it necessary to attempt to limit the spread of MRSA by using a range of infection prevention and control measures such as hand hygiene, the use of protective clothing and equipment (e.g., examination gloves or face masks), and accommodation of patients in isolation rooms or wards. The cost of these measures as well as the significant expense of second-line antimicrobials places a serious economic burden on scarce healthcare resources. Recent studies from Europe indicated that the average excess costs per MRSA-positive patient range from €5,700 to €10,000 [22][24]. Given the large number of MRSA carriers in Europe and in the USA, the financial burden to healthcare in these regions may account for billions of Euro or dollars (http://www.infectioncontroltoday.com/hot​news/55h168584264313.html).

MRSA have become a real international problem. Some strains predominate in geographically restricted settings while others have achieved pandemic spread. Since a bewildering biodiversity of novel strains and SCCmec elements has been described in recent years, the objective of this study is to summarise the genotypic characteristics of pandemic, epidemic and sporadic MRSA strains from different parts of the world based on the authors' genotyping experiments and on the published literature.

Results

Information on target genes, probes and primers is provided in Supplemental file S1. The sequence types (ST, as defined by multilocus sequence typing, or MLST, [25]), spa, SCCmec, capsule and agr types associated with each clonal complex (CC) as well as the names and accession numbers of associated whole genome sequenced strains are shown in Supplemental file S2. An overview of SCCmec types and their array hybridisation patterns is provided in Figure 1. The antimicrobial resistance and virulence-associated genes of each strain are shown in Figures 2 and 3, respectively, while complete hybridisation profiles for the individual strains are provided in Supplemental file S3.

thumbnail

Figure 1. Overview of SCCmec elements, their variants and DNA microarray hybridisation patterns.

Black circles, positive; grey circles, present, but yielding weak or ambiguous signals; divided circles, variable genes.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0017936.g001
thumbnail

Figure 2. Resistance genes in MRSA strains.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0017936.g002
thumbnail

Figure 3. Virulence-associated genes in MRSA strains (*, see text for further explanation).

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0017936.g003

Clonal complex 1

CC1 includes several strains of CA-MRSA including MW2/USA400, the first known PVL-positive MRSA [11]. The CC1 strains ST573 and ST772 differ significantly in MLST alleles to all other CC1 isolates and yield deviant hybridisation patterns. Therefore they will be described separately (see below). The remaining CC1-MRSA cluster into seven strains that can be differentiated based on the presence of the PVL genes, SCCmec elements IV or V and the SCCfus element. The latter comprises ccrA-1 and ccrB-1 as well as the fusidic acid resistance marker Q6GD50 (GenBank BX571857.1:SAS0043) first described in the genome sequence of the CC1-MSSA strain Sanger MSSA 476 [26]. All isolates of these CC1-MRSA strains harbour the enterotoxin gene seh and many isolates also carry the enterotoxin genes sek and seq. Other enterotoxin genes (sea-N315, seb, sec and sel) are only found sporadically. Most isolates harbour the immune evasion cluster (IEC) genes associated with β-haemolysin-converting phages in various combinations.

One CC1-MRSA strain carries SCCmec IV and PVL, but lacks SCCfus. The genome sequence of MW2 [27] is a representative of this strain, which is also known as USA400 or Canadian MRSA-7 [28]. The first known PVL-positive CA-MRSA belonged to this strain. In the late 1990s, it caused fatal infections in previously healthy children from Minnesota and North Dakota [11]. The authors sporadically found isolates in Australia, Germany and the UK.

A second strain also carries SCCmec IV, lacks SCCfus, but differs from USA400 in being PVL-negative. It has been found by the authors primarily in Australia where it is designated as West Australian (WA) MRSA-57 although it also includes some of the isolates originally described as WA MRSA-1. It has been isolated sporadically in Saxony (Germany, [29]), Ireland [30] and Egypt (isolate courtesy of M. Kamal El Din, Cairo).

A third strain is PVL-negative, but harbours both, SCCmec IV and SCCfus. It includes WA MRSA-45 and also some WA MRSA-1 isolates. It has been isolated in Australia as well as, sporadically, in Abu Dhabi (United Arab Emirates [31]), the UK and Ireland [30].

Sporadic isolates of PVL-positive CC1-MRSA-IV with SCCfus, PVL-positive CC1-MRSA-V and PVL-negative CC1-MRSA-V with SCCfus have been isolated from a small number of cases in Australia. A PVL-positive CC1-MRSA-V with SCCfus has been found in Abu Dhabi [31].

Clonal complex 5

CC5 is another common and widespread clonal complex, which comprises a large number of different MRSA strains, both HA- and CA-MRSA, some of which have attained pandemic spread.

Several whole genome sequences are available (Supplemental file S2) which comprise the features of the CC5 core genome including characteristic allelic variants of the ssl/set genes and of genes encoding microbial surface components recognising adhesive matrix molecules of the host (MSCRAMM genes). CC5 isolates carry the enterotoxin gene cluster egc (seg, sei, sem, sen, seo and seu/y), although partial deletions have been observed. β-haemolysin-converting phages carrying sak, scn and chp as well as sea or sea-N315 in various combinations are commonly detected. Many variable virulence- or resistance-associated genes and several different SCCmec elements have been found in CC5.

ST228-MRSA-I is colloquially known as the South German Epidemic Strain, Italian Clone, [32]; [33] or Spanish PFGE types E6/9/15/17/18 [34]. The strain occurs in Germany (where it appears to be a strictly HA-MRSA strain, although its incidence is decreasing), Hungary (where it replaced the “Hungarian Clone” ST239-MRSA-III, [35]), Italy [32]; [33]; [36], Slovenia [36] and Switzerland [37]. It was also found sporadically in Austria [38], Israel [39], Malta [40] and Australia. MLST variants of this strain have been described from Croatia (ST111, [41]) and Paraguay (ST5, ST221, [42]). The isolates harbour SCCmec I. A variant lacking ccrA/B-1 was identified in Saxony in 2000. Variable markers [43] include the mercury resistance operon, the β-lactamase operon as well as several other resistance genes (Figure 2), the toxic shock syndrome toxin tst1, IEC genes and the MSCRAMM genes bbp, clfA and sdrD. In contrast to other CC5 strains, ST228-MRSA-I lacks fnbB, a gene encoding a fibronectin-binding protein. Deletions of the leukocidin genes lukD+lukE and of neighbouring genes from the egc locus are common [43].

A ST5-MRSA-I, known as the Geraldine Clone, is a second SCCmec I strain from CC5. This is a common CA-MRSA clone in France [44]. Apart from a single veterinary isolate from Germany (courtesy of B. Walther, FU Berlin), isolates have not been detected outside of France. Unlike ST228-MRSA-I, Geraldine Clone isolates harbour Q6GD50, enterotoxin genes sed, sej and ser and fnbB. Most isolates carry tst1 and the enterotoxin genes sec and sel. The SCCmec element lacks pls-SCC.

The Australian strains WA MRSA-18, -21 (both ST5) and -48 (ST835) represent a third group of CC5-MRSA-I. These strains, however, harbour an atypical or truncated SCCmec I element. The genes mecA, ΔmecR1, ugpQ and ccrB-1 are detectable; ccrA-1 occasionally yields a signal and pls-SCC is usually absent. Resistance markers detected among these CC5-MRSA-I isolates include the β-lactamase operon and, in some isolates, qacC encoding resistance to quaternary ammonium compounds. In addition to egc, the enterotoxin genes sed, sej and ser are associated with these isolates as well as, variably, sea or sea-N315.

ST5-MRSA-II is a pandemic CC5 strain. A MLST single locus variant (SLV) of this strain, ST225-MRSA-II, has been reported [45]. Different STs as well as a number of additional genetic polymorphisms within this strain might suggest a polyphyletic origin by multiple and independent transfers of SCCmec II elements to various CC5-MSSA precursor strains [46]. Synonyms and vernacular names are UK-EMRSA-3, New York-Japan Clone, Rhine-Hesse Epidemic Strain, Irish AR07.3, Irish AR07.4, Irish AR11, USA100 and Canadian MRSA-2 [28]. Published CC5 genome sequences of isolates belonging to this strain include Mu3, Mu50, N315, JH1 and JH9. Isolates of ST5/ST225-MRSA-II have been identified in Austria [38], Croatia [41], Hong-Kong (China, [47]), Hungary [35], Japan [48], Portugal [49], Taiwan [50], the UK and the USA [48]. The authors have identified this strain in Ireland [15] and in different regions of Germany, the UK, Hong Kong and Australia. In Dresden/Saxony, ST5-MRSA-II is the second most prevalent MRSA strain (accounting for approximately 30% of isolates), and the most frequently isolated strain in this region's intensive care units [51]. Transmission of this strain has been reported in Australia where the index case was shown to be a healthcare worker who previously underwent surgery in a New York hospital [52]. ST5-MRSA-II isolates usually exhibit spa types t002, t003 or, in Ireland, t045. Antimicrobial resistance markers in ST5/ST225-MRSA-II isolates may vary (see Figure 2), although erm(A) and the aminoglycoside resistance gene aadD are commonly present. Variable virulence-associated genes include tst1, sea, sea-N315, sec, sed, sej, sel and ser [43]. Variants of this strain harbouring the arginine catabolic mobile element (ACME) have been isolated in Hong Kong and California/USA (NARSA 642).

CC5-MRSA-III has been isolated from humans in the South African province of KwaZulu-Natal [53], from Korean chicken meat samples [54], and from turkeys or turkey meat in Germany (courtesy of S. Cortez de Jäckel, Delbrück, Germany, and of the Federal Institute for Risk Assessment, Berlin, Germany). The latter isolates harbour SCCmec IIIA, lacking tet(K) and the mercury resistance operon. CC5-MRSA-III may initially appear to be methicillin-susceptible but resistance is observed following growth on selective agar containing methicillin [54].

CC5-MRSA-IV strains have achieved pandemic spread and significant clinical relevance. Colloquially strains have been described as the Paediatric Clone (although the first strain described under that name HDE288 has been subsequently shown to be CC5-MRSA-VI, [55]), WA MRSA-03 (ST5), -25 (ST575), -39 (ST526), -50 (ST73) and -74 (ST5), USA800 or Marseille Cystic Fibrosis Clone (ST5; [56]). As for ST5/ST225-MRSA-II, a large proportion of CC5-MRSA-IV isolates carry sea-N315 and/or sed+sej+ser. Other virulence genes, including tst1 and the epidermal cell differentiation inhibitor gene edinA, can be found in a minority of isolates. A novel enterotoxin gene has recently been located on the same plasmid as edinA (GenBank AP003089.1). Variable resistance markers in CC5-MRSA-IV are shown in Figure 2.

PVL-positive CC5-MRSA-IV has been identified by the authors in patients from the UK, France, Australia, Switzerland and Senegal and previously in Ireland [57]. Based on toxin gene profiles, these isolates cluster into three major variants harbouring sea-N315+sed+sej+ser or sea+edinA, or edinA. Variable resistance markers are shown in Figure 2.

ST5-MRSA-V has been described in Australia, where it is colloquially known as WA MRSA-11, -14, -34 and -35, Ireland [30] and Abu Dhabi. PVL-positive CC5-MRSA-V has been identified sporadically in Germany and Abu Dhabi.

CC5-MRSA-VI was first observed in Portugal in 1992 [58]. It was first described as Paediatric Clone carrying SCCmec IV but was later reclassified as harbouring a SCCmec VI element [55]. In France it was dubbed the New Paediatric Clone [44]. This strain has been identified in Portugal, Colombia, Argentina and the USA [58]. The authors identified New Paediatric Clone isolates (spa type t105 or t777) in France, and very sporadically in Australia and Germany, as well as PVL-positive CC5-MRSA-VI (spa t311) in Switzerland. The latter strain has also been reported from the Azores and Portugal [59].

A further novel SCCmec element (SCCmec type VII, [6] or SCCmec JCSC6082, GenBank: AB373032.1) was recently described in Sweden [16]. This strain (courtesy of C. Berglund, Stockholm, Sweden) yields signals with probes for mecA, ΔmecR1, ugpQ and ccrC, and it is positive for blaZ and tet(M).

In addition to the above mentioned strains, several CC5-MRSA carry multiple or composite SCCmec elements. One of these strains (ST149 which is a MLST single locus variant, SLV, of ST5, spa-type t002) was recently described in Malta [40]. This strain carries a SCCmec IV element as well as Q6GD50 and novel ccrA and ccrB genes (GenBank GU066221). The latter are identical to ccrASHP+ccrBSHP in a Chinese isolate of S. haemolyticus (GenBank EU934095.1, [60]), where these genes were accompanied by the ACME locus [61]. This locus, however, is absent in the Maltese strain. It lacks PVL, but it carries sea, egc as well as, commonly, tst1, sec and sel. Some isolates harbour the resistance genes erm(C) and tet(K). This strain appears to be common in Malta [40], but has not been reported elsewhere. Another, PVL- and tst1-positive ST149-MRSA-IV has been isolated from a Libyan patient in Switzerland [62].

A composite variant of a SCCmec IV has been described in the CC5 strain MRSA-ZH47 [63]. It resembles a SCCmec IV element, but also carries a set of SCCmec V-like recombinase genes (ccrC and “ccrAA”, a putative recombinase gene, see Materials and Methods).

Another CC5 strain with multiple/composite SCCmec elements originates from Spain. Isolates from a German patient hospitalised in the Canary Islands [29] and from a patient in Barcelona (Courtesy of S. Molinos, Barcelona) yielded hybridisation signals for mecA, ΔmecR1, ugpQ, ccrA-2, ccrB-2, ccrA-4 and ccrB-4. Because of the carriage of erm(C), msr(A), mph(C), aphA3 and sat as well as affiliation to spa type t067, these isolates probably represent an epidemic strain, or a close relative of it, recently described in Spain [64]. Similar isolates harbouring only erm(C) have been found by the authors in France, Australia and Germany.

A CC5 strain with a composite SCCmec element comprising SCCmec IV, ccrA-1, ccrB-1 and Q6GD50 has recently been described in the Netherlands [65].

Australian ST835 strains WA MRSA-40/46 harbour SCCmec VT elements and ccrA/B-2 genes. These strains vary in the presence of β-lactamase genes, the mupirocin and trimethoprim resistance genes mupA and dfrA, qacA as well as of sed+sej+ser. The authors have identified other CC5-MRSA which harbour composite or multiple SCCmec elements including [mecA, ΔmecR1, ugpQ, ccrA-1, ccrB-1, pls-SCC, dcs, ccrC], [mecA, ΔmecR1, ugpQ, dcs, ccrA-2, ccrB-2, ccrC] and [mecA, ugpQ,ccrAA”, ccrC, ccrA-4, ccrB-4]. However, these MRSA strains were only represented by one or two isolates in each case.

Sequence type 6

According to MLST data, ST6 is a double locus variant (DLV) of ST5 (arcC-12 and yqiL-3 rather than arcC-1 and yqiL-10, as in ST5). However, ST6 isolates differ in agr group, capsule and spa types. They harbour different alleles of hsdS-, set/ssl- and several MSCRAMM genes (bbp, fnbB, sdrC, sdrD, clfA, clfB, sasG). In addition, isolates of this ST carry cna but lack egc. These observations may be explained by a large scale chromosomal replacement with one parental strain belonging to CC5. The origin of the inserted region has not yet been determined. The size and location of the insert can be estimated by analysing the known positions of the probe sequences within the published CC5 genome sequences. Thus, the insert is localised around oriC, and ranges from hsdS3 downstream of oriC to the ssl/set-locus upstream of oriC. This equals ca. 1.500.000 bp (i.e., about half of the genome). It can be assumed that the SCCmec element is integrated into that insert. ST6 strains tested for the present study were PVL negative. They included ST6-MRSA-IV from Australia (where it is known as WA MRSA-51) and Abu Dhabi [31] as well as ST6-MRSA-V from Hong Kong.

Clonal complex 7

CC7-MRSA are rare. One ST, ST1048, is discussed separately due to its divergent hybridisation pattern.

The authors identified single isolates of CC7-MRSA-IV and CC7-MRSA-V in Saxony and in Australia, respectively. The enterotoxin A allele sea-N315, also known as sep, is present in both isolates (and it is also common in CC7-MSSA). Both isolates are PVL-negative.

Clonal complex 8

Similar to CC5, CC8 is a pandemic MRSA lineage. Numerous MRSA strains have originated from CC8, including both CA- and HA-MRSA, and several whole genome sequenced MRSA strains represent this lineage (see Supplemental file S2). Although related to CC8, ST72 and ST239/241 are discussed separately as they exhibit distinct hybridisation patterns. The core genome genes of the remaining CC8 strains such as protease, ssl/set and MSCRAMM genes of clinical isolates are in accordance with the sequenced genomes although occasional deletions of genes such as bbp, clfA or sdrD can be observed. Carriage of exotoxins and of β-haemolysin-converting phages is highly variable. Several different CC8 strains have been described, and can be distinguished based on SCCmec types and exotoxin profiles.

The first known MRSA was a CC8 strain, ST250-MRSA-I, which is also known as Early or Ancestral MRSA, Irish AR02 or Irish Phenotype I and II. The genome sequence (GenBank CP000046) of the strain COL, which was isolated in England in the 1960s, is representative of this strain [66]. The ST250-MRSA-I clone seems to be disappearing. However, it is still isolated in Australia, although rarely (one isolate out of more than 4000 tested, [67]). The description in this study is based on COL and on isolates recovered from hospitalised patients in Ireland in the 1970s to 1980s [15]. All isolates closely resemble COL, and they also show a characteristic deletion of several ssl/set genes. The carriage of pls-SCC [15], several resistance markers (see Figure 2), enterotoxin genes seb+sek+seq and of β-haemolysin-converting phages (sak, chp and scn) is variable.

A very similar and, likewise, ancient strain is ST247-MRSA-I. A reference isolate, NARSA 209, was recovered in the UK in 1971. Vernacular names include North German Epidemic Strain, UK-EMRSA-5, -8 and -17, Rome Clone, Spanish PFGE type E1, [34], Irish AR22, Irish New02 and, after an outbreak in Barcelona in 1989, Iberian Clone [68]. ST247-MRSA-I seems to be receding, as observed, for example, in Portugal [49] and Spain [69]. It has not been identified in Dresden, Saxony, since 1997 ([70] and authors' observations) or in Ireland since 1999 [15]. Thus, the description in this study is based partially on isolates recovered from the 1990s. More recently, ST247-MRSA-I has been found in Australia, Croatia [41], the Czech Republic [71], Italy, where it is also becoming increasingly rare [33], and in the Netherlands (isolates courtesy of P. Beisser, Maastricht). Although this strain yields a hybridisation profile similar to that of ST250-MRSA-I, it harbours a complete set of ssl/set genes, and with regard to these genes it resembles the NCTC8325 or USA300 genome sequences more than COL. Enterotoxin genes seb+sek+seq are rare, but about half of the isolates harbour sea. As in other CC8 isolates, bbp is deleted in a number of isolates. In addition to SCCmec I, all tested isolates carry tet(M). Additional resistance markers have been detected in some isolates (Figure 2).

Several different CC8-MRSA-IV strains have been described previously based on different typing methods. In the following paragraphs, we define these strains with reference to their carriage of exotoxin genes. However, as these genes are located on mobile elements such as phages or plasmids, it may be that these “strains” are in fact polyphyletic clusters. One of these strains includes CC8-MRSA-IV isolates which lack PVL or any enterotoxin genes (besides the ubiquitous enterotoxin homologue, GenBank CP000046.1:SACOL1657). They belong to ST8 or ST576 (tpi-19 instead of tpi-4) and include UK-EMRSA-14 and WA MRSA-5, -6 and -31. NARSA 645 is a reference strain that shows an Iberian Clone-like PFGE pattern (http://www.narsa.net). The authors found only a single isolate from Germany. However, in Australia this strain appears to be rather common. Isolates differ in the carriage of β-haemolysin-converting phages and of a variety of resistance genes.

Another PVL-negative CC8-MRSA-IV has been named the Lyon Clone or UK-EMRSA-2. It is frequently isolated in France [44], and can occasionally be identified in Germany, Ireland [30], the UK, the Netherlands (isolates courtesy of P. Beisser, Maastricht), Norway (courtesy of H. V. Aamont, Aakershus) and Australia. Most isolates of this strain carry sea, sak and scn, as well as, commonly, sed+sej+ser. Some isolates lack the sea gene. These isolates harbour chp, sak and scn, or they have a non-disrupted hlb gene and lack all IEC genes. Variable resistance markers are the mercury resistance and β-lactamase operons, erm(A), erm(C), vga(A)-BM3327, aacA-aphD, aadD, dfrA, far1, tet(K), tet(M), qacA and qacC. Another related strain has been described as UK-EMRSA-6. It is also sea-positive, and differs from Lyon Clone/UK-EMRSA-2 in the presence of aphA3+sat.

Another strain of CC8-MRSA-IV carries the enterotoxin genes seb+sek+seq, but lacks PVL. It is known as USA500 with NARSA 385 being a reference strain. Isolates have been identified in the USA (NARSA 119, -120, -121, -678, -686 and -708) and Australia (as a SLV, ST612, WA MRSA-20, [72]) as well as, for the present study, in the UK, in Ireland and, sporadically, in Germany. Some of the German isolates were recovered from patients with travel histories (Ethiopia, Zimbabwe and Mozambique) suggesting a wide distribution of this strain in Sub-Saharan Africa. This is also indicated by frequent observations of ST612 in South Africa [73]. USA500 has also been found in horses from the USA, Canada [74], Ireland [30] and Germany [75] as well as from humans with contact to horses [30]. Equine isolates differ from human isolates of USA500 by the absence of lysogenic β-haemolysin converting phages and thus they also lack the sea, sak, chp and scn genes. The carriage of resistance markers is highly variable (Figure 2).

A notable PVL-positive ST8-MRSA-IV is the widely known strain USA300 (also known as WA MRSA-12, Canadian MRSA-10 [28] or Spanish PFGE type A, [34]). Within a few years it has spread extensively across the USA, effectively marginalising other S. aureus strains, MRSA as well as MSSA [76]. It is mainly community-associated, but hospital-associated cases also occur [77]; [78]. In Europe, USA300 has not been isolated frequently. For instance, eight out of 25 PVL-positive CA-MRSA from Ireland were identified as USA300 [57]. Since these isolates originated from a sample of 1,389 MRSA isolates, it can be concluded that USA300 in particular, and PVL-positive MRSA in general, are much less of a problem in Ireland than in the USA [57]. In Dresden/Saxony, the authors identified the first case of a USA300 infection in 2005 [29], but only sporadic isolates have subsequently been observed (including three among 304 genotyped MRSA isolates from patients of the University Hospital Dresden, 2007 to 2009, unpublished observation by the authors). In the UK, USA300 is much less common than in the USA [79]. USA300 has also been infrequently found in Switzerland [80] and Spain [81]. In Abu Dhabi, three out of 54 isolates were identified as USA300 [31]. In Australia, although the overall prevalence is low, case numbers are steadily increasing [82]. Some infections with this strain have also been noted in Japan [61] and Hong Kong (in the present study). Two whole genome sequences of USA300 have been published (USA300-FPR3757, GenBank CP000255, [61] and USA300-TCH1516, GenBank CP000730, [83]). Both sequences harbour SCCmec IV and adjacent ACME genes. It has been hypothesised that this locus is related to enhanced survival of the organism on intact skin and, thus, to increased transmissibility by skin contact. However, a considerable proportion of Australian USA300 isolates lack the ACME locus [82]. The absence of ACME has been described in isolates from Colombia, too [84]. Other genes or gene clusters are also subject to a high degree of genetic variability in USA300 and genotyping of 76 West Australian isolates identified 16 different variants of USA300 [82]. However, the most common variant in Germany, Abu Dhabi and Australia is indistinguishable from the sequenced strain USA300-TCH1516. Variability within USA300 can involve β-haemolysin converting phages (sak, chp, scn) and enterotoxin genes (sek, seq). The authors also observed isolates that yielded USA300-like hybridisation patterns (including ACME), but lacked the SCCmec element [82] or even the PVL genes (isolate courtesy of P. Beisser, Maastricht), respectively. Resistance genes in USA300 are highly variable (see Figure 2 and [82]). The recent detection of plasmid-encoded cfr in an Irish USA300 isolate [21] is a reason for concern as this gene confers resistance to five classes of antimicrobial drugs including the oxazolidinones (linezolid).

Other CC8-MRSA-IV strains have been found sporadically in Australia. One carries PVL and enterotoxin genes sed+sej+ser and sek+seq, but lacks ACME (WA MRSA-62). Another harbours tst1+sec+sel and, variably, edinA.

CC8-MRSA-V has been found occasionally in Saxony and Australia. The Australian CC8-MRSA-V isolates (WA MRSA-53) carry sea and seb+sek+seq. These genes, however, are absent in the Saxon isolate.

CC8-MRSA-VIII harbouring a class A mec complex and ccrA/B-4 genes has been recently described in Canada [17] where this strain is known as Canadian MRSA-9. It was reported to carry enterotoxin genes sea and seb. The authors obtained two isolates (one from Ireland [85], and one from Australia, WA MRSA-16) which were similar with regard to SCCmec associated genes. However, they lacked the enterotoxin genes.

Several CC8-MRSA carry irregular, multiple or composite SCCmec elements. One is ST8-MRSA-II also known as Irish AR05, AR13, AR14, Irish-01 or Irish New03. This strain was predominant in Ireland [86] in the 1990s. However, it now appears to be marginalised by other strains. Thus, the following description is based partially on isolates from the 1990s. It is spa type t190. This strain harbours SCCmec II, from which the kdp operon is absent [15]. Based on this observation as well as on additional variation affecting the mec complex and the presence of pUB110, carrying aadD, and Tn554, carrying erm(A), SCCmec II subtypes A to E have been described [15]. Thus, the microarray allows rapid SCCmec II subtyping with [aadD+ and mecI/xylR+] being SCCmec IIA or IIB (depending on presence and localisation of Tn554), [aadD+ and mecI/xylR-] being SCCmec IIC, [aadD- and mecI/xylR+] being SCCmec IID and finally, [aadD- and mecI/xylR-] being SCCmec IIE. Additionally, this strain harbours ccrA/B-4 genes, which are more homologous to those of the SCC-CI element from S. epidermidis than to other ccrA/B-4 sequences from MRSA [87]. The microarray revealed that the mercury resistance operon is usually present, and a possible link to additional ccrA/B-4 genes, as seen in a SCC-CI element from S. epidermidis (ATCC12228), is currently under investigation. Essentially all ST8-MRSA-II, AR13/14 isolates harbour erm(A) and aacA-aphD. Other resistance markers including blaZ+blaI+blaR and mupA are variable. The majority of isolates carry a lysogenic β-haemolysin converting phage (scn, sak, and sea). They do not harbour enterotoxin genes apart from sea. Protease genes splA, splB and splE as well as sdrC are usually absent.

Another strain with an irregular or composite SCCmec element is ST8-MRSA-IV+ccrA/B-4, also known as Irish AR43, Irish-02, UK-EMRSA-12 and -13. This strain predominated in Northern Ireland in 1999 [86] (when most of the isolates described herein were sampled), but it has also been found in Norway (isolates courtesy of H. V. Aamont, Aakershus) as well as by the authors in the UK and Australia. The spa type is usually t190 [87]. This strain harbours SCCmec IV, although some isolates have been found to lack ccrA/B-2, possibly due to in vitro passage or exposure to freezing and thawing during storage. Variation in the region downstream of the mec complex or, respectively, in the J1 and J3 regions, allowed distinguishing subtypes IVE and IVF [15]. Isolates of Irish AR43 harbour an additional set of ccrA/B-4 genes similar to Irish AR13/14.

Irregular SCCmec elements can also be observed in ST254-MRSA which is known as UK-EMRSA-10 or the Hannover Epidemic strain (spa t009 or t036). Although in the 1990s ST254-MRSA was frequently isolated in German hospitals, it has receded since 2000. However, this strain is the predominant MRSA isolated from horses in Germany [75]. There are two variants of this strain which differ in relation to the carriage of SCCmec associated genes (see Figure 1). The Hannover Epidemic Strain is a multi-resistant strain, and the antimicrobial resistance genes tet(M) and aacA-aphD are always present. In addition, aphA3, sat as well as the mercury resistance operon can be detected in most isolates. The MSCRAMM gene bbp is usually absent. Enterotoxin genes seb+sek+seq are always detectable. Genes associated with lysogenic β-haemolysin-converting phages (sea, sak and scn) are usually present in isolates from humans, but have not been detected in equine isolates.

Clonal complex 9

Most CC9-MRSA strains have been recovered from veterinary sources. Particular strains from humans, ST733/834, have been assigned to CC9 by MLST, but will be discussed separately because of their distinct hybridisation pattern. CC9-MRSA with SCCmec types III and V have mainly been recovered from pigs or farm workers in mainland China, Hong Kong and Malaysia as well as in Italy [88]-[92]. The authors recently identified isolates of CC9-MRSA-IV in turkeys (courtesy of S. Cortez de Jäckel, Delbrück) and in retail chicken meat from Germany. Isolates are PVL-negative and do not carry other enterotoxin genes besides egc. Resistance markers are the β-lactamase operon, qacC, erm(B) and aadD.

Clonal complex 12

An isolate of CC12-MRSA-IV genotyped for this study was found in Ireland [15]. This strain was also observed in a small number of cases in Norway [93]. Another CC12-MRSA strain, WA MRSA-59 from Australia, has an irregular or truncated SCCmec element (mecA, ugpQ, mecI, mecR1, but no xylR and no detectable recombinase genes). Isolates carried the enterotoxin homologue ORF CM14, sea-N315 and seb. PVL has not been detected in this lineage.

Clonal complex 15

While CC15-MSSA are abundant among healthy carriers [94], MRSA from this lineage are extremely rare. To our knowledge, CC15-MRSA has only been detected in a collection of Italian MRSA strains isolated in 1980. This included three SCCmec I isolates and an isolate described to carry an SCCmec I variant in which ccrA/B-1 was replaced by ccrA/B-2 [33]. Within the present study, the authors did not identify a single CC15-MRSA isolate among approximately 3,000 genotyped MRSA. Thus, the description of the general features of this CC relies on data from MSSA (Supplemental file S3, [94]; [95]). Exotoxin genes (lukF/S-PV, sea, etA) are detectable only in a very small minority of isolates. The chp and scn genes are present, but sak was absent from essentially all isolates.

Clonal complex 20

A single isolate of a CC20-MRSA-V was identified in 2009 in Australia. It is negative for PVL genes. It also lacks other toxin genes, although seb, sec, sel and lukM+lukF-P83 genes have been identified by the authors in CC20-MSSA of human and veterinary origin.

Clonal complex 22

CC22 is a common and widespread clonal group and different MRSA strains have emerged from this genetic background. The sequencing of a complete genome of a CC22 strain could provide valuable insight in S. aureus biodiversity since alleles from CC22 appear to differ from previously published sequences. For instance, a CC22-specific allele of ssl7/set1 has already been identified (GenBank AF188836). Many probes on the DNA array yield irregular or weak signals with CC22 isolates, which could be attributed to the presence of divergent sequences. Beside ssl/set- and MSCRAMM genes, this also affects the γ-haemolysin locus. Probes for lukS/F-hlg and hlgA (derived from CC1, 5 and 8 sequences) yield weak or no signals, while a probe based on a lukS-hlg sequence from CC45 is strongly reactive (GenBank EF672356) [96]). Leukocidin lukD+lukE and proteases splA, splB and splE have not been detected in CC22 isolates and it is not yet known whether they may be present as variant alleles or are absent in this lineage.

CC22-MRSA with SCCmec types I, II or III have, to our knowledge, not been reported.

ST22-MRSA-IV is a pandemic CC22-MRSA strain. This strain is known as UK-EMRSA-15, Irish AR06, Barnim Epidemic Strain or Spanish PFGE type E13, [34], or Canadian MRSA-8 [28]. It has been reported in many countries [33]; [57]; [97]-[104]. Where ST22-MRSA-IV occurs, it tends to be abundant. In Dresden, ST22-MRSA-IV accounted for nearly 50% (141 out of 304 genotyped isolates from 2007 to 2009); in Portugal for 54% [49], in Malta for 66% [40], and in Ireland [85]; [105] as well as on the Azores [59] for more than 80% of MRSA isolates. In England, ST22-MRSA-IV is increasingly common (apparently at the expense of ST36-MRSA-II, UK-MRSA-16, [106]), being currently responsible for 85% of MRSA bacteraemia cases. ST22-MRSA-IV occurs in hospitals as well as in outpatients, and it has been recovered from animals such as horses [75], cats [107] and dogs [102]; [107]. Common resistance markers are β-lactamase and erm(C). A high percentage of Maltese ST22-MRSA-IV isolates harbour Q6GD50 which has not been found in isolates from other geographic regions [40]. Variable virulence markers in ST22-MRSA-IV are sec and sel as well as the IEC genes encoded by lysogenic β-haemolysin-converting phages (sak, chp, scn). The presence of tst1, or sometimes of tst1 and sea, is found in some isolates from Abu Dhabi [31], Egypt (isolates courtesy of M. Kamal El Din, Cairo) and England (where patients' names suggest a Middle Eastern origin). A case of an infection with a tst1-positive CC22-MRSA-IV has recently been reported from the USA, where it was one of the first reports of this strain [108].

Another, distinct ST22-MRSA-IV strain is found in Dublin, Ireland [109]. Its most distinguishing feature is the presence of the ACME-locus. It carries β-lactamase and erm(C) as well as, in the majority of cases, lnu(A), aacA-aphD, aadD and mupA.

A large scale nosocomial outbreak of PVL-positive ST22-MRSA-IV has been described in Bavaria, Germany [110]. Other isolates have also been found in Australia, England [111], Ireland [57] Abu Dhabi [31] and Hong Kong. Additionally, PVL-positive ST22-MRSA-IV has been isolated from patients in Germany who had family ties to Turkey [112]. Their presence in epidemiologically unrelated settings suggested a polyphyletic origin, given that PVL-positive CC22-MSSA are common and widespread [113]. Indeed, the demonstration of at least three different PVL-encoding phages, φPVL, φ108PVL and an unidentified icosahedral phage, in CC22-MRSA from England and Wales [40] indicates that this “strain” has evolved on multiple occasions. Furthermore, ST22-MRSA-IV harbouring PVL and tst1 genes have been recently described in India [114]. Variable resistance markers in PVL-positive ST22-MRSA-IV include β-lactamase, erm(C), aacA-aphD, aadD, dfrA and Q6GD50.

Sporadic cases of a PVL-negative CC22-MRSA-V have been identified by the authors in Saxony, as well as a PVL-positive CC22-MRSA-V in Western Australia.

Clonal complex 30

CC30 is another important clonal complex from which HA- and CA-MRSA originate. It is represented by the genome sequence of Sanger MRSA 252. Core genomic markers, ssl/set- and MSCRAMM genes are present as allelic variants which differ distinctly from other CCs. Some of these variants resemble alleles found in other CCs such as CC22 and CC45 [96] which may be more closely related to CC30 than to other CCs such as CC1, CC5 or CC8 [115]. Shared features of CC30 strains include the presence of egc (although partial deletions may occur) and cna. MSCRAMM genes bbp, fnbB and sdrD are usually detectable, but may be deleted from individual isolates. Lysogenic β-haemolysin-converting phages are usually commonly present. Because of the variable presence of sea and chp, it can be assumed that different phages have integrated into CC30 genomes.

CC30-MRSA-I was reported in Italy in 1980 [33].

A more widespread HA-MRSA strain from this lineage is ST36/39-MRSA-II, also known as UK-EMRSA-16 [116], USA200, Irish AR7.0/AR07.2, Spanish PFGE type E12, [34], or Canadian MRSA-4 [28]. Although frequently isolated in the UK and Ireland in the 1990s [15], recently it has become increasingly rare [107]. Isolates have also been found in Malta [40]; [117] and South Africa [73]. In Germany, ST36-MRSA-II is very rare. This strain harbours SCCmec II including aadD and erm(A) in integrated pUB110 and Tn554, respectively, as well as the β-lactamase operon and occasional other resistance markers (Figure 2). Most clinical isolates carry tst1, although this gene is absent in the genome sequence of Sanger MRSA252. This strain also lacks sdrD. The enterotoxin gene sea is also common, although another reference strain, ATCC43300, is sea-negative. ATCC43300 is unique among the tested ST36/39-MRSA-II in being positive for sec+sel and fnbB.

Another important CC30-MRSA strain is the PVL-positive ST30-MRSA-IV, Southwest Pacific Clone, USA1100 or West Samoan Phage Pattern (WSPP) Clone. This CA-MRSA strain was first observed among Samoan immigrants in New Zealand, but is widespread with isolates investigated in the present study coming from Germany, Switzerland, the UK, Australia [29]; [80], Hong Kong, Taiwan [50], Abu Dhabi, and the USA (NARSA 484). Other reports of this strain include Ireland [57], where it is the predominant PVL-positive MRSA strain, Scandinavia, Latvia [118] and Kuwait [119]. The WSPP Clone apparently evolved from the pandemic phage type 80/81 strain. This MSSA emerged in the 1950s and caused outbreaks of severe infections worldwide; however it virtually disappeared after the introduction of penicillinase-resistant β-lactams [120].

A PVL-negative, but tst1-positive strain of ST30-MRSA-IV is sporadically isolated in Ireland [15] and Australia. An infection with a PVL-positive CC30-MRSA-V has been described in Egypt [121]. A similar isolate has been identified from a patient with a SSTI living in the German/Polish border region (courtesy of R. Hillert, Görlitz).

Clonal complex 45

CC45 is another major lineage from which several MRSA strains have emerged. They cluster into two distinct groups as the majority of isolates belong to agr group I, while some strains yield a unique pattern. They fail to react with all three agrD-I probes, but they are positive with agrB and agrC probes corresponding to agr groups I and IV (for the sake of simplicity they are here referred to as CC45/agr IV). PVL has not been detected in the present study among CC45-MRSA isolates. However, two cases of PVL-positive ST45-MRSA-IV from Belgium [45] and Germany [122] have been reported. Leukocidin genes lukD+lukE were not identified. In contrast to CC22, the γ-haemolysin genes hlgA and lukF-hlg can be detected in CC45 isolates, and lukS-hlg was shown to be present in a specific allelic variant (GenBank EF672356, [96]). As observed in CC22, probes for protease genes do not yield signals. Enterotoxins sec and sel are occasionally found. Irregular signals for ssl/set might indicate the presence of yet unknown alleles. The gene cna is present, but sasG can only be detected in the CC45/agr IV isolates.

ST45-MRSA-II, (known as USA600, USA600-MRSA-II or Canadian MRSA-1 [28]) appears to be largely restricted to North America, where glycopeptide-resistant variants and an unusually high mortality rate of bloodstream infections associated with this strain have been reported [123]. Outside the USA, ST45-MRSA-II is rarely isolated, but this strain has, like ST45-MRSA-I and -III, been sporadically detected in Hong Kong [47]. In addition, the authors have identified a single isolate of ST45-MRSA-II in Australia. This isolate as well as reference strains NARSA 22, NARSA 648 and NARSA 715 were genotyped. They carry SCCmec II, including aadD and erm(A), as well as the β-lactamase operon. Variable resistance markers (positive in NARSA 22) include aacA-aphD, dfrA and qacC.

Another important CC45 strain is ST45-MRSA-IV, which is known as the Berlin Epidemic Strain, WA MRSA-75 or USA600-MRSA-IV. In Saxony, it is a relatively common MRSA strain (ca. 9% of MRSA isolates from Dresden, 2007-2009), and in Belgium it is the predominant MRSA strain [45]. This strain also occurs in the UK, the Netherlands [45], Switzerland [124], Croatia [41] and Australia. Unlike the Australian isolates, most of the Saxon isolates harbour aphA3 and sat. As in other CC45 strains, egc is present but seg is not detectable in many isolates. Enterotoxin genes sec and sel as well as genes sak, chp and scn, indicative of lysogenic β-haemolysin-converting phages, are commonly detected.

A similar CC45-MRSA-IV strain isolated in Australia carries sec, sel, tst1 and ACME.

ST45-MRSA-V has been found sporadically in Germany and in Australia (WA MRSA-4) as well as in Portugal [49]. Most isolates tested for this study harbour tst1, sek and seq.

A distinct group of CC45 isolates display agr IV alleles. Furthermore, these strains differ from other CC45 strains in that they carry other alleles of MSCRAMM genes fnbA, fnbB, sdrD, vwb and of lmrP. They are positive for sasG. Isolates carry sej and usually yield weak signals for ser probes, which may indicate the presence of an allelic variant of this gene. The gene sed, which is normally located on the same plasmids as sej and ser (e.g., pIB485, GenBank M94872.1) cannot be detected. The spa types associated with CC45/agr IV isolates are t727, t1081 (although this type can also be observed in ST1048 and ST1774, see below and [125]) or t1575. CC45/agr IV MRSA are widespread and increasingly common in Australia. There are two different strains carrying SCCmec type IV (WA MRSA-23) or V elements (WA MRSA-84), respectively. CC45/agr IV-MRSA-IV and -V are commonly isolated in Hong Kong (author's observations, [47]; [125]) and few isolates of a CC45/agr IV-MRSA with a combined SCCmec IV/V element have been identified as part of this study in Hong Kong. One of these isolates is ACME-positive. Sporadic isolates of CC45/agr IV-MRSA-IV have also been observed in Ireland [15].

Clonal complex 59

Several strains of CC59-MRSA can be distinguished based on carriage of SCCmec elements and PVL as well as on MLST and spa typing. West Australian strains of CC59 have recently been described in detail [126].

One PVL-positive strain, ST59-MRSA-IV, also known as USA1000, is mainly restricted to the USA (reference strains NARSA 483, NARSA 676). The authors identified a single isolate of USA1000 from Australia. The spa types associated with this strain are t216 or t316. USA1000 carries the β-lactamase operon and, variably, erm(A). Beside PVL, it harbours chp, scn and, variably, the enterotoxin genes seb, sek and seq. A sporadic Australian strain (WA MRSA-73, spa t528) is PVL-negative, but otherwise indistinguishable from USA1000 in terms of overall hybridisation patterns.

WA MRSA-24 is an infrequently isolated, mainly Australian CC59 strain with a SCCmec IV element. This strain belongs to ST87 (a SLV of ST59) and spa type t216. The β-lactamase operon, msr(A), mph(C), aphA3+sat, seb, sek and seq are present. This strain is also positive for sak, chp and scn but lacks sea. PVL is absent.

A group of sporadic Australian, Hong Kong and UK [127] isolates, dubbed WA MRSA-55/56, are ST59-MRSA-IV/spa type t437. These isolates carry PVL (although one PVL-negative isolate was also identified), seb, sek and seq. The gene sea is only detected occasionally.

The most widespread CC59-MRSA strain is PVL-positive ST59/952-MRSA-VT which is known as the Taiwan Clone. Isolates of this strain belong to spa types t437, t1950 or t2365. ST59/952-MRSA-VT is a common and clinically important MRSA strain in Taiwan [14]; [128]-[131]. The authors found this strain in Hong Kong, Australia, where it is the most frequently isolated CC59-MRSA strain, Saxony (a single case of recurrent furunculosis, [29]) and the UK [127]. This strain has a characteristic variant of a SCCmec V element, in which two ccrC genes are present (SCCmec VT or 5C2&5, GenBank AB12129, [132]). Enterotoxin genes seb+sek+seq are usually detectable. All isolates carry erm(B), aphA3+sat and blaZ+blaI+blaR. In addition, tet(K) and cat can often be found. This strain is indistinguishable from WA MRSA-55/56 in all markers covered by the microarray with the sole exception of the SCCmec element. Therefore, it may be assumed that both strains emerged from the same ancestral MSSA acquiring different SCCmec elements.

Additionally, there are also ST59-MRSA isolates harbouring a SCCmec V rather than a SCCmec VT element. PVL-negative ST59-MRSA-V (WA MRSA-9) has occasionally been observed in Australia [126] as well as PVL-positive CC59/ST359-MRSA-V in the UK [80].

WA MRSA-15 is another ST59 strain with a composite or novel SCCmec element. This is the second most common CC59-MRSA strain in Australia [126]. Its spa type is t976. Microarray hybridisation and PCR results suggest either the presence of a composite IV and V SCCmec element, or the presence of ccrC in addition to SCCmec IV. This strain is PVL-negative, but it harbours sea and usually seb+sek+seq. The β-lactamase operon is present while msr(A)+mph(C), aphA3+sat and tet(K) can be detected sporadically.

Sequence type 72

According to the MLST database, ST72 belongs to CC8. However, isolates yield a distinctive hybridisation profile. Differences to CC8 include the presence of egc and of CC5-like alleles of several MSCRAMM genes (bbp, sdrC, sdrD). MLST suggests a recombination of CC5 and CC8. Specifically, yqiL, pta and tpi may be derived from CC8 (yqiL-3, pta-4, tpi-4), while gmk, aroE and arcC suggest CC5 parentage (gmk-8, aroE-4, arcC-1). The glpF allele (glpF-1) may have originated from either clonal complex. Mapping the positions of probe binding sites over the known CC5 and CC8 genomes shows that CC5- and CC8-derived genes alternate through the genome suggesting multiple recombination events. Alleles of some ssl/set genes and vwB, sasG and clfB which are not associated with CC5 or CC8 suggest the involvement of additional, yet unidentified donor strains.

Two MRSA strains have been identified. One is a PVL-negative ST72-MRSA-IV which is known as USA700. It does not harbour exotoxins beside egc, and its carriage of resistance genes is variable (Figure 2). This strain includes NARSA 386 and 689. Isolates have been identified in Saxony and in Abu Dhabi. PVL-positive ST72-MRSA-IV has been isolated by the authors in Australia (WA MRSA-44) and from SSTIs of German tourists returning from Costa Rica.

Clonal complex 75, sequence types 883 and 1303

CC75 (ST75, ST1304) as well as ST883 and ST1303 are discussed as a group because they share several distinctive features. ST75-MRSA-IV (WA MRSA-8 and -79) isolates have been recovered from people residing in remote communities of Northern and Western Australia, and appear to be largely restricted to this part of the world. Although it is PVL-negative, this strain is a common cause of community acquired SSTIs [133]. There has been a single report of ST75-MRSA-V [133]. One isolate of ST1304-MRSA-IV (WA MRSA-72) from Australia was characterised. This is a SLV of ST75-MRSA-IV that also differs in carriage of possibly plasmid-borne enterotoxin genes (see below). ST883-MRSA-IV (WA MRSA-47) and ST1303-MRSA-IV occur sporadically in the Northern part of Western Australia.

Recently it has been shown that MLST genes of these strains differ grossly from that of any other known S. aureus (see [134] and Figure 4). Although not phenotypically different to other S. aureus, it has been suggested that ST75 strains should be regarded as a new subspecies of S. aureus [134]. These strains do not yield hybridisation signals with specific probes for capsule types 1, 5 or 8 and for agr groups I to IV. Unique agrB, agrD and agrC sequences have been demonstrated in ST75 (GenBank FJ154839, [135]; [136]) and ST883 (GenBank HQ260328, [136]). Genes encoding leukocidins and exfoliative toxins as well as protease genes splA, splB and splE cannot be detected by microarray hybridisation. Probes for MSCRAMM-, ssl/set- and hsdS-genes generally yield patterns which differ from all other S. aureus strains. With regard to these genes, ST883 and ST1303 resemble each other but differ from CC75. The gene cna is absent and sasG can be detected in CC75 only. The β-haemolysin gene hlb can only be detected when using random primer directed amplification, suggesting the presence of an allelic variant. CC75 and ST1303 carry egc (although sen is either absent, or present in an unknown allele). Seven out of eighteen ST75-MRSA-IV isolates as well as the single ST1303-MRSA-IV isolate tested carry seb. ST1304-MRSA-IV is positive for sed+sej+ser.

thumbnail

Figure 4. Network graph visualising relationships between concatenated MLST sequences of all STs mentioned in this study.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0017936.g004

Clonal complex 80

The vast majority of CC80 isolates belong to a PVL-positive strain harbouring SCCmec IV. Although SCCmec type I has previously been described in CC80 [41], the authors did not identify this strain in this study. Likewise, PVL-negative variants of CC80-MRSA-IV are infrequently isolated and have only been found in France and Croatia [41].

PVL-positive CC80-MRSA-IV has been dubbed the European CA-MRSA Clone. The strain is widespread and has been isolated in Austria [137], Denmark (where this strain was detected as early as 1993 [138]), France [44], Germany [80]; [139], Greece (isolates courtesy of V. Gogou, Larissa, [48]; [140]), Ireland [57], Malta [40], the Netherlands [141], Norway [93], Portugal [142], Sweden [143], Switzerland [80] and the UK [80]; [144]; [145]. In Greece, a considerable percentage of MRSA infections can be attributed to this strain [140]. The authors have identified isolates in Abu Dhabi, and other studies also indicate a wide distribution in the Middle East including Kuwait [119], Lebanon [146], Israel [39], Egypt [147] Algeria [148] and Tunisia [149]. Travellers returning from the Dead Sea or from Saudi Arabia to Germany [112], or from Tunisia or Libya to Switzerland [62] as well as patients with family ties to Turkey [112] have been found to carry this strain. In Australia, ST80-MRSA-IV as well as two SLVs, ST583 (WA MRSA-17) and ST728 (WA MRSA-30) are rarely isolated. CC80-MRSA-IV carries PVL, etD and edinC, but lack enterotoxin genes (beside an ubiquitous homologue, GenBank CP000046.1:SACOL1657). Nearly all CC80-MRSA-IV isolates carry aphA3 and sat; and they harbour the plasmid encoded genes blaZ, tet(K) and far1. Additional resistance genes lnu(A) or erm(C) are rarely detected. Mupirocin resistance in this strain has been reported previously [150].

Clonal complex 88

Several different CA-MRSA belong to this CC which appears, based on spa sequences and hybridisation profile, closely related to CC1 and CC80. It includes ST78-MRSA-IV (as well as its SLVs ST129, ST255, ST257), which is known in Australia as WA MRSA-2. This strain is PVL-negative, but usually harbours enterotoxin genes sec and sel. In addition, the vast majority of isolates carry blaZ and erm(A). It is frequently isolated in Australia, and a single isolate has been identified, as part of this study, in a patient from Saxony.

CC88-MRSA-IV carrying the exfoliative toxin gene etA were identified by the authors in the Netherlands, Portugal, Angola and Senegal. There is also a report from Japan [151]. PVL-positive CC88-MRSA-IV has been identified by the authors in the UK [80], Abu Dhabi and Australia. Other reports of this strain have come from Spain [152] and Nigeria [153].

PVL-positive CC88-MRSA-V and PVL-negative CC88-MRSA-VI have been identified sporadically by the authors in Western Australia. PVL-positive CC88-MRSA-V were recently described from Italy [33]; [ 154].

Sequence type 93

ST93 is a unique ST of S. aureus, which is essentially restricted to Australia. While PVL-negative ST93-MRSA-IV and PVL-positive ST93-MRSA-VT are extremely rare, a PVL-positive ST93-MRSA-IV is common and currently spreading across Australia [155]. This CA-MRSA strain is also known as the Queensland Clone [156]. A few cases have been identified in the UK suggesting small scale importation due to travel activities [157]. Recently, a whole genome sequence, JKD6159 (GenBank CP002114), has been released. In terms of hybridisation profiles and especially with regard to ssl/set genes, ST93 differs markedly from other S. aureus lineages [80]. Enterotoxin genes and tst1 are absent but the enterotoxin homologue ORF CM14 is present.

Clonal complex 97

CC97-MSSA can often be isolated from cattle [158] and occasionally from humans [95], but MRSA from this lineage are rare. CC97-MRSA-IV has sporadically been isolated from human patients in Australia (WA MRSA-54), Abu Dhabi [31] and, as part of this study, in Saxony. A ST97-MRSA-V has been isolated in Egypt (isolate courtesy of M. Kamal El Din, Cairo). A further CC97-MRSA strain has recently been described from the UK [159]; [160], in which a SCCmec V element, ACME and ccrA/B-4 genes are detectable. A CC97-MRSA strain was identified by the authors in swine from Germany. The strain carries a novel or composite/hybrid SCCmec element yielding signals with probes for mecA, ugpQ, ccrA-1, ccrB-1,ccrAA” and ccrC. All CC97-MRSA isolates tested are PVL-negative.

Clonal complex 121

Although CC121-MSSA are a common cause of SSTI worldwide [113]; [142]; [153]; [161]; [162], MRSA from this lineage appear to be very rare. The authors found a single MRSA isolate, CC121/ST577-MRSA-V (WA MRSA-22), in Australia. While PVL is common in CC121-MSSA [113], this isolate is PVL-negative. It harbours etA and edinA. Further CC121-MRSA-IV have been described from sporadic cases in the UK [145], Portugal [163], Poland (http://www.isssi2008.com/abstract/13.asp), China (see MLST database, quoted in [163]) and the USA [164]. A PVL-positive CC121-MRSA-V strain was identified recently in two unrelated paediatric patients from Cambodia [165].

Clonal complex 152

CC152-MRSA-V has been found sporadically in Germany [80], Sweden [166], Switzerland [62] and Australia (WA MRSA-89). Some patients infected with this strain had ties to Balkan countries (Macedonia, Kosovo [62]; [80]) which might indicate a wider distribution in that region. All isolates of this strain carry PVL genes and edinB. Probes for lukD+lukE as well as hlgA+lukS-hlg+lukF-hlg yield signals only after random amplification, which suggests the presence of hitherto unknown alleles. Enterotoxin genes and most ssl/set genes are not detectable.

ST377-MRSA-V has been observed in France, the Netherlands, Switzerland and Australia [167]. It is closely related to ST152 and cannot be distinguished using standard MLST primers. Specific gmk primers able to distinguish ST152 from ST377 have been described by Garnier [167]. A ST152-MRSA with a non-typeable SCCmec element has been isolated in Denmark from a patient with a travel history to Kosovo [138].

Sequence type 154

Two ST154-MRSA isolates have been characterised in this study, both cultured from central Asian immigrants to Western Europe [57]; [166]. The origin of these two isolates as well as a report from Mongolia [168] suggests a wide distribution of this strain in Central Asia. One isolate harbours a typical SCCmec IV element, while the other (courtesy of C. Berglund, Stockholm) lacks ccrA-2 and ccrB-2. Both isolates are PVL-positive.

Clonal complex 188

According to MLST data, CC188 is related to CC1 although it differs in two alleles (arcC-3 and gmk-8 instead of arcC-1 and gmk-1 [169]). However, CC188 hybridisation profiles are clearly distinct. Differences include the alleles of the agr locus, clfA, clfB, ebh, ebpS, fnbA, fnbB, hsdS, sdrC, sdrD and vwb, the presence of cna as well as the absence of sasG, seh, splA and Q2FXC0. Since these genes are distributed widely across the genome, the differences to CC1 strains cannot readily be explained by chromosomal replacement as previously observed for ST34 and ST239 [170]. Therefore, either the positions of the genes in the genome may be different than in the sequenced genomes, or CC188 originates from multiple recombination events.

ST188-MRSA-IV has been found sporadically in Australia (WA MRSA-38 or -78, [72]). Apart from SCCmec IV, β-lactamase and aacA-aphD, this strain may carry erm(B), tet(K) and cat. PVL, enterotoxin genes and tst1 are not present. Other ST188-MRSA have been observed from Asian countries: ST188-MRSA-III/spa t189 in Korea [171], PVL-negative CC188-MRSA-V in Hong Kong, and PVL-positive ST188-MRSA-V in Malaysia [172].

Sequence type 239

ST239 isolates belong to CC8. However, ST239 (including ST240 and ST241, which differ only in mutations in pta or yqiL genes, respectively) is discussed separately from CC8. The reason is the integration of a CC30 DNA fragment of approximately 635,000 base pairs (or ca. 20% of the genome, [170]; [173]) into a CC8 parent strain, with the integration site being localised around oriC. This has led to divergent MLST profiles (arcC-2, rather than arcC-3, [170]; [173]), spa types and hybridisation profiles. Differences to other CC8 strains include the affiliation to capsule type 5, the alleles of aur, clfB and isaB and the presence of cna, while other markers (such as agr group I alleles, ssl/set genes etc.) are in accordance to CC8. Two genome sequences of ST239-MRSA-III have recently been released (strain TW20, [173] and JKD6008, [174]).

ST239-MRSA-III is probably the oldest pandemic MRSA strain. It has been reported in many European countries including Croatia [41] the Czech Republic [71]; [175], Greece (isolates courtesy of V. Gogou, Larissa), Italy [33], Malta [40], Portugal [49]; [176], Spain [69] and the UK. In Hungary, it was common but it has been largely replaced by ST228-MRSA-I [35]. In Ireland, ST239-MRSA-III became the predominant strain in the 1980s [15], after it was introduced into the country following the repatriation from Iraq of a trauma patient [177]. In Saxony, this strain is rarely isolated and has been identified by the authors in patients with travel histories to Greece [29] or Turkey. This strain is frequently isolated in Turkey [178], Iran [179], Saudi Arabia [180], Hong Kong [47], mainland China [181]; [182], Taiwan [14]; [181] and Singapore [183]. In Trinidad & Tobago [184] it is virtually the only existent MRSA. In Australia, it is a common cause of hospital-acquired infection in the East coast states, and large outbreaks in the 1980s were attributable to this strain [155]. Furthermore, ST239-MRSA-III has also been reported in Argentina [185], Brazil [186]; [187], Chile [185], Egypt (isolates courtesy of M. Kamal El Din, Cairo), India [104], Korea [171], Malaysia [172], Mongolia [168], New Zealand [174], Pakistan [188], Paraguay [42], Russia [189], South Africa [73], Thailand [176] and Uruguay [185]. The reference strain ATCC33592, recovered in a hospital in New York [190], belongs also to ST239-MRSA-III.

The evolution of this strain has recently been reviewed based on genome sequences of 63 isolates from different parts of the world analysing genome-wide single-nucleotide polymorphisms, insertions or deletions [191]. In short, ST239-MRSA-III can be divided into three clades; a European, presumably ancestral one, an Asian and a South-American. However, there is some evidence for secondary, travel-associated cross-transmission [191].

ST239-MRSA-III is colloquially known as the Czech, Vienna, Hungarian, Portuguese or Brazilian Clone, UK-EMRSA-1, -4, -7, -9 or -11, AUS-EMRSA-2 or -3, Irish Phenotype III, Irish AR01, -09, -15 or -23, Canadian MRSA-3 (this refers to the ST241 SLV, [28]) or as Canadian MRSA-6 [28]. However, all these designations should be regarded as synonyms as their distinction is not always clear-cut. For instance, the Hungarian Clone was described as harbouring SCCmec III, while the Brazilian Clone carries SCCmec IIIA [192]. The difference is only the presence (III) or absence (IIIA) of an integrated plasmid pT181, which encompasses, among other genes, tet(K). Since the SCCmec-associated mercury resistance operon and other resistance and enterotoxin genes vary independently of pT181/tet(K) among these clones and since tet(K) might also be part of free plasmids, tet(K) could be regarded just as one mobile element among many others. Beyond the issue of tet(K), there are also other variations of the SCCmec III element. About two thirds of tested isolates harbour the mercury resistance operon. It is often, but not always, accompanied by “ccrAA+ccrC. This indicates a linkage of SCCmec III to SCCmer [4]. Some isolates do not yield signals with a probe which normally reacts in both, mecR1 and ΔmecR1; this could probably be attributed to another partial deletion of the mecR1 gene. In one case, the authors found the absence of mecI, mecR1 and xylR. Variable resistance genes in ST239-MRSA-III include erm(A), erm(C), aacA-aphD, aadD, aphA3, sat, dfrA, mupA, tet(K), different alleles of cat, qacA and qacC. PVL has not been detected in ST239-MRSA-III. Enterotoxin genes sea, sek and seq as well as phage-associated genes sak, scn and chp are variable. The ACME locus is present in a minority of isolates ([172], and in three out of some 200 tested by the authors).

Clonal complex 361

The authors observed three different CC361-MRSA strains. All are PVL-negative. CC361-MRSA-IV is detected sporadically in Western Australia (ST672-MRSA-IV or WA MRSA-29, [72]) and one isolate originated from Ireland. CC361-MRSA-V was isolated in Abu Dhabi where it appears to be rare [31]. A CC361-MRSA-VIII was found in Australia where it is referred to as WA MRSA-28 [72]. Isolates harbour the enterotoxin gene locus egc, which, however, might be partially deleted. One out of three tested WA MRSA-29 isolates carries tst1 and seb, which is a highly unusual combination of virulence genes [193].

Clonal complex 398

CC398-MRSA has recently received a lot of attention as strains from this lineage are of animal origin but are able to cause disease in humans. This has led to intense investigations including the sequencing of a complete genome of a ST398-MRSA-V strain, S0385, from the Netherlands [194].

ST398-MRSA-III, spa type t567, has been observed in Belgium [13]. ST398-MRSA-IV isolates appear to be a rare livestock-associated MRSA (LA-MRSA) strain. Two infections of humans were observed in Hong-Kong [47] and isolates from poultry have been reported from Belgium [13]. In Germany, this strain has been detected in cattle [195] and in turkeys (courtesy of S. Cortez de Jäckel, Delbrück), and by the authors in turkey meat samples. Isolates are negative for exotoxin genes and for sak, scn and chp.

PVL-negative ST398-MRSA-V is frequently found in association with livestock, although this strain is also increasingly isolated from human patients without animal contact. It was first discovered in a family outbreak in the Netherlands in 2006. Family members were farmers, and the strain was subsequently found in pigs from the same farm. Further investigations showed its presence in a high proportion of Dutch pigs as well as in farm personnel, veterinarians and students [196]-[200]. Recently, this strain has been observed not only in pigs, but in humans, cattle [158]; [195], horses [75], dogs [201], poultry [13], chickens and turkeys (courtesy of S. Cortez de Jäckel, Delbrück and of the Federal Institute for Risk Assessment, Berlin). It was also found in retail meat of different domestic animals [202]; [203]. In addition to the Netherlands, ST398-MRSA-V has been identified in Germany, Belgium, Italy, Austria, Spain [13]; [90]; [202]; [204]-[208] Canada (http://promedmail.oracle.com/pls/otn/f?p​=2400:1001:8447806422203976::NO::F2400_P​1001_BACK_PAGE,F2400_P1001_PUB_MAIL_ID:1​010,81749), the USA [209] and Australia (author's unpublished observation). This strain shows a remarkable diversity with regard to resistance genes. Isolates carry SCCmec V, or rather SCCmec VT, as indicated by the genome sequence of strain S0385 [194]. Rarely, recombinase genes “ccrAA” and ccrC may be absent. Essentially all isolates harbour the β-lactamase operon and tet(M). Additionally, tet(K) is frequently detected. The multidrug resistance gene cfr has recently been observed in ST398-MRSA-V [19]. In addition to the resistance markers detected by array hybridisation (Figure 2), tet(L), dfrK and dfrG can be found by PCR in some isolates [210][212]. Recently, the novel trimethoprim resistance gene dfrK [210], the macrolide-lincosamide-streptogramin B resistance gene erm(T) [212], a ABC transporter gene vga(C) for streptgramin A-lincosamide-pleuromutilin resistance ([213]) and the novel apramycin resistance gene apmA [214] have been described on plasmids from this strain. Many isolates of ST398-MRSA-V harbour multiple resistance genes which provide the same resistance phenotypes (tet(K)+tet(M), tet(L)+tet(M) or tet(K)+tet(L)+tet(M); erm(A)+erm(C) or erm(A)+erm(B)). The vast majority of ST398-MRSA-V isolates are negative for enterotoxin genes. Among 54 swine isolates from Germany, seb was detected only once, and sek+seq were detected in three isolates [215]. The genes sak, scn and chp were absent from isolates of the European LA-MRSA strain. However, these genes where detected by the authors in two human isolates from Hong Kong; one of which harbours sea.

PVL-positive ST398-MRSA-V has been described in China [216], and in children of Asian origin living in Sweden [217]. Two isolates (courtesy of C. Welinder-Olsson, Gothenburg, Sweden) have been genotyped. In contrast to the livestock-associated ST398-MRSA-V isolates, they carry sak, scn and chp. One isolate harbours also sea.

Sequence type 426

ST426-MRSA-IV has recently been described from the Arkhangelsk region in Russia [162]. The authors did not isolate ST426-MRSA within the present study, but genotyping data of ST426-MSSA isolates [94]; [95]; [113] allow the general features of that sequence type to be described. ST426-MSSA isolates harbour tst1, sea and ORF CM14 as well as, variably sec+sel, see and/or sek+seq. The gene cna can be detected in most isolates. Notably, nuc (encoding thermostable nuclease, DNAse) is not detectable by hybridisation. Since ST426 isolates are phenotypically DNAse-positive, the presence of a variant nuc allele can be assumed.

Clonal complex 509

CC509 appears to be a very rare CC [94]; [218], but MRSA belonging to it have previously been observed in Queensland, Australia [218]. One isolate of CC509/ST207-MRSA-V from New South Wales, Australia was genotyped. It is PVL-negative. The egc locus appears to be present in a variant or truncated form with only genes sem and seo being detectable.

Sequence types 573 and 772

Sequence types 573 and 772 belong, according to the MLST database, to CC1. However, with respect to the pta allele these strains differ from other CC1 (pta-12 or pta-22, respectively). Their hybridisation profile is also distinct, which may be attributed to one or multiple recombination events that have introduced genes from other CCs into CC1. This includes agr (group II rather than III), genes encoding the capsule type (5 rather than 8), the egc enterotoxin gene cluster, and the enterotoxin homologue ORF CM14. The enterotoxin H gene seh, which is otherwise typical for CC1 strains, cannot be detected in ST573/772. The genes cna and sasG are present. Protease genes splA, splB and splE are absent.

A PVL-negative ST573-MRSA-V strain has been described from Australia (WA MRSA-10, [72]).

PVL-positive ST772-MRSA-V, which is known as WA MRSA-60 or the Bengal Bay Clone [111], is relatively multi-resistant compared to other CA-MRSA. In addition to a SCCmec V (specifically, a VT [127]) element, they carry variably blaZ, erm(C), msr(A), mph(C), aacA-aphD, aphA3, sat and tet(K). Besides the PVL genes, all isolates tested harbour sea, and most carry sec and sel. This strain was found by the authors in Australia, Germany, the UK, Hong Kong and Abu Dhabi. German and British patients usually had a travel history or family background suggesting an infection in India or Bangladesh ([111], H.J. Linde, Regensburg, Germany, pers. communication, and own observations) where it appears to be increasingly common [104].

Sequence type 779

ST799-MRSA has been found sporadically by the authors in the UK, Ireland, France and Australia. Isolates harbour a C2 mec gene complex (mecA, ugpQ) but carriage of ccr genes varies (“ccrAA+ccrC or “ccrAA+ccrA/B4, or no detectable recombinases). Q6GD50 is detectable, possibly indicating a combination of SCCmec and SCCfus elements. ST779-MRSA are PVL-negative, but carry etD and edinB.

Sequence type 834

According to the MLST database, ST834 belongs to CC9. However, microarray hybridisation profiles differ from other CC9 strains in several key features such as agr allele (agr group I rather than II), capsule type (8 rather than 5), spa type, presence of sasG and alleles of some MSCRAMM genes (bbp, map, vwb). ST834-MRSA-IV occurs rarely in Australia, where it has been described as WA MRSA-13. The tested isolates harbour tst1, sec and sel, but lack PVL genes. PVL-negative ST834-MRSA-IV also has been observed in Cambodia [165].

Clonal complex 913

A single isolate of a ST913-MRSA-IV was identified by the authors from a Lebanese refugee in Germany who suffered from haemorrhagic bronchitis. It is positive for two genes encoding exfoliative toxins (etA and etD) as well as for edinB. It lacks enterotoxins and PVL. A recent paper [39] on MRSA isolates from the Negev region of Israel suggests a wider distribution of this strain in the Middle East as well as the presence of closely related ST912 and ST914.

Sequence type 1048

This sequence type has only been reported in Hong Kong where it was sporadically isolated in nursing homes [125]. The authors found a single isolate from Hong Kong. ST1048 is related to CC7, but differs in some markers including the presence of sasG and cna, and the alleles of arcC and spa. It has spa type t1081, which can also be observed in CC45 and ST1774. The tested isolate carries SCCmec IV, ccrC, and ACME. It is negative for PVL and enterotoxin genes, but a previous study [125] indicated the presence of egc genes seg and sei in some isolates of this ST.

Sequence type 1774

This strain was isolated from several patients in Hong Kong and has not been described previously. It shares spa type t1081 with other clones (CC45 and ST1048, see [125]). Isolates carry SCCmec IV, ccrC, and ACME. PVL and enterotoxin genes cannot be detected. Variable resistance markers include the β-lactamase operon and qacC.

Discussion

Strain definition and nomenclature

Genes of the “core genome” and the “core variable genome” [219] yield essentially the same phylogenetic information as the seven housekeeping genes used for MLST. Consequently, a MLST clonal complex can be identified by microarray hybridisation based on a characteristic fingerprint pattern [96], provided that a hybridisation pattern for this CC has been defined previously. For CC assignment, the presence or absence of sasG, cna, fosB, lukD+lukE, egc, seh, ORF CM14 as well as the identification of the actual allelic variant of genes of the agr, ssl/set, hysA, hsdS, and capsule loci and of genes encoding MSCRAMMs, proteases and a leukocidin homologue (“lukY”) are used [96]. Whilst clonal complex affiliation can be easily determined, the assignment to “strains” is not that straightforward. The concept of the “strain” can be beneficial for infection control purposes and subsequently, a wide variety of different epidemic or pandemic MRSA strains have been described. Unfortunately, different criteria and different methods have been applied for defining and naming MRSA strains. This has resulted in a confusing situation with several strains having multiple designations. For instance, ST5-MRSA-II is known as the Rhine-Hesse Epidemic Strain in Germany, UK-EMRSA-3 in the UK, USA100 in the USA, CMRSA-2 in Canada, AR07.3, AR07.4 or AR11 in Ireland, and New York-Japan Clone in Australia and elsewhere. For this reason, Enright et al. [220] proposed to designate strains by “sequence type-MRSA-SCCmec type” such as “ST5-MRSA-II”. We largely followed this principle. However, this nomenclature has shortcomings if clearly different strains have the same ST and SCCmec type (such as the various ST8-MRSA-IV). Additional information, such as PVL status or carriage of superantigens, is of relevance in defining the “pathotype” of the organism, which is important for clinical management purposes. Thus, PVL-positive and PVL-negative strains of the same ST and SCCmec affiliation are treated separately here, as their clinical significance may be different.

Another challenge, beyond the definition of individual strains, is that the concept of a “strain” in itself cannot properly be defined. Traditionally a strain has been defined as “an isolate or group of isolates that can be distinguished from other isolates of the same genus and species by phenotypic characteristics or genotypic characteristics or both” [221]; [222], which is essentially the same as a clone which is defined as a group of “isolates that are indistinguishable from each other by a variety of genetic tests” [221]; [222]. Thus, the definition of a clone or strain depends on the discriminatory power of the test and/or on the number of different tests applied. Isolates which appear to be indistinguishable by, e.g., PFGE might yield differences detectable by microarray hybridisation or genome sequencing. In the case of S. aureus, all previously defined strains can be subdivided into a considerable number of variants as they harbour variable genes in different combinations [29]; [43]; [82]. Of course, it is not practical to regard all these variants as “strains” and to invent and to use different names for, e.g. the variants of ST22-MRSA-IV which just differ in carriage of erm(C) or sec+sel. However, UK-EMRSA-2 and UK-EMRSA-6 (both CC8-MRSA-IV) are regarded as different “strains” although they differ only in the presence of aphA3 and sat, neither of which are particularly important from a clinical perspective. Similarly, Vienna and Hungarian epidemic strains differ basically in the presence of tet(K). On the other hand, isolates which are known as the Hannover Epidemic Strain could easily be divided into two “strains” based on their different SCCmec elements. In fact, a “strain” may be of polyphyletic origin. MSSA from different branches of one clonal group may have acquired the same SCCmec element independently on several occasions. This has previously been proposed in the case of ST5-MRSA-II [46]. These few examples emphasise the fact that the concept of “strains”, although convenient and practical, is in fact a rather arbitrary approach of forcing taxonomy on permanently changing and evolving biological subjects. When scrutinised by methods such as genome sequencing or microarray hybridisation, “strains” are not static blocks comprised of identical isolates, but rather consist of groups of isolates with similar sequences. These sequences might differ in single point mutations (as sometimes obvious in MLST, e.g., Taiwan Clone isolates may have different gmk alleles), in the composition and sequence of single loci (such as the variable part of the spa gene or the dru region within the SCCmec element) or in the presence or absence of complete genes or multi-gene mobile elements. Thus, the concept of “quasispecies” [223]-[227] could be applied in which the genome “cannot be described as a defined structure, but rather as a weighted average of a large number of individual sequences” [228]. The difference between S. aureus and the RNA-viruses (to which this concept has been applied first [228]), is basically the time frame in which variations evolve. Conveniently, the extent and time frame of variability in S. aureus provide ample opportunities for typing, i.e., for outbreak investigations and infection control purposes.

Biodiversity of MRSA and SCCmec elements

For more than three decades, MRSA was mainly an issue of hospital hygiene and infection prevention and control. Interestingly, the “older” SCCmec elements found in HA-MRSA strains have largely been observed in and restricted to a few genotypes, mainly to CC5 and CC8. CC5 and CC8 harbour the widest diversity of SCCmec elements, and some of the most recently described types have only been found in these CCs (Figure 5). This is not related to their overall abundance, i.e., to the statistical probability of a gene transfer event. In contrast, MRSA from the equally abundant CC15 [94] has only been described once, some 30 years ago [33]. Thus, SCCmec elements from other species may be more readily integrated into CC5 and CC8 than into other S. aureus lineages. These two CCs might serve as some kind of “entry gate” of SCCmec elements into the S. aureus gene pool from which, possibly after some adaptations, these elements can be transferred into other S. aureus lineages. The reason for this is unclear, but peculiarities of, e.g., lineage-specific restriction-modification systems which can control horizontal gene transfer into S. aureus and between different S. aureus could be scrutinised with in this regard.

thumbnail

Figure 5. Network graph based on hybridisation profiles, visualising similarities and relationships between clonal complexes and the spread of SCCmec elements.

Roman numerals indicate SCCmec types; PVL-negative strains are shown with black letters on white background, PVL-positive in white letters on black. A, ACME; F, SCCfus; M, SCCmer; IRR, irregular SCCmec elements; COM, composite or multiple SCCmec elements.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0017936.g005

The epidemiology of MRSA has changed over the last two decades with the rise of CA- and LA-MRSA harbouring a previously unknown variety of SCCmec elements. It is tempting to speculate that the rise of new strains was not only paralleled, but triggered by the emergence of these elements, especially of SCCmec IV. Compared to other SCCmec elements, SCCmec IV can be found in a wide diversity of different S. aureus clonal lineages (Figure 5). Interestingly, it is also the most common SCCmec element in S. epidermidis. It has been detected in approximately 40% of methicillin-resistant S. epidermidis from humans, which belonged to wide variety of genetic backgrounds [229]; and it is also common among coagulase-negative staphylococci from animals [230]. The evolutionary success of this element might suggest either a better ability to be transmitted between different strains, and even species, and/or lower fitness costs [7]; [8]. Recently, a variety of “atypical” SCCmec elements have been observed, some of which are described in this study. Whether they are variants of previously known types or entirely new elements still needs to be determined. However, these observations indicate that the spread and evolution of SCCmec elements is still ongoing. This prompts the question of where novel elements originated from. Apparently, these elements evolve independently of the S. aureus genome they actually reside in. Different SCCmec elements may be observed in otherwise virtually identical strains, and strains from completely different clonal complexes may acquire the same SCCmec elements. Similar to other mobile genetic elements they could be considered as “selfish genes” [231], i.e., as parasitic pieces of genetic information which undergo their own evolution and compete against each other, as previously discussed by Novick (“Mobile genetic elements are arguably selfish in that their evolution is driven by selective forces that operate on the elements themselves, independently of the host organisms within which they must of necessity reside” [193]). However, contrary to other “selfish” mobile genes (such as endogenous retroviruses in eukaryotic genomes) they confer an advantage to their “host organism” by introducing antibiotic resistance properties and even additional virulence factors such as a recently discovered phenol-soluble modulin [232]. The relative independence of such elements from host genomes also allows them to reside in other species, and, indeed, a wide range of SCCmec elements can be found in other staphylococci [229]. These bacteria provide an ample pool of additional hosts for the SCCmec elements, and it can be expected that novel elements may be transferred from other staphylococci to S. aureus. For that reason, the evolution of antibiotic resistance in bacteria infecting/colonising livestock is highly relevant. Many animal species harbour S. aureus as well as their own host-specific staphylococci (such as S. hyicus in swine or S. pseudintermedius in dogs). Global livestock populations now exceed the populations of most wild animals which might serve as hosts for S. aureus. For example, there are 1,300 million cattle, 900 million pigs, 500 million cats and 400 million dogs in the world [http://www.cattle-today.com/, http://en.wikipedia.org]. Because of their close proximity to humans, domestic animals might serve as reservoir for new strains as well as for novel SCCmec elements. While some animal-specific S. aureus such as ST151 have so far failed to evolve into MRSA or to infect humans, others have truly zoonotic potential with the best documented example being ST398-MRSA-V.

The role of Panton-Valentine leukocidin

Although PVL has been known for a long time [10]; [233], its occurrence in MRSA strains is a recent phenomenon. Since PVL is phage-encoded, it can be found in S. aureus belonging to many different clonal complexes. Occurrence in diverse MSSA has been discussed previously [113]. PVL-positive MRSA are found in clonal complexes or sequence types CC1, CC5, CC8, CC22, CC30, CC59, ST72, CC80, CC88, ST93, ST154, ST398 and ST772 (Figure 5). Additionally, PVL-positive ST45-MRSA have recently been reported [45]; [122]. As with SCCmec elements, PVL phages undergo a host-independent evolution. As a set of “selfish genes” they evolved to confer a selective advantage to their staphylococcal hosts in helping them to cope with the immune defences of the vertebrates in which these staphylococci parasitize. Thus, these phages compensate their staphylococcal host for the fitness costs they may cause. This strategy appears to be evolutionary successful as it evolved on multiple occasions. Staphylokinase-encoding phages in S. aureus can be regarded as another example. Staphylokinase improves the fitness of S. aureus in the human host by facilitating their entry into deeper host tissues and by inhibiting host defensins [234]. SCCmec elements also “pay” for being transmitted and multiplied by helping their staphylococcal hosts to cope with antibiotic compounds, which in a certain sense also belong to the defences of the human host against staphylococcal infection.

Some of the recently emerged PVL-positive MRSA strains are known to occur and predominate in certain regions such as USA300 in the USA, ST80-MRSA-IV in Europe and the Middle East, ST772-MRSA-V in India, ST59-MRSA-VT in Taiwan and ST93-MRSA-IV in Australia. Cases outside these regions are increasingly being reported. In part, this can be attributed to human travel activities. Other PVL-positive strains have been found in multiple distant settings (e.g., ST22-MRSA-IV in Bavaria, Germany, in Australian patients of Indian origin, in Abu Dhabi and in Great Britain) which might suggest a polyphyletic origin (see also [40]). Crudely, three different epidemiological situations can be distinguished. First, in European countries (such as Germany, [29]; ; the UK, [111]; Malta, [40] or Ireland, [57]; [235]), the prevalence of PVL-MRSA is low and has remained low for several years. In these countries, a variety of different strains can be observed and individual cases can often be traced to travel histories or to the foreign origin of patients. Thus, detection of such strains in travellers might indicate an epidemic situation elsewhere, and should prompt a thorough documentation of the patient's travel history. It may be speculated that an overwhelming presence of successful PVL-negative clones (ST22-MRSA-IV and ST398-MRSA-V) may hinder the dissemination of PVL-positive clones. However, there are no data indicating whether these strains would prevail in direct competition with a successful PVL-MRSA-clone, and generally it is not known which properties might render a strain “successful”. Secondly, in Australia or Abu Dhabi [31] PVL-MRSA are common and a number of different strains co-exist. Since Australia as well as the Gulf Emirates witnessed a recent and massive immigration of people from all over the world, it can be assumed that these people have introduced epidemic strains from their respective home countries. For instance, USA300 may have come with North American expatriates, or ST772-MRSA-V from India [111]. Thirdly, another situation emerged in the USA, where a single strain of PVL-MRSA (USA300) spread extensively and where this one strain effectively marginalised all other strains, whether PVL-positive or not [76]. Similarly, in Taiwan, most MRSA infections are caused by ST59-MRSA-VT [14]; [236]. A comparable picture may currently evolve in Australia due to a massive increase in ST93-MRSA-IV infections.

The role of PVL in MRSA and especially in USA300 has been extensively and controversially discussed [61]; [237]-[239], with particular emphasis on the situation in the USA. However, other parts of the world harbour other PVL-MRSA. If different strains from diverse clonal groups cause the same distinct syndromes (such as chronic/recurrent SSTI in immunocompetent young adults) the causative factor should be present in all of them. Thus, the observation that, e.g., PVL-positive CC5, CC8 and CC30 isolates can cause the same symptoms, but behave differently than essentially isogenic but PVL-negative CC5, CC8 and CC30 strains rendered it improbable that a factor other than PVL was the key marker of virulence in PVL-positive MRSA. As PVL-MRSA belong to different agr-groups, a connection of the evolutionary success of PVL-MRSA to agr group affiliation, i.e., to peculiarities of gene regulation is also improbable. The diversity and abundance of PVL-MRSA clones in Abu Dhabi and Australia could also indicate that no USA300-specific factor besides PVL (such as ACME) was necessary for the expansion of a PVL-MRSA clone. Thus, our observations suggest that PVL plays a key role in the evolutionary success of MRSA in a clearly defined ecological niche of chronic/recurrent SSTI in otherwise healthy young adults and, rarely, of necrotising pneumonia. In settings where PVL-MRSA is abundant, they also have been observed to cause, e.g., bloodstream infections [240]. However, this can be attributed to their overall abundance and to the relative rarity of other strains, since PVL is thought not to contribute to the pathogenesis of bloodstream infections [241].

Outlook

The evolving issue of community-acquired and livestock-associated MRSA poses a major public health threat. The biological diversity of MRSA is increasing and this enables MRSA to move out of the small and relatively controllable ecological niche of hospitals and intensive care units into the general population of developed and developing nations and into livestock animals. Consequently, it can no longer be considered an exclusive hospital-associated problem, and it cannot be fought by hospital infection prevention and control measures alone. Some of the MRSA strains may replace MSSA in a similar way as penicillinase-positive strains replaced penicillinase-negative strains in the 1950s and 1960s. A consequence of such a development may be that β-lactam antibiotics could only be used when proven to be effective, i.e. not as an initial therapy but only after susceptibility testing has been performed. This would result in an increased use of antimicrobials which are more expensive and/or less effective and in dire consequences for individual patients as well as for entire national healthcare systems.

Due to the increasing biodiversity of MRSA and the resulting exploitation of novel ecological niches outside of hospitals it cannot be realistically expected that MRSA might be eradicated easily. In order to check its current proliferation, factors which confer advantage to MRSA need to be turned into a disadvantage. Thus, carriage of mecA and/or PVL needs to be “penalised” by consequent treatment, eradication and infection prevention and control measures. Practically, a “search-and-destroy” policy as in Scandinavian countries, the Netherlands and Western Australia is warranted. This requires routine screening assays for mecA and/or PVL as well as advanced typing techniques and we anticipate that the methods and data from our study might contribute to this.

Materials and Methods

Strains and isolates

A database of microarray experiments performed by the authors on more than 3,000 MRSA isolates has been used for this study. Isolates have been collected as part of routine diagnostic work from the following sources: the Dresden University Hospital (Saxony, Germany) and hospitals of Hoyerswerda (Saxony, Germany) and Saarbrücken (Saarland, Germany), a variety of German intensive care units (as part of the S.A.R.I. study, [242]), the “Friedrich-Loeffler-Institut” (Federal Research Institute for Animal Health, Germany), the national MRSA reference centres in London (UK), Lyon (France) and Dublin (Ireland), hospitals in Ireland, Msida (Malta), Abu Dhabi (United Arab Emirates), Hong Kong (China), Trinidad & Tobago and from the Gram-positive Bacteria Typing and Research Unit, Perth (Australia). The majority of isolates were sampled between 2000 and August 2010. A small number of older isolates were also included (such as for ST247- and ST250-MRSA-I); this is mentioned in the text along with the strain descriptions. Additionally, a collection of reference strains from the Network on Antimicrobial Resistance in S. aureus (NARSA, Herndon, Virginia, USA) was characterised, mainly to reflect the diversity of MRSA strains in the USA. A few strains originated from other sources that are acknowledged in the respective sections and in the Acknowledgments.

Additional information on emerging MRSA strains and their geographic distributions as reported in recent publications has also been included.

Sequence-based typing

Multilocus sequence typing (MLST), which is based on sequencing of internal fragments of arcC, aroE, glpF, gmk, pta, tpi and yqiL housekeeping genes, was performed on selected isolates. The protocol used was as described by Enright et al. [25]. The sequences obtained were compared with those at the MLST website (http://saureus.mlst.net/) to assign a sequence type (ST). Related sequence types were clustered to clonal complexes (CC) using BURST analyses as provided on the MLST website.

The spa typing procedures were performed according to previously published protocols [243] using the nomenclature as described on the Ridom website (http://spa.ridom.de/) and either the RIDOM or SPATYPEMAPPER (freeware, download at http://www.clondiag.com/fileadmin/Media/​Downloads/SPATypeMapper_0_6.zip) software packages.

DNA microarray-based typing

The Alere StaphyType DNA microarray was employed using protocols and procedures previously described in detail [29]; [ 96]. The DNA microarray covers 334 target sequences, (approximately 170 distinct genes and their allelic variants) including species markers, SCCmec, capsule and agr group typing markers, resistance genes, exotoxins, and MSCRAMM genes. Primer and probe sequences have been published previously [29]; [96].

Target genes and information on primers and probes are provided in Supplemental file S1.

MRSA were grown on Columbia blood agar and incubated overnight at 37°C. Culture material was enzymatically lysed prior to DNA preparation using commercially available spin columns (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). Purified DNA samples were used as templates in a linear primer elongation using one primer per target. All targets were amplified simultaneously, and within this step, biotin-16-dUTP was incorporated into the resulting amplicons. An alternate protocol was used for a few isolates in which amplification and labelling were directed by random primers [139]; [244]. As this protocol does not rely on conserved primer binding sites, it proved to be useful for characterisation of unusual strains which are not fully represented by the published genome sequences (e.g., ST75 strains).

Amplicons obtained using either protocol were hybridised to the microarray followed by washing and blocking steps, and the addition of horseradish-peroxidase-streptavidin conjugate. After further incubation and washing steps, hybridisations were visualised by using a precipitating dye. An image of the microarray was taken and analysed using a designated reader and software (ALERE Technologies GmbH, Jena, Germany). Normalised intensities of the spots were calculated based their average intensities and on the local background [96]. Results were regarded as negative if the normalised intensity for a given probe was below 25% of the median value of species markers (coa, eno, fnbA, gapA, katA, nuc, rrn, sarA sbi, spa, vraS) and a biotin staining control. If the normalised intensity of a given probe was higher than 50% of this breakpoint, it was interpreted positive. If it was between 25% and 50%, the result was regarded as ambiguous. For some markers, for which allelic variants were to be discriminated (bbp, clfA, clfB and fnbB as well as some set/ssl genes, isaB, mprF and isdA), a different approach was used because these alleles differed only in single nucleotides. Here, only the probe with the strongest signal value was regarded as positive, provided that it exceeded the 50% breakpoint. All others were regarded as ambiguous or, if below the 25% breakpoint, as negative. This allowed an easy and clear distinction of clonal complex-specific variants of these genes. Genes which are not present in all tested isolates are labelled as rare, variable or common in Figures 2 and 3 as well as in Supplement S2 (see legends).

The affiliation of isolates to clonal complexes (CCs) or sequence types (STs) as defined by MLST [25] was determined by an automated comparison of hybridisation profiles to a collection of reference strains previously characterised by MLST [29]; [96]. Analysis of hybridisation patterns cannot discriminate sequence types which differ only in single point mutations affecting MLST genes (e.g., ST5 and ST225, or ST59 and ST952). However, there are also sequence types which originate from chromosomal replacements as previously described [170]; [173]. As these events result in different hybridisation patterns, such STs can be easily identified. MRSA strains which belong to these sequence types will be described separately from the parental CCs.

SCCmec typing

The SCCmec elements were typed using previously described PCR primers and conditions and by array hybridisation as described below.

For PCR-based typing, structural architecture and mec-complex were determined using the primers described by Zhang et al., 2005 [132]. SCCmec type IV was further sub-typed using published primers [245]. The cassette chromosome recombinase (ccr) was typed as described previously [246]. An ISau4-like transposase (GenBank accession number DQ680163) inserted into the open reading frame V011 of SCCmec VT was detected by the production of a ca. 1,600-bp PCR and confirmed by sequencing [126].

All Irish MRSA isolates underwent SCCmec typing for (i) the ccr and mec complex genes and (ii) the J regions and mecI [15]; [85]; [246]; [247]. In addition, isolates harbouring SCCmec IV underwent SCCmec IV sub-typing. Sub-typing of variant SCCmec II and IV elements from Irish isolates was performed as described previously [15]; [ 245].

The array includes probes for mecA, an accompanying gene, ugpQ, mecI and xylR. Two different probes for mecR1 allow the discrimination of un-truncated mecR1 and truncated mecR1 (ΔmecR1). Four different alleles of ccrA and ccrB (ccrA-1, ccrB-1, ccrA-2, ccrB-2, ccrA-3, ccrB-3, ccrA-4 and ccrB-4) can be distinguished. The gene ccrC and a “hypothetical protein” accompanying ccrC form an additional pair of recombinase genes. Because the latter is an analogue to ccrA, it is here tentatively named “ccrAA”. Alleles from strain 85-2082 (GenBank AB037671) and strain MRSAZH47 (GenBank AM292304) can be distinguished by different probes. While all SCCmec V strains react with the former probe, only a part of them yield signals with probes for the latter variant. This includes strains ST398-MRSA-V and Taiwan Clone ST59-MRSA-VT which are known to harbour a distinct variant, SCCmec VT (5C2&5).

J-region genes dcs, pls-SCC and the kdp-operon can also be detected. Other genes with relevance for SCCmec are a mercury resistance operon, the tobramycin resistance gene aadD, the macrolide, lincosamide and streptogramin B resistance gene erm(A), the tetracycline resistance gene tet(K) and the fusidic acid resistance marker Q6GD50. However, as these genes are plasmid- or transposon-encoded, they are not necessarily restricted to SCCmec elements. An overview on hybridisation patterns associated with the different SCCmec types is provided in Figure 1.

Tree reconstruction

In order to visualise similarities between hybridisation profiles, a network tree using SplitsTree software [248] was constructed. Array hybridisation profiles of the tested strains (Supplemental file S3) were converted into a series of ‘sequences’ (Supplemental file S5). Each position in this ‘sequence’, i.e., each probe, could have a value of ‘positive’ (‘C’), ‘negative’ (‘G’), ‘ambiguous’ (‘A’) or ‘variable’ (‘T’) with the latter including all these markers which are in Supplemental file S3 designated as ‘rare’, ‘variable’ or as ‘common’. These ‘sequences’ were used with SplitsTree version 4.11.3 on default settings (characters transformation: uncorrected P/ignore ambiguous states, distance transformation: Neighbour-Net, and variance: ordinary least squares). For CC15 and ST426, data from MSSA [96] were used as no MRSA isolates were found. The scale bar represents the number of differences between signal strings (with 0.1 meaning 10% difference).

Due to the high rate of recombination affecting many genes covered by the array, this tree does not reflect necessarily true phylogenetic relations. However, the observation that strains of the same clonal complex cluster together indicates that phylogenetic relationships indeed result in similar hybridisation patterns and, on a practical level, that the hybridisation profile can be used to predict CC affiliation [96]. Similarly, also CCs which are related according to sequence analyses (e.g., CC22, CC30, CC45 and ST207, see [115]) also cluster together.

For comparison, a SplitsTree analysis of the concatenated MLST sequences (Supplemental file S4) of all STs mentioned herein is provided as Figure 4.

Supporting Information

File S1.

Target genes, probes and primers.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0017936.s001

(PDF)

File S2.

Overview of sequence types (STs), spa types, some characteristic genomic markers and fully sequenced genomes of the clonal complexes (CCs) described in this study (bold typeset indicates STs and spa types identified in the present study; italic typeset indicates STs found by the authors in MSSA isolates or spa types described in literature or public databases such as RIDOM; *, see text for further explanation).

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0017936.s002

(PDF)

File S3.

Complete hybridisation results for MRSA strains examined in this study.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0017936.s003

(PDF)

File S4.

"nexus"-file used for the network graph based on concatenated MLST sequences (Figure 4).

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0017936.s004

(NEX)

File S5.

"nexus"-file used for the network graph based on hybridisation profiles (Figure 5).

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0017936.s005

(NEX)

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge H. Kanig, H. Nitschke (Dresden, Germany), E. Müller, I. Engelmann, G. Rößler, J. Sachtschal (Jena, Germany), O. Brennan and P. Kinnevey (Dublin, Ireland) as well as the staff of the bacteriological laboratory, Institute for Medical Microbiology and Hygiene, Technical University of Dresden for excellent help and technical assistance. V. Baier, R. Schuster and T. Uhlig (Jena, Germany) developed software used for this work. We thank Prof. E. Jacobs (Dresden, Germany) and E. Ermantraut (Jena, Germany) for supporting this work. We acknowledge H. V. Aamont (Aakershus, Norway), P. Beisser (Maastricht, Netherlands), B. Berger-Bächi (Zürich, Switzerland), C. Berglund (Stockholm, Sweden), S. Cortez de Jäckel (Delbrück, Germany), V. Gogou (Larissa, Greece), R. Hillert (Görlitz, Germany), M. Kamal El Din (Cairo, Egypt), S. Molinos (Barcelona, Spain), C. Welinder-Olsson (Gothenburg, Sweden), B. Walther (Berlin, Germany), the Federal Institute for Risk Assessment (Berlin, Germany), the Institut Pasteur (Paris, France) and the Network on Antimicrobial Resistance in Staphylococcus aureus (Hendon, Virginia, USA) for supplying additional strains.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: SM PS RE. Performed the experiments: AR HC KK JP H-LT. Analyzed the data: SM GC ACS DCC FGO SS RE. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: SM GC ACS DCC FGO SS KK PA MB MI LJ DJ AK FL ES SW. Wrote the paper: SM GC ACS DCC RE.

References

  1. 1. van Belkum A, Melles DC, Nouwen J, van Leeuwen WB, van Wamel W, et al. (2009) Co-evolutionary aspects of human colonisation and infection by Staphylococcus aureus. Infection, Genetics and Evolution 9: 32–47.
  2. 2. Jevons MP (1961) “Celbenin”-resistant Staphylococci. British Medical Journal. pp. 1924–1925.
  3. 3. El Solh A (2009) Ceftobiprole: a new broad spectrum cephalosporin. Expert Opin Pharmacother 10: 1675–86.
  4. 4. Ito T, Katayama Y, Asada K, Mori N, Tsutsumimoto K, et al. (2001) Structural comparison of three types of staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec integrated in the chromosome in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 45: 1323–36.
  5. 5. Oliveira DC, Wu SW, de Lencastre H (2000) Genetic organization of the downstream region of the mecA element in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates carrying different polymorphisms of this region. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 44: 1906–10.
  6. 6. IWG-SCC (2009) Classification of staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec (SCCmec): guidelines for reporting novel SCCmec elements. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 53:
  7. 7. Lee SM, Ender M, Adhikari R, Smith JMB, Berger-Bachi B, et al. (2007) Fitness cost of staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus by way of continuous culture. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 51: 1497–1499.
  8. 8. Ender M, McCallum N, Adhikari R, Berger-Bachi B (2004) Fitness Cost of SCCmec and Methicillin Resistance Levels in Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 48: 2295–2297.
  9. 9. Kaneko J, Kamio Y (2004) Bacterial two-component and hetero-heptameric pore-forming cytolytic toxins: structures, pore-forming mechanism, and organization of the genes. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem 68: 981–1003.
  10. 10. Panton P, Valentine F (1932) Staphylococcal toxin. Lancet 1: 506–508.
  11. 11. CDC (1999) Four pediatric deaths from community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus-Minnesota and North Dakota. JAMA 282: 1123–1125.
  12. 12. Lina G, Piemont Y, Godail-Gamot F, Bes M, Peter MO, et al. (1999) Involvement of Panton-Valentine leukocidin-producing Staphylococcus aureus in primary skin infections and pneumonia. Clin Infect Dis 29: 1128–32.
  13. 13. Nemati M, Hermans K, Lipinska U, Denis O, Deplano A, et al. (2008) Antimicrobial resistance of old and recent Staphylococcus aureus isolates from poultry: First detection of livestock-associated methicillin-resistant strain ST398. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 52: 3817–3819.
  14. 14. Takano T, Saito K, Teng LJ, Yamamoto T (2007) Spread of community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in hospitals in Taipei, Taiwan in 2005, and comparison of its drug resistance with previous hospital-acquired MRSA. Microbiol Immunol 51: 627–32.
  15. 15. Shore A, Rossney AS, Keane CT, Enright MC, Coleman DC (2005) Seven novel variants of the staphylococcal chromosomal cassette mec in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates from Ireland. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 49: 2070–83.
  16. 16. Berglund C, Ito T, Ikeda M, Ma XX, Soderquist B, et al. (2008) Novel type of staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec in a methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strain isolated in Sweden. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 52: 3512–6.
  17. 17. Zhang K, McClure JA, Elsayed S, Conly JM (2009) Novel staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec type, tentatively designated type VIII, harboring class A mec and type 4 ccr gene complexes in a Canadian epidemic strain of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 53: 531–40.
  18. 18. Sievert DM, Boulton ML, Stoltman G, Johnson D, Stobierski MG, et al. (2002) Staphylococcus aureus Resistant to Vancomycin. MMWR Weekly 51: 565–567.
  19. 19. Kehrenberg C, Cuny C, Strommenger B, Schwarz S, Witte W (2009) Methicillin-resistant and -susceptible Staphylococcus aureus strains of clonal lineages ST398 and ST9 from swine carry the multidrug resistance gene cfr. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 53: 779–81.
  20. 20. Long KS, Poehlsgaard J, Kehrenberg C, Schwarz S, Vester B (2006) The Cfr rRNA methyltransferase confers resistance to Phenicols, Lincosamides, Oxazolidinones, Pleuromutilins, and Streptogramin A antibiotics. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 50: 2500–5.
  21. 21. Shore AC, Brennan OM, Ehricht R, Monecke S, Schwarz S, et al. (2010) Identification and Characterization of the Multidrug Resistance Gene cfr in Panton-Valentine Leukocidin-Positive ST8-Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus-IVa (USA300). Antimicrob Agents Chemother.
  22. 22. Chaberny IF, Ziesing S, Mattner F, Barwolff S, Brandt C, et al. (2005) The burden of MRSA in four German university hospitals. Int J Hyg Environ Health 208: 447–53.
  23. 23. Kanerva M, Blom M, Tuominen U, Kolho E, Anttila VJ, et al. (2007) Costs of an outbreak of meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. J Hosp Infect 66: 22–8.
  24. 24. Wernitz MH, Keck S, Swidsinski S, Schulz S, Veit SK (2005) Cost analysis of a hospital-wide selective screening programme for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) carriers in the context of diagnosis related groups (DRG) payment. Clin Microbiol Infect 11: 466–71.
  25. 25. Enright MC, Day NPJ, Davies CE, Peacock SJ, Spratt BG (2000) Multilocus Sequence Typing for Characterization of Methicillin-Resistant and Methicillin-Susceptible Clones of Staphylococcus aureus. J Clin Microbiol 38: 1008–1015.
  26. 26. Holden MTG, Feil EJ, Lindsay JA, Peacock SJ, Day NPJ, et al. (2004) Complete genomes of two clinical Staphylococcus aureus strains: Evidence for the rapid evolution of virulence and drug resistance. PNAS 101: 9786–9791.
  27. 27. Baba T, Takeuchi F, Kuroda M, Yuzawa H, Aoki K, et al. (2002) Genome and virulence determinants of high virulence community-acquired MRSA. Lancet 359: 1819–27.
  28. 28. Christianson S, Golding GR, Campbell J, Mulvey MR, the Canadian Nosocomial Infection Surveillance Program (2007) Comparative genomics of canadian epidemic lineages of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. J Clin Microbiol 45: 1904–1911.
  29. 29. Monecke S, Jatzwauk L, Weber S, Slickers P, Ehricht R (2008) DNA Microarray based genotyping of MRSA strains from Eastern Saxony. Clin Microbiol Infect 14: 534–45.
  30. 30. Kinnevey P, Shore A, Rossney A, Coleman D (2010) Molecular characterization of sporadically-occurring nosocomial methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates from Ireland. ECCMID: Vienna.
  31. 31. Weber S, Ehricht R, Slickers P, Abdel-Wareth L, Donnelly G, et al. (2010) Genetic fingerprinting of MRSA from Abu Dhabi. ECCMID: Vienna.
  32. 32. Mato R, Campanile F, Stefani S, Crisostomo MI, Santagati M, et al. (2004) Clonal types and multidrug resistance patterns of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) recovered in Italy during the 1990s. Microb Drug Resist 10: 106–13.
  33. 33. Campanile F, Bongiorno D, Borbone S, Stefani S (2009) Hospital-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (HA-MRSA) in Italy. Annals of Clinical Microbiology and Antimicrobials 8: 22.
  34. 34. Vindel A, Trincado P, Gomez E, Cabrera R, Boquete T, et al. (2006) Prevalence and evolution of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Spanish hospitals between 1996 and 2002. J Clin Microbiol 44: 266.70
  35. 35. Conceicao T, Aires-de-Sousa M, Fuzi M, Toth A, Paszti J, et al. (2007) Replacement of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus clones in Hungary over time: a 10-year surveillance study. Clin Microbiol Infect 13: 971–9.
  36. 36. Grundmann H, Aanensen DM, van den Wijngaard CC, Spratt BG, Harmsen D, et al. (2010) Geographic distribution of Staphylococcus aureus causing invasive infections in Europe: a molecular-epidemiological analysis. PLoS Med 7: e1000215.
  37. 37. Basset P, Vogel V, Zanetti G, Blanc DS (2010) Patterns of mupirocin susceptibility during a large MRSA outbreak in a tertiary care hospital. International Symposium on Staphylococci and Staphylococcal Infections (ISSSI): Bath.
  38. 38. Krziwanek K, Luger C, Sammer B, Stumvoll S, Stammler M, et al. (2008) MRSA in Austria-an overview. Clin Microbiol Infect 14: 250–9.
  39. 39. Adler A, Givon-Lavi N, Moses AE, Block C, Dagan R (2010) Carriage of community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in a cohort of infants in southern Israel: risk factors and molecular features. J Clin Microbiol 48: 531–8.
  40. 40. Scicluna E, Shore A, Thuermer A, Ehricht R, Slickers P, et al. (2010) Characterisation of MRSA from Malta and the description of a Maltese epidemic MRSA strain. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 29: 163–170.
  41. 41. Budimir A, Deurenberg RH, Bosnjak Z, Stobberingh EE, Cetkovic H, et al. (2009) A variant of the Southern German clone of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus is predominant in Croatia. Clin Microbiol Infect.
  42. 42. Mayor L, Ortellado J, Menacho C, Lird G, Courtier C, et al. (2007) Molecular characterization of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates collected in Asuncion, Paraguay. J Clin Microbiol 45: 2298–300.
  43. 43. Monecke S, Ehricht R, Slickers P, Wiese N, Jonas D (2009) Intra-strain variability of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strains ST228-MRSA-I and ST5-MRSA-II. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 28: 1383–90.
  44. 44. Dauwalder O, Lina G, Durand G, Bes M, Meugnier H, et al. (2008) Epidemiology of invasive methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus clones collected in France in 2006 and 2007. J Clin Microbiol 46: 3454–8.
  45. 45. Deurenberg RH, Nulens E, Valvatne H, Sebastian S, Driessen C, et al. (2009) Cross-border dissemination of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, Euregio Meuse-Rhin region. Emerg Infect Dis 15: 727–34.
  46. 46. Nubel U, Roumagnac P, Feldkamp M, Song JH, Ko KS, et al. (2008) Frequent emergence and limited geographic dispersal of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 105: 14130–5.
  47. 47. Ip M, Yung RWH, Ng TK, Luk WK, Tse C, et al. (2005) Contemporary Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Clones in Hong Kong. J Clin Microbiol 43: 5069–5073.
  48. 48. Aires de Sousa M, Bartzavali C, Spiliopoulou I, Sanches IS, Crisostomo MI, et al. (2003) Two international methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus clones endemic in a university hospital in Patras, Greece. J Clin Microbiol 41: 2027–32.
  49. 49. Aires-de-Sousa M, Correia B, de Lencastre H (2008) Changing patterns in frequency of recovery of five methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus clones in Portuguese hospitals: surveillance over a 16-year period. J Clin Microbiol 46: 2912–7.
  50. 50. Takano T, Higuchi W, Otsuka T, Baranovich T, Enany S, et al. (2008) Novel characteristics of community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strains belonging to multilocus sequence type 59 in Taiwan. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 52: 837–45.
  51. 51. Kupfer M (2009) Epidemiologische Untersuchung zum Auftreten von Methicillin Resistenten Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) im Universitätsklinikum Dresden in den Jahren 2001 - 2007. Doctoral thesis: Faculty of Medicine. Technical University of Dresden.
  52. 52. Coombs GW, Van Gessel H, Pearson JC, Godsell MR, O'Brien FG, et al. (2007) Controlling a multicenter outbreak involving the New York/Japan methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus clone. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 28: 845–52.
  53. 53. Shittu A, Nubel U, Udo E, Lin J, Gaogakwe S (2009) Characterization of meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates from hospitals in KwaZulu-Natal province, Republic of South Africa. J Med Microbiol 58: 1219–1226.
  54. 54. Kwon NH, Park KT, Jung WK, Youn HY, Lee Y, et al. (2006) Characteristics of methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolated from chicken meat and hospitalized dogs in Korea and their epidemiological relatedness. Veterinary Microbiology 117: 304–312.
  55. 55. Oliveira DC, Milheirico C, de Lencastre H (2006) Redefining a structural variant of staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec, SCCmec type VI. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother 50: 3457–3459.
  56. 56. Rolain JM, Francois P, Hernandez D, Bittar F, Richet H, et al. (2009) Genomic analysis of an emerging multiresistant Staphylococcus aureus strain rapidly spreading in cystic fibrosis patients revealed the presence of an antibiotic inducible bacteriophage. Biol Direct 4: 1.
  57. 57. Rossney AS, Shore AC, Morgan PM, Fitzgibbon MM, O'Connell B, et al. (2007) The emergence and importation of diverse genotypes of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) harboring the Panton-Valentine leukocidin gene (pvl) reveal that pvl is a poor marker for community-acquired MRSA strains in Ireland. J Clin Microbiol 45: 2554–63.
  58. 58. Sa-Leao R, Santos Sanches I, Dias D, Peres I, Barros RM, et al. (1999) Detection of an archaic clone of Staphylococcus aureus with low-level resistance to methicillin in a pediatric hospital in Portugal and in international samples: relics of a formerly widely disseminated strain? J Clin Microbiol 37: 1913–20.
  59. 59. Conceicao T, Tavares A, Miragaia M, Hyde K, Aires-de-Sousa M, et al. (2010) Prevalence and clonality of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in the Atlantic Azores islands: predominance of SCCmec types IV, V and VI. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 29: 543–50.
  60. 60. Pi B, Yu M, Chen Y, Yu Y, Li L (2009) Distribution of the ACME-arcA gene among meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus haemolyticus and identification of a novel ccr allotype in ACME-arcA-positive isolates. J Med Microbiol 58: 731–736.
  61. 61. Diep BA, Gill SR, Chang RF, Phan TH, Chen JH, et al. (2006) Complete genome sequence of USA300, an epidemic clone of community-acquired meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Lancet 367: 731–9.
  62. 62. Francois P, Harbarth S, Huyghe A, Renzi G, Bento M, et al. (2008) Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, Geneva, Switzerland, 1993-2005. Emerg Infect Dis 14: 304–7.
  63. 63. Heusser R, Ender M, Berger-Bachi B, McCallum N (2007) Mosaic staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec containing two recombinase loci and a new mec complex, B2. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother 51: 390–393.
  64. 64. Perez-Vazquez M, Vindel A, Marcos C, Oteo J, Cuevas O, et al. (2008) Spread of invasive Spanish Staphylococcus aureus spa-type t067 associated with a high prevalence of the aminoglycoside-modifying enzyme gene ant(4′)-Ia and the efflux pump genes msrA/msrB. J Antimicrob Chemother 63: 21–31.
  65. 65. Beisser P, von Wintersdorff C, Boumans ML, de Neeling H, Stobberingh E (2009) Identification of a clinical methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strain containing both SCCmec type IV and SCC476-like sequences. Clin Microbiol Infect 15: S22.
  66. 66. Gill SR, Fouts DE, Archer GL, Mongodin EF, DeBoy RT, et al. (2005) Insights on Evolution of Virulence and Resistance from the Complete Genome Analysis of an Early Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Strain and a Biofilm-Producing Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis Strain. J Bacteriol 187: 2426–2438.
  67. 67. Coombs GW, Pearson JC, O'Brien FG, Murray RJ, Grubb WB, et al. (2006) Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus clones, Western Australia. Emerg Infect Dis 12: 241–7.
  68. 68. Dominguez MA, de Lencastre H, Linares J, Tomasz A (1994) Spread and maintenance of a dominant methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) clone during an outbreak of MRSA disease in a Spanish hospital. J Clin Microbiol 32: 2081–7.
  69. 69. Cuevas O, Cercenado E, Bouza E, Castellares C, Trincado P, et al. (2007) Molecular epidemiology of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Spain: a multicentre prevalence study (2002). Clin Microbiol Infect 13: 250–6.
  70. 70. Witte W, Heuck D, Braulke C (2000) Tätigkeitsbericht des Nationalen Referenzzentrums für Staphylokokken im Jahr 1999. Bundesgesundheitsbl - Gesundheitsforsch - Gesundheitsschutz 43: 633–638.
  71. 71. Melter O, Aires de Sousa M, Urbaskova P, Jakubu V, Zemlickova H, et al. (2003) Update on the major clonal types of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in the Czech Republic. J Clin Microbiol 41: 4998–5005.
  72. 72. Nimmo GR, Coombs GW (2008) Community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in Australia. Int J Antimicrob Agents 31: 401–10.
  73. 73. Jansen van Rensburg MJ, Eliya Madikane V, Whitelaw A, Chachage M, Haffejee S, et al. (2010) The dominant methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus clone from hospitals in Cape Town has an unusual genotype: ST612. Clin Microbiol Infect.
  74. 74. Weese JS, Archambault M, Willey BM, Hearn P, Kreiswirth BN, et al. (2005) Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in horses and horse personnel, 2000-2002. Emerg Infect Dis 11: 430–5.
  75. 75. Walther B, Monecke S, Ruscher C, Friedrich AW, Ehricht R, et al. (2009) Comparative molecular analysis substantiates a zoonotic potential of equine Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). J Clin Microbiol 47: 704–710.
  76. 76. Moran GJ, Krishnadasan A, Gorwitz RJ, Fosheim GE, McDougal LK, et al. (2006) Methicillin-resistant S. aureus infections among patients in the emergency department. N Engl J Med 355: 666–74.
  77. 77. Hulten KG, Kaplan SL, Lamberth LB, Slimp K, Hammerman WA, et al. (2010) Hospital-acquired Staphylococcus aureus infections at Texas Children's Hospital, 2001-2007. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 31: 183–90.
  78. 78. Chua T, Moore CL, Perri MB, Donabedian SM, Masch W, et al. (2008) Molecular epidemiology of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream isolates in urban Detroit. J Clin Microbiol 46: 2345–52.
  79. 79. Otter JA, Havill NL, Boyce JM, French GL (2009) Comparison of community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus from teaching hospitals in London and the USA, 2004-2006: where is USA300 in the UK? Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 28: 835–9.
  80. 80. Monecke S, Berger-Bächi B, Coombs C, Holmes A, Kearns A, et al. (2007) Comparative genomics and DNA-array-based genotyping of pandemic Staphylococcus aureus strains carrying Panton-Valentine Leucocidin. Clin Microbiol Infect 13: 236–249.
  81. 81. Molinos S, Giménez M, Rodrigo C, Quesada M, Prat C, et al. (2009) Emergencia de un nuevo clon de Staphylococcus aureusresistente a meticilina USA300 que carece de arginine catabolic mobile element(ACME), en España. XIII Reunión SEIMC. Sevilla.
  82. 82. Monecke S, Ehricht R, Slickers P, Tan HL, Coombs G (2009) The molecular epidemiology and evolution of the Panton-Valentine leukocidin-positive, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strain USA300 in Western Australia. Clin Microbiol Infect 15: 770–776.
  83. 83. Highlander SK, Hulten KG, Qin X, Jiang H, Yerrapragada S, et al. (2007) Subtle genetic changes enhance virulence of methicillin resistant and sensitive Staphylococcus aureus. BMC Microbiol 7: 99.
  84. 84. Arias CA, Rincon S, Chowdhury S, Martinez E, Coronell W, et al. (2008) MRSA USA300 Clone and VREF – A U.S.-Colombian Connection? N Engl J Med 359: 2177–2179.
  85. 85. Shore AC, Rossney AS, Kinnevey PM, Brennan OM, Creamer E, et al. (2010) Enhanced discrimination of highly clonal ST22-methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus IV isolates achieved by combining spa, dru, and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis typing data. J Clin Microbiol 48: 1839–52.
  86. 86. Rossney AS, McDonald P, Humphreys H, Glynn GM, Keane CT (2003) Antimicrobial resistance and epidemiological typing of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Ireland (North and South), 1999. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 22: 379–81.
  87. 87. Shore AC, Rossney AS, O'Connell B, Herra CM, Sullivan DJ, et al. (2008) Detection of staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec-associated DNA segments in multiresistant methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) and identification of Staphylococcus epidermidis ccrAB4 in both methicillin-resistant S. aureus and MSSA. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 52: 4407–19.
  88. 88. Wagenaar JA, Yue H, Pritchard J, Broekhuizen-Stins M, Huijsdens X, et al. (2009) Unexpected sequence types in livestock associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA): MRSA ST9 and a single locus variant of ST9 in pig farming in China. Vet Microbiol 139: 405–9.
  89. 89. Neela V, Mohd Zafrul A, Mariana NS, van Belkum A, Liew YK, et al. (2009) Prevalence of ST9 methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus among pigs and pig handlers in Malaysia. J Clin Microbiol 47: 4138–40.
  90. 90. Battisti A, Franco A, Merialdi G, Hasman H, Iurescia M, et al. (2010) Heterogeneity among methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus from Italian pig finishing holdings. Vet Microbiol 142: 361–6.
  91. 91. Guardabassi L, O'Donoghue M, Moodley A, Ho J, Boost M (2009) Novel Lineage of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus, Hong Kong. Emerg Infect Dis 15: 1998–2000.
  92. 92. Cui S, Li J, Hu C, Jin S, Li F, et al. (2009) Isolation and characterization of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus from swine and workers in China. J Antimicrob Chemother 64: 680–683.
  93. 93. Hanssen AM, Fossum A, Mikalsen J, Halvorsen DS, Bukholm G, et al. (2005) Dissemination of community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus clones in northern Norway: sequence types 8 and 80 predominate. J Clin Microbiol 43: 2118–24.
  94. 94. Monecke S, Luedicke C, Slickers P, Ehricht R (2009) Molecular epidemiology of Staphylococcus aureus in asymptomatic carriers. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 28: 1159–65.
  95. 95. Luedicke C, Slickers P, Ehricht R, Monecke S (2010) Molecular fingerprinting of Staphylococcus aureus from bone and joint infections. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 29: 457–63.
  96. 96. Monecke S, Slickers P, Ehricht R (2008) Assignment of Staphylococcus aureus isolates to clonal complexes based on microarray analysis and pattern recognition. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol 53: 237–251.
  97. 97. Ghebremedhin B, Konig W, Konig B (2005) Heterogeneity of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strains at a German university hospital during a 1-year period. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 24: 388–98.
  98. 98. Gosbell IB, Barbagiannakos T, Neville SA, Mercer JL, Vickery AM, et al. (2006) Non-multiresistant methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia in Sydney, Australia: emergence of EMRSA-15, Oceania, Queensland and Western Australian MRSA strains. Pathology 38: 239–44.
  99. 99. Kerttula AM, Lyytikainen O, Karden-Lilja M, Ibrahem S, Salmenlinna S, et al. (2007) Nationwide trends in molecular epidemiology of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, Finland, 1997-2004. BMC Infect Dis 7: 94.
  100. 100. Krziwanek K, Luger C, Sammer B, Stumvoll S, Stammler M, et al. (2008) MRSA in Austria-an overview. Clin Microbiol Infect 14: 250–9.
  101. 101. Udo EE, Al-Sweih N, Noronha B (2006) Characterisation of non-multiresistant methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (including EMRSA-15) in Kuwait Hospitals. Clin Microbiol Infect 12: 262–9.
  102. 102. Walther B, Wieler LH, Friedrich AW, Hanssen AM, Kohn B, et al. (2008) Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) isolated from small and exotic animals at a university hospital during routine microbiological examinations. Vet Microbiol 127: 171–178.
  103. 103. Witte W, Enright M, Schmitz FJ, Cuny C, Braulke C, et al. (2001) Characteristics of a new epidemic MRSA in Germany ancestral to United Kingdom EMRSA 15. Int J Med Microbiol 290: 677–82.
  104. 104. Dsouza N, Rodrigues C, Mehta A (2010) Molecular characterization of Methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) with emergence of epidemic clones ST 22 and ST 772, in Mumbai, India. J Clin Microbiol 48: 1806–11.
  105. 105. Rossney AS, Lawrence MJ, Morgan PM, Fitzgibbon MM, Shore A, et al. (2006) Epidemiological typing of MRSA isolates from blood cultures taken in Irish hospitals participating in the European Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance System (1999-2003). Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 25: 79–89.
  106. 106. Ellington MJ, Hope R, Livermore DM, Kearns AM, Henderson K, et al. (2010) Decline of EMRSA-16 amongst methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus causing bacteraemias in the UK between 2001 and 2007. J Antimicrob Chemother 65: 446–8.
  107. 107. Moodley A, Stegger M, Bagcigil AF, Baptiste KE, Loeffler A, et al. (2006) spa typing of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolated from domestic animals and veterinary staff in the UK and Ireland. J Antimicrob Chemother 58: 1118–1123.
  108. 108. Wolter DJ, Chatterjee A, Varman M, Goering RV (2008) Isolation and characterization of an epidemic methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus 15 variant in the central United States. J Clin Microbiol 46: 3548–9.
  109. 109. Shore A (2010) Identification and Molecular Characterisation of ACME among ST22-MRSA-IV Isolates. International Symposium on Staphylococci and Staphylococcal Infections (ISSSI): Bath.
  110. 110. Linde H, Wagenlehner F, Strommenger B, Drubel I, Tanzer J, et al. (2005) Healthcare-associated outbreaks and community-acquired infections due to MRSA carrying the Panton-Valentine leucocidin gene in southeastern Germany. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 24: 419–22.
  111. 111. Ellington MJ, Ganner M, Warner M, Cookson BD, Kearns AM (2010) Polyclonal multiply antibiotic-resistant methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus with Panton-Valentine leucocidin in England. J Antimicrob Chemother 65: 46–50.
  112. 112. Maier J, Melzl H, Reischl U, Drubel I, Witte W, et al. (2005) Panton-Valentine leukocidin-positive methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Germany associated with travel or foreign family origin. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 24: 637–639.
  113. 113. Monecke S, Slickers P, Ellington M, Kearns A, Ehricht R (2007) High diversity of Panton-Valentine leucocidin-positive, methicillin-susceptible isolates of Staphylococcus aureus and implications for the evolution of community-associated MRSA. Clin Microbiol Infect 13: 1157–64.
  114. 114. Nadig SDN, Ramachandraraju SN, Arakere GN (2010) Epidemic methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (EMRSA-15) variants detected from healthy and diseased individuals in India. J Med Microbiol 59: 815–21.
  115. 115. Cooper JE, Feil EJ (2006) The phylogeny of Staphylococcus aureus - which genes make the best intra-species markers? Microbiology 152: 1297–305.
  116. 116. Murchan S, Aucken HM, O'Neill GL, Ganner M, Cookson BD (2004) Emergence, spread, and characterization of phage variants of epidemic methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus 16 in England and Wales. J Clin Microbiol 42: 5154–5160.
  117. 117. Gould SW, Rollason J, Hilton AC, Cuschieri P, McAuliffe L, et al. (2008) UK epidemic strains of meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in clinical samples from Malta. J Med Microbiol 57: 1394–8.
  118. 118. Miklasevics E, Haeggman S, Balode A, Sanchez B, Martinsons A, et al. (2004) Report on the first PVL-positive community acquired MRSA strain in Latvia. Euro Surveill 9: 29–30.
  119. 119. Udo EE, O'Brien FG, Al-Sweih N, Noronha B, Matthew B, et al. (2008) Genetic lineages of community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Kuwait hospitals. J Clin Microbiol 46: 3514–6.
  120. 120. Robinson DA, Kearns AM, Holmes A, Morrison D, Grundmann H, et al. (2005) Re-emergence of early pandemic Staphylococcus aureus as a community-acquired meticillin-resistant clone. Lancet 365: 1256–8.
  121. 121. Enany S, Higuchi W, Okubo T, Takano T, Enany M, et al. (2007) Brain abscess caused by Panton-Valentine leukocidin-positive community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Egypt, April 2007. Euro Surveill 12: E070927 2.
  122. 122. Layer F, Witte W (2010) Emergence of a new community-acquired MRSA ST45. DGHM,. 244: Hannover.
  123. 123. Moore C, Zervos M, Perri M, Donabedian S, Osaki-Kiyan P, et al. (2009) USA600 methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia associated with reduced vancomycin susceptibility and significant mortality. Infectious Diseases Society of America Annual Meeting:. Philadelphia.
  124. 124. Blanc DS, Petignat C, Wenger A, Kuhn G, Vallet Y, et al. (2007) Changing molecular epidemiology of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in a small geographic area over an eight-year period. J Clin Microbiol 45: 3729–36.
  125. 125. Ho P-L, Lai EL, Chow K-H, Chow LSM, Yuen K-Y, et al. (2008) Molecular epidemiology of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in residential care homes for the elderly in Hong Kong. Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease 61: 135–142.
  126. 126. Coombs GW, Monecke S, Ehricht R, Slickers P, Pearson JC, et al. (2010) Differentiation of CC59 community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Western Australia. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 54: 1914–21.
  127. 127. Ellington MJ, Perry C, Ganner M, Warner M, McCormick Smith I, et al. (2009) Clinical and molecular epidemiology of ciprofloxacin-susceptible MRSA encoding PVL in England and Wales. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 28: 1113–21.
  128. 128. Boyle-Vavra S, Ereshefsky B, Wang CC, Daum RS (2005) Successful multiresistant community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus lineage from Taipei, Taiwan, that carries either the novel Staphylococcal chromosome cassette mec (SCCmec) type VT or SCCmec type IV. J Clin Microbiol 43: 4719–30.
  129. 129. Huang YC, Hwang KP, Chen PY, Chen CJ, Lin TY (2007) Prevalence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus nasal colonization among Taiwanese children in 2005 and 2006. J Clin Microbiol 45: 3992–5.
  130. 130. Lo WT, Lin WJ, Tseng MH, Wang SR, Chu ML, et al. (2006) Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in children, Taiwan. Emerg Infect Dis 12: 1267–70.
  131. 131. Wang R, Braughton KR, Kretschmer D, Bach T-HL, Queck SY, et al. (2007) Identification of novel cytolytic peptides as key virulence determinants for community-associated MRSA. 13: 1510–1514.
  132. 132. Zhang K, McClure JA, Elsayed S, Louie T, Conly JM (2005) Novel multiplex PCR assay for characterization and concomitant subtyping of staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec types I to V in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. J Clin Microbiol 43: 5026–33.
  133. 133. McDonald M, Dougall A, Holt D, Huygens F, Oppedisano F, et al. (2006) Use of a single-nucleotide polymorphism genotyping system to demonstrate the unique epidemiology of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in remote aboriginal communities. J Clin Microbiol 44: 3720–7.
  134. 134. Ng JW, Holt DC, Lilliebridge RA, Stephens AJ, Huygens F, et al. (2009) Phylogenetically distinct Staphylococcus aureus lineage prevalent among indigenous communities in northern Australia. J Clin Microbiol 47: 2295–300.
  135. 135. Monecke S, Ehricht R, Slickers P, Tan HL, Coombs G (2008) Genotyping of aberrant CA-MRSA strains from Australia which represent a novel agr group. ISSSI: Perth.
  136. 136. Monecke S, Kanig H, Rudolph W, Muller E, Coombs G, et al. (2010) Characterisation of Australian MRSA strains ST75- and ST883-MRSA-IV and analysis of their accessory gene regulator locus. PLoS One 5: e14025.
  137. 137. Krziwanek K, Luger C, Sammer B, Stumvoll S, Stammler M, et al. (2007) PVL-positive MRSA in Austria. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 26: 931–5.
  138. 138. Faria NA, Oliveira DC, Westh H, Monnet DL, Larsen AR, et al. (2005) Epidemiology of emerging methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in Denmark: a nationwide study in a country with low prevalence of MRSA infection. J Clin Microbiol 43: 1836–42.
  139. 139. Monecke S, Slickers P, Hotzel H, Richter-Huhn G, Pohle M, et al. (2006) Microarray-based characterisation of a Panton-Valentine leukocidin-positive community-acquired strain of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Clin Microbiol Infect 12: 718–728.
  140. 140. Vourli S, Perimeni D, Makri A, Polemis M, Voyiatzi A, et al. (2005) Community acquired MRSA infections in a paediatric population in Greece. Euro Surveill 10: 78–9.
  141. 141. Stam-Bolink EM, Mithoe D, Baas WH, Arends JP, Moller AV (2007) Spread of a methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus ST80 strain in the community of the northern Netherlands. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 26: 723–7.
  142. 142. Conceicao T, Aires-de-Sousa M, Pona N, Brito MJ, Barradas C, et al. (2011) High prevalence of ST121 in community-associated methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus lineages responsible for skin and soft tissue infections in Portuguese children. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 30: 293–297.
  143. 143. Fang H, Hedin G, Li G, Nord CE (2008) Genetic diversity of community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in southern Stockholm, 2000-2005. Clin Microbiol Infect 14: 370–6.
  144. 144. Holmes A, Ganner M, McGuane S, Pitt TL, Cookson BD, et al. (2005) Staphylococcus aureus isolates carrying Panton-Valentine leucocidin genes in England and Wales: frequency, characterization, and association with clinical disease. J Clin Microbiol 43: 2384–90.
  145. 145. Otter JA, French GL (2008) The emergence of community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus at a London teaching hospital, 2000-2006. Clin Microbiol Infect 14: 670–6.
  146. 146. Tokajian ST, Khalil PA, Jabbour D, Rizk M, Farah MJ, et al. (2010) Molecular characterization of Staphylococcus aureus in Lebanon. Epidemiol Infect 138: 707–12.
  147. 147. Enany S, Yaoita E, Yoshida Y, Enany M, Yamamoto T (2010) Molecular characterization of Panton-Valentine leukocidin-positive community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates in Egypt. Microbiol Res 165: 152–162.
  148. 148. Bekkhoucha SN, Cady A, Gautier P, Itim F, Donnio PY (2009) A portrait of Staphylococcus aureus from the other side of the Mediterranean Sea: molecular characteristics of isolates from Western Algeria. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 28: 553–5.
  149. 149. Ben Nejma M, Mastouri M, Bel Hadj Jrad B, Nour M (2008) Characterization of ST80 Panton-Valentine leukocidin-positive community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus clone in Tunisia. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis.
  150. 150. Udo EE, Sarkhoo E (2010) Genetic analysis of high-level mupirocin resistance in the ST80 clone of community-associated meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. J Med Microbiol 59: 193–9.
  151. 151. Ozaki K, Takano M, Higuchi W, Takano T, Yabe S, et al. (2009) Genotypes, intrafamilial transmission, and virulence potential of nasal methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus from children in the community. J Infect Chemother 15: 84–91.
  152. 152. Aspiroz C, Martin I, Lozano C, Torres C (2010) [First case of community-acquired Panton Valentine leukocidin-positive (ST88) methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteriemia in Spain in a patient with meningitis.]. Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin 28: 70–1.
  153. 153. Ghebremedhin B, Olugbosi MO, Raji AM, Layer F, Bakare RA, et al. (2009) Emergence of a community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strain with a unique resistance profile in Southwest Nigeria. J Clin Microbiol 47: 2975–80.
  154. 154. Stefani S, Bongiorno D, Cafiso V, Campanile F, Crapis M, et al. (2009) Pathotype and susceptibility profile of a community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strain responsible for a case of severe pneumonia. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 63: 100–4.
  155. 155. Coombs GW, Nimmo GR, Bell JM, Huygens F, O'Brien FG, et al. (2004) Genetic diversity among community methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strains causing outpatient infections in Australia. J Clin Microbiol 42: 4735–4743.
  156. 156. Munckhof WJ, Schooneveldt J, Coombs GW, Hoare J, Nimmo GR (2003) Emergence of community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infection in Queensland, Australia. Int J Infect Dis 7: 259–64.
  157. 157. Ellington MJ, Ganner M, Warner M, Boakes E, Cookson BD, et al. (2010) First international spread and dissemination of the virulent Queensland community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strain. Clin Microbiol Infect 16: 1009–1012.
  158. 158. Monecke S, Kuhnert P, Hotzel H, Slickers P, Ehricht R (2007) Microarray-based study on virulence-associated genes and resistance determinants of Staphylococcus aureus isolates from cattle. Veterinary Microbiology 125: 128–140.
  159. 159. Ellington MJ, Yearwood L, Ganner M, East C, Kearns AM (2008) Distribution of the ACME-arcA gene among methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus from England and Wales. J Antimicrob Chemother 61: 73–7.
  160. 160. Ellington MJ, Ganner M, McCormick Smith I, Warner M, Kearns A (2008) Dissemination of a new CA-MRSA strain in the UK. 18th European Congress of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases:. Barcelona, Spain.
  161. 161. Schefold JC, Esposito F, Storm C, Heuck D, Krueger A, et al. (2007) Therapy-refractory Panton Valentine Leukocidin-positive community-acquired methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus sepsis with progressive metastatic soft tissue infection: a case report. J Med Case Reports 1: 165.
  162. 162. Vorobieva V, Bazhukova T, Hanssen AM, Caugant DA, Semenova N, et al. (2008) Clinical isolates of Staphylococcus aureus from the Arkhangelsk region, Russia: antimicrobial susceptibility, molecular epidemiology, and distribution of Panton-Valentine leukocidin genes. Apmis 116: 877–87.
  163. 163. Amorim ML, Faria NA, Oliveira DC, Vasconcelos C, Cabeda JC, et al. (2007) Changes in the Clonal Nature and Antibiotic Resistance Profiles of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Isolates Associated with Spread of the EMRSA-15 Clone in a Tertiary Care Portuguese Hospital. J Clin Microbiol 45: 2881–2888.
  164. 164. Pan ES, Diep BA, Charlebois ED, Auerswald C, Carleton HA, et al. (2005) Population dynamics of nasal strains of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus–and their relation to community-associated disease activity. J Infect Dis 192: 811–8.
  165. 165. Chheng K, Tarquinio S, Wuthiekanun V, Sin L, Thaipadungpanit J, et al. (2009) Emergence of community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus associated with pediatric infection in Cambodia. PLoS One 4: e6630.
  166. 166. Berglund C, Molling P, Sjoberg L, Soderquist B (2005) Multilocus sequence typing of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus from an area of low endemicity by real-time PCR. J Clin Microbiol 43: 4448–54.
  167. 167. Garnier F, Tristan A, François B, Etienne J, Delage-Corre M, et al. (2006) Pneumonia and new methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus clone. Emerg Infect Dis [serial on the Internet].
  168. 168. Orth D, Grif K, Erdenechimeg L, Battogtokh C, Hosbayar T, et al. (2006) Characterization of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus from Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 25: 104–7.
  169. 169. Feil EJ, Cooper JE, Grundmann H, Robinson DA, Enright MC, et al. (2003) How clonal is Staphylococcus aureus? J Bacteriol 185: 3307–16.
  170. 170. Robinson DA, Enright MC (2004) Evolution of Staphylococcus aureus by Large Chromosomal Replacements. J Bacteriol 186: 1060–1064.
  171. 171. Peck KR, Baek JY, Song JH, Ko KS (2009) Comparison of genotypes and enterotoxin genes between Staphylococcus aureus isolates from blood and nasal colonizers in a Korean hospital. J Korean Med Sci 24: 585–91.
  172. 172. Ghaznavi-Rad E, Nor Shamsudin M, Sekawi Z, Khoon LY, Aziz MN, et al. (2010) Predominance and emergence of clones of hospital-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Malaysia. J Clin Microbiol 48: 867–72.
  173. 173. Holden MTG, Lindsay JA, Corton C, Quail MA, Cockfield JD, et al. (2009) Genome sequence of a recently emerged highly-transmissible, multi-antibiotic and antiseptic resistant, variant of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) sequence-type 239 (TW). J Bacteriol: JB.01255–09.
  174. 174. Howden BP, Seemann T, Harrison PF, McEvoy CR, Stanton JA, et al. (2010) Complete Genome Sequence of Staphylococcus aureus strain JKD6008, a ST239 clone of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus with intermediate level vancomycin resistance. J Bacteriol.
  175. 175. Melter O, Santos Sanches I, Schindler J, Aires de Sousa M, Mato R, et al. (1999) Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus clonal types in the Czech Republic. J Clin Microbiol 37: 2798–803.
  176. 176. Smyth DS, McDougal LK, Gran FW, Manoharan A, Enright MC, et al. (2010) Population structure of a hybrid clonal group of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, ST239-MRSA-III. PLoS One 5: e8582.
  177. 177. Humphreys H, Carroll JD, Keane CT, Cafferkey MT, Pomeroy HM, et al. (1990) Importation of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus from Baghdad to Dublin and subsequent nosocomial spread. J Hosp Infect 15: 127–35.
  178. 178. Alp E, Klaassen CH, Doganay M, Altoparlak U, Aydin K, et al. (2009) MRSA genotypes in Turkey: persistence over 10 years of a single clone of ST239. J Infect 58: 433–8.
  179. 179. Fatholahzadeh B, Emaneini M, Aligholi M, Gilbert G, Taherikalani M, et al. (2009) Molecular characterization of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus clones from a teaching hospital in Tehran. Jpn J Infect Dis 62: 309–11.
  180. 180. Cirlan M, Saad M, Coman G, Bilal NE, Elbashier AM, et al. (2005) International spread of major clones of methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus: nosocomial endemicity of multi locus sequence type 239 in Saudi Arabia and Romania. Infect Genet Evol 5: 335–9.
  181. 181. Aires de Sousa M, Crisostomo MI, Sanches IS, Wu JS, Fuzhong J, et al. (2003) Frequent recovery of a single clonal type of multidrug-resistant Staphylococcus aureus from patients in two hospitals in Taiwan and China. J Clin Microbiol 41: 159–63.
  182. 182. Chen H, Liu Y, Jiang X, Chen M, Wang H (2010) Rapid change of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus clones in a Chinese tertiary care hospital over a 15-year period. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 54: 1842–7.
  183. 183. Hsu L-Y, Loomba-Chlebicka N, Koh Y-L, Tan T-Y, Krishnan P, et al. (2007) Evolving EMRSA-15 epidemic in Singapore hospitals. J Med Microbiol 56: 376–379.
  184. 184. Akpaka PE, Kissoon S, Rutherford C, Swanston WH, Jayaratne P (2007) Molecular epidemiology of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates from regional hospitals in Trinidad and Tobago. Int J Infect Dis 11: 544–8.
  185. 185. Aires De Sousa M, Miragaia M, Sanches IS, Avila S, Adamson I, et al. (2001) Three-year assessment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus clones in Latin America from 1996 to 1998. J Clin Microbiol 39: 2197–205.
  186. 186. Teixeira LA, Resende CA, Ormonde LR, Rosenbaum R, Figueiredo AM, et al. (1995) Geographic spread of epidemic multiresistant Staphylococcus aureus clone in Brazil. J Clin Microbiol 33: 2400–4.
  187. 187. Vivoni AM, Diep BA, de Gouveia Magalhaes AC, Santos KR, Riley LW, et al. (2006) Clonal composition of Staphylococcus aureus isolates at a Brazilian university hospital: identification of international circulating lineages. J Clin Microbiol 44: 1686–91.
  188. 188. Zafar A, Stone M, Ibrahim S, Parveen Z, Hasan Z, et al. (2011) Prevalent genotypes of meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: report from Pakistan. J Med Microbiol 60: 56–62.
  189. 189. Baranovich T, Zaraket H, Shabana , II , Nevzorova V, Turcutyuicov V, et al. (2010) Molecular characterization and susceptibility of methicillin-resistant and methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus isolates from hospitals and the community in Vladivostok, Russia. Clin Microbiol Infect 16: 575–82.
  190. 190. Schaefler S, Jones D, Perry W, Ruvinskaya L, Baradet T, et al. (1981) Emergence of gentamicin- and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strains in New York City hospitals. J Clin Microbiol 13: 754–759.
  191. 191. Harris SR, Feil EJ, Holden MT, Quail MA, Nickerson EK, et al. (2010) Evolution of MRSA during hospital transmission and intercontinental spread. Science 327: 469–74.
  192. 192. Vandenesch F, Naimi T, Enright MC, Lina G, Nimmo GR, et al. (2003) Community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus carrying Panton-Valentine leukocidin genes: worldwide emergence. Emerg Infect Dis 9: 978–84.
  193. 193. Novick RP (2003) Mobile genetic elements and bacterial toxinoses: the superantigen-encoding pathogenicity islands of Staphylococcus aureus. Plasmid 49: 93–105.
  194. 194. Schijffelen MJ, Boel CH, van Strijp JA, Fluit AC (2010) Whole genome analysis of a livestock-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus ST398 isolate from a case of human endocarditis. BMC Genomics 11: 376.
  195. 195. Fessler A, Scott C, Kadlec K, Ehricht R, Monecke S, et al. (2010) Characterization of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus ST398 from cases of bovine mastitis. J Antimicrob Chemother 65: 619–625.
  196. 196. Huijsdens XW, van Dijke BJ, Spalburg E, van Santen-Verheuvel MG, Heck ME, et al. (2006) Community-acquired MRSA and pig-farming. Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob 5: 26.
  197. 197. van Loo I, Huijsdens X, Tiemersma E, de Neeling A, van de Sande-Bruinsma N, et al. (2007) Emergence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus of animal origin in humans. Emerg Infect Dis 13: 1834–9.
  198. 198. van Duijkeren E, Ikawaty R, Broekhuizen-Stins MJ, Jansen MD, Spalburg EC, et al. (2008) Transmission of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strains between different kinds of pig farms. Vet Microbiol 126: 383–9.
  199. 199. Wulf M, van Nes A, Eikelenboom-Boskamp A, de Vries J, Melchers W, et al. (2006) Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in veterinary doctors and students, the Netherlands. Emerg Infect Dis 12: 1939–41.
  200. 200. de Neeling AJ, van den Broek MJ, Spalburg EC, van Santen-Verheuvel MG, Dam-Deisz WD, et al. (2007) High prevalence of methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus in pigs. Vet Microbiol 122: 366–72.
  201. 201. Nienhoff U, Kadlec K, Chaberny IF, Verspohl J, Gerlach GF, et al. (2009) Transmission of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strains between humans and dogs: two case reports. J Antimicrob Chemother 64: 660–2.
  202. 202. Lozano C, Lopez M, Gomez-Sanz E, Ruiz-Larrea F, Torres C, et al. (2009) Detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus ST398 in food samples of animal origin in Spain. J Antimicrob Chemother 64: 1325–6.
  203. 203. de Boer E, Zwartkruis-Nahuis JTM, Wit B, Huijsdens XW, de Neeling AJ, et al. (2009) Prevalence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in meat. International Journal of Food Microbiology 134: 52–56.
  204. 204. Soavi L, Stellini R, Signorini L, Antonini B, Pedroni P, et al. (2010) Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus ST398, Italy. Emerg Infect Dis 16: 346–8.
  205. 205. Vanderhaeghen W, Cerpentier T, Adriaensen C, Vicca J, Hermans K, et al. (2010) Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) ST398 associated with clinical and subclinical mastitis in Belgian cows. Vet Microbiol 144: 166–71.
  206. 206. Krziwanek K, Metz-Gercek S, Mittermayer H (2009) Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus ST398 from human patients, upper Austria. Emerg Infect Dis 15: 766–9.
  207. 207. Pan A, Battisti A, Zoncada A, Bernieri F, Boldini M, et al. (2009) Community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus ST398 infection, Italy. Emerg Infect Dis 15: 845–7.
  208. 208. Potel C, Ãlvarez-Fernandez M, Constenla L, Ãlvarez P, Perez S (2010) First human isolates of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus sequence type 398 in Spain. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 29: 351–352.
  209. 209. Smith TC, Male MJ, Harper AL, Kroeger JS, Tinkler GP, et al. (2009) Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) strain ST398 is present in midwestern U.S. swine and swine workers. PLoS One 4: e4258.
  210. 210. Kadlec K, Schwarz S (2009) Identification of a novel trimethoprim resistance gene, dfrK, in a methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus ST398 strain and its physical linkage to the tetracycline resistance gene tet(L). Antimicrob Agents Chemother 53: 776–8.
  211. 211. Schwarz S, Kadlec K, Strommenger B (2008) Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus pseudintermedius detected in the BfT-GermVet monitoring programme 2004-2006 in Germany. J Antimicrob Chemother 61: 282–5.
  212. 212. Kadlec K, Schwarz S (2010) Identification of a plasmid-borne resistance gene cluster comprising the resistance genes erm(T), dfrK, and tet(L) in a porcine methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus ST398 strain. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 54: 915–8.
  213. 213. Kadlec K, Schwarz S (2009) Novel ABC transporter gene, vga(C), located on a multiresistance plasmid from a porcine methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus ST398 strain. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 53: 3589–91.
  214. 214. Fessler AT, Kadlec K, Schwarz S (2011) Novel apramycin resistance gene apmA in bovine and porcine methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus ST398 isolates. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 55: 373–5.
  215. 215. Kadlec K, Ehricht R, Monecke S, Steinacker U, Kaspar H, et al. (2009) Diversity of antimicrobial resistance pheno- and genotypes of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus ST398 from diseased swine. J Antimicrob Chemother 64: 1156–1164.
  216. 216. Yu F, Chen Z, Liu C, Zhang X, Lin X, et al. (2008) Prevalence of Staphylococcus aureus carrying Panton-Valentine leukocidin genes among isolates from hospitalised patients in China. Clin Microbiol Infect 14: 381–4.
  217. 217. Welinder-Olsson C, Floren-Johansson K, Larsson L, Oberg S, Karlsson L, et al. (2008) Infection with Panton-Valentine leukocidin-positive methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus t034. Emerg Infect Dis 14: 1271–2.
  218. 218. Munckhof WJ, Nimmo GR, Schooneveldt JM, Schlebusch S, Stephens AJ, et al. (2009) Nasal carriage of Staphylococcus aureus, including community-associated methicillin-resistant strains, in Queensland adults. Clin Microbiol Infect 15: 149–55.
  219. 219. Lindsay JA, Moore CE, Day NP, Peacock SJ, Witney AA, et al. (2006) Microarrays reveal that each of the ten dominant lineages of Staphylococcus aureus has a unique combination of surface-associated and regulatory genes. J Bacteriol 188: 669–76.
  220. 220. Enright MC, Robinson DA, Randle G, Feil EJ, Grundmann H, et al. (2002) The evolutionary history of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 99: 7687–92.
  221. 221. Tenover FC, Arbeit RD, Goering RV, Mickelsen PA, Murray BE, et al. (1995) Interpreting chromosomal DNA restriction patterns produced by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis: criteria for bacterial strain typing. J Clin Microbiol 33: 2233–9.
  222. 222. Dijkshoorn L, Ursing BM, Ursing JB (2000) Strain, clone and species: comments on three basic concepts of bacteriology. J Med Microbiol 49: 397–401.
  223. 223. Eigen M (1971) Selforganization of matter and the evolution of biological macromolecules. Naturwissenschaften 58: 465–523.
  224. 224. Nowak MA (1992) What is a Quasi-species? Trends in Ecology and Evolution 7: 118–121.
  225. 225. Nowak MA (2002) From Quasispecies to Universal Grammar. Z Phys Chem 216: 5–20.
  226. 226. Nowak MA, May RM (2000) Virus Dynamics. Oxford, , New York: Oxford University Press.
  227. 227. Steinhauer DA, Holland JJ (1987) Rapid Evolution of RNA Viruses. Annual Review of Microbiology 41: 409–431.
  228. 228. Domingo E, Sabo D, Taniguchi T, Weissmann C (1978) Nucleotide sequence heterogeneity of an RNA phage population. Cell 13: 735–744.
  229. 229. Miragaia M, Thomas JC, Couto I, Enright MC, de Lencastre H (2007) Inferring a Population Structure for Staphylococcus epidermidis from Multilocus Sequence Typing Data. J. Bacteriol 189: 2540–2552.
  230. 230. Fessler AT, Billerbeck C, Kadlec K, Schwarz S (2010) Identification and characterization of methicillin-resistant coagulase-negative staphylococci from bovine mastitis. J Antimicrob Chemother 65: 1576–82.
  231. 231. Dawkins R (1994) Das egoistische Gen (The selfish gene, German ed.). Spektrum Verlag: Heidelberg.
  232. 232. Queck SY, Khan BA, Wang R, Bach TH, Kretschmer D, et al. (2009) Mobile genetic element-encoded cytolysin connects virulence to methicillin resistance in MRSA. PLoS Pathog 5: e1000533.
  233. 233. Van de Velde H (1894) Etude sur le mécanisme de la virulence du Staphylocoque pyogène. La Cellule 10: 401–410.
  234. 234. Bokarewa MI, Jin T, Tarkowski A (2006) Staphylococcus aureus: Staphylokinase. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 38: 504–9.
  235. 235. Rossney A, Morgan P, O'Connell B (2005) Community-acquired PVL+ MRSA in Ireland: a preliminary report. Euro Surveill 10: E050421 1.
  236. 236. Wang C-C, Lo W-T, Chu M-L, Siu LK (2004) Epidemiological typing of community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates from children in Taiwan. Clinical Infectious Diseases 39: 481–487.
  237. 237. Voyich JM, Otto M, Mathema B, Braughton KR, Whitney AR, et al. (2006) Is Panton-Valentine leukocidin the major virulence determinant in community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus disease? J Infect Dis 194: 1761–70.
  238. 238. Diep BA, Palazzolo-Ballance AM, Tattevin P, Basuino L, Braughton KR, et al. (2008) Contribution of Panton-Valentine leukocidin in community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus pathogenesis. PLoS One 3: e3198.
  239. 239. Labandeira-Rey M, Couzon F, Boisset S, Brown EL, Bes M, et al. (2007) Staphylococcus aureus Panton-Valentine leukocidin causes necrotizing pneumonia. Science 315: 1130–3.
  240. 240. Seybold U, Kourbatova EV, Johnson JG, Halvosa SJ, Wang YF, et al. (2006) Emergence of community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus USA300 genotype as a major cause of health care-associated blood stream infections. Clin Infect Dis 42: 647–56.
  241. 241. Ellington MJ, Hope R, Ganner M, East C, Brick G, et al. (2007) Is Panton-Valentine leucocidin associated with the pathogenesis of Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia in the UK? J Antimicrob Chemother 60: 402–5.
  242. 242. Meyer E, Schwab F, Gastmeier P, Rueden H, Daschner FD (2006) Surveillance of antimicrobial use and antimicrobial resistance in German intensive care units (SARI): a summary of the data from 2001 through 2004. Infection 34: 303–9.
  243. 243. Harmsen D, Claus H, Witte W, Rothganger J, Claus H, et al. (2003) Typing of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus in a University Hospital Setting by Using Novel Software for spa Repeat Determination and Database Management. J Clin Microbiol 41: 5442–5448.
  244. 244. Monecke S, Leube I, Ehricht R (2003) Simple and robust array-based methods for the parallel detection of resistance genes of Staphylococcus aureus. Genome Letters 2: 106–118.
  245. 245. Milheirico C, Oliveira DC, de Lencastre H (2007) Multiplex PCR strategy for subtyping the staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec type IV in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: 'SCCmec IV multiplex'. J Antimicrob Chemother 60: 42–8.
  246. 246. Kondo Y, Ito T, Ma XX, Watanabe S, Kreiswirth BN, et al. (2007) Combination of multiplex PCRs for staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec type assignment: rapid identification system for mec, ccr, and major differences in junkyard regions. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 51: 264–74.
  247. 247. Oliveira DC, de Lencastre H (2002) Multiplex PCR strategy for rapid identification of structural types and variants of the mec element in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 46: 2155–61.
  248. 248. Huson DH, Bryant D (2006) Application of phylogenetic networks in evolutionary studies. Mol Biol Evol 23: 254–267.