Research Article

Structure and Kinetic Investigation of Streptococcus pyogenes Family GH38 α-Mannosidase

  • Michael D. L. Suits,

    Affiliation: York Structural Biology Laboratory, Department of Chemistry, University of York, York, United Kingdom

  • Yanping Zhu,

    Affiliations: Complex Carbohydrate Research Center, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, United States of America, Institute for Cell and Molecular Biosciences, The Medical School, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, United Kingdom

  • Edward J. Taylor,

    Affiliation: York Structural Biology Laboratory, Department of Chemistry, University of York, York, United Kingdom

  • Julia Walton,

    Affiliation: York Structural Biology Laboratory, Department of Chemistry, University of York, York, United Kingdom

  • David L. Zechel,

    Affiliation: Departments of Chemistry, Queen's University, Kingston, Canada

  • Harry J. Gilbert,

    Affiliations: Complex Carbohydrate Research Center, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, United States of America, Institute for Cell and Molecular Biosciences, The Medical School, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, United Kingdom

  • Gideon J. Davies mail

    Affiliation: York Structural Biology Laboratory, Department of Chemistry, University of York, York, United Kingdom

  • Published: February 03, 2010
  • DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0009006



The enzymatic hydrolysis of α−mannosides is catalyzed by glycoside hydrolases (GH), termed α−mannosidases. These enzymes are found in different GH sequence–based families. Considerable research has probed the role of higher eukaryotic “GH38” α−mannosides that play a key role in the modification and diversification of hybrid N-glycans; processes with strong cellular links to cancer and autoimmune disease. The most extensively studied of these enzymes is the Drosophila GH38 α−mannosidase II, which has been shown to be a retaining α−mannosidase that targets both α−1,3 and α−1,6 mannosyl linkages, an activity that enables the enzyme to process GlcNAc(Man)5(GlcNAc)2 hybrid N-glycans to GlcNAc(Man)3(GlcNAc)2. Far less well understood is the observation that many bacterial species, predominantly but not exclusively pathogens and symbionts, also possess putative GH38 α−mannosidases whose activity and specificity is unknown.

Methodology/Principal Findings

Here we show that the Streptococcus pyogenes (M1 GAS SF370) GH38 enzyme (Spy1604; hereafter SpGH38) is an α−mannosidase with specificity for α−1,3 mannosidic linkages. The 3D X-ray structure of SpGH38, obtained in native form at 1.9 Å resolution and in complex with the inhibitor swainsonine (Ki 18 µM) at 2.6 Å, reveals a canonical GH38 five-domain structure in which the catalytic “–1” subsite shows high similarity with the Drosophila enzyme, including the catalytic Zn2+ ion. In contrast, the “leaving group” subsites of SpGH38 display considerable differences to the higher eukaryotic GH38s; features that contribute to their apparent specificity.


Although the in vivo function of this streptococcal GH38 α−mannosidase remains unknown, it is shown to be an α−mannosidase active on N-glycans. SpGH38 lies on an operon that also contains the GH84 hexosaminidase (Spy1600) and an additional putative glycosidase. The activity of SpGH38, together with its genomic context, strongly hints at a function in the degradation of host N- or possibly O-glycans. The absence of any classical signal peptide further suggests that SpGH38 may be intracellular, perhaps functioning in the subsequent degradation of extracellular host glycans following their initial digestion by secreted glycosidases.


The sugar mannose, particularly α− and β−mannosides, play many and varied roles in biological organisms. β−Mannan is a plant polysaccharide recalcitrant to degradation whereas α−mannans are found in the fungal cell-wall. More subtle roles for α− and β−mannosides are found in the glycans of higher organisms, where oligosaccharide diversity affords cell signaling and recognition events that lead oligosaccharides to play the role of “glycocode”; the language of cellular communication [1]. Furthermore, mannose chemistry itself is extremely challenging, demanding inspired solutions to the problem of synthesis at its occluded anomeric centre [2], [3], [4]. Not surprisingly, therefore, there is considerable interest in the enzymatic synthesis and degradation of mannosides. In the context of the glycoside hydrolase (GH) catalyzed α−mannosidase hydrolysis, several of the >100 GH sequence-based families ( [5]; reviewed in [6], [7], [8], [9]) contain enzymes with putative α−mannosidase activity. These families include GH38 configuration-retaining α−mannosidases and family GH47 inverting mannosidases, that together are the most studied of the known α−mannosidases, as well as enzymes in GH76 and GH92; the latter recently studied in the context of 3-D structure, specificity and catalysis [10].

Of particular relevance to the study described here, are the GH38 α−mannosidases. Based on sequence similarity, these enzymes are approximately 1000 residues in length and have been found across the Archaea (19 ORFs, as of 18-Jan-2010), Bacteria (295 ORFs) and Eukaryote (118 ORFs) domains of life. The higher eukaryotic GH38 enzymes are involved in the processing the high-mannose and hybrid N-glycans, Figure 1. During cancer metastasis, the degree of branching in N-linked carbohydrate structures has been correlated with malignancy and disease progression through disruption of normal intracellular interactions and effectively concealing cancerous cells from immune detection [11]. Furthermore, mouse knock-outs show that mannosidase II deficient animals suffer from lupus-like auto immune diseases [12]. Characterisation of the mechanisms responsible for the synthesis, breakdown and recognition of oligosaccharides in N-linked glycosylation has therefore inspired considerable interest in the structural enzymology of GH38 enzymes.


Figure 1. Catalytic activity of GH38 α−mannosidases.

(A) Golgi α−mannosidase II is responsible for the hydrolysis of both α−1,3 and α−1–6 mannosides during the diversification of hybrid N glycans (GlcNAcMan5GlcNAc2 becoming GlcNAcMan3GlcNAc2). (B) The catalytic action of a retaining α−mannosidase, here exemplified for the α−1,3 mannosidase activity of GH38 enzymes; catalysis occurs with net retention of anomeric configuration.


At the 3-D level, the Drosophila α−mannosidase II [13] is the most extensively studied GH38 enzyme. This Golgi localised enzyme has dual α−1,3 and α−1,6 mannosidase activity and is implicated in the maturation/diversification of “hybrid” N-glycans prior to their augmentation into complex glycan structures, Figure 1. The initial Drosophila α−mannosidase II structure was solved in 2001 [14] and this has been followed by several 3-D analyses designed primarily to probe sub-site specificity [15] and the chemical [16] and conformational [17] aspects of mannosidase catalysis as well as α−mannosidase inhibition [18], [19], [20], [21], [22], [23], [24], [25], [26]. α−mannosidase II is considered a potential anti-cancer target, not least because its action in hybrid N-glycan modification is required prior to metastatic changes in N-glycans; such as those involving GlcNAc Transferase V [27], [28], [29], [30]. Indeed, the anti-cancer indolizidine alkaloid, swainsonine, is a potent inhibitor of α−mannosidase II and has been shown to reduced metastasis and improved clinical outcomes when used in clinical trials for treatment of colon, breast, and skin cancers [11]. The GH38 bovine lysosomal α−mannosidase (bLAM) has also been subjected to biochemical and structural analysis [31]. Despite the complexities arising from the proteolytic cleavage of the bovine enzyme into five fragments, the 3-D structure of bLAM confirms a similar overall domain structure and catalytic center for the mammalian enzyme. Yet, despite this wealth of structural information, little is known of the bacterial GH38 enzymes, many of which come from human symbionts and pathogens; although the link between pathogen carbohydrate catabolism and pathogenesis is well documented (for example refs. [32], [33]).

The CAZy website ( reveals that many bacterial species encode GH38 enzymes. At the time of submission very few of the ~300 open reading frames encoding putative GH38 α−mannosidases from bacteria have been characterised in any way. One exception, however, is the Escherichia coli α−mannosidase MngB, which converts 2-O-(6-phospho-α-mannosyl)-D-glycerate to mannose-6-phosphate and glycerate in the pathway which enables use of mannosyl-D-glycerate as a sole carbon source [34]. Other bacterial GH38 representatives are from a diversity of genera including Bacteroides (4), Clostridia (13), Listeria (28 with 4 or 5 GH38 entries per Listeria species), and Mycobacteria (20). However, with 32 species represented out of 37 possible, the genus Streptococcus constitutes the highest proportion of bacterial GH38s, including many human pathogens such as S. pyogenes (Group A Streptococcus or GAS). Group A streptococci are the pathogenic bacteria responsible for many acute human infections in the respiratory tract and skin including pharyngitis, impetigo, rheumatic fever, and acute glomerulonephritis [35]. Alarmingly, since the 1980s S. pyogenes has been identified to be globally responsible for a class of emerging, life threatening, invasive infections including the “flesh-eating” disease, necrotizing fasciitis, septicemia, and the excretion of the pyrogenic exotoxin-associated toxic shock syndrome [35]. Treatment of these invasive diseases, even with broad spectra antibiotics, is not always effective, with patient mortality exceeding 80% in cases of toxic shock [36]. The paucity of information on the α−mannosidases from these pathogenic bacteria, led us to study the S. pyogenes SpGH38 enzyme Spy1604. The SpGH38 gene is located on an operon that contains (in addition to two sugar transporters, transcriptional regulators and two-component putative histidine kinase) two other glycoside hydrolase genes. These are the GH84 Spy1600 enzyme, which is known to be a hexosaminidase that is able to cleave β−linked N-acetylglucosaminyl moieties from diverse substrates [37] and a GH1 “putative β−glucosidase” (a family that includes varied β−D glycoside hydrolases including glucosidases, mannosidases, galactosidases and glucuronidases).

Here we report, what we believe to be, the first structure of a bacterial α−mannosidase from the human pathogen S. pyogenes bound to the therapeutically important inhibitor swainsonine. Comparison of SpGH38 with Drosophila Golgi α−mannosidase II suggests a conserved domain architecture and catalytic centre in which diversification in the “leaving group” subsites accounts for the subtly different specificity. We show that SpGH38 is specific for α−1,3 linkages, with high activity on an α−1,3 disaccharide but no appreciable activity on α−1,6 linked substrate. SpGH38 is also able to hydrolyse (Man)5(GlcNAc)2 N-glycans to (Man)3(GlcNAc)2 consistent with an α−1,3 mannosidase activity, Figure 1b. Together with the operon organisation, the data imply that SpGH38 is a component of a host N- or possibly O-glycan degradation system.

Results and Discussion

SpGH38 Sequence Analysis

Streptococcus pyogenes M1 GAS SF370 ORF Spy1604 encodes a putative GH38 α-mannosidase. The gene encoding the full length enzyme (901 amino-acids) was cloned and subsequently over-expressed using a York ligation-independent cloning strategy (Ysbl-LIC) [38], [39]. Protein was produced at high levels in E. coli and purified using metal-ion affinity and gel filtration chromatography (see Materials and Methods).

SpGH38 is distantly related to various mammalian and insect α−manosidases including homologues from Bos taurus (2 ORFs), Drosophila (8), and Homo sapiens (5), as well as a variety of plant enzymes including α−mannosidases from Arabidopsis (4) and Oryza sativa (4) where numbers in brackets represent the number of family GH38 representatives from each species. These higher eukaryotic GH38s are quite divergent, reflected in, for example 28 and 24% sequence similarity with bLAM and dGMII respectively whilst within a “compartment” (such as human vs. Drosophila golgi enzymes) the identity is typically far greater (>40%). Within the Streptococcal species, sequence analyses reveals known GH38 homologs in group A S. pyogenes, group C Streptococcus (YP_002997299), group D Streptococcus (ZP_03980341), and also non-hemolytic Streptococcus (YP_002349517). Within S. pyogenes strains, GH38 ORFs are observed in S. pyogenes serotypes (M49 591, NZ131, MGAS9429, Manfredo, MGAS10394, MGAS8232, MGAS10270, MGAS6180, MGAS10750, MGAS315; see

Catalytic Activity of SpGH38

Recombinant SpGH38 was tested for α−mannosidase activity initially on a range of aryl α−mannosides (4-nitrophenyl α−D mannoside, 2,4 dinitrophenyl α−D mannoside and 4-methylumbelliferyl α−D mannoside). Activity was detectable, but poor, on both the 2-nitrophenyl and 2,4 dinitrophenyl derivatives and this prevented calculation of individual kcat and KM values for either substrate. The 2,4 dinitrophenyl substrate alone allowed calculation of an approximate kcat/KM of ~0.6 min−1mM−1. Activity on 4-MeUMB-Man was greater, permitting full Michaelis-Menten kinetics and allowing description of the SpGH38 as an α−mannosidase with a kcat of 1.8±0.24 min−1 and KM of 3.6±1.0 mM, Figure 2. SpGH38 activity was subsequently measured on a range of commercial α−mannobioside disaccharides (1,2/1,3/1,4 and 1,6 linked). The enzyme showed significant activity only on the α−1,3 linked disaccharide substrate yielding kcat of 384±6.2 min−1 and KM of 27±0.75 mM, Figure 2b. The data show that SpGH38 acts as an effective α−1,3 mannosidase with a kcat/Km of 14.2 min−1mM−1 on the disaccharide.


Figure 2. Catalytic activity of SpGH38 α−mannosidase and inhibition by swainsonine.

(A) Activity on 4-methylumbelliferyl α−D mannoside (4-MeUMB) and (B) α−1,3 mannobiose (see text for details) Substrate insolubility under the conditions used precluded higher [S] values. (C) The Ki for swainsonine was determined using α−1,3 mannobiose as substrate with [S] < < Km and [I] straddling the Ki. V0 and Vi are the rates of the reaction in the absence and presence of inhibitor, respectively. The Ki for a competitive inhibitor is derived from the gradient of 1/Ki (see Methods ); here 18±0.5 µM.


In order to test the activity and specificity of the enzyme on human N-glycans an unmodified human Man9GlcNAc2 glycan was incubated with SpGH38. No activity on the intact glycan was observed, Figure 3a, typical for many α−mannosidases whose lack of α−1,2 mannosidase activity prevents access to these masked substrates. The Man9GlcNAc2 glycan was therefore co-incubated with a specific α−1,2 mannosidase, the Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron Bt3990 enzyme (YP_210385) [10], to generate an “unmasked” Man5GlcNAc2 glycan (m/z 1580.2, Figure 3b). This was indeed a substrate for SpGH38 which was able to degrade it further to Man4GlcNAc2 (m/z 1376.0) and Man3GlcNAc2 (m/z 1171.8) Figure 3b. Although one cannot formally exclude a small amount of α−1,6 activity, in light both of the previous observations on mannobioside specificity and the absence of any significant amount of further degradation product, the most likely interpretation of the mass spectrometry data is that SpGH38 is able to sequentially remove the two α−1,3 linked mannobiosyl moieties from Man5GlcNAc2 to yield a glycan in which the α−1,6 linked mannosides remain, Figure 3b. This α−1,3 specificity is also in agreement with the active centre topography, described below in light of the 3-D structure of the SpGH38 enzyme and a comparison with the dual α−1,3/α−1,6 mannosidase in CAZY family GH38 – the Drosophila α−mannosidase II.


Figure 3. SpGH38-catalysed hydrolysis of Man9(GlcNAc)2 glycans.

(A) Action of SpGH38, alone, on Man9(GlcNAc)2. The glycan remains unmodified. (B) Action of SpGH38 in combination with a specific α−1,2 mannosidase the Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron Bt3990. Following α−1,2 mannoside removal (which has previously been shown to be specific, see Supplemental Figure 1 in [10], SpGH38 is able to further degrade the unmasked glycans, with the action pattern most indicative of α−1,3 mannosidase activity. An α−1,3 mannosidase activity for SpGH38 is further supported by the specificity of the enzyme for the disaccharide α−1,3 mannobiose (see text).


SpGH38 Structure Determination

The three-dimensional structure of SpGH38 was determined by the multiple anomalous dispersion phasing method using a selenomethionine-derivative form of the protein and the native structure refined to 1.90 Å resolution, Table 1. Subsequently, an inhibited form of SpGH38 in complex with swainsonine was determined at 2.6 Å resolution (discussed below). The selenomethionine-derived and native forms of SpGH38 each crystallize in different space groups, tetragonal P43212 and monoclinic P21, respectively, each with two protein molecules in the asymmetric unit. In each crystal form, the two SpGH38 molecules within the asymmetric unit inter-digitate to form a dimer. These dimers are essentially identical between crystal forms, overlapping with a root mean squared deviation of 0.4 Å on C-alpha atoms. Furthermore, molecular weight estimation for SpGH38 by size exclusion chromatography indicated a molecular mass of 250 kDa (data not shown). This suggests that SpGH38, with a monomer molecular weight of 102,751, behaves as an elongated dimer in solution. Of the GH38 structures of known function, the Bos Taurus bLAM [31], is also believed to be a dimer, whereas the Drosophila dGMII is believed to be monomeric [14].


Table 1. Data collection and refinement statistics for the Streptococcus pyogenes GH38 α−mannosidase.


Although exact delineation of domains is subjective, the SpGH38 structure can be considered as five domains: an N-terminal α/β-domain (residues 1-294), a three-helix bundle (295–392) and three predominantly β -sheet domains (393–515/806–824, 522–805, 825–901), Figure 4). The N-terminal α/β-domain, three-helix bundle, and the β−2 and β−3 domains form the “core” of SpGH38 with all of these domains contributing to the active center and substrate binding surface. The β−1 domain bows outward from the protein core, is involved in dimer interactions whilst also forming a lid “above” and somewhat into the active centre of its dimer mate. Broadly speaking SpGH38 resembles an elongated ellipse that is convex along the surface where β−2 and β−3 domains interact, and concaved on the three-helical bundle exposed surface.


Figure 4. 3-D structure of SpGH38 and its swainsonine complex.

(A) 3-D topology cartoon (divergent stereo) colored according to domains with swainsonine in ball-and-stick. N-term (red: 1–294) 3-α (green: 295–392), β-1 (blue: 393–514,806–825), β−2 (yellow: 522–805) and β−3 (cyan: 825–901) (B) Surface representation of SpGH38 colored as for part (A). (C) Active centre and electron density for the Swainsonine/Zn2+ complex of SpGH38 (divergent stereo). The map shown is the unbiased Fobs-Fcalc synthesis, contoured at 2.5 σ, calculated with model phases prior to the incorporation of Swainsonine/Zn2+ in any refinement. (D) schematic diagram of the interactions of swainsonine (shown in panel C) with H-bonds >3.0 Å shown as dashed lines and residue numbers for the SpGH38 indicated. Arg149 makes a close contact to a swainsonine carbon (indicated with an arrow) of 2.9 Å (spatially equivalent to an H-bond to mannose O6 of the true substrate).


The α/β-domain features a distorted β-barrel core composed of primarily parallel strands, surrounded by eight helices of varying length and an appreciable amount of coil. A metal ion, known to be catalytic and presumed to be zinc (see below) is coordinated by three residues derived from the coil elements: His13, Asp15 and Asp125, together with a single residue, His351, from a loop of the helical-bundle domain (Figure 4a, b). The three-helical bundle runs across the narrow axis of the concaved surface of SpGH38, serving as a central structural feature that makes many interactions with each of the other domains. The β−1 domain consists of seven anti-parallel strands which form a twisted β-barrel in which three of the strands along one side of the barrel extend beyond the edge of the barrel, twisting away from the core. An α-helix connects the two sides of the β1-barrel at this distal opening. Due to a lack of clear electron density, a gap exists in the model between residues 515–521 which join the β−1 and β−2 domains. Central to the β−2 domain is a 17-stranded, twisted β-super-sandwich, punctuated by an α-helix that joins strands 7 and 8, and terminating at another helix before forming a strand that contributes to the β−1 domain. The C-terminal β−3 domain contains four twisted anti-parallel β-strands and three extended coils resembling a distorted β-sandwich. Furthermore, axial to the β−1 domain and bordered by the three-helix and β−2 domains, a narrowing, cone-shaped channel through SpGH38 is established. This structural feature is of unknown function but is conserved in dGMII [14] and bLAM, albeit narrower in the latter case.

Comparison of SpGH38 to Known Structures

Secondary structure matching of full length SpGH38 using SSM [40] not surprisingly reveals the GH38 Drosophila α−mannosidase II as the top “hit” (Z score 9.8 with 664 residues aligning, r.m.s.d 2.6 Å). Due to the bLAM structure being defined as five separate chains in the PDB deposited coordinates it was not highlighted from an initial SSM search. However, pair-wise alignment of SpGH38 and bLAM is comparable to that observed for dGMII (Z score 8.6 with 686 residues aligning, r.m.s.d 2.8 Å. Beyond the GH38 family, very distant similarity is observed the Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron α-glucosidase (GH97), and this is largely due to similarity with the β−2 and β−3 domains of SpGH38.

Overall, the individual domains and architecture of SpGH38 are similar to both dGMII and bLAM, albeit different in spatial arrangement and intra-domain contacts, overlapping full length secondary structures with mean square deviations of 2.6 and 2.8 Å, respectively. However, the structural divergence was significant enough to prevent either being used as a suitable molecular replacement model for SpGH38, even when shorter, more conserved, features were used. Crystallization and diffraction data collection have also been reported for two other GH38 family members: the cytosolic α-mannosidase TM1851 from Thermotoga maritima and the Saccharomyces cerevisiae α-mannosidase Ams1 [41], [42]. However, molecular replacement using either dGMII or bLAM failed to result in a solution for either case.

As discussed, SpGH38 appears to exist as an elongated dimer. The SpGH38 dimer forms through an inter-digitation of the β−3 domain into the opening formed between α/β and β−2 domains of an adjacent molecule. A series of van der Waals' and hydrogen bonding interactions stabilize this intra-molecular connection involving hydrophobic residues Y574, V629, W764, Y766, F767 from the α/β and β−2 domains with F429, F433, P434, Y438, F474, Y476, L478, P479, F483, P486, and F488 of the β−3 domain which would be surface exposed in a monomeric state. This insertion of the β−3 domain effectively reduces the area of the putative Man5GlcNAc binding site in an adjacent molecule and introduces Y476, F483, R484, and Q431 which could putatively stabilize GlcNAc and Man substituents thereby anchoring a high mannose substrate. This inter-digitation between adjacent crystallographic dimers could also suggest a mechanism for restricting substrate access to the active centre, thereby providing added substrate specificity.

The putative high mannose anchoring site in bLAM is similar to SpGH38 in that it extends longer and wider compared to dGMII. Furthermore, although bLAM exists as a monomer in the crystal state, it has been characterized to be a dimer in solution. Through EM and crystal packing bLAM was hypothesized to form two possible dimers; one in which contacts are made between regions equivalent to the β−2 and β−3 domains in SpGH38, and another in which contacts are made between equivalents to the α/β-domain, the latter of which was more favored. The dimerization observed for SpGH38 introduces an alternative possibility for bLAM oligomerization.

Active Center and Swainsonine Complex

The natural product swainsonine is known to be a versatile glycosidase inhibitor having previously been used to study the active center of the Drosophila enzyme [14]. On SpGH38 it displays a Ki value of 18 µM (Figure 2c) using the linked assay with α−1,3 mannobiose as substrate. A complex was obtained of swainsonine with SpGH38 and data collected to 2.6 Å resolution. The mean B value for the ligand, 52 Å2, equates to that of the dataset as a whole (51 Å2) but that it is higher than its surroundings hints at an occupancy <1 for both swainsonine and the Zn2+ ion; the unbiased Fobs-Fcalc density is, however, unambiguous, Figure 4c. The active center of SpGH38 is located in a cleft at the bottom of a broad surface channel between the α/β− and β2-domains and bordered by a short helical linker that joins the second and third helices of the three-helical bundle domain. In apo-SpGH38 the zinc ion is coordinated in T5-square-based pyrimidal geometry by the OD1 moieties of D15 and D125, the NE2 nitrogens of H13 and H351, and a water molecule analogous to that characterized for dGMII [14], Figure4c, d; Figure 5a. In the swainsonine complex the position of the water molecule is occupied by the O2 hydroxyl oxygen of swainsonine. An additional contact is established between the O3 hydroxyl oxygen of the five-membered ring and zinc, which is now in an overall T6-octahedral coordination arrangement. The O1 hydroxyl oxygen of swainsonine is stabilized through electrostatic interactions with side chain oxygens of Y574 and D352 and further contributions from D15 and D352 stabilize the O3 and O2 hydroxyl oxygens of swainsonine in the active centre, respectively (schematic diagram in Figure 4d). These active centre interactions with hydroxyl oxygens 1–3 of swainsonine correspond to analogous interactions between dGMII and hydroxyl groups at positions 4, 3, and 2 of α−mannose in the -1 subsite [17] (subsite nomenclature in Ref. [43]), which helps to explain why swainsonine represents such a useful inhibitor of α-mannosidase II.


Figure 5. Conservation of GH38 reaction mechanism.

(A) Conserved active-centre constellation (here -1 subsite only) between the SpGH38 (grey), bovine bLAM (cyan) and the Drosophila GH38 α−mannosidase (blue). (B). GH38 α−mannosidases are known to act with net retention of anomeric configuration; a mechanism in which a glycosyl-enzyme intermediate is flanked by oxocarbenium-ion like transition-states. The intermediate has been trapped by the Withers and Rose groups [17] and shown to bind in a 1S5 skew-boat conformation which in the absence of evidence to the contrary might imply a transition-state close to a B2,5. Pseudo-Michaelis complexes published on the Drosophila α−mannosidase II show the −1 sugar in a 4C1 chair conformation but these have been obtained on a nucleophile-alanine variant so their conformational relevance to catalysis is unclear [15].


In addition to the favorable electrostatic interactions discussed previously, the position of F127 is conserved across α-mannosidase II active centers. Additionally, swainsonine is stabilized through stacking interactions of W18 with the five-membered ring, suggesting that the two aromatic residues contribute to positioning mannose into the correct orientation in the −1 subsite. Other conserved active centre residues, D125 and D232 are in equivalent positions to the catalytic nucleophile and general acid/base, respectively, of dGMII. As with the Drosophila enzyme, it is likely that R149 will encourage D125 to be ionized (as required for a nucleophile). The hydrogen-bond from Y192 to D125 may also stabilize the ionized form of D125. D232 will likely be neutral due to negative charge repulsion from D125, as expected for the acid/base.

The structure of SpGH38 is consistent with previous proposals (notably [17]) concerning the chemical basis for catalysis with net retention of anomeric configuration in this family. Thus one can support a mechanism, Figure 5b, in which protonic assistance to leaving group departure is given by D232 with electrophilic migration of the anomeric carbon to form the covalent glycosyl-enzyme intermediate. It seems likely that Zn2+ plays a role in aiding distortion of the sugar towards the transition-state (as also discussed for the Ca2+ in GH92 [10] and GH47 [44] α−mannosidases). The covalent intermediate species was trapped and observed on the Drosophila enzyme and shown to bind in a 1S5 (skew-boat) conformation [17]. Based on the stereoelectronic requirements for an incipient oxocarbenium-ion, the 1S5 intermediate was thus interpreted as implying catalysis “around” the B2,5 boat conformation. Such a proposal is consistent with diverse work on β−mannosidases in which β-linked substrate complexes have been observed in the 1S5 conformation (for example [45], [46], [47] and transition-state mimics ion B2,5 (Tailford et al. 2008), although such proposals are objected to by one group [48]. Catalysis around this area of the conformational sphere has also been proposed, recently, for inverting GH92 α−mannosidases [10]. The conformation of the Michaelis complex in GH38 enzymes is more difficult to address since the known 3-D structures of the Drosophila enzyme are observed with a nucleophile-Ala variant with the −1 subsite sugar (in 4C1 chair conformation) occupying a position that would not be possible on a wild-type enzyme [15]. Despite these caveats, the +1 subsite is well-mapped in these complexes and lies “below” the plane of the −1 sugar in a position consistent with an axial bond to the leaving group.

Basis for Apparent Substrate Specificity in SpGH38

In the −1 subsites, the Drosophila and SpGH38 enzymes are extremely similar, reflecting the common recognition and catalysis of α−mannosides, discussed above. The Drosophila GH38 α−mannosidase II is a dual specificity α−1,3/α−1,6 mannosidase whereas, on disaccharide substrates and N-glycan models SpGH38 appears to display α−1,3 mannosidase activity. The extended binding sites of the Drosophila enzyme are indeed formed by elements of structure not present in the less-decorated Streptococcal enzyme. Ala189 at the end of a core β−strand makes a structural divergence between the two enzymes in which the Drosophila enzyme (Pro265) embarks on a long insertion to Arg314 compared to a much shorter loop region to Glu204 in the Streptococcal enzyme. This extended loop region, together with variations elsewhere (notably 408–413) and a long N-terminal extension provide for considerably more developed leaving group subsites, and likely more sophisticated leaving group recognition, in the Drosophila enzyme compared to SpGH38. Furthermore, although the loops from (SpGH38) 757–773 (equating to approximately 859–883 in Drosophila α−mannosidase II) are of similar length, they vary markedly in orientation with elements of the SpGH38 sequence, notably W764 clashing into the +1/+2 subsites of the Drosophila 1,6 linked substrate complex (PDB pdb code 3bvw) – but making far less extensive clashes with the Drosophila 1,3 linked substrate complex (pdb code 3bvv), Figure 6. Within this region lies D763 of the SpGH38 whose, side-chain interacts would interact with the 2-OH of the +1 subsite mannoside, if one compares with the α−1,3 linked complex of the Drosophila enzyme. In the bovine and Drosophila enzymes the equivalent interaction is achieved via the main-chain carbonyl group of R876 (Drosophila numbering) with O2 (dist ~2.7 Å). In addition, the substrate binding cleft is more tightly constricted in the SpGH38, at this position, with just 6.2 Å between the catalytic acid/base (E and the putative O2 interacting D763 carboxylate oxygen compared to 7.5 Å for the comparative constriction in the Drosophila enzyme; a feature used in this latter case to accommodate the different α−1,3 and α−1,6 linked substrates. It is thus possible that the carboxylate of D763 could also make specific, productive interactions with α−1,3 linked mannoside (O2) compared to an α−1,6 linked substrate and that binding of the latter is hindered both by a tighter “collar” and the location of W764, but such speculation requires the analysis of complexes of the Streptococcal enzyme. As yet, we have not been able to obtain “leaving group”-containing complexes. One possible reason for this may be the insertion of the β−1 domain into the active centre of the dimer mate in the crystal forms observed here. In particular, Arg484 from this loop stacks with W764 discussed above, thus reducing accessibility to the +1 subsite in-crystal. Given the high KM (27 mM) for the disaccharide, it would seem likely that a more extended substrate is favored in vivo but it is difficult to speculate more on the exact nature of these addition subsites at this point.


Figure 6. Substrate specificity in SpGH38.

An overlap of the Drosophila GH38 α−mannosidase II complexes [15] with α−1,3 (green bonds) and α−1,6 linked ligands (blue bonds) with the SpGH38 structure (grey surface) focussing on the +1 subsite (the -1 subsites are essentially identical, Fig. 5A). Features which may contribute to 1,3 specificity include the position of W764, the interactions afforded by D763 and the tightness of the “sphincter” formed by D763 and the catalytic acid/base D232. The figure is shown in divergent (“wall-eyed”) stereo.



We have shown that The S. pyogenes ORF spy1604 encodes an α−1,3 mannosidase that is active on disaccharides, some aryl glycosides and can also effectively deglycosylate human N-glycans in vitro. This, coupled to the presence of a gene encoding an N-acetyl glucosaminidase (Spy1600) on the operon (an enzyme known to break β−linked N-acetylglucosaminides [37]) would suggest a role, in vivo, in the utilization of human glycan-derived carbohydrates as a nutrient source. It is known, for example, that other Streptococcal species can utilize N-glycans as their carbon sources; Streptococcus oralis grown using N-glycosylated ribonuclease B as the sole carbohydrate source produces α−1,3/α−1,6 and β−1,4 mannosidase activities to harness the N-glycans [49]. What is less clear is the cellular location of these enzymes. The absence of a secretion signal on SpGH38 and the GH84 hexosaminidase suggests, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, an intracellular location (although one cannot rule-out non-canonical sortase-based extracellular display, as recently shown for Streptococcus pneumoniae O-glycan degradation [50]). Streptococcus pyogenes does produce at least one secreted N-glycan deglycosylation enzyme. The most notably of these is EndoS, a family GH18 enzyme that is a key virulence factor in the organism [33], not least because of its ability to deglycosylate host immunoglobulins [51] leading to immune impairment and bacterial persistence. One possible role for the GH38 α−mannosidase and GH84 β−GlcNAcase enzymes might therefore be in the subsequent intracellular utilization of N-glycan oligosaccharides, derived from the extracellular action of EndoS or related enzymes.

Materials and Methods

Gene Cloning

The sequence of full length S. pyogenes α-mannosidase II, coding for SpGH38 residues 1-901, was amplified by PCR from genomic DNA using KOD Hot Start DNA polymerase (Novagen) and complementary gene-specific primers with additional 5′ sequences to facilitate ligation-independent cloning (LIC) as follows (with the LIC overhangs underlined:



The DNA product was then treated with T4 DNA polymerase in the presence of dATP to generate single-stranded 5′ overhangs. Subsequent treatment with BseRI resulted in complementary overhangs necessary for incorporation into the modified Escherichia coli expression vector pET28a, pET-YSBLIC [38]. LIC incorporation was facilitated by treatment with T4 DNA polymerase in the presence of dTTP to generate pSpGH38. The pSpGH38 expression construct under control of a T7 promoter contains SpGH38 fused to a 3C protease cleavable N-terminal His6-tag (MGSSHHHHHHSSGLEVLFQGPA-SpGH38), where the rhinoviral 3C protease recognition site is shown in bold. The SpGH38 sequence was analyzed with help of the CAZy database [5] and BlastP [52]. Sequence alignments were conducted with ClustalW [53].

Gene Expression and Protein Purification

E. coli BL21:DE3 cells harboring pSpGH38 were cultured in Luria broth supplemented with 50 µg mL−1 kanamycin at 37°C to mid-exponential phase (A600 ~0.6). The temperature was reduced to 16°C for 1 h at which time recombinant SpGH38 was induced by the addition of 0.2 mM isopropyl 1-β-D-thiogalactopyranoside and incubated for sixteen additional hours. Pelleted cells were resuspended in 50 mM NaH2PO4, 300 mM NaCl, pH 7.5 (buffer A), disrupted through sonication, and the clarified supernatant loaded onto a nickel-immobilized HiTrap Chelating™ 5 mL column pre-equilibrated with buffer A on an ÄKTA Explorer (Amersham Biosciences) FPLC. The lysate-loaded column was washed extensively with buffer A supplemented with 20 mM imidazole and 50 mM imidazole, in step-wise fashion, and SpGH38 eluted with 500 mM imidazole. Eluted fractions were passed to a Sephacryl S-200 gel-filtration column pre-equilibrated with 25 mM Tris, 150 mM NaCl, pH 7.5 for further purification. Fractions containing the α-mannosidase were identified by SDS-PAGE, pooled and concentrated using a 10 kDa MWCO Vivaspin 20 centrifugal concentrator. Swainsonine-complexed crystals were obtained from protein cleaved with 0.1 mg mL−1 3C protease at 4°C overnight, that was subsequently dialyses into 25 mM Tris (pH 7.5) prior to concentration.

Aryl Mannoside Kinetics and Determination of Inhibitor Ki Values

The activity of SpGH38 against 4-nitrophenyl-α-D-mannopyranoside (PNP-Man) or 2,4-dinotrophenyl-α-D-mannopyranoside (DNP-Man) were determined at 37°C in 50 mM NaH2PO4, pH 6.8, containing 1 mg mL−1 bovine serum albumin and substrate concentrations ranging up to 1.6 and 4.0 mM, respectively. 4-Methylumbelliferyl α-D-mannopyranoside assyas were conducted at 37°C in 100 mM MOPS, pH 7.0, containing 0.1 mM ZnSO4 and 1 mg mL−1 bovine serum albumin, respectively. The total reaction volume was 500 µl. Methylumbelliferone (MU; ε365 = 2.99×108 M−1 cm−1 at pH 7.0) derived from MU-Man hydrolysis was measured continuously by a fluorimeter with an excitation wavelength of 365 nm and an emission wavelength of 440 nm. Swainsonine (obtained from GlycoFineChem, New Zealand) inhibition assays were carried out using the α−1,3 mannobiose substrate with mannose detection as described below. The inhibition reactions were carried out with α−1,3-mannobiose as substrate and a range of inhibitor concentrations that spanned the Ki, which was calculated using the following equation:
where ν0 and νi are the rates of the reaction in the absence and presence of inhibitor, respectively. Under conditions where [S] < < KM, the fractional decrease in rate thus yields the Ki for a competitive inhibitor. A graph plotting v0/vi on the y-axis against the concentration of inhibitor on x-axis will give a gradient of 1/Ki, and an intercept of 1.

D-Mannose Detection Assay

SpGH38 specificity for α−1,2-, 1,3-, 1,4- or 1,6-linked mannobiose was determined using a four enzyme coupled assay based on the Megazyme International kit for D-mannose detection, deploying ATP and NADP+. Reactions were conducted at 37°C in 100 mM MOPS (pH 7.0), containing 0.1 mM ZnSO4, 1 mg mL−1 BSA, and 0.2 µM SpGH38. Briefly, SpGH38 liberated mannose was phosphorylated to mannose-6-phosphate by hexokinase (HK) which was subsequently converted to fructose-6-phosphate through the action of phosphomannose isomerase (PMI). Fructose-6-phosphate was then isomerized to glucose-6-phosphate by phosphoglucose isomerase (PGI) and finally, oxidized to gluconate-6-phosphate by glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6P-DH). The G6P-ΔH NADP+ cofactor is concurrently reduced to NADPH, which was monitored at 340 nm using an extinction coefficient of 6223 (M−1·cm−1). The enzymes were individually obtained from Sigma Chem. Co. and the concentrations (5U final in each case) were selected such that disaccharide cleavage was the rate limiting step in the reaction.

Enzyme Activity on High Mannose N-glycans, Mass Spectrometric Analysis of the Reaction Products

High mannose N-glycans (2–2.5 µg) were incubated with 2 µM SpGH38 at 37°C overnight in 50 mM MOPS, pH 7.0, containing 0.1 mM ZnSO4 and 1 mg mL−1 bovine serum albumin. The reaction products were lyophilized overnight, and then submitted to MALDI-TOF for analysis after permethylation. The procedure for preparing Man5GlcNAc2 is as follows: 2.5 µg of Man9GlcNAc2 (obtained from Dextra Laboratories, Reading UK) was incubated with 10 µM BT3990 at 37°C in 50 mM MOPS, pH 7.0 overnight. The reaction was stopped by adding Phenol: Chloroform: Isopropanol (25:24:1), then the upper water phase was transferred to a clean Eppendorf tube and lyophilized overnight.

SpGH38 Crystallization Data Collection and Structure Determination

Crystallization conditions for two crystal forms of recombinant SpGH38 have been established corresponding to P21 (apo) and P43212 (SeMet derivative and swainsonine complex) crystal systems. Both forms were obtained at 19°C in equal volumes of protein and reservoir solution. The P21 crystal form of apo-SpGH38 was crystallized in sitting drop setup by mixing 12 mg mL−1 protein with 100 mM Tris, pH 8.5, 1.5 M (NH4)2SO4 and 12% v/v glycerol with the reservoir solution acting as the cryo-protectant. The P43212 crystal form was obtained in hanging drop format from 15 mg mL−1 3C cleaved SpGH38 mixed with 3% v/v glycerol, 54% v/v Tacsimate (pH 7.0) and 2% v/v polyethylene glycol 6000; for this form appropriate cryo-protection was afforded through increasing the Tacsimate concentration to ~70% v/v. Crystals of the swainsonine complex form were obtained by soaking P43212 SpGH38 crystals for ~16 h in mother liquor supplemented with 2 mM swainsonine.

Diffraction data for SpGH38 selenomethionine derivative, apo, and swainsonine complex forms were collected at beamlines ID29-2, ID14-2, and ID14-1, respectively, of the European Synchrotron Radiation Facility. Data were processed with either the HKL2000 suite [54] or iMosflm/Scala [55], [56]. The structure of SpGH38 was solved by MAD phasing at the peak energy of 12.659 keV of a selenomethionine derivative using 0.5° oscillation for 200° and at a remote wavelength (energy 12.710 keV) for 180°. SHELXC and SHELXD [57] were used for locating selenium sites and initial density modification with autoSHARP [58]. Refinement of heavy atom positions, density modification and initial SpGH38 model building was conducted with RESOLVE [59]. A single SpGH38 molecule was then used as a molecular replacement model with the 1.9 Å native dataset in PHASER [60], followed by cycles of maximum-likelihood refinement using REFMAC [61] interspersed with manual corrections of the models using COOT [62]. Other computing used the CCP4 suite [63], unless otherwise stated. Apo and complexed structures of SpGH38 were solved by molecular replacement using PHASER [60]. Data processing and refinement statistics are presented in Table 1. Structural figures were drawn with PyMol (DeLano Scientific LLC).


Sam Hart, Johan Turkenburg, and Carlos Martinez-Fleites are thanked for help with diffraction data collection and discussions regarding structural analysis.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: MDLS HJG GJD. Performed the experiments: MDLS YZ EJT JW DLZ HJG GJD. Analyzed the data: MDLS YZ HJG GJD. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: MDLS DLZ HJG GJD. Wrote the paper: MDLS HJG GJD.


  1. 1. Davis BG (2000) Hand in Glove - Investigating Glycocode. Chem Ind 134–138.
  2. 2. Ito Y, Ogawa T (1994) A novel approach to the stereoselective synthesis of beta-mannosides. Angew Chemie Int Ed 33: 1765–1767.
  3. 3. Crich D, Chandrasekera NS (2004) Mechanism of 4,6-0-benzylidene-directed beta-Mannosylation as determined by alpha-deuterium kinetic isotope effects. Angew Chemie Int Ed 43: 5386–5389.
  4. 4. Gridley JJ, Osborn HMI (2000) Recent advances in the construction of beta-D-mannose and beta-D-mannosamine linkages. J Chem Soc Perkin Trans 1 10: 1471–1491.
  5. 5. Cantarel BL, Coutinho PM, Rancurel C, Bernard T, Lombard V, et al. (2009) The Carbohydrate-Active EnZymes database (CAZy): an expert resource for Glycogenomics. Nucleic Acids Res 37: D233–D238.
  6. 6. Davies G, Henrissat B (1995) Structures and Mechanisms of Glycosyl Hydrolases. Structure 3: 853–859.
  7. 7. Henrissat B, Davies G (1997) Structural and sequence-based classification of glycoside hydrolases. Curr Opin Struct Biol 7: 637–644.
  8. 8. Davies GJ, Sinnott ML (2008) Sorting the diverse: the sequence-based classifications of carbohydrate-active enzymes. Biochem J. DOI:10.1042/BJ20080382.
  9. 9. Vocadlo D, Davies GJ (2008) Mechanistic Insights into Glycosidase Chemistry. Curr Opin Chem Biol 12: 539–555.
  10. 10. Zhu Y, Suits MD, Thompson AJ, Chavan S, Dinev Z, et al. (2009) Mechanistic insights into a calcium-dependent family of mannosidases in a human gut symbiont. Nature Chem Biol 6: 125–132.
  11. 11. Goss PE, Reid CL, Bailey D, Dennis JW (1997) Phase IB clinical trial of the oligosaccharide processing inhibitor swainsonine in patients with advanced malignancies. Clin Cancer Res 3: 1077–1086.
  12. 12. Chui D, Sellakumar G, Green RS, Sutton-Smith M, McQuistan T, et al. (2001) Genetic remodeling of protein glycosylation in vivo induces autoimmune disease. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98: 1142–1147.
  13. 13. Rabouille C, Kuntz DA, Lockyer A, Watson R, Signorelli T, et al. (1999) The Drosophila GMII gene encodes a Golgi alpha-mannosidase II. J Cell Sci 112: 3319–3330.
  14. 14. van den Elsen JM, Kuntz DA, Rose DR (2001) Structure of Golgi alpha-mannosidase II: a target for inhibition of growth and metastasis of cancer cells. Embo J 20: 3008–3017.
  15. 15. Zhong W, Kuntz DA, Ernber B, Singh H, Moremen KW, et al. (2008) Probing the substrate specificity of Golgi alpha-mannosidase II by use of synthetic oligosaccharides and a catalytic nucleophile mutant. J Am Chem Soc 130: 8975–8983.
  16. 16. Shah N, Kuntz DA, Rose DR (2008) Golgi alpha-mannosidase II cleaves two sugars sequentially in the same catalytic site. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105: 9570–9575.
  17. 17. Numao S, Kuntz DA, Withers SG, Rose DR (2003) Insights into the mechanism of Drosophila melanogaster Golgi alpha-mannosidase II through the structural analysis of covalent reaction intermediates. J Biol Chem 278: 48074–48083.
  18. 18. Kuntz DA, Ghavami A, Johnston BD, Pinto BM, Rose DR (2005) Crystallographic analysis of the interactions of Drosophila melanogaster Golgi alpha-mannosidase II with the naturally occurring glycomimetic salacinol and its analogues. Tetrahedr Asymm 16: 25–32.
  19. 19. Wen X, Yuan Y, Kuntz DA, Rose DR, Pinto BM (2005) A combined STD-NMR/molecular modeling protocol for predicting the binding modes of the glycosidase inhibitors kifunensine and salacinol to Golgi alpha-mannosidase II. Biochemistry 44: 6729–6737.
  20. 20. Guo J, Asong J, Boons GJ (2006) Selective inhibition of glycosidases by feedback prodrugs. Angew Chemie Int Ed 45: 5345–5348.
  21. 21. Kawatkar SP, Kuntz DA, Woods RJ, Rose DR, Boons GJ (2006) Structural basis of the inhibition of Golgi alpha-mannosidase II by mannostatin A and the role of the thiomethyl moiety in ligand-protein interactions. J Am Chem Soc 128: 8310–8319.
  22. 22. Englebienne P, Fiaux H, Kuntz DA, Corbeil CR, Gerber-Lemaire S, et al. (2007) Evaluation of docking programs for predicting binding of Golgi alpha-mannosidase II inhibitors: A comparison with crystallography. Prot Struct Funct Bioinf 69: 160–176.
  23. 23. Fiaux H, Kuntz DA, Hoffman D, Janzer RC, Gerber-Lemaire S, et al. (2008) Functionalized pyrrolidine inhibitors of human type II alpha-mannosidases as anti-cancer agents: Optimizing the fit to the active site. Bioorg Med Chem 16: 7337–7346.
  24. 24. Kumar NS, Kuntz DA, Wen X, Pinto BM, Rose DR (2008) Binding of sulfonium-ion analogues of Di-epi-swainsonine and 8-epi-lentiginosine to Drosophila Golgi alpha-mannosidase II: The role of water in inhibitor binding. Proteins Struct Funct Bioinf 71: 1484–1496.
  25. 25. Kuntz DA, Tarling CA, Withers SG, Rose DR (2008) Structural analysis of Golgi alpha-mannosidase II inhibitors identified from a focused glycosidase inhibitor screen. Biochemistry 47: 10058–10068.
  26. 26. Kuntz DA, Zhong W, Guo J, Rose DR, Boons GJ (2009) The Molecular Basis of Inhibition of Golgi alpha-Mannosidase II by Mannostatin A. Chembiochem 10: 268–277.
  27. 27. Granovsky M, Fata J, Pawling J, Muller WJ, Khokha R, et al. (2000) Suppression of tumor growth and metastasis in Mgat5-deficient mice. Nat Medicine 6: 306–312.
  28. 28. Guo HB, Alvarez-Manilla G, Lee IT, Pierce M (2003) Down-regulation of tumor-associated N-glycans in GnT-V deficient (GnT-V-/-) mice. Glycobiol 13: 867–867.
  29. 29. Guo HB, Lee I, Kamar M, Pierce M (2003) N-acetylglucosaminyltransferase V expression levels regulate cadherin-associated homotypic cell-cell adhesion and intracellular signaling pathways. J Biol Chem 278: 52412–52424.
  30. 30. Handerson T, Pawelek JM (2003) β-1,6-branched Oligosaccharides and Coarse Vesicles: A Common, Pervasive Phenotype in Melanoma and Other Human Cancers. Cancer Res 63: 5363–5369.
  31. 31. Heikinheimo P, Helland R, Leiros HK, Leiros I, Karlsen S, et al. (2003) The structure of bovine lysosomal alpha-mannosidase suggests a novel mechanism for low-pH activation. J MolBiol 327: 631–644.
  32. 32. Shelburne SA, Davenport MT, Keith DB, Musser JM (2008) The role of complex carbohydrate catabolism in the pathogenesis of invasive streptococci. Trends Microbiol 16: 318–325.
  33. 33. Shelburne SA, Keith D, Horstmann N, Sumby P, Davenport MT, et al. (2008) A direct link between carbohydrate utilization and virulence in the major human pathogen group A Streptococcus. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105: 1698–1703.
  34. 34. Sampaio MM, Chevance F, Dippel R, Eppler T, Schlegel A, et al. (2004) Phosphotransferase-mediated transport of the osmolyte 2-O-alpha-mannosyl-D-glycerate in Escherichia coli occurs by the product of the mngA (hrsA) gene and is regulated by the mngR (farR) gene product acting as repressor. J Biol Chem 279: 5537–5548.
  35. 35. Cunningham MW (2000) Pathogenesis of group A streptococcal infections. ClinMicrobiolRev 13: 470–511.
  36. 36. Davies HD, McGeer A, Schwartz B, Green K, Cann D, et al. (1996) Invasive group A streptococcal infections in Ontario, Canada. Ontario Group A Streptococcal Study Group. NEnglJ Med 335: 547–554.
  37. 37. Sheldon WL, Macauley MS, Taylor EJ, Robinson CE, Charnock SJ, et al. (2006) Analysis of a group A streptococcal glycoside hydrolase from family 84 reveals it is a β-N-acetylglucosaminidase and not a hyaluronidase. Biochem J 399: 241–247.
  38. 38. Fogg MJ, Wilkinson AJ (2008) Higher-throughput approaches to crystallization and crystal structure determination. Biochem Soc Trans 36: 771–775.
  39. 39. Alzari PM, Berglund H, Berrow NS, Blagova E, Busso D, et al. (2006) Implementation of semi-automated cloning and prokaryotic expression screening: the impact of SPINE. Acta Crystallogr D62: 1103–1113.
  40. 40. Krissinel E, Henrick K (2004) Secondary-structure matching (SSM), a new tool for fast protein structure alignment in three dimensions. Acta Crystallogr D60: 2256–2268.
  41. 41. Nakajima M, Fushinobu S, Imamura H, Shoun H, Wakagi T (2006) Crystallization and preliminary X-ray analysis of cytosolic alpha-mannosidase from Thermotoga maritima. Acta Crystallogr F62: 104–105.
  42. 42. Watanabe Y, Noda NN, Honbou K, Suzuki K, Sakai Y, et al. (2009) Crystallization of Saccharomyces cerevisiae alpha-mannosidase, a cargo protein of the Cvt pathway. Acta Crystallogr D65: 571–573.
  43. 43. Davies GJ, Wilson KS, Henrissat B (1997) Nomenclature for sugar-binding subsites in glycosyl hydrolases. Biochem J 321: 557–559.
  44. 44. Karaveg K, Siriwardena A, Tempel W, Liu ZJ, Glushka J, et al. (2005) Mechanism of class 1 (Glycosylhydrolase family 47) alpha-mannosidases involved in N-glycan processing and endoplasmic reticulum quality control. J Biol Chem 280: 16197–16207.
  45. 45. Ducros V, Zechel DL, Murshudov GN, Gilbert HJ, Szabo L, et al. (2002) Substrate distortion by a β-mannanase: Snapshots of the Michaelis and covalent intermediate complexes suggest a B2,5 conformation for the transition-state. Angew Chemie Int Ed 41: 2824–2827.
  46. 46. Cartmell A, Topakas E, Ducros VMA, Suits MD, Davies GJ, et al. (2008) The Cellvibrio japonicus mannanase CjMan26c displays a unique exo-mode of action that is conferred by subtle changes to the distal region of the active site. J Biol Chem 283: 34403–34413.
  47. 47. Tailford LN, Offen WA, Smith NL, Dumon C, Morland C, et al. (2008) Structural and biochemical evidence for a boat-like transition state in β-mannosidases. Nature Chem Biol 4: 306–312.
  48. 48. Nerinckx W, Desmet T, Claeyssens M (2006) Itineraries of enzymatically and non-enzymatically catalyzed substitutions at O-glycopyranosidic bonds. Arkivoc 90–116.
  49. 49. Tarelli E, Byers HL, Homer KA, Beighton D (1998) Evidence for mannosidase activities in Streptococcus oralis when grown on glycoproteins as carbohydrate source. Carbohyd Res 312: 159–164.
  50. 50. Marion C, Limoli DH, Bobulsky GS, Abraham JL, Burnaugh AM, et al. (2009) Identification of a Pneumococcal Glycosidase That Modifies O-Linked Glycans. Infect Immunity 77: 1389–1396.
  51. 51. Collin M, Olsen A (2001) EndoS, a novel secreted protein from Streptococcus pyogenes with endoglycosidase activity on human IgG. Embo J 20: 3046–3055.
  52. 52. Altschul SF, Madden TL, Schaffer AA, Zhang J, Zhang Z, et al. (1997) Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res 25: 3389–3402.
  53. 53. Thompson JD, Higgins DG, Gibson TJ (1994) CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res 22: 4673–4680.
  54. 54. Otwinowski Z, Minor W (1997) Processing of X-ray diffraction data collected in oscillation mode. Methods Enzymol 276: 307–326.
  55. 55. Leslie AG (2006) The integration of macromolecular diffraction data. Acta Crystallogr D62: 48–57.
  56. 56. Evans P (2006) Scaling and assessment of data quality. Acta Crystallogr D62: 72–82.
  57. 57. Schneider TR, Sheldrick GM (2002) Substructure solution with SHELXD. Acta Crystallogr D58: 1772–1779.
  58. 58. Vonrhein C, Blanc E, Roversi P, Bricogne G (2006) Automated Structure Solution With autoSHARP. Methods MolBiol 364: 215–230.
  59. 59. Terwilliger TC, Berendzen J (1999) Automated MAD and MIR structure solution. Acta Crystallogr D55: 849–861.
  60. 60. McCoy AJ (2007) Solving structures of protein complexes by molecular replacement with Phaser. Acta Crystallogr D63: 32–41.
  61. 61. Murshudov GN, Vagin AA, Dodson EJ (1997) Refinement of macromolecular structures by the maximum-likelihood method. Acta Crystallogr D53: 240–255.
  62. 62. Emsley P, Cowtan K (2004) Coot: model-building tools for molecular graphics. Acta Crystallogr D60: 2126–2132.
  63. 63. Collaborative Computational Project Number 4 (1994) The CCP4 suite: programs for protein crystallography. Acta Crystallogr D50: 760–763.