Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Analysis of Vascular Development in the hydra Sterol Biosynthetic Mutants of Arabidopsis

  • Margaret Pullen,

    Affiliation The Integrative Cell Biology Laboratory, School of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, Durham University, Durham, United Kingdom

  • Nick Clark,

    Affiliation The Integrative Cell Biology Laboratory, School of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, Durham University, Durham, United Kingdom

  • Fatemeh Zarinkamar,

    Current address: Faculty of Basic Sciences, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran

    Affiliation The Integrative Cell Biology Laboratory, School of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, Durham University, Durham, United Kingdom

  • Jennifer Topping,

    Affiliation The Integrative Cell Biology Laboratory, School of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, Durham University, Durham, United Kingdom

  • Keith Lindsey

    keith.lindsey@durham.ac.uk

    Affiliation The Integrative Cell Biology Laboratory, School of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, Durham University, Durham, United Kingdom

Abstract

Background

The control of vascular tissue development in plants is influenced by diverse hormonal signals, but their interactions during this process are not well understood. Wild-type sterol profiles are essential for growth, tissue patterning and signalling processes in plant development, and are required for regulated vascular patterning.

Methodology/Principal Findings

Here we investigate the roles of sterols in vascular tissue development, through an analysis of the Arabidopsis mutants hydra1 and fackel/hydra2, which are defective in the enzymes sterol isomerase and sterol C-14 reductase respectively. We show that defective vascular patterning in the shoot is associated with ectopic cell divisions. Expression of the auxin-regulated AtHB8 homeobox gene is disrupted in mutant embryos and seedlings, associated with variably incomplete vascular strand formation and duplication of the longitudinal axis. Misexpression of the auxin reporter proIAA2∶GUS and mislocalization of PIN proteins occurs in the mutants. Introduction of the ethylene-insensitive ein2 mutation partially rescues defective cell division, localization of PIN proteins, and vascular strand development.

Conclusions

The results support a model in which sterols are required for correct auxin and ethylene crosstalk to regulate PIN localization, auxin distribution and AtHB8 expression, necessary for correct vascular development.

Introduction

The evolution of vascular tissues has been a critical event in the movement of plants from water to land, and in the construction of the higher plants. As well as providing mechanical strength, these tissues act as conduits for the transport of water, nutrients, hormones and even small RNA molecules around the plant [1]. The mechanisms by which the formation and maintenance of the patterns of vascular tissues are regulated are still poorly understood at the molecular level [2], [3]. It is in the embryo that the establishment of the early vascular tissues, the procambium, occurs. In Arabidopsis thaliana, this process involves stereotypical and predictable patterns of cell division, expansion and differentiation coordinated by signalling systems, and notably auxin, to execute spatially and temporally controlled patterns of gene expression [4], [5].

A number of models have been proposed to account for vascular development. Sachs pioneered the ‘auxin signal flow canalization hypothesis’, which suggests that polar auxin transport promotes strand extension [6]. Scarpella et al. [7] extended this model to suggest that expression domains of the auxin efflux carrier-encoding PINFORMED1 (PIN1) [8] in the epidermis provide positional information for the specification of procambial cells and the positioning of veins in the leaf. Inhibition of polar auxin transport by chemical inhibitors has also been shown to affect leaf vein patterning [9], further implicating auxin transport in vascular patterning.

Mutant screens have led to the identification of several classes of gene that are required for wild-type vascular development. The monopteros mutant, for example, is expressed in the Arabidopsis embryo, and the mutant is characterized by abnormal divisions in the prospective procambial tissue in the embryo and defective cotyledonary vein formation [10], [11]. Interestingly, the MONOPTEROS (MP) protein is a member of the auxin response factor (ARF) family, a class of transcription factors that regulate the transcription of auxin-responsive genes [12]. MP interacts with the related NONPHOTOTROPIC HYPOCOTYL4 (NPH4) [13]. ATHB8 is an HD-Zip protein which is a positive regulator of vascular cell differentiation, and its overexpression can lead to excessive xylem cells in vascular bundles [14], [15]. Recent data show that ATHB8 expression is regulated directly by MP, is required for procambial cell specification, and its loss of function phenotype is masked by MP function [16]. A related protein is PHAVOLUTA, also an HD-Zip transcription factor that is required for vascular cambium development as well as other aspects of leaf morphogenesis [17], [18]. Other mutant analyses provide alternative models for the control of vascular patterning to the auxin flow canalization model [19]. Recently, Petricka et al. [20] identified 45 different loci in a screen for mutants affecting vein pattern in Arabidopsis.

One intriguing class of mutants that show defective vascular patterning is that defective in sterol biosynthesis. This includes orc/sterol methyltransferase1 (smt1)/cephalopod (cph), hydra1 (hyd1), fackel (fk)/hyd2, cotyledon vascular pattern (cvp1/smt2) and cyclopropylsterol isomerase1-1 (cpi1-1) [21][27]. Although dwarfed, these can be considered as being distinct from the brassinosteroid (BR) dwarf mutants, even though they are defective in enzymes upstream of BR synthesis. For example, they exhibit defective embryonic and/or seedling cell patterning, including vein patterning, are typically seedling-lethal, and cannot be rescued by exogenous application of BRs [28]. Metabolic profiling of sterol methyltransferase mutants similarly suggests that developmental defects in these mutants are not due to defective BR content [29].

This raises the interesting question of the role of sterols (as distinct from BRs) in plant development. It has been postulated that specific sterols that are absent from, or are present at abnormally low levels in, the mutants and are required for appropriate signalling for cell division and expansion. Schrick et al. [23], for example, following an analysis of the fk mutant, propose a model in which specific sterol molecules, distinct from BRs, may have specific signalling roles required for correct cell patterning. Studies on fk have shown that a range of novel sterols are produced in these mutants [24], and various sterol intermediates accumulate to abnormal levels [22]. Any of these components might interfere with endogenous sterol-mediated signalling systems, and so disrupt development [30].

Since sterols are components of cell membranes, it is also possible that at least some of the developmental defects are the consequence of aberrant membrane function, such as altered membrane permeability and/or fluidity. Modified sterol profiles might also cause aberrant localization or function of important membrane-bound proteins such as receptors or transport proteins. Support of this hypothesis comes from the analysis of several sterol synthesis mutants. Both fkhyd2 and orc show mis-expression of the DR5::GUS auxin reporter [26], [31], and the hyd/fk mutants show enhanced auxin responses [26]. Inhibition of the auxin influx carrier AUX1 by 1-naphthoxyacetic acid (1-NOA) failed to block these responses in hyd mutants. This suggests either that the AUX1 protein is by-passed, perhaps due to an increased membrane permeability to auxin; or the mutants exhibit an increased activity of the AUX1 protein that is not inhibited by 1-NOA, perhaps due to a conformational change. In the hyd mutants, PIN3 localization showed a proximal shift to the columella initials at day 9 post-germination, then disappeared, associated with the loss of identity of the columella in these mutants [26]. In orc, the application of low concentrations of the AUX1-dependent auxin 2,4-D led to rescue of trichoblast polarity, suggesting that while auxin influx does not appear to be defective, auxin response or availability might be [31]. Rates of polar auxin transport in orc were reduced significantly compared to wild-type, and although AUX1 positioning was normal in the mutant, the PIN1 and PIN3 proteins were mis-localized. More recently, Men et al. [27] showed that defective sterol profiles in the cpi1-1 mutant are associated with defective PIN2 endocytosis and polar localization following cytokinesis. Furthermore, Pan et al. [32] showed that sterols are required for auxin-mediated PIN2 endocytosis; and Carland et al. [29] have found that sterol methyltransferase (smt) mutants of Arabidopsis exhibit a range of auxin-mediated responses, independent of BR function.

A view is therefore emerging to suggest that sterols are required for correctly regulated auxin signalling, by mediating carrier protein localization or functionality in the membrane. Further evidence for altered signalling comes from the observation that the hyd/fk mutants may be defective in the ethylene response pathway [26], [33]. However, the link between sterols, auxin and ethylene remains unclear. Recent work shows that, in the root, ethylene can induce auxin biosynthesis and transport [34], [35], and we have recently developed a mathematical model to describe auxin, ethylene and cytokinin interactions in the Arabidopsis root [36]. Consistent with this, aspects of defective auxin signalling and auxin-dependent root cell patterning and growth can be rescued in the hyd/fk mutants by the inhibition of ethylene signalling [33]. CONSTITUTIVE TRIPLE RESPONSE-1 (CTR1) acts as a repressor of auxin biosynthesis in Arabidopsis [37]. In the constitutively ethylene responsive ctr1 mutant, the local distribution of auxin regulating the establishment of cell polarity is disrupted, providing further evidence for a link between auxin and ethylene signal transduction.

To investigate the link between sterols, auxin and ethylene in vascular development, we studied these relationships in the sterol biosynthesis mutants hyd1 and fkhyd2. These genes encode adjacent enzymatic steps in the sterol biosynthetic pathway and their loss of function mutants have similar phenotypes. We found that defects in cell division, auxin transport machinery and vascular development were evident in the mutants, but those associated with auxin transport and responses in particular could be rescued to a significant extent by the inhibition of ethylene signalling.

Results

Abnormal vascular patterning is associated with abnormal cell division in the hyd/fk mutants

In both hyd1 and fkhyd2 seedling cotyledons, a varied vascular pattern is apparent as incomplete and isolated sections of xylem within the defined provascular field (Figs. 1A–H). Xylem ‘islands' are evident (Figs. 1G,H), indicative of a low level of co-ordination of cell patterning and differentiation. The main strands also show variable vessel size and orientation, with cells running parallel with each other, or contorted into a varied strand morphology not seen in wild-type plants. Vascular defects in the hypocotyl include dissociation of the vascular trace above the primary branch point beneath the SAM, and in some individuals, a duplication of the entire longitudinal axis (Fig. 1I). No examples of axis duplication were observed in the wild-type.

thumbnail
Figure 1. Vascular strand defects in hyd/fk mutant seedlings.

A: Safranine-stained wild-type cotyledon showing the tissue pattern of vascular differentiation, ×30 magnification. B: Safranine-stained hyd1 cotyledon, with dissociation of the primary vasculature into three traces, ×30 magnification. C: Safranine-stained cotyledons from a fkhyd2 seedling, with primary vascular dissociation in one of the cotyledons at the point indicated by the arrow, ×30 magnification. D–F: Cleared tissues from the central lamina of the first true leaf of 12 dpg plants of wild-type (d), hyd1 (e), fkhyd2 (f); bars  = 200 µM. G: fkhyd2 cotyledon showing proPIN1::GUS expression to reveal vascular strands and ‘islands' of vascular tissue (asterisks); bar  = 250 µM. H: Vascular ‘island' of disconnected xylem cells in fkhyd2 cotyledon (7 dpg) cleared with chloral hydrate; bar  = 50 µm. I: Aniline blue-stained hyd1 seedling (8 dpg) showing duplicated vascular strand in the mutant (arrow) ; bar  = 500 µM.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0012227.g001

Aniline blue staining was carried out to reveal phloem-associated callose in cotyledons and true leaves. The results show that, whereas in wild-type seedlings the xylem and phloem traces are closely aligned (Supplementary Fig. S1A), in the hyd mutants callose accumulates ectopically, and is variably associated with xylem traces showing a lack of coordinated differentiation of the two vascular cell types (Supplementary Figs. S1D–F).

The mutant seedlings also exhibit ectopic cell division in the shoot associated with defective vascular patterning, as visualized by the expression of CYC1At::CDB::GUS; this reporter marks cells entering mitosis [38]. In wild-type aerial parts, expression of this marker is confined predominantly to the young leaf primordia and developing stomata (Figs. 2A–C). In the 3 dpg shoot apices of fkhyd2 (Fig. 2D) and hyd1 (Fig. 2F), cotyledons show variable patterns and levels of CYC1At::CDB::GUS expression. Young mutant leaf primordia (as in Figs. 2E, G) show a spread of division activity across the SAM-containing region. By 7 dpg, strong reporter expression is retained around the SAM and in young primordia of both mutants (beyond the regions that express the gene in wild-type). In cotyledons, ectopic GUS activity is reduced, but is seen at foci associated with discontinuities in the xylem strands (Figs. 2G–I).

thumbnail
Figure 2. proCYC1At::CDB::GUS expression in hyd/fk seedlings.

A: Wild-type hypocotyl-cotyledon junction, 3 dpg; bar  = 100 µm. B: Wild-type leaf primordia, 7 dpg; bar  = 100 µm. C: Wild-type cotyledon epidermis, 7dpg; bar  = 50 µm. D: fkhyd2 hypocotyl-cotyledon junction, 3 dpg. Arrow indicates ectopic cell division events in hypocotyl and cotyledon; bar  = 100 µm. E: fkhyd2 hypocotyl-cotyledon junction, 7 dpg. Arrows indicate ectopic cell division events in hypocotyl and cotyledon; bar  = 200 µm. F: hyd1 hypocotyl-cotyledon junction, 3 dpg. Arrow indicates ectopic cell division events in hypocotyl; bar  = 100 µm. G; hyd1 hypocotyl-cotyledon junction, 7 dpg. Arrows indicate ectopic cell division events in hypocotyl and cotyledon; bar  = 200 µm. H, I: fkhyd2 cotyledons at 7 dpg, showing expression in proximity to dissociated or disjunct xylem vessels; bar  = 50 µm. J: Wild-type hypocotyl region of a 3 dpg seedling, showing expression restricted to stomatal precursors of the cotyledon epidermis and the developing first pair of true leaves; bar  = 100 µm. K: fkhyd2 hypocotyl (3 dpg) showing expression in association with the hypocotyl stele (arrow); bar  = 100 µm. L: fkhyd2 hypocotyl epidermis (3 dpg) showing mis-oriented ectopic cell division event spanning two longitudinal cell files; bar  = 50 µm.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0012227.g002

No expression of CYC1At::CDB::GUS was observed in hypocotyls of 3–7 dpg wild-type seedlings (Fig. 2J). However, in hyd/fk mutant hypocotyls there was seen cell division events in the stele of the upper hypocotyl in the vicinity of branching points in the xylem vascular strands (Fig. 2K) and in the hypocotyl epidermis at 7 dpg (Fig. 2L). The ectopic division event highlighted in Fig. 2L is associated with a cell expanding at an oblique angle to the cell file orientation in this region, indicative of defects in the control of axial cell elongation.

hydra mutants exhibit defective AtHB8 gene expression

To investigate the link between defective sterol profiles and the establishment of vascular patterning in the embryo, expression of the auxin-regulated proAtHB8∶GUS reporter was analysed in the hyd1 and fkhyd2 mutant backgrounds. The HD-Zip transcription factor AtHB8 is a positive regulator of vascular cell differentiation; its promoter is active in cells prior to their adopting vascular procambial cell fate, as well as in developed strands [14], [16]. It is the earliest known marker of vascular development [39].

Fig. 3 shows the expression of proAtHB8∶GUS in wild-type and fkhyd2 mutant embryos. In the wild-type, GUS activity is barely detectable during the globular-heart stage transition (Fig. 3A), and then resolving to the procambial traces in the pro-cotyledons, hypocotyl and root of older embryos (Fig. 3B).

thumbnail
Figure 3. proAtHB8∶GUS expression is disorganized in fkhyd2 embryos.

A: Wild-type globular embryo, showing very low levels of expression; bar  = 50 µm. B: Wild-type older torpedo-stage embryo, showing expression in procambium; bar  = 100 µm. C: fkhyd2 globular-stage embryo, showing stronger expression than wild-type embryos at the same stage (a); bar  = 50 µm. D: fkhyd2 heart-stage embryo; bar  = 50 µm. E: fkhyd2 torpedo-stage embryo; bar  = 50 µm. F: fkhyd2 early torpedo-stage embryo, showing highly localized expression in cotyledonary tissue; bar  = 50 µm. G: fkhyd2 late torpedo-stage embryo, showing expression in presumptive procambium; bar  = 50 µm.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0012227.g003

In fkhyd2 mutant embryos (which show a very similar expression pattern to hyd1 mutant embryos; not shown), a more variable expression pattern of proAtHB8∶GUS activity is seen, associated with a variable morphology between siblings (Figs. 3C–G). Analysis at the heart stage transition reveals diffuse GUS activity throughout the embryo (Fig. 3C), whilst later stages exhibit variable levels of signal - either relatively low (Fig. 3D, F) or relatively high (Fig. 3E). More mature embryos may have a rudimentary procambial trace, although may not demonstrate normal patterning (Fig. 3G). These observations suggest that the patterning processes allowing the definition of the procambial strands have been disrupted in the hyd/fk mutants.

Variability of proAtHB8∶GUS activity is also seen in the mutant seedlings (Fig. 4), reflecting disorganization of vascular strands. In cotyledons of fkhyd2 in particular, the intensity of proAtHB8∶GUS activity is relatively high compared with wild-type (compare Fig. 4C with Fig. 4G).

thumbnail
Figure 4. proAtHB8∶GUS expression in hyd/fk seedlings.

A: Wild-type cotyledon; bar  = 100 µm. B: Wild-type true leaf; bar  = 250 µm. C: Vascular trace in wild-type true leaf (detail from b); bar  = 50 µm. D: hyd1 seedling (3 dpg); bar  = 50 µm. E: hyd1 seedling (detail from d) showing lack of procambial and vascular strand coordination at the branch point in the upper hypocotyl; bar  = 50 µm. F: fkhyd2 cotyledons 7 dpg; bar  = 250 µm. G: Detail of vascular strand from fkhyd2 leaf (7 dpg), showing stronger expression than in wild-type vascular trace (c); bar  = 50 µm.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0012227.g004

hyd/fk mutants show altered proIAA2∶GUS expression

Auxin is a known regulator of vascular patterning, acting in part at least via ATHB8 [16], and the vascular defects in the hyd/fk mutants may suggest defects in auxin transport, localization and response, linked to altered proAtHB8∶GUS expression. To investigate this, we monitored the expression pattern of proIAA2∶GUS in the hyd/fk mutant aerial parts. IAA2 is an early auxin response AUX/IAA gene, induced strongly and specifically by endogenous auxin [40], [41]. The proIAA2∶GUS reporter [42] therefore acts as a marker for early auxin-induced gene expression and indicates the presence of active auxins and auxin responses. Previously, we showed that proIAA2∶GUS expression declined in hyd/fk mutant root tips after ca. 18 dpg [33] but had no information on expression in shoots.

In the wild-type shoot, no proIAA2∶GUS expression is discernible in cotyledons (Fig. 5A). As true leaves begin to emerge between 5 and 7 dpg, a stipule signal appears, followed by transient definition of the leaf vascular traces, prior to differentiation of the xylem vessels (Fig. 5B). Seedlings of both hyd1 and fkhyd2 at 3 dpg each show ectopic expression patterns of proIAA2∶GUS in shoot tissues. GUS activity, confined to the young root stele in wild-type, extends part-way into the mutant hypocotyl stele, and appears as a localized ectopic signal in the cotyledons (Figs. 5C, D). In older hyd/fk shoot tissues, ectopic expression in the cotyledon occurs in the vicinity of late-differentiating xylem, vascular islands, and in regions where the xylem trace shows poor coherence in the strand, particularly at the hydathodes (Figs. 5E, F). This ectopic expression was present in most cotyledons, although no signal was found in radialized cotyledon structures (Fig. 5G). In true leaves, both hyd/fk mutants show an enhanced proIAA2∶GUS expression in the vascular traces during lamina development (Figs. 5H, I). While recognizing that histological GUS activity is only semi-quantitative, these observations suggest that auxin is poorly localized in the developing vasculature of young leaves, possibly synthesized but not efficiently exported from these cells, consistent with aberrant proAtHB8∶GUS expression.

thumbnail
Figure 5. proIAA2∶GUS expression is disorganized in hyd/fk seedlings.

A: Wild-type seedling (3 dpg), showing absence of expression; bar  = 200 µm. B: Wild-type seedling (12 dpg), showing expression in stipules and low levels in vascular traces; bar  = 200 µm. C, D: hyd1 (c) and fkhyd2 (d) seedlings (3 dpg), showing ectopic expression in the cotyledon and hypocotyl developing vasculature; bar  = 200 µm. E, F: hyd1 (e) and fkhyd2 (f) seedlings (12 dpg), showing ectopic expression in the cotyledon developing vasculature; bar  = 200 µm. G: fkhyd2 seedling (12 dpg), showing lack of proIAA2∶GUS expression in the vasculature of the radialized leaf (arrow); bar  = 200 µm. H, I: proIAA2∶GUS expression associated with disjunct and dissociated xylem from hyd1 cotyledons (12 dpg); bar  = 50 µm.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0012227.g005

hydra/fk mutants show defective polar auxin transport machinery

The PIN-FORMED (PIN) family of proteins is required for auxin efflux from cells, and control directionality of auxin flow [43], which is required for the control of vascular patterning [7]. However, the interdependence of directional auxin transport with ethylene signalling and sterols is not well defined. To understand this better, we investigated whether an inhibition of ethylene signalling influenced polar auxin transport machinery in the hyd/fk mutants.

Analysis carried out over a developmental time course reveals that, while wild-type PIN1∶GFP and PIN2∶GFP localization can occur correctly in many cells, the mutants show more cell-to-cell variability than in wild-type, and localization can be very diffuse (Fig. 6). Poor PIN2∶GFP localization was observed (Figs. 6J, K), associated with defective epidermal development in the mutants [21]. Similarly, PIN4∶GFP, expressed in the columella cells in wild-type [44], is also poorly expressed in both hyd1 and fkhyd2, though localization is broadly as in wild-type (i.e. on all cell faces) in the cells in which expression is detectable (Figs. 6P, Q). The defective PIN localization analysed here in roots (due to ease of visualization) is consistent with a predicted requirement for sterols in vesicle transport and recycling [27], [31] and with the observed defective auxin distribution and meristem and vascular patterning [22], [26], [33].

thumbnail
Figure 6. PIN localization is defective in hyd/fk seedlings.

A: Polar auxin transport assays in wild-type and ein2 hypocotyls. Bars represent standard errors, n = 8. B–G: PIN1∶GFP localization (arrows) in roots of wild-type (B), hyd1 (C), fkhyd2 (D), ein2 (E), hyd1 ein2 (F) and fkhyd2 ein2 (G). Wild-type localization is predominantly at the basal end of the cells, but is less clearly localized in hyd1 and fkhyd2. Bars  = B–F, 50 µM; G, 25 µM. H–M: PIN2∶GFP localization in roots of wild-type (H), ein2 (I), hyd1 (J), fkhyd2 (K), hyd1 ein2 (L) and fkhyd2 treated with 10 mM silver thiosulphate (M). Bars  = 50 µM. N–R: PIN4∶GFP localization in roots of wild-type (N), ein2 (O), hyd1 (P), fkhyd2 (Q), hyd1 ein2 (R) and fkhyd2 ein2 (S). Bars  = 20 µM.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0012227.g006

Given that the inhibition of ethylene signalling partially rescues auxin responses and cell patterning in the root in the hyd/fk mutants [26], [33], we investigated the effects of ein2 or silver treatment, both of which reduce ethylene responses, on PIN∶GFP localization. The ein2 mutation conveys a systemic ethylene resistance through the elimination of a signalling relay step between the cytoplasm and the nucleus [45]. Analysis of 3H-IAA transport in hypocotyls shows ein2 has an enhanced rate of polar auxin transport compared to wildtype, and has normal PIN localization (Fig. 6). The expression and localization of PIN1, PIN2 and PIN4 GFP fusion proteins exhibited the wild-type pattern both in the single ein2 mutant or following silver treatment (Figs. 6E, 6I and 6O). Experimentally reduced ethylene responses in both hyd1 and fkhyd2 mutants led to a more ordered localization of PIN1∶GFP in particular (Figs. 6B–G), with partial rescue for PIN2∶GFP (Figs. 6H–M) but no rescue of PIN4∶GFP (Figs. 6N–S), compared with individual hyd/fk mutants. Consistent with these observations, ethylene inhibition leads to partial phenotypic rescue of root development in the hyd/fk mutants [33].

Inhibition of ethylene responses in hyd/fk partially rescues vascular pattern

To investigate the effect of ethylene signalling on vascular tissue patterning in the hyd/fk mutants, hyd1 ein2 and fkhyd2 ein2 double mutants were analysed. Comparisons were also made with wild-type and ein2 mutants.

The xylem traces of cotyledon primary vascular strands in hyd/fk ein2 mutants are more coherent than observed in hyd/fk single mutants, and less ‘noise' is evident within the xylem (Figs. 7A–C, cf. Fig. 1). Figs. 7D–F show seedlings of ein2 mutants and fkhyd2 ein2 double mutants expressing the proAtHB8∶GUS procambial cell identity reporter. The activity of this transgene in ein2 seedlings (Fig. 7D) is indistinguishable from wild-type (cf. Figs. 4A–C), and the patterns of differentiating xylem traces in wild-type and ein2 show no differences. The hyd 1 ein2 and fkhyd2 ein2 seedlings (Figs. 7E, F) have greater vascular strand coherence than do fk/hyd single mutants (cf. Figs. 4D–G).

thumbnail
Figure 7. Vascular strand coherence is improved by the ein2 mutation in the hyd/fk mutants.

A–C: Cleared tissues from the central lamina of the first true leaf of 12 dpg plants of ein2 (A), hyd1 ein2 (B) and fkhyd2 ein2 (C); bars  = 200 µm. D–F: proAtHB8∶GUS expression in ein2 and hyd/fk ein2 mutants. D: ein2 true leaves of a 10 dpg seedling; bar  = 100 µm. E: hyd1 ein2 first true leaf of a 10 dpg seedling; bar  = 250 µm. F: fkhyd2 ein2 first true leaf from 10 dpg seedling; bar  = 200 µm.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0012227.g007

Introduction of the ein2 mutation into the hyd1 background led to a decreased frequency of ectopic cell divisions in the shoot at 7 dpg, though not at 3 dpg, as monitored by CYC1At::CDB::GUS expression (Fig. 8). In contrast to both hyd1 ein2 and ein2 (Figs. 8A–D), the fkhyd2 ein2 shoot apices show relatively high levels of CYC1At::CDB::GUS expression at 3 dpg and 7 dpg (Figs. 8E, F). Furthermore, ectopic cell division events in fkhyd2 ein2 double mutants were found in similar positions as in fkhyd2 single mutants, in association with compromised xylem integrity, vascular islands and in association with late-differentiating xylem (Figs. 8G, H). Therefore, repression of ethylene signalling in the hyd1 mutants partially inhibits the ectopic cell divisions seen in the mutant shoots, but no effect was evident in the more severe fkhyd2 mutant.

thumbnail
Figure 8. Inhibition of ethylene signalling in hyd/fk mutants leads to partial rescue of cell division patterning.

A–H: proCYC1At::CDB::GUS expression in ein2 mutants and hyd/fk ein2 double mutants. A, B: ein2 seedlings at 3 dpg (A) and 7 dpg (A); bars  = 100 µm (A), 200 µm (B). C, D: hyd1 ein2 double mutant seedlings at 3 dpg (C) and 7 dpg (D); bars  = 200 µm. E, F: fkhyd2 ein2 double mutant seedlings at 3 dpg (E) and 7 dpg (F); bars  = 200 µm (E), 250 µm (F). G, H: Detail of fkhyd2 ein2 double mutant cotyledons at 7 dpg, showing that ectopic cell division activity persists in the vicinity of dissociated and disjunct xylem vessels; bars  = 50 µm.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0012227.g008

The hyd/fk mutants were previously reported to have enhanced ethylene signalling [26], [33]. The auxin-responsive proIAA2∶GUS reporter was used to determine whether ethylene signalling was responsible for the altered auxin localization or responses in aerial parts of fkhyd2 ein2 double mutants. Expression of the proIAA2∶GUS auxin-responsive reporter showed similar positional signals in wild-type and ein2 single mutant seedlings between 3 and 12 dpg (Figs. 9A, B cf Fig. 5), suggesting that auxin positional localization functions normally in ein2. The activity of proIAA2∶GUS in fkhyd2 ein2 mutant cotyledons (as distinct from the true leaves) appeared similar to that in fkhyd2 single mutants, and likewise occurred in association with xylem disjunctures (Fig. 9C). However, fkhyd2 ein2 seedlings showed proIAA2∶GUS expression that was more clearly defined in association with vascular tissues in true leaves (e.g. Fig. 9D). Similar results were found for hyd1 ein2 seedlings (data not shown). These results suggest that poor auxin localization in post-embryonic aerial parts of the hyd/fk mutants is in part dependent on ethylene defects, i.e. apparent in leaves but not the embryonically derived cotyledons. EIN2 is not strongly expressed in the embryo [5], and might not therefore be expected to rescue these embryonically derived structures.

thumbnail
Figure 9. Inhibition of ethylene signalling on proIAA2∶GUS expression in fkhyd2 mutants.

A–D: proIAA2∶GUS expression in ein2 and fkhyd2 ein2 mutants. A, B: ein2 seedling at 3 dpg (a) and 12 dpg (b); bars  = 200 µm. C,D: fkhyd2 ein2 seedling at 3 dpg (C) and 12 dpg (D) showing similar pattern but reduced intensity of expression compared to fkhyd2 single mutants (see Figs. 5D, G, F); bars  = 200 µm.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0012227.g009

Discussion

Vascular tissue development is regulated by complex interactions between multiple signalling pathways, and the nature of the interactions is far from clear, though progress is being made in defining the mechanisms involved [3]. A role for sterols as essential components of vascular patterning is evident from biosynthesis mutant phenotypes, but the molecular basis of their actions is not well understood. We have investigated sterol-hormone interactions through the analysis of double mutants in sterol synthesis and ethylene responses, and monitored effects on PIN proteins and auxin-regulated genes, including a key gene, AtHB8, which is an auxin-regulated transcription factor required for vascular development.

The hyd1 and fkhyd2 sterol mutants are similarly defective in several aspects of development. Vascular coordination is poor throughout the mutant seedling and originates from patterning problems at the point of procambial coordination. Embryonically derived tissues such as cotyledons generally showed more defective vascular patterning than did true leaves. Disjunct and dissociated xylem vessels were seen typically in association with persistent ectopic cell division activity. These phenotypes are distinct from BR mutants which are dwarfed and less severely affected in cellular patterning and histogenesis; though the BR signalling pathway is required for wild-type vascular differentiation [46][48].

There is a growing body of evidence that correct sterol profiles are necessary for the controlled integration of plant hormone signalling. We have shown previously that the hyd1 and fkhyd2 mutants exhibit defects in both auxin and ethylene signalling [26], [33]. The pharmacological or genetic inhibition of ethylene signalling can restore to a significant degree the cellular organization and activity of the root meristems and, as we now show here, vascular tissues. Ethylene signalling inhibition also led to a restoration of auxin-mediated gene expression patterns and the localization of PIN1 and PIN2, though not the consistently poor production of PIN4. This supports the concept of cross-talk between sterols, ethylene and auxin.

Carland et al. [25] showed that the cvp1 mutant, defective in the enzyme sterol methyltransferase 2 (SMT2), has misshapen and misaligned vascular cells, as well as abnormal organ expansion and elongation. The authors proposed that SMT2 may be required to establish a polarizing signal necessary for wild-type vascular patterning. In support of this, the same group recently found that smt mutants exhibited defects in auxin responses and localization [29]. Previously we found that the hyd mutants show defective PIN3 localization in the root tip [26], and Willemsen et al. [31] found that the orc allele of SMT1 exhibits defective PIN1 and PIN3 localization. In addition, abnormal expression of the proIAA2∶GUS reporter was found in the roots of hyd1 and fkhyd2 seedlings [33]. Since root meristem function depends on controlled auxin distribution and auxin-mediated gene expression [49], [50], these observations suggest that the mis-direction and hence mis-localization of auxin at the root apex of sterol mutants can account for their previously reported defective root meristem function [21], [26], [31], [33]. These data implicate a role for sterols in regulating cell polarity and auxin distribution. In support of this view, Grebe et al. [51] have evidence that sterol and PIN2 recycling share a common endosomal pathway, and that PIN2 localization, and auxin-mediated inhibition of PIN2 endocytosis is inhibited in mutants with defective sterol profiles [27]. Pan et al. have also shown that the fk mutant has defective PIN2 recycling [32].

In this paper we show that the hyd1 and fkhyd2 mutants show cell-to-cell variability in the localization of PINS 1, 2 and 4, and this can be partially rescued by the inhibition of ethylene signalling. PIN1 is known to have a major role in shoot auxin translocation in addition to auxin transport into the root tip [8], [52]. We show defects in proIAA2∶GUS expression in the mutant aerial tissues, indicating an altered patterning of auxin distribution and/or responses. One interpretation of the persistence of ectopic proIAA2∶GUS activity in the vicinity of discontinuities in the vascular xylem is that auxin transport is compromised by a lack of coherence between vessel elements, allowing a local and ectopic accumulation of auxin. It is also possible that incorrect auxin localization, due to abnormal PIN protein function, in turn causes defective vascular patterning. Evidence in favour of this latter hypothesis is supported further by the misexpression of proAtHB8∶GUS. This transcription factor is auxin-regulated, and is a positive regulator of vascular differentiation in Arabidopsis [14][16]. Here we show that the proAtHB8∶GUS marker is very poorly localized in the hyd mutants, particularly in embryos where longitudinal procambial traces are established which define the plant body, and also in cotyledons and true leaves of establishment-stage seedlings.

Correct vascular patterning is also a product of the coordination of cell expansion and cell division. These processes are severely disrupted in hyd1 and fkhyd2 and other sterol mutants, though a number of genes affect vascular strand development [19], [20]. Similarly, the sterol-deficient cvp1 has reduced axial cell expansion [25], and Schrick et al. [53] have shown that sterol mutants exhibit cell wall stubs, indicative of defective cytokinesis. These authors proposed that sterols are required for cellulose biosynthesis and cell wall construction; one possible mechanism might be via a role for sitosterol as an initiating factor in cellulose biosynthesis [54]. The hyd mutants exhibit ectopic lignin and callose accumulation (Fig. S1), showing a dissociation between cell patterning and wall biochemistry. It is also possible that defects in phragmoplast formation in these mutants contributes to, or is associated with, the observed defective PIN protein localization.

The role of sterol interactions with ethylene signalling and auxin is intriguing. The hyd mutants show enhanced ethylene responses, as well as defects in auxin responses [26], [33]. Recent work provides evidence that ethylene can induce auxin biosynthesis and transport in the root, a basis for crosstalk mechanisms [34][36], [55]. In addition, enhanced ethylene responses in the root tip can lead not only to reduced root cell elongation, but also to ectopic divisions of the quiescent centre cells [56]. Similarly, ethylene can promote aberrant divisions in the shoot [57]. Given that we have demonstrated partial rescue by ein2 of auxin-mediated gene expression and vascular patterning in the hyd mutants, it is possible that sterol-mediated ethylene signalling defects, perhaps as a result of a (currently obscure) sterol dependence of ethylene signalling components [28], results in defective auxin signalling or distribution (via PIN mislocalization). This in turn could lead to the vascular patterning defects.

In a second model, it is possible that the defective ethylene responses of hyd/fk mutants are due to aberrant auxin responses. Auxin itself reinforces PIN localization [58] and can promote ethylene biosynthesis [59], possibly promoting complex feedback effects in the absence of correct sterol profiles. Evidence arguing against this is that the hyd mutants do not obviously over-produce ethylene, although the root phenotype of hyd1 at least can be partially rescued by treatment with the ethylene synthesis inhibitor aminoethoxyvinylglycine [26]. It is therefore possible that the failure of the auxin distribution system in sterol mutants contribute to the observed aberrant ethylene responses, and suppression of the latter by ein2 in turn ameiorates the auxin transport defects.

Finally, it remains possible that certain sterols are also required as ligands for START domain-containing transcription factors such as PHABULOSA, REVOLUTA, PHAVOLUTA and, indeed, ATHB8 [28], [53], [60], and so have a post-translational role in the function of these proteins in leaf development and vascular differentiation.

It is clear that the phenotypic effects of defective sterol profiles affect multiple signalling pathways that impinge on each other. It would therefore not be appropriate to consider the link between sterol biosynthesis and vascular differentiation as a linear pathway, but rather as a network of interdependent components, the relationships between which we are beginning to unravel. Given the prevalence of feedback loops between auxin, PINs and ethylene [34][36], and the implication of sterols as a component in this network, each of the above-mentioned interactions may contribute to the observed complex mutant phenotypes. To date there is no evidence that individual sterols, as distinct from brassinosteroids, act as novel hormone-like molecules. Instead, their main role in development may be via the regulation of cross-talk between established growth regulators such as the auxins and ethylene, through which they modulate the temporal and spatial expression of key regulatory genes.

Materials and Methods

Plant material

The hyd1 and fkhyd2 mutants were identified in a screen of transgenic lines as described previously [21], [26]. hyd1 ein2-1 and fkhyd2 ein2-1 crosses generated previously as described [33]. For in vitro growth studies, A. thaliana seeds were stratified and surface sterilized and plated on growth medium (half-strength Murashige and Skoog medium (1/2 MS10; Sigma), 1% sucrose, 3.25 g/l Phytagel agar; Sigma) as described [21].

Histology

Epidermal cell morphology was revealed by agarose impressions and scanning electron microscopy. To produce agarose impressions, tissue samples were floated on molten 6% (w/v) agarose on the surface of a microscope slide, which was allowed to set before the plant material was removed. The agarose was examined under a light microscope using DIC optics. Leaf material was prepared for visualization of xylem vessels and cleared epidermal cells using standard light microscopy after [61]. To visualize xylem strands, tissues were stained for 5 min with safranin-O (1% w/v in 95% ethanol) and dipped momentarily into 95% ethanol to wash out excess stain, before mounting in 25% (w/v) chloral hydrate. To visualize callose in sieve tube elements in seedlings, aniline blue was used according to [61]. Samples were fixed for 1 hour in 3∶1 ethanol∶acetic acid, cleared overnight in 25% chloral hydrate, and dehydrated through an ethanol series (30%, 50%, 70% v/v for 1 hour each before 96% overnight). After dehydration, leaf tissues were mounted on microscope slides in 50% v/v glycerol prior to microscopy. For visualization of procambial tissue in whole-mount embryos, developing siliques were harvested from plants heterozygous for hyd/fk mutations, and carrying the proAtHB8::GUS transgene, the testa punctured with a fine tungsten histology needle, and the embryos vacuum-infiltrated with X-Gluc in buffer. GUS-positive embryos were dissected from their seed coat, and mounted in a clearing mixture of 8∶2∶1 (w∶v∶v) chloral hydrate∶glycerol∶water prior to microscopy. The CYC1At::CDB::GUS line was fixed in 90% acetone for 15 min on ice prior to incubation, as described [62], to halt cells in the process of dividing. Tissue localization of GUS enzyme activity was performed as described [21].

Microscopy

For light microscopy, seedlings and embryos were viewed under a Zeiss Axioskop (Carl Zeiss Ltd, Herts, UK). Images were captured as digital images on a Photometrics COOLSNAP™cf colour digital camera (Roper Scientific Inc, Trenton, New Jersey, USA) using OpenLab3.1.1 software (Improvision, Coventry, UK). Images were processed in Photoshop 5.0 (Adobe Systems Inc., Mountain View, CA). For GFP analysis, fresh seedlings were mounted in dH2O under a large (32×24 mm) zero-thickness coverslip, and examined using either Zeiss LSM510 or Leica SP5 microscopes, argon laser excitation at 488nm and emission filter at 505–530 nm. Images were captured digitally using the integral LSM software. Scanning electron microscopy was carried out as described previously [21].

Polar auxin transport assays

The polar transport of [3H]-IAA (GEH, Amersham, UK) was measured in hypocotyl segments essentially according to [52] and as modified by [63].

Supporting Information

Figure S1.

Correlation between xylem and phloem traces. Merged bright-field and aniline-blue stained UV fluorescence images showing the correspondence between xylem and phloem-associated callose (blue fluorescence) in cotyledons and true leaves. A: Wild-type cotyledon; bar  = 100 µm. B–D: Vascular traces from hyd1 cotyledon (B) and true leaf tissues (C, D). Substantial ectopic callose deposition is found, variably associated with xylem traces; bars  = 100 µm.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0012227.s001

(3.70 MB TIF)

Acknowledgments

The following kindly provided seed: Dr. S. Baima (Rome), pATHB8::GUS; Prof. Jiri Friml (Gent), proPIN4:PIN4::GFP; Prof. Ben Scheres (Utrecht), proPIN2:PIN2::GFP; Prof. Marie-Theres Hauser (Vienna), CYC1At::CDB::GUS; Prof. Klaus Palme (Freiburg), proPIN:PIN1::GFP; and Dr. Ranjan Swarup (Nottingham), proIAA2:GUS.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: MP JT KL. Performed the experiments: MP NC FZ. Analyzed the data: MP JT KL. Wrote the paper: MP JT KL.

References

  1. 1. Kehr J, Buhtz A (2008) Long distance transport and movement of RNA through the phloem. J Exp Bot 59: 85–92.
  2. 2. Aloni R (2001) Foliar and axial aspects of vascular differentiation - hypotheses and evidence. J Plant Growth Reg 20: 22–34.
  3. 3. Dengler NG (2001) Regulation of vascular development. J Plant Growth Regul 20: 1–13.
  4. 4. De Smet I, Jürgens G (2007) Patterning the axis in plants - auxin in control. Curr Opin Genet Devel 17: 337–343.
  5. 5. Spencer MWB, Casson SA, Lindsey K (2007) Transcriptional profiling of the Arabidopsis embryo. Plant Physiol 143: 924–940.
  6. 6. Sachs T (2000) Integrating cellular and organismal aspects of vascular differentiation. Plant Cell Physiol 41: 641–656.
  7. 7. Scarpella E, Marcos D, Friml J, Berleth T (2006) Control of leaf vascular patterning by polar auxin transport. Genes Devel 20: 1015–1027.
  8. 8. Gälweiler L, Changhui G, Muller A, Wisman E, Mendgen K, et al. (1998) Regulation of polar auxin transport by AtPIN1 in Arabidopsis vascular tissue. Science 282: 2226–2230.
  9. 9. Mattsson J, Sung ZR, Berleth T (1999) Responses of plant vascular systems to auxin transport inhibition. Development 126: 2979–2991.
  10. 10. Berleth T, Jürgens G (1993) The role of the monopteros gene in organising the basal body region of the Arabidopsis embryo. Development 118: 575–587.
  11. 11. Przemeck GKH, Mattsson J, Hardtke CS, Sung ZR, Berleth T (1996) Studies on the role of the Arabidopsis gene MONOPTEROS in vascular development and plant cell axialization. Planta 200: 229–237.
  12. 12. Hardtke CS, Berleth T (1998) The Arabidopsis gene MONOPTEROS encodes a transcription factor mediating embryo axis formation and vascular development. EMBO J 17: 1405–1411.
  13. 13. Hardtke CS, Ckurshumova W, Vidaurre DP, Singh SA, Stamatiou G, et al. (2004) Overlapping and non-redundant functions of the Arabidopsis auxin response factors MONOPTEROS and NONPHOTOTROPIC HYPOCOTYL4. Development 131: 1089–1100.
  14. 14. Baima S, Nobill F, Sessa G, Luccetti S, Ruberti I, et al. (1995) The expression of the AtHB8 homeobox gene is restricted to provascular cells in Arabidopsis thaliana. Development 121: 4171–4182.
  15. 15. Baima S, Possenti M, Matteucci A, Wisman E, Altamura MM, et al. (2001) The Arabidopsis ATHB8 HD-zip protein acts as a differentiation-promoting transcription factor of the vascular meristems. Plant Physiol 126: 643–655.
  16. 16. Donner TJ, Sherr I, Scarpella E (2009) Regulation of procambial cell state acquisition by auxin signaling in Arabidopsis. Development 136: 3235–3246.
  17. 17. McHale NA, Koning RE (2004) MicroRNA-directed cleavage of Nicotiana sylvestris PHAVOLUTA mRNA regulates the vascular cambium and structure of apical meristems. Plant Cell 16: 1730–1740.
  18. 18. Prigge MJ, Otsuga D, Alonso JM, Ecker JR, Drews GN, et al. (2005) Class III homeodomain-leucine zipper gene family members have overlapping, antagonistic, and distinct roles in Arabidopsis development. Plant Cell 17: 61–76.
  19. 19. Koizumi K, Sugiyama M, Fukuda H (2000) A series of novel mutants of Arabidopsis thaliana that are defective in the formation of continuous vascular network: calling the auxin signal flow canalization hypothesis into question. Development 127: 3107–3204.
  20. 20. Petricka JJ, Clay NK, Nelson TM (2008) Vein patterning screens and the defectively organized tributaries mutants in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J 56: 251–263.
  21. 21. Topping JF, May VJ, Muskett PR, Lindsey K (1997) Mutations in the HYDRA genes of Arabidopsis perturb cell shape and disrupt embryonic and seedling morphogenesis. Development 124: 4415–4424.
  22. 22. Schrick K, Mayer U, Horrichs A, Kuhnt C, Bellini C, et al. (2000) FACKEL is a sterol C-14 reductase required for organised cell expansion in Arabidopsis embryogenesis. Genes Devel 14: 1471–1484.
  23. 23. Schrick K, Mayer U, Martin G, Bellini C, Kuhnt C, et al. (2002) Interactions between sterol biosynthesis genes in embryonic development of Arabidopsis. Plant J 31: 61–73.
  24. 24. Jang JC, Fujioka S, Tasaka M, Seto H, Takatsuto S, et al. (2000) A critical role of sterols in embryonic patterning and meristem programming revealed by the fackel mutants of Arabidopsis thaliana. Genes Devel 14: 1485–1497.
  25. 25. Carland FM, Fujioka S, Takatsuto S, Yoshida S, Nelson T (2002) The identification of CVP1 reveals a role for sterols in vascular patterning. Plant Cell 14: 2045–2058.
  26. 26. Souter M, Topping J, Pullen M, Friml J, Palme K, et al. (2002) hydra mutants of Arabidopsis are defective in sterol profiles and auxin and ethylene signalling. Plant Cell 14: 1017–1031.
  27. 27. Men S, Boutte Y, Ikeda Y, Li X, Palme K, et al. (2008) Sterol-dependent endocytosis mediates post-cytokinetic acquisition of PIN2 auxin efflux carrier polarity. Nature Cell Biol 10: 237–244.
  28. 28. Lindsey K, Pullen ML, Topping JF (2003) Importance of plant sterols in pattern formation and hormone signalling. Trends Plant Sci 8: 521–525.
  29. 29. Carland F, Fujioka S, Nelson T (2010) The sterol methyltransferases SMT1, SMT2, and SMT3 influence Arabidopsis development through nonbrassinosteroid products. Plant Physiol 153: 741–756.
  30. 30. Clouse , D S (2000) Plant development: a role for sterols in embryogenesis. Current Biol 10: R601–R604.
  31. 31. Willemsen V, Friml J, Grebe M, van den Toorn A, Palme K, et al. (2003) Cell polarity and PIN protein positioning in Arabidopsis require STEROL METHYLTRANSFERASE1 function. Plant Cell 15: 612–625.
  32. 32. Pan J, Fujioka S, Peng J, Chen J, Li G, et al. (2009) The E3 ubiquitin ligase SCFTIR1/AFB and membrane sterols play key roles in auxin regulation of endocytosis, recycling and plamsa membrane accumulation of the auxin efflux transporter PIN2 in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell 21: 568–580.
  33. 33. Souter MA, Pullen ML, Topping JF, Zhang X, Lindsey K (2004) Rescue of defective auxin-mediated gene expression and root meristem function by inhibition of ethylene signalling in sterol biosynthesis mutants of Arabidopsis. Planta 219: 773–783.
  34. 34. Ruzicka K, Ljung K, Vanneste S, Podhorska R, Beeckman T, et al. (2007) Ethylene regulates root growth through effects on auxin biosynthesis and transport-dependent auxin distribution. Plant Cell 19: 2197–2212.
  35. 35. Swarup R, Perry P, Hagenbeek D, Van Der Straeten D, Beemster GTS, et al. (2007) Ethylene regulates auxin biosynthesis in Arabidopsis seedlings to enhance inhibition of root elongation. Plant Cell 19: 2186–2196.
  36. 36. Liu J, Mehdi S, Topping J, Tarkowski P, Lindsey K (2010) Modelling and experimental analysis of hormonal crosstalk in Arabidopsis. Molec Systems Biol 6: 373.
  37. 37. Ikeda Y, Men SZ, Fischer U, Stepanova AN, Alonso JM, et al. (2009) Local auxin biosynthesis modulates gradient-directed planar polarity in Arabidopsis. Nature Cell Biol 11: 731–738.
  38. 38. Hauser M-T, Bauer E (2000) Histochemical analysis of root meristem activity in Arabidopsis thaliana using a cyclin:GUS (β-glucuronidase) marker line. Plant Soil 226: 1–10.
  39. 39. Scarpella E, Francis P, Berleth Y (2004) Stage-specific markers define early steps of procambium development in Arabidopsis leaves and correlate termination of vein formation with mesophyll differentiation. Development 131: 3445–3455.
  40. 40. Abel S, Nguyen MD, Theologis A (1995) The PS-IAA4/5-like family of early auxin-inducible mRNAs in Arabidopsis thaliana. J Mol Biol 251: 533–549.
  41. 41. Abel SN, Ballas N, Wong LM, Theologis A (1996) DNA elements responsive to auxin. Bioessays 18: 647–654.
  42. 42. Swarup R, Friml J, Marchant A, Ljung K, Sandberg G, et al. (2001) Localization of the auxin permease AUX1 suggests two functionally distinct hormone transport pathways operate in the Arabidopsis root apex. Genes Devel 15: 2648–2653.
  43. 43. Popanov IA, Teale WD, Trebar M, Blilou I, Palme K (2005) The PIN auxin efflux facilitators: evolutionary and functional perspectives. Trends Plant Sci 10: 170–177.
  44. 44. Friml J, Benková E, Blilou I, Wisniewska J, Hamann T, et al. (2002) AtPIN4 mediates sink-driven auxin gradients and root patterning in Arabidopsis. Cell 108: 661–73.
  45. 45. Guzmán P, Ecker JR (1990) Exploiting the triple response of Arabidopsis to identify ethylene-related mutants. Plant Cell 2: 513–523.
  46. 46. Li J, Chory J (1997) A putative leucine-rich repeat receptor kinase involved in brassinosteroid signal transduction. Cell 90: 929–938.
  47. 47. Wang ZY, Seto H, Fujioka S, Yoshida S, Chory J (2001) BRI1 is a critical component of a plasma-membrane receptor for plant steroids. Nature 410: 380–383.
  48. 48. Cano-Delgado A, Yin YH, Yu C, Vafeados D, Mora-Garcia S, et al. (2004) BRL1 and BRL3 are novel brassinosteroid receptors that function in vascular differentiation in Arabidopsis. Development 131: 5341–5351.
  49. 49. Sabatini S, Beis D, Wolkenfelt H, Murfett J, Guilfoyle T, et al. (1999) An auxin-dependent distal organizer of pattern and polarity in the Arabidopsis root. Cell 99: 463–472.
  50. 50. Aida M, Beis D, Heidstra R, Willemsen V, Blilou I, et al. (2004) The PLETHORA genes mediate patterning of the Arabidopsis root stem cell niche. Cell 119: 109–120.
  51. 51. Grebe M, Xu J, Mobius W, Ueda T, Nakano A, et al. (2003) Arabidopsis sterol endocytosis involves actin-mediated trafficking via ARA6-positive early endosomes. Current Biol 13: 1378–1387.
  52. 52. Okada K, Ueda J, Komaki MK, Bell CJ, Shimura Y (1991) Requirement of the auxin polar transport system in early stages of Arabidopsis bud formation. Plant Cell 3: 677–684.
  53. 53. Schrick K, Fujioka S, Takatsuto S, Stierhof YD, Stransky H, et al. (2004) A link between sterol biosynthesis, the cell wall, and cellulose in Arabidopsis. Plant J 38: 227–243.
  54. 54. Peng L, Kawagoe Y, Hogan P, Delmer D (2002) Sitosterol-beta-glucoside as primer for cellulose biosynthesis in plants. Science 295: 147–150.
  55. 55. Stepanova AN, Yun J, Likhacheva AV, Alonso JM (2007) Multilevel interactions between ethylene and auxin in Arabidopsis roots. Plant Cell 19: 2169–2185.
  56. 56. Ortega-Martinez O, Pernas M, Carol RJ, Dolan L (2007) Ethylene modulates stem cell division in the Arabidopsis thaliana root. Science 317: 507–510.
  57. 57. Kazama H, Dan H, Imaseki H, Wasteneys GO (2004) Transient exposure to ethylene stimulates division and alters the fate and polarity of hypocotyl epidermal cells. Plant Physiol 134: 1614–1623.
  58. 58. Sauer M, Balla J, Luschnig C, Wisniewska J, Reinoehl V, et al. (2006) Canalization of auxin flow by Aux/IAA-ARF-dependent feedback regulation of PIN polarity. Genes Devel 20: 2902–2911.
  59. 59. Kende H (1993) Ethylene biosynthesis. Ann Rev Plant Physiol Plant Molec Biol 44: 283–307.
  60. 60. McConnell JR, Emery JF, Eshed Y, Bao N, Bowman J, et al. (2001) Role of PHABULOSA and PHAVOLUTA in determining radial patterning in shoots. Nature 411: 709–713.
  61. 61. Carland FM, Berg BL, Fitzgerald JN, Jinamorphongs S, Nelson T, et al. (1999) Genetic regulation of vascular tissue patterning in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 11: 2123–2137.
  62. 62. Donnelly PM, Bonetta D, Tsukaya H, Dengler RE, Dengler NG (1999) Cell cycling and cell enlargement in developing leaves of Arabidopsis. Development 215: 407–419.
  63. 63. Chilley PM, Casson SA, Tarkowski P, Wang KL-C, Hawkins N, et al. (2006) The POLARIS peptide of Arabidopsis regulates auxin transport and root growth via effects on ethylene signalling. Plant Cell 18: 3058–3072.