Open Access

Research Article

Introduction Top

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a complex neurological disorder characterised by demyelination and axonal loss[1]. The relative contribution of genetic and environmental factors to MS aetiology is an area of fertile debate. It is becoming increasingly clear that a multitude of genetic and environmental factors interact at different points during the course of an individual's life to determine disease susceptibility[2]. These factors include the Human Leukocyte Antigen (HLA) region, Epstein-Barr virus (EBV), vitamin D and smoking[3], [4], [5].

The evidence implicating EBV in MS aetiology is growing[6]. MS patients are almost universally seropositive for EBV infection (99.5%) although there is a very high rate of asymptomatic EBV infection amongst control populations too (94.2%)[7], [8]. Furthermore, high titres of antibodies against EBV have been shown to predict conversion from the initial demyelination seen in a clinically isolated syndrome (CIS) to definite MS[9]. Elevated titres of antibodies directed against the latent phase antigen of EBV infection are also correlated with disease activity on MRI[10]. Finally, studies have suggested that a latitude gradient exists for the incidence of IM, resembling that of MS[11], [12].

EBV infection can occur either asymptomatically or present as infectious mononucleosis (IM). A previous meta-analysis of cohort and case-control studies have suggested that IM more than doubles the risk of MS (relative risk (RR) 2.3; 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.7–3.0; p<10⁻⁸) [13]. Given the high rates of asymptomatic EBV infection present both in patient and control populations, this implicates IM as the manifestation of EBV infection most associated with the development of MS. Since the original meta-analysis of IM and MS was published several other much larger studies have been directed towards understanding the association between IM and MS. Establishing the precise magnitude of the relationship between IM and MS is important in understanding the role of EBV in MS and also for attempts at risk prediction[14]. Therefore in the present study we aimed to broaden the previous meta-analysis to include studies published since 2006 to confirm the association of IM and MS and to see if the relationship between IM and MS is latitude dependent.

Methods Top

Search Strategy

We searched Medline from January 2006 until April 2010 for articles with the phrase: “(Epstein-Barr virus OR EBV OR human herpesvirus 4 OR HHV-4 OR infectious mononucleosis OR glandular fever) AND (multiple sclerosis OR MS OR disseminated sclerosis)”. This was the same strategy used by Thacker and colleagues in 2006[13]. We hand-searched abstracts generated from this search term for cohort or case-control studies and examined references of these articles for potential additional studies. Experts in the field were unaware of any ongoing unpublished studies for inclusion.

Statistical analysis

We used the generic inverse variance with random effects model in Reference Manager 5.0 to calculate the overall RR, 95% CI and test statistic for the interaction and heterogeneity of studies. RRs were subsequently calculated for subgroups of studies and compared between case-control and cohort studies, and studies using definite MS diagnostic criteria and those using definite/probable MS. We extracted latitude from papers based on either the latitude of the study centre if performed in a distinct region or the geographical midpoint of the country if a national study. We tested for an interaction between latitude and sex-ratio by both a comparison of RRs based on the median value for each factor and also performed linear weighted fit on the natural log of RRs in Mathematica 7.0.1.0.

Results Top

Included studies

Our search criteria produced 150 studies. We identified four studies (one population cohort study and three case-control studies) not included in the original meta-analysis, making a total of 18 studies[15], [16], [17], [18], [19], [20], [21], [22], [23], [24], [25], [26], [27], [28], [29], [30], [31], [32]. The details of the studies included are shown in table S1. In terms of case-control studies, the new studies increased the number of MS cases included in the meta-analysis from 1642 to 19390 and controls from 3596 to 16007. The RR in all studies had a range of 0.8–17 and a median RR of 2.21.

Risk of MS following IM

Including all of the 18 identified studies in our meta-analysis, we calculated a RR of 2.17 (95% CI 1.97–2.39; p<10⁻⁵⁴; figure 1). There was no significant heterogeneity between studies (p = 0.47). There were no significant differences detected when comparing subgroups of studies based on design or diagnostic criteria, or when dichotomised based on median latitude or sex-ratio (table 1).

Figure 1. Forest plot of multiple sclerosis risk after infectious mononucleosis.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0012496.g001

Table 1. Relative risk and 95% confidence intervals for different subgroups of studies.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0012496.t001

Interaction with latitude and sex-ratio

We tested both latitude and sex-ratio for correlation with the RR for each study using linear weighted fit (figure 2). No significant correlation was found for either (latitude: r²<0.01, p = 0.91; sex-ratio: r²<0.01, p = 0.79).

Figure 2. Plots of relative risk against latitude and sex-ratio.

Error bars show 95% confidence intervals of relative risk estimates.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0012496.g002

Discussion Top

With an MS patient sample size an order of magnitude larger than the previous meta-analysis, our study has established unequivocally that IM is a significant risk factor for the development of MS. The robust nature of this relationship is unsurprising given the wealth of serological research implicating EBV in MS aetiology. Meta-analysis has some limitations: notably publication bias of included studies and heterogeneity of study designs[33]. We have attempted to avoid these pitfalls in this study.

There was no strong evidence to suggest that the degree to which IM influences MS susceptibility varies by latitude, however the range of latitudes at which studies have been conducted is relatively small. This study cannot exclude an effect of EBV infection on MS latitudinal risk, as studies conducted so far include predominantly Caucasian cases and controls or are studies of IM and MS in predominantly Caucasian populations. Studies on other populations also afflicted by MS would be valuable in examining whether IM is a risk factor of equal magnitude in all populations, especially since EBV is known to interact with certain HLA alleles that vary in frequency between different populations[4]. MS susceptibility is defined by an interplay of many different genetic and environment risk factors and so it is likely that these all act in concert at different points in the disease process to establish the well-described latitudinal gradient[34]. Thus it is unsurprising that, even if IM has an important role in establishing MS prevalence patterns, examining this risk factor alone did not reveal any strong effects of IM in the latitudinal distribution of MS. It is unsurprising that we detected no interaction between IM and the sex-ratio of MS cases since there were no significant difference between the rates of IM in males and females in a recent cohort study[35].

The mechanism by which EBV infection is associated with MS is currently poorly understood. One hypothesis is that infection of any sort is an epiphenomenon in the development of MS, reflecting a generally increased propensity to infection or generally altered immune responses directed against infectious antigens[36], [37], [38]. Certainly some studies have cast doubt upon the specific role of current EBV infection in MS[39], although there is little doubt that past EBV infection is an important risk factor[8]. An alternative is that a lack of exposure to infectious agents early in life results in a failure of tolerance in the immune system: the “hygiene hypothesis”[12]. This certainly fits with an increased rate of IM in MS patients, since EBV infection later in life is more likely to result in IM. However, it is difficult to reconcile this with elevated MS risk in migrants moving from regions of low MS prevalence to high prevalence[40]. Also, whereas one would expect this to predict a difference in MS risk with birth order of siblings (due to differing exposure to infectious antigens), this was not observed in a large Canadian study[41].

IM has an important role in MS susceptibility but future work needs to examine how IM rather than asymptomatic EBV infection appears to be the main association with MS. The role of EBV in MS remains to be elucidated and furthermore, of increasing interest is attempts to understand how MS risk factors interact that lead to the development of MS[2], [8]. For this reason, prospective studies should try to investigate the reasons why some individuals present with IM after infection and why some of these individuals then develop MS.

Supporting Information Top

Table S1.

Characteristics of studies included in the meta-analysis.

(0.05 MB DOC)

References Top

1. Noseworthy JH, Lucchinetti C, Rodriguez M, Weinshenker BG (2000) Multiple sclerosis. N Engl J Med 343: 938–952. Find this article online
2. Handel AE, Giovannoni G, Ebers GC, Ramagopalan SV (2010) Environmental factors and their timing in adult-onset multiple sclerosis. Nat Rev Neurol 6: 156–166. Find this article online
3. Handel AE, Handunnetthi L, Giovannoni G, Ebers GC, Ramagopalan SV (2010) Genetic and environmental factors and the distribution of multiple sclerosis in Europe. Eur J Neurol. Find this article online
4. Simon KC, van der Mei IA, Munger KL, Ponsonby A, Dickinson J, et al. (2010) Combined effects of smoking, anti-EBNA antibodies, and HLA-DRB1*1501 on multiple sclerosis risk. Neurology 74: 1365–1371. Find this article online
5. Ramagopalan SV, Maugeri NJ, Handunnetthi L, Lincoln MR, Orton SM, et al. (2009) Expression of the multiple sclerosis-associated MHC class II Allele HLA-DRB1*1501 is regulated by vitamin D. PLoS Genet 5: e1000369. Find this article online
6. Salvetti M, Giovannoni G, Aloisi F (2009) Epstein-Barr virus and multiple sclerosis. Curr Opin Neurol 22: 201–206. Find this article online
7. Ascherio A, Munger KL, Lennette ET, Spiegelman D, Hernan MA, et al. (2001) Epstein-Barr virus antibodies and risk of multiple sclerosis: a prospective study. JAMA 286: 3083–3088. Find this article online
8. Goodin DS (2009) The causal cascade to multiple sclerosis: a model for MS pathogenesis. PLoS ONE 4: e4565. Find this article online
9. Lunemann JD, Tintore M, Messmer B, Strowig T, Rovira A, et al. (2010) Elevated Epstein-Barr virus-encoded nuclear antigen-1 immune responses predict conversion to multiple sclerosis. Ann Neurol 67: 159–169. Find this article online
10. Farrell RA, Antony D, Wall GR, Clark DA, Fisniku L, et al. (2009) Humoral immune response to EBV in multiple sclerosis is associated with disease activity on MRI. Neurology 73: 32–38. Find this article online
11. Warner HB, Carp RI (1981) Multiple sclerosis and Epstein-Barr virus. Lancet 2: 1290. Find this article online
12. Ascherio A, Munger KL (2007) Environmental risk factors for multiple sclerosis. Part I: the role of infection. Ann Neurol 61: 288–299. Find this article online
13. Thacker EL, Mirzaei F, Ascherio A (2006) Infectious mononucleosis and risk for multiple sclerosis: a meta-analysis. Ann Neurol 59: 499–503. Find this article online
14. De Jager PL, Chibnik LB, Cui J, Reischl J, Lehr S, et al. (2009) Integration of genetic risk factors into a clinical algorithm for multiple sclerosis susceptibility: a weighted genetic risk score. Lancet Neurol 8: 1111–1119. Find this article online
15. Operskalski EA, Visscher BR, Malmgren RM, Detels R (1989) A case-control study of multiple sclerosis. Neurology 39: 825–829. Find this article online
16. Souberbielle BE, Martin-Mondiere C, O'Brien ME, Carydakis C, Cesaro P, et al. (1990) A case-control epidemiological study of MS in the Paris area with particular reference to past disease history and profession. Acta Neurol Scand 82: 303–310. Find this article online
17. Hopkins RS, Indian RW, Pinnow E, Conomy J (1991) Multiple sclerosis in Galion, Ohio: prevalence and results of a case-control study. Neuroepidemiology 10: 192–199. Find this article online
18. Martyn CN, Cruddas M, Compston DA (1993) Symptomatic Epstein-Barr virus infection and multiple sclerosis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 56: 167–168. Find this article online
19. Casetta I, Granieri E, Malagu S, Tola MR, Paolino E, et al. (1994) Environmental risk factors and multiple sclerosis: a community-based, case-control study in the province of Ferrara, Italy. Neuroepidemiology 13: 120–128. Find this article online
20. Gusev E, Boiko A, Lauer K, Riise T, Deomina T (1996) Environmental risk factors in MS: a case-control study in Moscow. Acta Neurol Scand 94: 386–394. Find this article online
21. Marrie RA, Wolfson C, Sturkenboom MC, Gout O, Heinzlef O, et al. (2000) Multiple sclerosis and antecedent infections: a case-control study. Neurology 54: 2307–2310. Find this article online
22. Hernan MA, Zhang SM, Lipworth L, Olek MJ, Ascherio A (2001) Multiple sclerosis and age at infection with common viruses. Epidemiology 12: 301–306. Find this article online
23. Zorzon M, Zivadinov R, Nasuelli D, Dolfini P, Bosco A, et al. (2003) Risk factors of multiple sclerosis: a case-control study. Neurol Sci 24: 242–247. Find this article online
24. Haahr S, Plesner AM, Vestergaard BF, Hollsberg P (2004) A role of late Epstein-Barr virus infection in multiple sclerosis. Acta Neurol Scand 109: 270–275. Find this article online
25. Ponsonby AL, van der Mei I, Dwyer T, Blizzard L, Taylor B, et al. (2005) Exposure to infant siblings during early life and risk of multiple sclerosis. JAMA 293: 463–469. Find this article online
26. Zaadstra BM, Chorus AM, van Buuren S, Kalsbeek H, van Noort JM (2008) Selective association of multiple sclerosis with infectious mononucleosis. Mult Scler 14: 307–313. Find this article online
27. Ramagopalan SV, Valdar W, Dyment DA, DeLuca GC, Yee IM, et al. (2009) Association of infectious mononucleosis with multiple sclerosis. a population-based study. Neuroepidemiology 32: 257–262. Find this article online
28. Ahlgren C, Toren K, Oden A, Andersen O (2009) A population-based case-control study on viral infections and vaccinations and subsequent multiple sclerosis risk. Eur J Epidemiol 24: 541–552. Find this article online
29. Lindberg C, Andersen O, Vahlne A, Dalton M, Runmarker B (1991) Epidemiological investigation of the association between infectious mononucleosis and multiple sclerosis. Neuroepidemiology 10: 62–65. Find this article online
30. Haahr S, Koch-Henriksen N, Moller-Larsen A, Eriksen LS, Andersen HM (1995) Increased risk of multiple sclerosis after late Epstein-Barr virus infection: a historical prospective study. Mult Scler 1: 73–77. Find this article online
31. Goldacre MJ, Wotton CJ, Seagroatt V, Yeates D (2004) Multiple sclerosis after infectious mononucleosis: record linkage study. J Epidemiol Community Health 58: 1032–1035. Find this article online
32. Nielsen TR, Rostgaard K, Nielsen NM, Koch-Henriksen N, Haahr S, et al. (2007) Multiple sclerosis after infectious mononucleosis. Arch Neurol 64: 72–75. Find this article online
33. Conn HO (1997) Interpretation of data from multiple trials: a critical review. J Intern Med 241: 177–183. Find this article online
34. Handel AE, Giovannoni G, Ebers GC, Ramagopalan SV (2010) Environmental factors and their timing in adult-onset multiple sclerosis. Nat Rev Neurol. Find this article online
35. Crawford DH, Macsween KF, Higgins CD, Thomas R, McAulay K, et al. (2006) A cohort study among university students: identification of risk factors for Epstein-Barr virus seroconversion and infectious mononucleosis. Clin Infect Dis 43: 276–282. Find this article online
36. Lunemann JD, Kamradt T, Martin R, Munz C (2007) Epstein-barr virus: environmental trigger of multiple sclerosis? J Virol 81: 6777–6784. Find this article online
37. Sotgiu S, Piana A, Pugliatti M, Sotgiu A, Deiana GA, et al. (2001) Chlamydia pneumoniae in the cerebrospinal fluid of patients with multiple sclerosis and neurological controls. Mult Scler 7: 371–374. Find this article online
38. Fainardi E, Castellazzi M, Tamborino C, Seraceni S, Tola MR, et al. (2009) Chlamydia pneumoniae-specific intrathecal oligoclonal antibody response is predominantly detected in a subset of multiple sclerosis patients with progressive forms. J Neurovirol 15: 425–433. Find this article online
39. Willis SN, Stadelmann C, Rodig SJ, Caron T, Gattenloehner S, et al. (2009) Epstein-Barr virus infection is not a characteristic feature of multiple sclerosis brain. Brain 132: 3318–3328. Find this article online
40. Hammond SR, English DR, McLeod JG (2000) The age-range of risk of developing multiple sclerosis: evidence from a migrant population in Australia. Brain 123(Pt 5): 968–974. Find this article online
41. Gaudet JP, Hashimoto L, Sadovnick AD, Ebers GC (1995) A study of birth order and multiple sclerosis in multiplex families. Neuroepidemiology 14: 188–192. Find this article online