Research Article

Patterns of Sequence Divergence and Evolution of the S1 Orthologous Regions between Asian and African Cultivated Rice Species

  • Romain Guyot equal contributor mail,

    equal contributor Contributed equally to this work with: Romain Guyot, Andrea Garavito

    Affiliation: Plant Genome and Development Laboratory (UMR 5096 – CNRS – IRD – UPVD), Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD), Montpellier, France

    Current address: UMR DIADE, Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD), Montpellier, France

  • Andrea Garavito equal contributor,

    equal contributor Contributed equally to this work with: Romain Guyot, Andrea Garavito

    Affiliation: Plant Genome and Development Laboratory (UMR 5096 – CNRS – IRD – UPVD), Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD), Montpellier, France

    Current address: UMR DIADE, Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD), Montpellier, France

  • Frédérick Gavory,

    Affiliation: Génoscope, Institut de Génomique, Evry, France

  • Sylvie Samain,

    Affiliation: Génoscope, Institut de Génomique, Evry, France

  • Joe Tohme,

    Affiliation: Agrobiodiversity and Biotechnology Project, International Center for Tropical Agriculture (CIAT), Cali, Colombia

  • Alain Ghesquière,

    Affiliation: Plant Genome and Development Laboratory (UMR 5096 – CNRS – IRD – UPVD), Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD), Montpellier, France

    Current address: UMR DIADE, Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD), Montpellier, France

  • Mathias Lorieux

    Affiliations: Plant Genome and Development Laboratory (UMR 5096 – CNRS – IRD – UPVD), Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD), Montpellier, France, Agrobiodiversity and Biotechnology Project, International Center for Tropical Agriculture (CIAT), Cali, Colombia

    Current address: UMR DIADE, Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD), Montpellier, France

  • Published: March 10, 2011
  • DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0017726


A strong postzygotic reproductive barrier separates the recently diverged Asian and African cultivated rice species, Oryza sativa and O. glaberrima. Recently a model of genetic incompatibilities between three adjacent loci: S1A, S1 and S1B (called together the S1 regions) interacting epistatically, was postulated to cause the allelic elimination of female gametes in interspecific hybrids. Two candidate factors for the S1 locus (including a putative F-box gene) were proposed, but candidates for S1A and S1B remained undetermined. Here, to better understand the basis of the evolution of regions involved in reproductive isolation, we studied the genic and structural changes accumulated in the S1 regions between orthologous sequences. First, we established an 813 kb genomic sequence in O. glaberrima, covering completely the S1A, S1 and the majority of the S1B regions, and compared it with the orthologous regions of O. sativa. An overall strong structural conservation was observed, with the exception of three isolated regions of disturbed collinearity: (1) a local invasion of transposable elements around a putative F-box gene within S1, (2) the multiple duplication and subsequent divergence of the same F-box gene within S1A, (3) an interspecific chromosomal inversion in S1B, which restricts recombination in our O. sativa×O. glaberrima crosses. Beside these few structural variations, a uniform conservative pattern of coding sequence divergence was found all along the S1 regions. Hence, the S1 regions have undergone no drastic variation in their recent divergence and evolution between O. sativa and O. glaberrima, suggesting that a small accumulation of genic changes, following a Bateson-Dobzhansky-Muller (BDM) model, might be involved in the establishment of the sterility barrier. In this context, genetic incompatibilities involving the duplicated F-box genes as putative candidates, and a possible strengthening step involving the chromosomal inversion might participate to the reproductive barrier between Asian and African rice species.


Speciation is one of the central processes in evolution. Geographic isolation of previously interbreeding populations and their subsequent evolutionary divergence appear as one of the mechanisms that influence the emergence of reproductive barriers, and then could promote the creation of new species. In this type of speciation, called geographic speciation or allopatric speciation, reproductive isolation may be achieved by prezygotic or postzygotic barriers (reviewed in [1]). The mechanism that allows the establishment of intrinsic postzygotic reproductive barriers was explained by the Bateson, Dobzhansky and Muller (BDM) model of genetic incompatibilities [2], [3], [4], as an accumulation of genetic substitutions through the divergent evolution of epistatic genes. These substitutions, which could be either adaptive or neutral in the same population, may be deleterious once confronted in the hybrids. The BDM model was recently supported by the identification of incompatibilities between genes acting as postzygotic barriers [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11]. In strictly geographic speciation, the complete absence of gene flow between populations suggests a predictable uniform pattern of divergence across genomic regions. By contrast sympatric speciation, that allows a certain level of continuous gene flow between populations, leads to a mosaic genome structure with disparate sequence divergence, as demonstrated in whole genome approaches between closely related animal species [12], [13]. The regions of high divergence are more likely to be associated with the presence of loci that maintain the genetic isolation of species or populations, since they are influenced by the strong diversifying pressure exerted over these loci [14].

Cultivated rice belongs to two distinct species: Oryza sativa L. originated from Asia but now cultivated worldwide, and Oryza glaberrima Steud originated and restricted to West Africa. Despite the remarkable morphological and agricultural trait differences of Asian and African cultivated rice species [15], their wild relatives diverged recently from a common ancestor, approximately 0.6 to 0.7 million years ago [16], [17], [18]. An Asian origin and ancestral animal dispersal to Africa of Oryza species were proposed to explain the biogeographic pattern of African rice [19], [20]. Then, the posterior domestication processes of O. sativa in Asia and O. glaberrima in Africa took place independently. Despite a complex history, it appears that japonica and indica subspecies of O. sativa were domesticated from each other from pre-differentiated populations of O. rufipogon in Asia, approximately 7,000 years ago [21], [22], O. glaberrima was domesticated from its wild relative O. barthii, in the Niger River delta in Mali approximately 3,000 years ago [23], [24].

O. sativa and O. glaberrima are reproductively isolated, limiting significantly the use of the genetic potential of O. glaberrima for the improvement of Asian rice. Therefore, the identification and characterization of the genetic factors that affect fertility in the interspecific hybrids will allow an easier use of O. glaberrima in rice breeding programs, and a better understanding of the nature of postzygotic barriers. Reproductive isolation between O. sativa and O. glaberrima is mediated by a strong postzygotic barrier, which results from the action of several loci over the fertility of the F1 hybrids [25], [26]. Among them, the S1 locus plays a central role. By regular and innovative mapping approaches, the S1 locus was recently fine mapped [27], [28]. Additionally, the existence of two linked epistatic loci was inferred from genetic data, and a model based on a BDM incompatibility between the three adjacent loci (S1A, S1 and S1B) was proposed to explain the allelic elimination of female gametes [27]. Finally, a gene coding for a putative F-box protein, and a Pack-Mule carrying a segment of an AP2 homolog were inferred as the most likely candidate factors for S1.

Here we study patterns of divergence and evolution in the S1A, S1 and S1B loci (called here S1 regions), by genomic comparative approaches between orthologous sequences in O. glaberrima cv. CG14 and O. sativa sp. japonica cv. Nipponbare. Our objectives were (1) to establish the genomic sequence of the S1 regions in O. glaberrima, (2) to identify patterns of divergence and evolution in the S1 regions, and (3) to determine whether these patterns are informative to better understand the origin and the mechanism of the S1 postzygotic reproductive barrier.

Our results suggest that the S1 regions of O. sativa and O. glaberrima have undergone no drastic variation in its recent divergence and evolution, implying that the accumulation of small genic changes, following a Bateson-Dobzhansky-Muller (BDM) model, might be the major evolutionary force behind this reproductive barrier. In this context, genetic incompatibilities involving the duplicated F-box genes as putative candidates, and a possible strengthening step involving the chromosomal inversion might participate to the reproductive barrier between Asian and African rice species.


Sequencing of the S1, S1A and S1B loci in O. glaberrima

In a previous work we described the fine genetic and physical mapping, sequencing, and comparative analysis of the S1 locus [27]. Additionally we detected the presence of two other loci that interact epistatically with S1 to cause the allelic elimination of female gametes produced by the F1 hybrids. In order to study these two additional loci, we sequenced the seven remaining clones from the O. glaberrima cv. CG14 BAC library [29] that constitute the minimum tiling path (MTP) established around S1 [27]. The eight sequenced clones (including the one from our previous work) were obtained with a coverage ranging between 11 and 14× and an error rate below 1 base per 100 kb. They account altogether for 1,102 kb of sequences which, once assembled, constitute an 813 kb contig, referred here as “the S1 regions”. The seven newly obtained sequences are available with the following EMBL accession numbers: FP340539 (OG-BBa0041E07); FP340540 (OG-BBa0056F23); FP340541 (OG-BBa0088O22); FP340542 (OG-BBa0045G15); FP340544 (OG-BBa0017A24); FP340545 (OG-BBa0066E18); and FP340546 (OG-BBa0093E08).

Determining the bounds of the S1A and S1B loci

In order to find the bounds of the segment that bears the S1A and S1B loci, we designed a set of new polymorphic markers, based on the sequence comparison of the orthologous regions between Nipponbare and CG14. Marker evaluation was carried out in the plants that limited the S1A and S1B loci [27], in order to find the approximated recombination sites. Using this approach the S1A locus was reduced to 171 kb, while no reduction was obtained for S1B locus, remaining as a 654 kb sequence (Figure 1). The 813 kb sequence thus covers completely the S1A and S1 loci and partially the S1B locus, since the 102 kb proximal segment from the S1B locus (markers C6_27332 to RM3805) is not included in the physical map and the sequenced clones. This segment was not found available either in the O. glaberrima (cv. GC14) genome project, due to a gap in the obtained physical map (R.A. Wing and P.R. Marri, personal communication). Additionally, microsatellite markers positioned within the gap segment in Nipponbare show an incongruent pattern of amplification and non-amplification in our O. glaberrima accessions (Data not shown). These data suggest that the structure of the proximal region of the S1B segment might be significantly different between O. sativa and O. glaberrima. Nevertheless, the nature and exact location of these differences remain unknown.


Figure 1. Genetic and physical maps of S1, S1A and S1B loci.

Comparison between the genetic and physical maps of the S1 loci, showing the interval of high probability of presence of S1A and S1B loci, determined by identifying the recombination breakpoints. The S1A locus is completely represented in the O. glaberrima physical map, while approximately 110 kb are missing from S1B. A straight line and a gray solid bar represent the O. sativa and O. glaberrima chromosomes respectively.


Sequence annotation and organization of the 813 kb of the CG14 S1 regions

The sequences of the CG14 BAC clones were annotated in detail. Gene and transposable element (TE) annotations are indicated in Figure 2. In total, 143 non-TE related coding regions were annotated, which corresponds to a gene density of about one gene per 6 kb of genomic sequence (Table S1). Most of predicted genes were confirmed by identification of protein domains, BLASTX homologies in Swiss-Prot database or BLASTN homologies with nucleotide databases. On the 143 predicted genes, 96.3% showed strong BLASTN homology with O. sativa genomic and full-length cDNA sequences. Seven pseudogenes were identified by the presence of fragmented coding regions lacking start codons, or by the presence of stop codons in the frame of exons. Of the 143 predicted genes, 35 (25%) belong to eleven distinct duplicated gene families scattered along the 813 kb analyzed, coding for F-box (gene families I and VII), LRR proteins (II), putative homeobox (III), Early nodulin-like (IV), Pectate lyase (V), Transferase (VI and X), Esterase/Lipase (VIII), Cystein synthase (IX) and Methylase proteins (XI) (Table 1 and Figure 2). Copy numbers of duplicated genes vary from two to seven genes. Most of the duplicated gene families were organized in clusters of relatively adjacent duplicated genes, with the exception of the two genes from family I (F-box family) separated by 154 kb of genomic sequence. The majority of the duplicated gene families were found to be arrayed in tandem while only three families showed duplicated genes in opposite orientations (I, V and X, Table 1). As illustrated by the S1 regions, the rice genome appears to be shaped by a relatively high number of local gene duplications [30].


Figure 2. Physical map and annotation of the 813 kb region of the S1, S1A and S1B loci in O. glaberrima cv. CG14.

Yellow, blue and red boxes represent genes, transposons and retrotransposons, respectively. TEs nested into others TEs or genes are raised above their insertion sites. Markers used in the genetic map are indicated in gray. A black arrow indicates a large sequence inversion, relative to O. sativa ssp. japonica cv. Nipponbare. Regions spanning the S1, S1A and S1B loci are indicated. Roman numerals indicate duplicated gene families listed in Table 1.


Table 1. List of identified gene families in the O. glaberrima S1 regions.


In total 380 known TE were identified representing 18.3% of the genomic sequence. Of the 380 elements, 37 were classified as class I retroelements (Table S2). Interestingly, ten annotated transposons overlaped with predicted coding regions. These transposons were classified as pack-MULE since they showed similarities with Mutator-like elements and contained embedded coding sequences [31]. Among enclosed coding regions, six were classified as pseudogene due to the presence of frame-shift mutations or the complete absence of start codons. Only three pack-MULE displayed similarities to proteins with known functions (Table S3).

Sequence comparisons of orthologous S1 regions

The orthologous regions were identified in the O. sativa ssp. japonica cv. Nipponbare public sequence as a stretch of 847 kb between coordinates 1,900,806 and 2,748,457 on chromosome 6. The orthologous regions in O. sativa ssp. indica cv 93-11 sequence was also used for comparative analysis and consist of a stretch of 1,077 kb broken by 152 ambiguous segments (with ‘N’), representing gaps, that sometimes did not allow accurate comparative analysis. Pairwise comparisons between CG14 and Nipponbare S1 regions revealed the presence of stretches of highly conserved segments interrupted by a limited number of zones with significant alterations. Most of the sequence variations involved mechanisms of sequence insertions, deletions, duplications, and a large sequence inversion, as illustrated in Figure 3. Sequence variation was not limited to intergenic regions since they overlap with different segments that include coding genes. Detailed analysis of the collinearity was then performed between the non-TE genes located within the CG14 and Nipponbare orthologous regions. All CG14 predicted genes were used as queries to BLAST them against Nipponbare genes within the S1 regions, to generate a matrix of distance between genes used to draw the relationships between orthologous and paralogous genes (Figure S1). Most of the genes (>90%) were found conserved in the same order and orientation between the two orthologous sequence. Seventeen and 11 predicted genes, respectively in CG14 and Nipponbare, were found to be involved in mechanisms that disrupt the collinearity. First, eleven genes were present in CG14 and absent in Nipponbare, while only three extra genes were found in the Nipponbare segment. Of the eleven extra genes predicted in CG14, seven were enclosed into pack-MULE elements (66E18.45, 17A24.25, 49I08.4, 49I08.45, 49I08.75, 49I08.9 and 49I08.10, Table S1 and S3). In Nipponbare, two of the three extra genes (Os06g04710 and Os06g05470) were classified as expressed proteins. This result suggests that a significant number of collinearity disruptions in the S1 regions may be produced by gene movement mechanisms, such as the transposition of pack-MULE elements. These disruptions were mainly distributed into three large segments along the S1 regions and one region outside the S1 regions (Figure 3). Detailed comparisons between CG14 and the two sub-species of O. sativa (ssp. japonica cv. Nipponbare and ssp. indica cv. 93-11) were carried out in these sites, in order to investigate the molecular mechanisms involved.


Figure 3. Orthologous sequence comparisons between the 813 kb and 847 kb from the O. glaberrima cv. GC14 and O. sativa ssp. japonica cv. Nipponbare S1 regions.

Comparisons were performed using dot plot alignment of the CG14 sequence (horizontal axis) against the Nipponbare sequence (vertical axis; coordinates 1,900,806–2,750,619-bp on chromosome 6). The S1A, S1 and S1B regions are indicated along the horizontal axis. Positions and orientation of genes are symbolized by black and colored boxes along X and Y-axes. Colored boxes represent genes that disrupted microcollinearity. Clear boxes in the dot blot underline four large regions showing a strong disruption in the microcollinearity.


Around the 93E18.3 and 93E18.5 CG14 genes, located in the flanking region of the genetic interval of S1A, sequence comparisons showed a large insertion of 13,123 bp of sequence in CG14 relative to Nipponbare (Figure 3, box A). This extra segment carries a predicted pseudogene (93E18.3) and a gene coding for a putative protein (93E18.5), absent in O. sativa (Nipponbare and 93-11; data not shown). It was not possible to identify the mechanism that originated this insertion (or deletion in Nipponbare), since its extremities have no similarity with known TEs, and no traces of short duplications were clearly visible at the insertion site in CG14. Although the insertion (or deletion) of large segments containing genes appears to be common in rice compared to distant species such as Brachypodium [32], such rearrangement hasn't been previously reported between closely related rice species.

Comparisons between orthologous sequences around 66E18.3 (Putative protein) and 66E18.4 (Putative F-box protein) genes indicated that both CG14 and Nipponbare regions have undergone a multitude of small changes since the loci have diverged from a common ancestor (Figure 3, box B). Here collinearity is altered by a local gene order alteration involving both genes, compared to the positions of the orthologous genes from O. sativa (ssp. japonica and indica) (Figure 4). In addition to the order rearrangement, a several TE insertions (two MITEs and two retrotransposons in CG14, and a large helitron and a transposon in Nipponbare and 93-11) were detected. Furthermore, a block of approximately 13 kb comprising genes Os06g04690, Os06g04699 and one helitron was found duplicated in tandem orientation in Nipponbare but not in 93-11 (Figure 4 B). The mechanisms at the origin of the gene rearrangement between 66E18.3 and 66E18.4 remain unidentified, thus no evolutionary model could be developed. However it seems clear that numerous TEs have been inserted up- and downstream the orthologous genes after the divergence between O. glaberrima and O. sativa; and that after the divergence between indica and japonica subspecies, a large duplication occurred in Nipponbare relative to 93-11. Furthermore, comparisons between the F-box duplicated genes in Nipponbare (Os06g04690 and Os06g04710) reveal significant changes. Due to frame-shift mutations, the predicted Os06g04710 gene is shorter than the duplicated Os06g04690 gene, resulting in a predicted protein that lacks the N-terminal region of the F-box domain. Altogether, these events indicate that this region may represent an intense spot of recent divergence between O. glaberrima and O. sativa, but also within O. sativa subspecies.


Figure 4. Comparisons of the orthologous sequences around the 66E18.3/66E18.4 CG14 genes.

A. Dot plot comparison between the genomic region of genes 66E18.3 and 66E18.4 from CG14 (horizontal axis; coordinates 145–180 kb) against the O. sativa ssp. japonica cv. Nipponbare orthologous sequence (vertical axis; coordinates 2,034,806–2,088,806-bp on chromosome 6). B. Schematic representation of the comparison between the genomic region of genes 66E18.3 and 66E18.4 and their orthologous genes in O. sativa ssp. japonica cv. Nipponbare and O. sativa ssp. indica cv. 93-11. Colored backgrounds link orthologous regions. Boxes symbolize the positions of transposons and helitrons elements (light blue), Retrotransposons (red), Putative protein gene 66E18.3 and its orthologs (green), Putative F-box protein gene 66E18.4 and its orthologs (purple), and other genes (yellow).


At the 49I08.7/49I08.11 genes region (Figure 3, box C), localized within the S1 locus, the collinearity was altered by the presence of a total of five extra genes in O. glaberrima compared to O. sativa [27]. Most of them (49I08.75; 49I08.9 and 49I08.10) appear to be enclosed within pack-MULE elements, suggesting that massive re-localization of these elements in the O. glaberrima region may be here the mechanism for collinearity perturbation (Table S3).

Dot plot alignment of the CG14 and Nipponbare orthologous sequences around genes 88O22.2/88O22.7 evidenced a paracentric chromosomal inversion of approximately 45 kb (Figure 3, box D). This inversion involved four different coding genes (88O22.3, 88O22.4, 88O22.5 and 88O22.6) in CG14, perturbing gene orders and orientations. A detailed comparison between orthologous sequences was carried out in order to identify the chromosomal inversion breakpoints and to investigate the process responsible of such rearrangement. Close analysis indicated that the distal and proximal inversion breakpoints contain gene duplications in both species (respectively 88O22.2/88O22.7 genes and Os06g05209/Os06g05272 genes). These genes, coding for Pectate lyase proteins, belonged to a locally duplicated gene family composed of three gene copies (Family V, Table 1). Duplicated genes at the edge of the inversion were nearly identical, with the exception of the first 36 extra-nucleotides at the 5′ end of 88O22.7 and Os06g05209 genes, resulting in twelve extra amino-acids for each gene (purple boxes and arrowheads, Figure 5 A). All genes located in the inversion breakpoints in CG14 and Nipponbare appear intact and seem putatively functional (even after switching their upstream segment), since their coding regions are identical. A tentative model for the chromosomal inversion process is depicted in Figure 5 B. In the ancestral fragment—here the structure of the fragment is identical to the Nipponbare one—, two homologous Pectate lyase genes in opposite orientations flanked an internal region of 45 kb (Blue and green boxes, Figure 5 B). A mechanism of homologous recombination between inverted Pectate lyase genes occurred, leading to an inversion of the internal region and the exchange of upstream regions of Pectate lyase genes.


Figure 5. Comparisons of the orthologous sequences around the 88O22.2/88O22.7 CG14 genes.

A. Dot plot comparison and structures between the genomic region of genes 88O22.3/88O22.7 from CG14 (horizontal axis; coordinates 445–506 kb) and their orthologous in Nipponbare (vertical axis; coordinates 2,336,995–2,376,853-bp on chromosome 6). B. A model for the generation of the chromosomal inversion between O. glaberrima and O. sativa. a. Hypothetical ancestral segment (identical to the organization in the Nipponbare genome); b. Breakpoints occur by homologous recombination between two homologous genes coding for Pectate lyase proteins. c. Segment in O. glaberrima. Boxes symbolize the positions of Pectate lyase duplicated genes (blue, green and orange), transposons elements (light blue), Retrotransposons (red), and other genes (yellow). Purple boxes and arrowheads indicate the positions of twelve extra amino acids between duplicated Pectate lyase genes.


Unfortunately the reduced quality of the sequence assembly for 93-11 did not allow us to confirm the presence of the chromosomal inversion between O. glaberrima and O. sativa ssp. indica. Nevertheless, a mapping analysis based on BLAST alignments of available BAC end sequence (BES) pairs from seven different Oryza species [33] around and within the inversion breakpoints, clearly indicated that the inversion structure is identical between O. glaberrima and four other Oryza species (O. nivara, O. officinalis, O. alta and O. australiensis). On the contrary, the mapping of BESs from O. sativa (ssp. japonica cv Nipponbare) and O. rufipogon, the wild ancestor of O. sativa, suggest a different genomic structure compared to the O. glaberrima region (Figure S2).

Since chromosomal inversions are known to suppress genetic recombination between normal and inverted chromosomal segments, we evaluated the recombination rates in our O. sativa×O. glaberrima backcross populations [27] around and within the inversion. The genetic map obtained from 779 BC1F1 plants, after a high marker saturation in the site of the structural variation, showed a complete absence of genetic recombination between the inversion breakpoints, in contrast to the recombination rates found in the rest of the 813 kb contig (Figure S3). These data suggest that the chromosomal inversion represents an inter-specific rearrangement between O. glaberrima and O. sativa, which strictly restricts recombination within its limits. To our knowledge, this is the first report of a chromosomal inversion initiated by duplicated genes in plants. The considerable number of locally duplicated genes in rice may offer potential recombination targets for chromosomal rearrangements mechanisms involving coding regions [30].

Transposable elements participated to the dynamic evolution of S1 regions

Beside the alteration of the order and orientation of genes through re-localization of pack-MULE elements, comparative analysis between the Nipponbare and CG14 S1 regions reveals changes of the genomic structure due to differential insertion or deletion of a multitude of transposable elements. Since the divergence of the two species, more than 117 kb of TE (13% of the segment) were inserted in Nipponbare, against 72 kb (9%) in CG14. The size difference observed at the S1 regions, mainly due to the insertion of long full-length LTR retrotransposons, is in agreement with the genome size difference between O. sativa (434 Mb) and O. glaberrima (352 Mb) [34]. Most of the TEs appear randomly inserted along the S1 regions, with the apparent exception of the TE accumulation that occurred in the S1 locus (Figure 3). Here, the CG14 segment has undergone a 1.5× sequence size increase due to the local accumulation of TEs in the neighborhood of the S1 candidate gene (49I08.11) [27]. Beside the S1 locus, successive but isolated TE insertions responsible for the observed interruptions on the collinearity occurred specifically in Nipponbare, downstream the chromosomal inversion (Figure 3).

Gene divergence in S1 regions between O. sativa and O. glaberrima

Of the 143 annotated genes in the sequenced regions, 120 were used for pairwise comparisons and divergence analysis with their respective Nipponbare orthologous genes, from which 109 fell into the S1 regions. Twenty-three CG14 genes were not analyzed due to the absence of a Nipponbare orthologous gene, deep annotated gene structure differences between them, or because one of the two was annotated as a pseudogene. Similar analyses were carried out as a control, using two other published genomic regions in CG14 where no reproductive isolation region between the two species has been previously reported: (1) the ADH region on the short arm of chromosome 11, containing 13 annotated genes [18], and (2) the MOC1 region on the long arm of chromosome 6, containing 17 annotated genes [35]. The mean rate of non-synonymous substitutions (Ka) and synonymous substitutions (Ks) across the S1 regions are respectively 0.009 and 0.035 (Figure 6). No statistical difference in the mean levels of Ka and Ks (respectively P = 0.771 and P = 0.317) was found when comparing with the ADH (Ka = 0.007, Ks = 0.040) and MOC1 (Ka = 0.004, Ks = 0.020) regions (Table S4 and Figure S4), suggesting that the S1 as well as the ADH and MOC1 regions are globally under identical evolution rates of protein-coding genes. Despite an overall uniformity of Ka and Ks values along the S1 regions, several isolated peak values were higher than both background and mean values (Figure 6). Functions and Gene Ontology (GO) of annotated genes harboring increased Ks and/or Ka values were investigated. Of the 21 genes showing elevated Ks or Ka (at least two times the Ks or Ka mean values, indicated by symbols on Figure 6), 14 have known functions and are classified into the following categories of the “biological process” of Gene Ontology: response to biotic stimulus, protein modification, signal transduction and response to endogenous stimulus; and into the “molecular function” categories: kinase activity, nucleotide binding, protein binding, transferase activity, catalytic activity and hydrolase activity. The function and ontology of these genes suggest that high divergence may be a consequence of a local and accelerated evolution possibly driven by adaptation [36] (Figure 6). The Ka/Ks ratio was also calculated to characterize the evolution of protein-coding sequences in the S1 loci (Table S5). More than 85% of the genes were found to be under strong purifying selection, six genes to have a neutral evolution, while the 11 genes with the highest Ka/Ks values seemed to be evolving under positive selection or relaxed selective constraint. Finally, we investigated whether high gene divergence is globally associated to structural variations such as transposable element abundance, duplications and chromosomal inversions. No clear association was found between divergent genes and transposable element abundance as illustrated by the S1 locus, where a clear accumulation of TEs was observed in CG14 compared to Nipponbare [27], with no significant effect on gene divergence. Similarly, within the chromosomal inversion, no peak of high divergence was associated to genes at the relative exception of the hypothetical gene 88O22.6. The high Ks values observed for the duplicated Pectate lyase genes might be generated by mosaic gene structures since these genes are located at the inversion breakpoints (Figure 6 A).


Figure 6. Representation of Ka and Ks values between 109 O. sativa and O. glaberrima orthologous genes in the S1 regions.

A. Representation of Ks values. The horizontal line is the mean value of Ks (Ks = 0.035) for the 109 analyzed orthologous genes in the S1 regions. B. Representation of Ka values. The horizontal line is the mean value of Ka (Ka = 0.09) for the 109 analyzed orthologous genes in the S1 regions. Lines below graphics represent analyzed genes located into S1A, S1, S1B loci, and those within the chromosomal inversion (i). Symbols represent different divergent genes with similar annotated function or unknown function as follows in O. glaberrima: (*) 66E18.4 and 49I08.11 (F-box proteins), (“) 66E18.6 (HAD phosphatase protein), (+) 66E18.8, 17A24.2 and 17A24.3 (LRR proteins), (°) 49I08.16 and 49I08.18 (Putative Serine/threonine protein kinases), (∧) 88O22.2 and 88O22.7 (Pectate lyase located at breakpoint inversion), (§) 41E07.23 (PRR protein) and (<) 88O22.10, 88O22.11 and 41E07.12 (Putative transferase proteins), ($) 88O22.6 and 88O22.19 (Hypothetical proteins) and (#) 93E08.17, 66E18.3, 56F23.3, 56F23.12 and 41E07.25 (Putative proteins).


Characterization of duplicated F-box genes in the S1 regions

The gene 49I08.11 coding for a putative F-box protein has been proposed as a putative candidate gene for the S1 locus, on the basis of the protein function of homologous genes and its high degree of divergence between the two species [27]. Sequencing of the 813 kb of the S1 regions in O. glaberrima revealed a duplicated copy of the 49I08.11 F-box gene, located 154 kb apart in the S1A locus (gene 66E18.4) (Figure 2 and Table S1). The duplicated genes exhibited high overall sequence similarities (90.7% of nucleotide identities). Both O. glaberrima F-box genes were found conserved in the orthologous O. sativa region. Altogether these data suggest that the duplicated F-box 66E18.4 gene may also be a valuable candidate gene for S1A.

To study evolution of this F-box gene family, detailed gene comparisons were performed at the S1A and S1 loci. In the S1 locus, nucleotide and amino acid alignments showed significant sequence variations between orthologous F-box genes in O. glaberrima and O. sativa (Figure S5). The elevated Ka and Ks values and the calculated Ka/Ks ratio (Table S5) suggest an accelerated but neutral evolution, while the majority of genes in the S1 regions appears to be under a purifying evolution. Besides coding region evolution, the CG14 49I08.11 F-box gene is embedded in an accumulation of TEs that reshaped its upstream and downstream regions. Furthermore its gene structure also evolved through the insertion of a non-autonomous transposon nested into the fourth intron of the gene [27]. In the S1A locus, a unique F-box gene is present in CG14 (66E18.4) and in O. sativa ssp. indica (BGIOSIBCE020566), compared to two tandemly duplicated orthologous genes in O. sativa ssp. japonica (Os06g04690 and Os06g04710). While the structure of the Os06g04690, BGIOSIBCE020566 and 66E18.4 genes appears to be the same, the 5′ part of the Os06g04710 gene exhibits several frame-shifts, resulting in a shorter predicted protein that lacks the N-terminal region of the F-box domain. Beside this variation, the alignments between the S1A F-box genes showed numerous polymorphisms at the amino-acid levels (Figure S5), which shaped the corresponding phylogenetic tree (Figure S6). Ka/Ks rates, calculated for these coding regions, suggest a similar evolution to the one observed for the S1 F-box genes. Together these results suggest an accelerated evolution of these F-box genes that drives the divergence of the O. sativa and O. glaberrima orthologous genes, but also between the two O. sativa subspecies. These evidences allow considering these duplicated genes as potential candidates for the S1A and S1 loci.


The growing availability of whole genome sequences and comparative analysis of gene divergence have helped evolutionists to deduce the presence of reproductive barriers within highly divergent genomic regions [14], and even to infer the possible path of speciation for several related species [12], [13], [37]. Whole genome sequence comparisons between indica and japonica subspecies of Asian rice have also led to the identification of large regions of high polymorphisms, whose origins have been associated with geographical differentiation, reproductive barriers, subsequent independent domestications, and a more recent admixture possibly mediated by human migration [36]. However no direct comparison between experimentally validated postzygotic isolating loci has been performed so far at the sequence level, to directly investigate in detail the genomic evolution of such regions.

Between the two cultivated rice species, the S1 locus acts as the strongest postzygotic reproductive barrier, having an important role on their origin and conservation. In a previous work, we described the fine genetic and physical mapping of the S1 locus. Additionally we detected the presence of two other loci (S1A and S1B) that interact epistatically with S1 to cause the allelic elimination of female gametes produced by the F1 hybrids [27]. Based on available data, we build a genetic model where BDM incompatibilities between the alleles of the O. sativa and O. glaberrima S1A, S1 and S1B loci are provoking the female gamete elimination and the strong transmission ratio distortion observed in the hybrids [27]. Our genetic model states that the final allelic frequencies and final survival rates of female gametes are associated to the recombination ratio between the three epistatic loci, their segregation during meiosis, and the alleles (indica or japonica) confronted in a given cross. In order to understand the basis of the evolution of the S1 genomic regions, and to infer possible gene candidates or mechanisms behind this reproductive barrier, we sequenced the seven remaining O. glaberrima clones that constitute the physical map of the S1 regions, and compared them with the orthologous regions in O. sativa.

The comparisons revealed that the S1 regions in both species are strongly conserved in terms of genomic structure and coding sequence divergence. Three isolated regions showing a disturbed collinearity were identified concerning: (1) local invasion of transposable elements (mainly Pack-MULEs carrying remnant of coding genes) around a putative F-box gene, candidate gene for the locus S1, (2) multiple duplication and subsequent divergence of the same F-box gene, within S1A, (3) and an interspecific chromosomal inversion in S1B. Additionally, we showed that most of the genes in the S1 regions undergone a strong purifying selection, with the exception of few isolated divergent genes. These genes belong to functional categories known to confer adaptive advantages, and their highly divergent evolution could be a consequence of local adaptation to the African or Asian environments, or of human selection following the independent domestication processes. The pattern of evolution of a genomic region involved in a reproductive barrier could provide indications on its establishment, specifically, if it occurred under either an active or a restricted gene flow [14]. The similar rate of gene divergence between the S1 regions and two other genomic sites not involved in reproductive isolation may suggest a limited gene flow between populations during the establishment of the S1 barrier. In consequence, the geographic localizations of O. rufipogon and O. sativa in Asia and of O. barthii and O. glaberrima in West Africa, together with a restricted gene flow could imply that this speciation process is the result of geographical isolation, in agreement with the current hypothesis of a common Asian origin and ancestral migrations to Africa [19], [20]. However a precise estimation of gene flow rate is required to test this hypothesis.

Under this highly conservative context, the S1 barrier between O. sativa and O. glaberrima appears to have evolved from the divergent evolution of punctual genes and not from large genomic structural rearrangements, as predicted by the BDM model of incompatibilities. A detailed analysis of genes known to be implicated in BDM incompatibilities could help to identify possible candidates for the S1 locus. Recently several molecular studies in animals and plants (including rice) revealed that gene duplication and divergence could be directly involved in postzygotic reproductive barriers concerning BDM incompatibilities in hybrids [9], [10], [11], [38]. In our previous work, two putative candidate genes for the locus S1 were identified: an F-box gene and a Pack-MULE transposon carrying a fragment of a AP2 gene [27]. Interestingly, a strongly conserved copy of the F-box gene from the S1 locus is located in S1A, constituting the only gene family to be present at two different loci along the S1 regions. The presence of these duplicated genes appears to match well the evolutionary model of an ancestral duplication followed by a divergent evolution of the alleles in each population. In terms of divergence, the F-box genes 66E18.4 and 49I08.11 in O. glaberrima cv. CG14 and their respective orthologous genes Os06g04690 and Os06g04710, and Os06g04980 in O. sativa cv. Nipponbare, exhibit a significant accelerated but neutral evolution (Table S5), in contrast to the purifying evolution of the majority of genes along the S1 regions. Additionally, the up- and downstream regions of these F-box genes have undergone a multitude of structural variations since O. sativa and O. glaberrima diverged (including a second gene duplication and divergence in the S1A locus, in the japonica genome), suggesting that a dynamic evolution may be associated to them.

In rice, the implication of F-box proteins in postzygotic barriers has already been reported for the Sa intersubspecific male sterility locus. In this case, the selective abortion of microspores is caused by the interaction between the indica and japonica alleles of a SUMO E3 ligase (SaM) and a F-box gene (SaF) [7]. This constitutes another argument for considering the hypothesis that the duplicated F-box genes are involved in the sterility barrier mediated by the S1 locus. Even more, the second gene duplication and divergence in the S1A locus would allow to explain not only the observed differences in the TRD levels found between the O. glaberrima×O. sativa ssp. indica and the O. glaberrima×O. sativa ssp. japonica hybrids [27], but also the presence of the intersubspecific sterility locus S10, localized on the same genetic position [16], [39]. F-box proteins constitute one of the largest multi-gene families with more than 700 putative genes and pseudogenes in rice [40], [41], [42]. F-box proteins and their SCF (Skp1-Cullin-F-box) complexes are known to be involved in regulatory functions on several processes, such as the progression throughout the meiotic [43], [44] and mitotic divisions [45] during gametogenesis. In our genetic model for the female sterility caused by S1, only the cells that inherit a compatible allelic combination are able to pursue their development after each cellular division, to form a functional embryo sac [27]. Taking into account the recognized role of F-box proteins in the cell cycle progression, a BDM incompatibility after a hypothetical divergent subfunctionalization or neofunctionalization involving these genes could thus explain the arrested development of some allelic forms of hybrid gametes. Remarkably, the results from a previous F-box protein microarray analysis during rice panicle development evidenced the expression of genes Os06g04690, Os06g04710 and Os06g04980 (probe Os.3577.1.S1_x_at) in whole panicles throughout the meiotic and young microspore stages, and their down-regulation in mutants for the gene Udh1, an important transcription factor for meiocyte differentiation [40]. These expression data demonstrate that these genes are expressed at the time and in the tissues where the BDM incompatibility is supposed to take place in the hybrids according to our genetic model. Taking into account the ability of F-box genes to closely interact with other proteins, their evolutionary plasticity, their known role in cell cycle progression and reproductive barriers, and their expression in reproductive tissues, the duplicated copies of the F-box gene appear as the best candidate factors for the S1A and S1 loci.

The comparative analysis of gene divergence have helped us to identify two genes possibly involved in the sterility barrier caused by the S1A and the S1 loci, however no plausible candidate was determined for S1B, since the available sequence only partially spans the locus, and the structure of its proximal region seems to have a different configuration between the two species. However a striking alteration of the collinearity was observed within the S1B locus, in the form of a 45 kb chromosomal paracentric inversion between CG14 and Nipponbare. Mapping of BES pairs from seven Oryza species suggest a similar structure of the inversion region between O. glaberrima and both closely and distantly related species; while a different structure was found in O. sativa cv. Nipponbare and O. rufipogon. These data suggest that the inversion may have occurred recently in O. rufipogon, and has been inherited by O. sativa after domestication. In addition to the direct genomic sequence comparison between O. sativa and O. glaberrima, the genetic analysis showed a complete restriction of recombination between markers spanning the inversion in our interspecific BC1F1 populations. Besides reducing dramatically recombination between inverted and standard non-inverted chromosomes, inversions appear to play a major role in evolution of species [46], [47]. Between the close relatives sympatric species Drosophila pseudoobscura and D. persimilis, inversions were found within regions associated with hybrid sterility, suggesting that they might have contributed to their speciation process [48]. Moreover, gene divergence was found higher within inverted regions than in non-inverted regions suggesting the occurrence of gene flow between the two species [13]. In contrast to the Drosophila example, the genic divergence outside and within the inversion in the rice S1B locus appears to be quite uniform (Table S5), suggesting that the inversion might have occurred after speciation or at least after the complete geographical isolation of the species. With the chromosomal inversion fixed in the O. rufipogon-O. sativa species group, its role in the reproductive isolation mechanisms would be limited to an increase of the genetic linkage between the loci involved in this sterility barrier. Since recombination between the three loci plays a key role in the final allelic frequencies and survival rates of female gametes produced by the hybrids [27], it is probable that the restriction of the recombination caused by the inversion would have a strengthening effect over the barrier [49].

The effect of the inversion on the recombination is not the only sign that the S1 barrier could have been strengthened over time. S1 has been described as a complex locus, having different effects over male and female fertility of the O. sativa and O. glaberrima hybrids. Plants that carry only the S1 locus in a heterozygote state are partially male sterile [25], [28], while heterozygocity at the S1A, S1 and S1B loci is necessary to observe partial female sterility [27]. This differential effect over male and female fertility could mean that the barrier has been strengthened over time by sequential accumulations of incompatibilities. Furthermore, the presence of an additional locus (S1C) in one of the four interspecific populations examined, which has a supplementary deleterious effect over female gamete elimination [27], seems to indicate that an auxiliary strengthening step may be currently under fixation.


In this work, we have studied the structural and genic divergence of the S1 regions between O. sativa and O. glaberrima, as a method to understand the basis of their evolution and to infer possible gene candidates or mechanisms working behind this reproductive barrier. The comparisons showed that the S1 regions have undergone no drastic variation in their recent divergence and evolution, suggesting that a small accumulation of genic changes, following a Bateson-Dobzhansky-Muller (BDM) model, might be involved in the establishment of the sterility barrier. In this context, genetic incompatibilities involving the duplicated F-box genes as putative candidates, and a possible strengthening step involving a chromosomal inversion that increases the genetic linkage between the factors involved in the epistatic interaction are suspected to participate in the reproductive barrier between Asian and African rice species. The knowledge generated by these comparative approaches contributes to a better understanding of the general evolution of postzygotic reproductive barriers in plants. Additionally, it allows considering new breeding strategies aiming unlocking the genetic potential of O. glaberrima for the improvement of the Asian rice. Additional efforts still remain necessary to confirm the candidate genes and to identify the molecular mechanism that controls the S1 postzygotic barrier.

Materials and Methods

Sequence analysis and gene annotation method

O. glaberrima cv. CG14 BAC sequencing was done by the Sanger method. Sequence analysis was done as previously described [27]. Briefly, coding regions were predicted ab initio using the FGENESH program [50] and then confirmed by comparative analysis with annotated genes models and proteins in O. sativa cv. Nipponbare, downloaded from the TIGR database [51]. Predicted gene structures were manually evaluated by alignment with rice EST and full-length cDNA (FLcDNA) public sequences [52]. Detailed analysis was performed with the EMBOSS Analysis software [53] and the physical map diagram was drawn using gff2ps software [54]. Putative transposable elements (TEs) were first identified and annotated by RepeatMasker searches ( against local databases of rice TEs downloaded from the REPBASE [55], from the TIGR repeat database [56], and RetrOryza [57], and finally manually corrected. De novo prediction of TEs was performed according to structure of the different classes of TEs. The final annotation of the BAC sequences was performed using the Artemis tool [58], and the comparison with the Nipponbare genome was accomplished using dot-plot alignments of the Dotter software [59]. Nucleotide and amino-acid alignments were carried out using ClustalX [60].

Molecular marker analysis

Genetic markers were designed from the comparison of the Nipponbare sequence with its orthologous CG14 sequence as previously described [27], and evaluated in four O. sativa×O. glaberrima BC1F1 populations developed from our previous work [27]. PCR reactions were carried as described [61], with an annealing temperature and magnesium concentration optimized for each primer pair (Table S6). Separation of the PCR products was carried in 4% agarose and revealed with Ethidium Bromide for polymorphisms greater than 12 bp, and in a Li-Cor sequencer (Li-Cor Biosciences) for smaller polymorphisms, using a M13 tail tag (IRD700 and IRD800).

Detection of a chromosomal inversion in Oryza species by mapping BAC end sequence pairs

Public BESs from 9 Oryza species (O. sativa, O. rufipogon, O. glaberrima, O. nivara, O. punctata, O. minuta, O. officinalis, O. alta and O. australiensis) developed in the frame of the Oryza Map Alignment Project (OMAP, were downloaded from AGI web site ( [33]. BACs were mapped onto the O. glaberrima S1 region by aligning BES pairs using BLASTN. BACs overlapping the chromosomal inversion breakpoints (as indicated by the alignment of the two BES of each BAC, inside and outside the inverted region, within a distance <300,000 bp) were filtered, and the orientation of both BESs relative to the O. glaberrima S1 genomic region was analyzed.

Orthologous sequence comparisons

The orthologous CG14 S1 regions were identified by BLASTN against the O. sativa ssp. japonica cv Nipponbare pseudomolecules (release v. 6.1) downloaded from the MSU Rice Genome Annotation Project web site [51], and against the O. sativa ssp. indica 93-11 downloaded from the Beijing Genomic Institute web site (​ownload.jsp). Sequence comparisons were carried out using the Dotter program [59], the Artemis Comparison Tool [62], and the EMBOSS package. The downloaded O. sativa sequences were re-annotated for genes and TEs with similar approaches used to annotate the O. glaberrima segment. To study microcollinearity between orthologous O. glaberrima and O. sativa sequences, the nucleotide sequences of non-TE coding genes were extracted for each segment and used as queries for BLAST alignments between each other to generate a distance matrix. Microcollinearity relationships were displayed using GenomePixelizer software (

Calculation of nonsynonymous and synonymous nucleotide substitution rates

Orthologous O. sativa and O. glaberrima annotated coding regions were aligned using the Needle tools [53] to estimate the degree of gene structure conservations. Orthologous genes with clear distinct annotated gene structure were removed from further analysis. Calculations for nonsynonymous and synonymous nucleotides substitution rate were done as previously described [27]. Identical analyses were carried out with two control loci recently sequenced in O. glaberrima: ADH [18] from chromosome 11 (positions 5.598–5.750 Mbp) and MOC1 from chromosome 6 (positions 24.25–24,40 Mbp) [35]. A non-parametric statistical test (Kruskal–Wallis analysis of variance) was used to analyze the homogeneity of Ka and Ks data between the S1 region and the ADH and MOC1 loci. P<0.05 was considered to be statistically significant to report non homogenous data.

Supporting Information

Figure S1.

Schematic representation of microcollinearity relationships between O. glaberrima cv. GC14 and O. sativa cv. Nipponbare S1 regions. Colored boxes indicate positions and orientation of non-TE genes along axes representing the CG14 (upper segment) and Nipponbare (lower segment) S1 regions. Colored lines linking boxes symbolize high identity relationships between one, or several genes from CG14 and Nipponbare. Red boxes indicate genes lacking orthologs. Blue and green boxes represent the positions of duplicated genes in Nipponbare compared to CG14. Orange boxes indicate the positions of genes contained in the inversion. The positions of S1A, S1 and S1B loci are indicated along the horizontal axis of CG14. Identified gene families in CG14 as classified in Table 1 are indicated below the diagram.



Figure S2.

Mapping of pairs of BAC end sequences (BES) from seven Oryza species spanning the O. glaberrima inversion breakpoints. Pairs of BAC end sequences (BES) were mapped on the O. glaberrima S1 regions. BACs spanning the inversion breakpoints were symbolized on the O. glaberrima physical map as horizontal lines limited by colored arrows, representing orientations of BES (blue arrows for sense orientations and red arrows for antisense orientations). The name of each mapped BAC is indicated below each horizontal line. BACs limited by two BES in opposite orientation indicate similar organization of the inversion compared to O. glaberrima, while BACs limited by two BES in identical orientation suggest a different orientation compared to O. glaberrima. A tree in the left of the figure symbolizes the evolutionary relationships of the Oryza species used in this analysis as described in Ge et al., 1999 (Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 96:14400–14405).



Figure S3.

Comparison between structural variations identified between orthologous S1 regions in CG14 and Nipponbare, and the genetic map of the S1 locus between O. sativa and O. glaberrima. Structural variations between orthologous S1 regions (left) compared with the genetic map obtained from the O. sativa×O. glaberrima 779 BC1F1 plants previously described [27]. Marker positions in the CG14 physical map are shown. Blue frames on the physical maps of O. glaberrima cv. CG 14 and O. sativa ssp. japonica cv. Nipponbare indicate the position of the chromosomal inversion.



Figure S4.

Frequencies of Ka and Ks values between orthologous coding sequences in the O. glaberrima and O. sativa S1, ADH and MOC1 regions. Distribution of the Ka and Ks values of the S1 (A), ADH (B) and MOC1 (C) orthologous regions from O. sativa ssp. japonica cv. Nipponbare and O. glaberrima cv. CG14.



Figure S5.

Amino-acid alignment between duplicated F-box proteins in the S1 orthologous regions. Alignment of predicted amino-acid sequences of F-box genes in the S1 and S1A loci from O. sativa ssp. japonica cv. Nipponbare (OSj), O. sativa ss. indica cv. 93-11 (OSi) et O. glaberrima cv. CG14 (OG). Blue box indicates the identified F-box domain. The conserved Leucine amino acids in the Leucine rich repeat regions are underlined in grey. S1A-OSjp designates the duplicated and partial F-box protein in the Nipponbare S1A locus.



Figure S6.

Phylogenetic relationships among the S1 and S1A orthologous F-box proteins. Phylogenetic tree of the S1 and S1A orthologous F-box genes from O. sativa ssp. japonica cv. Nipponbare (OSj), O. sativa ssp. indica cv. 93-11 (OSi) and O. glaberrima cv. CG14 (OG). The unrooted tree was generated by the neighbor-joining method using ClustalX program. Numbers indicates bootstrap values with 1000 replicates.



Table S1.

List of identified genes in the 813 kb of the O. glaberrima cv. CG14 S1 regions.



Table S2.

List of the different types of TE found in the O. glaberrima S1 regions.



Table S3.

List of identified pack-MULEs and enclosed genes in the O. glaberrima cv. CG14 S1 regions.



Table S4.

Sequence comparison between orthologous coding sequences in the O. glaberrima cv. CG14 and O. sativa cv. Nipponbare ADH and MOC1 regions.



Table S5.

Sequence comparison between orthologous coding sequences in the O. glaberrima cv. CG14 and O. sativa cv. Nipponbare S1 regions.



Table S6.

New molecular markers designed in the S1 regions.




Our thanks go to R.A. Wing and P.R. Marri (AGI, Arizona) for sharing data on the O. glaberrima whole genome sequence, and to P. Touzet et V. Poncet for their valuable comments on the manuscript.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: RG AG ML JT AG. Performed the experiments: RG AG FG SS. Analyzed the data: RG AG ML. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: RG AG. Wrote the paper: RG AG ML.


  1. 1. Coyne JA, Orr HA (2004) Speciation Sunderland. Massachusetts U.S.A: Sinauer Associates.
  2. 2. Muller HJ (1942) Isolating Mechanisms, Evolution and Temperature. Biological Symposium 6: 71–125.
  3. 3. Bateson W (1909) Heredity and variation in modern lights. In: Seward AC, editor. Darwin and modern science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 81–101.
  4. 4. Dobzhansky T (1936) Studies on hybrid sterility. II. Localization of sterility factors in Drosophila pseudoobscura hybrids. Genetics 21: 113–135.
  5. 5. Chen J, Ding J, Ouyang Y, Du H, Yang J, et al. (2008) A triallelic system of S5 is a major regulator of the reproductive barrier and compatibility of indica-japonica hybrids in rice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 105: 11436–11441.
  6. 6. Lee HY, Chou JY, Cheong L, Chang NH, Yang SY, et al. (2008) Incompatibility of nuclear and mitochondrial genomes causes hybrid sterility between two yeast species. Cell 135: 1065–1073.
  7. 7. Long Y, Zhao L, Niu B, Su J, Wu H, et al. (2008) Hybrid male sterility in rice controlled by interaction between divergent alleles of two adjacent genes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 105: 18871–18876.
  8. 8. Brideau NJ, Flores HA, Wang J, Maheshwari S, Wang X, et al. (2006) Two Dobzhansky-Muller genes interact to cause hybrid lethality in Drosophila. Science 314: 1292–1295.
  9. 9. Masly JP, Jones CD, Noor MA, Locke J, Orr HA (2006) Gene transposition as a cause of hybrid sterility in Drosophila. Science 313: 1448–1450.
  10. 10. Bikard D, Patel D, Le Mette C, Giorgi V, Camilleri C, et al. (2009) Divergent evolution of duplicate genes leads to genetic incompatibilities within A. thaliana. Science 323: 623–626.
  11. 11. Yamagata Y, Yamamoto E, Aya K, Win KT, Doi K, et al. (2010) Mitochondrial gene in the nuclear genome induces reproductive barrier in rice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107: 1494–1499.
  12. 12. Turner TL, Hahn MW, Nuzhdin SV (2005) Genomic islands of speciation in Anopheles gambiae. PLoS Biol 3: e285.
  13. 13. Kulathinal RJ, Stevison LS, Noor MA (2009) The genomics of speciation in Drosophila: diversity, divergence, and introgression estimated using low-coverage genome sequencing. PLoS Genet 5: e1000550.
  14. 14. Wu CI, Ting CT (2004) Genes and speciation. Nat Rev Genet 5: 114–122.
  15. 15. Sarla N, Swamy BPM (2005) Oryza glaberrima: A source for the improvement of Oryza sativa. Current Science 89: 955–963.
  16. 16. Zhu Q, Ge S (2005) Phylogenetic relationships among A-genome species of the genus Oryza revealed by intron sequences of four nuclear genes. New Phytologist 167: 249–265.
  17. 17. Ma J, Bennetzen JL (2004) Rapid recent growth and divergence of rice nuclear genomes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 101: 12404–12410.
  18. 18. Ammiraju JS, Lu F, Sanyal A, Yu Y, Song X, et al. (2008) Dynamic evolution of Oryza genomes is revealed by comparative genomic analysis of a genus-wide vertical data set. Plant Cell 20: 3191–3209.
  19. 19. Second G (1985) Evolutionary relationships in the Sativa group of Oryza based on isozyme data. Genet Sel Evol 17: 89–114.
  20. 20. Vaughan D, Kadowaki K, Kaga A, Tomooka N (2005) On the phylogeny and biogeography of the genus Oryza. Breeding Science 55: 113–122.
  21. 21. Sweeney M, McCouch S (2007) The complex history of the domestication of rice. Annals of Botany 100: 951–957.
  22. 22. Fuller DQ, Qin L, Zheng Y, Zhao Z, Chen X, et al. (2009) The domestication process and domestication rate in rice: Spikelet bases from the lower Yangtze. Science 323: 1607–1610.
  23. 23. Portères R (1962) Berceaux Agricoles Primaires Sur le Continent Africain. The Journal of African History 3: 195–210.
  24. 24. Murray SS (2004) Searching for the origins of African rice domestication. Antiquity 78​ndex.html.
  25. 25. Sano Y (1990) The genic nature of gamete eliminator in rice. Genetics 125: 183–191.
  26. 26. Doi K, Taguchi K, Yoshimura A (2003) Genetic analysis of pollen sterility loci found in hybrid progeny between Oryza sativa and O. glabberima. In: Khush GS, Brar DS, Hardy B, editors. Advances in rice genetics. Los Baños (Philippines): International Rice Research Institute. pp. 149–151.
  27. 27. Garavito A, Guyot R, Lozano J, Gavory F, Samain S, et al. (2010) A genetic model for the female sterility barrier between Asian and African cultivated rice species. Genetics 185: 1425–1440.
  28. 28. Koide Y, Onishi K, Nishimoto D, Baruah AR, Kanazawa A, et al. (2008) Sex-independent transmission ratio distortion system responsible for reproductive barriers between Asian and African rice species. New Phytologist 179: 888–900.
  29. 29. Kim H, Hurwitz B, Yu Y, Collura K, Gill N, et al. (2008) Construction, alignment and analysis of twelve framework physical maps that represent the ten genome types of the genus Oryza. Genome Biol 9: R45.
  30. 30. Rizzon C, Ponger L, Gaut BS (2006) Striking similarities in the genomic distribution of tandemly arrayed genes in Arabidopsis and rice. PLoS Comput Biol 2: e115.
  31. 31. Jiang N, Bao Z, Zhang X, Eddy SR, Wessler SR (2004) Pack-MULE transposable elements mediate gene evolution in plants. Nature 431: 569–573.
  32. 32. Bossolini E, Wicker T, Knobel PA, Keller B (2007) Comparison of orthologous loci from small grass genomes Brachypodium and rice: implications for wheat genomics and grass genome annotation. Plant J 49: 704–717.
  33. 33. Ammiraju JS, Luo M, Goicoechea JL, Wang W, Kudrna D, et al. (2006) The Oryza bacterial artificial chromosome library resource: construction and analysis of 12 deep-coverage large-insert BAC libraries that represent the 10 genome types of the genus Oryza. Genome Res 16: 140–147.
  34. 34. Martinez CP, Arumuganathan K, Kikuchi A, Earle ED (1994) Nuclear DNA content of ten rice species as determined by flow cytometry. Jpn J Genet 69: 513–523.
  35. 35. Lu F, Ammiraju JS, Sanyal A, Zhang S, Song R, et al. (2009) Comparative sequence analysis of MONOCULM1-orthologous regions in 14 Oryza genomes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106: 2071–2076.
  36. 36. Tang T, Lu J, Huang J, He J, McCouch SR, et al. (2006) Genomic variation in rice: genesis of highly polymorphic linkage blocks during domestication. PLoS Genet 2: e199.
  37. 37. Osada N, Wu CI (2005) Inferring the mode of speciation from genomic data: a study of the great apes. Genetics 169: 259–264.
  38. 38. Mizuta Y, Harushima Y, Kurata N (2010) Rice pollen hybrid incompatibility caused by reciprocal gene loss of duplicated genes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. Doi: 10.1073/pnas.1003124107.
  39. 39. Sano Y, Sano R, Eiguchi M, Hirano HY (1994) Gamete eliminator adjacent to the Wx locus as revealed by pollen analysis in rice. Journal of Heredity 85: 310–312.
  40. 40. Jain M, Nijhawan A, Arora R, Agarwal P, Ray S, et al. (2007) F-box proteins in rice. Genome-wide analysis, classification, temporal and spatial gene expression during panicle and seed development, and regulation by light and abiotic stress. Plant Physiol 143: 1467–1483.
  41. 41. Xu G, Ma H, Nei M, Kong H (2009) Evolution of F-box genes in plants: different modes of sequence divergence and their relationships with functional diversification. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106: 835–840.
  42. 42. Thibaud-Nissen F, Ouyang S, Buell CR (2009) Identification and characterization of pseudogenes in the rice gene complement. BMC Genomics 10: 317.
  43. 43. Wang Y, Yang M (2006) The ARABIDOPSIS SKP1-LIKE1 (ASK1) protein acts predominately from leptotene to pachytene and represses homologous recombination in male meiosis. Planta 223: 613–617.
  44. 44. Pesin JA, Orr-Weaver TL (2008) Regulation of APC/C activators in mitosis and meiosis. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 24: 475–499.
  45. 45. Gusti A, Baumberger N, Nowack M, Pusch S, Eisler H, et al. (2009) The Arabidopsis thaliana F-box protein FBL17 is essential for progression through the second mitosis during pollen development. PLoS One 4: e4780.
  46. 46. Hoffmann AA, Sgro CM, Weeks AR (2004) Chromosomal inversion polymorphisms and adaptation. Trends Ecol Evol 19: 482–488.
  47. 47. Rieseberg LH (2001) Chromosomal rearrangements and speciation. Trends Ecol Evol 16: 351–358.
  48. 48. Noor MA, Grams KL, Bertucci LA, Reiland J (2001) Chromosomal inversions and the reproductive isolation of species. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 98: 12084–12088.
  49. 49. Navarro A, Barton NH (2003) Accumulating postzygotic isolation genes in parapatry: a new twist on chromosomal speciation. Evolution 57: 447–459.
  50. 50. Salamov AA, Solovyev VV (2000) Ab initio gene finding in Drosophila genomic DNA. Genome Res 10: 516–522.
  51. 51. Ouyang S, Zhu W, Hamilton J, Lin H, Campbell M, et al. (2007) The TIGR Rice Genome Annotation Resource: improvements and new features. Nucleic Acids Res 35: D883–D887.
  52. 52. Kikuchi S, Satoh K, Nagata T, Kawagashira N, Doi K, et al. (2003) Collection, mapping, and annotation of over 28,000 cDNA clones from japonica rice. Science 301: 376–379.
  53. 53. Rice P, Longden I, Bleasby A (2000) EMBOSS: the European Molecular Biology Open Software Suite. Trends Genet 16: 276–277.
  54. 54. Abril JF, Guigo R (2000) gff2ps: visualizing genomic annotations. Bioinformatics 16: 743–744.
  55. 55. Jurka J, Kapitonov VV, Pavlicek A, Klonowski P, Kohany O, et al. (2005) Repbase Update, a database of eukaryotic repetitive elements. Cytogenet Genome Res 110: 462–467.
  56. 56. Ouyang S, Buell CR (2004) The TIGR Plant Repeat Databases: a collective resource for the identification of repetitive sequences in plants. Nucleic Acids Res 32: D360–D363.
  57. 57. Chaparro C, Guyot R, Zuccolo A, Piegu B, Panaud O (2007) RetrOryza: a database of the rice LTR-retrotransposons. Nucleic Acids Res 35: D66–D70.
  58. 58. Rutherford K, Parkhill J, Crook J, Horsnell T, Rice P, et al. (2000) Artemis: sequence visualization and annotation. Bioinformatics 16: 944–945.
  59. 59. Sonnhammer EL, Durbin R (1995) A dot-matrix program with dynamic threshold control suited for genomic DNA and protein sequence analysis. Gene 167: GC1–GC10.
  60. 60. Thompson JD, Gibson TJ, Plewniak F, Jeanmougin F, Higgins DG (1997) The CLUSTAL_X windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Res 25: 4876–4882.
  61. 61. Orjuela J, Garavito A, Bouniol M, Arbelaez JD, Moreno L, et al. (2010) A universal core genetic map for rice. Theor Appl Genet 120: 563–572.
  62. 62. Carver TJ, Rutherford KM, Berriman M, Rajandream MA, Barrell BG, et al. (2005) ACT: the Artemis Comparison Tool. Bioinformatics 21: 3422–3423.